Discrepancy between antihypertensive effect and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition by captopril

Is There a Threshold for Medication Adherence? Lessons Learnt From Electronic Monitoring of Drug Adherence

Medication adherence is a well-recognized problem in the management of patients with chronic diseases needing a long-term pharmacotherapy. While fighting against non-adherence, an important question frequently arises, i.e., how much adherence is enough to obtain the full treatment benefits? Most studies having attempted to answer this question have used large pharmacy records and health care databases to quantify the percentage of days covered by the prescribed treatment and hence deduce a threshold below which there appears to be fewer benefits from therapy. In the present paper, the use of data obtained using electronic monitoring of adherence is discussed as another means to assess adherence thresholds with a particular emphasis on hypertension. The data show that even with the use of electronic monitoring of adherence, which provides a comprehensive dosing history, it is extremely difficult to define an adherence threshold in hypertension. This is due to many factors that need to be taken into account, including not only the pattern of patients’ adherence and their clinical and environmental characteristics, but also the pharmacological characteristics of the prescribed drugs, the severity of the disease and many others. To determine adherence cut-offs more precisely, specific protocols should be designed to answer the question in various clinical conditions. These protocols should be conducted in well-defined patients’ groups, they should use the most reliable methods to measure adherence providing if possible a detailed dosing history perhaps combined with drugs levels in blood or urine. These studies should also choose the best methods to measure clinical endpoints, such as ambulatory blood pressure monitoring or home blood pressure in the case of hypertension. One important aspect is that datasets should be solid and large enough to be able to analyze adherence data as a continuous variable using newly developed mathematical models including new metrics catching the complexity of adherence. The rapid development of new technologies like devices, connectivity, and analytics, will probably provide new solutions to improve our ability to define valid and clinically useful adherence thresholds in various therapeutic areas.

Interventions for infantile haemangiomas of the skin

BACKGROUND

Infantile haemangiomas (previously known as strawberry birthmarks) are soft, raised swellings of the skin that occur in 3% to 10% of infants. These benign vascular tumours are usually uncomplicated and tend to regress spontaneously. However, when haemangiomas occur in high-risk areas, such as near the eyes, throat, or nose, impairing their function, or when complications develop, intervention may be necessary. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of interventions for the management of infantile haemangiomas in children.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated our searches of the following databases to February 2017: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, AMED, LILACS, and CINAHL. We also searched five trials registries and checked the reference lists of included studies for further references to relevant trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of all types of interventions, versus placebo, active monitoring, or other interventions, in any child with single or multiple infantile haemangiomas (IHs) located on the skin.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcome measures were clearance, a subjective measure of improvement, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were other measures of resolution; proportion of parents or children who consider there is still a problem; aesthetic appearance; and requirement for surgical correction. We used GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence for each outcome; this is indicated in italics.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 28 RCTs, with a total of 1728 participants, assessing 12 different interventions, including lasers, beta blockers (e.g. propranolol, timolol maleate), radiation therapy, and steroids. Comparators included placebo, an active monitoring approach, sham radiation, and interventions given alone or in combination.Studies were conducted in a number of countries, including China, Egypt, France, and Australia. Participant age ranged from 12 weeks to 13.4 years. Most studies (23/28) included a majority of females and different types of IHs. Duration of follow-up ranged from 7 days to 72 months.We considered most of the trials as at low risk of random sequence generation, attrition bias, and selective reporting bias. Domains such as allocation concealment and blinding were not clearly reported in general. We downgraded evidence for issues related to risk of bias and imprecision.We report results for the three most important comparisons, which we chose on the basis of current use. Outcome measurement of these comparisons was at 24 weeks' follow-up.Oral propranolol versus placeboCompared with placebo, oral propranolol 3 mg/kg/day probably improves clinician-assessed clearance (risk ratio (RR) 16.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.22 to 65.34; 1 study; 156 children; moderate-quality evidence) and probably leads to a clinician-assessed reduction in mean haemangioma volume of 45.9% (95% CI 11.60 to 80.20; 1 study; 40 children; moderate-quality evidence). We found no evidence of a difference in terms of short- or long-term serious adverse events (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.33 to 3.39; 3 studies; 509 children; low-quality evidence), nor in terms of bronchospasm, hypoglycaemia, or serious cardiovascular adverse events. The results relating to clearance and resolution for this comparison were based on one industry-sponsored study.Topical timolol maleate versus placeboThe chance of reduction of redness, as a measure of clinician-assessed resolution, may be improved with topical timolol maleate 0.5% gel applied twice daily when compared with placebo (RR 8.11, 95% CI 1.09 to 60.09; 1 study; 41 children;low-quality evidence). Regarding short- or long-term serious cardiovascular events, we found no instances of bradycardia (slower than normal heart rate) or hypotension in either group (1 study; 41 children; low-quality evidence). No other safety data were assessed, and clearance was not measured.Oral propranolol versus topical timolol maleateWhen topical timolol maleate (0.5% eye drops applied twice daily) was compared with oral propranolol (via a tablet taken once per day, at a 1.0 mg/kg dose), there was no evidence of a difference in haemangioma size (as a measure of resolution) when measured by the proportion of patients with a clinician-assessed reduction of 50% or greater (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.97; 1 study; 26 participants; low-quality evidence). Although there were more short- or long-term general adverse effects (such as severe diarrhoea, lethargy, and loss of appetite) in the oral propranolol group, there was no evidence of a difference between groups (RR 7.00, 95% CI 0.40 to 123.35; 1 study; 26 participants; very low-quality evidence). This comparison did not measure clearance.None of our key comparisons evaluated, at any follow-up, a subjective measure of improvement assessed by the parent or child; proportion of parents or children who consider there is still a problem; or physician-, child-, or parent-assessed aesthetic appearance.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found there to be a limited evidence base for the treatment of infantile haemangiomas: a large number of interventions and outcomes have not been assessed in RCTs.Our key results indicate that in the management of IH in children, oral propranolol and topical timolol maleate are more beneficial than placebo in terms of clearance or other measures of resolution, or both, without an increase in harms. We found no evidence of a difference between oral propranolol and topical timolol maleate with regard to reducing haemangioma size, but we are uncertain if there is a difference in safety. Oral propranolol is currently the standard treatment for this condition, and our review has not found evidence to challenge this. However, these results are based on moderate- to very low-quality evidence.The included studies were limited by small sample sizes and risk of bias in some domains. Future trials should blind personnel and participants; describe trials thoroughly in publications; and recruit a sufficient number of children to deduce meaningful results. Future trials should assess patient-reported outcomes, as well as objective outcomes of benefit, and should report adverse events comprehensively. Propranolol and timolol maleate require further assessment in RCTs of all types of IH, including those considered problematic, as do other lesser-used interventions and new interventions. All treatments should be compared against propranolol and timolol maleate, as beta blockers are approved as standard care.

Propranolol versus captopril in the treatment of infantile hemangioma (IH): A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Renin-angiotensin system components have been demonstrated in the biology of infantile hemangioma (IH). Captopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, is proposed as a therapeutic alternative to oral propranolol.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare the benefit of propranolol and captopril in the treatment of IH, and to assess angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism in patients with IH and in control subjects.

METHODS

Thirty patients with IH and 35 healthy control subjects were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either propranolol or captopril. Assessment was done clinically and by measurement of serum vascular endothelial growth factor and angiotensin II in patients and control subjects. Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism was also studied.

RESULTS

Clinical improvement was significantly better and faster in the patients treated with propranolol. Both groups showed reduced vascular endothelial growth factor and angiotensin II levels posttreatment, with a significantly higher percentage reduction in the propranolol-treated group. Cardiac side effects were reported only in the captopril-treated group. Baseline vascular endothelial growth factor level was significantly higher, and baseline angiotensin II level was significantly lower, in patients than control subjects.

