Valsartan, blood pressure reduction, and C-reactive protein: primary report of the Val-MARC trial

Angiotensin Regulation of Vascular Homeostasis: Exploring the Role of ROS and RAS Blockers

Extensive research has been conducted to elucidate and substantiate the crucial role of the Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS) in the pathogenesis of hypertension, cardiovascular disorders, and renal diseases. Furthermore, the role of oxidative stress in maintaining vascular balance has been well established. It has been observed that many of the cellular effects induced by Angiotensin II (Ang II) are facilitated by reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase. In this paper, we present a comprehensive overview of the role of ROS in the physiology of human blood vessels, specifically focusing on its interaction with RAS. Moreover, we delve into the mechanisms by which clinical interventions targeting RAS influence redox signaling in the vascular wall.

Influence of Hypersensitive C-Reactive Protein on the Effect of Continuous Antihypertensive Pharmacological Therapy

ABSTRACT

Systemic chronic inflammation, represented by hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), is an essential contributing factor to hypertension. However, the influence of hsCRP levels on the effect of antihypertensive pharmacological therapy remains unknown. We evaluated hsCRP levels in 3756 newly diagnosed, untreated hypertensive subjects. Participants were grouped by tertiles of hsCRP and were randomly treated with nitrendipine + captopril, nitrendipine + spironolactone hydrochlorothiazide + captopril, and hydrochlorothiazide + spironolactone. Blood pressure (BP) was recorded every 2 weeks. A multivariate mixed linear model was used to evaluate the impact of baseline hsCRP levels on the continuous antihypertensive effect. After 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of continuous antihypertensive treatment, no significant difference was observed in BP decline among the different hsCRP groups. We identified interactions between baseline hsCRP levels and follow-up time. After adjusting for conventional risk factors and the interactions between hsCRP and follow-up time, there was no significant association between baseline hsCRP level and antihypertensive effects at 0-6 months of follow-up. However, from 6 to 12 months, subjects with higher baseline hsCRP levels exhibited a more marked BP-lowering effect ( P < 0.001 at 9 months, P = 0.002 at 12 months). Overall, there exist interaction effects between baseline hsCRP levels and follow-up time. Individuals with higher baseline hsCRP levels may exhibit a better response to antihypertensive therapy.

Blood pressure lowering and risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes: an individual participant data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Blood pressure lowering is an established strategy for preventing microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes, but its role in the prevention of diabetes itself is unclear. We aimed to examine this question using individual participant data from major randomised controlled trials.

METHODS

We performed a one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis, in which data were pooled to investigate the effect of blood pressure lowering per se on the risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes. An individual participant data network meta-analysis was used to investigate the differential effects of five major classes of antihypertensive drugs on the risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes. Overall, data from 22 studies conducted between 1973 and 2008, were obtained by the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration (Oxford University, Oxford, UK). We included all primary and secondary prevention trials that used a specific class or classes of antihypertensive drugs versus placebo or other classes of blood pressure lowering medications that had at least 1000 persons-years of follow-up in each randomly allocated arm. Participants with a known diagnosis of diabetes at baseline and trials conducted in patients with prevalent diabetes were excluded. For the one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis we used stratified Cox proportional hazards model and for the individual participant data network meta-analysis we used logistic regression models to calculate the relative risk (RR) for drug class comparisons.

FINDINGS

145 939 participants (88 500 [60·6%] men and 57 429 [39·4%] women) from 19 randomised controlled trials were included in the one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis. 22 trials were included in the individual participant data network meta-analysis. After a median follow-up of 4·5 years (IQR 2·0), 9883 participants were diagnosed with new-onset type 2 diabetes. Systolic blood pressure reduction by 5 mm Hg reduced the risk of type 2 diabetes across all trials by 11% (hazard ratio 0·89 [95% CI 0·84-0·95]). Investigation of the effects of five major classes of antihypertensive drugs showed that in comparison to placebo, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (RR 0·84 [95% 0·76-0·93]) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (RR 0·84 [0·76-0·92]) reduced the risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes; however, the use of β blockers (RR 1·48 [1·27-1·72]) and thiazide diuretics (RR 1·20 [1·07-1·35]) increased this risk, and no material effect was found for calcium channel blockers (RR 1·02 [0·92-1·13]).

INTERPRETATION

Blood pressure lowering is an effective strategy for the prevention of new-onset type 2 diabetes. Established pharmacological interventions, however, have qualitatively and quantitively different effects on diabetes, likely due to their differing off-target effects, with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers having the most favourable outcomes. This evidence supports the indication for selected classes of antihypertensive drugs for the prevention of diabetes, which could further refine the selection of drug choice according to an individual's clinical risk of diabetes.

FUNDING

British Heart Foundation, National Institute for Health Research, and Oxford Martin School.

Effect of sacubitril/valsartan on inflammation and oxidative stress in doxorubicin-induced heart failure model in rabbits

Our study evaluates the effects of sacubitril/valsartan (SAC/VAL) in the rabbit model of doxorubicin-induced heart failure. Twenty rabbits (5 per group) were administered with doxorubicin (DOX, 1.5 mg kg^-1, i.v.) to induce heart failure. Specific biomarkers such as BNP, CnT, CRP and ROMs were determined. The cardiac enzymatic anti-oxidant systems were recorded with their electrographic profiles. HR, SBP, DBP and MAP were restored at 5 or 10 mg kg^-1 (p.o.) of SAC/VAL compared to DOX, followed by reduced levels of creatinine and BNP (p < 0.001). Significant improvements (p < 0.05) compared to DOX were also noticed in CAT, SOD and LPO with the same doses of SAC/VAL. Specific biomarkers such as BNP, CnT, CRP and ROMs descended significantly (p < 0.001) with treatment when compared to their baseline values. Our findings implied that SAC/VAL treatment reduced the inflammation and oxidative stress to improve the cardiac function.

Reduction in hsCRP levels is associated with decreased incidence of cardiovascular events in Japanese hypertensive women but not in men

To test our hypothesis that the magnitude of reduction in hsCRP achieved by antihypertensive medications may predict the benefit for cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive individuals, we performed subanalysis of the ATTEMPT-CVD study. The hypertensive participants enrolled in the ATTMEPT-CVD study were categorized into two groups according to whether achieved reduction in hsCRP levels at 6 months after initiation of antihypertensive medications from baseline was equal to or greater than 40% (responder group) or less than 40% (non-responder group). Baseline characteristics and blood pressure during follow-up period were similar between the groups. For women, the incidence of cardiovascular events was significantly less in responder group than non-responder group (P < 0.0221). However, for men, there was no significant difference between the groups regarding incident cardiovascular events (P = 0.2434). There was a significant interaction (P = 0.0187) between sexes for incident cardiovascular events. Our results provide the evidence suggesting that substantial reduction (40% or greater reduction) in hsCRP on antihypertensive medication predicts the benefit for cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive women but it does not in hypertensive men. The magnitude of achieved reduction in hsCRP by antihypertensive medications seems to be a useful indicator of successful treatment in Japanese hypertensive women.

This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01075698.

Correlation Between Ideal Cardiovascular Health Metrics and Plasma hs-CRP Levels in a North China Population: One Four-Year Follow-Up Study

Background

This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the potential association of ideal cardiovascular health metrics with the plasma levels of highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) among people in North China.

