Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic prosthetic valves in vitro. A manifestation of localized gradients and pressure recovery

Guidelines for the Evaluation of Prosthetic Valve Function With Cardiovascular Imaging: A Report From the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration With the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

In patients with significant cardiac valvular disease, intervention with either valve repair or valve replacement may be inevitable. Although valve repair is frequently performed, especially for mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, valve replacement remains common, particularly in adults. Diagnostic methods are often needed to assess the function of the prosthesis. Echocardiography is the first-line method for noninvasive evaluation of prosthetic valve function. The transthoracic approach is complemented with two-dimensional and three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for further refinement of valve morphology and function when needed. More recently, advances in computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance have enhanced their roles in evaluating valvular heart disease. This document offers a review of the echocardiographic techniques used and provides recommendations and general guidelines for evaluation of prosthetic valve function on the basis of the scientific literature and consensus of a panel of experts. This guideline discusses the role of advanced imaging with transesophageal echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance in evaluating prosthetic valve structure, function, and regurgitation. It replaces the 2009 American Society of Echocardiography guideline on prosthetic valves and complements the 2019 guideline on the evaluation of valvular regurgitation after percutaneous valve repair or replacement.

Echocardiographic Versus Invasive Aortic Valve Gradients in Different Clinical Scenarios

BACKGROUND

The role of echocardiography in deriving transvalvular mean gradients from transaortic velocities in aortic stenosis (AS) and in structural valve degeneration (SVD) is well established. However, reports following surgical aortic valve replacement, post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and valve-in-valve-TAVR (ViV-TAVR) have cautioned against the use of echocardiography-derived mean gradients to assess normal functioning bioprosthesis due to discrepancy compared with invasive measures in a phenomenon called discordance.

METHODS

In a multicenter study, intraprocedural echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients in AS, SVD, post-native TAVR, and post-ViV-TAVR were compared, when obtained concomitantly, and discharge echocardiographic gradients were recorded. Absolute discordance (intraprocedural echocardiographic - invasive mean gradient) and percent discordance (intraprocedural echocardiographic - invasive mean gradient/echocardiographic mean gradient) were calculated. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine variables independently associated with elevated postprocedure invasive gradients ≥20 mm Hg, absolute discordance >10 mm Hg, and discharge echocardiographic mean gradient ≥20 mm Hg.

RESULTS

A total of 5,027 patients were included in the registry: 4,725 native TAVR and 302 ViV-TAVR. Intraprocedural concomitant echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients were obtained pre-TAVR in AS (n = 2,418), pre-ViV-TAVR in SVD (n = 101), in post-ViV-TAVR (n = 77), and in post-TAVR (n = 823). Echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients demonstrated strong correlation (r = 0.69) and agreement (bias, 0.11; 95% CI, -0.4-0.62) in AS, moderate correlation (r = 0.56) and agreement (bias, 1.08; 95% CI, -2.53 to 4.59) in SVD, moderate correlation (r = 0.61) and weak agreement (bias, 6.47; 95% CI, 5.08-7.85) post-ViV-TAVR, and weak correlation (r = 0.18) and agreement (bias, 3.41; 95% CI, 3.16-3.65) post-TAVR. Absolute discordance occurs primarily in ViV-TVR and is not explained by sinotubular junction size and increases with increasing echocardiographic mean gradient. Percent discordance in AS and SVD (1.3% and 4%, respectively) was lower compared with post-TAVR/ViV-TAVR (66.7% and 100%, respectively). Compared with self-expanding valves, balloon expanding valves were independently associated with elevated discharge echocardiographic but lower invasive mean gradient (odds ratio = 3.411, 95% CI, 1.482-7.852, P = .004; vs odds ratio = 0.308, 95% CI, 0.130-0.731, P = .008, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-TAVR/ViV-TAVR, echocardiography is discordant from invasive mean gradients, and absolute discordance increases with increasing echocardiographic mean gradient and is not explained by sinotubular junction size. Percent discordance is significantly higher post-TAVR/ViV-TAVR than in AS and SVD. Post-TAVR/ViV-TAVR, poor correlation and wide limits of agreement suggest echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients may not be used interchangeably and a high residual echocardiographic mean gradient should be confirmed invasively before considering any additional procedure to "correct" the gradient. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement valve types have variable impact on echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients.

Discrepancy between invasive and echocardiographic transvalvular gradient after TAVI: Insights from the LAPLACE-TAVI registry

BACKGROUND

Echocardiography-based transvalvular mean pressure gradient (ECHO-mPG) used to assess the forward valve function and structural valve deterioration could overestimate the true pressure gradient. This study evaluated the discrepancy between invasive and ECHO-mPG after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with respective valve type and size, its impact on a device success criterion, and predictors of a pressure discrepancy.

METHODS

We analyzed 645 patients registered in a multicenter TAVI registry (balloon-expandable valve [BEV]: 500; self-expandable valve [SEV]: 145). The invasive transvalvular mPG was measured after valve implantation using two Pigtail catheters (CATH-mPG), while the ECHO-mPG was measured within 48 h after TAVI. Pressure recovery (PR) was calculated using the following formula: ECHO-mPG × effective orifice area (EOA)/ascending aortic area (AoA) × (1 - EOA/AoA).

RESULTS

ECHO-mPG was weakly correlated with (r = 0.29, p < 0.0001), and consistently overestimated CATH-mPG in both BEV and SEV, and respective valve sizes. The magnitude of the discrepancy was larger for BEV than SEV (p < 0.001) and smaller valves (p < 0.001). After the correction of PR using the above formula, the pressure discrepancy remained for BEV (p < 0.001) but not SEV (p = 0.10). The proportion of patients with an ECHO-mPG > 20 mmHg decreased from 7.0% to 1.6% after correction (p < 0.0001). Among the baseline and procedural variables, post-procedural ejection fraction, BEV versus SEV, and smaller valves were associated with a larger discrepancy in mPG.

CONCLUSIONS

ECHO-mPG could be overestimated after TAVI, especially in patients with a smaller BEV. A higher ejection fraction, BEV, and smaller valves were predictors of a pressure discrepancy between CATH- and ECHO-mPG.

