Administration time-dependent effects of aspirin in women at differing risk for preeclampsia

Controversies and Clarifications Regarding the Role of Aspirin in Preeclampsia Prevention: A Focused Review

Preeclampsia is one of the leading causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. In recent decades, many studies have evaluated different interventions in order to prevent the occurrence of preeclampsia. Among these, administration of low-dose aspirin from early pregnancy showed consistent evidence of its prophylactic role. In this article, we review the scientific literature on this topic, highlighting the rationale for aspirin use, who should be treated, the timing of initiation and cessation of therapy, the importance of proper dosing, and its role in the prevention of other adverse outcomes.

Effect of aspirin on blood pressure in hypertensive patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Aspirin is widely used for secondary prevention in patients with hypertension. However, previous studies mainly focused on the preventive effects of aspirin, and there has been a lack of reliable evidence on whether taking aspirin affects blood pressure This study aimed to investigate whether aspirin would affect the blood pressure in patients with hypertension.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane database, Embase, Scopus and Medline databases were searched until September 2023. For continuous variables (e.g., blood pressure reduction), the mean difference (MD) was selected as the effect magnitude indices. We used the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool to assess the risk of bias.

RESULT

A total of five studies were included, comprising 20,312 patients. We found that aspirin did not affect SBP (MD = -0.78, 95% CI: - 2.41, 0.84). A similar result was found for DBP (MD = -0.86, 95% CI: - 2.14, 0.42).

CONCLUSION

This study showed no significant difference in blood pressure between the aspirin and control groups, suggesting that aspirin does not affect blood pressure.

Low-dose aspirin therapy for the prevention of preeclampsia: time to reconsider our recommendations?

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends initiation of 81 mg of aspirin daily for women at risk of preeclampsia between 12 and 28 weeks' gestation, optimally before 16 weeks, with continuation until delivery. The World Health Organization recommends that 75 mg of aspirin should be initiated before 20 weeks of gestation for women at high risk of preeclampsia. Both the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence quality statement on "Antenatal Assessment of Pre-eclampsia Risk" request that healthcare providers prescribe low-dose aspirin to pregnant women at increased risk of preeclampsia daily from 12 weeks of gestation. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists recommends 150 mg of aspirin daily, and the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guidelines suggest risk stratification with a dosage of 75 mg for those at moderate risk of preeclampsia and 150 mg for those at high risk of preeclampsia. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics initiative on preeclampsia recommends 150 mg of aspirin to be initiated at 11 to 14+6 week's gestation and also proposes that 2 tablets of 81 mg is an acceptable alternative. Review of the available evidence suggests that both the dosage and timing of aspirin initiation is key to its effectiveness at reducing the risk of preeclampsia. Doses of >100 mg of aspirin daily initiated before 16 weeks' gestation seem to be most effective at reducing the risk of preeclampsia and thus dosages recommended by most major societies and organizations may not be effective. Randomized control trials examining 81 mg vs 162 mg of aspirin daily for the prevention of preeclampsia are required to assess the safety and efficacy of aspirin dosages available in the United States.

ASPRE trial: effects of aspirin on mean arterial blood pressure and uterine artery pulsatility index trajectories in pregnancy

OBJECTIVES

The mechanism by which aspirin prevents pre-eclampsia is poorly understood, and its effects on biomarkers throughout pregnancy are unknown. We aimed to investigate the effects of aspirin on mean arterial pressure (MAP) and mean uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) using repeated measures from women at increased risk of preterm pre-eclampsia.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal secondary analysis of the Combined Multimarker Screening and Randomized Patient Treatment with Aspirin for Evidence-Based Pre-eclampsia Prevention (ASPRE) trial using repeated measures of MAP and UtA-PI. In the trial, 1620 women at increased risk of preterm pre-eclampsia were identified using the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks, of whom 798 were randomly assigned to receive 150 mg/day aspirin and 822 were assigned to receive placebo daily from 11-14 weeks to 36 weeks of gestation or delivery, whichever came first. MAP and UtA-PI were measured at baseline and follow-up visits at 19-24, 32-34 and 36 weeks of gestation. Generalized additive mixed models with treatment by gestational age interaction terms were used to investigate the effects of aspirin on MAP and UtA-PI trajectories over time.

RESULTS

Among 798 participants in the aspirin group and 822 in the placebo group, there were 5951 MAP and 5942 UtA-PI measurements. Trajectories of raw and multiples of the median (MoM) values of MAP did not differ significantly between the two groups (MAP MoM analysis: P-value for treatment by gestational age interaction, 0.340). In contrast, trajectories of raw and MoM values of UtA-PI showed a significantly steeper decline in the aspirin group than in the placebo group, with the difference mainly driven by a more pronounced reduction before 20 weeks of gestation (UtA-PI MoM analysis: P-value for treatment by gestational age interaction, 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

In women at increased risk of preterm pre-eclampsia, 150 mg/day aspirin initiated in the first trimester does not affect MAP but is associated with a significant decrease in mean UtA-PI, particularly before 20 weeks of gestation. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Preeclampsia and Venous Thromboembolism: Pathophysiology and Potential Therapy

Preeclampsia (PET) is a multisystem inflammatory disorder that represents a leading cause of feto-maternal morbidity and mortality, complicating 2-5% of all pregnancies. PET incurs an increased risk of venous thromboembolism, which is one of the leading causes of death in pregnancy and in the postpartum period. This prothrombotic phenotype is attributable to the maternal phase of PET, which is characterized by a systemic inflammatory response and coagulation activation. Research continues to be undertaken in terms of preventative measures, however, currently revolves around pharmacological low dose aspirin initiated in the first trimester of pregnancy for those with risk factors. Treatment involves antenatal corticosteroids for fetal lung development in preterm birth, parenteral magnesium sulfate for fetal neuroprotection and maternal seizure prophylaxis, and timely birth of the fetus and placenta being the only definitive treatment of PET. Patients with a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk deemed to be >1-3% are treated with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in the form of low molecular weight heparin. Completing each woman's VTE risk assessment is crucial, particularly in the setting of PET, as there is also a proven associated competing hemorrhagic risk.

A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Aspirin When Delivered at Different Medication Times for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Diseases

PURPOSE

Effective antiplatelet therapy can significantly reduce the incidence and mortality rate of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Aspirin is widely used in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases; however, there is widespread debate as to when patients should take an enteric-coated aspirin tablet on a daily basis. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of different aspirin medication times (morning or before bedtime) in terms of the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases using meta-analysis.

METHODS

Studies with randomized control trials (RCT) or crossover trials regarding to the usage of aspirin (morning or before bedtime) for the primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases were searched in Medline, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP Database and CBM. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5, v5.3), a Cochrane systematic reviews software, was used to perform meta-analysis based on the recommendation of the Cochrane Handbook for risk assessment tools.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis showed that taking low-dose aspirin tablets before bed reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared with taking it in the morning. At the same time, the number of studies on platelet aggregation rate, C-reactive protein (CRP), serum nitric oxide (NO) or thromboxane B₂ (TXB₂) is too small to be reliable. However, there was a large heterogeneity across the studies. The quality of some studies was not high enough.

