Determining surgical indications for acute type B dissection based on enlargement of aortic diameter during the chronic phase

Mechanisms of aortic dissection: From pathological changes to experimental and in silico models

Aortic dissection continues to be responsible for significant morbidity and mortality, although recent advances in medical data assimilation and in experimental and in silico models have improved our understanding of the initiation and progression of the accumulation of blood within the aortic wall. Hence, there remains a pressing necessity for innovative and enhanced models to more accurately characterize the associated pathological changes. Early on, experimental models were employed to uncover mechanisms in aortic dissection, such as hemodynamic changes and alterations in wall microstructure, and to assess the efficacy of medical implants. While experimental models were once the only option available, more recently they are also being used to validate in silico models. Based on an improved understanding of the deteriorated microstructure of the aortic wall, numerous multiscale material models have been proposed in recent decades to study the state of stress in dissected aortas, including the changes associated with damage and failure. Furthermore, when integrated with accessible patient-derived medical data, in silico models prove to be an invaluable tool for identifying correlations between hemodynamics, wall stresses, or thrombus formation in the deteriorated aortic wall. They are also advantageous for model-guided design of medical implants with the aim of evaluating the deployment and migration of implants in patients. Nonetheless, the utility of in silico models depends largely on patient-derived medical data, such as chosen boundary conditions or tissue properties. In this review article, our objective is to provide a thorough summary of medical data elucidating the pathological alterations associated with this disease. Concurrently, we aim to assess experimental models, as well as multiscale material and patient data-informed in silico models, that investigate various aspects of aortic dissection. In conclusion, we present a discourse on future perspectives, encompassing aspects of disease modeling, numerical challenges, and clinical applications, with a particular focus on aortic dissection. The aspiration is to inspire future studies, deepen our comprehension of the disease, and ultimately shape clinical care and treatment decisions.

Questions and Certainty in Diagnosis and Management of Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a severe cardiovascular condition that requires timely diagnosis and intervention to prevent life-threatening complications. The aim of this review was to focus on the most crucial and controversial aspects of contemporary TBAD management. It is recognized that in the acute phase, computed tomography angiography (CTA) plays an essential role in evaluating the extent of the dissection and monitoring disease progression. CTA has significantly improved the management of TBAD by providing detailed assessments of aortic anatomy and dynamic flow changes, positioning it as the cornerstone imaging modality for identifying acute high-risk patients who may require early intervention. Recently, new advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) technology have the potential to provide further information beyond imaging alone. However, such sophisticated techniques should be reserved for stable patients after the acute phase. After decades of medical therapy and high risk surgery, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery for complicated TBAD, offering lower perioperative morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, its use in uncomplicated TBAD remains a topic of ongoing debate. While recent studies suggest that preemptive TEVAR combined with optimal medical therapy may reduce late adverse events and improve long-term outcomes, these findings remain controversial. This review critically analyzes the current literature on both diagnosis and TEVAR treatment, evaluating these controversies in the context of clinical practice.

Outcomes of Secondary Endovascular Aortic Repair After Frozen Elephant Trunk

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the midterm outcomes of secondary extension of frozen elephant trunk (FET) by means of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

METHODS

This single-center prospective study was conducted in a tertiary aortic center on consecutive patients having undergone TEVAR with an endograft covering most of the 10 cm FET module with 2 to 4 mm oversizing. All patients were monitored by computerized tomography angiography (CTA) at sixth month and yearly thereafter.

RESULTS

From January 2015 to July 2022, among 159 patients who received FET, 30 patients (18.8%) underwent a TEVAR procedure (13 for a thoracoabdominal aneurysm, 11 for a chronic aortic dissection and 6 for an emergency procedure). All connections were successfully achieved with 2 postoperative deaths (6.6%) and 1 paraplegia (3.3%). At a median follow-up of 21 months (interquartile range [IQR], 4.2-34.7), 5 patients (25%) required a fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) extension followed by 4 patients with 5 reinterventions, 3 for a Type 3 endoleak due to disconnection between FET and TEVAR endograft, and 2 unrelated to the FET for a secondary Type 1C endoleak. All reinterventions were successful, without mortality or morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, FET connection with a TEVAR endograft was effective with low postoperative morbidity but with a risk of aortic reintervention related to disconnection between the FET and TEVAR endograft. These results suggest the need for annual CTA monitoring with no time limit in patients following connection of the FET with a TEVAR endograft.

CLINICAL IMPACT

In this series of 30 patients, midterm outcomes of secondary extension of frozen elephant trunk (FET) by thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) showed 3 disconnections (10%) with a Type 3 endoleak between FET and TEVAR. These findings suggest the need for annual CTA monitoring with no time limit. But so far, only a few studies provide some information after one year while the risk of disconnection increases over time and becomes a concern after 3 years. This is the new message brought by our study.

Early three-dimensional growth in uncomplicated type B aortic dissection is associated with long-term outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Late adverse events (LAEs) are common among initially uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD); however, identifying those patients at highest risk of LAEs remains a significant challenge. Early false lumen (FL) growth has been suggested to increase risk, but confident determination of growth is often hampered by error in two-dimensional clinical measurements. Semi-automated three-dimensional (3D) mapping of aortic growth, such as by vascular deformation mapping (VDM), can potentially overcome this limitation using computed tomography angiograms (CTA). We hypothesized that FL growth in the early pre-dissection phase by VDM can accurately predict LAEs.

METHODS

We performed a two-center retrospective study of patients with uTBAD, with paired CTAs in the acute (1-14 days) and subacute/early chronic (1-6 months) periods. VDM analysis was used to map 3D growth. Standard clinical CT measures (ie, aortic diameters, tear characteristics) were also collected. Multivariate analysis was conducted using a decision tree and Cox proportional hazards model. LAEs were defined as aneurysmal FL (>55 mm); rapid growth (>5 mm within 6 months); aorta-specific mortality, rupture, or re-dissection.

RESULTS

A total of 107 (69% male) patients with uTBAD initially met inclusion criteria with a median follow-up of 7.3 years (interquartile range [IQR], 4.7-9.9 years). LAEs occurred in 72 patients (67%) at 2.5 years (IQR, 0.7-4.8 years) after the initial event. A multivariate decision tree model identified VDM growth (>2.1 mm) and baseline diameter (>42.7 mm) as optimal predictors of LAEs (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.94), achieving an 87% accuracy (sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 76%) after leave-one-out validation. Guideline reported high-risk features were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Early growth of the FL in uTBAD was the best tested indicator for LAEs and improves upon the current gold-standard of baseline diameter in selecting patients for early prophylactic thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Integrated multi-omics profiling reveals neutrophil extracellular traps potentiate Aortic dissection progression

Adverse aortic remodeling increases the risk of aorta-related adverse events (AAEs) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and affects the overall prognosis of aortic dissection (AD). It is imperative to delve into the exploration of prognostic indicators to streamline the identification of individuals at elevated risk for postoperative AAEs, and therapeutic targets to optimize the efficacy of TEVAR for patients with AD. Here, we perform proteomic and single-cell transcriptomic analyses of peripheral blood and aortic lesions, respectively, from patients with AD and healthy subjects. The integrated multi-omics profiling identifies that highly phenotype-associated macrophages orchestrate neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) through CXCL3/CXCR2 axis, thereby promoting the development of AD. Increased NETs formation is a defining feature of systemic immunity and aortic microenvironment of AD. Inhibiting NETs formation through the blockade of citrullinated histone H3 or CXCL3/CXCR2 axis ameliorates the progression and rupture of aortic dissection in male mice. The plasma level of citrullinated histone H3 predicts AAEs following endovascular therapy, facilitating the risk stratification and prognostic evaluation for patients with AD.

Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Repair of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms

The thoracic aorta is a dynamic structure composed of the aortic root, ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta. It is subject to the pressure and volume of the cardiac cycle and susceptible to atherosclerotic and aneurysmal changes. With these changes, the risk for acute aortic syndromes increases, thus creating the impetus for earlier interventions. The previous standard of open surgical repair has undergone a transition in recent years toward endovascular repair being favored in the descending and abdominal aortas with ongoing investigation into approaches for the ascending and aortic arch. These therapies have been shown to improve early mortality and morbidity outcomes with the caveat of more interventions compared with open surgery. We undertook this review to analyze the current data available regarding long-term outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular repair for thoracic aortic disease. The data support long-term benefit of endovascular repair for thoracic aortic disease. The primary indications identified for reintervention are endoleak and further aneurysmal degeneration. As the devices available for endovascular repair evolve, ongoing review of these outcomes will be necessary. It will also be important to trend the results as further techniques become available for endovascular repair of the ascending aorta and aortic arch.

Mid-Term Outcomes Following TEVAR for Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection

Objective: To evaluate the mid-term outcomes following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for chronic type B aortic dissection (TBD), especially to know which re-entry closure affects the thoracic false lumen remodeling in the late chronic TBD. Methods: From April 2017 to April 2022, 25 patients with chronic TBD underwent TEVAR. The late chronic TBD received the re-entry closure including stent-graft deployment in the renal artery, infrarenal aorta, and unilateral or bilateral iliac artery. Results: Complete shrinkage of the thoracic false lumen was accomplished in 67% of the early chronic cases but only 13% of the late chronic cases. The thoracic false lumen shrinkage over 5 mm in diameter was obtained in 78% of the early chronic cases and 69% of the late chronic cases. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses revealed the re-entry closure of common or external iliac artery affects the thoracic false lumen remodeling. Conclusion: The re-entry closure in the common or external iliac artery could affect the thoracic false lumen remodeling following TEVAR for the late chronic TBD. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2023; 32: 351-356).

Interventions in Acute or Subacute Phase for Type B Aortic Dissection

The treatment strategy for acute and subacute Stanford type B aortic dissection has changed significantly since the advent of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Indication for invasive treatment: In addition to the conventional complicated cases (rupture or malperfusion case), the indication for invasive treatment now includes cases with refractory hypertension, persistent or recurrent pain, large aortic diameter, and other conditions that are considered to have a poor prognosis with conservative treatment. Treatment methods: TEVAR is the first choice for acute, subacute, and early chronic-stage treatment, and when this is not possible, other techniques (fenestration and graft replacement) are chosen. Treatment timing: The timing of invasive treatment should be emergent in life-threatening conditions (for rupture or malperfusion case) and immediate in symptomatic cases, while in other cases, preemptive TEVAR is considered appropriate on a scheduled timing within 6 months of onset. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2023; 32: 157-163.).

Morphologic prognostic factor for thoracoabdominal aortic dilation after acute type A dissection repair

OBJECTIVES

Risk factors for late-term aortic dilation after acute type A aortic dissection repair have not been well examined. The goal of this study was to determine the relationship between the abdominal aortic true lumen location and thoraco-abdominal aortic dilation after surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection.

METHODS

Patients who were preoperatively diagnosed with acute type A aortic dissection between April 2014 and July 2022 were included in this study. We evaluated the renal artery-level dissected aortic morphology and classified the study population into 2 groups: the ventral (those with the true lumen located on the ventral side) and the dorsal (other patients not assigned to the ventral group) groups, based on the location of the true lumen. Aortic dilation was defined as thoraco-abdominal aortic expansion ≥5 mm on 1-year postoperative computed tomography images.

RESULTS

We examined 49 surgical patients who were assigned to the ventral (n = 22) and dorsal (n = 27) groups. The number of patients with ≥5 mm thoraco-abdominal aortic dilation after the operation was significantly higher in the ventral group than in the dorsal group (90.9% vs 51.9%, P = 0.009). The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the ventral type was an independent prognostic factor for thoraco-abdominal aortic dilation after the operation (odds ratio, 6.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.56-23.77; P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The location of the true lumen of the abdominal aorta in acute type A aortic dissection may be a prognostic factor for thoraco-abdominal aortic dilation after surgical repair.

Fenestrated Thoracic Endovascular Repair for Acute Type B Aortic Dissection with Isolated Left Vertebral Artery: A Case Report

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD) has been discussed for its potential to prevent future aortic events. We present a fenestrated TEVAR in the case of an 86-year-old man with acute uTBAD with an isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA). The ILVA originated from the distal side of the left subclavian artery, the left subclavian artery, and the intramural hematoma with an ulcer-like projection extended close to the left subclavian artery. We selected a fenestrated stent graft to achieve a proximal healthy landing. This case demonstrates that a fenestrated stent graft for acute uTBAD is useful for preserving arch vessels.

Prognostic impact of early aortic volume changes at hospital discharge in patients with acute type B aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

Early prediction of aorta-related events is important for determining subsequent treatment strategies in patients with acute aortic dissection. However, most studies evaluated long-term aortic growth rates by annual assessment. The purpose of our study was to determine whether the in-hospital growth rate of aortic volume was associated with aorta-related events.

METHODS

We studied 116 patients with uncomplicated type B acute aortic dissection. We analyzed whether changes in aortic volume were associated with aorta-related events during a 5-year follow-up. According to the growth rate from admission to discharge, patients were divided into two groups: Increase >0 (aortic volume: n = 59, aortic diameter: n = 43) and Reduction ≤0 (aortic volume: n = 57, aortic diameter: n = 73) in maximum aortic diameter or aortic volume. The primary endpoint was the discriminative ability of the growth rate of aortic volume for aorta-related events.

RESULTS

According to the evaluation of aortic volume changes, the Increase group had significantly higher aorta-related event rates than those in the Reduction group (49.2 % vs. 3.5 %, respectively; p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed that the growth rate of aortic volume had a clearly useful discrimination, with an area under the curve of 0.84, whereas the discriminative ability of the growth rate of maximum aortic diameter was poor (area under the curve: 0.53). Multivariate analysis showed that the growth rate of aortic volume from admission to discharge was an independent predictor of aorta-related events (hazard ratio, 26.3; 95 % confidence interval, 2.04-286.49; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital evaluation of aortic volume was helpful to predict long-term aorta-related events in patients with uncomplicated type B acute aortic dissection.

Need for and update on clinical trials for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection

The mainstay of management for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection is currently optimal medical therapy, targeting blood pressure and heart rate, along with serial imaging. There is a paucity of data that informs whether early intervention with thoracic endografting in this group of patients will promote aortic remodeling and better long-term outcomes. Investigations to date, including the Investigation of Stent Grafts in Aortic Dissection (INSTEAD), INSTEAD-XL, and Acute Dissection: Stent Graft or Best Medical Therapy (ADSORB) studies, have compared thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with optimal medical therapy in patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection but have not shown a benefit for TEVAR conclusively. We discuss three major new randomized trials, which will recruit concurrently in Scandinavia (the Scandinavian trial of uncomplicated aortic dissection therapy [SUNDAY] trial), in the United States (the IMPRoving outcomes in vascular DisEase - aortic dissection [IMPROVE-AD] trial) and the United Kingdom (the Early aortic repair in patients needing endovascular surgery for type B aortic dissection [EARNEST] trial), which promise to provide conclusive, level 1 evidence to decipher whether early TEVAR in this cohort of patients in beneficial.

