Apolipoprotein(a) attenuates endogenous fibrinolysis in the rabbit jugular vein thrombosis model in vivo

Endothelial dysfunction: Pathophysiology and therapeutic targets for sepsis-induced multiple organ dysfunction syndrome

Sepsis and septic shock are critical medical conditions characterized by a systemic inflammatory response to infection, significantly contributing to global mortality rates. The progression to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) represents the most severe complication of sepsis and markedly increases clinical mortality. Central to the pathophysiology of sepsis, endothelial cells play a crucial role in regulating microcirculation and maintaining barrier integrity across various organs and tissues. Recent studies have underscored the pivotal role of endothelial function in the development of sepsis-induced MODS. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiology of sepsis-induced MODS, with a specific focus on endothelial dysfunction. It also compiles compelling evidence regarding potential small molecules that could attenuate sepsis and subsequent multi-organ damage by modulating endothelial function. Thus, this review serves as an essential resource for clinical practitioners involved in the diagnosing, managing, and providing intensive care for sepsis and associated multi-organ injuries, emphasizing the importance of targeting endothelial cells to enhance outcomes of the patients.

Pathophysiology and Management of Hypercoagulation in Infectious Diseases

Numerous systemic infections may have hypercoagulation as one of the complications, which may range from asymptomatic presentation of elevation of biochemical markers of coagulation such as that of fibrin and thrombin generation, to a much severe, symptomatic, life-threatening, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), which results in the formation of thrombi in the microvasculature of various organs. This phenomenon contributes to increase in morbidity and mortality in various infectious diseases. The current review discusses various mechanisms of hypercoagulation during infections such as tissue factor activation, endothelial cell activation, inhibition of physiological anticoagulant pathways, and fibrinolysis inhibition. The review also discusses pathophysiological changes in the coagulation system and its management in the recent pandemic of COVID-19. The article also discusses role of various parenteral and oral anticoagulants in the management of infectious diseases. The review provides clinical data on various anticoagulants used during hospitalization and extended prophylaxis for the management of venous thromboembolism in various infections.

Methodology Because this is a review of published literature and no humans or animals were involved, ethical committee approval was not required and patient consent was not required.

Cholesterol Lowering Biotechnological Strategies: From Monoclonal Antibodies to Antisense Therapies. A Pre-Clinical Perspective Review

In recent years, the increase in available genetic information and a better understanding of the genetic bases of dyslipidemias has led to the identification of potential new avenues for therapies. Additionally, the development of new technologies has presented the key for developing novel therapeutic strategies targeting not only proteins (e.g., the monoclonal antibodies and vaccines) but also the transcripts (from antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) to small interfering RNAs) or the genomic sequence (gene therapies). These pharmacological advances have led to successful therapeutic improvements, particularly in the cardiovascular arena because we are now able to treat rare, genetically driven, and previously untreatable conditions (e.g, familial hypertriglyceridemia or hyperchylomicronemia). In this review, the pre-clinical pharmacological development of the major biotechnological cholesterol lowering advances were discussed, describing facts, gaps, potential future steps forward, and therapeutic opportunities.

TNF-α increases the risk of bleeding in patients after CAR T-cell therapy: A bleeding model based on a real-world study of Chinese CAR T Working Party

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown excellent clinical efficacy in patients with hematologic malignancies. However, severe bleeding after this treatment is a life-threatening complication for most patients. This study evaluated the risk factors associated with bleeding in CAR T treatment and developed a predictive model for this complication. Analysis performed in the First Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University and external validation launched in Suzhou Hongci Hematology Hospital (Jiangsu, China). We conducted a real-world study incorporating data from 400 patients with hematologic malignancies treated with CAR T between 1 November 2015 and 1 September 2019. Also, 39 patients from another hospital were selected for external validation. Patients with severe bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 13.04, 95% confidence interval 5.82-29.18; p < 0.001) had a higher risk of death after CAR T. Stage III and IV cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (odds ratio [OR] 6.07, 95% CI 2.35-16.76; p < 0.001) and higher tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) levels (OR 4.00, 95% CI 1.53-11.35; p < 0.001) were independent factors of bleeding in patients after CAR-T treatment. The predictive model developed by Lasso regression, which selected factors such as CRS period, transfusion volume, platelet percentage, platelet count, thrombinogen time, interleukin 6, and TNF-α levels, and showed Nomogram, yielded excellent agreement (C-statistics = 0.905) with the calibration curve, which improved clinical benefit with respect to established bleeding scores such as outpatient bleeding risk index (MOBRI). External validation was performed using 39 patients from another hospital with an AUC of 0.700. Patients with severe bleeding after Car-T therapy had increased the risk of death. A cross-validated bleeding risk score based on CRS stages and TNF-α level show significant prognostic value in patients undergoing CAR-T treatment.

Potent reduction of plasma lipoprotein (a) with an antisense oligonucleotide in human subjects does not affect ex vivo fibrinolysis

It is postulated that lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] inhibits fibrinolysis, but this hypothesis has not been tested in humans due to the lack of specific Lp(a) lowering agents. Patients with elevated Lp(a) were randomized to antisense oligonucleotide [IONIS-APO(a)_Rx] directed to apo(a) (n = 7) or placebo (n = 10). Ex vivo plasma lysis times and antigen concentrations of plasminogen, factor XI, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor, and fibrinogen at baseline, day 85/92/99 (peak drug effect), and day 190 (3 months off drug) were measured. The mean ± SD baseline Lp(a) levels were 477.3 ± 55.9 nmol/l in IONIS-APO(a)_Rx and 362.1 ± 89.9 nmol/l in placebo. The mean± SD percentage change in Lp(a) for IONIS-APO(a)_Rx was -69.3 ± 12.2% versus -5.4 ± 6.9% placebo (P < 0.0010) at day 85/92/99 and -15.6 ± 8.9% versus 3.2 ± 12.2% (P = 0.003) at day 190. Clot lysis times and coagulation/fibrinolysis-related biomarkers showed no significant differences between IONIS-APO(a)_Rx and placebo at all time points. Clot lysis times were not affected by exogenously added Lp(a) at concentrations up to 200 nmol/l to plasma with very low (12.5 nmol/l) Lp(a) levels, whereas recombinant apo(a) had a potent antifibrinolytic effect. In conclusion, potent reductions of Lp(a) in patients with highly elevated Lp(a) levels do not affect ex vivo measures of fibrinolysis; the relevance of any putative antifibrinolytic effects of Lp(a) in vivo needs further study.

