Optimal Duration of Aspirin Plus Clopidogrel After Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

Early dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with minor ischemic stroke after intravenous thrombolysis

OBJECTIVES

Minor stroke is defined by a score of 5 or less on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Prior trials have shown efficacy of short term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in secondary prevention of stroke among patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor ischemic stroke, but no randomized clinical trials have studied this benefit after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Our aim was to investigate the safety of DAPT within 90 days after IVT in patients with acute minor ischemic stroke.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed medical records of patients older than 18 years that received IVT between January 2015 and December 2022. Patients had a diagnosis of acute minor stroke or averted stroke (complete recovery and negative image on follow-up). Single or dual antiplatelet treatment was started 24 hours after thrombolysis according to the physician's judgment. Patients were divided in two groups: single and dual antiplatelet therapy. We assessed clinical outcome using the modified Rankin scale (mRS), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and mortality at 90 days.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients met the inclusion criteria, 68% men aged 64±16,5 years. Seventy five percent had an ischemic stroke and 25% had an averted stroke. Median door-to-needle time was 50 minutes. Fifty one percent were in the single antiplatelet group and 49% in the dual antiplatelet therapy group. There were no differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between groups. The 90-day mRS did not show significant difference between groups. No patients had SICH nor died during follow-up. One patient in the single antiplatelet group had stroke recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual antiplatelet therapy after IVT with rtPA for acute minor ischemic stroke appears not to increase the risk of bleeding and mortality compared to single antiplatelet therapy in the first three months after the event. This is the first study to assess this subject in a Latin American population.

Effects of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared to single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) in patients with traumatic brain injury

Japan is one of the world's most aging societies and the number of elderly patients taking antithrombotic drugs is increasing. In recent years, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), in which two antiplatelet drugs are administered, has become common in anticipation of its high therapeutic efficacy. However, there are concerns about increased bleeding complications in use of DAPT. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate the effects of DAPT in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). A prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted from December 2019 to May 2021 to examine the effects of antithrombotic drugs and reversal drugs in 721 elderly patients with TBI. In the current study, the effect of DAPT on TBI was examined in a secondary analysis. Among the registered patients, 132 patients taking antiplatelet drugs only were divided into those treated with single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) (n=106) and those treated with DAPT (n=26) prior to TBI. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on admission, pupillary findings, course during hospitalization, and outcome were compared in the two groups. A similar analysis was performed in patients with a mild GCS of 13-15 (n=95) and a moderate to severe GCS of 3-12 (n=37) on admission. The DAPT group had significantly more males (67.0 % vs. 96.2 %), a higher severity of illness on admission, and a higher frequency of brain herniation findings on head CT (21.7 % vs. 46.2 %), resulting in significantly higher mortality (12.3 % vs. 30.8 %). The only significant factor for mortality was severity on admission. The rate of DAPT was significantly higher in patients with a moderate to severe GCS on admission, and DAPT was the only significant factor related to severity on admission. These findings suggest that the severity of injury on admission influences the outcome six months after injury, and that patients with more severe TBI on admission are more likely to have been treated with DAPT compared to SAPT.

Understanding Antithrombotic Agents for Rehabilitation Therapy: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

In rehabilitation medicine, attention must be paid to the medication. Among them, antithrombotic drugs are used for the initial treatment and secondary prevention of stroke, so as a basic knowledge, the pharmacological actions, characteristics, indications, and precautions for the use of antithrombotic drugs should be known. Antithrombotic agents are divided into antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, and the appropriate antithrombotic agent is selected according to the main disease or condition. Antiplatelet agents include aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, prasugrel, ticagrelor, and cilostazol. Each antiplatelet agent has a different mechanism of action, characteristics, and indications, and should be prescribed with due consideration. Anticoagulants include heparin, synthetic Xa inhibitors, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), synthetic antithrombin agents, and warfarin. Knowledge of the mechanism of action, characteristics, and indications of each anticoagulant is necessary, as well as monitoring and dose adjustment. With regard to ischemic cerebrovascular disease (ICD) and antithrombotic agents, the first step is to classify cerebral infarction and to determine whether antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants should be used. Bleeding and recurrence prevention are important considerations in the selection of appropriate antithrombotic agents for the pathophysiology of ICD.

