First-in-Human Experience and Acute Procedural Outcomes Using a Novel Pulsed Field Ablation System: The PULSED AF Pilot Trial

In vivo assessment of catheter-tissue contact using tissue proximity indication and its impact on cardiac lesion formation in pulsed field ablation

BACKGROUND

No evidence exists regarding whether tissue proximity indication (TPI), an impedance-based contact indicator, can improve in vivo lesion formation and durability during pulsed field ablation (PFA).

OBJECTIVE

This in vivo study investigated the relationship between catheter-tissue contact and lesion formation.

METHODS

In 5 porcine subjects, PFA applications were delivered at 35 atrial target sites using the VARIPULSE variable-loop circular catheter with the CARTO 3 mapping system. We compared acute ablative low-voltage zones (LVZs; <0.5 mV), chronic LVZs, and pathologic lesions between no/minimum contact (TPI-negative/flickering TPI-positive status) and consistent tissue contact (consistent TPI-positive status) for typical clinical scenarios and tissue tenting (TPI-positive status with electrodes extensively away from the 3-dimensional mapping surface) for safety margin. Ultrasound imaging also confirmed contact category assessments.

RESULTS

Acute and chronic LVZs were significantly larger with consistent contact compared with no/minimum contact, including pathologic lesion length (36.0 ± 12.5 mm vs 17.4 ± 15.2 mm; P = .002) and maximum width (10.3 ± 2.7 mm vs 5.7 ± 5.1 mm; P = .035); results with tenting (length: 34.6 ± 11.7 mm; width: 11.3 ± 1.9 mm) were comparable to consistent contact. Lesion transmurality was achieved in all lesions with consistent contact or tissue tenting but only in 54.5% with no/minimum contact (P = .001 for each). The TPI-based electrode contact distance, measured as the cumulative length of the multielectrode catheter tip positive for TPI, significantly correlated with lesion length, maximum width, and transmurality.

CONCLUSION

Consistent TPI-based contact during PFA was strongly associated with distinct chronic transmural lesions, emphasizing the importance of tissue contact in optimizing circumferential lesion formation with circular PFA catheters.

Efficacy and safety of pulsed-field versus conventional thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has emerged as an innovative alternative to radiofrequency (RF) and cryoablation because it selectively targets myocardial tissue. Thus, we aim to estimate the efficacy and safety of PFA versus thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were retrieved from PubMed, WOS, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and CENTRAL through September 2023. We used RevMan V. 5.4 to pool dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). PROSPERO ID: CRD42023480321.

Results

We included 17 studies with a total of 2255 patients. PFA was significantly associated with a decreased incidence of AF recurrence (RR: 0.66 with 95% CI [0.51, 0.87], p = .003). However, there was no significant difference between PFA and thermal ablation in arrhythmia recurrence (RR: 0.92 with 95% CI [0.74, 1.46], p = .42). PFA was significantly associated with decreased total procedure time (MD: -15.15 with 95% CI [-20.23, -10.07], p < .00001), decreased heart rate change (MD: -7.39 with 95% CI [-12.16, -2.62], p = .002), decreased phrenic nerve palsy (RR: 0.38 with 95% CI [0.15, 0.98], p = .05), and reduced esophageal lesions (RR: 0.09 with 95% CI [0.01, 0.69], p = .02). On the contrary, PFA was significantly associated with increased pericardial tamponade (RR: 6.14 with 95% CI [1.43, 26.33], p = .01).

Conclusion

PFA was significantly associated with decreased AF recurrence, total procedure time, heart rate change, phrenic nerve palsy, esophageal lesion, and increased incidence of pericardial tamponade compared with thermal ablation.

Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Novel Technology for Safer and Faster Ablation

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common arrhythmia, is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Evidence indicates that rhythm control offers superior cardiovascular outcomes compared to rate control, especially when initiated early after the diagnosis of AF. Catheter ablation remains the single best therapy for AF; however, it is not free from severe complications and only a small percentage of AF patients in the Western world ultimately receive ablation. Ensuring that AF ablation is safe, effective, and efficient is essential to make it accessible to all patients. With the limitations of traditional thermal ablative energies, pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel non-thermal energy source. PFA targets irreversible electroporation of cardiomyocytes to achieve cell death without damaging adjacent structures. Through its capability to create rapid, selective lesions in myocytes, PFA presents a promising alternative, offering enhanced safety, reduced procedural times, and comparable, if not superior, efficacy to thermal energies. The surge of new evidence makes it challenging to stay updated and understand the possibilities and challenges of PFA. This review aims to summarize the most significant advantages of PFA and how this has translated to the clinical arena, where four different catheters have received CE-market approval for AF ablation. Further research is needed to explore whether adding new ablation targets, previously avoided due to risks associated with thermal energies, to pulmonary vein isolation can improve the efficacy of AF ablation. It also remains to see whether a class effect exists or if different PFA technologies can yield distinct clinical outcomes given that the optimization of PFA parameters has largely been empirical.

Safety, efficacy, and quality of life outcomes of pulsed field ablation in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the PULSED AF trial

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation (PFA), a novel treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), has yet to be evaluated in a Japanese cohort.

METHODS

In this sub-analysis of the PULSED AF trial, 12-month outcomes of paroxysmal AF (PAF) and persistent AF (PsAF) patients treated with PFA in four Japan centers were assessed. After a 90-day blanking period, primary efficacy was determined via freedom from a composite endpoint of acute procedural failure, arrhythmia recurrence, or antiarrhythmic drug escalation over 1 year. Patient improvement was evaluated via two quality of life (QoL) surveys (AFEQT and EQ-5D) at baseline and 12 months.

RESULTS

The analysis included 32 patients, 16 PAF and 16 PsAF, with PAF patients averaging 61.1 ± 10.6 years and PsAF patients averaging 62.8 ± 11.5 years of age. Females made up 31% of PAF and 25% of PsAF cohorts. Acute pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 100% of both cohorts. The primary efficacy success rate at 12 months was 75.0% for PAF and 56.3% for PsAF patients. No primary safety events occurred. The mean AFEQT score significantly increased for both PAF (25.9 points, p < 0.0001) and PsAF (13.2 points, p = 0.0002) patients, while the EQ-5D-5L score improved significantly for PAF (0.12 points, p = 0.048) patients but not for PsAF (0.04 points, p = 0.08) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to outcomes in the global cohort, ablation with the PulseSelect™ PFA catheter was efficient, effective, and safe in a Japanese population, resulting in improved QoL for PAF and PsAF patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04198701.

Pulsed Field Ablation: A Comprehensive Update

One of the recent advancements in the field of cardiac electrophysiology is pulsed field ablation (PFA). PFA is a novel energy modality that does not rely on thermal processes to achieve ablation which, in turn, results in limited collateral damage to surrounding structures. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms, safety, efficacy, and clinical applications of PFA for the management of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. We also summarize the published pre-clinical and clinical studies regarding this new technology.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation without the use of fluoroscopy

INTRODUCTION

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) and fluoroless ablation (FA) are emerging techniques in contemporary in electrophysiology. With widespread use of 3D electroanatomic mapping systems and advanced intracardiac echo (ICE) imaging, fluoroless ablation has become more widely adopted. However, with the importance of tissue contact for lesion durability, initial PFA has been used with fluoroscopic guidance, but both ICE and electroanatomic mapping make fluoroless PFA feasible. The objective of this study is to demonstrate that PFA can be done safely and effectively without fluoroscopy.

