Blood Pressure and Arterial Load After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis

Analysis of Energy and Pressure in the Sinus with Different Blood Pressures after Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of changing systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP, respectively) on sinus flow and valvular and epicardial coronary flow dynamics after TAVR and SAVR.

METHODS

SAPIEN 3 and Magna valves were deployed in an idealized aortic root model as part of a pulse duplicating left heart flow loop simulator. Different combinations of SBP and DBP were applied to the test setup and the resulting change in total coronary flow from baseline (120/60 mmHg), effective orifice area (EOA), and left ventricular (LV) workload, with each combination, was assessed. In addition, particle image velocimetry was used to assess the Laplacian of pressure (∇ 2 P ) in the sinus, coronary and main flow velocities, the energy dissipation rate (EDR) in the sinus and the LV workload.

RESULTS

This study shows that under an elevated SBP, there is an increase in the total coronary flow, EOA, LV workload, peak velocities downstream of the valve,∇ 2 P , and EDR. With an elevated DBP, there was an increase in the total coronary flow and∇ 2 P . However, EOA and LV workload decreased with an increase in DBP, and EDR increased with a decrease in DBP.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood pressure alters the hemodynamics in the sinus and downstream flow following aortic valve replacement, potentially influencing outcomes in some patients.

Prognostic value of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity changes post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) offers a solution, especially for high-risk aortic stenosis (AS) patients. However, patient outcomes post-TAVR show variability, highlighting the need for reliable prognostic indicators. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), a measure of arterial stiffness, may predict outcomes post-TAVR. This study aims to explore baPWV's prognostic value in relation to all-cause mortality post-TAVR. This study prospectively enrolled 212 severe AS patients undergoing TAVR between September 2015 and December 2021, focusing on pre- and post-TAVR baPWV measurements to explore associations with all-cause mortality. Of the 212 patients (119 females, 93 males, mean age 85 years), post-TAVR baPWV increased significantly from 1589 ± 376 to 2010 ± 521 cm/s (p < 0.001). Aortic valve (AV) peak velocity and mean pressure gradient decreased, while AV area increased, indicating procedural success. Despite this, 88% of patients experienced an increase in baPWV, with higher pre-procedure AV peak velocity and mean pressure gradient identified as predictors of increased baPWV post-TAVR. Over 23 months, 29 patients (14%) reached the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality. Notably, changes in baPWV, rather than baseline values, were significantly associated with event-free survival (HR: 0.64 per 1SD increase, p = 0.009). The study highlights the prognostic value of baPWV changes post-TAVR in predicting patient outcomes. Elevated baPWV post-TAVR may reflect a beneficial adaptation to altered hemodynamics, suggesting the need for individualized patient evaluation and the integration of baPWV measurements into clinical practice for improved post-TAVR management.

Positive blood pressure response may predict the recovery of renal function after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

OBJECTIVE

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may ameliorate renal function and increase blood pressure (BP). We aimed to investigate the association between increased BP and improved renal function (IRF) after TAVI.

METHODS

A total of 176 patients who had undergone TAVI were evaluated retrospectively. BP records that were taken 24 h before and 72 h after TAVI were reviewed. Pre-procedural, post-procedural 48 h, and the first month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels were noted. IRF was accepted as a ≥ 10% increase in eGFR. The predictors of acute kidney injury (AKI) development at 48 h and IRF at 1 month were investigated. The association between mortality and BP response was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 157 patients were included in this study after exclusion as defined in the methodology. Mean age was 78.1 ± 7,1 and 51.6% were female. AKI occurred in 25.5% of patients and baseline eGFR and male gender were found as independent predictors for AKI development. IRF was observed in 16% at 48 h and 31.8% of patients at 1-month follow-up. Positive BP response was seen in 42% of patients. Pre-procedural chronic kidney disease, positive BP response, and an early increase in eGFR emerged as independent predictors of IRF at the first month. The patients with positive BP response were found to have decreased mortality at 710 days follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Positive BP response after TAVI is related to improved survival and renal functions. The beneficial effect of TAVI on renal function may be precisely evaluated at 1st month rather than 48 h.

Differential Impact of Blood Pressure Control Targets on Epicardial Coronary Flow After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Background

The cause for the association between increased cardiovascular mortality rates and lower blood pressure (BP) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) is unclear. This study aims to assess how the epicardial coronary flow (ECF) after AVR varies as BP levels are changed in the presence of a right coronary lesion.

Methods

The hemodynamics of a 3D printed aortic root model with a SAPIEN 3 26 deployed were evaluated in an in vitro left heart simulator under a range of varying systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). ECF and the flow ratio index were calculated. Flow index value <0.8 was considered a threshold for ischemia.

Results

As SBP decreased, the average ECF decreased below the physiological coronary minimum at 120 mmHg. As DBP decreased, the average ECF was still maintained above the physiological minimum. The flow ratio index was >0.9 for SBP ≥130 mmHg. However, at an SBP of 120 mmHg, the flow ratio was 0.63 (p ≤ 0.0055). With decreasing DBP, no BP condition yielded a flow ratio index that was less than 0.91.

Conclusions

Reducing BP to the current recommended levels assigned for the general population after AVR in the presence of coronary artery disease may require reconsideration of levels and treatment priority. Additional studies are needed to fully understand the changes in ECF dynamics after AVR in the presence and absence of coronary artery disease.

Using Augmented Mean Arterial Pressure to Identify High Mortality Risk Patients With Moderate Aortic Stenosis

OBJECTIVE

To study the usefulness of a novel echocardiographic marker, augmented mean arterial pressure (AugMAP = [(mean aortic valve gradient + systolic blood pressure) + (2 × diastolic blood pressure)] / 3), in identifying high-risk patients with moderate aortic stenosis (AS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adults with moderate AS (aortic valve area, 1.0-1.5 cm2) at Mayo Clinic sites from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2020, were identified. Baseline demographic, echocardiographic, and all-cause mortality data were retrieved. Patients were grouped into higher and lower AugMAP groups using a cutoff value of 80 mm Hg for analysis. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used to assess the performance of AugMAP.