Clinical Outcomes and Factors Associated With Aortic Shrinkage After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Aneurysmal Chronic Aortic Dissection

PURPOSE

The effectiveness of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for chronic aortic dissection (AD) with aneurysmal degeneration remains controversial. We retrospectively investigated clinical outcomes and assessed predictors of aortic shrinkage after TEVAR for chronic aneurysmal AD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2010 and December 2021, 70 patients with double-barrel-type chronic AD were enrolled. Major intimal tears in thoracic aorta were covered by stent graft. Early and late clinical outcomes, and diameter change of downstream aorta during follow-up period were reviewed. Subsequently, factors associated with aortic shrinkage were assessed by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Mean age was 63 (interquartile range [IQR]: 54-68) years, 54 (80%) men, median duration from AD onset was 4 (IQR: 1-10) years, and maximum aortic diameter was 53 (IQR: 49-58) mm. Supra-aortic debranching procedure was required in 57 (81%) patients. Early aorta-related death occurred in 2 (3%) patients. Both stroke and spinal cord ischemia occurred in 1 (2%) patient. Five-year freedom rates from aorta-related death and reintervention were 96% and 51%, respectively. Sixty-four patients underwent follow-up computed tomography (84%) 1 year after TEVAR, with 33 (52%) achieving aortic shrinkage. In multivariable analysis, duration from AD onset (per year) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.82, 0.70-0.97; p=0.017) and maximum aortic-diameter ratio between aortic arch and descending aorta (per 0.1) (morphologic index; OR: 1.34, 1.04-1.74; p=0.023) were independent aortic shrinkage predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic AD with aneurysmal degeneration achieved satisfactory survival outcomes, but with a considerable reintervention rate. Duration from AD onset and preoperative aortic morphology could affect post-TEVAR aortic shrinkage. Earlier intervention could lead to better aortic shrinkage.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic aortic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration showed low incidence of early and late aorta-related death. By contrast, aortic shrinkage rate was low with high incidence of reintervention to the residual downstream aorta. According to the assessment of preoperative variables, chronicity and aortic morphology could predict postoperative aortic shrinkage.

Gore TAG thoracic branch endograft for treatment of a subacute type B aortic dissection complicated by rupture

An 80-year-old man presented with a subacute zone 3-5 type B aortic dissection complicated by rupture and visceral and lower extremity malperfusion. He underwent emergent zone 2 repair with a Gore TAG thoracic branch endograft with inclusion of the left subclavian artery for a dominant left vertebral artery. The patient's postoperative course was uncomplicated. Type B aortic dissections can be anatomically complex, and rupture is a rare complication in the subacute phase. We report the novel use of a Gore TAG thoracic branch endograft for the management of type B aortic dissection complicated by rupture and demonstrate its feasibility for patients with type B aortic dissection complicated by rupture.

Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: Challenges in Diagnosis and Categorisation

BACKGROUND

Acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a rare disease that is likely under-diagnosed in the UK. As a progressive, dynamic clinical entity, many patients initially diagnosed with uncomplicated TBAD deteriorate, developing end-organ malperfusion and aortic rupture (complicated TBAD). An evaluation of the binary approach to the diagnosis and categorisation of TBAD is needed.

METHODS

A narrative review of the risk factors predisposing patients to progression from unTBAD to coTBAD was undertaken.

RESULTS

Key high-risk features predispose the development of complicated TBAD, such as maximal aortic diameter > 40 mm and partial false lumen thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

An appreciation of the factors that predispose to complicated TBAD would aid clinical decision-making surrounding TBAD.

Surgical outcomes associated with sleep apnea syndrome in Stanford A aortic dissection patients

Background

Patients suffering from aortic dissection (AD) often experience sleep apnea syndrome (SAS), which aggravates their respiratory function and aortic false lumen expansion.

Methods

We analyzed the peri-operative data of Stanford A AD patients, with or without SAS, between January 2017 and June 2019. Subjects were separated into SAS positive (SAS⁺) and SAS negative (SAS⁻) cohorts, based on the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) and the Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI). We next analyzed variables between the SAS⁺ and SAS⁻ groups.

Results

155, out of 198 AAD patients, were enlisted for this study. SAS⁺ patients exhibited higher rates of pneumonia (p < 0.001), heart failure (HF, p = 0.038), acute kidney injury (AKI, p = 0.001), ventilation time (p = 0.009), and hospitalization duration (p < 0.001). According to subsequent follow-ups, the unstented aorta false lumen dilatation (FLD) rate increased markedly, with increasing degree of SAS (p < 0.001, according to AHI and ODI). The SAS⁺ patients exhibited worse cumulative survival rate (p = 0.025). The significant risk factors (RF) for poor survival were: severe (p = 0.002) or moderate SAS (p = 0.008), prolonged ventilation time (p = 0.018), AKI (p = 0.015), HF New York Heart Association (NYHA) IV (p = 0.005) or III (p = 0.015), pneumonia (p = 0.005), Marfan syndrome (p = 0.010), systolic blood pressure (BP) upon arrival (p = 0.009), and BMI ≥ 30 (p = 0.004).

Conclusions

SAS⁺ Stanford A AD patients primarily exhibited higher rates of complications and low survival rates in the mid-time follow-up. Hence, the RFs associated with poor survival must be monitored carefully in SAS patients. Moreover, the FLD rate is related to the degree of SAS, thus treating SAS may mitigate FLD.

Fate and Consequences of the False Lumen after TEVAR in Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) occurs due to an entry tear in the intimal layer of the aorta distal to the origin of the left subclavian artery where blood enters the newly formed false lumen (FL) and extends distally or proximally to form a dissection over an indeterminate length of the aorta which, over time, may eventually rupture. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) aims to seal off the entry tear proximally with the stent-graft, occluding the origin of the dissection and excluding the FL. Nevertheless, in some cases, the perfusion to the FL is maintained, hindering the aortic remodelling process and increasing the risk of aneurysmal degeneration and rupture, particularly in the abdominal aorta where evidence suggest that remodelling is slower. This review examines the long-term effects of a patent or partially thrombosed FL on clinical outcomes following TEVAR in TBAD, also highlighting the pathological processes behind negative aortic remodelling. Another aim of this review is to provide an overview and appraisal of the currently available techniques for managing a patent or partially thrombosed FL to prevent long-term morbidity occurring.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using several search engines including PubMed, Ovid, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase to identify and extract relevant studies.

RESULTS

Evidence in the literature show that a partially thrombosed FL is more dangerous than a patent FL due to the occlusion of the distal re-entry tears, impeding outflow and increasing mean arterial and diastolic pressures, whereas the latter is decompressed via distal re-entry sites. FL thrombosis and satisfactory remodelling is sometimes achieved in as few as 40% of patients after TEVAR due to the maintained perfusion of the FL either at the level of the thoracic or abdominal aorta. However, although the thoracic aorta is predominantly covered by the TEVAR stent-graft, poorer remodelling and more dilation is seen in the abdominal aorta. Several techniques are available to embolize the FL, including the Provisional Extension to Induce Complete Attachment, Stent Assisted Balloon Induced Intimal Disruption and Relamination in Aortic Dissection Repair, candy-plug, and Knickerbocker techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of TBAD is invariably TEVAR to seal off the proximal entry tear while extending the repair distally to completely exclude the FL. A risk of aortic wall dilatation distal to TEVAR stent-graft remains; hence, regular monitoring and accurate imaging are essential. At present, a patent FL can be treated using a range of different endovascular techniques.