5-Year Outcomes With Self-Expanding vs Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Small Annuli

BACKGROUND

Self-expanding transcatheter heart valves (THVs) are associated with better echocardiographic hemodynamic performance than balloon-expandable THVs and are considered preferable in patients with small annuli.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare 5-year outcomes between self-expanding vs balloon-expandable THVs in severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients with small annuli.

METHODS

Consecutive severe AS patients with an aortic valve annulus area <430 mm² who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with either the CoreValve Evolut (Medtronic) or SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences) THV between 2012 and 2021 were enrolled from the Bern TAVI registry. A 1:1 propensity-matched analysis was performed to account for baseline differences between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 723 patients were included, and propensity score matching resulted in 171 pairs. Technical success was achieved in over 85% of both groups with no significant difference. Self-expanding THVs were associated with a lower transvalvular gradient (8.0 ± 4.8 mm Hg vs 12.5 ± 4.5 mm Hg; P < 0.001), a larger effective orifice area (1.81 ± 0.46 cm² vs 1.49 ± 0.42 cm²; P < 0.001), and a lower incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch (19.7% vs 51.8%; P < 0.001) than balloon-expandable THVs. At 5 years, there were no significant differences in mortality (50.4% vs 39.6%; P = 0.269) between groups. Disabling stroke occurred more frequently in patients with a self-expanding THV than those with a balloon-expandable THV (6.6% vs 0.6%; P = 0.030). Similar results were obtained using inverse probability of treatment weighting in the Bern TAVI registry and the nationwide Swiss TAVI registry.

CONCLUSIONS

The echocardiographic hemodynamic advantage of self-expanding THVs was not associated with better clinical outcomes compared with balloon-expandable THVs up to 5 years in patients with small annuli. (Swiss TAVI Registry; NCT01368250).

Non-invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of pressure recovery distance after aortic valve stenosis

BACKGROUND

Decisions in the management of aortic stenosis are based on the peak pressure drop, captured by Doppler echocardiography, whereas gold standard catheterization measurements assess the net pressure drop but are limited by associated risks. The relationship between these two measurements, peak and net pressure drop, is dictated by the pressure recovery along the ascending aorta which is mainly caused by turbulence energy dissipation. Currently, pressure recovery is considered to occur within the first 40-50 mm distally from the aortic valve, albeit there is inconsistency across interventionist centers on where/how to position the catheter to capture the net pressure drop.

METHODS

We developed a non-invasive method to assess the pressure recovery distance based on blood flow momentum via 4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Multi-center acquisitions included physical flow phantoms with different stenotic valve configurations to validate this method, first against reference measurements and then against turbulent energy dissipation (respectively n = 8 and n = 28 acquisitions) and to investigate the relationship between peak and net pressure drops. Finally, we explored the potential errors of cardiac catheterisation pressure recordings as a result of neglecting the pressure recovery distance in a clinical bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) cohort of n = 32 patients.

RESULTS

In-vitro assessment of pressure recovery distance based on flow momentum achieved an average error of 1.8 ± 8.4 mm when compared to reference pressure sensors in the first phantom workbench. The momentum pressure recovery distance and the turbulent energy dissipation distance showed no statistical difference (mean difference of 2.8 ± 5.4 mm, R2 = 0.93) in the second phantom workbench. A linear correlation was observed between peak and net pressure drops, however, with strong dependences on the valvular morphology. Finally, in the BAV cohort the pressure recovery distance was 78.8 ± 34.3 mm from vena contracta, which is significantly longer than currently accepted in clinical practise (40-50 mm), and 37.5% of patients displayed a pressure recovery distance beyond the end of the ascending aorta.

CONCLUSION

The non-invasive assessment of the distance to pressure recovery is possible by tracking momentum via 4D Flow CMR. Recovery is not always complete at the ascending aorta, and catheterised recordings will overestimate the net pressure drop in those situations. There is a need to re-evaluate the methods that characterise the haemodynamic burden caused by aortic stenosis as currently clinically accepted pressure recovery distance is an underestimation.

Effect of aortic curvature on bioprosthetic aortic valve performance

Transvalvular pressure gradient (ΔP) after aortic valve replacement is an important surrogate of aortic bioprostheses performance. Invasive ΔP is often measured after transcatheter aortic valve replacement to exclude patient-prosthetic mismatch. However, invasive aortic pressures are usually recorded in the pressure recovery (PR) zone downstream of the valve, potentially resulting in ΔP underestimation compared to noninvasive measurements. PR was extensively studied in straight ascending aortas. However, the impact of various aortic arch configurations on ΔP has not been explored. PR was assessed in a pulse duplicating simulator at various cardiac conditions of cardiac output, heart rates and pressures. Three different aortic geometries with identical root dimensions but with different aortic arches were used: (1) curvature 1, (2) curvature 2, and (3) straight aortic models. Instantaneous pressure and peak ΔP measurements were recorded incrementally along the models for each cardiac condition. The models with aortic arches produced two distinct PR zones (after the valve and after the aortic arch), whereas the model without an aortic arch produced only one PR zone (after the valve). The trend of the pressure and ΔP curves for each model was independent of the cardiac condition used, but the individually measured pressure magnitudes did change with different conditions. In this study, we illustrated the differences in PR between distinct aortic curvatures and straight aorta. PR affects pressure and ΔP measurements. These effects are clear when recording aortic pressures by catheterization and echocardiography.

Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Thrombosis and Literature Review

An 83-year-old gentleman with a history of 23-mm Hancock-II-bioprosthetic aortic valve (BAV) replacement ten-years prior presented with symptoms of dyspnea and lower extremity edema. During the preceding seven-years, he had been noted to have asymptomatic increased mean transvalvular gradients (MG; 36–50 mmHg) felt to be due to either early bioprosthetic degeneration, pannus formation, or patient–prosthesis mismatch. An echocardiogram at the time of symptom development demonstrated significant flow acceleration through the aortic valve, mild regurgitation, and severely increased MG (48 mmHg) with prolonged acceleration time (AT, 140 msec). A trial of warfarin anticoagulation resulted in dramatic improvement after only 6 weeks with laminar flow through the AV, near-total resolution of regurgitation, and a decrease in MG to 14 mmHg and AT to 114 msec. These findings strongly suggest that BAV thrombosis was the predominant mechanism responsible for the longstanding high MG. Our case highlights that BAV thrombosis should be considered in the differential of elevated gradients regardless of the age of prosthesis, and that a trial of warfarin anticoagulation may be beneficial even if elevated gradients have been present for a prolonged period. Valvular gradients are often abnormal long before a formal diagnosis; however, these may reverse quickly with anticoagulation therapy.

Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Hemodynamics: Definitions, Outcomes, and Evidence Gaps: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

A virtual workshop was organized by the Heart Valve Collaboratory to identify areas of expert consensus, areas of disagreement, and evidence gaps related to bioprosthetic aortic valve hemodynamics. Impaired functional performance of bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement is associated with adverse patient outcomes; however, this assessment is complicated by the lack of standardization for labelling, definitions, and measurement techniques, both after surgical and transcatheter valve replacement. Echocardiography remains the standard assessment methodology because of its ease of performance, widespread availability, ability to do serial measurements over time, and correlation with outcomes. Management of a high gradient after replacement requires integration of the patient's clinical status, physical examination, and multimodality imaging in addition to shared patient decisions regarding treatment options. Future priorities that are underway include efforts to standardize prosthesis sizing and labelling for both surgical and transcatheter valves as well as trials to characterize the consequences of adverse hemodynamics.

Comparison of performance of self-expanding and balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves

Objective

To evaluate the flow dynamics of self-expanding and balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves pertaining to turbulence and pressure recovery. Transcatheter aortic valves are characterized by different designs that have different valve performance and outcomes.

Methods

Assessment of transcatheter aortic valves was performed using self-expanding devices (26-mm Evolut [Medtronic], 23-mm Allegra [New Valve Technologies], and small Acurate neo [Boston Scientific]) and a balloon-expandable device (23-mm Sapien 3 [Edwards Lifesciences]). Particle image velocimetry assessed the flow downstream. A Millar catheter was used for pressure recovery calculation. Velocity, Reynolds shear stresses, viscous shear stress, and pressure gradients were calculated.

Results

The maximal velocity at peak systole obtained with the Evolut R, Sapien 3, Acurate neo, and Allegra was 2.12 ± 0.19 m/sec, 2.41 ± 0.06 m/sec, 2.99 ± 0.10 m/sec, and 2.45 ± 0.08 m/sec, respectively (P < .001). Leaflet oscillations with the flow were clear with the Evolut R and Acurate neo. The Allegra shows the minimal range of Reynolds shear stress magnitudes (up to 320 Pa), and Sapien 3 the maximal (up to 650 Pa). The Evolut had the smallest viscous shear stress magnitude range (up to 3.5 Pa), and the Sapien 3 the largest (up to 6.2 Pa). The largest pressure drop at the vena contracta occurred with the Acurate neo transcatheter aortic valve with a pressure gradient of 13.96 ± 1.35 mm Hg. In the recovery zone, the smallest pressure gradient was obtained with the Allegra (3.32 ± 0.94 mm Hg).

Conclusions

Flow dynamics downstream of different transcatheter aortic valves vary significantly depending on the valve type, despite not having a general trend depending on whether or not valves are self-expanding or balloon-expandable. Deployment design did not have an influence on flow dynamics.

Prognostic Implications of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain in Patients With Surgically Treated Mitral Valve Disease and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background

This study investigated whether left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS), as an LV function parameter less affected by mitral valve (MV) repair or prosthesis, is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with surgically treated MV disease.

Methods

Among 750 patients who underwent MV surgery, we assessed LV-GLS by speckle tracking echocardiography in 344 patients (148 men, mean age 58 ± 13 years) who showed preserved LV ejection fraction on echocardiography between 6 months and 2 years after MV surgery and who did not undergo aortic valve surgery. The assessed clinical events included admission for worsening of heart failure and cardiac death.

Results

During a period of 42.4 ± 26.0 months, 32 (9.3%) patients were hospitalized for worsening heart failure, and 3 (0.8%) died due to cardiac causes. The absolute value of LV-GLS (|LV-GLS|) was significantly lower in patients with clinical events than in those without (12.1 ± 3.1 vs. 15.0 ± 3.2%, p < 0.001) despite comparable LV ejection fraction between groups. |LV-GLS| showed predictive value for clinical events (cut-off 13.9%, area under the curve 0.744, p < 0.001). Patients with |LV-GLS| ≤14.0% had poorer outcomes than those with |LV-GLS| >14.0% (log-rank p < 0.001). Prognosis was worse in patients with |LV-GLS| ≤14.0% and pulmonary hypertension than among those who with |LV-GLS| ≤14.0% without pulmonary hypertension (log rank p < 0.001). In nested Cox proportional hazard regression models, reduced |LV-GLS| was independently associated with the occurrence of clinical events.

Conclusions

In patients with surgically treated MV and preserved LV ejection fraction, assessment of LV-GLS provides functional information associated with cardiovascular outcomes.

In vitro Doppler versus catheter transvalvular pressure gradients in balloon-expandable versus self-expanding transcatheter aortic valves

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this in vitro study was to compare Doppler versus catheter transvalvular pressure gradients (TPG) in third generations balloon-expandable (BE) versus self-expanding (SE) transcatheter heart valves (THV).

BACKGROUND

TPG is a key parameter to assess and follow valve hemodynamic function following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). It remains uncertain and debated whether, and to which extent, TPGs differ according to the type of THV, that is, BE versus SE and to the method used for TPG measurement, that is, Doppler echocardiography versus cardiac catheterization.

METHODS

The CoreValve EVOLUT PRO 26 mm and the SAPIEN 3 23 mm THVs were tested in a left heart simulator using a 21 mm aortic annulus under following conditions: heart rate: 70 bpm, mean aortic pressure: 100 mmHg, stroke volume: 30, 70 and 100 ml. Mean TPGs were measured by continuous-wave Doppler and by micro-tip pressure catheters positioned in the left ventricle and at 50 mm downstream to the tip of the THV leaflets.

