Coronary computed tomographic angiography and risk of all-cause mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction in subjects without chest pain syndrome from the CONFIRM Registry (coronary CT angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an international multicenter registry)

Atherosclerosis evaluation and cardiovascular risk estimation using coronary computed tomography angiography

Clinical risk scores based on traditional risk factors of atherosclerosis correlate imprecisely to an individual's complex pathophysiological predisposition to atherosclerosis and provide limited accuracy for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Over the past two decades, computed tomography scanners and techniques for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) analysis have substantially improved, enabling more precise atherosclerotic plaque quantification and characterization. The accuracy of CCTA for quantifying stenosis and atherosclerosis has been validated in numerous multicentre studies and has shown consistent incremental prognostic value for MACE over the clinical risk spectrum in different populations. Serial CCTA studies have advanced our understanding of vascular biology and atherosclerotic disease progression. The direct disease visualization of CCTA has the potential to be used synergistically with indirect markers of risk to significantly improve prevention of MACE, pending large-scale randomized evaluation.

Coronary Artery Disease: Role of Computed Tomography and Recent Advances

In this review, the authors summarize the role of coronary computed tomography angiography and coronary artery calcium scoring in different clinical presentations of chest pain and preventative care and discuss future directions and new technologies such as pericoronary fat inflammation and the growing footprint of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine.

Testosterone therapy and the risk of cardiovascular disease in older, hypogonadal men

The debate over the cardiovascular (CV) implications of testosterone therapy (TT) have resulted in diverging safety recommendations and clinical guidelines worldwide. This narrative review synthesizes and critically evaluates long-term studies examining the effects of TT within the context of aging, obesity, and endogenous sex hormones on CV disease (CVD) risk to support informed clinical decision-making. Observational studies have variably linked low endogenous testosterone with increased CVD risk, while randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrate that TT yields cardiometabolic benefits without increasing short-term CV risk. The TRAVERSE trial, as the first RCT powered to assess CVD events, did not show increased major adverse cardiac events (MACE) incidence; however, its limitations - specifically the maintenance of testosterone at low-normal levels, a high participant discontinuation rate, and short follow-up - warrant a careful interpretation of its results. Furthermore, findings from the TTrials cardiovascular sub-study, which showed an increase in non-calcified plaque, indicate the need for ongoing research into the long-term CV impact of TT. The decision to initiate TT should consider the current evidence gaps, particularly for older men with known CVD. The CV effects of maintaining physiological testosterone levels through exogenous means remain to be fully explored. Until more definitive evidence is available, clinical practice should prioritize individualized care and informed discussions on the potential CV implications of TT.

Impact of coronary CT angiography in selection of treatment modalities and subsequent cardiovascular events in Thai patients with stable CAD

BACKGROUND

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) enables improved diagnosis of subclinical, coronary artery disease (CAD). This retrospective cohort study investigated the association between different treatment modalities guided by CCTA and the prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with stable CAD.

METHODS

From 2005 to 2013, a total of 9338 patients, including both asymptomatic individuals with risk factors and symptomatic patients with suspected CAD, who underwent CCTA were analyzed. The patients were categorized into one of three groups based on results of CCTA: obstructive CAD (≥ 50% stenosis in at least one vessel), non-obstructive CAD (1-49% stenosis in at least one vessel), and no observed CAD (0% stenosis). They were subsequently followed up to assess the treatment they received and the occurrence of MACEs (cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or late revascularization).

RESULTS

During an average follow-up period of 9.9 ± 2.4 years, patients with obstructive CAD had the highest incidence of MACEs (19.8%), followed by those with non-obstructive CAD and no coronary artery stenosis (10.3 and 5.5%, respectively). After adjusting for confounding variables, it was found that patients treated with statins alone were the least likely to develop MACEs in all three groups, compared to those receiving no treatment, with hazard ratios (95% CI) of 0.43 (0.32, 0.58), 0.47 (0.34, 0.64), and 0.46 (0.31, 0.69), respectively. In patients with obstructive CAD, treatment with a combination of statin and aspirin, or early revascularization was associated with a lower likelihood of experiencing MACEs compared to no treatment with hazard ratios of 0.43 (0.33, 0.58) and 0.64 (0.43, 0.97), respectively.

CONCLUSION

CCTA offers useful guidance for the treatment of patients with stable CAD and shows potential for prevention of CV events. However, the full validation of a given strategy utilizing CCTA will require a prospective longitudinal study, utilizing a randomized clinical trial design.

Rationale and design of the CONFIRM2 (Quantitative COroNary CT Angiography Evaluation For Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational, Multicenter Registry) study

BACKGROUND

In the last 15 years, large registries and several randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the diagnostic and prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Advances in CT scanner technology and developments of analytic tools now enable accurate quantification of coronary artery disease (CAD), including total coronary plaque volume and low attenuation plaque volume. The primary aim of CONFIRM2, (Quantitative COroNary CT Angiography Evaluation For Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational, Multicenter Registry) is to perform comprehensive quantification of CCTA findings, including coronary, non-coronary cardiac, non-cardiac vascular, non-cardiac findings, and relate them to clinical variables and cardiovascular clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

CONFIRM2 is a multicenter, international observational cohort study designed to evaluate multidimensional associations between quantitative phenotype of cardiovascular disease and future adverse clinical outcomes in subjects undergoing clinically indicated CCTA. The targeted population is heterogenous and includes patients undergoing CCTA for atherosclerotic evaluation, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease or pre-procedural evaluation. Automated software will be utilized for quantification of coronary plaque, stenosis, vascular morphology and cardiac structures for rapid and reproducible tissue characterization. Up to 30,000 patients will be included from up to 50 international multi-continental clinical CCTA sites and followed for 3-4 years.

SUMMARY

CONFIRM2 is one of the largest CCTA studies to establish the clinical value of a multiparametric approach to quantify the phenotype of cardiovascular disease by CCTA using automated imaging solutions.

Stratification in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Imaging, Biomarkers, and Genetic Testing

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is the most common monogenic autosomal dominant disorder. However, the condition is often underdiagnosed and undertreated. The objective of this review is to provide an update on the risk stratification in patients with HeFH, incorporating new cardiovascular imaging techniques, various biomarkers, and genetic studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The diagnosis of HeFH places patients in a high cardiovascular risk category due to the increased incidence of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, the level of risk varies significantly among different individuals with HeFH. Achieving an optimal stratification of cardiovascular risk is crucial for establishing appropriate and accurate treatment and management strategies. Different new tools such as risk scores have emerged in recent years, aiding physicians in assessing the risk stratification for HeFH using imaging, biomarkers, and genetics. This review emphasizes that not all patients with HeFH face the same cardiovascular risk. By utilizing different assessment tools, we can identify those who require more intensive monitoring, follow-up, and treatment.