METHODS

At a single center, consecutive patients undergoing ablation with a pentaspline PFA catheter using a fluoroless approach are described. The standard 3D anatomic map settings were adjusted with changes in interior and exterior projection, respiratory compensation, and interpolation. In addition, projection map lesions were used to confirm adequate circumferential ablation lesions. ICE was used extensively for wire guidance and evaluation of contact with tissue.

RESULTS

Beginning on March 15, 2024, 50 consecutive subjects (19 female/31 male) aged 68.0 (± 13.7) underwent PFA ablation. The average CHA2DS2-VA2Sc score was 3.0 (± 1.9). The average LVEF was 57.3% (± 10.0) and the average LA size was 3.9 cm (± 1.2). Projection lesions were placed with every application of PFA. An average of 41.7 (± 8.5) PFA applications were placed. In 100% (50/50) of subjects, acute isolation of the pulmonary veins was achieved. Eighteen subjects also underwent concomitant posterior wall isolation and in 100% of these subjects, posterior isolation was achieved. There were zero complications in this cohort. In 50/50 subjects (100%), fluoroscopy was not used. In comparison to the control cohort, the LA dwell time of the ablation catheter was similar (p = 0.34).

CONCLUSION

In comparison to the traditional PFA with fluoroscopy, this proof-of-concept study shows fluoroless PFA ablation can be performed safely and with similar acute success rates as with use of fluoroscopy.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Pulsed field ablation: A promising approach for ventricular tachycardia ablation

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been a central therapeutic strategy for ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, concerns about its long-term effectiveness and complications have arisen. Pulsed field ablation (PFA), characterized by its nonthermal, highly tissue-selective ablation technique, has emerged as a promising alternative. This comprehensive review delves into the potential advantages and opportunities presented by PFA in the realm of VT, drawing insights from both animal experimentation and clinical case studies. PFA shows promise in generating superior lesions within scarred myocardial tissue, and its inherent repetition dependency holds the potential to enhance therapeutic outcomes. Clinical cases underscore the promise of PFA for VT ablation. Despite its promising applications, challenges such as catheter maneuverability and proarrhythmic effects require further investigation. Large-scale, long-term studies are essential to establish the suitability of PFA for VT treatment.

VARIPULSE: A step-by-step guide to pulmonary vein isolation

INTRODUCTION

The VARIPULSE™ variable-loop circular catheter (VLCC) is a bidirectional, multielectrode catheter that can perform electrophysiological mapping and deliver pulsed field energy through the TRUPULSE™ Generator for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. This ablation system, including the CARTO 3™ three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping system, represents a fully integrated system.

METHODS

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel, primarily cardiac tissue-selective ablation technology with a minimal thermal effect, potentially eliminating the collateral tissue damage associated with radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation. Integration of a mapping system may lead to shorter fluoroscopy times and improve the usability of the system, allowing tracking of energy density and placement to confirm no areas around the vein are left untreated.

RESULTS

This step-by-step review covers patient selection, mapping, the step-by-step ablation workflow, details on catheter repositioning and ensuring contact, considerations for ablation of specific anatomical variations, and discussion of ablation without fluoroscopy based on our initial clinical experience.

CONCLUSIONS

The VLCC is part of the fully integrated PFA system designed for pulmonary vein isolation, using mapping to guide catheter placement and lesion set creation. The current workflow, which is based on our initial clinical experience, may be further refined as the PFA system is used in real-world settings.

Efficacy and safety of a novel hexaspline pulsed field ablation system in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the PLEASE-AF study

AIMS

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging non-thermal ablative modality demonstrating considerable promise for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, these PFA trials have almost universally included only Caucasian populations, with little data on its effect on other races/ethnicities. The PLEASE-AF trial sought to study the 12-month efficacy and the safety of a multi-electrode hexaspline PFA catheter in treating a predominantly Asian/Chinese population of patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) by delivering different pulse intensities at the PV ostium (1800 V) and atrium (2000 V). Acute success was defined as no PV potentials and entrance/exit conduction block of all PVs after a 20-min waiting period. Follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months included 12-lead electrocardiogram and 24-h Holter examinations. The primary efficacy endpoint was 12-month freedom from any atrial arrhythmias lasting at least 30 s. The cohort included 143 patients from 12 hospitals treated by 28 operators: age 60.2 ± 10.0 years, 65.7% male, Asian/Chinese 100%, and left atrial diameter 36.6 ± 4.9 mm. All PVs (565/565, 100%) were successfully isolated. The total procedure, catheter dwell, total PFA application, and total fluoroscopy times were 123.5 ± 38.8 min, 63.0 ± 30.7 min, 169.7 ± 34.6 s, and 27.3 ± 10.1 min, respectively. The primary endpoint was observed in 124 of 143 patients (86.7%). One patient (0.7%) developed a small pericardial effusion 1-month post-procedure, not requiring intervention.

CONCLUSION

The novel hexaspline PFA catheter demonstrated universal acute PVI with an excellent safety profile and promising 12-month freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias in an Asian/Chinese population with paroxysmal AF.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05114954.

Efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation for accessory pathways: a pilot study

AIMS

Radiofrequency ablation is used as a first-line therapy for accessory pathways (APs). However, data regarding the effects of pulsed field ablation (PFA) on APs are limited. We sought to evaluate the acute procedural and 6-month success and safety of PFA in a cohort of patients with APs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A focal contact force-sensing PFA catheter was used for patients with APs. Pulsed field ablation generator generated a bipolar and biphasic waveform (±1000 V) with a duration of 100 ms from the tip of the PFA catheter. A 100% acute procedural success was achieved in 10 conscious patients with APs (7 left anterolateral, 2 left inferolateral, and 1 right posteroseptal APs) including 6 (60%) patients after an initial application. The average total ablation time was 6.3 ± 4.9 s for 4.7 ± 1.8 ablation sites (ASs), including 3.1 ± 2.4 s at targets and 3.2 ± 2.9 s at 3.2 ± 2 bolus ASs. The mean skin-to-skin time was 59.3 ± 15.5 min, and PFA catheter dwell time was 29.4 ± 7.8 min. One patient encountered transient sinus arrest during PFA due to parasympathetic overexcitation. Sinus rhythm was restored in all patients without any significant adverse events during the short-term follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Pulsed field ablation of APs was feasible, effective, and safe. Its efficiency was remarkable for its ultrarapid termination of AP conduction. Further studies are warranted to prove whether utilization of PFA with current parameters can extend to manifold AP ablation.

Method, safety, and outcomes of persistent AF ablation without a circular mapping catheter: 3 years experience of a Belgian Tertiary Centre

BACKGROUND

We aimed to share our methods and experience of persistent AF ablation without a circular mapping catheter (CMC), thereby avoiding femoral venous and transseptal punctures, decreasing the cost of the procedure, and possibly reducing the duration of the procedure and fluoroscopy time.

METHODS

We report our experience with 261 persistent AF ablations performed without a CMC over the past 3 years.