Methods

A total of 80,968 participants were included in this study at baseline. Data relating to seven health metrics and plasma hs-CRP levels were collected at baseline and the end of follow-up. The change in health metrics of each individual was compared and recorded. The potential association of gain or loss of each health metric, as well as the change in the total number of health metrics that each individual had during follow-up, with the risk of increased hs-CRP level, were explored by multiple Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

A total of 72,321 participants (94.51%) completed the follow-up, and the average follow-up time was 4.1 years. Ideal body mass index (BMI), physical activity, smoking status and total cholesterol all had significant impacts on hs-CRP levels, with ideal BMI having the largest impact. Losing ideal BMI during follow-up raised the probability of hs-CRP increase during the follow-up time by 1.72 (95% CI, 1.59–1.86) times for men and 2.05 (95% CI, 1.76–2.39) times for women. The effects of ideal salt intake and blood pressure on hs-CRP levels were uncertain. Changes in the total number of ideal metrics for each individual had a significant cumulative effect on hs-CRP. The hazard ratio of loss of four to six health metrics during follow-up on the risk of hs-CRP increase was 1.69 (95% CI, 1.38–2.06) for men and 1.52 (95% CI, 1.13–2.04) for women.

Conclusion

Loss or gain of ideal cardiovascular health metrics is associated with significant fluctuations in plasma hs-CRP levels. The cardiovascular benefits brought by the ideal health metrics are mediated at least in part by reducing systemic inflammation in the body.

Clinical approach to the inflammatory etiology of cardiovascular diseases

Inflammation is an obligatory marker of arterial disease, both stemming from the inflammatory activity of cholesterol itself and from well-established molecular mechanisms. Raised progenitor cell recruitment after major events and clonal hematopoiesis related mechanisms have provided an improved understanding of factors regulating inflammatory phenomena. Trials with inflammation antagonists have led to an extensive evaluation of biomarkers such as the high sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP), not exerting a causative role, but frequently indicative of the individual cardiovascular (CV) risk. Aim of this review is to provide indication on the anti-inflammatory profile of agents of general use in CV prevention, i.e. affecting lipids, blood pressure, diabetes as well nutraceuticals such as n-3 fatty acids. A crucial issue in the evaluation of the benefit of the anti-inflammatory activity is the frequent discordance between a beneficial activity on a major risk factor and associated changes of hsCRP, as in the case of statins vs PCSK9 antagonists. In hypertension, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors exert an optimal anti-inflammatory activity, vs the case of sartans. The remarkable preventive activity of SLGT-2 inhibitors in heart failure is not associated with a clear anti-inflammatory mechanism. Finally, icosapent ethyl has been shown to reduce the CV risk in hypertriglyceridemia, with a 27 % reduction of hsCRP. The inflammation-based approach to arterial disease has considerably gained from an improved understanding of the clinical diagnostic strategy and from a better knowledge on the mode of action of numerous agents, including nutraceuticals.

Effect of Different Classes of Antihypertensive Drugs on Endothelial Function and Inflammation

Hypertension is characterized by structural and functional changes in blood vessels that travel with increased arterial stiffness, vascular inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. Some antihypertensive drugs have been shown to improve endothelial function and reduce levels of inflammatory markers regardless of the effect of blood pressure lowering. Third-generation β-blockers, such as nebivolol and carvedilol, because they have additional properties, have been shown to improve endothelial function in patients with hypertension. Calcium channel antagonists, because they have antioxidant effects, may improve endothelial function and vascular inflammation.The Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARBs) are able to improve endothelial dysfunction and vascular inflammation in patients with hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have shown beneficial effects on endothelial function in patients with hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases, however there are few studies evaluating the effect of treatment with this class on the reduction of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Further studies are needed to assess whether treatment of endothelial dysfunction and vascular inflammation may improve the prognosis of patients with essential hypertension.

Immunosuppressive Therapy Improves Both Short- and Long-Term Prognosis in Patients With Virus-Negative Nonfulminant Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory cardiomyopathy (infl-CMP) is characterized by increased cardiac inflammation in the absence of viruses, ischemia, valvular disease, or other apparent causes. Studies addressing the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy in patients with infl-CMP are sparse. This study retrospectively investigates whether immunosuppressive agents on top of heart failure therapy according to current guidelines improves cardiac function and long-term outcome in patients with infl-CMP.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Within the Innsbruck and Maastricht Cardiomyopathy Registry, a total of 209 patients fulfilled the criteria for infl-CMP using endomyocardial biopsy (≥14 infiltrating inflammatory cells/mm²). A total of 110 (53%) patients received immunosuppressive therapy and 99 (47%) did not. To correct for potential selection bias, 1:1 propensity score matching was used on all significant baseline parameters, resulting in a total of 90 patients per group. Baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between both patient groups, reflecting optimal propensity score matching. After a median follow-up of 31 (15-47) months, immunosuppressive therapy resulted in an improved long-term outcome (eg, heart transplantation-free survival) as compared with standard heart failure therapy alone (Log-rank P=0.043; hazard ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.17-0.92]) and in a significant larger increase of left ventricular ejection fraction after a mean of 12 months follow-up, as compared with patients receiving standard heart failure treatment only (12.2% versus 7.3%, respectively; P=0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

To conclude, this study suggests that immunosuppressive therapy in infl-CMP patients results in an improved heart transplantation-free survival as compared with standard heart failure therapy alone, underscoring the urgent need for a large prospective multicenter trial.

Potential Protective Role of Blood Pressure-Lowering Drugs on the Balance between Hemostasis and Fibrinolysis in Hypertensive Patients at Rest and During Exercise

In patients with hypertension, the triad represented by endothelial dysfunction, platelet hyperactivity, and altered fibrinolytic function disturbs the equilibrium between hemostasis and fibrinolysis and translates into a hypercoagulable state, which underlies the risk of thrombotic complications. This article reviews the scientific evidence regarding some biological effects of antihypertensive drugs, which can protect patients from the adverse consequences of hypertensive disease, improving endothelial function, enhancing antioxidant activity, and restoring equilibrium between hemostatic and fibrinolytic factors. These protective effects appear not to be mediated through blood pressure reduction and are not shared by all molecules of the same pharmacological class.

Circulating microparticles and central blood pressure according to antihypertensive strategy

OBJECTIVES

This prospective, randomized, open-label study aimed to compare the effects of antihypertensive treatment based on amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide on the circulating microparticles and central blood pressure values of hypertensive patients.

METHODS

The effects of treatments on circulating microparticles were assessed during monotherapy and after the consecutive addition of valsartan and rosuvastatin followed by the withdrawal of rosuvastatin. Each treatment period lasted for 30 days. Central blood pressure and pulse wave velocity were measured at the end of each period. Endothelial, monocyte, and platelet circulating microparticles were determined by flow cytometry. Central blood pressure values and pulse wave velocity were recorded at the end of each treatment period.

RESULTS

No differences in brachial blood pressure were observed between the treatment groups throughout the study. Although similar central blood pressure values were observed during monotherapy, lower systolic and diastolic central blood pressure values and early and late blood pressure peaks were observed in the amlodipine arm after the addition of valsartan alone or combined with rosuvastatin. Hydrochlorothiazide-based therapy was associated with a lower number of endothelial microparticles throughout the study, whereas a higher number of platelet microparticles was observed after rosuvastatin withdrawal in the amlodipine arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite similar brachial blood pressure values between groups throughout the study, exposure to amlodipine was associated with lower central blood pressure values after combination with valsartan, indicating a beneficial interaction. Differences between circulating microparticles were modest and were mainly influenced by rosuvastatin withdrawal in the amlodipine arm.