LIMITATIONS

We studied a relatively small number of patients and control subjects.

CONCLUSION

Propranolol shows greater benefit than captopril in the treatment of IH.

Effects of captopril on factors affecting gastric mucosal integrity in aspirin-induced gastric lesions in Sprague-Dawley rats

INTRODUCTION

Captopril is an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, which is used as an antihypertensive agent and has shown antioxidant properties. This study aims at determining the effects of captopril on factors affecting gastric mucosal integrity in aspirin-induced gastric lesions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighteen male Sprague-Dawley (200-250 g) rats that were given aspirin (40 mg/100 g body weight) were divided into three groups: the control, captopril (1 mg/100 g body weight daily) and ranitidine (2.5 mg/100 g body weight twice daily) groups. Ranitidine and captopril were given orally for 28 days. Rats in all groups were sacrificed and the parameters measured.

RESULTS

Captopril reduced gastric acidity, and increased gastric glutathione (GSH) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) significantly in comparison to the control group. Captopril also reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) and gastric lesions insignificantly compared to the control group. Ranitidine healed the lesions significantly compared to the control group. There was no difference between ranitidine and captopril on the severity of lesions, gastric acidity, MDA and GSH. Captopril increased PGE2 compared to ranitidine (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Captopril has desirable effects on the factors affecting gastric mucosal integrity (acidity, PGE2 and GSH) and is comparable to ranitidine in ulcer healing.

Reinventing the ACE inhibitors: some old and new implications of ACE inhibition

Since their inception, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been used as first-line therapy for the treatment of cardiovascular and renal diseases. They restore the balance between the vasoconstrictive salt-retentive and hypertrophy-causing peptide angiotensin II (Ang II) and bradykinin, a vasodilatory and natriuretic peptide. As ACE is a promiscuous enzyme, ACE inhibitors alter the metabolism of a number of other vasoactive substances. ACE inhibitors decrease systemic vascular resistance without increasing heart rate and promote natriuresis. They have been proven effective in the treatment of hypertension, and reduce mortality in congestive heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. They inhibit ischemic events and stabilize plaques. Furthermore, they delay the progression of diabetic nephropathy and neuropathy and act as antioxidants. Ongoing studies have elucidated protective roles for them in both memory-related disorders and cancer. Lastly, N- and C-domain selective ACE inhibitors have led to new uses for ACE inhibitors.

Addition of an angiotensin receptor blocker to full-dose ACE-inhibition: controversial or common sense?

Both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) interfere with the activity of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in a different way. Theoretically, one might expect beneficial effects when they are used in combination, as a more complete suppression of the RAS can be achieved. But can this additional effect still be seen in patients on full-dose ACE-inhibition? Several controlled trials demonstrated that combination therapy can have additional benefits in hypertensive patients, in chronic heart failure patients, and in both diabetic and non-diabetic nephropathy patients. However, the clinical benefit was not always as pronounced as expected and not every patient will benefit from dual blockade of the RAS. There is some evidence of a less pronounced effect of combination therapy when a full dose of the ACE-inhibitor is given. However, it is well known that ACE-inhibitors cannot completely suppress the formation of angiotensin II, in particular, when the RAS is activated. Indeed, clinical trials indicated that add-on therapy with an ARB was especially of use when the RAS remained activated despite full-dose ACE-inhibitor treatment. In summary, combination of a full-dose ACE-inhibitor and an ARB can be a rational choice in selected patients.

Beneficial hemodynamic and renal effects of intravenous enalaprilat following coronary artery bypass surgery complicated by left ventricular dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are an effective therapy for all stages of heart failure due to reduced systolic left ventricular function. Because sufficient data on intravenous angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors following coronary artery bypass surgery complicated by postoperative left ventricular dysfunction are unavailable, the efficacy and safety of intravenously administered enalaprilat were evaluated.

DESIGN

A placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind protocol.

SETTING

Postoperative intensive care unit at the German Heart Institute Berlin.

PATIENTS

Forty patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction <35% following coronary artery bypass surgery on the second postoperative day or after weaning from intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation.

INTERVENTIONS

A loading dose of enalaprilat 0.625 mg infused over 1 hr was followed by 5 mg/24 hrs administered continuously for up to 72 hrs.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Systemic and pulmonary hemodynamic variables, blood gases, hormonal variables, renal function, and electrolytes were measured before and repeatedly during therapy. Acute effects were as follows: At 1 hr, enalaprilat increased the cardiac index (p <.001), stroke volume index (p <.001), and right ventricular stroke work index (p <.03) compared with placebo, whereas mean arterial pressure (p <.008) and both systemic (p <.001) and pulmonary (p <.02) vascular resistance decreased. Continuous effects were as follows: Over 72 hrs, enalaprilat decreased diastolic pulmonary artery pressure (p <.019), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (p <.02), and central venous pressure (p <.02). The cardiac and stroke volume indexes were consistently higher in the enalaprilat group, whereas systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances were lower. The arterial blood-pressure lowering effect was blunted and heart rate remained unchanged. Mixed venous oxygenation (p <.02) was higher and arterial oxygenation was not modified. Finally, enalaprilat increased creatinine clearance (p <.002) and decreased creatinine (p <.02) and urea (p <.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous enalaprilat safely and effectively improves cardiac and renal function following coronary artery bypass surgery complicated by postoperative left ventricular dysfunction.

Angiotensin II receptor blockade: is there truly a benefit of adding an ACE inhibitor?

We assessed the blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) achieved with 2 angiotensin (Ang) antagonists given either alone at different doses or with an ACE inhibitor. First, 20 normotensive subjects were randomly assigned to 100 mg OD losartan (LOS) or 80 mg OD telmisartan (TEL) for 1 week; during another week, the same doses of LOS and TEL were combined with 20 mg OD lisinopril. Then, 10 subjects were randomly assigned to 200 mg OD LOS and 160 mg OD TEL for 1 week and 100 mg BID LOS and 80 mg BID TEL during the second week. Blockade of the RAS was evaluated with the inhibition of the pressor effect of exogenous Ang I, an ex vivo receptor assay, and the changes in plasma Ang II. Trough blood pressure response to Ang I was blocked by 35+/-16% (mean+/-SD) with 100 mg OD LOS and by 36+/-13% with 80 mg OD TEL. When combined with lisinopril, blockade was 76+/-7% with LOS and 79+/-9% with TEL. With 200 mg OD LOS, trough blockade was 54+/-14%, but with 100 mg BID it increased to 77+/-8% (P<0.01). Telmisartan (160 mg OD and 80 mg BID) produced a comparable effect. Thus, at their maximal recommended doses, neither LOS nor TEL blocks the RAS for 24 hours; hence, the addition of an ACE inhibitor provides an additional blockade. A 24-hour blockade can be achieved with an angiotensin antagonist alone, provided higher doses or a BID regimen is used.

