Predicting the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients hospitalized with heart failure

Extended thromboprophylaxis in heart failure patients; the unmet need

Heart failure (HF) is considered one of a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. The association between HF and venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been reported in several studies owing to many physiological and thromboembolic risk factors. Thus, the need for extended thromboprophylaxis during the post-discharge period in HF patients has been evaluated. Most guidelines do not recommend extended thromboprophylaxis because of its uncertain benefits and increased risk of bleeding. However, recent evidence in HF patients revealed no increased risk of bleeding with extended thromboprophylaxis, which highlights the importance of identifying ideal candidates who might benefit from extended thromboprophylaxis. Several risk assessment models (RAMs) have been developed to identify patients at a high risk of VTE who would benefit from in-hospital and post-discharge prophylactic anticoagulation therapy based on the risk-benefit principle. However, their accuracy in predicting VTE is questionable, and none have a standardized approach for evaluating the risk of VTE in HF patients. In this review, we provided an overview of the incidence and pathophysiology of VTE in HF patients, a summary of guideline recommendations for VTE prevention, and a summary of studies evaluating the use of extended thromboprophylaxis, with a focus on subgroup or post-hoc analyses of HF patients. We also discussed the need to design an ideal RAM that can identify candidate patients for extended thromboprophylaxis by stratifying the risk of VTE and identifying the key risk factors for bleeding in medically ill patients, including those with HF.

Prognostic Significance of Heart Failure in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Comprehensive Assessment of 30-Day Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Patients with heart failure (HF) are known to have an increased risk of pulmonary embolism (PE), but there is limited evidence regarding the prognostic implications of HF in patients with acute PE and the relationship between PE prognosis and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The primary objective of this study was the development of a composite outcome (mortality, major bleeding, and recurrence) within the first 30 days. The secondary objective was to identify the role of LVEF in predicting the development of early complications in patients with both HF and reduced LVEF.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted at two tertiary hospitals between January 2012 and December 2022 to assess differences among patients diagnosed with acute PE based on the presence or absence of a history of HF. Cox regression models were employed to assess the impact of HF and reduced LVEF on the composite outcome at 30 days.

RESULTS

Out of 1991 patients with acute symptomatic PE, 7.13% had a history of HF. Patients with HF were older and had more comorbidities. The HF group exhibited higher mortality (11.27% vs. 4.33%, p < 0.001) and a higher incidence of major bleeding (9.86% vs. 4.54%, p = 0.005). In the multivariate analysis, HF was an independent risk factor for the development of the composite outcome (HR 1.93; 95% CI 1.35-2.76). Reduced LVEF was independently associated with a higher risk of major bleeding (HR 3.44; 95% CI 1.34-8.81).

CONCLUSION

In patients with acute pulmonary embolism, heart failure is independently associated with a higher risk of early complications. Additionally, heart failure with reduced LVEF is an independent risk factor for major bleeding.

Prognostic Implication of Platelet Reactivity According to Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Status in Patients Treated With Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Analysis of the PTRG-DES Consortium

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery disease patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) often exhibit reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, the impact of LV dysfunction status in conjunction with platelet reactivity on clinical outcomes has not been previously investigated.

METHODS

From the multicenter PTRG-DES (Platelet function and genoType-Related long-term prognosis in DES-treated patients) consortium, the patients were classified as preserved-EF (PEF: LVEF ≥ 50%) and reduced-EF (REF: LVEF< 5 0%) group by echocardiography. Platelet reactivity was measured using VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and high platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as PRU ≥ 252. The major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) were a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and stroke at 5 years after PCI. Major bleeding was defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding types 3-5.

RESULTS

A total of 13,160 patients from PTRG-DES, 9,319 (79.6%) patients with the results of both PRU and LVEF were analyzed. The incidence of MACCE and major bleeding was higher in REF group as compared with PEF group (MACCEs: hazard ratio [HR] 2.17, P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.85-2.55; major bleeding: HR 1.78, P < 0.001, 95% CI 1.39-2.78). The highest rate of MACCEs was found in patients with REF and HPR, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (HR 3.14 in REF(+)/HPR(+) vs. PEF(+)/HPR(-) group, P < 0.01, 95% CI 2.51-3.91). The frequency of major bleeding was not associated with the HPR in either group.

CONCLUSION

LV dysfunction was associated with an increased incidence of MACCEs and major bleeding in patients who underwent PCI. The HPR status further exhibited significant increase of MACCEs in patients with LV dysfunction in a large, real-world registry.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04734028.

In-Hospital and readmission outcomes of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms and heart failure: Insights from the National Readmissions Database

Background

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are chronic leukemias associated with increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. Prior studies suggest patients with MPN are at increased risk of HF. Additionally, pre-clinical murine models harboring the JAK2 mutation, the most common driver mutation in MPNs, have shown accelerated adverse cardiac remodeling in myocardial infarction and pressure overload HF models. However, clinical outcomes, including in-hospital and readmission outcomes, of patients with MPN admitted for HF have not been well characterized.

Methods

Patients hospitalized for HF with and without MPN were identified using the 2017 and 2018 National Readmission Database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to match 1 MPN with 10 non-MPN controls. Outcomes were in-hospital death, 90-day CV-related, HF-related, and all-cause readmissions. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate risk of in-hospital death and 90-day readmission outcomes, respectively.

Results

After PSM, 4,626 patients with MPN were matched with 46,260 without. Patients with MPN were associated with increased risk of in-hospital death (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.00 - 1.35), 90-day CV-related (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 - 1.18) and all-cause (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.17 - 1.31) but not HF-related (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97 - 1.14) readmissions.

Conclusion

Among patients hospitalized for HF, MPN was associated with increased risk of in-hospital death, and 90-day CV-related readmissions (driven primarily by thrombotic readmissions). Further investigation is needed in order to improve outcomes in patients with MPN and HF.