Cilostazol-based dual antiplatelet treatment in ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack patients with asymptomatic carotid artery disease: a propensity score matching analysis

Background

The optimal treatment for asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid artery disease remains controversial. Data on the efficacy of antiplatelet agents and stroke outcomes are limited. This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of cilostazol-based dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and asymptomatic carotid artery disease.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary-care setting and included baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of participants. The study included patients who had experienced first-ever ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis, with a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis refers to stenosis in patients without neurological symptoms referable to the carotid arteries. Propensity scores were estimated using a logistic regression model based on participants' baseline characteristics. The efficacy outcome was the composite outcome of recurrent ischemic events and vascular-related death in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. The safety outcome was the occurrence of hemorrhagic complications such as intracranial hemorrhages or extracranial hemorrhages. The effectiveness of dual therapy compared to monotherapy was evaluated at various time points following the initiation of antiplatelet treatment.

Results

This study included 516 patients with a 1-year follow-up period. At 1 year, composite events occurred in 10 (6.3%) patients in the dual antiplatelet group compared with 12 (7.6%) in the single antiplatelet group (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61-0.90; p = 0.024). Extracranial hemorrhage occurred in 12 (7.6%) patients in the dual antiplatelet group compared with nine (5.7%) in the single antiplatelet group (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.13-1.48; p = 0.017). No intracranial hemorrhages were observed in this cohort.

Conclusion

Patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis who received cilostazol-based dual antiplatelet therapy had a lower risk of composite events but a higher risk of minor extracranial hemorrhage than those who received a single antiplatelet agent.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for the Acute Management and Long-term Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack, An Updated Review

To improve the efficacy over antiplatelet monotherapy, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has been increasingly adopted in the management of non-cardioembolic stroke. For minor ischemic stroke and high-risk transient ischemic attack, the aspirin-clopidogrel combination is now recommended for acute short-term treatment, whereas aspirin-ticagrelor combination may be considered in selected patients, especially those with resistance to clopidogrel. For long-term stroke prevention, aspirin-dipyridamole combination has been used as an alternative to antiplatelet monotherapy, and aspirin or clopidogrel combined with cilostazole may be prescribed for added protection in high-risk patients. In this paper, we review the development of DAPT from a historical perspective and describe the findings from major clinical trials published up until the end of 2023. Using the 2021 American Heart Association guideline for secondary stroke prevention as a basis for our recommendations, we further discuss areas of controversy and more recent developments to provide an updated review for clinicians to consider in their daily practice.

Antithrombotic therapy for secondary prevention in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: A multiple treatment network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

As stroke represents one of the leading causes of mortality and disability worldwide, we aimed to determine the preventive effect of different antiplatelet therapies after an ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.

Methods

Network meta-analysis evaluating antiplatelet regimes after an ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases until Nov. 23, 2021, for randomized controlled trials. Direct comparisons within trials were combined with indirect evidence from other trials by using a frequentist model. An additive network meta-analysis model was used to evaluate the influence of individual components. The primary efficacy endpoint was a recurrent stroke, the main safety outcomes were the risk of major bleeding and mortality at the longest available follow-up.

Results

58 randomized controlled trials (175,730 patients) were analyzed. The analysis involved 20 antithrombotic strategies including different antiplatelet agents, combinations with aspirin, and anticoagulant therapies. Cilostazol proved to be the most efficacious in reducing stroke recurrence and the risk of bleeding (RR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.55–0.80 and RR = 0.39, 95%CI = 0.08–2.01) compared to aspirin, respectively. Intensification with combinations of aspirin with ticagrelor or clopidogrel resulted in a lower risk of stroke recurrence (RR = 0.79, 95%CI = 0.67–0.93 and RR = 0.79, 95%CI = 0.72–0.87) but carried a higher bleeding risk (RR = 3.01, 95%CI = 1.65–5.49 and RR = 1.78 95%CI = 1.49–2.13).

