Bridging Thrombolysis Achieved Better Outcomes Than Direct Thrombectomy After Large Vessel Occlusion: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Bridging the Gap: Improving Acute Ischemic Stroke Outcomes with Intravenous Thrombolysis Prior to Mechanical Thrombectomy

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Current guidelines recommend intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) followed by mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). This combined approach, known as bridging therapy (BT), is believed to increase the likelihood of a favorable functional outcome when administered within 4.5 h of symptom onset. However, the benefits of BT over direct mechanical thrombectomy (d-MT) remain debated. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of AIS-LVO patients undergoing MT within 6 h of symptom onset, with and without prior IVT.

METHODS

Within the prospective Transzlációs Idegtudományi Nemzeti Laboratórium (TINL) STROKE-registry, AIS-LVO patients admitted to the Department of Neurology, University of Pécs between February 2023 and June 2024 were investigated. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients reaching functional independence at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2. Secondary endpoints included clinical improvement at 72 h (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score of ≤1 or a change from baseline [ΔNIHSS] of ≥4) and successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] score ≥ 2). Safety outcomes were evaluated based on thrombus migration and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Results were compared using linear and logistic regression analyses adjusted for baseline variables.

RESULTS

Of 82 patients, 51 (62.2%) received BT, while 31 (37.8%) underwent d-MT. The BT group showed a significantly higher rate of functional independence (45.7% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.014) and a lower 90-day mortality rate (13.7% vs. 35.5%, p = 0.029). Multivariate analysis revealed that IVT was independently associated with favorable functional outcomes (p = 0.011) and reduced mortality (p = 0.021). No significant differences were observed in terms of clinical improvement at 72 h, successful recanalization, thrombus migration, or hemorrhagic transformation between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports current guidelines recommending BT for thrombectomy-eligible AIS-LVO patients, offering new insights into the ongoing clinical debate.

Safety and efficacy of bridging intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy in different age groups of acute ischemic stroke patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bridging intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy (MT) versus direct MT in different age groups of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to large vessel occlusion (LVO) of the anterior circulation.

METHODS

Consecutive patients from the prospective endovascular stroke registry of the Comprehensive Stroke Center, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy, between January 2015 and June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into age groups (≤ 80 years old and > 80 years old); for each age group, they were further divided in the bridging therapy group and the direct MT group. We performed a propensity score analysis according to baseline characteristics. Safety outcomes were any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH (sICH) and 3-month mortality. Efficacy outcomes were successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction, mTICI, score ≥ 2b) and 3-month functional independence (modified Rankin Scale, mRS, ≤ 2).

RESULTS

We included 761 AIS patients with anterior circulation LVO (mean age 73.5 ± 12.8 years; 44.8% males; mean baseline NIHSS 16 ± 5). After propensity score, there were 365 patients ≤ 80 years old (52% bridging therapy) and 187 patients > 80 years old (57% bridging therapy). In both age groups of patients, we found no statistically significant differences in the rates of any ICH, sICH, successful recanalization and 3-month mortality and functional independence between bridging therapy and direct MT groups.

CONCLUSION

In our population, safety and efficacy outcomes of bridging therapy versus direct MT did not differ in both AIS patients ≤ 80 and > 80 years old.

Suppression of neuronal CDK9/p53/VDAC signaling provides bioenergetic support and improves post-stroke neuropsychiatric outcomes

Bioenergy decline occurs with reperfusion following acute ischemic stroke. However, the molecular mechanisms that limit energy metabolism and their impact on post-stroke cognitive and emotional complications are still unclear. In the present study, we demonstrate that the p53 transcriptional response is responsible for neuronal adenosine triphosphate (ATP) deficiency and progressively neuropsychiatric disturbances, involving the downregulation of mitochondrial voltage-dependent anion channels (VDACs). Neuronal p53 transactivated the promoter of microRNA-183 (miR-183) cluster, thereby upregulating biogenesis of miR-183-5p (miR-183), miR-96-5p (miR-96), and miR-182-5p. Both miR-183 and miR-96 directly targeted and post-transcriptionally suppressed VDACs. Neuronal ablation of p53 protected against ATP deficiency and neurological deficits, whereas post-stroke rescue of miR-183/VDAC signaling reversed these benefits. Interestingly, cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) was found to be enriched in cortical neurons and upregulated the p53-induced transcription of the miR-183 cluster in neurons after ischemia. Post-treatment with the CDK9 inhibitor oroxylin A promoted neuronal ATP production mainly through suppressing the miR-183 cluster/VDAC axis, further improved long-term sensorimotor abilities and spatial memory, and alleviated depressive-like behaviors in mice following stroke. Our findings reveal an intrinsic CDK9/p53/VDAC pathway that drives neuronal bioenergy decline and underlies post-stroke cognitive impairment and depression, thus highlighting the therapeutic potential of oroxylin A for better outcomes.

Comparative Effectiveness of Intravenous Thrombolysis plus Mechanical Thrombectomy versus Mechanical Thrombectomy Alone in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to large artery vessel occlusion experienced a dramatic development within the last decade. This meta-analysis investigates the effectiveness of bridging therapy (BT) versus mechanical thrombectomy (MT) alone in treating acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers assessed two-arm clinical trials from Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to January 2024. Data extraction and quality were evaluated using the ROBINS-2 tool. Our primary outcomes were improvement in NIHSS scores and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis, which included 2,638 participants from 8 randomized controlled trials, found that BT resulted in a greater improvement in NIHSS scores from baseline compared to endovascular treatment alone (mean difference [MD] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.73-1.20], p < 0.00001). Additionally, BT group achieved successful recanalization more frequently before and after thrombectomy. Thrombectomy alone hat a shorter time from stroke onset to groin puncture compared to BT (MD 9.91, 95% CI: [4.31-15.52], p = 0.005). Functional outcomes, mortality rates, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates, and long-term recovery metrics, such as Barthel index and modified Rankin Scale scores, were comparable between both treatment approaches.

CONCLUSION

BT is superior to endovascular treatment alone based on NIHSS score improvement and successful reperfusion rates before and after thrombectomy. Despite MT alone demonstrating a shorter time from stroke onset to groin puncture (MD of 9.91 min), it did not contribute to greater NIHSS improvement at 24 h and 7 days. Further trials with larger sample sizes are warranted to enhance precision in clinical guidance.

Intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy versus mechanical thrombectomy alone for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis of clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the gold standard treatment for large vessel occlusion (LVO). A vital factor that might influence MT outcomes is the use of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). A few clinical trials in this domain thus far have not yielded consistent outcomes. We conducted this meta-analysis to synthesize collective evidence in this regard.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement guidelines were followed, and we performed a comprehensive literature search of four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL). For outcomes constituting continuous data, the mean difference (MD) and its standard deviation (SD) were pooled. For outcomes constituting dichotomous data, the frequency of events and the total number of patients were pooled as the risk ratio (RR).

RESULTS

Seven clinical trials with a total of 2317 patients are included in this meta-analysis. Six trials are randomized, and one trial was nonrandomized. No significant differences were found between MT plus IVT and MT alone in successful recanalization (RR 1.04, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [0.92 to 1.17], P = 0.53), 90-day functional independence (RR 1.03, 95% CI [0.90 to 1.19], P = 0.65), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) (RR 1.22, 95% CI [0.84 to 1.75], P = 0.30), or mortality (RR 0.94, 95% CI [0.76 to 1.18], P = 0.61).

CONCLUSION

The current evidence does not favor either MT plus IVT or MT alone for LVO except for the procedural time. More trials are needed in this regard, and certain factors should be considered when comparing the two approaches.

Outcomes of Bridging Intravenous Thrombolysis Versus Endovascular Therapy Alone in Late-Window Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Studies comparing bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with direct endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke who present late are limited. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and safety of bridging IVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who underwent EVT 6 to 24 hours after time last known well.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke and a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of ≥6 from 20 centers across 10 countries in the multicenter retrospective CLEAR study (CT for Late Endovascular Reperfusion) between January 2014 and May 2022. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting modeling adjusted for clinical and imaging confounders to compare functional outcomes, reperfusion success, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality between EVT patients with and without prior IVT.