RESULTS

The procedures were performed with no apparent loss of efficacy or safety. Freedom from recurrence was defined as a 1-year absence of AF/atrial flutter (AFL) episodes >30 s, beyond the 3-month blanking period. At 1 year, 72% of the patients were free from arrythmias.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent AF ablation is feasible without a CMC, reducing the need for venous and transseptal punctures and the cost of the procedure. We suggest that prospective studies should aim to characterise the reduction in procedure and fluoroscopy times as a result of this technique.

Outcomes of Focal Pulsed Field Ablation for Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is primarily used for treatment of atrial fibrillation as it provides better safety and efficacy. However, there are limited data available on the use of PFA for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). The study sought to describe the outcomes of PSVT ablation with a novel focal contact force (CF)-sensing PFA.

METHODS

In this first-in-human pilot study, a focal CF-sensing PFA catheter was used for mapping and ablation navigated with an electroanatomic mapping system (EAMS). Pulsed field energy was delivered as biphasic/bipolar electrical pulse trains with 2000 V/delivery. CF was controlled from 2 g to 10 g during PFA.

RESULTS

Procedural acute success was achieved without general anaesthesia or conscious sedation in all 10 patients, including 7 patients diagnosed with typical atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardias and 3 patients with orthodromic reciprocating tachycardias. Successful target ablation time was 2.0 ± 0.5 seconds per patient, and the acute procedural success at the first single site was achieved in 5 patients. The mean skin-to-skin procedure time was 79.4 ± 15 minutes, PFA catheter dwell time was 50.1 ± 14 minutes, and fluoroscopy time was 6.2 ± 7 minutes. Maintenance of sinus rhythm was observed in all patients within 6-month follow-up. No serious adverse events occurred in any subjects during PFA or during the 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A focal CF-sensing PFA catheter could effectively, rapidly, and safely ablate PSVT in conscious patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05770921.

Prevalence, timing, and impact of early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias after pulsed field ablation: A secondary analysis of the PULSED AF trial

BACKGROUND

Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ERAT) within 3 months of thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is common and often considered transient. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a nonthermal energy source in which ERAT is not well described.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to analyze ERAT in patients with AF undergoing PFA in the Pulsed Field Ablation to Irreversibly Electroporate Tissue and Treat AF (PULSED AF) trial.

METHODS

This analysis included 154 (52.4%) paroxysmal AF and 140 (47.6%) persistent AF who had ≥10 rhythm assessments during the 90-day blanking period. ERAT was defined as any instance of ≥30 seconds of AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia on transtelephonic monitoring (weekly and symptomatic) or ≥10 seconds on electrocardiography (at 3 months), both within 90 days. Late recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (LRAT) was defined as observed atrial tachyarrhythmias between 90 days and 12 months.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of ERAT was 27.1% in patients with paroxysmal AF and 31.6% in patients with persistent AF. In patients with ERAT, 73% had ERAT onset within the first month of the procedure. The presence of ERAT was associated with LRAT in patients with paroxysmal AF (hazard ratio 6.4; 95% confidence interval 3.6-11.3) and patients with persistent AF (hazard ratio 3.8; 95% confidence interval 2.2-6.6). Yet, in 29.4% of patients with paroxysmal AF and 34.3% of patients with persistent AF with ERAT, LRAT was not observed. LRAT was positively correlated with the number of ERAT observations.

CONCLUSION

ERAT after PFA predicted LRAT in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. However, the concept of a blanking period after PFA is still valid, as approximately one-third of patients with ERAT did not continue to have LRAT during follow-up and may not need reablation.

Pulsed electric field performance calculator tool based on an in vitro human cardiac model

Introduction

Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) is a novel non-thermal method for cardiac ablation, relying on irreversible electroporation induced by high-energy pulsed electric fields (PEFs) to create localized lesions in the heart atria. A significant challenge in optimizing PFA treatments is determining the lethal electric field threshold (EFT), which governs ablation volume and varies with PEF waveform parameters. However, the proprietary nature of device developer's waveform characteristics and the lack of standardized nonclinical testing methods have left optimal EFTs for cardiac ablation uncertain.

Methods

To address this gap, we introduced a laboratory protocol employing human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) in monolayer format to evaluate the impact of a range of clinically relevant biphasic pulse parameters on lethal EFT and adiabatic heating (AH). Cell death areas were assessed using fluorescent dyes and confocal microscopy, while lethal EFTs were quantified through comparison with electric field numerical simulations.

Results and conclusion

Our study confirmed a strong correlation between cell death in hiPSC-CMs and the number and duration of pulses in each train, with pulse repetition frequency exerting a comparatively weaker influence. Fitting of these results through machine learning algorithms were used to develop an open-source online calculator. By estimating lethal EFT and associated temperature increases for diverse pulse parameter combinations, this tool, once validated, has the potential to significantly reduce reliance on animal models during early-stage device de-risking and performance assessment. This tool also offers a promising avenue for advancing PFA technology for cardiac ablation medical devices to enhance patient outcomes.

A New Hope for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Application of Pulsed-Field Ablation Technology

In recent years, the prevalence of and mortality associated with cardiovascular diseases have been rising in most countries and regions. AF is the most common arrhythmic condition, and there are several treatment options for AF. Pulmonary vein isolation is an effective treatment for AF and is the cornerstone of current ablation techniques, which have one major limitation: even when diagnosed and treated at a facility that specializes in ablation, patients have a greater chance of recurrence. Therefore, there is a need to develop better ablation techniques for the treatment of AF. This article first compares the current cryoablation (CBA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) techniques for the treatment of AF and discusses the utility and advantages of the development of pulsed-field ablation (PFA) technology. The current research on PFA is summarized from three perspectives, namely, simulation experiments, animal experiments, and clinical studies. The results of different stages of experiments are summarized, especially during animal studies, where pulmonary vein isolation was carried out effectively without causing injury to the phrenic nerve, esophagus, and pulmonary veins, with higher safety and shorter incision times. This paper focuses on a review of various a priori and clinical studies of this new technique for the treatment of AF.

State-of-the-art pulsed field ablation for cardiac arrhythmias: ongoing evolution and future perspective

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an innovative approach in the field of cardiac electrophysiology aimed at treating cardiac arrhythmias. Unlike traditional catheter ablation energies, which use radiofrequency or cryothermal energy to create lesions in the heart, PFA utilizes pulsed electric fields to induce irreversible electroporation, leading to targeted tissue destruction. This state-of-the-art review summarizes biophysical principles and clinical applications of PFA, highlighting its potential advantages over conventional ablation methods. Clinical data of contemporary PFA devices are discussed, which combine predictable procedural outcomes and a reduced risk of thermal collateral damage. Overall, these technological developments have propelled the rapid evolution of contemporary PFA catheters, with future advancements potentially impacting patient care.

Multidisciplinary management strategies for atrial fibrillation

There has been a significant increase in the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) over the past 30 years. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for AF, but research investigations have shown that AF recurrence still occurs in a significant number of patients after ablation. Heart rhythm outcomes following catheter ablation are correlated with numerous clinical factors, and researchers developed predictive models by integrating risk factors to predict the risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation. The purpose of this article is to outline the risk scores for predicting cardiac rhythm outcomes after PVI and to discuss the modifiable factors that increase the risk of recurrence of AF, with the hope of further improving catheter ablation efficacy through preoperative identification of high-risk populations and postoperative management of modifiable risk factors.