Conclusion

The prognosis of patients with an ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack is improved with antiplatelets. Cilostazol showed the best risk-benefit characteristics without trade-off with the risk of major bleeding. Improved stroke recurrence with intensified antiplatelet regimens is counterbalanced with higher bleeding risk, and consequently, mortality remains unaffected. Treatment decisions in stroke survivals should integrate the assessment of bleeding risk for better identification of patients with the highest benefit of treatment intensification.

Systematic review registration

Prospero registration number: CRD42020197143, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=197143.

Recent advances in the management of transient ischemic attacks

Transient ischemic attack (TIA) constitutes an important clinical condition, indicating the presence of considerable risk for a subsequent ischemic stroke. Its prompt diagnosis and management have the potential for reducing the risk of neurologic disability, highlighting the critical need to prioritize the care of patients with TIA. The risk of ischemic stroke following a TIA is directly related to its etiopathogenesis, and recognizable causes are commonly categorized within one of three domains: cerebrovascular pathology, cardiac dysfunction, and hematologic disorders. Therefore, the clinical approach to patients suspected of having suffered a TIA demands a comprehensive evaluation, including testing of possible etiologic conditions in all three of these domains, best carried out in an expedited fashion since the stroke risk is greatest in the hours and days that follow the index event. The present is a review of the existing literature addressing the diagnosis, evaluation, prioritization, and management strategies available to clinicians who provide care to patients with TIA.

Time Course for Benefit and Risk of Ticagrelor and Aspirin in Acute Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the short-term time course benefit and risk of ticagrelor with aspirin in acute mild-moderate ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) in the THALES (The Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Treated with Ticagrelor and ASA for Prevention of Stroke and Death) trial.

METHODS

In an exploratory analysis of the THALES trial, we evaluated the cumulative incidence of irreversible efficacy and safety outcomes at different timepoints during the 30-day treatment period. The efficacy outcome was major ischemic events defined as a composite of ischemic stroke or non-hemorrhagic death. The safety outcome was major hemorrhage defined as a composite of intracranial hemorrhage and fatal bleedings. Net clinical impact was defined as the combination of these two endpoints.

RESULTS

This analysis included a total of 11,016 patients (5523 in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and 5493 in the aspirin group) with mean age of 65 years, and 39% were women. The reduction of major ischemic events by ticagrelor occurred in the first week (4.1% vs 5.3%; absolute risk reduction 1.15%, 95% CI 0.36% to 1.94%), and remained throughout the 30-day treatment period. An increase in major hemorrhage was seen during the first week and remained relatively constant in the following weeks (absolute risk increase, approximately 0.3%). Cumulative analysis showed that the net clinical impact favored ticagrelor-aspirin in the first week (absolute risk reduction 0.97%, 95% CI, 0.17% to 1.77%) and remained constant throughout the 30 days.

DISCUSSION

In patients with mild-moderate ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA, the treatment effect of ticagrelor-aspirin was present from the first week. The ischemic benefit of ticagrelor-aspirin outweighs the risk of major hemorrhage throughout the treatment period, which may support the use of 30 days treatment with ticagrelor and aspirin in these patients.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with mild-moderate ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA, the ischemic benefit of ticagrelor-aspirin outweighs the risk of major hemorrhage throughout the 30-day treatment period.

Association of Timing for Starting Dual Antiplatelet Treatment With Cilostazol and Recurrent Stroke: A CSPS.com Trial Post Hoc Analysis

Background and Objectives

Long-term treatment with the combination of cilostazol with aspirin or clopidogrel showed a lower risk of stroke recurrence compared to aspirin or clopidogrel alone after high-risk noncardioembolic ischemic stroke in a randomized trial. We aimed to determine whether the effect of the dual medication compared to monotherapy on risk of recurrent ischemic stroke differs according to timing of starting medication after stroke onset.