Risk profile analysis of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair: Laboratory and radiographic predictors

BACKGROUND

There is emerging evidence to support pre-emptive thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) intervention for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (unTBAD). Pre-emptive intervention would be particularly beneficial in patients that have a higher baseline risk of progressing to complicated TBAD (coTBAD). There remain debate on the optimal clinical, laboratory, morphological, and radiological parameters, which would identify the highest-risk patients that would benefit most from pre-emptive TEVAR.

AIM

This review summarizes evidence on the clinical, laboratory, and morphological parameters that increase the risk profiles of unTBAD patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was carried out on multiple electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, and Scopus to collate all research evidence on the clinical, laboratory, and morphological parameters that increase the risk profiles of unTBAD patients RESULTS: At present, there are no clear clinical guidelines using risk-stratification to inform the selection of unTBAD patients for TEVAR. However, there are noticeable literature trends that can assist with the identification of the most at-risk unTBAD patients. Patients are at particular risk when they have refractory pain and/or hypertension, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), larger aortic diameter, and larger entry tears. These risks should be considered alongside factors that increase the procedural risk of TEVAR to create a well-balanced approach. Advances in biomarkers and imaging are likely to identify more pertinent parameters in the future to optimize the development of balanced, risk-stratified treatment protocols.

CONCLUSION

There are a variety of risk profiling parameters that can be used to identify the high-risk unTBAD patient, with novel biomarkers and imaging parameters emerging. Longer-term evidence verifying these parameters would be ideal. Further randomized controlled trials and multicentre registry analyses are also warranted to guide risk-stratified selection protocols.

Criteria for endovascular intervention in type B aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

The use of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for the management of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (un-TBAD) remains controversial. There is a lack of consensus over whether pre-emptive TEVAR should be carried out in patients with un-TBAD at risk of progression to complicated TBAD. We present a review of current evidence and seek to suggest criteria where endovascular intervention in un-TBAD may prove beneficial relative to pharmacotherapy alone.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched using terms including: type B aortic dissection, risk factors, medical therapy, TEVAR, false lumen (FL) expansion, and mortality. Papers were selected based on title and abstract.

RESULTS

Optimal medical therapy remains the mainstay treatment for patients with un-TBAD, however, patients with un-TBAD present with varying degrees of disease progression risk. Factors such as age, aortic morphology, history of connective tissue disorders, FL thrombosis, and aortic branch involvement may potentiate progression from un-TBAD to complicated TBAD. Short- and long-term outcomes associated with TEVAR for TBAD remain promising.

CONCLUSION

Pre-emptive TEVAR may be beneficial in patients with un-TBAD presenting with the above factors, however, further prospective research into the optimal timing for TEVAR in un-TBAD is required.

Differences in the Area of Proximal and Distal Entry Tears at CT Angiography Predict Long-term Clinical Outcomes in Aortic Dissection

Purpose

To identify entry tear variables that are related to adverse clinical events by using CT angiography (CTA) performed during the subacute phase of aortic dissection.

Materials and Methods

In this prospective study conducted from January 2000 to December 2013, participants with an aortic dissection with a patent false lumen and no comorbidities underwent CTA during the subacute phase. Participants were followed up for a survival analysis to assess the time to an adverse aortic event (AAE). The maximum aortic diameter (MAD), proximal and distal tear areas and difference between these areas, and partial false-lumen thrombosis were assessed by using Cox regression for adverse events.

Results

Seventy-two participants (mean age, 55 years ± 12 [standard deviation]; 55 men) were evaluated: 47 were surgically treated (type A aortic dissection) and 25 were medically treated (type B aortic dissection). Twenty-two participants had an AAE manifest during follow-up (9.22 years ± 5.78): There were 18 elective surgeries for aneurysmal degeneration, two emergent surgeries for acute aortic syndrome, and two aortic condition-related deaths. A categorical model composed of genetic aortic disease (GAD) (hazard ratio [HR], 3.4 [95% CI: 1.2, 9.9]; P = .02), MAD greater than 45 mm (HR, 6.1 [95% CI: 2.4, 15.8]; P < .001), and tear dominance (HR, 5.2 [95% CI: 2.1, 13]; P < .001), defined as an absolute tear area difference of greater than 1.2 cm², was used to stratify participants into three risk groups: low, without any risk factors (57% [41 of 72] and 7% [three of 41] had events); intermediate, with one risk factor (31% [22 of 72] and 50% [11 of 22] had events); and high, with two or more risk factors (13% [nine of 72] and 89% [eight of nine] had events; log rank P < .001).

Conclusion

Tear dominance demonstrated at CTA performed in the subacute phase of aortic dissection was related to long-term adverse events. Participants without GAD, dominant tears, or MAD greater than 45 mm had conditions that were safely managed with optimal medical treatment and imaging follow-up.Keywords: CT Angiography, Vascular, Aorta, Dissection Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021See also commentary by Fleischmann and Burris in this issue.

Influence of nocturnal hypoxemia on follow-up course after type B acute aortic syndrome

Introduction

Association between sleep nocturnal breathing disorders and acute aortic syndrome (AAS) has been described but mid-term data are scarce.

Objectives

We assessed the prognostic value of sleep apnea parameters and their relationship with aortic morphology after the onset of a type B AAS.

Methods

Between January 2010 and January 2018, sleep apnea screening in post type B AAS was prospectively performed. The association of sleep apnea parameters with aortic morphology and aortic expansion during follow-up was studied.

Results

Over the 8-year-study period, 103 patients were included, with a mean age of 57.8 ± 12.1 years old. Median follow-up was 25.0 months (11.0–51.0). Thirty-two patients (31%) required aortic stenting during the acute phase. In patients treated by aortic stenting, the descending thoracic aortic diameter was positively associated with a higher percentage of nocturnal time of saturation ≤ 90% after adjustment (p = 0.016). During follow-up, the nocturnal time of saturation ≤ 90% in patients treated by medical therapy was the only parameter associated with significant aortic expansion rate (r = 0.26, p = 0.04). Thirty-eight patients started and sustained nocturnal ventilation during follow-up. The association between aortic expansion rate and nocturnal time of saturation ≤ 90% did not persist during follow-up after adjustment on nocturnal ventilation initiation (r = 0.25, p = 0.056).

Conclusions

Nocturnal hypoxemia parameters are positively associated with the max onset aortic diameter and significant aortic growth after type B AAS. Nocturnal ventilation seems to mitigate aortic expansion during follow-up.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-021-01778-y.

Predictors of Long-Term Aortic Growth and Disease Progression in Patients with Aortic Dissection, Intramural Hematoma, and Penetrating Aortic Ulcer

BACKGROUND

We aimed to identify predictors of long-term aortic diameter change and disease progression in a population cohort of patients with newly diagnosed aortic dissection (AD), intramural hematoma (IMH), or penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU).

METHODS

We used the Rochester Epidemiology Project record linkage system to identify all Olmsted County, MN-USA, residents diagnosed with AD, IMH, and PAU (1995-2015). The endpoints were aortic diameter change, freedom from clinical disease progression (any related intervention, aortic aneurysm, new aortic syndrome, rupture or death) and disease resolution (complete spontaneous radiological disappear). Linear regression was used to assess aortic growth rate; predictors of disease progression were identified with Cox proportional hazards.