CONCLUSION

Additional blood pressure benefits can be achieved by taking aspirin before bedtime, but it does not affect its antiplatelet effect and does not pose a higher risk of bleeding.

The impact of acetylsalicylic acid dosed at bedtime on circadian rhythms of blood pressure in the high-risk group of cardiovascular patients-a randomized, controlled trial

Purpose

Time of drug administration may significantly influence its effect. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of ASA (administrated in the morning or in the evening) on the anti-hypertensive effect and diurnal blood pressure profile in the high-risk group of cardiovascular patients.

Methods

All patients (n = 114) had been diagnosed with coronary heart disease and arterial hypertension prior to the enrolment and had been treated with 75 mg per day of ASA in the morning. The patients were randomly assigned to one of the two study groups receiving 75 mg of ASA per day in a single antiplatelet therapy for 3 months in the morning (n = 58) or in the evening (n = 56). The control group (n = 61) consisted of patients with arterial hypertension but without coronary heart disease, not receiving ASA. In all the patients, during each visit, clinical blood pressure (BP) and ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) were performed.

Results

There was a significant reduction in 24-h BP and blood pressure at night in the ASA group evening group compared with the ASA morning group and the control group.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrated that compared with the use of ASA in the morning, its administration in the evening may lead to favourable drop in the ABPM and an improvement of the diurnal profile in the high-risk group of cardiovascular patients who are not naïve to ASA.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-02997-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A Pilot Randomized Trial Comparing the Effects of 80 versus 160 mg of Aspirin on Midtrimester Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index in Women with a History of Preeclampsia

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of 80 mg and 160 mg of aspirin, initiated in the first trimester of pregnancy, on mid-trimester uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) in women with a history of preeclampsia.

METHODS

We performed a pilot double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pregnant women with a history of preeclampsia were recruited between 10^0/7 and 13^6/7 weeks gestation and randomly assigned to take either 80 or 160 mg of aspirin daily at bedtime from randomization to 35^6/7 weeks gestation. The primary outcome was mean UtA-PI at 22-24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included the rate of fetal growth restriction and preeclampsia, stratified as term (≥37 weeks), preterm (<37 weeks), and early-onset (<34 weeks) preeclampsia.

RESULTS

A total of 107 participants were randomized, including 41 (38%) with a history of preterm preeclampsia and 16 (15%) with a history of early-onset preeclampsia. We observed no significant difference in mean UtA-PI at 22-24 weeks between the 2 groups (0.97; 95% CI 0.88-1.05 vs. 0.97; 95% CI 0.88-1.07, P = 0.9). The rates of fetal growth restriction (8% vs. 2%; P = 0.20); preeclampsia (12% vs. 15%; P = 0.78), preterm preeclampsia (4% vs. 2%; P = 0.56), and early-onset preeclampsia (0% vs. 2%; P = 0.52) were similar in both groups. No serious adverse events associated with the study treatment were reported.

CONCLUSION

We observed no significant difference in UtA-PI between the two doses of aspirin, but we observed low rates of fetal growth restriction and preterm and early-onset preeclampsia (all less than 5%). The benefits of aspirin for the prevention of preterm preeclampsia is probably not related to the improvement of deep placentation alone.

Prophylactic aspirin for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications: An overview of meta-analyses

Benefits of aspirin administration on pre-eclampsia and IUGR depend on the gestational age and dose of aspirin administration. Meta-analyses show that, to prevent preterm labor, aspirin could be administrated even after 16 weeks of gestational age.

Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications

BACKGROUND

Pre-eclampsia is associated with deficient intravascular production of prostacyclin, a vasodilator, and excessive production of thromboxane, a vasoconstrictor and stimulant of platelet aggregation. These observations led to the hypotheses that antiplatelet agents, low-dose aspirin in particular, might prevent or delay development of pre-eclampsia.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of antiplatelet agents, such as aspirin and dipyridamole, when given to women at risk of developing pre-eclampsia.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (30 March 2018), and reference lists of retrieved studies. We updated the search in September 2019 and added the results to the awaiting classification section of the review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised trials comparing antiplatelet agents with either placebo or no antiplatelet agent were included. Studies only published in abstract format were eligible for inclusion if sufficient information was available. We would have included cluster-randomised trials in the analyses along with individually-randomised trials, if any had been identified in our search strategy. Quasi-random studies were excluded. Participants were pregnant women at risk of developing pre-eclampsia. Interventions were administration of an antiplatelet agent (such as low-dose aspirin or dipyridamole), comparisons were either placebo or no antiplatelet.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed trials for inclusion and extracted data independently. For binary outcomes, we calculated risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), on an intention-to-treat basis. For this update we incorporated individual participant data (IPD) from trials with this available, alongside aggregate data (AD) from trials where it was not, in order to enable reliable subgroup analyses and inclusion of two key new outcomes. We assessed risk of bias for included studies and created a 'Summary of findings' table using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventy-seven trials (40,249 women, and their babies) were included, although three trials (relating to 233 women) did not contribute data to the meta-analysis. Nine of the trials contributing data were large (> 1000 women recruited), accounting for 80% of women recruited. Although the trials took place in a wide range of countries, all of the nine large trials involved only women in high-income and/or upper middle-income countries. IPD were available for 36 trials (34,514 women), including all but one of the large trials. Low-dose aspirin alone was the intervention in all the large trials, and most trials overall. Dose in the large trials was 50 mg (1 trial, 1106 women), 60 mg (5 trials, 22,322 women), 75mg (1 trial, 3697 women) 100 mg (1 trial, 3294 women) and 150 mg (1 trial, 1776 women). Most studies were either low risk of bias or unclear risk of bias; and the large trials were all low risk of bas. Antiplatelet agents versus placebo/no treatment The use of antiplatelet agents reduced the risk of proteinuric pre-eclampsia by 18% (36,716 women, 60 trials, RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.88; high-quality evidence), number needed to treat for one women to benefit (NNTB) 61 (95% CI 45 to 92). There was a small (9%) reduction in the RR for preterm birth <37 weeks (35,212 women, 47 trials; RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.95, high-quality evidence), NNTB 61 (95% CI 42 to 114), and a 14% reduction infetal deaths, neonatal deaths or death before hospital discharge (35,391 babies, 52 trials; RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.95; high-quality evidence), NNTB 197 (95% CI 115 to 681). Antiplatelet agents slightly reduced the risk of small-for-gestational age babies (35,761 babies, 50 trials; RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.92; high-quality evidence), NNTB 146 (95% CI 90 to 386), and pregnancies with serious adverse outcome (a composite outcome including maternal death, baby death, pre-eclampsia, small-for-gestational age, and preterm birth) (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.96; 17,382 women; 13 trials, high-quality evidence), NNTB 54 (95% CI 34 to 132). Antiplatelet agents probably slightly increase postpartum haemorrhage > 500 mL (23,769 women, 19 trials; RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.12; moderate-quality evidence due to clinical heterogeneity), and they probably marginally increase the risk of placental abruption, although for this outcome the evidence was downgraded due to a wide confidence interval including the possibility of no effect (30,775 women; 29 trials; RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.54; moderate-quality evidence). Data from two large trials which assessed children at aged 18 months (including results from over 5000 children), did not identify clear differences in development between the two groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Administering low-dose aspirin to pregnant women led to small-to-moderate benefits, including reductions in pre-eclampsia (16 fewer per 1000 women treated), preterm birth (16 fewer per 1000 treated), the baby being born small-for-gestational age (seven fewer per 1000 treated) and fetal or neonatal death (five fewer per 1000 treated). Overall, administering antiplatelet agents to 1000 women led to 20 fewer pregnancies with serious adverse outcomes. The quality of evidence for all these outcomes was high. Aspirin probably slightly increased the risk of postpartum haemorrhage of more than 500 mL, however, the quality of evidence for this outcome was downgraded to moderate, due to concerns of clinical heterogeneity in measurements of blood loss. Antiplatelet agents probably marginally increase placental abruption, but the quality of the evidence was downgraded to moderate due to low event numbers and thus wide 95% CI. Overall, antiplatelet agents improved outcomes, and at these doses appear to be safe. Identifying women who are most likely to respond to low-dose aspirin would improve targeting of treatment. As almost all the women in this review were recruited to the trials after 12 weeks' gestation, it is unclear whether starting treatment before 12 weeks' would have additional benefits without any increase in adverse effects. While there was some indication that higher doses of aspirin would be more effective, further studies would be warranted to examine this.