2023 Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased exponentially in many developed countries, including Australia and New Zealand. This Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation from the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) recognises healthcare factors, expertise and expenditure relevant to the Australian and New Zealand healthcare environments including considerations of potential implications for First Nations Peoples. The statement is cognisant of international advice but tailored to local conditions and populations, and is intended to be used by electrophysiologists, cardiologists and general physicians across all disciplines caring for patients with AF. They are also intended to provide guidance to healthcare facilities seeking to establish or maintain catheter ablation for AF.

Pulsed Field Energy in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: From Physical Principles to Clinical Applications

Atrial fibrillation, representing the most prevalent sustained cardiac arrhythmia, significantly impacts stroke risk and cardiovascular mortality. Historically managed with antiarrhythmic drugs with limited efficacy, and more recently, catheter ablation, the interventional approach field is still evolving with technological advances. This review highlights pulsed field ablation (PFA), a revolutionary technique gaining prominence in interventional electrophysiology because of its efficacy and safety. PFA employs non-thermal electric fields to create irreversible electroporation, disrupting cell membranes selectively within myocardial tissue, thus preventing the non-selective damage associated with traditional thermal ablation methods like radiofrequency or cryoablation. Clinical studies have consistently shown PFA's ability to achieve pulmonary vein isolation-a cornerstone of AF treatment-rapidly and with minimal complications. Notably, PFA reduces procedure times and has shown a lower incidence of esophageal and phrenic nerve damage, two common concerns with thermal techniques. Emerging from oncological applications, the principles of electroporation provide a unique tissue-selective ablation method that minimizes collateral damage. This review synthesizes findings from foundational animal studies through to recent clinical trials, such as the MANIFEST-PF and ADVENT trials, demonstrating PFA's effectiveness and safety. Future perspectives point towards expanding indications and refinement of techniques that promise to improve AF management outcomes further. PFA represents a paradigm shift in AF ablation, offering a safer, faster, and equally effective alternative to conventional methods. This synthesis of its development and clinical application outlines its potential to become the new standard in AF treatment protocols.

Initial clinical experience with the balloon-in-basket pulsed field ablation system: acute results of the VOLT CE mark feasibility study

AIMS

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) potentially offers improved safety and procedural efficiencies compared with thermal ablation. Opportunities remain to improve effective circumferential lesion delivery, safety, and workflow of first-generation PFA systems. In this study, we aim to evaluate the initial clinical experience with a balloon-in-basket, 3D integrated PFA system with a purpose-built form factor for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The VOLT CE Mark Study is a pre-market, prospective, multi-centre, single-arm study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Volt™ PFA system for the treatment of paroxysmal (PAF) or persistent AF (PersAF). Feasibility sub-study subjects underwent phrenic nerve evaluation, endoscopy, chest computed tomography, and cerebral magnetic resonance imaging. Study endpoints were the rate of primary serious adverse event within 7 days and acute procedural effectiveness. A total of 32 subjects (age 61.6 ± 9.6 years, 65.6% male, 84.4% PAF) were enrolled and treated in the feasibility sub-study and completed a 30-day follow-up. Acute effectiveness was achieved in 99.2% (127/128) of treated PVs (96.9% of subjects, 31/32) with 23.8 ± 4.2 PFA applications/subject. Procedure, fluoroscopy, LA dwell, and transpired ablation times were 124.6 ± 28.1, 19.8 ± 8.9, 53.0 ± 21.0, and 48.0 ± 19.9 min, respectively. Systematic assessments of initial safety revealed no phrenic nerve injury, pulmonary vein stenosis, or oesophageal lesions causally related to the PFA system and three subjects with silent cerebral lesions (9.4%). There were no primary serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The initial clinical use of the Volt PFA System demonstrates acute safety and effectiveness in the treatment of symptomatic, drug refractory AF.

Novel Ablation Catheters for Atrial Fibrillation

Various ablation technologies with different energy sources are currently being either used or being investigated for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Potential complications continue to occur due to the indiscriminate thermal effects on non-targeted tissues adjacent to the myocardium that are common to all thermal ablation modalities. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has recently gained significant attention and interest as an approach to AF ablation. PFA uniquely has the ability to circumvent certain complications related to thermal energy. PFA is a non-thermal ablation modality with the potential for unique-tissue selectivity that can minimize damage to collateral cardiac structures. Several PFA systems for AF ablation are currently being investigated. Some PFA systems have been designed to serve as single-shot approaches to achieve pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), and others have focal designs enabling flexible PVI lesion sets as well as linear/focal ablations. Favorable acute success rates and low incidence of complications with short procedure times have been reported with several PFA systems regardless of catheter design (single-shot or focal catheter). Clinical PFA studies in which chronic remapping was conducted, demonstrated pulmonary vein (PV) durability improved with evolutional modifications of pulsed field waveforms/dosing, achieving over 90% PV durability with optimized waveforms. Rare adverse events related to PFA may surface with its increasing use worldwide and as sicker patients get exposed to PFA. We believe that both excitement and vigilance are in order as we embark on yet another new chapter of AF ablation.

Pulsed field versus cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a real-world observational study on procedural outcomes and efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation often necessitates catheter ablation when antiarrhythmic drug therapy fails. Single-shot technologies using thermal energy, such as cryoballoon ablation, are commonly used, but pulsed field ablation (PFA), an innovative non-thermal ablation technique, is a potential alternative. This retrospective observational study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of cryoballoon ablation and PFA in patients undergoing their first pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedure for atrial fibrillation treatment.

METHODS

We utilised real-world data from patients who underwent PVI using cryoballoon ablation or PFA. The primary outcome encompassed procedural complications, including phrenic nerve palsy, cardiac tamponade, thromboembolic complications, bleeding complications and mortality. Secondary outcomes were procedural characteristics including procedure duration, length of hospital admission, and re-do ablation rates within 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 1714 procedures were analysed: 1241 in the cryoballoon group and 473 in the PFA group. Gender distribution (p = 0.03) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.01) differed significantly. With regard to the primary outcome, the cryoballoon group demonstrated a higher incidence of phrenic nerve palsy compared with the PFA group (15 vs 0; p = 0.02). The procedure duration was shorter in the PFA group, even after adjusting for baseline characteristics (95.0 vs 74.0 min; p < 0.001). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, admission duration differed between the groups as well (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The study results supported the safety and efficacy of PFA over cryoballoon ablation for PVI, highlighting advantages such as shorter procedure duration and absence of phrenic nerve palsy.

Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanisms, Advantages, and Limitations

Pulsed field ablation with irreversible electroporation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation involves tissue-specific and non-thermal energy-induced cell necrosis, which helps avoid complications, such as pulmonary vein stenosis, atrial collateral tissue damage, and extensive atrial structural damage, often encountered with traditional thermal ablation. In existing clinical trials, pulsed field ablation has shown excellent effects on pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. Pulsed field ablation is easy, simple, and quick and can reduce iatrogenic injury. Therefore, the application of pulsed field ablation technology in the treatment of atrial fibrillation has a promising future. Notably, the adjustment of parameters in pulsed field ablation with different ablation catheter systems can strongly affect the area and depth of the necrotic myocardium, which greatly affects the likelihood of atrial fibrillation recurrence and incidence of adverse complications after ablation. In this paper, we review the mechanisms, advantages, and limitations of pulsed field ablation based on the results of a series of previous studies and provide ideas and directions for future research.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Pentaspline Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter Versus Cryoballoon for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Results From a Prospective Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

Cryoballoon ablation is currently the gold standard technique for single-shot pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has recently emerged as an interesting nonthermal alternative energy for PVI. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the safety and long-term efficacy of PVI using the pentaspline PFA catheter in comparison to cryoballoon ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between January 2021 and December 2022, we included all consecutive patients of our center in whom a first PVI-only procedure was performed using PFA or cryoballoon. The choice of the energy was based on patients' preference between general anesthesia (PFA) and local anesthesia (cryoballoon). The primary end point was freedom from documented atrial arrhythmia recurrence after a 3-month blanking period. A total of 301 patients (paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in 220 patients) underwent a first PVI procedure performed using PFA (n=151) or cryoballoon (n=150). Complete short-term PVI was obtained in 144 of 150 patients (96%) in the cryoballoon group and in all patients of the PFA group (P=0.01). Procedure duration was significantly longer in the cryoballoon group. Transient and persistent phrenic nerve injuries were observed in the cryoballoon group only (13/150 and 2/150, respectively). One-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia was significantly higher in the PFA group compared with the cryoballoon group (87.9% versus 77.7%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.30-0.96]; P=0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective, comparative, real-life study suggested that PFA could overcome safety limitations of cryoballoon with optimal effectiveness. Randomized controlled studies are required to further investigate the potential superiority of PFA over cryoballoon.

Esophageal injury, perforation, and fistula formation following atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Esophageal perforation and fistula formation are rare but serious complications following atrial fibrillation ablation. In this review article, we outline the incidence, pathophysiology, predictors, and preventative strategies of this dreaded complication.

METHODS

We conducted an electronic search in 10 databases/electronic search engines to access relevant publications. All articles reporting complications following atrial fibrillation ablation, including esophageal injury and fistula formation, were included for systematic review.

RESULTS

A total of 130 manuscripts were identified for the final review process. The overall incidence of esophageal injury following atrial fibrillation ablation was significantly higher with thermal ablation modalities (radiofrequency 5-40%, cryoballoon 3-25%, high-intensity focused ultrasound < 10%) as opposed to non-thermal ablation modalities (no cases reported to date). The incidence of esophageal perforation and fistula formation with the use of thermal ablation modalities is estimated to occur in less than 0.25% of all atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. The use of luminal esophageal temperature monitoring probe and mechanical esophageal deviation showed protective effect toward reducing the incidence of this complication. The prognosis is very poor for patients who develop atrioesophageal fistula, and the condition is rapidly fatal without surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal perforation and fistula formation following atrial fibrillation ablation are rare complications with poor prognosis. Various strategies have been proposed to protect the esophagus and reduce the incidence of this fearful complication. Pulsed field ablation is a promising new ablation technology that may be the future answer toward reducing the incidence of esophageal complications.

Cardiac Pulsed Field Ablation Lesion Durability Assessed by Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Reflectometry

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation uses electrical fields to cause nonthermal cell death over several hours. Polarization-sensitive optical coherence reflectometry is an optical imaging technique that can detect changes in the tissue ultrastructure in real time, which occurs when muscular tissue is damaged. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of a polarization-sensitive optical coherence reflectometry system to predict the development of chronic lesions based on acute changes in tissue birefringence during pulsed field ablation.

METHODS

Superior vena cava isolation was performed in 30 swine using a biphasic, bipolar pulsed field ablation system delivered with a nonirrigated focal tip catheter. Acute changes in tissue birefringence and voltage abatement were analyzed for each individual lesion. A high-resolution electroanatomical map was performed at baseline and 4 to 12 weeks after ablation to locate electrical gaps in the ablated area.

RESULTS

A total of 141 lesions were delivered and included in the analysis. Acute electrical isolation based on the electroanatomical map was achieved in 96% of the animals, but chronic isolation was only seen in 14 animals (46%). The mean voltage abatement of lesions that showed recovery was 82.8%±14.6% versus 84.4%±17.4% for those that showed fibrosis (P=0.7). The mean acute reduction in tissue birefringence in points demonstrating fibrosis was 63.8%±11.3% versus 9.1%±0.1% in the points that resulted in electrical gaps. A threshold of acute reduction of birefringence of ≥20% could predict chronic lesion formation with a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 83%.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute tissue birefringence changes assessed with polarization-sensitive optical coherence reflectometry during pulsed field ablation can predict chronic lesion formation and guide the ablation procedure although limited by the tissue thickness.

A pilot clinical assessment of biphasic asymmetric pulsed field ablation catheter for pulmonary vein isolation

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a new treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), and its selective ablation characteristics give it a significant advantage in treatment. In previous cellular and animal experiments, we have demonstrated that biphasic asymmetric pulses can be used to ablate myocardial tissue. However, small-scale clinical trials are needed to test whether this approach is safe and feasible before extensive clinical trials can be performed. Therefore, the purpose of this experiment is to determine the safety and feasibility of biphasic asymmetric pulses in patients with AF and is to lay the foundation for a larger clinical trial. Ablation was performed in 10 patients with AF using biphasic asymmetric pulses. Voltage mapping was performed before and after PFA operation to help us detect the change in the electrical voltage of the pulmonary veins (PV). 3-Dimensional mapping system showed continuous low potential in the ablation site, and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was achieved in all four PV of the patients. There were no recurrences, PV stenosis, or other serious adverse events during the 12 months follow-up. The results suggest that PFA using biphasic asymmetric waveforms for patients with AF is safe, durable, and effective and that a larger clinical trial could begin.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier, ChiCTR2100051894.

Cardiac blood vessels and irreversible electroporation: findings from pulsed field ablation

The clinical use of irreversible electroporation in invasive cardiac laboratories, termed pulsed field ablation (PFA), is gaining early enthusiasm among electrophysiologists for the management of both atrial and ventricular arrhythmogenic substrates. Though electroporation is regularly employed in other branches of science and medicine, concerns regarding the acute and permanent vascular effects of PFA remain. This comprehensive review aims to summarize the preclinical and adult clinical data published to date on PFA's effects on pulmonary veins and coronary arteries. These data will be contrasted with the incidences of iatrogenic pulmonary vein stenosis and coronary artery injury secondary to thermal cardiac ablation modalities, namely radiofrequency energy, laser energy, and liquid nitrogen-based cryoablation.

