Vasoflux, a new anticoagulant with a novel mechanism of action

Investigations of the effectiveness of heparin variants as inhibitors of histones

BACKGROUND

Extracellular histones exert cytotoxic and procoagulant effects which contribute to immunothrombosis in vascular diseases such as sepsis. Heparin has been shown to neutralize the pathologic effects of histones in vitro and in animal models.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecularweight heparin (LMWH), Vasoflux (lacks anticoagulant activity), and fondaparinux in neutralizing the cytotoxic and procoagulant activities of histones METHODS: Binding affinities between heparin variants and histone subunits were determined by Bio-layer Interferometry. The ability of heparin variants to diminish the cytotoxic and procoagulant effects of histones was studied by treating endothelial cells or monocytic THP-1 cells with histones ± heparin variants.

RESULTS

Unfractionated heparin, LMWH, and Vasoflux bind histone subunits with high affinities (Kd <1 pM-66.7 nM) whereas fondaparinux exhibited a low affinity (Kd of 3.06 µM-81.1 mM). UFH, LMWH, and Vasoflux neutralize histone-mediated cytotoxicity as well as monocytic procoagulant activity (as assessed by cell surface tissue factor and phosphatidylserine). In contrast, fondaparinux has no effect on these activities. All four heparin variants reverse histone-mediated impairment of APC generation in a dose-dependent manner.

CONCLUSIONS

The ability of heparin to neutralize the cytotoxic and procoagulant effects of histones require heparin fragments >1.7 kDa and is independent of the antithrombin-binding pentasaccharide. In contrast, the ability of heparin to neutralize histone-mediated impairment of APC generation is independent of size and anticoagulant activity. These findings suggest that heparin variants may have differential therapeutic potential in vascular diseases associated with elevated levels of histones.

Mechanistic Studies of DNase I Activity: Impact of Heparin Variants and PAD4

Background

Excessive production of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in sepsis contributes to vascular occlusion by acting as a scaffold and stimulus for thrombus formation. Removal of extracellular DNA, the major structural component of NETs, by DNase I may reduce host injury.

Objectives

(1) To determine how heparin variants (unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin, Vasoflux, and fondaparinux) affect DNase I activity, (2) to measure temporal changes in circulating DNA and DNase I in septic patients.

Methods

DNA–histone complexes were treated with DNase I ± heparin variants and visualized via agarose gels. We compared the ability of DNase I ± heparin variants to digest NETs released by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-stimulated neutrophils versus DNA–histone complexes released by necrotic HEK293 cells. Plasma DNA and DNase I levels were measured longitudinally in 76 septic patients.

Results

Heparin enhances DNase I-mediated digestion of DNA–histone complexes in a size-dependent manner that does not require the antithrombin-binding region. In contrast, DNase I alone was able to degrade the DNA–histone component of NETs presumably due to peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4)-mediated histone citrullination that weakens DNA–histone interactions. In purified systems, PAD4 treatment of DNA–histone complexes enhanced the ability of DNase I to degrade histone-bound DNA. In septic patients, endogenous DNase I levels remained persistently low over 28 days, and there were no significant correlations between DNA and DNase I levels.

Conclusion

Heparin enhances DNA-mediated digestion of DNA–histone complexes in a size-dependent manner that is independent of its anticoagulant properties. Citrullination of histones by PAD4 renders DNA–histone complexes susceptible to DNase I digestion. Endogenous DNase I levels are persistently decreased in septic patients, which supports the potential utility of DNase I as a therapy for sepsis.