RESULTS

A total of 4563 patients with moderate AS were included (mean ± SD age, 73.7±12.5 years; 60.5% men). Median follow-up was 2.5 years; 36.0% of patients died. The mean ± SD left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 60.1%±11.4%, and the mean ± SD AugMAP was 99.1±13.1 mm Hg. Patients in the lower AugMAP group, with either preserved or reduced LVEF, had significantly worse survival performance (all P<.001). Multivariate Cox regression showed that AugMAP (hazard ratio, 0.962; 95% CI, 0.942 to 0.981 per 5-mm Hg increase; P<.001) and AugMAP less than 80 mm Hg (hazard ratio, 1.477; 95% CI, 1.241 to 1.756; P<.001) were independently associated with all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

AugMAP is a simple and effective echocardiographic marker to identify high-risk patients with moderate AS independent of LVEF. It can potentially be used in the candidate selection process if moderate AS becomes indicated for aortic valve intervention in the future.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Prognostication with Augmented Mean Arterial Pressure

BACKGROUND

Post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patient outcome is an important research topic. To accurately assess post-TAVR mortality, we examined a family of new echo parameters (augmented systolic blood pressure (AugSBP) and arterial mean pressure (AugMAP)) derived from blood pressure and aortic valve gradients.

METHODS

Patients in the Mayo Clinic National Cardiovascular Diseases Registry-TAVR database who underwent TAVR between 1 January 2012 and 30 June 2017 were identified to retrieve baseline clinical, echocardiographic and mortality data. AugSBP, AugMAP and valvulo-arterial impedance (Zva) (Zva) were evaluated using Cox regression. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and the c-index were used to assess the model performance against the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score.

RESULTS

The final cohort contained 974 patients with a mean age of 81.4 ± 8.3 years old, and 56.6% were male. The mean STS risk score was 8.2 ± 5.2. The median follow-up duration was 354 days, and the one-year all-cause mortality rate was 14.2%. Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression showed that AugSBP and AugMAP parameters were independent predictors for intermediate-term post-TAVR mortality (all p < 0.0001). AugMAP1 < 102.5 mmHg was associated with a 3-fold-increased risk of all-cause mortality 1-year post-TAVR (hazard ratio 3.0, 95%confidence interval 2.0-4.5, p < 0.0001). A univariate model of AugMAP1 surpassed the STS score model in predicting intermediate-term post-TAVR mortality (area under the curve: 0.700 vs. 0.587, p = 0.005; c-index: 0.681 vs. 0.585, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Augmented mean arterial pressure provides clinicians with a simple but effective approach to quickly identify patients at risk and potentially improve post-TAVR prognosis.

Association of ACEI/ARB and statin prescribing patterns with mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): Findings from real-world claims data

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the standard of care for most patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), but the impact of medical therapy prescribing patterns on post-TAVR patients has not been thoroughly investigated.

METHODS

We analyzed Optum claims data from 9,012 adults who received TAVR for AS (January 2014-December 2018). Pharmacy claims data were used to identify patients who filled ACEI/ARB and/or statin prescriptions during the study's 90-day landmark period post-TAVR. Kaplan-Meier and adjusted Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to evaluate the association of prescribing patterns with mortality during the 3-year follow-up period. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine the impact of 11 potential confounders on the observed associations.

RESULTS

A significantly lower adjusted 3-year mortality was observed for patients with post-TAVR prescription for ACEI/ARBs (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.91, P = .0003) and statins (HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.94, P = .0018) compared to patients who did not fill prescriptions for these medications post-TAVR. Subgroup analyses revealed that the survival benefit associated with ACEI/ARB prescription was not affected by any of the potential confounding variables, except preoperative ACEI/ARB prescription was associated with significantly lower risk of mortality vs postoperative prescription only. No other subgroup variables had significant interactions associated with survival benefits, including preoperative use of statins.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large-scale, real-world analysis of patients undergoing TAVR, the prescription of ACEI/ARB and statins was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality at 3-years, especially in those where the medications were initiated preoperatively.

Pulsatile energy consumption as a surrogate marker for vascular afterload improves with time post transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis

The effect of arterial stiffening on elevated pulsatile left ventricular afterload patients with aortic stenosis (AS) is pronounced beyond systemic hypertension. Circulatory afterload pulsatile efficiency (CAPE) is a marker of vascular function, defined as the ratio of steady state energy consumption (SEC) to maintain systemic circulation and pulsatile energy consumption (PEC). Twenty patients aged 80 ± 7 years were assessed at baseline and a median of 60 days post transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), with pulsatile vascular load calculated using simultaneous radial applanation tonometry derived aortic pressure and cardiac magnetic resonance phase-contrast imaging derived ascending aortic flow. Eight out of 20 patients had a reduction in PEC post TAVR, and the reduction of PEC correlated strongly with the number of days post TAVR (R = 0.62, P < 0.01). Patients assessed within the 100 days of TAVR had a rise in their PEC when compared to baseline (0.19 ± 0.09 vs 0.14 ± 0.08 W, P = 0.04). Baseline PEC correlated moderately with baseline SEC (R = 0.49, P = 0.03), and a high baseline PEC was predictive of post TAVR PEC reduction (R = 0.54, P =0.01). Overall, no significant differences were found between baseline and post TAVR for systolic aortic pressure (131 ± 20 vs 131 ± 20 mmHg), systemic vascular resistance (1894 ± 493 vs 2015 ± 519 dynes.s/cm⁵), aortic valve ejection time (337 ± 22 vs 324 ± 34 ms) or aortic characteristic impedance (120 ± 48 vs 107 ± 41 dynes.s/cm⁵). Improved flow profiles after TAVR likely unmask the true vascular properties by altering ventriculo-valvulo-arterial coupling, leading to downstream vascular remodelling secondary to flow conditioning, and results in eventual improvement of pulsatile afterload as reflected by our proposed index of CAPE.

Arterial stiffness in aortic stenosis - complex clinical and prognostic implications

Arterial stiffness and degenerative aortic stenosis (AoS) are frequently associated leading to a combined valvular and vascular load imposed on the left ventricle (LV). Vascular load consists of a pulsatile load represented by arterial stiffness and a steady load corresponding to vascular resistance. Increased vascular load in AoS has been associated with LV dysfunction and poor prognosis in pre-intervention state, as well as after aortic valve replacement (AVR), suggesting that the evaluation of arterial load in AoS may have clinical benefits. Nevertheless, studies that investigated arterial stiffness in AoS either before or after AVR used various methods of measurement and their results are conflicting. The aim of the present review was to summarize the main pathophysiological mechanisms which may explain the complex valvulo-arterial interplay in AoS and their consequences on LV structure and function on the patients' outcome. Future larger studies are needed to clarify the complex hemodynamic modifications produced by increased vascular load in AoS and its changes after AVR. Prospective evaluation is needed to confirm the prognostic value of arterial stiffness in patients with AoS. Simple, non-invasive, reliable methods which must be validated in AoS still remain to be established before implementing arterial stiffness measurement in patients with AoS in clinical practice.

