1
|
Parekh J, Sharma V, Robl J, Kshetri R, Osnard M, Vutthikraivit W, Arustamyan M, Deshmukh A, Rossen J, Horwitz PA, Panaich S. Temporary-Permanent Pacemakers in the Management of Conduction Abnormalities in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CARDIOVASCULAR ANGIOGRAPHY & INTERVENTIONS 2024; 3:101310. [PMID: 39130177 PMCID: PMC11308022 DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Background Injury to the cardiac conduction system requiring a permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a known adverse outcome of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Temporary-permanent pacemakers (TPPM) have been used as a bridge to PPM implantation in patients with systemic infection; however, there are only a few reports of its routine use in patients undergoing TAVR. This study aimed to assess the utility of routine use of TPPM in patients undergoing TAVR with a high risk of needing a PPM or those who develop high-grade conduction abnormalities during/after TAVR. Methods Between April 2015 and December 2021, 978 patients underwent TAVR at our institution, of whom 111 patients had TPPM placed before or during/after TAVR during the study period. In total, 89 patients were included in the final analysis. Results The median age was 78 years (IQR, 71-84 years); 52 (58.4%) patients with preexisting native conduction disease were considered high risk for advanced heart block and had TPPM placed before TAVR. In addition, 37 (41.6%) patients had TPPM placed during/after TAVR. Of the 89 patients who received TPPM, 51 (57.3%) were treated with a balloon-expandable valve and 38 (42.7%) with a self-expandable valve. Of the patients who underwent TPPM placement, only 49 (55.1%) required a PPM, and TPPM was removed in 40 (44.9%) patients. TPPM was in place for a median of 6 days (IQR, 2-11 days). Only 1 of the 89 patients (1.1%) who received a TPPM had lead dislodgment. No other complications were noted. Median length of stay was 3 days (IQR, 2-4 days). Conclusions In patients with high-risk baseline conduction abnormalities before TAVR and those who develop new high-grade conduction abnormalities during/after TAVR, TPPM provides a feasible and safe method for pacing that could allow early ambulation, facilitate early discharge, and prevent unnecessary PPM implantations in some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jai Parekh
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Vikram Sharma
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Jared Robl
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Rupesh Kshetri
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Michael Osnard
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Wasawat Vutthikraivit
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Michael Arustamyan
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Abhishek Deshmukh
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - James Rossen
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Phillip A. Horwitz
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Sidakpal Panaich
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
- Swedish Heart and Vascular Institute, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nakashima M, Jilaihawi H, He Y, Williams D, Pushkar I, Williams M, Hisamoto K. Membranous Septum Length Predicts New Conduction Abnormalities in Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Novel Predictor for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement. J Surg Res 2024; 295:385-392. [PMID: 38070251 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The membranous septum (MS) length measured by cardiac computed tomography (CT) is useful for the prediction of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) and new left bundle branch block (LBBB) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. However, its predictive value for patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is unknown. METHODS A total of 2531 consecutive patients were registered in the institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database between July 2017 and June 2020. Patients who underwent non-SAVR procedures, had prior pacemaker/implantable cardioverter defibrillator, prior SAVR, no preprocedural CT assessment, or suboptimal CT imaging were excluded. RESULTS A total of 126 SAVR with preprocedural CT assessment were analyzed. Bicuspid aortic valve morphology was confirmed on CT in 59.5% of patients. There were three new PPMIs and five new LBBBs observed after SAVR at the time of discharge. In-hospital mortality was 0.8%. Low left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (<50%), LV mass index >120 g/m2, large right coronary artery height, and MS length <1.5 mm predicted new PPMI/LBBB. Multivariate analysis showed LV mass index >120 g/m2 (odds ratio: 9.165; 95% confidence interval: 1.644-51.080; P = 0.011) and MS length <1.5 mm (odds ratio: 14.449; 95% confidence interval: 1.632-127.954; P = 0.016) were independent predictors for new PPMI/LBBB. CONCLUSIONS Short MS length on preoperative cardiac CT is a powerful and novel predictor for the risk of new PPMI/LBBB after SAVR. Special care should be taken in patients with short MS length to avoid suture-mediated trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yuxin He
- Heart Valve Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - David Williams
- Heart Valve Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Illya Pushkar
- Heart Valve Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | | | - Kazuhiro Hisamoto
- Heart Valve Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York; Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ahmadzadeh M, Rahimi M, Toufan-Tabrizi* M, Mohammadi K. Determining whether LV filling time contributes to HF symptoms in different widths of QRS in LBBB patients: A clinical study. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract 2024; 2024:e202408. [PMID: 38404659 PMCID: PMC10886770 DOI: 10.21542/gcsp.2024.8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Accurate assessment of left ventricular (LV) function is essential for managing patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between LV systolic function, left ventricular diastolic filling time (LVFT), QRS duration, and heart failure symptoms in patients with LBBB. METHODS This study was conducted between June 2021 and June 2022. Patients with LBBB and sinus rhythm who were referred to the echocardiography department were included in the study. All the patients underwent electrocardiogram-gated echocardiography using the same machine. In this study, the LVFT value was measured in absolute terms and as a ratio to the R-R interval (LVFT/RR). RESULTS A total of sixty-five patients were included, forty-two (64.6%) were women, and the mean age was 60.71 ± 8.72. We performed three one-way ANOVA tests that showed that LV filling time/RR ratio, QRS duration, and ejection fraction were significantly different between heart failure classes (p = 0.008, p = 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). A weak correlation was observed between LVEF and LVFT/RR (r = 0.349, p = 0.004). Additionally, QRS duration was negatively correlated with LVEF (r = - 0.395, p = 0.004) and LVFT/RR (r = - 0.350, p = 0.004), although these correlations were weak. CONCLUSION We showed that LVFT/RR ratio differed significantly between HF functional classes and was lower in patients with more severe HF symptoms. Additionally, QRS duration was negatively correlated with LVEF and LVFT/RR, and patients with more severe HF symptoms had longer QRS durations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Kamran Mohammadi
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rivard L, Nault I, Krahn AD, Daneault B, Roux JF, Natarajan M, Healey JS, Quadros K, Sandhu RK, Kouz R, Greiss I, Leong-Sit P, Gourraud JB, Ben Ali W, Asgar A, Aguilar M, Bonan R, Cadrin-Tourigny J, Cartier R, Dorval JF, Dubuc M, Dürrleman N, Dyrda K, Guerra P, Ibrahim M, Ibrahim R, Macle L, Mondesert B, Moss E, Raymond-Paquin A, Roy D, Tadros R, Thibault B, Talajic M, Nozza A, Guertin MC, Khairy P. Rationale and Design of the Randomized Bayesian Multicenter COME-TAVI Trial in Patients With a New Onset Left Bundle Branch Block. CJC Open 2023; 5:611-618. [PMID: 37720184 PMCID: PMC10502429 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are at risk of developing delayed high-degree atrioventricular block. Management of new-onset LBBB post-TAVI remains controversial. In the Comparison of a Clinical Monitoring Strategy Versus Electrophysiology-Guided Algorithmic Approach in Patients With a New LBBB After TAVI (COME-TAVI) trial, consenting patients with new-onset LBBB that persists on day 2 after TAVI, meeting exclusion/inclusion criteria, are randomized to an electrophysiological study (EPS)-guided approach or 30-day electrocardiographic monitoring. In the EPS-guided approach, patients with a His to ventricle (HV) interval ≥ 65 ms undergo permanent pacemaker implantation. Patients randomized to noninvasive monitoring receive a wearable continuous electrocardiographic recording and transmitting device for 30 days. Follow-up will be performed at 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary endpoint is a composite outcome designed to capture net clinical benefit. The endpoint incorporates major consequences of both strategies in patients with new-onset LBBB after TAVI, as follows: (i) sudden cardiac death; (ii) syncope; (iii) atrioventricular conduction disorder requiring a pacemaker (for a class I or IIa indication); and (iv) complications related to the pacemaker or EPS. The trial incorporates a Bayesian design with a noninformative prior, outcome-adaptive randomization (initially 1:1), and 2 prespecified interim analyses once 25% and 50% of the anticipated number of primary endpoints are reached. The trial is event-driven, with an anticipated upper limit of 452 patients required to reach 77 primary outcome events over 12 months of follow-up. In summary, the aim of this Bayesian multicentre randomized trial is to compare 2 management strategies in patients with new-onset LBBB post-TAVI-an EPS-guided approach vs noninvasive 30-day monitoring. Trial registration number: NCT03303612.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Rivard
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andrew D. Krahn
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Benoit Daneault
- Department of Cardiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jean-Francois Roux
- Department of Cardiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Madhu Natarajan
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey S. Healey
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kenneth Quadros
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Roopinder K. Sandhu
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Remi Kouz
- Department of Cardiology, Hopital Sacre-Coeur de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Isabelle Greiss
- Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier de Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Peter Leong-Sit
- Department of Cardiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Walid Ben Ali
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anita Asgar
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Martin Aguilar
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Raoul Bonan
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Julia Cadrin-Tourigny
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Raymond Cartier
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jean-Francois Dorval
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marc Dubuc
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nicolas Dürrleman
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Katia Dyrda
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Peter Guerra
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marina Ibrahim
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Reda Ibrahim
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Laurent Macle
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Blandine Mondesert
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Emmanuel Moss
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alexandre Raymond-Paquin
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Denis Roy
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Rafik Tadros
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bernard Thibault
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mario Talajic