Cardiovascular Insights for the Appropriate Management of Chronic Venous Disease: A Narrative Review of Implications for the Use of Venoactive Drugs

Evidence suggests that chronic venous disease (CVD) may be a cardiovascular disorder, as patients with CVD are prone to developing arterial (atherosclerosis) and venous (thromboembolism) diseases. This may be partly explained by shared risk factors. Thus, patients with CVD or cardiovascular disease require careful history-taking and physical assessment to identify coexisting pathologies and risk factors. This article summarises a symposium at the XIX World Congress of the International Union of Phlebology held in Istanbul, Turkey, in September 2022. Common pathophysiological features of CVD and cardiovascular disease are endothelial injury, hypercoagulability and systemic inflammation. In CVD, inflammation primarily affects the microcirculation, with changes in capillary permeability, vein wall and valve remodelling and increase in oxidative stress. Once patients develop symptoms/signs of CVD, they tend to reduce their physical activity, which may contribute to increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Data show that the presence of CVD is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, including peripheral arterial disease and heart failure (HF), and the risk of adverse cardiovascular events increases with CVD severity. In addition, patients with cardiovascular disease, particularly those with HF, are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and should be assessed for VTE risk if they are hospitalised with cardiovascular disease. Therefore, CVD management must include a multi-specialty approach to assess risk factors associated with both the venous and arterial systems. Ideally, treatment should focus on the resolution of endothelial inflammation to control both CVD and cardiovascular disease. International guidelines recommend various conservative treatments, including venoactive drugs (VADs), to improve the symptoms/signs of CVD. Micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF) is a VAD, with high-quality evidence supporting its use in relieving symptoms/signs of CVD and improving quality of life. Moreover, in large-scale observational studies, MPFF has shown superior effectiveness in real-world populations compared with other VADs. Video Abstract. (MP4 97173 kb).

Development and validation of a predictive nomogram for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis dislodgement in orthopedic patients

Objective

To analyze the risk factors of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) detachment in orthopedic patients, and to establish a risk nomogram prediction model.

Methods

The clinical data of 334 patients with orthopedic DVT admitted to the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2020 to July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. General statistics included gender, age, BMI, thrombus detachment, inferior vena cava filter window type, filter implantation time, medical history, trauma history, operation, use of tourniquet, thrombectomy, anesthesia mode, anesthesia grade, operative position, blood loss during operation, blood transfusion, immobilization, use of anticoagulants, thrombus side, thrombus range, D-dimer content before filter implantation and during removal of inferior vena cava filter. Logistic regression was used to perform univariate and multivariate analysis on the possible factors of thrombosis detachment, screen out independent risk factors, establish a risk nomogram prediction model by variables, and internally verify the predictability and accuracy of the model.

Results

Binary logistic regression analysis showed that Short time window filter (OR = 5.401, 95% CI = 2.338–12.478), lower extremity operation (OR = 3.565, 95% CI = 1.553–8.184), use of tourniquet (OR = 3.871, 95% CI = 1.733–8.651), non-strict immobilization (OR = 3.207, 95% CI = 1.387–7.413), non-standardized anticoagulation (OR = 4.406, 95% CI = 1.868–10.390), distal deep vein thrombosis (OR = 2.212, 95% CI = 1.047–4.671) were independent risk factors for lower extremity DVT detachment in orthopedic patients (P &lt; 0.05). Based on these six factors, a prediction model for the risk of lower extremity DVT detachment in orthopedic patients was established, and the risk prediction ability of the model was verified. The C-index of the nomogram model was 0.870 (95% CI: 0.822–0.919). The results indicate that the risk nomogram model has good accuracy in predicting the loss of deep venous thrombosis in orthopedic patients.

Conclusion

The nomogram risk prediction model based on six clinical factors, including filter window type, operation condition, tourniquet use, braking condition, anticoagulation condition, and thrombosis range, has good predictive performance.

Superior Predictive Value of D-Dimer to the Padua Prediction Score for Venous Thromboembolism in Inpatients with AECOPD: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Background

The optimal tool for risk prediction of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in inpatients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is still unknown. This study aimed to evaluate whether D-dimer could predict the risk of VTE in inpatients with AECOPD compared to the Padua Prediction Score (PPS).

Methods

Inpatients with AECOPD were prospectively enrolled from seven medical centers in China between December 2018 and June 2020. On admission, D-dimer was detected, PPS was calculated for each patient, and the incidence of 2-month VTE was investigated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of D-dimer and PPS on VTE development, and the best cut-off value for both methods was evaluated through the Youden index.

Results

Among the 4468 eligible patients with AECOPD, 90 patients (2.01%) developed VTE within 2 months after admission. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of D-dimer for predicting VTE were significantly higher than those of the PPS both in the overall cohort (0.724, 95% CI 0.672–0.776 vs 0.620, 95% CI 0.562–0.679; P<0.05) and the subgroup of patients without thromboprophylaxis (0.747, 95% CI 0.695–0.799 vs 0.640, 95% CI 0.582–0.698; P<0.05). By calculating the Youden Index, the best cut-off value of D-dimer was determined to be 0.96 mg/L with an AUC of 0.689, which was also significantly better than that of the PPS with the best cut-off value of 2 (AUC 0.581, P=0.007). After the combination of D-dimer with PPS, the AUC (0.621) failed to surpass D-dimer alone (P=0.104).

Conclusion

D-dimer has a superior predictive value for VTE over PPS in inpatients with AECOPD, which might be a better choice to guide thromboprophylaxis in inpatients with AECOPD due to its effectiveness and convenience.

Clinical Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trail Registry NO. ChiCTR2100044625; URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=121626.

2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" replaces the "2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" and the "2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure." The 2022 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with heart failure.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2020 to December 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant clinical trials and research studies, published through September 2021, were also considered. This guideline was harmonized with other American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines published through December 2021. Structure: Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The 2022 heart failure guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with heart failure, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' interests. Many recommendations from the earlier heart failure guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data. Value statements are provided for certain treatments with high-quality published economic analyses.