Systemic blood pressure in severe aortic stenosis: Haemodynamic correlates and long-term prognostic impact

AIMS

Blood pressure (BP) targets in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) are controversial. This study sought to describe the haemodynamic profile and the clinical outcome of severe AS patients with low versus high central meaarterial pressure (MAP).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with severe AS (n = 477) underwent right and left heart catheterization prior to aortic valve replacement (AVR). The population was divided into MAP quartiles. The mean systolic BP, diastolic BP, and MAP in the entire population were 149 ± 25, 68 ± 11, and 98 ± 14 mmHg. Patients in the lowest MAP quartile had the lowest left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), systemic vascular resistance, and valvulo-arterial impedance, whereas there were no significant differences in mean right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and stroke volume index across MAP quartiles. However, left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) was lowest in patients in the lowest and highest in those in the highest MAP quartile. After a median (interquartile range) post-AVR follow-up of 3.7 (2.6-5.2) years, mortality was highest in patients in the lowest MAP quartile [hazard ratio 3.08 (95% confidence interval 1.21-7.83); P = 0.02 for lowest versus highest quartile]. In the multivariate analysis, lower MAP [hazard ratio 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.62-0.99) per 10 mmHg increase; P = 0.04], higher mean right atrial pressure and lower LVEF were independent predictors of death.

CONCLUSIONS

In severe AS patients, lower MAP reflects lower systemic vascular resistance and valvulo-arterial impedance, which may help to preserve stroke volume and filling pressures despite reduced left ventricular performance, and lower MAP is a predictor of higher long-term post-AVR mortality.

Immediate reduction in left ventricular ejection time following TAVI is associated with improved quality of life

Background

TAVI has shown to result in immediate and sustained hemodynamic alterations and improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), but previous studies have been suboptimal to predict who might benefit from TAVI. The relationship between immediate hemodynamic changes and outcome has not been studied before. This study sought to assess whether an immediate hemodynamic change, reflecting myocardial contractile reserve, following TAVI is associated with improved HRQoL. Furthermore, it assessed whether pre-procedural cardiac power index (CPI) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) could predict these changes.

Methods

During the TAVI procedure, blood pressure and systemic hemodynamics were prospectively collected with a Nexfin® non-invasive monitor. HRQoL was evaluated pre-procedurally and 12 weeks after the procedure, using the EQ-5D-5L classification tool.

Results

Overall, 97/114 (85%) of the included patients were eligible for analyses. Systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and stroke volume increased immediately after TAVI (all p &lt; 0.005), and left ventricular ejection time (LVET) immediately decreased with 10 ms (95%CI = −4 to −16, p &lt; 0.001). Overall HRQoLindex increased from 0.810 [0.662–0.914] before to 0.887 [0.718–0.953] after TAVI (p = 0.016). An immediate decrease in LVET was associated with an increase in HRQoLindex (0.02 index points per 10 ms LVET decrease, p = 0.041). Pre-procedural CPI and LVEF did not predict hemodynamic changes or change in HRQoL.

Conclusion

TAVI resulted in an immediate hemodynamic response and increase in HRQoL. Immediate reduction in LVET, suggesting unloading of the ventricle, was associated with an increase in HRQoL, but neither pre-procedural CPI nor LVEF predicted these changes.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03088787

Cerebral Microbleeds During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Prospective Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cohort

BACKGROUND

Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) have been observed in healthy elderly people undergoing systematic brain magnetic resonance imaging. The potential role of acute triggers on the appearance of CMBs remains unknown. We aimed to describe the incidence of new CMBs after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and to identify clinical and procedural factors associated with new CMBs including hemostatic measures and anticoagulation management.

METHODS

We evaluated a prospective cohort of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis referred for TAVR for CMBs (METHYSTROKE [Identification of Epigenetic Risk Factors for Ischemic Complication During the TAVR Procedure in the Elderly]). Standardized neurologic assessment, brain magnetic resonance imaging, and analysis of hemostatic measures including von Willebrand factor were performed before and after TAVR. Numbers and location of microbleeds on preprocedural magnetic resonance imaging and of new microbleeds on postprocedural magnetic resonance imaging were reported by 2 independent neuroradiologists blinded to clinical data. Measures associated with new microbleeds and postprocedural outcome including neurologic functional outcome at 6 months were also examined.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients (47% men, 80.9±5.7 years of age) were included. On preprocedural magnetic resonance imaging, 22 patients (26% [95% CI, 17%-37%]) had at least 1 microbleed. After TAVR, new microbleeds were observed in 19 (23% [95% CI, 14%-33%]) patients. The occurrence of new microbleeds was independent of the presence of microbleeds at baseline and of diffusion-weighted imaging hypersignals. In univariable analysis, a previous history of bleeding (P=0.01), a higher total dose of heparin (P=0.02), a prolonged procedure (P=0.03), absence of protamine reversion (P=0.04), higher final activated partial thromboplastin time (P=0.05), lower final von Willebrand factor high-molecular-weight:multimer ratio (P=0.007), and lower final closure time with adenosine-diphosphate (P=0.02) were associated with the occurrence of new postprocedural microbleeds. In multivariable analysis, a prolonged procedure (odds ratio, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.03-1.73] for every 5 minutes of fluoroscopy time; P=0.02) and postprocedural acquired von Willebrand factor defect (odds ratio, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.08-1.89] for every lower 0.1 unit of high-molecular-weight:multimer ratio; P=0.004) were independently associated with the occurrence of new postprocedural microbleeds. New CMBs were not associated with changes in neurologic functional outcome or quality of life at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

One out of 4 patients undergoing TAVR has CMBs before the procedure and 1 out of 4 patients develops new CMBs. Procedural or antithrombotic management and persistence of acquired von Willebrand factor defect were associated with the occurrence of new CMBs.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT02972008.

Care of the patient after valve intervention

This review aims to outline the current evidence base and guidance for care of patients post-valve intervention. Careful follow-up, optimisation of medical therapy, antithrombotics, reduction of cardiovascular risk factors and patient education can help improve patient outcomes and quality of life. Those with mechanical valves should receive lifelong anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist but in certain circumstances may benefit from additional antiplatelet therapy. Patients with surgical bioprosthetic valves, valve repairs and transcatheter aortic valve implantation also benefit from antithrombotic therapy. Additionally, guideline-directed medical therapy for coexistent heart failure should be optimised. Cardiovascular risk factors such as hyperlipidaemia, hypertension and diabetes should be treated in the same way as those without valve intervention. Patients should also be encouraged to exercise regularly, eat healthily and maintain a healthy weight. Currently, there is not enough evidence to support routine cardiac rehabilitation in individuals post-valve surgery or intervention but this may be considered on a case-by-case basis. Women of childbearing age should be counselled regarding future pregnancy and the optimal management of their valve disease in this context. Patients should be educated regarding meticulous oral health, be encouraged to see their dentist regularly and antibiotics should be considered for high-risk dental procedures. Evidence shows that patients post-valve intervention or surgery are best treated in a dedicated valve clinic where they can undergo clinical review and surveillance echocardiography, be provided with heart valve education and have access to the multidisciplinary valve team if needed.