TRIPLE ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY: FOCUS ON EFFICACY AND PROGNOSIS

In the article, with regard to current clinical recommendations, the place of combined antihypertensive therapy, especially triple drugs regimens, is considered in the treatment of patients with arterial hypertension. Special focus is given to the body of evidence for the efficacy of valsartan and amlodipine, as the reference drug of angiotensin II receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers, respectively. Not only their high antihypertensive properties are demonstrated, but also a favorable effect on target-organ protection and prognosis is described. In particular, the possibilities of valsartan in reducing the severity of left ventricular hypertrophy and microalbuminuria are described, and its unique properties in the class of sartans that allow the use of this drug in patients with ischemic heart disease and chronic heart failure are emphasized. Data on the antiatherosclerotic effects of amlodipine and its proven ability to reduce cardiovascular risk are presented. Current data are presented about their use in a fixed-dose combination with hydrochlorothiazide, including real clinical practice settings. The evidence base of high clinical efficacy, safety and metabolic neutrality of the triple combination of antihypertensive drugs valsartan, amlodipine and hydrochorothiazide is presented. The issues of increasing adherence of patients to treatment when prescribing fixed-dose combinations are considered. An algorithm for the selection of antihypertensive drugs in the form of monotherapy and combination therapy of two or three drugs depending on the clinical situation (the presence of certain target-organs damages and associated clinical conditions, primarily ischemic heart disease, atherosclerosis of carotid arteries and chronic heart failure) and the severity of the additional risk of cardiovascular complications.

Valsartan attenuates pulmonary hypertension via suppression of mitogen activated protein kinase signaling and matrix metalloproteinase expression in rodents

It has previously been demonstrated that the renin-angiotensin system is involved in the pathogenesis and development of pulmonary hypertension (PH). However, the efficacy of angiotensin II type I (AT1) receptor blockers in the treatment of PH is variable. The present study examined the effects of the AT1 receptor blocker valsartan on monocrotaline (MCT)‑induced PH in rats and chronic hypoxia‑induced PH in mice. The results demonstrated that valsartan markedly attenuated development of PH in rats and mice, as indicated by reduced right ventricular systolic pressure, diminished lung vascular remodeling and decreased right ventricular hypertrophy, compared with vehicle treated animals. Immunohistochemical analyses of proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression revealed that valsartan suppressed smooth muscle cell proliferation. Western blot analysis demonstrated that valsartan limited activation of p38, c‑Jun N‑terminal kinase 1/2 and extracellular signal‑regulated kinase 1/2 signaling pathways and significantly reduced MCT‑induced upregulation of pulmonary matrix metalloproteinases‑2 and ‑9, and transforming growth factor‑β1 expression. The results suggested that valsartan attenuates development of PH in rodents by reducing expression of extracellular matrix remodeling factors and limiting smooth muscle cell proliferation to decrease pathological vascular remodeling. Therefore, valsartan may be a valuable future therapeutic approach for the treatment of PH.

Angiotensin receptor blockers are not associated with reduced inflammatory markers in the general population

OBJECTIVE

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have been suggested to reduce inflammation in randomized controlled trials. We assessed the association between ARBs and inflammatory markers in a general population setting.

METHODS

This is a population-based prospective study conducted in Lausanne, Switzerland. Baseline data from 933 participants on antihypertensive drugs (424 on ARBs) was collected in 2003-2006. Follow-up data from 1120 participants (572 on ARBs) was collected in 2009-2012. C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukins 1β and 6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) were assessed and categorized in quartiles.

RESULTS

At baseline, no differences were found between participants taking or not taking ARBs for all inflammatory markers studied, and this association persisted after multivariate adjustment: odds ratios (ORs) and (95% confidence interval) for being in the highest quartile of interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, TNF-α and CRP for participants on ARB compared to participants not on ARB were 1.23 (0.89-1.70), 1.26 (0.93-1.70), 1.14 (0.85-1.53) and 1.27 (0.96-1.69) respectively (P > 0.05). These findings were further replicated in the follow-up study: OR and (95% CI) of 1.10 (0.78-1.55), 0.87 (0.64-1.19), 0.83 (0.61-1.14) and 0.91 (0.68-1.22) for interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, TNF-α and CRP respectively (P > 0.05). Finally, no effect of ARBs was found when comparing participants who received ARBs throughout the 5.4-year follow-up with participants on other antihypertensive drugs: OR and (95% CI) of 0.93 (0.61-1.42), 0.80 (0.54-1.17), 0.86 (0.59-1.25) and 0.95 (0.67-1.35) for interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, TNF-α and CRP respectively (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ARBs are not associated with reduced levels of inflammatory markers in the general population.

Effect of Angiotensin II Type I Receptor Blockade with Valsartan on Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis: A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Valsartan and Placebo (EFFERVESCENT)

BACKGROUND

Progression of atherosclerosis is associated with a greater risk for adverse outcomes. Angiotensin II plays a key role in the pathogenesis and progression of atherosclerosis. We aimed to investigate the effects of angiotensin II type-1 receptor blockade with Valsartan on carotid wall atherosclerosis, with the hypothesis that Valsartan will reduce progression of atherosclerosis.

METHODS

Subjects (n = 120) with carotid intima-media thickness >0.65 mm by ultrasound were randomized (2:1) in a double-blind manner to receive either Valsartan or placebo for 2 years. Bilateral T2-weighted black-blood carotid magnetic resonance imaging was performed at baseline, 12 and 24 months. Changes in the carotid bulb vessel wall area and wall thickness were primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included changes in carotid plaque thickness, plasma levels of aminothiols, C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and endothelium-dependent and -independent vascular function.

RESULTS

Over 2 years, the carotid bulb vessel wall area decreased with Valsartan (-6.7, 95% CI [-11.6, -1.9] mm(2)) but not with placebo (3.4, 95% CI [-2.8, 9.6] mm(2)), P = .01 between groups. Similarly, mean wall thickness decreased with Valsartan (-0.18, 95% CI [-0.30, -0.06] mm), but not with placebo (0.08, 95% CI [-0.07, 0.23] mm), P = .009 between groups. Furthermore, plaque thickness decreased with Valsartan (-0.35, 95% CI [-0.63, -0.08] mm) but was unchanged with placebo (+0.28, 95% CI [-0.11, 0.69] mm), P = .01 between groups. These findings were unaffected by statin therapy or changes in blood pressure. Notably, there were significant improvements in the aminothiol cysteineglutathione disulfide, and trends to improvements in fibrinogen levels and endothelium-independent vascular function.

CONCLUSIONS

In subjects with carotid wall thickening, angiotensin II type-1 receptor blockade was associated with regression in carotid atherosclerosis. Whether these effects translate into improved outcomes in subjects with subclinical atherosclerosis warrants investigation.

Usual Blood Pressure and Risk of New-Onset Diabetes: Evidence From 4.1 Million Adults and a Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies

Background

Reliable quantification of the association between blood pressure (BP) and risk of type 2 diabetes is lacking.

Objectives

This study sought to determine the association between usual BP and risk of diabetes, overall and by participant characteristics.

Methods

A cohort of 4.1 million adults, free of diabetes and cardiovascular disease, was identified using validated linked electronic health records. Analyses were complemented by a meta-analysis of prospective studies that reported relative risks of new-onset diabetes per unit of systolic blood pressure (SBP).