To test, or not to test: that is the question for the future of lipoprotein(a)

INTRODUCTION

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a potent, highly heritable and common risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Evidence for a causal association between elevated Lp(a) and ASCVD has been provided by large epidemiological investigations that have demonstrated a curvilinear association with increased risk, as well as from genetic examinations and cellular and transgenic animal studies. Although there are several therapies available for lowering Lp(a), none are selective for Lp(a) and there is no clinical trial data that has specifically shown that lowering Lp(a) reduces the risk of ASCVD. Hence, screening for elevated Lp(a) is not routinely incorporated into clinical practice. Areas covered: This paper reviews the current evidence supporting the causal role of Lp(a) in the primary and secondary prevention of ASCVD, screening approaches for high Lp(a), current guidelines on testing Lp(a), and barriers to the routine screening of elevated Lp(a) in clinical practice. Expert opinion: At present, there is a moderate level of evidence supporting the routine screening of elevated Lp(a). Current guidelines recommend testing for elevated Lp(a) in individuals at intermediate or high risk of ASCVD.

Lipoprotein(a) in clinical practice: New perspectives from basic and translational science

Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) are a causal risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) and calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS). Genetic, epidemiological and in vitro data provide strong evidence for a pathogenic role for Lp(a) in the progression of atherothrombotic disease. Despite these advancements and a race to develop new Lp(a) lowering therapies, there are still many unanswered and emerging questions about the metabolism and pathophysiology of Lp(a). New studies have drawn attention to Lp(a) as a contributor to novel pathogenic processes, yet the mechanisms underlying the contribution of Lp(a) to CVD remain enigmatic. New therapeutics show promise in lowering plasma Lp(a) levels, although the complete mechanisms of Lp(a) lowering are not fully understood. Specific agents targeted to apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)), namely antisense oligonucleotide therapy, demonstrate potential to decrease Lp(a) to levels below the 30-50 mg/dL (75-150 nmol/L) CVD risk threshold. This therapeutic approach should aid in assessing the benefit of lowering Lp(a) in a clinical setting.

Characterization of the I4399M variant of apolipoprotein(a): implications for altered prothrombotic properties of lipoprotein(a)

Essentials Elevated lipoproteinp(a) is an independent and causal risk factor for atherothrombotic diseases. rs3798220 (Ile/Met substitution in apo(a) protease-like domain) is associated with disease risk. Recombinant I4399M apo(a) altered clot structure to accelerate coagulation/delay fibrinolysis. Evidence was found for increased solvent exposure and oxidation of Met residue.

SUMMARY

Background Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is a causal risk factor for a variety of cardiovascular diseases. Apolipoprotein(a) (apo[a]), the distinguishing component of Lp(a), is homologous with plasminogen, suggesting that Lp(a) can interfere with the normal fibrinolytic functions of plasminogen. This has implications for the persistence of fibrin clots in the vasculature and hence for atherothrombotic diseases. A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (rs3798220) in the gene encoding apo(a) has been reported that results in an Ile→Met substitution in the protease-like domain (I4399M variant). In population studies, the I4399M variant has been correlated with elevated plasma Lp(a) levels and higher coronary heart disease risk, and carriers of the SNP had increased cardiovascular benefit from aspirin therapy. In vitro studies suggested an antifibrinolytic role for Lp(a) containing this variant. Objectives We performed a series of experiments to assess the effect of the Ile→Met substitution on fibrin clot formation and lysis, and on the architecture of the clots. Results We found that the Met variant decreased coagulation time and increased fibrin clot lysis time as compared with wild-type apo(a). Furthermore, we observed that the presence of the Met variant significantly increased fibrin fiber width in plasma clots formed ex vivo, while having no effect on fiber density. Mass spectrometry analysis of a recombinant apo(a) species containing the Met variant revealed sulfoxide modification of the Met residue. Conclusions Our data suggest that the I4399M variant differs structurally from wild-type apo(a), which may underlie key differences related to its effects on fibrin clot architecture and fibrinolysis.

Lipoprotein (a): truly a direct prothrombotic factor in cardiovascular disease?

Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] have been determined to be a causal risk factor for coronary heart disease, and may similarly play a role in other atherothrombotic disorders. Lp(a) consists of a lipoprotein moiety indistinguishable from LDL, as well as the plasminogen-related glycoprotein, apo(a). Therefore, the pathogenic role for Lp(a) has traditionally been considered to reflect a dual function of its similarity to LDL, causing atherosclerosis, and its similarity to plasminogen, causing thrombosis through inhibition of fibrinolysis. This postulate remains highly speculative, however, because it has been difficult to separate the prothrombotic/antifibrinolytic functions of Lp(a) from its proatherosclerotic functions. This review surveys the current landscape surrounding these issues: the biochemical basis for procoagulant and antifibrinolytic effects of Lp(a) is summarized and the evidence addressing the role of Lp(a) in both arterial and venous thrombosis is discussed. While elevated Lp(a) appears to be primarily predisposing to thrombotic events in the arterial tree, the fact that most of these are precipitated by underlying atherosclerosis continues to confound our understanding of the true pathogenic roles of Lp(a) and, therefore, the most appropriate therapeutic target through which to mitigate the harmful effects of this lipoprotein.