Impact of blood pressure on coronary perfusion and valvular hemodynamics after aortic valve replacement

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate the impact of various blood pressures (BPs) on coronary perfusion and valvular hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement (AVR).

BACKGROUND

Lower systolic and diastolic (SBP/DBP) pressures from the recommended optimal target range of SBP < 120-130 mmHg and DBP < 80 mmHg after AVR have been independently associated with increased cardiovascular and all-cause mortality.

METHODS

The hemodynamic assessment of a 26 mm SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve (TAV), 29 mm Evolut R TAV, and 25 mm Magna Ease surgical aortic valve (SAV) was performed in a pulsed left heart simulator with varying SBP, DBP, and heart rate (HR) conditions (60 and 120 bpm) at 5 L/min cardiac output (CO). Average coronary flow (CF), effective orifice areas (EOAs), and valvulo-arterial impedance (Zva) were calculated.

RESULTS

At HR of 60 bpm, at SBP < 120 mmHg and DBP < 60 mmHg, CF decreased below the physiological lower limit with several different valves. Zva and EOA were found to increase and decrease respectively with increasing SBP and DBP. The same results were found with an HR of 120 bpm. The trends of CF variation with BP were similar in all valves however the drop below the lower physiological CF limit was valve dependent.

CONCLUSION

In a controlled in vitro system, with different aortic valve prostheses in place, CF decreased below the physiologic minimum when SBP and DBP were in the range targeted by blood pressure guidelines. Combined with recent observations from patients treated with AVR, these findings underscore the need for additional studies to identify the optimal BP in patients treated with AVR for AS.

Prognostic Value of Ventricular-Arterial Coupling After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Midterm Clinical Outcomes

Background

Ventricular‐arterial coupling predicts outcomes in patients with heart failure. The arterial elastance to end‐systolic elastance ratio (Ea/Ees) is a noninvasively assessed index that reflects ventricular‐arterial coupling. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of ventricular‐arterial coupling assessed through Ea/Ees after transcatheter aortic valve replacement to predict clinical events.

Methods and Results

We retrieved data on 1378 patients (70% women) who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement between October 2013 and May 2017 from the OCEAN‐TAVI (Optimized transCathEter vAlvular iNtervention) Japanese multicenter registry. We determined the association between Ea/Ees and the composite end point of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death by classifying the patients into quartiles based on Ea/Ees values (group 1: <0.326; group 2: 0.326–0.453; group 3: 0.453–0.666; and group 4: >0.666) during the midterm follow‐up after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. During a median follow‐up period of 736 days (interquartile range, 414–956), there were 247 (17.9%) all‐cause deaths, 89 (6.5%) cardiovascular deaths, 130 (9.4%) hospitalizations for heart failure, and 199 (14.4%) composite events of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death. The incidence of the composite end point was significantly higher in group 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.08–2.87 [P=0.024]), group 3 (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.53–3.86 [P<0.001]), and group 4 (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.83–4.57 [P<0.001]) than that in group 1. On adjusted multivariable Cox analysis, Ea/Ees was significantly associated with composite events (HR, 1.47 per 1‐unit increase; 95% CI, 1.08–2.01 [P=0.015]).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that a higher Ea/Ees at discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with adverse clinical outcomes during midterm follow‐up.

Registration

URL: https://www.upload.umin.ac.jp/. Unique identifier: UMIN000020423.

Arterial biomarkers in the evaluation, management and prognosis of aortic stenosis

Degenerative aortic valve stenosis is the most common primary valve disease and a significant cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In an era when new techniques for the management of aortic stenosis are gaining ground, the understanding of this disease is more important than ever to optimize treatment. So far, the focus has been placed on the assessment of the valve itself. However, the role that the arterial system plays in the pathogenesis and natural history of the disease needs to be further elucidated. Arteriosclerosis, when it coexists with a stenotic valve, augments the load posed on the left ventricle contributing to greater impairment of cardiovascular function. Arterial stiffness, a well-established predictor for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality, could play a role in the prognosis and quality of life of this population. Several studies using a variety of indices to assess arterial stiffness have tried to address the potential utility of arterial function assessment in the case of aortic stenosis. Importantly, reliable data identify a prognostic role of arterial biomarkers in aortic stenosis and stress their possible use to optimize timing and method of treatment. This review aims at summarizing the existing knowledge on the interplay between the heart and the vessels in the presence of degenerative aortic stenosis, prior, upon and after interventional management. Further, it discusses the evidence supporting the potential clinical application of arterial biomarkers for the assessment of progression, severity, management and prognosis of aortic stenosis.

Prevalence of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Caused by Systemic Hypertension Preceding the Development of Severe Aortic Stenosis

It is generally assumed that left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in aortic stenosis (AS) is a compensatory adaptation to chronic outflow obstruction. The advent of transcutaneous aortic valve replacement has stimulated more focus on AS in older patients, most of whom have antecedent hypertension. Accordingly, our aim was to investigate the interaction between hypertension and AS on LV remodeling in contemporary practice. We studied consecutive patients referred for echocardiograms with initial aortic valve (AV) peak velocity <3.0 m/s and a peak velocity of >3.5 m/s on a subsequent study performed at least 5 years later. LV size and geometry were measured echocardiographically. Midwall fractional shortening (FSmw) and peak systolic stress were calculated from 2-dimensional echocardiographic and Doppler data. Of 80 patients with progressive AS, 59% were women with mean age 82 ± 9 years. The average interval between the 2 echocardiograms was 5.9 ± 1.8 years. During the study period, peak velocity increased from 2.5 ± 0.4 to 4.2 ± 0.6 m/s (p < 0.01) and LV mass indexed to body surface area increased from 80 ± 28 to 122 ± 51 g/m² (p < 0.01) with a corresponding shift from normal or concentric LV remodeling geometry to concentric hypertrophy. There was no correlation between change in LV mass index and AV mean gradient or valvulo-arterial impedance. However, change in LV mass index did correlate positively with initial peak velocity and inversely with initial LV mass. Plots of FSmw against circumferential stress at baseline and follow-up suggest that systolic function more than compensates for increasing load in many patients. In conclusion, most patients seen in our practice with severe AS have antecedent hypertension and LV remodeling at a time when outflow obstruction is mild. LV remodeling worsens in parallel with worsening severity of AS. Remodeling in these patients features increasing concentric remodeling of the LV, rather than LV dilation. Systolic function, as assessed by FSmw, remains compensated, or even improves relative to afterload, during progression of AS. Given these findings, we speculate that regression of LV hypertrophy to normal will not be affected by transcutaneous aortic valve replacement because LV hypertrophy preceded hemodynamically severe AS.