RESULTS

Of 5098 patients screened for eligibility, we included 2749 patients, of whom 549 received bridging IVT before EVT. The timing of IVT was not recorded. Witnessed stroke onset and transfer rates were higher in the bridging IVT group (25% versus 12% and 77% versus 55%, respectively, P value for both <0.0001), and time intervals between stroke onset and treatment were shorter (time last known well-start of EVT median 560 minutes [interquartile range, 432-791] versus 724 minutes [interquartile range, 544-912]; P<0.0001). After adjustment for confounders, there was no difference in functional outcome at 3 months (adjusted common odds ratio for modified Rankin Scale shift, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.89-1.19]; P=0.72) or successful reperfusion (adjusted odds ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.81-1.75]; P=0.39). There were no safety concerns associated with bridging IVT versus direct EVT (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage: adjusted odds ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.38-1.48]; P=0.40; mortality: adjusted odds ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.89-1.46]; P=0.31). Results were unchanged when the analysis was limited to patients who received IVT >6 hours after last known well.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke who underwent EVT 6 to 24 hours from last known well, bridging IVT was not associated with a difference in outcomes compared with direct EVT.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04096248.

Real-world setting comparison of bridging therapy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intravenous Thrombolysis (IVT) prior to Mechanical Thrombectomy (MT) for Acute Ischaemic Stroke (AIS) due to Large-Vessel Occlusion (LVO) remains controversial. Therefore, the authors performed a meta-analysis of the available real-world evidence focusing on the efficacy and safety of Bridging Therapy (BT) compared with direct MT in patients with AIS due to LVO.

METHODS

Four databases were searched until 01 February 2023. Retrospective and prospective studies from nationwide or health organization registry databases that compared the clinical outcomes of BT and direct MT were included. Odds Ratios (ORs) and 95 % Confidence Intervals (CIs) for efficacy and safety outcomes were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Of the 12 studies, 86,695 patients were included. In patients with AIS due to LVO, BT group was associated with higher odds of achieving excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1) at 90 days (OR = 1.48, 95 % CI 1.25-1.75), favorable discharge disposition (to the home with or without services) (OR = 1.33, 95 % CI 1.29-1.38), and decreased mortality at 90 days (OR = 0.62, 95 % CI 0.56-0.70), as compared with the direct MT group. In addition, the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage did not increase significantly in the BT group.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis indicates that BT was associated with favorable outcomes in patients with AIS due to LVO. These findings support the current practice in a real-world setting and strengthen their validity. For patients eligible for both IVT and MT, BT remains the standard treatment until more data are available.

Efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy in the posterior cerebral circulation-a single center study

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the current standard treatment for strokes in the anterior cerebral circulation (AMT) and has recently been proven to be beneficial in the posterior circulation strokes (PMT). Our study aims to evaluate parameters for favorable outcomes in PMT-patients and to compare the clinical characteristics of individuals who received AMT and PMT. For this purpose, we confronted AMT and PMT-receipients and performed a multivariate regression analysis to assess the influence of factors on favorable outcomes in the study group and in the AMT and PMT subgroups. When analysing 623 MT-patients, those who received PMT had significantly lower admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (9 vs. 13; p < 0.001) and 24 h post-MT (7 vs. 12; p = 0.006). Key parameters influencing the favorable outcomes of PMT at discharge and at 90th day include: NIHSS scores (OR: 0.865, 95% CI: 0.813-0.893, and OR: 0.900, 95% CI: 0.861-0.925), MT time (OR: 0.993, 95% CI: 0.987-0.998 and OR: 0.993, 95% CI: 0.990-0.997), and leukocytosis (OR: 0.961, 95% CI: 0.928-0.988 and OR: 0.974, 95% CI: 0.957-0.998). Different clinical profiles exist between AMT and PMT-recipients, with the neurological status post-MT being decisive for the prognosis. Several factors play an important role in predicting outcome, especially in the PMT group.

Prior Thrombectomy Does Not Affect the Surgical Complication Rate of Decompressive Hemicraniectomy in Patients with Malignant Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Even though mechanical recanalization techniques have dramatically improved acute stroke care since the pivotal trials of decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant courses of ischemic stroke, decompressive hemicraniectomy remains a mainstay of malignant stroke treatment. However, it is still unclear whether prior thrombectomy, which in most cases is associated with application of antiplatelets and/or anticoagulants, affects the surgical complication rate of decompressive hemicraniectomy and whether conclusions derived from prior trials of decompressive hemicraniectomy are still valid in times of modern stroke care.

METHODS

A total of 103 consecutive patients who received a decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction were evaluated in this retrospective cohort study. Surgical and functional outcomes of patients who had received mechanical recanalization before surgery (thrombectomy group, n = 49) and of patients who had not received mechanical recanalization (medical group, n = 54) were compared.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the two groups did significantly differ regarding preoperative systemic thrombolysis (63.3% in the thrombectomy group vs. 18.5% in the medical group, p < 0.001), the rate of hemorrhagic transformation (44.9% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.04) and the preoperative Glasgow Coma Score (median of 7 in the thrombectomy group vs. 12 in the medical group, p = 0.04) were similar to those of prior randomized controlled trials of decompressive hemicraniectomy. There was no significant difference in the rates of surgical complications (10.2% in the thrombectomy group vs. 11.1% in the medical group), revision surgery within the first 30 days after surgery (4.1% vs. 5.6%, respectively), and functional outcome (median modified Rankin Score of 4 at 5 and 14 months in both groups) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A prior mechanical recanalization with possibly associated systemic thrombolysis does not affect the early surgical complication rate and the functional outcome after decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant ischemic stroke. Patient characteristics have not changed significantly since the introduction of mechanical recanalization; therefore, the results from former large randomized controlled trials are still valid in the modern era of stroke care.

Endovascular thrombectomy without versus with different pre-intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

The current guideline recommended the use of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), but the effectiveness and safety of tenecteplase compare to alteplase in patients before EVT remain uncertain.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify eligible articles from inception until September 16, 2023. The primary outcome was functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included excellent outcome (mRS 0-1) at 90 days, all-cause mortality at follow-up, successful reperfusion (TICI 2b-3) after the end of EVT, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) or any intracranial hemorrhage (aICH). The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42023470419.

Results

Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included involving 2,836 acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. Compared to EVT alone, tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg and 0.4 mg/kg) + EVT and 0.9 mg/kg alteplase + EVT were significant difference associated with higher successful reperfusion (TICI 2b-3) after the end of EVT (RR = 2.31; 95% CI 1.15-4.63; RR = 2.31; 95% CI 1.00-5.33; RR = 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09). And compared to 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase + EVT, alteplase (0.6 mg/kg and 0.9 mg/kg) + EVT were significant difference associated with lower successful reperfusion (TICI 2b-3) after the end of EVT (RR = 0.45; 95% CI 0.22-0.90; RR = 0.45; 95% CI 0.23-0.91). The risk of aICH (RR = 1.50; 95% CI 1.07-2.09) was significantly higher for 0.6 mg/kg alteplase + EVT than EVT alone. There was no significant difference in functional independence (mRS 0-2), excellent outcome (mRS 0-1), all-cause mortality or sICH among the different IVT strategies (0.25 mg/kg or 0.4 mg/kg tenecteplase and 0.6 mg/kg or 0.9 mg/kg alteplase) before EVT.

Conclusion

The use of alteplase before EVT may potentially improve the successful reperfusion after EVT compared to tenecteplase. Due to the insufficient sample size, more high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm effectiveness and safety of tenecteplase compare to alteplase in patients before EVT.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42023470419.

Meta-analysis of direct endovascular thrombectomy vs bridging therapy in the management of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion

BACKGROUND

Debates persist when using intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO). This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized evidence on outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO), comparing bridging therapy (BT) with MT alone.

METHOD

We conducted searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to July 2023 to identify pertinent clinical trials and observational studies.