RESULTS

Doppler TPGs (9.5 ± 3.9 mmHg) were on average 40.5 ± 13.9% higher (p < 0.001) than catheter TPGs (6.3 ± 3.4 mmHg). Both Doppler and catheter TPGs were lower (p = 0.003) in the SE versus BE THVs (Doppler: 8.7 ± 3.5 vs. 10.7 ± 4.6; catheter: 5.0 ± 1.7 mmHg vs. 7.1 ± 2.2). The Doppler versus catheter difference in TPG increased with the higher flow conditions. The Doppler versus catheter difference in TPG was similar in BE versus SE THVs (3.6 ± 1.1 vs. 3.7 ± 1.4 mmHg or 42 ± 9 vs. 47 ± 9%; p = 0.58) overall and in each flow conditions.

CONCLUSION

The Doppler TPGs are, on average, 40% higher than the catheter TPGs for both BE and SE THVs. The SE THV had lower Doppler and catheter TPGs compared to the BE THV, at normal and high flow states. The absolute and percent differences between Doppler versus catheter TPGs were similar in BE versus SE THVs.

Invasive versus echocardiographic gradients in degenerated surgical aortic valve prostheses: A multicenter study

Objectives

To compare echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients obtained concomitantly in degenerated bioprosthetic surgical aortic valves (SAVRs).

Methods

In a multicenter study, we compared concomitant echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients of SAVR, obtained before valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in all patients, patients with primary stenosis (AS), primary aortic regurgitation (AR), and mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD), and in small versus large valves (≤ or >23 mm). Dimensionless index (DI) was calculated in all groups.

Results

In total, 74 patients were included and data presented as median (interquartile range). Echocardiography-catheterization mean gradient discordance was observed in all patients (invasive = 22 mm Hg [11-34] vs echocardiographic = 32 mm Hg [21-42], P = .013), small valves (invasive = 15 mm Hg [8-34] vs echocardiographic = 28 mm Hg [21-41], P = .013), and large valves (invasive = 20 mm Hg [8.5-27.13] vs echocardiographic = 32 mm Hg [25.5 – 41.5], P < .0001), with a bias of 8 ± 15 mm Hg and wide limits of agreement (–22 to 39 mm Hg) on Bland–Altman plots, indicating these modalities may not be interchangeable. Discordance occurred in AR (invasive = 3 mm Hg [1-6] vs echocardiographic = 12 mm Hg [7-22], P = .017) and in MAVD (invasive = 19 mm Hg [12-29] vs echocardiographic = 31 mm Hg [23-39], P < .0001) but not in AS (invasive = 35 mm Hg [24-45] vs echocardiographic = 41 mm Hg [30-50], P = .45). A lower DI (0.21 [0.14-0.25]) occurred in AS compared with MAVD (0.31 [0.19-0.39]) and AR (0.55 [0.51-0.69]), P < .0001.

Conclusions

Discordance between echocardiography and invasive mean gradients exists in degenerated SAVR, regardless of valve size, but depends on mechanism of failure and DI helps stratify these patients. With a discrepancy between echocardiographic mean gradients AND the patient's symptoms OR the valve leaflet structure and/or mobility on imaging, especially before redo-SAVR or valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement, invasive gradients may adjudicate the true valvular hemodynamics.

Elevated Prosthetic Valve Gradients: What to Consider When Determining an Etiology

DOPPLER echocardiography is a useful noninvasive tool for the assessment of cardiac hemodynamics. However, it is subject to limitations that can have important clinical implications, especially in the setting of valve prosthesis. Elevation in mean transvalvular gradient is a finding that has a variety of etiologies. One such etiology is the pressure-recovery (PR) phenomenon, a consequence of stream convergence and energy conversion across a narrowing, which is an artifact of Doppler echocardiographic calculations of valvular flow. The elevated gradient measured with Doppler echocardiography as a result of PR is not present on cardiac catheterization and does not represent true problematic valve hemodynamics. PR should be suspected with an elevated gradient on Doppler echocardiography with normal leaflet motion, especially in the setting of a small proximal aorta. Understanding and awareness of PR are important because PR can lead to overestimation of disease severity in the clinical setting.

49 years of normal functioning Starr-Edwards aortic valve prosthesis

Although it is no longer in production, the Starr–Edwards valve has successfully replaced hundreds of thousands of heart valves in the past 50 years of its use. We report on the case of a valve in the aortic position still functioning 49 years after implantation without replacement, showcasing the valve’s durability.

A multilayered valve leaflet promotes cell-laden collagen type I production and aortic valve hemodynamics

Patients with aortic heart valve disease are limited to valve replacements that lack the ability to grow and remodel. This presents a major challenge for pediatric patients who require a valve capable of somatic growth and at a smaller size. A patient-specific heart valve capable of growth and remodeling while maintaining proper valve function would address this major issue. Here, we recreate the native valve leaflet structure composed of poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) and cell-laden gelatin-methacrylate/poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (GelMA/PEGDA) hydrogels using 3D printing and molding, and then evaluate the ability of the multilayered scaffold to produce collagen matrix under physiological shear stress conditions. We also characterized the valve hemodynamics under aortic physiological flow conditions. The valve's fibrosa layer was replicated by 3D printing PCL in a circumferential direction similar to collagen alignment in the native leaflet, and GelMA/PEGDA sustained and promoted cell viability in the spongiosa/ventricularis layers. We found that collagen type I production can be increased in the multilayered scaffold when it is exposed to pulsatile shear stress conditions over static conditions. When the PCL component was mounted onto a valve ring and tested under physiological aortic valve conditions, the hemodynamics were comparable to commercially available valves. Our results demonstrate that a structurally representative valve leaflet can be generated using 3D printing and that the PCL layer of the leaflet can sustain proper valve function under physiological aortic valve conditions.

Validation of pressure drop assessment using 4D flow MRI-based turbulence production in various shapes of aortic stenoses

PURPOSE

To validate pressure drop measurements using 4D flow MRI-based turbulence production in various shapes of stenotic stenoses.