Methods

In a subanalysis of the randomized controlled trial, patients between 8 and 180 days after stroke onset were randomly assigned to receive aspirin or clopidogrel alone or a combination of cilostazol with aspirin or clopidogrel. They were divided into 3 groups according to the timing of starting trial treatment: between 8 and 14 days after stroke onset (8–14 days group), between 15 and 28 days after stroke onset (15–28 days group), and between 29 and 180 days after stroke onset (29–180 days group). The primary efficacy outcome was the first recurrence of ischemic stroke. Safety outcomes included severe or life-threatening bleeding.

Results

Of 1,879 patients, 498 belonged to the 8–14 days group, 467 to the 15–28 days group, and 914 to the 29–180 days group. There was a significant treatment-by-subgroup interaction for the recurrence of ischemic stroke between trial treatment and trichotomized groups. The recurrence of ischemic stroke was less common with dual therapy than with monotherapy in the 15–28 days group (annualized rate 1.5% vs 4.9%, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio 0.34 [95% CI 0.12–0.95]) and the 29–180 days group (1.9% vs 4.4%, respectively; 0.27 [0.12–0.63]) and similarly common in the 8–14 days group (4.5% for both; 1.02 [0.51–2.04]). Severe or life-threatening bleeding occurred similarly between patients on dual therapy and those on monotherapy in any of the trichotomized groups (crude hazard ratio 0.22 [95% CI 0.03–1.88] in the 8–14 days group, 1.07 [0.15–7.60] in the 15–28 days group, and 0.76 [0.24–2.39] in the 29–180 days group).

Discussion

Long-term dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol starting 15–180 days after stroke onset, compared to therapy started 8–14 days after onset, was more effective for secondary stroke prevention than monotherapy without increasing hemorrhage risk.

Trial Registration Information

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01995370; UMIN Clinical Trials Registry 000012180.

Classification of Evidence

This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with acute noncardioembolic stroke taking either aspirin or clopidogrel, the addition of cilostazol 15–180 days after stroke onset decreases the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke.

Efficacy and safety of clopidogrel and/or aspirin for ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Patients experiencing acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack are commonly treated with clopidogrel and/or aspirin (mono- and dual-antiplatelet therapy) to minimize the risk for recurrent stroke. Updated data from systematic studies can be used to guide practice. The present study aimed to compare findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses addressing the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel or aspirin - alone or in combination - in patients experiencing acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, EBSCO, and CINAHL databases were searched for relevant studies published from inception to 2020. Data from each study were extracted independently using a predefined data abstraction form. The Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews tool and A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 were used to evaluate risk of bias and the quality of the included studies.

RESULTS

Seven studies, published between 2010 and 2020, were eligible for analysis. The included studies evaluated a wide range of outcomes, including recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, recurrent ischemic stroke, vascular mortality and vascular events, bleeding events, all-cause mortality, functional disability, and quality of life. The risk of bias and methodological validity of the included studies ranged from low to high according to ROBIS and AMSTAR 2 parameters. Results revealed that clopidogrel plus aspirin was more effective than aspirin alone in reducing the risk for recurrent stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), with high-quality evidence. However, compared with aspirin, dual treatment increased major bleeding events (intracranial bleeding and extracranial bleeding), supported by high-quality evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

High-quality evidence suggested that clopidogrel plus aspirin was more efficient than monotherapy, although the risk for hemorrhagic stroke was relatively higher in combined therapy regimens lasting >1 month.