Sulfated Non-Saccharide Glycosaminoglycan Mimetics as Novel Drug Discovery Platform for Various Pathologies

Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are very complex, natural anionic polysaccharides. They are polymers of repeating disaccharide units of uronic acid and hexosamine residues. Owing to their template-free, spatiotemporally-controlled, and enzyme-mediated biosyntheses, GAGs possess enormous polydispersity, heterogeneity, and structural diversity which often translate into multiple biological roles. It is well documented that GAGs contribute to physiological and pathological processes by binding to proteins including serine proteases, serpins, chemokines, growth factors, and microbial proteins. Despite advances in the GAG field, the GAG-protein interface remains largely unexploited by drug discovery programs. Thus, Non-Saccharide Glycosaminoglycan Mimetics (NSGMs) have been rationally developed as a novel class of sulfated molecules that modulate GAG-protein interface to promote various biological outcomes of substantial benefit to human health. In this review, we describe the chemical, biochemical, and pharmacological aspects of recently reported NSGMs and highlight their therapeutic potentials as structurally and mechanistically novel anti-coagulants, anti-cancer agents, anti-emphysema agents, and anti-viral agents. We also describe the challenges that complicate their advancement and describe ongoing efforts to overcome these challenges with the aim of advancing the novel platform of NSGMs to clinical use.

Therapeutic monitoring of unfractionated heparin - trials and tribulations

INTRODUCTION

Heparin is one of the oldest biological medicines with an established role in prevention and treatment of arterial and venous thromboembolism. Published therapeutic ranges for unfractionated heparin (UFH) mostly precede the large increase in the number of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagent/instrument combinations that now show wide variability. Areas covered: This paper explores the use of UFH, the development of heparin therapeutic ranges (HTRs), and the strengths and limitations of the methods used to monitor heparin's anticoagulant effect. Expert commentary: Despite longstanding use of UFH for management of thromboembolic conditions, the optimal test for monitoring UFH remains undetermined. Although used extensively for monitoring UFH, routine APTT-derived HTRs are based on limited science that may have little relevance to current laboratory practice. Anti-FXa levels may provide better and more reliable HTRs; however, even these levels show considerable inter-laboratory variation, and there are insufficient clinical studies proving improved clinical efficacy. Alternative tests for monitoring UFH reported over time have not been proven effective nor feasible, secondary to technical or cost issues, or lack of general adoption. Thus, despite limited evidence of clinical utility, an uncomfortable marriage of convenience represented by heparin laboratory monitoring is unlikely to be terminated in the immediate future.

Old and new applications of non-anticoagulant heparin

The aim of this chapter is to provide an overview of non-anticoagulant effects of heparins and their potential use in new therapeutic applications. Heparin and heparin derivatives have been tested in inflammatory, pulmonary and reproductive diseases, in cardiovascular, nephro- and neuro-tissue protection and repair, but also as agents against angiogenesis, atheroschlerosis, metastasis, protozoa and viruses. Targeting and inhibition of specific mediators involved in the inflammatory process, promoting some of the above mentioned pathologies, are reported along with recent studies of heparin conjugates and oral delivery systems. Some reports from the institute of the authors, such as those devoted to glycol-split heparins are also included. Among the members and derivatives of this class, several are undergoing clinical trials as antimetastatic and antimalarial agents and for the treatment of labour pain and severe hereditary anaemia. Other heparins, whose therapeutic targets are non-anticoagulant such as nephropathies, retinopathies and cystic fibrosis are also under investigation.

The Future of Anticoagulation

Anticoagulant agents, such as unfractionated heparin and warfarin, have been in use for roughly 50 years. Over the past decade, injectable agents such as low-molecular-weight heparins, pentasaccharide, and direct thrombin inhibitors have been major advances in preventing and treating thrombosis. Despite these somewhat recent additions, there is still enormous potential to improve on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of these agents, as well as improve patient outcomes. There are currently a large number of anticoagulant agents (injectable and oral) that could be available for use in the next several years. Many of these new agents have unique mechanisms that may provide practitioners with anticoagulant alternatives. This review gives a detailed analysis of the anticoagulant agents that may add to our armamentarium in the management of thrombosis.