RESULT

76 studies, involving 37,658 patients, revealed no significant difference in 90-day functional independence between DEVT and BT. However, a trend favoring BT for achieving functional independence with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-1 was observed, having Odds ratio (OR) of 0.75 (95% CI 0.66-0.86; p < 0.001). DEVT was associated with higher postprocedural mortality (OR 1.44;95% CI 1.25-1.65; p < 0.001), but a lower risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage compared to BT (OR 0.855; 95% CI 0.621-1.177; p = 0.327). Successful recanalization rates favored BT, emphasizing the importance of individualized treatment decisions (OR 0.759; 95% CI 0.594-0.969; p = 0.027). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify key contributors to heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis underscores the intricate equilibrium between functional efficacy and safety in the evaluation of DEVT and BT for ACS-LVO. Fundamentally, while BT appears more efficacious, concerns about safety arise due to the superior safety profile demonstrated by DEVT. Individualized treatment decisions are imperative, and further trials are warranted to enhance precision in clinical guidance.

Prior anticoagulation and bridging thrombolysis improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing endovascular thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke

BACKGROUND

Where stroke occurs with pre-existing atrial fibrillation (AF)studies validating the safety and efficacy of bridging thrombolysis, and the use of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in the setting of prior anticoagulation, are limited to single-center reports.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis, AF patients undergoing EVT for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke enrolled in a prospectively-maintained, international multicenter database (International Stroke Perfusion Imaging Registry (INSPIRE)) between 2016 and 2019 were studied. Patients were categorized by anticoagulation status: anticoagulated (warfarin/non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants) versus not anticoagulated. Patients not anticoagulated were further divided into intravenous thrombolysis versus no thrombolysis. Outcomes compared between groups included 90-day modified Rankin Scale, 90-day mortality, rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and good reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b-3).

RESULTS

Of 563 AF patients, 118 (21%) were on anticoagulation. AF patients on anticoagulation showed improved 90-day functional outcomes (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.68, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.00 to 2.82). Mortality (26.3% vs 23.8%), sICH (4.5% vs 3.9%), and rates of good reperfusion (91.3% vs 88.0%) were similar between those anticoagulated and those not anticoagulated. Thrombolysis before EVT in AF patients was independently associated with improved 90-day functional outcomes (aOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.79) and reduced mortality (aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.84), with similar sICH rates (3.4% vs 4.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulated patients with AF who underwent EVT had improved 90-day functional outcomes and similar sICH rates. Thrombolysis before EVT in AF patients was associated with improved 90-day functional outcomes and reduced mortality.

Impact of atrial fibrillation on the treatment effect of bridging thrombolysis in ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy: a multicenter international cohort study

BACKGROUND

The role of bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains debatable. Atrial fibrillation (AF) associated strokes may be associated with reduced treatment effect from IVT. This study compares the effect of bridging IVT in AF and non-AF patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study comprised anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) AIS patients receiving EVT alone or bridging IVT plus EVT within 6 hours of symptom onset. Primary outcome was good functional outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were successful reperfusion defined as expanded Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) grading ≥2b flow, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

We included 705 patients (314 AF and 391 non-AF patients). The mean age was 68.6 years and 53.9% were male. The odds of good functional outcomes with bridging IVT was higher in the non-AF (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.28, 95% CI 1.06 to 4.91, P=0.035) compared with the AF subgroups (aOR 1.89, 95% CI 0.89 to 4.01, P=0.097). However, this did not constitute a significant effect modification by the presence of AF on bridging IVT (interaction aOR 0.12, 95% CI -1.94 to 2.18, P=0.455). The rate of successful reperfusion, sICH, and mortality were similar between bridging IVT and EVT for both AF and non-AF patients.

CONCLUSION

The presence of AF did not modify the treatment effect of bridging IVT. Further individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials may shed light on the comparative efficacy of bridging IVT in AF versus non-AF LVO strokes.

Intravenous thrombolysis prior to endovascular thrombectomy in elderly stroke patients: An analysis of the National Inpatient Sample database

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), also termed bridging thrombolysis, remains uncertain, and there is limited data on its use for elderly patients who may be more prone to hemorrhagic complications.

METHODS

This was a large-scale cross-sectional study of the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Adult EVT patients presenting directly to thrombectomy centers without prior treatment were identified. Patient demographics, stroke risk factors, stroke etiology, medical comorbidities, and IVT treatment were recorded. Outcomes of interest include in-hospital mortality, rates of discharge to home, and hemorrhagic complications. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to account for possible confounders.

RESULTS

35,735 EVT patients presenting directly to thrombectomy centers without prior thrombolytic treatment were identified. 32.5% (11,630 patients) were treated with bridging thrombolysis. Overall, bridging thrombolysis was significantly associated with lower rates of in-hospital mortality (8.8% vs. 11.2%, p < 0.001) and higher rates of discharge to home (38.0% vs. 28.7%, p < 0.001). IVT's association with lower odds of in-hospital mortality was significantly attenuated with increasing age (interaction p = 0.038), and there was no significant association between IVT treatment with in-hospital mortality for patients 80 years or older (OR 0.99 [95%CI 0.72-1.35], p = 0.94). Similarly, older age significantly amplifies the hemorrhagic risk associated with bridging thrombolysis (interaction p = 0.006). When considering only patients without hemorrhagic complications, age does not significantly modulate IVT's association with patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Bridging thrombolysis may be associated with better outcomes; however, its benefit may be diminished among elderly patients due to higher rates of hemorrhagic complications.

Association of intravenous thrombolysis and pre-interventional reperfusion: a post hoc analysis of the SWIFT DIRECT trial

BACKGROUND

A potential benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is pre-interventional reperfusion. Currently, there are few data on the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion in patients randomized to IVT or no IVT before MT.

METHODS

SWIFT DIRECT (Solitaire With the Intention For Thrombectomy Plus Intravenous t-PA vs DIRECT Solitaire Stent-retriever Thrombectomy in Acute Anterior Circulation Stroke) was a randomized controlled trial including acute ischemic stroke IVT eligible patients being directly admitted to a comprehensive stroke center, with allocation to IVT with MT versus MT alone. The primary endpoint of this analysis was the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion, defined as a pre-interventional expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of ≥2a. The effect of IVT and potential treatment effect heterogeneity were analyzed using logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of 396 patients, pre-interventional reperfusion occurred in 20 (10.0%) patients randomized to IVT with MT, and in 7 (3.6%) patients randomized to MT alone. Receiving IVT favored the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion (adjusted OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.23 to 6.87). There was no IVT treatment effect heterogeneity on the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion with different strata of Randomization-to-Groin-Puncture time (p for interaction=0.33), although the effect tended to be stronger in patients with a Randomization-to-Groin-Puncture time >28 min (adjusted OR 4.65, 95% CI 1.16 to 18.68). There were no significant differences in rates of functional outcomes between patients with and without pre-interventional reperfusion.

CONCLUSION

Even for patients with proximal large vessel occlusions and direct access to MT, IVT resulted in an absolute increase of 6% in rates of pre-interventional reperfusion. The influence of time strata on the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion should be studied further in an individual patient data meta-analysis of comparable trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

clinicaltrials.gov NCT03192332.

Clinical evidence comparing bridging and direct endovascular thrombectomy: progress and controversies

Clinical evidence comparing bridging endovascular thrombectomy (bEVT) with intravenous thrombolysis and direct endovascular thrombectomy (dEVT) without thrombolysis for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) presented directly to an EVT-capable center is overwhelming but inconsistent. This study aimed to analyze the progress and controversies in clinical evidence based on current meta-analyses. Three databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, were searched. Relevant data were extracted and reviewed from the pooled studies. The Assessment of Multiple Systematic Review (AMSTAR-2) was used for quality assessment. Twenty-five meta-analyses were finally included. There were 56% (14/25) from Asian countries, 20% (5/25) from North America, and 24% (6/25) from Europe. The majority (72%, 18/25) of evidence arose in a short period from 2020 to 2022 with the serial publication of four randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Among the 25 meta-analyses, 11 pooled at least three RCTs but there is substantial overlap among seven (five recruited the same four RCTs solely and two recruited the same three RCTs solely). Meanwhile, quality rating based on AMSTAR-2 showed 16 'high' rated studies (64%). For functional independence, 40% (10/25) of studies favored bEVT and 60% showed neutral results. For symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, most studies (82.6%, 19/23) showed no significant difference. Non-RCT studies contributed to evidence favoring bEVT. Current RCTs provide an update of clinical evidence comparing bEVT and dEVT. However, they simultaneously contribute to an unnecessary overlap among studies. Contemporary observational studies demonstrated different but possibly confounded evidence. Thus, this issue still requires more clinical evidence under standard procedures.

