Lipoprotein(a) in patients with acute cerebral ischemia

Lipoprotein(a) and functional outcome of acute ischemic stroke when discordant with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

BACKGROUND

Several studies have indicated that residual cardiovascular risk might be associated with elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] even in the setting of controlled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). We aimed to prospectively examine the association between Lp(a) and unfavorable functional outcome among patients with acute ischemic stroke when Lp(a) and LDL-C were discordant.

METHODS

Based on samples from the Infectious Factors, Inflammatory Markers and Prognosis of Acute Ischemic Stroke study, 973 patients with baseline plasma Lp(a) levels were included. The primary outcome was the composite outcome of death or major disability (modified Rankin Scale score of 3-6) at 6 months. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the risk for the primary outcome. Discordance analyses were performed, using difference in percentile units (>10 units), to detect the relative risk when Lp(a) and LDL-C were discordant.

RESULTS

In total, 201 (20.7%) participants experienced major disability or death at 6 months. The multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (OR) for the highest quartile was 1.88 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16-3.04] compared with the lowest quartile. Each 1-SD higher log-Lp(a) was associated with a 23% increased risk (95% CI: 2%-47%) for the primary outcome. Compared with the concordant group, the high Lp(a)/low LDL-C discordant group was associated with increased risk for the primary outcome (adjusted OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.01-2.52).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated plasma Lp(a) levels were associated with increased risk of major disability and death at 6 months. Discordantly high Lp(a)/low LDL-C was associated with an unfavorable functional outcome, supporting the predictive potential of plasma Lp(a) after ischemic stroke, especially when discordant with LDL-C. Key messages What is already known on this topic Previous studies have indicated that a positive association between increased lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and cardiovascular disease risk remained even in patients who achieved controlled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. The findings of studies exploring the association between Lp(a) and unfavorable clinical outcomes of stroke were inconsistent, and whether Lp(a) can predict the risk of unfavorable functional outcome in stroke patients when Lp(a) and LDL-C levels are discordant remains unknown. What this study adds Elevated plasma Lp(a) levels were associated with increased risk of major disability and death at 6 months beyond LDL-C levels in acute ischemic stroke patients. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy The combination of LDL-C-lowering therapies and Lp(a)-lowering therapies may have better clinical efficacy for patients with ischemic stroke, and it is of great clinical interest to further explore this possibility in dedicated randomized trials.

Elevated lipoprotein(a) and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 are associated with unfavorable functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke

Background

The association of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and stroke functional outcomes was conflicting. The aim of the study was to clarify whether high Lp(a) is associated with unfavorable functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke.

Methods

A total of 9709 individuals from the third China National Stroke Registry cohort were recruited. Plasma level of Lp(a) at admission was measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The cut-off was set at the median for Lp(a). Functional outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months and 1 year after ischemic stroke. The association between Lp(a) and functional outcomes was evaluated using a logistic regression model.

Results

The median age was 63.0 years, and 31.1% participants were women. Patients in higher Lp(a) group had higher incidences of unfavorable functional outcomes at 3 months. In logistic regression model, elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with unfavorable functional outcomes at 3 months (Q4 vs. Q1: odds ratio 1.33, 95% confidence interval 1.11–1.61). Subgroup analysis showed that in the lower Lp-PLA₂ group, Lp(a) level was not associated with functional outcomes, but in the higher Lp-PLA₂ group, Lp(a) level was significantly associated with functional outcomes. After grouped by different levels of Lp(a) and Lp-PLA₂, the Lp(a) high/ Lp-PLA₂ high group showed the highest incidence of unfavorable functional outcomes at 3 months and 1 year.

Conclusions

Elevated Lp(a) level is associated with unfavorable functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke. The increment in both Lp(a) and Lp-PLA₂ are associated with unfavorable functional outcomes at 3 months and 1 year after ischemic stroke.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12974-021-02359-w.

