Coronary thrombolysis, conjunctive heparin infusion, and the effect on systemic thrombin activity

Specific types of activated Factor XII increase following thrombolytic therapy with tenecteplase

BACKGROUND

Activated Factor XII (XIIa) is believed to participate in a number of pathophysiological processes including inflammation, thrombosis and fibrinolysis. Increasing XIIa levels following thrombolytic therapy have previously been reported. In contrast to other thrombolytics, tenecteplase (TNK-tpa) does not show paradoxical thrombin activation, indicating a lower procoagulant effect of this fibrin-selective thrombolytic agent. Recent research has demonstrated that in-vivo XIIa exists in a number of different types, and the aim of this study was to investigate plasma variations of different types of XIIa following thrombolytic treatment with TNK-tpa.

METHODS

Citrated blood samples were obtained from 34 patients admitted with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with TNK-tpa. Samples were taken immediately prior to treatment, 30-90 min after and 4 days post-treatment. XIIa measurements were performed using 2 ELISA assays designed to preferentially measure different types of XIIa; XIIaA and XIIaR. Both assays utilised a monoclonal antibody 2/215, which is highly specific for XIIa, as the solid phase capture antibody. The assay for XIIaA used a conjugate based on a polyclonal antibody against the entire XIIa molecule, whilst the assay for XIIaR incorporated a reagent to release otherwise unavailable XIIa and used a conjugate based on a monoclonal antibody against beta-XIIa.

RESULTS

Changes in plasma XIIaA concentration as a result of therapy were more evident than changes in XIIaR concentration. XIIaA showed a significant increase from 67.1 (49.0-84.4) pM to 97.8 (75.5-133.1) pM [median and 25 and 75% percentiles] in the 30-90 min sample (P < 0.001), returning to pre-intervention levels 61.5 (47.5-81.0) pM by day 4. In contrast, no significant change in XIIaR concentration was observed following thrombolytic therapy with TNK-tpa.

CONCLUSION

In patients admitted with STEMI, thrombolytic therapy with TNK-tpa resulted in a significant short-lasting increase in specific types of XIIa (namely XIIaA), whereas other types of XIIa (XIIaR) were largely unaffected by this intervention.

Activation of the contact system and inflammation after thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Thrombolytic therapy activates the contact system, and factor XII activation may activate the coagulation cascade and inflammation. It is not known whether an early inflammatory response is induced by thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We prospectively measured the plasma levels of activated factor XII, cleaved kininogen, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (as indexes of the contact phase and coagulation activation), and interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) (as indexes of inflammation) in 39 patients hospitalized for AMI within 12 hours of symptom onset: 26 receiving thrombolytic therapy and 13 heparin alone. Blood samples were collected at baseline and after 90 minutes and 24 hours. Patients undergoing thrombolysis had a significant early increase in activated factor XII (from 2.2 ng/ml at baseline to 4.7 ng/ml after 90 minutes; p = 0.0001), cleaved kininogen (from 26% to 37%; p = 0.001), and fragment 1 + 2 (from 1.4 to 2.1 nmol/L; p = 0.0001), whereas the 24-hour levels were similar to baseline levels. The levels of interleukin-6 significantly increased during the first 90 minutes (from 3.9 to 6.3 microg/ml; p = 0.001), and were even higher after 24 hours (11.9 ng/ml, p = 0.0001). CRP levels increased only after 24 hours (p = 0.0001). There were no changes in these parameters in patients receiving heparin alone, except for a 24-hour increase in interleukin-6 and CRP levels. Thus, in patients with AMI receiving thrombolytic therapy, early activation of inflammation parallels the activation of the contact system and the coagulation cascade, which might contribute to microvascular obstruction and reperfusion injury.

Thrombin generation and fibrinolytic activities among patients receiving reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab or undergoing direct angioplasty plus abciximab for acute myocardial infarction

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of these 2 reperfusion strategies (reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab or direct angioplasty plus abciximab) on fibrinolytic and thrombin generation activities. The effect of reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab and direct angioplasty plus abciximab on hemostatic factors is unknown. Of 70 patients with acute myocardial infarction of < or = 6 hours, 34 were randomized to reduced-dose alteplase (35 to 50 mg in 1 hour) and 36 to direct angioplasty. A standard bolus and infusion dose of abciximab was administered to all patients. Blood specimens were collected at baseline, and at 1, 4, 12, and 24 hours. The following parameters were assayed: fibrinogen, plasminogen and antiplasmin activities, tissue plasminogen activator antigen, D-dimer, prothrombin fragments F1 + 2, and thrombin/antithrombin III complexes. Among patients treated with reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab, the fibrinogen level decreased by 28.4% in the first hour (11.7 +/- 3.4 vs 7.8 +/- 2.5 micromol/L, p <0.001). Correspondingly, plasminogen and antiplasmin activities decreased by 43.8% (p <0.001) and 59.1% (p <0.001), respectively. Prothrombin fragments F1 + 2 increased from 2.2 +/- 1.7 to 4.2 +/- 1.6 nmol/L (1 hour) (p <0.001) and thrombin/antithrombin III increased from 16.3 +/- 15.0 to 33.5 +/- 19.9 microg/L (1 hour) (p <0.001). Conversely, in the direct angioplasty group, there was a marginal elevation in fibrinogen level at 1 hour (10.2 +/- 2.4 vs 10.6 +/- 2.0 micromol/L, p = 0.064) despite a significant reduction in plasminogen and an increase in tissue plasminogen activator levels. There was no significant change in prothrombin fragments F1 + 2 and thrombin/antithrombin III levels. Thus, there was considerable fibrinolytic activity with reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab; thrombin generation was not prevented. Among patients treated with direct angioplasty, there was some endogenous fibrinolytic activity, but there was no significant thrombin generation.