Time-Dependent Hypotensive Effect of Aspirin in Mice

Objective- Evening but not morning administration of low-dose aspirin has been reported to lower blood pressure in hypertensive patients. The present study was designed to determine whether this phenomenon could be replicated in mice, and if so, whether a time-dependent effect of aspirin on blood pressure was because of alteration of circadian clock function. Approach and Results- We recapitulated the protective effect of aspirin (50 μg/d for 7 days) at zeitgeber time 0 (active-to-rest transit), but not at zeitgeber time 12, on a high-salt diet-induced increase of blood pressure. However, the time of aspirin administration did not influence expression of canonical clock genes or their acetylation. We used mouse Bmal1 and Per2-luciferase reporters expressed in U2OS cells to determine the real-time effect of aspirin on circadian function but found that the oscillation of bioluminescence was unaltered. Timing of aspirin administration also failed to alter urinary prostaglandin metabolites or catecholamines, or the acetylation of its COX-1 (cyclooxygenase-1) target in platelets. Conclusions- The time-dependent hypotensive effect of aspirin in humans has been recapitulated in hypertensive mice. However, this does not seem to reflect a direct impact of aspirin on circadian clocks or on acetylation of platelet COX-1.

Low dose aspirin for preventing fetal growth restriction: a randomised trial

The purpose of this study was to investigate when in pregnancy to stop the administration of low dose aspirin (150 mg/daily) so as to prevent fetal growth restriction (FGR) A randomised, placebo-controlled study was designed. The patients were all screened positive using the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) early pregnancy screening test for preeclampsia (PE) and FGR prediction. One hundred and fifty patients were enrolled and divided equally into three groups: A – the controls who received placebo treatment; B – those who received aspirin till 32 weeks of gestation and C – those who received aspirin till 36 weeks of gestation. The mean gestational age at enrollment was similar for all the groups (12.4 weeks). The growth curves, fetal and maternal Doppler measurements and amniotic fluid index (AFI) were monitored every 4 weeks. Also, the outcome of the pregnancy was noted and all the results were compared between the groups. FGR was defined as a fetal weight below the 10th centile for gestational age. In group C, there were less cases of FGR compared with the other groups: 6% vs. 10% in group B vs. 24% in controls. Also, there was a significant birth weight improvement in this group with a median of 3180 g compared with 2950 g in group B and 2760 g in group A (P=0.01). The gestational age at delivery was similar in all the groups (39 weeks in group C/39.2 weeks in group B/38.6 weeks in group A). In conclusion, low dose aspirin improves the outcome in the selected population and should be offered for prevention of FGR from 12 to 36 weeks.

Does the timing of aspirin administration influence its antiplatelet effect - review of literature on chronotherapy

This publication is a summary of the multidirectional effects of aspirin and its role in modern medicine. The history of aspirin, or acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), and its use dates back to ancient times, although the substance in its pure form has been produced and sold since 1899. Initially it was used for its antipyretic, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory effects. Over the years many other benefits associated with the administration of ASA have been revealed. The mechanism of aspirin’s action was discovered thanks to the British pharmacologist and Nobel Prize winner Sir John Vane. Understanding the effects of acetylsalicylic acid, associated with the inhibition of cyclooxygenase and proinflammatory thromboxane A2 and with increased concentration of vasoprotective, antithrombotic prostacyclin, gave rise to the era of using small “cardiac” doses of ASA in cardiovascular diseases. In addition to the well-researched antiplatelet effect, other properties of ASA have been discovered, such as the non-COX-1 dependent improvement of endothelial function or the hypotensive effect after evening administration. According to the currently available knowledge, it is possible to speak of a pleiotropic effect of ASA and its use in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases, taking into account its anti-aggregation effect, circadian rhythms, and the principles of chronotherapy.

How important is aspirin adherence when evaluating effectiveness of low-dose aspirin?

Low-dose aspirin (LDA) is advocated for women at high-risk of pre-eclampsia, providing a modest, 10%, reduction in risk. Cardiology meta-analyses demonstrate 18% reduction in serious vascular events with LDA. Non-responsiveness to aspirin (sometimes termed aspirin resistance) and variable clinical effectiveness are often attributed to suboptimal adherence. The aim of this review was to identify the scope of adherence assessments in RCTs evaluating aspirin effectiveness in cardiology and obstetrics and discuss the quality of information provided by current methods. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, limited to humans and English language, for RCTs evaluating aspirin in cardiology; 14/03/13-13/03/16 and pregnancy 1957-13/03/16. Search terms; 'aspirin', 'acetylsalicylic acid' appearing adjacent to 'myocardial infarction' or 'pregnancy', 'pregnant', 'obstetric' were used. 38% (25/68) of obstetric and 32% (20/62) of cardiology RCTs assessed aspirin adherence and 24% (6/25) and 29% (6/21) of obstetric and cardiology RCTs, respectively, defined acceptable adherence. Semi-quantitative methods (pill counts, medication weighing) prevailed in obstetric RCTs (93%), qualitative methods (interviews, questionnaires) were more frequent in obstetrics (67%). Two obstetric RCTs quantified serum thromboxane B₂ and salicylic acid, but no quantitative methods were used in cardiology Aspirin has proven efficacy, but suboptimal adherence is widespread and difficult to accurately quantify. Little is currently known about aspirin adherence in pregnancy. RCTs evaluating aspirin effectiveness show over-reliance on qualitative adherence assessments vulnerable to inherent inaccuracies. Reliable adherence data is important to assess and optimise the clinical effectiveness of LDA. We propose that adherence should be formally assessed in future trials and that development of quantitative assessments may prove valuable for trial protocols.