Structural features of glycol-split low-molecular-weight heparins and their heparin lyase generated fragments

Periodate oxidation followed by borohydride reduction converts the well-known antithrombotics heparin and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) into their "glycol-split" (gs) derivatives of the "reduced oxyheparin" (RO) type, some of which are currently being developed as potential anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory drugs. Whereas the structure of gs-heparins has been recently studied, details of the more complex and more bioavailable gs-LMWHs have not been yet reported. We obtained RO derivatives of the three most common LMWHs (tinzaparin, enoxaparin, and dalteparin) and studied their structures by two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and ion-pair reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. The liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis was extended to their heparinase-generated oligosaccharides. The combined NMR/LC-MS analysis of RO-LMWHs provided evidence for glycol-splitting-induced transformations mainly involving internal nonsulfated glucuronic and iduronic acid residues (including partial hydrolysis with formation of "remnants") and for the hydrolysis of the gs uronic acid residues when formed at the non-reducing ends (mainly, in RO-dalteparin). Evidence for minor modifications, such as ring contraction of some dalteparin internal aminosugar residues, was also obtained. Unexpectedly, the N-sulfated 1,6-anhydromannosamine residues at the enoxaparin reducing end were found to be susceptible to the periodate oxidation. In addition, in tinzaparin and enoxaparin, the borohydride reduction converts the hemiacetalic aminosugars at the reducing end to alditols. Typical LC-MS signatures of RO-derivatives of individual LMWH both before and after digestion with heparinases included oligosaccharides generated from the original antithrombin-binding and "linkage" regions.

Profiling glycol-split heparins by high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis of their heparinase-generated oligosaccharides

Glycol-split (gs) heparins, obtained by periodate oxidation/borohydride reduction of heparin currently used as an anticoagulant and antithrombotic drug, are arousing increasing interest in anticancer and anti-inflammation therapies. These new medical uses are favored by the loss of anticoagulant activity associated with glycol-splitting-induced inactivation of the antithrombin III (AT) binding site. The structure of gs heparins has not been studied yet in detail. In this work, ion pair reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (IPRP-HPLC) coupled with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) widely used for unmodified heparin has been adapted to the analysis of oligosaccharides generated by digestion with heparinases of gs heparins usually prepared from porcine mucosal heparin. The method was also found to be very effective in analyzing gs derivatives obtained from heparins of different animal and tissue origins. Besides the major 2-O-sulfated disaccharides, heparinase digests of gs heparins contain mainly tetra- and hexasaccharides incorporating one or two gs residues, with distribution patterns typical for individual gs heparins. A heptasulfated, mono-N-acetylated hexasaccharide with two gs residues was shown to be a marker of the gs-modified AT binding site within heparin chains.

Identification of diabetic nephropathy-selective proteins in human plasma by multi-lectin affinity chromatography and LC-MS/MS

PURPOSE

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a serious complication of diabetes mellitus. Microalbuminuria has been established as a risk factor for the development of diabetic renal disease. Recently, microalbuminuria has been reported to have limitations in determining disease risk and predicting DN. Therefore, identification of more specific biomarkers for prediction of DN is needed.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

When kidney damage is initiated, glycoprotein leakage into the blood may occur, thus altering the glycoproteome profile of the blood. Here, we have used a combined approach of glycoprotein enrichment of plasma with a proteomic analysis to discover potential DN biomarkers. We isolated glycoproteins from plasma provided by six type 2 diabetes control (DC) and six type 2 DN patients using multi-lectin affinity chromatography. Captured glycoproteins were resolved by 1-D PAGE and tryptic digests of isolated proteins were analyzed by LC-MS/MS.

RESULTS

From the comparative and semi-quantitative proteome analysis, we identified 13 up- and 14 down-regulated glycoproteins in DN plasma. Among the up-regulated glycoproteins, the levels of lumican, vasorin and retinol binding protein-4 were verified by Western blot analysis of individual plasma samples.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Collectively, our findings show that biomarker discovery has considerable potential for predicting diabetic nephropathy in diabetic patients.