2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure

AIM

The "2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" replaces the "2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" and the "2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure." The 2022 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with heart failure.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2020 to December 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant clinical trials and research studies, published through September 2021, were also considered. This guideline was harmonized with other American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines published through December 2021.

STRUCTURE

Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The 2022 heart failure guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with heart failure, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' interests. Many recommendations from the earlier heart failure guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data. Value statements are provided for certain treatments with high-quality published economic analyses.

Patients with right lower extremity deep vein thrombosis have a higher risk of symptomatic pulmonary embolism: a retrospective study of 1585 patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk for pulmonary embolism (PE) and explore the relationship between the site of thrombosis and PE in patients with acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

METHODS

1585 hospitalized patients first diagnosed with acute lower extremity DVT were investigated retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: the non-PE group (Group 1) and the PE group (Group 2). Then, Group 2 was divided into two subgroups: asymptomatic pulmonary embolism (asPE, Group 2a) and symptomatic pulmonary embolism (sPE, Group 2b). Kaplan-Meier curves and logistic regression analysis were used to explore the relevant risk factors for PE.

RESULTS

Among 1585 patients, 458 patients suffered from PE, accounting for 28.9%. 102 (22.3%) of them had the typical clinical manifestations of PE and were defined as sPE, and the remaining 356 (77.7%) patients were classified as asPE. Patients with proximal lower extremity DVT were significantly more predominant in the PE group than in the non-PE group (92.8% vs. 86.2%, p<0.001). Moreover, in Group 2, patients with typical PE manifestations showed a higher proportion of patients with right lower extremity DVT than left lower extremity DVT (26.7% vs. 17.7%, P=0.035), and bilateral lower extremity DVT than unilateral DVT (44.1% vs. 20.5%, p<0.001). By multivariate analysis, alcohol consumption (OR, 1.824; 95% CI, 1.194-2.787; p=0.005), heart failure (OR, 2.345; 95% CI, 1.560-3.526; p<0.001), proximal DVT (OR, 2.096; 95% CI,1.407-3.123; p<0.001) were independent risk factors for PE.

CONCLUSION

Patients with proximal acute lower extremity DVT were more likely to suffer from PE than those with distal DVT. Patients with right acute lower extremity DVT had a higher risk of sPE than patients with left acute lower extremity DVT. Alcohol consumption and heart failure were associated with the occurrence of PE in patients with acute lower extremity DVT.

The significance of heart failure in hospitalised patients with pulmonary embolism. A gender-specific analysis

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is a risk factor for the development of pulmonary embolism (PE). Few studies have examined sex differences in risk of PE among HF patients.

AIMS

(a) To examine the incidence, characteristics and in-hospital outcomes among patients hospitalised with PE according to HF status; (b) to compare the in-hospital mortality (IHM) after PE between HF and non-HF patients and (c) to identify variables associated with IHM. All analyses were stratified by sex.

METHODS

We included all adult patients hospitalised for PE from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018. Data were collected from the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database. Poisson regression models were constructed to quantify the difference in the incidences between HF and non-HF populations. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to obtain comparable subgroups by sex and HF status.

RESULTS

We identified 46,835 PE hospitalisations, 11.4% with HF. Adjusted incidence of PE was higher in HF patients than in those without HF (Incidence Rate Ratio 1.11; 95% CI 1.08-1.13). Crude and PSM adjusted IHM were significantly higher in men and women hospitalised with PE suffering HF than in men and women without HF (P < .001). Women with HF who suffered a PE had lower IHM than men with this condition (P < .001) after adjusting.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjusted incidence of PE was higher in HF patients than in those without HF. After PSM suffering, HF was associated to higher IHM in men and women. Women with PE and HF had lower IHM than men with these conditions.

Factor Xa Inhibition with Apixaban Does Not Influence Cardiac Remodelling in Rats with Heart Failure After Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is considered to be a prothrombotic condition and it has been suggested that coagulation factors contribute to maladaptive cardiac remodelling via activation of the protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1). We tested the hypothesis that anticoagulation with the factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor apixaban would ameliorate cardiac remodelling in rats with HF after myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were either subjected to permanent ligation of the left ascending coronary artery (MI) or sham surgery. The MI and sham animals were randomly allocated to treatment with placebo or apixaban in the chow (150 mg/kg/day), starting 2 weeks after surgery. Cardiac function was assessed using echocardiography and histological and molecular markers of cardiac hypertrophy were assessed in the left ventricle (LV). Apixaban resulted in a fivefold increase in anti-FXa activity compared with vehicle, but no overt bleeding was observed and haematocrit levels remained similar in apixaban- and vehicle-treated groups. After 10 weeks of treatment, LV ejection fraction was 42 ± 3% in the MI group treated with apixaban and 37 ± 2 in the vehicle-treated MI group (p > 0.05). Both vehicle- and apixaban-treated MI groups also displayed similar degrees of LV dilatation, LV hypertrophy and interstitial fibrosis. Histological and molecular markers for pathological remodelling were also comparable between groups, as was the activity of signalling pathways downstream of the PAR1 receptor.

CONCLUSION

FXa inhibition with apixaban does not influence pathological cardiac remodelling after MI. These data do not support the use of FXa inhibitor in HF patients with the aim to amend the severity of HF. Graphical Abstract.

HFBD: a biomarker knowledge database for heart failure heterogeneity and personalized applications

MOTIVATION

Heart failure (HF) is a cardiovascular disease with a high incidence around the world. Accumulating studies have focused on the identification of biomarkers for HF precision medicine. To understand the HF heterogeneity and provide biomarker information for the personalized diagnosis and treatment of HF, a knowledge database collecting the distributed and multiple-level biomarker information is necessary.

RESULTS

In this study, the HF biomarker knowledge database (HFBD) was established by manually collecting the data and knowledge from literature in PubMed. HFBD contains 2618 records and 868 HF biomarkers (731 single and 137 combined) extracted from 1237 original articles. The biomarkers were classified into proteins, RNAs, DNAs, and the others at molecular, image, cellular and physiological levels. The biomarkers were annotated with biological, clinical and article information as well as the experimental methods used for the biomarker discovery. With its user-friendly interface, this knowledge database provides a unique resource for the systematic understanding of HF heterogeneity and personalized diagnosis and treatment of HF in the era of precision medicine.