Antihypertensive effects of fasidotril, a dual inhibitor of neprilysin and angiotensin-converting enzyme, in rats and humans

The aim of this study was to assess the antihypertensive activity of fasidotril, a dual inhibitor of neprilysin (NEP) and angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE), in various models of hypertension in rats (spontaneously hypertensive rats [SHR]; renovascular Goldblatt 2-kidney, 1-clip rats; and deoxycorticosterone acetate [DOCA]-salt hypertensive rats) and in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Fasidotril treatment (100 mg/kg PO twice daily for 3 weeks) resulted in a progressive and sustained decrease in systolic blood pressure (-20 to -30 mm Hg) in SHR and Goldblatt rats compared with vehicle-treated rats and prevented the progressive rise in blood pressure in DOCA-salt hypertensive rats. After a 4-week placebo run-in period, 57 patients with essential hypertension were included in a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study and received orally either fasidotril (100 mg twice daily) or placebo for 6 weeks. Blood pressure was measured during the 6 hours after the first intake and then at trough (12 hours after the last intake) on days 7, 28, and 42. The first dose of fasidotril had no significant effect on blood pressure. After 42 days, compared with placebo, fasidotril lowered supine systolic and diastolic blood pressures by 7.4/5.4 mm Hg and standing blood pressure by 7.6/6.8 mm Hg. Fasidotril, a dual NEP/ACE inhibitor, was an effective oral antihypertensive agent during chronic treatment in high-renin renovascular rats, normal-renin SHR, and low-renin DOCA-salt hypertensive rats and in patients with essential hypertension.

Delayed recovery of hypertension after single dose losartan in angiotensin II-infused conscious rats

OBJECTIVE

In a conscious unrestrained rat model, it takes approximately 1 week for angiotensin II to increase blood pressure to maximum levels. We investigated the time required for hypertension to fully recover after acute angiotensin II receptor blockade in this angiotensin II dependent hypertensive model.

DESIGN

Conscious unrestrained rats (n = 8) infused with 10 ng/kg per min angiotensin II for 21 days received losartan (10 mg/kg) on day 17 of angiotensin II infusion. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate were monitored continuously. The acute pressor response to 50 ng/kg per min angiotensin II was monitored for 2 h on days 15, 17, 18, 19 and 20 of angiotensin II infusion. Plasma renin concentration (PRC) was measured daily.

RESULTS

Angiotensin II increased MAP acutely by 26 +/- 2 mmHg and by a further 23 +/- 4 mmHg between days 4 and 8. Losartan acutely reduced MAP by 75 +/- 2 mmHg; 24 h later MAP had partially recovered but remained suppressed by 47 +/- 3 mmHg. MAP had not fully recovered 4 days later. Some 2 h after losartan, the acute pressor response to angiotensin II had fallen from 24 +/- 2 mmHg to zero. This recovered to 13 +/- 5 and 28 +/- 2 mmHg 24 and 48 h post losartan. After losartan PRC rose from 0.1 +/- 0.05 to above 1 ng/ml per h for less than 24 h.

CONCLUSION

A single dose of losartan reverses both the fast and slow pressor effects of continuous angiotensin II infusions. While losartan is metabolized, the fast vasoconstrictor effect recovers quickly but the slow pressor effect takes almost a week to build up again to maximum levels. Since the slow pressor effect is mediated via the AT1 receptor, any means of blocking the renin-angiotensin system is likely to keep blood pressure below maximum hypertensive levels for several days after the drug has disappeared from the circulation.

Effects of eprosartan versus enalapril in hypertensive patients on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and safety parameters: results from a 26-week, double-blind, multicentre study. Eprosartan Multinational Study Group

A double-blind comparator study was performed in 528 hypertensive patients [baseline sitting diastolic blood pressure (SitDBP) 95-114 mmHg]. The primary objective was to compare the incidence of drug-related cough in patients treated with enalapril and eprosartan. The secondary objective was to compare antihypertensive efficacy between treatments. This paper reports the effects seen on the safety profile, plasma renin activity, aldosterone and angiotensin II (A-II) in each treatment group. Eprosartan was titrated from 200 mg b.i.d. to 300 mg b.i.d. and enalapril from 5 mg o.d. to 20 mg o.d. over 12 weeks. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5-25 mg o.d. could be added where required to the treatment for the final six weeks of the titration phase if SitDBP > or = 90 mmHg. Patients received the maximum titrated dosage during the maintenance phase. In the study overall, similar mean changes in blood pressure from baseline were evident with each treatment. Measurement of mean plasma neurohormone levels showed significant increases in renin activity in both groups and statistically significant A-II elevations in the eprosartan group (p < 0.05). Neither eprosartan nor enalapril significantly altered serum lipid profiles or electrolyte levels. Most adverse experiences reported throughout the study were mild or moderate in both treatment groups. Fewer patients receiving eprosartan (4.9%) than enalapril (9.1%) discontinued treatment because of adverse experiences. In conclusion, the results of this study show that eprosartan is well tolerated. Both eprosartan and enalapril significantly increased plasma renin activity while plasma A-II was elevated in the eprosartan group.

Inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme in human hand veins

Conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II likely occurs in human veins, supporting the existence of endothelial angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity in these vessels. Using the dorsal hand vein technique, we investigated the effects of 2 ACE inhibitors, captopril (single oral dose of 6.25 mg) and enalaprilat (local infusion of 1 microgram/min), on venous responsiveness in healthy subjects. Orally administered captopril induced a marked decrease in angiotensin I- but not angiotensin II-induced venoconstriction. This blunted response persisted for at least 4 hours. Enalaprilat and captopril increased the sensitivity to bradykinin, decreasing the dose producing half-maximal response (ED50) of bradykinin 18-fold and 5-fold, respectively, without changing the maximal venodilatory response. These results confirm that there is substantial rapid metabolism of angiotensin I in human veins and suggest that a single dose of locally infused angiotensin I can be used with the dorsal hand vein technique to assess the time-course effect of vascular ACE inhibition after oral administration. Our findings also extend previous in vitro observations in human veins by showing that these agents potentiate the venodilatory effects of bradykinin in vivo.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

ACE inhibitors have achieved widespread usage in the treatment of cardiovascular and renal disease. ACE inhibitors alter the balance between the vasoconstrictive, salt-retentive, and hypertrophic properties of angiotensin II (Ang II) and the vasodilatory and natriuretic properties of bradykinin and alter the metabolism of a number of other vasoactive substances. ACE inhibitors differ in the chemical structure of their active moieties, in potency, in bioavailability, in plasma half-life, in route of elimination, in their distribution and affinity for tissue-bound ACE, and in whether they are administered as prodrugs. Thus, the side effects of ACE inhibitors can be divided into those that are class specific and those that relate to specific agents. ACE inhibitors decrease systemic vascular resistance without increasing heart rate and promote natriuresis. They have proved effective in the treatment of hypertension, they decrease mortality in congestive heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction, and they delay the progression of diabetic nephropathy. Ongoing studies will elucidate the effect of ACE inhibitors on cardiovascular mortality in essential hypertension, the role of ACE inhibitors in patients without ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction, and the role of ACE inhibitors compared with newly available angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists.

Inhibitor index: a novel method for measuring pharmacological inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme

Research into the exact mechanism and site of action of ACE inhibiting compounds has been hampered by methodological difficulties concerning the quantitation of ACE inhibition in tissues. This paper describes an attempt to address this difficulty. ACE activity in serum and uncentrifuged skeletal muscle homogenates was measured with a fluorometric assay before and during treatment in 24 fosinopril-treated and 26 atenolol-treated hypertensives. The absolute difference in activity between the higher and the lower of two different sample dilutions divided by the mean activity was taken to represent competitive inhibition in the sample, "inhibitor index". The reduction in muscle ACE activity coinciding with fosinopril treatment was not statistically significant (-2.6%, p = 0.68). The inhibitor index, however, increased by 46% (p = 0.045) and no change was seen in the atenolol-treated group (-12%, p = 0.51). The change in muscle inhibitor index (but not the reduction in serum ACE activity) correlated inversely with the change in blood pressure (r = -0.50, p = 0.034) and serum aldosterone (r = -0.54, p = 0.031) in the fosinopril group, but not in the atenolol group. In a second study, serum inhibitor index increased by 0.28 (95% CI 0.24-0.32) in 12 trandolapril-treated, but was unchanged in 11 atenolol-treated patients (+0.0097, 95% CI -0.029-0.048). In conclusion, the present study indicates that the inhibitor index described recognizes physiologically relevant ACE inhibition. The value of the method needs to be investigated further.