Preventative Imaging with Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is the diagnostic modality of choice for patients with stable chest pain. In this review, we scrutinize the evidence on the use of CCTA for the screening of asymptomatic patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical evidence suggests that CCTA imaging enhances cardiovascular risk stratification and prompts the timely initiation of preventive treatment leading to reduced risk of major adverse coronary events. Visualization of coronary plaques by CCTA also helps patients to comply with preventive medications. The presence of non-obstructive plaques and total plaque burden are prognostic for cardiovascular events. High-risk plaque features and pericoronary fat attenuation index, enrich the prognostic output of CCTA on top of anatomical information by capturing information on plaque vulnerability and coronary inflammatory burden. Timely detection of atherosclerotic disease or coronary inflammation by CCTA can assist in the deployment of targeted preventive strategies and novel therapeutics to prevent cardiovascular disease.

A Pilot Study on the Association between Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Coronary Artery Calcification in a Group of Patients Investigated via Cardiac Computed Tomography in a European Country with High Cardiovascular Risk

(1) Background: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality worldwide; the prevention and early detection of coronary artery disease are of critical importance; and the coronary artery calcium score is a powerful method in the assessment of coronary artery disease. Among European countries, Romania ranks as a country with a very high risk of cardiovascular diseases, but the data are limited in regard to the prevalence of the calcium score. (2) Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to establish the coronary calcium score in a group of patients investigated via cardiac CT and to determine the correlation with the presence of cardiovascular risk factors. (3) Results: According to the Agatston calcium score, 50% of the patients had a positive calcium score. High calcium scores above 400 UA were present in 12.6% of patients. Regarding the association between the presence of cardiovascular risk factors and the levels of coronary artery calcification, a mild level of calcification was associated with age over 50 years (X2 = 3.88, p = 0.04, OR = 3.25; 95% CI 0.94-11.14); a moderate level of calcification with the age of patients over 50 years (X2 = 6.54, p = 0.01, OR = 5.58; 95% CI 1.29-24.16), dyslipidemia (X2 = 7.28, p = 0.007, OR = 3.37; 95% CI 1.34-8.51), and arterial hypertension (X2 = 5.37, p = 0.02, OR = 2.88; 95% CI 1.14-7.27); a severe level of calcification with hypertension (X2 = 4.61, p = 0.03, OR = 7.03; 95% CI 0.90-54.81); and a very severe level of calcification with hypertension (X2 = 4.61, p = 0.03, OR = 7.03; 95% CI 0.90-54.81), smoking (X2 = 8.07, p = 0.004, OR = 4.44; 95% CI 1.47-13.44), and diabetes (X2 = 13.65, p = 0.001, OR = 6.59; 95% CI 2.5-20.18). (4) Conclusion: Half of the patients investigated by using cardiac CT had a calcium score of zero. Predictors for coronary calcium scores in relation to risk factors varied. For the very severe coronary calcification level, the strongest predictor was the presence of smoking and diabetes, which increased the odds for very severe calcification by 13.46 times. Patients who had multiple cardiovascular risk factors, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking were 9.18 times more likely to have very severe calcification.

Association between Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and the Liver Fibrosis Score in Patients with and without Coronary Artery Disease: From the FU-CCTA Registry

The liver fibrosis score reflects the degree of hepatic scarring and has been reported to be associated with cardiovascular disease. Using a coronary artery computed tomography angiography registry at the Fukuoka University Hospital (FU-CCTA registry), we investigated the association between major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and the liver fibrosis score (fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4I)) in 612 patients who underwent CCTA to screen for coronary artery disease and performed a prognosis survey for up to 5 years. The primary endpoint was MACEs (all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, coronary revascularization). FIB-4I in all patients and in patients with hypertension (HTN) was significantly higher in the MACE group than in the non-MACE group. The event-free survival rate of MACEs targeting only patients with HTN was significantly lower in patients with a high risk of liver fibrosis (FIB-4I values of 2.67 or higher) than in those with a low or intermediate risk (less than 2.67). However, no significant difference was observed in all patients or in patients without HTN. Finally, FIB-4I and body mass index were independent factors associated with MACEs in patients with HTN. In conclusion, the liver fibrosis score may be an independent predictor of MACEs in hypertensive patients undergoing CCTA.

When Does a Calcium Score Equate to Secondary Prevention?: Insights From the Multinational CONFIRM Registry

BACKGROUND

Elevated coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores in subjects without prior atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) have been shown to be associated with increased cardiovascular risk.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to determine at what level individuals with elevated CAC scores who have not had an ASCVD event should be treated as aggressively for cardiovascular risk factors as patients who have already survived an ASCVD event.

METHODS

The authors performed a cohort study comparing event rates of patients with established ASVCD to event rates in persons with no history of ASCVD and known calcium scores to ascertain at what level elevated CAC scores equate to risk associated with existing ASCVD. In the multinational CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter) registry, the authors compared ASCVD event rates in persons without a history of myocardial infarction (MI) or revascularization (as categorized on CAC scores) to event rates in those with established ASCVD. They identified 4,511 individuals without known coronary artery disease (CAC) who were compared to 438 individuals with established ASCVD. CAC was categorized as 0, 1 to 100, 101 to 300, and >300. Cumulative major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), MACE plus late revascularization, MI, and all-cause mortality incidence was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method for persons with no ASCVD history by CAC level and persons with established ASCVD. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to calculate HRs with 95% CIs, which were adjusted for traditional cardiovascular risk factors.

RESULTS

The mean age was 57.6 ± 12.4 years (56% male). In total, 442 of 4,949 (9%) patients experienced MACEs over a median follow-up of 4 years (IQR: 1.7-5.7 years). Incident MACEs increased with higher CAC scores, with the highest rates observed with CAC score >300 and in those with prior ASCVD. All-cause mortality, MACEs, MACE + late revascularization, and MI event rates were not statistically significantly different in those with CAC >300 compared with established ASCVD (all P > 0.05). Persons with a CAC score <300 had substantially lower event rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CAC scores >300 are at an equivalent risk of MACE and its components as those treated for established ASCVD. This observation, that those with CAC >300 have event rates comparable to those with established ASCVD, supplies important background for further study related to secondary prevention treatment targets in subjects without prior ASCVD with elevated CAC. Understanding the CAC scores that are associated with ASCVD risk equivalent to stable secondary prevention populations may be important for guiding the intensity of preventive approaches more broadly.

