Refining the World Health Organization Definition: Predicting Autopsy-Defined Sudden Arrhythmic Deaths Among Presumed Sudden Cardiac Deaths in the POST SCD Study

Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Management of the Comatose Adult Patient With an Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death, accounting for ≈50% of all cardiovascular deaths. The prognosis of such individuals is poor, with <10% surviving to hospital discharge. Survival with a favorable neurologic outcome is highest among individuals who present with a witnessed shockable rhythm, received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, achieve return of spontaneous circulation within 15 minutes of arrest, and have evidence of ST-segment elevation on initial ECG after return of spontaneous circulation. The cardiac catheterization laboratory plays an important role in the coordinated Chain of Survival for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The catheterization laboratory can be used to provide diagnostic, therapeutic, and resuscitative support after sudden cardiac arrest from many different cardiac causes, but it has a unique importance in the treatment of cardiac arrest resulting from underlying coronary artery disease. Over the past few years, numerous trials have clarified the role of the cardiac catheterization laboratory in the management of resuscitated patients or those with ongoing cardiac arrest. This scientific statement provides an update on the contemporary approach to managing resuscitated patients or those with ongoing cardiac arrest.

The Lancet Commission to reduce the global burden of sudden cardiac death: a call for multidisciplinary action

Despite major advancements in cardiovascular medicine, sudden cardiac death (SCD) continues to be an enormous medical and societal challenge, claiming millions of lives every year. Efforts to prevent SCD are hampered by imperfect risk prediction and inadequate solutions to specifically address arrhythmogenesis. Although resuscitation strategies have witnessed substantial evolution, there is a need to strengthen the organisation of community interventions and emergency medical systems across varied locations and health-care structures. With all the technological and medical advances of the 21st century, the fact that survival from sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) remains lower than 10% in most parts of the world is unacceptable. Recognising this urgent need, the Lancet Commission on SCD was constituted, bringing together 30 international experts in varied disciplines. Consistent progress in tackling SCD will require a completely revamped approach to SCD prevention, with wide-sweeping policy changes that will empower the development of both governmental and community-based programmes to maximise survival from SCA, and to comprehensively attend to survivors and decedents' families after the event. International collaborative efforts that maximally leverage and connect the expertise of various research organisations will need to be prioritised to properly address identified gaps. The Commission places substantial emphasis on the need to develop a multidisciplinary strategy that encompasses all aspects of SCD prevention and treatment. The Commission provides a critical assessment of the current scientific efforts in the field, and puts forth key recommendations to challenge, activate, and intensify efforts by both the scientific and global community with new directions, research, and innovation to reduce the burden of SCD worldwide.

Heart Failure Burden by Autopsy, Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy, and ICD Utilization Among Sudden Deaths

BACKGROUND

Studies of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) report high sudden cardiac death (SCD) rates but presume cardiac cause. Underlying causes, guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) use in community sudden deaths with heart failure (HF) are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the burden of HF, GDMT, and ICD use among autopsied sudden deaths in the POST SCD (Postmortem Systematic Investigation of Sudden Cardiac Death) study, a countywide postmortem study of all presumed SCDs.

METHODS

Incident WHO-defined (presumed) SCDs for individuals of ages 18 to 90 years were autopsied via prospective surveillance of consecutive out-of-hospital deaths in San Francisco County from February 1, 2011, to March 1, 2014. Sudden arrhythmic deaths (SADs) had no identifiable nonarrhythmic cause (eg, pulmonary embolism), and are thus considered potentially rescuable with ICD.

RESULTS

Of 525 presumed SCDs, 100 (19%) had HF. There were 85 patients with known HF (31 HFpEF, 54 HFrEF) and 15 with subclinical HF (postmortem evidence of cardiomyopathy and pulmonary edema without HF diagnosis). SADs comprised 56% (293 of 525) of all presumed SCDs, and 69% (69 of 100) of HF SCDs. The rates were similar in HFrEF (40 of 54 [74%]) and HFpEF (19 of 31 [61%], P = 0.45). Four SAD patients (4%) had ICDs, 3 of which experienced device failure. Twenty-eight SCDs had ejection fraction ≤35%: 22 (79%) with arrhythmic and 6 (21%) with noncardiac causes. Of the 22 SAD patients, 8 (36%) had no identifiable barrier to ICD referral. Complete use of GDMT in HFrEF was 6%.

