Incidence of defibrillator shocks after elective generator exchange following uneventful first battery life

Risk Stratification in Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy Using CMR Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Accurate risk stratification of nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) remains challenging.

Objective

To evaluate the association of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging-derived measurements with clinical outcomes in NIDCM.

Data Sources

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science Core Collection databases were systematically searched for articles from January 2005 to April 2023.

Study Selection

Prospective and retrospective nonrandomized diagnostic studies reporting on the association between CMR imaging-derived measurements and adverse clinical outcomes in NIDCM were deemed eligible.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Prespecified items related to patient population, CMR imaging measurements, and clinical outcomes were extracted at the study level by 2 independent reviewers. Random-effects models were fitted using restricted maximum likelihood estimation and the method of Hartung, Knapp, Sidik, and Jonkman.

Main Outcomes and Measures

All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, arrhythmic events, heart failure events, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

Results

A total of 103 studies including 29 687 patients with NIDCM were analyzed. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) presence and extent (per 1%) were associated with higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81 [95% CI, 1.60-2.04]; P < .001 and HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.02-1.12]; P = .02, respectively), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 2.43 [95% CI, 2.13-2.78]; P < .001 and HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.07-1.24]; P = .01), arrhythmic events (HR, 2.69 [95% CI, 2.20-3.30]; P < .001 and HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.03-1.12]; P = .004) and heart failure events (HR, 1.98 [95% CI, 1.73-2.27]; P < .001 and HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.01-1.10]; P = .02). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (per 1%) was not associated with all-cause mortality (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.97-1.02]; P = .47), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.94-1.00]; P = .05), or arrhythmic outcomes (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.97-1.01]; P = .34). Lower risks for heart failure events (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.95-0.98]; P = .002) and MACE (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.96-0.99]; P < .001) were observed with higher LVEF. Higher native T1 relaxation times (per 10 ms) were associated with arrhythmic events (HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.01-1.14]; P = .04) and MACE (HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.01-1.11]; P = .03). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) (per 1%) was not associated with heart failure events (HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.95-1.18]; P = .15) or MACE (HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.94-1.14]; P = .43). Limited data precluded definitive analysis for native T1 relaxation times, GLS, and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) with respect to mortality outcomes.

Conclusion

The presence and extent of LGE were associated with various adverse clinical outcomes, whereas LVEF was not significantly associated with mortality and arrhythmic end points in NIDCM. Risk stratification using native T1 relaxation times, extracellular volume fraction, and global longitudinal strain requires further evaluation.

Respiratory Function of Mitochondria in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease with Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator

We studied the respiratory activity of mitochondria in peripheral blood leukocytes from 36 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and a history of ventricular tachyarrhythmias required cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. The measurements were carried out in incubation buffers with different oxidation substrates (succinate and pyruvate-malate mixture). In pyruvate-malate incubation buffer, oxygen consumption rate and respiratory control coefficients in patients with triggered device did not differ significantly from those in patients without cardioverter-defibrillator triggering. At the same time, respiratory control coefficients were below the reference values. In succinate buffer, values of mitochondrial parameters were significantly lower in patients with triggered devices. Our findings indicate that mitochondria of patients with non-triggered cardioverters-defibrillators have better functional and metabolic plasticity. It was concluded that activity of respiratory processes in mitochondria could be an indicator that should be taken into the account when assessing the risk of developing ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Defibrillator exchange in the elderly

Background

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in elderly patients is controversial because survival benefits might be attenuated by nonarrhythmic causes of death.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcome of septuagenarians and octogenarians after ICD generator exchange (GE).

Methods

A total of 506 patients undergoing elective GE were analyzed to determine the incidence of ICD shocks and/or survival after GE. Patients were divided into a septuagenarian group (age 70-79 years) and an octogenarian group (age ≥80 years). The primary endpoint was death from any cause. Secondary endpoints were survival after appropriate ICD shock and death without experiencing ICD shocks after GE ("prior death").

