1
|
Severo Sánchez A, González Martín J, de Juan Bagudá J, Morán Fernández L, Muñoz Guijosa C, Arribas Ynsaurriaga F, Delgado JF, García-Cosío Carmena MD. Sex and Gender-related Disparities in Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Heart Transplantation. Curr Heart Fail Rep 2024:10.1007/s11897-024-00670-0. [PMID: 38861129 DOI: 10.1007/s11897-024-00670-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Limited research has been conducted on sex disparities in heart transplant (HT). The aim of this review is to analyse the available evidence on the influence of sex and gender-related determinants in the entire HT process, as well as to identify areas for further investigation. RECENT FINDINGS Although women make up half of the population affected by heart failure and related mortality, they account for less than a third of HT recipients. Reasons for this inequality include differences in disease course, psychosocial factors, concerns about allosensitisation, and selection or referral bias in female patients. Women are more often listed for HT due to non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and have a lower burden of cardiovascular risk factors. Although long-term prognosis appears to be similar for both sexes, there are significant disparities in post-HT morbidity and causes of mortality (noting a higher incidence of rejection in women and of malignancy and cardiac allograft vasculopathy in men). Additional research is required to gain a better understanding of the reasons behind gender disparities in eligibility and outcomes following HT. This would enable the fair allocation of resources and enhance patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Severo Sánchez
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier González Martín
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier de Juan Bagudá
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Morán Fernández
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | - Christian Muñoz Guijosa
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), 28041, Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Arribas Ynsaurriaga
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Francisco Delgado
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Dolores García-Cosío Carmena
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim D, Choi JO, Cho YH, Sung K, Oh J, Cho HJ, Jung SH, Lee HY, Park JJ, Choi DJ, Kang SM, Kim MS, Kim JJ. Impacts of Pre-transplant Panel-Reactive Antibody on Post-transplantation Outcomes: A Study of Nationwide Heart Transplant Registry Data. Korean Circ J 2024; 54:325-335. [PMID: 38767440 PMCID: PMC11169906 DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2023.0300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The number of sensitized heart failure patients on waiting lists for heart transplantation (HTx) is increasing. Using the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY), a nationwide multicenter database, we investigated the prevalence and clinical impact of calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA) in patients undergoing HTx. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 813 patients who underwent HTx between 2014 and 2021. Patients were grouped according to peak PRA level as group A: patients with cPRA ≤10% (n= 492); group B: patients with cPRA >10%, <50% (n=160); group C patients with cPRA ≥50% (n=161). Post-HTx outcomes were freedom from antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), acute cellular rejection, coronary allograft vasculopathy, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 44 (19-72) months. Female sex, re-transplantation, and pre-HTx renal replacement therapy were independently associated with an increased risk of sensitization (cPRA ≥50%). Group C patients were more likely to have longer hospital stays and to use anti-thymocyte globulin as an induction agent compared to groups A and B. Significantly more patients in group C had positive flow cytometric crossmatch and had a higher incidence of preformed donor-specific antibody (DSA) compared to groups A and B. During follow-up, group C had a significantly higher rate of AMR, but the overall survival rate was comparable to that of groups A and B. In a subgroup analysis of group C, post-transplant survival was comparable despite higher preformed DSA in a desensitized group compared to the non-desensitized group. CONCLUSIONS Patients with cPRA ≥50% had significantly higher incidence of preformed DSA and lower freedom from AMR, but post-HTx survival rates were similar to those with cPRA <50%. Our findings suggest that sensitized patients can attain comparable post-transplant survival to non-sensitized patients when treated with optimal desensitization treatment and therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darae Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Oh Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Yang Hyun Cho
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kiick Sung
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jaewon Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Jai Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Ho Jung
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hae-Young Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Joo Park
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Dong-Ju Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Seok-Min Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myoung Soo Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Joong Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Breathett K, Knapp SM, Lewsey SC, Mohammed SF, Mazimba S, Dunlay SM, Hicks A, Ilonze OJ, Morris AA, Tedford RJ, Colvin MM, Daly RC. Differences in Donor Heart Acceptance by Race and Gender of Patients on the Transplant Waiting List. JAMA 2024; 331:1379-1386. [PMID: 38526480 PMCID: PMC10964157 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.0065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
Importance Barriers to heart transplant must be overcome prior to listing. It is unclear why Black men and women remain less likely to receive a heart transplant after listing than White men and women. Objective To evaluate whether race or gender of a heart transplant candidate (ie, patient on the transplant waiting list) is associated with the probability of a donor heart being accepted by the transplant center team with each offer. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used the United Network for Organ Sharing datasets to identify organ acceptance with each offer for US non-Hispanic Black (hereafter, Black) and non-Hispanic White (hereafter, White) adults listed for heart transplant from October 18, 2018, through March 31, 2023. Exposures Black or White race and gender (men, women) of a heart transplant candidate. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was heart offer acceptance by the transplant center team. The number of offers to acceptance was assessed using discrete time-to-event analyses, nonparametrically (stratified by race and gender) and parametrically. The hazard probability of offer acceptance for each offer was modeled using generalized linear mixed models adjusted for candidate-, donor-, and offer-level variables. Results Among 159 177 heart offers with 13 760 donors, there were 14 890 candidates listed for heart transplant; 30.9% were Black, 69.1% were White, 73.6% were men, and 26.4% were women. The cumulative incidence of offer acceptance was highest for White women followed by Black women, White men, and Black men (P < .001). Odds of acceptance were less for Black candidates than for White candidates for the first offer (odds ratio [OR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.84) through the 16th offer. Odds of acceptance were higher for women than for men for the first offer (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.39-1.68) through the sixth offer and were lower for the 10th through 31st offers. Conclusions and Relevance The cumulative incidence of heart offer acceptance by a transplant center team was consistently lower for Black candidates than for White candidates of the same gender and higher for women than for men. These disparities persisted after adjusting for candidate-, donor-, and offer-level variables, possibly suggesting racial and gender bias in the decision-making process. Further investigation of site-level decision-making may reveal strategies for equitable donor heart acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khadijah Breathett
- Krannert Cardiovascular Research Center, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Shannon M. Knapp
- Krannert Cardiovascular Research Center, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Sabra C. Lewsey
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Selma F. Mohammed
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Sula Mazimba
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
- AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida
| | - Shannon M. Dunlay
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Albert Hicks
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore
| | - Onyedika J. Ilonze
- Krannert Cardiovascular Research Center, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Alanna A. Morris
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ryan J. Tedford
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Monica M. Colvin
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Richard C. Daly
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Issitt RW, Cudworth E, Cortina-Borja M, Gupta A, Kallon D, Crook R, Shaw M, Robertson A, Tsang VT, Henwood S, Muthurangu V, Sebire NJ, Burch M, Fenton M. Rapid desensitization through immunoadsorption during cardiopulmonary bypass. A novel method to facilitate human leukocyte antigen incompatible heart transplantation. Perfusion 2024; 39:543-554. [PMID: 36625378 PMCID: PMC10943618 DOI: 10.1177/02676591221151035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-antibody production represents a major barrier to heart transplantation, limiting recipient compatibility with potential donors and increasing the risk of complications with poor waiting-list outcomes. Currently there is no consensus to when desensitization should take place, and through what mechanism, meaning that sensitized patients must wait for a compatible donor for many months, if not years. We aimed to determine if intraoperative immunoadsorption could provide a potential desensitization methodology. METHODS Anti-HLA antibody-containing whole blood was added to a Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit set up to mimic a 20 kg patient undergoing heart transplantation. Plasma was separated and diverted to a standalone, secondary immunoadsorption system, with antibody-depleted plasma returned to the CPB circuit. Samples for anti-HLA antibody definition were taken at baseline, when combined with the CPB prime (on bypass), and then every 20 min for the duration of treatment (total 180 min). RESULTS A reduction in individual allele median fluorescence intensity (MFI) to below clinically relevant levels (<1000 MFI), and in the majority of cases below the lower positive detection limit (<500 MFI), even in alleles with a baseline MFI >4000 was demonstrated. Reduction occurred in all cases within 120 min, demonstrating efficacy in a time period usual for heart transplantation. Flowcytometric crossmatching of suitable pseudo-donor lymphocytes demonstrated a change from T cell and B cell positive channel shifts to negative, demonstrating a reduction in binding capacity. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative immunoadsorption in an ex vivo setting demonstrates clinically relevant reductions in anti-HLA antibodies within the normal timeframe for heart transplantation. This method represents a potential desensitization technique that could enable sensitized children to accept a donor organ earlier, even in the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard W Issitt
- Perfusion Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
- Digital Research, Informatics and Virtual Environment, NIHR Great Ormond Street Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Eamonn Cudworth
- Clinical Transplantation Laboratory, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mario Cortina-Borja
- Population, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Arun Gupta
- Clinical Transplantation Laboratory, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Delordson Kallon
- Clinical Transplantation Laboratory, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Richard Crook
- Perfusion Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Michael Shaw
- Perfusion Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Alex Robertson
- Perfusion Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Victor T Tsang
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Sophie Henwood
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Vivek Muthurangu
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Neil J Sebire
- Digital Research, Informatics and Virtual Environment, NIHR Great Ormond Street Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Michael Burch