Inhibition of Lp(a)-induced functional impairment of endothelial cells and endothelial progenitor cells by hepatocyte growth factor

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) is one of the risk factors for peripheral artery disease (PAD). Our previous report demonstrated that hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) gene therapy attenuated the impairment of collateral formation in Lp(a) transgenic mice. Since risk factors for atherosclerosis accelerate endothelial senescence and impair angiogenesis, we examined the role of Lp(a) in dysfunction and senescence of endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) and endothelial cells.

METHODS

In vitro and in vivo incorporation assays were performed using ex-vivo expanded DiI-labeled human EPC. Senescence of cultured endothelial cells, production of oxidative stress and angiogenesis function were evaluated by SA-β-galactosidase staining, dihydroethidium (DHE) staining and Matrigel assay, respectively.

RESULTS

EPC transplantation significantly stimulated recovery of ischemic limb perfusion, while EPC pre-treated with Lp(a) did not increase ischemic limb perfusion. Impairment of angiogenesis by EPC with Lp(a) was associated with a significant decrease in CD31-positive capillaries and DiI-labeled EPC. Importantly, Lp(a) significantly accelerated the onset of senescence and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in human aortic endothelial cells, accompanied by a significant increase in the protein expression of p53 and p21. On the other hand, HGF significantly attenuated EPC dysfunction, senescence, ROS production, and p53 and p21 expression induced by Lp(a).

CONCLUSION

Lp(a) might affect atherosclerosis via acceleration of senescence, ROS production, and functional impairment of the endothelial cell lineage. HGF might have inhibitory effects on these atherogenic actions of Lp(a).

Lipoprotein(a) and ischemic heart disease--a causal association? A review

The aim of this review is to summarize present evidence of a causal association of lipoprotein(a) with risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD). Evidence for causality includes reproducible associations of a proposed risk factor with risk of disease in epidemiological studies, evidence from in vitro and animal studies in support of pathophysiological effects of the risk factor, and preferably evidence from randomized clinical trials documenting reduced morbidity in response to interventions targeting the risk factor. Elevated and in particular extreme lipoprotein(a) levels have in prospective studies repeatedly been associated with increased risk of IHD, although results from early studies are inconsistent. Data from in vitro and animal studies implicate lipoprotein(a), consisting of a low density lipoprotein particle covalently bound to the plasminogen-like glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a), in both atherosclerosis and thrombosis, including accumulation of lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic plaques and attenuation of t-PA mediated plasminogen activation. No randomized clinical trial of the effect of lowering lipoprotein(a) levels on IHD prevention has ever been conducted. Lacking evidence from randomized clinical trials, genetic studies, such as Mendelian randomization studies, can also support claims of causality. Levels of lipoprotein(a) are primarily determined by variation in the LPA gene coding for the apolipoprotein(a) moiety of lipoprotein(a), and genetic epidemiologic studies have documented association of LPA copy number variants, influencing levels of lipoprotein(a), with risk of IHD. In conclusion, results from epidemiologic, in vitro, animal, and genetic epidemiologic studies support a causal association of lipoprotein(a) with risk of IHD, while results from randomized clinical trials are presently lacking.

Apolipoprotein(a) inhibits the conversion of Glu-plasminogen to Lys-plasminogen: a novel mechanism for lipoprotein(a)-mediated inhibition of plasminogen activation

BACKGROUND

Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are associated with an increased risk for thrombotic disorders. Lp(a) is a unique lipoprotein consisting of a low-density lipoprotein-like moiety covalently linked to apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], a homologue of the fibrinolytic proenzyme plasminogen. Several in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that Lp(a)/apo(a) can inhibit tissue-type plasminogen activator-mediated plasminogen activation on fibrin surfaces, although the mechanism of inhibition by apo(a) remains controversial. Essential to fibrin clot lysis are a number of plasmin-dependent positive feedback reactions that enhance the efficiency of plasminogen activation, including the plasmin-mediated conversion of Glu-plasminogen to Lys-plasminogen.

OBJECTIVE

Using acid-urea gel electrophoresis to resolve the two forms of radiolabeled plasminogen, we determined whether apo(a) is able to inhibit Glu-plasminogen to Lys-plasminogen conversion.

METHODS

The assays were performed in the absence or presence of different recombinant apo(a) species, including point mutants, deletion mutants and variants that represent greater than 90% of the known apo(a) isoform sizes.

RESULTS

Apo(a) substantially suppressed Glu-plasminogen conversion. Critical roles were identified for the kringle IV types 5-9 and kringle V; contributory roles for sequences within the amino-terminal half of the molecule were also observed. Additionally, with the exception of the smallest naturally-occurring isoform of apo(a), isoform size was found not to contribute to the inhibitory capacity of apo(a).

CONCLUSION

These findings underscore a novel contribution to the understanding of Lp(a)/apo(a)-mediated inhibition of plasminogen activation: the ability of the apo(a) component of Lp(a) to inhibit the key positive feedback step of plasmin-mediated Glu-plasminogen to Lys-plasminogen conversion.

Relationship between lipoprotein(a) and spontaneous recanalization of infarct-related arteries in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is known to inhibit the fibrinolysis system and promote thrombus formation.