Aspirin vs Heparin for the Prevention of Preeclampsia

Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy that remains a significant cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Preeclampsia can be resolved by delivery, and most of the proposed preventive treatment approaches are based on processes involved in placental development in early pregnancy. Yet, none of these has been established in clinical practice. Low-dose aspirin is the most promising candidate, nevertheless; while some individual randomized controlled trials showed minimal or no statistically significant benefit, recent metanalyses showed that early initiation before 16 weeks of gestation is associated with prevention of early-onset preeclampsia and reduction in prevalence of perinatal death or morbidity of pregnant women. Heparin could be an alternative antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory median to prevent preeclampsia either alone or in combination with aspirin; however, results are conflicting concerning efficacy.

Aspirin and blood pressure: Effects when used alone or in combination with antihypertensive drugs

Arterial hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular and renal events. Lowering blood pressure is thus an important strategy for reducing morbidity and mortality. Since low-dose aspirin is a cornerstone in the prevention of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, combined treatment with aspirin and antihypertensive drugs is very common. However, the impact of aspirin therapy on blood pressure control remains a subject of intense debate. Recent data suggest that the cardioprotective action of aspirin extends beyond its well-known antithrombotic effect. Aspirin has been shown to trigger the synthesis of specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators from arachidonic acid and omega-3 fatty acids. These novel anti-inflammatory and pro-resolving mediators actively stimulate the resolution of inflammation and tissue regeneration. Additionally, they may contribute to other protective effects on redox status and vascular reactivity that have also been attributed to aspirin. Of note, aspirin has been shown to improve vasodilation through cyclooxygenase-independent mechanisms. On the other hand, higher aspirin doses have been reported to exert a negative impact on blood pressure due to inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 activity, which reduces renal blood flow, glomerular filtration rate and sodium and water excretion. This review aims to provide an overview of the effects of aspirin on blood pressure and the underlying mechanisms, focusing on the interaction between aspirin and antihypertensive drugs. Studies in both experimental and human hypertension are presented.

The role of aspirin dose on the prevention of preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction are major causes of perinatal death and handicap in survivors. Randomized clinical trials have reported that the risk of preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia, and fetal growth restriction can be reduced by the prophylactic use of aspirin in high-risk women, but the appropriate dose of the drug to achieve this objective is not certain.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to estimate the impact of aspirin dosage on the prevention of preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia, and fetal growth restriction.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of daily aspirin or placebo (or no treatment) during pregnancy. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to December 2015, and study bibliographies were reviewed. Authors were contacted to obtain additional data when needed. Relative risks for preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia, and fetal growth restriction were calculated with 95% confidence intervals using random-effect models. Dose-response effect was evaluated using meta-regression and reported as adjusted R². Analyses were stratified according to gestational age at initiation of aspirin (≤16 and >16 weeks) and repeated after exclusion of studies at high risk of biases.

RESULTS

In all, 45 randomized controlled trials included a total of 20,909 pregnant women randomized to between 50-150 mg of aspirin daily. When aspirin was initiated at ≤16 weeks, there was a significant reduction and a dose-response effect for the prevention of preeclampsia (relative risk, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.75; P < .001; R², 44%; P = .036), severe preeclampsia (relative risk, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.83; P = .009; R², 100%; P = .008), and fetal growth restriction (relative risk, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.70; P < .001; R², 100%; P = .044) with higher dosages of aspirin being associated with greater reduction of the 3 outcomes. Similar results were observed after the exclusion of studies at high risk of biases. When aspirin was initiated at >16 weeks, there was a smaller reduction of preeclampsia (relative risk, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.99; P = .04) without relationship with aspirin dosage (R², 0%; P = .941). Aspirin initiated at >16 weeks was not associated with a risk reduction or a dose-response effect for severe preeclampsia (relative risk, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.14; P = .28; R², 0%; P = .838) and fetal growth restriction (relative risk, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.05; P = .34; R², not available; P = .563).

CONCLUSION

Prevention of preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction using aspirin in early pregnancy is associated with a dose-response effect. Low-dose aspirin initiated at >16 weeks' gestation has a modest or no impact on the risk of preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia, and fetal growth restriction. Women at high risk for those outcomes should be identified in early pregnancy.

Low dose aspirin and pregnancy: how important is aspirin resistance?

Antiplatelet agents are pivotal for prevention of coronary artery disease and cerebrovascular disease worldwide. Individual patient data meta-analysis indicates that low-dose aspirin causes a 10% risk reduction in pre-eclampsia for women at high individual risk. However, in the last 15 years it has emerged that a significant proportion of aspirin-treated individuals exhibit suboptimal platelet response, determined biochemically and clinically, termed 'aspirin non-responsiveness', 'aspirin resistance' and 'aspirin treatment failure'. More recently, investigation of aspirin responsiveness has begun in pregnant women. This review explores the history and clinical relevance of 'aspirin resistance' applied to high-risk obstetric populations.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Is 'aspirin resistance' clinically relevant in high-risk obstetrics?

Sleep-time ambulatory blood pressure as a prognostic marker of vascular and other risks and therapeutic target for prevention by hypertension chronotherapy: Rationale and design of the Hygia Project