RESULTS

Of 133 incident cases, 46 ADs, 12 IMHs, and 28 PAUs with sufficient imaging data were included. Overall median follow-up was 8.1 years. Aortic diameter increase occurred in 40 ADs (87%, median 1.0 mm/year), 5 IMHs (42%, median 0.2 mm/year) and 14 PAUs (50%, median 0.4 mm/year). Symptomatic presentation (P = 0.045), connective tissue disorders (P = 0.005), and initial aortic diameter >42 mm (P = 0.013) were associated with AD growth rate. PAU depth >9 mm (P = 0.047) and female sex (P = 0.013) were associated with aortic growth rate in PAUs and IMHs. At 10 years, freedom from disease progression was 22% (95% CI 12-41) for ADs, 44% (95% CI 22-92) for IMHs, and 46% (95% CI 27-78) for PAUs. DeBakey I/IIIB AD (HR 3.09; P = 0.038), initial IMH aortic diameter (HR 1.4; P = 0.037) and PAU depth >10 mm (HR 3.92; P = 0.018) were associated with disease progression. No AD spontaneously resolved; resolution rate at 10 years was 22% (95% CI 0-45) for IMHs and 11% (95% CI 0-23) for PAUs.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic growth and clinical disease progression are observed in most patients with aortic syndromes, while spontaneous resolution is uncommon. Predictors of aortic growth and disease progression may be used to tailor appropriate follow-up and eventual early intervention.

Descending Aorta Diameters as Predictor of Late Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

A subset of patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD) has been shown to possess higher risk of experiencing late adverse outcomes. Therefore, we conducted an analysis to investigate the role of descending aorta diameters, including total descending aorta diameter and false lumen diameter, as predictor of late adverse outcomes in patients with uTBAD.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed through Pubmed, ClinicalKey, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies. Our primary outcome was the composite late adverse events following their first episode of hospitalization. All meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager version 5.4.

RESULTS

A total of 2,339 (male 68.8%) patients from a total of 15 cohorts were included in our analysis. During follow-up period, there were 655 (27.3%) and 149 (6.3%) cases of late adverse events and mortality, respectively. Patients with higher initial descending aorta diameter were at higher risk of developing late adverse events (RR 2.99 [2.60, 3.44]; P < 0.001) and mortality (RR 3.15 [2.34, 4.25]; P <0.001) throughout follow-up period. Maximum false lumen diameter at the initial presentation seemed to significantly be associated with late adverse events (RR 1.87 [1.46, 2.39]; P <0.001) but not with mortality (RR 2.55 [0.81-8.00; P = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

Descending aorta diameters, particularly maximum initial descending aorta diameter, is a good and helpful predictor of late adverse outcomes in patients with uTBAD.

Postoperative Maximal Aortic Diameter is a Significant Predictor of Dilation of the Residual Dissected Aorta after Aortic Replacement for Acute Debakey Type I Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the impact of aortic diameter on late aortic dilation of the residual dissected aorta after tear-oriented aortic replacement for acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection.

METHODS

Of 133 patients who underwent aortic replacement for acute DeBakey type I/II aortic dissection between 2008 and 2019, 45 patients with a residual dissected aorta after surgery for acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection and who underwent computed tomography at predischarge and after 1 year were retrospectively assessed. The aortic diameter and false lumen area were measured at 3 levels: the maximal aortic site, seventh thoracic vertebra, and celiac axis. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was employed to identify the predictors of late aortic dilation, defined as an aortic growth rate of ≥5 mm/year or a maximal aortic diameter of ≥55 mm.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 75 [range: 13-152] months, 6 patients (5 men; mean age: 57 ± 14 years) experienced aortic dilation. All 6 patients had the maximal aortic diameter between the distal aortic arch and seventh thoracic vertebra level at the last computed tomography. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that the predischarge maximal aortic diameter was an independent determinant of late aortic dilation (hazard ratio: 2.28/mm, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-5.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Predischarge maximal aortic diameter is a significant predictor of late aortic dilation in patients with a residual dissected aorta after tear-oriented surgical repair of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection.

Aortic enlargement in two weeks is associated with subsequent aortic events in patients with type B acute aortic syndrome

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether aortic enlargement in 2 weeks in patients with type B acute aortic syndrome is associated with aorta-related adverse events.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study included 183 patients who were diagnosed with uncomplicated type B acute aortic syndrome (classic aortic dissection and intramural hematoma) between 2010 and 2019 and had follow-up computed tomography at second or third week. Aortic diameter was measured at admission and at predischarge follow-up. Aorta-related adverse events were defined by a composite of aortic rupture, surgical or endovascular aortic repair, redissection, severe intestinal malperfusion, and aortic enlargement.

RESULTS

The patients whose aortic diameter enlarged ≥2 mm but <5 mm in 2 weeks were categorized as moderate aortic enlargement group. During follow-up, 51 patients (28%) had aorta-related adverse events and 36 patients (20%) had moderate aortic enlargement. Patients with moderate aortic enlargement showed lower aorta-related event-free survival rates than those without moderate enlargement (48 ± 9% vs 90 ± 3% at 1 year, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, moderate aortic enlargement (subhazard ratio, 3.64; 95% confidence interval, 2.08-6.35; P < .001) and aortic diameter ≥40 mm at admission (subhazard ratio, 2.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.60-5.48; P < .001) were associated with aorta-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate aortic enlargement in 2 weeks is a significant risk factor of aorta-related adverse events in patients with uncomplicated type B acute aortic syndrome. Patients with moderate aortic enlargement should be followed up carefully and may be candidates for subsequent endovascular treatment.

Predictors of adverse events in uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review with meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) has been selectively used for uncomplicated acute type B Aortic Dissection (TBAD); however, not all cases will benefit from TEVAR. A search for high risk clinical and radiographic predictors for complications is ongoing. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify predictors of major adverse events during follow-up of uncomplicated TBAD, in order to identify who might benefit from elective TEVAR.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

16 studies were included in a qualitative synthesis and 10 in the meta-analysis. Several risk factors associated to major adverse events have been described, including (1) aortic diameter ≥40 mm, (2) greater false lumen diameter (>22mm), (3) patent false lumen, (4) primary entry tear > 10mm, and (5) greater number of false lumen vessels origin. Quantitative synthesis identified an aortic diameter ≥40 mm significantly associated with major adverse events (HR=3.56; p<0.00001). Reporting of false lumen status, aortic diameters and growth, and demographic data was not always congruent with the most recent recommendations by Society for Vascular Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons, published in 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute and subacute patients with uncomplicated TBAD presenting with an aortic diameter ≥ 40 mm and solely treated with BMT have an increased hazard of developing major adverse events (HR), making them potential candidates for TEVAR. Remaining risk factors analysed have weaker evidence.