Results

The association of the ICD with all-cause mortality and arrhythmic death was determined for septuagenarians and octogenarians. Comparing both groups, similar left ventricular ejection fraction (35.6% ± 11.2% vs 32.4% ± 8.9%) and baseline prevalence of New York Heart Association functional class III or IV heart failure (17.1% vs 14.7%) were found. During the entire follow-up period of the study, 42.5% of patients in the septuagenarian group died compared to 79% in the octogenarian group (P <.01). Prior death was significantly more frequent in both age groups than were appropriate ICD shocks. Predictors of mortality were common in both groups and included advanced heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, and renal failure.

Conclusion

In clinical practice, decision-making for ICD GE among the elderly should be considered carefully for individual patients.

Toward Better Risk Stratification for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Recipients: Implications of Explainable Machine Learning Models

Background: Current guideline-based implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implants fail to meet the demands for precision medicine. Machine learning (ML) designed for survival analysis might facilitate personalized risk stratification. We aimed to develop explainable ML models predicting mortality and the first appropriate shock and compare these to standard Cox proportional hazards (CPH) regression in ICD recipients. Methods and Results: Forty-five routine clinical variables were collected. Four fine-tuned ML approaches (elastic net Cox regression, random survival forests, survival support vector machine, and XGBoost) were applied and compared with the CPH model on the test set using Harrell’s C-index. Of 887 adult patients enrolled, 199 patients died (5.0 per 100 person-years) and 265 first appropriate shocks occurred (12.4 per 100 person-years) during the follow-up. Patients were randomly split into training (75%) and test (25%) sets. Among ML models predicting death, XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy and outperformed the CPH model (C-index: 0.794 vs. 0.760, p < 0.001). For appropriate shock, survival support vector machine showed the highest accuracy, although not statistically different from the CPH model (0.621 vs. 0.611, p = 0.243). The feature contribution of ML models assessed by SHAP values at individual and overall levels was in accordance with established knowledge. Accordingly, a bi-dimensional risk matrix integrating death and shock risk was built. This risk stratification framework further classified patients with different likelihoods of benefiting from ICD implant. Conclusions: Explainable ML models offer a promising tool to identify different risk scenarios in ICD-eligible patients and aid clinical decision making. Further evaluation is needed.

Prediction of appropriate ICD therapy in patients with ischemic heart failure

BACKGROUND

Previous studies show inconsistent results on the role of innervation imaging (with I-123-mIBG) and perfusion imaging in predicting appropriate ICD therapy (aICDth). These studies included patients with both dilated and ischemic cardiomyopathy. This study compared the ability of 123I-mIBG imaging along with perfusion imaging (using thallium-199) to predict aICDth in patients with ischemic heart failure (IHF) in relation to indication for ICD implantation (primary vs. secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD)).

METHODS

mIBG/thallium SPECT imaging were performed before ICD implantation in 80 patients with IHF: 49 candidates for primary and 31 for secondary SCD prevention.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 18 months, the imaging results could not predict patients with appropriate ICD therapy among patients with ICD implants for primary SCD prevention. While in the secondary SCD prevention group, those who received a ICDth had significantly larger summed scores of regional perfusion and innervation impairment, but not higher heart-to-mediastinal mIBG ratio. The best results to predict aICDth were using mIBG summed score (cut-off point > 34%, sensitivity 72%, specificity 100%, AUC 0.909, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The prognostic value of innervation and perfusion imaging in patients with IHF differ based on indication for ICD implantation (primary vs. secondary prevention of SCD).