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
- Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Matthew Fenton
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
- Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gemelli M, Doulamis IP, Addonizio M, Tzani A, Rempakos A, Kampaktsis P, Guariento A, Dunque ER, Asleh R, Alvarez P, Briasoulis A. Impact of age over 70 years in the new allocation system on the outcomes of heart transplantation in the US. Clin Transplant 2024; 38:e15317. [PMID: 38607287 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) allocation criteria changed in 2018 to accommodate the increased prevalence of patients on a ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplant and prioritize sicker people in anticipation of a heart graft. We aimed to assess the impact of patient age in the new allocation policy on mortality following heart transplantation. Secondary outcomes included the effect of age ≥70 on post-transplant events, including stroke, dialysis, pacemaker, and rejection requiring treatment. METHODS The UNOS Registry was queried to identify patients who underwent heart transplants alone in the US between 2000 and 2021. Patients were divided into groups according to their age (over 70 and under 70 years old). RESULTS Patients aged over 70 were more likely to require dialysis during follow-up, but less likely to experience rejection requiring treatment, compared with patients aged <70. Age ≥70 in the new allocation system was a significant predictor of 1-year mortality (adjusted HR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.05-1.91; p = .024), but its effect on 5-year mortality was not significant after adjusting for potential confounders (adjusted HR: 1.27; 95% CI:.97-1.66; p = .077). Undergoing transplantation under the new allocation policy vs the old allocation policy was not a significant predictor of mortality in patients over 70 years old. CONCLUSIONS Age ≥70 is a significant predictor of 1-year mortality following heart transplantation, but not at 5 and 10 years; however, the new allocation does not seem to have changed the outcomes for this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Gemelli
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular and Public Health Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Ilias P Doulamis
- Department of Surgery, Lahey Clinic, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mariangela Addonizio
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular and Public Health Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Aspasia Tzani
- Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Athanasios Rempakos
- Medical School of Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Polydoros Kampaktsis
- Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Alvise Guariento
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular and Public Health Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Ernesto Ruiz Dunque
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Section of Heart failure and Transplantation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Rabea Asleh
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Heart Institute, Hadassah University Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Paulino Alvarez
- Division of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Alexandros Briasoulis
- Medical School of Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Section of Heart failure and Transplantation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Han J, Rushakoff J, Moayedi Y, Henricksen E, Lee R, Luikart H, Shalakhti O, Gragert L, Benck L, Malinoski D, Kobashigawa J, Teuteberg J, Khush KK, Patel J, Kransdorf E. HLA sensitization is associated with an increased risk of primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2024; 43:387-393. [PMID: 37802261 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a leading cause of early morbidity and mortality following heart transplantation (HT). We sought to determine the association between pretransplant human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization, as measured using the calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) value, and the risk of PGD. METHODS Consecutive adult HT recipients (n = 596) from 1/2015 to 12/2019 at 2 US centers were included. Severity of PGD was based on the 2014 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus statement. For each recipient, unacceptable HLA antigens were obtained and locus-specific cPRA (cPRA-LS) and pre-HT donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were assessed. RESULTS Univariable logistic modeling showed that peak cPRA-LS for all loci and HLA-A was associated with increased severity of PGD as an ordinal variable (all loci: OR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14, p = 0.025, HLA-A: OR 1.14, 95% CI: 1.03-1.26, p = 0.011). Multivariable analysis showed peak cPRA-LS for HLA-A, recipient beta-blocker use, total ischemic time, donor age, prior cardiac surgery, and United Network for Organ Sharing status 1 or 2 were associated with increased severity of PGD. The presence of DSA to HLA-B was associated with trend toward increased risk of mild-to-moderate PGD (OR 2.56, 95% CI: 0.99-6.63, p = 0.053), but DSA to other HLA loci was not associated with PGD. CONCLUSIONS Sensitization for all HLA loci, and specifically HLA-A, is associated with an increased severity of PGD. These factors should be included in pre-HT risk stratification to minimize the risk of PGD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiho Han
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Josh Rushakoff
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Yasbanoo Moayedi
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erik Henricksen
- Department of Transplant, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California
| | - Roy Lee
- Department of Transplant, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California
| | - Helen Luikart
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Omar Shalakhti
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Loren Gragert
- Department of Pathology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Lillian Benck
- Division of Cardiology, NorthShore University Health System, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Darren Malinoski
- Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Jon Kobashigawa
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jeffrey Teuteberg
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Kiran K Khush
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Jignesh Patel
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Evan Kransdorf
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Srivastava PK, Kittleson MM. Modern advances in heart transplantation. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2024; 82:147-156. [PMID: 38244826 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2024.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
Heart transplantation (HTx) is the only definitive therapy for patients with end stage heart disease. With the increasing global prevalence of heart failure, the demand for HTx has continued to grow and outpace supply. In this paper, we will review advances in the field of HTx along the clinical journey of a HTx recipient. Starting with the sensitized patient, we discuss current methods to define sensitization, and assays to help identify clinically relevant anti-HLA antibodies. Desensitization strategies targeting all levels of the adaptive immune system are discussed with emphasis on novel techniques such as anti-CD 38 blockade and use of the Immunoglobulin G-Degrading Enzyme of Streptococcus Pyogenes. We next discuss donor procurement and the resurgence of donation after circulatory death as a viable strategy to significantly and safely increase the donor pool. Post-transplant, we evaluate non-invasive surveillance techniques including gene expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA. Last, we discuss the ground-breaking developments in the field of xenotransplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratyaksh K Srivastava
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute at Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Michelle M Kittleson
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute at Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gemelli M, Doulamis IP, Tzani A, Rempakos A, Kampaktsis P, Alvarez P, Guariento A, Xanthopoulos A, Giamouzis G, Spiliopoulos K, Asleh R, Ruiz Duque E, Briasoulis A. Rejection Requiring Treatment within the First Year following Heart Transplantation: The UNOS Insight. J Pers Med 2023; 14:52. [PMID: 38248753 PMCID: PMC10817284 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14010052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Heart failure is an extremely impactful health issue from both a social and quality-of-life point of view and the rate of patients with this condition is destined to rise in the next few years. Transplantation remains the mainstay of treatment for end-stage heart failure, but a shortage of organs represents a significant problem that prolongs time spent on the waiting list. In view of this, the selection of donor and recipient must be extremely meticulous, considering all factors that could predispose to organ failure. One of the main considerations regarding heart transplants is the risk of graft rejection and the need for immunosuppression therapy to mitigate that risk. In this study, we aimed to assess the characteristics of patients who need immunosuppression treatment for rejection within one year of heart transplantation and its impact on mid-term and long-term mortality. (2) Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Registry was queried to identify patients who solely underwent a heart transplant in the US between 2000 and 2021. Patients were divided into two groups according to the need for anti-rejection treatment within one year of heart transplantation. Patients' characteristics in the two groups were assessed, and 1 year and 10 year mortality rates were compared. (3) Results: A total of 43,763 patients underwent isolated heart transplantation in the study period, and 9946 (22.7%) needed anti-rejection treatment in the first year. Patients who required treatment for rejection within one year after transplant were more frequently younger (49 ± 14 vs. 52 ± 14 years, p < 0.001), women (31% vs. 23%, p < 0.001), and had a higher CPRA value (14 ± 26 vs. 11 ± 23, p < 0.001). Also, the rate of prior cardiac surgery was more than double in this group (27% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), while prior LVAD (12% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) and IABP (10% vs. 9%, p < 0.01) were more frequent in patients who did not receive anti-rejection treatment in the first year. Finally, pre-transplantation creatinine was significantly higher in patients who did not need treatment for rejection in the first year (1.4 vs. 1.3, p < 0.01). Most patients who did not require anti-rejection treatment underwent heart transplantation during the new allocation era, while less than half of the patients who required treatment underwent transplantation after the new allocation policy implementation (65% vs. 49%, p < 0.001). Patients who needed rejection treatment in the first year had a higher risk of unadjusted 1 year (HR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.88-2.70; p < 0.001), 5 year (HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.60-1.79; p < 0.001), and 10 year (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.41-1.54, p < 0.001) mortality, and this was confirmed at the adjusted analysis at all three time-points. (4) Conclusions: Medical treatment of acute rejection was associated with significantly increased 1 year mortality compared to patients who did not require anti-rejection therapy. The higher risk of mortality was confirmed at a 10 year follow-up. Further studies and newer follow-up data are required to investigate the role of anti-rejection therapy in the heart transplant population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Gemelli
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular and Public Health Sciences, University of Padua, 35122 Padova, Italy; (M.G.); (A.G.)
| | - Ilias P. Doulamis
- Department of Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, USA;
| | - Aspasia Tzani
- Heart and Vascular Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA;
| | - Athanasios Rempakos
- Medical School of Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece
| | - Polydoros Kampaktsis
- Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, NY 10032, USA;
| | - Paulino Alvarez
- Division of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA;
| | - Alvise Guariento
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular and Public Health Sciences, University of Padua, 35122 Padova, Italy; (M.G.); (A.G.)
| | - Andrew Xanthopoulos
- Department of Cardiology, University General Hospital of Larissa, 413 34 Larissa, Greece; (A.X.); (G.G.)
| | - Grigorios Giamouzis
- Department of Cardiology, University General Hospital of Larissa, 413 34 Larissa, Greece; (A.X.); (G.G.)