AVAILABILITY

The platform is openly available at http://sysbio.org.cn/HFBD/.

Current Opinion on the use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism among Medical Inpatients

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a known cause of morbidity and mortality, especially among acutely ill medical patients. Although VTE prophylaxis is part of post-discharge clinical care in surgical patients, there is controversy regarding its use in acutely ill medical patients and the current guideline statements suggest against its routine use. Recent clinical trials (APEX, MAGELLAN and MARINER) compared the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (including betrixaban and rivaroxaban) with the standard of the care, enoxaparin, to identify the risk–benefit tradeoff. In this review, we summarized the key findings from these trials and substudies and recent updates in society guidelines regarding VTE prevention. In addition, we discussed the potential barriers, cost-effectiveness, and COVID-19 with respect to the implementation of extended-duration or post-discharge usage of direct oral anticoagulants.

Anticoagulation versus placebo for heart failure in sinus rhythm

BACKGROUND

People with chronic heart failure (HF) are at risk of thromboembolic events, including stroke, pulmonary embolism, and peripheral arterial embolism; coronary ischaemic events also contribute to the progression of HF. The use of long-term oral anticoagulation is established in certain populations, including people with HF and atrial fibrillation (AF), but there is wide variation in the indications and use of oral anticoagulation in the broader HF population.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether long-term oral anticoagulation reduces total deaths and stroke in people with heart failure in sinus rhythm.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated the searches in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase in March 2020. We screened reference lists of papers and abstracts from national and international cardiovascular meetings to identify unpublished studies. We contacted relevant authors to obtain further data. We did not apply any language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing oral anticoagulants with placebo or no treatment in adults with HF, with treatment duration of at least one month. We made inclusion decisions in duplicate, and resolved any disagreements between review authors by discussion, or a third party.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, and assessed the risks and benefits of antithrombotic therapy by calculating odds ratio (OR), accompanied by the 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified three RCTs (5498 participants). One RCT compared warfarin, aspirin, and no antithrombotic therapy, the second compared warfarin with placebo in participants with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, and the third compared rivaroxaban with placebo in participants with HF and coronary artery disease. We pooled data from the studies that compared warfarin with a placebo or no treatment. We are uncertain if there is an effect on all-cause death (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.18; 2 studies, 324 participants; low-certainty evidence); warfarin may increase the risk of major bleeding events (OR 5.98, 95% CI 1.71 to 20.93, NNTH 17). 2 studies, 324 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of the studies reported stroke as an individual outcome. Rivaroxaban makes little to no difference to all-cause death compared with placebo (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.13; 1 study, 5022 participants; high-certainty evidence). Rivaroxaban probably reduces the risk of stroke compared to placebo (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.95; NNTB 101; 1 study, 5022 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and probably increases the risk of major bleeding events (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.33; NNTH 79; 1 study, 5008 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the three RCTs, there is no evidence that oral anticoagulant therapy modifies mortality in people with HF in sinus rhythm. The evidence is uncertain if warfarin has any effect on all-cause death compared to placebo or no treatment, but it may increase the risk of major bleeding events. There is no evidence of a difference in the effect of rivaroxaban on all-cause death compared to placebo. It probably reduces the risk of stroke, but probably increases the risk of major bleedings. The available evidence does not support the routine use of anticoagulation in people with HF who remain in sinus rhythm.

Platelet Activity and Its Correlation with Inflammation and Cell Count Readings in Chronic Heart Failure Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Background and objectives: There has been an increasing interest in the role of inflammation in thrombosis complications in chronic heart failure (HF) patients. The incidence of thrombosis in HF has been shown to be the highest in patients classified as NYHA IV (New York Heart association). It is stated that inflammation is regulated by platelet-induced activation of blood leukocytes. We aimed to compare the platelet and cell count readings in chronic HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients according to NYHA functional class and to evaluate the correlation between those readings. Materials and methods: A total of 185 patients were examined. The results of heart echoscopy (TEE) testing; fibrinogen, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), C reactive protein (CRP), and cortisol concentrations; complete blood counts; and a 6 min walking test were assessed and platelet aggregation was determined. Results: Mean platelet volume (MPV) increased with deterioration of a patient’s state (p < 0.005). Lymphocyte count and percentage were the lowest in the NYHA IV group (p < 0.005). Neutrophil and monocyte percentage and count were the highest (p < 0.045) in the NYHA IV group. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)- and ADR-induced platelet aggregation was higher in the NYHA III group compared to NYHA II and I groups (p < 0.023). NYHA functional class correlated with mean platelet volume (MPV) (r = 0.311, p = 0.0001), lymphocyte count (r = −0.186, p = 0.026), monocyte count (p = 0.172, p = 0.041), and percentage (r = 0.212, p = 0.011). CRP concentration correlated with NT-proBNP (r = 0.203, p = 0.005). MPV correlated with fibrinogen concentration (r = 0.244, p = 0.004). Conclusions: (1) MPV could be considered as an additional reading reflecting a patient’s condition, however the use of MPV to identify patients at risk of hypercoagulable state should be evaluated in more extensive studies; (2) increased neutrophil and monocyte counts could indicate a higher inflammatory state in chronic HFrEF.

Soluble fibrin monomer complex is associated with cardio- and cerebrovascular events in patients with heart failure

•

The soluble fibrin monomer complex (SFMC), is a marker of fibrin formation.

•

SFMC is abnormally elevated in a variety of clinical situations of hypercoagulability.

•

SFMC is an independent predictor of adverse prognosis in patients with heart failure.

Background

A biomarker of fibrin formation, the soluble fibrin monomer complex (SFMC), is abnormally elevated in a variety of clinical situations of hypercoagulability. The aim of the present study was to examine the prognostic impact of SFMC, with regard to increased risk of major cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and all-cause mortality, on patients with heart failure (HF).