2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC

Document Reviewers: Rudolf A. de Boer (CPG Review Coordinator) (Netherlands), P. Christian Schulze (CPG Review Coordinator) (Germany), Magdy Abdelhamid (Egypt), Victor Aboyans (France), Stamatis Adamopoulos (Greece), Stefan D. Anker (Germany), Elena Arbelo (Spain), Riccardo Asteggiano (Italy), Johann Bauersachs (Germany), Antoni Bayes-Genis (Spain), Michael A. Borger (Germany), Werner Budts (Belgium), Maja Cikes (Croatia), Kevin Damman (Netherlands), Victoria Delgado (Netherlands), Paul Dendale (Belgium), Polychronis Dilaveris (Greece), Heinz Drexel (Austria), Justin Ezekowitz (Canada), Volkmar Falk (Germany), Laurent Fauchier (France), Gerasimos Filippatos (Greece), Alan Fraser (United Kingdom), Norbert Frey (Germany), Chris P. Gale (United Kingdom), Finn Gustafsson (Denmark), Julie Harris (United Kingdom), Bernard Iung (France), Stefan Janssens (Belgium), Mariell Jessup (United States of America), Aleksandra Konradi (Russia), Dipak Kotecha (United Kingdom), Ekaterini Lambrinou (Cyprus), Patrizio Lancellotti (Belgium), Ulf Landmesser (Germany), Christophe Leclercq (France), Basil S. Lewis (Israel), Francisco Leyva (United Kingdom), AleVs Linhart (Czech Republic), Maja-Lisa Løchen (Norway), Lars H. Lund (Sweden), Donna Mancini (United States of America), Josep Masip (Spain), Davor Milicic (Croatia), Christian Mueller (Switzerland), Holger Nef (Germany), Jens-Cosedis Nielsen (Denmark), Lis Neubeck (United Kingdom), Michel Noutsias (Germany), Steffen E. Petersen (United Kingdom), Anna Sonia Petronio (Italy), Piotr Ponikowski (Poland), Eva Prescott (Denmark), Amina Rakisheva (Kazakhstan), Dimitrios J. Richter (Greece), Evgeny Schlyakhto (Russia), Petar Seferovic (Serbia), Michele Senni (Italy), Marta Sitges (Spain), Miguel Sousa-Uva (Portugal), Carlo G. Tocchetti (Italy), Rhian M. Touyz (United Kingdom), Carsten Tschoepe (Germany), Johannes Waltenberger (Germany/Switzerland) All experts involved in the development of these guidelines have submitted declarations of interest. These have been compiled in a report and published in a supplementary document simultaneously to the guidelines. The report is also available on the ESC website www.escardio.org/guidelines For the Supplementary Data which include background information and detailed discussion of the data that have provided the basis for the guidelines see European Heart Journal online.

Prospective evaluation of health status, quality of life and clinical outcomes following implantable defibrillator generator exchange

BACKGROUND

Little is known about health status and quality of life (QoL) after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) generator exchange (GE).

METHODS

We prospectively followed patients undergoing first-time ICD GE. Serial assessments of health status were performed by administering the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

Mean age was 67.5 ± 14.3 years, left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) was 36.5% ± 15.0% and over 40% of the cohort had improved LVEF to > 35% at the time of GE. SF-36 scores were significantly worse in physical/general health domains compared to domains of emotional/social well-being ( P < 0.001 for each comparison). Physical health scores were significantly worse among those with medical comorbidities including diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and atrial fibrillation. Mean follow-up was 1.6 ± 0.5 years after GE. Overall SF-36 scores remained stable across all domains during follow-up. Survival at 3 years post-GE was estimated at 80%. Five patients died during follow-up and most deaths were adjudicated as non-arrhythmic in origin. Four patients experienced appropriate ICD shocks after GE, three of whom had LVEF which remains impaired LVEF (i.e., < 35%) at the time of GE.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing ICD GE have significantly worse physical health compared to emotional/social well-being, which is associated with the presence of medical comorbidities. In terms of clinical outcomes, the incidence of appropriate shocks after GE among those with improvement in LVEF is very low, and most deaths post-procedure appear to be non-arrhythmic in origin. These data represent an attempt to more fully characterize the spectrum of QoL and clinical outcomes after GE.

Role of stimulating growth factor 2 and galectin-3 in predicting the ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy

Aim. To assess the role of stimulating growth factor 2 (ST-2) and galectin-3 in predicting the ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35%.

Material and methods. The study included 40 patients (men, 36 (90,0%); median age, 64,5 [57,5; 68,5] years) with CAD, NYHA class IIIII heart failure, LVEF <35%, indications for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (primary prevention of sudden cardiac death). Prior to ICD implantation, patients were measured for serum ST-2 and galectin-3 levels. For 18 months, patients were assessed for arrhythmic events recorded in the ICD memory.

Results. The 1st group consisted of 10 (25,0%) patients who had VTA episodes, arrested by antitachycardia pacing or shock during 18-month follow-up. The 2nd group consisted of 30 (75,0%) patients without VTA episodes. It was found that ST-2 concentration >22,48 ng/ml (p=0,02) and galectin-3 >10,95 ng/ml (p=0,009) corresponded to appropriate ICD discharge. Multivariate ROC analysis demonstrated that the only independent predictor of VTA was ST-2 elevation (odds ratio, 1,11; 95% CI, 1,01-1,21; p=0,023).

Conclusion. An increase in the concentration of both ST-2 >22,48 ng/ml and galectin-3 >10,95 ng/ml had a high predictive value in assessing the VTA risk in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. In multivariate analysis, an increase in ST-2 >22,48 ng/ml was an independent predictor of VTA.

Ongoing Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias and All-Cause Mortality at Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Generator Change: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

[Figure: see text].

Incidence of Ventricular Arrhythmias and 1-Year Predictors of Mortality in Patients Treated With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Undergoing Generator Replacement

Background

When implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) battery is depleted most patients undergo generator replacement (GR) even in the absence of persistent ICD indication. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and the overall prognosis of patients with and without persistent ICD indication undergoing GR. Predictors of 1‐year mortality were also analyzed.

Methods and Results

Patients with structural heart disease implanted with primary prevention ICD undergoing GR were included. Patients were stratified based on the presence/absence of persistent ICD indication (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% at the time of GR and/or history of appropriate ICD therapies during the first generator's life). The study included 371 patients (82% male, 40% with ischemic heart disease). One third of patients (n=121) no longer met ICD indication at the time of GR. During a median follow‐up of 34 months after GR patients without persistent ICD indication showed a significantly lower incidence of appropriate ICD shocks (1.9% versus 16.2%, P<0.001) and ICD therapies. 1‐year mortality was also significantly lower in patients without persistent ICD indication (1% versus 8.3%, P=0.009). At multivariable analysis permanent atrial fibrillation, chronic advanced renal impairment, age >80, and persistent ICD indication were found to be significant predictors of 1‐year mortality.

Conclusions

Patients without persistent ICD indication at the time of GR show a low incidence of appropriate ICD therapies after GR. Persistent ICD indication, atrial fibrillation, advanced chronic renal disease, and age >80 are significant predictors of 1‐year mortality. Our findings enlighten the need of performing a comprehensive clinical reevaluation of ICD patients at the time of GR.

Sudden Cardiac Death Prediction in Non-ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: a Multiparametric and Dynamic Approach

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Sudden cardiac death is recognised as a devastating consequence of non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Although implantable cardiac defibrillators offer protection against some forms of sudden death, the identification of patients in this population most likely to benefit from this therapy remains challenging and controversial. In this review, we evaluate current guidelines and explore established and novel predictors of sudden cardiac death in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current international guidelines for primary prevention implantable defibrillator therapy do not result in improved longevity for many patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and severe left ventricular dysfunction. More precise methods for identifying higher-risk patients that derive true prognostic benefit from this therapy are required. Dynamic and multi-parametric characterization of myocardial, electrical, serological and genetic substrate offers novel strategies for predicting major arrhythmic risk. Balancing the risk of non-sudden death offers an opportunity to personalize therapy and avoid unnecessary device implantation for those less likely to derive benefit.

[Continuation of ICD treatment at the time of device exchange without adequate treatment?]

INTRODUCTION

Due to improved treatment of heart failure, patients are older and have more comorbidities at the time of an elective device exchange. This leads to higher rates of complications and represents an opportunity for re-evaluation of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) treatment.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the current literature regarding the indications for continued ICD therapy and device exchange in patients who have never received adequate treatment through the ICD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with primarily prophylactic indications, who have not received adequate treatment and have shown significant improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >35%, have a significantly lower risk of ventricular arrythmia (VA) after device exchange. Although further ventricular events can occur in these patients, the continuation of ICD treatment should be individually discussed in cases of high age and increased comorbidities. In female patients with a non-ischemic cardiac myopathy and an almost normalized LVEF, mostly during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), a discontinuation of ICD treatment or downgrading to CRT with pacemaker (CRT-P) treatment should be discussed.

CONCLUSION

At the time of an elective device exchange for primarily prophylactic indications, the possibility to discontinue ICD treatment can be discussed with patients who have not experienced adequate treatment. Additional factors, such as LVEF, age, sex and comorbidities of the patient should be taken into consideration in order to make an individualized decision. As prospective randomized studies are lacking, it is not possible to give generally valid recommendations.

Incidence of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy and mortality after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator replacement: results from a real-world nationwide cohort

Aims

The safety of omitting implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) generator replacement in patients with no prior appropriate therapy, comorbid conditions, and advanced age is unclear. The aim was to investigate incidence of appropriate ICD therapy after generator replacement.

Methods and results

We identified patients implanted with a primary prevention ICD (n = 4630) from 2007 to 2016, who subsequently underwent an elective ICD generator replacement (n = 670) from the Danish Pacemaker and ICD Register. The data were linked to other databases and evaluated the outcomes of appropriate therapy and death. Predictors of ICD therapy were identified using multivariate Cox regression analyses. A total of 670 patients underwent elective ICD generator replacement. Of these, 197 (29.4%) patients had experienced appropriate therapy in their 1st generator period. During follow-up of 2.0 ± 1.6 years, 95 (14.2%) patients experienced appropriate therapy. Predictors of appropriate therapy in 2nd generator period was low initial left ventricular ejection fraction (≤25%) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.87, confidence interval (CI) 1.13–1.95] and appropriate therapy in 1st generator period (HR 3.95, CI 2.57–6.06). For patients with appropriate therapy in 1st generator period, 4-year incidence of appropriate therapy was 50.6% vs. 16.4% in those without (P < 0.001). Among patients >80 years with no prior appropriate therapy 8.8% of patients experienced appropriate therapy after replacement. Comorbidity burden and advanced age were associated with reduced device utilization after replacement and a high competing risk of death without preceding appropriate therapy.

Conclusion

A significant residual risk of appropriate therapy in the 2nd generator was present even among patients with advanced age and with a full prior generator period without any appropriate ICD events.

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators are the Main Link in the Modern Concept of Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention. Problems and Prospects of the Development of the Method

The article covers the development of the problem of sudden cardiac death prevention with the implantable cardioverter-defibrillators from the moment of creation of these devices to our days. The current concept of primary prevention of sudden cardiac death, based on the severity of manifestation of heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction, is not effective enough. Its practical application is difficult because it requires mass application of implantable defibrillators, with low predictive accuracy of these criteria in terms of development of life-threatening arrhythmias. The development of methods for visualizing the myocardium, allowing to assess the severity of myocardial fibrosis, as well as the possibilities of medical genetics, at the present stage, allows us to clarify indications for implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators and thereby significantly improve the concept of preventing sudden cardiac death with these instruments.

Octo- and nonagenarians' outlook on life and death when living with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: a cross-sectional study

Background

Elderly individuals are increasingly represented among patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), but data describing life with an ICD are scarse among octo- and nonagenarians. Moreover, few studies have reported those elderly patients’ perspective on timly discussions concerning what shock deactivation involves, preferences on battery replacement, and their attitudes about turning off the ICD nearing end-of-life. Consequently, the aim of the study was to describe outlooks on life and death in octo- and nonagenarian ICD-recipients.

Methods

Participants were identified via the Swedish Pacemaker- and ICD-registry, with 229 octo- and nonagenarians (82.0 ± 2.2 years, 12% female) completing the survey on one occasion. The survey involved questions on health and psychological measures, as well as on experiences, attitudes and knowledge of end-of-life issues in relation to the ICD.

Results

The majority (53%) reported their existing health as being good/very good and rated their health status as 67 ± 18 on the EuroQol Visual Analog Scale. A total of 34% had experienced shock(s), 11% suffered from symptoms of depression, 15% had anxiety, and 26% reported concerns related to their ICD. About one third (34%) had discussed their illness trajectory with their physician, with those octo- and nonagenarians being more decisive about a future deactivation (67% vs. 43%, p < .01). A minority (13%) had discussed what turning off shocks would involve with their physician, and just 7% had told their family their wishes about a possible deactivation in the future. The majority desired battery replacement even if they had reached a very advanced age when one was needed (69%), or were seriously ill with a life-threatening disease (55%). When asked about deactivation in an anticipated terminal illness, about one third (34%) stated that they wanted to keep the shocks in the ICD during these circumstances. About one-fourth of the octo- and nonagenarians had insufficient knowledge regarding the ethical aspects, function of the ICD, and practical consequences of withdrawing the ICD treatment in the end-of-life.

Conclusions

Increasing numbers of elderly persons receive an ICD and geriatric care must involve assessments of life expectancy as well as the patient’s knowledge and attitudes in relation to generator changes and deactivation.

The relationship between baseline and follow-up left ventricular ejection fraction with adverse events among primary prevention ICD patients

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is used to select patients for primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). The relationship between baseline and long-term follow-up LVEF and clinical outcomes among primary prevention ICD patients remains unclear.

METHODS

We studied 195 patients with a baseline LVEF ≤35% ≤6 months prior to ICD implantation and follow-up LVEF 1-3 years after ICD implantation without intervening left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or transplant. The co-primary study endpoints were: (1) a composite of time to death, LVAD, or transplant and (2) appropriate ICD therapy. We examined multivariable Cox proportional hazard models with a 3-year post-implant landmark view; the LVEF closest to the 3-year mark was considered the follow-up LVEF for analyses. Follow-up LVEF was examined using 2 definitions: (1) ≥10% improvement compared to baseline or (2) actual value of ≥40%.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (26%) had a LVEF improvement of ≥10% and 44 (23%) had a follow-up LVEF ≥40%. Neither baseline nor follow-up LVEF was significantly associated with the composite endpoint. In contrast, both baseline and follow-up LVEF were associated with risk for long-term ICD therapies, whether follow-up LVEF was modeled as a ≥10% absolute improvement (baseline LVEF HR 0.87, CI 0.91-0.93, P < .001; follow-up LVEF HR 0.18, CI 0.06-0.53, P = .002) or a ≥40% follow-up value (baseline LVEF HR 0.89, CI 0.83-0.96, P = .001, follow-up LVEF HR 0.26, CI 0.08-0.87, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Among primary prevention ICD recipients, both baseline and follow-up LVEF were independently associated with long-term risk for appropriate ICD therapy, but they were not associated with time to the composite of LVAD, transplant, or death.

Cost-effectiveness of a risk-stratified approach to cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillators (high versus low) at the time of generator change

OBJECTIVE

Responders to cardiac resynchronisation therapy whose device has a defibrillator component and who do not receive a therapy in the lifetime of the first generator have a very low incidence of appropriate therapy after box change. We investigated the cost implications of using a risk stratification tool at the time of generator change resulting in these patients being reimplanted with a resynchronisation pacemaker.

METHODS

A decision tree was created using previously published data which had demonstrated an annualised appropriate defibrillator therapy risk of 2.33%. Costs were calculated at National Health Service (NHS) national tariff rates (2016-2017). EQ-5D utility values were applied to device reimplantations, admissions and mortality data, which were then used to estimate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over 5 years.

RESULTS

At 5 years, the incremental cost of replacing a resynchronisation defibrillator device with a second resynchronisation defibrillator versus resynchronisation pacemaker was £5045 per patient. Incremental QALY gained was 0.0165 (defibrillator vs pacemaker), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £305 712 per QALYs gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis resulted in an ICER of £313 612 (defibrillator vs pacemaker). For reimplantation of all patients with a defibrillator rather than a pacemaker to yield an ICER of less than £30 000 per QALY gained (current NHS cut-off for approval of treatment), the annual arrhythmic event rate would need to be 9.3%. The budget impact of selective replacement was a saving of £2 133 985 per year.

CONCLUSIONS

Implanting low-risk patients with a resynchronisation defibrillator with the same device at the time of generator change is not cost-effective by current NHS criteria. Further research is required to understand the impact of these findings on individual patients at the time of generator change.

Predicting appropriate shocks in patients with heart failure: Patient level meta-analysis from SCD-HeFT and MADIT II

BACKGROUND

No precise tools exist to predict appropriate shocks in patients with a primary prevention ICD. We sought to identify characteristics predictive of appropriate shocks in patients with a primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).

METHODS

Using patient-level data from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT II) and the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT), we identified patients with any appropriate shock. Clinical and demographic variables were included in a logistic regression model to predict appropriate shocks.

RESULTS

There were 1,463 patients randomized to an ICD, and 285 (19%) had ≥1 appropriate shock over a median follow-up of 2.59 years. Compared with patients without appropriate ICD shocks, patients who received any appropriate shock tended to have more severe heart failure. In a multiple logistic regression model, predictors of appropriate shocks included NYHA class (NYHA II vs. I: OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.07-2.55; NYHA III vs. I: OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.10-2.76), lower LVEF (per 1% change) (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06), absence of beta-blocker therapy (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.23-2.12), and single chamber ICD (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.13-2.45).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis of patient level data from MADIT-II and SCD-HeFT, higher NYHA class, lower LVEF, no beta-blocker therapy, and single chamber ICD (vs. dual chamber) were significant predictors of appropriate shocks.

Digital monitoring and care: Virtual medicine

Remote digital health monitoring technologies can be synergistically organized to create a virtual medical system providing more continuous care centered on the patient rather than the bricks and mortar medical complex. Utilization of the digitalized patient health monitoring can facilitate diagnosis, treatment plans, physician-patient interaction, and accelerate the progress of medical research, education, and training. The field of cardiac electrophysiology has been an early adopter of this shift in care and serves as a paradigm applicable to all areas of medicine. The overall impact of this remote virtual care model on the quality of medical care and patient experience requires greater study, as well as vigilance as to the differences between technology and care in order to preserve the intangible and immeasurable factors that bring humanity to the art and science of medicine.

[We implant too many ICD - contra]

Based on prospective population-based cohort studies from the Netherlands approximately 120,000 sudden cardiac deaths (SCD) have to be assumed in 2014 in Germany for persons older than 55 years of age without an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). In contrast in 2014 only 30,000 ICD were implanted in Germany. Due to the fact that victims of SCD are difficult to predict many more implantations are actually necessary because only approximately one third of the patients use their ICD during battery running time. Also according to the largest ICD study on ischemic cardiomyopathy at least six patients must be treated with an ICD to save one life after 8 years. Guidelines for ICD implantation are based on 12 randomized studies with more than 9000 patients. In 2014 in Germany 94 % of ICD implantations were carried out in accordance with the guidelines. The most important studies for primary prophylaxis of SCD (MADIT 2 and SCD-HeFT) finished recruitment of patients in 2001 but propensity score-matched ICD patients from a large national data base showed identical survival curves in 2005 and 2006. New ICD developments in recent years, such as suppression of inappropriate ICD therapy by improved programming, cardiac resynchronization, and telemonitoring showed promise for current ICD patients of improved survival in comparison to the original randomized patients from the studies, which led to the indications in the guidelines.

Generator exchange in a primary prevention cardiac resynchronziation responder: do you reimplant a defibrillator?

This case-based review discusses the benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and whether defibrillation function is necessary in CRT responders. An evaluation of the literature and evidence to date is discussed. Recommendations based on these data, expert opinion, and recently published appropriate use criteria are given.