Results

Among the overall cohort, 20 mm Hg higher SBP and 10 mm Hg higher diastolic BP were associated with a 58% and a 52% higher risk of new-onset diabetes (hazard ratio: 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56 to 1.59; and hazard ratio: 1.52; 95% confidence interval: 1.51 to 1.54), respectively. There was no evidence of a nadir to a baseline BP of 110/70 mm Hg. The strength of the association per 20 mm Hg higher SBP declined with age and with increasing body mass index. Estimates were similar even after excluding individuals prescribed antihypertensive or lipid-lowering therapies. Systematic review identified 30 studies with 285,664 participants and 17,388 incident diabetes events. The pooled relative risk of diabetes for a 20 mm Hg higher usual SBP across these studies was 1.77 (1.53 to 2.05).

Conclusions

People with elevated BP are at increased risk of diabetes. The strength of the association declined with increasing body mass index and age. Further research should determine if the observed risk is modifiable.

The role of inflammatory biomarkers in developing targeted cardiovascular therapies: lessons from the cardiovascular inflammation reduction trials

Anti-inflammatory add-on therapy to conventional cardiovascular prophylaxis has been proposed as a novel therapeutic approach to potentially reduce residual cardiovascular risk. This hypothesis has been challenged by a series of unsuccessful Phase III studies testing the impact on clinical outcomes of novel agents with immunomodulatory actions. Specifically, the apparent ability of phospholipase A2 (PLA2) inhibitors and of antioxidants to ameliorate inflammation and to reduce coronary disease in Phase II trials did not translate into improved secondary cardiovascular prevention in larger population-based studies. Other anti-inflammatory agents are still under scrutiny. However, studies to date have lacked information on the inflammatory profile of the participants, both at baseline and at follow-up, thereby limiting the possibility of identifying subgroups of patients in whom 'residual inflammation' can be detected despite optimal conventional therapy, and who could therefore benefit from a cardiovascular prevention strategy specifically targeting inflammation. This has also rendered it difficult to interpret the results as a conclusive demonstration of inefficacy of the tested anti-inflammatory strategies in the treatment of atherosclerosis. We here discuss the importance of better patient characterization to minimize heterogeneity of the study population, so that effectiveness of different anti-inflammatory strategies can be evaluated in targeted subgroups of patients. We also illustrate how specific inflammatory biomarkers could assist in this process, with particular emphasis on the roles of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and circulating monocyte phenotype.

PKC-α-dependent augmentation of cAMP and CREB phosphorylation mediates the angiotensin II stimulation of renin in the collecting duct

In contrast to the negative feedback of angiotensin II (ANG II) on juxtaglomerular renin, ANG II stimulates renin in the principal cells of the collecting duct (CD) in rats and mice via ANG II type 1 (AT1R) receptor, independently of blood pressure. In vitro data indicate that CD renin is augmented by AT1R activation through protein kinase C (PKC), but the exact mechanisms are unknown. We hypothesize that ANG II stimulates CD renin synthesis through AT1R via PKC and the subsequent activation of cAMP/PKA/CREB pathway. In M-1 cells, ANG II increased cAMP, renin mRNA (3.5-fold), prorenin, and renin proteins, as well as renin activity in culture media (2-fold). These effects were prevented by PKC inhibition with calphostin C, PKC-α dominant negative, and by PKA inhibition. Forskolin-induced increases in cAMP and renin expression were prevented by calphostin C. PKC inhibition and Ca2+ depletion impaired ANG II-mediated CREB phosphorylation and upregulation of renin. Adenylate cyclase 6 (AC) siRNA remarkably attenuated the ANG II-dependent upregulation of renin mRNA. Physiological activation of AC with vasopressin increased renin expression in M-1 cells. The results suggest that the ANG II-dependent upregulation of renin in the CD depends on PKC-α, which allows the augmentation of cAMP production and activation of PKA/CREB pathway via AC6. This study defines the intracellular signaling pathway involved in the ANG II-mediated stimulation of renin in the CD. This is a novel mechanism responsible for the regulation of local renin-angiotensin system in the distal nephron.

In prehypertension leukocytosis is associated with body mass index but not with blood pressure or incident hypertension

BACKGROUND

Previous studies reported increased white blood cell counts (WBCCs), an inflammatory marker, in hypertension, prehypertension and metabolic syndrome. Evidence suggests that inflammation precedes blood pressure (BP) elevation and may contribute to incident hypertension. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may reduce inflammation. We analyzed WBCC trends in TRial Of Preventing HYpertension (TROPHY) to determine if this inflammatory marker predicted incident hypertension in prehypertensive individuals and whether randomized assignment to the ARB candesartan (391 individuals) for 2 years, lowered WBCC compared with placebo-treated controls (381 individuals).

METHODS

A new analysis of TROPHY trial data.

RESULTS

In the total population, baseline BMI correlated with WBCC (r = 0.185, P < 0.0001), neutrophils (r = 0.135, P < 0.001) and lymphocytes (r = 0.204, P < 0.0001). Baseline triglycerides also correlated significantly with inflammatory markers. Despite a wide range of home BP (HBP) values, HBP did not correlate with baseline WBCC counts. After 2 years, candesartan decreased placebo corrected HBP by -5.5/-2.5 mmHg, (P < 0.0001), but WBCC, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were not different in placebo and in candesartan groups. Baseline WBCC, neutrophils and lymphocyte counts did not predict incident hypertension in the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

In TROPHY, candesartan lowered BP but did not alter WBCC. Baseline WBCC did not predict incident hypertension. Our findings do not support the hypothesis that inflammation contributes to incident hypertension or that ARB treatment suppresses inflammation. The significant independent association of WBCC with baseline BMI and triglycerides is consistent with the evidence that obesity and insulin resistance are associated with inflammation. The findings highlight the importance of effective lifestyle modification in prehypertension to reduce inflammatory cardio-metabolic risk and suppress transition to hypertension.

Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of Hispanic hypertensive patients

Hispanics are the largest and fastest-growing minority population in the United States, currently comprising about 16.3% (52 million) of the total population. With an increased prevalence of metabolic risk factors in this population, the rate of uncontrolled hypertension (HTN) in Hispanics significantly exceeds the rates observed among non-Hispanic blacks and whites. Unfortunately, data on HTN in Hispanics remains limited due to the under-representation of Hispanics in clinical trials; with most of the data primarily restricted to observational and retrospective subgroup analyses. This article aims to review the available data on prevalence, awareness and control of HTN, risk factors and some of the challenges unique to the Hispanics population. We also discuss treatment strategies derived from large HTN trials that included Hispanics.

Effects of valsartan on inflammatory and oxidative stress markers in hypertensive, hyperglycemic patients: an open-label, prospective study

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus and hypertension are aggravated by activation of the renin-angiotensin system caused by increased oxygen stress and local inflammatory responses. Several studies have suggested that angiotensin II type 1 receptors can reduce inflammatory markers (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hs-CRP], interleukin [IL]-6, IL-18, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule [VCAM]-I, and l-selectin) and oxidative stress markers (urinary 8-hydroxy-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine [8-OHdG] and 8-epi-prostaglandin F2α [8-isoprostane]) in hypertensive patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, on inflammatory and oxidative stress markers in hypertensive patients with mild diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance.