Ageing, hypertension and aortic valve stenosis - Understanding the series circuit using cardiac magnetic resonance and applanation tonometry

BACKGROUND

Aortic stenosis (AS) is no longer considered to be a disease of fixed left ventricular (LV) afterload, but rather, functions as a series circuit, with important contributions from both the valve and vasculature. Patients with AS are typically elderly, with hypertension and a markedly remodelled aorta. The arterial component is sizeable, and yet, quantifying this to-date has been difficult to determine. We compared measurement of aortic pressure, flow and global LV load using a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)/applanation tonometry (AT) technique to uncouple ventriculo-arterial (VA) interactions.

METHODS

20 healthy elderly patients and 20 with AS underwent a CMR/AT protocol. CMR provided LV volume and aortic flow simultaneously with AT pressure acquisition. Aortic pressure was derived by transformation of the AT waveform. Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and global LV load were determined as the relationship of pressure to flow in the frequency domain. Values from both cohorts were compared.

RESULTS

AS patients were older (p ​< ​0.01) albeit with no significant difference in brachial or central aortic pressure. SVR (14228 vs 19906 ​dyne ​s.cm-3; p ​= ​0.02) and load (740 vs 946 ​dyne ​s.cm-3; p ​= ​0.02) were higher in patients with AS, whilst aortic peak flow velocity was lower (38 vs 58 ​cm/s; p ​< ​0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantification of aortic pressure, flow velocity and global LV load using a simultaneous CMR/AT technique is able to demonstrate the progressive effects of hypertension and aortic stiffening with advanced age and valvular stenosis. This technique may help to better identify future patients at risk of VA coupling mismatch after correction of AS.

Hypertension in aortic stenosis: a focused review and recommendations for clinical practice

: In patients with aortic stenosis, the presence of hypertension negatively affects the hemodynamic severity of the stenosis, and worsens adverse left ventricular remodeling. It accelerates the progression of the stenosis and is associated with worse prognosis. Proper management of hypertension is thus crucial but there are concerns about the safety and efficacy of antihypertensive medications as well as uncertainty about optimal blood pressure (BP) targets and their impact on left ventricular mass regression and survival benefits. In the present review, we discuss these issues based on the evidence available in the current literature. Focus is first directed on the consequences of a persistently elevated BP before and after surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter valve implantation, and the clinical significance of an abnormal BP response during exercise in patients with significant aortic stenosis. Available data on use of antihypertensive drugs are then critically addressed, the conclusion being that calcium channel blockers may be associated with lower survival, and that diuretics may have disadvantages in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and smaller left ventricular cavity dimensions, β-blockers may be well tolerated and a better choice for patients with concomitant coronary artery disease and arrhythmias. Renin--angiotensin system blockers improve survival given either before or after valve intervention. Emphasis is placed on the fact that evidence is not derived from randomized trials but only from observational studies. Finally, we discuss the optimal SBP level to reach in patients with aortic stenosis. Again, randomized trials are not available but observational evidence suggests that values between 130 and 139 mmHg systolic and 70-90 mmHg diastolic might represent the best option, and lower BP targets should probably be avoided.

Effect of Transaortic Valve Intervention for Aortic Stenosis on Myocardial Mechanics

Chronic afterload excess in aortic stenosis results in compensatory concentric hypertrophy which mitigates the increased systolic load. Surgical aortic valve replacement has been shown to decrease afterload and improve left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF). The extent to which these changes take place in patients undergoing TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve intervention) may be different than what has been observed in the surgical aortic valve replacement patients who were generally younger with few co-morbidities. Accordingly, we analyzed indices of LV structure and ventricular mechanics pre- and 1-year after TAVI in 397 patients (mean age 81±9, 46% women) with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, complete echocardiographic data was available in 156 patients and these patients compromised our study population. Our principal findings are: (1) LV remodeling occurs after TAVI; (2) afterload decreases significantly; (3) LV chamber and myocardial function, assessed by left ventricular ejection fraction and midwall fractional shortening, and stroke volume, respectively, remain unchanged or decrease. In conclusion, TAVI effects LV remodeling despite significant co-morbidities. Thus, TAVI reduces afterload and leads to LV remodeling. Surprisingly, however, systolic function does not improve. These data run counter to the paradigm that afterload reduction improves systolic function and suggest that the response to afterload reduction is complex in the TAVI population.

Meta-analysis of impact of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

INTRODUCTION

To determine whether renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) prescription is associated with better survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), we performed the first meta-analysis of currently available studies.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

To identify all studies reporting impact of RASI prescription on survival after TAVI, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, etc. through October 2019. We extracted adjusted (if unavailable, unadjusted) hazard ratios (HRs) with their confidence intervals (CIs) of midterm (up to ≥6-month) all-cause mortality for RASI prescription from each study and combined study-specific estimates using inverse variance-weighted averages of logarithmic HRs in the random-effects model.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We identified 13 eligible studies with a total of 26,132 TAVI patients and included them in the present meta-analysis. None was a randomized controlled trial, 5 were observational studies comparing patients with versus without RASI prescription (including 3 propensity score matched studies), and 8 were observational studies investigating RASI prescription as one of covariates. The primary meta-analysis of all studies demonstrated that RASI prescription was associated with significantly lower midterm mortality (HR=0.83; 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.92; P=0.0002). Although we identified significant funnel plot asymmetry (P=0.036 by the rank correlation test) suggesting publication bias, correcting for it using the trim-and-fill method did not substantially alter the result favoring RASI prescription (corrected HR=0.85; 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.95; P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

RASI prescription may be associated with better midterm survival after TAVI.