HYPOTHESIS

We retrospectively investigated the influences of Lp(a) on infarct-related artery patency in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

In 144 patients with ST-segment elevation, myocardial, coronary angiography (CAG) was performed within 12 h of the onset of symptoms. Subjects were divided into 2 groups according to the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade, Group I (TIMI 0-1, n = 94) versus Group II (TIMI 2-3, n = 50). The Gensini score and 0- to 3-vessel disease score estimated the severity and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD), respectively. Lp(a), lipid profile and c-reactive protein (CRP) were measured before any medications including thrombolytics were given.

RESULTS

The Lp(a) level was higher in Group I than in Group II. There was a weak correlation between Lp(a) level and Gensini score. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, a Lp(a) level was a predictor of infarct-related artery patency in the early phase of AMI. There were no significant differences in the location of the infarct-related arteries, extent of CAD, time from pain to CAG, number of risk factors, and hs-CRP values between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The Lp(a) level was significantly higher in patients with persistent occlusion compared with those with spontaneous recanalization of infarct-related arteries in the early phase of AMI.

Lipoprotein (a) in patients with spontaneous venous thromboembolism

INTRODUCTION

Elevated lipoprotein (a) (Lp (a)) has been established as a risk factor of coronary heart disease and stroke. Findings concerning the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adults are contradictory. The aim of our study was to investigate, whether elevated Lp (a) levels are an independent risk factor of spontaneous symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE). Our study was further designed to detect differences in risk profiles between thrombosis patients with and without symptomatic PE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We investigated Lp (a) in 128 patients with spontaneous symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT, group 1), 105 with spontaneous symptomatic pulmonary embolism with or without DVT (PE, group 2) and 122 healthy controls. Lp (a) was measured with an immunoturbidimetric assay (Tina-quant(R), Roche, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany) on a Hitachi-Modular system.

RESULTS

Lp (a) levels (mg/L) were not significantly different among groups, median levels (25th-75th percentiles) were 170 (51-386) in group 1, 140 (<20-427) in group 2 and 126 (54-331) in controls, respectively. As continuous variable, odds ratios for VTE for a 100 mg/L increase of Lp (a) were 1.1 [95% confidence interval 0.98-1.2] for group 1 versus controls and 1.1 [0.95-1.2] for group 2 versus controls. The prevalence of Lp (a) above 300 mg/L was not significantly different among patients and controls (group 1: 30%, group 2: 32% and controls: 25%, p=0.4, p=0.2, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion we found no association between Lp (a) and VTE regardless whether DVT occurred together with PE or not.

What role do coagulation disorders play in the pathogenesis of leptospirosis?

Leptospirosis is a zoonosis of worldwide distribution, spread by the urine of infected animals. It is a major public health problem, especially in developing countries, where circumstances for transmission are most favourable. The clinical picture varies from mild disease to a severe illness with haemostatic derangements and multiorgan failure eventually leading to death. Although the haemorrhagic complications of severe disease are serious, the pathophysiology is scarcely elucidated. The complex mechanisms involved in inflammation-induced coagulation activation are extensively studied in various infectious diseases, i.e. Gram-negative sepsis. Tissue factor-mediated coagulation activation, impairment of anticoagulant and fibrinolytic pathways in close concert with the cytokine network are thought to be important. But for human leptospirosis, data are limited. Because of the growing interest in this field, the impact of leptospirosis, and the availability of new therapeutic strategies, we reviewed the evidence regarding the role of coagulation in leptospirosis and provide suggestions for future research.

Lp(a) lipoprotein and plasminogen activity in patients with different etiology of ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Lp(a) lipoprotein plays an important part in atherothrombogenesis and is considered an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease. However, its role in cerebrovascular disease remains unclear, in particular because of the heterogeneous nature of strokes. We investigated whether elevated Lp(a) is more frequent in ischemic stroke related to atherothrombosis than in other etiologies of stroke. Because of the close structural homology between Lp(a) and plasminogen, we also studied the role of plasminogen in different stroke subtypes and whether there is a dependency on Lp(a) plasma levels.

METHODS

Lp(a) levels and plasminogen activity were measured in 253 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke and in 63 controls (CS). Subtypes of stroke were established according to the TOAST criteria.

RESULTS

Median Lp(a) levels were found to be higher in the total cerebral infarction group and in patients with large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) when compared with CS (20.9 and 22.0 mg/dl, respectively, vs. 16.0 mg/dl; p < 0.05). In addition, elevated Lp(a) levels >30 mg/dl were more frequent among the LAA subgroup than among CS (39.4 vs. 11.1%; p < 0.001). Mean plasminogen activity was lower in the total cerebral infarction group (110.8 vs. 120.3%; p < 0.001) and in patients with cardioembolic stroke (109.8 vs. 120.3%; p < 0.05) when compared with CS. There was no correlation between Lp(a) levels and plasminogen activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the hypothesis that elevated Lp(a) is a risk factor for ischemic stroke and especially for strokes caused by LAA. Low plasminogen activity may play a role in the pathogenesis of cerebrovascular disease, especially for the development of cardioembolic stroke.

Plasma and plasma components in the management of disseminated intravascular coagulation

A variety of clinical conditions can cause systemic activation of coagulation that ranges from insignificant laboratory changes to severe disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). DIC consists of a widespread systemic activation of coagulation, resulting in diffuse fibrin deposition in small and midsize vessels. There is compelling evidence from clinical and experimental studies that DIC is involved in the pathogenesis of microvascular dysfunction and contributes to organ failure. In addition, the massive and ongoing activation of coagulation can result in depletion of platelets and coagulation factors, which might cause bleeding. Recent insight into important pathogenetic mechanisms that might lead to DIC has resulted in novel preventive and therapeutic approaches to patients with sepsis and derangement of coagulation. Supportive strategies aimed at inhibition of coagulation activation might theoretically be justified and have been found beneficial in experimental and initial clinical studies. These strategies comprise inhibition of tissue factor-mediated activation of coagulation or restoration of physiological anticoagulant pathways.

