Marijuana Use and the Risk of Early Ischemic Stroke: The Stroke Prevention in Young Adults Study

Cannabis and Craniotomy for Glioblastoma: Impact on Complications and Health Care Utilization

OBJECTIVE

Despite advances in treatment of glioblastomas (GBMs), the median survival remains 14-16 months. In the United States, 52.5 million people ≥12 years of age used cannabis in 2021. We aim to elucidate differences in complications after craniotomy for resection of GBM between users and nonusers of cannabis.

METHODS

Merative MarketScan Research Data (2008-2019) (includes >265 million patients) were used to extract adults (≥18 years of age) with GBM diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases-9 code 191.x and International Classification of Diseases-10 code C71.x) who had a craniotomy (Current Procedure Terminology code 61510) from inpatient admission data. The inverse probability treatment weighted analysis balanced the groups of cannabis abuse disorder (CAD) and no CAD in terms of age, gender, insurance coverage, comorbidities, and prior 12-month opioid dependence.

RESULTS

Individuals with CAD were younger (median, 37 vs. 51 years; P < 0.0001). There was a lower percentage of women (19% vs. 45%; P < 0.0001). In the CAD group, opioid abuse pattern for ≥12 months was higher (16% vs. 5%; P = 0.001) and the rate of complications was higher (32% vs. 15%; P = 0.001) during index hospital stay. At 6 months postdischarge, neurologic complications were higher among the CAD group (27% vs. 8%; P < 0.001). At 1 year postdischarge, patients with CAD sought fewer outpatient services (P = 0.012). More neurologic complications were seen in the CAD group (31% vs. 12%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective population-based study sounds a higher rate of neurologic complications among patients using cannabis who also had a newly diagnosed GBM. This suggests the lack of a protective effect from use of cannabis in patients with primary malignant brain tumors.

Locked-in syndrome following elective cervical foraminotomy: a case report

INTRODUCTION

There are no previously reported cases of locked-in syndrome occurring following cervical spinal surgery. We describe a case of locked-in syndrome following an elective cervical foraminotomy and discuss potential etiologies and contributing factors to our patient's presentation.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 54-year-old male with a history of head and neck cancer and prior anterior cervical discectomy and fusion presented with neck pain following a motor vehicle accident. The patient underwent C4-C7 left-sided cervical posterior foraminotomy with no intraoperative complications. On postoperative day 1, the patient suddenly developed rapidly progressing weakness of the extremities and soon became non-verbal. CT angiography and near-infrared spectroscopy confirmed a basilar artery occlusion and left vertebral artery dissection. On MRI, infarcts involving the bilateral pons, left cerebral hemisphere, and left cerebellar infarct were identified.

CONCLUSION

The etiology of locked-in syndrome in our patient remains unclear, but it is likely multifactorial. It is possible that the patient was predisposed to vascular injury from prior radiation therapy to the head and neck. In addition, intraoperative vascular insult may have occurred from vibrational shear stress, in turn leading to a vertebral artery dissection, basilar artery occlusion, and pontine infarct, ultimately resulting in our patient's locked-in state.

Role of Cannabinoid Signaling in Cardiovascular Function and Ischemic Injury

Cardiovascular disease represents a leading cause of death, morbidity, and societal economic burden. The prevalence of cannabis use has significantly increased due to legalization and an increased societal acceptance of cannabis. Therefore, it is critically important that we gain a greater understanding of the effects and risks of cannabinoid use on cardiovascular diseases as well as the potential for cannabinoid-directed drugs to be used as therapeutics for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. This review summarizes our current understanding of the role of cannabinoid receptors in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and myocardial ischemia and explores their use as therapeutic targets in the treatment of ischemic heart disease. Endocannabinoids are elevated in patients with atherosclerosis, and activation of cannabinoid type 1 receptors (CB1Rs) generally leads to an enhancement of plaque formation and atherosclerosis. In contrast, selective activation of cannabinoid type 2 receptors (CB2Rs) appears to exert protective effects against atherosclerosis. Endocannabinoid signaling is also activated by myocardial ischemia. CB2R signaling appears to protect the heart from ischemic injury, whereas the role of CB1R in ischemic injury is less clear. This narrative review serves to summarize current research on the role of cannabinoid signaling in cardiovascular function with the goal of identifying critical knowledge gaps and future studies to address those gaps in a way that facilitates the development of new treatments and better cardiovascular health. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Cardiovascular diseases, including atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction, are a leading cause of death. Cannabinoid drugs have well known acute effects on cardiovascular function, including tachycardia and orthostatic hypotension. The recent legalization of marijuana and cannabinoids for both medical and recreational use has dramatically increased their prevalence of use. This narrative review on the role of cannabinoid signaling in cardiovascular disease contributes to a better understanding of this topic by integrating current knowledge and identifying critical gaps.

Mental health adverse events with cannabis use diagnosed in the Emergency Department: what are we finding now and are our findings accurate?