Ventricular stroke work and vascular impedance refine the characterization of patients with aortic stenosis

Aortic stenosis (AS) management is classically guided by symptoms and valvular metrics. However, the natural history of AS is dictated by coupling of the left ventricle, aortic valve, and vascular system. We investigated whether metrics of ventricular and vascular state add to the appreciation of AS state above valve gradient alone. Seventy patients with severe symptomatic AS were prospectively followed from baseline to 30 days after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Left ventricular stroke work (SW_LV) and vascular impedance spectrums were calculated noninvasively using in-house models based on central blood pressure waveforms, along with hemodynamic parameters from echocardiograms. Patients with higher preprocedural SW_LV and lower vascular impedance were more likely to experience improved QOL after TAVR. Patients fell into two categories: those who did and those who did not exhibit increase in blood pressure after TAVR. In patients who developed hypertension (19%), vascular impedance increased and SW_LV remained unchanged (impedance at zeroth harmonic: Z ₀, from 3964.4 to 4851.8 dyne·s/cm³, P = 0.039; characteristic impedance: Z _c, from 376.2 to 603.2 dyne·s/cm³, P = 0.033). SW_LV dropped only in patients who did not develop new hypertension after TAVR (from 1.58 to 1.26 J; P < 0.001). Reduction in valvular pressure gradient after TAVR did not predict change in SW_LV (r = 0.213; P = 0.129). Reduction of SW_LV after TAVR may be an important metric in management of AS, rather than relying solely on the elimination of transvalvular pressure gradients.

The impact of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on arterial stiffness and wave reflections

BACKGROUND

The study of arterial properties in patients with aortic valve stenosis who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains challenging and results so far seem equivocal. We sought to investigate the acute and long-term effect of TAVI on arterial stiffness and wave reflections.

METHODS

We enrolled 90 patients (mean age 80.2 ± 8.1 years, 50% males) with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Arterial stiffness was assessed by carotid-femoral and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (cfPWV and baPWV). Augmentation index corrected for heart rate (AIx@75), central pressures and subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR) were assessed with arterial tonometry. Measurements were conducted at baseline, after TAVI and at 1 year.

RESULTS

Immediately after TAVI there was an increase in arterial stiffness (7.5 ± 1.5 m/s vs 8.4 ± 1.7 m/s, p = .001 for cfPWV and 1773 ± 459 vs 2383 ± 645 cm/s, p < .001 for baPWV) that was retained at 1 year (7.5 ± 1.5 m/s vs 8.7 ± 1.7 m/s, p < .001 and 1773 ± 459 cm/s vs 2286 ± 575, p < .001). Post-TAVI we also observed a decrease in AIx@75 (32.2 ± 12.9% vs 27.9 ± 8.4%, p = .016) that was attenuated 1 year later (32.2 ± 12.9% vs 29.8 ± 9.1%, p = .38), and an increase in SEVR (131.2 ± 30.0% vs 148.4 ± 36.1%, p = .002), which remained improved at 1 year (131.2 ± 30.0% vs 146.0 ± 32.2%, p = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

After TAVI the arterial system exhibits an increase of stiffness in response to the acute relief of the obstruction, which is retained in the long term.

Additive Value of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and C-Reactive Protein Level Assessment for Prediction of 2-year Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Available prediction models are inaccurate in elderly who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of present study was to analyze the separate and combined prognostic values of baseline HDL-C and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in patients treated successfully with TAVI who had complete 2-year follow-up. We analyzed 334 patients treated with TAVI from 01/2010 to 07/2017 who had measurements of HDL-C and CRP on admission or during qualification for the procedure. Baseline HDL-C ≤46 mg/dl (areas under the curve [AUC] = 0.657) and CRP ≥0.20 mg/dl (AUC = 0.634) were predictive of 2-year mortality. After stratification with both cutoffs, patients with low HDL-C and concomitant high CRP most often had LVEF ≤50% and were high risk as per EuroSCORE II. Those with isolated CRP elevation had the lowest frequency of LVEF ≤50%, but more sarcopenia (based on psoas muscle area). After adjustment in the multivariate analysis for other identified predictors including EuroSCORE II and statin therapy, isolated HDL-C ≤46 mg/dl (identified in 40 patients) and isolated CRP ≥0.20 mg/dl (n = 109) were both independent predictors of 2-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.92 and HR = 2.42, respectively) compared with patients with both markers within established cutoffs (n = 105) who had the lowest 2-year mortality (9.5%). Patients with both markers exceeding cutoffs (n = 80) had the highest risk (HR = 4.53) with 2-year mortality of 42.5%. High CRP was associated with increased mortality within the first year of follow-up, whereas low HDL-C increased mortality in the second year. The combination of both markers with EuroSCORE II enhanced mortality prediction (AUC = 0.697). In conclusion, low baseline HDL-C and high CRP jointly contribute to the prediction of increased all-cause mortality after TAVI.

Management of patients with combined arterial hypertension and aortic valve stenosis: a consensus document from the Council on Hypertension and Council on Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology, the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is the third most common cardiovascular disease. The prevalence of both AS and arterial hypertension increases with age, and the conditions therefore often co-exist. Co-existence of AS and arterial hypertension is associated with higher global left ventricular (LV) pressure overload, more abnormal LV geometry and function, and more adverse cardiovascular outcome. Arterial hypertension may also influence grading of AS, leading to underestimation of the true AS severity. Current guidelines suggest re-assessing patients once arterial hypertension is controlled. Management of arterial hypertension in AS has historically been associated with prudence and concerns, mainly related to potential adverse consequences of drug-induced peripheral vasodilatation combined with reduced stroke volume due to the fixed LV outflow obstruction. Current evidence suggests that patients should be treated with antihypertensive drugs blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, adding further drug classes when required, to achieve similar target blood pressure (BP) values as in hypertensive patients without AS. The introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation has revolutionized the management of patients with AS, but requires proper BP management during and following valve replacement. The purpose of this document is to review the recent evidence and provide practical expert advice on management of hypertension in patients with AS.

Priorities for Patient-Centered Research in Valvular Heart Disease: A Report From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group

Over the past decade, the field of valvular heart disease (VHD) has rapidly transformed, largely as a result of the development and improvement of less invasive transcatheter approaches to valve repair or replacement. This transformation has been supported by numerous well-designed randomized trials, but they have centered almost entirely on devices and procedures. Outside this scope of focus, however, myriad aspects of therapy and management for patients with VHD have either no guidelines or recommendations based only on expert opinion and observational studies. Further, research in VHD has often failed to engage patients to inform study design and identify research questions of greatest importance and relevance from a patient perspective. Accordingly, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened a Working Group on Patient-Centered Research in Valvular Heart Disease, composed of clinician and research experts and patient advocacy experts to identify gaps and barriers to research in VHD and identify research priorities. While recognizing that important research remains to be done to test the safety and efficacy of devices and procedures to treat VHD, we intentionally focused less attention on these areas of research as they are more commonly pursued and supported by industry. Herein, we present the patient-centered research gaps, barriers, and priorities in VHD and organized our report according to the "patient journey," including access to care, screening and diagnosis, preprocedure therapy and management, decision making when a procedure is contemplated (clinician and patient perspectives), and postprocedure therapy and management. It is hoped that this report will foster collaboration among diverse stakeholders and highlight for funding bodies the pressing patient-centered research gaps, opportunities, and priorities in VHD in order to produce impactful patient-centered research that will inform and improve patient-centered policy and care.