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anna Nozza
- Montreal Health Innovations Coordinating Center, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marie-Claude Guertin
- Montreal Health Innovations Coordinating Center, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Paul Khairy
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vilalta V, Cediel G, Mohammadi S, López H, Kalavrouziotis D, Resta H, Dumont E, Voisine P, Philippon F, Escabia C, Borrellas A, Alperi A, Fernandez-Nofrerias E, Carrillo X, Panagides V, Bayes-Genis A, Rodés-Cabau J. New-onset persistent left bundle branch block following sutureless aortic valve replacement. Heart 2022; 109:143-150. [PMID: 35842233 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the incidence, predictive factors and prognostic value of new-onset persistent left bundle branch block (NOP-LBBB) in patients undergoing sutureless surgical aortic valve replacement (SU-SAVR). METHODS A total of 329 consecutive patients without baseline conduction disturbances or previous permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) who underwent SU-SAVR with the Perceval valve (LivaNova Group, Saluggia, Italy) in two centres from 2013 to 2019 were included. Patients were on continuous ECG monitoring during hospitalisation and 12-lead ECG was performed after the procedure and at hospital discharge. NOP-LBBB was defined as a new postprocedural LBBB that persisted at hospital discharge. Baseline, procedural and follow-up clinical and echocardiography data were collected in a dedicated database. RESULTS New-onset LBBB was observed in 115 (34.9%) patients, and in 76 (23.1%) persisted at hospital discharge. There were no differences in baseline and procedural characteristics between patients with (n=76) and without (n=253) NOP-LBBB. After a median follow-up of 3.3 years (2.3-4.4 years), patients with NOP-LBBB had a higher incidence of PPI (14.5% vs 6.3%, p=0.016), but exhibited similar rates of all-cause mortality (19.4% vs 19.2%, p=0.428), cardiac mortality (8.1% vs 9.4%, p=0.805) and heart failure readmission (21.0% vs 23.2%, p=0.648), compared with the no/transient LBBB group. NOP-LBBB was associated with a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 1-year follow-up (delta: -5.7 vs +0.2, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS NOP-LBBB occurred in approximately a quarter of patients without prior conduction disturbances who underwent SU-SAVR and was associated with a threefold increased risk of PPI along with a negative impact on LVEF at follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Vilalta
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.,Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Germán Cediel
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Siamak Mohammadi
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Helena López
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Dimitri Kalavrouziotis
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Helena Resta
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Eric Dumont
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pierre Voisine
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - François Philippon
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Claudia Escabia
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Andrea Borrellas
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Alberto Alperi
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Xavier Carrillo
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Vassili Panagides
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Antoni Bayes-Genis
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.,Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Rodés-Cabau
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Monizzi G, Olivares P, Makmur G, Fabbiocchi F, Grancini L, Mastrangelo A, Ferrari C, Galli S, Montorsi P, Bartorelli AL. Conduction disorders after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A comparison between SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN 3 Ultra balloon-expandable valves. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:922696. [DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.922696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundConduction disorders (CD) are the most common complications after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). The last generation of Edwards balloon expandable valves, the SAPIEN 3 Ultra (S3U), is provided with an external sealing skirt that aims to further reduce paravalvular leakage (PVL) compared to SAPIEN 3 (S3) and could potentially lead to higher CD rate. We sought to investigate the rate of new-onset CD in patients undergoing TAVI with the S3 or S3U valve.MethodsWe included 582 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI in a single high-volume Center. Patients with previously implanted pacemaker and Valve in valve procedures were excluded. CD rate was evaluated early after implantation and at discharge.ResultsNo significant difference in the overall CD rate was found between S3 and S3U patients both immediately after the procedure (S3 45.5% vs. S3U 41.8%, p = 0.575) and at discharge (S3 30.4% vs. S3U 35.6%, p = 0.348) with low rate of permanent pacemaker implantation (S3 6.3% vs. S3U 5.5%, p = 0.749). No significant differences were found also in patients with pre-existing atrial fibrillation (S3 8.2% vs. S3U 5%, p = 0.648). A significantly lower rate of PVL was found with S3U compared to S3 (S3 42% vs. S3U 26%, p = 0.007). According to the manufacturer’s guidelines we confirmed that S3U were implanted in a significantly higher position compared to S3 (S3 4.89 ± 1.57 mm vs. S3U 4.47 ± 1.36 mm, p = 0.001).ConclusionNo significant difference in the rate of CD, including the need for PPM implantation, was found in patients undergoing TAVI with the S3 compared to S3U. Moreover, S3U significantly reduced the PVL rate.
Collapse
|
7
|
Xu S, Zhang E, Qian Z, Sun J, Zou F, Wang Y, Hou X, Zou J. Mid- to Long-Term Clinical and Echocardiographic Effects of Post-procedural Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:911234. [PMID: 35837611 PMCID: PMC9275565 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.911234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims To date, the prognostic effects of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remain controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the mid- (1 year) to long-term (> 1 year) clinical and echocardiographic effects of post-procedural PPI in patients after TAVR. Methods PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from the establishment of databases up to 1 December 2021. Studies comparing clinical and echocardiographic outcomes between patients with and without post-TAVR PPI of ≥ 1-year follow-up were collected for further meta-analysis. Results A total of 39 studies comprising of 83,082 patients were included in this meta-analysis. At mid-term follow-up (1 year), the pooled results demonstrated a higher risk of all-cause mortality in patients with post-procedural PPI than those without following TAVR (relative risk (RR), 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10–1.24; P < 0.00001). No significant differences were observed in cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.71–1.03; P = 0.10) or heart failure rehospitalization (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.58–1.44; P = 0.69) at 1-year follow-up. At long-term follow-up (> 1 year), post-TAVR PPI had negative effects on all-cause mortality (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09–1.28; P < 0.0001) and heart failure rehospitalization (RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.18–1.71; P = 0.0002). There was no difference in long-term cardiovascular mortality between the two groups (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.97–1.36; P = 0.11). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was not significantly different at baseline (mean difference, 1.40; 95% CI, –0.13–2.93; P = 0.07), but was significantly lower in the PPI group at 1-year follow-up (mean difference, –3.57; 95% CI, –4.88 to –2.26; P < 0.00001). Conclusion Our meta-analysis provides evidence that post-TAVR PPI has negative clinical and echocardiographic effects on patients at mid- to long-term follow-up. Further studies are urgently needed to explore the cause of these complications and optimize the treatment and management of patients requiring permanent pacing after TAVR. Systematic Review Registration [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021289935], identifier [CRD42021289935].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shun Xu
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Enrui Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhiyong Qian
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jinyu Sun
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Fengwei Zou
- Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Yao Wang
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaofeng Hou
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jiangang Zou
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tsushima T, Main A, Al-Kindi SG, Dallan LAP, Wheat HL, Baeza CR, Pelletier MP, Arruda MS, Mackall JA, Thal SG, Ohno Y, Lee KH, Siqueira DA, Kaneko T, Harloff MT, Costa G, Barbanti M, Attizzani GF. Risk Stratification of New Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Am J Cardiol 2022; 175:80-87. [PMID: 35597627 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.03.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Previous studies reported that new-onset persistent left bundle branch block (NOP-LBBB) was related to worse outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, these results can be confounded by the presence of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation before and after TAVI. Long-term outcomes and the risk stratification of NOP-LBBB not having PPM implantation before and after TAVI have not been fully investigated. This is an international, multicenter, retrospective study of patients who underwent TAVI from July 31, 2007, to May 8, 2020. A total of 2,240 patients were included, and 17.5% of patients developed NOP-LBBB. NOP-LBBB was associated with cardiac mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.419, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.014 to 1.985, p = 0.041) and the composite outcomes of cardiac mortality and/or heart failure readmission (aHR 1.313, 95% CI 1.027 to 1.678, p = 0.030). Patients who developed NOP-LBBB with pre-TAVI left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% were significantly associated with cardiac mortality (aHR 2.049, 95% CI 1.039 to 4.041, p = 0.038), heart failure (aHR 3.990, 95% CI 2.362 to 6.741, p <0.001), and the composite outcome (aHR 2.729, 95% CI 1.703 to 4.374, p <0.001). Although NOP-LBBB with pre-TAVI LVEF >40% had a significant decrease in LVEF 6 to 12 months after TAVI (-1.8 ± 9.7% vs +0.6 ± 8.1%, p = 0.003), NOP-LBBB with pre-TAVI LVEF <40% had a significant increase in LVEF 6 to 12 months after TAVI (+9.7 ± 13.6% vs +13.0 ± 11.7%, p = 0.157). In conclusion, patients with NOP-LBBB without pre-TAVI and post-TAVI PPM developed significantly worse long-term outcomes, especially in patients with pre-TAVI LVEF <40%. Further prospective investigation should be undertaken.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Tsushima
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Anthony Main
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Sadeer G Al-Kindi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Luis Augusto Palma Dallan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Heather L Wheat
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Cristian R Baeza
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Marc P Pelletier
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Mauricio S Arruda
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Judith A Mackall
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Sergio G Thal
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Yohei Ohno
- Department of Cardiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kyong-Hee Lee
- Department of Cardiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Dimytri A Siqueira
- Department of Cardiology, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia - Fundação Adib Jatene, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Tsuyoshi Kaneko
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Morgan T Harloff