METHODS

In vitro flow phantoms with seven different 3D-printed aortic valve geometries were constructed and scanned with 4D flow MRI with six-directional flow encoding (ICOSA6). The pressure drop through the valve was non-invasively predicted based on the simplified Bernoulli, the extended Bernoulli, the turbulence production, and the shear-scaling methods. Linear regression and agreement of the predictions with invasively measured pressure drop were analyzed.

RESULTS

All pressure drop predictions using 4D Flow MRI were linearly correlated to the true pressure drop but resulted in different regression slopes. The regression slope and 95% limits of agreement for the simplified Bernoulli method were 1.35 and 11.99 ± 21.72 mm Hg. The regression slope and 95% limits of agreement for the extended Bernoulli method were 1.02 and 0.74 ± 8.48 mm Hg. The regression slope and 95% limits of agreement for the turbulence production method were 0.89 and 0.96 ± 8.01 mm Hg. The shear-scaling method presented good correlation with an invasively measured pressure drop, but the regression slope varied between 0.36 and 1.00 depending on the shear-scaling coefficient.

CONCLUSION

The pressure drop assessment based on the turbulence production method agrees well with the extended Bernoulli method and invasively measured pressure drop in various shapes of the aortic valve. Turbulence-based pressure drop estimation can, as a complement to the conventional Bernoulli method, play a role in the assessment of valve diseases.

Assessment of trans-aortic pressure gradient using a coronary pressure wire in patients with mechanical aortic and mitral valve prostheses

Accurate evaluation of trans-aortic valvular pressure gradients is challenging in cases where dual mechanical aortic and mitral valve prostheses are present. Non-invasive Doppler echocardiographic imaging has its limitations due to multiple geometric assumptions. Invasive measurement of trans-valvular gradients with cardiac catheterization can provide further information in patients with two mechanical valves, where simultaneous pressure measurements in the left ventricle and ascending aorta must be obtained. Obtaining access to the left ventricle via the mitral valve after a trans-septal puncture is not feasible in the case of a concomitant mechanical mitral valve, whereas left ventricular apical puncture technique is associated with high procedural risks. Retrograde crossing of a bileaflet mechanical aortic prosthesis with standard catheters is associated with the risk of catheter entrapment and acute valvular regurgitation. In these cases, the assessment of trans-valvular gradients using a 0.014˝ diameter coronary pressure wire technique has been described in a few case reports. We present the case of a 76-year-old female with rheumatic valvular heart disease who underwent mechanical aortic and mitral valve replacement in the past. She presented with decompensated heart failure and echocardiographic findings suggestive of elevated pressure gradient across the mechanical aortic valve prosthesis. The use of a high-fidelity 0.014˝ diameter coronary pressure guidewire resulted in the detection of a normal trans-valvular pressure gradient across the mechanical aortic valve. This avoided a high-risk third redo valve surgery in our patient. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Significant intra-valvular pressure loss across EPIC SUPRA and perimount magna supra-annular designed aortic bioprostheses in patients with normal aortic size

Doppler-derived trans-prosthetic gradients are higher and the estimated effective valve area is smaller than the catheter-derived and directly measured hemodynamic values, mostly due to pressure recovery phenomenon. Pressure recovery to a varying extent is common to all prosthetic heart valves including bioprostheses. Pressure recovery-related differences are usually small except in patients with bileaflet metallic prosthesis, wherein high-pressure local jets across central orifice have been documented since long back and also in patients with narrow aortic root. We describe two patients with normally functioning stented aortic bioprostheses with supra-annular design (EPIC SUPRA and PERIMOUNT MAGNA), wherein very high trans-prosthetic gradients and critically reduced estimated effective valve orifice areas in presence of normal aortic size were consistently recorded over long periods of follow-up. The valve leaflets, however had normal excursion, were thin, opened with a triangular or oblong shape and had expected geometric valve area (1.7 and 1.6 cm² respectively) measured by 3D trans-oesophageal echocardiographic planimetry. Pressure recovery upstream the valves accounted for 20% and 12% of total pressure gradients respectively. Dominant site for pressure drop was intra-valvular (75–85%). Such a phenomenon has not been reported in vivo for these two valve designs.

The echocardiography of replacement heart valves

This is a practical description of how replacement valves are assessed using echocardiography. Normal transthoracic appearances including normal variants are described. The problem of differentiating normal function, patient-prosthesis mismatch and pathological obstruction in aortic replacement valves with high gradients is discussed. Obstruction and abnormal regurgitation is described for valves in the aortic, mitral and right-sided positions and when to use echocardiography in suspected infective endocarditis. The roles of transoesophageal and stress echocardiography are described and finally when other imaging techniques may be useful.

Moderate Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch Has No Negative Effect on Patients' Functional Status After Aortic Valve Replacement With CarboMedics Prosthesis

Background:

Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the subject of continuing debate in the cardiac surgery field.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency and severity of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) and the functional status of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) using a CarboMedics prosthesis in the mid-term follow up.

Patients and Methods:

We retrospectively studied 66 consecutive patients who were referred to AVR with a CarboMedics prosthesis at the Rajaie cardiovascular medical and research center, a university referral hospital in Tehran, Iran. The severity of PPM as well as clinical and echocardiographic parameters and the patients’ New York heat association (NYHA) functional classification status, operative data and postoperative complications, and mortality in a mid-term (4 - 5 months) follow up period was assessed. Severe PPM was defined as the effective orifice area (EOA) indexed to the patient’s body surface area (BSA) < 0.65 cm²/m² and moderate PPM was defined as the indexed effective orifice area (IEOA) between 0.65 and 0.85 cm²/m².

Results:

Of the 66 studied patients, 39 were male and 27 were female. The mean age of the patients was 43 ± 17 with a range of 6 - 76 years. Implanted sizes of the CarboMedics AV prosthesis in 22 patients were 19 and 21 mm, and in 44 patients were 23 and 25 mm. Eleven patients had moderate PPM (IEOA < 0.85 cm²/m²) and 55 of them did not have PPM (IEOA ≥ 0.85 cm²/m²). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the echocardiographic trans-aortic pressure gradients (35.6 ± 19 vs. 23.2 ± 16 mmHg; P = 0.061) and the mean NYHA functional classification (1.10 ± 0.3 vs. 1.01 ± 0.10; P = 0.074) after AVR in the mid-term follow up.