Cardiovascular Outcomes of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Functional Testing in Suspected Coronary Syndromes: Real-World Evidence From the Nationwide Cohort

Background Real-world evidence for the selection of gatekeeping studies in patients with suspected coronary syndromes is limited. Methods and Results We identified 27 036 patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), single-photon emission computed tomography, and the treadmill test for suspected coronary syndromes from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort between 2006 and 2014. The primary end point was a composite of cardiac death and myocardial infarction, and the secondary end point was a composite of the primary end point and revascularization. During a median follow-up of 5.4 years, the risk of both primary and secondary end points was significantly higher in the single-photon emission computed tomography group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81 [95% CI, 1.34-2.45]; and HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.22-1.66]), but significantly lower in the treadmill test group (HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.42-0.67]; and HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.62-0.76]) compared with the CCTA group. After balancing baseline risk factors, there was no significant difference in the primary end point in those with single-photon emission computed tomography (HR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.78-1.57]; P=0.58) or treadmill test (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.65-1.08]; P=0.18) groups, compared with the CCTA group. The event rate of the secondary end point was significantly lower in the treadmill test group than in the CCTA group (HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.78-0.96]; P=0.008). Conclusions Compared with functional testing, initial CCTA was not associated with a lower rate of cardiac death or myocardial infarction when used as an initial diagnostic test for patients with suspected coronary syndromes.

The novel H2VK-65 clinical risk assessment tool predicts high coronary artery calcium score in symptomatic patients referred for coronary computed tomography angiography

Background

Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) has emerged as a powerful imaging modality for the detection and prognostication of individuals with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). High amounts of coronary artery calcium (CAC) significantly obscure the interpretation of CCTA. Clinical risk assessment tools and data specific to predictors of high CAC in symptomatic patients are limited.

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent CAC scan and CCTA to diagnose CAD during 2016-2020 were included. A high CAC score was defined as >400 by Agatston method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictors of high CAC. The clinical risk score was derived from factors independently associated with high CAC. The derivation cohort was composed of 465 patients; this score was validated in 98 patients.

Results

The mean age was 63 ± 11 years, 53% were female, and 15.9% had high CAC scores. The independent predictors of high CAC scores were age >65 years (odds ratio [OR] 3.02, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.56-5.85, p = 0.001), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (OR 11.09, 95%CI 3.38-36.38, p < 0.001), heart failure (OR 6.52, 95%CI 2.23-19.09, p = 0.001), hypertension (OR 26.44, 95%CI 9.02-77.44, p < 0.001), and vascular diseases, including ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack and peripheral arterial disease (OR 20.96, 95%CI 4.19-104.86, p < 0.001). The H₂VK-65 (Hypertension, Heart failure, Vascular diseases, CKD, and Age > 65) score allocates 1 point for age >65, 2 points for CKD or heart failure, and 3 points for hypertension or vascular diseases. Using a threshold of ≥4 points, the sensitivity and specificity to detect high CAC was 81% and 80%, respectively. The area under the curve was 0.88 and 0.85 in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively.

Conclusion

The novel H₂VK-65 score demonstrated good performance for predicting high CAC scores in symptomatic patients referred for CCTA.

Cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease with and without myocardial ischemia: Long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

After the results of the ISCHEMIA Trial, the role of myocardial ischemia in the prognosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) was under debate. We sought to comparatively evaluate the long-term prognosis of patients with multivessel CAD with or without documented myocardial ischemia.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study that included patients with CAD obtained from the research protocols database of "The Medicine, Angioplasty or Surgery Study," the MASS Study Group. Patients were stratified according to the presence or absence of myocardial ischemia. Cardiovascular events (overall mortality and myocardial infarction) were tracked from the registry entry up to a median follow-up of 8.7 years. Myocardial ischemia was assessed at baseline by a functional test with or without imaging.

RESULTS

From 1995 to 2018, 2015 patients with multivessel CAD were included. Of these, 1001 presented with conclusive tests at registry entry, 790 (79%) presenting with ischemia and 211 (21%) without ischemia. The median follow-up was 8.7 years (IQR 4.04 to 10.07). The primary outcome occurred in 228 (28.9%) patients with ischemia and in 64 (30.3%) patients without ischemia (p_log-rank=0.60). No significant interaction was observed with the presence of myocardial ischemia and treatment strategies in the occurrence of the combined primary outcome (p_interation=0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

In this sample, myocardial ischemia was not associated with a worse prognosis compared with no ischemia in patients with multivessel CAD. These results refer to debates about the role of myocardial ischemia in the occurrence of cardiovascular events.

[The Revival of the "Ischemic" Approach in the Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease: Analysis of Major World Research]

This analytical review focuses on large international studies on diagnostics of ischemic heart disease and addresses the role of radionuclide methods in evaluating myocardial perfusion and transient ischemia. Based on the reviewed data, the authors proposed a comprehensive instrumental approach to selecting a tactics for the management of patients with suspected or documented ischemic heart disease and for evaluating their prognosis.

The long-term prognostic value provided by Coronary CT angiography

BACKGROUND

Risk-stratification of patients has a major role in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The aim was to find the most informative predictors of cardiovascular events in patients undergoing Coronary CT Angiography.

METHODS

We carried out a secondary analysis of a large registry dataset. The included population comprises adults aged 18 or older who underwent Coronary CT Angiography of 64-detector rows or greater. We clustered patients based on their characteristics and compared the risk for poor clinical outcomes between the two clusters.

RESULTS

There were two clusters of patients having different risks for all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and late revascularization [hazard ratios (95%CI) = 2.28 (2.02, 2.57), 1.63 (1.40, 1.89), and 2.46 (2.1, 2.88), all P < 0.001]. The severity of stenosis in the left main coronary artery adjusted for age and sex was the most significant predictor of the high-risk cluster [adjusted odds ratio (95%CI) = 3.35 (2.98, 3.77), P < 0.001]. The severity of stenosis in the first obtuse marginal branch of the left circumflex, distal left circumflex, distal left anterior descending, posterior descending, the first diagonal branch of the left anterior descending, and proximal right coronary artery were important as well (all adjusted odds ratios ≥ 2.52). Cluster profiling showed a higher performance for CT Angiography features (sensitivity = 97.4%, specificity = 85.7%, C-statistic = 98.7%) than calcium, Framingham, and Duke scores in identifying high-risk patients (C-statistic = 82.1, 77.0, and 88.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Coronary CT Angiography can accurately risk-stratify patients concerning poor clinical outcomes.

Imaging subclinical coronary atherosclerosis to guide lipid management, are we there yet?

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk (ASCVD) is an ongoing epidemic, and lipid abnormalities are its primordial cause. Most individuals suffering a first ASCVD event are previously asymptomatic and often do not receive preventative therapies. The cornerstone of primary prevention has been the identification of individuals at risk through risk calculators based on clinical and laboratory traditional risk factors plus risk enhancers. However, it is well accepted that a clinical risk calculator misclassifies a significant proportion of individuals leading to the prescription of a lipid-lowering medication with very little yield or a missed opportunity for lipid-lowering agents with a potentially preventable event. The development of coronary artery calcium scoring (CAC) and CT coronary angiography (CCTA) provide complementary tools to directly visualize coronary plaque and other risk-modifying imaging components that can potentially provide individualized lipid management. Understanding patient selection for CAC or potentially CCTA and the risk implications of the different parameters provided, such as CAC score, coronary stenosis, plaque characteristics and burden, epicardial adipose tissue, and pericoronary adipose tissue, have grown more complex as technologies evolve. These parameters directly affect the shared decision with patients to start or withhold lipid-lowering therapies, to adjust statin intensity or LDL cholesterol goals. Emerging lipid lowering studies with non-invasive imaging as a guide to patient selection and treatment efficacy, plus the evolution of lipid lowering therapies from statins to a diverse armament of newer high-cost agents have pushed these two fields forward with a complex interaction. This review will discuss existing risk estimators, and non-invasive imaging techniques for subclinical coronary atherosclerosis, traditionally studied using CAC and more recently CCTA with qualitative and quantitative measurements. We will also explore the current data, gaps of knowledge and future directions on the use of these techniques in the risk-stratification and guidance of lipid management.