A Review of Risk Factors and Predictors for Hemorrhagic Transformation in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

Acute ischemic strokes (AIS) and hemorrhagic strokes lead to disabling neuropsychiatric and cognitive deficits. A serious and fatal complication of AIS is the occurrence of hemorrhagic transformation (HT). HT is cerebral bleeding that occurs after an ischemic event in the infarcted areas. This review summarises how specific risk factors such as demographic factors like age, gender, and race/ethnicity, comorbidities including essential hypertension, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and ischemic heart disease along with predictors like higher NIHSS score, larger infarction size, cardioembolic strokes, systolic blood pressure/pulse pressure variability, higher plasma glucose levels, and higher body temperature during ischemic event, lower low-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol, early ischemic changes on imaging modalities, and some rare causes make an individual more susceptible to developing HT. We also discuss few other risk factors such as the role of blood-brain barrier, increased arterial stiffness, and globulin levels in patients postreperfusion using thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy. In addition, we discuss the implications of dual antiplatelet therapy and the length of treatment in reference to the incidence of developing HT. Current research into inflammatory mediators and biomarkers such as Cyclooxygenase-2, matrix metalloproteinases, and soluble ST2 and their potential role as treatment options for HT is also briefly discussed. Finally, this review calls for more research into use of dual antiplatelet and the timing of antiplatelet and anticoagulant use in reference to hemorrhagic transformation.

The Clinical Efficacy of Clopidogrel Bisulfate Tablets Combined with Olmesartan Medoxomil for Ischemic Stroke with Hypertension and the Effect of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Level on Prognosis

Background

Ischemic stroke combined with hypertension can increase risks of stroke recurrence and death.

Aim

The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical efficacy of clopidogrel bisulfate tablets combined with olmesartan medoxomil in the treatment of ischemic stroke patients with hypertension and the effect of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT₁R) level on prognosis.

Methods

Ninety ischemic stroke patients with hypertension were chosen for continuous treatment with clopidogrel bisulfate tablets and olmesartan medoxomil for 12 months. The Modified Edinburgh Scandinavian Stroke Scale (MESSS) score, Brunnstrom score, Barthel score, death, recurrence, and progression of cerebrovascular residual lesions were observed and recorded during the treatment period. According to the plasma AT₁R expression of the patients before treatment, the patients were divided into a high-AT₁R group and low-AT₁R group. Then, survival analysis was performed.

Results

Compared with pretreatment, the MESSS scores of the patients at the first, second, third, sixth, ninth, and twelfth months after treatment were reduced (p < 0.01) while the Brunnstrom score and Barthel score were prominently boosted (p < 0.01). Compared with the low-AT₁R group, patients in the high-AT₁R group had higher rates of stroke recurrence and progression of residual cerebrovascular lesions (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Clopidogrel bisulfate tablets combined with olmesartan medoxomil has prominent clinical effects in the treatment of ischemic stroke patients with hypertension, evidently improving the prognosis. In addition, the level of AT₁R may be a vital factor affecting the prognosis.

Outcomes Associated With Clopidogrel-Aspirin Use in Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Pooled Analysis of Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Non-Disabling Cerebrovascular Events (CHANCE) and Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) Trials

Importance

Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin is effective for secondary prevention after minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Uncertainties remained about the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy for minor stroke or TIA.

Objective

To obtain precise estimates of efficacy and risk of dual antiplatelet therapy after minor ischemic stroke or TIA.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This analysis pooled individual patient-level data from 2 large-scale randomized clinical trials that evaluated clopidogrel-aspirin as a treatment to prevent stroke after a minor stroke or high-risk TIA. The Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Non-Disabling Cerebrovascular Events (CHANCE) trial enrolled patients at 114 sites in China from October 1, 2009, to July 30, 2012. The Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) trial enrolled patients at 269 international sites from May 28, 2010, to December 19, 2017. Both were followed up for 90 days. Data analysis occurred from November 2018 to May 2019.

Interventions

In the 2 trials, patients with minor stroke or high-risk TIA were randomized to clopidogrel-aspirin or aspirin alone within 12 hours (POINT) or 24 hours (CHANCE) of symptom onset.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary efficacy outcome was a major ischemic event (ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or death from ischemic vascular causes). The primary safety outcome was major hemorrhage.