| | - Kyriakos Spiliopoulos
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Thessaly, 412 23 Larissa, Greece;
| | - Rabea Asleh
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA;
- Heart Institute, Hadassah University Medical Center, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel
| | - Ernesto Ruiz Duque
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Section of Heart Failure and Transplantation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
| | - Alexandros Briasoulis
- Medical School of Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Section of Heart Failure and Transplantation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang Z, Markmann C, Yu M, Agarwal D, Rostami S, Wang W, Liu C, Zhao H, Ochoa T, Parvathaneni K, Xu X, Li E, Gonzalez V, Khadka R, Hoffmann J, Knox JJ, Scholler J, Marcellus B, Allman D, Fraietta JA, Samelson-Jones B, Milone MC, Monos D, Garfall AL, Naji A, Bhoj VG. Immunotherapy targeting B cells and long-lived plasma cells effectively eliminates pre-existing donor-specific allo-antibodies. Cell Rep Med 2023; 4:101336. [PMID: 38118406 PMCID: PMC10772570 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/22/2023]
Abstract
Pre-existing anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) allo-antibodies constitute a major barrier to transplantation. Current desensitization approaches fail due to ineffective depletion of allo-specific memory B cells (Bmems) and long-lived plasma cells (LLPCs). We evaluate the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting CD19 and B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) to eliminate allo-antibodies in a skin pre-sensitized murine model of islet allo-transplantation. We find that treatment of allo-sensitized hosts with CAR T cells targeting Bmems and LLPCs eliminates donor-specific allo-antibodies (DSAs) and mitigates hyperacute rejection of subsequent islet allografts. We then assess the clinical efficacy of the CAR T therapy for desensitization in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) with pre-existing HLA allo-antibodies who were treated with the combination of CART-BCMA and CART-19 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03549442) and observe clinically meaningful allo-antibody reduction. These findings provide logical rationale for clinical evaluation of CAR T-based immunotherapy in highly sensitized candidates to promote successful transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Zhang
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, P.R. China
| | - Caroline Markmann
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Ming Yu
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Divyansh Agarwal
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Susan Rostami
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Chengyang Liu
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Huiwu Zhao
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Trini Ochoa
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Kalpana Parvathaneni
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Xiaoming Xu
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Eric Li
- Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Vanessa Gonzalez
- Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Roman Khadka
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Jennifer Hoffmann
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - James J Knox
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - John Scholler
- Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Brooke Marcellus
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Immunogenetics Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - David Allman
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Joseph A Fraietta
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Benjamin Samelson-Jones
- Division of Hematology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Michael C Milone
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Dimitri Monos
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Immunogenetics Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Alfred L Garfall
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Ali Naji
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Vijay G Bhoj
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Horn ET, Xu Q, Dibridge JN, Huston JH, Hickey GW, Kaczorowski DJ, Keebler ME, Zeevi A. Reduction of HLA donor specific antibodies in heart transplant patients treated with proteasome inhibitors for antibody mediated rejection. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e15132. [PMID: 37705362 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
In this project, we describe proteasome inhibitor (PI) treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in heart transplantation (HTX). From January 2018 to September 2021, 10 patients were treated with PI for AMR: carfilzomib (CFZ) n = 8; bortezomib (BTZ) n = 2. Patients received 1-3 cycles of PI. All patients had ≥1 strong donor-specific antibody (DSA) (mean fluorescence intensity [MFI] > 8000) in undiluted serum. Most DSAs (20/21) had HLA class II specificity. The MFI of strong DSAs had a median reduction of 56% (IQR = 13%-89%) in undiluted serum and 92% (IQR = 53%-95%) at 1:16 dilution. Seventeen DSAs in seven patients were reduced > 50% at 1:16 dilution after treatment. Four DSAs from three patients did not respond. DSA with MFI > 8000 at 1:16 dilution was less responsive to treatment. 60% (6/10) patients presented with graft dysfunction; 4/6 recovered ejection fraction > 40% after treatment. Pathologic AMR was resolved in 5/7 (71.4%) of patients within 1 year after treatment. 9/10 (90%) patients survived to 1 year after AMR diagnosis. Using PI in AMR resulted in significant DSA reduction with some resolution of graft dysfunction. Larger studies are needed to evaluate PI for AMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward T Horn
- University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Qingyong Xu
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Julie N Dibridge
- UPMC Presbyterian Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jessica H Huston
- Department of Cardiology, UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gavin W Hickey
- Department of Cardiology, UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David J Kaczorowski
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mary E Keebler
- Department of Cardiology, UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Adriana Zeevi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Battle R, Pritchard D, Peacock S, Hastie C, Worthington J, Jordan S, McCaughlan JA, Barnardo M, Cope R, Collins C, Diaz-Burlinson N, Rosser C, Foster L, Kallon D, Shaw O, Briggs D, Turner D, Anand A, Akbarzad-Yousefi A, Sage D. BSHI and BTS UK guideline on the detection of alloantibodies in solid organ (and islet) transplantation. Int J Immunogenet 2023; 50 Suppl 2:3-63. [PMID: 37919251 DOI: 10.1111/iji.12641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
Solid organ transplantation represents the best (and in many cases only) treatment option for patients with end-stage organ failure. The effectiveness and functioning life of these transplants has improved each decade due to surgical and clinical advances, and accurate histocompatibility assessment. Patient exposure to alloantigen from another individual is a common occurrence and takes place through pregnancies, blood transfusions or previous transplantation. Such exposure to alloantigen's can lead to the formation of circulating alloreactive antibodies which can be deleterious to solid organ transplant outcome. The purpose of these guidelines is to update to the previous BSHI/BTS guidelines 2016 on the relevance, assessment, and management of alloantibodies within solid organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Battle
- Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Sarah Peacock
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Sue Jordan
- National Blood Service Tooting, London, UK
| | | | - Martin Barnardo
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Rebecca Cope
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | - Luke Foster
- Birmingham Blood Donor Centre, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Olivia Shaw
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - David Turner
- Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Arthi Anand
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
DeFilippis EM, Ji Z, Masotti M, Maharaj V, Alexy T, Kittleson MM, Cogswell R. Association between calculated panel reactive antibody and waitlist outcomes in the 2018 heart allocation system. J Heart Lung Transplant 2023; 42:1469-1477. [PMID: 37268050 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of heart transplant (HT) waitlist candidate sensitization on waitlist outcomes in the US is unknown. METHODS Adult waitlist outcomes in OPTN (October 2018-September 2022) by calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) were modeled to identify thresholds of clinical significance. The primary outcome was the rate of HT by cPRA category (low: 0-35, middle: >35-90, high: >90) assessed using multivariable competing risk analysis (compete: waitlist removal for death or clinical deterioration). The secondary outcome was waitlist removal for death or clinical deterioration. RESULTS The elevated cPRA categories were associated with lower rates of HT. Candidates in the middle (35-90) and high cPRA categories (>90) had an adjusted 24% lower rate (hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.92) and 61% lower rate (HR 0.39 95% CI. 0.33-0.47) of HT than the lowest category, respectively. Waitlist candidates in the high cPRA category listed in the top acuity strata (Statuses 1, 2) had increased rates of delisting for death or deterioration compared to those in the low cPRA category (adjusted HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.5-5.5), however, elevated cPRA (middle, high) was not associated with an increased rate of death and delisting when the cohort was considered as a whole. CONCLUSIONS Elevated cPRA was associated with reduced rates of HT across all waitlist acuity tiers. Among HT waitlist candidates listed at the top acuity strata, the high cPRA category was associated with increased rates of delisting due to death or deterioration. Elevated cPRA may require consideration for critically ill candidates under continuous allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ersilia M DeFilippis
- Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Ziyu Ji
- Division of Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Maria Masotti
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Valmiki Maharaj
- Division of Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Tamas Alexy
- Division of Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Michelle M Kittleson
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Rebecca Cogswell
- Division of Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kittleson MM. Management of the sensitized heart transplant candidate. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2023; 28:362-369. [PMID: 37678171 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW For sensitized heart transplant candidates who have antibodies to human leukocyte antigens (HLA), finding a suitable donor can be challenging and can lead to adverse waitlist outcomes. In recent years, the number of sensitized patients awaiting heart transplantation has increased likely due to the use of durable and mechanical circulatory support as well as increasing number of candidates with underlying congenital heart disease. RECENT FINDINGS Advances in the assessment of HLA antibodies allow for identification of heart transplant candidates who may benefit from desensitization strategies to widen the donor pool and mitigate the risk of adverse posttransplant outcomes. SUMMARY Antibody sensitization is a barrier to successful heart transplantation and strategies to identify sensitized patients, stratify their risk, and mitigate this risk through desensitization is crucial to optimize the quality of life and survival of HT recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle M Kittleson
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Youn JC, Kim D, Jung MH, Kim JJ, Kim IC, Lee HS, Choi JO, Jeon ES, Nishihara K, Seguchi O, Kransdorf EP, Chang DH, Kittleson MM, Patel JK, Cole RM, Moriguchi JD, Ramzy D, Esmailian F, Kobashigawa JA. Three year post heart transplant outcomes of desensitized durable mechanical circulatory support patients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2023; 42:1408-1414. [PMID: 37150473 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risks and benefits of desensitization therapy (DST) in highly sensitized mechanical circulatory support (MCS) patients are not well known. We investigated 3 year post-transplant outcomes of desensitized durable MCS patients. METHODS Among 689 consecutively enrolled heart transplantation recipients between 2010 and 2016, we categorized them into Group A (desensitized MCS patients, n = 21), Group B (desensitized non-MCS patients, n = 28) and Group C (all nondesensitized patients, n = 640). Post-transplant outcomes included the incidence of primary graft dysfunction, 3-year survival, freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy, nonfatal major adverse cardiac events, any treated rejection, acute cellular rejection, antibody mediated rejection (AMR) and infectious complications. RESULTS The types of DST in Groups A and B were similar and included combinations of rituximab/intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis/bortezomib. Group A, compared with Group B, showed significantly higher pre-DST panel reactive antibody (PRA) (92.2 ± 9.8 vs. 83.3 ± 15.6, P = 0.007) and higher PRA reduction after DST (-22.2 ± 26.9 vs. -6.3 ± 7.5, P = 0.015). Groups A and C showed comparable primary graft dysfunction, 3-year survival, freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy, nonfatal major adverse cardiac events, any treated rejection, acute cellular rejection, and AMR. Although statistically not significant, Group A showed numerically higher 3-year freedom from AMR than Group B. Infectious complications were similar in both Groups A and B. CONCLUSIONS DST for MCS patients showed significant PRA reduction, resulting in an expansion of the donor pool. The post-transplant outcome of desensitized MCS patients showed comparable clinical outcomes to non-desensitized control patients in the same study period, revealing the safety and efficacy of DST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong-Chan Youn