Safety and Efficacy of Direct Thrombectomy Versus Bridging Therapy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Eligible for Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, we conducted a meta-analysis of reported randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the safety and efficacy of direct thrombectomy (DT) and bridging therapy (BT) for patients eligible for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT).

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to July 11, 2022 was performed. RCTs comparing DT and BT were included. The relative risk or rate difference and their 95% confidence intervals in a Mantel-Haenszel fixed effects model were used as the effect index of each outcome. The noninferior margin was specified as 80% for the relative risk or -10% for the rate difference. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a favorable functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-2 or a return to baseline at 90 days. Additional efficacy and safety outcomes included successful recanalization at the end of thrombectomy, excellent clinical outcomes (defined as an mRS score of 0-1), death within 90 ± 14 days, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, any type of intracerebral hemorrhage, and clot migration.

RESULTS

Six RCTs with 2334 patients were pooled for the meta-analysis. The results showed the noninferiority of DT for favorable functional outcomes, higher successful recanalization rates, and any intracerebral hemorrhage in the BT group, with no statistically significant differences for other outcomes. The risk of bias for all RCTs in our analysis was low.

CONCLUSIONS

DT achieved noninferiority to BT for favorable functional outcomes. Patient-level pooled analysis and subgroup analysis are needed to provide more information to distinguish which patients will benefit more from which therapy.

Bridging Thrombolysis Before Endovascular Therapy in Stroke Patients With Faster Core Growth

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

It is still uncertain that going direct to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) leads to equivalent outcomes as bridging IV thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic patients. This study aimed to explore whether the rate of ischemic core growth influenced the patient outcomes after bridging IVT vs direct EVT.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study based on the International Stroke Perfusion Imaging Registry (INSPIRE). It selected acute ischemic stroke patients receiving perfusion CT within 4.5 hours of stroke onset. Patients who went direct to EVT were compared with those who received bridging treatment of IVT before EVT. Ischemic core growth rate was estimated by the acute ischemic core volume on perfusion CT divided by the time from stroke onset to perfusion CT, based on the assumption of a linear growth pattern of ischemic core. Core growth rate was stratified into fast (>15 mL/h) and slow (≤15 mL/h), based on its interaction with bridging IVT in predicting the primary outcome. The primary outcome was modified Rankin scale of 0-2 at 3 months. The secondary outcomes included successful thrombectomy reperfusion defined by modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b-3 and time from groin puncture to reperfusion.

RESULTS

Of the 1,221 EVT patients in the INSPIRE, 323 patients were selected, of which 82 patients received direct EVT and 241 patients received bridging IVT. Bridging IVT was associated with a higher rate of good clinical outcome among patients with fast core growth (39% vs 7% for direct EVT, odds ratio [OR] 8.75 [1.96-39.1], p = 0.005), but the difference was not notable for patients with slow core growth (55% vs 55% for direct EVT, OR 1.00 [0.53-1.87], p = 0.989). In patients with fast core growth, the bridging and direct EVT patients showed no difference in the reperfusion rate (80% vs 76%, p = 0.616). However, patients who received bridging IVT were more likely to achieve reperfusion earlier (the median groin to reperfusion time of 63.0 vs 94.0 minutes, p = 0.005).

DISCUSSION

Patients with fast core growth were more likely to benefit from bridging IVT. This is likely because prior IVT facilitates clot removal and thus reduces time to reperfusion.

Association of Intravenous Thrombolysis with Delayed Reperfusion After Incomplete Mechanical Thrombectomy

PURPOSE

Treatment of distal vessel occlusions causing incomplete reperfusion after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is debated. We hypothesized that pretreatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) may facilitate delayed reperfusion (DR) of residual vessel occlusions causing incomplete reperfusion after MT.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with incomplete reperfusion after MT, defined as extended thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (eTICI) 2a-2c, and available perfusion follow-up imaging at 24 ± 12 h after MT. DR was defined as absence of any perfusion deficit on time-sensitive perfusion maps, indicating the absence of any residual occlusion. The association of IVT with the occurrence of DR was evaluated using a logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders. Sensitivity analyses based on IVT timing (time between IVT start and the occurrence incomplete reperfusion following MT) were performed.

RESULTS

In 368 included patients (median age 73.7 years, 51.1% female), DR occurred in 225 (61.1%). Atrial fibrillation, higher eTICI grade, better collateral status and longer intervention-to-follow-up time were all associated with DR. IVT did not show an association with the occurrence of DR (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.44-1.46, even in time-sensitive strata, aOR 2.28 [95% CI 0.65-9.23] and aOR 1.53 [95% CI 0.52-4.73] for IVT to incomplete reperfusion following MT timing <80 and <100 min, respectively).

CONCLUSION

A DR occurred in 60% of patients with incomplete MT at ~24 h and did not seem to occur more often in patients receiving pretreatment IVT. Further research on potential associations of IVT and DR after MT is required.

Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy vs. Bridging Therapy in Stroke Patients in A “Stroke Belt” Region of Southern Europe

The aim of this 4-year observational study is to analyze the outcomes of stroke patients treated with direct mechanical thrombectomy (dMT) compared to bridging therapy (BT) (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] + BT) based on 3-month outcomes, in real clinical practice in the "Stroke Belt" of Southern Europe. In total, 300 patients were included (41.3% dMT and 58.6% BT). The frequency of direct referral to the stroke center was similar in the dMT and BT group, whereas the time from onset to groin was longer in the BT group (median 210 [IQR 160–303] vs. 399 [IQR 225–675], p = 0.001). Successful recanalization (TICI 2b-3) and hemorrhagic transformation were similar in both groups. The BT group more frequently showed excellent outcomes at 3 months (32.4% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis showed that BT was independently associated with excellent outcomes (OR 2.7. 95% CI,1.2–5.9, p = 0.02) and lower mortality (OR 0.36. 95% CI 0.16–0.82, p = 015). Conclusions: Compared with dMT, BT was associated with excellent functional outcomes and lower 3-month mortality in this real-world clinical practice study conducted in a region belonging to the “Stroke Belt” of Southern Europe. Given the disparity of results on the benefit of BT in the current evidence, it is of vital importance to analyze the convenience of its use in each health area.

Mechanical thrombectomy alone versus with thrombolysis for ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

INTRODUCTION

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard of care in eligible patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The question of whether intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) improves outcomes in conjunction with MT remains unanswered. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCT) to explore outcomes of MT with and without IVT.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review of the English language literature was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of science, and Scopus. Outcomes of interest included 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2, thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) score 2b-3, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), distal embolization, and mortality. We calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Six RCTs with 2334 patients compared outcomes of patients treated with MT alone and MT with IVT. Both treatments resulted in comparable rates of mRS 0-2 (RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.88-1.04; p-value = 0.282), sICH (RR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.55-1.17; p-value = 0.253), mortality at 90-days (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.88-1.28; p-value = 0.529), and distal embolization (RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.79-1.52; p-value = 0.572). MT alone was associated with a lower rate of TICI 2b-3 compared to MT with IVT (RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.93-0.99; p-value = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis of six RCTs, MT alone was comparable to MT plus IVT for mRS 0-2, sICH, mortality, and distal embolization; however, MT alone resulted in lower rates of TICI 2b-3. Further trials are needed to determine which patient populations benefit from MT plus IVT and to increase the power of future meta-analyses.