Lipoprotein (a) level as a risk factor for stroke and its subtype: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The role of lipoprotein-A [Lp (a)] as a risk factor for stroke is less well documented than for coronary heart disease. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis for the published observational studies in order to investigate the association of Lp (a) levels with the risk of stroke and its subtypes. In our meta-analysis, 41 studies involving 7874 ischemic stroke (IS) patients and 32,138 controls; 13 studies for the IS subtypes based on TOAST classification and 7 studies with 871 Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) cases and 2865 control subjects were included. A significant association between increased levels of Lp (a) and risk of IS as compared to control subjects was observed (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.76; 95% confidence interval (CIs) 0.53-0.99). Lp (a) levels were also found to be significantly associated with the risk of large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) subtype of IS (SMD 0.68; 95% CI 0.01-1.34) as well as significantly associated with the risk of ICH (SMD 0.65; 95% CI 0.13-1.17) as compared to controls. Increased Lp (a) levels could be considered as a predictive marker for identifying individuals who are at risk of developing IS, LAA and ICH.

Lipoprotein(a), ferritin, and albumin in acute phase reaction predicts severity and mortality of acute ischemic stroke in North Indian Patients

BACKGROUND

Inflammation plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis and prognosis of stroke. We studied the behavior of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], ferritin, and albumin as acute phase reactants and their roles in the severity and mortality of stroke.

METHODS

We recruited 100 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke and 120 controls. Blood samples were drawn on days 1 and 7 and at both 3 and 6 months. Stroke was classified using Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment classification. Stroke severity was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Prognosis at 6 months was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale, and mortality was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), Lp(a), ferritin, and albumin were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunoturbidimetry, and chemiluminescence commercial kits, respectively.

RESULTS

Levels of IL-6, Lp(a), and ferritin were consistently higher among cases than controls (P < .0001). Serum Lp(a) levels peaked at day 7 after stroke and tapered thereafter. Albumin levels were lower than controls on admission day and increased subsequently. In our study, Lp(a) acted as an acute phase reactant while albumin acted as a negative acute phase reactant. There was no association between Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment subtype and elevated serum levels of Lp(a), albumin, and ferritin. Lp(a) and ferritin were high in patients with severe stroke. Albumin was negatively correlated with stroke severity. Serum levels of Lp(a) ≥ 77 mg/dL, albumin ≤ 3.5 g/dL, and ferritin ≥ 370 ng/dL is associated with a significantly increased risk of having a poorer outcome in stroke. Serum levels of Lp(a) >77 mg/dL and albumin <3.5 g/dL were also associated with increased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

High levels of Lp(a) and ferritin and low levels of albumin are associated with increased severity and poorer long term prognosis of stroke. Patients with admission levels of Lp(a) >77 mg/dL and albumin <3.5 g/dL had increased mortality.

Hypercoagulation Testing in Ischemic Stroke

Context.—The utility of laboratory testing for hypercoagulability in the setting of stroke is uncertain.

Objective.—To review the current literature and to make recommendations with regard to laboratory testing for various hypercoagulability risk factors for ischemic stroke.

Data Sources.—Published articles studying the utility of various hypercoagulation tests in predicting initial and/or recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack as well as cerebral vein thrombosis were collected and reviewed, with an emphasis on prospective studies.

Conclusions.—Certain tests, such as C-reactive protein, homocysteine, antiphospholipid antibodies, and lipoprotein(a), may be useful in patients with a history of stroke or at high risk for stroke, as evidenced by prospective data. Factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, protein C, protein S, and antithrombin are not recommended for routine testing but may be useful in certain populations, such as in pediatric patients or in patients with cerebral vein thrombosis.

Lp(a) lipoprotein and plasminogen activity in patients with different etiology of ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Lp(a) lipoprotein plays an important part in atherothrombogenesis and is considered an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease. However, its role in cerebrovascular disease remains unclear, in particular because of the heterogeneous nature of strokes. We investigated whether elevated Lp(a) is more frequent in ischemic stroke related to atherothrombosis than in other etiologies of stroke. Because of the close structural homology between Lp(a) and plasminogen, we also studied the role of plasminogen in different stroke subtypes and whether there is a dependency on Lp(a) plasma levels.

METHODS

Lp(a) levels and plasminogen activity were measured in 253 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke and in 63 controls (CS). Subtypes of stroke were established according to the TOAST criteria.

