Preventing Recurrent Preeclampsia by Tailored Treatment of Nonphysiologic Hemodynamic Adjustments to Pregnancy

Use of the USCOM® noninvasive cardiac output measurement system to predict the development of pre-eclampsia in hypertensive pregnancies

OBJECTIVES

To assess the ability of the USCOM® (USCOM), using measurements of cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR), to predict the development of pre-eclampsia (PE) and severe PE in hypertensive pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study of women in the second or third trimester recruited at a tertiary center in Sydney, Australia. Demographic data and hemodynamic measurements using the USCOM were taken for all study participants at recruitment. Pregnancy outcome, including development of PE and severe PE, was tracked. Data were analyzed using ANOVA testing, pair-wise comparison testing, and Student's t-testing.

RESULTS

Recruitment included 65 normotensive controls, 34 women with chronic hypertension (CH), 51 with gestational hypertension (GH), and 21 with PE. Significantly higher weight, body surface area, and blood pressure measurements were found in the hypertensive, compared with the normotensive control and pregnancies. There were no observed differences in USCOM-measured CO, cardiac index, SVR, or systemic vascular resistance index between hypertensive women who did versus did not develop PE or severe PE in later pregnancy. Analysis of the CH and GH subgroups, as well as only unmedicated hypertensive women (n = 24), also showed no significant difference in hemodynamic parameters between those who did or did not develop PE or severe PE.

CONCLUSIONS

Our group was unable to successfully predict the onset of PE or severe PE based on hemodynamic parameters measured with the USCOM. It is possible this relates to the high proportion of women on antihypertensive medication at recruitment.

Hypertensive pregnancy disorder, an under-recognized women specific risk factor for heart failure?

During pregnancy, the maternal cardiovascular (CV) system undergoes major haemodynamic alterations ensuring adequate placental perfusion and a healthy pregnancy course. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) occur in almost 10% of gestations and preeclampsia, a more severe form, in 3-4%. Women with HDP demonstrated impaired myocardial function, biventricular chamber dysfunction and adverse biventricular remodelling. Shortly after delivery, women who experienced HDP express increased risk of classic CV risk factors such as hypertension, renal disease, abnormal lipid profile, and diabetes. Within the first two decades following a HDP, women experience increased rates of heart failure, chronic hypertension, ischaemic heart and cerebral disease. The mechanism underlying the relationship between HDP in younger women and CV disease later in life could be explained by sharing pre-pregnancy CV risk factors or due to a direct impact of HDP on the maternal CV system conferring a state of increased susceptibility to future metabolic or haemodynamic insults. Racial disparities in CV risk and social determinants of health also play an important role in their remote CV risk. Although there is general agreement that women who suffered from HDP should undertake early CV screening to allow appropriate prevention and timely treatment, a screening and intervention protocol has not been standardized due to limited available evidence. In this review, we discuss why women with hypertensive pregnancy may be disproportionately affected by heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and how cardiac remodelling during or after pregnancy may influence its development.

Maternal Hemodynamics from Preconception to Delivery: Research and Potential Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications: Position Statement by Italian Association of Preeclampsia and Italian Society of Perinatal Medicine

OBJECTIVE

 The Italian Association of Preeclampsia (AIPE) and the Italian Society of Perinatal Medicine (SIMP) developed clinical questions on maternal hemodynamics state of the art.

STUDY DESIGN

 AIPE and SIMP experts were divided in small groups and were invited to propose an overview of the existing literature on specific topics related to the clinical questions proposed, developing, wherever possible, clinical and/or research recommendations based on available evidence, expert opinion, and clinical importance. Draft recommendations with a clinical rationale were submitted to 8th AIPE and SIMP Consensus Expert Panel for consideration and approval, with at least 75% agreement required for individual recommendations to be included in the final version.