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Giuliano Costa
- Division of Cardiology, Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco," University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Marco Barbanti
- Division of Cardiology, Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco," University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Guilherme F Attizzani
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dowling C, Gooley R, McCormick L, Rashid HN, Dargan J, Khan F, Firoozi S, Brecker SJ. Patient-Specific Computer Simulation to Predict Conduction Disturbance With Current-Generation Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valves. STRUCTURAL HEART : THE JOURNAL OF THE HEART TEAM 2022; 6:100010. [PMID: 37274548 PMCID: PMC10236875 DOI: 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Patient-specific computer simulation may predict the development of conduction disturbance following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Validation of the computer simulations with current-generation devices has not been undertaken. Methods A retrospective study was performed on patients who had undergone TAVR with a current-generation self-expanding transcatheter heart valve (THV). Preprocedural computed tomography imaging was used to create finite element models of the aortic root. Procedural contrast angiography was reviewed, and finite element analysis performed using a matching THV device size and implantation depth. A region of interest corresponding to the atrioventricular bundle and proximal left bundle branch was identified. The percentage of this area (contact pressure index [CPI]) and maximum contact pressure (CPMax) exerted by THV were recorded. Postprocedural electrocardiograms were reviewed, and major conduction disturbance was defined as the development of persistent left bundle branch block or high-degree atrioventricular block. Results A total of 80 patients were included in the study. THVs were 23- to 29-mm Evolut PRO (n = 53) and 34-mm Evolut R (n = 27). Major conduction disturbance occurred in 27 patients (33.8%). CPI (28.3 ± 15.8 vs. 15.6 ± 11.2%; p < 0.001) and CPMax (0.51 ± 0.20 vs. 0.36 ± 0.24 MPa; p = 0.008) were higher in patients who developed major conduction disturbance. CPI (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63-0.86; p < 0.001) and CPMax (AUC, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57-0.81; p = 0.006) demonstrated a discriminatory power to predict the development of major conduction disturbance. Conclusions Patient-specific computer simulation may identify patients at risk for conduction disturbance after TAVR with current-generation self-expanding THVs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron Dowling
- MonashHeart, Monash Health and Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Robert Gooley
- MonashHeart, Monash Health and Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Liam McCormick
- MonashHeart, Monash Health and Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Hashrul N. Rashid
- MonashHeart, Monash Health and Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - James Dargan
- Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, St. George’s, University of London and St. George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Faisal Khan
- Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, St. George’s, University of London and St. George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sami Firoozi
- Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, St. George’s, University of London and St. George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Stephen J. Brecker
- Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, St. George’s, University of London and St. George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang J, Liu S, Han X, Chen Y, Chen H, Wan Z, Song B. Prognostic Outcome of New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:842929. [PMID: 35463780 PMCID: PMC9024042 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.842929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundLeft bundle branch block (LBBB) is a common complication of the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and its impact on prognosis is controversial.MethodsA comprehensive electronic search was conducted in databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and The Web of Science), from the date of database establishment till March 2021, to screen for studies on new-onset LBBB after TAVR. We next performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of new-onset LBBB after TAVR on patient prognosis, based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.ResultsA total of 17 studies, including 9205 patients, were eligible for our analysis. Patients with new-onset LBBB had elevated all-cause mortality risk verses patients without new-onset LBBB, during all follow ups. The relevant data are as follows: 30-day (RR:1.71; 95%CI:1.27–2.29; P < 0.001), 1-year (RR:1.31; 95%CI:1.12–1.52; P < 0.001), and 2-year (RR:1.31; 95%CI:1.09–1.56; P = 0.003) follow ups. Likewise, new-onset LBBB patients also experienced increased cardiovascular mortality, compared to non-new-onset LBBB patients, but only in the 1-year follow up (RR:1.49; 95%CI:1.23–1.82; P < 0.001). Hospitalization for heart failure was dramatically elevated in patients with new-onset LBBB verses non-new-onset LBBB, in all follow ups. The relevant data are as follows: 30-day (RR:1.56; 95%CI:1.13–2.12; P = 0.007), 1-year (RR:1.35; 95%CI:1.08–1.68; P = 0.007), and 2-year (RR:1.49; 95%CI:1.21–1.84; P < 0.001). Similarly, new-onset LBBB patients had higher PPI risk than non-new-onset LBBB patients, in all follow ups. The relevant data are as follows: 30-day (RR:3.05; 95%CI:1.49–6.22; P = 0.002), 1-year (RR:2.15; 95%CI:1.52–3.03; P < 0.001), and 2-year (RR:2.52; 95%CI:1.68–3.78; P < 0.001).ConclusionPatients with new-onset LBBB have worse prognosis after TAVR than those without new-onset LBBB. Recognition of the adverse effects of post-TAVR new-onset LBBB can lead to the development of new strategies that enhance clinical outcomes.Systematic Trial Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=197224, identifier: 19722.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jialu Wang
- The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Shidong Liu
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiangxiang Han
- The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yang Chen
- The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hao Chen
- The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Zunhui Wan
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Bing Song
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Bing Song
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mitsis A, Eftychiou C, Christophides T, Sakellaropoulos S, Avraamides P. The conjunction conundrum in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Curr Probl Cardiol 2022; 48:101130. [PMID: 35114293 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
A continuous discussion regarding the predictors for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is ongoing, especially in the era of low and medium risk patients. The aim of this article is to review the data so far regarding the pathophysiology, risk factors, and the indications for permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI. The factors that contribute to rhythm abnormalities post TAVI can be divided into pre-existing conduction abnormalities, patient-related anatomical factors, and peri-procedural technical factors. The latter components are potentially modifiable, and this is where attention should be directed, particularly now that in an era of TAVI expansion towards lower-risk patients.
Collapse
Key Words
- AF, Atrial fibrillation
- AS, Aortic stenosis
- AV, Atrioventricular
- BAV, Balloon aortic valvuloplasty
- BBB, Bundle branch block
- BEV, Balloon expandable valve
- CAVB, Complete Atrioventricular block
- CRT,
- CT, Computer tomography
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy
- ECG, Electrocardiogram
- EPS, Electrophysiology study
- ID, Implantation depth
- LAH, Left anterior hemiblock
- LBBB, Left bundle branch block
- LCC, Left coronary cusp
- LVEF, Left ventricular ejection function
- LVOT, Left ventricular outflow track
- LVOT- EI, Left ventricular outflow track eccentricity index
- LVOT-CA, Left ventricular outflow track calcification
- MS, Membranous septum
- NCC, Non coronary cusp
- PPI, Permanent pacemaker implantation
- PVL, Paravalvular leak
- RAO, Right anterior oblique
- RBBB, Right bundle branch block
- RCC, Right coronary cusp
- SAS, Severe aortic stenosis
- SEV, Self-expandable valve
- TAVI, Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- Transcatheter aortic valve implantation, pacemaker implantation, LBBB, balloon expandable valves, self-expandable valves, LVOT. List of abbreviations, AMCC, Aortomitral continuity calcification
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Mitsis
- Cardiology Department, Nicosia General Hospital, 2029, Nicosia, Cyprus.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nakashima M, Jilaihawi H. Conduction Disturbances and Pacing in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Interv Cardiol Clin 2021; 10:455-463. [PMID: 34593109 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccl.2021.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Conduction disturbances (CDs) after transcatheter artic replacement remain a clinical concern and relatively common complication. A recent meta-analysis showed both new-onset persistent left bundle branch block and new permanent pacemaker implantation were related to all-cause death with risk ratio 1.32 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17 to 1.49; P<.001) and 1.17 (95% CI 1.11-1.25; P<.001) at 1 year, respectively. Preprocedural computed tomography imaging can highlight potential risk factors for CDs, such as membranous septum length, device landing zone calcium, and the annulus size/degree of device oversizing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Nakashima
- Heart Valve Center, NYU Langone Health, 530 1st Avenue, Suite 9V, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Hasan Jilaihawi
- Heart Valve Center, NYU Langone Health, 530 1st Avenue, Suite 9V, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Increased Rate of New-onset Left Bundle Branch Block in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (From a National Registry). Am J Cardiol 2021; 156:101-107. [PMID: 34344509 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.06.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
There is a growing interest in transcutaneous aortic valve implantation (TAVI) therapy among patients with bicuspid severe aortic stenosis (BAV). Conduction disturbances remain a frequent complication of TAVI, and new-onset permanent LBBB (NOP-LBBB) post-TAVI may be a marker of worse outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the rate of NOP-LBBB following TAVI among patients with BAV as compared to tricuspid severe aortic stenosis (TAV). Patients enrolled in the multicenter (5 centers) Bicuspid AS TAVI Registry were reviewed and compared with patients with TAV. Patients with previous aortic valve replacement, other valve morphologies and those with preprocedural LBBB or pacemaker were excluded. NOP-LBBB was defined as LBBB first detected and persisting 30-days following TAVI. A total of 387 patients (66 with BAV, 321 with TAV), age 80.3 ± 7.3, 47% females were analyzed. The device success rates were 95% in both groups without any conversions to surgery. The rate of NOP-LBBB was significantly higher among patients with BAV versus TAV (29.2% vs 16.9%, p = 0.02). However, the rate of post procedural pacemaker implantation was similar (14.8% vs 12.5%; respectively, p = 0.62). In BAV and TAV groups, 1-year mortality (6.1% vs 7.2%; respectively, p = 0.75) and stroke rates (6.1% vs 3.5%; respectively, p = 0.30) were not significantly different. Multivariate analysis identified BAV as an independent predictor of NOP-LBBB (AdjOR = 2.7, 95%CI 1.3 to 5.4). Furthermore, BAV subtypes with raphe (type 1) were identified as independent predictors of NOP-LBBB (AdjOR = 3.2, 95%CI: 1.5 to 6.7). In conclusion, patients with BAV undergoing TAVI have greater risk for developing NOP-LBBB compared with patients with TAV and the presence of raphe was associated with increased risk of NOP-LBBB. The prognostic significance for this finding warrants further evaluation in future studies.