The anti-inflammatory effects of heparin and related compounds

Heparin is a glycosaminoglycan well known for its anticoagulant properties. In addition, heparin possesses anti-inflammatory effects. Although the mechanisms responsible for the anticoagulant effects of heparin are well understood, those underlying its anti-inflammatory effects are not. This review presents some of the evidence from clinical and animal studies supporting an anti-inflammatory role for heparin and heparin-related derivatives. Potential mechanisms by which heparin can exert its anti-inflammatory effects are discussed. The clinical use of heparin as an anti-inflammatory agent has been held back by the fear of bleeding. Development of nonanticoagulant heparins or heparin derivatives should mitigate this concern.

The heparin binding properties of heparin cofactor II suggest an antithrombin-like activation mechanism

The serpin heparin cofactor II (HCII) is a glycosaminoglycan-activated inhibitor of thrombin that circulates at a high concentration in the blood. The antithrombotic effect of heparin, however, is due primarily to the specific interaction of a fraction of heparin chains with the related serpin antithrombin (AT). What currently prevents selective therapeutic activation of HCII is the lack of knowledge of the determinants of glycosaminoglycan binding specificity. In this report we investigate the heparin binding properties of HCII and conclude that binding is nonspecific with a minimal heparin length of 13 monosaccharide units required and affinity critically dependent on ionic strength. Rapid kinetics of heparin binding indicate an induced fit mechanism that involves a conformational change in HCII. Thus, HCII binds to heparin in a manner analogous to the interaction of AT with low affinity heparin. A fully allosteric 2000-fold heparin activation of thrombin inhibition by HCII is demonstrated for heparin chains up to 26 monosaccharide units in length. We conclude that the heparin-binding mechanism of HCII is closely analogous to that of AT and that the induced fit mechanism suggests the potential design or discovery of specific HCII agonists.

Heparin and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin

This article about unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is part of the Seventh American College of Chest Physicians Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence-Based Guidelines. UFH is a heterogeneous mixture of glycosaminoglycans that bind to antithrombin via a pentasaccharide, catalyzing the inactivation of thrombin and other clotting factors. UFH also binds endothelial cells, platelet factor 4, and platelets, leading to rather unpredictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Variability in activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) reagents necessitates site-specific validation of the aPTT therapeutic range in order to properly monitor UFH therapy. Lack of validation has been an oversight in many clinical trials comparing UFH to LMWH. In patients with apparent heparin resistance, anti-factor Xa monitoring may be superior to measurement of aPTT. LMWHs lack the nonspecific binding affinities of UFH, and, as a result, LMWH preparations have more predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. LMWHs have replaced UFH for most clinical indications for the following reasons: (1) these properties allow LMWHs to be administered subcutaneously, once daily without laboratory monitoring; and (2) the evidence from clinical trials that LMWH is as least as effective as and is safer than UFH. Several clinical issues regarding the use of LMWHs remain unanswered. These relate to the need for monitoring with an anti-factor Xa assay in patients with severe obesity or renal insufficiency. The therapeutic range for anti-factor Xa activity depends on the dosing interval. Anti-factor Xa monitoring is prudent when administering weight-based doses of LMWH to patients who weigh > 150 kg. It has been determined that UFH infusion is preferable to LMWH injection in patients with creatinine clearance of < 25 mL/min, until further data on therapeutic dosing of LMWHs in renal failure have been published. However, when administered in low doses prophylactically, LMWH is safe for therapy in patients with renal failure. Protamine may help to reverse bleeding related to LWMH, although anti-factor Xa activity is not fully normalized by protamine. The synthetic pentasaccharide fondaparinux is a promising new antithrombotic agent for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Targeting thrombin – rational drug design from natural mechanisms

It is difficult to overstate the medical importance of the serine protease thrombin. Thrombin is involved in many diverse processes, such as cell signaling and memory, but it is the crucial role that it plays in blood coagulation that commands the interest of the medical community. Thrombosis is the most common cause of death in the industrialized world and, whether through venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction or stroke, ultimately involves the inappropriate activity of thrombin. The number and type of intrinsic and extrinsic natural mechanisms of targeting thrombin that have evolved validate thrombin as an important physiological target, and provide strategies to knock it out. The more we learn about the natural mechanisms that determine thrombin specificity the more likely we are to develop compounds that selectively alter thrombin activity. In this article, we review the natural mechanisms that regulate thrombin activity and novel approaches to inhibit thrombin based on these mechanisms.