Noninvasive Morphologic and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Type B Aortic Dissection: State of the Art and Future Perspectives

Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is associated with relatively high rates of morbidity and mortality, and appropriate treatment selection is important for optimizing patient outcomes. Depending on individualized risk factors, clinical presentation, and imaging findings, patients are generally stratified to optimal medical therapy anchored by antihypertensives or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Using standard anatomic imaging with CT or MRI, several high-risk features including aortic diameter, false lumen (FL) features, size of entry tears, involvement of major aortic branch vessels, or evidence of visceral malperfusion have been used to select patients likely to benefit from TEVAR. However, even with these measures, the number needed to treat for TEVAR remains, and improved risk stratification is needed. Increasingly, the relationship between FL hemodynamics and adverse aortic remodeling in TBAD has been studied, and evolving noninvasive techniques can measure numerous FL hemodynamic parameters that may improve risk stratification. In addition to summarizing the current clinical state of the art for morphologic TBAD evaluation, this review provides a detailed overview of noninvasive methods for TBAD hemodynamics characterization, including computational fluid dynamics and four-dimensional flow MRI. Keywords: CT, Image Postprocessing, MRI, Cardiac, Vascular, Aorta, Dissection © RSNA, 2021.

Aortic Dissection and Other Acute Aortic Syndromes: Diagnostic Imaging Findings from Acute to Chronic Longitudinal Progression

Acute aortic dissection is the prototype of acute aortic syndromes (AASs), which include intramural hematoma, limited intimal tear, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, traumatic or iatrogenic aortic dissection, and leaking or ruptured aortic aneurysm. The manifestation is usually sudden and catastrophic with acutely severe tearing chest or back pain. However, clinical symptoms do not allow distinction between AAS types and other acute pathologic conditions. Diagnostic imaging is essential to rapidly confirm and accurately diagnose the type, magnitude, and complications of AASs. CT fast acquisition of volumetric datasets has become instrumental in diagnosis, surveillance, and intervention planning. Most critical findings affecting initial intervention and prognosis are obtained at CT, including involvement of the ascending aorta, primary intimal tear location, rupture, malperfusion, size and patency of the false lumen, complexity and extent of the dissection, maximum caliber of the aorta, and progression or postintervention complications. Involvement of the ascending aorta-Stanford type A-has the most rapid lethal complications and requires surgical intervention to affect its morbidity and mortality. Lesions not involving the ascending aorta-Stanford type B-have a lesser rate of complications in the acute phase. During the acute to longitudinal progression, various specific and nonspecific imaging findings are encountered, including pleural and pericardial effusions, fluid collections, progression including aortic enlargement, and postoperative changes that can be discerned at CT. A systematic analysis algorithm is proposed for CT of the entire aorta throughout the continuum of AASs into the chronic and posttreated disease state, which synthesizes and communicates salient findings to all care providers. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Prognostic value of aerobic capacity and exercise oxygen pulse in postaortic dissection patients

BACKGROUND

Although recommendations encourage daily moderate activities in post aortic dissection, very little data exists regarding cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to personalize those patient's physical rehabilitation and assess their cardiovascular prognosis.

DESIGN

We aimed at testing the prognostic insight of CPET regarding aortic and cardiovascular events by exploring a prospective cohort of patients followed-up after acute aortic dissection.

METHODS

Patients referred to our department after an acute (type A or B) aortic dissection were prospectively included in a cohort between September 2012 and October 2017. CPET was performed once optimal blood pressure control was obtained. Clinical follow-up was done after CPET for new aortic event and major cardio-vascular events (MCE) not directly related to the aorta.

RESULTS

Among the 165 patients who underwent CPET, no adverse event was observed during exercise testing. Peak oxygen pulse was 1.46(1.22-1.84) mlO2/beat, that is, 97 (83-113) % of its predicted value, suggesting cardiac exercise limitation in a population under beta blockers (92% of the population). During a follow-up of 39(20-51) months from CPET, 42 aortic event recurrences and 22 MCE not related to aorta occurred. Low peak oxygen pulse (<85% of predicted value) was independently predictive of aortic event recurrence, while low peak oxygen uptake (<70% of predicted value) was an independent predictor of MCE occurrence.

CONCLUSION

CPET is safe in postaortic dissection patients should be used to not only to personalize exercise rehabilitation, but also to identify those patients with the highest risk for new aortic events and MCE not directly related to aorta.

18F-FDG uptake as a predictive factor for progressive aortic enlargement in aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

Progressive aortic enlargement (PAE) is a critical adverse event in patients with medically treated aortic dissection (AD). However, no reliable predictor of the PAE has been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for the prediction of PAE in patients with medically treated AD.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with AD who underwent optimal medical therapy were enrolled. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT examinations were performed in subacute phase (2 weeks-3 months) after the onset of AD. Target-to-background ratio (TBR) was measured as the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) in the dissected aortic wall divided by blood pool SUV. The relation between TBR and occurrence of PAE (> 10 mm/year) was evaluated.

RESULTS

PAE was observed in four patients during the median follow-up period of 24 months. The TBR measured in the 4 patients showing PAE was significantly higher than that in the remaining 12 patients without PAE (2.44 ± 0.56 vs 1.87 ± 0.33, P = 0.025). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of TBR for predicting PAE was 0.82. With a threshold of 2.34, the TBR showed the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of 75%, 92%, 75%, and 92%, respectively, for the prediction of PAE.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the dissected aortic wall as determined by TBR is associated with increased risk of PAE in patients with medically treated AD. TBR shows good specificity and negative predictive value for predicting PAE.

Aortic morphology post type A acute aortic syndrome: Prognosis significance and association with 24-hour blood pressure-monitoring parameters

BACKGROUND

After an emergent surgery for type A acute aortic syndrome, medical management is based on optimal blood pressure (BP) control. We assessed the prognostic significance of BP monitoring and its relationship with aortic morphology following type A acute aortic syndrome.

METHODS

The data of 120 patients who underwent BP monitoring after a type A acute aortic syndrome from January 2005 to June 2016 were retrospectively collected. The first CT angiogram performed after surgery was used for the morphological analysis.

RESULTS

The population included 79 males, with an overall mean age of 60 ± 12 years. Seven patients (5.8%) died during a median follow-up of 5.5 years. The median delay between BP monitoring and discharge was 3 (1-5) months. The mean 24-hour BP of the cohort was 127/73 mm Hg ± 10/17. During follow-up, different parameters of BP monitoring were not associated with the risk of aortic events. However, the diameter of the false lumen of the descending thoracic aorta was the best predictor associated with the risk of new aortic events during follow-up, particularly for the threshold of 28 mm or more (P < .001; Hazard ratio 4.7[2.7-8.2]). The diameter of the false lumen was associated with night-time systolic BP (P = .025; r = .2), 24-hour pulse pressure (P = .002; r = .28), and night-time pulse pressure (P = .008; r = .24).

CONCLUSION

The risk of new aortic events following type A acute aortic syndrome is associated with the size of the residual false lumen, but not directly with BP parameters. Night-time BP parameters are associated with the size of the residual false lumen.

Computed tomography-based hemodynamic index for aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

In this study we aimed to propose a new computed tomography-based hemodynamic indicator to quantify the functional significance of aortic dissection and predict post intervention luminal remodeling.

METHODS

Computational hemodynamics and 3D structural analyses were conducted in 51 patients with type B aortic dissection, at initial presentation and at approximately 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year post intervention. A functional index was proposed on the basis of luminal pressure difference. Statistical relationships between the proposed indicator and longitudinal luminal development were analyzed.