Clinical utility of coronary artery computed tomography angiography- What we know and What's new?

Coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography (CCTA) is increasingly recognized for diagnosing obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) among patients presenting with chest pain. In this review, we summarize the utility of CCTA to determine luminal stenosis and identifying coronary plaques with high-risk features. We review different scoring systems that can quantify total plaque burden including how artificial intelligence can facilitate more detailed plaque assessment. We discuss how CCTA can also be used to detect the hemodynamic significance of CAD lesions (fractional flow reserve CT and CT perfusion) and also local factors outside the vessel wall that may predispose to plaque rupture (fat attenuation index and wall shear stress). We conclude with technological advances in imaging acquisition using photon counting CT and post-image processing techniques especially those that can mitigate blooming artifacts.

Comparison of conventional scoring systems to machine learning models for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography

BACKGROUND

The study aims to compare the prognostic performance of conventional scoring systems to a machine learning (ML) model on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to discriminate between the patients with and without major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and to find the most important contributing factor of MACE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From November to December 2019, 500 of 1586 CCTA scans were included and analyzed, then six conventional scores were calculated for each participant, and seven ML models were designed. Our study endpoints were all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, late coronary revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure. Score performance was assessed by area under the curve (AUC) analysis.

RESULTS

Of 500 patients (mean age: 60 ± 10; 53.8% male subjects) referred for CCTA, 416 patients have met inclusion criteria, 46 patients with early (<90 days) cardiac evaluation (due to the inability to clarify the reason for the assessment, deterioration of the symptoms vs. the CCTA result), and 38 patients because of missed follow-up were not enrolled in the final analysis. Forty-six patients (11.0%) developed MACE within 20.5 ± 7.9 months of follow-up. Compared to conventional scores, ML models showed better performance, except only one model which is eXtreme Gradient Boosting had lower performance than conventional scoring systems (AUC:0.824, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.701-0.947). Between ML models, random forest, ensemble with generalized linear, and ensemble with naive Bayes were shown to have higher prognostic performance (AUC: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-0.99, AUC: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81-0.98, and AUC: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.97), respectively. Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) had the highest correlation with MACE.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the conventional scoring system, ML models using CCTA scans show improved prognostic prediction for MACE. Anatomical features were more important than clinical characteristics.

Heterogeneity in coronary heart disease risk

There is large inter-individual heterogeneity in risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Risk factors traditionally used in primary risk assessment only partially explain this heterogeneity. Residual, unobserved heterogeneity leads to age-related attenuation of hazard rates and underestimation of hazard ratios. Its magnitude is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to estimate a lower and an approximate upper bound. Heterogeneity was parametrized by a log-normal distribution with shape parameter σ. Analysis was based on published data. From concordance indices of studies including traditional risk factors and additional diagnostic imaging data, we calculated the part of heterogeneity explained by imaging data. For traditional risk assessment, this part typically remains unexplained, thus constituting a lower bound on unobserved heterogeneity. Next, the potential impact of heterogeneity on CHD hazard rates in several large countries was investigated. CHD rates increase with age but the increase attenuates with age. Presuming this attenuation to be largely caused by heterogeneity, an approximate upper bound on σ was derived. Taking together both bounds, unobserved heterogeneity in studies without imaging information can be described by a shape parameter in the range σ = 1-2. It substantially contributes to observed age-dependences of hazard ratios and may lead to underestimation of hazard ratios by a factor of about two. Therefore, analysis of studies for primary CHD risk assessment should account for unobserved heterogeneity.

Causal Relationship of Coronary Artery Calcium on Myocardial Infarction and Preventive Effect of Antiplatelet Therapy

Background

The role of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) to guide antiplatelet therapy in order to prevent myocardial infarction (MI) is still uncertain. This study aimed to find the causal relationship of CACS on MI and preventive effect of antiplatelet therapy.

Methods

From 2005 to 2013, all patients with cardiovascular risk factors or symptoms of suspected CAD underwent coronary computed tomography. CACSs were measured using Agatston method and stratified into 4 groups: 0, 1–99, 100–399, and ≥ 400. Antiplatelet therapy was prescribed following physician discretion. Outcomes of interest were MI and bleeding. A mediation analysis was applied to find association pathways. CACS was considered as an independent variable, whereas antiplatelet therapy was considered as a mediator and MI considered the outcome of interest.

Results

A total of 7,849 subjects were enrolled. During an average of 9.9 ± 2.4 years follow-up, MI and bleeding events occurred in 2.24% (n = 176) and 2.82% (n = 221) of subjects, respectively. CACSs 100–399 and CAC ≥ 400 were significantly associated with the development of MI [OR 3.14 (1.72, 5.72), and OR 3.22 (1.66, 6.25), respectively, p < 0.001]. Antiplatelet therapy reduced the risk of MI of these corresponding CAC groups with ORs of 0.60 (0.41, 0.78) and 0.56 (0.34, 0.77), p < 0.001]. A risk of bleeding was associated with antiplatelet therapy (only aspirin), anticoagulant, hypertension, male gender and old age.

Conclusion

CACS was associated with the development of future MI. The preventive effect of antiplatelet therapy was clearly demonstrated in subjects with CACSs equal to or above 100, but this benefit was partially offset by an increased risk of bleeding.

Updates on the Use of Subclinical Atherosclerosis to Predict Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The high variability of cardiovascular risk in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is a challenge for therapeutical management. Subclinical cardiovascular imaging represents a tool to overcome this challenge. The purpose of this review is to update the reader on the most recent findings on the non-invasive detection of atherosclerotic burden by carotid doppler ultrasound (US), coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, and computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for the optimization of risk stratification in HeFH subjects.

RECENT FINDINGS

Carotid ultrasound (US) proved its efficacy in the long-term follow-up of HeFH children treated early on with statins, showing a significant reduction of atherosclerotic progression compared to untreated unaffected siblings. The added value of CAC score has been confirmed to predict the risk of cardiovascular events and improve risk stratification provided by available risk equations in asymptomatic HeFH subjects from large prospective cross-national cohorts. Additionally, CTCA provides detailed information on plaque quality and stability, but its role in primary prevention HeFH subjects needs to be further explored. Cardiovascular imaging for the detection of subclinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in HeFH is a promising tool to improve diagnostic and therapeutical management of this undertreated and late-diagnosed disease.

