Intramural Outflow Tract Ventricular Tachycardia

Venous anatomy of the left ventricular summit region: Insights from high-speed rotational retrograde angiography

INTRODUCTION

Mapping and ablation through the coronary venous system (CVS) have shown potential for ventricular arrhythmias originating from the left ventricular summit (LVS). Multielectrode catheters and balloons are frequently used for mapping and venous ethanol ablation (VEA). However, there is limited data on the venous size and drainage condition in the LVS region. This study aimed to investigate the morphology, angiographic size, and drainage condition of LV summit veins via high-speed rotational angiography (RA).

METHODS

We measured and analyzed the size of the great cardiac vein (GCV), the anterior interventricular vein (AIV), veins near to the LVS, and other main tributaries of CVS in 102 patients undergoing electrophysiology study.

RESULTS

Rotational retrograde angiography of LVS was successfully performed in 81 patients. The diameter of GCV at the level of the Vieussens valve and the distal end of GCV (junction of GCV-AIV) was larger in males than females (6.8 ± 1.1 vs. 5.6 ± 1.2 mm, p < .001; 5.2 ± 0.9 vs. 4.6 ± 0.8, p = .002, respectively) while no significant gender differences were observed in other tributaries. The LV summit veins presented downward drainage direction in half of the patients, indicating potential anatomic adjacency with His bundle. Left anterior oblique (LAO) 45° projection might provide the practical and optimal view of the LV summit veins.

CONCLUSIONS

The coronary veins of the LVS region present various anatomical morphologies and ostium sizes. We provide a systematic description and angiographic size spectrum of CVS. RA could facilitate assessing the feature of CVS comprehensively.

Intramyocardial Mapping of Ventricular Arrhythmias via Septal Venous Perforators: Defining the Superior Intraseptal Space

Left ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias that fail endocardial mapping and ablation have traditionally been labeled as originating from the epicardial left ventricular summit. Although these sometimes can be targeted from the epicardial surface of the left ventricular ostium, such approach poses significant technical challenges. A significant proportion of such arrhythmias, however, exhibit intramyocardial origin, demonstrated by mapping intraseptal branches of the anterior interventricular vein, and henceforth defined as the basal superior intraseptal space.

Intracardiac electrogram characteristics of intramural outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias

BACKGROUND

Annotation of earliest depolarization which depends on maximum dV/dt of unipolar-electrograms and unipolar QS morphology identify site of origin for ventricular premature contractions (VPC). However, identification of unipolar QS morphology has limitations due to low spatial resolution. This study aims to compare electrogram characteristics at successful ablation site in patients with outflow tract (OT) VPC.

METHODS

Local activation time (LAT), duration, and voltage data of each bipolar- and unipolar-electrogram at the successful ablation sites from the right ventricle OT (RVOT) and the left ventricle OT (LVOT) cases were analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-four of 60 (73%) of patients were ablated from RVOT and in 16/60 (27%) required ablation from both sides. All patients had acute VPC suppression. Bipolar-electrogram-QRS onset was earlier (36.4 ± 14.5 ms vs 26.3 ± 7.4 ms, p = 0.01), duration of bipolar-electrogram was shorter (56.9 ± 18.9 ms vs 78.9 ± 21.8 ms, p = 0.002), and bi-voltage amplitude was higher (3.2 ± 2.3 mV vs 1.4 ± 1.1 mV, p = 0.07) for patients with RVOT-only ablation. Mean bipolar-unipolar-electrogram difference was 4.4 ± 4.5 ms in the RVOT group vs 12.8 ± 4.9 ms in RVOT + LVOT group (p < 0.001). Unipolar QS morphology was recorded in 3.0 ± 3.9 vs 3.6 ± 1.8 cm² in RVOT and RVOT + LVOT group, respectively (p = 0.41). Unipolar-electrogram revealed W pattern in 3/44 of RVOT vs 5/16 of RVOT + LVOT group, respectively (p = 0.01). In 18/60 (30%) of patients, unipolar QS was not identified at successful ablation site.

CONCLUSION

QS in unipolar-electrogram was not a perfect predictor for successful ablation sites. Analysis of bipolar voltage amplitude and duration with bipolar-unipolar-electrogram time difference may identify presence of a deeper source.

Intramural Mapping of Intramural Septal Ventricular Arrhythmias

Background

Intramural ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) can originate in patients with or without structural heart disease. Electrogram (EGM) recordings from intramural sources of VA have not been described thoroughly.

Objective

We hypothesized that the presence of scar may be linked to the site of origin (SOO) of focal, intramural VAs.

Methods

In a series of 21 patients (age: 55 ± 11 years, 12 women, mean ejection fraction 43 ± 14%) in whom the SOO of intramural VAs was identified, we analyzed bipolar EGM characteristics at the SOO and compared the findings with the endocardial breakout site. The patients were from a pool of 86 patients with intramural VAs referred for ablation.

