Optimal small-capacitor biphasic waveform for external defibrillation: influence of phase-1 tilt and phase-2 voltage

The effects of second and third phase duration on defibrillation efficacy of triphasic rectangle waveforms

BACKGROUND

Biphasic waveforms are superior to monophasic waveforms for the termination of ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, whether triphasic waveforms are more effective than biphasic ones is still controversial. In the present study, we investigated the effects of second and third phase duration of triphasic rectangle waveform on defibrillation efficacy in a rabbit model of VF.

METHODS

VF was electrically induced and untreated for 30s in 20 New Zealand rabbits. A defibrillatory shock was applied with one of the 7 waveforms: 6 triphasic rectangle waveforms and a biphasic rectangle waveform. The triphasic waveforms had identical first duration but with different second and third phase durations. A 5 step up-and-down protocol was utilized for determining the defibrillation threshold (DFT). After a 5min interval, the procedure was repeated. A total of 35 cardiac arrest events and defibrillations were investigated for each animal.

RESULTS

Two triphasic waveforms with identical first and second phase duration but shorter third phase duration had significantly lower DFT energy than biphasic waveform (0.57±0.18J vs. 0.80±0.28J, p=0.001; 0.60±0.18J vs. 0.80±0.28J, p=0.003). However, no statistical difference in DFT energy was observed between the two triaphsic waveforms that had identical phase duration but different voltages (0.57±0.18J vs. 0.60±0.18J, p=0.638).

CONCLUSIONS

Phase durations played a main role on defibrillation success for triphasic rectangle waveforms. The optimal triphasic rectangle waveforms that composed of identical second and first phase durations but with shorter third pulse were superior to biphasic rectangle waveform for ventricular defibrillation.

Extended charge banking model of dual path shocks for implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Background

Single path defibrillation shock methods have been improved through the use of the Charge Banking Model of defibrillation, which predicts the response of the heart to shocks as a simple resistor-capacitor (RC) circuit. While dual path defibrillation configurations have significantly reduced defibrillation thresholds, improvements to dual path defibrillation techniques have been limited to experimental observations without a practical model to aid in improving dual path defibrillation techniques.

Methods

The Charge Banking Model has been extended into a new Extended Charge Banking Model of defibrillation that represents small sections of the heart as separate RC circuits, uses a weighting factor based on published defibrillation shock field gradient measures, and implements a critical mass criteria to predict the relative efficacy of single and dual path defibrillation shocks.

Results

The new model reproduced the results from several published experimental protocols that demonstrated the relative efficacy of dual path defibrillation shocks. The model predicts that time between phases or pulses of dual path defibrillation shock configurations should be minimized to maximize shock efficacy.

Discussion

Through this approach the Extended Charge Banking Model predictions may be used to improve dual path and multi-pulse defibrillation techniques, which have been shown experimentally to lower defibrillation thresholds substantially. The new model may be a useful tool to help in further improving dual path and multiple pulse defibrillation techniques by predicting optimal pulse durations and shock timing parameters.

Optimizing defibrillation waveforms for ICDs

While no simple electrical descriptor provides a good measure of defibrillation efficacy, the waveform parameters that most directly influence defibrillation are voltage and duration. Voltage is a critical parameter for defibrillation because its spatial derivative defines the electrical field that interacts with the heart. Similarly, waveform duration is a critical parameter because the shock interacts with the heart for the duration of the waveform. Shock energy is the most often cited metric of shock strength and an ICD's capacity to defibrillate, but it is not a direct measure of shock effectiveness. Despite the physiological complexities of defibrillation, a simple approach in which the heart is modeled as passive resistor-capacitor (RC) network has proved useful for predicting efficient defibrillation waveforms. The model makes two assumptions: (1) The goal of both a monophasic shock and the first phase of a biphasic shock is to maximize the voltage change in the membrane at the end of the shock for a given stored energy. (2) The goal of the second phase of a biphasic shock is to discharge the membrane back to the zero potential, removing the charge deposited by the first phase. This model predicts that the optimal waveform rises in an exponential upward curve, but such an ascending waveform is difficult to generate efficiently. ICDs use electronically efficient capacitive-discharge waveforms, which require truncation for effective defibrillation. Even with optimal truncation, capacitive-discharge waveforms require more voltage and energy to achieve the same membrane voltage than do square waves and ascending waveforms. In ICDs, the value of the shock output capacitance is a key intermediary in establishing the relationship between stored energy-the key determinant of ICD size-and waveform voltage as a function of time, the key determinant of defibrillation efficacy. The RC model predicts that, for capacitive-discharge waveforms, stored energy is minimized when the ICD's system time constant taus equals the cell membrane time constant taum, where taus is the product of the output capacitance and the resistance of the defibrillation pathway. Since the goal of phase two is to reverse the membrane charging effect of phase one, there is no advantage to additional waveform phases. The voltages and capacitances used in commercial ICDs vary widely, resulting in substantial disparities in waveform parameters. The development of present biphasic waveforms in the 1990s resulted in marked improvements in defibrillation efficacy. It is unlikely that substantial improvement in defibrillation efficacy will be achieved without radical changes in waveform design.