Differing early blood pressure and renin-angiotensin system responses to the first dose of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in congestive heart failure

We previously demonstrated differing blood pressure (BP) responses to the first dose of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in congestive heart failure (CHF). We wished to confirm the disparate responses to the first dose of these agents, study the response to repeated dosing, and explore possible explanations (slow, tight binding, and steric hindrance) for the phenomenon. Forty-eight elderly patients (aged 51-85 years) with stable CHF were studied for 48 hours. Groups (n = 12) received one of the following: (a) perindopril 2 mg orally (p.o.) + placebo intravenously (i.v.) (day 1) and perindopril 2 mg p.o. (day 2); (b) enalapril 2.5 mg p.o. + placebo i.v. (day 1) and enalapril 2.5 mg p.o. (day 2); (c) placebo p.o. + perindopril at 0.167 mg i.v. (day 1) and perindopril 2 mg p.o. (day 2); or (d) placebo p.o. + placebo i.v. (day 1) and placebo p.o. (day 2). Supine BP was measured on day 1. On day 2, BP was recorded by ambulatory BP monitor. Blood samples were taken at baseline and at intervals during the 48-h study period for estimation of neurohumoral parameters. Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) was estimated by plasma ACE inhibition and also by the ratio of angiotensin II (Ang II)/Ang I + Ang II. On day I, enalapril 2.5 mg caused a greater decrease in BP than did placebo response between 6 and 9 h postdose. Perindopril 2 mg produced a profile of BP response similar to that of placebo. Ambulatory BP on day 2 was consistently lower with enalapril as compared with perindopril. Profiles of plasma ACE inhibition were similar with each active therapy. Enalapril therapy produced a greater increase in plasma renin activity (PRA) than did other treatments. There was no temporal dissociation between plasma ACE inhibition and profile of Ang peptides for any treatment. We have confirmed the disparate BP responses to perindopril and enalapril in CHF. We noted no evidence of slow, tight binding or steric hindrance to explain these differences.

Inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme and potentiation of bradykinin by retro-inverso analogues of short peptides and sequences related to angiotensin I and bradykinin

There is pharmacological evidence indicating that, in addition to the inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE; EC 3.4.15.1), the potentiation of bradykinin (BK) responses may also involve the BK receptor or some binding site in the structures involved in the contractile response to this peptide. Dipeptides such as Val-Trp and some of its analogues as well as tripeptide homologues, including total and partial retro-inverso peptides, were synthesized and assayed for their ability to inhibit purified guinea pig plasma ACE and to potentiate the action of BK on the isolated ileum of the same species. The peptides containing the P2-P1, P1-P'1, and P'1-P'2 inverted amide bonds inhibited ACE, were resistant to hydrolysis, and, depending on the amino acid composition, some of them potentiated the contractile response to BK while others did not. Des-[Arg1]-BK, which has an intrinsic activity at concentrations higher than 10(-5) M, and the very dissimilar angiotensin I (AI) analogue [Cys5-Cys10]-angiotensin-I-(5-10)-amide, which has no detectable contractile activity, were able to inhibit ACE and potentiate BK. In contrast to these peptides, BPP5a and BPP9a from Bothrops jararaca venom, and Potentiators B and C from Agkistrodon halys blomhoffi venom were more effective as BK potentiators than as ACE inhibitors. In conclusion, we have synthesized and assayed compounds that preferentially inhibit ACE, e.g. retro-inverso tripeptides, or potentiate the response of smooth muscle to BK, e.g. snake venom peptides.

Adrenal and circulating renin-angiotensin system in stroke-prone hypertensive rats

The plasma and adrenal renin-angiotensin system in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP) and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats were examined in animals at 5, 11, 18, and 25 weeks of age. Plasma active renin was significantly increased in 18- and 25-week-old SHRSP with impaired renal function, whereas there was no difference in the plasma prorenin level or renal renin content between the two strains at all ages examined. Thus, the rate of activation of prorenin seems to be enhanced in the kidney of SHRSP with malignant hypertension. Adrenal renin contents were severalfold higher in SHRSP than WKY rats at all ages. However, adrenal angiotensin peptides were not increased in SHRSP aged 5 and 11 weeks. In 18-week-old SHRSP, adrenal angiotensin II (Ang II) and III (Ang III) levels were fourfold and 1.8-fold higher, respectively, than in WKY rats, accompanied by 1.5-fold higher plasma aldosterone. Increased adrenal angiotensin and plasma aldosterone were also found in 25-week-old SHRSP. Zonal distribution studies indicated that the elevated Ang II and III in SHRSP were derived mainly from the capsular tissue (the zona glomerulosa). To examine the contribution of circulating angiotensin to the adrenal angiotensin content, effects of bilateral nephrectomy on adrenal angiotensin and renin were examined in 18-week-old rats. At 24 hours after nephrectomy, plasma angiotensin, prorenin, and active renin were decreased to almost negligible concentrations. Conversely, in both adrenal capsular and decapsular tissues of SHRSP and WKY rats, neither angiotensin nor renin was significantly decreased after nephrectomy. These results suggest that the increase in adrenal capsular Ang II contents in SHRSP may be partly due to an enhanced local production of Ang II.

Circulatory and extracirculatory effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition

The antihypertensive effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors cannot be fully explained by their actions on the circulating renin-angiotensin system (RAS). Agents such as captopril or enalapril maintain efficacy during long-term therapy even when plasma concentrations of converting enzyme or angiotensin II are not fully suppressed. Components of the entire RAS exist at several sites, thereby making it possible for drugs to produce effects at extracirculatory locations. An ACE inhibitor such as quinapril that has a comparatively short plasma concentration half-life binds strongly to plasma ACE as well as to ACE in key tissues including artery wall, heart, and kidney. The effects of ACE inhibition on the tissue RAS are of potential importance in fully explaining the blood pressure-lowering effects of these drugs. ACE inhibitors might also reduce blood pressure by blocking nonhemodynamic actions of angiotensin II. They affect vascular properties by increasing compliance of arteries and they act on baroreceptors and central regulatory mechanisms. Furthermore, ACE inhibitors affect other neuroendocrine systems, including aldosterone, kinins, and prostaglandins; attenuation of sympathetic activity can contribute further to their antihypertensive properties. Actions independent of circulating renin effects do not necessarily require plasma ACE inhibition throughout a 24-hour period. Sustained antihypertensive effects by drugs with short durations of plasma ACE inhibition give credibility to therapeutic targets beyond the circulating RAS.

Pharmacokinetic optimisation of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are increasingly used to treat hypertension and congestive heart failure. Recently, several new ACE inhibitors with pharmacokinetic features different from earlier agents such as captopril or enalapril have come into use. This review discusses the use of pharmacokinetics to optimise ACE inhibitory therapy in various patient groups. Among the pharmacokinetic characteristics of ACE inhibitors the route of excretion and to a lesser degree the half-life appear to be the most clinically relevant. There is no evidence that being a prodrug offers a significant clinical advantage. The importance of varying tissue penetration also remains to be determined. Knowledge of ACE inhibitor pharmacokinetics is particularly important in patients with renal or hepatic dysfunction in whom the major route of excretion of these agents is impaired. This might also be the case in elderly patients or those with severe congestive heart failure. However, for most ACE inhibitors, major changes in the drug dosage (amount or interval) are necessary only when the glomerular filtration rate falls below 30 ml/min (1.80 L/h). The occurrence of adverse effects due to overdosage or drug interactions may be prevented by adapting the prescription of an ACE inhibitor to its pharmacokinetic characteristics.