Collapse
|
14
|
Aymond JD, Benn F, Williams CM, Bernard ML, Hiltbold AE, Khatib S, Polin GM, Rogers PA, Tafur Soto JD, Ramee SR, Parrino PE, Falterman JB, Al-Khatib SM, Morin DP. Epidemiology, evaluation, and management of conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2021; 66:37-45. [PMID: 34332660 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Aortic stenosis is the most common valvulopathy requiring replacement by means of the surgical or transcatheter approach. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has quickly become a viable and often preferred treatment strategy compared to surgical aortic valve replacement. However, transcatheter heart valve system deployment not infrequently injures the specialized electrical system of the heart, leading to new conduction disorders including high-grade atrioventricular block and complete heart block (CHB) necessitating permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI), which may lead to deleterious effects on cardiac function and patient outcomes. Additional conduction disturbances (e.g., new-onset persistent left bundle branch block, PR/QRS prolongation, and transient CHB) currently lack clearly defined management algorithms leading to variable strategies among institutions. This article outlines the current understanding of the pathophysiology, patient and procedural risk factors, means for further risk stratification and monitoring of patients without a clear indication for PPI, our institutional approach, and future directions in the management and evaluation of post-TAVR conduction disturbances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D Aymond
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | - Francis Benn
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | - Cody M Williams
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | | | - A Elise Hiltbold
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | - Sammy Khatib
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | - Glenn M Polin
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | - Paul A Rogers
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | | | - Stephen R Ramee
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | - P Eugene Parrino
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | | | - Sana M Al-Khatib
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | - Daniel P Morin
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sammour Y, Krishnaswamy A, Kumar A, Puri R, Tarakji KG, Bazarbashi N, Harb S, Griffin B, Svensson L, Wazni O, Kapadia SR. Incidence, Predictors, and Implications of Permanent Pacemaker Requirement After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 14:115-134. [PMID: 33478630 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a safe and feasible alternative to surgery in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis regardless of the surgical risk. Conduction abnormalities requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remain a common finding after TAVR due to the close proximity of the atrioventricular conduction system to the aortic root. High-grade atrioventricular block and new onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) are the most commonly reported conduction abnormalities after TAVR. The overall rate of PPM implantation after TAVR varies and is related to pre-procedural and intraprocedural factors. The available literature regarding the impact of conduction abnormalities and PPM requirement on morbidity and mortality is still conflicting. Pre-procedural conduction abnormalities such as right bundle branch block and LBBB have been linked with increased PPM implantation and mortality after TAVR. When screening patients for TAVR, heart teams should be aware of various anatomical and pathophysiological conditions that make patients more susceptible to increased risk of conduction abnormalities and PPM requirement after the procedure. This is particularly important as TAVR has been recently approved for patients with low surgical risk. The purpose of this review is to discuss the incidence, predictors, impact, and management of the various conduction abnormalities requiring PPM implantation in patients undergoing TAVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasser Sammour
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA; Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Amar Krishnaswamy
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Arnav Kumar
- Andreas Gruentzig Cardiovascular Center, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Rishi Puri
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Khaldoun G Tarakji
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Najdat Bazarbashi
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Serge Harb
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Brian Griffin
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Lars Svensson
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Oussama Wazni
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Samir R Kapadia
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ciardetti N, Ciatti F, Nardi G, Di Muro FM, Demola P, Sottili E, Stolcova M, Ristalli F, Mattesini A, Meucci F, Di Mario C. Advancements in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Focused Update. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2021; 57:711. [PMID: 34356992 PMCID: PMC8306774 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57070711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the leading technique for aortic valve replacement in symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis with conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) now limited to patients younger than 65-75 years due to a combination of unsuitable anatomies (calcified raphae in bicuspid valves, coexistent aneurysm of the ascending aorta) and concerns on the absence of long-term data on TAVI durability. This incredible rise is linked to technological evolutions combined with increased operator experience, which led to procedural refinements and, accordingly, to better outcomes. The article describes the main and newest technical improvements, allowing an extension of the indications (valve-in-valve procedures, intravascular lithotripsy for severely calcified iliac vessels), and a reduction of complications (stroke, pacemaker implantation, aortic regurgitation).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Carlo Di Mario
- Structural Interventional Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Clinica Medica, Room 124, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50139 Florence, Italy; (N.C.); (F.C.); (G.N.); (F.M.D.M.); (P.D.); (E.S.); (M.S.); (F.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Impact of Bundle Branch Block on Permanent Pacemaker Implantation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10122719. [PMID: 34205478 PMCID: PMC8235153 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10122719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Data regarding the impact of infra-Hisian conduction disturbances leading to permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain limited. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of right and/or left bundle branch block (RBBB/LBBB) on post-TAVI PPI. We performed a systematic literature review to identify studies reporting on RBBB and/or LBBB status and post-TAVI PPI. Study design, patient characteristics, and the presence of branch block were analyzed. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CI were extracted. The final analysis included 36 studies, reporting about 55,851 patients. Data on LBBB were extracted from 33 studies. Among 51,026 patients included, 5503 showed pre-implant LBBB (11.9% (10.4%–13.8%)). The influence of LBBB on post-TAVI PPI was not significant OR 1.1474 (0.9025; 1.4588), p = 0.2618. Data on RBBB were extracted from 28 studies. Among 46,663 patients included, 31,603 showed pre-implant RBBB (9.2% (7.3%–11.6%)). The influence of RBBB on post-TAVI PPI was significant OR 4.8581 (4.1571; 5.6775), p < 0.0001. From this meta-analysis, the presence of RBBB increased the risk for post-TAVI PPI, independent of age or LVEF, while this finding was not confirmed for patients experimenting with LBBB. This result emphasizes the need for pre-operative evaluation strategies in patient selection for TAVI.
Collapse
|
18
|
Poels TT, Stassen R, Kats S, Veenstra L, van Ommen V, Kietselaer B, Houthuizen P, Maessen JG, Prinzen FW. Effective Distance between Aortic Valve and Conduction System Is an Independent Predictor of Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 57:medicina57050476. [PMID: 34064932 PMCID: PMC8150689 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57050476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Background and objectives: Persistent left bundle branch block (P-LBBB) has been associated with poor clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures. We hypothesized that the distance from the aortic valve to the proximal conduction system, expressed as the effective distance between the aortic valve and conduction system (EDACS), can predict the occurrence of P-LBBB in patients undergoing a TAVI procedure. Materials and methods: In a retrospective study, data from 269 patients were analyzed. EDACS was determined using two longitudinal CT sections. Results: Sixty-four of the patients developed P-LBBB. EDACS ranged between −3 and +18 mm. EDACS was significantly smaller in P-LBBB than in non-P-LBBB patients (4.6 (2.2–7.1) vs. 8.0 (5.8–10.2) mm, median values (interquartile range); p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.78 for predicting P-LBBB based on EDACS. In patients with EDACS of ≤3 mm and >10 mm, the chance of developing P-LBBB was ≥50% and <10%, respectively. Conclusions: A small EDACS increases the risk for the development of P-LBBB during TAVI by a factor of >25. As EDACS can be measured pre-procedurally, it may be a valuable additional factor to weigh the risks of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas T. Poels
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands; (R.S.); (S.K.); (J.G.M.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Robert Stassen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands; (R.S.); (S.K.); (J.G.M.)
| | - Suzanne Kats
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands; (R.S.); (S.K.); (J.G.M.)
| | - Leo Veenstra
- Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands; (L.V.); (V.v.O.); (B.K.)
| | - Vincent van Ommen
- Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands; (L.V.); (V.v.O.); (B.K.)
| | - Bastiaan Kietselaer
- Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands; (L.V.); (V.v.O.); (B.K.)
| | - Patrick Houthuizen
- Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, P.O. Box 1350, 5623EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands;
| | - Jos G. Maessen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands; (R.S.); (S.K.); (J.G.M.)
| | - Frits W. Prinzen
- CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, P.O. Box 616, 6229ER Maastricht, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Généreux P, Piazza N, Alu MC, Nazif T, Hahn RT, Pibarot P, Bax JJ, Leipsic JA, Blanke P, Blackstone EH, Finn MT, Kapadia S, Linke A, Mack MJ, Makkar R, Mehran R, Popma JJ, Reardon M, Rodes-Cabau J, Van Mieghem NM, Webb JG, Cohen DJ, Leon MB. Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research. Eur Heart J 2021; 42:1825-1857. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Aims
The Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC), founded in 2010, was intended to (i) identify appropriate clinical endpoints and (ii) standardize definitions of these endpoints for transcatheter and surgical aortic valve clinical trials. Rapid evolution of the field, including the emergence of new complications, expanding clinical indications, and novel therapy strategies have mandated further refinement and expansion of these definitions to ensure clinical relevance. This document provides an update of the most appropriate clinical endpoint definitions to be used in the conduct of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve clinical research.