This article describes the rationale, objectives, design and conduct of the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM)-based Hygia Project. Given the substantial evidence of the significantly better prognostic value of ABPM compared to clinic BP measurements, several international guidelines now propose ABPM as a requirement to confirm the office diagnosis of hypertension. Nonetheless, all previous ABPM outcome investigations, except the Monitorización Ambulatoria para Predicción de Eventos Cardiovasculares study (MAPEC) study, relied upon only a single, low-reproducible 24 h ABPM assessment per participant done at study inclusion, thus precluding the opportunity to explore the potential reduction in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk associated with modification of prognostic ABPM-derived parameters by hypertension therapy. The findings of the single-center MAPEC study, based upon periodic systematic 48 h ABPM evaluation of all participants during a median follow-up of 5.6 years, constitute the first proof-of-concept evidence that the progressive reduction of the asleep systolic blood pressure (SBP) mean and correction of the sleep-time relative SBP decline toward the normal dipper BP profile, most efficiently accomplished by a bedtime hypertension treatment strategy, best attenuates the risk of CVD, stroke and development of new-onset diabetes. The Hygia Project, primarily designed to extend the use of ABPM in primary care as a requirement for diagnosis of hypertension, evaluation of response to treatment and individualized assessment of CVD and other risks, is a research network presently composed of 40 clinical sites and 292 investigators. Its main objectives are to (i) investigate whether specific treatment-induced changes in ABPM-derived parameters reduce risk of CVD events, stroke, new-onset diabetes and/or development of chronic kidney disease (CKD); and (ii) test the hypothesis that bedtime chronotherapy entailing the entire daily dose of ≥1 conventional hypertension medications exerts better ambulatory BP control and CVD, metabolic and renal risk reduction than all such medications ingested in the morning upon awakening. Between 2007 and 2015, investigators recruited 18 078 persons [9769 men/8309 women, 59.1 ± 14.3 years of age (mean ± SD)], including 15 764 with hypertension according to ABPM criteria as participants in the prospective randomized chronotherapy trial. The initial evaluation includes 48 h ABPM, detailed medical history and screening laboratory blood and urine tests. The same evaluation procedure is scheduled annually, or more frequently when treatment adjustment is required for proper ambulatory BP control, targeting a median follow-up of >5 years. The primary CVD outcome end point is the composite of CVD death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, heart failure, ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke. The independent Hygia Project Events Committee periodically evaluates blinded clinical reports to ascertain and certify every documented event. Beyond the potential findings resulting from testing the main hypotheses, the Hygia Project has already demonstrated, as proof of concept, that the routine diagnosis of hypertension and individualized assessment of CVD and other risks by ABPM, as currently recommended, is fully viable in the primary care setting, where most people with either hypertension, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes or CKD receive routine medical attention.

[Medical approaches for managing preeclampsia]

Preecalmpsia is an hypertensive disease of pregnancy complicating 1-5 % of all pregnancies. Although symptomatic management has improved, there is currently no curative treatment, and only childbirth and delivery of the placenta, usually prematurely, alleviate the mother's symptoms. When preeclampsia occurs before 37 weeks of gestation expectant management is often possible in order to reduce post-natal complications related to prematurity. The management depends on the severity of the disease and gestational age. The modalities of this management are reviewed in this article.

Early prediction and aspirin for prevention of pre-eclampsia (EPAPP) study: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effect of early administration of aspirin on the prevention of pre-eclampsia in high-risk women.

METHODS

This was planned as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of aspirin for women with risk factors for pre-eclampsia. Participants were randomized to start either aspirin (81 mg/day) or placebo at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was pre-eclampsia and secondary outcomes included gestational hypertension and small-for-gestational age at birth.

RESULTS

The trial suffered from slow recruitment, leading to a protocol change to broaden the inclusion criteria (from a minimum score of multiple risk factors to at least one risk factor for pre-eclampsia). The trial was then terminated prematurely due to continuing slow recruitment and a lack of equipoise given a change in national guidelines to administer aspirin to high-risk women. From the 53 women who were randomized, 30 were included in the final analysis. There was no evidence that the primary outcome of pre-eclampsia was prevented by low-dose aspirin (relative risk (RR) 0.88, 95% CI 0.21-3.66). Gestational hypertension was seen in two women, both in the aspirin group. There was no evidence that the occurrence of small-for-gestational age was reduced by aspirin (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.06-12.72).

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study was underpowered to show effectiveness of aspirin compared to placebo due to the premature termination and difficulties encountered, it highlights practical issues to inform future studies.

Prediction and prevention of early-onset pre-eclampsia: impact of aspirin after first-trimester screening

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of a combination of screening and treatment with low-dose aspirin on the prevalence of early-onset pre-eclampsia (PE).

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of two consecutive cohorts of women screened for early PE. The first cohort was observed to determine whether algorithms developed to screen for PE at 11 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation could be applied to our population. High-risk women in the second cohort were advised on their risk and offered aspirin (150 mg at night), with treatment starting immediately after screening. The prevalence of early PE and the proportion of women with PE delivering at 34-37 weeks' gestation were compared between the cohorts.

RESULTS

In the observational and interventional cohorts, 3066 and 2717 women, respectively, were screened. There were 12 (0.4%) cases of early PE in the observational cohort and one (0.04%) in the interventional cohort (P < 0.01). Among all women with PE delivering before 37 weeks, 25 (0.83%) were in the observational cohort and 10 (0.37%) in the interventional cohort (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

A strategy of first-trimester screening for early PE coupled with prescription of aspirin to the high-risk group appears to be effective in reducing the prevalence of early PE.

Time-Dependent Effects of Aspirin on Blood Pressure and Morning Platelet Reactivity

Aspirin is used for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention by millions of patients on a daily basis. Previous studies suggested that aspirin intake at bedtime reduces blood pressure compared with intake on awakening. This has never been studied in patients with CVD. Moreover, platelet reactivity and CVD incidence is highest during morning hours. Bedtime aspirin intake may attenuate morning platelet reactivity. This clinical trial examined the effect of bedtime aspirin intake compared with intake on awakening on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement and morning platelet reactivity in patients using aspirin for CVD prevention. In this randomized open-label crossover trial, 290 patients were randomized to take 100 mg aspirin on awakening or at bedtime during 2 periods of 3 months. At the end of each period, 24-hour blood pressure and morning platelet reactivity were measured. The primary analysis population comprised 263 (blood pressure) and 133 (platelet reactivity) patients. Aspirin intake at bedtime did not reduce blood pressure compared with intake on awakening (difference systolic/diastolic: −0.1 [95% confidence interval, −1.0, 0.9]/−0.6 [95% confidence interval, −1.2, 0.0] mm Hg). Platelet reactivity during morning hours was reduced with bedtime aspirin intake (difference: −22 aspirin reaction units [95% confidence interval, −35, −9]). The intake of low-dose aspirin at bedtime compared with intake on awakening did not reduce blood pressure of patients with CVD. However, bedtime aspirin reduced morning platelet reactivity. Future studies are needed to assess the effect of this promising simple intervention on the excess of cardiovascular events during the high risk morning hours.

Low-dose aspirin for prevention of adverse outcomes related to abnormal placentation

Meta-analysis of randomized studies on the use of low-dose aspirin in women at high risk of preeclampsia (PE) has demonstrated that if treatment is initiated at ≤16 weeks' gestation, there is significant reduction in the risk of PE [relative risk (RR) 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.62], fetal growth restriction (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.33-0.64), preterm birth (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.22-0.57) and perinatal death (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19-0.92), whereas the effect of treatment after 16 weeks is substantially less (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61-0.99; RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.88-1.08; RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.97; and RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.73-1.19, respectively). Moreover, the decrease in the risk of PE from early onset treatment seems to be related to the dose of aspirin, and a dose of >80 mg daily should be considered for optimal benefits.

Does palm oil vitamin E reduce the risk of pregnancy induced hypertension?