Different hemodynamic (24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring) and renin-inhibiting effect of a 1-week treatment with enalapril and lisinopril

Ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate monitoring were used for comparing the antihypertensive effect of a 1-week treatment with enalapril and lisinopril 10 mg once daily (double-blind crossover placebo-controlled study). Twelve outpatients with mild to moderate hypertension were treated. Both drugs had a significant and identical hypotensive effect. Neither drug affected the diurnal rhythm of blood pressure or heart rate. Therefore the two drugs are equipotent antihypertensive agents. Both drugs inhibited ACE activity to a highly significant extent, but in this regard lisinopril was more effective than enalapril. However, lisinopril's greater ACE inhibition was not accompanied by a greater hypotensive effect. The clinical value of this difference is not yet established.

Increased production of angiotensin II in the adrenal gland of stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats with malignant hypertension

Angiotensin(Ang) contents in the adrenal gland of stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats(SHRSP) and age-matched Wistar Kyoto rats(WKY) were determined using reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography combined with a specific radioimmunoassay. In normotensive 5 wk-old SHRSP, the adrenal renin activity was about 3 times higher than that of age-matched WKY while the adrenal Ang I and Ang II concentrations did not differ from those of WKY. In the severely hypertensive 25 wk-old SHRSP, the adrenal Ang II and Ang I, and plasma aldosterone concentrations were about 5-fold, 2-fold and 4-fold, respectively, increased compared with levels in the WKY. In the 25 wk-old SHRSP 24 h after bilateral nephrectomy, the adrenal Ang II and plasma aldosterone levels were not decreased and were 10 and 3 times, respectively, higher than those of nephrectomized control WKY. Thus, the enhanced local generation of Ang II in the adrenal gland may contribute to the increased release of aldosterone in SHRSP with malignant hypertension.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme: clinical applications and laboratory investigations on serum and other biological fluids

Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) is a peptidyldipeptide hydrolase that is located mainly on the luminal surface of vascular endothelial cells but also in cells derived from the monocyte-macrophage system. Physiologically, ACE is a key enzyme in the renin-angiotensin system, converting angiotensin I into the potent vasopressor angiotensin II and also inactivating the vasodilator bradykinin. Increased serum ACE activity (SACE) has been reported in pathologies involving a stimulation of the monocytic cell line, primarily granulomatous diseases. Sarcoidosis is the most frequent and the better studied of these diseases; high SACE is not only a well-established marker for the diagnosis but is also a useful tool for following its course and evaluating the effect of therapy. SACE can also be increased in nonsarcoidotic pulmonary granulomatous diseases such as silicosis and asbestosis, in extrathoracic granulomatous pathologies such as Gauchers disease and leprosis, and, to a lesser extent, in nongranulomatous disorders such as hyperthyroidism or cholestasis. On the other hand, monitoring sarcoidosis obviates the measurement of ACE activity in other biological fluids, e.g., broncho-alveolar and cerebrospinal fluids, in the search of a locoregional dissemination or dis-simulation of the disease. Decreased SACE has been reported in vascular pathologies involving an endothelial abnormality, e.g., deep vein thrombosis, and in endothelium dysfunctions related to the toxicity of chemo- and radiotherapy used in cancers, leukemias, and hematopoietic or organ transplantations. SACE is also of interest for monitoring arterial hypertension treated with specific synthetic ACE inhibitors. These various reasons for determining ACE activity have led to the development of numerous methods. The most widely used is the spectrophotometric assay using hippuryl-histidyl-leucine as substrate. Fluorimetric and radiochemical assays using both classic and novel substrates have been proposed, but they are time consuming, require special apparatus, and are not suited to automation. Kinetic spectrophotometry of furylacryloyl-phenylalanyl-glycyl-glycine hydrolysis is now used extensively because it is easy to automatize. Efforts are now required to standardize one or more of these assays. Indeed, "normal" plasma values differ not only according to the substrate, but also to the method of determination and to sex and age.

Tissue and plasma angiotensin converting enzyme and the response to ACE inhibitor drugs

1. There is a body of circumstantial and direct evidence supporting the existence and functional importance of a tissue based RAS at a variety of sites. 2. The relation between circulatory and tissue based systems is complex. The relative importance of the two in determining haemodynamic effects is unknown. 3. Despite the wide range of ACE inhibitors already available, it remains unclear whether there are genuine differences related to tissue specificity. 4. Pathological states such as chronic cardiac failure need to be explored with regard to the contribution of tissue based ACE activities in generating acute and chronic haemodynamic responses to ACE inhibitors. 5. The role of tissue vs plasma ACE activity may be clarified by study of the relation between drug concentration and haemodynamic effect, provided that the temporal dissociation is examined and linked to circulating and tissue based changes in ACE activity, angiotensin peptides and sympathetic hormones.

Once-daily lisinopril compared with twice-daily captopril in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension: assessment of office and ambulatory blood pressures

This multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study compared the antihypertensive effects of two angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, lisinopril and captopril, in 70 patients (35 lisinopril, 35 captopril) with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg once-daily lisinopril or 25, 50, and 100 mg bid captopril were increased at biweekly intervals until patients responded to treatment, as defined by a decrease in office diastolic pressure to less than 90 mm Hg or at least a 10 mm Hg decrease from baseline. Patients who responded to a 2-week titration dose remained at that dose for another 2 weeks. Blood pressure assessments were made using both office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Area under the curve analysis of ambulatory blood pressure reductions showed significant differences between treatment groups for both systolic (P = .023) and diastolic (P = .007) blood pressures, with lisinopril-treated patients showing the most significant reduction in pressure. Greater reductions (P less than .05) were also noted in patients receiving lisinopril at hours 10 to 12, suggesting two blood pressure troughs for those receiving captopril. Both drugs were well tolerated, and no patients withdrew from either treatment group. The authors concluded that after at least 4 weeks of therapy, once-daily lisinopril administration was more effective than twice-daily captopril administration in reducing blood pressure, when measured by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Newer ACE inhibitors. A look at the future

Available information indicates that about 78 new molecules belonging to the class of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are under investigation, and that at least 11 or 12 of the newer ACE inhibitors will be available for clinical use. The newer ACE inhibitors can be classified, according to the zinc ion ligand of ACE, into 3 main chemical classes: sulfhydryl-, carboxyl- and phosphoryl-containing ACE inhibitors. All the newer sulfhydryl-containing ACE inhibitors differ from captopril since they are prodrugs, and among them alacepril and probably moveltipril (altiopril, MC 838) are converted in vivo to captopril. When compared with captopril, they show a slower onset and a longer duration of action, and obviously the same route of elimination. Zofenopril, a prodrug that is converted in vivo to the active diacid, shows a greater potency, a similar peak time and a longer duration of action than captopril and, unlike captopril, partial elimination through the liver. The newer carboxyl-containing ACE inhibitors are prodrugs which are converted in vivo to active diacids. Like enalaprilat, they are excreted via the kidney; the exception is spirapril, which is totally eliminated by the liver. Compared to enalapril, benazepril shows an earlier peak time and a slightly shorter terminal half-life, cilazapril and ramipril have an earlier peak time and even longer terminal half-life, perindopril shows similar peak time and terminal half-life, while delapril, quinapril and spirapril show an earlier peak time and a shorter half-life. The phosphoryl-containing ACE inhibitors belong to a new chemical class. Fosinopril is a prodrug which is converted to the active diacid in vivo, shows a relatively late peak time, a long terminal half-life, and is eliminated partially by the liver. SQ 29852, the only newly developed ACE inhibitor which is not a prodrug, seems to be more effective than captopril, with a much longer lasting effect and elimination through the kidney. When the differences in potency between these drugs are compensated by dosage adjustment, all the newer ACE inhibitors are expected to exert a similar amount of inhibition of circulating ACE, and therefore to inhibit to a similar extent the generation of circulating angiotensin II and the breakdown of bradykinin. Obviously they may differ in timing and the duration of circulating ACE inhibition according to their pharmacokinetic properties. With regard to the possibility that they may stimulate prostaglandin synthesis, it is suggested that this action, which does not seem to be specific to this drug class, plays only a minor role in their antihypertensive action; the hypothesis that the sulfhydryl group exerts an additional stimulating action remains to be proved.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