Acute Effects of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Central Aortic Hemodynamics in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

Severe aortic stenosis induces abnormalities in central aortic pressure, with consequent impaired organ and tissue perfusion. Relief of aortic stenosis by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is associated with both a short- and long-term hypertensive response. Counterintuitively, patients who are long-term normotensive post-TAVR have a worsened prognosis compared with patients with hypertension, yet the underlying mechanisms are not understood. We investigated immediate changes in invasively measured left ventricular and central aortic pressure post-TAVR in patients with severe aortic stenosis using aortic reservoir pressure, wave intensity analysis, and indices of aortic function. Fifty-four patients (mean age 83.6±6.2 years, 50.0% female) undergoing TAVR were included. We performed reservoir pressure and wave intensity analysis on invasively acquired pressure waveforms from the ascending aorta and left ventricle immediately pre- and post-TAVR. Following TAVR, there were increases in systolic, diastolic, mean, and pulse aortic pressures (all P<0.05). Post-TAVR reservoir pressure was unchanged (54.5±12.4 versus 56.6±14.0 mm Hg, P=0.30) whereas excess pressure increased 47% (29.0±10.9 versus 42.6±15.5 mm Hg, P<0.001). Wave intensity analysis (arbitrary units, au) demonstrated increased forward compression wave (64.9±35.5 versus 124.4±58.9, ×10³ au, P<0.001), backward compression wave (11.6±5.5 versus 14.4±6.9, ×10³ au, P=0.01) and forward expansion wave energies (43.2±27.3 versus 82.8±53.1, ×10³ au, P<0.001). Subendocardial viability ratio improved with aortic function effectively unchanged post-TAVR. Increased central aortic pressure following TAVR relates to increased transmitted power and energy to the proximal aorta with increased excess pressure but unchanged reservoir pressure. These changes provide a potential mechanism for the improved prognosis associated with relative hypertension post-TAVR.

Bedside Renal Doppler Ultrasonography and Acute Kidney Injury after TAVR

Acute kidney injury (AKI) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is associated with a dismal prognosis. Elevated renal resistive index (RRI), through renal Doppler ultrasound (RDU) evaluation, has been associated with AKI development and increased systemic arterial stiffness. Our pilot study aimed to investigate the performance of Doppler based RRI to predict AKI and outcomes in TAVR patients. From May 2018 to May 2019, 100 patients with severe aortic stenosis were prospectively enrolled for TAVR and concomitant RDU evaluation at our institution (Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg University, France). AKI by serum Creatinine (sCr-AKI) was defined according to the VARC-2 definition and AKI by serum Cystatin C (sCyC-AKI) was defined as an sCyC increase of greater than 15% with baseline value. Concomitant RRI measurements as well as renal and systemic hemodynamic parameters were recorded before, one day, and three days after TAVR. It was found that 10% of patients presented with AKI_sCr and AKI_sCyC. The whole cohort showed higher baseline RRI values (0.76 ± 0.7) compared to normal known and accepted values. AKI_sCyC had significant higher post-procedural RRI one day (Day 1) after TAVR (0.83 ± 0.1 vs. 0.77 ± 0.6, CI 95%, p = 0.005). AUC for AKI_sCyC was 0.766 and a RRI cut-off value of ≥ 0.795 had the most optimal sensitivity/specificity (80/62%) combination. By univariate Cox analysis, Mehran Risk Score, higher baseline right atrial pressure at baseline > 0.8 RRI values one day after TAVR (HR 6.5 (95% CI 1.3-32.9; p = 0.021) but not RRI at baseline were significant predictors of AKI_sCyC. Importantly, no significant impact of baseline biological parameters, renal or systemic parameters could be demonstrated. Doppler-based RRI can be helpful for the non-invasive assessment of AKI development after TAVR.

Lower Blood Pressure After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement is Associated with Increased Mortality

Background Blood pressure (BP) guidelines for patients with aortic stenosis or a history of aortic stenosis treated with aortic valve replacement (AVR) match those in the general population, but this extrapolation may not be warranted. Methods and Results Among patients enrolled in the Medtronic intermediate, high, and extreme risk trials, we included those with a transcatheter AVR (n=1794) or surgical AVR (n=1103) who were alive at 30 days. The associations between early (average of discharge and 30 day post-AVR) systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) measurements and clinical outcomes between 30 days and 1 year were evaluated. Among 2897 patients, after adjustment, spline curves demonstrated an association between lower SBP (<120 mm Hg, representing 21% of patients) and DBP (<60 mm Hg, representing 30% of patients) and increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and repeat hospitalization. These relationships were unchanged when patients with moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation post-AVR were excluded. After adjustment, compared with DBP 60 to <80 mm Hg, DBP 30 to <60 mm Hg was associated with increased all-cause (adjusted hazard ratio 1.62, 95% CI 1.23-2.14) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 2.13, 95% CI 1.52-3.00), but DBP 80 to <100 mm Hg was not. Similarly, after adjustment, compared with SBP 120 to <150 mm Hg, SBP 90 to <120 mm Hg was associated with increased all-cause (adjusted hazard ratio 1.63, 95% CI 1.21-2.21) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.81, 95% CI 1.25-2.61), but SBP 150 to <180 mm Hg was not. Conclusions Lower BP in the first month after transcatheter AVR or surgical AVR is common and associated with increased mortality and repeat hospitalization. Clarifying optimal BP targets in these patients ought to be a priority and may improve patient outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration Information URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01586910, NCT01240902.

Low systemic arterial compliance is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in aortic valve stenosis

Objective

Lower systemic arterial compliance (SAC) is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension, but this has not been assessed in a prospective study in aortic valve stenosis (AS).

Methods

Data from 1641 patients (38% women) with initially asymptomatic mild-moderate AS enrolled in the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis study was used. Median follow-up was 4.3 years. SAC was assessed from Doppler stroke volume index to central pulse pressure ratio and considered low if ≤0.64 mL/m², corresponding to the lower tertile in the population. The association of SAC with outcome was assessed in Cox regression analysis and reported as HR and 95% CI.