Predictors of functional dependence at one year in acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion

BACKGROUND

In China, the current status of clinical treatment of eLVO and the factors affecting its long-term prognosis are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the predictive factors of functional outcomes at one year in patients of acute ischemic stroke with emergent large vessel occlusion (eLVO).

METHODS

We retrospectively collected 536 patients who underwent treatments for eLVO. Primary outcomes included one-year functional outcomes and delayed functional independence (DFI). The logistic regression was performed to predict the primary outcome.

RESULTS

431 (85%) survivors participated in the one-year follow-up. In the multivariate logistic analysis adjusted for baseline characteristics, the following factors were found to be significant predictors of functional dependence at one year: old age (aOR = 1.042, 95% CI=1.01-1.076, p = 0.011), low Alberta stroke program early CT score (ASPECTS) (aOR = 0.791, 95% CI=0.671-0.933, p = 0.005), unsuccessful reperfusion (aOR = 0.168, 95% CI=0.048-0.586, p = 0.005), poor medication compliance (aOR = 0.022, 95% CI=0.007-0.072, p < 0.001), and complicated with stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) (aOR = 2.269, 95% CI=1.103-4.670, p = 0.026). We also found that men (aOR = 3.947, 95% CI=1.15-13.549, p = 0.029) had better medication adherence (aOR = 14.077, 95% CI=1.736-114.157, p = 0.013), and going to rehabilitation centers (aOR = 5.197, 95% CI=1.474-18.327, p = 0.010) were independent predictors of DFI.

CONCLUSION

The significant predictors of functional dependence at one year were: old age, low ASPECTS, unsuccessful reperfusion, poor medication adherence, and combination with SAP. Men, good medication adherence, and going to rehabilitation centers contributed to getting delayed functional independence.

Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Prior Bridging Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The current guideline recommends using an intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (IV tPA) prior to mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in eligible acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO). Some recent studies found no significant differences in the long-term functional outcomes between bridging therapy (BT, i.e., IV tPA prior to MT) and direct MT (dMT).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and functional outcomes between BT and dMT in AIS patients with ELVO who were eligible for IV tPA administration. Based on the ELVO location, patients were categorized as the anterior group (occlusion of the anterior circulation), or the combined group (occlusion of the anterior and/or posterior circulation). A subgroup analysis was performed based on the study type, i.e., RCT and non-RCT.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies (3985 patients) matched the eligibility criteria. Comparing the BT and dMT groups, no significant differences in terms of mortality and good functional outcome were observed at 90 days. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhagic (sICH) events were more frequent in BT patients in the combined group (OR = 0.73, p = 0.02); this result remained significant only in the non-RCT subgroup (OR = 0.67, p = 0.03). The RCT subgroup had a significantly higher rate of successful revascularization in BT patients (OR = 0.73, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis uncovered no significant differences in functional outcome and mortality rate at 90 days between dMT and BT in patients with AIS who had ELVO. Although BT performed better in terms of successful recanalization rate, there is a risk of increased sICH rate in this group.

Endovascular thrombectomy with or without intravenous alteplase for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Among patients who had an ischaemic stroke presenting directly to a stroke centre where endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is immediately available, there is uncertainty regarding the role of intravenous thrombolysis agents before or concurrently with EVT. To support a rapid guideline, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the impact of EVT alone versus EVT with intravenous alteplase in patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion.

METHODS

In November 2021, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, clincialtrials.gov and the ISRCTN registry for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing EVT alone versus EVT with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke. We conducted meta-analyses using fixed effects models and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

In total 6 RCTs including 2334 participants were eligible. Low certainty evidence suggests that, compared with EVT and alteplase, there is possibly a small decrease in the proportion of patients independent with EVT alone (risk ratio (RR) 0.97, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.05; risk difference (RD) -1.5%; 95% CI -5.4% to 2.5%), and possibly a small increase in mortality with EVT alone (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.29; RD 1.2%, 95% CI -2.0% to 4.9%) . Moderate certainty evidence suggests that there is probably a small decrease in symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) with EVT alone (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.07; RD -1.0%; 95%CI -1.8% to 0.27%).

CONCLUSIONS

Low certainty evidence suggests that there is possibly a small decrease in the proportion of patients that achieve functional independence and a small increase in mortality with EVT alone. Moderate certainty evidence suggests that there is probably a small decrease in sICH with EVT alone. The accompanying guideline provides contextualised guidance based on this body of evidence.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021249873.

Acute Neurointervention for Ischemic Stroke

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is one of the major causes of death worldwide and a leading cause of disability. Until recently treatment of AIS was supportive, and in a minority of patients intravenous thrombolysis was available but with marginal clinical benefit. With the advent of stent retrievers, distal aspiration catheters as well as improved patient selection neurologic outcomes have greatly improved. However, the care of patients with AIS is still challenging and requires the early recognition of stroke symptoms, extensive diagnostic testing, early intervention, and advanced nursing and critical care.

Efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment with or without intravenous alteplase in acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

The current meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of direct endovascular treatment (EVT) and bridging therapy (EVT with prior intravenous thrombolysis (IVT)) in patients with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke.

METHODS

This meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. Eligible RCTs were identified through a systemic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) from the inception dates to January 10, 2022. The pooled analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 software. The primary outcome was functional outcome on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (range 0 to 5) at 90 days. The secondary outcomes included successful reperfusion, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality (mRS 6) within 90 days.

RESULTS

A total of 4 RCTs involving 1633 patients were finally included. Findings of pooled analyses indicated that neither the primary outcomes (no disability (mRS 0), no significant disability despite some symptoms (mRS 1), slight disability (mRS 2), moderate disability (mRS 3), moderately severe disability (mRS 4), severe disability (mRS 5), excellent outcome (mRS 0-1), functional independence outcome (mRS 0-2), and poor outcome (mRS 3-5)) nor the secondary outcomes (successful reperfusion, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality) in the EVT groups were not statistically significant compared with the IVT plus EVT groups (P > 0.05). In addition, the outcomes of sensitivity analysis implied that the findings of meta-analysis were credible.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with acute ischemic stroke due to LVO of anterior circulation, EVT alone yielded efficacy and safety outcomes similar to IVT plus EVT.

European Stroke Organisation - European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy expedited recommendation on indication for intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion

Six randomized controlled clinical trials have assessed whether mechanical thrombectomy (MT) alone is non-inferior to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) plus MT within 4.5 hours of symptom onset in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) ischaemic stroke and no contraindication to IVT. An expedited recommendation process was initiated by the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and conducted with the European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) according to ESO standard operating procedure based on the GRADE system. We identified two relevant Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) questions, performed systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the literature, assessed the quality of the available evidence and wrote evidence-based recommendations. Expert opinion was provided if insufficient evidence was available to provide recommendations based on the GRADE approach. For stroke patients with anterior circulation LVO directly admitted to a MT-capable centre ('mothership') within 4.5 hours of symptom onset and eligible for both treatments, we recommend IVT plus MT over MT alone (moderate evidence, strong recommendation). MT should not prevent the initiation of IVT, nor should IVT delay MT. In stroke patients with anterior circulation LVO admitted to a centre without MT facilities and eligible for IVT ≤4.5 hrs and MT, we recommend IVT followed by rapid transfer to a MT capable-centre ('drip-and-ship') in preference to omitting IVT (low evidence, strong recommendation). Expert consensus statements on ischaemic stroke on awakening from sleep are also provided. Patients with anterior circulation LVO stroke should receive IVT in addition to MT if they have no contraindications to either treatment.

Mechanical Thrombectomy vs Bridging Therapy for Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

and Purpose: Current guidelines recommend the use of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) plus intravenous thrombolysis (aka bridging therapy, [BT]) for patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. However, clinical equipoise exists in relation to the use of BT versus MT alone. Our objective is to compare the efficacy and safety of BT to MT for anterior circulation LVO.

METHODS

A systematic search of biomedical literature databases was performed from inception to October 29, 2021 to identify prospective and retrospective studies comparing the rates for functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) and mortality at 90 days, symptomatic hemorrhage (sICH), and successful recanalization rates for MT and BT. Effect size was represented by odds ratio (OR) and analysis was done using random effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed by I² and Cochrane's Q statistics.