RESULTS

 More and more evidence in literature underlines the relationship between maternal and fetal hemodynamics, as well as the relationship between maternal cardiovascular profile and fetal-maternal adverse outcomes such as fetal growth restriction and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Experts agreed on proposing a classification of pregnancy hypertension, complications, and cardiovascular states based on three different hemodynamic profiles depending on total peripheral vascular resistance values: hypodynamic (>1,300 dynes·s·cm-5), normo-dynamic, and hyperdynamic (<800 dynes·s·cm-5) circulation. This differentiation implies different therapeutical strategies, based drugs' characteristics, and maternal cardiovascular profile. Finally, the cardiovascular characteristics of the women may be useful for a rational approach to an appropriate follow-up, due to the increased cardiovascular risk later in life.

CONCLUSION

 Although the evidence might not be conclusive, given the lack of large randomized trials, maternal hemodynamics might have great importance in helping clinicians in understanding the pathophysiology and chose a rational treatment of patients with or at risk for pregnancy complications.

KEY POINTS

· Altered maternal hemodynamics is associated to fetal growth restriction.. · Altered maternal hemodynamics is associated to complicated hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.. · Maternal hemodynamics might help choosing a rational treatment during hypertensive disorders..

Pharmacotherapeutic options for the treatment of hypertension in pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy affect approximately one in 10 pregnancies and are associated with increased risk of adverse fetal, neonatal and maternal outcomes. There is strong evidence that effective treatment of hypertension (blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg), and enhanced monitoring throughout pregnancy reduces these risks.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides a contemporaneous review of treatment of hypertension in pregnancy with antihypertensive agents. We completed a systematic search and review of all meta-analyses and systematic reviews of studies comparing antihypertensives for treatment of pregnancy hypertension in the last five years. We provide a clinically focused summary of when to treat hypertension in pregnancy and which antihypertensive agents can be offered. Special scenarios reviewed include treatment-resistant hypertension and pre-pregnancy antihypertensive optimization.

EXPERT OPINION

Several antihypertensives are considered safe and are known to be effective for treatment of hypertension in pregnancy. Given the current uncertainty as to which antihypertensive(s) are superior for treatment of hypertension in pregnancy, women should be counselled and offered a range of antihypertensive options in keeping with evidence on clinical effectiveness, local context and availability of antihypertensive(s), potential side effect profile, and women's preference. Further research is required to help guide clinical decision making, and move toward personalized treatment.

Management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: a Position Statement of the European Society of Hypertension Working Group 'Hypertension in Women'

Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP), remain the leading cause of adverse maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes. Epidemiological factors, comorbidities, assisted reproduction techniques, placental disorders, and genetic predisposition determine the burden of the disease. The pathophysiological substrate and the clinical presentation of HDP are multifarious. The latter and the lack of well designed clinical trials in the field explain the absence of consensus on disease management among relevant international societies. Thus, the usual clinical management of HDP is largely empirical. The current position statement of the Working Group 'Hypertension in Women' of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) aims to employ the current evidence for the management of HDP, discuss the recommendations made in the 2023 ESH guidelines for the management of hypertension, and shed light on controversial issues in the field to stimulate future research.

The "Preeclampsia and Hypertension Target Treatment" study: a multicenter prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of the antihypertensive therapy based on maternal hemodynamic findings