Methods and results
Several years after the publication of the VARC-2 manuscript, an in-person meeting was held involving over 50 independent clinical experts representing several professional societies, academic research organizations, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and industry representatives to (i) evaluate utilization of VARC endpoint definitions in clinical research, (ii) discuss the scope of this focused update, and (iii) review and revise specific clinical endpoint definitions. A writing committee of independent experts was convened and subsequently met to further address outstanding issues. There were ongoing discussions with FDA and many experts to develop a new classification schema for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction and failure. Overall, this multi-disciplinary process has resulted in important recommendations for data reporting, clinical research methods, and updated endpoint definitions. New definitions or modifications of existing definitions are being proposed for repeat hospitalizations, access site-related complications, bleeding events, conduction disturbances, cardiac structural complications, and bioprosthetic valve dysfunction and failure (including valve leaflet thickening and thrombosis). A more granular 5-class grading scheme for paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) is being proposed to help refine the assessment of PVR. Finally, more specific recommendations on quality-of-life assessments have been included, which have been targeted to specific clinical study designs.
Conclusions
Acknowledging the dynamic and evolving nature of less-invasive aortic valve therapies, further refinements of clinical research processes are required. The adoption of these updated and newly proposed VARC-3 endpoints and definitions will ensure homogenous event reporting, accurate adjudication, and appropriate comparisons of clinical research studies involving devices and new therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Philippe Généreux
- Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, NJ, USA
| | - Nicolo Piazza
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Maria C Alu
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tamim Nazif
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rebecca T Hahn
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
| | - Philippe Pibarot
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Jeroen J Bax
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jonathon A Leipsic
- Department of Radiology, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Philipp Blanke
- Department of Radiology, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Eugene H Blackstone
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic and Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Matthew T Finn
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samir Kapadia
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Michael J Mack
- Baylor Scott & White Heart Hospital Plano, Plano, TX, USA
| | - Raj Makkar
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Roxana Mehran
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - John G Webb
- Department of Cardiology, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - David J Cohen
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Martin B Leon
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Généreux P, Piazza N, Alu MC, Nazif T, Hahn RT, Pibarot P, Bax JJ, Leipsic JA, Blanke P, Blackstone EH, Finn MT, Kapadia S, Linke A, Mack MJ, Makkar R, Mehran R, Popma JJ, Reardon M, Rodes-Cabau J, Van Mieghem NM, Webb JG, Cohen DJ, Leon MB. Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 77:2717-2746. [PMID: 33888385 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 470] [Impact Index Per Article: 156.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC), founded in 2010, was intended to (i) identify appropriate clinical endpoints and (ii) standardize definitions of these endpoints for transcatheter and surgical aortic valve clinical trials. Rapid evolution of the field, including the emergence of new complications, expanding clinical indications, and novel therapy strategies have mandated further refinement and expansion of these definitions to ensure clinical relevance. This document provides an update of the most appropriate clinical endpoint definitions to be used in the conduct of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve clinical research. METHODS AND RESULTS Several years after the publication of the VARC-2 manuscript, an in-person meeting was held involving over 50 independent clinical experts representing several professional societies, academic research organizations, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and industry representatives to (i) evaluate utilization of VARC endpoint definitions in clinical research, (ii) discuss the scope of this focused update, and (iii) review and revise specific clinical endpoint definitions. A writing committee of independent experts was convened and subsequently met to further address outstanding issues. There were ongoing discussions with FDA and many experts to develop a new classification schema for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction and failure. Overall, this multi-disciplinary process has resulted in important recommendations for data reporting, clinical research methods, and updated endpoint definitions. New definitions or modifications of existing definitions are being proposed for repeat hospitalizations, access site-related complications, bleeding events, conduction disturbances, cardiac structural complications, and bioprosthetic valve dysfunction and failure (including valve leaflet thickening and thrombosis). A more granular 5-class grading scheme for paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) is being proposed to help refine the assessment of PVR. Finally, more specific recommendations on quality-of-life assessments have been included, which have been targeted to specific clinical study designs. CONCLUSIONS Acknowledging the dynamic and evolving nature of less-invasive aortic valve therapies, further refinements of clinical research processes are required. The adoption of these updated and newly proposed VARC-3 endpoints and definitions will ensure homogenous event reporting, accurate adjudication, and appropriate comparisons of clinical research studies involving devices and new therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Philippe Généreux
- Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, New Jersey, USA
| | - Nicolo Piazza
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Maria C Alu
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tamim Nazif
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA
| | - Rebecca T Hahn
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA
| | - Philippe Pibarot
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jeroen J Bax
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jonathon A Leipsic
- Department of Radiology, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Philipp Blanke
- Department of Radiology, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Eugene H Blackstone
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic and Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Matthew T Finn
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA
| | - Samir Kapadia
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Michael J Mack
- Baylor Scott & White Heart Hospital Plano, Plano, Texas, USA
| | - Raj Makkar
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Roxana Mehran
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Popma
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Reardon
- Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Josep Rodes-Cabau
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - John G Webb
- Department of Cardiology, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - David J Cohen
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Martin B Leon
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sandhu A, Tzou WS. A Disruptive Technology: Determining Need for Permanent Pacing After TAVR. Curr Cardiol Rep 2021; 23:53. [PMID: 33871728 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-021-01481-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has changed the paradigm for management of severe aortic stenosis. Despite evolution of TAVR over the past 2 decades, conduction system disturbances remain a concern post-TAVR. In this review, we describe (1) permanent pacemaker (PP) implant rates associated with TAVR, (2) risk factors predicting need for PP therapy post-TAVR, (3) management of perioperative conduction abnormalities, and (4) novel areas of research. RECENT FINDINGS Conduction disturbances remain a common issue post-TAVR, in particular, left bundle branch block (LBBB). Though newer data describes resolution of a significant fraction of these disturbances over time, rates of pacemaker therapy remain high despite improvements in valve technology and procedural technique. Recent consensus statements and guideline documents are important first steps in standardizing an approach to post-TAVR conduction disturbances. New areas of research show promise in both prediction and treatment of conduction disturbances post-TAVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amneet Sandhu
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.,Division of Cardiology, Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Wendy S Tzou
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Salatzki J, Fischer T, Riffel J, André F, Hirschberg K, Ochs A, Hund H, Müller-Hennessen M, Giannitsis E, Friedrich MG, Scholz E, Frey N, Katus HA, Ochs M. Presence of contractile impairment appears crucial for structural remodeling in idiopathic left bundle-branch block. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2021; 23:39. [PMID: 33789682 PMCID: PMC8015193 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-021-00731-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To differentiate effects of ventricular asynchrony from an underlying hypocontractile cardiomyopathy this study aimed to enhance the understanding of functional impairment and structural remodeling in idiopathic left bundle-branch block (LBBB). We hypothesize, that functional asynchrony with septal flash volume effects alone might not entirely explain the degree of functional impairment. Hence, we suggest the presence of a superimposed contractile cardiomyopathy. METHODS In this retrospective study, 53 patients with idiopathic LBBB were identified and matched to controls with and without cardiovascular risk factors. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was used to evaluate cardiac function, volumes and myocardial fibrosis using native T1 mapping and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Septal flash volume was assessed by CMR volumetric measurements and allowed to stratify patients with systolic dysfunction solely due to isolated ventricular asynchrony or superimposed contractile impairment. RESULTS Reduced systolic LV-function, increased LV-volumes and septal myocardial fibrosis were found in patients with idiopathic LBBB compared to healthy controls. LV-volumes increased and systolic LV-function declined with prolonged QRS duration. Fibrosis was typically located at the right ventricular insertion points. Subgroups with superimposed contractile impairment appeared with pronounced LV dilation and increased fibrotic remodeling compared to individuals with isolated ventricular asynchrony. CONCLUSIONS The presence of superimposed contractile impairment in idiopathic LBBB is crucial to identify patients with enhanced structural remodeling. This finding suggests an underlying cardiomyopathy. Future studies are needed to assess a possible prognostic impact of this entity and the development of heart failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janek Salatzki
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Theresa Fischer
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Riffel
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian André
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristóf Hirschberg
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Semmelweis University Heart and Vascular Center, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Andreas Ochs
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hauke Hund
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Müller-Hennessen
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Evangelos Giannitsis
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias G Friedrich
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Cardiology, Departments of Medicine and Diagnostic Radiology, Mc-Gill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Eberhard Scholz
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Norbert Frey
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hugo A Katus
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marco Ochs
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chen S, Chau KH, Nazif TM. The incidence and impact of cardiac conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 9:452-467. [PMID: 33312903 PMCID: PMC7724062 DOI: 10.21037/acs-2020-av-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has developed into an established therapy for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) across the spectrum of surgical risk. Despite improvements in transcatheter heart valve (THV) technologies and procedural techniques, cardiac conduction disturbances, including high degree atrioventricular block (AVB) requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation and new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB), remain frequent complications. TAVR-related conduction disturbances occur due to injury to the conduction system from interactions with interventional equipment and the transcatheter valve stent frame. Risk factors for post-TAVR conduction disturbances have been identified and include clinical characteristics, baseline electrocardiogram findings (right bundle branch block), anatomic factors, and potentially modifiable procedural factors (type of transcatheter valve, depth of implantation, over-sizing). New-onset LBBB and PPM implantation after TAVR have been shown to be associated with adverse long-term clinical outcomes, including mortality and heart failure hospitalization. These clinical consequences are likely to be of increasing importance as TAVR is utilized in younger and lower risk population. This review provides an updated overview of the literature regarding the incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of TAVR-related conduction disturbances, as well as proposed strategies for the management of this frequent clinical challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shmuel Chen
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katherine H Chau
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tamim M Nazif
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Galand V, Martins RP, Behar N, Pichard C, Mabo P, Leclercq C. CRT-Pacemaker Versus CRT-Defibrillator Who Needs Sudden Cardiac Death Protection? Curr Heart Fail Rep 2020; 17:116-124. [DOI: 10.1007/s11897-020-00465-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
25
|