RESULTS

Median Lp(a) levels were found to be higher in the total cerebral infarction group and in patients with large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) when compared with CS (20.9 and 22.0 mg/dl, respectively, vs. 16.0 mg/dl; p < 0.05). In addition, elevated Lp(a) levels >30 mg/dl were more frequent among the LAA subgroup than among CS (39.4 vs. 11.1%; p < 0.001). Mean plasminogen activity was lower in the total cerebral infarction group (110.8 vs. 120.3%; p < 0.001) and in patients with cardioembolic stroke (109.8 vs. 120.3%; p < 0.05) when compared with CS. There was no correlation between Lp(a) levels and plasminogen activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the hypothesis that elevated Lp(a) is a risk factor for ischemic stroke and especially for strokes caused by LAA. Low plasminogen activity may play a role in the pathogenesis of cerebrovascular disease, especially for the development of cardioembolic stroke.

A Systematic Comparison of the Quality and Volume of Published Data Available on Novel Risk Factors for Stroke versus Coronary Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

To identify new treatments to prevent stroke, it is important that we have reliable data on potential novel risk factors.

METHODS

We studied seven novel vascular risk factors [apo-lipoprotein (b), C-reactive protein, Chlamydia pneumoniae, fibrin-D dimer, fibrinogen, Helicobacter pylori and lipoprotein (a)] and compared the amount of published data on their relations with ischaemic stroke versus acute coronary events by systematic review of all studies published up to 2003.

RESULTS

From a total of 22,875 abstracts reviewed, 266 eligible studies were identified (167 case-control studies and 99 cohort studies). Two hundred and eleven (79%) studies included coronary events as an outcome for the purpose of a risk factor analysis. In 186 (70%) studies, coronary events were the only outcome that was analysed. Only 73 (27%) studies included stroke or TIA as an outcome event, and only 45 studies (17%) reported risk factor analyses for ischaemic stroke separately. These results were qualitatively consistent across the risk factors studied and the relative lack of data on risk factors for stroke was even greater in prospective cohort studies.

CONCLUSION

Data on novel risk factors for stroke are lacking compared with the equivalent data for acute coronary events, and there are very few data on specific subtypes of ischaemic stroke.

LDL phenotype B and other lipid abnormalities in patients with large vessel disease and small vessel disease

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Controversies concerning the significance of lipid abnormalities in stroke come mostly from the researches that studied lipid profile without considering stroke aetiologies. We investigated the prevalence of LDL phenotype B and other lipid abnormalities in stroke survivors with large vessel disease (LVD) or small vessel disease (SVD) (TOAST criteria) and in control subjects (CS).

METHODS

We studied 30 patients with LVD and 41 patients with SVD screened out of 585 stroke patients and 30 CS who fulfilled the following exclusion criteria: cardiac disorders, renal or hepatic failure, diabetes mellitus, or treatment with lipid-lowering agents. At least 3 months after stroke, the concentrations of total cholesterol (TC), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TGs), apolipoprotein E (apoE), and lipoprotein (a) [lp(a)] were measured and LDL phenotypes and apoE isoforms were identified.

RESULTS

Patients with LVD had significantly higher concentrations of LDL-C than CS (p<0.05). They had higher concentrations of TGs and lower concentrations of HDL-C than patients with SVD and CS (p<0.05). LDL phenotype B was more frequent in patients with LVD (63.3%) than in patients with SVD (39.0%) or in CS (16.7%) (p<0.05). The concentration of apoE was higher in patients with LVD than in patients with SVD or in CS (p<0.05). The percentage of patients with increased level of lp(a) (i.e., >30 mg/ml) was greater in patients with LVD (36.7%) than in CS (10%) (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with stroke due to LVD, but not SVD, have high prevalence of atherogenic lipid abnormalities, including increased frequency of LDL phenotype B and higher percentage of increased lp(a) level, like patients with other atherogenic diseases.