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Research Institute for Intractable Cardiovascular Disease, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Darae Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Mi-Hyang Jung
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Research Institute for Intractable Cardiovascular Disease, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Jin Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Research Institute for Intractable Cardiovascular Disease, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - In-Cheol Kim
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye Sun Lee
- Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Oh Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun-Seok Jeon
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Keith Nishihara
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Osamu Seguchi
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Department of Transplant Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Evan P Kransdorf
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - David H Chang
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michelle M Kittleson
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jignesh K Patel
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Robert M Cole
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jaime D Moriguchi
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Danny Ramzy
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Fardad Esmailian
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jon A Kobashigawa
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Issitt R, Shetty P, Crook R, Cross N, Henwood S, Broadhead M, Spencer H, Aurora P, Gupta A, Kallon D, Fenton M, Muthialu N. Lung transplantation in an 18-month-old with donor specific antibodies - The use of intraoperative, targeted plasma exchange. Perfusion 2023; 38:1530-1533. [PMID: 35840547 DOI: 10.1177/02676591221114958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sensitised patients undergoing Human Leukocyte Antigen-incompatible transplantation are at increased risk of hyperacute rejection and may be predisposed to antibody-mediated rejection, chronic lung allograft dysfunction and higher mortality. CASE We present a case of primary lung transplantation in the setting of late identification of donor specific antibodies treated with intraoperative target plasma exchange. The patient was treated with fresh human plasma to a final volume of 1.5 times the patient's systemic circulation. From a pre-transplant mean fluorescence intensity of 5002, donor-specific antibodies were undetectable following plasma exchange on single antigen bead assay. CONCLUSIONS This method represents a potential desensitisation technique for use in the intraoperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Issitt
- Department of Perfusion, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Pooja Shetty
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - Richard Crook
- Department of Perfusion, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nigel Cross
- Department of Perfusion, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - Sophie Henwood
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - Michael Broadhead
- Department of Anaesthetics, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - Helen Spencer
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
- Paediatric Cardiology, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Aurora
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
- Paediatric Cardiology, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Arun Gupta
- Clinical Transplantation Laboratory, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Delordson Kallon
- Clinical Transplantation Laboratory, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Matthew Fenton
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
- Paediatric Cardiology, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nagarajan Muthialu
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Currie M, Leipzig M, Kaghazchi A, Zhu Y, Shudo Y, Woo YJ. Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Combined Heart-Kidney Transplantation With or Without Prior Ventricular Assist Device. Transplant Proc 2023; 55:1674-1680. [PMID: 37393169 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.04.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both combined heart-kidney transplantation and ventricular assist devices (VADs) pose significant challenges, including sensitization, immunosuppressive treatment, and infrastructure demands. Despite these challenges, we hypothesized that the recipients of combined heart-kidney transplants with and without VADs would have equivalent survival. We aimed to compare the survival of heart-kidney transplant recipients with and without prior VAD placement. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed all patients enrolled in the United Network for Organ Sharing database who underwent heart-kidney transplants. We created a matched cohort of patients undergoing heart-kidney transplantation with or without prior VAD using 1:1 nearest propensity-score matching with preoperative variables. RESULTS In the propensity-matched cohort, 399 patients underwent heart-kidney transplantation with prior VAD, and 399 underwent heart-kidney transplantation without prior VAD. The estimated survival of heart--kidney recipients with prior VAD was 84.8% at one year, 81.2% at 3 years, and 75.3% at 5 years. The estimated survival of heart-kidney recipients without prior VAD was 86.8.7% at one year, 84.0% at 3 years, and 78.8% at 5 years. There was no statistically significant difference in the survival of heart-kidney transplant recipients with or without prior VAD at one year (P = .42; Figure 2), 3 years (P = .34), or 5 years (P = .30). CONCLUSION Despite the increased challenge of heart-kidney transplantation in recipients with prior VAD, we demonstrated that these patients have similar survival to those who underwent heart-kidney transplantation without previous VAD placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Currie
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| | - Matthew Leipzig
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Aydin Kaghazchi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Yuanjia Zhu
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Yasuhiro Shudo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Y Joseph Woo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bernhardt AM, Copeland H, Deswal A, Gluck J, Givertz MM. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation/Heart Failure Society of America Guideline on Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support. J Heart Lung Transplant 2023; 42:e1-e64. [PMID: 36805198 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.10.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M Bernhardt
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Hannah Copeland
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Lutheran Health Physicians, Fort Wayne, Indiana
| | - Anita Deswal
- Department of Cardiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jason Gluck
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Michael M Givertz
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
DeFilippis EM, Kransdorf EP, Jaiswal A, Zhang X, Patel J, Kobashigawa JA, Baran DA, Kittleson MM. Detection and management of HLA sensitization in candidates for adult heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2023; 42:409-422. [PMID: 36631340 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Heart transplantation (HT) remains the preferred therapy for patients with advanced heart failure. However, for sensitized HT candidates who have antibodies to human leukocyte antigens , finding a suitable donor can be challenging and can lead to adverse waitlist outcomes. In recent years, the number of sensitized patients awaiting HT has increased likely due to the use of durable and mechanical circulatory support as well as increasing number of candidates with underlying congenital heart disease. This State-of-the-Art review discusses the assessment of human leukocyte antigens antibodies, potential desensitization strategies including mechanisms of action and specific protocols, the approach to a potential donor including the use of complement-dependent cytotoxicity, flow cytometry, and virtual crossmatches, and peritransplant induction management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ersilia M DeFilippis
- Center for Advanced Cardiac Care, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Evan P Kransdorf
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Abhishek Jaiswal
- Hartford HealthCare Heart and Vascular Institute, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Xiaohai Zhang
- HLA and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jignesh Patel
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jon A Kobashigawa
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - David A Baran
- Cleveland Clinic, Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Weston, Florida
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rao RA, Kransdorf EP, Patel JK, Kobashigawa JA, Kittleson MM. How to Approach HLA Sensitization in Heart Transplant Candidates. JACC: HEART FAILURE 2023; 11:469-475. [PMID: 37019560 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
|
20
|
Holzhauser L, DeFilippis EM, Nikolova A, Byku M, Contreras JP, De Marco T, Hall S, Khush KK, Vest AR. The End of Endomyocardial Biopsy?: A Practical Guide for Noninvasive Heart Transplant Rejection Surveillance. JACC. HEART FAILURE 2023; 11:263-276. [PMID: 36682960 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Noninvasive heart transplant rejection surveillance using gene expression profiling (GEP) to monitor immune activation is widely used among heart transplant programs. With the new development of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) assays, more programs are transitioning to a predominantly noninvasive rejection surveillance protocol with a reduced frequency of endomyocardial biopsies. As a result, many practical questions arise that potentially delay implementation of these valuable new tools. The purpose of this review is to provide practical guidance for clinicians transitioning toward a less invasive acute rejection monitoring protocol after heart transplantation, and to answer 10 common questions about the GEP and dd-cfDNA assays. Evidence supporting GEP and dd-cfDNA testing is reviewed, as well as guidance on test interpretation and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luise Holzhauser
- Division of Cardiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ersilia M DeFilippis
- Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andriana Nikolova
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mirnela Byku
- Department of Cardiology, University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Teresa De Marco
- Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Shelley Hall
- Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Kiran K Khush
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Halverson LP, Hachem RR. Antibody-Mediated Rejection: Diagnosis and Treatment. Clin Chest Med 2023; 44:95-103. [PMID: 36774172 PMCID: PMC10148231 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2022.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a form of lung allograft rejection that is emerging as an important risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction and decreased long-term survival. In this review, we provide a brief overview of our current understanding of its pathophysiology with an emphasis on donor-specific antibodies before moving on to focus on the current diagnostic criteria and treatment strategies. Our goal is to discuss the limitations of our current knowledge and explore how novel diagnostic and therapeutic options aim to improve outcomes through earlier definitive diagnosis and preemptive targeted treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura P Halverson
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8052, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA.
| | - Ramsey R Hachem
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8052, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bernhardt AM, Copeland H, Deswal A, Gluck J, Givertz MM. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation/Heart Failure Society of America Guideline on Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support. J Card Fail 2023; 29:304-374. [PMID: 36754750 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M Bernhardt
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Hannah Copeland
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Lutheran Health Physicians, Fort Wayne, Indiana
| | - Anita Deswal
- Department of Cardiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jason Gluck
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Michael M Givertz
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Emerson D, Kim RW. Sensitization in Congenial Heart Transplantation: Moving the Needle. Ann Thorac Surg 2023; 115:742. [PMID: 36375496 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.10.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dominic Emerson
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 127 S San Vicente Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048.