Noninvasive Imaging for the Asymptomatic Patient: How to Use Imaging to Guide Treatment Goals?

Imaging subclinical atherosclerosis identifies individuals at higher risk of cardiovascular disease through direct visualization before events occur so that preventative measures can be taken. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scans are the most widely used and studied to identify subclinical atherosclerosis and are most useful in men older than 40 years and women older than 50 years. Coronary computed tomography angiography has high prognostic value and might be the best modality for assessing subclinical atherosclerosis with incremental increase in predictive value over CAC. Ankle-brachial indexes are specific markers for cardiovascular risk but are a less sensitive tool for risk assessment.

Usefulness of Cardiac Computed Tomography in Coronary Risk Prediction: A Five-Year Follow-Up of the SPICA Study (Secure Prevention with Imaging of the Coronary Arteries)

Accurate identification of individuals at high coronary risk would reduce acute coronary syndrome incidence and morbi-mortality. We analyzed the effect on coronary risk prediction of adding coronary artery calcification (CAC) and Segment Involvement Score (SIS) to cardiovascular risk factors. This was a prospective cohort study of asymptomatic patients recruited between 2013–2017. All participants underwent a coronary computed tomography angiography to determine CAC and SIS. The cohort was followed-up for a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, coronary angiography and/or revascularization (median = five years). Discrimination and reclassification of the REGICOR function with CAC/SIS were examined with the Sommer’s D index and with the Net reclassification index (NRI). Nine of the 251 individuals included had an event. Of the included participants, 94 had a CAC = 0 and 85 a SIS = 0, none of them had an event. The addition of SIS or of SIS and CAC to the REGICOR risk function significantly increased the discrimination capacity from 0.74 to 0.89. Reclassification improved significantly when SIS or both scores were included. CAC and SIS were associated with five-year coronary event incidence, independently of cardiovascular risk factors. Discrimination and reclassification of the REGICOR risk function were significantly improved by both indexes, but SIS overrode the effect of CAC.

Use of Coronary CT Angiography as a Screening Tool for Coronary Artery Disease in Asymptomatic Healthy Individuals or Patients

심장 돌연사 환자들은 종종 흉통 또는 운동성 호흡곤란 등의 전조증상이 나타나지 않기 때문에 잠재적인 무증상 관상동맥 질환을 조기에 발견하는 것이 매우 중요하다. 관상동맥 전산화단층촬영 혈관조영술은 방사선 노출로 인한 위험성 때문에 무증상 환자에서 스크리닝 검사로 정당화되지 못했었지만 최근에 전산화단층촬영 기술의 비약적인 발전으로 방사선량을 1 mSv 미만으로 최소화함으로써 무증상 환자의 관상동맥 질환 선별 검사의 유용성에 대한 많은 연구가 진행되어 왔다. 그러나, 여전히 무증상 정상인 또는 환자의 관상동맥 질환 선별 검사에 대한 관상동맥 전산화단층촬영 혈관조영술의 유용성에 대해서는 다양한 의견들이 있다. 이 종설에서는 무증상 정상인 또는 환자들에게 관상동맥 질환 선별 검사로 관상동맥 칼슘 점수와 관상동맥 전산화단층촬영 혈관조영술 유용성에 대해서 다양한 문헌고찰을 통해서 알아보았다. 관상동맥 전산화단층촬영 혈관조영술상 무증상 정상인의 2.6%에서 70% 이상의 유의한 관상동맥 협착이 발견되었고, 선별 목적의 관상동맥 전산화단층촬영 혈관조영술이 무증상 건강한 사람의 미래의 심혈관 질환 발생을 예측할 수 있다. 그러나 현재 미국국립보건원에서 진행하고 있는 SCOT-HEART 2 연구가 끝나면 관상동맥 전산화단층촬영 혈관조영술이 무증상 성인의 심혈관 예방에 선별 검사로 적절한지 결정을 내릴 수 있을 것으로 생각된다.

The Atherosclerotic Profile of a Young Symptomatic Population between 19 and 49 Years: Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography or Coronary Artery Calcium Score?

(1) Background: Whether coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) or the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) should be used for diagnosis of coronary heart disease, is an open debate. The aim of our study was to compare the atherosclerotic profile by coronary CTA in a young symptomatic high-risk population (age, 19-49 years) in comparison with the coronary artery calcium score (CACS). (2) Methods: 1137 symptomatic high-risk patients between 19-49 years (mean age, 42.4 y) who underwent coronary CTA and CACS were stratified into six age groups. CTA-analysis included stenosis severity and high-risk-plaque criteria (3) Results: Atherosclerosis was more often detected based on CTA than based on CACS (45 vs. 27%; p < 0.001), 50% stenosis in 13.6% and high-risk plaque in 17.7%. Prevalence of atherosclerosis was low and not different between CACS and CTA in the youngest age groups (19-30 y: 5.2 and 6.4% and 30-35 y: 10.6 and 16%). In patients older than >35 years, the rate of atherosclerosis based on CTA increased (p = 0.004, OR: 2.8, 95%CI:1.45-5.89); and was higher by CTA as compared to CACS (34.9 vs. 16.7%; p < 0.001), with a superior performance of CTA. In patients older than 35 years, stenosis severity (p = 0.002) and >50% stenosis increased from 2.6 to 12.5% (p < 0.001). High-risk plaque prevalence increased from 6.4 to 26.5%. The distribution of high-risk plaque between CACS 0 and >0.1 AU was similar among all age groups, with an increasing proportion in CACS > 0.1 AU with age. A total of 24.9% of CACS 0 patients had coronary artery disease based on CTA, 4.4% > 50% stenosis and 11.5% had high-risk plaque. (4) Conclusions: In a symptomatic young high-risk population older than 35 years, CTA performed superior than CACS. In patients aged 19-35 years, the rate of atherosclerosis was similar and low based on both modalities. CACS 0 did not rule out coronary artery disease in a young high-risk population.

Evaluation of coronary stenosis versus plaque burden for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment and management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide a summary of recent literature on the relative impact of luminal stenosis versus atherosclerotic plaque burden in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk stratification and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent results from both randomized controlled clinical trials as well as observational cohort studies have demonstrated that ASCVD risk is mediated mainly by the extent of atherosclerotic disease burden rather than by the presence of coronary stenosis or inducible ischemia. Although patients with obstructive CAD are generally at higher risk for ASCVD events than patients with nonobstructive CAD, this is driven by a higher plaque burden in those with obstructive CAD. Accordingly, the ASCVD risk for a given plaque burden is similar in patients with and without obstructive CAD. Accompanying these observations are randomized controlled trial data, which show that optimization of medical therapy instead of early revascularization is most important for improving prognosis in patients with stable obstructive CAD.