Results

In 16/21 patients intramural scarring was detected by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging In patients in whom the intramural SOO was reached, intramural bipolar EGMs showed a lower voltage and had broader EGMs compared to the endocardial breakout sites (0.97 ± 0.56 vs. 2.28 ± 0.15 mV, p = .001; and 122.3 ± 31.6 vs. 96.5 ± 26.3 ms, p < .01). All intramural sampled sites at the SOO had either low voltage or broad abnormal EGMs. The activation time was significantly earlier at the intramural SOO than at breakout sites (−36.2 ± 11.8 vs. −23.2 ± 9.1 ms, p < .0001).

Conclusions

Sites of origin of intramural VAs with scar by CMR display EGM characteristics of scarring, supporting that scar tissue localizes to the SOO of intramural outflow tract arrhythmias in some patients. Scarring identified by CMR may be helpful in planning ablation procedures in patients with suspected intramural VAs.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Landing on the spot: Approaches to outflow tract PVCs; from ECG to EGMs to intracardiac echocardiography

Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) are increasingly recognized, as the use of ECG wearables becomes more widespread. In particular, PVCs arising from both the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) comprise the majority of these arrhythmias and form a significant component of an electrophysiology practice. A keen understanding of the correlative anatomy of the outflow tracts, in addition to recognizing key ECG indices illustrating PVC sites of origin, are fundamental in preparing for a successful ablation. Patient selection, incorporating symptomatology, structural disease, and PVC burden can pose a challenge, though tools such as the ABC-VT risk score may help identify those patients with a higher risk of clinical deterioration. Utilizing intracardiac echocardiography to highlight salient anatomic features not visible with fluoroscopy allows for a more precise and safer ablation. Interpretation of intracardiac EGMs, and the careful examination for low amplitude highly fractionated pre-potentials, enhanced by the advent of new developed mapping/ablation catheters, remains crucial. Utilizing these tools will guide the electrophysiologist to an efficient and effective outflow tract PVC ablation.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Chemical ablation of ventricular tachycardia arising from the left ventricular summit

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) arising from the left ventricular summit is very tough to treat endocardially and epicardially due to the distance from the VT origin and close proximity to the coronary arteries, respectively. Ethanol infusions into coronary veins feeding VT origins were able to safely abolish this type of VT.

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) arising from the left ventricular summit is very tough to treat endocardially and epicardially due to the distance from the VT origin and close proximity to the coronary arteries, respectively. Ethanol infusions into coronary veins feeding VT origins were able to safely abolish this type of VT.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Retrograde Coronary Venous Ethanol Infusion for Ablation of Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) can fail because of inaccessibility to the VT substrate. Transarterial coronary ethanol ablation can be effective but entails arterial instrumentation risk. We hypothesized that retrograde coronary venous ethanol ablation can be an alternative bail-out approach to failed VT RFA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Out of 334 consecutive patients undergoing VT/premature ventricular contraction ablation, 7 patients underwent retrograde coronary venous ethanol ablation. Six out of 7 patients had failed RFA attempts (including epicardial in 3). Coronary venogram-guided venous mapping was performed using a 4F quadripolar catheter or an alligator-clip-connected angioplasty wire. Targeted veins included those with early presystolic potentials and pace-maps matching VT/premature ventricular contraction. An angioplasty balloon (1.5-2×6 mm) was used to deliver 1 to 4 cc of 98% ethanol into a septal branch of the anterior interventricular vein in 5 patients with left ventricular summit VT, a septal branch of the middle cardiac vein, and a posterolateral coronary vein (n=1 each). The clinical VT was successfully ablated acutely in all patients. There were no complications of retrograde coronary venous ethanol ablation, but 1 patient developed pericardial and pleural effusion attributed to pericardial instrumentation. On follow-up of 590±722 days, VT recurred in 4 out of 7 patients, 3 of whom were successfully reablated with RFA.

CONCLUSIONS

Retrograde coronary venous ethanol ablation is safe and feasible as a bail-out approach to failed VT RFA, particularly those originating from the left ventricular summit.

Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Arising From the Cardiac Outflow Tracts - Recent Insights and Techniques for the Successful Treatment of Common and Challenging Cases

Ventricular arrhythmias (VA), like premature ventricular contractions (PVC) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients without structural heart disease (idiopathic VA), mainly arise from the right and left ventricular outflow tracts (RVOT/LVOT). The prognosis for OT VA is generally good in the majority of patients, but there is potential for developing dilated cardiomyopathies from the high burden of VA, as well as a certain risk for sudden cardiac death because of fast monomorphic VT or polymorphic VT triggered by short-coupling PVC. Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has evolved into a widely accepted treatment strategy for patients suffering from VAs. A detailed knowledge of surface ECGs and complex cardiac anatomy, especially within the ventricular OTs, is essential for the understanding of cardiac OT-VAs and highly related to safe and successful RFCA procedures. This review article focuses on RFCA of idiopathic VA arising from the cardiac OT as well as adjacent regions and will illustrate recent insights and technical issues. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1073-1086).