METHODS

In this open-label, prospective study, hypertensive patients aged >20 years with mild diabetes (requiring treatment by diet alone or an oral hypoglycemic), seen on an outpatient basis at the Division of Diabetes, Metabolism, and Endocrinology, Omori Hospital, Toyko, Japan, who were receiving a therapeutic dietary regimen for ≥1 month in the treatment of diabetes or hypertension, were eligible for enrollment. Blood pressure, inflammatory markers (hs-CRP, IL-6, IL-18, VCAM-1, and L-selectin), and oxidative stress markers (urinary 8-OHdG and 8-isoprostane) were monitored before treatment commencement with valsartan (40-80 mg/d) and after 3 months of treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients (18 men, 8 women; mean [SD] age, 57.7 [11.3] years; mean [SD] weight, 65.3 [13.1] kg) were enrolled in the study. After 3 months of treatment, patients' mean (SD) blood pressure had significantly decreased from 153.1 (11.2)/88.3 (11.4) to 143.7 (13.7)/85.2 (9.0) mm Hg (P < 0.05). Among the inflammatory and oxidative stress markers, hs-CRP, VCAM-1, and urinary 8-OHdG concentrations decreased significantly from 0.231 (0.199) to 0.134 (0.111) mg/dL (P = 0.043), 471.1 (193.9) to 403.2 (135.2) ng/mL (P = 0.012), and 12.12 (5.99) to 8.07 (3.36) ng/mg · creatinine (P = 0.001), respectively. The reductions in these markers were observed in patients regardless of whether or not their glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration improved (defined as a decrease of ≥1% in HbA1c).

CONCLUSION

This small, open-label, prospective study found that a 3-month treatment with valsartan was associated with a significant reduction of hs-CRP, VCAM-1, and urinary 8-OHdG concentrations independent of improvement in HbA1c concentration in these hypertensive patients with hyperglycemia.

CYP1A1, GCLC, AGT, AGTR1 gene-gene interactions in community-acquired pneumonia pulmonary complications

This study was conducted to establish the possible contribution of functional gene polymorphisms in detoxification/oxidative stress and vascular remodeling pathways to community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) susceptibility in the case-control study (350 CAP patients, 432 control subjects) and to predisposition to the development of CAP complications in the prospective study. All subjects were genotyped for 16 polymorphic variants in the 14 genes of xenobiotics detoxification CYP1A1, AhR, GSTM1, GSTT1, ABCB1, redox-status SOD2, CAT, GCLC, and vascular homeostasis ACE, AGT, AGTR1, NOS3, MTHFR, VEGFα. Risk of pulmonary complications (PC) in the single locus analysis was associated with CYP1A1, GCLC and AGTR1 genes. Extra PC (toxic shock syndrome and myocarditis) were not associated with these genes. We evaluated gene-gene interactions using multi-factor dimensionality reduction, and cumulative gene risk score approaches. The final model which included >5 risk alleles in the CYP1A1 (rs2606345, rs4646903, rs1048943), GCLC, AGT, and AGTR1 genes was associated with pleuritis, empyema, acute respiratory distress syndrome, all PC and acute respiratory failure (ARF). We considered CYP1A1, GCLC, AGT, AGTR1 gene set using Set Distiller mode implemented in GeneDecks for discovering gene-set relations via the degree of sharing descriptors within a given gene set. N-acetylcysteine and oxygen were defined by Set Distiller as the best descriptors for the gene set associated in the present study with PC and ARF. Results of the study are in line with literature data and suggest that genetically determined oxidative stress exacerbation may contribute to the progression of lung inflammation.

Trends in C-reactive protein levels in US adults from 1999 to 2010

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a well-known biomarker of systemic inflammation and cardiovascular disease. We investigated the trends in prevalence of elevated CRP levels (>3.0 mg/L) in a general population of US adults. Data from 27,214 subjects aged ≥20 years in the 1999-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed. After adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)(2)), and medications for lowering blood pressure, glucose, and lipids, the prevalence of elevated CRP decreased significantly from 36.7% in 1999-2002 to 32.0% in 2007-2010, corresponding to a decrease in mean CRP level from 1.92 to 1.66 mg/L (both P < 0.001). The trend remained significant after additional adjustment for several traditional cardiovascular risk factors and use of different medications, including statins. However, the decreasing trends were attenuated after additional adjustment for total bilirubin (P = 0.08 and 0.02), which increased from 0.62 to 0.73 mg/dL over 12 years (P < 0.001). The decreasing trend of CRP levels is encouraging and may be related to the increase in total bilirubin levels. Such trends may be explained in part by the increasing use of medications such as statins, which can increase bilirubin levels and decrease CRP levels.

Clinical correlates of change in inflammatory biomarkers: The Framingham Heart Study

OBJECTIVES

Traditional clinical risk factors are associated with inflammation cross-sectionally, but associations of longitudinal variation in inflammatory biomarkers with corresponding changes in clinical risk factors are incompletely described. We sought to analyze clinical factors associated with change in inflammation in the community.

METHODS

We studied 3013 Framingham Offspring (n = 2735) and Omni Cohort (n = 278) participants (mean age 59 years, 55% women, 9% ethnic/racial minority) who attended two consecutive examination cycles (mean 6.7 years apart). We selected ten inflammatory biomarkers representing distinctive biological functions: C-reactive protein (CRP), intercellular adhesion molecule-1, interleukin-6, isoprostanes, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase-2 (Lp-PLA2) activity, Lp-PLA2-mass, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, osteoprotegerin, P-selectin, and tumor necrosis factor receptor II (TNFRII). We constructed multivariable-adjusted regression models to assess the relations of baseline, follow-up and change in clinical risk factors with change in biomarker concentrations over time.

RESULTS

Baseline, follow-up and change in clinical risk factors explain a moderate amount of the variation in biomarker concentrations across 2 consecutive examinations (ranging from r(2) = 0.28 [TNFRII] up to 0.52 [Lp-PLA2-mass]). In multivariable models, increasing body-mass index, smoking initiation, worsening lipid profile, and increasing waist size were associated with increasing concentrations of several biomarkers. Conversely, hypercholesterolemia therapy and hormone replacement cessation were associated with decreasing concentrations of biomarkers such as CRP, Lp-PLA2-mass and activity.

CONCLUSION

Cardiovascular risk factors have different patterns of association with longitudinal change in inflammatory biomarkers and explain modest amounts of variability in biomarker concentrations. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of longitudinal change in inflammatory markers is not explained by traditional risk factors.

Efficacy and effects on lipid metabolism of combination treatment with losartan + hydrochlorothiazide versus losartan + amlodipine: a 48-week prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial

BACKGROUND

Both combination therapies of an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) with the thiazide diuretic hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and an ARB with a calcium channel blocker (CCB) are recommended to achieve blood pressure (BP) goals in antihypertensive treatment. However, although HCTZ is known to have unfavorable effects on lipid metabolism, the effects of HCTZ in the ARB + HCTZ combination on lipid metabolism have not been fully elucidated.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effects on lipid metabolism of combination treatment with the ARB losartan + HCTZ and losartan + the CCB amlodipine and to assess the efficacy in BP lowering of these 2 combination therapies. The metabolism of glucose, uric acid (UA), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), an inflammation marker of atherosclerosis, were also assessed in association with lipid metabolism.