SUMMARY

Emerging evidence shows that atherosclerotic plaque burden, and not stenosis per se, is the main driver of ASCVD risk in patients with CAD. This information challenges the current paradigm of selecting patients for intensive secondary prevention measures based primarily on the presence of obstructive CAD.

CT coronary angiography-guided cardiovascular risk screening in asymptomatic patients: is it time?

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the UK, whilst millions live with various forms of the disease. Coronary artery disease constitutes a significant portion of this morbidity and mortality, and is the leading cause of premature death. Increasing focus is thus being placed on the optimisation of CVD prevention, where risk screening plays a key role. Indeed, the decline in age-adjusted cardiovascular mortality achieved up to now has been largely attributed to primary preventative therapies (e.g., statins) introduced earlier in the disease process. National initiatives exist to improve cardiovascular health at a population level, but in its current form, CVD screening at the individual level is predominantly undertaken using multivariate risk scores based on population-based data. These have multiple innate flaws, highlighted in this review. Non-invasive imaging plays a key role in the screening of other disease processes, helping to personalise the screening process. Although the coronary artery calcium score as a screening tool has a role in national and international guidance, whether a shift to screening with computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) is now appropriate is open for discussion. Image acquisition techniques continue to improve with reducing radiation exposure and an ever-expanding evidence-base for additional prognostic data offered by CTCA. This enables the potential identification of sub-clinical atherosclerosis, including with novel artificial intelligence techniques. This review aims to report current guidelines regarding cardiac CT imaging in the asymptomatic primary prevention setting, advances in various CT technologies and future opportunities for progress in this field.

Is There a Role of Coronary CTA in Primary Prevention? Current State and Future Directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Information on subclinical atherosclerosis burden provides prognostic information on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk beyond what can be achieved by traditional risk factors alone and may therefore improve allocation of preventive treatment in primary prevention. The purpose of this review is to discuss the potential role and value of assessing subclinical atherosclerosis using coronary artery calcium (CAC) versus computed tomography angiography (CTA) among asymptomatic patients in the context of current primary prevention cholesterol guidelines.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since 2013, primary prevention cholesterol guidelines have lowered the treatment threshold for initiating statin therapy resulting in high statin eligibility and sensitivity for detecting ASCVD events. Thus, one of the main advantages of assessing subclinical atherosclerosis is to identify those individuals who are at so low ASCVD risk that preventive treatment may safely be withhold. Numerous studies have shown that both CAC and CTA provide highly valuable information on ASCVD risk in the individual patient. However, while extensive data exist regarding the ability of CAC to improve treatment allocation in the context of primary prevention guidelines, such data is sparse for CTA. Furthermore, there is no data to show that CTA improves risk classification and treatment allocation in primary prevention beyond what can be achieved by assessment of CAC. Although CTA provides important information regarding prognosis in symptomatic patients undergoing clinical CTA, there is no strong evidence to support its use in the primary prevention setting. Thus, the potential value of CTA in primary prevention is not clear and is currently not recommended by guidelines.

Automated cardiac volume assessment and cardiac long- and short-axis imaging plane prediction from electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography volumes enabled by deep learning

AIMS

To develop an automated method for bloodpool segmentation and imaging plane re-slicing of cardiac computed tomography (CT) via deep learning (DL) for clinical use in coronary artery disease (CAD) wall motion assessment and reproducible longitudinal imaging.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred patients who underwent clinically indicated cardiac CT scans with manually segmented left ventricle (LV) and left atrial (LA) chambers were used for training. For each patient, long-axis (LAX) and short-axis planes were manually defined by an imaging expert. A DL model was trained to predict bloodpool segmentations and imaging planes. Deep learning bloodpool segmentations showed close agreement with manual LV [median Dice: 0.91, Hausdorff distance (HD): 6.18 mm] and LA (Dice: 0.93, HD: 7.35 mm) segmentations and a strong correlation with manual ejection fraction (Pearson r: 0.95 LV, 0.92 LA). Predicted planes had low median location (6.96 mm) and angular orientation (7.96 ° ) errors which were comparable to inter-reader differences (P > 0.71). 84-97% of DL-prescribed LAX planes correctly intersected American Heart Association segments, which was comparable (P > 0.05) to manual slicing. In a test cohort of 144 patients, we evaluated the ability of the DL approach to provide diagnostic imaging planes. Visual scoring by two blinded experts determined ≥94% of DL-predicted planes to be diagnostically adequate. Further, DL-enabled visualization of LV wall motion abnormalities due to CAD and provided reproducible planes upon repeat imaging.

CONCLUSION

A volumetric, DL approach provides multiple chamber segmentations and can re-slice the imaging volume along standardized cardiac imaging planes for reproducible wall motion abnormality and functional assessment.

Role of coronary artery calcium score in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

First developed in 1990, the Agatston coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is an international guideline-endorsed decision aid for further risk assessment and personalized management in the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This review discusses key international studies that have informed this 30 year journey, from an initial coronary plaque screening paradigm to its current role informing personalized shared decision making. Special attention is paid to the prognostic value of a CAC score of zero (the so called "power of zero"), which, in a context of low estimated risk thresholds for the consideration of preventive therapy with statins in current guidelines, may be used to de-risk individuals and thereby inform the safe delay or avoidance of certain preventive therapies. We also evaluate current recommendations for CAC scoring in clinical practice guidelines around the world, and past and prevailing barriers for its use in routine patient care. Finally, we discuss emerging approaches in this field, with a focus on the potential role of CAC informing not only the personalized allocation of statins and aspirin in the general population, but also of other risk-reduction therapies in special populations, such as individuals with diabetes and people with severe hypercholesterolemia.

Coronary CT angiography: a guide to examination, interpretation, and clinical indications

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of Cardiac Computed Tomography (CCT) has changed the paradigm in the field of diagnostic cardiovascular medicine. CCT is the primary tool in the assessment of suspected Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) and should be followed by functional assessment when needed to stratify disease and to plan potential interventional or surgical therapy.

AREAS COVERED

We provided the current state of the knowledge on the main aspects of technique of examination, image interpretation and clinical indications. We have focused our attention on the basic routine applications and activities.

EXPERT OPINION

The primary role of CCT in suspected CAD will progressively become the standard approach. In general, any situation in which anatomy of the heart and thoracic vessels/structures is mandatory must be approached using CT first, whenever possible. The quantity and quality of information that can be provided by CCT is big and the operators should learn how to deal with this information. On the other hand, CCT is only apparently a straightforward and simple examination. It is actually the most complex diagnostic procedure that can be performed on CT and requires highly skilled operators and state-of-art-technology.

Major adverse events associated with inducible cardiac ischemia during treadmill exercise testing for peripheral artery disease

BACKGROUND

The coexistence of coronary artery disease and peripheral artery disease (PAD) is well-established. Whether myocardial ischemia by electrocardiography during treadmill testing to evaluate PAD severity is associated with adverse cardiac and limb events has not been established. The aim of the current study is to assess the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), major adverse limb events (MALE), and all-cause mortality in patients with evidence of myocardial ischemia on ECG compared with those without ischemia in patients undergoing treadmill testing for PAD evaluation.