In view of the high anti-oxidative potential oftocotrienol, the role of the tocotrienol-rich fraction (TRF) of palm oil in preventing pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) was explored in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial in an urban teaching hospital. Healthy primigravidae were randomized to receive either oral TRF 100 mg daily or placebo, from early second trimester until delivery. Out of 299 women, 151 were randomized into the TRF arm and 148 into the placebo arm. A total of 15 (5.0%) developed PIH. Although there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of PIH (4/151 or 2.6% in the TRF arm vs. 11/148 or 7.4% in the placebo arm, p = 0.058) between the two arms, there was a tendency towards a lower incidence of PIH in the TRF arm compared to the placebo arm. With TRF supplementation, the relative risk (RR) of PIH was 0.36 (95% CI 0.12-1.09). In conclusion, although TRF from palm oil does not statistically significantly reduce the risk of development of PIH in the population studied, the 64% reduction in incidence of PIH is substantial. The findings warrant further clinical trials, particularly in high risk populations.

Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure measurements for the diagnosis of hypertension in pregnancy

Several studies have indicated that the use of the 24 h mean blood pressure, mainly using reference thresholds derived from general nonpregnancy practice, does not provide an effective test for an individualized early diagnosis of hypertension in pregnancy, thus concluding that ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is not a valid approach in pregnancy. With the use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, epidemiologic studies have reported gender differences in the circadian variability of blood pressure and heart rate. Typically, men exhibit a lower heart rate and higher blood pressure than women, the differences being larger for systolic than for diastolic blood pressure. Moreover, normotensive and hypertensive pregnant women are characterized by differing but predictable patterns of blood pressure variability throughout gestation. However, the diminished blood pressure in nongravid women as compared with men, the added decrease in blood pressure during the second trimester of gestation in normotensive but not in hypertensive pregnant women and the large amplitude of the circadian pattern that characterizes the blood pressure of healthy pregnant women at all gestational ages, have not been taken into account when establishing reference thresholds for the diagnosis of hypertension in pregnancy. This review will describe these issues, summarize previous results from independent groups on the prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy, propose answers as to an accurate reference threshold for blood pressure at different stages of gestation and suggest how this information should be used in order to identify those women at a higher risk of hypertension, who will also be more suitable for prophylactic and/or therapeutic intervention in the early stages of pregnancy.

Prevention of perinatal death and adverse perinatal outcome using low-dose aspirin: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare early vs late administration of low-dose aspirin on the risk of perinatal death and adverse perinatal outcome.

METHODS

Databases were searched for keywords related to aspirin and pregnancy. Only randomized controlled trials that evaluated the prophylactic use of low-dose aspirin (50-150 mg/day) during pregnancy were included. The primary outcome combined fetal and neonatal death. Pooled relative risks (RR) with their 95% CIs were compared according to gestational age at initiation of low-dose aspirin (≤ 16 vs > 16 weeks of gestation).

RESULTS

Out of 8377 citations, 42 studies (27 222 women) were included. Inclusion criteria were risk factors for pre-eclampsia, including: nulliparity, multiple pregnancy, chronic hypertension, cardiovascular or endocrine disease, prior gestational hypertension or fetal growth restriction, and/or abnormal uterine artery Doppler. When compared with controls, low-dose aspirin started at ≤ 16 weeks' gestation compared with low-dose aspirin started at >16 weeks' gestation was associated with a greater reduction of perinatal death (RR = 0.41 (95% CI, 0.19-0.92) vs 0.93 (95% CI, 0.73-1.19), P = 0.02), pre-eclampsia (RR = 0.47 (95% CI, 0.36-0.62) vs 0.78 (95% CI, 0.61-0.99), P < 0.01), severe pre-eclampsia (RR = 0.18 (95% CI, 0.08-0.41) vs 0.65 (95% CI, 0.40-1.07), P < 0.01), fetal growth restriction (RR = 0.46 (95% CI, 0.33-0.64) vs 0.98 (95% CI, 0.88-1.08), P < 0.001) and preterm birth (RR = 0.35 (95% CI, 0.22-0.57) vs 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.97), P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Low-dose aspirin initiated at ≤ 16 weeks of gestation is associated with a greater reduction of perinatal death and other adverse perinatal outcomes than when initiated at >16 weeks.

Administration-time differences in effects of hypertension medications on ambulatory blood pressure regulation

Specific features of the 24-h blood pressure (BP) pattern are linked to progressive injury of target tissues and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. Several studies have consistently shown an association between blunted asleep BP decline and risk of fatal and nonfatal CVD events. Thus, there is growing focus on ways to properly control BP during nighttime sleep as well as during daytime activity. One strategy, termed chronotherapy, entails the timing of hypertension medications to endogenous circadian rhythm determinants of the 24-h BP pattern. Significant and clinically meaningful treatment-time differences in the beneficial and/or adverse effects of at least six different classes of hypertension medications, and their combinations, are now known. Generally, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are more effective with bedtime than morning dosing, and for dihydropyridine derivatives bedtime dosing significantly reduces risk of peripheral edema. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is highly circadian rhythmic and activates during nighttime sleep. Accordingly, evening/bedtime ingestion of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) benazepril, captopril, enalapril, lisinopril, perindopril, quinapril, ramipril, spirapril, trandolapril, and zofenopril exerts more marked effect on the asleep than awake systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP means. Likewise, the bedtime, in comparison with morning, ingestion schedule of the angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs irbesartan, olmesartan, telmisartan, and valsartan exerts greater therapeutic effect on asleep BP, plus significant increase in the sleep-time relative BP decline, with the additional benefit, independent of drug terminal half-life, of converting the 24-h BP profile into a more normal dipping pattern. This is the case also for the bedtime versus upon-awakening regimen of combination ARB-CCB, ACEI-CCB, and ARB-diuretic medications. The chronotherapy of conventional hypertension medications constitutes a new and cost-effective strategy for enhancing the control of daytime and nighttime SBP and DBP levels, normalizing the dipping status of their 24-h patterning, and potentially reducing the risk of CVD events and end-organ injury, for example, of the blood vessels and tissues of the heart, brain, kidney, and retina.

Is there a BP benefit of changing the time of aspirin administration in treated hypertensive patients?

Background and design: The effects of aspirin on blood pressure (BP) are controversial and a chronopharmacological effect of aspirin on 24-hour BP was reported recently in otherwise untreated hypertensive patients. The study was designed to test the timing effect of aspirin dosing on 24-hour BP in treated hypertensive patients routinely taking aspirin for cardiovascular prevention.

Method and results: Seventy-five patients were randomized into two groups. One group was to receive aspirin in the evening then in the morning for 1 month and the other group in the morning then in the evening, following a cross-over design. The principal assessment criterion was 24-hour systolic BP (SBP) measured by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Patients were aged 65 ± 9 years and had been hypertensive for 12 ± 10 years. They were all taking a mean of 2.8 antihypertensive drugs and did not modify their treatment throughout the study. Of the included subjects, 70% were men and 33% were diabetics. Mean 24-hour SBP values were clinically equivalent and were not statistically different, depending on whether the aspirin was taking in the morning or evening (128.3 ± 1.4 vs. 128.3 ± 1.4 mmHg, respectively). Neither was there any significant difference in diurnal and nocturnal SBP or in 24-hour, diurnal, and nocturnal diastolic BP (DBP).