Overview of anticoagulant drugs for the future

More efficacious, safer, and easier to use anticoagulants are under development. Multiple agents have been shown to be effective in ex vivo or animal thrombosis models and several have progressed to clinical studies. Investigators have not yet determined if pharmaceuticals that inhibit coagulation factor activity earlier in the cascade (for example, inhibitors of tissue factor/factor VIIa, factor IXa, or Xa) are superior to those that block the cascade at a later point. Orally bioavailable drugs for the long-term treatment of thrombotic disorders, particularly those that do not require monitoring, are needed and are under development. Local delivery of anticoagulants or genes modulating anticoagulant control at sites of increased thrombogenicity, such as in diseased arteries, is a promising treatment modality that may decrease systemic bleeding problems. Much about the initiating pathophysiologic events leading to venous thrombotic disease needs to be elucidated before such local therapy can be tested in the venous vasculature. While awaiting better anticoagulants to become routinely available, we need to improve patient management with existing drugs by instituting anticoagulation clinics, promoting patient self-monitoring, and improving efforts to educate patients and health care providers about the use of anticoagulant drugs.

Randomized comparison of a novel anticoagulant, vasoflux, and heparin as adjunctive therapy to streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction: results of the VITAL study (Vasoflux International Trial for Acute Myocardial Infarction Lysis)

BACKGROUND

Vasoflux is a low-molecular-weight heparin derivative that inhibits factor IXa activation of factor X and catalyzes fibrin-bound thrombin inactivation by heparin cofactor II. We studied whether vasoflux improves the results of thrombolysis with streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We randomized 277 patients with acute myocardial infarction to standard intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) or intravenous vasoflux 1, 4, 8, or 16 mg/kg as a bolus followed by 1, 4, 8, or 16 mg/kg per hour infusion, on top of streptokinase and aspirin, until angiography at 90 minutes. Patency and corrected Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count were studied at 60 and 90 minutes. Rates of TIMI grade 3 flow with vasoflux at any dose (35% to 42%) were not different from UFH (41%) at either time point, nor was the corrected TIMI frame count. However, there was an excess of bleeding in the patients randomized to vasoflux 8 or 16 mg/kg: 78% and 71%, compared with 53% for UFH (P =.004 and.043, respectively). Major bleeding was observed in 13% and 28% at these vasoflux doses compared with 8% with UFH (P =.558 and.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

At doses that increase the risk of bleeding, the addition of vasoflux to streptokinase and aspirin did not lead to improved patency rates compared with UFH. Targeting factor IXa and heparin cofactor II may not be a useful adjunct to thrombolysis.

Molecular basis for the susceptibility of fibrin-bound thrombin to inactivation by heparin cofactor ii in the presence of dermatan sulfate but not heparin

Although fibrin-bound thrombin is resistant to inactivation by heparin.antithrombin and heparin.heparin cofactor II complexes, indirect studies in plasma systems suggest that the dermatan sulfate.heparin cofactor II complex can inhibit fibrin-bound thrombin. Herein we demonstrate that fibrin monomer produces a 240-fold decrease in the heparin-catalyzed rate of thrombin inhibition by heparin cofactor II but reduces the dermatan sulfate-catalyzed rate only 3-fold. The protection of fibrin-bound thrombin from inhibition by heparin.heparin cofactor II reflects heparin-mediated bridging of thrombin to fibrin that results in the formation of a ternary heparin.thrombin.fibrin complex. This complex, formed as a result of three binary interactions (thrombin.fibrin, thrombin.heparin, and heparin.fibrin), limits accessibility of heparin-catalyzed inhibitors to thrombin and induces conformational changes at the active site of the enzyme. In contrast, dermatan sulfate binds to thrombin but does not bind to fibrin. Although a ternary dermatan sulfate. thrombin.fibrin complex forms, without dermatan sulfate-mediated bridging of thrombin to fibrin, only two binary interactions exist (thrombin.fibrin and thrombin. dermatan sulfate). Consequently, thrombin remains susceptible to inactivation by heparin cofactor II. This study explains why fibrin-bound thrombin is susceptible to inactivation by heparin cofactor II in the presence of dermatan sulfate but not heparin.