BACKGROUND

Despite major advances in the pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in the nonpregnant population, treatments for hypertension in pregnancy have remained largely unchanged over the years. There is recent evidence that a more adequate control of maternal blood pressure is achieved when the first given antihypertensive drug is able to correct the underlying hemodynamic disorder of the mother besides normalizing the blood pressure values.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the blood pressure control in women receiving an appropriate or inappropriate antihypertensive therapy following the baseline hemodynamic findings.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective multicenter study that included a population of women with de novo diagnosis of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. A noninvasive assessment of the following maternal parameters was performed on hospital admission via Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor before any antihypertensive therapy was given: cardiac output, heart rate, systemic vascular resistance, and stroke volume. The clinician who prescribed the antihypertensive therapy was blinded to the hemodynamic evaluation and used as first-line treatment a vasodilator (nifedipine or alpha methyldopa) or a beta-blocker (labetalol) based on his preferences or on the local protocols. The first-line pharmacologic treatment was retrospectively considered hemodynamically appropriate in either of the following circumstances: (1) women with a hypodynamic profile (defined as low cardiac output [≤5 L/min] and/or high systemic vascular resistance [≥1300 dynes/second/cm2]) who were administered oral nifedipine or alpha methyldopa and (2) women with a hyperdynamic profile (defined as normal or high cardiac output [>5 L/min] and/or low systemic vascular resistances [<1300 dynes/second/cm2]) who were administered oral labetalol. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the occurrence of severe hypertension between women treated with a hemodynamically appropriate therapy and women treated with an inappropriate therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 152 women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were included in the final analysis. Most women displayed a hypodynamic profile (114 [75.0%]) and received a hemodynamically appropriate treatment (116 [76.3%]). The occurrence of severe hypertension before delivery was significantly lower in the group receiving an appropriate therapy than in the group receiving an inappropriately treated (6.0% vs 19.4%, respectively; P=.02). Moreover, the number of women who achieved target values of blood pressure within 48 to 72 hours from the treatment start was higher in the group who received an appropriate treatment than in the group who received an inappropriate treatment (70.7% vs 50.0%, respectively; P=.02).

CONCLUSION

In pregnant individuals with de novo hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, a lower occurrence of severe hypertension was observed when the first-line antihypertensive agent was tailored to the correct maternal hemodynamic profile.

The role of lung and cardiac ultrasound for cardiovascular hemodynamic assessment of women with preeclampsia

Preeclampsia remains the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality and is associated with abnormal body fluid homeostasis and cardiovascular dysfunction. Moreover, 2 distinct hemodynamic phenotypes have been described in preeclampsia, which might require different therapeutic approaches. Fluid restriction is mandatory in women at risk of pulmonary edema, whereas additional fluid administration may be required to correct tissue hypoperfusion in women with intravascular volume depletion. As clinical examination alone cannot discriminate among different hemodynamic patterns, optimal management of women with preeclampsia remains challenging. Noninvasive bedside ultrasound has become an important diagnostic and monitoring tool in critically ill patients, and it has been demonstrated that it can also be used in the monitoring of women with preeclampsia. Echocardiography in combination with lung ultrasound provides information on hemodynamic status, cardiac function, lung congestion, and fluid responsiveness and, therefore, could help clinicians identify women at higher risk of life-threatening complications. This review describes the cardiovascular changes in preeclampsia and provides an overview of the ultrasound methodologies that could be efficiently used for better hemodynamic assessment and management of women with preeclampsia.

NO donors on top of anti-hypertensive therapy reduces complications in chronic hypertensive pregnancies with hypodynamic circulation

OBJECTIVES

Chronic hypertension is associated with significant adverse maternal and fetal outcomes that appear to be often associated to a hypodynamic circulation. Treatment of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy tailored on maternal hemodynamics might reduce or mitigate these complications. Our purpose was to assess the hemodynamic modifications induced by the addition of NO donors and increased oral fluid intake on top of standard antihypertensive therapy in hypodynamic chronic hypertensive patients. We further evaluated if the possible hemodynamic modification induced by NO donors and increased oral fluid intake might be associated to a reduction of the severity and rate of complications vs. patients on antihypertensive standard treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a case-control study of 321 chronic hypertensive patients with a hypodynamic circulation at the echocardiographic evaluation at 24 weeks' gestation. We included 160 controls (standard antihypertensive therapy) and 161 cases (standard therapy + NO donor patches + increased oral fluid intake). Student T test for paired and unpaired data, univariate logistic regression analysis, ROC curve analysis, and Cox Hazards Regression analysis were used as appropriate.