| | - Richard W Kim
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 127 S San Vicente Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sawinski D, Lai JC, Pinney S, Gray AL, Jackson AM, Stewart D, Levine DJ, Locke JE, Pomposelli JJ, Hartwig MG, Hall SA, Dadhania DM, Cogswell R, Perez RV, Schold JD, Turgeon NA, Kobashigawa J, Kukreja J, Magee JC, Friedewald J, Gill JS, Loor G, Heimbach JK, Verna EC, Walsh MN, Terrault N, Testa G, Diamond JM, Reese PP, Brown K, Orloff S, Farr MA, Olthoff KM, Siegler M, Ascher N, Feng S, Kaplan B, Pomfret E. Addressing sex-based disparities in solid organ transplantation in the United States - a conference report. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:316-325. [PMID: 36906294 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Solid organ transplantation provides the best treatment for end-stage organ failure, but significant sex-based disparities in transplant access exist. On June 25, 2021, a virtual multidisciplinary conference was convened to address sex-based disparities in transplantation. Common themes contributing to sex-based disparities were noted across kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplantation, specifically the existence of barriers to referral and wait listing for women, the pitfalls of using serum creatinine, the issue of donor/recipient size mismatch, approaches to frailty and a higher prevalence of allosensitization among women. In addition, actionable solutions to improve access to transplantation were identified, including alterations to the current allocation system, surgical interventions on donor organs, and the incorporation of objective frailty metrics into the evaluation process. Key knowledge gaps and high-priority areas for future investigation were also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deirdre Sawinski
- Weill Cornell Medicine - New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
| | - Jennifer C Lai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sean Pinney
- University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Alice L Gray
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Annette M Jackson
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Department of Surgery, Durham, Carolina, USA
| | - Darren Stewart
- United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Jayme E Locke
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - James J Pomposelli
- Department of Surgery University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research and Education (CCTCARE), Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | | | - Darshana M Dadhania
- Weill Cornell Medicine - New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Rebecca Cogswell
- University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Richard V Perez
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Jesse D Schold
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Jon Kobashigawa
- Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jasleen Kukreja
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - John C Magee
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - John Friedewald
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois USA
| | - John S Gill
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gabriel Loor
- Baylor College of Medicine Lung Institute, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth C Verna
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mary Norine Walsh
- Ascension St Vincent Heart Center, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Norah Terrault
- Keck Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Guiliano Testa
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Joshua M Diamond
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Peter P Reese
- Division of Renal, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Susan Orloff
- Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Maryjane A Farr
- Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Kim M Olthoff
- Department of Surgery, Penn Transplant Institute, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mark Siegler
- University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA; MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Nancy Ascher
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sandy Feng
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Bruce Kaplan
- Department of Surgery University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research and Education (CCTCARE), Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Elizabeth Pomfret
- Department of Surgery University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research and Education (CCTCARE), Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Maitra NS, Dugger SJ, Balachandran IC, Civitello AB, Khazanie P, Rogers JG. Impact of the 2018 UNOS Heart Transplant Policy Changes on Patient Outcomes. JACC. HEART FAILURE 2023; 11:491-503. [PMID: 36892486 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
In 2018, the United Network for Organ Sharing implemented a 6-tier allocation policy to replace the prior 3-tier system. Given increasing listings of critically ill candidates for heart transplantation and lengthening waitlist times, the new policy aimed to better stratify candidates by waitlist mortality, shorten waiting times for high priority candidates, add objective criteria for common cardiac conditions, and further broaden sharing of donor hearts. There have been significant shifts in cardiac transplantation practices and patient outcomes following the implementation of the new policy, including changes in listing practices, waitlist time and mortality, transplant donor characteristics, post-transplantation outcomes, and mechanical circulatory support use. This review aims to highlight emerging trends in United States heart transplantation practice and outcomes following the implementation of the 2018 United Network for Organ Sharing heart allocation policy and to address areas for future modification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil S Maitra
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Samuel J Dugger
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Isabel C Balachandran
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA; Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andrew B Civitello
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA; Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Prateeti Khazanie
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Joseph G Rogers
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA; Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rudzik KN, Rivosecchi RM, Palmer BA, Hickey GW, Huston JH, Keebler ME, Kaczorowski DJ, Horn ET. Basiliximab induction versus no induction in adult heart transplantation. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14937. [PMID: 36793206 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Induction immunosuppression in heart transplant recipients varies greatly by center. Basiliximab (BAS) is the most commonly used induction immunosuppressant but has not been shown to reduce rejection or improve survival. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare rejection, infection, and mortality within the first 12 months following heart transplant in patients who received BAS or no induction. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of adult heart transplant recipients given BAS or no induction from January 1, 2017 to May 31, 2021. The primary endpoint was incidence of treated acute cellular rejection (ACR) at 12-months post-transplant. Secondary endpoints included ACR at 90 days post-transplant, incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) at 90 days and 1 year, incidence of infection, and all-cause mortality at 1 year. RESULTS A total of 108 patients received BAS, and 26 patients received no induction within the specified timeframe. There was a lower incidence of ACR within the first year in the BAS group compared to the no induction group (27.7 vs. 68.2%, p < .002). BAS was independently associated with a lower probability of having a rejection event during the first 12-months post-transplant (hazard ratio (HR) .285, 95% confidence interval [CI] .142-.571, p < .001). There was no difference in the rate of infection and in mortality after hospital discharge at 1-year post-transplant (6% vs. 0%, p = .20). CONCLUSION BAS appears to be associated with greater freedom from rejection without an increase in infections. BAS may be a preferred to a no induction strategy in patients undergoing heart transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ryan M Rivosecchi
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Brittany A Palmer
- Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gavin W Hickey
- Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jessica H Huston
- Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mary E Keebler
- Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David J Kaczorowski
- Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Edward T Horn
- Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Akhtar W, Peterzan MA, Banya W, Olwell B, Aghouee FV, Brookes P, Dunning J, Dar O. Donor specific antibodies association with survival and adverse events after heart transplantation: A single center retrospective study between 2006 and 2021. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14914. [PMID: 36630276 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Newly detected donor HLA-specific antibodies (DSA) are historically known to be associated with reduced survival in heart transplant patients. Our objective is to clarify the modern incidence of DSA and determine its relationship with survival and MACE. METHODS This retrospective study included all patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation at Harefield Hospital, London between January 1, 2006 and May 31, 2021. We identified patients who developed DSA at any point post heart transplantation and its effect on survival and MACE (defined as rejection, coronary event, stroke, and arrhythmia. RESULTS In total of 232 patients were included with a median follow up time of 4.7 years post heart transplantation. 23.7% of patients included developed DSA post heart transplantation. There was a significantly increased risk of death in patients developing DSA versus not (sub distribution hazard ratio [SHR] 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.03-3.24, p = .04). At the time of detection of DSA, 38.2% of the cohort had rejection necessitating treatment. A MACE event had occurred in 48.1% by 2 years and 53.7% by 3 years in the DSA cohort. There was a significantly increased risk of MACE in patients developing DSA versus not (SHR 2.48 [1.58-3.89, p < .0001]). CONCLUSIONS This study showed an increased risk of death and MACE in patients developing DSA post heart transplantation. Further research is required into the optimal management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waqas Akhtar
- Department of Advanced Heart Failure, Transplantation and Mechanical Support, Harefield Hospital, Harefield, UK
| | - Mark A Peterzan
- Department of Advanced Heart Failure, Transplantation and Mechanical Support, Harefield Hospital, Harefield, UK
| | - Winston Banya
- Department of Advanced Heart Failure, Transplantation and Mechanical Support, Harefield Hospital, Harefield, UK
| | - Brian Olwell
- Department of Advanced Heart Failure, Transplantation and Mechanical Support, Harefield Hospital, Harefield, UK
| | - Farveh Vakilian Aghouee
- Department of Advanced Heart Failure, Transplantation and Mechanical Support, Harefield Hospital, Harefield, UK
| | - Paul Brookes
- Department of Advanced Heart Failure, Transplantation and Mechanical Support, Harefield Hospital, Harefield, UK
| | - John Dunning
- Department of Advanced Heart Failure, Transplantation and Mechanical Support, Harefield Hospital, Harefield, UK
| | - Owais Dar
- Department of Advanced Heart Failure, Transplantation and Mechanical Support, Harefield Hospital, Harefield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hwang NC, Sivathasan C. Review of Postoperative Care for Heart Transplant Recipients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2023; 37:112-126. [PMID: 36323595 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.09.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Revised: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The early postoperative management strategies after heart transplantation include optimizing the function of the denervated heart, correcting the causes of hemodynamic instability, and initiating and maintaining immunosuppressive therapy, allograft rejection surveillance, and prophylaxis against infections caused by immunosuppression. The course of postoperative support is influenced by the quality of allograft myocardial protection prior to implantation and reperfusion, donor-recipient heart size matching, surgical technique of orthotopic heart transplantation, and patient factors (eg, preoperative condition, immunologic compatibility, postoperative vasomotor tone, severity and reversibility of pulmonary vascular hypertension, pulmonary function, mediastinal blood loss, and end-organ perfusion). This review provides an overview of the early postoperative care of recipients and includes a brief description of the surgical techniques for orthotopic heart transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nian Chih Hwang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, National Heart Centre, Singapore.