METHODS

This 48-week, prospective, randomized, open-label trial was conducted at 2 clinics and 2 hospitals in Tokorozawa City (Saitama, Japan) and Shinjuku-ku Ward (Tokyo, Japan). Eligible patients had a systolic BP (SBP) >140 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) >90 mm Hg despite a >1-month history of monotherapy with an ARB. Patients were randomly assigned to receive losartan 50 mg/d + HCTZ 12.5 mg/d (LOS + HCTZ) or losartan 50 mg/d + amlodipine 5 mg/d (LOS + CCB) for 48 weeks. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 weeks. Biochemical measurements were centrally measured at a single institute. Tolerability and treatment compliance were assessed by physicians every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients were enrolled; 26 were excluded from the final analysis, leaving 42 and 44 patients in the LOS + HCTZ and LOS + CCB groups, respectively, included in the final analysis. At 48 weeks, SBP and DBP were significantly decreased in the 2 treatment groups (both, P < 0.0001). The decrease in SBP was significantly greater in the LOS + HCTZ group than in the LOS + CCB group (P < 0.001). The difference in the decrease in DBP between the 2 groups was nonsignificant. There were no significant differences in the changes from baseline (Δ) in any of the lipid parameters between the 2 groups. The decreases at 8 and 12 weeks in LDL-C, TC, and apolipoprotein (apo) B were significantly greater in the LOS + CCB group compared with those in the LOS + HCTZ group. The between-group differences in ΔTG, ΔHDL-C, ΔapoA-1, and ΔapoE throughout the study were nonsignificant. Changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), hemoglobin A1c, and hs-CRP were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The between-group difference in ΔUA in men was not significant, but a significant difference was found in women (LOS + HCTZ, 0.74 mg/dL; LOS + CCB, 0.28 mg/dL [P = 0.0017]). No clinically significant adverse events were reported with either treatment throughout the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from the present study suggest that LOS + HCTZ was more efficacious in decreasing SBP than was LOS + CCB in the management of hypertension refractory to ARB monotherapy. Unfavorable effects on lipid metabolism were not observed with either combination therapy.

A low-dose atorvastatin and losartan combination directly improves aortic ring relaxation and diminishes ischaemic-reperfusion injury in isolated rat hearts

Background

The cardiovascular pleiotropic effects of statins and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) could be of interest for innovative preventive approaches. We aimed to investigate whether low-dose atorvastatin and losartan, separately not possessing protective cardiovascular pleiotropic effects, express them when combined.

Material/Methods

Forty-five adult male Wistar rats were anaesthetized and their thoracic aortas and hearts were isolated. Relaxation of aortic rings, coronary flow rate and the extent of myocardial ischaemic-reperfusion injury were measured. Different concentrations (0.01, 0.1, 1.0 μM) of atorvastatin and losartan added to a perfusion medium were first tested. The separate drugs, which were ineffective, were then combined at the same concentrations and the concentration was tested in the same model.

Results

Low concentrations of atorvastatin or losartan (0.1 and 1 μM, respectively) produced no effects in isolated aorta. However, surprisingly, when these drug concentrations were combined, a significantly improved endothelium-dependent relaxation of the thoracic aorta was observed. Similarly, when combining individually ineffective concentrations of atorvastatin or losartan (0.01 and 0.1 μM, respectively), significantly increased coronary flow and a decreased extent of myocardial injury were observed. By using a nitric oxide-synthase inhibitor, we demonstrated that the vasodilatory effects obtained were nitric oxide-dependent. The degree of effectiveness by the combination was comparable to that obtained by 10-fold (atorvastatin) or 100-fold (losartan) higher concentrations of the separate drugs.

Conclusions

Our results revealed that remarkable additive/synergistic effects exist between low-doses of a statin (atorvastatin) and an ARB (losartan), resulting in important cardiovascular protection. This new concept could be valuable in cardiovascular prevention.

Increased inflammatory biomarkers in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients: improvement after angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade

Diabetes and hypertension increasingly are recognized as pro-inflammatory conditions. We tested the hypothesis that in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes, blood pressure (BP) reduction with an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), valsartan, or with a beta blocker, atenolol, is associated with a decreased inflammatory response. Normotensive subjects and hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes (40 to 70 years of age) participated in the study. Patients (n = 28) were randomized to double-blind treatment for 1 year with valsartan (80-160 mg) or atenolol (50-100 mg) daily, added to previous therapy. Age-matched controls (n = 12) were also studied. Serum levels of cytokines (IL-6, IL-18), chemokines (MCP-1), and adhesion molecules (sICAM, sE-selectin) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as indices of systemic and vascular inflammation, before and 1 year after treatment. BP was similarly reduced by valsartan and atenolol. Glycemic control and lipid profiles were comparable in the two groups and did not change significantly with antihypertensive therapy. Serum levels of all inflammatory markers were increased in patients before treatment (by two- to four-fold vs. controls, P < .05). IL-6, IL-18, sICAM, and MCP-1 levels were reduced by valsartan (three-fold, P < .05). Only IL-18 was reduced by atenolol compared with pretreatment levels (P < .05). These data indicate that proinflammatory mediators are significantly increased in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients and that despite similar BP lowering by valsartan and atenolol and similar glucose levels in both treated groups, global inflammatory status was improved only in the valsartan group. Our findings suggest that antihypertensive treatment, particularly with an ARB, ameliorates inflammatory processes in diabetic hypertensive patients. Such effects, which are independent of BP and glycemic control, may contribute to cardiovascular protection.

Vascular inflammation

Inflammation of the vessel wall is involved in all stages of the course of atherothrombotic disease, from the development of early lesions to the occurrence of clinical events. Significant advances in recent years have largely improved our understanding of this phenomenon and of its influence not only on atherogenesis, but also on other intimately related disorders such as arterial hypertension or the metabolic syndrome. Emerging imaging technologies as well as measurement of serum concentrations of specific biomarkers offer the possibility to detect and, to some extent, quantify the degree of chronic vascular inflammation in vivo. In addition, many standard and novel antiatherosclerotic therapies may exert beneficial effects through anti-inflammatory actions. As a result, detection and treatment of vascular inflammation are certain to become increasingly important in the management with patients of cardiovascular disease.

Inflammation in high blood pressure: a clinician perspective

Hypertension is one of the most important contributors to atherosclerosis. A possible link between inflammation and elevated blood pressure has been suggested by several cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Possible mechanisms include an imbalance between vasoconstrictors and vasodilators, amplified thrombogenesis and platelet activation, and perhaps a direct effect of inflammatory mediators. C-reactive protein (CRP), an inflammatory cytokine, may play an essential role in vascular inflammation and can directly decrease the production of nitric oxide, a vasocodilator. Angiotensin II (Ang II) up-regulates several inflammatory cytokines, leukocyte adhesion molecules, and chemokines through the activation of the nuclear factor-kappa B leading to a decrease in the bioavailability of vasodilators. The increase in oxidative stress and endothelin-1 production through Ang II may further contribute to vasoconstriction. Adipose tissue can add to the production of CRP and creates a prothrombotic state. The presence of low-grade inflammation, especially elevations of CRP, can help predict the risk of future cardiovascular events and is associated with target organ damage in hypertensive individuals. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists, and, to a lesser degree calcium channel antagonists, have shown efficacy in reducing CRP. Lifestyle changes such as exercise, weight loss, and tobacco cessation have also shown a similar efficacy. Whether targeting inflammation in the treatment of uncomplicated hypertension can alter the natural history of the disease or lead to improved outcome has yet to be determined.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of valsartan in the post-myocardial infarction population

INTRODUCTION

The most common risk factors for heart failure are hypertension and myocardial infarction. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) attenuate the deleterious effects of angiotensin II. Valsartan is a once or twice daily ARB that is FDA-approved for hypertension, LV dysfunction post-myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure as both an adjunct in ACE-inhibitor tolerant, and alternative in ACE-I intolerant patients.

AREAS COVERED

This article presents a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of valsartan, with particular attention paid to the post-myocardial infarction population.