A comparison of lisinopril with enalapril by monitoring plasma angiotensin II levels in humans

The present study was designed to examine and compare the acute effects of lisinopril (20 mg) and enalapril (10 mg) after a single oral administration on the inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in eight normal subjects. Serum concentration of lisinopril and enalaprilat, an active metabolite of enalapril, reached the respective maximal levels at 6 and 4 hr after administration of the drugs. At 24 hr, the serum concentration of lisinopril was higher than that of enalapril; thus the rate of disappearance of lisinopril was retarded, in comparison to that of enalapril. The reduction of serum angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) activity was consistent with the pattern of increase of concentration of the drugs in the serum. However, with these two drugs, the concentration of plasma ANG II was decreased in a similar manner, and it returned to the pretreatment level within 24 hr. Thus, there was no significant difference in ANG II levels throughout the 24 hr-study between the lisinopril and enalapril treatment. The results indicate that a single administration of 20 mg lisinopril and 10 mg enalapril show similar potency for lowering the circulating ANG II level, although lisinopril exerts a more sustained inhibition of serum ACE activity. The measurement of ANG II provides useful informations for evaluating the efficacy of ACE inhibitors for the inhibition of circulatory RAS.

Stereoselective protection of exogenous and endogenous atrial natriuretic factor by enkephalinase inhibitors in mice and humans

We compared the relative potencies of sinorphan and retorphan, the S- and R-enantiomers of acetorphan a potent inhibitor of enkephalinase (EC 3.4.34.11), to inhibit membrane metalloendopeptidase in vivo and to protect exogenous and endogenous ANF after oral administration. In mice, sinorphan was 2-3 fold as potent as retorphan in inhibiting the specific in vivo binding of [3H]acetorphan to kidney enkephalinase. The same potency ratio was found for the enhancement of trichloroacetic acid-precipitated radioactivity in kidneys of mice that had received 125I-ANF, which is used as a test for the protection of the hormone against inactivation in vivo. In nine healthy human volunteers who had received a low oral dosage of sinorphan or retorphan in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, sinorphan was also 2-3 fold more potent than retorphan in inhibiting plasma enkephalinase activity. These effects were accompanied by a related rise in plasma ANF immunoreactivity, which also reflected the difference in the effectiveness of the two compounds. Sinorphan was also more potent than retorphan in enhancing urinary cyclic GMP excretion and sodium excretion in five of these subjects. These data indicate that, in humans as in rodents, enkephalinase plays a crucial role in the inactivation of ANF, its partial inhibition in vivo being accompanied by a significant protection of the exogenous or endogenous hormone as well as by typical ANF-like responses. Thus orally administered sinorphan appears to be a promising compound for therapeutic use in cardiovascular and renal diseases in which ANF has been postulated to exert beneficial effects.

Hypotensive effect of captopril. Role of bradykinin and prostaglandinlike substances

Captopril (0.15-10 mg/kg) administration in the anesthetized dog causes immediate hypotension concomitant with an increase in tonus of the assay tissue (cat terminal ileum) superfused with circulating blood (Vane's cascade method). The increase in cat terminal ileum tonus was antagonized by a bradykinin receptor antagonist, L-349b. Treatment of the animals with indomethacin blocked or reversed the hypotensive effect of captopril without affecting the increase in tonus of the cat terminal ileum. Captopril potentiated the hypotension induced by bradykinin injected intra-arterially, and indomethacin reduced the hypotensive effect of intra-arterially injected bradykinin. Addition of captopril or enalapril to the superfusing blood maintained at 37 degrees C in an extracorporeal circuit caused a long-lasting increase in the tonus of the cat terminal ileum. The present results support the hypothesis that immediate hypotension induced by captopril involves a prostaglandin-dependent component possibly resulting from increased bradykinin levels generated in the vicinity of captopril action.

Perindopril. A review of its pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacology

Perindopril is an orally active, non-thiol angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, which in doses of 4 to 8mg is effective in the control of essential hypertension. As monotherapy it is as effective as once-daily atenolol and possibly more effective than twice-daily captopril. A synergistic response has been noted when perindopril is combined with a thiazide diuretic. Maximal pharmacodynamic effects (ACE inhibition, increase in plasma renin activity and angiotensin I, reduction in aldosterone and angiotensin II and blood pressure) are seen 4 to 6 hours after dosing, with substantial effects still present at 24 hours. Perindopril is a prodrug which requires de-esterification to perindoprilat for useful ACE inhibition. Maximal plasma perindoprilat concentrations are reached 2 to 6 hours after oral administration of perindopril, and 70% of the active metabolite is cleared by the kidneys. The other major metabolite of perindopril is an inactive glucuronide. Ageing is associated with increased serum perindoprilat concentrations, which are probably caused by a combination of enhanced conversion to the active metabolite and diminished renal clearance. Compensated cirrhosis does not appear to have an independent effect. There is little published experience of the use of perindopril in patients with cardiac failure or other cardiac disease, but preliminary evidence would support the general value of this class of agent as adjunctive therapy.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: mechanistic controversies

Many studies have investigated the mechanisms responsible for the therapeutic effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Initially, the hemodynamic changes that occur with these agents were attributed solely to the inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in plasma. Further research suggested other mechanisms were operable as a relationship was not always evident between hemodynamic changes and inhibition of the plasma renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. A relationship between the pharmacodynamics of these agents and the inhibition of vascular and tissue renin-angiotensin systems, however, has been observed. Mechanisms less likely to contribute to the actions of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are increases in bradykinin and prostaglandin concentrations, or inhibition in the renin-angiotensin system within the central nervous system. Ancillary cardiovascular effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors offer possible new therapeutic gains. An understanding of these mechanistic controversies and newly-defined cardiovascular actions of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are important to clinicians using these agents.

Effects of chronic infusion of renin inhibitor A-64662 in sodium-depleted monkeys

The potent and primate-selective renin inhibitor A-64662 (n = 8) or vehicle (n = 6) was administered intravenously for 7 days to sodium-depleted cynomolgus monkeys to investigate the chronic effects on arterial pressure, sodium excretion, and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. A 0.1-mg/kg i.v. bolus followed by a continuous 0.01-mg/kg/min infusion of A-64662 lowered mean arterial pressure from 89 +/- 3 (average of 4 control days) to 75 +/- 4 mm Hg (p less than 0.05) after 1 day of administration. This decrement was associated with marked inhibition of plasma renin activity (PRA) from 57.7 +/- 11.1 to 1.3 +/- 0.6 ng angiotensin I (Ang I)/ml/hr (p less than 0.05). Similar hypotensive levels (range 73 +/- 4 to 77 +/- 4 mm Hg) were observed on days 2-7 of A-64662 infusion and PRA remained suppressed, ranging from 0.6 +/- 0.4 to 1.9 +/- 1.0 ng Ang I/ml/hr. Plasma angiotensin II (Ang II) levels were reduced (p less than 0.05) from the control value of 66.7 +/- 20.2 to 12.4 +/- 3.3 and 26.4 +/- 6.5 pg/ml on the second and seventh days, respectively, of A-64662 infusion. In contrast, infusion of vehicle alone had no discernible effect on mean arterial pressure, PRA, or plasma Ang II concentrations. Plasma aldosterone decreased (p less than 0.05) from control on the second and third days of A-64662 infusion, although differences between the treatment groups were not detected throughout the study. Urinary sodium excretion remained at control levels throughout the infusion of A-64662. Cessation of A-64662 administration resulted in a recovery of mean arterial pressure to preinfusion levels within 1 day. This study indicates that continuous infusion of A-64662 results in a sustained hypotension in sodium-depleted monkeys. This effect appears to be related, at least partially, to inhibition of PRA and lower plasma Ang II levels.