CONCLUSIONS

One in 5 community sudden deaths had HF; two-thirds had autopsy-confirmed arrhythmic causes. ICD prevention criteria captured only 8% (22 of 293) of all SAD cases countywide; GDMT and ICD use remain important targets for HF sudden death prevention.

Understanding Etiologies of Cardiac Arrest: Seeking Definitional Clarity

Cardiac arrest leading to death and sudden cardiac death (SCD) may refer implicitly to situations in which death is unexpected and primarily of cardiac cause. National and international societies have published differing definitions for the various terms relating to cardiac arrest and SCD. We highlight the controversies in defining SCD, including the lack of a universal definition, the heterogeneity in the operationalization of the term "sudden," and limitations of time-based systems of SCD classification. We discuss the importance of a standardized methodology for classifying cardiac arrest as recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) that should include use of multisource evidence (eg, coroner, autopsy, and toxicology reports) for confirming or refuting a cardiac cause of arrest. We reveal how a universal definition of SCD has been incorrectly attributed to the WHO and how this has been perpetuated in the literature. We make the case that definitional clarity is essential to understanding epidemiology, evaluating novel treatments, forming international collaboration, and innovating public health prevention strategies. We propose a practical schema to categorize cardiac arrest events to describe and study this population more accurately.

Thoracic Aortic Dilation: Implications for Physical Activity and Sport Participation

Thoracic aortic dilatation is a progressive condition that results from aging and many pathological conditions (i.e., connective tissue, inflammatory, shear stress disorders, severe valvular heart disease) that induce degenerative changes in the elastic properties, leading to the loss of elasticity and compliance of the aortic wall. Mild aortic root enlargement may be also observed in athletes and is considered as a normal adaptation to regular exercise training. On the other hand, high-intensity physical activity in individuals with a particular genetic substrate, such as those carrying gene variants associated with Marfan syndrome or other inherited aortopathies, can favor an excessive aortic enlargement and trigger an acute aortic dissection. The evaluation of the aortic valve and aortic root diameters, as well as the detection of a disease-causing mutation for inherited aortic disease, should be followed by a tailored decision about sport eligibility. In addition, the risk of aortic complications associated with sport in patients with genetic aortic disease is poorly characterized and is often difficult to stratify for each individual athlete. This review aims to describe the relationship between regular physical activity and aortic dilation, focusing on patients with bicuspid aortic valve and inherited aortic disease, and discuss the implications in terms of aortic disease progression and sport participation.

Witnessed and unwitnessed sudden cardiac death: a nationwide study of persons aged 1-35 years

AIMS

The aim of this study is to compare clinical characteristics and causes of death among witnessed and unwitnessed sudden cardiac death (SCD) cases aged 1-35 years.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this retrospective nationwide study, all deaths in persons aged 1-35 years in Denmark during 2000-09 were included (23.7 million person-years). Using the in-depth descriptive Danish death certificates and Danish nationwide registries, 860 cases of sudden, unexpected death were identified. Through review of autopsy reports and register data, we identified 635 cases of SCD of which 266 (42%) were witnessed and 326 (51%) were unwitnessed. In 43 cases (7%), witnessed status was missing. Clinical characteristics were overall similar between the two groups. We found a male predominance among unwitnessed SCD compared to witnessed SCD (71% and 62%, respectively, P-value 0.012), as well as more psychiatric comorbidity (20% and 13%, respectively, P-value 0.029). Unwitnessed SCD more often occurred during sleep whereas witnessed SCD more often occurred while the individual was awake and relaxed (P-value < 0.001). The autopsy rate among all SCD cases was 70% with no significant difference in autopsy rate between the two groups. Sudden unexplained death, which was the leading autopsy conclusion in both groups, was more frequent among unwitnessed SCD (P-value 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Several clinical characteristics and autopsy findings were similar between witnessed and unwitnessed SCD cases. Our data support the inclusion of both witnessed and unwitnessed cases in epidemiological studies of SCD cases aged 1-35 years, although the risk of misclassification is higher among unwitnessed and non-autopsied cases of SCD.