RESULTS

The computed luminal pressure difference (true lumen pressure minus false lumen pressure) varied overall from positive to negative along the aorta. The first balance position at which the pressure difference equals 0 was proposed as the functional indicator. A more distally located first balance position indicated better functional status. Implantation of stent graft distally shifted this balance position. Patients with the balance position shifted out of the dissected region (43%) presented the highest functional improvement after intervention; whereas those with the balance position shifted to the abdominal region (25%) showed unsatisfactory results. The magnitude of distal shifting of the first balance position at 3 months post intervention was statistically related to the subsequent true lumen expansion and false lumen reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

The first balance position of luminal pressure difference quantified the hemodynamic status of the dissected aorta. The magnitude of distal shifting of the balance position after intervention was associated with functional improvement and might be used predict longitudinal aortic remodeling.

Endovascular Therapy for Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection

Objectives: Endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta (TEVAR) represents a therapeutic option for type B aortic dissection. However, the optimal timing for TEVAR is controversial. We examined the outcomes of TEVAR for chronic type B dissection and reviewed aortic morphology using pre- and postoperative CT scan images.

Methods: Between 2012 and 2017, 12 patients underwent TEVAR for chronic type B dissection at our institution. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and operative data including CT scan images, comparing the values between early group (5 cases, 3 months to 1 year from initial dissection) and late group (7 cases, more than 1 year from initial dissection).

Results: There were no paraplegia, stroke, and death in our cohort. There was no difference in degree of the aortic remodeling between two groups.

Conclusions: Outcomes after TEVAR for chronic type B aortic dissection were favorable. Aortic remodeling could be obtained in selected patients by closing an entry with TEVAR procedure. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2018; 27: 281–287.)

Analysis of Risk Factors for Aortic Enlargement in Patients with Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection

Objectives: Uncomplicated type B aortic dissection is generally treated with medical management including antihypertensive therapy. The purpose of this study is to investigate risk factors associated with the aortic enlargement in medically treated patients. Methods: Between July 2004 and April 2016, 127 consecutive patients with acute type B aortic dissection were treated in our institution. Of these, 104 patients diagnosed with uncomplicated type B dissection were managed medically as an initial treatment. According to the diameter of the dissected aorta, these patients were retrospectively placed into 2 groups: 1) enlargement group (group E: n=36); and 2) unchanged group (group U: n=68). Results: There was statistically significant difference regarding the initial diameter of the dissected aorta (group E: 42±7 mm, group U: 36±7 mm) (p<0.01). As regards the aneurysm growth rate, a significant difference between both groups was noted (group E: 10±32 mm/half-year, group U -3±19 mm/half-year) (p<0.05). In all 104 patients, 42 patients (40.4%) had patent false lumen with the average number of 1.5 intimal tears. Multivariate analysis showed the relationship for aortic enlargement were patent false lumen (p<0.05, 95%CI 0.407-0.935) and initial aortic diameter (p<0.01, 95%CI 1.076-1.158). Aortic event free survival (1/5/10 years) was 100/86/77% in group E and 92/79/79% in group U, respectively no differences between two groups (p=0.747). Conclusions: The medically managed patients with uncomplicated chronic type B dissection showed excellent survival rate during long-term follow-up. The results of surgical or endovascular treatment in patients underwent initial medical therapy were also satisfactory. The patent false lumen and aortic diameter at the onset may impact on aortic enlargement. Considering our results, the feasibility of elective endovascular repairs in stable dissection remains controversial even in the endovascular era. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2018; 27: 55-60.).

Fate of uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection and impact of concurrent aortic dilatation on remote aortic events

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the reliable prognostic factors of mortality and subsequent aortic events during the follow-up of uncomplicated type B acute aortic dissection.

METHODS

From January 2004 to December 2014, 255 patients with uncomplicated type B acute aortic dissection were admitted to our hospital. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to identify risk factors for all-cause mortality, aorta-related mortality, and aortic events.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality was observed in 7 patients (2.7%). The rates of 5-year freedom from all-cause mortality, aorta-related mortality, and aortic events were 79.4% ± 2.9%, 93.3% ± 2.0%, and 71.7% ± 3.4%, respectively. The rate of 5-year freedom from aortic events was significantly lower among those with a patent false lumen (P = .006). Age and descending aorta diameter were independent risk factors of all-cause and aorta-related mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08 and 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.10 and 1.03-1.24; P = .0001 and .007, respectively). Independent risk factors for aortic events were descending aorta diameter, false lumen thickness, and dilatation of abdominal aorta (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.12; P = .006; HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.11; P = .00002; HR, 2.01; CI, 1.20-3.38; P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

In uncomplicated type B acute aortic dissection, the age and dilatation of the thoracic aorta were associated with a higher risk of death, whereas false lumen thickness and concurrent abdominal aortic dilatation augment the risk for aortic events.

Case Series of Aortic Arch Aneurysm in Patients with Bovine Arch Treated with Proximal Scalloped and Fenestrated Stent Graft

PURPOSE

The bovine arch is the most common variant of the aortic arch and occurs when the innominate artery shares a common origin with the left common carotid artery. We report an endovascular repair of aortic arch aneurysm in patients with a bovine arch using the Najuta proximal scalloped and fenestrated stent graft.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repairs using the Najuta stent graft were performed at our facility. It was inserted and deployed at a zone 0 with precise positional adjustment of the scallop of the stent graft to the brachiocephalic trunk.

RESULTS

Overall, eight patients with bovine aortic arch were treated with fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair. Technical success was 100% with no 30-day death. The follow-up period ranged from 7 to 29 (median 12) months. None of the patients had a stroke or paraplegia, and no endoleak was observed. All brachiocephalic trunks scalloped, and the left subclavian artery fenestrated vessels remained patent during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The Najuta stent graft repair of aortic arch aneurysms in patients with a bovine arch is a safe and effective treatment option, with good immediate and short-term results.

Current evidence in predictors of aortic growth and events in acute type B aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES

Acute type B aortic dissection can have a stable course or evolve into aneurysm and subsequent adverse events. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the morphologic predictors of an adverse course to establish their validity based on consistency of results.

METHODS

Fifty-one studies were included in this review, reporting on aortic size, false lumen (FL) size, primary entry tear (ET) size and location, status of FL thrombosis, number of ETs, branch vessels involvement, and FL longitudinal extent.

RESULTS

Some predictors showed good consistency, whereas others did not. Aortic size was the most investigated predictor. A larger diameter at presentation predicted worse outcomes, with few exceptions. Both FL size and size relative to true lumen size also predicted an adverse course, although a standardized measurement method was not used. Regarding primary ET size and location, evidence was sparse and somewhat conflicting. Although FL complete thrombosis was consistently associated with a more benign course, the role of partial thrombosis remained unclear and the concept of FL saccular formation might account for the inconsistency, but further evidence is needed. A higher number of re-entry tears was considered to be protective against false channel expansion, but results need to be confirmed. The predictive role of branch vessels involvement and FL longitudinal extent remain controversial.

CONCLUSIONS

Among several predictors of aortic growth and events in acute type B aortic dissection, controversial and even conflicting results have been described. Consistent evidence has been demonstrated only for two predictors: aortic size at presentation is associated with adverse events and total FL thrombosis has a protective role.