METHODS

Patients undergoing treadmill exercise ankle-brachial index (ABI) evaluation (January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2006) were identified using the Mayo Clinic Gonda Vascular Laboratory database. Patients with ischemia by electrocardiogram (ECG) were age and sex matched to patients without ischemia. Outcomes were compared by ECG category.

RESULTS

Of 4128 patients who underwent treadmill exercise, 170 (4.1%) had inducible myocardial ischemia by ECG. These were matched with 340 patients without ischemia. The positive ECG group had a higher percentage of diabetes mellitus (31.2% vs 21.8%; P = .02), carotid artery disease (22.4% vs 13.2%; P = .009), exercise-induced angina (14.1% vs 2.9%; P < .0001), and dyspnea (60.6% vs 35.6%; P < .0001). While the resting ABI was similar, the postexercise ABI was lower in the positive ECG group (0.5 vs 0.7; P = .04). After a median follow-up of 8 years, MACE were significantly greater in the positive ECG group (62.4% vs 46.5%; P < .001). MALE were significantly less frequent (17.1% vs 23.2%; P = .02), without an increased risk of amputation. In multivariable analysis, inducible ischemia was associated with higher incidence of MACE (hazard ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.16; P < .001) and lower incidence of MALE (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.84; P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

ECG monitoring during vascular treadmill testing identified a subset of patients with more frequent MACE but less MALE.

Prognostic implications of left ventricular mass-geometry in patients with no or nonobstructive coronary artery disease

Background

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is widely used as a first-line noninvasive modality that frequently exhibits no or nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in clinical practice, along with abnormal left ventricular (LV) geometry on echocardiography. However, the combined prognostic value of these findings has not been well elucidated. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic implications of abnormal LV geometry in individuals with no or nonobstructive CAD.

Methods

A total of 5806 subjects with no CAD or nonobstructive CAD (luminal narrowing < 50%) on CCTA were included in the study. The major exclusion criteria were structural heart disease and a history of myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization. Abnormal LV geometry on echocardiography was defined as LV mass index > 95 g/m² in women and > 115 g/m² in men, and/or relative wall thickness > 0.42. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.

Results

A total of 5803 subjects without significant obstructive CAD (age, 56.6 ± 8.87 years; men, 3884 [66.9%]). Of them, 4045 (69.7%) subjects had normal LV geometry and 1758 (30.3%) had abnormal LV geometry respectively. During a mean follow-up of 6.2 ± 1.48 years, 84 (1.44%) subjects died in the study population. Of these, 56 subjects were from the normal LV geometry group (1.24%) and 28 were from the abnormal LV geometry group (2.32%). Subjects with abnormal LV geometry had significantly worse survival rates (log-rank, p < 0.001). After adjustment for confounding factors, abnormal LV geometry was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.04–2.58; p = 0.034). Moreover, abnormal LV geometry was significantly worse in survival when classified as those with no CAD (log-rank, p = 0.024) and nonobstructive CAD (Log-rank, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Abnormal LV geometry portends a worse prognosis in subjects with no or nonobstructive CAD. These findings suggest that LV geometry assessment can help improve the stratification of individuals with these CCTA findings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-021-02005-6.

Association between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography: FU-CCTA registry

It is unclear whether higher levels of serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) prevent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We prospectively evaluated 501 patients who had undergone coronary computed tomography angiography at Fukuoka University Hospital and either were clinically suspected of having coronary artery disease (CAD) or had at least one cardiovascular risk factor with a follow-up of up to 5 years. The primary endpoint was MACE (cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization). The patients were divided into tertiles according to the HDL-C level: 47 mg/dl ≥ HDL-C level [n = 167, lower HDL-C level (L-HDL)], 58 mg/dl ≥ HDL-C level ≥ 48 mg/dl [n = 167, middle HDL-C level (M-HDL)] and HDL-C level ≥ 59 mg/dl [n = 167, higher HDL-C level (H-HDL)] groups. There were significant differences in %CAD among the L-HDL, M-HDL and H-HDL groups. Unexpectedly, there was no difference in %MACE between M-HDL and H-HDL, although %MACE in M-HDL was significantly lower than that in L-HDL (p < 0.05). By a multivariate logistic regression analysis, MACE in H-HDL-C was independently associated with diabetes mellitus (DM) (p = 0.03). A Kaplan-Meier curve according to the HDL subgroup indicated that M-HDL, not H-HDL, enjoyed the greatest freedom from MACE among the 3 groups (log-rank test p = 0.047). Finally, the results of a Cox regression model indicated that L-HDL and H-HDL had significantly higher risk of MACE than M-HDL. In conclusions, patients with middle HDL-C levels, not higher HDL-C levels, showed the greatest freedom from MACE. Patients with higher HDL-C levels need to be strictly managed for DM to prevent MACE.

Lower Extremity Artery Disease as a Predictor of Coronary Artery Disease

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is an important determinant of long-term outcome in patients with lower extremity artery disease (LEAD). In this study we evaluated the CAD prevalence among LEAD patients and the association of LEAD lesions location with the CAD presence and severity. 203 patients with LEAD, referred for peripheral and simultaneous coronary angiography, were evaluated. LEAD and CAD were considered angiographically significant for stenosis higher than 50% of arterial lumen. More than two-thirds of LEAD patients had significant CAD, half of them having multi-vessel CAD and a quarter single CAD. Infrapoplitheal arterial lesions seemed to be the strongest predictor of CAD being associated with significant and multi-vessel CAD and also with the presence of left main (LM) lesions. Femoral artery lesions were highly associated with multi-vessel CAD, but there was no association with significant CAD and LM lesions. No association was found between iliac artery lesions and CAD.

Coronary atherosclerosis as the main endpoint of non-invasive imaging in cardiology: a narrative review

The change of paradigm determined by the introduction of cardiac computed tomography (CCT) in the field of cardiovascular medicine has allowed new evidence to emerge. These evidences point towards a major role, probably the most important one in terms of prognostic impact, in the detection, characterization and quantification of atherosclerosis as the main driver and endpoint for the management of coronary artery disease (CAD). Extensive literature has been published in the last decade with large numbers and patients' populations, investigating several aspects and correlations between atherosclerotic plaque features and risk factors; also, the relationship between plaque features, both with qualitative and quantitative approaches, and cardiovascular events has been investigated. More recent studies have also pointed out the relationship between the knowledge and classification of sub-clinical atherosclerosis and the induced modification of medical therapy (both aggressiveness and compliance) that is most likely able to increase the effect of anti-atherosclerotic drugs, hence significantly improving prognosis. Non-invasive assessment of CAD by means of CCT is becoming the primary tool for management and also the most important parameter for the comprehension of natural history of CAD and how the therapies we adopt are affecting plaque burden as a whole. In this review we will address the modern concepts of CAD driven understanding and management of cardiovascular disease.