Results

The study enrolled 5170 patients (CHANCE) and 4881 patients (POINT). Analysis included individual data from 10 051 patients (5016 in the clopidogrel-aspirin treatment group and 5035 in the control group) with a median age of 63.2 (interquartile range, 55.0-72.9) years; 6106 patients (60.8%) were male. Clopidogrel-aspirin treatment reduced the risk of major ischemic events at 90 days compared with aspirin alone (328 of 5016 [6.5%] vs 458 of 5035 [9.1%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.70 [95% CI, 0.61-0.81]; P < .001), mainly within the first 21 days (263 of 5016 [5.2%] vs 391 of 5035 [7.8%]; HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.56-0.77]; P < .001), but not from day 22 to day 90. No evidence of heterogeneity of treatment outcome across trials or prespecified subgroups was observed. Major hemorrhages were more frequent in the clopidogrel-aspirin group, but the difference was nonsignificant.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this analysis of the POINT and CHANCE trials, the benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy appeared to be confined to the first 21 days after minor ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on management of transient ischaemic attack

The aim of the present European Stroke Organisation Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) management guideline document is to provide clinically useful evidence-based recommendations on approaches to triage, investigation and secondary prevention, particularly in the acute phase following TIA. The guidelines were prepared following the Standard Operational Procedure for a European Stroke Organisation guideline document and according to GRADE methodology. As a basic principle, we defined TIA clinically and pragmatically for generalisability as transient neurological symptoms, likely to be due to focal cerebral or ocular ischaemia, which last less than 24 hours. High risk TIA was defined based on clinical features in patients seen early after their event or having other features suggesting a high early risk of stroke (e.g. ABCD2 score of 4 or greater, or weakness or speech disturbance for greater than five minutes, or recurrent events, or significant ipsilateral large artery disease e.g. carotid stenosis, intracranial stenosis). Overall, we strongly recommend using dual antiplatelet treatment with clopidogrel and aspirin short term, in high-risk non-cardioembolic TIA patients, with an ABCD2 score of 4 or greater, as defined in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We further recommend specialist review within 24 hours after the onset of TIA symptoms. We suggest review in a specialist TIA clinic rather than conventional outpatients, if managed in an outpatient setting. We make a recommendation to use either MRA or CTA in TIA patients for additional confirmation of large artery stenosis of 50% or greater, in order to guide further management, such as clarifying degree of carotid stenosis detected with carotid duplex ultrasound. We make a recommendation against using prediction tools (eg ABCD2 score) alone to identify high risk patients or to make triage and treatment decisions in suspected TIA patients as due to limited sensitivity of the scores, those with score value of 3 or less may include significant numbers of individual patients at risk of recurrent stroke, who require early assessment and treatment. These recommendations aim to emphasise the importance of prompt acute assessment and relevant secondary prevention. There are no data from randomised controlled trials on prediction tool use and optimal imaging strategies in suspected TIA.

Antithrombotic Therapy for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Non-Cardioembolic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Systematic Review

Stroke embodies one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. We aimed to provide a comprehensive insight into the effectiveness and safety of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. A systematic search for randomized controlled trials, comparing antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy versus aspirin or placebo among patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, was performed in order to summarize data regarding the different regimens. Keyword-based searches in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted until the 1st of January 2021. Our search explored 46 randomized controlled trials involving ten antiplatelet agents, six combinations with aspirin, and four anticoagulant therapies. The review of the literature reflects that antiplatelet therapy improves outcome in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Monotherapy proved to be an effective and safe choice, especially in patients with a high risk of bleeding. Intensified antiplatelet regimens further improve stroke recurrence; however, bleeding rate increases while mortality remains unaffected. Supplementing the clinical judgment of stroke treatment, assessment of bleeding risk is warranted to identify patients with the highest benefit of treatment intensification.