In vitro inhibition of fibrinolysis by apolipoprotein(a) and lipoprotein(a) is size- and concentration-dependent

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is considered an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic heart and circulatory diseases. The unique, polymorphic character of Lp(a) is based on its apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)), which has remarkable structural analogies with plasminogen, an important protein for fibrinolysis. The formation of plasmin from plasminogen is a fundamental step in the dissolution of fibrin. Repression of this step may lead to a deceleration of fibrinolysis. It has been suggested that Lp(a) has antifibrinolytic properties through apo(a) and that the apo(a)-size polymorphism has a distinct influence on the prothrombotic properties of Lp(a). However, the results on this topic are controversial. Therefore we used a standardized in vitro fibrinolysis model to provide further information on the influence of Lp(a) on plasmin formation. Monitoring the time-course of plasmin formation, we investigated the inhibition of plasmin formation through dependence on Lp(a), respectively, free apo(a) concentration. Furthermore, we investigated the influence of three Lp(a)/apo(a) phenotypes ((22K)Lp(a), 22 kringle-4 repeats; (30K)Lp(a), 30 kringle-4 repeats; (35K)Lp(a), 35 kringle-4 repeats). Adding varying amounts of Lp(a) to our model, we observed that the rate of plasmin formation was inversely related to the Lp(a) concentration. At 0.1 micromol/l (30K)Lp(a), for example, the plasmin formation was reduced by 12.7% and decreased further by 40.7% at 0.25 micromol/l Lp(a). A similar but more distinct effect was observed when free (30K)apo(a) was added to the model (25.3% at 0.1 micromol/l vs. 59.3% at 0.25 micromol/l). Comparing the antifibrinolytic influence of different apo(a) phenotypes we found that the reduction of plasmin generation advanced with the size of apo(a). At 0.1 micromol/l Lp(a) the reduction of the plasmin formation increased in the order (22K)Lp(a), (30K)Lp(a) and (35K)Lp(a) from 3.7% to 10.7% and 22.3%, respectively. Experiments with different phenotypes of free apo(a) showed similar results (0.5 micromol/l: (22K)apo(a), 56.4% vs. (30K)Lp(a), 80.4%). Summarizing these results, our study indicates a distinct interrelation of Lp(a)/apo(a) phenotype and concentration with the formation of plasmin. From the antifibrinolytic Lp(a)/apo(a) effect in vitro it may be hypothesized that Lp(a)/apo(a) also has an inhibitory influence on in vivo fibrinolysis.

Association Between Plasma Lipoprotein(a) Concentration and Restenosis After Stent Implantation

BACKGROUND

The plasma concentration of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is associated with atherosclerotic and thrombotic vascular diseases. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between plasma Lp(a) concentration and in-stent restenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and 9 patients with successful elective coronary stent implantation underwent follow-up angiography at 24+/-6 weeks. Restenosis after stent implantation occurred in 38 patients. Univariate analysis showed that the reference diameter of the lesion was smaller in the restenosis group (2.93+/-0.29 mm) than in the no-restenosis group (3.21+/-0.43 mm) (p < 0.05). The lesion was longer in the restenosis group (14.2+/-5.3 mm) than in the no-restenosis group (11.6+/-4.9 mm) (p < 0.05). Plasma Lp(a) concentrations in the restenosis group (30.5+/-23.9 mg/dl) were higher than in the no-restenosis group (16.9+/-11.1 mg/dl) (p < 0.01). Other lipid concentrations were similar in both groups. Among the plasma Lp(a) concentrations, the rate of restenosis (71.4%) in the high Lp(a) group (> 40 mg/dl) (n = 14) was greater compared with the other groups: 33.3% in the intermediate Lp(a) group (10-40 mg/dl) (n = 54), and 24.4% in the low Lp(a) group (< 10 mg/dl) (n = 41) (p < 0.01). The late loss (0.57+/-0.53 mm) in the low Lp(a) group was significantly less than the other groups: 0.88+/-0.47 mm in the intermediate Lp(a) group, and 1.08+/-0.56 mm in the high Lp(a) group (p < 0.05). In a multivariate regression model, plasma Lp(a) concentration remained significant as an independent predictor of restenosis in patients undergoing stent implantation (p = 0.020 odds ratio (OR) 1.37 95%conficence interval (CI) 1.050-1.793), although the reference diameter (p = 0.025 OR 0.23 95%CI 0.061-0.830) and lesion length (p = 0.021 OR 1.12 95%CI 1.017-1.232) were related to stent restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma Lp(a) concentration is an independent predictor of stent restenosis.

Lipoprotein(a) as a risk factor for atherosclerosis and thrombosis: mechanistic insights from animal models

Evidence continues to accumulate from epidemiological studies that elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are a risk factor for a variety of atherosclerotic and thrombotic disorders. Lp(a) is a unique lipoprotein particle consisting of a moiety identical to low-density lipoprotein to which the glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] that is homologous to plasminogen is covalently attached. These features have suggested that Lp(a) may contribute to both proatherogenic and prothrombotic/antifibrinolytic processes and in vitro studies have identified many such candidate mechanisms. Despite intensive research, however, definition of the molecular mechanisms underlying the epidemiological data has proven elusive. Moreover, an effective and well-tolerated regimen to lower Lp(a) levels has yet to be developed. The use of animal models holds great promise for resolving these questions. Establishment of animal models for Lp(a) has been hampered by the absence of this lipoprotein from common small laboratory animals. Transgenic mice and rabbits expressing human apo(a) have been developed and these have been used to: (i) examine regulation of apo(a) gene expression; (ii) study the mechanism and molecular determinants of Lp(a) assembly from LDL and apo(a); (iii) demonstrate that apo(a)/Lp(a) are indeed proatherogenic and antifibrinolytic; and (iv) identify structural domains in apo(a) that mediate its pathogenic effects. The recent construction of transgenic apo(a) rabbits is a particularly promising development in view of the excellent utility of the rabbit as a model of advanced atherosclerosis.