Quadriphasic waveforms are superior to triphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in a cardiac arrest swine model with high impedance

BACKGROUND

We have demonstrated previously that triphasic waveform shocks were superior to biphasic waveform shocks for transthoracic defibrillation. Our purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of quadriphasic versus triphasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation in a porcine model.

METHODS

Sixteen adult swine (19-25 kg, mean: 21.5 kg) were deeply anesthetized and intubated. To simulate impedance of the human chest, fixed electrical resistors (25 or 50 ohms) was placed in series with the defibrillator and the chest of each pig. After 30 s of electrically induced VF, each pig received transthoracic shocks, using either a truncated exponential triphasic waveform (5 ms positive pulse duration, 5 ms negative pulse duration and 5 ms positive pulse duration, total waveform duration 15 ms) or a quadriphasic waveform (5/5/5/5 ms, total waveform duration 20 ms). Each pig received transthoracic triphasic and quadriphasic shocks at three selected energy levels (50, 100 and 150 J) in random sequence. Four shocks were delivered at each energy level to construct an energy versus % success curve. Success was defined as VF termination at 5 s after shock. The total shocks were divided into three groups based on the delivered energy actually delivered to the animal: <40, 40-65 and >65 J. Delivered energy = (animal impedance/total impedance) times selected energy of the shock.

RESULTS

For high-impedance animals (86-102 ohms), quadriphasic waveform shocks achieved significantly higher percent shock success than triphasic shocks for the termination of VF at the energy levels of >65 J actually delivered (quadriphasic 72.7+/-12.2%, triphasic 38.9+/-7.7%, p<0.02). No differences in the shock success between quadriphasic and triphasic waveforms were found for other two energy levels. There were no differences in ventricular tachycardia or asystole after shocks between quadriphasic and triphasic waveforms.

CONCLUSION

In this porcine model, 20 ms (5/5/5/5) quadriphasic shocks were superior to 15 ms (5/5/5) triphasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation in animals with impedances that simulated high impedance in humans.

The Strength-Duration Relationship of Monophasic Waveforms with Varying Capacitance Sizes in External Defibrillation

The shape of the shock waveform influences defibrillation efficacy. However, the optimal combination between capacitance size and truncation/tilt which can determine monophasic waveform's shape, has not been determined for external defibrillation. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of varying capacitance and tilt on external defibrillation using exponential monophasic waveforms. In a pig model of external defibrillation (n = 10, 30 +/- 6 kg), nine exponential monophasic waveforms combining three capacitance values (30 microF, 60 microF, and 120 microF) and three tilt values (55%, 75%, and 95%) were tested randomly. The energy and leading edge voltage at 50% defibrillation success (E50 and V50) were used to evaluate defibrillation efficacy. E50 and V50 were determined by the Bayesian technique. The lowest stored E50 for the 30microF, 60 microF, and 120 microF waveforms were 90 +/- 12 J (95% tilt), 106 +/- 45 J (55% tilt), and 107 +/- 52 J (75% tilt), respectively. The lowest V50 for the 30 microF, 60 microF, and 120 microF waveforms were 2,439 +/- 166 V (95% tilt), 1,849 +/- 375 V (55% tilt), and 1,301 +/- 322 V (75% tilt), respectively. The average current at external defibrillation threshold demonstrated a strength versus pulse duration relationship similar to that seen with pacing. Reducing capacitance has the same effect as truncating the waveform. The E50 is more sensitive to tilt values changes in larger capacitance waveforms. This study suggests that the optimal combination between capacitance and tilt may be 120 microF and 55%-75% for external defibrillation.

Entrainment by an extracellular AC stimulus in a computational model of cardiac tissue

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac tissue can be entrained when subjected to sinusoidal stimuli, often responding with action potentials sustained for the duration of the stimulus. To investigate mechanisms responsible for both entrainment and extended action potential duration, computer simulations of a two-dimensional grid of cardiac cells subjected to sinusoidal extracellular stimulation were performed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The tissue is represented as a bidomain with unequal anisotropy ratios. Cardiac membrane dynamics are governed by a modified Beeler-Reuter model. The stimulus, delivered by a bipolar electrode, has a duration of 750 to 1,000 msec, an amplitude range of 800 to 3,200 microA/cm, and a frequency range of 10 to 60 Hz. The applied stimuli create virtual electrode polarization (VEP) throughout the sheet. The simulations demonstrate that periodic extracellular stimulation results in entrainment of the tissue. This phase-locking of the membrane potential to the stimulus is dependent on the location in the sheet and the magnitude of the stimulus. Near the electrodes, the oscillations are 1:1 or 1:2 phase-locked; at the middle of the sheet, the oscillations are 1:2 or 1:4 phase-locked and occur on the extended plateau of an action potential. The 1:2 behavior near the electrodes is due to periodic change in the voltage gradient between VEP of opposite polarity; at the middle of the sheet, it is due to spread of electrotonic current following the collision of a propagating wave with refractory tissue.

CONCLUSION

The simulations suggest that formation of VEP in cardiac tissue subjected to periodic extracellular stimulation is of paramount importance to tissue entrainment and formation of an extended oscillatory action potential plateau.