Screening for hypercoagulable syndromes following stroke

Patients with ischemic stroke of unclear etiology are often screened for hypercoagulable syndromes or thrombophilias. These have been recognized to cause venous thrombosis, and include hereditary deficiencies of coagulation factors, genetic mutations, or acquired disorders. However, the majority of coagulation disorders are only rarely associated with ischemic stroke. The tests most commonly used to screen for thrombophilias comprise a complex array of assays that may be unreliable in various settings, including acute thrombosis, inflammation, and uses of medications such as anticoagulants. The diagnostic yield of thrombophilia tests in unselected stroke patients is very low, but may improve with careful selection of younger patients who have an otherwise undetermined cause of stroke or a history of venous thrombosis or multiple miscarriages. Various strategies have been developed that can guide the selection of patients (based on specific characteristics) and tests in the evaluation of thrombophilias. Although the diagnosis of thrombophilia aids in the potential explanation of stroke etiology, the best regimen for secondary prevention treatment for the majority of thrombophilias is still unknown.

Laboratory evaluation of hypercoagulability with venous or arterial thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations for hypercoagulation testing for patients with venous, arterial, or neurovascular thrombosis, as reflected in the medical literature and the consensus opinion of recognized experts in the field.

DATA SOURCES, EXTRACTION, AND SYNTHESIS

The authors extensively examined the literature and current practices, and prepared a draft manuscript with preliminary recommendations. The draft manuscript was circulated to each of the expert participants (n = 30) in the consensus conference prior to the convening of the conference. The manuscript and recommendations were then presented at the conference for discussion. Recommendations were accepted if a consensus of the 28 experts attending the conference was reached. The discussions were also used to revise the manuscript into its final form.

CONCLUSIONS

The resulting article provides 17 recommendations for hypercoagulation testing in the setting of venous, arterial, or neurovascular thrombosis. The supporting evidence for test selection is analyzed and cited, and consensus recommendations for test selection are presented. Issues for which a consensus was not reached at the conference are also discussed.

Detection of lipoprotein(a) in intraparenchymal cerebral vessels: correlation with vascular pathology and clinical history

Serum levels of lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), have been shown to be associated with increased risk of atherosclerosis (AS) and AS-related diseases such as myocardial and ischemic cerebral infarcts (ICI). Lp(a) has been detected in the vascular wall of the aorta and coronary vessels, and we documented the presence of apo(a) in cerebral vessels of the Circle of Willis, associated with AS changes. In this study we further investigated and characterized the biochemical nature of Lp(a) detected in both large and small cerebral parenchymal vessels. Autopsy specimens of cerebral vessels of 51 patients were examined by immunohistochemistry with monoclonal antibodies against apo(a), apoB, and plasminogen. Lp(a) was detected in cerebral capillaries and arterioles. All of the 8 patients with ICI expressed Lp(a) in parenchymal vessels, generally (6/8) in both capillaries and arterioles. Of 43 patients without ICI only 25 had Lp(a) detected. Among the patients without ICI, there was a slightly increased incidence of parenchymal Lp(a) in those patients who had severe hypoxic brain damage (12/20) compared to those patients without severe hypoxic damage (9/23). Thus, the presence of Lp(a) in small cerebral parenchymal vessels may reflect the role of Lp(a) in ICI.

Lipoprotein (a) level and mortality in patients with critical lower limb ischaemia

OBJECTIVE

to investigate if serum lipoprotein (a) level is a predictor of survival in patients with lower limb atherosclerotic occlusive disease.

DESIGN

prospective follow up study.

METHODS

demographic, biochemical and disease variables were collected prospectively in 441 patients with lower limb arterial occlusive disease. Survival data were obtained at a mean follow up of 44 months, and significant risk factors identified by the life table method and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

the cumulative survival for all patients at three and five years was 79% and 63%. Lipoprotein (a) level was the only significant independent biochemical predictor for all deaths and cardiorespiratory deaths on multivariate analysis, along with age, diabetes mellitus, renal impairment, cardiac diseases and major amputation. An elevated Lipoprotein(a) level of >24 mg/dl incurred a 107% and 45% increase in mortality at three and five years respectively. The higher mortality associated with elevated Lipoprotein (a) was particularly evident in patients with critical ischemia, in whom three and five year survival was reduced from 85% to 63% and 67% to 53% (p=0.0064). In claudicants a survival discrepancy was manifested only after five years (73% vs 62%), and the overall association did not reach statistic significance (p=0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

lipoprotein (a) level is a reliable biochemical marker for survival in patients with critical ischemia where traditional atherosclerosis risk factors were prevalent.