We have previously reviewed the types and numbers of cannabis-associated adverse events that have mental health presentations that are encountered in the Emergency Department. A particular challenge in examining these events is disentangling cannabis use adverse events from adverse events associated with use of multiple recreational substances. Since that review was published, cannabis legalization for recreational use has greatly expanded world-wide and with these changes in the legal climate has come clearer information around the frequency of adverse events seen in the Emergency Department. However, as we examined the current state of the literature, we also examined some of research designs and the biases that may be impacting the validity of the data in this field. The biases both of clinicians and researchers as well as research approaches to studying these events may be impacting our ability to assess the interaction between cannabis and mental health. For example, many of the studies performed examining cannabis-related admissions to the Emergency Department were administrative studies that relied on front line clinicians to identify and attribute that cannabis use was associated with any particular admission. This narrative review provides an overview on what we currently know about mental health adverse events in the Emergency Department with a focus on the mental health impacts both for those with and without a history of mental illness. The evidence that cannabis use can adversely impact genders and sexes differently is also discussed. This review outlines what the most common adverse events related to mental health with cannabis use are; as well as noting the most concerning but much rarer events that have been reported. Additionally, this review suggests a framework for critical evaluation of this field of study going forward.

Myopericarditis Associated With Marijuana Intake: A Case Report and Literature Review

A 26-year-old male who endorses daily cigarette smoking and marijuana vaping presented to the emergency department with acute onset of left-sided chest pain radiating to the left shoulder. Physical examination was unremarkable, but laboratory investigations showed elevated white blood cells, cardiac biomarkers including troponin and creatine kinase, and mildly elevated C-reactive protein levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Electrocardiogram displayed subtle ST-segment elevation in a diffuse pattern, leading to a diagnosis of acute myopericarditis. The patient was treated with anti-inflammatory medication and supportive care and instructed to cease cannabis use.

Cannabis and adverse cardiovascular events: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Background

Cannabis is the most used illicit drug in the world. Global trends of decriminalization and legalization of cannabis lead to various forms of cannabis use and bring great concerns over adverse events, particularly in the cardiovascular (CV) system. To date, the association between cannabis and adverse CV events is still controversial.

Purpose

We aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the adverse CV events from cannabis use.

Patients and methods

A systematic search for publications describing the adverse CV events of cannabis use, including acute myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke, was performed via PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Data on effect estimates in individual studies were extracted and combined via random-effects meta-analysis using the DerSimonian and Laird method, a generic inverse-variance strategy.

Results

Twenty studies with a total of 183,410,651 patients were included. The proportion of males was 23.7%. The median age and follow-up time were 42.4 years old (IQR: 37.4, 50.0) and 6.2 years (IQR: 1.7, 27.7), respectively. The prevalence of cannabis use was 1.9%. Cannabis use was not significantly associated with acute MI (pooled odds ratio (OR): 1.29; 95%CI: 0.80, 2.08), stroke (pooled OR 1.35; 95%CI: 0.74, 2.47), and adverse CV events (pooled OR: 1.47; 95%CI: 0.98, 2.20).

Conclusion

The risk of adverse CV events including acute MI and stroke does not exhibit a significant increase with cannabis exposure. However, caution should be exercised when interpreting the findings due to the heterogeneity of the studies.

Differences in Multiple Risk Factors Between Black and White Individuals With Young-Onset Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Stroke in young adults constitutes 15%-18% of all ischemic stroke cases. Black individuals have an excess risk of ischemic stroke especially in young adults. Although it is known that Black patients have a higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes, few studies have addressed the association of concurrent multiple vascular risk factors with the excess risk of early-onset stroke among Black individuals.

METHODS

A population-based case-control study of early-onset ischemic stroke, ages 15-49 years, was conducted in the Baltimore-Washington DC region between 1992 and 2007. Presence of the risk factors of obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and current smoking were obtained from both cases and controls by an in-person interview. Risk factor groups were defined as (1) 1 risk factor, (2) 2 risk factors, (3) 3 risk factors, and (4) 4 risk factors. Logistic regression analysis adjusting for age and sex was used to evaluate the association between each risk factor group and ischemic stroke compared with the reference group with no risk factors.

RESULTS

The study included 1,034 cases and 1,091 controls. Of the cases, 47% were Black, 54% were men, and the mean (±SD) age was 41.0 (±6.9) years. The odds of having a stroke increased exponentially as the number of risk factors increased, 2.1, 2.6, 7.6, 16.5, all p < 0.001, for groups 1-4, respectively. When stratified by race, Black individuals were approximately 6 times more likely to have all 4 risk factors.

DISCUSSION

The risk of stroke in young adults increased exponentially with the number of risk factors. Young Black patients with ischemic stroke were approximately 6 times more likely to have the co-occurrence of obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking compared with their White counterparts. Targeting public health interventions to identify and improve care to Black young adults with multiple stroke risk factors may have substantial impact on lowering risk of stroke.