| | - Cumaraswamy Sivathasan
- Mechanical Cardiac Support and Heart Transplant Program, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, National Heart Centre, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
van den Hoogen P, Huibers MMH, van den Dolder FW, de Weger R, Siera-de Koning E, Oerlemans MIF, de Jonge N, van Laake LW, Doevendans PA, Sluijter JPG, Vink A, de Jager SCA. Elevated Plasma Immunoglobulin Levels Prior to Heart Transplantation Are Associated with Poor Post-Transplantation Survival. BIOLOGY 2022; 12:biology12010061. [PMID: 36671753 PMCID: PMC9855413 DOI: 10.3390/biology12010061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and antibody-mediated rejection are immune-mediated, long-term complications that jeopardize graft survival after heart transplantation (HTx). Interestingly, increased plasma levels of immunoglobulins have been found in end-stage heart failure (HF) patients prior to HTx. In this study, we aimed to determine whether increased circulating immunoglobulin levels prior to transplantation are associated with poor post-HTx survival. Pre-and post-HTx plasma samples of 36 cardiac transplant recipient patients were used to determine circulating immunoglobulin levels. In addition, epicardial tissue was collected to determine immunoglobulin deposition in cardiac tissue and assess signs and severity of graft rejection. High levels of IgG1 and IgG2 prior to HTx were associated with a shorter survival post-HTx. Immunoglobulin deposition in cardiac tissue was significantly elevated in patients with a survival of less than 3 years. Patients with high plasma IgG levels pre-HTx also had significantly higher plasma levels after HTx. Furthermore, high pre-HTX levels of IgG1 and IgG2 levels were also significantly increased in patients with inflammatory infiltrate in CAV lesions. Altogether the results of this proof-of-concept study suggest that an activated immune response prior to transplantation negatively affects graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia van den Hoogen
- Laboratory for Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Circulatory Health Laboratory, Regenerative Medicine Center, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Manon M. H. Huibers
- Department of Pathology, Circulatory Health Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Floor W. van den Dolder
- Department of Pathology, Circulatory Health Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roel de Weger
- Department of Pathology, Circulatory Health Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Erica Siera-de Koning
- Department of Pathology, Circulatory Health Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marish I. F. Oerlemans
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolaas de Jonge
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Linda W. van Laake
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter A. Doevendans
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Heart Institute (NLHI), 3511 EP Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Centraal Militair Hospitaal (CMH), 3584 EZ Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost. P. G. Sluijter
- Laboratory for Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Circulatory Health Laboratory, Regenerative Medicine Center, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Aryan Vink
- Department of Pathology, Circulatory Health Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia C. A. de Jager
- Laboratory for Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Circulatory Health Laboratory, Regenerative Medicine Center, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pearman M, Emmanuel S, Jansz P, Watson A, Connellan M, Iyer A, Barua S, Hayward CS. Comparing left ventricular assist device inflow cannula angle between median sternotomy and thoracotomy using 3D reconstructions. Artif Organs 2022. [PMID: 36582131 DOI: 10.1111/aor.14492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation via thoracotomy has many potential advantages compared to conventional sternotomy, including improved inflow cannula (IFC) positioning. We compared the difference in IFC angles, postoperative, and long-term outcomes for patients with LVADs implanted via thoracotomy and sternotomy. METHODS A single-center, retrospective analysis of 14 patients who underwent thoracotomy implantation was performed and matched with 28 patients who underwent sternotomy LVAD implantations for a total of 42 patients. Inclusion required a minimum LVAD support duration of 30 days and excluded concomitant procedures. A postoperative CT-chest was used to measure the angle the between the IFC and mitral valve in two-dimensions and results were compared with three-dimensional reconstruction using the same CT chest. Outcome data were extracted from medical records. RESULTS There was no significant difference in gender, INTERMACS score, BMI, or age between the two groups. Median cardiopulmonary bypass time was longer in the thoracotomy group compared to the sternotomy group, 107 min (86-122) versus 76 min (56-93), p < 0.01. 3D reconstructions revealed less deviation of the IFC away from the mitral valve in devices implanted via thoracotomy compared to sternotomy, median (IQR) angle 16.3° (13.9°-21.0°) versus 23.2° (17.9°-26.4°), p < 0.01. Rates of pump thrombosis, stroke, and gastrointestinal bleeding were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS Devices implanted via thoracotomy demonstrated less deviation away from mitral valve. However, there was no difference in morbidity between the two approaches. 3D reconstruction of the heart is an innovative technique to measure angulation and is clinically advantageous when compared to 2D imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine Pearman
- St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Chippendale, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sam Emmanuel
- St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Chippendale, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.,Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul Jansz
- St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Chippendale, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.,Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alasdair Watson
- St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark Connellan
- St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Arjun Iyer
- St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sumita Barua
- St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.,Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christopher Simon Hayward
- St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.,Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kittleson MM, Wittlieb-Weber C, Rossano JW. When art and science collide: The 2022 guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2022; 42:541-543. [PMID: 36564336 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle M Kittleson
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Carol Wittlieb-Weber
- Division of Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joseph W Rossano
- Division of Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ali U, Giudicatti L, Lee F, Fazackerley C, Slimani K, Merry C, Shah A, Larbalestier R. Outcomes of Cardiac Transplantation in Western Australia - A Contemporary Single Centre Experience. Heart Lung Circ 2022; 31:1685-1691. [PMID: 36182547 DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac transplantation remains the gold standard therapy for select patients with end-stage heart failure and outcomes have improved significantly over the past few decades. We report the 5-year contemporary experience of cardiac transplantation in Western Australia, one of the most remote transplant centres worldwide. METHODS Patients undergoing isolated cardiac transplant at Fiona Stanley Hospital (FSH) from February 2015 until April 2021 were included. Donor details were collected using donor electronic records (Donate Life, Australia). Recipient data was collated from electronic medical records at FSH and the Australia and New Zealand Society of Cardiothoracic Surgery database. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcome measures included postoperative intensive care and total hospital length of stay and rates of acute kidney injury, rejection, serious infections, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Frailty indices were also assessed. RESULTS A total of 60 patients were included (mean age 53±14 yrs, 66.7% male). The commonest indication for transplant was a non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (46.7%). Mean donor age was 35±12 years and median donor ischaemia time was 171 minutes (IQR=138-240). After median follow-up of 3.7 years, there were no mortalities. Postoperative renal failure occurred in 21 (35.0%) patients, pneumonia in four (6.7%), deep sternal wound infection in three (5.1%), acute rejection in 17 (28.3%) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in 23 (38.3%). CONCLUSION With recipient and donor criteria comparable to national and international standards, compounded by the challenges of geographic isolation, we report the first published data on contemporary outcomes post isolated cardiac transplantation in Western Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umar Ali
- Department of Cardiothoracic surgery and Transplantation, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Heart Lung Research Institute of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Lauren Giudicatti
- Advanced Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplant Unit, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Felicity Lee
- Advanced Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplant Unit, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
| | - Clare Fazackerley
- Advanced Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplant Unit, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Karim Slimani
- Department of Cardiothoracic surgery and Transplantation, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Chris Merry
- Department of Cardiothoracic surgery and Transplantation, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia; Heart Lung Research Institute of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Amit Shah
- Advanced Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplant Unit, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Robert Larbalestier
- Department of Cardiothoracic surgery and Transplantation, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia; Heart Lung Research Institute of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Yamamoto T, Pearson DS, Ababneh EI, Harris C, Nissaisorakarn P, Mahowald GK, Heher YK, Elias N, Markmann JF, Lewis GD, Riella LV. Case report: Successful simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation across a positive complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatch. FRONTIERS IN NEPHROLOGY 2022; 2:1047217. [PMID: 37675007 PMCID: PMC10479575 DOI: 10.3389/fneph.2022.1047217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
Preformed donor-specific antibodies are associated with a higher risk of rejection and worse graft survival in organ transplantation. However, in heart transplantation, the risk and benefit balance between high mortality on the waiting list and graft survival may allow the acceptance of higher immunologic risk donors in broadly sensitized recipients. Transplanting donor-recipient pairs with a positive complement dependent cytotoxic (CDC) crossmatch carries the highest risk of hyperacute rejection and immediate graft loss and is usually avoided in kidney transplantation. Herein we report the first successful simultaneous heart-kidney transplant with a T- and B-cell CDC crossmatch positive donor using a combination of rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, bortezomib and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction followed by eculizumab therapy for two months post-transplant. In the year following transplantation, both allografts maintained stable graft function (all echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fractions ≥ 65%, eGFR>60) and showed no histologic evidence of antibody-mediated rejection. In addition, the patient has not developed any severe infections including cytomegalovirus or BK virus infection. In conclusion, a multitarget immunosuppressive regimen can allow for combined heart/kidney transplantation across positive CDC crossmatches without evidence of antibody-mediated rejection or significant infection. Longer follow-up will be needed to further support this conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayuki Yamamoto
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Daniel S. Pearson
- Histocompatibility Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Emad I. Ababneh
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Cynthia Harris
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Pitchaphon Nissaisorakarn
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Grace K. Mahowald
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Histocompatibility Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Yael K. Heher
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Nahel Elias
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - James F. Markmann
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Gregory D. Lewis
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Leonardo V. Riella
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hwang NC, Sivathasan C. Preoperative Evaluation and Care of Heart Transplant Candidates. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2022; 36:4161-4172. [PMID: 36028377 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Revised: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Heart transplantation is recommended for patients with advanced heart failure refractory to medical and device therapy, and who do not have absolute contraindications. When patients become eligible for heart transplantation, they undergo comprehensive evaluation and preparation to optimize their posttransplantation outcomes. This review provides an overview of the processes that are employed to enable the candidates to be transplant-ready when donor hearts are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nian Chih Hwang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia, National Heart Centre, Singapore.
| | - Cumaraswamy Sivathasan
- Mechanical Cardiac Support and Heart Transplant Program, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, National Heart Centre, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Rubinstein G, Lotan D, Moeller CM, DeFilippis EM, Slomovich S, Oren D, Yuzefpolskaya M, Sayer G, Uriel N. Sex differences in patients undergoing heart transplantation and LVAD therapy. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2022; 20:881-894. [PMID: 36409479 DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2022.2149493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and heart transplantation (HT) are the two life-sustaining therapies that have revolutionized the management of end-stage heart failure (HF). Yet, significant sex differences exist with respect to their use and effects. AREAS COVERED This review summarizes sex differences in the utilization, outcomes, and complications of LVAD and HT. Particular emphasis is placed on leading clinical trials in the field, historical and recent large registries-based analyses, as well as contemporary technological and policy changes affecting these differences. EXPERT OPINION Women with advanced HF remain under-treated with guideline-directed medical therapy and are less likely to be referred for consideration for LVAD and HT. This remains true despite newer LVAD technology and the new heart transplant allocation system. Community outreach, education, as well as increased representation of women in clinical research may reduce inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gal Rubinstein
- Division of Cardiology, Center of Advance Cardiac Care, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dor Lotan
- Division of Cardiology, Center of Advance Cardiac Care, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cathrine M Moeller
- Division of Cardiology, Center of Advance Cardiac Care, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ersilia M DeFilippis
- Division of Cardiology, Center of Advance Cardiac Care, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sharon Slomovich
- Division of Cardiology, Center of Advance Cardiac Care, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Oren
- Division of Cardiology, Center of Advance Cardiac Care, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melana Yuzefpolskaya
- Division of Cardiology, Center of Advance Cardiac Care, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gabriel Sayer
- Division of Cardiology, Center of Advance Cardiac Care, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nir Uriel
- Division of Cardiology, Center of Advance Cardiac Care, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Chaban R, Cooper DKC, Pierson RN. Pig heart and lung xenotransplantation: Present status. J Heart Lung Transplant 2022; 41:1014-1022. [PMID: 35659792 PMCID: PMC10124776 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The recent pig heart transplant in a patient at the University of Maryland Medical Center has stimulated renewed interest in the xenotransplantation of organs from genetically engineered pigs. The barriers to the use of pigs as sources of organs have largely been overcome by 2 approaches - (1) the deletion of expression of the three known pig carbohydrate xenoantigens against which humans have preformed antibodies, and (2) the transgenic introduction of human 'protective' proteins, such as complement-regulatory proteins. These gene modifications, coupled with immunosuppressive therapy based on blockade of the CD40/CD154 costimulation pathway, have resulted in survival of baboons with life-supporting pig heart grafts for almost 9 months. The initial clinical success at the University of Maryland reinforces encouraging preclinical results. It suggests that pig hearts are likely to provide an effective bridge to an allotransplant, but their utility for destination therapy remains uncertain. Because of additional complex immunobiological problems, the same approach has been less successful in preclinical lung xenograft transplantation, where survival is still measured in days or weeks. The first formal clinical trials of pig heart transplantation may include patients who do not have access to an allotransplant, those with contraindications for mechanical circulatory support, those in need of retransplantation or with a high level of panel-reactive antibodies. Infants with complex congenital heart disease, should also be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Chaban
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
| | - David K C Cooper
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Richard N Pierson
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sommer W, Avsar M, Aburahma K, Salman J, Kaufeld KT, Rojas SV, Meyer AL, Chichelnitskiy E, Süsal C, Kreusser MM, Verboom M, Hallensleben M, Bara C, Blasczyk R, Falk C, Karck M, Haverich A, Ius F, Warnecke G. Heart transplantation across preformed donor-specific antibody barriers using a perioperative desensitization protocol. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:2064-2076. [PMID: 35426974 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Heart transplantation across preformed donor-specific HLA-antibody barriers is associated with impaired short- and long-term survival. Therefore, in recipients with preformed anti-HLA antibodies, waiting for crossmatch-negative donors is standard practice. As an alternative strategy, recipients with preformed anti-HLA donor specific antibodies have been managed at our institutions with a perioperative desensitization regimen. A retrospective analysis was performed comparing heart transplant recipients with preformed donor-specific HLA-antibodies to recipients without donor-specific antibodies. Recipients with a positive virtual crossmatch received a perioperative desensitization protocol including tocilizumab intraoperatively, plasma exchange and rituximab followed by a six-month course of IgGAM. Among the 117 heart-transplanted patients, 19 (16%) patients underwent perioperative desensitization, and the remaining 98 (84%) patients did not. Cold ischemic time, posttransplant extracorporeal life support for primary graft dysfunction, and intensive care unit stay time did not differ between groups. At 1-year follow-up, freedom from pulsed steroid therapy for presumed rejection and biopsy-confirmed acute cellular or humoral rejection did not differ between groups. One-year survival amounted to 94.7% in the treated patients and 81.4% in the control group. Therefore, heart transplantation in sensitized recipients undergoing a perioperative desensitization appears safe with comparable postoperative outcomes as patients with a negative crossmatch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wiebke Sommer
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Murat Avsar
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Khalil Aburahma
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Jawad Salman
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Klaus Tim Kaufeld
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sebastian V Rojas
- Clinic for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Diabetes Centre North Rhine Westphalia, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Anna L Meyer
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Evgeny Chichelnitskiy
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Caner Süsal
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Institute of Immunology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Murielle Verboom
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Engineering, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Michael Hallensleben
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Engineering, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christoph Bara
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Rainer Blasczyk
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Engineering, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christine Falk
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Matthias Karck
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Axel Haverich
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Fabio Ius
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Gregor Warnecke
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kim HE, Yang YH, Paik HC, Jeong SJ, Kim SY, Park MS, Lee JG. The Assessment and Outcomes of Crossmatching in Lung Transplantation in Korean Patients. J Korean Med Sci 2022; 37:e177. [PMID: 35668687 PMCID: PMC9171353 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In lung transplantation, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility is not included in the lung allocation score system or considered when placing donor allografts. However, HLA matching may affect the outcomes of lung transplantation. This study evaluated the current assessment status, prevalence, and effects of HLA crossmatching in lung transplantation in Korean patients using nationwide multicenter registry data. METHODS Two hundred and twenty patients who received lung transplantation at six tertiary hospitals in South Korea between March 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data, including general demographic characteristics, primary diagnosis, and pretransplant status of the recipients and donors registered by the Korean Organ Transplant Registry, were retrospectively analyzed. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests. RESULTS Complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatch (CDC-XM) was performed in 208 patients (94.5%) and flow cytometric crossmatch (flow-XM) was performed in 125 patients (56.8%). Among them, nine patients (4.1%) showed T cell- and/or B cell-positive crossmatches. The incidences of postoperative complications, including primary graft dysfunction, acute rejection, and chronic allograft dysfunction in positively crossmatched patients, were not significant compared with those in patients without mismatches. Moreover, Kaplan-Meier analyses showed poorer 1-year survival in patients with positive crossmatch according to CDC-XM (P < 0.001) and T lymphocyte XM (P = 0.002) than in patients without mismatches. CONCLUSION Positive CDC and T lymphocyte crossmatching results should be considered in the allocation of donor lungs. If unavailable, the result should be considered for postoperative management in lung transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ha Eun Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Ho Yang
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo Chae Paik
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Su Jin Jeong
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Song Yee Kim
- Division of Pulmonology & Critical Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Moo Suk Park
- Division of Pulmonology & Critical Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Gu Lee
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Vasanthan V, Rieger J, Holloway DD, Clarke B, Miller R, Kent WD. Sternum-Sparing Left Ventricular Assist Device Insertion Reduces Perioperative Transfusions and Blood Loss: A Single-Centre Canadian Experience. CJC Open 2022; 4:833-839. [PMID: 36254329 PMCID: PMC9568692 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improve survival and quality of life, as either destination therapy or a bridge to transplantation. Although less-invasive hemisternotomy approaches for LVAD implantation are well studied, only a paucity of data is available in the literature on sternum-sparing bilateral minithoracotomy (BMT). Our centre has one of Canada’s most extensive experiences with the BMT approach. Herein, we compared LVAD implantation via BMT with patients who received full median sternotomy or hemisternotomy. Methods A single-centre retrospective review of data from Foothills Medical Centre (Calgary, Canada) was performed. Patients underwent LVAD insertion from 2012 to 2019, receiving either BMT (n = 11) or sternotomy (full median sternotomy or upper hemisternotomy with left minithoracotomy; n = 38). Intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes were assessed. Results Patients who received BMT had significantly fewer transfusions of red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and platelets. The BMT group had lower chest-tube output in the first 12 hours. No significant differences occurred in ventilation time, intensive care unit length of stay, mortality, stroke, or reoperation for bleeding. Conclusions Outcomes suggest that sternum-sparing LVAD implantation is a feasible alternative to sternotomy, leading to less postoperative blood loss and transfusion in the early postoperative period. Less transfusion is particularly valuable in this patient population, to reduce antigen-related sensitization prior to transplantation. Additional study is needed to assess potential benefits related to right heart function, postoperative mobility, and re-entry for transplantation.