Methods and Results

We conducted a prospective observational study where we analyzed data of 723 hospitalized patients with decompensated HF who were discharged alive and whose SFMC had been measured in a stable condition prior to discharge. The patients were divided into tertiles based on SFMC levels: the first (SFMC < 1.7 μg/ml, n = 250), second (≤1.8 SFMC < 2.9 μg/ml, n = 233), and third (3.0 μg/ml ≤ SFMC, n = 240) tertiles. The prevalence of chronic kidney disease and anemia was significantly higher in the third tertile than in the first and second tertiles. In contrast, age, sex, CHADS₂-Vasc score, left ventricular ejection fraction, and prevalence of hypertension, diabetes and atrial fibrillation did not differ among the tertiles. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, accumulated event rates of both MACCE and all-cause mortality progressively increased from the first to third tertiles (log-rank P < 0.05, respectively). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, the third tertile was found to be an independent predictor of MACCE (HR 2.014, P = 0.046) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.792, P = 0.036).

Conclusion

SFMC is an independent predictor of adverse prognosis in patients with HF.

Anticoagulation in Patients with Heart Failure and Sinus Rhythm

The risk of thromboembolic events is significantly increased among patients with heart failure, even in those without atrial fibrillation. However, it is still unclear whether patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm can benefit from prophylactic anticoagulant therapy.This was a retrospective review of the pathophysiological mechanisms, epidemiological studies, and clinical trials on anticoagulation in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm.Some subgroup analyses of clinical trials found that prophylactic anticoagulant therapy could reduce the incidence of stroke in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm, and the risk of bleeding was significantly increased. Regarding the incidence of primary endpoint outcomes, all results from clinical trials were negative.Prophylactic anticoagulation did not improve the clinical outcome in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm.

Call to Action to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major preventable disease that affects hospitalized inpatients. Risk stratification and prophylactic measures have good evidence supporting their use, but multiple reasons exist that prevent full adoption, compliance, and efficacy that may underlie the persistence of VTE over the past several decades. This policy statement provides a focused review of VTE, risk scoring systems, prophylaxis, and tracking methods. From this summary, 5 major areas of policy guidance are presented that the American Heart Association believes will lead to better implementation, tracking, and prevention of VTE events. They include performing VTE risk assessment and reporting the level of VTE risk in all hospitalized patients, integrating preventable VTE as a benchmark for hospital comparison and pay-for-performance programs, supporting appropriations to improve public awareness of VTE, tracking VTE nationwide with the use of standardized definitions, and developing a centralized data steward for data tracking on VTE risk assessment, prophylaxis, and rates.

Relationship between the site of thrombosis and the prevalence of pulmonary embolism in acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

Lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (LEDVT) is common and can lead to pulmonary embolism (PE). Currently, the mechanism of how LEDVT causes PE is unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between the thrombus sites and PE in LEDVT patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study that included the medical data of 3101 patients aged >18 years who were diagnosed with LEDVT by duplex ultrasound was performed at The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from 2008 to 2017. The clinical information of the patients was collected. According to the thrombosis sites, the patients were divided into three groups. We determined the cumulative prevalence and prevalence rate of PE between the groups and used Cox proportional hazard regression models, which were stratified on matched sets, to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) for all of the outcomes of interest. We focused on the relationship of proximal or isolated distal LEDVT with PE and also analyzed the relationship of the left side or right side of LEDVT with PE.

RESULTS

A total of 1629 (52.5%) patients had left LEDVT (group 1), 912 (29.4%) patients had right LEDVT (group 2), and 560 (18.1%) patients had bilateral LEDVT (group 3). The rate of PE was higher in group 2 than in group 1, although there were more patients suffering from LEDVT in group 1 than in group 2 (P < .001). The patients with proximal LEDVT in group 3 exhibited a greater risk of PE compared with those with isolated distal LEDVT (adjusted HR, 2.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-5.49). We also observed that the proportion of patients with proximal LEDVT who were receiving treatment was much higher than that of patients with distal LEDVT (P < .05). The patients with right LEDVT had a higher risk of PE than the patients with left LEDVT (adjusted HR, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.21), and the patients with right LEDVT had more comorbidities, such as malignant neoplasms, hypertension, and diabetes (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with proximal bilateral LEDVT had a higher likelihood for development of PE than did patients with distal LEDVT, which may be associated with inadequate therapy for proximal bilateral LEDVT. PE was more likely to develop with right-sided LEDVT because these patients had more comorbidities in our study.

Evaluation of Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy via the AngioJet System Combined with Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Current methods of treating lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (LEDVT), such as catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) alone, or percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) alone, are accompanied by unacceptably high risks of complications. This preliminary retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of CDT combined with PMT (via the AngioJet system), relative to CDT alone, in treating LEDVT.

METHODS

Forty-two patients (43 limbs) with symptomatic deep venous thrombosis received either CDT alone (n = 12) or PMT combined with CDT (PMT + CDT) from May 2012 to December 2016. The groups were compared for clinical outcomes and demographics, LEDVT risk factors, and dosages of urokinase. Thrombus removal, by venographic evidence, was classified as grades I (<50%), II (50 to 99%), or III (>99%).

RESULTS

In the CDT (PMT + CDT) cohorts, grades I, II, and III thrombus removal was achieved by 8% (3%), 17% (10%), and 75% (87%) of patients, respectively. The urokinase dosage and hospitalization required by the CDT group (5.29 ± 0.45 million IU, 20.4 ± 4.6 days) were significantly greater than those required by the PMT + CDT group (4.08 ± 1.15 million IU, 16.0 ± 6.0 days; P = 0.001, 0.039). The clinical outcomes of the 2 groups were similar.

CONCLUSION

Combined PMT and CDT was effective and safe for LEDVT clinical therapy, and hospital stay, urokinase dosage, and complications were less compared with patients who received CDT only.