NAloxone CARdiac Arrest Decision Instruments (NACARDI) for targeted antidotal therapy in occult opioid overdose precipitated cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

We have recently demonstrated that a significant proportion of fatal out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) are precipitated by occult overdose, which could benefit from antidote therapy administered adjunctively with other cardiac resuscitation measures. We sought to develop simple decision instruments that EMS providers and other first responders can use to rapidly identify occult opioid overdose-associated OHCAs.

METHODS

We examined data from February 2011 through December 2017 in the Postmortem Systematic Investigation of Sudden Cardiac Death study, in which San Francisco (California) County EMS-attended OHCA deaths received autopsy and expert panel adjudication of cause of death. Using classification tree analyses, we derived highly sensitive and specific decision instruments that predicted our primary outcome of occult opioid OD-associated OHCA. We then calculated screening performance characteristics of these instruments.

RESULTS

Of 767 OHCA deaths, 80 (10.4%) were associated with occult opioid overdose. Of the eight models with 100% sensitivity for opioid overdose-associated cardiac arrest, the highest specificity model (23.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 20.3-26.7%) was age < 60 years OR race = black or non-Latinx white OR arrest in public place. The highest specificity instrument (96.3%, 95% CI 94.6-97.5%) consisting of age < 60 years AND race = black or non-Latinx white AND unwitnessed arrest AND female sex had 25% (95% CI 16-35.9%) sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

We have derived simple decision instruments that can identify patients whose OHCA precipitant was occult opioid overdose. These instruments may be used to guide selective administration of the antidote naloxone in OHCA resuscitations.

Year in Review in Cardiac Electrophysiology

In the past year, there have been numerous advances in our understanding of arrhythmia mechanisms, diagnosis, and new therapies. We have seen advances in basic cardiac electrophysiology with data suggesting that secretoneurin may be a biomarker for patients at risk of ventricular arrhythmias, and we have learned of the potential role of an NPR-C (natriuretic peptide receptor-C) in atrial fibrosis and the role of an atrial specific 2-pore potassium channel TASK-1 as a therapeutic target for atrial fibrillation. We have seen studies demonstrating the role of sensory neurons in sleep apnea-related atrial fibrillation and the association between bariatric surgery and atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes. Artificial intelligence applied to electrocardiography has yielded estimates of age, sex, and overall health. We have seen new tools for collection of patient-centered outcomes following catheter ablation. There have been significant advances in the ability to identify ventricular tachycardia termination sites through high-density mapping of deceleration zones. We have learned that right ventricular dysfunction may be a predictor of survival benefit after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. We have seen further insights into the role of His bundle pacing on improving outcomes. As our understanding of cardiac laminopathies advances, we may have new tools to predict arrhythmic event rates in gene carriers. Finally, we have seen numerous advances in the treatment of arrhythmias in patients with congenital heart disease.

Sudden Arrhythmic Death at the Higher End of the Heart Failure Spectrum

The risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is high in heart failure (HF) patients. Sudden arrhythmic death (SAD) is a frequent cause of exit in HF patients at the lower end of the HF spectrum, and implantable cardioverter–defibrillators have been recommended to prevent these life-threatening rhythm disturbances in select patients. However, less is known regarding the cause of SCD in patients at the upper end of the HF spectrum, despite the fact that the majority of out-of-hospital SCD victims have unknown or near-normal/normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). In this review, we report the epidemiology, summarize the mechanisms, discuss the diagnostic challenges, and propose a stepwise approach for the prevention of SAD in HF with near-normal/normal LVEF.