Conclusions:

Moderate PPM has no negative effect on echocardiographic trans-aortic pressure gradients or the patients’ NYHA functional status after AVR with a CarboMedics prosthesis in the mid-term follow up.

Transesophageal Echocardiographic Measurement of Cardiac Index by the Prosthetic Mitral Valve Method Is Not Similar to the Continuous Thermodilution Method Via a Pulmonary Artery Catheter

OBJECTIVE

To compare the agreement of cardiac index measurements between transesophageal echocardiography across the prosthetic mitral valve and the continuous thermodilution method through a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC-TD) in patients undergoing double-valve replacement.

DESIGN

Observational prospective study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five patients undergoing double-valve replacement (12 men and 13 women, age 25-78 years, ASA III-IV, NYHA II-III, LVEF≥45%). Patients were grouped according to their prosthesis (mechanical prosthesis v bioprosthesis).

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent cardiac index assessment during double-valve replacement.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Cardiac index across the prosthetic mitral valve was measured simultaneously using transesophageal echocardiography (CI(MV)) and PAC-TD (CI(PAC)) at 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass, and at 0, 15, and 30 minutes after incision closure. A correlation was present between CI(MV) and CI(PAC) in both groups (mechanical prosthesis: r = 0.47, p<0.01; bioprosthesis: r = 0.60, p<0.01). In the mechanical prosthesis group, the bias between techniques (CI(PAC) v CI(MV)) was-0.5 L/min/m(2) (95% CI:-1.97 to 0.97), and error was 55%. In the bioprosthesis group, the bias between both techniques was-1.3 L/min/m(2) (95% CI:-3.1 to 0.5), and error was 56%.

CONCLUSIONS

A relatively weak correlation and lack of agreement between values of CI(PAC) and CI(MV) were observed in patients undergoing double-valve replacement. Therefore, transesophageal echocardiography might not be interchangeable with PAC-TD for measuring cardiac output or cardiac index. A regression equation is needed to correct the probable value of CI(PAC). CI(MV) might be useful as a quantitative or semi-quantitative cardiac output measurement.

Echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic valves

Echocardiographic evaluation of prosthetic valves is similar in many respects to evaluation of native valve disease. However, there are some important differences. First, there are several types of prosthetic valves with different fluid dynamics for each basic design and differing flow velocities for each valve size. Second, the mechanisms of valve dysfunction are somewhat different from those for native valve disease. Third, the technical aspects of imaging artificial devices, specifically the problem of acoustic shadowing, significantly affect the diagnostic approach when prosthetic valve dysfunction is suspected. Fourth, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has rapidly expanded in recent years. Echocardiography plays an essential role in identifying patients suitable for TAVI and providing intra-procedural monitoring, and is the modality for post-procedure follow-up. Both an understanding of the basic approach to echocardiographic evaluation and detailed knowledge of the specific flow dynamics for the size and type of prosthesis in an individual patient are needed for appropriate patient management.

Steady flow hemodynamic and energy loss measurements in normal and simulated calcified tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves

The bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), which forms with two leaflets instead of three as in the normal tricuspid aortic valve (TAV), is associated with a spectrum of secondary valvulopathies and aortopathies potentially triggered by hemodynamic abnormalities. While studies have demonstrated an intrinsic degree of stenosis and the existence of a skewed orifice jet in the BAV, the impact of those abnormalities on BAV hemodynamic performance and energy loss has not been examined. This steady-flow study presents the comparative in vitro assessment of the flow field and energy loss in a TAV and type-I BAV under normal and simulated calcified states. Particle-image velocimetry (PIV) measurements were performed to quantify velocity, vorticity, viscous, and Reynolds shear stress fields in normal and simulated calcified porcine TAV and BAV models at six flow rates spanning the systolic phase. The BAV model was created by suturing the two coronary leaflets of a porcine TAV. Calcification was simulated via deposition of glue beads in the base of the leaflets. Valvular performance was characterized in terms of geometric orifice area (GOA), pressure drop, effective orifice area (EOA), energy loss (EL), and energy loss index (ELI). The BAV generated an elliptical orifice and a jet skewed toward the noncoronary leaflet. In contrast, the TAV featured a circular orifice and a jet aligned along the valve long axis. While the BAV exhibited an intrinsic degree of stenosis (18% increase in maximum jet velocity and 7% decrease in EOA relative to the TAV at the maximum flow rate), it generated only a 3% increase in EL and its average ELI (2.10 cm2/m2) remained above the clinical threshold characterizing severe aortic stenosis. The presence of simulated calcific lesions normalized the alignment of the BAV jet and resulted in the loss of jet axisymmetry in the TAV. It also amplified the degree of stenosis in the TAV and BAV, as indicated by the 342% and 404% increase in EL, 70% and 51% reduction in ELI and 48% and 51% decrease in EOA, respectively, relative to the nontreated valve models at the maximum flow rate. This study indicates the ability of the BAV to function as a TAV despite its intrinsic degree of stenosis and suggests the weak dependence of pressure drop on orifice area in calcified valves.

Increased prosthetic valve gradients: abnormal prosthetic function or pressure recovery?

The non-invasive evaluation of prosthetic valve function is challenging. The effects of flow rate, valvular geometry, leaflet motion, and pressure recovery all impact the Doppler assessment of prosthetic performance. Differentiating prosthesis obstruction from pressure recovery in patients who are found to have high Doppler velocities across an aortic valve prosthesis is critical in order to direct appropriate management. In this manuscript, we present two cases of patients with aortic valve prosthesis with high Doppler velocities and review the pathophysiology and evaluation of prosthesis function.