Associations between dyspnoea, coronary atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular outcomes: results from the long-term follow-up CONFIRM registry

AIMS 

The relationship between dyspnoea, coronary artery disease (CAD), and major cardiovascular events (MACE) is poorly understood. This study evaluated (i) the association of dyspnoea with the severity of anatomical CAD by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and (ii) to which extent CAD explains MACE in patients with dyspnoea.

METHODS AND RESULTS 

From the international COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN for Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter (CONFIRM) registry, 4425 patients (750 with dyspnoea) with suspected but without known CAD were included and prospectively followed for ≥5 years. First, the association of dyspnoea with CAD severity was assessed using logistic regression analysis. Second, the prognostic value of dyspnoea for MACE (myocardial infarction and death), and specifically, the interaction between dyspnoea and CAD severity was investigated using Cox proportional-hazard analysis. Mean patient age was 60.3 ± 11.9 years, 63% of patients were male and 592 MACE events occurred during a median follow-up duration of 5.4 (IQR 5.1-6.0) years. On uni- and multivariable analysis (adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, chest pain typicality, and risk factors), dyspnoea was associated with two- and three-vessel/left main (LM) obstructive CAD. The presence of dyspnoea increased the risk for MACE [hazard ratio (HR) 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29-1.90], which was modified after adjusting for clinical predictors and CAD severity (HR 1.26, 95% CI: 1.02-1.55). Conversely, when stratified by CAD severity, dyspnoea did not provide incremental prognostic value in one-, two-, or three-vessel/LM obstructive CAD, but dyspnoea did provide incremental prognostic value in non-obstructive CAD.

CONCLUSION 

In patients with suspected CAD, dyspnoea was independently associated with severe obstructive CAD on CCTA. The severity of obstructive CAD explained the elevated MACE rates in patients presenting with dyspnoea, but in patients with non-obstructive CAD, dyspnoea portended additional risk.

Associations between smoking habits and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography as screening for coronary artery disease

We analyzed whether smoking was associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the progression of coronary atherosclerosis as assessed by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) as screening for coronary artery disease (CAD). We enrolled 443 patients who had all undergone CCTA and either were clinically suspected of having CAD or had at least one cardiovascular risk factor. We divided the patients into smoking (past and current smoker) and non-smoking groups and into males and females, and evaluated the presence of CAD, severity of coronary atherosclerosis and MACE (cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization) with a follow-up of up to 5 years. %CAD and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis in the smoking group were significantly higher than those in the non-smoking group. %MACE in males and smokers were significantly higher than those in females and non-smokers, respectively. Interestingly, Kaplan-Meier curves also showed that female non-smokers enjoyed significantly greater freedom from MACE than female smokers (p = 0.007), whereas there was no significant difference in freedom from MACE between male non-smokers and male smokers (p = 0.984). Although there were no significant predictors of MACE in all patients according to a multiple logistic regression analysis, smoking was useful for predicting MACE in females, but not males. In conclusion, smoking was significantly associated with MACE in females, but not males, who underwent CCTA as screening for CAD.

Coronary Artery Disease Screening Using CT Coronary Angiography

BACKGROUND: The increased utility of CT coronary angiography (CTCA) in cardiovascular screenings of aircrew has led to the increased detection of asymptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD). A systematic review of studies relevant to the interpretation of CTCA for the occupational fitness assessment of high-risk vocations was performed, with findings used to describe the development of a pathway for the aeromedical disposition of military aviators with asymptomatic CAD.METHODS: Medline was searched using the terms CT coronary angiogram and screening and prognosis. The inclusion criteria were restricted to study populations ages > 18 yr, were asymptomatic, were not known to have CAD, had undergone CTCA, and with their associations with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and other relevant cardiac outcomes reported.RESULTS: Included in this systematic review were 10 studies. When compared to subjects with no or nonobstructive CAD, those with obstructive CAD on CTCA had hazard ratios (HR) for cardiac events ranging from 1.42 to 105.48. Comparing subjects with nonobstructive CAD and those without CAD on CTCA, a lower HR of 1.19 for cardiac events was found. The annual event rates of subjects with no CAD on CTCA were extremely low, ranging from 0 to 0.5%.CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings, we suggest that CTCA should only be performed in aircrew with higher cardiac risk profiles. Those found to have no CAD or minimal CAD (i.e., 25% stenosis) in a non-left main coronary artery on CTCA can be returned to flying duties. All other results should be further evaluated with an invasive angiogram.Cheong RWL, See B, Tan BBC, Koh CH. Coronary artery disease screening using CT coronary angiography. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2020; 91(10):812817.

Management of established coronary artery disease in aircrew without myocardial infarction or revascularisation

This paper is part of a series of expert consensus documents covering all aspects of aviation cardiology. In this manuscript, we focus on the broad aviation medicine considerations that are required to optimally manage aircrew with established coronary artery disease in those without myocardial infarction or revascularisation (both pilots and non-pilot aviation professionals). We present expert consensus opinion and associated recommendations. It is recommended that in aircrew with non-obstructive coronary artery disease or obstructive coronary artery disease not deemed haemodynamically significant, nor meeting the criteria for excessive burden (based on plaque morphology and aggregate stenosis), a return to flying duties may be possible, although with restrictions. It is recommended that aircrew with haemodynamically significant coronary artery disease (defined by a decrease in fractional flow reserve) or a total burden of disease that exceeds an aggregated stenosis of 120% are grounded. With aggressive cardiac risk factor modification and, at a minimum, annual follow-up with routine non-invasive cardiac evaluation, the majority of aircrew with coronary artery disease can safely return to flight duties.

Outcomes of anatomical vs. functional testing for coronary artery disease : Lessons from the major trials

Management of patients presenting with suspected stable coronary artery disease (CAD) are challenging because estimation of pretest probability for obstructive CAD remains difficult. In addition, identification of those who benefit from coronary revascularization remains ineffective regardless of the wide array of noninvasive testing alternatives available. Functional testing, which has long been considered to be the test of choice to risk stratify these patients, shows modest agreement with CAD severity detected by invasive coronary angiography and has been reported to be ineffective in settings of low prevalence of obstructive CAD. A growing body of evidence demonstrates the excellent diagnostic accuracy as well as prognostic value of coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography especially in conjunction with noninvasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) testing, challenging the primary role of functional testing especially in patients without prior or known CAD. Landmark trials, including the Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of chest pain (PROMISE) and Scottish Computed Tomography of the Heart (SCOT-HEART), have contributed to a better understanding of how coronary CT angiography may play a role in more efficient management and even improved health outcomes. The emerging role of coronary CT has been acknowledged by the 2019 Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology recommending the use of CT as a first-line tool for the evaluation of patients with stable chest pain with a class I, level of evidence B recommendation. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview on existing evidence, clinical implication, limitations of available data, and remaining questions to be answered by future research.