Lipoprotein(a) serum levels and vascular diseases in an older Caucasian population cohort. Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging (ILSA)

OBJECTIVE

To investigate elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels as a risk factor for stroke, myocardial infarction, angina, intermittent claudication, and combination of the above in a cohort of unselected older individuals.

DESIGN

Population cohort from one of the eight centers participating in the Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging (ILSA).

SETTING

General community.

PARTICIPANTS

A subsample of 446 subjects (M/F: 231/ 215, mean age: 74.5 +/- 5.7 years) of the original, randomly selected, population cohort of 704 individuals, 65 to 84 years of age, free-living or institutionalized in the Impruneta Municipality, area of Florence, Italy.

MEASUREMENTS

Conventional vascular risk factors and vascular diseases defined following a two-step procedure (screening phase and confirmation on positives) using standard and validated criteria. Lp(a) levels determined by an ELISA method.

RESULTS

No association was observed between elevated Lp(a) levels alone and any of the examined vascular diseases (stroke, myocardial infarction, angina, and intermittent claudication). In contrast, examining the interactions between elevated Lp(a) and conventional vascular risk factors, when elevated Lp(a) was combined with a history of smoking, a marked increase in the risk of vascular diseases combined (odds ratio [OR]: 4.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-13.40) was observed, much higher than that expected based on the additive effect of smoking and elevated Lp(a) alone.

CONCLUSIONS

With the cautions due to the cross-sectional design of the study and the limited statistical power, these results suggest a possible synergistic effect between elevated Lp(a) levels and other pro-atherogenic factors such as smoking on the risk of vascular diseases in older individuals.

Lipoprotein (a) and stroke

Strokes are one of the most common causes of mortality and long term severe disability. There is evidence that lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) is a predictor of many forms of vascular disease, including premature coronary artery disease. Several studies have also evaluated the association between Lp(a) and ischaemic (thrombotic) stroke. Several cross sectional (and a few prospective) studies provide contradictory findings regarding Lp(a) as a predictor of ischaemic stroke. Several factors might contribute to the existing confusion--for example, small sample sizes, different ethnic groups, the influence of oestrogens in women participating in the studies, plasma storage before Lp(a) determination, statistical errors, and selection bias. This review focuses on the Lp(a) related mechanisms that might contribute to the pathogenesis of ischaemic stroke. The association between Lp(a) and other cardiovascular risk factors is discussed. Therapeutic interventions that can lower the circulating concentrations of Lp(a) and thus possibly reduce the risk of stroke are also considered.

Lipoprotein (a) and the risk of ischemic stroke in young women

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

lipoprotein (a) (lp (a)) is a lipid-containing particle similar to LDL which has been found in atherosclerotic plaque. The role of lp (a) in ischemic stroke remains controversial, but some studies suggest lp (a) is particularly important as a risk factor for stroke in young adults. We investigated the role of lp (a) as a risk factor for stroke in young women enrolled in the Stroke Prevention in Young Women Study.

METHODS

subjects were participants in a population-based, case-control study of risk factors for ischemic stroke in young women. Cases were derived from surveillance of 59 regional hospitals in the central Maryland, Washington DC, Pennsylvania and Delaware area. Lp (a) was measured in 110 cases and 216 age-matched controls. Demographics, risk factors, and stroke subtype were determined by interview and review of medical records.

RESULTS

lp (a) values were higher in blacks than whites, but within racial groups, the distribution of lp (a) values was similar between cases and controls. After adjustment for age, race, hypertension, diabetes, cigarette smoking, coronary artery disease, total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol, the odds ratio for an association of lp (a) and stroke was 1.36 (95% CI 0.80-2.29). There was no dose-response relationship between lp (a) quintile and stroke risk. Among stroke subtypes, only lacunar stroke patients had significantly elevated lp (a) values compared to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

we found no association of lp (a) with stroke in a population of young women with ischemic stroke. Small numbers of patients limit conclusions regarding risk in ischemic stroke subtypes, but we could not confirm previous suggestions of an association of lp (a) with atherosclerotic stroke in young adults.