Contemporary use of and future roles for heparin in antithrombotic therapy

Although heparin therapy is an established component of the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease, recent advances have resulted in improvements in the clinical use of this agent. Studies have shown that weight-based dosing influences significantly both the time to reach a therapeutic intensity of anticoagulation and the incidence of thromboembolic recurrence. It is now considered the standard of care. A growing understanding of the variability among activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) reagents and the influence of these differences on aPTT outcomes has led to the use of reagent-specific therapeutic ranges for heparin monitoring. Many practitioners now choose to adjust the therapeutic range to correspond to heparin serum concentrations of 0.2-0.4 U/mL rather than the more common practice of prolonging aPTT to 1.5-2.5 times the mean normal aPTT. Pharmaceutical companies have developed low molecular weight heparins to minimize adverse effects associated with unfractionated heparin. More specific thrombin inhibitors are also under investigation with the aim of improving clinical outcomes in coronary syndromes now treated with heparin. Low molecular weight heparins or specific thrombin inhibitors are unlikely to replace unfractionated heparin in the near future. Therefore, optimum dosing and appropriate monitoring of heparin are critically important in the management of thromboembolic disease.

Thrombin generation and activity during thrombolysis and concomitant heparin therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

This prospective study investigated the behavior of thrombin generation and activity during thrombolysis and concomitant heparin administration.

BACKGROUND

It has been shown that during thrombolytic therapy there is an increase in thrombin generation and activity. Increased thrombin activity is suppressed by concomitant intravenous heparin, but it is unknown whether thrombin generation is also affected.

METHODS

Thrombin generation was assessed by measuring prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 and thrombin-antithrombin complex plasma levels and thrombin activity by measuring fibrinopeptide A plasma levels. Serial blood samples were obtained before and at 90 min and 24 and 48 h after the administration of streptokinase (15 patients), recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (15 patients) or anistreplase (13 patients). An intravenous bolus of heparin (5,000 IU) was administered before the start of thrombolytic therapy, followed by an infusion of 1,000 U/h to maintain an activated partial thromboplastin time > 1.5 times baseline.

RESULTS

During thrombolytic and concomitant heparin therapy, there was an increase in the plasma levels of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (baseline 1.08 vs. 2.73 nmol/liter, p < 0.001) and thrombin-antithrombin complex (baseline 6.5 vs. 17.1 micrograms/ml, p < 0.01) at 90 min, whereas no change was observed in fibrinopeptide A at 90 min (baseline 2.8 vs. 3.0 nmol/liter, p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

During thrombolytic therapy with both fibrin-specific and non-fibrin-specific drugs, there is an increase in thrombin generation despite concomitant administration of intravenous heparin.

Activation of the hemostatic system during thrombolytic therapy

Activation of the hemostatic mechanism has been described during thrombolytic therapy. This phenomenon has been detected by new methods of assessing hemostatic system function, based on immunoenzymatic or radioimmunoassays. However, these methods are extremely sensitive and, unless they are performed in expert laboratories, carefully following the recommended procedures, they generate in vitro artifacts. A description of these methods is provided, as well as a critical review of the available studies. The correct use of these methods will provide us with an understanding of the complex response of the hemostatic system to pharmacologic thrombolysis.

Thrombolytic, antiplatelet, and antithrombotic agents

The relative efficacy and safety of individual thrombolytic agents, administered alone and with antiplatelet and antithrombotic drugs, in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction are presented. The clinical benefits and risks of treatment choices are discussed in relation to the mechanisms of the formation and prevention of thrombus and thrombolysis. It is concluded that streptokinase, tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), and anisoylated plasminogen-streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) significantly reduce mortality and improve left ventricular function equally, despite differences in the rate at which they achieve vascular patency, their durations of action, and the extent to which their use is associated with adverse events. The questions of how best to minimize reocclusion/reinfarction, bleeding, and stroke are discussed, with particular focus on the beneficial use of aspirin and the unresolved issue of how best to use heparin.