Evaluation of lipoprotein(a) as a prothrombotic factor: progress from bench to bedside

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Since the homology between apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) and plasminogen was discovered in 1987, the role of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) as an inhibitor of the normal fibrinolytic role of plasmin(ogen) has been a major research focus. In this review we summarize recent basic research aimed at identifying mechanisms by which Lp(a) can either inhibit fibrinolysis or promote coagulation, as well as recent clinical studies of Lp(a) as a risk factor for thrombosis either in the presence or absence of atherosclerosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

It has recently been reported that the inhibition of plasminogen activation by apo(a) results from the interaction of apo(a) with the ternary complex of tissue-type plasminogen activator, plasminogen and fibrin, rather than competition of apo(a) and plasminogen for binding sites on fibrin. Lp(a) species containing smaller apo(a) isoforms bind more avidly to fibrin and are better inhibitors of plasminogen activation. Recent clinical studies have provided strong evidence that Lp(a), either alone or in synergy with other thrombotic risk factors, significantly increases the risk of venous thromboembolism and ischemic stroke.

SUMMARY

Lp(a) both attenuates fibrinolysis, through inhibition of plasminogen activation, and promotes coagulation, through alleviation of extrinsic pathway inhibition. Further basic and clinical studies are required to more clearly define the role of Lp(a) in thrombotic disorders, and to determine the extent to which thrombotic risk is dependent on apo(a) isoform size.

Inhibition of plasminogen activation by lipoprotein(a): critical domains in apolipoprotein(a) and mechanism of inhibition on fibrin and degraded fibrin surfaces

Similarity between the apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) moiety of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and plasminogen suggests a potentially important link between atherosclerosis and thrombosis. Lp(a) may interfere with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)-mediated plasminogen activation in fibrinolysis, thereby generating a hypercoagulable state in vivo. A fluorescence-based system was employed to study the effect of apo(a) on plasminogen activation in the presence of native fibrin and degraded fibrin cofactors and in the absence of positive feedback reactions catalyzed by plasmin. Human Lp(a) and a physiologically relevant, 17-kringle recombinant apo(a) species exhibited strong inhibition with both cofactors. A variant lacking the protease domain also exhibited strong inhibition, indicating that the apo(a)-plasminogen binding interaction mediated by the apo(a) protease domain does not ultimately inhibit plasminogen activation. A variant in which the strong lysine-binding site in kringle IV type 10 had been abolished exhibited substantially reduced inhibition whereas another lacking the kringle V domain showed no inhibition. Amino-terminal truncation mutants of apo(a) also revealed that additional sequences within kringle IV types 1-4 are required for maximal inhibition. To investigate the inhibition mechanism, the concentrations of plasminogen, cofactor, and a 12-kringle recombinant apo(a) species were systematically varied. Kinetics for both cofactors conformed to a single, equilibrium template model in which apo(a) can interact with all three fibrinolytic components and predicts the formation of ternary (cofactor, tPA, and plasminogen) and quaternary (cofactor, tPA, plasminogen, and apo(a)) catalytic complexes. The latter complex exhibits a reduced turnover number, thereby accounting for inhibition of plasminogen activation in the presence of apo(a)/Lp(a).

Inhibition of fibrinolysis by lipoprotein(a)

A high plasma concentration of lipoprotein Lp(a) is now considered to be a major and independent risk factor for cerebro- and cardiovascular atherothrombosis. The mechanism by which Lp(a) may favour this pathological state may be related to its particular structure, a plasminogen-like glycoprotein, apo(a), that is disulfide linked to the apo B100 of an atherogenic LDL-like particle. Apo(a) exists in several isoforms defined by a variable number of copies of plasminogen-like kringle 4 and single copies of kringle 5 and the catalytic region. At least one of the plasminogen-like kringle 4 copies present in apo(a) (kringle IV type 10) contains a lysine binding site (LBS) that is similar to that of plasminogen. This structure allows binding of these proteins to fibrin and cell membranes. Plasminogen thus bound is cleaved at Arg561-Val562 by plasminogen activators and transformed into plasmin. This mechanism ensures fibrinolysis and pericellular proteolysis. In apo(a) a Ser-Ile substitution at the Arg-Val plasminogen activation cleavage site prevents its transformation into a plasmin-like enzyme. Because of this structural/functional homology and enzymatic difference, Lp(a) may compete with plasminogen for binding to lysine residues and impair, thereby, fibrinolysis and pericellular proteolysis. High concentrations of Lp(a) in plasma may, therefore, represent a potential source of antifibrinolytic activity. Indeed, we have recently shown that during the course of the nephrotic syndrome the amount of plasminogen bound and plasmin formed at the surface of fibrin are directly related to in vivo variations in the circulating concentration of Lp(a) (Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., 2000, 20: 575-584; Thromb. Haemost., 1999, 82: 121-127). This antifibrinolytic effect is primarily defined by the size of the apo(a) polymorphs, which show heterogeneity in their fibrin-binding activity--only small size isoforms display high affinity binding to fibrin (Biochemistry, 1995, 34: 13353-13358). Thus, in heterozygous subjects the amount of Lp(a) or plasminogen bound to fibrin is a function of the affinity of each of the apo(a) isoforms and of their concentration relative to each other and to plasminogen. The real risk factor is, therefore, the Lp(a) subpopulation with high affinity for fibrin. According to this concept, some Lp(a) phenotypes may not be related to atherothrombosis and, therefore, high Lp(a) in some individuals might not represent a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In agreement with these data, it has been recently reported that Lp(a) particles containing low molecular mass apo(a) emerged as one of the leading risk conditions in advanced stenotic atherosclerosis (Circulation, 1999, 100: 1154-1160). The predictive value of high Lp(a) as a risk factor, therefore, depends on the relative concentration of Lp(a) particles containing small apo(a) isoforms with the highest affinity for fibrin. Within this context, the development of agents able to selectively neutralise the antifibrinolytic activity of Lp(a), offers new perspectives in the prevention and treatment of the cardiovascular risk associated with high concentrations of thrombogenic Lp(a).