Genetically engineered HEK cells as a valuable tool for studying electroporation in excitable cells

Electric pulses used in electroporation-based treatments have been shown to affect the excitability of muscle and neuronal cells. However, understanding the interplay between electroporation and electrophysiological response of excitable cells is complex, since both ion channel gating and electroporation depend on dynamic changes in the transmembrane voltage (TMV). In this study, a genetically engineered human embryonic kidney cells expressing NaV1.5 and Kir2.1, a minimal complementary channels required for excitability (named S-HEK), was characterized as a simple cell model used for studying the effects of electroporation in excitable cells. S-HEK cells and their non-excitable counterparts (NS-HEK) were exposed to 100 µs pulses of increasing electric field strength. Changes in TMV, plasma membrane permeability, and intracellular Ca2+ were monitored with fluorescence microscopy. We found that a very mild electroporation, undetectable with the classical propidium assay but associated with a transient increase in intracellular Ca2+, can already have a profound effect on excitability close to the electrostimulation threshold, as corroborated by multiscale computational modelling. These results are of great relevance for understanding the effects of pulse delivery on cell excitability observed in context of the rapidly developing cardiac pulsed field ablation as well as other electroporation-based treatments in excitable tissues.

Impact of pulsed field ablation on intraluminal esophageal temperature

INTRODUCTION

Atrio-esophageal fistula after esophageal thermal injury (ETI) is one of the most devastating complications of available energy sources for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) uses electroporation as a new energy source for catheter ablation with promising periprocedural safety advantages over existing methods due to its unique myocardial tissue sensitivity. In preclinical animal studies, a dose-dependent esophageal temperature rise has been reported. In the TESO-PFA registry intraluminal esophageal temperature (TESO) changes in a clinical setting are evaluated.

METHODS

Consecutive symptomatic AF patients (62 years, 67% male, 61% paroxysmal AF, CHA2 DS2 Vasc Score 2) underwent first-time PFA and were prospectively enrolled into our registry. Eight pulse trains (2 kV/2.5 s, bipolar, biphasic, x4 basket/flower configuration each) were delivered to each pulmonary vein (PV). Two extra pulse trains per PV in flower configuration were added for wide antral circumferential ablation. Continuous intraluminal esophageal temperature (TESO) was monitored with a 12-pole temperature probe.

RESULTS

Median TESO change was statistically significant and increased by 0.8 ± 0.6°C, p < .001. A TESO increase ≥ 1°C was observed in 10/43 (23%) patients. The highest TESO measured was 40.3°C. The largest TESO difference (∆TESO) was 3.7°C. All patients remained asymptomatic considering possible ETI. No atrio-esophageal fistula was reported on follow-up.

CONCLUSION

A small but significant intraluminal esophageal temperature rise can be observed in most patients during PFA. TESO rise over 40°C is rare. The clinical implications of the observed findings need to be further evaluated.

Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: An Initial Australian Single-Centre Experience

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a newer ablation energy source with the potential to reduce complications and improve efficacy compared to conventional thermal atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. This study aimed to present an initial single-centre Australian experience of PFA for AF ablation.

METHODS

Initial consecutive patients undergoing PFA for paroxysmal or persistent AF at a single centre were included. Baseline patient characteristics, procedural data and clinical outcomes were collected prospectively at the time of the procedure. Patients were followed up at 3 months and 6-monthly thereafter.

RESULTS

In total, 100 PFA procedures were performed in 97 patients under general anaesthesia. All pulmonary veins (403 of 403) were successfully isolated acutely. Median follow-up was 218 days (range, 16-343 days), and the Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmias at 180 days was 87% (95% confidence interval 79%-95%). Median procedure time was 74 minutes (range, 48-134 minutes). Median fluoroscopy dose-area product was 345 μGym2 (interquartile range, 169-685 μGym2). Two (2%) pseudoaneurysm vascular access complications occurred. There were no cases of thromboembolic complications, stroke, phrenic nerve palsy, pulmonary vein stenosis, atrio-oesophageal fistula, or pericardial tamponade.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulsed field ablation can be performed safely and efficiently, with encouraging efficacy in early follow-up. Further data and clinical trials will be required to assess the comparative utility of PFA in contemporary AF ablation practice.

Absence of Arrhythmogenicity with Biphasic Pulsed Electric Fields Delivered to Porcine Airways

Pulsed electric field (PEF) technologies treat many types of tissue. Many systems mandate synchronization to the cardiac cycle to avoid the induction of cardiac arrhythmias. Significant differences between PEF systems make the assessment of cardiac safety from one technology to another challenging. A growing body of evidence suggests that shorter duration biphasic pulses obviate the need for cardiac synchronization, even when delivered in a monopolar fashion. This study theoretically evaluates the risk profile of different PEF parameters. It then tests a monopolar, biphasic, microsecond-scale PEF technology for arrhythmogenic potential. PEF applications of increasing likelihood to induce an arrhythmia were delivered. The energy was delivered throughout the cardiac cycle, including both single and multiple packets, and then with concentrated delivery on the t-wave. There were no sustained changes to the electrocardiogram waveform or to the cardiac rhythm, despite delivering energy during the most vulnerable phase of the cardiac cycle, and delivery of multiple packets of PEF energy across the cardiac cycle. Only isolated premature-atrial contractions (PAC) were observed. This study provides evidence that certain varieties of biphasic, monopolar PEF delivery do not require synchronized energy delivery to prevent harmful arrhythmias.

The Safety and Feasibility of Pulsed-Field Ablation in Atrioventricular Nodal Re-Entrant Tachycardia: First-in-Human Pilot Trial

BACKGROUND

The incidence of atrioventricular conduction system damage during the catheter ablation procedure has long been a safety concern in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) with high tissue selectivity is a promising technique to address this problem in patients with AVNRT.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of PFA in patients with AVNRT.

METHODS

This was an investigator-initiated, single-center, single-arm, prospective study performed in West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Patients diagnosed with AVNRT by electrophysiological examination were included and treated using PFA. The primary outcome was the ability to achieve acute ablation success. The secondary outcomes were ablation success after 6 months and safety incidents reported.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients with AVNRT with a mean age of 47.9 ± 13.9 years were included and underwent PFA. Acute ablation success was achieved in all patients. The skin-to-skin procedure time was 109.1 ± 32.1 minutes, and fluoroscopy time was 4.1 ± 0.9 minutes. A median of 8 (range: 6.5 to 11.0) PFA applications were delivered. The average distance of the closest ablation site to the His bundle was 6.5 ± 2.5 mm, with a minimum distance of 2.0 mm. All patients maintained sinus rhythm after 6 months. No adverse events occurred in any patient during the ablation or the 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

PFA showed favorable feasibility and safety in patients with AVNRT in this pilot study. Further study with larger population and longer follow-up time is warranted to verify the results.

A novel pulsed field ablation system using linear and spiral ablation catheters can create large and durable endocardial and epicardial ventricular lesions in vivo

BACKGROUND

We investigated the preclinical safety and efficacy of ventricular pulsed field ablation (PFA) using a family of novel, 6-/8-Fr, linear, and spiral PFA/mapping catheters (CRC EP, Inc).

METHODS

QRS-gated, bipolar PFA (>2.0 kV) was performed in 10 healthy swine. Altogether, 20 endocardial and epicardial right and left ventricular applications were delivered. The catheters were inserted through an 8.5-Fr steerable introducer. The intensity of skeletal muscle activation was quantified using an accelerometer. Lesions were assessed by pre- versus post-PFA electrogram analysis, pacing threshold, 3D voltage mapping, necropsy, and histology. The swine rete mirabile, liver and kidneys were examined for embolic events.