Risk of Venous Thromboembolism after New Onset Heart Failure

New-onset heart failure (HF) is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. It is uncertain to what extent HF confers an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Adults ≥65 years old hospitalized with a new diagnosis of HF were identified from Medicare claims from 2007–2013. We identified the incidence, predictors and outcomes of VTE in HF. We compared VTE incidence during follow-up after HF hospitalization with a corresponding period 1-year prior to the HF diagnosis. Among 207,535 patients with a new HF diagnosis, the cumulative incidence of VTE was 1.4%, 2.5%, and 10.5% at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years, respectively. The odds of VTE were greatest immediately after new-onset HF and steadily declined over time (OR 2.2 [95% CI 2.0–2.3], OR 1.5 [1.4–1.7], and OR 1.2 [1.2–1.3] at 0–30 days, 4–6 months, and 7–9 months, respectively). Over 26-month follow-up, patients with HF were at two-fold higher risk of VTE than patients without HF (adjusted HR 2.31 [2.18–2.45]). VTE during follow-up was associated with long-term mortality (adjusted HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.56–1.64). In conclusion, patients with HF are at increased risk of VTE early after a new HF diagnosis. VTE in patients with HF is associated with long-term mortality.

A prospective cohort study to identify and evaluate endotypes of venous thromboembolism: Rationale and design of the Genotyping and Molecular Phenotyping in Venous ThromboEmbolism project (GMP-VTE)

Several clinical, genetic and acquired risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been identified. However, the molecular pathophysiology and mechanisms of disease progression remain poorly understood. This is reflected by uncertainties regarding the primary and secondary prevention of VTE and the optimal duration of antithrombotic therapy. A growing body of literature points to clinically relevant differences between VTE phenotypes (e.g. deep vein thrombosis (DVT) versus pulmonary embolism (PE), unprovoked versus provoked VTE). Extensive links to cardiovascular, inflammatory and immune-related morbidities are testament to the complexity of the disease. The GMP-VTE project is a prospective, multi-center cohort study on individuals with objectively confirmed VTE. Sequential data sampling was performed at the time of the acute event and during serial follow-up investigations. Various data levels (e.g. clinical, genetic, proteomic and platelet data) are available for multi-dimensional data analyses by means of advanced statistical, bioinformatic and machine learning methods. The GMP-VTE project comprises n = 663 individuals with acute VTE (mean age: 60.3 ± 15.9 years; female sex: 42.8%). In detail, 28.4% individuals (n = 188) had acute isolated DVT, whereas 71.6% subjects (n = 475) had PE with or without concomitant DVT. In the study sample, 28.9% (n = 129) of individuals with PE and 30.1% (n = 55) of individuals with isolated DVT had a recurrent VTE event at the time of study enrolment. The systems-oriented approach for the comprehensive dataset of the GMP-VTE project may generate new biological insights into the pathophysiology of VTE and refine our current understanding and management of VTE.

Rate and impact of venous thromboembolism in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database 2003–2013

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and coronary artery disease are major health issues that cause substantial morbidity and mortality. New data have emerged suggesting that these two conditions could have a close relationship. Thus, we sought to determine the trends in annual rate of VTE occurrence in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and measure its impact on in-hospital mortality, bleeding complications, and cost and length of hospitalization. We queried the 2003–2013 Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases to identify adults with primary diagnosis of STEMI. VTE events were then allocated. Inpatient outcomes of patients with VTE were compared to those without VTE. Out of 2,495,757 hospitalizations for STEMI, VTE was diagnosed in 25,149 (1%) hospitalizations. Patients who experienced VTE were older (mean age: 67.5 vs 64.8, p < 0.01) and had a higher proportion of black patients (10.1% vs 7.7%, p < 0.001) and females (40.1% vs 35%, p < 0.001) compared to patients without VTE. There was an increasing trend in the rate of VTE during the study period (2003: 0.8% vs 2013: 1.0%, p < 0.001). Patients with VTE had a prolonged hospitalization (median: 9 vs 3 days, p < 0.001), increased cost, higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (OR: 2.13, p < 0.001), intracranial hemorrhage (OR: 2.14, p < 0.001), blood transfusions (OR: 1.94, p < 0.001), and mortality (OR: 1.39, p < 0.001). The rate of VTE occurrence in patients with STEMI in our study was 10 per 1000 admissions. VTE was associated with more bleeding complications, longer hospital stays, higher costs, and mortality. These findings suggest that a more aggressive approach for VTE prophylaxis may be warranted in this population.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis using the Caprini score

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) including pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is one of the leading causes of preventable cardiovascular disease in the United States (US) and is the number one preventable cause of death following a surgical procedure. Post-operative VTE is associated with multiple short and long-term complications. We will focus on reviewing the many faces of VTE in detail as they represent common challenging scenarios in clinical practice.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and Risk in the Inpatient and Outpatient Continuum of Care Among Hospitalized Acutely Ill Patients in the US: A Retrospective Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients in the US. The objectives of this study were to examine VTE prophylaxis patterns and risk for VTE events during hospitalization and post-discharge among patients hospitalized for acute illnesses in the US.

METHODS

Acutely ill hospitalized patients were identified from the MarketScan databases (January 1, 2012-June 30, 2015). Proportions of patients that received inpatient and/or outpatient VTE prophylaxis were determined. VTE rates were calculated for the overall study population and for each subpopulation with each acute illness type. Risk for VTE events after the index admission was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Of the acutely ill patients (n = 17,895, mean age: 58.4 years), most were hospitalized for infectious diseases (40.6%), followed by respiratory diseases (31.0%), cancer (10.7%), heart failure (10.4%), ischemic stroke (6.4%), and rheumatic diseases (0.9%). Among the entire study population, 59.1% did not receive any VTE prophylaxis, and only 7.1% received both inpatient and outpatient prophylaxis. Among the overall study population, cumulative VTE rate, including during index admission and within 6 months post-discharge, was 4.6%. VTE risk in the inpatient and outpatient continuum of care remained elevated up to 30-40 days after hospital admission, with 60.1% of VTEs occurring within 40 days of hospital admission.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective analysis of nearly 18,000 patients hospitalized for acute illnesses, 59.1% did not receive any VTE prophylaxis and only 7.1% received VTE prophylaxis in both the inpatient and outpatient continuum of care, despite significant VTE risk extending from hospitalization into the post-discharge period.