RESULTS

Overall, 41 studies with 14885 patients were included. Mean age ± standard deviation (years) was 69±11 for BT and 70±11 for MT. All studies used alteplase as thrombolytic agent. BT group had 29% higher odds for functional independence (OR=1.29, 95% CI 1.16-1.44, I²=42%), 25% higher odds of successful reperfusion (OR=1.25, 95% CI=1.08-1.44, I²=42%) and a 31% decrease in odds for mortality (OR=.69, 95% CI .60-.80, I²=47%) compared with MT. sICH prevalence was similar between groups (OR=1.10, 95% CI=.95-1.28, I²=0%). Six of the studies were randomized clinical trials (RCT) with intention-to-treat analysis done in patients presenting directly to MT-capable centers. When analysis was restricted to these six RCT (n= 2333), no differences were observed in functional independence (OR=1.08, 95% CI=.91-1.27, I²=0%), sICH (OR=1.37, 95% CI=.95-1.97, I²=0%) or mortality (OR=.93, 95% CI=.74-1.16, I²=0%) between groups. However, successful reperfusion favored BT group (OR=1.35, 95% CI=1.06-1.73, I²=0%).

DISCUSSION

The odds for functional independence, successful reperfusion and mortality for the entire dataset favored the use of BT over MT (medium heterogeneity and low quality of the evidence). When analysis was restricted to RCT, both treatments had similar functional and safety outcomes (no heterogeneity), but recanalization rates favored BT group (no heterogeneity). Because these findings may differ in patients that present to non-MT-capable centers or with the use of other thrombolytic agents, further RCTs are needed.

Rapid Identification of Patients Eligible for Direct Emergent Computed Tomography Angiography during Acute Ischemic Stroke: The DARE-PACE Assessment

Background: We investigated the clinical signs to establish a method for rapid identification of patients with the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥ 8 eligible for direct brain CTA study; Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 2895 in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Four items in the NIHSS were selected as the main clinical signs of stroke; Results: A total of 922 (31.8%) patients had an initial NIHSS score of ≥8. The average door-to-CT time and door-to-CTA time were 13.4 ± 1.8 and 75.5 ± 44.5 min, respectively. Among 658 patients who had the priority signs, namely dense hemiplegia (D), aphasia with right arm drop (AR), and eyeball forced deviation (E), 634 patients (96.4%) with an NIHSS score ≥ 8 were identified. By using a classification and regression tree analysis, 153 patients with an NIHSS ≥ 8 were identified among 175 patients (87.4%) who had the secondary signs, namely hemiparesis with limb falls (P), aphasia (A), drowsy or worse consciousness (C), and eyeball limitation (E). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 85.4%, 97.7%, and 95.3%, respectively. Conclusions: The DARE-PACE assessment involving a checkbox list provides excellent accuracy for rapid identification of AIS patients with an NIHSS score ≥ 8 for direct CTA study to reduce the time delay for endovascular thrombectomy.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO)-European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) expedited recommendation on indication for intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion

Six randomized controlled clinical trials have assessed whether mechanical thrombectomy (MT) alone is non-inferior to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) plus MT within 4.5 hours of symptom onset in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic stroke and no contraindication to IVT. An expedited recommendation process was initiated by the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and conducted with the European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) according to ESO standard operating procedure based on the GRADE system. We identified two relevant Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) questions, performed systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the literature, assessed the quality of the available evidence, and wrote evidence-based recommendations. Expert opinion was provided if insufficient evidence was available to provide recommendations based on the GRADE approach.For stroke patients with anterior circulation LVO directly admitted to a MT-capable center ('mothership') within 4.5 hours of symptom onset and eligible for both treatments, we recommend IVT plus MT over MT alone (moderate evidence, strong recommendation). MT should not prevent the initiation of IVT, nor should IVT delay MT. In stroke patients with anterior circulation LVO admitted to a center without MT facilities and eligible for IVT ≤4.5 hours and MT, we recommend IVT followed by rapid transfer to a MT capable-center ('drip-and-ship') in preference to omitting IVT (low evidence, strong recommendation). Expert consensus statements on ischemic stroke on awakening from sleep are also provided. Patients with anterior circulation LVO stroke should receive IVT in addition to MT if they have no contraindications to either treatment.

Effect of stroke etiology on endovascular thrombectomy with or without intravenous alteplase: a subgroup analysis of DIRECT-MT

BACKGROUND

Stroke etiology might influence the clinical outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion receiving endovascular treatment (EVT) with or without thrombolysis.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether stroke etiology resulted in different efficacy and safety in patients treated with EVT-alone or EVT preceded by intravenous alteplase (combined therapy).

METHODS

We assessed the efficacy and safety of treatment strategy based on prespecified stroke etiology, cardioembolism (CE), large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA), and undetermined cause (UC) for patients enrolled in the DIRECT-MT trial. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the adjusted common OR for a shift of better mRS score for EVT-alone versus combined therapy. A term was entered to test for interaction.

RESULTS

In this study, 656 patients were grouped into three prespecified stroke etiologic subgroups. The adjusted common ORs for improvement in the 90-day ordinal mRS score with EVT-alone were 1.2 (95% CI 0.8 to 1.8) for CE, 1.6 (95% CI 0.8 to 3.3) for LAA, and 0.8 (95% CI 0.5 to 1.3) for UC. Compared with CE, EVT-alone was more likely to result in an mRS score of 0-1 (p_interaction=0.047) and extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction ≥2b (p_interaction=0.041) in the LAA group. The differences in mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 90 days were not significant between the subgroups (p＞0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results did not support the hypothesis that a specific treatment strategy based on stroke etiology should be used for patients with large vessel occlusion (NCT03469206).

Direct Endovascular Thrombectomy or With Prior Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis

Background and purpose: It is unclear whether endovascular thrombectomy alone compared with intravenous thrombolysis combination with endovascular thrombectomy can achieve similar neurological outcomes in patients with acute large vessel occlusion stroke. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare endovascular thrombectomy alone or intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular thrombectomy in this population.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We restricted our search to randomized clinical trials that examined the clinical outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy alone vs. intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular thrombectomy. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess study quality. Random-effects meta-analyses were used for evaluating all outcomes.

Results: Total three randomized controlled trials with 1,092 individuals enrolled were included in the meta-analysis, including 543 (49.7%) who received endovascular thrombectomy alone and 549 (50.3%) who received intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular thrombectomy. The primary outcome of 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin scale (mRS) score ≤ 2) was 44.6% (242/543) in the endovascular thrombectomy alone group vs. 42.8% (235/549) in the alteplase with endovascular thrombectomy group (odds ratio (OR), 1.08 [95% CI, 0.85–1.38]; P = 0.0539). Among pre-specified secondary outcomes, no significant between-group differences were found in excellent outcome (mRS score ≤ 1) (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.85–1.47]; P = 0.418), mortality at 90 days (OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.68–1.29]; P = 0.673), successful reperfusion (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b-3) (OR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.54–1.05]; P = 0.099), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.45–1.15]; P = 0.171).

Conclusions: Among patients with acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation within 4.5 h from the onset, endovascular thrombectomy alone was non-inferior to combined intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy.

Trauma Communications Center Coordinated Severity-Based Stroke Triage: Protocol of a Hybrid Type 1 Effectiveness-Implementation Study

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) can improve the outcomes of patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO), but a minority of patients with LVO are treated and there are disparities in timely access to MT. In part, this is because in most regions, including Alabama, the emergency medical service (EMS) transports all patients with suspected stroke, regardless of severity, to the nearest stroke center. Consequently, patients with LVO may experience delayed arrival at stroke centers with MT capability and worse outcomes. Alabama's trauma communications center (TCC) coordinates EMS transport of trauma patients by trauma severity and regional hospital capability. Our aims are to develop a severity-based stroke triage (SBST) care model based on Alabama's trauma system, compare the effectiveness of this care pathway to current stroke triage in Alabama for improving broad, equitable, and timely access to MT, and explore stakeholder perceptions of the intervention's feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability.

Methods: This is a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation study with a multi-phase mixed methods sequential design and an embedded observational stepped wedge cluster trial. We will extend TCC guided stroke severity assessment to all EMS regions in Alabama; conduct stakeholder interviews and focus groups to aid in development of region and hospital specific prehospital and inter-facility stroke triage plans for patients with suspected LVO; implement a phased rollout of TCC Coordinated SBST across Alabama's six EMS regions; and conduct stakeholder surveys and interviews to assess context-specific perceptions of the intervention. The primary outcome is the change in proportion of prehospital stroke system patients with suspected LVO who are treated with MT before and after implementation of TCC Coordinated SBST. Secondary outcomes include change in broad public health impact before and after implementation and stakeholder perceptions of the intervention's feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability using a mixed methods approach. With 1200 to 1300 total observations over 36 months, we have 80% power to detect a 15% improvement in the primary endpoint.

Discussion: This project, if successful, can demonstrate how the trauma system infrastructure can serve as the basis for a more integrated and effective system of emergency stroke care.

Preclinical modeling of mechanical thrombectomy

Mechanical thrombectomy to treat large vessel occlusions (LVO) causing a stroke is one of the most effective treatments in medicine, with a number needed to treat to improve clinical outcomes as low as 2.6. As the name implies, it is a mechanical solution to a blocked artery and modeling these mechanics preclinically for device design, regulatory clearance and high-fidelity physician training made clinical applications possible. In vitro simulation of LVO is extensively used to characterize device performance in representative vascular anatomies with physiologically accurate hemodynamics. Embolus analogues, validated against clots extracted from patients, provide a realistic simulated use experience. In vitro experimentation produces quantitative results such as particle analysis of distal emboli generated during the procedure, as well as pressure and flow throughout the experiment. Animal modeling, used mostly for regulatory review, allows estimation of device safety. Other than one recent development, nearly all animal modeling does not incorporate the desired target organ, the brain, but rather is performed in the extracranial circulation. Computational modeling of the procedure remains at the earliest stages but represents an enormous opportunity to rapidly characterize and iterate new thrombectomy concepts as well as optimize procedure workflow. No preclinical model is a perfect surrogate; however, models available can answer important questions during device development and have to date been successful in delivering efficacious and safe devices producing excellent clinical outcomes. This review reflects on the developments of preclinical modeling of mechanical thrombectomy with particular focus on clinical translation, as well as articulate existing gaps requiring additional research.

Aspects of ischemic stroke biomechanics derived using ex-vivo and in-vitro methods relating to mechanical thrombectomy

Establishing the underlying biomechanics of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and its treatment is fundamental to developing more effective clinical treatments for one of society's most impactful diseases. Recent changes in AIS management, driven by clinical evidence of improved treatments, has already led to a rapid rate of innovation, which is likely to be sustained for many years to come. These unprecedented AIS triage and treatment innovations provide a great opportunity to better understand the disease. In this article we provide a perspective on the recreation of AIS in the laboratory to inform contemporary device design and procedural techniques in mechanical thrombectomy. Presentation of these findings, which have been used to solve the applied problem of designing mechanical thrombectomy devices, is intended to help inform the development of basic biomechanics solutions for AIS.

Intravenous Thrombolysis Before Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Whether intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy provides additional benefit for functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke remains uncertain. We performed a meta‐analysis to compare the outcomes of direct mechanical thrombectomy (dMT) to mechanical thrombectomy with bridging using intravenous thrombolysis (bridging therapy [BT]) in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Methods and Results

We performed a literature search in the PubMed, Excerpta Medica database, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 2003, to April 26, 2021. We included randomized clinical trials and observational studies that reported the 90‐day functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing dMT compared with BT. The 12 included studies (3 randomized controlled trials and 9 observational studies) yielded 3924 participants (mean age, 68.0 years [SD, 13.1 years]; women, 44.2%; 1887 participants who received dMT and 2037 participants who received BT). A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trial and observational data revealed similar 90‐day functional independence (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.90–1.19), mortality (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.78–1.36), and successful recanalization (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.76–1.14) for patients treated with dMT or BT. Compared with those in the BT group, patients in the dMT group were less likely to experience symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51–0.91; P=0.008) or any intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61–0.84; P<0.001).

Conclusions

In this meta‐analysis of patients with acute ischemic stroke, we found no significant differences in 90‐day functional outcome or mortality between dMT and BT, but a lower rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage for dMT. These findings support the use of dMT without intravenous thrombolysis bridging therapy.

Registration

URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: 42021234664.

Modelling Combined Intravenous Thrombolysis and Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischaemic Stroke: Understanding the Relationship between Stent Retriever Configuration and Clot Lysis Mechanisms

Background: Combined intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy (IVT-MT) is a common treatment in acute ischaemic stroke, however the interaction between IVT and MT from a physiological standpoint is poorly understood. In this pilot study, we conduct numerical simulations of combined IVT-MT with various idealised stent retriever configurations to evaluate performance in terms of complete recanalisation times and lysis patterns. Methods: A 3D patient-specific geometry of a terminal internal carotid artery with anterior and middle cerebral arteries is reconstructed, and a thrombus is artificially implanted in the MCA branch. Various idealised stent retriever configurations are implemented by varying stent diameter and stent placement, and a configuration without a stent retriever provides a baseline for comparison. A previously validated multi-level model of thrombolysis is used, which incorporates blood flow, drug transport, and fibrinolytic reactions within a fibrin thrombus. Results: Fastest total recanalisation was achieved in the thrombus without a stent retriever, with lysis times increasing with stent retriever diameter. Two mechanisms of clot lysis were established: axial and radial permeation. Axial permeation from the clot front was the primary mechanism of lysis in all configurations, as it facilitated increased protein binding with fibrin fibres. Introducing a stent retriever channel allowed for radial permeation, which occurred at the fluid-thrombus interface, although lysis was much slower in the radial direction because of weaker secondary velocities. Conclusions: Numerical models can be used to better understand the complex physiological relationship between IVT and MT. Two different mechanisms of lysis were established, providing a basis towards improving the efficacy of combined treatments.

Difficult questions of intravenous thrombolytic therapy in ischemic stroke

The article reflects the current achievements in the field of reperfusion therapy for ischemic stroke. The data are presented that allow a practicing neurologist to make informed decisions about intravenous thrombolysis in difficult clinical situations: minor stroke, suspected stroke "mask", atypical clinical picture, patient's age over 80 years, posterior circulation stroke, isolated dizziness, severe neurological deficit, large artery occlusion, chronic neuroimaging changes, polymorbidity and low functional level before stroke. It has been shown that an increase in the number of candidates for intravenous thrombolysis can be achieved by intensifying the selection of patients within the 4.5-hour therapeutic window, which primarily implies the optimization of local stroke treatment protocols with a reduction in the door-to-needle time, as well as, in the short term, expanding the therapeutic window. Approaches to reduce the risk of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation are discussed. We are also talking about a rare but life-threatening complication angioedema. Thus, the intensification of intravenous thrombolysis, as well as an increase in its effectiveness and safety are the primary tasks of each stroke department.

A Prospective Study to Investigate Controlling Blood Pressure Under Transcranial Doppler After Endovascular Treatment in Patients With Occlusion of Anterior Circulation

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of blood pressure (BP) management with transcranial Doppler (TCD) guidance in patients with large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) on the long-term prognosis.

Methods: This was a prospective study; 232 patients were nonrandomized assigned to TCD-guided BP management (TBM) group or non-TCD-guided BP management (NBM) group. In the TBM group, BP was controlled according to TCD showing cerebral blood flow fluctuation. In the NBM group, BP was controlled according to the guidelines. The primary endpoint was a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 2 or lower at 90 days. The safety outcomes were the rates of symptomatic or any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and mortality at 90 days.