RESULTS

At enrollment the hemodynamic parameters were similar between the two groups. After 3-4 weeks stroke volume (77 ± 19 mL vs. 69 ± 19 mL; p < 0.001), and cardiac output (6.2 ± 1.7 L vs. 5.0 ± 1.6 L; p < 0.001) were higher and total peripheral vascular resistance (1465 ± 469 dyne·s·cm-5 vs. 1814 ± 524 dyne·s·cm-5; p < 0.001) was lower in the cases vs controls. Superimposed preeclampsia, preterm delivery before 34 weeks, abruptio placentae, HELLP Syndrome, fetal growth restriction, and perinatal death were more represented in the standard treatment group vs NO treated patients (81% vs 53%; p < 0.001). In particular, the standard treatment group showed 48% fetal growth restriction vs 34% in the NO treated group (p < 0.011). The Cox proportional-hazards regression showed a lower proportion of event-free pregnancies in controls on standard treatment (HR 2.6; 95% CI 2.0-3.5; p < 0.0001), and a prolongation of pregnancies in CH cases complicated by fetal growth restriction taking NO donors (HR 0.29; 95% CI 0.19-0.43; p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The tailored treatment with NO donors and oral fluids of hypodynamic CH might have positive effects on the reduction or mitigations of adverse outcomes.

Maternal haemodynamics in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy under antihypertensive therapy (HyperDiP): study protocol for a prospective observational case-control study

INTRODUCTION

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are associated with a high incidence of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. HDP, in particular pre-eclampsia, have been determined as risk factors for future cardiovascular disease. Recently, the common hypothesis of pre-eclampsia being a placental disorder was challenged as numerous studies show evidence for short-term and long-term cardiovascular changes in pregnancies affected by HDP, suggesting a cardiovascular origin of the disease. Despite new insights into the pathophysiology of HDP, concepts of therapy remain unchanged and evidence for improved maternal and neonatal outcome by using antihypertensive agents is lacking.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A prospective observational case-control study, including 100 women with HDP and 100 healthy controls, which will assess maternal haemodynamics using the USCOM 1A Monitor and Arteriograph along with cardiovascular markers (soluble fms-like kinase 1/placental-like growth factor, N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide) in women with HDP under antihypertensive therapy, including a follow-up at 3 months and 1 year post partum, will be conducted over a 50-month period in Vienna. A prospective, longitudinal study of cardiovascular surrogate markers conducted in Oslo will serve as a comparative cohort for the Vienna cohort of haemodynamic parameters in pregnancy including a longer follow-up period of up to 3 years post partum. Each site will provide a dataset of a patient group and a control group and will be assessed for the outcome categories USCOM 1A measurements, Arteriograph measurements and Angiogenic marker measurements. To estimate the effect of antihypertensive therapy on outcome parameters, ORs with 95% CIs will be computed. Longitudinal changes of outcome parameters will be compared between normotensive and hypertensive pregnancies using mixed-effects models.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been granted to all participating centres. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and will be presented at national and international conferences.

[High blood pressure in women - gender-specific features]

Arterial hypertension, particularly elevated systolic blood pressure, is the most common risk factor for cardio- and cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality in women as it is in men. Blood pressure regulation and the development of sustained hypertension differ by sex. There are still few data on the question of whether the current normal values can apply equally to men and women and on the question of a different effect and dosage of antihypertensive drugs in women.

An update on maternal cardiac hemodynamics in fetal growth restriction and pre-eclampsia

Pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction (FGR) have been long related to primary placental dysfunction, caused by abnormal trophoblast invasion. Nevertheless, emerging evidence has led to a new hypothesis for the origin of pre-eclampsia and FGR. Suboptimal maternal cardiovascular adaptation has been shown to result in uteroplacental hypoperfusion, ultimately leading to placental hypoxic damage with secondary dysfunction. In this review, we summarize current evidence on maternal cardiac hemodynamics in FGR and pre-eclampsia. We also discuss the different approaches for antihypertensive treatment according to the hemodynamic phenotype observed in pre-eclampsia and FGR.