Results

Low SAC at baseline was characterised by older age, female sex, hypertension, obesity, presence of a small aortic root, lower mean aortic gradient and more severe AS by effective aortic valve area (all p<0.01). In Cox regression analysis adjusting for factors, low SAC was associated with higher HRs for cardiovascular death (HR 2.13(95% CI 1.34 to 3.40) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.71(95% CI 1.23 to 2.38)), both p=0.001). The results did not change when systolic or diastolic blood pressure, other measures of AS severity or presence of discordantly graded AS were included in subsequent models. Presence of low SAC did not improve mortality prediction in reclassification analysis.

Conclusions

In patients with AS without diabetes and known cardiovascular disease, but a high prevalence of hypertension, low SAC was associated with higher cardiovascular and all-cause mortality independent of well-known prognosticators.

Trial registration number

NCT00092677; Post-results.

Imaging and Impact of Myocardial Fibrosis in Aortic Stenosis

Aortic stenosis is characterized both by progressive valve narrowing and the left ventricular remodeling response that ensues. The only effective treatment is aortic valve replacement, which is usually recommended in patients with severe stenosis and evidence of left ventricular decompensation. At present, left ventricular decompensation is most frequently identified by the development of typical symptoms or a marked reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction <50%. However, there is growing interest in using the assessment of myocardial fibrosis as an earlier and more objective marker of left ventricular decompensation, particularly in asymptomatic patients, where guidelines currently rely on nonrandomized data and expert consensus. Myocardial fibrosis has major functional consequences, is the key pathological process driving left ventricular decompensation, and can be divided into 2 categories. Replacement fibrosis is irreversible and identified using late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance, while diffuse fibrosis occurs earlier, is potentially reversible, and can be quantified with cardiac magnetic resonance T1 mapping techniques. There is a substantial body of observational data in this field, but there is now a need for randomized clinical trials of myocardial imaging in aortic stenosis to optimize patient management. This review will discuss the role that myocardial fibrosis plays in aortic stenosis, how it can be imaged, and how these approaches might be used to track myocardial health and improve the timing of aortic valve replacement.

Arterial Properties as Determinants of Left Ventricular Mass and Fibrosis in Severe Aortic Stenosis: Findings From ACRIN PA 4008

Background The role of arterial load in severe aortic stenosis is increasingly recognized. However, patterns of pulsatile load and their implications in this population are unknown. We aimed to assess the relationship between the arterial properties and both (1) left ventricular remodeling and fibrosis and (2) the clinical course of patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement ( AVR ). Methods and Results We enrolled 38 participants with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis scheduled to undergo surgical AVR . Aortic root characteristic impedance, wave reflections parameters (reflection magnitude, reflected wave transit time), and myocardial extracellular mass were measured with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and arterial tonometry Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was repeated at 6 months in 30 participants. A reduction in cellular mass (133.6 versus 113.9 g; P=0.002) but not extracellular mass (42.3 versus 40.6 g; P=0.67) was seen after AVR . Participants with higher extracellular mass exhibited greater reflection magnitude (0.68 versus 0.54; P=0.006) and lower aortic root characteristic impedance (56.3 versus 96.9 dynes/s per cm5; P=0.006). Reflection magnitude was a significant predictor of smaller improvement in the quality of life (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score) after AVR ( R=-0.51; P=0.0026). The 6-minute walk distance at 6 months after AVR was positively correlated with the reflected wave transit time ( R=0.52; P=0.01). Conclusions Consistent with animal studies, arterial wave reflections are associated with interstitial volume expansion in severe aortic stenosis and predict a smaller improvement in quality of life following AVR . Future trials should assess whether wave reflections represent a potential therapeutic target to mitigate myocardial interstitial remodeling and to improve the clinical status of this patient population.

Hypertension and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: parallel or series?

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in the elderly and it causes significant morbidity and mortality. Hypertension is also highly prevalent in elderly patients with AS, and AS patients with hypertension have worse outcomes. Accurate assessment of AS severity and understanding its relationship with arterial compliance has become increasingly important as the options for valve management, particularly transcatheter interventions, have grown. The parameters used for quantifying stenosis severity have traditionally mainly focused on the valve itself. However, AS is now recognized as a systemic disease involving aging ventricles and stiff arteries rather than one limited solely to the valve. Over the last decade, valvuloarterial impedance, a measure of global ventricular load, has contributed to our understanding of the pathophysiology and course of AS in heterogeneous patients, even when segregated by symptoms and severity. This review summarizes our growing understanding of the interplay between ventricle, valve, and vessel, with a particular emphasis on downstream vascular changes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and the role of valvuloarterial impedance in predicting left ventricular changes and prognosis in patients with various transvalvular flow patterns.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The year in review 2017

This article is a continuation of our previously published annual reviews of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). In 2017, TAVR further established a foothold in the management of intermediate risk patients with the publication of SURTAVI trial. Randomized trials also addressed the use of cerebral protection during TAVR and single versus dual antiplatelet therapy after TAVR. Newer generation valve systems continued to be studied for their efficacy and safety. This paper summarizes the major studies published in 2017.

The development or worsening of hypertension after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) improves short-term and long-term patient outcomes

Objectives

In patients with symptomatic aortic valve disease who are at intermediate to high risk for open surgical aortic valve replacement, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) decreases overall mortality and improves quality of life. Hypertension (HTN) after TAVR has been associated with improved cardiac function and short-term survival but its effect on survival over 1 year is unclear. Our study aims to evaluate the effect of HTN following TAVR on short-term and long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective chart review case-control study of 343 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR between August 2012 and November 2016 was performed to elucidate the relationship between HTN and post-TAVR outcomes.

Results

193 patients who underwent TAVR (56.2%) developed or had a worsening of their HTN after TAVR. The development of post-TAVR HTN was associated with a significantly better overall survival at 1 year (89% vs 67%, p<0.001) and 2 years (72% vs 46%, p=0.002). Patients with increased blood pressure also had a significant lower in hospital cardiovascular mortality (1% vs 12%, p<0.001). However, the development or worsening of their HTN after TAVR was associated with an increase in heart failure (HF) exacerbations and diuretic use.

Conclusions

The development or worsening of HTN after TAVR is associated with improved overall survival despite an increase in postprocedural HF exacerbations and antihypertensive medication utilisation. The outcomes of this study could be important in postoperative management of patients who underwent TAVR.