Hypersulfated low molecular weight heparin with reduced affinity for antithrombin acts as an anticoagulant by inhibiting intrinsic tenase and prothrombinase

In buffer systems, heparin and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) directly inhibit the intrinsic factor X-activating complex (intrinsic tenase) but have no effect on the prothrombin-activating complex (prothrombinase). Although chemical modification of LMWH, to lower its affinity for antithrombin (LA-LMWH) has no effect on its ability to inhibit intrinsic tenase, N-desulfation of LMWH reduces its activity 12-fold. To further explore the role of sulfation, hypersulfated LA-LMWH was synthesized (sLA-LMWH). sLA-LMWH is not only a 32-fold more potent inhibitor of intrinsic tenase than LA-LMWH; it also acquires prothrombinase inhibitory activity. A direct correlation between the extent of sulfation of LA-LMWH and its inhibitory activity against intrinsic tenase and prothrombinase is observed. In plasma-based assays of tenase and prothrombinase, sLA-LMWH produces similar prolongation of clotting times in plasma depleted of antithrombin and/or heparin cofactor II as it does in control plasma. In contrast, heparin has no effect in antithrombin-depleted plasma. When the effect of sLA-LMWH on various components of tenase and prothrombinase was examined, its inhibitory activity was found to be cofactor-dependent (factors Va and VIIIa) and phospholipid-independent. These studies reveal that sLA-LMWH acts as a potent antithrombin-independent inhibitor of coagulation by attenuating intrinsic tenase and prothrombinase.

Cardiopulmonary bypass in humans: bypassing unfractionated heparin

Seven anticoagulants besides unfractionated heparin have been used for human cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), mainly in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The collective experience with these alternative anticoagulants provides a perspective on current efforts aimed at improving CPB anticoagulation. Unfortunately, each alternative currently lacks a standard dosing schedule and a reliable method of monitoring the adequacy of its anticoagulant effect during CPB. Most also lack proven antidotes. Thus, unfractionated heparin remains the anticoagulant of choice for standard CPB.

Comparison of heparin- and dermatan sulfate-mediated catalysis of thrombin inactivation by heparin cofactor II

Heparin and dermatan sulfate activate heparin cofactor II (HCII) comparably, presumably by liberating the amino terminus of HCII to bind to exosite I of thrombin. To explore this model of activation, we systematically substituted basic residues in the glycosaminoglycan-binding domain of HCII with neutral amino acids and measured the rates of thrombin inactivation by the mutants. Mutant D, with changes at Arg(184), Lys(185), Arg(189), Arg(192), Arg(193), demonstrated a approximately 130-fold increased rate of thrombin inactivation that was unaffected by the presence of glycosaminoglycans. The increased rate reflects displacement of the amino terminus of mutant D because (a) mutant D inactivates gamma-thrombin at a 65-fold slower rate than alpha-thrombin, (b) hirudin-(54-65) decreases the rate of thrombin inactivation, and (c) deletion of the amino terminus of mutant D reduces the rate of thrombin inactivation approximately 100-fold. We also examined the contribution of glycosaminoglycan-mediated bridging of thrombin to HCII to the inhibitory process. Whereas activation of HCII by heparin was chain-length dependent, stimulation by dermatan sulfate was not, suggesting that dermatan sulfate does not utilize a template mechanism to accelerate the inhibitory process. Fluorescence spectroscopy revealed that dermatan sulfate evokes greater conformational changes in HCII than heparin, suggesting that dermatan sulfate stimulates HCII by producing more effective displacement of the amino terminus.