Potential new cardiovascular risk factors: left ventricular hypertrophy, homocysteine, lipoprotein(a), triglycerides, oxidative stress, and fibrinogen

The 1996 Bethesda Conference acknowledged left ventricular hypertrophy, hyperhomocysteinemia, lipoprotein(a) excess, hypertriglyceridemia, oxidative stress, and hyperfibrinogenemia as possible new cardiac risk factors. This review summarizes the current literature that supports these conditions as cardiac risk factors. Left ventricular hypertrophy is an independent risk factor for vascular disease. Improvement or progression of left ventricular hypertrophy influences subsequent cardiovascular complications. Clinical trials are under way to assess the potential benefit of decreasing homocysteine levels. The role of lipoprotein(a) excess in vascular disease is controversial. The atherogenic potential of lipoprotein(a) seems to be neutralized by effective reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Increasing evidence supports an independent role of hypertriglyceridemia in cardiovascular disease and a possible clinical benefit from decreasing triglyceride levels. Among antioxidant micronutrients, supplementation with vitamin E has been shown to be beneficial in primary and secondary prevention studies. Data supporting the use of other antioxidants are much weaker. Preliminary evidence suggests that reducing fibrinogen levels in patients with high baseline levels and coronary disease may be beneficial. Despite the potential relation between new risk factors and cardiovascular disease, routine clinical application of these conditions as cardiovascular risk factors would be premature. Evidence is needed that these conditions extend prognostic ability beyond conventional risk factors and that modification of these conditions can reduce the risk for cardiovascular events.

Apolipoprotein(a) size polymorphism in young adults with ischemic stroke

High serum lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) concentration which is largely determined by genetic factors, mainly the apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) polymorphism, is associated with ischemic cerebrovascular disease. The aim of this study was to investigate whether apo(a) size was associated with acute ischemic stroke in young adults for which causal factors often remain undetermined. Lipid parameters, Lp(a) concentration and apo(a) isoform size distribution were determined in 90 young patients (37.4+/-8.7 years) with acute cerebral ischemia, and compared to those of control subjects with similar age and sex ratio. Apo(a) size was expressed as its apparent number of kringle 4 (Kr 4) repeats. Serum Lp(a) concentrations were significantly higher in patients than in controls (median values: 0.18 vs. 0.07 g/l, P=0.009) and were as expected inversely related to the number of kringle 4 repeats in both controls (r2=-0.61, P < 0.001) and patients (r2=-0.56, P < 0.001). However there was no difference in the apo(a) isoform size distributions between the two groups (median isoform size: 27 vs. 27 Kr 4, P=0.25). Lp(a) levels were increased as well in patients with size apo(a) isoform < or = 22 Kr 4 as in those with isoforms > 25 Kr 4. Multivariate analysis showed that apo(a) phenotype did not appear as a risk factor for cerebrovascular infarction. Thus, our results indicate that serum Lp(a) was significantly increased in young people with ischemic stroke but fail to reveal a role of small-sized apo(a) isoforms in the occurrence of this event. They suggest that other factors, genetic or environmental in nature, than the apo(a) size contribute to increase the serum Lp(a) concentrations in these young patients.

Lipid and lipoprotein levels remain stable in acute ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study

Serum lipoproteins including lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), are emerging as possible biological markers for cerebrovascular disease. Existing data on Lp(a) and serum lipids levels following acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are however equivocal. To determine whether serum Lp(a) and other lipid levels obtained within 24 h of acute ischemic stroke onset changed over the ensuing 4 weeks and whether these levels are related to an acute phase response, acquired nutritional deficiency, and neurovascular data, we conducted repeated measurement analyses among 19 subjects (mean age 65.0 +/- 12.1 years; 32% women) presenting with AIS (evaluated within 9.7 +/- 12.7 h). Eleven of the subjects had a moderate-to-severe stroke, defined by NIH stroke severity scale, and seven patients had a large cerebral infarction. Seven serial measurements of Lp(a), total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, and other lipoproteins, major acute phase reactants and albumin levels were collected for each subject over 4 weeks. The mean initial levels, (mg/dl), of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, Lp(a), apolipoproteins A-I and B were: 225 +/- 57.6, 154 +/- 56.0, 40 +/- 10.4, 181 +/- 93.7, 52 +/- 28.6, 130 +/- 24.6, and 141 +/- 46.1, respectively. There were no significant changes in mean serum lipid, apolipoprotein or Lp(a) levels over the 4-week study period, analyzed by a random effects model to test for time trend. In addition, there were no significant changes in established acute phase or nutritional markers (C-reactive protein, alpha 1-glycoprotein, haptoglobin or serum albumin). Our findings suggest that serum lipid, apolipoprotein and Lp(a) levels remain stable following AIS, consistent with the absence of acute phase response or nutritional deficiency.