Antifibrinolytic effect of single apo(a) kringle domains: relationship to fibrinogen binding

Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are associated with an increased risk for the development of atherosclerotic disease which may be attributable to the ability of Lp(a) to attenuate fibrinolysis. A generally accepted mechanism for this effect involves direct competition of Lp(a) with plasminogen for fibrin(ogen) binding sites thus reducing the efficiency of plasminogen activation. Efforts to determine the domains of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] which mediate fibrin(ogen) interactions have yielded conflicting results. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to determine the ability of single KIV domains of apo(a) to bind plasmin-treated fibrinogen surfaces as well to determine their effect on fibrinolysis using an in vitro clot lysis assay. A bacterial expression system was utilized to express and purify apo(a) KIV (2), KIV (7), KIV (9) DeltaCys (which lacks the seventh unpaired cysteine) and KIV (10) which contains a strong lysine binding site. We also expressed and examined three mutant derivatives of KIV (10) to determine the effect of changing critical residues in the lysine binding site of this kringle on both fibrin(ogen) binding and fibrin clot lysis. Our results demonstrate that the strong lysine binding site in apo(a) KIV (10) is capable of mediating interactions with plasmin-modified fibrinogen in a lysine-dependent manner, and that this kringle can increase in vitro fibrin clot lysis time by approximately 43% at a concentration of 10 microM KIV (10). The ability of the KIV (10) mutant derivatives to bind plasmin-modified fibrinogen correlated with their lysine binding capacity. Mutation of Trp (70) to Arg abolished binding to both lysine-Sepharose and plasmin-modified fibrinogen, while the Trp (70) -->Phe and Arg (35) -->Lys substitutions each resulted in decreased binding to these substrates. None of the KIV (10) mutant derivatives appeared to affect fibrinolysis. Apo(a) KIV (7) contains a lysine- and proline-sensitive site capable of mediating binding to plasmin-modified fibrinogen, albeit with a lower apparent affinity than apo(a) KIV (10). However, apo(a) KIV (7) had no effect on fibrinolysis in vitro. Apo(a) KIV (2) and KIV (9) DeltaCys did not bind measurably to plasmin-modified fibrinogen surfaces and did not affect fibrinolysis in vitro.

Apolipoprotein E phenotype and the efficacy of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke

We used stored plasma samples from 409 patients in the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke (NINDS) tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) Stroke Trial to examine the relationship between an apolipoprotein (Apo) E2 or an Apo E4 phenotype and a favorable outcome 3 months after stroke, the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage, and the response to intravenous t-PA therapy. For the 27 patients with an Apo E2 phenotype who were treated with t-PA, the odds ratio (OR) of a favorable outcome at 3 months was 6.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7-15.3%] compared to the 161 patients without an Apo E2 phenotype who were treated with placebo. The 190 patients treated with t-PA who did not have an Apo E2 phenotype also had a greater, though less pronounced, likelihood of a favorable outcome (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.2%) than patients without an Apo E2 phenotype treated with placebo. For the 31 patients with an Apo E2 phenotype treated with placebo, the OR of a favorable 3 month outcome was 0.8 (95% CI 0.4-1.7%) compared to the 161 patients without an Apo E2 phenotype treated with placebo. This interaction between treatment and Apo E2 status persisted after adjustment for baseline variables previously associated with 3 month outcome, for differences in the baseline variables in the two treatment groups and in the Apo E2-positive and -negative groups, and for a previously reported time-to-treatment x treatment interaction (p = 0.03). Apo E4 phenotype, present in 111 (27%) of the 409 patients, was not related to a favorable 3 month outcome, response to t-PA, 3 month mortality, or risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. We conclude that the efficacy of intravenous t-PA in patients with acute ischemic stroke may be enhanced in patients who have an Apo E2 phenotype, whereas the Apo E2 phenotype alone is not associated with a detectable benefit on stroke outcome at 3 months in patients not given t-PA. In contrast to prior studies of head injury and stroke, we could not detect a relationship between Apo E4 phenotype and clinical outcome.

Relation between lipoprotein (a) and in vitro oxidation of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins

OBJECTIVES

To assess the relationship between lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)] and lipoprotein oxidation in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

DESIGN AND METHODS

Oxidation of apolipoprotein (apo)B-containing lipoproteins, vitamin E, carotenoids, lipid-lipoprotein levels were determined in 171 CAD and 70 non-CAD subjects.