Antiplatelet Therapy in the Secondary Prevention of Non-cardioembolic Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Mini-Review

The aim of this mini-review is to discuss the main antiplatelet agents that have been successfully used in the secondary prevention of non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attacks (TIA). The methodology is based on a literature review of available peer-reviewed English studies listed in PubMed. The findings reveal that aspirin remains a reliable antiplatelet agent in the secondary prevention of acute non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke and TIA. Nevertheless, currently, there are also other agents, i.e., ticagrelor, clopidogrel, and cilostazol, that can be applied. In addition, the results indicate that time is significant not only in severe stroke but also in non-severe stroke and TIA, which suggests that antiplatelet therapy should be applied within 24 h after the first symptoms because early treatment can lead to an improvement in neurological outcomes and reduce the chance of an early subsequent stroke.

Cilostazol for secondary stroke prevention: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Stroke is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Cilostazol, an antiplatelet and phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor, has not been clearly established for ischaemic stroke use. We aim to determine the efficacy and safety of cilostazol for secondary stroke prevention.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to 25 September 2020, for randomised trials comparing the efficacy and safety of cilostazol monotherapy or dual therapy with another antiplatelet regimen or placebo, in patients with ischaemic stroke. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) was used to assess study quality. This meta-analysis was reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.

Results

Eighteen randomised trials comprising 11 429 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Most trials possessed low risk of bias and were of low heterogeneity. Cilostazol significantly reduced the rate of ischaemic stroke recurrence (risk ratio, RR=0.69, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.81), any stroke recurrence (RR=0.64, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.74) and major adverse cardiovascular events (RR=0.67, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.81). Cilostazol did not significantly decrease mortality (RR=0.90, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.25) or increase the rate of good functional outcome (Modified Rankin Scale score of 0–1; RR=1.07, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.19). Cilostazol demonstrated favourable safety profile, significantly reducing the risk of intracranial haemorrhage (RR=0.46, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.68) and major haemorrhagic events (RR=0.49, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.70).

Conclusions

Cilostazol demonstrated superior efficacy and safety profiles compared with traditional antiplatelet regimens such as aspirin and clopidogrel for secondary stroke prevention but does not appear to affect functional outcomes. Future randomised trials can be conducted outside East Asia, or compare cilostazol with a wider range of antiplatelet agents.

Ischemic stroke with a preceding Trans ischemic attack (TIA) less than 24 hours and thrombolytic therapy

Background

Acute ischemic stroke attack with and without a recent TIA may differ in clinical risk factors, and this may affect treatment outcomes following thrombolytic therapy. We examined whether the odds of exclusion or inclusion for thrombolytic therapy are greater in ischemic stroke with TIA less than 24 h preceding ischemic stroke (recent-TIA) as compared to those without recent TIA or non-TIA > 24 h and less than 1 month (past-TIA).

Methods

A retrospective hospital-based analysis was conducted on 6315 ischemic stroke patients, of whom 846 had proven brain diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) of an antecedent TIA within 24 h prior to ischemic stroke. The logistic regression model was developed to generate odds ratios (OR) to determine clinical factors that may increase the likelihood of exclusion or inclusion for thrombolytic therapy. The validity of the model was tested using a Hosmer-Lemeshow test, while the Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) was used to test the sensitivity of our model.

Results

In the recent-TIA ischemic stroke population, patients with a history of alcohol abuse (OR = 5.525, 95% CI, 1.003–30.434, p = 0.05), migraine (OR = 4.277, 95% CI, 1.095–16.703, p = 0.037), and increasing NIHSS score (OR = 1.156, 95% CI, 1.058–1.263, p = 0.001) were associated with the increasing odds of receiving rtPA, while older patients (OR = 0.965, 95% CI, 0.934–0.997, P = 0.033) were associated with the increasing odds of not receiving rtPA.

Conclusion

In recent-TIA ischemic stroke patients, older patients with higher INR values are associated with increasing odds of exclusion from thrombolytic therapy. Our findings demonstrate clinical risks factors that can be targeted to improve the use and eligibility for rtPA in in recent-TIA ischemic stroke patients.