Akdemir B, Roukoz H. A single-centre cohort and short-term follow-up of patients who developed persistent new onset left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Acta Cardiol 2020; 75:360-365. [PMID: 31984845 DOI: 10.1080/00015385.2020.1713520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Background: The most common conduction abnormality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) with an exact frequency that varies based on the valve system used for TAVR. PPM implantation in patients with persistent new onset LBBB post TAVR is controversial. The primary objective of this study is to report PPM utilisation and mortality in this patient population.Methods: A TAVR registry included patients older than 18 years who underwent TAVR between March 2012 and June 2015 at University of Minnesota Medical Centre. After exclusion, 151 patients were divided into two groups; patients with persistent new onset LBBB after TAVR (new LBBB, n = 47) and patients without persistent new onset LBBB (no new LBBB, n = 104).Results: Among the 151 patients, 47 (31.1%) patients developed new-onset LBBB after the procedure and persisted at discharge. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (52.5 ± 11.1 vs. 56.4 ± 10.8, p: .047) and mean aortic valve gradient (40.6 ± 11.5 vs. 45.7 ± 14.1, p: .022) were significantly higher in no new LBBB group. Among those with new LBBB, there was a significantly higher rate of PPM implant during index hospitalisation (14.9%, vs. 0%, p < .001). LVEF remained significantly lower at 1 year follow up in new LBBB group compared to no new LBBB group (51.8 ± 11.2 vs. 57.6 ± 8.3, p: .002). Also in new LBBB group, there was a non-significantly higher rate of all-cause mortality in 1 year compared to no new LBBB group (14.9% vs. 9.6% p: .34). There were no significant differences between patients with and without new LBBB with respect to PPM implant after discharge in 1 year (2.13% vs. 3.8% p: .58), length of stay (7.3 ± 7.3 vs. 5.9 ± 2.7 p: .09), post-op atrial fibrillation (AF) (16.3% vs. 8.5% p: .20).Conclusions: New onset LBBB was frequent conduction problem post TAVR and one-third of patients with new onset LBBB persisted at discharge. New LBBB after TAVR was associated with a higher risk of PPM implantation during the index hospitalisation but not after discharge. Our findings suggest that early PPM implantation for post-TAVR LBBB is not indicated without complete or high degree AV block. Further research is required to identify the patients with new LBBB who would progress to advanced AV block or heart failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baris Akdemir
- Cardiovascular Division, Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Henri Roukoz
- Cardiovascular Division, Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lin SI, Miura M, Tagliari AP, Lee YH, Shirai S, Puri R, Maisano F, Taramasso M. Intraventricular Conduction Disturbances After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 15:e11. [PMID: 32905123 PMCID: PMC7463330 DOI: 10.15420/icr.2020.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Despite significant improvements in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) outcomes, periprocedural conduction disturbances, such as new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) and new pacemaker implantation (PMI), remain relatively frequent concerns. The development of periprocedural conduction disturbances can be explained by the proximity between the aortic valve and the conduction system. Although prior studies reported heterogeneity in PMI rates after TAVI, current evidence supports the potentially deleterious consequence of LBBB and PMI, and several predisposing factors have been reported. Therefore, new strategies to avoid conduction disturbances and to improve their management are required, particularly with the current trend to expand TAVI to a low-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu-I Lin
- Cardiovascular Center, MacKay Memorial Hospital Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Mizuki Miura
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Zurich Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ana Paula Tagliari
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Zurich Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ying-Hsian Lee
- Cardiovascular Center, MacKay Memorial Hospital Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shinichi Shirai
- Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Rishi Puri
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, OH, US
| | - Francesco Maisano
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Zurich Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maurizio Taramasso
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Zurich Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sasaki K, Izumo M, Kuwata S, Ishibashi Y, Kamijima R, Watanabe M, Kaihara T, Okuyama K, Koga M, Nishikawa H, Tanabe Y, Higuma T, Akashi YJ. Clinical Impact of New-Onset Left Bundle-Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the Japanese Population ― A Single High-Volume Center Experience ―. Circ J 2020; 84:1012-1019. [DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-19-1071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kenichi Sasaki
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine
| | - Masaki Izumo
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine
| | - Shingo Kuwata
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine
| | - Yuki Ishibashi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine
| | - Ryo Kamijima
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine
| | - Mika Watanabe
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine
| | - Toshiki Kaihara
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine
| | - Kazuaki Okuyama
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine
| | - Masashi Koga
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine
| | - Haruka Nishikawa
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine
| | - Yasuhiro Tanabe
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine
| | - Takumi Higuma
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine
| | - Yoshihiro J Akashi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hayashidani S, Shiose A, Tsutsui H. New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation - Not a Harmless Bystander. Circ J 2020; 84:888-890. [PMID: 32389906 DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-20-0292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shunji Hayashidani
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University
| | - Akira Shiose
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University
| | - Hiroyuki Tsutsui
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hamandi M, Tabachnick D, Lanfear AT, Baxter R, Shin K, Zingler B, Mack MJ, DiMaio JM, Kindsvater S. Effect of new and persistent left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement on long-term need for pacemaker implantation. Proc AMIA Symp 2020; 33:157-162. [PMID: 32313452 PMCID: PMC7155984 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2020.1717906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiac conduction abnormalities, including left bundle branch block (LBBB), are common following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study assessed the incidence and outcomes of new or widening persistent LBBB following TAVR. Data regarding 550 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR between 2012 and 2016 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Both 30-day and 1-year outcomes of patients with isolated new or worsening LBBB following TAVR were reviewed. Fifty-two patients (9.5%) developed new or worsening LBBB. Six of the 52 (11.5%) patients received a permanent pacemaker (PPM) for LBBB prior to discharge. For patients discharged home following TAVR without a PPM, the 1-year PPM requirement was 15.2% in patients with new or worsening LBBB compared to 4.5% in patients without new or worsening LBBB (P = 0.01). One-year mortality rates for patients who did not have a new PPM placed before discharge were 15.2% in patients with new or worsening LBBB, 13.9% in patients without new or worsening LBBB, and 11.9% in patients with preoperative PPMs (P = 0.81). Patients with new or worsening persistent LBBB discharged without a PPM experience a higher requirement for PPM implantation in the year following TAVR compared to patients without new or worsening persistent LBBB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohanad Hamandi
- Department of Cardiovascular Research, Baylor Scott & White The Heart HospitalPlanoTexas
| | - Deborah Tabachnick
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White The Heart HospitalPlanoTexas
| | - Allison T. Lanfear
- Department of Cardiovascular Research, Baylor Scott & White The Heart HospitalPlanoTexas
| | - Ronald Baxter
- Department of Cardiovascular Research, Baylor Scott & White The Heart HospitalPlanoTexas
| | - Kathryn Shin
- Department of Cardiovascular Research, Baylor Scott & White The Heart HospitalPlanoTexas
| | - Brittany Zingler
- Department of Cardiovascular Research, Baylor Scott & White The Heart HospitalPlanoTexas
| | - Michael J. Mack
- Department of Cardiovascular Research, Baylor Scott & White The Heart HospitalPlanoTexas
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White The Heart HospitalPlanoTexas
| | - J. Michael DiMaio
- Department of Cardiovascular Research, Baylor Scott & White The Heart HospitalPlanoTexas
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White The Heart HospitalPlanoTexas
| | - Steven Kindsvater
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Baylor Scott & White The Heart HospitalPlanoTexas
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Subramani S, Arora L, Krishnan S, Hanada S, Sharma A, Ramakrishna H. Analysis of Conduction Abnormalities and Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34:1082-1093. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.07.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
31
|
Megaly M, Abraham B, Abdelsalam M, Saad M, Omer M, Elbadawi A, Mentias A, Narayanan MA, Gafoor S, Brilakis ES, Goessl M, Cavalcante JL, Garcia S, Kapadia S, Pershad A, Sorajja P, Sengupta J. Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With New-Onset Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2020; 21:1299-1304. [PMID: 33246556 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of new-onset persistent left bundle branch block (LBBB) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) on all-cause mortality has been controversial. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of eleven studies (7398 patients) comparing the short- and long- outcomes in patients who had new-onset LBBB after TAVR vs. those who did not. RESULTS During a mean follow-up of 20.5±14months, patients who had new-onset persistent LBBB after TAVR had a higher incidence of all-cause mortality (29.7% vs. 23.6%; OR 1.28 (1.04-1.58), p=0.02), rehospitalization for heart failure (HF) (19.5% vs. 17.3%; OR 1.4 (1.13-1.73), p=0.002), and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMi) (19.7% vs. 7.1%; OR 2.4 (1.64-3.52), p<0.001) compared with those who did not. Five studies (4180 patients) reported adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality; new LBBB remained associated with a higher risk of mortality (adjusted HR 1.43 (1.08-1.9), p<0.01, I2=81%). CONCLUSION Post-TAVR persistent LBBB is associated with higher PPMi, HF hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality. While efforts to identify patients who need post-procedural PPMi are warranted, more studies are required to evaluate the best follow-up and treatment strategies, including the type of pacing device if required, to improve long-term outcomes in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Megaly
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Valve Science Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Bishoy Abraham
- Division of Internal Medicine, Ascension St. John Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Mahmoud Abdelsalam
- Division of Internal Medicine, Temple University/Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center, Johnstown, PA, USA
| | - Marwan Saad
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Division of Cardiology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Omer
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Valve Science Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Ayman Elbadawi
- Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Amgad Mentias
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Roy and Lucille J. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | - Sameer Gafoor
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Swedish Medical Centre, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Mario Goessl
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Valve Science Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - João L Cavalcante
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Valve Science Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Santiago Garcia
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Valve Science Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Samir Kapadia
- Division of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ashish Pershad
- Division of Cardiology, Banner University Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Paul Sorajja
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Valve Science Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Jay Sengupta
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Brinkert M, Wolfrum M, Moccetti F, Bossard M, Berte B, Cuculi F, Kobza R, Toggweiler S. Relevance of New Conduction Disorders After Implantation of the ACURATE Neo Transcatheter Heart Valve in the Aortic Valve Position. Am J Cardiol 2020; 125:783-787. [PMID: 31898969 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.11.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Revised: 11/16/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The ACURATE neo transcatheter heart valve has been associated with very low rates of new conduction disorders (CDs). We assessed the clinical relevance of new CDs in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with this valve. Data of consecutive patients without a pre-existing left bundle branch block (LBBB) or a permanent pacemaker (PPM) undergoing TAVR with the ACURATE neo were analyzed from the prospective SwissTAVI registry. Patients with new CDs were compared with patients with an unchanged electrocardiogram (ECG). ACURATE neo was implanted in 203 patients (mean age 82 ± 6 years, 63% women), CDs occurred in 28 patients (22 [11%] developed a LBBB, 6 [3%] required a PPM). New CDs resulted in a longer median duration of hospitalization (7 vs 5 days, interquartile range 4 to 13 vs 3 to 8 days, p = 0.04). At 1-year follow-up, left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly lower in patients with new CDs comparedwith patients with an unchanged ECG (54% ± 13% vs 61% ± 9%, p <0.01). Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival at 1-year were 89% in patients with new CDs and 95% in patients with an unchanged ECG (hazard ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 0.7 to 6.2, p = 0.22). After TAVR with the self-expanding ACURATE neo valve, the rate of new CDs, including complete LBBB was low and very few patients required a new PPM. However, new CDs prolonged initial hospitalization and increased the risk for left ventricular-dysfunction at 1-year follow-up. Patients without new CDs had excellent outcomes with a very high survival rate at 1-year follow-up.