Prevalence of high IgM anticardiolipins in patients with ischemic stroke

Lupus anticoagulant (LA), IgG and IgM isotypes of anticardiolipins (aCL), lipoprotein (a), and the resistance to activated protein C were determined in patients with ischemic stroke. The raised concentration of the aCL-IgM isotype was noted in 42% of patients with this type of stroke, and it was in contrast with an 8% frequency of an increased level of aCL-IgG isotype in these cases. The high level of lipoprotein (a) was found with similar frequency in stroke patients and in age-matched control subjects. It is concluded that the elevated concentration of IgM isotype of anticardiolipin antibodies can be regarded as significant in the ethiological work-up in elderly stroke patients.Copyright Lippincott-Raven Publishers

Genetics of stroke--a review

Evidence from twin and family shows that genetic factors contribute to the risk of stroke and that their role may be at least as important in stroke as in coronary heart disease. Additional support for the significance of genetic factors comes from other findings such as epidemiological data showing phenotypic heterogeneity of stroke, genetic influence on many of the risk factors for stroke, and racial and geographic differences in morbidity and mortality in stroke victims. Yet, apart from the reported associations of a small number of cases with Mendelian cerebrovascular diseases, only a few studies have directly investigated gene markers or molecular genetics of stroke. This review presents the existing evidence on the genetic background of stroke and discusses results from the genetic studies of stroke published to date.

Relationship between lipoprotein (a) and both stroke and carotid atheroma

In vitro studies provide mechanisms by which elevated lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] concentrations may promote both thrombosis and atherogenesis. Case-control studies have reported raised Lp(a) concentrations in patients with stroke, but prospective studies have failed to confirm the association. A potential confounding factor is that Lp(a) may rise acutely after stroke. We determined Lp(a) concentrations in 164 patients studied at least 21 days after stroke or transient ischaemic attack, and in 91 controls. In the patient group we correlated Lp(a) concentrations with both the degree of carotid stenosis estimated on duplex ultrasonography, and with stroke subtype (large vessel disease, lacunar infarction, and cardioembolic and unknown pathogenesis). There was no difference between Lp(a) concentration in cases and controls [median (quartiles) 0.10 (0.04, 0.39) versus 0.12 (0.04, 0.30) g/L, P = 0.34]. There was no difference in the proportion of cases compared with controls with a markedly elevated Lp(a) of > 0.4 g/L (21.3 versus 16.5%, P = 0.34). There was non-significant trend towards higher median Lp(a) concentrations in women [median (quartiles) 0.16 (0.04, 0.32) g/L versus 0.12 (0.04, 0.28) g/L, P = 0.3]. In view of this trend we analysed the differences between cases and controls for each sex separately. Lp(a) concentrations in men were median (quartiles) 0.08 (0.04, 0.26) g/L in the 101 cases and 0.12 (0.04, 0.28) g/L in the 43 controls (P = 0.6). Lp(a) concentrations in women were median (quartiles) 0.25 (0.04, 0.44) g/L in the 63 cases, and 0.16 (0.04, 0.32) g/L in the 48 controls (P = 0.16). Within the patient group there was no difference between Lp(a) concentrations in the different stroke subgroups. There was no relationship between Lp(a) concentrations and mean percentage carotid stenosis (rs = 0.14, P = 0.07). Our results suggest that in an unselected population of men studied more than 3 weeks post event there is no relationship between lipoprotein(a) concentrations and either stroke/transient ischaemic attack, or carotid atheroma. The relationship in women requires further study.