Lijnema TH, Huizenga JR, Jager J, Mackor AJ, Gips CH. Gravimetric determination of the water concentration in whole blood, plasma and erythrocytes and correlations with hematological and clinicochemical parameters.
Clin Chim Acta 1993;
214:129-38. [PMID:
8472379 DOI:
10.1016/0009-8981(93)90105-d]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
We have assessed gravimetric methods for determination of intravascular water, established whole blood-, plasma- and erythrocyte water reference values in a healthy volunteer group (n = 97, 48 females) and correlated these variables with 30 simultaneous hematological, clinicochemical and body parameters. The water standard was 55.56 mol/kg = 100 mass %. For erythrocyte water determination three methods were evaluated: 2 indirect methods were easy to perform, the third, using a hematocrit centrifuge, was the most reliable. Imprecision (within-batch coefficient of variation (CV), %) was excellent: whole blood 0.2, plasma 0.1, erythrocytes 0.7-2.2 and recoveries (means, %) 99.7-100.1. Serum water was found to be slightly higher than plasma water. Volunteer group, mean reference values, mass %: whole blood water 79.7, plasma water 91.2, erythrocyte water, three methods 66.2, 64.6 and 64.2, respectively. Females had mean 1.6 mass % higher whole blood water and 0.9-1.0 mass % higher erythrocyte water than males with no difference in plasma water. In the volunteer group whole blood water correlated strongly with hematocrit (r = -0.96), hemoglobin (r = -0.94) and erythrocytes (r = -0.85) and centrifuge hematocrit (r = -0.91). Plasma water correlated strongly with plasma total protein (r = -0.74, all correlations P < 0.001). Hemoglobin and hematocrit can serve as surrogate parameters for whole blood water when water determination is not available; total protein reflects plasma water.
Collapse