Collapse
|
33
|
Cano Ó, Vijayaraman P. The search for physiologic pacing post-TAVR. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2020; 31:822-824. [PMID: 31990115 DOI: 10.1111/jce.14372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Óscar Cano
- Electrophysiology Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe and Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas en RED en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Valencia, Spain
| | - Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman
- Electrophysiology Section, Geisinger Heart Istitute, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Faroux L, Chen S, Muntané-Carol G, Regueiro A, Philippon F, Sondergaard L, Jørgensen TH, Lopez-Aguilera J, Kodali S, Leon M, Nazif T, Rodés-Cabau J. Clinical impact of conduction disturbances in transcatheter aortic valve replacement recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2020; 41:2771-2781. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Aims
The clinical impact of new-onset persistent left bundle branch block (NOP-LBBB) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) recipients remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the impact of (i) periprocedural NOP-LBBB and PPI post-TAVR on 1-year all-cause death, cardiac death, and heart failure hospitalization and (ii) NOP-LBBB on the need for PPI at 1-year follow-up.
Methods and results
We performed a systematic search from PubMed and EMBASE databases for studies reporting raw data on 1-year clinical impact of NOP-LBBB or periprocedural PPI post-TAVR. Data from 30 studies, including 7792 patients (12 studies) and 42 927 patients (21 studies) for the evaluation of the impact of NOP-LBBB and PPI after TAVR were sourced, respectively. NOP-LBBB was associated with an increased risk of all-cause death [risk ratio (RR) 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17–1.49; P < 0.001], cardiac death (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.20–1.78; P < 0.001), heart failure hospitalization (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.05–1.72; P = 0.02), and PPI (RR 1.89, 95% CI 1.58–2.27; P < 0.001) at 1-year follow-up. Periprocedural PPI after TAVR was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.11–1.25; P < 0.001) and heart failure hospitalization (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03–1.36; P = 0.02). Permanent pacemaker implantation was not associated with an increased risk of cardiac death (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.67–1.05; P = 0.13).
Conclusion
NOP-LBBB and PPI after TAVR are associated with an increased risk of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalization at 1-year follow-up. Periprocedural NOP-LBBB also increased the risk of cardiac death and PPI within the year following the procedure. Further studies are urgently warranted to enhance preventive measures and optimize the management of conduction disturbances post-TAVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Faroux
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, 2725 chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec G1V4G5, Canada
| | - Shmuel Chen
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Guillem Muntané-Carol
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, 2725 chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec G1V4G5, Canada
| | - Ander Regueiro
- Institut Clínic Cardiovascular, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Carrer de Villaroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francois Philippon
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, 2725 chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec G1V4G5, Canada
| | - Lars Sondergaard
- Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Troels H Jørgensen
- Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - José Lopez-Aguilera
- Hospital Reina Sofia of Cordoba, Avenida Menendez Pidal, 14004 Cordoba, Spain
| | - Susheel Kodali
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Martin Leon
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Tamim Nazif
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Josep Rodés-Cabau
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, 2725 chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec G1V4G5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Oechslin L, Hofer D, Hermann M. [CME: Left Bundle Branch Block and Painful Left Bundle Branch Block Syndrome]. PRAXIS 2020; 109:1017-1025. [PMID: 33050815 DOI: 10.1024/1661-8157/a003543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
CME: Left Bundle Branch Block and Painful Left Bundle Branch Block Syndrome Abstract. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is the electrocardiographic correlate of a pathologic transmission of the electrical signals in the myocardium which can lead to a dyssynchronous left ventricular activation and thus to an inefficient contraction of the ventricles. It is usually the expression of an underlying cardiopathy and represents an independent risk factor of cardiovascular mortality, therefore further examination is indicated in each case. Besides the treatment of an underlying disease, a specific therapy has been available since the introduction of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). A rarer phenomenon is the painful left bundle branch block in structurally healthy hearts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel Hofer
- Klinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsspital Zürich
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tian Y, Padmanabhan D, McLeod CJ, Zhang P, Xiao P, Sandhu GS, Greason KL, Gulati R, Nkomo VT, Rihal CS, Polk LE, Sanvick C, Liu XP, Friedman PA, Cha YM. Utility of 30-Day Continuous Ambulatory Monitoring to Identify Patients With Delayed Occurrence of Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12:e007635. [DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.118.007635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background:
Mechanical injury in the conduction system requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) associated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure is a common complication. The objective of this study was to use ambulatory monitor BodyGuardian to assess late occurrence of atrioventricular block (AVB) after TAVR.
Methods:
This prospective study evaluated 365 patients who underwent TAVR at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota between June 2016 and August 2017. Patients who received PPM for bradycardia after TAVR before discharge were considered as the PPM group. Those not requiring PPM received a BodyGuardian system (BodyGuardian group) for 30 days of continuous monitoring. Primary end point was Mobitz II or third-degree atrioventricular block (II/III AVB) at 30-day follow-up.
Results:
Of 365 patients, 74 who had a PPM or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator before TAVR and 94 who were enrolled in other studies were excluded. Of 197 patients enrolled in the study, 70 (35.5%) received PPM and 127 had BodyGuardian before the hospital dismissal. Eleven of 127 (8.6%) BodyGuardian group required PPM within 30 days after TAVR for late occurrence of symptomatic bradycardia. In total, 33 of 197 (16.7%) patients developed II/III AVB (24 before and 9 after discharge). Thirty-four patients had preexisting right bundle branch block. Of them, 16 (47%) developed II/III AVB. Of 53 patients who developed new left bundle branch block after TAVR, 14% progressed to II/III AVB within 30 days.
Conclusions:
In patients without a standard post-TAVR pacing indication, yet a potential risk to develop AVB, a strategy of 30-day monitoring identifies additional patients who require permanent pacing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Tian
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (Y.T., D.P., P.Z., P.X., G.S.S., R.G., V.T.N., C.S.R., L.E.P., C.S., P.A.F., Y.-M.C.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, China (Y.T., X.-P.L.)
| | - Deepak Padmanabhan
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (Y.T., D.P., P.Z., P.X., G.S.S., R.G., V.T.N., C.S.R., L.E.P., C.S., P.A.F., Y.-M.C.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Pei Zhang
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (Y.T., D.P., P.Z., P.X., G.S.S., R.G., V.T.N., C.S.R., L.E.P., C.S., P.A.F., Y.-M.C.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Peilin Xiao
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (Y.T., D.P., P.Z., P.X., G.S.S., R.G., V.T.N., C.S.R., L.E.P., C.S., P.A.F., Y.-M.C.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Gurpreet S. Sandhu
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (Y.T., D.P., P.Z., P.X., G.S.S., R.G., V.T.N., C.S.R., L.E.P., C.S., P.A.F., Y.-M.C.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Kevin L. Greason
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery (K.L.G.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Rajiv Gulati
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (Y.T., D.P., P.Z., P.X., G.S.S., R.G., V.T.N., C.S.R., L.E.P., C.S., P.A.F., Y.-M.C.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Vuyisile T. Nkomo
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (Y.T., D.P., P.Z., P.X., G.S.S., R.G., V.T.N., C.S.R., L.E.P., C.S., P.A.F., Y.-M.C.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Charanjit S. Rihal
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (Y.T., D.P., P.Z., P.X., G.S.S., R.G., V.T.N., C.S.R., L.E.P., C.S., P.A.F., Y.-M.C.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Lynn E. Polk
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (Y.T., D.P., P.Z., P.X., G.S.S., R.G., V.T.N., C.S.R., L.E.P., C.S., P.A.F., Y.-M.C.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Carrie Sanvick
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (Y.T., D.P., P.Z., P.X., G.S.S., R.G., V.T.N., C.S.R., L.E.P., C.S., P.A.F., Y.-M.C.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Xing-Peng Liu
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, China (Y.T., X.-P.L.)
