Failure of beta-adrenergic blockade to alter ventricular fibrillation threshold in the dog. Evidence for extra-adrenergic effects of pronethalol

Electrophysiologic effects of beta blockers in ventricular arrhythmias

Beta-adrenergic receptor blocking agents are effective antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with ventricular arrhythmias. However, these agents exert little or no measurable electrophysiologic effect on normal Purkinje and ventricular muscle fibers when administered acutely. They prevent catecholamine-induced increases in Purkinje fiber automaticity and may interfere with catecholamine-dependent slow responses. beta-adrenergic blocking drugs also prevent the decrease in ventricular fibrillation threshold induced by catecholamines. In the acutely ischemic ventricle, some beta blockers selectively depress conduction within the ischemic zone. The long-term administration of some beta blockers has, in contrast to their short-term effects, been shown to prolong action potential duration and effective refractory period in the ventricle. Which of these observed electrophysiologic effects, either alone or in combination, contributes to the ventricular antiarrhythmic effects of beta-blocking drugs in man is at present unknown.

Vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation in patients with clinically manifest ventricular tachycardia

Ventricular vulnerability may be assessed by measuring the threshold current for the induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF). This technique has been widely utilized in animal experimentation and has been safely applied in a small number of clinical studies. We measured the VF threshold (VFT), using the single stimulus technique in 10 patients with coronary artery disease just prior to the institution of cardiopulmonary bypass. There were no adverse effects of VFT measurement. Three patients had nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) on 24-hour ambulatory monitoring and had VFTs of 10, 14, and 16 mA. In this group VF was induced without any preceding repetitive ventricular responses. Seven patients had no repetitive forms on ambulatory monitoring. Their VFTs ranged from 30 to greater than 40 mA (mean greater than 37). Repetitive extrasystoles were regularly observed in this group at current intensities which ranged from 53% to 80% of the VFT. Thus patients with manifest VT appear to have an enhanced vulnerability to VF. Single or multiple responses were not observed in these patients but appeared to be present in patients with coronary disease and no demonstrable rhythm disorder.

Effects of timolol and propranolol on inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in dogs with subacute myocardial infarction

Timolol and propranolol reduce the incidence of cardiac death after myocardial infarction (MI). To explore possible mechanisms of this reduction in mortality, the antiarrhythmic effects of these 2 beta blockers were compared in a dog model of inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) 4 to 6 days after experimental closed-chest MI. Dogs with inducible VT or VF underwent drug studies with timolol and propranolol; the sequence of drug administration was randomized. Timolol doses were 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 mg/kg; propranolol doses were 1.0, 3.0 and 10.0 mg/kg. Timolol and propranolol were equally effective in abolishing inducible VT or VF: 77% of instances of inducible VT or VF responded to 1 or both beta blockers. The VF threshold was significantly elevated by both timolol and propranolol; the elevation in the VF threshold was significantly greater in "responders," i.e., dogs in whom VT was prevented by beta blockade (15 +/- 9 vs 8 +/- 9 mA, p less than 0.05). The ventricular effective refractory period was prolonged by both drugs; again, more so in the responders than in the nonresponders (16 +/- 9 vs 8 +/- 14 mA, p less than 0.05). The QTc interval was not significantly affected by either beta blocker. Among the responders, no difference was detected between timolol and propranolol in the extent to which the effective refractory period was prolonged or the VF threshold elevated. However, the highest dose of propranolol decreased the mean blood pressure significantly more than the comparable dose of timolol. In conclusion, timolol and propranolol are equally effective in abolishing inducible VT or VF in the dog after subacute MI.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The repetitive extrasystole as an index of vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation during myocardial ischemia in the canine heart

The repetitive extrasystole threshold (RET) is a reliable measure of vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation (VF) during diverse interventions in the normal heart. Whether this relationship also holds during varying degrees of myocardial ischemia has not been adequately explored. In 15 chloralose-anesthetized dogs, circumflex coronary blood flow (CBF) was decreased progressively with the use of an externally applied balloon occluder. There was a statistically significant correlation between the RET and ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) until left circumflex coronary artery flow was reduced by 90% of control values (r = 0.92). During reductions of CBF of 90% or greater, the VFT fell more than the RET and the RET/VFT ratio was disrupted. Total coronary occlusion, whether performed abruptly or gradually (5 minutes), likewise resulted in a disproportionate decline in VFT. During sustained total coronary occlusion, the VFT recovered to control values within 15 minutes, and the relationship between the RE and VF thresholds was restored. We conclude that the vulnerable period threshold for provoking repetitive extrasystole is a reliable index of vulnerability to VF during myocardial ischemia and remains so until nearly total occlusion of a major coronary vessel.