RESULTS

All applications were single-shot (56 ± 18 s) without catheter repositioning. Minimal microbubbling was observed without significant skeletal muscle stimulation (mean acceleration 0.05 m/s2) or ventricular tachyarrhythmias. There was significant reduction in post- versus pre-PFA electrogram amplitude (0.5 ± 0.2 mV versus 3.2 ± 0.9 mV, P < 0.001) with a marked increase in pacing threshold (>20 mA versus 7.5 ± 2.9 mA, P < 0.001). All lesions were large and durable up to 28 days, measuring 32 ± 5 mm (length), 27 ± 8 mm (width), and 8 ± 3 mm (depth) using the spiral catheters and 43 ± 1 mm (length), 7 ± 1 mm (width), and 8 ± 1 mm (depth) using the linear catheters. Despite higher waveform voltages and prolonged applications, no thermal effects were detected at necropsy/histology. Moreover, gross and microscopic examinations revealed no evidence of thromboembolism, vascular or collateral injury.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel, QRS-gated PFA system using linear and spiral PFA catheters is capable of creating large and durable ventricular lesions in vivo without significant microbubbling, ventricular arrhythmias or thromboembolism.

Respiratory control minimizes diaphragmatic contraction and dry cough during pulsed-field ablation of atrial fibrillation

AIMS

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a promising new ablation modality to treat atrial fibrillation. However, PFA can cause varying degrees of diaphragmatic contraction and dry cough, especially under conscious sedation. This prospective study presents a method to minimize the impact of PFA on diaphragmatic contraction and dry cough during the procedure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients underwent PFA for pulmonary vein (PV) and superior vena cava isolation under conscious sedation. Each patient received two groups of ablations in each vein: the control group allowed PFA application during any phase of respiratory cycle, while the test group used respiratory control, delivering PFA energy only at the end of expiration. A rating score system was developed to assess diaphragmatic contraction and dry cough. A total of 1401 control ablations and 4317 test ablations were performed. The test group had significantly lower scores for diaphragmatic contraction (P < 0.01) and dry cough (P < 0.001) in all PVs compared to the control group. The average relative reductions in scores for all PVs were 33-47% for diaphragmatic contraction and 67-83% for dry cough. The percentage of ablations with scores ≧2 for diaphragmatic contraction decreased significantly from 18.5-28.0% in the control group to 0.4-2.6% in the test group (P < 0.001). For dry cough, the percentage decreased from 11.9-43.7% in the control group to 0.7-2.1% in the test group.

CONCLUSION

Pulsed-field ablation application at the end of expiration can reduce the severity of diaphragmatic contraction and eliminate moderate and severe dry cough during PV isolation performed under conscious sedation.

The Effects of Interphase and Interpulse Delays and Pulse Widths on Induced Muscle Contractions, Pain and Therapeutic Efficacy in Electroporation-Based Therapies

Electroporation is used in medicine for drug and gene delivery, and as a nonthermal ablation method in tumor treatment and cardiac ablation. Electroporation involves delivering high-voltage electric pulses to target tissue; however, this can cause effects beyond the intended target tissue like nerve stimulation, muscle contractions and pain, requiring use of sedatives or anesthetics. It was previously shown that adjusting pulse parameters may mitigate some of these effects, but not how these adjustments would affect electroporation's efficacy. We investigated the effect of varying pulse parameters such as interphase and interpulse delay while keeping the duration and number of pulses constant on nerve stimulation, muscle contraction and assessing pain and electroporation efficacy, conducting experiments on human volunteers, tissue samples and cell lines in vitro. Our results show that using specific pulse parameters, particularly short high-frequency biphasic pulses with short interphase and long interpulse delays, reduces muscle contractions and pain sensations in healthy individuals. Higher stimulation thresholds were also observed in experiments on isolated swine phrenic nerves and human esophagus tissues. However, changes in the interphase and interpulse delays did not affect the cell permeability and survival, suggesting that modifying the pulse parameters could minimize adverse effects while preserving therapeutic goals in electroporation.

Pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation - Lessons from magnetic resonance imaging

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a promising technology for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Due to its unique tissue selectivity, PFA potentially bears superior characteristics as compared to established thermal energy sources in AF ablation procedures. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) is an established tool in the analysis of myocardial fibrosis representing atrial cardiomyopathy as well as ablation-induced atrial scar formation following catheter ablation with thermal energy. Mechanisms of atrial lesion formation differ between thermal ablation and electroporation and its impact on results of CMR imaging are not fully understood until now. In this review article, the potential of CMR imaging for PFA lesion assessment and available data are discussed. Further, additional needs to adopt imaging approaches to the cellular mechanisms of electroporation are considered.

Index-Guided High-Power Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Studies have suggested the superiority of high-power compared to standard-power radiofrequency ablation ablation (RFCA). This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of high-power compared to standard-power RFCA guided by ablation index (AI) or lesion index (LSI).

RECENT FINDINGS

A systematic review and meta-analysis study comparing IGHP and IGLP approaches for AF ablation was conducted. The relevant published studies comparing IGHP and IGSP methods for RFCA in AF patients until October 2022 were collected from Cochrane, ProQuest, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. A total of 2579 AF patients from 11 studies were included, 1682 received IGHP RFCA, and 897 received IGSP RFCA. To achieve successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), the IGHP RFCA group had a significantly shorter procedure time than the IGHP RFCA group (mean difference (MD) -19.91 min; 95% CI -25.23 to -14.59 min; p < 0.01), radiofrequency (RF) application time (MD -10.92 min; 95% CI -14.70 to -7.13 min; p < 0.01), and fewer number of lesions (MD -10.90; 95% CI -18.77 to -3.02; p < 0.01) than the IGSP RFCA. First-pass PVI was significantly greater in the IGHP RFCA group than in the IGSP RFCA group (risk ratio (RR) 1.17; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.28; p < 0.01). The IGHP RFCA is an effective and efficient strategy for AF ablation. The superiority of IGHP RFCA includes the shorter procedure time, shorter RF application time, fewer number of lesions for complete PVI, and more excellent first-pass PVI.

The promise of pulsed field ablation and the challenges ahead

For many years, guidelines have suggested thermal ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Thermal ablation involves the destruction of tissue, leading to multiple complications. This ablation technique has been tried and tested, however, newer techniques are being investigated in order to avoid these complications. Pulsed field ablation, a nonthermal method of tissue ablation, is being explored as a more safe and efficient way to treat atrial fibrillation. This mini review aims to highlight the mechanisms of pulsed field ablation, its history and evolution, previous studies showing its efficacy, its major challenges and pitfalls, and future advancements to overcome these challenges. This method of ablation could potentially revolutionize the treatment of atrial fibrillation and prevent recurrences, thereby making it easier for the physicians and patients involved.

Safety and acute efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with pulsed field ablation vs thermal energy ablation: A meta-analysis of single proportions

Background

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel energy source for the ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) using ultrarapid electrical pulses to induce cell death via electroporation.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and acute efficacy of ablation for AF with PFA vs thermal energy sources.