Need for plasma angiotensin measurements to investigate converting-enzyme inhibition in humans

Since only a minute proportion of total angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is present in plasma, the reliability of conventional in vitro measurements of ACE activity has been questioned. Data presented here demonstrate that the definition of ACE inhibition depends on the methodology used, with different results obtained with different substrates. We have developed a method that provides accurate and precise determinations of "true" angiotensin levels and in vivo ACE activity was estimated by measuring the plasma angiotensin II/angiotensin I ratio. Since the initial interruption of angiotensin II production by an ACE inhibitor stimulates renal renin release, the response can be quantitated by measuring changes in plasma levels of angiotensin I. The actual state of the renin-angiotensin system during ACE inhibition is represented by the plasma angiotensin II level. When ACE inhibition is no longer complete, increased angiotensin I levels bring the system back toward initial angiotensin II concentrations.

Comparison of once-daily captopril or enalapril in mild essential hypertension

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of a daily low dose of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, captopril or enalapril, in mild essential hypertension. Nine men with seated diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 104 mm Hg on placebo participated in the study. After one month of placebo, captopril 25 mg was administered; blood pressure, heart rate, ACE activity and plasma renin activity were measured hourly for 4 hours. Each patient then received captopril 50 mg once daily for 8 weeks and similar measurements were made 24 hours post-dose every 2 weeks. After another month of placebo, the identical protocol was repeated after enalapril 5 mg. Although blood pressure and ACE activity decreased significantly (P less than 0.05) within 2-4 hours of the acute doses of each inhibitor, neither captopril or enalapril produced significant reductions 24 hours after the small daily dose. Thus, neither ACE inhibitor alone was adequate to control blood pressure in mild hypertension when given once daily during 8 weeks of treatment.

Pharmacokinetics of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors

1. The pharmacokinetics of most ACE inhibitors have been evaluated indirectly by the measurements of plasma ACE activity and circulating levels of angiotensin I and II. 2. Although plasma ACE activity is very useful to study the degree and the time-course of ACE inhibition, one has to be aware that very different results can be obtained depending on the substrate employed in the assay. It is therefore impossible to compare the results of different inhibitors unless an identical methodology is used. 3. A clear dissociation between plasma angiotensin II levels and the antihypertensive effects of ACE inhibitors has been reported. This observation is in part linked to problems with the measurement of angiotensin II. New methods of determination of plasma angiotensin II have now allowed demonstration of the complete disappearance of plasma angiotensin II following acute ACE inhibition. During chronic treatment, however, angiotensin II generation is effectively blocked only during part of the day, but blood pressure remains controlled permanently. 4. Among the different pharmacokinetic characteristics of ACE inhibitors presently available, the route of excretion and to a lesser degree the half-life appear to be the most clinically relevant. However, the importance of the ability of ACE inhibitors to inhibit tissue renin-angiotensin systems remains to be defined.

First dose response and 24-hour antihypertensive efficacy of the new once-daily angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril

The reduction in blood pressure (BP) after the first dose and after 8 weeks of treatment with a new once-daily angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, ramipril, was examined in 12 untreated hypertensive patients, using ambulatory intraarterial BP monitoring. The first period of monitoring began 24 hours before the first dose was given, and continued for 24 hours afterwards. A second 24-hour period of monitoring was carried out after 8 weeks of treatment, commencing immediately after the morning dose. Angiotensin II levels and serum drug levels were measured at 0, 2, 6 and 24 hours after the acute dose. BP decreased progressively from the first hour after the first dose, reached a maximum in the fifth hour (p less than 0.001) and then the effect diminished. The maximum reduction of systolic BP in any patient was 64 mm Hg, the minimum 4 mm Hg. Blood pressure was significantly (p less than 0.05) reduced throughout the 24 hours after dosing, with a mean daytime reduction of 13/12 mm Hg, and a mean nighttime reduction of 15/7 mm Hg. Angiotensin II levels were significantly (p less than 0.02) and maximally reduced by 2 hours after administration, but the reduction was no longer significant after 24 hours. Serum drug levels were also maximal 2 hours after administration. The trial population could be clearly divided into groups of good and poor responders on the basis of BP reduction. The angiotensin II levels were higher before treatment, and decreased further, in all patients with a good response than in those with a poor response.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acute effects of the new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor cilazapril: a pilot study

This study assesses the magnitude and duration of action of three different oral doses of the new orally active angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor RO 312848 (cilazapril, Hoffman-LaRoche, Nutley, NJ) on blood pressure and plasma ACE levels. Twelve hypertensive patients were separated into two groups: Group A (n = 6) received two single daily doses of 5 and 10 mg, each preceded and followed by two placebo days, and Group B (n = 6) received 10 and 20 mg on an identical protocol. The onset and duration of an appreciable blood pressure lowering effects were at 2 hours and at least for 12 hours, respectively, whereas suppression of ACE levels occurred at 1 hour and lasted for more than 72 hours. Response of these two parameters was partial after 5 mg, but was maximal after 10 mg and did not increase further with the 20-mg dose. A 5-10 mg dose daily may be sufficient to maintain chronic blood pressure control with this agent, but long-term dose trials are necessary to establish its clinical utility.

Individual responses to converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium antagonists

This study was designed to assess whether the acute blood pressure response of an individual hypertensive patient to a calcium antagonist or an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor is a good predictor of the long-term efficacy of these drug classes in this particular patient. The concept that good responses to ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists may be mutually exclusive was also tested. Sixteen patients were included in a randomized crossover trial of enalapril, 20 mg daily, and diltiazem, 120 mg daily, for 6 weeks each. Blood pressure was measured by ambulatory blood pressure recording. During the washout phase, the acute effect of nifedipine, 10 mg p.o., and enalaprilat, 5 mg i.v., was evaluated. Nifedipine and enalaprilat reduced blood pressure equally well. The long-term blood pressure reduction induced by enalapril and diltiazem was similar. The acute blood pressure response to a given drug was not a good predictor of the result obtained with long-term therapy. No age dependency of the antihypertensive effect of either drug class was apparent. There was no evidence that a good response to one drug excluded a similarly good response to the other.

Short- and long-term effects of ramipril in hypertension

The effect of various doses of ramipril, a new converting enzyme inhibitor, was compared with that of placebo in patients with mild essential hypertension. After a single dose of 2.5 mg blood pressure was not significantly affected, despite a decrease in converting enzyme levels. Single doses of 5 or 10 mg did reduce blood pressure, although complete inhibition of the enzyme was apparent only with the higher dose. Despite partial recovery, both converting enzyme and blood pressure remained reduced for 48 hours. After 1 month of treatment with 10 mg of ramipril, renal vascular resistance had decreased and renal blood flow increased. Continued treatment for 1 year controlled blood pressure in 6 of 10 patients; in the remainder a diuretic needed to be added to maintain control of blood pressure.