The incidence of delayed complications in acute type B aortic dissections is underestimated

OBJECTIVE

Acute type B aortic dissections (TBADs) can have immediate or delayed complications within the first 2 weeks. Because the majority of clinical series retrospectively categorized TBAD, the incidence and outcome of delayed complications in initially uncomplicated TBAD within the first 14 days are not well described.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 86 patients (78% male; age, 62.5 ± 13 years) with acute TBAD treated consecutively between January 2004 and May 2016 at a tertiary referral center. All TBADs were confirmed by computed tomography angiography (CTA) on admission, after 2 to 5 days, and after 10 to 14 days. Study end points were the incidence of immediate and delayed complications (aortic rupture, malperfusion, rapid aortic expansion >4 mm, pain or hypertension resistant to medical therapy) and in-hospital mortality. In addition, we looked at CTA-detected morphometric variables (maximum diameters of descending aorta, false lumen [FL], and primary entry tear; number of intimal tears; FL configuration; true lumen collapse; course of the dissection) and their association with delayed complications. Finally, we assessed treatment modalities and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Of all TBADs, 22 (26%) presented with immediate complications (rupture, n = 11); 64 patients (74%) were initially assessed as having uncomplicated TBAD. Of these 64 patients, 24 (28% of all 86) suffered from delayed complications (malperfusion, n = 10; aortic rupture, n = 3; early expansion >4 mm, n = 8; refractory pain, n = 2; uncontrollable hypertension, n = 1) at a median interval of 7.1 (2-14) days after symptom onset. During the first 14 days, 40 patients (46%) remained uncomplicated. The CTA analysis revealed a significant association of initial thoracic aortic diameter (P = .009), size of the primary entry tear (P = .018), true lumen collapse (P = .019), and partially thrombosed FL (P = .019) with the occurrence of delayed complications within the first 14 days. Of the patients with delayed complications, 87.5% underwent surgery (90% thoracic endovascular aortic repair, 10% peripheral revascularization); 12.5% in this group died following aortic rupture before they received surgical repair. The mortality of patients with delayed complicated TBAD was significantly higher compared with those who remained uncomplicated within the 14-day period (12.5% vs 0%; P = .0221).

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed complications in initially uncomplicated acute TBAD are not infrequent. Morphologic variables like maximum diameter of the descending aorta, primary entry tear, true lumen collapse, and partially thrombosed FL were associated with an increased risk of delayed complications in initially uncomplicated TBAD. Future clinical research must verify the predictive role of clinical and morphologic variables in the acute phase, particularly with regard to a possible early surgical treatment to prevent a fatal outcome.

Update on the Therapeutic Strategy of Type B Aortic Dissection

Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a life-threatening disease. Current therapeutic guidelines recommend medical therapy with aggressive blood pressure lowering for patients with acute TBAD unless they have fatal complications. Although patients with uncomplicated TBAD have relatively low early mortality, aorta-related adverse events during the chronic phase worsen the long-term clinical outcome. Recent advances in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) can improve clinical outcomes in patients with both complicated and uncomplicated TBAD. According to present guidelines, complicated TBAD patients are recommended for TEVAR. However, the indication in uncomplicated TBAD remains controversial. Recent results of randomized trials, which compared the clinical outcome in patients treated with optimal medical therapy and those treated with TEVAR, suggest that preemptive TEVAR should be considered in uncomplicated TBAD with suitable aortic anatomy. However, these trials failed to show improvement in early mortality in patients treated with TEVAR compared with patients treated with optimal medical therapy, which suggest the importance of patient selection for TEVAR. Several clinical and imaging-related risk factors have been shown to be associated with early disease progression. Preemptive TEVAR might be beneficial and should be considered for high-risk patients with uncomplicated TBAD. However, an interdisciplinary consensus has not been established for the definition of patients at high-risk of TBAD, and it should be confirmed by experts including physicians, radiologists, interventionalists, and vascular surgeons. This review summarizes the current understanding of the therapeutic strategy in patients with TBAD based on evidence and expert consensus.

Impact of the Management of Type B Aortic Dissection on the Long-Term Blood Pressure

Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurement (ABPM) is recommended to assess optimal BP control, and we studied its influence after an acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD). We retrospectively collected data from 111 patients with ATBAD from January 2004 to September 2014. Controlled BP group was defined according to a 24-hour BP under 130/80 mm Hg during chronic phase. The population consisted of 85 men, with a mean age of 61 ± 13 years and mean body mass index of 28 ± 6 kg/m². The median delay between ambulatory BP measurement and ATBAD was 2 (0.3 to 4) months. The mean 24-hour BP of the entire population was 124/71 ± 15/8.8 mm Hg. BP was not controlled in 41 patients (37%). The treatment score at discharge was 3.9 ± 1.4. The mean glomerular filtration rate was 83 ± 28 ml/min/1.73 m², with no difference between groups. Visceral stent implantation in the acute phase (odds ratio [OR] 3.857 [1.199 to 12.406], p = 0.023), higher left ventricular ejection fraction (OR 1.092 [1.005 to 1.187], p = 0.038), and higher platelet count at discharge (OR 1.064 [1.018 to 1.112], p = 0.006) were identified as predictors of good BP control by multivariate analysis. The analysis showed that nighttime systolic BP was associated with aortic events during follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] 5.2 [1.01 to 27.2], p = 0.049), particularly for a threshold of 124 mm Hg or more (HR 1.967 [1.052 to 3.678], p = 0.0341). Nighttime pulse pressure showed also its significance (HR 20.1 [1.4 to 282.7], p = 0.026). In conclusion, subclinical renal malperfusion revascularization seems to improve BP control. A greater nighttime systolic BP was associated with the risk of new aortic events during follow-up.

Multi-Velocity Encoding Four-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Chronic Aortic Dissection

Background: Chronic descending thoracic aortic dissection (CDTAD) following surgical repair of ascending aortic dissection requires long-term imaging surveillance. We investigated four-dimensional (4D)-flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a novel multi-velocity encoding (multi-VENC) technique as an emerging clinical method enabling the dynamic quantification of blood volume and velocity throughout the cardiac cycle.

Methods: Patients with CDTAD (n = 10; mean age, 55.1 years; standard deviation (SD) 10.8) and healthy volunteers (n = 9; mean age, 37.1 years; SD 11.4; p < 0.01) underwent 3T MRI, and standard views and 4D-flow data were obtained. Flow measurements were made in selected regions of interest within the ascending and descending thoracic aorta.

Results: The overall flow profile at peak systole was reduced in the false lumen (FL) compared with the true lumen (TL) and normal aortas (p < 0.05 for velocity < 0.4 m/s). Peak systolic flow rate per aortic lumen area (mL/s/cm ² ) was lower in the FL than in the TL (p < 0.05), and both rates were lower than that of control aortas (p < 0.05). Blood flow reversal was higher in the FL than in the TL throughout the descending aorta in CDTAD patients (p < 0.05). A derived pulsatility index was elevated in the TL compared with that in the FL in CDTAD patients. Generated pathline images demonstrated flow patterns in detail, including sites of communication between the true and FL.

Conclusions: 4D-flow MRI revealed FL blood flow and reduced blood flow velocity and flow rate in the TL of CDTAD patients compared with normal aortas of healthy participants. Thus, multi-VENC 4D-flow MRI could serve as an adjunct in the long-term assessment of CDTAD following surgical repair of ascending aortic dissection.

Type B Aortic Dissections: Current Guidelines for Treatment

Stanford type B aortic dissections (TBADs) involve the descending aorta and can present with complications, including malperfusion syndrome or aortic rupture, which are associated with significant morbidity and mortality if left untreated. Clinical diagnosis is straightforward, typically confirmed using CT angiography. Treatment begins with immediate anti-impulse medical therapy. Acute TBAD with complications should be repaired with emergent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Uncomplicated TBAD with high-risk features should undergo TEVAR in the subacute phase. Open surgical repair is seldom required and reserved only for select cases. It is critical to follow these patients clinically and radiographically in the outpatient setting.