RESULTS

In CAD patients with Lp (a) concentrations >/= 30 mg/dL; total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), malondialdehyde (MDA), and apo B levels were significantly higher and lag-time and age were significantly lower than those of CAD patients with Lp (a) concentrations < 30 mg/dL. In non-CAD subjects with Lp (a) concentrations >/= 30 mg/dL; TC, LDL-C, and vitamin E levels were significantly higher and lag-time was significantly lower than those of non-CAD subjects with Lp (a) concentrations < 30 mg/dL. In CAD patients, Lp (a) correlated negatively with lag-time and positively with MDA levels. Lp (a) correlated negatively with lag-time and vitamin E levels in non-CAD subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that plasma apo B-containing lipoproteins of both CAD and non-CAD subjects with Lp (a) levels >/= 30 mg/dL are more susceptible to in vitro oxidative modification than those of subjects with Lp (a) levels < 30 mg/dL. The relationship between Lp (a) and enhanced susceptibility of apo B-containing lipoproteins to oxidation, appears to support routine investigation of Lp (a).

Lipoprotein(a), left atrial appendage function and thromboembolic risk in patients with chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) has a prothrombotic effect by modulating the fibrinolytic system. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether serum Lp(a) levels are associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism in chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Clinical, laboratory and transesophageal echocardiographic data were collected in 172 consecutive, non-anticoagulated patients with chronic NVAF. Thirty-four patients (thromboembolic group) had a recent (<1 month) embolic event and/or a left atrial thrombus on transesophageal echocardiography. The thromboembolic group had a higher frequency of spontaneous echo contrast (94 vs. 58%, p<0.0001), increased concentrations of Lp(a) (median: 31.5 vs. 15.5 mg/dl, p<0.0001) and fibrinogen (median: 352 vs. 314 mg/dl, p = 0.0015), larger left atrial dimensions (median: 5.1 vs. 4.8cm, p = 0.0078), and reduced left atrial appendage (LAA) flow velocities (median: 9.5 vs. 21.2 cm/s, p<0.0001) than the nonthromboembolic group. Multivariate analysis identified 3 independent predictors of thromboembolism: Lp(a) level > or =30 mg/dl (odds ratio (OR) 9.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.4-20.4, p<0.0001), LAA flow velocity of <20 cm/s (OR 8.7, 95% CI 3.3-23.0, p = 0.0003) and a fibrinogen concentration of <377mg/dl (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.5-6.9, p = 0.0201). The Lp(a) elevations and reduced LAA flow velocities are independently associated with thromboembolism in chronic NVAF.

The rate of plasmin formation after in vitro clotting is inversely related to lipoprotein(a) plasma levels

Lipoprotein(a) levels are largely genetically determined and are linked to increased risk of coronary artery disease. The hypothesis that elevated lipoprotein(a) levels lead to decreased fibrinolysis, due to the close structural homology with plasminogen, could in part explain the genesis of this risk, although contrasting results have been obtained in different studies. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether the rate of plasmin formation, enhanced in vitro by a fixed amount of human tissue plasminogen activator after clotting, was related to plasma lipoprotein(a) levels in 45 healthy subjects. Aliquots of human plasma were clotted with calcium chloride and thrombin followed by addition of tissue plasminogen activator. We then measured the time course of plasmin formation, determined as hydrolysis of H-D-valyl-L-leucyl-L-lysine-p-nitroanilide dihydrocortide (S-2251). The log of lipoprotein(a) level was negatively related to the rate of plasmin formation (r(s)=-0.46, P=0. 002), and multiple regression analysis indicated that this relationship was not influenced by the amount of plasminogen, fibrinogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, tissue plasminogen activator, or by the size of apo(a) isoforms. These data support the concept that lipoprotein(a) can inhibit plasminogen activation and plasmin formation and can thereby play an important role in the genesis of atherosclerosis as an antifibrinolytic agent.

Apolipoprotein(a), a link between atherosclerosis and tumor angiogenesis

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a LDL-like particle with one apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] covalently bound to apolipoprotein B, the structural protein of Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL). Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LL/2) cells exhibited delayed growth and reduced angiogenesis in apo(a) transgenic mice, expressing a recombinant apo(a) [r-apo(a)] with 18 kringle 4 repeats. The mean microvessel density of subcutaneous LL/2 tumors from apo(a) transgenic mice was significantly lower than that of tumors from control wild type mice. CHO cells secreting a truncated apo(a) protein with only six kringle 4 repeats did not exhibit delayed tumor growth nor did it impair angiogenesis. These data point to an unappreciated role of human apo(a) in angiogenesis and cancer biology. As angiogenesis is necessary for reendothelialization following vascular injury, suppression of angiogenesis by apo(a) may also contribute to the atherogenicity of apo(a). The differences between the truncated apo(a) and r-apo(a) are consistent with the higher atherogenicity of higher molecular weight isoforms.

Lipoprotein(a) interactions with lipid and non-lipid risk factors in patients with early onset coronary artery disease: results from the NHLBI Family Heart Study

BACKGROUND

A positive interaction between high plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and unfavorable plasma lipid levels has been reported to result in very high risk for premature coronary artery disease (CAD). We further examined this issue for men and women with early onset CAD. We also examined potential interactions between Lp(a) and non-lipid risk factors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 338 men and women with early onset CAD (most with a positive family history of early CAD) and 480 general population controls, we measured Lp(a), lipids and other risk factors. In univariate analysis, relative odds for CAD was 1.7 (P = 0.002) for plasma Lp(a) >50 mg/dl. Elevated Lp(a) level was found to interact with adjusted plasma total/high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol such that when Lp(a) was over 50 mg/dl and adjusted plasma total/HDL cholesterol >5.8, relative odds for CAD were 8.0-9.6 (P<0.0001) in multiple logistic regression. Non-lipid risk factors were generally found to multiply the risk associated with Lp(a) (as predicted by logistic regression) without evidence for interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

We find evidence that Lp(a) does interact positively with adjusted plasma total/HDL cholesterol ratio. Aggressive risk factor intervention, especially for lipids, in those with elevated Lp(a) therefore appears indicated.