| | - Paul A. Friedman
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (Y.T., D.P., P.Z., P.X., G.S.S., R.G., V.T.N., C.S.R., L.E.P., C.S., P.A.F., Y.-M.C.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Yong-Mei Cha
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (Y.T., D.P., P.Z., P.X., G.S.S., R.G., V.T.N., C.S.R., L.E.P., C.S., P.A.F., Y.-M.C.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kiefer NJ, Salber GC, Burke GM, Chang JD, Guibone KA, Popma JJ, Hahn RT, Pinto DS, Strom JB. The Impact of Basal Septal Hypertrophy on Outcomes after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2019; 32:1416-1425. [PMID: 31466847 PMCID: PMC8479796 DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of basal septal hypertrophy (BSH) on preprocedural transthoracic echocardiography in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is unknown. METHODS Medical charts and preprocedural transthoracic echocardiograms of 378 patients who underwent TAVR were examined. The association between BSH and the primary composite outcome of valve pop-out, recapture, embolization, aborted procedure, conversion to open procedure, new conduction disturbance, or need for permanent pacemaker ≤30 days after TAVR was evaluated. Patients with preexisting pacemakers were excluded. Sensitivity analyses were performed varying the definition of BSH. RESULTS Of 296 TAVR patients (78.3%) with interpretable images, 55 (18.6%) had BSH at a median of 40 days (interquartile range, 19-62 days) before TAVR. Age and sex were similar among those with and without BSH. BSH patients received postdilation more frequently (BSH+ vs BSH-: 41.8% vs 29.9%, P = .04). A total of 50 individuals (16.9%) received pacemakers within 30 days, and 128 (43.2%) developed conduction disturbances (with left bundle branch block most common), without differences between groups. BSH was unrelated to the primary outcome on multivariate analysis (adjusted odds ratio BSH+ vs BSH-, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.42-2.11; P = .88). CONCLUSIONS In this convenience sample of TAVR recipients at a large academic medical center, patients with BSH were more likely to receive postdilation. BSH was not associated with procedural or conduction outcomes after TAVR in patients without preexisting pacemakers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J Kiefer
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gregory C Salber
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gordon M Burke
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James D Chang
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kimberly A Guibone
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey J Popma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rebecca T Hahn
- Division of Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Duane S Pinto
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jordan B Strom
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Eschalier R, Massoullié G, Nahli Y, Jean F, Combaret N, Ploux S, Souteyrand G, Chabin X, Bosle R, Lambert C, Chazot E, Citron B, Bordachar P, Motreff P, Pereira B, Clerfond G. New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block After TAVI has a Deleterious Impact on Left Ventricular Systolic Function. Can J Cardiol 2019; 35:1386-1393. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2018] [Revised: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
39
|
Scarsini R, De Maria GL, Joseph J, Fan L, Cahill TJ, Kotronias RA, Burzotta F, Newton JD, Kharbanda R, Prendergast B, Ribichini F, Banning AP. Impact of Complications During Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: How Can They Be Avoided and Managed? J Am Heart Assoc 2019; 8:e013801. [PMID: 31522627 PMCID: PMC6818016 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.119.013801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Scarsini
- Oxford Heart Centre Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford United Kingdom.,Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine University of Verona Italy
| | - Giovanni L De Maria
- Oxford Heart Centre Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford United Kingdom
| | - Jubin Joseph
- Oxford Heart Centre Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford United Kingdom.,Guy's and St.Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom
| | - Lampson Fan
- Oxford Heart Centre Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford United Kingdom
| | - Thomas J Cahill
- Oxford Heart Centre Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford United Kingdom
| | - Rafail A Kotronias
- Oxford Heart Centre Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford United Kingdom.,Department of Cardiovascular Medicine University of Oxford United Kingdom
| | | | - James D Newton
- Oxford Heart Centre Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford United Kingdom
| | - Rajesh Kharbanda
- Oxford Heart Centre Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford United Kingdom
| | | | - Flavio Ribichini
- Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine University of Verona Italy
| | - Adrian P Banning
- Oxford Heart Centre Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Muntané-Carol G, Philippon F, Rodés-Cabau J. New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block Post-TAVI: No More an Innocent Bystander. Can J Cardiol 2019; 35:1286-1288. [PMID: 31500887 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2019] [Revised: 06/15/2019] [Accepted: 06/16/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - François Philippon
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Josep Rodés-Cabau
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, Goldschlager NF, Hamilton RM, Joglar JA, Kim RJ, Lee R, Marine JE, McLeod CJ, Oken KR, Patton KK, Pellegrini CN, Selzman KA, Thompson A, Varosy PD. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay. Heart Rhythm 2019; 16:e128-e226. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.10.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
42
|
Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, Goldschlager NF, Hamilton RM, Joglar JA, Kim RJ, Lee R, Marine JE, McLeod CJ, Oken KR, Patton KK, Pellegrini CN, Selzman KA, Thompson A, Varosy PD. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 2019; 140:e382-e482. [DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Kenneth A. Ellenbogen
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for detailed information
- ACC/AHA Representative
| | - Michael R. Gold
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for detailed information
- HRS Representative
| | | | | | - José A. Joglar
- ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Cara N. Pellegrini
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for detailed information
- HRS Representative
- Dr. Pellegrini contributed to this article in her personal capacity. The views expressed are her own and do not necessarily represent the views of the US Department of Veterans Affairs or the US government
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rodés-Cabau J, Ellenbogen KA, Krahn AD, Latib A, Mack M, Mittal S, Muntané-Carol G, Nazif TM, Sondergaard L, Urena M, Windecker S, Philippon F. Management of Conduction Disturbances Associated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74:1086-1106. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 171] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
44
|
Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, Goldschlager NF, Hamilton RM, Joglar JA, Kim RJ, Lee R, Marine JE, McLeod CJ, Oken KR, Patton KK, Pellegrini CN, Selzman KA, Thompson A, Varosy PD. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74:e51-e156. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
45
|
Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, Goldschlager NF, Hamilton RM, Joglar JA, Kim RJ, Lee R, Marine JE, McLeod CJ, Oken KR, Patton KK, Pellegrini CN, Selzman KA, Thompson A, Varosy PD. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: Executive Summary. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74:932-987. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
46
|
Judson GL, Agrawal H, Mahadevan VS. Conduction System Abnormalities After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Mechanism, Prediction, and Management. Interv Cardiol Clin 2019; 8:403-409. [PMID: 31445724 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccl.2019.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Conduction disturbances following TAVR are a common occurrence given the proximity of the various conduction system tissues, including the AV node, His-bundle, and bundle branches to the left ventricular outflow tract and aortic root. Impairment of these conduction system abnormalities may necessitate permanent pacemaker implantation, which increases morbidity and mortality, as well as length of stay, for the patient. The incidence, mechanisms, and predictors of conduction abnormalities and treatment options are discussed in this up-to-date review of the topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory L Judson
- Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, L524, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Harsh Agrawal
- Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, L524, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Vaikom S Mahadevan
- Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, L524, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Russo E, Potenza DR, Casella M, Massaro R, Russo G, Braccio M, Dello Russo A, Cassese M. Rate and Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Current Status. Curr Cardiol Rev 2019; 15:205-218. [PMID: 30516109 PMCID: PMC6719385 DOI: 10.2174/1573403x15666181205105821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2018] [Revised: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcather aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a safe and indispensable treatment option for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who are at high surgical risk. Recently, outcomes after TAVI have improved significantly and TAVI has emerged as a qualified alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement in the treatment of intermediate risk patients and greater adoption of this procedure is to be expected in a wider patients population, including younger patients and low surgical risk patients. However since the aortic valve has close spatial proximity to the conduction system, conduction anomalies are frequently observed in TAVI. In this article, we aim to review the key aspects of pathophysiology, current incidence, predictors and clinical association of conduction anomalies following TAVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Russo
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.,Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Division of Cardiology, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Domenico R Potenza
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Division of Cardiology, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Michela Casella
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Center, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Raimondo Massaro
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Division of Cardiology, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Giulio Russo
- Institute of Cardiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Braccio
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Antonio Dello Russo
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Center, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Cassese
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Muntané-Carol G, Guimaraes L, Ferreira-Neto AN, Wintzer-Wehekind J, Junquera L, del Val D, Faroux L, Philippon F, Rodés-Cabau J. How does new-onset left bundle branch block affect the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve repair? Expert Rev Med Devices 2019; 16:589-602. [DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1624161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - David del Val
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chamandi C, Barbanti M, Munoz-Garcia A, Latib A, Nombela-Franco L, Gutiérrez-Ibanez E, Veiga-Fernandez G, Cheema AN, Cruz-Gonzalez I, Serra V, Tamburino C, Mangieri A, Colombo A, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Elizaga J, Lee DH, Garcia del Blanco B, Puri R, Côté M, Philippon F, Rodés-Cabau J. Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With New-Onset Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block Following TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12:1175-1184. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Revised: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 03/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
50
|
As TAVI Population Expands, More Studies of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Are Needed. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2019; 20:281-282. [PMID: 31023544 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|