FUNDING

Portola Pharmaceuticals.

Updated clinical models for VTE prediction in hospitalized medical patients

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurring in hospitalized medical patients is associated with increased length of hospitalization, high rate of acute care hospital transfer, longer inpatient rehabilitation and multiplication of health-care costs. Identification of acutely ill hospitalized medical patients eligible for thromboprophylaxis is a sophisticated process. Global VTE risk stems from the combination of predictors related with the acute medical illness, comorbidities, associated treatments and patients' intrinsic risk factors. Emerging clinical risk factors related to underlying pathologies should be considered when VTE risk is assessed. The Padua Prediction Score (PPS), the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE-RAM) and the Geneva Risk Score are three robust risk assessment models (RAM) which underwent extensive external validation in cohorts of acutely ill hospitalized medical patients. The development of the IMPROVE bleeding risk assessment model and the identification of D-Dimer increase as a biomarker-predictor of VTE are some steps forward for personalized thromboprophylaxis. The beneficial impact of the RAMs in VTE prevention is already seen by the decrease of in-hospital VTE rates when RAMs are incorporated in electronic alert systems.

Longitudinal increases in blood biomarkers of inflammation or cardiovascular disease and the incidence of venous thromboembolism

Essentials Inflammatory and cardiac diseases are associated with increased venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. Our prospective study assessed rise in inflammatory or cardiac biomarkers and VTE risk. A greater 6-year rise in N-terminal natriuretic peptide is associated with increased VTE incidence. Volume overload or impending cardiac disease may contribute to VTE occurrence.

SUMMARY

Background We previously showed that participants in the population-based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) cohort with elevated levels of blood biomarkers of inflammation or cardiac disease were at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Objective We hypothesized that ARIC participants with larger 6-year increases in the levels of three biomarkers - C-reactive protein (CRP), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and troponin T - would also have an increased subsequent risk of VTE. Methods We measured changes in the levels of these biomarkers in 9844 participants from 1990-1992 to 1996-1998, and then identified VTEs through 2015. Results A greater 6-year rise in the level of NT-proBNP, but not in that of CRP or troponin T, was significantly associated with increased VTE incidence over a median of 17.6 years of follow-up. After adjustment for other VTE risk factors, those whose NT-proBNP level rose from < 100 pg mL-1 to ≥ 100 pg mL-1 had a hazard ratio for VTE of 1.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.80), as compared with the reference group with an NT-proBNP level of < 100 pg mL-1 at both times. This hazard ratio was slightly higher (1.66, 95% CI 1.19-2.31) during the first 10 years of follow-up, but was attenuated (1.24, 95% CI 0.99-1.56) after adjustment for prevalent and incident coronary heart disease, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. Conclusions The two most likely explanations for our results are that: (i) an increasing NT-proBNP level reflects increasing subclinical volume overload and potentially increased venous stasis or subclinical PE that had gone unrecognized over time; or (ii) an increasing NT-proBNP level is a risk marker for impending cardiac disease that places patients at risk of VTE.

Increased Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Women with Uterine Leiomyoma: A Nationwide, Population-Based Case-Control Study

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a sex-specific disease that has different presentations between men and women. Women with uterine leiomyoma can present with VTE without exhibiting the traditional risk factors. We investigated the relationship between a history of uterine leiomyoma and the risk of VTE using the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, nationwide, population-based case-control study using the NHIRD. We identified 2,282 patients with diagnosed VTE and 392,635 subjects without VTE from 2000 to 2013. After development of an age and index diagnosis year frequency-matched model and propensity score-matched model, 2 models with a case-to-control ratio of 1 to 4 were established. Using the diagnosis of uterine leiomyoma as the exposure factor, conditional logistic regression was performed to examine the association between uterine leiomyoma and VTE. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the joint effect of uterine leiomyoma and comorbid diseases on the risk of VTE.

Results

A strong association was observed between uterine leiomyoma and VTE in the overall patient model, frequency-matched model and propensity score-matched model [p < 0.0001, odds ratio (OR): 1.547; p = 0.0005, OR: 1.486; p = 0.0405, OR: 1.26, respectively]. In the subgroup analyses, women with uterine leiomyoma who were ≥ 45 years old were less likely to experience VTE, but women with uterine leiomyoma and anemia, cancer, coronary artery disease or heart failure were more likely to experience VTE.

Conclusions

Women with uterine leiomyomas have an increased risk of developing VTE, especially during reproductive periods or in the presence of specific diseases.

New paradigms in venous thromboprophylaxis of medically ill patients

Acutelly-ill hospitalised medical patients are at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), both in-hospital and in the immediate post-discharge period, and mortality from VTE is thought to be particularly high in this patient population. However, despite previous mandates from international antithrombotic guidelines such as those of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) for the "universal" use of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised medical patients, global audits suggest that implementation of thromboprophylaxis continues to be challenging because of the perceived higher risk of bleeding and lower risk of VTE than that reported in clinical trials. Recent population-based studies also reveal that a "universal" hospital-only thromboprophylactic strategy does not reduce the community burden of VTE from this population, which may constitute nearly one quarter of the attributable risk of VTE. Lastly, four large randomised placebo-controlled trials of extended thromboprophylaxis have failed to show a definitive net clinical benefit in hospitalised medical patients. Recent large-scale efforts in deriving and validating scored VTE and bleed risk assessment models (RAMs) have been completed in the medically-ill population. In addition, an elevated D-dimer as a new biomarker to identify at-VTE risk medically ill patients has also undergone prospective evaluation. This paper will review current concepts of VTE and bleed risk in hospitalised medical patients, both in the hospital as well as the post-hospital discharge period, and will discuss new paradigms of thromboprophylaxis in this population using an individualised, patient-centered approach.