Echocardiographic Assessment of Heart Valve Prostheses

Patients submitted to valve replacement with mechanical or biological prosthesis, may present symptoms related either to valvular malfunction or ventricular dysfunction from other causes. Because a clinical examination is not sufficient to evaluate a prosthetic valve, several diagnostic methods have been proposed to assess the functional status of a prosthetic valve. This review provides an overview of echocardiographic and Doppler techniques useful in evaluation of prosthetic heart valves. Compared to native valves, echocardiographic evaluation of prosthetic valves is certainly more complex, both for the examination and the interpretation. Echocardiography also allows discriminating between intra- and/or peri-prosthetic regurgitation, present in the majority of mechanical valves. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) requires different angles of the probe with unconventional views. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the method of choice in presence of technical difficulties. Three-dimensional (3D)-TEE seems to be superior to 2D-TEE, especially in the assessment of paravalvular leak regurgitation (PVL) that it provides improved localization and analysis of the PVL size and shape.

Echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic heart valves

Valvular heart disease is a global health problem. It is estimated that more than 280,000 prosthetic heart valves are implanted worldwide each year. As the world's population is aging, the incidence of prosthetic heart valve implantation and the prevalence of prosthetic heart valves continue to increase. Assessing heart valve prosthesis function remains challenging, as prosthesis malfunction is unpredictable but not uncommon. Transthoracic two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography is the preferred method for assessing prosthetic valve function. Clinically useful Doppler-derived measures for assessing prosthetic valve hemodynamic profiles have been reported for aortic, mitral, and tricuspid valve prostheses, but echocardiographic data regarding pulmonary valve prostheses remain limited. Complete prosthetic valve evaluation by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is sometimes challenging due to acoustic shadowing and artifacts. In these cases, further imaging with transesophageal echocardiography, fluoroscopy and/or gated CT may be warranted, particularly if prosthetic valve dysfunction is suspected. Being able to differentiate pathologic versus functional obstruction of an individual prosthesis is extremely important, as this distinction affects management decisions. Transprosthetic and periprosthetic regurgitation may be difficult to visualize on TTE, so careful review of Doppler-derived data combined with a high index of suspicion is warranted, particularly in symptomatic patients. A baseline TTE soon after valve implantation is indicated in order to "fingerprint" the prosthesis hemodynamic profile. It remains unclear how frequently serial imaging should be performed in order to assess prosthetic valve function, as this issue has not been systematically studied.

Hemodynamic performance during exercise of the new St. Jude Trifecta aortic bioprosthesis: results from a French multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Initial experience with the new St. Jude Trifecta pericardial aortic stented bioprosthesis shows an excellent resting hemodynamic profile. Little is known about changes in the hemodynamic profile of the Trifecta valve during exercise.

METHODS

Between February 2011 and November 2012, 85 patients (49 men; mean age, 76 ± 7 years) with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who underwent aortic valve replacement with the Trifecta bioprosthesis at three centers in France (Amiens, Rennes, and Angers) underwent quantitative Doppler echocardiographic at rest, during low-level exercise (25 W), and during peak exercise (68 ± 21 W), 6 months after aortic valve replacement.

RESULTS

Mean peak transvalvular aortic velocity, mean transvalvular gradient, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction for all valve sizes were 211 ± 35 cm/sec, 10 ± 3 mm Hg, and 62 ± 10% at rest; 237 ± 48 cm/sec, 13 ± 4 mm Hg, and 64 ± 10% during low-level exercise; and 248 ± 70 cm/sec, 15 ± 5 mm Hg, and 67 ± 10% during peak exercise, respectively. Mean effective orifice area was 1.84 ± 0.42 cm(2) at rest, 1.86 ± 0.84 cm(2) (P = .92) during low-level exercise, and 1.95 ± 0.62 cm(2) (P = .49) during peak exercise. The prevalence of prosthesis-patient mismatch was low in the overall series (23%) and increased to 30% for the smallest valve sizes (19 and 21 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The new Trifecta bioprosthesis provides an excellent hemodynamic profile both at rest and during exercise. This type of valve could be an appropriate choice in patients with small aortic annular diameters, to avoid prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Impact of energy loss index on left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement

Background

Recently, the energy loss index (ELI) has been proposed as a new functional index to assess the severity of aortic stenosis (AS). The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the ELI on left ventricular mass (LVM) regression in patients after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with mechanical valves.

Methods

A total of 30 patients with severe AS who underwent AVR with mechanical valves was studied. Echocardiography was performed to measure the LVM before AVR (pre-LVM) (n = 30) and repeated 12 months later (post-LVM) (n = 19). The ELI was calculated as [effective orifice area (EOA) × aortic cross sectional area]/(aortic cross sectional area − EOA) divided by the body surface area. The LVM regression rate (%) was calculated as 100 × (post-LVM − pre-LVM)/(pre-LVM). A cardiac event was defined as a composite of cardiac death and heart failure requiring hospitalization.

Results

LVM regressed significantly (245.1 ± 84.3 to 173.4 ± 62.6 g, P < 0.01) at 12 months after AVR. The LVM regression rate negatively correlated with the ELI (R = −0.67, P < 0.01). By receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, ELI <1.12 cm²/m² predicted smaller (<−30.0 %) LVM regression rates (area under the curve = 0.825; P = 0.030). Patients with ELI <1.12 cm²/m² had significantly lower cardiac event-free survival.

Conclusion

The ELI as well as the EOA index (EOAI) could predict LVM regression after AVR with mechanical valves. Whether the ELI is a stronger predictor of clinical events than EOAI is still unclear, and further large-scale study is necessary to elucidate the clinical impact of the ELI in patients with AVR.

Localized transvalvular pressure gradients in mitral bileaflet mechanical heart valves and impact on gradient overestimation by Doppler

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that localized high velocity may be recorded by continuous-wave Doppler interrogation through the smaller central orifices of bileaflet mechanical heart valves (BMHV) and that this may result in overestimation of the transvalvular pressure gradient (TPG). However, the prevalence and clinical relevance of this phenomenon remain unclear, particularly for BMHVs in the mitral position. The objective of this in vitro study was to assess the presence and magnitude of localized high velocity in mitral BMHVs as well as its impact on TPG overestimation by Doppler.

METHODS

Nine BMHVs were tested under nine different flow conditions (volumes and flow waveforms) in a simulator specifically designed to assess mitral valve hemodynamics. Flow velocity was measured at three different locations (leading edge, midleaflets, and trailing edge) within the central and lateral orifices of the BMHVs using pulsed-wave Doppler. TPG was measured by pulsed-wave and continuous-wave Doppler and by catheterization.

