Myocardial Strain and Association With Clinical Outcomes in Danon Disease: A Model for Monitoring Progression of Genetic Cardiomyopathies

Echocardiography to Assess Cardiac Structure and Function in Genetic Cardiomyopathies

Rodents are the most common experimental models used in cardiovascular research including studies of genetic cardiomyopathies. Genetic cardiomyopathies are characterized by changes in cardiac structure and function. Echocardiography allows for relatively inexpensive, non-invasive, reliable, and reproducible assessment of these changes. However, the fast heart and small size present unique challenges for investigators. To ensure accuracy and reproducibility of these measurements, investigators need to be familiar with standard practices in the field, normal values, and potential pitfalls. The goal of this chapter is to describe steps needed for reliable acquisition and analysis of echocardiography in rodent models. Additionally, we discuss some common pitfalls and challenges.

The Genetic Evaluation of Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a common cause of heart failure and is the primary indication for heart transplantation. A genetic etiology can be found in 20-35% of patients with DCM, especially in those with a family history of cardiomyopathy or sudden cardiac death at an early age. With advancements in genome sequencing, the understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships in DCM has expanded with over 60 genes implicated in the disease. Subsequently, these findings have increased adoption of genetic testing in the management of DCM, which has allowed for improved risk stratification and identification of at risk family members. In this review, we discuss the genetic evaluation of DCM with a focus on practical genetic testing considerations, genotype-phenotype associations, and insights into upcoming personalized therapies.

How Often Does Apical Sparing of Longitudinal Strain Indicate the Presence of Cardiac Amyloidosis?

Echocardiographic diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is frequently suggested by the presence of a left ventricular (LV) apical sparing pattern (ASP) on longitudinal strain (LS) assessment, the so-called "cherry on top" pattern, defined by strain magnitude preserved exclusively at the apex. However, it is unclear how frequently this strain pattern truly represents CA. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of ASP in the diagnosis of CA. We retrospectively identified consecutive adult patients who had the following studies performed within an 18-month period: (1) transthoracic echocardiogram and (2) either (a) cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, (b) Technetium-Pyrophosphate (PYP) imaging, or (c) endomyocardial biopsy. LS was retrospectively measured in the apical 4-, 3-, and 2-chamber views in patients who had adequate noncontrast images (n = 466). An apical sparing ratio (ASR) was calculated as (average apical strain)/[(average basal strain) + (average midventricular strain)]. Patients with ASR ≥1 were evaluated for the presence/absence of CA, using established criteria. Basic LV parameters were also measured. A total of 33 patients (7.1%) had ASP. Nine of these patients (27%) had "confirmed" CA, 2 (6.1%) "highly probable" CA, 1 (3.0%) "possible" CA, and 21 (64%) no evidence of CA. When comparing patients with and without confirmed CA, there were no significant differences in ASR, average global LS, ejection fraction, or LV mass. Patients with confirmed CA were older (76 ± 9 vs 59 ± 18 years, p = 0.01) and had thicker posterior wall (15 ± 3 vs 11 ± 3 mm, p = 0.004) with a trend toward thicker septal wall (15 ± 2 vs 12 ± 4 mm, p = 0.05). In conclusion, the presence of ASP on LS represents confirmed or highly probable CA in only 1/3 of patients and is more likely to indicate true CA in older patients with increased LV wall thickness. Although a larger, prospective study is needed to confirm these findings, 1/3 should be considered as a large diagnostic yield that justifies further testing, given the poor outcomes associated with CA diagnosis.

Beyond Sarcomeric Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: How to Diagnose and Manage Phenocopies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We describe the most common phenocopies of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, their pathogenesis, and clinical presentation highlighting similarities and differences. We also suggest a step-by-step diagnostic work-up that can guide in differential diagnosis and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last years, a wider application of genetic testing and the advances in cardiac imaging have significantly changed the diagnostic approach to HCM phenocopies. Different prognosis and management, with an increasing availability of disease-specific therapies, make differential diagnosis mandatory. The HCM phenotype can be the cardiac manifestation of different inherited and acquired disorders presenting different etiology, prognosis, and treatment. Differential diagnosis requires a cardiomyopathic mindset allowing to recognize red flags throughout the diagnostic work-up starting from clinical and family history and ending with advanced imaging and genetic testing. Different prognosis and management, with an increasing availability of disease-specific therapies make differential diagnosis mandatory.

Arrhythmias as Presentation of Genetic Cardiomyopathy

There is increasing evidence regarding the prevalence of genetic cardiomyopathies, for which arrhythmias may be the first presentation. Ventricular and atrial arrhythmias presenting in the absence of known myocardial disease are often labelled as idiopathic, or lone. While ventricular arrhythmias are well-recognized as presentation for arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy in the right ventricle, the scope of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy has broadened to include those with dominant left ventricular involvement, usually with a phenotype of dilated cardiomyopathy. In addition, careful evaluation for genetic cardiomyopathy is also warranted for patients presenting with frequent premature ventricular contractions, conduction system disease, and early onset atrial fibrillation, in which most detected genes are in the cardiomyopathy panels. Sudden death can occur early in the course of these genetic cardiomyopathies, for which risk is not adequately tracked by left ventricular ejection fraction. Only a few of the cardiomyopathy genotypes implicated in early sudden death are recognized in current indications for implantable cardioverter defibrillators which otherwise rely upon a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤0.35 in dilated cardiomyopathy. The genetic diagnoses impact other aspects of clinical management such as exercise prescription and pharmacological therapy of arrhythmias, and new therapies are coming into clinical investigation for specific genetic cardiomyopathies. The expansion of available genetic information and implications raises new challenges for genetic counseling, particularly with the family member who has no evidence of a cardiomyopathy phenotype and may face a potentially negative impact of a genetic diagnosis. Discussions of risk for both probands and relatives need to be tailored to their numeric literacy during shared decision-making. For patients presenting with arrhythmias or cardiomyopathy, extension of genetic testing and its implications will enable cascade screening, intervention to change the trajectory for specific genotype-phenotype profiles, and enable further development and evaluation of emerging targeted therapies.