Methods

We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that evaluated the safety and efficacy of ablation for AF with PFA and compared them to landmark clinical trials for ablation of AF with thermal energy sources. Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation was used to establish variance of raw proportions followed by the inverse with the random-effects model to combine the transformed proportions and generate the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

We included 24 studies for a total of 5203 patients who underwent AF ablation. Among these patients, 54.6% (n = 2842) underwent PFA and 45.4% (n = 2361) underwent thermal ablation. There were significantly fewer periprocedural complications in the PFA group (2.05%; 95% CI 0.94-3.46) compared to the thermal ablation group (7.75%; 95% CI 5.40-10.47) (P = .001). When comparing AF recurrence up to 1 year, there was a statistically insignificant trend toward a lower prevalence of recurrence in the PFA group (14.24%; 95% CI 6.97-23.35) compared to the thermal ablation group (25.98%; 95% CI 15.75-37.68) (P = .132).

Conclusion

Based on the results of this meta-analysis, PFA was associated with lower rates of periprocedural complications and similar rates of acute procedural success and recurrent AF with up to 1 year of follow-up compared to ablation with thermal energy sources.

Reversible Pulsed Electrical Fields as an In Vivo Tool to Study Cardiac Electrophysiology: The Advent of Pulsed Field Mapping

BACKGROUND

During electrophysiological mapping of tachycardias, putative target sites are often only truly confirmed to be vital after observing the effect of ablation. This lack of mapping specificity potentiates inadvertent ablation of innocent cardiac tissue not relevant to the arrhythmia. But if myocardial excitability could be transiently suppressed at critical regions, their suitability as targets could be conclusively determined before delivering tissue-destructive ablation lesions. We studied whether reversible pulsed electric fields (PFREV) could transiently suppress electrical conduction, thereby providing a means to dissect tachycardia circuits in vivo.

METHODS

PFREV energy was delivered from a 9-mm lattice-tip catheter to the atria of 12 swine and 9 patients, followed by serial electrogram assessments. The effects on electrical conduction were explored in 5 additional animals by applying PFREV to the atrioventricular node: 17 low-dose (PFREV-LOW) and 10 high-dose (PFREV-HIGH) applications. Finally, in 3 patients manifesting spontaneous tachycardias, PFREV was applied at putative critical sites.

RESULTS

In animals, the immediate post-PFREV electrogram amplitudes diminished by 74%, followed by 78% recovery by 5 minutes. Similarly, in patients, a 69.9% amplitude reduction was followed by 84% recovery by 3 minutes. Histology revealed only minimal to no focal, superficial fibrosis. PFREV-LOW at the atrioventricular node resulted in transient PR prolongation and transient AV block in 59% and 6%, while PFREV-HIGH caused transient PR prolongation and transient AV block in 30% and 50%, respectively. The 3 tachycardia patients had atypical atrial flutters (n=2) and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. PFREV at putative critical sites reproducibly terminated the tachycardias; ablation rendered the tachycardias noninducible and without recurrence during 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Reversible electroporation pulses can be applied to myocardial tissue to transiently block electrical conduction. This technique of pulsed field mapping may represent a novel electrophysiological tool to help identify the critical isthmus of tachycardia circuits.

Thermal Profiles for Focal Pulsed Electric Field Ablation

BACKGROUND

Pulsed electrical field (PEF) ablation may cause tissue heating. These changes are reportedly small, but each PEF system and waveform will have a different behavior, and data are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare the temperature profile of focal point, monopolar biphasic PEF ablation versus radiofrequency (RF).

METHODS

Ablation lesions were performed on perfused thigh muscle of swine. PEF lesions were performed with 3 compatible ablation catheters at the highest (25 amp) energy, and 1 catheter (Tacticath SE) was also used at the 22- and 19-amp levels. Temperature changes in the tissue were measured using fluoroptic temperature probes inserted at the muscle surface, as well as 3 mm and 7 mm below the surface. Temperatures were recorded continuously at baseline, during delivery, and after ablation. Muscle temperatures were compared with those of RF lesions performed with 1 catheter (Tacticath SE) at 30 W for 30 seconds.

RESULTS

PEF ablation with 3energy settings produced small temperature changes. Maximum average temperature rise for PEF for the maximum (25-amp) energy setting (32 lesions) was 7.6 °C, 2.8 °C, and 0.9 °C at the surface, 3-mm depth, and 7-mm depth, respectively. The temperature rise was dose dependent, with lower energy settings yielding less temperature rise. RF ablations (10 lesions) produced temperature increases of 16.6 °C, 39.8 °C, and 9.5 °C at the surface, 3-mm depth, and 7-mm depth, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PEF caused detectable temperature changes in muscle tissue, which never exceeded 2.8 °C at the 3-mm depth versus baseline. By contrast, RF produced substantial temperature rises. These data support that focal monopolar biphasic energy delivered by this PEF technology retains a favorable thermal safety profile.

Catheter-Based Electroporation: A Novel Technique for Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias

Catheter ablation of arrhythmias is now standard of care in invasive electrophysiology. Current ablation strategies are based on the use of thermal energy. With continuous efforts to optimize thermal energy delivery, effectiveness has greatly improved; however, safety concerns persist. This review focuses on a novel ablation technology, irreversible electroporation (IRE), also known as pulsed-field ablation which may be a safer alternative for arrhythmia management. Pulsed-field ablation is thought to be a nonthermal ablation that applies short-duration high-voltage electrical fields to ablate myocardial tissue with high selectivity and durability while sparing important neighboring structures such as the esophagus and phrenic nerves. There are multiple ongoing studies investigating the potential superior outcomes of IRE compared to radiofrequency ablation in treating patients with atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. In this review, we describe the current evidence of preclinical and clinical trials that have shown promising results of catheter-based IRE.

Systematic Workflow and Electrogram guidance to reduce X-ray Exposure Time during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation: the SWEET-Cryo strategy

AIMS

Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (CB-PVI) offers similar efficacy to point-by-point radiofrequency PVI for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but generally with higher X-ray exposure. Strategies aimed at reducing fluoroscopy mostly rely on other costly imaging techniques, limiting their applicability. We designed a Systematic Workflow and Electrogram guidance to reduce X-ray Exposure Time during CB-PVI (SWEET-Cryo) strategy and analysed its impact on fluoroscopy use and acute procedural and clinical outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled 100 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF undergoing CB-PVI by two operators with different levels of expertise. Patients treated with the SWEET-Cryo strategy (prospective cohort; n = 50) or conventional fluoroscopy (retrospective control cohort; n = 50) were compared. When applied by the senior operator, the SWEET-Cryo strategy significantly reduced the mean fluoroscopy time (FT) (2.6 ± 1.25 vs. 20.3 ± 10.8 min) and mean dose area product (DAP) (5.1 ± 3.8 vs. 35.3 ± 22.3 Gy cm2) compared with those of the control group, respectively (P < 0.001). Significant reductions in FT (6.4 ± 2.5 min vs. 32.5 ± 10.05) and DAP (13.9 ± 7.7 vs. 92.3 ± 63.8) were also achieved by the less experienced operator (P < 0.001). No difference was observed in acute and long-term complications or freedom from AF between fluoroscopy strategies during a 33-month median follow-up. Mean FT was maintained below 3 min in randomly selected cases performed during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to conventional protocols and regardless of the operator's experience, the optimized SWEET-Cryo strategy dramatically reduced fluoroscopy exposure during CB-PVI. The efficacy, safety, or added costs of the ablation procedure were not compromised.