Results: One hundred sixty-three patients were assigned to the TBM group, and 69 were assigned to the NBM group. In the propensity score-matched cohort (65 matches in both groups), there was significant difference in the proportion of participants with mRS 0–2 at 90 days according to BP management (adjusted odds ratio 3.34, 95% CI 1.36 to 8.22). There was no difference in the rates of symptomatic or any ICH and mortality between two groups. In inverse probability-weighted regression adjustment analysis, mortality decreased significantly in the TBM group than in the NBM group (adjusted odds ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.76–0.99, p = 0.03).

Conclusion: In patients with acute ischemic stroke from large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation, BP management under TCD was superior to NBM in improving the clinical outcomes at 90 days.

Clinical Trial Registration: (URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=55484; Identifier: ChiCTR2000034443.

Thrombectomy with or without thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recently, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about direct mechanical thrombectomy (d-MT) vs. intravenous thrombolysis before MT (IVT + MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients have been reported. This study aims to investigate the differences in efficacy and safety of MT with or without IVT for the treatment of patients with AIS.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov from March 2011 to February 2021 were systematically searched for studies comparing the two strategies directly. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to assess the risk of bias and pool the data with a random effect model.

RESULTS

We pooled 1633 patients from 4 RCTs. The primary outcome, proportion of patients achieving functional independence (mRS0-2) at 90 days, was not significantly different between the two groups (MT 46.02% vs. IVT + MT 45.47%, OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.84-1.25). However, the risk of developing any ICH was lower in the d-MT group (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.63-0.89). In addition, the remaining secondary outcomes, such as successful reperfusion (eTICI scale, 2b-3) at final angiogram (OR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.62-1.03) and mortality at 90 days (RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.85-1.31), did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes were similar for d-MT and IVT + MT, with d-MT having a lower risk of any ICH. We need to focus on precision medicine in the future.

REGISTRATION

URL: http://inplasy.com ; Unique identifier: INPLASY202130094.

Direct endovascular treatment versus bridging therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke eligible for intravenous thrombolysis: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

In this review and meta-analysis we sought to compare the efficacy and safety of direct endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and bridging therapy for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT)-eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusions (AIS-LVO).

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies providing outcomes of patients with IVT-eligible AIS-LVO who have undergone EVT with or without IVT. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days. The secondary outcomes included the rates of (1) an excellent outcome defined as an mRS score of 0 or 1 at 90 days, (2) mortality at 90 days, (3) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), (4) any type of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), (5) successful recanalization, and (6) clot migration.

RESULTS

We included three RCTs and six observational studies (4 of which were propensity score-adjusted studies) with a total of 3133 patients. In unadjusted and adjusted analyses, no differences in the rates of mRS scores 0-2, mRS scores 0-1, mortality at 90 days, sICH or successful recanalization were detected between patients with AIS-LVO who underwent direct EVT or bridging therapy. The patients treated with direct EVT had a lower risk ratio for any type of ICH and clot migration than did the patients treated with bridging therapy.

CONCLUSION

Compared with bridging therapy, direct EVT may be equally effective and yield a lower rate of ICH and clot migration in patients with AIS.

TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO: CRD42021236691.

Efficacy and safety of bridging thrombolysis initiated before transfer in a drip-and-ship stroke service

Objective

Data regarding the efficacy and safety of bridging thrombolysis (BT) initiated before transfer for evaluation of endovascular therapy is heterogeneous. We, therefore, analyse efficacy and safety of BT in patients treated within a drip-and-ship stroke service.

Methods

Consecutive adult patients suffering from acute ischaemic stroke and large-vessel occlusions (LVO) transferred to our comprehensive stroke centre for evaluation of endovascular therapy in 2017–2020 were identified from a local prospective stroke database and categorised according to BT and no-BT. BT was defined as intravenous thrombolysis initiated before transfer. LVO was assessed before and after transfer. Functional outcome before stroke and at 3 months using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) was determined. Excellent outcome was defined as mRS 0–1 or return to prestroke mRS. For safety analysis, intracranial haemorrhages and mortality at 3 months were analysed. Main analysis was limited to patients with anterior circulation stroke.

Results

Of N=714 patients, n=394 (55.2%) received BT. More patients in the BT group with documented LVO before transfer recanalised without endovascular therapy (n=46, 11.7%) than patients who did not receive BT before transfer (n=4, 1.3%, p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, BT was the strongest independent predictor of early recanalisation (adjusted OR 10.9, 95% CI 3.8 to 31.1, p<0.001). BT tended to be an independent predictor of an excellent outcome at 3 months (adjusted OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.96, p=0.077). There were no differences in safety between the BT and no-BT groups.

Conclusions

BT initiated before transfer was a strong independent predictor of early recanalisation.

Safety and Outcomes of Thrombectomy in Ischemic Stroke With vs Without IV Thrombolysis

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that IV thrombolysis (IVT) treatment before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is associated with better outcomes in patients with anterior circulation large artery occlusion (LAO) stroke, we examined a large real-world database, the Safe Implementation of Treatment in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombectomy Register (SITS-ISTR).

METHODS

We identified centers recording ≥10 consecutive patients in the SITS-ISTR, with at least 70% available modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 3 months during 2014 to 2019. We defined LAO as intracranial internal carotid artery, first and second segment of middle cerebral artery, and first segment of anterior cerebral artery. Main outcomes were functional independence (mRS score 0-2) and death at 3 months and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) per modified SITS-Monitoring Study. We performed propensity score-matched (PSM) and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of 6,350 patients from 42 centers, 3,944 (62.1%) received IVT. IVT + EVT-treated patients had less frequent atrial fibrillation, ongoing anticoagulation, previous stroke, heart failure, and prestroke disability. PSM analysis showed that IVT + EVT-treated patients had a higher rate of functional independence than patients treated with EVT alone (46.4% vs 40.3%, p < 0.001) and a lower rate of death at 3 months (20.3% vs 23.3%, p = 0.035). SICH rates (3.5% vs 3.0%, p = 0.42) were similar in both groups. Multivariate adjustment yielded results consistent with PSM.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment with IVT was associated with favorable outcomes in EVT-treated LAO stroke in the SITS-ISTR. These findings, while indicative of international routine clinical practice, are limited by observational design, unmeasured confounding, and possible residual confounding by indication.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that IVT before EVT increases the probability of functional independence at 3 months compared to EVT alone.

Direct mechanical thrombectomy without intravenous thrombolysis versus bridging therapy for acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Direct mechanical thrombectomy may result in similar outcomes compared to a bridging approach with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT + MT) in acute ischemic stroke. Recent randomized controlled trials have varied in their design and noninferiority margin.

AIM

We sought to meta-analyze accumulated trial data to assess the difference and non-inferiority in clinical and procedural outcomes between direct mechanical thrombectomy and bridging therapy.

SUMMARY OF REVIEW

We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted for the pooled data. The primary outcome was good functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤ 2). Secondary outcomes included excellent functional outcome (mRS ≤ 1), mortality, any intracranial hemorrhage, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, successful reperfusion (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥ 2 b), and procedure-related complications. Four randomized controlled trials comprising 1633 patients (817 direct mechanical thrombectomy, 816 bridging therapy) were included. There were no statistical differences for the 90-day good functional outcome (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.84-1.25, p = 0.54, I²= 0%), and the absolute risk difference was 1% (95% CI: -4% to 5%). The lower 95% CI falls within the strictest noninferiority margin of -10% among included randomized control trials. Direct mechanical thrombectomy reduced the odds of successful reperfusion (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.60-0.97, p = 0.03, I²= 0%) and any intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49-0.86, p = 0.003, I²= 38%). There was no difference in the remaining secondary outcomes. The risk of bias for all studies was low.

CONCLUSION

The combined trial data assessing direct mechanical thrombectomy versus bridging therapy showed no difference in improving good functional outcome. The wide noninferiority thresholds set by individual trials are in contrast with the clinical consensus on minimally important differences. However, our pooled analysis indicates noninferiority of direct mechanical thrombectomy with a 4% margin of confidence. The application of these findings is limited to patients presenting directly to mechanical thrombectomy-capable centers and real-world workflow times may differ against those achieved in a trial setting.