Reduced cardiac function and risk of venous thromboembolism in Asian countries

Patients with reduced cardiac function are thought to have a higher risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Additionally, they are vulnerable to complications of pulmonary embolism (PE) as well as right heart failure (HF), which in return is supposed to increase the rate of mortality. Studies focusing on VTE in heart failure patients were rare in Asian countries before the 21st century. Nowadays, more and more data are becoming available in this field in Asia. It is already known that heart failure can increase the risk of VTE, but so far a consensus on this issue has not been reached for many years, not only in Asian countries but all over the world. This condition may be due to the detailed pathological advancement in Virchow’s triad and some other theories. In clinical practice, VTE, especially PE is difficult to diagnose in patients with heart failure because of overlapping symptoms (e.g. cough and chest pain) and the elevation of laboratory markers (e.g. probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and D-dimer in both heart failure and VTE patients). Management of VTE in heart failure patients is also controversial because heart failure patients always have complications, such as renal failure and hepatic failure, which increase the risk of bleeding. In this study, we analyzed data from China, Japan, Korea, Singapore and India mainly to get a better understanding of the research progress in VTE in patients with heart failure. The aim of this review is to discuss the risk, incidence, advancement of diagnosis, management and prevention of VTE in patients with heart failure in Asian countries.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and heart failure

Thromboembolism contributes to morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF), and atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the main factors promoting this complication. As they share many risk factors, HF and AF frequently coexist, and patients with both conditions are at a particularly high risk of thromboembolism. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are direct antagonists of thrombin (dabigatran) and factor Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban), and were designed to overcome the limitations of vitamin K antagonists. Compared with warfarin in non-valvular AF, NOACs demonstrated non-inferiority with better safety, most particularly for intracranial haemorrhages. Therefore, the European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend NOACs for most patients with non-valvular AF. Subgroups of patients with both AF and HF from the pivotal studies investigating the safety and efficacy of NOACs have been analysed and, for each NOAC, results were similar to those of the total analysis population. A recent meta-analysis of these subgroups has confirmed the better efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients with AF and HF - particularly the 41% decrease in the incidence of intracranial haemorrhages. The prothrombotic state associated with HF suggests that patients with HF in sinus rhythm could also benefit from treatment with NOACs. However, in the absence of clinical trial data supporting this indication, current guidelines do not recommend anticoagulant treatment of patients with HF in sinus rhythm. In conclusion, recent analyses of pivotal studies support the use of NOACs in accordance with their indications in HF patients with non-valvular AF.

The MARINER trial of rivaroxaban after hospital discharge for medical patients at high risk of VTE. Design, rationale, and clinical implications

Hospital-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of premature death and disability worldwide. Evidence-based guidelines recommend that anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis be given to hospitalised medical patients at risk of VTE, but suggest against routine use of thromboprophylaxis beyond the hospital stay. The MARINER study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis using rivaroxaban, begun at hospital discharge and continued for 45 days, for preventing symptomatic VTE in high-risk medical patients. Eligible patients are identified using the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE VTE) risk score, combined with a laboratory test, D-dimer. The rivaroxaban regimen is 10 mg once daily for patients with CrCl ≥ 50 ml/min, or 7.5 mg once daily for patients with CrCl ≥ 30 ml/min and < 50 ml/min. The primary efficacy outcome is the composite of symptomatic VTE (lower extremity deep-vein thrombosis and non-fatal pulmonary embolism) and VTE-related death. The principal safety outcome is major bleeding. A blinded clinical events committee adjudicates all suspected outcome events. The sample size is event-driven with an estimated total of 8,000 patients to acquire 161 primary outcome events. Study design features that distinguish MARINER from previous and ongoing thromboprophylaxis trials in medically ill patients are: (i) use of a validated risk assessment model (IMPROVE VTE) and D-dimer determination for identifying eligible patients at high risk of VTE, (ii) randomisation at the time of hospital discharge, (iii) a 45-day treatment period and (iv) restriction of the primary efficacy outcome to symptomatic VTE events.

Heart failure and risk of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism is a major global health problem that is often secondary to other clinical situations. Many studies have investigated the association between venous thromboembolism and heart failure, but have yielded inconsistent findings. We aimed to quantify the absolute and relative risks (RR) for venous thromboembolism in patients with heart failure after hospital admission. We also assessed rates of venous thromboembolism in patients in different settings.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched for studies investigating the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients in hospital with heart failure. We searched for studies published between Jan 1, 1955, and March 31, 2015, in PubMed, Embase, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Ovid HealthSTAR, Global Health, Ovid Nursing Database, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus, ProQuest Central, Conference Papers Index, BIOSIS Previews, and ClinicalTrials.gov. All cohort studies and subgroup analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible for inclusion if they reported venous thromboembolism rates (number of events per follow-up period) or RR estimates. We extracted data from published reports and contacted the corresponding authors of records with insufficient quantitative data. RRs and 95% CIs were pooled using a random-effects model. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42014015504.

FINDINGS

Of 8673 records identified, we included 71 studies with data from 88 cohorts in our analysis, with 59 cohorts included in the assessment of venous thromboembolism rates and 46 cohorts included in the meta-analysis of heart failure and risk of venous thromboembolism. Venous thromboembolism rates varied widely in patients in hospital with heart failure from different settings. The overall median symptomatic venous thromboembolism rate was 2·48% (IQR 0·84-5·61); rates was were 3·73% (1·05-7·31) for patients who did not receive thromboprophylaxis and 1·47% (0·64-3·54) for those who did. Overall, patients with heart failure in hospital had an RR of 1·51 (1·36-1·68) for venous thromboembolism. The overall I(2) statistic was 96·1% and there was no evidence of publication bias (Egger's test, p=0·46).

INTERPRETATION

Heart failure is a common independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism. Thromoboprophylaxis should be considered in clinical practice for high-risk patients.

FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation.