Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Lesions

Optimal Timing for Resumption of Anticoagulation After Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients With Mechanical Heart Valves

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulation in patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and mechanical heart valves is often held for risk of ICH expansion; however, there exists a competing risk of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Optimal timing to resume anticoagulation remains uncertain.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively studied patients with ICH and mechanical heart valves from 2000 to 2018. The primary outcome was a composite end point of symptomatic hematoma expansion or new ICH, AIS, and intracardiac thrombus up to 30 days post-ICH. The exposure was timing of reinitiation of anticoagulation classified as early (resumed up to 7 days after ICH), late (≥7 and up to 30 days after ICH), and never if not resumed or resumed after 30 days post-ICH. We included 184 patients with ICH and mechanical heart valves (65 anticoagulated early, 100 late, 19 not resumed by day 30 post-ICH). Twelve patients had AIS, 16 new ICH, and 6 intracardiac thromboses. The mean time from ICH to anticoagulation was 12.7 days. Composite outcomes occurred in 12 patients resumed early (18.5%), 14 resumed late (14.0%), and 4 never resumed (21.1%). There was no increased hazard of the composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 1.1 [95% CI, 0.2-6.0]), AIS, or worsening or new ICH among patients resumed early versus late. There was no difference in the composite among patients never resumed versus resumed. Patients who never resumed anticoagulation had significantly more severe ICH (median Glasgow Coma Scale: 10.6, 13.9, and 13.9 among those who resumed never, early, and late, respectively; P=0.0001), higher in-hospital mortality (56.5%, 0%, and 0%, respectively; P<0.0001), and an elevated 30-day AIS risk (HR, 15.9 [95% CI, 1.9-129.7], P=0.0098).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of patients with ICH and mechanical heart valves, there was no difference in 30-day thrombotic and hemorrhagic brain-related outcomes when anticoagulation was resumed within 7 versus 7 to 30 days after ICH. Withholding anticoagulation >30 days was associated with severe baseline ICH, higher in-hospital case fatality, and elevated AIS risk.

Expanding Indications of Nonvitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Beyond Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism: A Review of Emerging Clinical Evidence

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have emerged as a new therapy for patients who need and can tolerate oral anticoagulation. DOACs were initially approved for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and treatment for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Ease of administration, no requirement of bridging with other anticoagulants, and less frequent dosing have made DOACs preferable choice for anticoagulation. Studies are showing promising results regarding use of DOACs beyond the common indications. Studies have been done to show the potential benefit of DOACs in valvular atrial fibrillation, heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease. Data have shown safety as well as comparable bleeding incidences with DOACs compared to vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants. Naturally interest is growing to see the use of DOACs apart from the NVAF, DVT, or PE. Authors have highlighted various study results to show the potential beneficial role of DOACs in the above-mentioned situations.

An Evidence-Based Approach to Anticoagulation Therapy Comparing Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Bioprosthetic Valves: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Network Meta-Analysis

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a newer class of anticoagulants that inhibit factor Xa or factor IIa and include drugs such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, betrixaban, and dabigatran. Although vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been traditionally used to prevent thromboembolic events, DOACs have gained popularity because of their faster onset and offset of action and reduced need for monitoring. This study aimed to provide more data for anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation with bioprosthetic heart valves by incorporating all available trials to date. A search was performed across 5 electronic databases to identify relevant studies. We analyzed the data using a pooled risk ratio for categorical outcomes and used the I2 test to determine heterogeneity. The quality of randomized controlled trials was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, and the National Institutes of Health tool was used for observational studies. Our study included a frequentist network meta-analysis (MA) of the aggregate data to obtain the network estimates for the outcomes of interest. We retrieved 28 studies with a total of 74,660 patients with bioprosthetic heart valves. Our MA significantly showed that DOACs decrease the risk of all-cause bleeding (risk ratio [RR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 to 0.85, p >0.00001), stroke and systemic embolization (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.99, p = 0.03), and intracranial bleeding outcomes (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.86, p = 0.004) compared with VKA. In contrast, there was no significant difference between the compared groups in major bleeding (RR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.02, p = 0.10) and all-cause mortality outcomes (RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.07, p = 0.43), respectively. In addition, the network MA results did not favor any of the studied interventions over each other (p <0.05) regarding all-cause bleeding, mortality, stroke and systemic embolization, and major bleeding outcomes. In conclusion, our study found that DOACs are more effective in reducing the risk of bleeding, stroke, systemic embolism, and intracranial bleeding than VKAs. However, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding, major bleeding, thromboembolic events, and all-cause mortality. In addition, our network MA did not identify any specific DOAC treatment as more favorable than others.

Associations between clinical and social factors and anticoagulant prescription among patients with atrial fibrillation: A retrospective cohort study from a large healthcare system

BACKGROUND

Patient clinical factors and social determinants of health (SDOH) are associated with an increased risk of stroke for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the association between these factors and the management of AF is not well characterized, particularly among those factors commonly collected in electronic health records (EHRs). This study used EHR data to evaluate the associations between patient clinical factors and SDOH and prescribing of an oral anticoagulant (OAC) for stroke prevention in AF.

METHODS

This analysis included adult patients with newly diagnosed AF who had ≥2 encounters in the Advocate Aurora Health system in Wisconsin between May 2016 and May 2021. Patient-level demographics, comorbidities, medications, and SDOH were retrospectively extracted from EHRs. Area deprivation index (ADI) was linked to patient records as a measure of socioeconomic status.

RESULTS

Of 16,656 patients with AF, 10,898 (65.4%) were prescribed an OAC within the first year of diagnosis. Patients were less likely to be prescribed an OAC (relative risk [95% CI]) if they were widowed (0.98 [0.96-0.99] vs single) or had a history of alcoholism (0.86 [0.79-0.95] vs no history). Most patients (53.3%) received prescriptions from a primary care provider. A linear relationship was found between worsening ADI and increased prescriptions for warfarin vs those for direct-acting OACs.

CONCLUSIONS

Although guideline-concordant anticoagulant use remained suboptimal, clinical characteristics were strongly associated for whether a patient with AF would be prescribed an OAC. Disparities in patient care regarding the prescribing of OACs due to SDOH and associated behaviors were small but present, particularly for national ADI.

Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with a left-sided bioprosthetic heart valve: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To compare the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of DOACs versus VKAs in patients with a previously and newly surgically implanted BHV with or without AF. A systematic search on MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed till November 2022. Treatment effects were estimated with relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 2 subgroup analysis from ARISTOTLE and ENGAGE-AF-TIMI 48 and 4 observational studies were included for a total of 5808 patients, 1893 on DOACs and 3915 on VKAs. AF prevalence was 98.28%. In the overall analysis, DOACs vs VKAs were associated with a RR for stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA)/systemic embolism (SE) of 0.63 (95% CI 0.51-0.79; I2 = 0%) and a RR of major bleeding of 0.50 (95% CI 0.39-0.63; I2 = 0%) in a median follow-up of 19 months (IQR 4.5-33.4). In the 3 RCTs (DAWA, RIVER, ENAVLE), DOACs vs VKAs were associated with a RR of stroke/TIA/SE and major bleeding of 0.38 (95% CI 0.13-1.58, I2 = 0%) and of 0.68 (95% CI 0.32-1.44; I2 = 5%) respectively. In patients randomized during the first three months from valve surgery, DOACs vs VKAs were associated with a RR of stroke/TIA/SE and major bleeding of 0.54 (95% CI 0.14-2.08; I2 = 0%) and of 0.76 (95% CI 0.05-10.72; I2 = 66%). In previously implanted BHV patients with AF, DOACs showed a risk-benefit profile at least comparable to VKAs. DOACs showed a similar, even if underpowered, risk-benefit profile during the first three months after BHV implantation prevalently in patients with AF.

A drug utilization study of oral anticoagulants in five representative cities of China between 2015 and 2019

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Oral anticoagulants (OACs), including warfarin and newer direct-acting OACs (DOACs), have been used for decades to prevent thromboembolic diseases. A drug utilization study was performed to determine the prescribing patterns of OACs.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Cooperation Project of Hospital Prescription Analysis in China. A total of 455,490 prescription records from 43 tertiary hospitals in five cities of China (Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Hangzhou and Chengdu) were selected for inclusion. Quarterly trends of defined daily doses (DDDs) and defined daily dose cost (DDDC) from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2019 were calculated.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Warfarin was the most widely used OAC with DDDs between 189,982 and 176,323 from the first quarter (Q1) of 2015 to the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2019, whereas the use of DOACs increased rapidly during this period. DDDs of rivaroxaban increased from 5409 in Q1 of 2015 to 125,800 in Q4 of 2019, whereas the DDDC declined from 160.5 to 45.7. From Q1 of 2018, rivaroxaban became the most prescribed OAC, surpassing warfarin, in patients diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis. In addition, the DDDs of rivaroxaban exceeded those of warfarin in patients diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation since the second quarter (Q2) of 2019. DDDs in outpatients and inpatients increased by 80.6% and 71.4%, respectively, and the DDDC for outpatients in Q4 of 2019 was 6.7-fold higher than that in Q1 of 2015. Among patients of all ages, the DDDs in elderly patients increased from 36.8% in Q1 of 2015 to 59.4% in Q4 of 2019. Moreover, the departments of cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery prescribed the majority of the OACs.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

In this study, we describe OAC prescription patterns in China. DOACs, especially rivaroxaban, contribute to the continuous increase in the use of OACs. In the investigated population of China, outpatients and elderly patients were observed to be administered the highest proportion of DOACs.

Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Valvular Atrial Fibrillation : A Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in place of warfarin, but evidence about their effectiveness and safety in patients with valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) remains limited.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared with warfarin in patients with valvular AF.

DESIGN

New-user retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

SETTING

U.S.-based commercial health care database from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2019.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with valvular AF who were newly prescribed DOACs or warfarin.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary effectiveness outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety outcome was a composite of intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding.

RESULTS

Among a total of 56 336 patients with valvular AF matched on propensity score, use of DOACs (vs. warfarin) was associated with lower risk for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.70]) and major bleeding events (HR, 0.67 [CI, 0.63 to 0.72]). The results for the effectiveness and safety outcomes remained consistent for apixaban (HRs, 0.54 [CI, 0.47 to 0.61] and 0.52 [CI, 0.47 to 0.57], respectively) and rivaroxaban (HRs, 0.74 [CI, 0.64 to 0.86] and 0.87 [CI, 0.79 to 0.96], respectively); with dabigatran, results were consistent for the major bleeding outcome (HR, 0.81 [CI, 0.68 to 0.97]) but not for effectiveness (HR, 1.03 [CI, 0.81 to 1.31]).

LIMITATION

Relatively short follow-up; inability to ascertain disease severity.

CONCLUSION

In this comparative effectiveness study using practice-based claims data, patients with valvular AF who were new users of DOACs had lower risks for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding than new users of warfarin. These data may be used to guide risk-benefit discussions regarding anticoagulant choices for patients with valvular AF.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

None.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Asian Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Consensus Recommendations by the Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology on Strategies for Thrombotic and Bleeding Risk Management

The disease burden of AF is greater in Asia-Pacific than other areas of the world. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as effective alternatives to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for preventing thromboembolic events in patients with AF. The Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology developed this consensus statement to guide physicians in the management of AF in Asian populations. Statements were developed by an expert consensus panel who reviewed the available data from patients in Asia-Pacific. Consensus statements were developed then put to an online vote. The resulting 17 statements provide guidance on the assessment of stroke risk of AF patients in the region, the appropriate use of DOACs in these patients, as well as the concomitant use of DOACs and antiplatelets, and the transition to DOACs from VKAs and vice versa. The periprocedural management of patients on DOAC therapy and the management of patients with bleeding while on DOACs are also discussed.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Can We Compare Direct Oral Anticoagulants to Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Bio-Prosthetic Valves?

Background

There are no clear consensus guidelines on the indications and types of anticoagulation therapies in patients with bio-prosthetic valves either with concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) or sinus rhythm. In our meta-analysis, we assessed the safety and efficacy of DOACs as compared to the standard treatment with warfarin in patients with AF and bioprosthetic valves.

Methods

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies in the English language, and studies reporting patients with valvular heart disease that included bioprosthetic valvular disease. A systematic literature review using Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science was performed using the terms “Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulant,” “Oral Anticoagulants,” “Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant,” “Atrial Fibrillation,” “Bioprosthetic Valve” for literature published prior to January 2021. Extraction of data from included studies was carried out independently by three reviewers from Covidence. We assessed the methodical rigor of the included studies using the modified Downs and Black checklist.

Results

Four RCTs and one observational study (n=1776) were included in our study. A random-effect model using RevMan (version 5.4; The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen) was used for data analysis. The pooled data showed that there was a non-significant reduction in the incidence of stroke and systemic embolism in the patients taking DOACs as compared to warfarin (HR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.29, 1.67; I² = 50%). The incidence of major bleeding was lower in the DOACs group; the difference was statistically significant (HR 0.42; 95% CI, 0.26, 0.67; I² = 7%). The difference was not statistically significant for all-cause mortality in both groups (HR 1.24; 95% CI, 0.91, 1.67; I² = 0%).

Conclusion

Our results showed that there was no difference in the outcomes of stroke and systemic embolism between DOACs and warfarin but there were statistically significantly lower major bleeding events. We conclude that larger clinical trials are needed to assess the true safety and efficacy of DOACs in patients with AF and bioprosthetic valves.

Oral anticoagulant use in patients with atrial fibrillation and mitral valve repair

BACKGROUND

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who have undergone mitral valve repair are at risk for thromboembolic strokes. Prior to 2019, only vitamin K antagonists were recommended for patients with AF who had undergone mitral valve repair despite the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in 2010.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the use of anticoagulants in patients with AF who underwent surgical mitral valve repair (sMVR) or transcatheter mitral valve repair (tMVR).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with AF undergoing sMVR or tMVR between 04/2014 and 12/2018 using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database. We identified anticoagulants prescribed within 90 days of discharge from hospitalization.

RESULTS

Overall, 1997 patients with AF underwent valve repair: 1560 underwent sMVR, and 437 underwent tMVR. The mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc score among all patients was 4.1 (SD 1.9). The overall use of anticoagulation was unchanged between 2014 (72.2%) and 2018 (70.0%) (P = .49). Among patients who underwent sMVR or tMVR between April 2014 and December 2018, the use of VKA therapy decreased from 62.9% to 32.1% (P < .01 for trend) and the use of DOACs increased from 12.4% to 37.3% (P < .01 for trend).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with AF who underwent sMVR or tMVR between 2014 and 2018, roughly 30% of patients were not treated with any anticoagulant within 90 days of discharge, despite an elevated stroke risk in the cohort. The rate of DOAC use increased steadily over the study period but did not significantly increase the rate of overall anticoagulant use in this high-risk cohort.

A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with bioprosthetic mitral valve and atrial fibrillation or flutter: Rationale and design of the RIVER trial

The efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with bioprosthetic mitral valves and atrial fibrillation or flutter remain uncertain. DESIGN: RIVER was an academic-led, multicenter, open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial with blinded outcome adjudication that enrolled 1005 patients from 49 sites in Brazil. Patients with a bioprosthetic mitral valve and atrial fibrillation or flutter were randomly assigned (1:1) to rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (15 mg in those with creatinine clearance <50 mL/min) or dose-adjusted warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2.0-30.); the follow-up period was 12 months. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, transient ischemic attack, major bleeding, valve thrombosis, systemic embolism, or hospitalization for heart failure. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary composite outcome, bleeding events, and venous thromboembolism. SUMMARY: RIVER represents the largest trial specifically designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a direct oral anticoagulant in patients with bioprosthetic mitral valves and atrial fibrillation or flutter. The results of this trial can inform clinical practice and international guidelines.

Clinical Utility and Cost of Inpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography Following Acute Ischemic Stroke

Background and Purpose

It is unclear whether it is clinically necessary or cost-effective to routinely obtain a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) during inpatient admission for ischemic stroke.

Methods

We assessed consecutive patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke at a comprehensive stroke center from 2015 to 2017 who underwent TTE. We assessed for findings on TTE that would warrant urgent intervention including cardiac thrombus, atrial myxoma, mitral stenosis, valve vegetation, valve dysfunction requiring surgery, and low ejection fraction. Subsequent changes in management included changes in anticoagulation, antibiotics, or valve surgery. We calculated in-hospital resource utilization and associated costs for inpatient TTE using individual direct cost details within a case-costing system.

Results

Of 695 patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke, 516 (74%) had a TTE and were included in our analysis. TTE findings were potentially clinically significant in 30 patients (5.8%) and changed management in 17 patients (3.3%). Inpatient admission was prolonged to expedite TTE in 24 patients, while TTE occurred after discharge in 76 patients. After correcting for the cost of TTE, the mean difference in cost to prolong an admission for TTE was $555.52 (USD), or $16 832 per change in management.

Conclusions

Given the low clinical utility of inpatient TTE after acute ischemic stroke and the costs associated with prolonging admission, discharge from hospital should not be delayed solely to obtain TTE.

Antithrombotic Therapy to Prevent Recurrent Strokes in Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease: JACC Scientific Expert Panel

Stroke survivors carry a high risk of recurrence. Antithrombotic medications are paramount for secondary prevention and thus crucial to reduce the overall stroke burden. Appropriate antithrombotic agent selection should be based on the best understanding of the physiopathological mechanism that led to the initial ischemic injury. Antiplatelet therapy is preferred for lesions characterized by atherosclerosis and endothelial injury, whereas anticoagulant agents are favored for cardiogenic embolism and highly thrombophilic conditions. Large randomized controlled trials have provided new data to support recommendations for the evidence-based use of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulant agents after stroke. In this review, the authors cover recent trials that have altered clinical practice, cite systematic reviews and meta-analyses, review evidence-based recommendations based on older landmark trials, and indicate where there are still evidence-gaps and new trials being conducted.

Quality of Warfarin Anticoagulation in Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Australians With Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that suboptimal anticoagulation quality, as measured by time in therapeutic range (TTR), affects a significant percentage of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, TTR has not been previously characterised in Indigenous Australians who experience a greater burden of AF and stroke.

METHOD

Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians with AF on warfarin anticoagulation therapy were identified from a large tertiary referral centre between 1999 and 2012. Time in therapeutic range was calculated as a proportion of daily international normalised ratio (INR) values between 2 and 3 for non-valvular AF and 2.5 to 3.5 for valvular AF. INR values between tests were imputed using the Rosendaal technique. Linear regression models were employed to characterise predictors of TTR.

RESULTS

Five hundred and twelve (512) patients with AF on warfarin were included (88 Indigenous and 424 non-Indigenous). Despite younger age (51±13 vs 71±12 years, p<0.001), Indigenous Australians had greater valvular heart disease, diabetes, and alcohol excess compared to non-Indigenous Australians (p<0.05 for all). Time in therapeutic range was significantly lower in Indigenous compared to non-Indigenous Australians (40±29 vs 50±31%, p=0.006). Univariate predictors of poorer TTR included Indigenous ethnicity, younger age, diuretic use, and comorbidities, such as valvular heart disease, heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p<0.05 for all). Valvular heart disease remained a significant predictor of poorer TTR in multivariate analyses (p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

Indigenous Australians experience particularly poor warfarin anticoagulation quality. Our data also suggest that many non-Indigenous Australians spend suboptimal time in therapeutic range. These findings reinforce the importance of monitoring warfarin anticoagulation quality to minimise stroke risk.

Review of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Guide for Effective Drug Utilization

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been developed as a viable and in some cases superior alternative to warfarin. These agents have overcome some of the limitations of warfarin, which has a narrow therapeutic window and many food and drug interactions. DOACs have been demonstrated to have a more predictable and reliable pharmacology and, unlike warfarin, do not require frequent monitoring of anticoagulant effect. For these reasons, the use of DOACs is increasing. Despite the many positive attributes of these agents, limitations and contraindications do exist. An understanding of the pharmacology, indications, and contraindications is therefore crucial for effective patient management. We review the available agents to aid in effective drug utilization.

Does an imbalance in circulating vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) cause atrial fibrillation in patients with valvular heart disease?

Background

The pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) can stimulate fibrosis within the atrium and ventricle. We hypothesized that there is a relationship between the serum VEGFs/soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (sVEGFRs) levels and AF in patients with valvular heart disease (VHD). This provides a new paradigm for studying AF.

Methods

The plasma levels of VEGF-A, VEGF-C, sVEGFR-1 and sVEGFR-2 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). A total of 100 people, consisting of AF patients (long-standing, persistent AF; n=49), sinus rhythm (SR) patients (n=31) and healthy controls (n=20), were included in this study.

Results

The plasma levels of VEGF-A were significantly higher in AF patients compared to healthy control (P<0.05). The plasma levels of sVEGFR-1 were significantly higher in AF compared to SR (P<0.05). The plasma levels of sVEGFR-2 were significantly lower in AF patients compared to SR patients and healthy controls (both P<0.05). There was a significant and negative correlation between AF and the sVEGFR-2 levels in the groups (r=-0.432, P=0.000).

Conclusions

An imbalance in VEGFs and sVEGFRs may contribute to AF by breaking the balance of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Additionally, sVEGFR-2 may be an important biomarker of AF.

Influence of warfarin on cardiac and cerebrovascular events following bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: A nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The need for anticoagulation treatment following bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement remains controversial. We investigated the associations of warfarin treatment with the risks of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, including mortality, bleeding incidents, and reoperation requirement after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement surgery.

METHODS

We identified 1086 patients who received first bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement between 2001 and 2010 using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Database. Patients were excluded for prior use of warfarin, warfarin use for >3 months, dual valve procedures, prior valve surgeries, or concomitant surgeries. Enrolled patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether they were warfarin-naïve or received warfarin for <3 months postsurgery. After propensity score matching, 282 patients not receiving warfarin were matched to 282 patients receiving warfarin for <3 months. Patients were followed-up for minimum 36 months.

RESULTS

Patients receiving warfarin were younger and showed less frequent kidney disease than those who did not use warfarin. The warfarin group demonstrated a gross decrease in major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Patients receiving warfarin for <30 days were at an even lower risk for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events than those treated for ≥30 days. No significant difference in bleeding or reoperation risk was observed between warfarin users and warfarin nonusers. Similar findings remained after propensity-score matching but the benefit of short-term warfarin use diminished in a younger population.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term use of postoperative warfarin (especially <30 days) following bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement may be associated with a reduction in MACCE compared with nonuse.

Follow-up and management of valvular heart disease patients with prosthetic valve: a clinical practice guideline for Indian scenario

PURPOSE

Valvular heart disease (VHD) patients after prosthetic valve implantation are at risk of thromboembolic events. Follow-up care of patients with prosthetic valve has a paramount role in reducing the morbidity and mortality. Currently, in India, there is quintessential need to stream line the follow-up care of prosthetic valve patients. This mandates the development of a consensus guideline for the antithrombotic therapy in VHD patients post prosthetic valve implantation.

METHODS

A national level panel was constituted comprising 13 leading cardio care experts in India who thoroughly reviewed the up to date literature, formulated the recommendations, and developed the consensus document. Later on, extensive discussions were held on this draft and the recommendations in 8 regional meetings involving 79 additional experts from the cardio care in India, to arrive at a consensus. The final consensus document is developed relying on the available evidence and/or majority consensus from all the meetings.

RESULTS

The panel recommended vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy with individualized target international normalized ratio (INR) in VHD patients after prosthetic valve implantation. The panel opined that management of prosthetic valve complications should be personalized on the basis of type of complications. In addition, the panel recommends to distinguish individuals with various co-morbidities and attend them appropriately.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulant therapy with VKA seems to be an effective option post prosthetic valve implantation in VHD patients. However, the role for non-VKA oral therapy in prosthetic valve patients and the safety and efficacy of novel oral anticoagulants in patients with bioprosthetic valve need to be studied extensively.

Effects of a reminder to initiate oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter discharged from the emergency department: REMINDER study

CLINICIAN’S CAPSULE

What is known about the topic?

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) reduces stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter; however, initiation rates in patients discharged from the ED are low.

What did this study ask?

Can a simple quality improvement intervention increase the initiation of appropriate OAC in the ED?

What did this study find?

The rate of OAC initiation was increased by 8.5%.

Why does this study matter to clinicians?

This simple intervention is transferrable and therefore can improve patient care.

Impact of incorporating ABCB1 and CYP4F2 polymorphisms in a pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin dosing algorithm for the Brazilian population

PURPOSE

Interpatient variation of warfarin dose requirements may be explained by genetic variations and general and clinical factors. In this scenario, diverse population-calibrated dosing algorithms, which incorporate the main warfarin dosing influencers, have been widely proposed for predicting supposed warfarin maintenance dose, in order to prevent and reduce adverse events. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of the inclusion of ABCB1 c.3435C>T and CYP4F2 c.1297G>A polymorphisms as additional covariates in a previously developed pharmacogenetic-based warfarin dosing algorithm calibrated for the Brazilian population.

METHODS

Two independent cohorts of patients treated with warfarin (n = 832 and n = 133) were included for derivation and replication of the algorithm, respectively. Genotyping of ABCB1 c.3435C>T and CYP4F2 c.1297G>A polymorphisms was performed by polymerase chain reaction followed by melting curve analysis and TaqMan® assay, respectively. A multiple linear regression was performed for the warfarin stable doses as a dependent variable, considering clinical, general, and genetic data as covariates.

RESULTS

The inclusion of ABCB1 and CYP4F2 polymorphisms was able to improve the algorithm's coefficient of determination (R²) by 2.6%. In addition, the partial determination coefficients of these variants revealed that they explained 3.6% of the warfarin dose variability. We also observed a marginal improvement of the linear correlation between observed and predicted doses (from 59.7 to 61.4%).

CONCLUSION

Although our study indicates that the contribution of the combined ABCB1 and CYP4F2 genotypes in explaining the overall variability in warfarin dose is not very large, we demonstrated that these pharmacogenomic data are statistically significant. However, the clinical relevance and cost-effective impact of incorporating additional variants in warfarin dosing algorithms should be carefully evaluated.

Genotype-guided warfarin therapy: current status

Warfarin pharmacogenomics has been an extensively studied field in the last decades as it is focused on personalized therapy to overcome the wide interpatient warfarin response variability and decrease the risk of side effects. In this expert review, besides briefly summarizing the current knowledge about warfarin pharmacogenetics, we also present an overview of recent studies that aimed to assess the efficacy, safety and economic issues related to genotype-based dosing algorithms used to guide warfarin therapy, including randomized and controlled clinical trials, meta-analyses and cost-effectiveness studies. To date, the findings still present disparities, mostly because of standard limitations. Thus, further studies should be encouraged to try to demonstrate the benefits of the application of warfarin pharmacogenomic dosing algorithms in clinical practice.

Adherence to Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: An Australian Survey

Background:

The aim of this study was to investigate the proportion of patients who have suboptimal adherence to oral anticoagulant (OAC), identify the predictors of adherence, and determine whether patient-related factors vary across adherence levels in Australia.

Methods:

Respondents were recruited for an online survey using Facebook. Survey instruments included the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, the Anticoagulation Knowledge Tool, the Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaires, and a modified Cancer Information Overload scale. Predictors of medication adherence were identified using ordinal regression analysis.

Results:

Of the 386 responses eligible for analysis, only 54.9% reported a high level of adherence. Participants aged 65 years or younger were less likely to have high adherence compared to older participants (odds ratio [OR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.88; P = .013), while females were more likely to be highly adherent compared to males (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.08-2.64; P = .023). The analyses showed that age, gender, treatment satisfaction, information overload, concerns about making mistake when taking OACs, and cost of medication were significant predictors of adherence.

Conclusion:

Self-reported suboptimal adherence to OAC is common among patients with atrial fibrillation. A focus on supporting people who are at higher risk of suboptimal adherence is needed to maximize the benefit of OAC therapy in this population.

Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis while on a Novel Oral Anticoagulant for Atrial Fibrillation

•

BPVT occurred while on a DOAC for treatment of AF.

•

Echocardiographic and pathologic images of BPVT are shown.

•

The definition of NVAF is not uniform in clinical trials or guidelines.

•

The optimal anticoagulation strategy for BPV and AF is unclear.

•

Caution is advised in using DOACs for AF in patients with BPVs.

The Use of Idarucizumab for Dabigatran Reversal in Clinical Practice: A Case Series

PURPOSE

To describe the use of idarucizumab (Praxbind, Boehringer Ingelheim) in routine clinical practice at a large urban academic medical center.

SUMMARY

Seven total doses of idarucizumab were administered to six unique patients from October 31, 2015, to October 31, 2016. The reversal agent was used in conjunction with local bleeding control measures, blood product transfusions, and acid-suppressive therapy. In 86% of cases, idarucizumab administration resulted in a successful cessation of bleeding by clinical assessment. Two patients expired due to coexisting conditions. Idarucizumab was administered to patients with normal baseline coagulation tests in 43% of cases. No adverse reactions related to idarucizumab were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Idarucizumab administration resulted in successful resolution of bleeding by clinical assessment. The therapy for acute bleeding with use of dabigatran (Pradaxa, Boehringer Ingelheim) remains supportive care, in addition to idarucizumab in cases of severe or uncontrolled bleeding. Development of institution-specific protocols and better guidance for using baseline coagulation tests are needed.

Clinical Prediction Model for Time in Therapeutic Range While on Warfarin in Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Though warfarin has historically been the primary oral anticoagulant for stroke prevention in newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF), several new direct oral anticoagulants may be preferred when anticoagulation control with warfarin is expected to be poor. This study developed a prediction model for time in therapeutic range (TTR) among newly diagnosed AF patients on newly initiated warfarin as a tool to assist decision making between warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants.

Methods and Results

This electronic medical record–based, retrospective study included newly diagnosed, nonvalvular AF patients with no recent warfarin exposure receiving primary care services through a large healthcare system in rural Pennsylvania. TTR was estimated as the percentage of time international normalized ratio measurements were between 2.0 and 3.0 during the first year following warfarin initiation. Candidate predictors of TTR were chosen from data elements collected during usual clinical care. A TTR prediction model was developed and temporally validated and its predictive performance was compared with the SAMe‐TT₂R₂ score (sex, age, medical history, treatment, tobacco, race) using R² and c‐statistics. A total of 7877 newly diagnosed AF patients met study inclusion criteria. Median (interquartile range) TTR within the first year of starting warfarin was 51% (32, 67). Of 85 candidate predictors evaluated, 15 were included in the final validated model with an R² of 15.4%. The proposed model showed better predictive performance than the SAMe‐TT₂R₂ score (R²=3.0%).

Conclusions

The proposed prediction model may assist decision making on the proper mode of oral anticoagulant among newly diagnosed AF patients. However, predicting TTR on warfarin remains challenging.

Effects of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The original non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) trials in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) enrolled patients with native valve pathologies. The object of this study was to quantify the benefit-risk profiles of NOACs versus warfarin in AF patients with native valvular heart disease (VHD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Trials were identified by exhaustive literature search. Trial data were combined using inverse variance weighting to produce a meta-analytic summary hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of efficacy and safety of NOACs versus warfarin. Our final analysis included 4 randomized controlled trials that enrolled 71 526 participants, including 13 574 with VHD. Pooling results from included trials showed that NOACs versus warfarin reduced stroke or systemic embolism (HR: 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.82) and intracranial hemorrhage (HR: 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24-0.92) in AF patients with VHD. However, risk reduction of major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage was driven by apixaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran (HR for major bleeding: 0.79 [95% CI, 0.69-0.91]; HR for intracranial hemorrhage: 0.33 [95% CI, 0.25-0.45]) but not rivaroxaban (HR for major bleeding: 1.56 [95% CI, 1.20-2.04]; HR for intracranial hemorrhage: 1.27 [95% CI, 0.77-2.10]).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with AF and native VHD, NOACs reduce stroke and systemic embolism compared with warfarin. Evidence shows that apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban also reduce bleeding in this patient subgroup, whereas major bleeding (but not intracranial hemorrhage or mortality rate) is significantly increased in VHD patients treated with rivaroxaban. NOACs are a reasonable alternative to warfarin in AF patients with VHD.

Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with cervical artery dissection and cerebral venous thrombosis. A case series and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

To date, very little is known about the effects of direct oral anticoagulants (DOA) use in patients with cervical artery dissection (CAD) and cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). We present our initial experience with the use of DOA for CAD and CVT and an overview of the published literature.

METHODS

From our database, we identified 4 patients who received DOA after CAD and 4 patients after CVT. Also, we analyzed the data reported for 45 patients who received DOA after CAD and 23 after CVT from review of the literature.

RESULTS

Among patients with CAD, resolved or improved arterial stenosis was noted in 27 (55%), and symptomatic recurrent ischemic stroke in 2 (4%). Among patients with CVT, complete or partial recanalization was noted in 25 (90%), and no significant functional disability in 26 (93%). No patient developed intracranial hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

Although no statistical conclusions can be drawn from these data, DOA could be an alternative in patients with CAD-related embolic infarct and CVT-related hemorrhagic venous infarct. A large-scale clinical trial will be needed to validate these results.

Restarting Anticoagulant Therapy After Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The safety and efficacy of restarting anticoagulation therapy after intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) remain unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the associations of anticoagulation resumption with the subsequent risk of ICH recurrence and thromboembolism.

METHODS

We searched published medical literature to identify cohort studies involving adults with anticoagulation-associated ICH. Our predictor variable was resumption of anticoagulation. Outcome measures were thromboembolic events (stroke and myocardial infarction) and recurrence of ICH. After assessing study heterogeneity and publication bias, we performed a meta-analysis using random-effects models to assess the strength of association between anticoagulation resumption and our outcomes.

RESULTS

Eight studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis, with 5306 ICH patients. Almost all studies evaluated anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists. Reinitiation of anticoagulation was associated with a significantly lower risk of thromboembolic complications (pooled relative risk, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.45; Q=5.12, P for heterogeneity=0.28). There was no evidence of increased risk of recurrent ICH after reinstatement of anticoagulation therapy, although there was significant heterogeneity among included studies (pooled relative risk, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.77; Q=24.68, P for heterogeneity <0.001). No significant publication bias was detected in our analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In observational studies, reinstitution of anticoagulation after ICH was associated with a lower risk of thromboembolic complications and a similar risk of ICH recurrence. Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the true risk-benefit profile of anticoagulation resumption after ICH.

Impact of valvular heart disease on oral anticoagulant therapy in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: results from the RAMSES study

The definition of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is controversial. We aimed to assess the impact of valvular heart disease on stroke prevention strategies in NVAF patients. The RAMSES study was a multicenter and cross-sectional study conducted on NVAF patients (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02344901). The study population was divided into patients with significant valvular disease (SVD) and non-significant valvular disease (NSVD), whether they had at least one moderate valvular disease or not. Patients with a mechanical prosthetic valve and mitral stenosis were excluded. Baseline characteristics and oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapies were compared. In 5987 patients with NVAF, there were 3929 (66%) NSVD and 2058 (34%) SVD patients. The predominant valvular disease was mitral regurgitation (58.1%), followed by aortic regurgitation (24.1%) and aortic stenosis (17.8%). Patients with SVD had higher CHA₂DS₂VASc [3.0 (2.0; 4.0) vs. 4.0 (2.0; 5.0), p < 0.001] and HAS-BLED [2.0 (1.0; 2.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0; 2.0), p = 0.004] scores compared to patients with NSVD. Overall, 2763 (71.2%) of NSVD and 1515 (73.8%) of SVD patients were on OAC therapy (p = 0.035). When the patients with SVD were analyzed separately, the mean CHA₂DS₂VASc and HAS-BLED scores were higher in patients with mitral regurgitation compared to patients with aortic regurgitation and aortic stenosis [4.0 (3.0; 5.0), 3.0 (2.0; 4.0), 3.0 (2.0; 4.0) p < 0.001 and 2.0 (1.0; 3.0), 1.0 (1.0; 2.0), 1.0 (0.0; 2.0) p < 0.001, respectively]. In patients with SVD, 65.7% of mitral regurgitation, 82.6% of aortic regurgitation and 88.0% of aortic stenosis patients were on OAC therapy. One out of three NVAF patients had at least one moderate valvular heart disease with the predominance of mitral regurgitation. Patients with SVD were at greater risk of stroke and bleeding compared to patients with NSVD. Although patients with mitral regurgitation should be given more aggressive anticoagulant therapy due to their higher risk of stroke, they are undertreated compared to patients with aortic valve diseases.

VKORC1 and CYP2C9 polymorphisms related to adverse events in case-control cohort of anticoagulated patients

Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are highly effective but have a narrow therapeutic index and require routine monitoring of the INR. The primary aim of pharmacogenetics (PGx) is to optimize patient care, achieving drug treatments that are personalized according to the genetic profile of each patient. The best-characterized genes involved in VKA PGx involve pharmacokinetics (VKORC1) and pharmacodynamics (CYP2C9) of VKA metabolism. The role of these genes in clinical outcomes (bleeding and thrombosis) during oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy is controversial. The aim of the present study was to evaluate any potential association between genotype VKORC1 and CYP2C9 and adverse events (hemorrhagic and/or thrombotic), during initiation and long-term VKA treatment, in Caucasian patients. Furthermore, we aimed to determine if the concomitant prescription of other selected drugs affected the association between genotype and adverse events.We performed a retrospective, matched case-control study to determine associations between multiple gene variants, drug intake, and any major adverse effects in anticoagulated patients, monitored in 2 Italian anticoagulation clinics.Our results show that anticoagulated patients have a high risk of adverse events if they are carriers of 1 or more genetic polymorphisms in the VKORC1 (rs9923231) and CYP2C9 (rs1799853 and rs1057910) genes.Information on CYP2C9 and VKORC1 variants may be useful to identify individualized oral anticoagulant treatment for each patient, improve management and quality of VKA anticoagulation control, and monitor drug surveillance in pharmacovigilance programs.

Apixaban-Induced Resolution of A Massive Left Atrial and Appendage Thrombosis in a Very Elderly Patient

A 86-year-old woman with first diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent mitral valve annuloplasty 10 years before was admitted to our Unit due to congestive heart failure. Trans-thoracic echocardiogram (TTE) revealed a large fluctuant echogenic mass in the posterior wall of the left atrium. Trans-esophageal echo (TEE) showed the origin of the mass within the left atrial appendage. An adjusted dose of the novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) apixaban, was prescribed. A complete disappearance was appreciated by examination at 12 weeks after the first drug administration. Although apixaban, resulted superior to warfarin in preventing stroke and thrombo-embolic events in patients with non valvular AF, while causing less bleeding, few data are actually available regarding the efficacy and safety of this drug in left atrium and appendage thrombosis management. Our report shows that this NOAC could be a simple and useful option to manage huge atrial thrombosis in very elderly patients.