EXPERT OPINION

Valsartan is a safe, well-tolerated and readily titratable ARB. In addition to its vasodilatory effects there are pleotropic effects associated with the ARB such as modulation of a number of neurohormonal regulators, cytokines and small molecules. Given the clear evidence-based benefits above and beyond its hypertensive properties, it has the potential, if priced appropriately, to grow in its impact as a pharmacotherapeutic long after its patent expires.

Behavioural modification of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory response to C-reactive protein in patients with hypertension

OBJECTIVES

A central hypothesis of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory reflex model is that innate immune activity is inhibited by the efferent vagus. We evaluated whether changes in markers of tonic or reflex vagal heart rate modulation following behavioural intervention were associated inversely with changes in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) or interleukin-6 (IL-6).

DESIGN

Subjects diagnosed with hypertension (n = 45, age 35-64 years, 53% women) were randomized to an 8-week protocol of behavioural neurocardiac training (with heart rate variability biofeedback) or autogenic relaxation. Assessments before and after intervention included pro-inflammatory factors (hsCRP, IL-6), markers of vagal heart rate modulation [RR high-frequency (HF) power within 0.15-0.40 Hz, baroreflex sensitivity and RR interval], conventional measures of lipoprotein cholesterol and 24-h ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

RESULTS

Changes in hsCRP and IL-6 were not associated with changes in lipoprotein cholesterol or blood pressure. After adjusting for anti-inflammatory drugs and confounding factors, changes in hsCRP related inversely to changes in HF power (β = -0.25±0.1, P = 0.02), baroreflex sensitivity (β = -0.33±0.7, P = 0.04) and RR interval (β = -0.001 ± 0.0004, P = 0.02). Statistically significant relationships were not observed for IL-6.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in hsCRP were consistent with the inhibitory effect of increased vagal efferent activity on pro-inflammatory factors predicted by the cholinergic anti-inflammatory reflex model. Clinical trials for patients with cardiovascular dysfunction are warranted to assess whether behavioural interventions can contribute independently to the chronic regulation of inflammatory activity and to improved clinical outcomes.

Inflammation and hypertension: the interplay of interleukin-6, dietary sodium, and the renin-angiotensin system in humans

BACKGROUND

Prior evidence suggests a link between inflammation and hypertension. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) has been implicated in animal studies to play an important role in angiotensin II (ANGII)-mediated hypertension. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship of IL-6 and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activity in human hypertension.

METHODS

Data from 385 hypertensives and 196 normotensives are included in this report. Blood pressure and laboratory evaluation were performed on liberal and low sodium diets. IL-6 response to an ANGII infusion was evaluated to assess the effect of acute RAS activation.

RESULTS

Hypertensives had higher baseline IL-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) compared with normotensives on both diets. IL-6 increased in response to ANGII in hypertensives and normotensives (28% in hypertensives, 31% in normotensives, P ≤ 0.001 for change from baseline). In the setting of RAS activation by a low salt diet, multivariate regression analysis adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), gender, race, and hypertension status demonstrated an independent positive association of plasma renin activity (PRA) with CRP (β = 0.199, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in IL-6 or CRP levels between liberal and low sodium diets.

CONCLUSION

These findings confirm an association between hypertension and inflammation and provide human data supporting previous evidence from animal studies that IL-6 plays a role in ANGII-mediated hypertension. Notably, compared to levels on a liberal sodium diet, neither IL-6 nor CRP were higher with activation of the RAS by a low salt diet indicating that a low sodium diet is not inflammatory despite increased RAS activity.

Reduction of age-associated arterial wall changes by low-dose valsartan

BACKGROUND

Functional and morphological arterial wall impairment progresses with ageing. Angiotensin II in the arterial wall is involved in this process. Appropriate early intervention might theoretically slow the progress of age-related changes. Herein, we investigated a new approach to this issue: whether arterial wall changes present in middle-aged males could be reduced by low-dose valsartan intervention.

METHODS

Forty apparently healthy, middle-aged males (42.9 ± 0.9 years) were recruited for a double-blind randomized study and received either placebo or valsartan (20 mg daily) for 30 days. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), pulse wave velocity (PWV), and β-stiffness of the common carotid artery were measured using an Aloka alfa-10 Prosound with an integrated eTracking system at inclusion, after 30 days, and after 3 and 8 months.

RESULTS

Intervention resulted in FMD increase (154.2 ± 20.1 %; p < 0.001) and PWV and β-stiffness decrease compared to initial values (-6.9 ± 1.0 % and -13.2 ± 1.4 %; both p < 0.01) whereas values in the untreated group (p < 0.001 for all parameters) remained unchanged throughout the study. The advantageous effects decreased over the months following valsartan discontinuation, but were still significant after 3 months (largely in FMD and less in PWV and β-stiffness), and negligible after 8 months. The beneficial effects were ascribed to valsartan's pleiotropic effects, as no blood pressure changes were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that age-related arterial wall changes in middle-aged males are reversible and could be reduced by a low-dose, short-term valsartan intervention. The new approach merits detailed investigation in future studies.

The effect of amlodipine besylate, losartan potassium, olmesartan medoxomil, and other antihypertensives on central aortic blood pressure and biomarkers of vascular function

Biomarkers are being increasingly used in the study of cardiovascular disease because they provide readily quantifiable surrogate endpoints and allow accurate assessment of the effects of therapy on particular pathological processes. However, in order to be useful, biomarkers must be relevant, predictable, accurate, and reproducible. There is compelling evidence from large-scale clinical trials that inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system [angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin type II receptor blockers (ARBs)] and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) may have beneficial effects beyond blood pressure control in the treatment of hypertension. Biomarkers are expected to provide further insight into these beneficial effects and allow for quantitative assessment. This review summarizes the published clinical evidence on the effects of various antihypertensive drugs, particularly ARBs (e.g. losartan and olmesartan medoxomil) and CCBs (e.g. amlodipine), alone and in combination with other agents (e.g. hydrochlorothiazide), on central aortic pressure and the biomarkers high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), adiponectin, cystatin C, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), procollagen, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-6. Of these biomarkers, the benefits of antihypertensive therapy on hsCRP, adiponectin, and HOMA-IR reflect a potential for quantifiable long-term vascular benefits.

Angiotensin blockade in diabetic patients decreases insulin resistance-associated low-grade inflammation

BACKGROUND

Insulin-resistant states, such as metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2), have been associated with chronic low-grade systemic inflammation. Elevated levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) and C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), are found in patients with type 2 diabetes with and without complications. Angiotensin II (Ang II), a potent vasopressor, seems to regulate also the expression of the above inflammatory mediators acting as proinflammatory cytokine. In this study, we examined the effects of candesartan, an angiotensin receptror blocker, in the chronic low-grade inflammation observed in DM 2.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients with DM2 of <5years duration were recruited for the study. Patients received 4mg of candesartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, for 6months. Blood levels of IL-6, MCP-1, hs-CRP and other inflammatory indices were measured before and at the end of candesartan administration.

RESULTS

At the end of treatment with candesartan, IL-6 levels decreased significantly (P<0·05). Serum levels of MCP-1 and hs-CRP showed a trend for significant decrease with treatment (P<0·08 and P<0·09, respectively). Statistically significant correlations were found between hs-CRP and MCP-1 (r=0·623, P< 0·05), IL-6 and MCP-1 (r=0·703, P<0·05) and TRT and MCP-1 (r=0·752, P<0·05), before but not at the end of candesartan administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Candesartan could decrease the low-grade inflammation of type 2 DM as shown by the decrease of inflammatory mediators. Thus, angiotensin receptor blockers could be useful for treating patients with DM2 not only for their antihypertensive capacity but also for their anti-inflammatory actions.

Pitavastatin further decreases serum high-sensitive C-reactive protein levels in hypertensive patients with hypercholesterolemia treated with angiotensin II, type-1 receptor antagonists

Lipid-lowering therapy with a statin not only powerfully lowers cholesterol but also exerts anti-inflammatory effects by decreasing serum C-reactive protein (CRP). Since an angiotensin II, type-1 receptor antagonist (ARB) also decreases CRP levels, the add-on effect of statins on CRP may be worth exploring. We determined the effect of pitavastatin on serum levels of highly sensitive CRP (hs-CRP) in 30 patients with hypercholesterolemia undergoing treatment with anti-hypertensive medication including ARBs. Pitavastatin, 2 mg daily, was given. The control group consisted of hypertensive patients without hyperlipidemia. The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and hs-CRP were measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. For the atherosclerotic index, LDL-C/HDL-C ratios at 12 months were calculated. The LDL-C level was markedly reduced at 1 month and thereafter. The baseline level of hs-CRP in the hyperlipidemia group was significantly higher than that in the control group (1.647 ± 0.210 mg/L vs. 0.666 ± 0.097 mg/L p < 0.0001). After 3 months, the percentage of reduction of hs-CRP was significantly higher than that in the control group. The absolute values of hs-CRP were significantly decreased to a level similar to the control group, and the hs-CRP in both groups was remained at the same level for 12 months. Although the LDL-C/HDL-C ratios of the pitavastatin group was significantly reduced from 3.3 to 1.8, those of the control group were not changed. In conclusion, pitavastatin was found to have powerful anti-inflammatory, add-on effects over the similar effects of ARB as assessed by hs-CRP.

Suppressive effects of valsartan on microalbuminuria and CRP in patients with metabolic syndrome (Val-Mets)

The presence of metabolic syndrome (Mets) increases the risk for cardiovascular disease. There is a significant correlation between the levels of urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) and high-sensitive C-reactive peptide (hs-CRP), and accumulation of each Mets component. Increasing evidence has shown the importance of blockade of renin-angiotensin-systems (RAS) for reducing urinary albumin excretion and hs-CRP levels in Mets patients. However, the impact of RAS blockade on these effects in hypertensive (HT) Mets patients without diabetes mellitus (DM) has not been evaluated. We prospectively measured the levels of UACR and hs-CRP in 153 HT patients with and without Mets. Body weight; waist circumference; presence of dyslipidemia and DM, and levels of HOMA-R, UACR, and hs-CRP were significantly higher in HT patients with Mets than in those without Mets. After we treated these Mets patients with valsartan for 6 months, blood pressure (BP), UACR, and hs-CRP were decreased, whereas body weight, HOMR-R, and the lipid profile were not changed. In HT Mets patients without DM, 6 months after valsartan administration, levels of UACR and hs-CRP were also significantly decreased by 37.8% (-9.0-56.5%, p < 0.05) and 23.6% (-28.7-73.4%, p < 0.05), respectively. However, the percentage change of UACR and hs-CRP was not correlated with the reduction in BP. Valsartan administration lowered increased levels of chronic inflammation in both HT Mets patients with DM and in those without DM. These results indicate that the anti-inflammatory properties of valsartan might also have beneficial effects in Mets patients without DM.

Central Pressure and Biomarker Responses to Renin Inhibition with Hydrochlorothiazide and Ramipril in Obese Hypertensives: The ATTAIN Study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In obese, hypertensive subjects, the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is enhanced and natriuresis impaired, suggesting a role for combination RAS blockade with diuretics. Data suggest that renin inhibition may attenuate diuretic-induced RAS activation and oxidative stress.

METHODS

In this 8-week, double-blind study of 386 obese individuals (mean body mass index: 35.3) with stage 2 hypertension (mean age: 54.9 years; mean sitting systolic blood pressure, SBP: ≧160 but <200 mm Hg), we compared the efficacy of aliskiren + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in reducing blood pressure (BP), plasma renin activity (PRA), and a urinary marker of oxidative stress to ramipril. Subjects were randomized to aliskiren/HCTZ 150/12.5 mg or ramipril 5 mg for 1 week, and after the 1st week force titrated to aliskiren/HCTZ 300/25 mg or ramipril 10 mg for 7 weeks.

RESULTS

After 8 weeks, aliskiren/HCTZ provided greater reductions in office BP than ramipril (-28.1/-10.1 vs. -16.6/-3.6 mm Hg, p < 0.0001) as well as 24-hour ambulatory and central pressure measures. Aliskiren/HCTZ also lowered PRA (-45 vs. +83%) and the urinary F2-isoprostane/creatinine ratio (-18 vs. +7%) to a greater extent than ramipril. Adverse events (AEs) were similar in the two groups (35.8% with aliskiren/HCTZ vs. 37.3% on ramipril reporting at least one AE).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the aliskiren/HCTZ combination reduced BP, PRA, and isoprostanes to a greater extent than did ramipril in obese patients with stage 2 hypertension.

Rosuvastatin, inflammation, C-reactive protein, JUPITER, and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease--a perspective

The major public health concern worldwide is coronary heart disease, with dyslipidemia as a major risk factor. Statin drugs are recommended by several guidelines for both primary and secondary prevention. Rosuvastatin has been widely accepted because of its efficacy, potency, and superior safety profile. Inflammation is involved in all phases of atherosclerosis, with the process beginning in early youth and advancing relentlessly for decades throughout life. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a well-studied, nonspecific marker of inflammation which may reflect general health risk. Considerable evidence suggests CRP is an independent predictor of future cardiovascular events, but direct involvement in atherosclerosis remains controversial. Rosuvastatin is a synthetic, hydrophilic statin with unique stereochemistry. A large proportion of patients achieve evidence-based lipid targets while using the drug, and it slows progression and induces regression of atherosclerotic coronary lesions. Rosuvastatin lowers CRP levels significantly. The Justification for Use of statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) trial was designed after the observation that when both low density lipoprotein and CRP were reduced, patients fared better than when only LDL was lowered. Advocates and critics alike acknowledge that the benefits of rosuvastatin in JUPITER were real. After a review, the US Food and Drug Administration extended the indications for rosuvastatin to include asymptomatic JUPITER-eligible individuals with one additional risk factor. The American Heart Association and Centers of Disease Control and Prevention had previously recognized the use of CRP in persons with "intermediate risk" as defined by global risk scores. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines went further and recommended use of statins in persons with low LDL and high CRP levels at intermediate risk. The JUPITER study focused attention on ostensibly healthy individuals with "normal" lipid profiles and high CRP values who benefited from statin therapy. The backdrop to JUPITER during this period was an increasing awareness of a rising cardiovascular risk burden and imperfect methods of risk evaluation, so that a significant number of individuals were being denied beneficial therapies. Other concerns have been a high level of residual risk in those who are treated, poor patient adherence, a need to follow guidelines more closely, a dual global epidemic of obesity and diabetes, and a progressively deteriorating level of physical activity in the population. Calls for new and more effective means of reducing risk for coronary heart disease are intensifying. In view of compelling evidence supporting earlier and aggressive therapy in people with high risk burdens, JUPITER simply offers another choice for stratification and earlier risk reduction in primary prevention patients. When indicated, and in individuals unwilling or unable to change their diet and lifestyles sufficiently, the benefits of statins greatly exceed the risks. Two side effects of interest are myotoxicity and an increase in the incidence of diabetes.