Beta-Blockers in Pregnancy: Clinical Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review was to determine the anticipated benefits and adverse effects of beta-blockers in pregnant women with hypertension. The other issue was to assess the possible adverse effects of beta-blockers for their babies and provide current consensus recommendations for appropriate selection and individualized antihypertensive treatment with beta-blockers in pregnancy-associated hypertension.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a major cause of maternal and fetal morbidity, with consequences later in life. Certain beta-blockers are useful for ameliorating hypertension in pregnancy and may have a protective role in endothelial dysfunction. However, some aspects of beta-blocker use in pregnancy are contentious among providers. Evidence on their safety, although well documented, is variable, and recent research reveals areas of controversy. Besides intrauterine growth restriction, other neonatal and obstetric complications remain a concern and should be explored thoroughly. Attention is necessary when treating pregnancy-associated hypertensive disorders with beta-blockers. Specific beta-blockers are considered safe in pregnancy, although the associated effects in the fetus are not clearly known and evidence is lacking for many safety outcomes, other than intrauterine growth restriction. Nevertheless, beta-blockers with specific indications in pregnancy under individualized selection and monitoring may confer substantial improvements in pregnant women with hypertension.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: definition, management, and out-of-office blood pressure measurement

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy increase the risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. In 2018, the Japanese classification of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was standardized with those of other countries, and a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy was considered to be present if hypertension existed during pregnancy and up to 12 weeks after delivery. Strategies for the prevention of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy have become much clearer, but further research is needed on appropriate subjects and methods of administration, and these have not been clarified in Japan. Although guidelines for the use of antihypertensive drugs are also being studied and standardized with those of other countries, the use of calcium antagonists before 20 weeks of gestation is still contraindicated in Japan because of the safety concerns that were raised regarding possible fetal anomalies associated with their use at the time of their market launch. Chronic hypertension is now included in the definition of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and blood pressure measurement is a fundamental component of the diagnosis of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Out-of-office blood pressure measurements, including ambulatory and home blood pressure measurements, are important for pregnant and nonpregnant women. Although conditions such as white-coat hypertension and masked hypertension have been reported, determining their occurrence in pregnancy is complicated by the gestational week. This narrative review focused on recent reports on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including those related to blood pressure measurement and classification.

The impact of pregnancy on antihypertensive drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics: current status and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are rising in prevalence, and increase risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Physiologic changes occur during pregnancy that alter drug pharmacokinetics. However, antihypertensive drugs lack pregnancy-specific dosing recommendations due to critical knowledge gaps surrounding the extent of gestational changes in antihypertensive drug pharmacokinetics and underlying mechanisms.

AREAS COVERED

This review (1) summarizes currently recommended medications and dosing strategies for non-emergent HDP treatment, (2) reviews and synthesizes existing literature identified via a comprehensive Pubmed search evaluating gestational changes in the maternal pharmacokinetics of commonly prescribed HDP drugs (notably labetalol and nifedipine), and (3) offers insight into the metabolism and clearance mechanisms underlying altered HDP drug pharmacokinetics during pregnancy. Remaining knowledge gaps and future research directions are summarized.

EXPERT OPINION

A series of small pharmacokinetic studies illustrate higher oral clearance of labetalol and nifedipine during pregnancy. Pharmacokinetic modeling and preclinical studies suggest these effects are likely due to pregnancy-associated increases in hepatic UGT1A1- and CYP3A4-mediated first-pass metabolism and lower bioavailability. Accordingly, higher and/or more frequent doses may be needed to lower blood pressure during pregnancy. Future research is needed to address various evidence gaps and inform the development of more precise antihypertensive drug dosing strategies.