Retrograde ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall: regional left atrial ablation, vagal denervation and feasibility in humans

Vein of Marshall chemical ablation decreases atrial fibrillation drivers detected by CARTOFINDER

INTRODUCTION

This study sought to elucidate the impact of vein of Marshall (VOM) chemical ablation on atrial fibrillation (AF) drivers by investigating the changes in CARTOFINDER mappings before and after VOM chemical ablation in patients with persistent AF.

METHODS

This study included 23 consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for long-persistent AF (>18 months). VOM chemical ablation was performed following pulmonary vein isolation. CARTOFINDER and AF cycle length (AFCL) maps were created in the left atrium (LA) before and after VOM chemical ablation. The LA was divided into 8 segments, and the number of focal activation points with 6 or more repetitions was counted in each segment.

RESULTS

The number of focal activation points was largest in the LA appendage (LAA). After VOM chemical ablation, the number of focal activation points in the LA decreased significantly (37 [interquartile range, IQR: 19-55] vs. 15 [IQR: 7-21], p < .001), and median AFCL was significantly prolonged (159 [147-168] vs. 164 [150-173] ms, p < .001). In the assessment of each segment, significant decreases in focal activation points were observed in the inferior, lateral, and anterior segments and LAA. Among the focal activation points disappearing after chemical ablation, the number in the non-ethanol-affected area was significantly larger than that in the affected area (13 [8-25] vs. 4 [1-10], p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

VOM chemical ablation decreases AF drivers detected by CARTOFINDER. Mechanisms other than direct myocardial damage are considered to contribute the attenuation of AF drivers.

Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion for AF Ablation; A Review

The outcomes of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation are modest with various adjunctive strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) yielding largely disappointing results in randomised controlled trials. Linear ablation is a commonly employed adjunct strategy but is limited by difficulty in achieving durable bidirectional block, particularly at the mitral isthmus. Epicardial connections play a role in AF initiation and perpetuation. The ligament of Marshall has been implicated as a source of AF triggers and is known to harbour sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve fibres that contribute to AF perpetuation. Ethanol infusion into the Vein of Marshall, a remnant of the superior vena cava and key component of the ligament of Marshall, may eliminate these AF triggers and can facilitate the ease of obtaining durable mitral isthmus block. While early trials have demonstrated the potential of Vein of Marshall 'ethanolisation' to reduce arrhythmia recurrence after persistent AF ablation, further randomised trials are needed to fully determine the potential long-term outcome benefits afforded by this technique.

Use of intracardiac echocardiography in vein of Marshall ethanol infusion for ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Few methods have been reported to demonstrate real-time effects during vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion in persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF).

OBJECTIVE

This study was to evaluate the impact of left atrial (LA) monitoring using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) during VOM ethanol infusion.

METHODS

Seventy-four consecutive patients with PeAF who underwent VOM ethanol infusion followed by radiofrequency (RF) ablation were included. Patients with findings on ICE consistent with echogenic streaming in the LA and with increased myocardial local echogenicity along the VOM area were placed into one group (group A) and those without into the other group (group B). Outcomes between the 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (62%) were placed into group A. A new ethanol-induced low-voltage area in group A was larger than that in group B (8.5 cm2 [5.5-10.2 cm2] and 4.0 cm2 (2.4-6.3 cm2]; P < .001). The RF ablation time required to achieve MI block was reduced in group A patients (263.0 seconds [196.0-351.0 seconds] vs 417.0 seconds [315.0-709.5 seconds] in group B patients; P < .001). MI block was achieved in 46 patients (100%) via an endocardial approach in group A and 27 patients (96.4%) in group B (extra coronary sinus ablation in 4 patients). One patient developed clinically significant pericardial effusions and required pericardiocentesis in group B.

CONCLUSION

Presence of increased myocardial local echogenicity at the ridge and consistent echogenic streaming in the LA detected by ICE-based imaging during VOM ethanol infusion suggests increased ablated tissue in that region and lower RF ablation time during ablation for PeAF.

A proposed index of myocardial staining for vein of Marshall ethanol infusion: an Italian single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Mitral isthmus (MI) conduction block is a fundamental step in anatomical approach treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). However, MI block is hardly achievable with endocardial ablation only. Retrograde ethanol infusion (EI) into the vein of Marshall (VOM) facilitates MI block. Fluorographic myocardial staining (MS) during VOM-EI could be helpful in predicting procedural alcoholization outcome even if its role is qualitatively assessed in the routine. The aim was to quantitatively assess MS during VOM-EI and to evaluate its association with MI block achievement.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for PeAF at Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio (Pisa, Italy) from February 2022 to May 2023 were considered. Patients with identifiable VOM were included. A proposed index of MS (MSI) was retrospectively calculated in each included patient. Correlation of MSI with low-voltage zones (LVZ) extension after VOM-EI and its association with MI block achievement were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 42 patients out of 49 (85.8%) had an identifiable VOM. MI block was successfully achieved in 35 patients out of 42 (83.3%). MSI was significantly associated with the occurrence of MI block (OR 1.24 (1.03-1.48); p = 0.022). A higher MSI resulted in reduced ablation time (p = 0.014) and reduced radiofrequency applications (p = 0.002) to obtain MI block. MSI was also associated with MI block obtained by endocardial ablation only (OR 1.07 (1.02-1.13); p = 0.002). MSI was highly correlated with newly formed LVZ extension (r = 0.776; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study cohort, optimal MSI predicts MI block and facilitates its achievement with endocardial ablation only.

Efficacy and feasibility of vein of Marshall ethanol infusion during persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation (CA) is currently used to treat persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). However, its effectiveness is limited. This study aimed to estimate the effectiveness of the vein of Marshall absolute ethanol injection (VOM-EI) for PeAF ablation.

HYPOTHESIS

Adjunctive vein of Marshall ethanol injection (VOM-EI) strategies are more effective than conventional catheter ablation (CA) and have similar safety outcomes.

METHODS

We extensively searched the literature for studies evaluating the effectiveness and safety of VOM-EI + CA compared with CA alone. The primary endpoint was the rate of acute bidirectional block of the isthmus of the mitral annulus (MIBB). The secondary endpoints were atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence over 30 seconds after a 3-month blanking period. Weighted pooled risk ratios (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Based on the selection criteria, nine studies were included in this systematic review, including patients with AF (n = 2508), persistent AF (n = 1829), perimitral flutter (n = 103), and perimitral AT (n = 165). There were 1028 patients in the VOM-EI + CA group and 1605 in the CA alone group. The VOM-EI + CA group showed a lower rate of AF/AT relapse (RR = 0.70; 95% CI = 0.53-0.91; p = .008) and a higher rate of acute MIBB (RR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.11-1.50; p = .0007) than the CA alone group.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis revealed that adjunctive VOM-EI strategies are more effective than conventional CA and have similar safety outcomes.

A novel stepwise catheter ablation method of the mitral isthmus for persistent atrial fibrillation: efficacy and reproducibility

BACKGROUND

Ethanol infusion of the vein of Marshall (EI-VOM) has been widely used to facilitate mitral isthmus (MI) ablation. According to the literature, the success rate of achieving a bidirectional conduction block across the MI ranges from 51 to 96%, with no standardized strategy or method available for cardiac electrophysiologists.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to introduce and evaluate a novel ablation method of MI.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) that underwent catheter ablation were included. The MI ablation procedure followed a stepwise approach. In step 1, ethanol infusion of the vein of Marshall (EI-VOM) was performed. In step 2, a "V-shape" endocardial linear ablation connecting the left inferior pulmonary vein (LIPV) to mitral annulus (MA) was performed. In step 3, earliest activation sites(EASs) near the ablation line were identified using activation mapping followed by reinforced ablation. In step 4, precise epicardial ablation was performed, with the catheter introduced into the coronary sinus(CS) to target key ablation targets (KATs).

RESULTS

135 patients with PeAF underwent catheter ablation with the stepwise ablation method adopted in 119 cases. Bidirectional conduction blocks were achieved in 117 patients (98.3%). The block rates of every step were 0%, 58.0%, 44.0%, and 92.9%, and the cumulative block rates for the four steps were 0%, 58.0%, 76.5%, and 98.3%, respectively. No patient experienced fatal complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our novel stepwise catheter ablation method for MI yielded a high bidirectional block rate with high reproducibility.

The impact of empirical Marshall vein ethanol infusion as a first-choice intraoperative strategy on the long-term outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing mitral isthmus ablation

Background

Marshall vein ethanol infusion (MVEI) as an additional therapy to conventional catheter ablation (CA) has been proved to be efficacious in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). However, whether empirical MVEI could be the first-line strategy in mitral isthmus (MI) ablation has seldom been investigated. Here, we aim to compare the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes between provisional and empirical MVEI in PeAF patients undergoing the index MI ablation procedure.

Methods

We enrolled 133 patients with PeAF either in the provisional group (n = 38, MVEI was performed when conventional endocardial and/or epicardial ablation procedures were inadequate to achieve bidirectional MI block) or in the empirical group (n = 95, MVEI was performed empirically before MI CA).

Results

All of the baseline characteristics were comparable. Less spontaneous or inducible atrial tachycardias (ATs) were encountered in the empirical group of patients (P < 0.001). More epicardial ablations were applied (26.3% vs. 9.5%, P = 0.016) and a higher incidence of CA-facilitated restoration of sinus rhythm was recorded (86.8% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) in the provisional group of patients. Although more fluoroscopy time (6.4[4.2, 9.3] vs. 9.5[5.9, 11.6] min, P = 0.019) and radiation exposure (69.0[25.3, 160.2] vs. 122.0[62.5, 234.1] mGy, P = 0.010) were documented in the empirical group with comparable procedure time, less time (455.9 ± 192.2 vs. 366.5 ± 161.3 s, P = 0.038) was consumed to achieve bidirectional MI block during endocardial ablation in the provisional group. Incidences of procedure-related complications were similar between the two groups. During a 16.5 ± 4.4-month follow-up, the empirical group of patients showed a significantly higher rate of freedom from AT recurrence (95.8% vs. 81.6%, log-rank P = 0.003), while the rate of freedom from AF or atrial tachyarrhythmias (combining AF and AT) was similar. Both univariate (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.64, P = 0.008) and multivariate (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.92, P = 0.037) Cox regression analyses indicated that empirical MVEI was independently associated with lower long-term AT recurrence.

Conclusion

Among patients with PeAF who underwent the index MI ablation procedure, empirical MVEI could reduce endocardial MI ablation time and provide greater long-term freedom from AT recurrence.

Pulmonary vein isolation alone or in combination with substrate modulation after electrical cardioversion failure in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: The PACIFIC trial: Study design

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is effective at treating 50% of unselected patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Alternatively, PVI combined with a new ablation strategy entitled the Marshall-PLAN ensures a 78% 1-year sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance rate in the same population. However, a substantial subset of patients could undergo the Marshall-PLAN unnecessarily. It is therefore essential to identify those patients who can be treated with PVI alone versus those who may truly benefit from the Marshall-PLAN before ablation is performed. In this context, we hypothesized that electrical cardioversion (EC) could help to select the most appropriate strategy for each patient.

METHODS

In this multicentre, prospective, randomized study, patients with AF recurrence within 4 weeks after EC will be randomized 1:1 to PVI alone or the Marshall-PLAN. Conversely, patients in whom SR is maintained for ≥4 weeks after EC will be treated with PVI only and included in a prospective registry. The primary endpoint will be the 1-year SR maintenance rate after a single ablation procedure.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The Marshall-PLAN might be necessary in patients with an advanced degree of persistent AF (i.e., where SR is not maintained for ≥4 uninterrupted weeks after EC). Conversely, in patients with mild or moderate persistent AF (i.e., where SR is maintained for ≥4 weeks after EC), PVI alone might be a sufficient ablation strategy. The PACIFIC trial is the first study designed to assess whether rhythm monitoring after EC could help to identify patients who should undergo adjunctive ablation strategies beyond PVI.

Gaps after linear ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (Marshall-PLAN): Clinical implication

BACKGROUND

Beyond pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, anatomic isthmus transection is an adjunctive strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation. Data on the durability of multiple lines of block remain scarce.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of gaps within such a lesion set.

METHODS

We followed 291 consecutive patients who underwent (1) vein of Marshall ethanol infusion, (2) PV isolation, and (3) mitral, cavotricuspid, and dome isthmus transection. Dome transection relied on 2 distinct strategies over time: a single roof line with touch-ups applied in case of gap demonstrated by conventional maneuvers (first leg), and an alternative floor line if the roof line exhibited a gap during high-density mapping with careful electrogram reannotation (second leg).

RESULTS

Twelve-month sinus rhythm maintenance was 70% after 1 procedure and 94% after 1 or 2 procedures. Event-free survival after the first procedure was lower in case of residual gaps within the lesion set (log-rank, P = .004). Delayed gaps were found in 94% of a second procedure performed in the 69 patients relapsing despite a complete lesion set with PV gaps increasing the risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation (67% vs 34%; P = .02) and anatomic isthmus gaps supporting a majority of atrial tachycardias (60%). Between the first leg and the second leg, a significant decrease was found in roof lines considered blocked during the first procedure (99% vs 78%; P < .001) and in delayed dome gaps observed during a second procedure (68% vs 43%; P = .05).

CONCLUSION

Gaps are arrhythmogenic and can be reduced by optimized ablation and assessment of lines of block. Closing these gaps improves sinus rhythm maintenance.

A specific notation for contrast medium and dehydrated ethanol injection into the vein of Marshall during mitral isthmus ablation-A case report

BACKGROUND

Ablation of the vein of Marshall (VOM) by dehydrated ethanol (DE) is an important method for completely blocking the mitral isthmus (MI). Before DE ablation of the VOM, Marshall angiography should be performed so that the contrast medium is inevitably exposed to DE.

METHOD

We present a case of DE ablation of the VOM. When iodixanol was exposed to DE, some floccule embolized the lumen of the over-the-wire (OTW) balloon dilatation catheter and led to the impossibility of DE ablation. Then, we performed in vitro experiments: iodixanol, not iomeprol, produced many stable white floccules when it encountered DE.

CONCLUSION

Iodixanol is not an appropriate contrast for DE ablation of the VOM. However, if there is no other alternative contrast, the following methods might be used to address the problem: ⑴ diluted iodixanol (iodixanol:normal saline 1:1) could be used for VOM ablation; or ⑵ the lumen of the OTW could be flushed by NS after VOM angiography, and then DE injection could be performed.

Ganglionic Plexus Ablation: A Step-by-step Guide for Electrophysiologists and Review of Modalities for Neuromodulation for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

As the most common sustained arrhythmia, AF is a complex clinical entity which remains a difficult condition to durably treat in the majority of patients. Over the past few decades, the management of AF has focused mainly on pulmonary vein triggers for its initiation and perpetuation. It is well known that the autonomic nervous system (ANS) has a significant role in the milieu predisposing to the triggers, perpetuators and substrate for AF. Neuromodulation of ANS - ganglionated plexus ablation, vein of Marshall ethanol infusion, transcutaneous tragal stimulation, renal nerve denervation, stellate ganglion block and baroreceptor stimulation - constitute an emerging therapeutic approach for AF. The purpose of this review is to summarise and critically appraise the currently available evidence for neuromodulation modalities in AF.

Right atrial appendage firing in atrial fibrillation

Background

The role of atrial fibrillation (AF) drivers located at the left atrium, superior vena cava, crista terminalis and coronary sinus (CS) is well established. While these regions are classically targeted during catheter ablation, the role of right atrial appendage (RAA) drivers has been incompletely investigated.

Objective

To determine the prevalence and electrophysiological characteristics of AF driver’s arising from the RAA.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical and procedural data of 317 consecutive patients who underwent an AF ablation procedure after bi-atrial mapping (multipolar catheter). We selected patients who presented with a per-procedural RAA firing (RAAF). RAAF was defined as the recording of a sustained RAA EGM with a cycle length shorter than 120 ms or 120 &lt; RAAF CL ≤ 130 ms and ratio RAA CL/CS CL ≤ 0.75.

Results

Right atrial/atrium appendage firing was found in 22 patients. The prevalence was estimated at 7% (95% CI, 4–10). These patients were mostly men (72%), median age: 66 yo ± 8 without structural heart disease (77%). RAAFs were predominantly found in paroxysmal AF patients (63%, 32%, and 5% for paroxysmal, short standing and long-standing AF, respectively, p &gt; 0.05). RAAF median cycle length was 117 ms ± 7 while CS cycle length was 180 ms ± 10 (p &lt; 0.01).

Conclusion

In 317 consecutive AF ablation patients (22 patients, 7%) the presence of a high-voltage short-cycle-length right atrial appendage driver (RAAF) may conclusively be associated with AF termination. This case series exemplifies the not-so-uncommon role of the RAA in the perpetuation of AF.

Ethanol Infusion of Vein of Marshall for the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The Basics and Clinical Practice

Catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) is particularly challenging, as the clinical outcomes are modest. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus linear ablation is one of the main strategies for PeAF ablation. Completely durable transmural lesions are difficult to achieve by catheter ablation during mitral isthmus ablation. The ligament of Marshall contains the vein of Marshall (VOM), myocardial tracts and innervation, and serves as arrhythmogenic foci that make it an attractive target in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Additionally, it co-localizes with the mitral isthmus, and may serve as a part of the perimitral isthmus reentrant circuit. Ethanol infusion into the VOM results in rapid ablation of the neighboring myocardium and its innervation. Its incorporation into PVI significantly increases the success rate of mitral isthmus block and the clinical outcome of PeAF ablation.

Distribution of atrial low voltage induced by vein of Marshall ethanol infusion

INTRODUCTION

Systematic and quantitative descriptions of vein of Marshall (VOM)-induced tissue ablation are lacking. We sought to characterize the distribution of low voltage observed in the left atrium (LA) after VOM ethanol infusion.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The distribution of ethanol-induced low voltage was evaluated by comparing high-density maps performed before and after VOM ethanol infusion in 114 patients referred for atrial fibrillation ablation. The two most frequently impacted segments were the inferior portion of the ridge (82.5%) and the first half of the mitral isthmus (pulmonary vein side) (92.1%). Low-voltage absence in these typical areas resulted from inadvertent ethanol infusion in the left atrial appendage vein (n = 3), initial VOM dissection (n = 3), or a "no branches" VOM morphology (n = 1). Visible anastomosis of the VOM with roof or posterior veins more frequently resulted in low-voltage extension beyond typical areas, toward the entire left antrum (19.0% vs. 1.9%, p = .0045) or the posterior LA (39.7% vs. 3.8%, p < .001) but with a limited positive predictive value ranging from 29.4% to 43.5%. Ethanol-induced low voltage covered a median LA surface of 3.6% (1.9%-5.0%) and did not exceed 8% of the LA surface in 90% of patients.

CONCLUSION

VOM ethanol infusion typically locates at the inferior ridge and the adjacent half of the mitral isthmus. Low-voltage extensions can be anticipated but not guaranteed by the presence of visible anastomosis of the VOM with roof or posterior veins.

Optimized Computed Tomography Acquisition Protocol for Ethanol Infusion Into the Vein of Marshall

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to introduce a computed tomography (CT) protocol for optimal planning of vein of Marshall (VOM) catheterization.

BACKGROUND

Ethanol infusion into the VOM (Et-VOM) is increasingly used in atrial fibrillation ablation.

METHODS

Preprocedural CT was performed with either a conventional (conv-CT; n = 132) or an optimized CT protocol (VOM-CT; n = 126) designed for obtaining on a single image both left atrial and coronary sinus (CS) enhancement. The detection rate and anatomical features of the CT-derived VOM were analyzed and the utility of VOM-CT protocol was assessed by comparing the procedural data.

RESULTS

VOM was detected in 35% in conv-CT versus 63% in VOM-CT (P < 0.001). The VOM-CT protocol did not impair the assessment of left atrial anatomy and appendage patency. In VOM-CT, the detection of the VOM was related to body mass index and width of epicardial space on posterior wall. Mean distance between CS ostium and VOM was 36 ± 7 mm. Mean VOM diameter was 1.6 ± 0.3 mm. On the CS circumference, the VOM emerged superiorly in 68% and postero-superiorly in 32%. Ethanol infusion into the VOM was attempted in 165 patients (77 conv-CT, 70 VOM-CT, and 18 without-CT). After registration in CARTO, the VOM segmented on CT matched its location on venography in all cases. As compared with conv-CT and without-CT, procedures guided by VOM-CT showed significantly shorter radiation time, shorter procedure time, lower amount of the contrast medium, and fewer contrast injections to obtain VOM catheterization.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed CT protocol allows for improved visualization of the VOM, translating into easier VOM catheterization.

Adjunctive Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be associated with limited efficacy. Due to its autonomic innervation, the vein of Marshall (VOM) is an attractive target during AF ablation. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive ethanol infusion of VOM (VOM-EI) in AF ablation.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive literature search for studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of VOM-EI in AF ablation compared to AF catheter ablation alone. The primary outcome of interest was late (≥3 months) AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. The secondary outcomes included acute mitral isthmus bidirectional block (MIBB) and procedural complications (pericardial effusion, stroke, or atrio-esophageal fistula). Pooled relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model.

Results

A total of four studies, including 804 AF patients (68.2% with persistent AF, the mean age of 63.5±9.9 years, 401 patients underwent VOM-EI plus CA vs. 403 patients who had CA alone), were included in the final analysis. VOM-EI group was associated with a lower risk of late AF/AT recurrence (RR:0.63; 95% CI:0.46-0.87; P = 0.005), and increased probability to achieve acute MIBB (RR:1.39; 95% CI:1.08-1.79; P = 0.009) without an increase in procedural complications (RR:1.05; 95% CI:0.57-1.94; P = 0.87).

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that adjunctive VOM-EI strategy is more effective than conventional catheter ablation with similar safety profiles.

Perimitral atrial tachycardias dependent on residual nonligament of Marshall conduction

INTRODUCTION

Catheter ablation for perimitral atrial tachycardia (PMAT) that persists despite lateral mitral isthmus (LMI) ablation is challenging. The aim of this study was to identify the role of the ligament of Marshall (LOM) in PMATs that persist after LMI conduction block has been created, and evaluate the validity of ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (VOM) as treatment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixteen consecutive PMATs in 13 patients that persisted despite apparent LMI conduction block, which was confirmed by ultrahigh-resolution mapping and entrainment pacing along the mitral annulus, were analyzed. PMATs were classified into two types based on the location of the endocardial breakthrough site: those utilizing the LOM (n = 13), which had a breakthrough site along with the LOM, and those not utilizing the LOM (n = 3), which had a breakthrough site at an anterior or posterior side of the LOM. Of the 16 PMATs, 5 PMATs (31%) were not suitable for ethanol infusion into the VOM because the LOM was not involved in the tachycardia circuit or because of the anatomy of the VOM. Fourteen PMATs (88%) were successfully terminated solely by breakthrough site ablation. At a mean follow-up period of 12 ± 9 months, 10 (77%) patients have remained free from atrial tachyarrhythmias.

CONCLUSION

In cases of PMAT following LMI ablation, epicardial conduction over the LMI can occur independently of the LOM. Ethanol infusion into the VOM in such cases would not abolish residual epicardial conduction. The anatomy of the VOM can also preclude the use of this method.

Durability of Left Atrial Lesions After Ethanol Infusion in the Vein of Marshall

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the persistence of left atrial (LA) lesions created by ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall (EIVM) by electroanatomical mapping on repeat catheter ablation for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia.

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the durability of LA lesions created by EIVM.

METHODS

The study included consecutive patients who underwent EIVM for persistent atrial fibrillation or perimitral LA flutter (index procedure) and repeat catheter ablation for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia or atrial fibrillation at a single center between January 2019 and April 2020. The acute effect of EIVM was assessed at the index procedure by comparing the area of bipolar voltage <0.05 mV in the vein of Marshall (VOM) region before and immediately after EIVM. The long-term effect of EIVM was assessed by comparing this area in the VOM region between the redo procedure and the index procedure.

RESULTS

Twenty-four consecutive patients (mean age 68.6 ± 6.1 years, 58% men) underwent redo procedures after previous EIVM for persistent atrial fibrillation (n = 21 [88%]) or perimitral LA flutter (n = 5 [21%]). In each patient, the EIVM-related lesion persisted, with a chronic scar in the VOM region (median 13.1 cm² [interquartile range: 8.1-15.9 cm²] vs 12.4 cm² [interquartile range: 7.6-15.7 cm²] acutely, respectively). One quarter of patients (9 of 20) had late mitral isthmus reconnection, which was located at the mitral annular edge or in the coronary sinus.

CONCLUSIONS

Atrial lesions created by EIVM are durable, which reinforces the efficacy profile of EIVM. Reconduction sites in the mitral isthmus are located at the edge of the scar and in the coronary sinus.

Coronary Arterial Vasospasm: A Rare Complication of Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion for Atrial Fibrillation

A 75-year-old man was admitted for repeat ablation of atrial fibrillation. At 30 min after infusion of 3.5 ml of ethanol into the vein of Marshall, inferior ST-segment elevation with coronary arterial vasospasm was observed. This is the first report of coronary vasospasm after chemical ablation of the vein of Marshall. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Characteristics of macroreentrant atrial tachycardias using an anatomical bypass: Pseudo-focal atrial tachycardia case series

INTRODUCTION

Human atria comprise distinct layers. One layer can bypass another, and lead to a downstream centrifugal propagation at their interface. We sought to characterize anatomical substrates, electrophysiological properties, and ablation outcomes of "pseudo-focal" atrial tachycardias (ATs), defined as macroreentrant ATs mimicking focal ATs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively analyzed left atrial ATs showing centrifugal propagation with postpacing intervals (PPIs) after entrainment pacing suggestive of a macroreentrant mechanism. A total of 22 patients had pseudo-focal ATs consisting of 15 perimitral and 7 roof-dependent flutters. A low-voltage area was consistently found at the collision site and colocalized with distinct anatomical structures like the: (1) coronary sinus-great cardiac vein bundle (27%), (2) vein of Marshall bundle (18%), (3) Bachmann bundle (27%), (4) septopulmonary bundle (18%), and (5) fossa ovalis (9%). The mean missing tachycardia cycle length (TCL) was 65 ± 31 ms (22%) on the endocardial activation map. PPI was 0 [0-15] ms and 0 [0-21] ms longer than TCL at the breakthrough site and the opposite site, respectively. While feasible in 21 pseudo-focal ATs (95%), termination was better achieved by blocking the anatomical isthmus than ablating the breakthrough site [20/21 (95%) vs. 1/5 (20%); p < .001].

CONCLUSION

Perimitral and roof-dependent flutters with centrifugal propagation are favored by a low-voltage area located at well-identified anatomical structures. Comprehensive entrainment pacing maneuvers are crucial to distinguish pseudo-focal ATs from true focal ATs. Blocking the anatomical isthmus is a better therapeutic option than ablating the breakthrough site.

Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion: Feasibility, Pitfalls, and Complications in Over 700 Patients

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion is a relatively new therapeutic option for atrial tachyarrhythmias. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, pitfalls, and complications associated with this procedure in a large cohort of patients.

Epicardial course of the musculature related to the great cardiac vein: Anatomical considerations and clinical implications for mitral isthmus block after vein of Marshall ethanol infusion

BACKGROUND

Mitral isthmus gaps have been ascribed to an epicardial musculature anatomically related to the great cardiac vein (GCV) and the vein of Marshall (VOM). Their lumen offers an access for radiofrequency application or ethanol infusion, respectively.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of mitral isthmus gaps accessible via the GCV lumen, to assess their location around the GCV circumference, and to propose an efficient ablation strategy when present.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients underwent VOM ethanol infusion (step 1) and endocardial linear ablation from the mitral annulus to the left inferior pulmonary vein (step 2). In cases of mitral isthmus gap, endovascular ablation of the GCV anchored wall facing the left atrium was systematically performed (step 3), while the opposite GCV free wall was targeted in case of block failure only (step 4).

RESULTS

After VOM ethanol infusion and endocardial ablation, mitral isthmus block occurred in 51 patients (51%). Pacing maneuvers and activation sequences demonstrated an epicardial gap via the VOM in 2 patients (2%) and via the GCV in 47 patients (47%). In the latter case, block was achieved at the GCV anchored wall in 42 patients (89%) and the GCV free wall in 5 patients (11%). Global success rate of mitral isthmus block was 98%. No tamponade occurred.

CONCLUSION

With the advent of VOM ethanol infusion, residual mitral isthmus gaps are mostly eliminated within the first centimeter of the GCV. Thorough mapping of the entire circumference of the GCV wall can help identify these epicardial gaps.

Effectiveness of ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall combined with a fixed anatomical ablation strategy (the "upgraded 2C3L" approach) for catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Linear ablation in addition to pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) has failed to improve the success rate for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF), due to incomplete block of ablation lines, especially in the mitral isthmus (MI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study enrolled 191 patients (66 in group 1 and 125 in group 2). In group 1, ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall was first performed, followed by radiofrequency (RF) applications targeting bilateral PVAI and bidirectional block in the roofline, cavotricuspid isthmus, and MI. In group 2, PVAI and the three linear ablations were completed using only RF energy. MI block was achieved in 63 (95.5%) and 101 (80.8%) patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = .006). Patients in group 1 had shorter ablation time for left pulmonary vein antrum (8.15 vs. 12.59 min, p < .001) and MI (7.0 vs. 11.8 min, p < .001) and required less cardioversion (50 [78.5%] vs. 113 [90.4%], p = .007). During the 12-month follow-up, 58 (87.9%) patients were free from atrial fibrillation/atrial tachycardia in group 1 compared with 81 (64.8%) in group 2 (p < .001). In multivariate cox regression, the "upgraded 2C3L" procedure is associated with a lower recurrence rate (hazard ratio = 0.27, 95% confidence interval = 0.12-0.59).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the conventional "2C3L" approach, the "upgraded 2C3L" approach has higher effectiveness for ablation of PeAF.

Autonomic modulation and cardiac arrhythmias: old insights and novel strategies

The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a critical role in both health and states of cardiovascular disease. There has been a long-recognized role of the ANS in the pathogenesis of both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). This historical understanding has been expanded in the context of evolving insights into the anatomy and physiology of the ANS, including dysfunction of the ANS in cardiovascular disease such as heart failure and myocardial infarction. An expanding armamentarium of therapeutic strategies-both invasive and non-invasive-have brought the potential of ANS modulation to contemporary clinical practice. Here, we summarize the integrative neuro-cardiac anatomy underlying the ANS, review the physiological rationale for autonomic modulation in atrial and VAs, highlight strategies for autonomic modulation, and finally frame future challenges and opportunities for ANS therapeutics.

What are the post-ablation insular residual electrograms in the posterior left pulmonary veins electrically connected to?

A 67-year-old man underwent a third ablation procedure for a recurrent atrial tachycardia (AT) after an extensive pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, linear ablation along the left atrial (LA) roof and posterolateral mitral isthmus (MI), and defragmentation of persistent atrial fibrillation and an induced perimitral AT. High-resolution mapping during the clinical AT using the Rhythmia system (Boston Scientific) suggested that the AT was a ridge-related reentrant AT and exhibited a reconnection of the left PVs (LPVs). The residual electrograms in the posterior LPVs were surrounded by endocardial scar, which was like an island consisting of residual LPV electrograms. Retrograde venography of the vein of Marshall (VOM) demonstrated that the VOM reached the posterior left superior PV through the ridge between the LA appendage and left inferior PV and then the LPV carina. An ethanol infusion into the VOM resulted in a simultaneous AT termination and complete electrical isolation of the LPVs, that is, the disappearance of the residual LPV electrograms. The insular residual LPV electrograms in the present case did not appear to be endocardially connected to the LA, because the LPV electrograms were surrounded by endocardial scar and there was a large time gap between the earliest activation in the posterior LPVs and activation in the surrounding area. The VOM course on the venography and elimination of the residual LPV electrograms with an ethanol infusion into the VOM suggested that the insular residual LPV electrograms were electrically connected to the posterolateral LA via the VOM and its branches.

Efficacy and safety of ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall for mitral isthmus ablation

INTRODUCTION

Chemical ablation by retrograde infusion of ethanol into the vein of Marshall (VOM-EI) can facilitate the achievement of mitral isthmus block. This study sought to describe the efficacy and safety of this technique.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-two consecutive patients (14 males, median age 71 years) with attempted VOM-EI for mitral isthmus ablation were included in the study. VOM-EI was successfully performed with a median of 4 ml of 96% ethanol in 19 patients (86%) and the mitral isthmus was successfully blocked in all (100%). Touch up endocardial and/or epicardial ablation after VOM-EI was necessary for 12 patients (63%). Perimitral flutter was present in 12 patients (63%) during VOM-EI and terminated or slowed by VOM-EI in 4 and 3 patients, respectively. The low-voltage area of the mitral isthmus region increased from 3.1 cm² (interquartile range [IQR] 0-7.9) before to 13.2 cm² (IQR: 8.2-15.0) after VOM-EI and correlated significantly with the volume of ethanol injected (p = .03). Median high-sensitive cardiac troponin-T increased significantly from 330 ng/L (IQR: 221-516) the evening of the procedure to 598 ng/L (IQR: 382-769; p = .02) the following morning. A small pericardial effusion occurred in three patients (16%), mild pericarditis in one (5%), and uneventful VOM dissection in two (11%). After a median follow-up of 3.5 months (IQR: 3.0-11.0), 10 of 18 patients (56%) with VOM-EI and available follow-up had arrhythmia recurrence. Repeat ablation was performed in five patients (50%) and peri-mitral flutter diagnosed in three (60%).

CONCLUSION

VOM-EI is feasible, safe, and effective to achieve acute mitral isthmus block.

Ligament of Marshall ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation

Beyond pulmonary vein isolation, the two main additional strategies: Cox-Maze procedure or targeting of electrical signatures (focal bursts, rotational activities, meandering wavelets), remain controversial. High-density mapping of these arrhythmias has demonstrated firstly that a patchy lesion set is highly proarrhythmogenic, favoring macro-re-entry through conduction slowing and providing pivots for localized re-entry. Secondly, discrete anatomical structures such as the Vein or Ligament of Marshall (VOM/LOM) and the coronary sinus (CS) have epicardial muscular bundles that are more frequently involved in re-entry than previously thought. The Marshall Bundle can be ablated at any point along its course from the mid-to-distal coronary sinus to the left atrial appendage. If necessary, the VOM may be directly ablated using ethanol infusion to eliminate PV contributions and produce conduction block across the mistral isthmus. Ethanol ablation of the VOM, supplemented with RF ablation, may be more effective in producing conduction block at the mitral isthmus than repeat RF ablation alone.

Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: From concept to clinical practice

The vein of Marshall (VOM) contains innervation, myocardial connections, and arrhythmogenic foci that make it an attractive target in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Additionally, it co-localizes with the mitral isthmus, which is critical to sustain perimitral flutter, and is a true atrial vein that communicates with underlying myocardium. Retrograde balloon cannulation of the VOM from the coronary sinus is feasible and allows for ethanol delivery, which results in rapid ablation of neighboring myocardium and its innervation. Here we review the body of work performed over a span of 13 years, from the inception of the technique, to its preclinical validation, to demonstration of its ablative and denervation effects, and finally to completion of a randomized clinical trial demonstrating favorable outcomes, improving rhythm control in catheter ablation of persistent AF.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion

Catheter ablation has become a cornerstone treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulmonary vein isolation is the accepted approach for paroxysmal AF ablation, but it is less effective for persistent AF. The vein of Marshall (VOM) is located in the epicardial left atrium and can be a source of AF triggers as well as a tract for autonomic nerves. It directly communicates with the underlying myocardium, including the left atrial ridge and the posterior mitral isthmus. This review discusses the latest evidence regarding the mechanisms, procedural aspects, and outcomes of VOM ethanol infusion when used as an adjunct to pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent AF.

Significance of manifest localized staining during ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall

BACKGROUND

Localized staining due to venule injury is attributable to ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (Et-VOM).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate adverse outcomes of localized staining during Et-VOM in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

Two hundred four patients (age 64 ± 10 years; 153 male) were sorted based on the aspect of localized staining. Staining of atrial myocardium that spread uniformly along the VOM vascular tree following selective VOM venography was considered normal, in contrast to predominantly localized staining that spread concentrically from a focal point due to vascular injury. Outcomes between the 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS

Localized staining was observed in 27% of patients. No patients developed clinically significant pericardial effusions during Et-VOM; however, 7 patients developed pericardial effusions on the first postprocedural day (3.6% in patients with vs 3.4% in patients without localized staining). No significant difference was found in achievement of acute mitral isthmus (MI) block (96% vs 98%) and size of the endocardial low-voltage area (8.5 ± 4.1 cm² vs 9.3 ± 5.3 cm²) in patients with and without localized staining, respectively. Long-term follow-up was not impacted by localized staining. Freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias (66% vs 76%) and durability of MI block (57% vs 54%) were not significantly different with and without localized staining. There were no cases of rehospitalization for pericarditis, chronic pericardial effusion, or heart failure.

CONCLUSION

In our study, localized staining was frequent but was not associated with clinically relevant impact or disadvantages.

Determinants of outcome impact of vein of Marshall ethanol infusion when added to catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: A secondary analysis of the VENUS randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The Vein of Marshall Ethanol for Untreated Persistent AF (VENUS) trial demonstrated that adding vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion to catheter ablation (CA) improves ablation outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). There was significant heterogeneity in the impact of VOM ethanol infusion on rhythm control.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the association between outcomes and (1) achievement of bidirectional perimitral conduction block and (2) procedural volume.

METHODS

The VENUS trial randomized patients with persistent AF (N = 343) to CA combined with VOM ethanol or CA alone. The primary outcome (freedom from AF or atrial tachycardia [AT] lasting longer than 30 seconds after a single procedure) was analyzed by 2 categories: (1) successful vs no perimitral block and (2) high- (>20 patients enrolled) vs low-volume centers.

RESULTS

In patients with perimitral block, the primary outcome was reached 54.3% after VOM-CA and 37% after CA alone (P = .01). Among patients without perimitral block, freedom from AF/AT was 34.0% after VOM-CA and 37.0% after CA (P = .583). In high-volume centers, the primary outcome was reached in 56.4% after VOM-CA and 40.2% after CA (P = .01). In low-volume centers, freedom from AF/AT was 30.77% after VOM-CA and 32.61% after CA (P = .84). In patients with successful perimitral block from high-volume centers, the primary outcome was reached in 59% after VOM-CA and 39.1% after CA (P = .01). Tests for interaction were significant (P = .002 for perimitral block and P = .04 for center volume).

CONCLUSION

Adding VOM ethanol infusion to CA has a greater impact on outcomes when associated with perimitral block and performed in high-volume centers. Perimitral block should be part of the VOM procedure.

Identification and Endocardial Ablation of the Ligament of Marshall for Pulmonary Vein Isolation

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to establish criteria for identifying ligament of Marshall (LOM) connections that are responsible for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) failure, assess their incidence, and determine if they can be targeted by focal endocardial ablation at the anterior carina of the left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV).

BACKGROUND

Wide antral ablation of the left pulmonary veins (PVs) may not achieve PVI, sometimes requiring empirical ablation of the PV carina. The mechanism could be due to epicardial conduction along the LOM, which courses adjacent to the anterior carina.

METHODS

In patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation, if wide ablation of the left PV did not achieve isolation, bidirectional mapping was performed. A presumptive LOM connection was diagnosed if the earliest entrance was mapped to the anterior LSPV, while the earliest exit was mapped inferior to the left inferior PV. Focal ablation at the LSPV anterior carina was performed, even if not at the site of earliest entrance activation. The primary endpoint was successful PVI immediately after ablation.

RESULTS

The study included 455 consecutive patients who underwent 570 procedures, of which 364 were first-time ablations. Presumptive LOM connections were identified in 48 procedures (8.4%) and in 41 patients (11.2%) undergoing first-time ablation and were successfully ablated at the anterior carina of the LSPV in 47 of 48 procedures (98%).

CONCLUSIONS

LOM connections may be a common cause of PVI failure and can be easily identified and reliably ablated with focal endocardial ablation at the anterior LSPV carina.

Effect of Catheter Ablation With Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion vs Catheter Ablation Alone on Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The VENUS Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has limited success. Procedural strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation have failed to consistently improve results. The vein of Marshall contains innervation and AF triggers that can be ablated by retrograde ethanol infusion.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether vein of Marshall ethanol infusion could improve ablation results in persistent AF when added to catheter ablation.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The Vein of Marshall Ethanol for Untreated Persistent AF (VENUS) trial was an investigator-initiated, National Institutes of Health-funded, randomized, single-blinded trial conducted in 12 centers in the United States. Patients (N = 350) with persistent AF referred for first ablation were enrolled from October 2013 through June 2018. Follow-up concluded in June 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to catheter ablation alone (n = 158) or catheter ablation combined with vein of Marshall ethanol infusion (n = 185) in a 1:1.15 ratio to accommodate for 15% technical vein of Marshall ethanol infusion failures.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was freedom from AF or atrial tachycardia for longer than 30 seconds after a single procedure, without antiarrhythmic drugs, at both 6 and 12 months. Outcome assessment was blinded to randomization treatment. There were 12 secondary outcomes, including AF burden, freedom from AF after multiple procedures, perimitral block, and others.