RESULTS

The maximum flow velocity occurred within the central orifice of the BMHV in 61% of the 81 tested conditions. This locally higher velocity within the central orifice predominantly occurred at the leading edge of the prosthesis. Doppler overestimated mean TPG by an average of 5% to 10% compared with catheterization. The magnitude of the localized high velocity and ensuing overestimation of TPG by Doppler was more important at higher mitral flow volumes (P < .0001) as well as in BMHVs with smaller internal ring diameters (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the flow velocity distribution within the three orifices of mitral BMHVs is not uniform and that higher velocity occurs more frequently, but not always, within the inflow aspect of the central orifice. In most mitral BMHVs and flow conditions, this localized high-velocity phenomenon causes small overestimation of TPGs (<2 mm Hg and <10%) by Doppler and is thus not clinically relevant. However, in small mitral BMHVs exposed to high flow rates, the overestimation of TPG due to localized high velocity could become more important and overlap with the range of gradients found in patients with prosthesis dysfunction or prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Management of prosthetic heart valve complications

OPINION STATEMENT

With greater awareness and treatment of valvular heart disease, there are now an increasing number of patients with prosthetic heart valves. However, replacement of a diseased valve with a prosthetic valve creates the opportunity for new and unique complications that once diagnosed require specific treatments. Complications which may occur depend not only on the type of prosthesis but also are influenced by clinical factors that are important to understand and may affect treatment strategies. Tissue prostheses tend to deteriorate over time while mechanical prostheses require anticoagulation with its attendant risks. The rate of serious prosthetic heart valve complications is approximately 3 % per year. They include bleeding, systemic embolization, obstruction due to thrombus or pannus formation, patient-prosthesis mismatch, infective endocarditis, structural deterioration, prosthetic and peri-prosthetic regurgitation, and hemolysis. Importantly, the risk of prosthetic heart valve complications can be reduced by appropriate choices made at the time of surgery such as utilization of the correct prosthesis size and type. In addition, adherence to current guidelines for anticoagulation, endocarditis prophylaxis, and the timing of clinical and echocardiographic surveillance is also important to prevent complications. Should complications occur, rapid diagnosis, usually with echocardiography, is pivotal and can provide important hemodynamic as well as anatomic information critical to determining appropriate treatment and timing of surgical re-intervention if necessary. Optimal treatment of prosthetic heart valve complications remains a challenge and new treatment strategies continue to evolve.

Marked discrepancy in pressure gradient between Doppler and catheter examinations on Medtronic Mosaic valve in aortic position

A 71-year-old woman underwent aortic valve replacement with 23 mm Medtronic Mosaic Ultra valve 4 years ago because of aortic stenosis. Although she had been asymptomatic since the operation, echocardiography showed 4 m/s of transprosthetic valve flow that implied early prosthetic valve failure. Catheter examination revealed that the mean transvalvular pressure gradient during systole was 15.1 mmHg on simultaneous pressure recording, and calculated valve area 1.82 cm(2). Her body surface area was 1.56 m(2). Prosthetic valve failure and prosthesis-patient mismatch were both denied. The discrepancy between Doppler study data and catheter data seemed to be due to fluid dynamical pressure recovery phenomenon. Net pressure difference between the left ventricle and the aorta may be significantly smaller than that estimated using Bernoulli's equation from transvalvular flow speed in some patients after aortic valve replacement.

Effective valve opening area in the detection of dysfunctional aortic valve prostheses: a differentiated statistical analysis of this parameter including the introduction of minimal expected normal values as borderline to dysfunctional stenotic prostheses

BACKGROUND

Dysfunction of heart valve prostheses (VP) is a life-threatening complication and the diagnosis remains difficult. The motivation for this study was to improve the detection of dysfunctional VP by optimizing application of the prosthetic effective orifice area (VA). For this reason the minimal expected normal VA (VA(expected)) was introduced.

METHODS

We investigated echocardiographically 1,369 normally functioning aortic valve prostheses (AVP). Mean VA, transprosthetic peak (PPG) and mean pressure gradients (MPG) were evaluated to gain reference values depending on prosthetic size and construction principle. Mean VA(expected) was calculated by applying a simple formula that was developed empirically using statistical analyses. The results were compared with those of 65 dysfunctional AVPs.

RESULTS

VA(expected) can be applied as a threshold between normal and dysfunctional stenotic AVP and showed a correct estimation in 87% of all normally functioning and 100% of dysfunctional stenotic VPs. The sensitivity for all prosthetic sizes is 1.0, independently of the constructional principle of the VP. Specificity ranged between 0.8 and 1.0, dependent on VP size. The formula representing VA(expected) is simple and can be executed easily.

CONCLUSION

As nearly independent of stroke volume and in consideration of VA(expected), VA seems to have become one of the preferable parameters for detecting pathological stenotic AVPs echocardiographically. The additional application of PPG/MPG and other parameters permits prostheses with relevant isolated regurgitation and patient-prosthesis-mismatch to be distinguished.

A new index measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to detect mechanical heart valve malfunction

More than two thirds of valve replacement operations performed each year used mechanical heart valve. These valves are subject to complications such: pannus and/or thrombus formation. One other potential complication is a malfunction in one of the valve leaflets. It is then important to develop parameters that will allow a non-invasive diagnosis of such valve malfunction. In the present study, we evaluated under steady low flow (1-8 L/min) and pulsatile flow (3, 5 and 7 L/min) a bileafleat mechanical heart valve with normal function, 50% and 100% of one valve leaflet malfunction. Image analysis was performed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate transvalvular pressure gradients (TPG), effective orifice area and a new index given by central/lateral velocity ratio downstream of the valve. Our results showed that the flow upstream and downstream of the defective valve is highly influenced by malfunction severity. TPG did not allow differentiating valve malfunction at low flow under steady and pulsatile conditions. However the new index given by central/lateral ratio allowed differentiating the presence of valve malfunction using a single transverse velocity measurement.