Collapse
|
40
|
Donovan DJ, Richmond ME, Bacha EA, Addonizio LJ, Zuckerman WA. Association between homograft tissue exposure and allosensitization prior to heart transplant in patients with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14201. [PMID: 34889487 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical repair for patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) often incorporates homograft tissue or other foreign material that can lead to allosensitization. We sought to identify the relationship between pre-sensitization prior to heart transplant and exposure to homograft tissue in CHD patients. METHODS Retrospective chart review of all CHD patients who underwent heart transplant at a major pediatric transplant center between 1/1/2011-3/31/18. Operative records determined use of homograft tissue or foreign material. Panel reactive antibody (PRA) and LuminexTM single-antigen bead (SAB) testing results were reviewed. Statistical analysis determined odds of pre-sensitization in patients exposed to homograft tissue. RESULTS Fifty-six CHD patients underwent transplant during the review period. Thirteen patients (23%) were pre-sensitized by PRA>10%. By SAB testing, 33 patients (59%) developed any anti-HLA antibody >0 MFI, 30 patients (54%) >2000 MFI, and 19 patients (34%) >6000 MFI. Patients with homografts were more likely to be pre-sensitized by PRA (OR = 7.31, p = .007), and to have developed any anti-HLA antibody at various levels, >0 (OR = 4.52, p = .034), >2000 (OR = 8.59, p = .003), and >6000 (OR = 8.50, p = .004). Of patients with homografts, those pre-sensitized by PRA had longer exposure times (9.80 vs 4.96 years, p = .025). There was no difference in exposure time with relation to pre-sensitization by SAB testing. CONCLUSIONS Previous exposure to homograft tissue appears to increase the odds of pre-sensitization by either the PRA or SAB testing. Longer exposure time to homograft tissue prior to transplant is associated with increased pre-sensitization at transplant as determined by PRA, though not by SAB testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis J Donovan
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, New York-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marc E Richmond
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, New York-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Emile A Bacha
- Division of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Linda J Addonizio
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, New York-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Warren A Zuckerman
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, New York-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hilscher MB, Wells ML, Venkatesh SK, Cetta F, Kamath PS. Fontan-associated liver disease. Hepatology 2022; 75:1300-1321. [PMID: 35179797 DOI: 10.1002/hep.32406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Moira B Hilscher
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyDepartment of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Michael L Wells
- Division of Abdominal ImagingDepartment of RadiologyMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Sudhakar K Venkatesh
- Division of Abdominal ImagingDepartment of RadiologyMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Frank Cetta
- Division of Pediatric CardiologyDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Patrick S Kamath
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyDepartment of MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Crespo-Leiro MG, Costanzo MR, Gustafsson F, Khush KK, Macdonald PS, Potena L, Stehlik J, Zuckermann A, Mehra MR. Heart transplantation: focus on donor recovery strategies, left ventricular assist devices, and novel therapies. Eur Heart J 2022; 43:2237-2246. [PMID: 35441654 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Heart transplantation is advocated in selected patients with advanced heart failure in the absence of contraindications. Principal challenges in heart transplantation centre around an insufficient and underutilized donor organ pool, the need to individualize titration of immunosuppressive therapy, and to minimize late complications such as cardiac allograft vasculopathy, malignancy, and renal dysfunction. Advances have served to increase the organ donor pool by advocating the use of donors with underlying hepatitis C virus infection and by expanding the donor source to use hearts donated after circulatory death. New techniques to preserve the donor heart over prolonged ischaemic times, and enabling longer transport times in a safe manner, have been introduced. Mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation has allowed patients with advanced heart failure to avoid progressive deterioration in hepato-renal function while awaiting an optimal donor organ match. The management of the heart transplantation recipient remains a challenge despite advances in immunosuppression, which provide early gains in rejection avoidance but are associated with infections and late-outcome challenges. In this article, we review contemporary advances and challenges in this field to focus on donor recovery strategies, left ventricular assist devices, and immunosuppressive monitoring therapies with the potential to enhance outcomes. We also describe opportunities for future discovery to include a renewed focus on long-term survival, which continues to be an area that is under-studied and poorly characterized, non-human sources of organs for transplantation including xenotransplantation as well as chimeric transplantation, and technology competitive to human heart transplantation, such as tissue engineering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Generosa Crespo-Leiro
- Department of Cardiology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (CHUAC), Instituto de Investigación Biomedica A Coruña (INIBIC), Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red Cardiovascular (CIBERCV), As Xubias 84, 15006 A Coruña, Spain
| | | | - Finn Gustafsson
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kiran K Khush
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Luciano Potena
- Heart Failure and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Josef Stehlik
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Andreas Zuckermann
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mandeep R Mehra
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
The role of sensitization in post-transplant outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease sensitization in adults with congenital heart disease. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcchd.2022.100384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
44
|
De novo human leukocyte antigen allosensitization patterns in patients bridged to heart transplantation using left ventricular assist devices. Transpl Immunol 2022; 72:101567. [PMID: 35278648 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2022.101567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We examined the impact and time course of de novo human leukocyte antigen (HLA) allosensitization following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS Forty patients had a calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) prior to LVAD surgery between January 2014 and December 2018. Of these patients, we retrospectively studied 33 patients who had pre-LVAD cPRA <10%. De novo allosensitization was defined as cPRA ≥10% within 3 months following LVAD surgery, and "persistent allosensitization" was defined as cPRA ≥10% at time of heart transplant or death. One-third (11/33) of our cohort developed de novo allosensitization within 3-months post-LVAD. Median duration of follow-up during LVAD support was 588 days (IQR 337-1071 days), or approximately 19 months. In an adjusted, multivariable analysis, female sex remained associated with de novo allosensitization (adjusted odds ratio [95%CI]: 11 (1.4-85), P = 0.026). De novo allosensitization was subsequently associated with persistent allosensitization (P = 0.024). Both axial-flow and centrifugal-flow LVADs had similar rates of allosensitization. Compared to those with no allosensitization, patients with de novo allosensitization did not appear to have inferior post-transplant outcomes of death or treated rejection. CONCLUSION In our single-center experience, one-third of patients developed de novo allosensitization which did not appear to associate with inferior post-transplant outcomes. Female sex was associated with de novo allosensitization.
Collapse
|
45
|
Cabrera-Rubio I, Canteli Álvarez Á, Castrillo Bustamante C, Burgos Palacios V, Ruiz Lera M, Cobo Belaustegui M, Llano Cardenal MF, González-Vílchez F. Sensitization during short-term mechanical circulatory support. Determinants, therapeutic management, and outcomes after heart transplant. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA (ENGLISH ED.) 2022; 75:251-260. [PMID: 33863685 DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2021.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The development of human-leukocyte antigen antibodies is a well-known adverse effect of the use of long-term ventricular assist devices (VADs). The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of sensitization during short-term mechanical circulatory support with VAD (CentriMag), its determinants, and its impact on posttransplant outcomes. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of patients who were bridged to transplant with short-term VAD from 2009 to 2019. Sensitization was defined as a calculated panel-reactive antibody> 10%. The endpoints included overall survival and rejection-free survival. RESULTS A total of 89 patients (median age 56.0 [interquartile range, 50.0-59.9] years, 16.8% female) received a short-term VAD as a bridge to transplant. The median duration of support was 23.6 [interquartile range, 16.6-35.0] days. Eleven patients (12.4%) became sensitized during support. The only factor significantly associated with sensitization was female sex (OR, 8.67; 95%CI, 1.93-38.8; P=.005). Of the 89 patients, 21 patients died during support; 68 patients underwent heart transplant. After a mean follow-up of 49.6 ±31.2 months, 8 patients (11.8%) died and 20 (29.4%) had at least 1 rejection episode. On multivariate analysis, sensitization was an independent predictor of acute rejection (HR, 3.64; 95%CI, 1.42-9.33; P=.007), with a nonstatistically significant trend to higher mortality (HR, 4.07; 95%CI, 0.96-17.3; P=.057). CONCLUSIONS Sensitization with short-term VADs can occur and is significantly associated with female sex and with rejection. Sensitization also showed a nonstatistically significant trend to higher mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indira Cabrera-Rubio
- Unidad de Insuficiencia Cardiaca Avanzada y Trasplante Cardiaco, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, Spain.
| | - Ángela Canteli Álvarez
- Unidad de Insuficiencia Cardiaca Avanzada y Trasplante Cardiaco, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Cristina Castrillo Bustamante
- Unidad de Insuficiencia Cardiaca Avanzada y Trasplante Cardiaco, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Virginia Burgos Palacios
- Unidad de Insuficiencia Cardiaca Avanzada y Trasplante Cardiaco, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Marta Ruiz Lera
- Unidad de Insuficiencia Cardiaca Avanzada y Trasplante Cardiaco, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Manuel Cobo Belaustegui
- Unidad de Insuficiencia Cardiaca Avanzada y Trasplante Cardiaco, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Miguel Fernando Llano Cardenal
- Unidad de Insuficiencia Cardiaca Avanzada y Trasplante Cardiaco, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Francisco González-Vílchez
- Unidad de Insuficiencia Cardiaca Avanzada y Trasplante Cardiaco, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Cabrera-Rubio I, Canteli Álvarez Á, Castrillo Bustamante C, Burgos Palacios V, Ruiz Lera M, Cobo Belaustegui M, Llano Cardenal MF, González-Vílchez F. Sensibilización durante la asistencia circulatoria de corta duración. Determinantes, tratamiento y pronóstico después del trasplante cardiaco. Rev Esp Cardiol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2021.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
47
|
Abstract
Cardiac transplantation is considered the gold-standard treatment option for patients suffering from end-stage heart failure refractory to maximum medical therapy. A major determinant of graft function and recipient survival is a comprehensive evaluation of the donor allograft. Challenges arise when designing and implementing an evidence-based donor evaluation protocol due to the number of influential donor-specific characteristics and the complex interactions that occur between them. Here, we present our systematic approach to donor evaluation by examining the impact that relevant donor variables have on graft function and recipient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Tatum
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut St, Suite 607, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
| | - Alexandros Briasoulis
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 20 Hawkins Drive E318, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
| | - Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut St, Suite 607, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
| | - H. Todd Massey
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut St, Suite 607, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Rodriguez ER, Santos-Martins C, Tan CD. Pathology of cardiac transplantation. Cardiovasc Pathol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822224-9.00023-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
|
49
|
Correlation Between Microvascular Inflammation in Endomyocardial Biopsies and Rejection Transcripts, Donor-specific Antibodies, and Graft Dysfunction in Antibody-mediated Rejection. Transplantation 2021; 106:1455-1464. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
50
|
Post-transplantation outcomes of sensitized patients receiving durable mechanical circulatory support. J Heart Lung Transplant 2021; 41:365-372. [PMID: 34895990 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sensitization, defined as the presence of circulating antibodies, presents challenges, particularly in patients undergoing heart transplantation (HTx) bridged with durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS). We aimed to investigate the post-transplantation outcomes of sensitized MCS patients. METHODS Among 889 consecutively enrolled heart transplant (HTx) recipients between 2010 and 2018, 86 (9.7%) sensitized MCS patients (Group A) were compared with sensitized non-MCS patients (Group B, n = 189), non-sensitized MCS patients (Group C, n = 162), and non-sensitized non-MCS patients (Group D, n = 452) regarding post-HTx outcomes, including the incidence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD), 1-year survival, and 1-year freedom from antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). RESULTS Sensitized MCS patients (Group A) showed comparable rates of PGD, 1-year survival, and 1-year freedom from AMR with Groups C and D. However, Group A showed significantly higher rates of 1-year freedom from AMR (95.3% vs 85.7%, p = 0.02) and an earlier decline in panel-reactive antibody (PRA) levels (p < 0.01) than sensitized non-MCS patients (Group B). Desensitization therapy effectively reduced the levels of PRA in both Groups A and B. When Group A was further divided according to the presence of preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSA), patients with preformed DSA showed significantly lower rates of 1-year freedom from AMR than those without (84.2% vs 98.5%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Sensitized MCS patients showed significantly lower rates of AMR and an earlier decline in PRA levels following HTx than sensitized non-MCS patients. Removal of MCS at the time of transplantation might underlie these observations.
Collapse
|