Conclusion: It does not appear useful to advise patients with long-standing hypertension to modify timing of aspirin intake in order to reduce BP values.

Twenty-four-hour and conventional blood pressure components and risk of preterm delivery or neonatal complications in gestational hypertension

Gestational hypertension is a recognized risk factor for the development of complications during pregnancy. The present study retrospectively assessed the respective values of blood pressure components derived from conventional and 24-h recordings (ABPM) as predictors of premature delivery in women with gestational hypertension based on office readings from 26th week of gestation onwards. Blood pressures were measured conventionally and over 24 h. Standard medical and obstetric history, and standard laboratory work-up were taken into account. The mean (+/- standard deviation, SD) age of 123 women was 29 +/- 6 years. Current pregnancy was, on average, the second. The conventional systolic (SBP)/diastolic (DBP) blood pressure averaged 140 +/- 19/92 +/- 14 mmHg, and pulse pressure (PP) and mean arterial pressure (MBP) averaged 48 +/- 10 and 108 +/- 15 mmHg. The corresponding values derived from ABPM were 135 +/- 16/90 +/- 11, 47 +/- 9 and 105 +/- 12 mmHg. The 24-h blood pressures had better prognostic value than the conventional blood pressures. The 24-h SBP predicted risk of premature delivery and was inversely related to the duration of pregnancy and birth weight. After the exclusion of 41 women with white-coat hypertension, the highest predictive value was associated with PP. PP wider by 1SD was associated with 66% higher risk of premature delivery, and was associated with shortening of pregnancy by 2 weeks and 400 g lower birth weight, even after adjustment for SBP. In conclusion, ABPM is superior to conventional blood pressure measurements in predicting adverse outcome of pregnancy. Twenty-four-hour PP, of all classic indices, seems to be most closely related to increase of that risk.

Aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity

Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) or aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) sensitivities encompass a diverse group of both pharmacological and hypersensitivity reactions. Conventionally, hypersensitivities include aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), ASA-induced urticaria, and anaphylaxis. With an increasing prevalence of coronary artery disease in an aging population, aspirin continues to play a significant role in cardiac prophylaxis in a large patient population. Invariably, the clinician will encounter patients with clear indications for aspirin therapy but a history of aspirin sensitivity. Although protocols have been established for aspirin challenge and desensitization, it is not always an efficacious or safe procedure. This article reviews the different classifications of ASA/NSAIDs hypersensitivities to better guide the clinician in dealing with this patient population. History of crossrelativities between multiple NSAIDs implies a non-IgE-mediated process. Similarly, a history of monosensitivity to one NSAID implies an IgE-mediated process, although specific antibodies are often elusive. Despite the name, AERD can potentially be exacerbated by all cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors based on dose-dependent inhibition of COX-1. Aspirin desensitization can be achieved to improve both upper and lower respiratory symptoms for most patient with AERD. Aspirin desensitization can usually be achieved for those in need of the antiplatelet effects of aspirin, with the exception of those with aspirin-induced urticaria and baseline chronic urticaria. However, desensitization should only be attempted in those with stable coronary artery disease because the process of desensitization carries the inherent risk of anaphylaxis/anaphylactoid reaction, which may further increase cardiac demand and bring about ischemic injury. Therefore, desensitization is reserved until coronary artery disease is stabilized.

Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications

BACKGROUND

Pre-eclampsia is associated with deficient intravascular production of prostacyclin, a vasodilator, and excessive production of thromboxane, a vasoconstrictor and stimulant of platelet aggregation. These observations led to the hypotheses that antiplatelet agents, low-dose aspirin in particular, might prevent or delay development of pre-eclampsia.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of antiplatelet agents for women at risk of developing pre-eclampsia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (July 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2005, Issue 1), EMBASE (1994 to November 2005) and handsearched congress proceedings of the International and European Societies for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised trials comparing antiplatelet agents with either placebo or no antiplatelet agent were included. Quasi-random studies were excluded. Participants were pregnant women at risk of developing pre-eclampsia. Interventions were any comparisons of an antiplatelet agent (such as low-dose aspirin or dipyridamole) with either placebo or no antiplatelet.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors assessed trials for inclusion and extracted data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-nine trials (37,560 women) are included. There is a 17% reduction in the risk of pre-eclampsia associated with the use of antiplatelet agents ((46 trials, 32,891 women, relative risk (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 0.89), number needed to treat (NNT) 72 (52, 119)). Although there is no statistical difference in RR based on maternal risk, there is a significant increase in the absolute risk reduction of pre-eclampsia for high risk (risk difference (RD) -5.2% (-7.5, -2.9), NNT 19 (13, 34)) compared with moderate risk women (RD -0.84 (-1.37, -0.3), NNT 119 (73, 333)). Antiplatelets were associated with an 8% reduction in the relative risk of preterm birth (29 trials, 31,151 women, RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.97); NNT 72 (52, 119)), a 14% reduction in fetal or neonatal deaths (40 trials, 33,098 women, RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.98); NNT 243 (131, 1,666) and a 10% reduction in small-for-gestational age babies (36 trials, 23,638 women, RR 0.90, 95% CI0.83 to 0.98). There were no statistically significant differences between treatment and control groups for any other outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Antiplatelet agents, largely low-dose aspirin, have moderate benefits when used for prevention of pre-eclampsia and its consequences. Further information is required to assess which women are most likely to benefit, when treatment is best started, and at what dose.

Chronobiologically explored effects of Telmisartan

Effects of Micardis (Telmisartan), alone or with low-dose aspirin, on blood pressure and other cardiovascular endpoints are examined in 20 patients with MESOR-hypertension in a crossover, double-blind, randomized study consisting of three stages, each lasting 7 days: I-placebo, II-Micardis, and III-Micardis with low-dose aspirin. Treatment was administered each day at a different circadian stage, upon awakening, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 hr after awakening. During each stage, the following variables were measured at 3-hr intervals during waking: systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, ejection fraction, intrarenal resistive index, acceleration time, and serum creatinine. Each data series was analyzed by single cosinor. Results were summarized by population-mean least squares spectra. At matched treatment times, the MESOR and circadian amplitude of each variable were compared among the three treatments by paired t-tests. A prominent circadian rhythm characterizes all variables. Micardis was associated not only with a lowering of blood pressure, but also with a reduction of the circadian blood pressure amplitude. The ejection fraction was increased, and the resistive index and acceleration time were decreased, the effect being more pronounced when low-dose aspirin was added to Micardis. Any circadian-stage dependent effect of Micardis, with or without low-dose aspirin, will require monitoring over spans longer than a single day for a given treatment administration time.