RESULTS

Of the 343 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 66.5 [9.7] years; 261 men), 316 (92.1%) completed the trial. Vein of Marshall ethanol was successfully delivered in 155 of 185 patients. At 6 and 12 months, the proportion of patients with freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia after a single procedure was 49.2% (91/185) in the catheter ablation combined with vein of Marshall ethanol infusion group compared with 38% (60/158) in the catheter ablation alone group (difference, 11.2% [95% CI, 0.8%-21.7%]; P = .04). Of the 12 secondary outcomes, 9 were not significantly different, but AF burden (zero burden in 78.3% vs 67.9%; difference, 10.4% [95% CI, 2.9%-17.9%]; P = .01), freedom from AF after multiple procedures (65.2% vs 53.8%; difference, 11.4% [95% CI, 0.6%-22.2%]; P = .04), and success achieving perimitral block (80.6% vs 51.3%; difference, 29.3% [95% CI, 19.3%-39.3%]; P < .001) were significantly improved in vein of Marshall-treated patients. Adverse events were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with persistent AF, addition of vein of Marshall ethanol infusion to catheter ablation, compared with catheter ablation alone, increased the likelihood of remaining free of AF or atrial tachycardia at 6 and 12 months. Further research is needed to assess longer-term efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01898221.

The ligament of Marshall and arrhythmias: A review

The ligament of Marshall (LOM) is a remnant of the embryonic sinus venosus and left cardinal vein, and contains fat and fibrous tissues, blood vessels, muscle bundles, nerve fibers, and ganglia. The complexity of LOM's structure makes it as a source of triggers and drivers as well as substrates of re-entry for atrial arrhythmias, especially for atrial fibrillation (AF). LOM also serves as a portion of left atrial macro-re-entrant circuit, especially peri-mitral isthmus re-entrant circuit. Experimental studies demonstrate that the LOM acts as a sympathetic conduit between the left stellate ganglion and the ventricles, and participates in the initiation and maintenance of ventricular arrhythmias. Endocardial or epicardial catheter ablation or ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall may serve as an important adjunct therapy to pulmonary vein isolation in patients with advanced stage of AF, and may help alleviate ventricular arrhythmias as well.

Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation After Cryoballoon Ablation: What to Expect!

Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence following cryoballoon ablation may occur as a consequence of pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection, which can be treated effectively by performing repeat PV isolation. Alternatively, AF recurrence can manifest in presence of bilateral antral PV isolation. In such circumstances, one may pursue catheter ablation of AF triggers, if present, or proceed with empiric posterior left atrial wall ablation. Although traditionally, focal radiofrequency ablation has been used for this, cryoballoon ablation, itself, may also be used for ablation/isolation of certain structures such as the superior vena cava, the left atrial appendage and even the posterior left atrial wall.

Comparative Study of Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency for Pulmonary Vein Isolation when Combined with vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Introduction

Ethanol infusion (EI) in the vein of Marshall (VOM) has multifactorial effects that could be synergistic to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) versus cryoablation when combined with a VOM-EI has never been investigated. The aim of this study is to evaluate outcome differences of AF ablation using RF versus cryoablation when combined with a VOM-EI.

Materials and Methods

Consecutive patients (n=132) underwent catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF with either RF or cryoballoon (CB) for PVI combined with VOM-EI. Bi-directional conduction block at the mitral isthmus was attempted. The end-point was the freedom from any atrial arrhythmias documented after a blanking period of 90 days after the procedure.

Results

Kaplan-Meier estimates of the arrhythmia-free survival after 1 year were 63.8 (RF + VOM), and 82.7 % (CB + VOM), respectively. Comparison between CB + VOM versus RF + VOM reached a significance (p=0.0292). The periprocedural complication rate was comparable in both groups (5.0 % RF, 5.8 % CB; p=0.14) with a significant difference in the incidence of phrenic nerve palsy (0 % RF, 2.0 % CB; p<0.05).

Conclusions

PVI with a CB had an increased freedom from AF recurrence compared to RF combined with VOM-EI. The present results suggest a potential additive effect of a VOM-EI to CB application.

Chemical mapping as a predictor of vein of Marshall ethanol ablative effects

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to test regional pharmacological effects of an antiarrhythmic agents to predict ablative effects.

BACKGROUND

The vein of Marshall (VOM) providing vascular access to myocardial tissue has been used for ablative purposes using ethanol.

METHODS

A total of 35 patients (male 21, 63.2 ± 7.8 years old) were included. A balloon-tipped infusion catheter was inserted into the VOM. Endocardial ultrahigh-resolution mapping was performed along the VOM region to record the change in atrial electrograms (AEs) after VOM injection of cibenzoline of 3.5 mg during sustained atrial fibrillation (AF). Subsequently, ethanol was infused into the VOM and ablative region was mapped.

RESULTS

In 17 patients (49 %), cibenzoline reduced AEs amplitude by >50%, all of which had also complete elimination of AEs following ethanol (Group A). In 18 patients (Group B), cibenzoline failed to eliminate AEs; yet, in 13 of 18 AEs were eliminated by ethanol. In the remaining five patients, ethanol did not eliminate AE.

CONCLUSIONS

Cibenzoline into the VOM could reliably predicts the results of subsequent ethanol infusion into the VOM using ultrahigh-resolution mapping system, which leads to avoid unnecessary permanent lesion creation by ethanol infusion.

Potential complications in patients undergoing an ethanol injection into the vein of Marshall

BACKGROUND

Ethanol injections into the vein of Marshall (VOM) (EIM) are considered to be a good therapeutic option for atrial tachyarrhythmias, however, the safety remains to be determined. To elucidate what would affect the safety and potential complications of an EIM, we investigated the anatomical features of the VOM and patient background.

METHODS

We performed the EIM before the conventional pulmonary vein isolation for drug-resistant atrial fibrillation in 88 patients and evaluated the anatomical features of the VOM and their background.

RESULTS

All procedures were completed, however, other than myocardial staining, trivial contrast medium leaked out of the VOM into the pericardial space, that is, extravasation of contrast medium with capillary rupture, during the EIM in 20 patients (22.7%) regardless of the features of the VOM. No pericardial effusions requiring further intervention developed after the extravasation, which resolved by the next day on echocardiography in 18 of those patients. However, two patients who had extravasation other than during the initial contrast injection required additional therapeutic intervention for nonnegligible pericardial effusions. Their body weights were significantly lower and the latter two patients were also small lean women with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

The physical constitution, regardless of the characteristics of the VOM, could be strongly associated with adverse events during the EIM. We must take extreme care in smaller patients with poor compliant hearts during the EIM.