Waveform analysis of biphasic external defibrillators

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

All internal defibrillators and some external defibrillators use biphasic waveforms. The study analysed the discharged waveform pulses of two manual and two semi-automated biphasic external defibrillators.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The defibrillators were discharged into resistive loads of 25, 50 and 100 Omega simulating the patient's transthoracic impedance. The tested biphasic defibrillators differed in initial current as well as initial voltage, varying from 10.9 to 73.3 A and from 482.8 to 2140.0 V, respectively. The energies of the manual defibrillators set at 100, 150 and 200 J deviated by up to +19.1 or -28.9% from the selected energy. Impedance-normalised delivered energy varied from 1.0 to 12.5 J/Omega. Delivered energy, shock duration and charge flow were examined with respect to the total pulse, its splitting into positive and negative phases and their impedance dependence. For three defibrillators pulse duration increased with the resistive load, whereas one defibrillator always required 9.9 ms. All tested defibrillators showed a higher charge flow in the positive phase. Defibrillator capacitance varied between approximately 200 and 100 mu F and internal resistance varied from 2.0 to 7.6 Omega. Defibrillator waveform tilt ranged from -13.1 to 61.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

The tested defibrillators showed remarkable differences in their waveform design and their varying dependence on transthoracic impedance.

Multicenter study of principles-based waveforms for external defibrillation

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of a shock waveform for external defibrillation depends on the waveform characteristics. Recently, design principles based on cardiac electrophysiology have been developed to determine optimal waveform characteristics. The objective of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of principles-based monophasic and biphasic waveforms for external defibrillation.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, blinded, multicenter study of 118 patients undergoing electrophysiologic testing or receiving an implantable defibrillator was conducted. Ventricular fibrillation was induced, and defibrillation was attempted in each patient with a biphasic and a monophasic waveform. Patients were randomly placed into 2 groups: group 1 received shocks of escalating energy, and group 2 received only high-energy shocks.

RESULTS

The biphasic waveform achieved a first-shock success rate of 100% in group 1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 95.1% to 100%) and group 2 (95% CI 94.6% to 100%), with average delivered energies of 201+/-17 J and 295+/-28 J, respectively. The monophasic waveform demonstrated a 96.7% (95% CI 89.1% to 100%) first-shock success rate and average delivered energy of 215+/-12 J for group 1 and a 98.2% (95% CI 91.7% to 100%) first-shock success rate and average delivered energy of 352+/-13 J for group 2.

CONCLUSION

Using principles of electrophysiology, it is possible to design both biphasic and monophasic waveforms for external defibrillation that achieve a high first-shock efficacy.

Automatic adjustment of biphasic pulse duration in transthoracic defibrillation

Many studies have proven that biphasic defibrillation pulses are more efficient than the damped sinusoid monopolar waveform. Transthoracic resistance was shown to change during the two phases. On the other hand, it was proven that transthoracic resistance plays an important role in the defibrillation process, yielding the current for selected energy or voltage. Pre-shock measurement of the resistance may lead to improved selection. Stabilized current defibrillators are of low stored-to-delivered energy ratio. Therefore, automatic dynamic adjustment of some defibrillator parameters with respect to transthoracic resistance changes seems rational. An approach is known for modifying the pulse duration, in order to deliver a selected energy. A method is proposed here and an experimental defibrillator is developed for dynamic pulse duration adjustment with the purpose of obtaining a desired optimal time-course of the cardiac cell transmembrane potential.

New approach to biphasic waveforms for internal defibrillation: fully discharging capacitors

INTRODUCTION

The use of two independent, fully discharging capacitors for each phase of a biphasic defibrillation waveform may lead to the design of a simpler, smaller, internal defibrillator. The goal of this study was to determine the optimal combination of capacitor sizes for such a waveform.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eight full-discharge (95/95% tilt), biphasic waveforms produced by several combinations of phase-1 capacitors (30, 60, and 90 microF) and phase-2 capacitors (1/3, 2/3, and 1.0 times the phase-1 capacitor) were tested and compared to a single-capacitor waveform (120 microF, 65/65% tilt) in a pig ventricular fibrillation model (n = 12, 23+/-2 kg). In the full-discharge waveforms, phase-2 peak voltage was equal to phase-1 peak voltage. Shocks were delivered between a right ventricular lead and a left pectoral can electrode. E50s and V50s were determined using a ten-step Bayesian process. Full-discharge waveforms with phase-2 capacitors of < or =40 microF had the same E50 (6.7+/-1.7 J to 7.3+/-3.9 J) as the single-capacitor truncated waveform (7.3+/-3.7 J), whereas waveforms with phase-2 capacitors of > or =60 microF had an extremely high E50 (14.5+/-10.8 J or greater, P < 0.05). Moreover, of the former set of energy-efficient waveforms, those with phase-1 capacitors of > or =60 microF additionally exhibited V50s that were equivalent to the V50 of the single-capacitor waveform (344+/-65 V to 407+/-50 V vs 339+/-83 V).

CONCLUSION

Defibrillation efficacy can be maintained in a full-discharge, two-capacitor waveform with the proper choice of capacitors.