Reference thresholds for 24-h, diurnal, and nocturnal ambulatory blood pressure mean values in pregnancy

OBJECTIVES

Several studies have indicated that the use of the 24-h mean of blood pressure, mainly using reference thresholds derived from the general non-pregnancy practice, does not provide a proper test for diagnosis of hypertension in pregnancy. This prospective study examines previously derived reference thresholds for the 24-h, diurnal, and nocturnal mean of blood pressure as potential screening tests for the diagnosis of hypertension in pregnancy.

METHODS

We studied 235 normotensive and 168 hypertensive pregnant women, who provided 2430 blood pressure series sampled every 20 min during the day and every 30 min at night for 48 consecutive hours once every 4 weeks from the first obstetric visit until delivery. Sensitivity and specificity for each parameter are based on the comparison of the distributions of mean blood pressure values with reference thresholds previously established from an independent population of 113 pregnant women also evaluated monthly by 48-h ambulatory monitoring throughout gestation.

RESULTS

Sensitivity of mean blood pressure values, above 70% at all stages of pregnancy, was higher than that obtained from clinic blood pressure measurements, which were always below 14%. The poorest results were consistently obtained for the nocturnal mean. Sensitivity was similar for the 24-h and the diurnal mean, with values ranging from 71% for diastolic blood pressure in the first trimester of pregnancy to 93% for systolic blood pressure in the third trimester. Systolic blood pressure consistently provided better sensitivity than diastolic blood pressure at all gestational ages.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study on women systematically studied by 48-h ambulatory monitoring throughout gestation indicates that mean ambulatory blood pressure values provide higher sensitivity and specificity than conventional measurements. Moreover, results indicate that diagnosis of hypertension in pregnancy based on ambulatory blood pressure should be established from thresholds much lower than those currently used in clinical practice.

Valoración prospectiva del test de tolerancia hiperbárica en el diagnóstico de hipertensión gestacional y preeclampsia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Recent studies have tried to overcome poor results from isolated blood pressure values in detecting hypertension in pregnancy by relying on ambulatory monitoring. Low sensitivity of the 24-hour mean has led many authors to conclude that ambulatory monitoring is not a valid approach in pregnancy. Against this background, we have evaluated prospectively the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of gestational hypertension of the tolerance-hyperbaric test. This is a combined approach consisting of establishing tolerance intervals for the circadian variability of blood pressure as a function of gestational age, and then computing the hyperbaric index (area of blood pressure excess above the upper limit of the interval) by comparison of any patient's blood pressure profile with those limits.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We studied 328 women who provided a 2014 blood pressure series. They were sampled for 48 hours once every 4 weeks from the first obstetric visit (mostly within the first trimester of gestation) until delivery. The hyperbaric index of each blood pressure series was calculated by taking into account the reference circadian tolerance limits established from a 497 series previously sampled from an independent reference group of 189 normotensive pregnant women.

RESULTS

Sensitivity of the tolerance-hyperbaric test was 91% for women sampled during the first trimester of gestation, and increased up to 99% in the third trimester. Specificity was above 99% in all trimesters. Positive and negative predictive values were above 96% in all trimesters. Moreover, the hyperbaric index provided an early identification of subsequent gestational hypertension and preeclampsia, on the average of 23 weeks prior to the clinical confirmation of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The tolerance-hyperbaric test represents a reproducible, stable, noninvasive, and high sensitivity test for the very early identification of subsequent gestational hypertension and preeclampsia, which can also be used as a guide for establishing prophylactic or therapeutic interventions.

Reproducibility of the tolerance-hyperbaric test for diagnosing hypertension in pregnancy

BACKGROUND

The tolerance-hyperbaric test has been shown to provide a valuable approach for the prediction of the outcome of pregnancy. In this test, diagnosis of hypertension is based on the hyperbaric index (area of blood pressure excess above the upper limit of a reference threshold) calculated by comparison with a time-specified tolerance interval for the circadian variability of blood pressure.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate prospectively the stability and reproducibility of the tolerance-hyperbaric test.

METHODS

We studied 403 women who provided 2430 blood pressure series sampled for 48 consecutive hours once every 4 weeks from the first obstetric visit (mostly within the first trimester of gestation) until delivery. Circadian 90% tolerance limits for blood pressure were established as a function of trimester of gestation from 497 series previously sampled from an independent reference group of 189 normotensive pregnant women. Diagnosis of hypertension was established in this trial for each woman in the validation sample on the highly restricted basis of presenting at least one blood pressure profile with a hyperbaric index above the threshold for diagnosis after 20 weeks of gestation.

RESULTS

Sensitivity of the tolerance-hyperbaric test was 93% for women sampled during the first trimester of gestation, and increased to 99% by the third trimester. Specificity was more than 99% in all trimesters. The positive and negative predictive values were greater than 96% in all trimesters.

CONCLUSIONS

The tolerance-hyperbaric test represents a reproducible, stable, non-invasive and high-sensitivity test for the very early identification of subsequent hypertension in pregnancy.

Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications

BACKGROUND

Pre-eclampsia is associated with deficient intravascular production of prostacyclin, a vasodilator, and excessive production of thromboxane, a platelet-derived vasoconstrictor and stimulant of platelet aggregation. These observations led to the hypotheses that antiplatelet agents, low-dose aspirin in particular, might prevent or delay the development of pre-eclampsia.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of antiplatelet agents when given to women at risk of developing pre-eclampsia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (September 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2003), EMBASE (1994 to 2003) and we handsearched the congress proceedings of the International and European Societies for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised trials comparing antiplatelet agents with either placebo or no antiplatelet agent during pregnancy. Quasi-random study designs were excluded. Participants were pregnant women considered to be at risk of developing pre-eclampsia. Interventions were any comparisons of an antiplatelet agent (such as low-dose aspirin or dipyridamole) with either placebo or no antiplatelet agent.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers assessed trials for inclusion in the review and extracted data. We entered data into the Review Manager software and double checked.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-one trials involving 36,500 women are included in this review. There is a 19% reduction in the risk of pre-eclampsia associated with the use of antiplatelet agents ((43 trials, 33,439 women; relative risk (RR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75 to 0.88); number needed to treat (NNT) 69 (51, 109)).Twenty-eight trials (31,845 women) reported preterm birth. There is a small (7%) reduction in the risk of delivery before 37 completed weeks ((RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.98); NNT 83 (50, 238)). Fetal or neonatal deaths were reported in 38 trials (34,010 women). Overall there is a 16% reduction in baby deaths in the antiplatelet group (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.96); NNT 227 (128, 909)). Small-for-gestational age babies were reported in 32 trials (24,310 women), with an 8% reduction in risk (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.00). There were no significant differences between treatment and control groups in any other measures of outcome.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Antiplatelet agents, in this review largely low-dose aspirin, have small-moderate benefits when used for prevention of pre-eclampsia. Further information is required to assess which women are most likely to benefit, when treatment is best started, and at what dose.