Blockade of angiotensin converting enzyme in circumventricular organs of the brain after oral lisinopril administration demonstrated by quantitative in vitro autoradiography

1. To elucidate the central effect of lisinopril, a new angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, ACE localization and levels were followed in the brain of Sprague-Dawley rats by quantitative in vitro autoradiography after administration of the drug. 2. Following acute lisinopril (10 mg/kg p.o.) treatment, serum ACE activity was acutely reduced, but returned to normal by 24 h. 3. Levels of ACE in most parts of the brain, including the basal ganglia and choroid plexus of all ventricles were not affected by lisinopril. Lisinopril inhibited brain ACE in the subfornical organ and organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis, circumventricular organs, where the blood brain barrier is deficient. These regions are rich in ACE and angiotensin II receptors, and are known targets for angiotensin II-induced effects on fluid, electrolyte and blood pressure homeostasis. 4. These observations indicate that quantitative in vitro autoradiography is a powerful method to study the access of drugs to the central nervous system. 5. This study shows that blood brain barrier plays an important role in limiting the penetration of lisinopril into the central nervous system. The circumventricular organs may be important targets for ACE inhibitors.

Renal vein immunoreactive renin in patients with renal artery stenosis and essential hypertension

In 36 patients with unilateral renal artery stenosis and in 24 with essential hypertension the plasma levels of total immunoreactive renin, and enzymatically active renin were measured in both renal veins (V) and in the aorta (A) by direct RIA by using monoclonal renin antibodies. Active renin and trypsin-activatable inactive renin were also measured by indirect RIA with angiotensin-I antibodies. The V/A ratio for the different forms of renin calculated from the results of direct and indirect RIA were not different. The V/A ratio of active renin for the kidney with the stenotic artery was 3.04 +/- 0.28 (mean +/- sem) with direct and 3.02 +/- 0.25 with indirect RIA. The contralateral ratio was 1.04 +/- 0.02 with the direct and 1.05 +/- 0.02 with the indirect RIA. In essential hypertension it was 1.28 +/- 0.04 with direct RIA and 1.28 +/- 0.04 with indirect RIA. Chronic treatment with captopril had no influence on this ratio in both patients groups. The V/A ratio of total immunoreactive renin was lower than that of active renin and this ratio had lost discriminative power for lateralization. This ratio was significantly greater than one on the affected side in renal artery stenosis but not contralaterally and in essential hypertension. This study shows that renin activity after trypsin-activation of plasma is an accurate measure of the total renin concentration, i.e. active renin plus prorenin. It also shows that a kidney with a stenotic artery secretes inactive renin, which is immunologically related to active renin and is likely to be prorenin. Direct RIA for measuring active renin is technically more simple than indirect RIA. Direct RIA however is somewhat less sensitive. For measuring the V/A ratio for active renin in patients with renal artery stenosis this can be overcome by stimulating the renin-angiotensin system for instance by captopril.

The haemodynamic and humoral effects of treatment for one month with the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril in salt replete hypertensive patients

We have studied the effects of treatment for one month with perindopril, 4 or 8 mg once daily, in seven hypertensive patients. Blood pressure was lowered from 164/93 mm Hg to 145/84 mm Hg by 4 mg of perindopril and after one month remained at 142/82 mm Hg. Neither postural hypotension nor tachycardia occurred. Inhibition of plasma angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) lasting for over 24 h was achieved and there was a significant increase in plasma renin activity (PRA). Maximum plasma concentrations of the active metabolite of perindopril, S-9780, were detected four h after oral administration. After treatment for one month there was evidence of reduced sensitivity of plasma ACE to the action of the inhibitor. The plasma concentration of S-9780 required to produce 50% inhibition of plasma ACE rose from 2.4 ng X ml-1 following the first dose to 5.5 ng X ml-1 after one month.

Captopril plus hydrochlorothiazide once daily normalizes 24 h blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension

The hypotensive effect of captopril 50 mg twice daily and of captopril 50 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg once daily was studied in 12 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, whose blood pressure was not normalized by captopril 25 mg twice daily alone. Both captopril 50 mg twice daily and captopril 50 mg + HCTZ 25 mg once daily caused a significant reduction of outpatient blood pressures as compared with placebo (P less than 0.001). Captopril 50 mg + HCTZ 25 mg once daily also reduced outpatient blood pressures significantly when compared with captopril 25 mg twice daily (P less than 0.01). Both captopril 50 mg twice daily and captopril 50 mg + HCTZ 25 mg once daily significantly reduced 24 h blood pressure (P less than 0.001) without disturbance of its normal circadian rhythm. This effect was more pronounced while on captopril + HCTZ. Captopril 50 mg + HCTZ 25 mg once daily normalizes 24 h blood pressure in most patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, whose blood pressure is not controlled by captopril 25 mg twice daily alone.

Pharmacology of converting enzyme inhibitors

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors were developed to prevent the in vivo generation of angiotensin II and thereby to reduce peripheral vasoconstriction. However, these compounds exert some additional effects that may or may not be angiotensin dependent. These include potential sodium diuresis, bradykinin accumulation, prostaglandin release, blunting of sympathetic activity, parasympathomimetic actions, central effects, redistribution of blood flow toward some particularly important organs. Only the comprehensive assessment of the many complex interactions that exist between the renin-angiotensin and several other regulatory systems reveals the complete therapeutic profile of this class of pharmacologic agents.

Comparison of captopril and enalapril in patients with severe chronic heart failure

To evaluate the concept that long duration of action is an advantageous property of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the treatment of severe heart failure, we randomly assigned 42 patients to therapy with either a short-acting inhibitor (captopril, 150 mg daily) or a long-acting inhibitor (enalapril, 40 mg daily) for one to three months while concomitant therapy with digoxin and diuretics was kept constant. The treatment groups had similar hemodynamic and clinical characteristics at base-line evaluation and similar initial responses to converting-enzyme inhibition. During long-term therapy, captopril and enalapril produced similar decreases in systemic blood pressure, but the hypotensive effects of enalapril were more prolonged and persistent than those of captopril. Consequently, although the patients in both groups improved hemodynamically and clinically during the study, serious symptomatic hypotension (syncope and near syncope) was seen primarily among those treated with enalapril. Sustained hypotension also probably accounted for the decline in creatinine clearance (P less than 0.05) and the notable retention of potassium (P less than 0.05) observed in the patients treated with enalapril but not in those treated with captopril. We conclude that when large, fixed doses of converting-enzyme inhibitors are used in the treatment of patients with severe chronic heart failure, long-acting agents may produce prolonged hypotensive effects that may compromise cerebral and renal function, and thus they may have disadvantages in such cases, as compared with short-acting agents.

Studies on the antihypertensive effect of single doses of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril (HOE 498) in man

The time course of the blood pressure lowering effect and the dose-response relationship of the new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril (HOE 498) were studied in 8 patients, with essential hypertension. As compared with placebo, a single oral dose of 2.5 mg ramipril lowered systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The antihypertensive action of single oral doses of 5, 7.5 and 10 mg ramipril was more pronounced. No change in heart rate occurred. Angiotensin converting enzyme activity was suppressed after all doses of ramipril studied. Plasma renin activity increased after 2.5 mg and 5 mg ramipril. Plasma aldosterone was not affected by 2.5 mg, but it fell after 5 mg ramipril. Thus, ramipril produced prolonged inhibition (more than 12 hours) of angiotensin converting enzyme activity and lowered blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension.