Response time and reliability of three neonatal patient-triggered ventilators

Feasibility and physiological effects of noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in preterm infants

BackgroundNoninvasive neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NIV-NAVA) was introduced to our clinical practice via a pilot and a randomized observational study to assess its safety, feasibility, and short-term physiological effects.MethodsThe pilot protocol applied NIV-NAVA to 11 infants on nasal CPAP, high-flow nasal cannula, or nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation (NIMV), in multiple 2- to 4-h periods of NIV-NAVA for comparison. This provided the necessary data to design a randomized, controlled observational crossover study in eight additional infants to compare the physiological effects of NIV-NAVA with NIMV during 2-h steady-state conditions. We recorded the peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), FiO2, Edi, oxygen saturations (histogram analysis), transcutaneous PCO2, and movement with an Acoustic Respiratory Movement Sensor.ResultsThe NAVA catheter was used for 81 patient days without complications. NIV-NAVA produced significant reductions (as a percentage of measurements on NIMV) in the following: PIP, 13%; FiO2, 13%; frequency of desaturations, 42%; length of desaturations, 32%; and phasic Edi, 19%. Infant movement and caretaker movement were reduced by 42% and 27%, respectively. Neural inspiratory time was increased by 39 ms on NIV-NAVA, possibly due to Head's paradoxical reflex.ConclusionNIV-NAVA was a safe, alternative mode of noninvasive support that produced beneficial short-term physiological effects, especially compared with NIMV.

Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation for Preterm Neonates: Synchronized or Not?

Although continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is an effective strategy to prevent invasive ventilation, failure rates are high and many babies require endotracheal intubation. Prolonged exposure to mechanical ventilation is linked with bronchopulmonary dysplasia and other morbidities. Different techniques of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) have been proposed as an alternative to CPAP. Bilevel NIPPV and conventional mechanical ventilator-driven NIPPV are used in clinical practice. Both methods differ substantially in pressures and cycling times, potentially affecting their mechanism of action. This review focuses on noninvasive ventilation strategies, their physiologic effects, impact on clinical outcome parameters, and effects of synchronization.

Synchronized mechanical ventilation for respiratory support in newborn infants

BACKGROUND

During synchronised mechanical ventilation, positive airway pressure and spontaneous inspiration coincide. If synchronous ventilation is provoked, adequate gas exchange should be achieved at lower peak airway pressures, potentially reducing baro/volutrauma, air leak and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Synchronous ventilation can potentially be achieved by manipulation of rate and inspiratory time during conventional ventilation and employment of patient-triggered ventilation.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of:(i) synchronised mechanical ventilation, delivered as high-frequency positive pressure ventilation (HFPPV) or patient-triggered ventilation (assist control ventilation (ACV) and synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV)), with conventional ventilation or high-frequency oscillation (HFO);(ii) different types of triggered ventilation (ACV, SIMV, pressure-regulated volume control ventilation (PRVCV), SIMV with pressure support (PS) and pressure support ventilation (PSV)).

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review group to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2016, Issue 5), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to June 5 2016), EMBASE (1980 to June 5 2016), and CINAHL (1982 to June 5 2016). We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials comparing synchronised ventilation delivered as HFPPV to CMV, or ACV/SIMV to CMV or HFO in neonates. Randomised trials comparing different triggered ventilation modes (ACV, SIMV, SIMV plus PS, PRVCV and PSV) in neonates.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were collected regarding clinical outcomes including mortality, air leaks (pneumothorax or pulmonary interstitial emphysema (PIE)), severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grades 3 and 4), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (oxygen dependency beyond 28 days), moderate/severe BPD (oxygen/respiratory support dependency beyond 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (PMA) and duration of weaning/ventilation.Eight comparisons were made: (i) HFPPV versus CMV; (ii) ACV/SIMV versus CMV; (iii) SIMV or SIMV + PS versus HFO; iv) ACV versus SIMV; (v) SIMV plus PS versus SIMV; vi) SIMV versus PRVCV; vii) SIMV vs PSV; viii) ACV versus PSV. Data analysis was conducted using relative risk for categorical outcomes, mean difference for outcomes measured on a continuous scale.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-two studies are included in this review. The meta-analysis demonstrates that HFPPV compared to CMV was associated with a reduction in the risk of air leak (typical relative risk (RR) for pneumothorax was 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 to 0.93). ACV/SIMV compared to CMV was associated with a shorter duration of ventilation (mean difference (MD) -38.3 hours, 95% CI -53.90 to -22.69). SIMV or SIMV + PS was associated with a greater risk of moderate/severe BPD compared to HFO (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.65) and a longer duration of mechanical ventilation compared to HFO (MD 1.89 days, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.74).ACV compared to SIMV was associated with a trend to a shorter duration of weaning (MD -42.38 hours, 95% CI -94.35 to 9.60). Neither HFPPV nor triggered ventilation was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of BPD. There was a non-significant trend towards a lower mortality rate using HFPPV versus CMV and a non-significant trend towards a higher mortality rate using triggered ventilation versus CMV. No disadvantage of HFPPV or triggered ventilation was noted regarding other outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared to conventional ventilation, benefit is demonstrated for both HFPPV and triggered ventilation with regard to a reduction in air leak and a shorter duration of ventilation, respectively. In none of the trials was complex respiratory monitoring undertaken and thus it is not possible to conclude that the mechanism of producing those benefits is by provocation of synchronised ventilation. Triggered ventilation in the form of SIMV ± PS resulted in a greater risk of BPD and duration of ventilation compared to HFO. Optimisation of trigger and ventilator design with respect to respiratory diagnosis is encouraged before embarking on further trials. It is essential that newer forms of triggered ventilation are tested in randomised trials that are adequately powered to assess long-term outcomes before they are incorporated into routine clinical practice.

Synchronized mechanical ventilation for respiratory support in newborn infants

BACKGROUND

During synchronised mechanical ventilation, positive airway pressure and spontaneous inspiration coincide. If synchronous ventilation is provoked, adequate gas exchange should be achieved at lower peak airway pressures, potentially reducing baro/volutrauma, air leak and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Synchronous ventilation can potentially be achieved by manipulation of rate and inspiratory time during conventional ventilation and employment of patient-triggered ventilation.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of:(i) synchronised mechanical ventilation, delivered as high-frequency positive pressure ventilation (HFPPV) or patient-triggered ventilation (assist control ventilation (ACV) and synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV)), with conventional ventilation or high-frequency oscillation (HFO);(ii) different types of triggered ventilation (ACV, SIMV, pressure-regulated volume control ventilation (PRVCV), SIMV with pressure support (PS) and pressure support ventilation (PSV)).

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review group to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2016, Issue 5), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to June 5 2016), EMBASE (1980 to June 5 2016), and CINAHL (1982 to June 5 2016). We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials comparing synchronised ventilation delivered as HFPPV to CMV, or ACV/SIMV to CMV or HFO in neonates. Randomised trials comparing different triggered ventilation modes (ACV, SIMV, SIMV plus PS, PRVCV and PSV) in neonates.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were collected regarding clinical outcomes including mortality, air leaks (pneumothorax or pulmonary interstitial emphysema (PIE)), severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grades 3 and 4), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (oxygen dependency beyond 28 days), moderate/severe BPD (oxygen/respiratory support dependency beyond 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (PMA) and duration of weaning/ventilation.Eight comparisons were made: (i) HFPPV versus CMV; (ii) ACV/SIMV versus CMV; (iii) SIMV or SIMV + PS versus HFO; iv) ACV versus SIMV; (v) SIMV plus PS versus SIMV; vi) SIMV versus PRVCV; vii) SIMV vs PSV; viii) ACV versus PSV. Data analysis was conducted using relative risk for categorical outcomes, mean difference for outcomes measured on a continuous scale.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-two studies are included in this review. The meta-analysis demonstrates that HFPPV compared to CMV was associated with a reduction in the risk of air leak (typical relative risk (RR) for pneumothorax was 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 to 0.93). ACV/SIMV compared to CMV was associated with a shorter duration of ventilation (mean difference (MD) -38.3 hours, 95% CI -53.90 to -22.69). SIMV or SIMV + PS was associated with a greater risk of moderate/severe BPD compared to HFO (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.65) and a longer duration of mechanical ventilation compared to HFO (MD 1.89 days, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.74).ACV compared to SIMV was associated with a trend to a shorter duration of weaning (MD -42.38 hours, 95% CI -94.35 to 9.60). Neither HFPPV nor triggered ventilation was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of BPD. There was a non-significant trend towards a lower mortality rate using HFPPV versus CMV and a non-significant trend towards a higher mortality rate using triggered ventilation versus CMV. No disadvantage of HFPPV or triggered ventilation was noted regarding other outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared to conventional ventilation, benefit is demonstrated for both HFPPV and triggered ventilation with regard to a reduction in air leak and a shorter duration of ventilation, respectively. In none of the trials was complex respiratory monitoring undertaken and thus it is not possible to conclude that the mechanism of producing those benefits is by provocation of synchronised ventilation. Triggered ventilation in the form of SIMV ± PS resulted in a greater risk of BPD and duration of ventilation compared to HFO. Optimisation of trigger and ventilator design with respect to respiratory diagnosis is encouraged before embarking on further trials. It is essential that newer forms of triggered ventilation are tested in randomised trials that are adequately powered to assess long-term outcomes before they are incorporated into routine clinical practice.

Evaluation of Ultrasound-Based Sensor to Monitor Respiratory and Nonrespiratory Movement and Timing in Infants

GOAL

To describe and validate a noncontacting sensor that used reflected ultrasound to separately monitor respiratory, nonrespiratory, and caretaker movements of infants.

METHODS

An in-phase and quadrature (I & Q) detection scheme provided adequate bandwidth, in conjunction with postdetection filtering, to separate the three types of movement. The respiratory output was validated by comparing it to the electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) obtained from an infant ventilator in 11 infants. The nonrespiratory movement output was compared to movement detected by miniature accelerometers attached to the wrists, ankles, and heads of seven additional infants. Caretaker movement was compared to visual observations annotated in the recordings.

RESULTS

The respiratory rate determined by the sensor was equivalent to that from the Edi signal. The sensor could detect the onset of inspiration significantly earlier than the Edi signal (23+/-69 ms). Nonrespiratory movement was identified with an agreement of 0.9 with the accelerometers. It potentially interfered with the respiratory output an average of 4.7+/-4.5% and 14.9+/15% of the time in infants not requiring or on ventilatory support, respectively. Caretaker movements were identified with 98% sensitivity and specificity. The sensor outputs were independent of body coverings or position.

CONCLUSION

This single, noncontacting sensor can independently quantify these three types of movement.

SIGNIFICANCE

It is feasible to use the sensor as trigger for synchronizing mechanical ventilators to spontaneous breathing, to quantify overall movement, to determine sleep state, to detect seizures, and to document the amount and effects of caretaker activity in infants.

Advances in respiratory support for high risk newborn infants

BACKGROUND

A significant proportion of premature infants present with respiratory failure early in life and require supplemental oxygen and some form of mechanical respiratory support.

FINDINGS

Many technical advances in the devices for neonatal respiratory support have occurred in recent years and new management strategies have been developed and evaluated in this population. This article describes some of these novel methods and discusses their application and possible advantages and limitations.

CONCLUSION

Newer methods of respiratory support have led to marked improvement in outcome of premature infants with respiratory failure. Some of these strategies are very promising but further investigation to evaluate their short term efficacy and impact on long term respiratory and other relevant outcomes is needed before wider use.

Effects of synchronisation during SiPAP-generated nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in preterm infants

OBJECTIVE

The SiPAP flow driver (Care Fusion, Dublin, Ohio, USA) offers synchronised nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (sNIPPV) using an abdominal capsule. This study aims to describe the accuracy and effects of synchronised NIPPV using SiPAP in preterm infants.

DESIGN

Ten infants, born <28 weeks' gestation, receiving synchronised SiPAP-generated NIPPV, in 'biphasic trigger' mode, were observed. Abdominal capsule signals, delivered pressures, respiratory pattern and oxygen saturations were recorded. Tidal volume (VT), apnoeas, proportion of breaths supported by SiPAP and time between inspiration onset and SiPAP pressure rise were analysed.

RESULTS

Infants were of median 26(+0) weeks' gestational age and birth weight 776 g. Mean (SD) respiratory rate (RR) was 53 (14)/min. 82% (17) of spontaneous breaths triggered a SiPAP pressure peak. Mean time between inspiration and SiPAP pressure rise was 28 (20) ms. There was no difference in VT when breaths triggered a SiPAP pressure peak compared with breaths without a pressure peak. No VT was generated by pressure peaks delivered during apnoea. Capsule signals were not recognised following >10% of breaths, resulting in asynchronous NIPPV delivery. Movements resulted in irregular SiPAP pressures and desaturation. When the RR was faster, >55/min, breaths irregularly triggered a SiPAP pressure peak (p=0.003). Compared with times when every breath resulted in a pressure peak, lower mean pressures were achieved, 7.9 vs 8.4 cm H2O (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The SiPAP synchronisation system triggered rapidly with most spontaneous breaths, but did not result in larger tidal volumes. When the RR was >55/min, the SiPAP delivered fewer pressure peaks at lower pressures.

Nasal flow-synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation to facilitate weaning in very low-birthweight infants: unmasked randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Nasal flow-synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NFSIPPV) is a new non-invasive ventilatory mode that delivers synchronized mechanical breaths through the nasal prongs. An unmasked, prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of NFSIPPV and conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in increasing the likelihood for successful extubation in very low-birthweight infants.

METHODS

Consecutive infants who weighed <1251 g at birth, required endotracheal intubation within 48 h of birth and met specific predetermined criteria for extubation by day 14 of life were recruited. Each infant was randomized to receive either NFSIPPV or NCPAP soon after extubation. Extubation was deemed successful if re-intubation was not needed for at least 72 h. Criteria for re-intubation were persistent severe respiratory acidosis (arterial pH <7.20 with pCO2 >70 mmHg), severe recurrent apneic episodes not responding to increased ventilatory settings and then requiring bag ventilation, and hypoxemia (SaO2 <90% or pO2 <60 mmHg with FiO2 > or =0.70).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups at randomization. Ninety-four percent (30/32) infants were successfully extubated to NFSIPPV but only 61% (19/31) to conventional NCPAP (P > 0.005). Infants assigned to NCPAP failed extubation mainly because of apnea and hypercapnia, and those assigned to NFSIPPV because of hypoxia. Neither procedure induced major adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

NFSIPPV in the post-extubation period is safe and more effective than NCPAP in preventing re-ventilation.

Synchronized mechanical ventilation for respiratory support in newborn infants

BACKGROUND

During synchronized mechanical ventilation, positive airway pressure and spontaneous inspiration coincide. If synchronous ventilation is provoked, adequate gas exchange should be achieved at lower peak airway pressures, potentially reducing baro/volutrauma, air leak and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Synchronous ventilation can potentially be achieved by manipulation of rate and inspiratory time during conventional ventilation and employment of patient triggered ventilation.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of: (i) synchronized mechanical ventilation, delivered as high frequency positive pressure ventilation (HFPPV) or patient triggered ventilation - assist control ventilation (ACV) or synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV)) with conventional ventilation (CMV) (ii) different types of triggered ventilation (ACV, SIMV, pressure regulated volume control ventilation (PRVCV) and SIMV plus pressure support (PS) SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches from 1985-2007 of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2007),Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, MEDLINE, previous reviews, abstracts and symposia proceedings; hand searches of journals in the English language and contact with expert informants.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials comparing synchronized ventilation delivered as high frequency positive pressure ventilation (HFPPV) or triggered ventilation (ACV/SIMV) to conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) in neonates. Randomised trials comparing different triggered ventilation modes (ACV, SIMV, SIMV plus PS and PRVCV) in neonates.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data regarding clinical outcomes including mortality, air leaks (pneumothorax or pulmonary interstitial emphysema (PIE)), severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grades 3 and 4), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (oxygen dependency beyond 28 days), moderate/severe BPD (oxygen/respiratory support dependency beyond 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) and duration of weaning/ventilation. Four comparisons were made: (i) HFPPV vs. CMV; (ii) ACV/SIMV vs. CMV; (iii) ACV vs. SIMV or PRVCV vs. SIMV (iv) SIMV plus PS vs. SIMV. Data analysis was conducted using relative risk for categorical outcomes, weighted mean difference for outcomes measured on a continuous scale.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen studies were eligible for inclusion. The meta-analysis demonstrates that HFPPV compared to CMV was associated with a reduction in the risk of air leak (typical relative risk for pneumothorax was 0.69, 95% CI 0.51, 0.93). ACV/SIMV compared to CMV was associated with a shorter duration of ventilation (weighted mean difference -34.8 hours, 95% CI -62.1, -7.4). ACV compared to SIMV was associated with a trend to a shorter duration of weaning (weighted mean difference -42.4 hours, 95% CI -94.4, 9.6). Neither HFPPV nor triggered ventilation was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of BPD. There was a non-significant trend towards a lower mortality rate using HFPPV vs. CMV and a non-significant trend towards a higher mortality rate using triggered ventilation vs. CMV. No disadvantage of HFPPV or triggered ventilation was noted regarding other outcomes. Since the last review, two new patient triggered modes have been included: pressure regulated volume control ventilation (PRVCV) and SIMV plus pressure support. Each of these methods of ventilation has only been tested in single randomised trials with no significant advantages in important outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared to conventional ventilation, benefit is demonstrated for both HFPPV and triggered ventilation with regard to a reduction in air leak and a shorter duration of ventilation, respectively. In none of the trials was complex respiratory monitoring undertaken and thus it is not possible to conclude that the mechanism of producing those benefits is by provocation of synchronized ventilation. Further trials are needed to determine whether synchronized ventilation is associated with other benefits, but optimisation of trigger and ventilator design with respect to respiratory diagnosis is encouraged before embarking on further trials. It is essential newer forms of triggered ventilation are tested in adequately powered randomised trials with long-term outcomes before they are incorporated into routine clinical practice.

Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: what do we know in 2007?

Although neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is widely used today, its place in neonatal respiratory support is yet to be fully defined. Current evidence indicates that NIPPV after extubation of very premature infants reduces the rate of reintubation. However, much is still not known about NIPPV including its mechanisms of action. It may improve pulmonary mechanisms, tidal volume and minute ventilation but more studies are required to confirm these findings. There is some evidence that NIPPV marginally improves gas exchange. More research is needed to establish which device is best, what settings to use or whether to use synchronised rather than non-synchronised NIPPV, and about the way to wean NIPPV. Future studies should enrol sufficient infants to detect uncommon serious complications and include long-term follow up to determine important neurodevelopment and pulmonary outcomes.

Does measuring respiratory function improve neonatal ventilation?

AIMS

To determine whether using a respiratory function monitor alters clinicians' choice of ventilator settings, tidal volumes or blood gases in the first 48 h of ventilation.

METHODS

Clinicians were trained to use a respiratory function monitor to optimize neonatal ventilation. Thirty-five infants, weighing < 2 kg, treated with the Infant Star ventilator were randomized to have a respiratory function monitor display visible or concealed. All reasons for altering ventilator settings were noted. Data on ventilator parameters and clinical care were collected hourly. The primary outcome was the mean peak pressure used during the first 48 h.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in peak pressures, tidal volumes or arterial carbon dioxide levels between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the Florian respiratory function monitor in the first 48 h of ventilation with the Infant Star ventilator did not alter the choice of ventilator settings, tidal or minute volumes or arterial blood gases. Possible explanations for this result include lack of power due to the small numbers recruited and bias due to the unblinded nature of the trial.

Episodes of hypoxemia during synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in ventilator-dependent very low birth weight infants

Distinct patterns of asynchrony, and episodes of hypoxemia, may occur in a spontaneously breathing preterm infant during conventional intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) on traditional time-cycled, pressure-limited ventilators. Synchronized IMV (SIMV) and assist/control ventilation are frequent modes of patient-triggered ventilation used with infant ventilators. The objective of this study was to use computerized pulse oximetry to quantify the occurrence of episodes of hypoxemia (oxygen desaturation) during SIMV vs. IMV, in preterm infants < or = 1,250 g who required mechanical ventilation at > or = 14 days of age. We performed a randomized, crossover study with each infant being randomized to IMV or SIMV (Infant Star ventilator) for initial testing for a 1-hr period. Patients were subsequently tested on the alternate modality after a stabilization period of 10 min at the same ventilator and fractional inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2) settings. Pulse oximetry data were obtained with a Nellcor N-200 monitor, a microcomputer, and a software program (SatMaster). An investigator blinded to the randomized assignment evaluated all measurements. Eighteen very low birth weight (VLBW) infants with a birth weight of 777 +/- 39 g (mean +/- SEM) and gestational age 25.1 +/- 0.3 weeks were studied. The average pulse oximeter oxygen saturation (SaO2) was higher on SIMV than IMV (P < 0.01). During SIMV, these infants had significantly fewer episodes of hypoxemia (duration of episodes of oxygen desaturation as a percentage of scorable recording time) to 86-90% SaO2 (P < 0.01), 81-85% SaO2 (P < 0.01), and 76-80% SaO2 (P < 0.05) when compared to IMV. There was also a significant decrease in percentage of time of desaturation to SaO2 < 90% (P = 0.002), < 85% SaO2 (P = 0.003), and < 80% SaO2 (P = 0.02) during SIMV vs. IMV. Our preliminary findings indicate that the use of SIMV in a population of VLBW ventilator-dependent infants (> or = 14 days of age) results in better oxygenation and decreased episodes of hypoxemia as compared to IMV.

Synchronized mechanical ventilation for respiratory support in newborn infants

BACKGROUND

During synchronized mechanical ventilation, positive airway pressure and spontaneous inspiration coincide. Thus, if synchronous ventilation is provoked, adequate gas exchange should be achieved at lower peak airway pressures, potentially reducing barotrauma and hence airleak and chronic lung disease. Synchronous ventilation can be achieved by manipulation of rate and inspiratory time during conventional ventilation and employment of patient assisted ventilation.

OBJECTIVES

To compare (i) the efficacy of synchronized mechanical ventilation, delivered as high frequency positive pressure ventilation or triggered ventilation (patient triggered ventilation (PTV) or synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV)) with conventional ventilation(ii) different types of triggered ventilation

SEARCH STRATEGY

Searches from 1985-2004 of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004), Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, MEDLINE, previous reviews, abstracts and symposia proceedings; hand searches of journals in the English language and contact with expert informants.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized or quasi randomized clinical trials comparing synchronized ventilation delivered as high frequency positive pressure ventilation (HFPPV) or triggered ventilation (PTV/SIMV) to conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) in neonates. Randomized trials comparing different triggered ventilation modes (PTV and SIMV) in neonates.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data regarding clinical outcomes including mortality, airleaks (pneumothorax or pulmonary interstitial emphysema (PIE)), severe intracerebral haemorrhage (grades 3 and 4), chronic lung disease (oxygen dependency beyond 28 days) and duration of weaning/ventilation. Three comparisons were made: (i) HFPPV vs CMV; (ii) PTV/SIMV vs CMV; (iii) PTV vs SIMV. Data analysis was conducted using relative risk for categorical outcomes, weighted mean difference for outcomes measured on a continuous scale.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven studies were eligible for inclusion. The meta-analysis demonstrate that HFPPV compared to CMV was associated with a reduction in the risk of airleak (typical relative risk for pneumothorax was 0.69, 95% CI 0.51, 0.93). PTV/SIMV compared to CMV was associated with a shorter duration of ventilation (weighted mean difference -34.8 hours, 95% CI -62.1, -7.4). PTV compared to SIMV was associated with a trend to a shorter duration of weaning (weighted mean difference -42.4 hours, 95% CI -94.4, 9.6). Neither HFPPV nor triggered ventilation was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of chronic lung disease. There was a non-significant trend towards a lower mortality rate using HFPPV versus CMV, but a non-significant trend towards a higher mortality rate using triggered ventilation versus CMV. No disadvantage of HFPPV or triggered ventilation was noted regarding other outcomes.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared to conventional ventilation, benefit is demonstrated for both HFPPV and triggered ventilation with regard to a reduction in airleak and a shorter duration of ventilation, respectively. In none of the trials was complex respiratory monitoring undertaken and thus it is not possible to conclude that the mechanism of producing those benefits is by provocation of synchronized ventilation. Further trials are needed to determine whether synchronized ventilation is associated with other benefits, but optimization of trigger and ventilator design with respect to respiratory diagnosis is encouraged before embarking on further trials.

Synchronized ventilation of very-low-birth-weight infants; report of 6 years' experience

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of long-term patient triggered ventilation (PTV) using assist/control or synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) in very-low-birth-weight infants with respiratory distress.

METHODS

Ninety-seven very-low-birth-weight infants who had undergone synchronized ventilation for respiratory distress or insufficiency were assessed from January 1995 to December 2000. Death, oxygen support, pneumothorax development while ventilated, intracranial hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, periventricular leukomalacia, retinopathy of prematurity and duration of ventilation were noted as the mean outcome measures.

RESULTS

The mean birth weight was 1139 +/- 268 g (range 450-1500 g) and the mean gestational age was 29.0 +/- 2.8 weeks (range 23-36 weeks). Eighty-four per cent of 97 infants survived. Antenatal steroids were administered to only 20% of mothers. Surfactant was administered to all of the 67% of infants with respiratory distress syndrome. The mean duration of ventilator support was 4.7 +/- 7.3 days (1-43 days) for survivors and 8.9 +/- 11 days (1-45 days) for infants who died. No respiratory paralysis was necessary in any case during ventilation and pneumothorax was diagnosed in only eight infants. Severe intracranial hemorrhage (grade > or = III) and periventricular leukomalacia developed in 15% and 12% of infants, respectively. Necrotizing enterocolitis (Bell's classification stage > or = 2) and retinopathy of prematurity were noted in two infants. Four infants had evidence of chronic lung disease. The rate of survival without major morbidity was 83.5%.

CONCLUSION

Patient-triggered ventilation, initially PTV with Asist/Control and subsequently with SIMV in very-low-birth-weight infants with respiratory distress is feasible, but optimization of trigger and ventilator performance with respect to respiratory diagnosis is essential.

Volume-guaranteed ventilation

Pressure-limited, time-cycled ventilation has been the primary mode of ventilation for neonates for several decades. But the realization that volume rather than pressure causes ventilator-induced lung injury has led to the development of new strategies for ventilation. Volume guarantee is a mode of ventilation that automatically adjusts the inspiratory pressure to achieve a set tidal volume according to changes in lung compliance or resistance or the patient's respiratory drive. Volume-guaranteed ventilation delivers a specific, preset volume of gas, and inspiration ends when it has been delivered. This mode of ventilation requires careful attention to the infant and to ventilator settings.

Update on patient-triggered ventilation

Physiologic studies have demonstrated short-term benefits of triggered ventilation over conventional ventilation. The results of the randomized trials are disappointing. Meta-analysis has highlighted that the only significant difference in outcomes on PTV compared with conventional ventilation is a shorter duration of weaning. A few of the trials included infants with meconium aspiration syndrome and congenital pneumonia, but most infants randomized had RDS. In addition, a high proportion of the infants included in the meta-analysis were from two trials in which the SLE 2000 and airway pressure triggering system were mainly used. We cannot confidently conclude that in a population of infants with another respiratory disorder or even in those with RDS supported by an alternative triggering system, a different result might have been achieved. In addition, the benefits of PTV demonstrated in physiologic studies are largely related to achieving synchronized ventilation. In none of the randomized trials was any attempt made to determine if the infants were breathing synchronously with their ventilators. Before dismissing PTV for use in the management of infants with acute respiratory distress, an appropriately designed trial needs to take place. Essential, before any such trial, is identification of optimum method of PTV delivery, which may be disease specific.

Effects of the inspiratory pressure waveform during patient-triggered ventilation on pulmonary stretch receptor and phrenic nerve activity in cats

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of square wave, sinusoidal, and linear inspiratory pressure waveforms during pressure-controlled assist/control ventilation on the firing pattern of pulmonary stretch receptors and phrenic nerve activity.

DESIGN

Experimental, comparative study.

SETTING

Research laboratory at a university biomedical center.

SUBJECTS

Nine anesthetized, endotracheally intubated young cats (2.5-3.4 kg).

INTERVENTION

With interposed periods of continuous positive airway pressure (0.2 kPa), each cat was exposed to periods of assist/control ventilation with three different pressure waveforms, where the peak inspiratory pressure (0.74 +/- 0.13 kPa), end-expiratory pressure (0.2 +/- 0.02 kPa), and tidal volume (14.9 +/- 5.22 mL/kg) were kept constant. Preset controlled ventilator rate was set below the rate of spontaneous breathing, and the mechanical inflation time equaled the inspiratory time during spontaneous breathing on continuous positive airway pressure.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Respiratory rate and arterial blood gases did not change between the three pressure waveforms during assist/control ventilation. Peak pulmonary stretch receptor activity was lower and mean phrenic nerve activity higher during continuous positive airway pressure than during assist/control ventilation (p <.05). Peak inspiratory pulmonary stretch receptor activity was the same with all three pressure waveforms (82 +/- 17 impulses.sec-1) but occurred earlier with square wave than with sinusoidal or linear pressure waveforms (p <.05). The total number of impulses in the phrenic nerve activity burst was smaller with square wave than with the other two pressure waveforms (0.21 +/- 0.17 vs. 0.33 +/- 0.27 and 0.42 +/- 0.30 arbitrary units; p <.05), and the phrenic nerve activity burst duration was shorter with square wave (1.10 +/- 0.45 vs. 1.54 +/- 0.36 and 1.64 +/- 0.25 secs; p <.05).

CONCLUSION

Square wave pressure waveform during pressure-controlled assist/control ventilation strongly inhibits spontaneous inspiratory activity in cats. One mechanism for this inhibition is earlier and sustained peak pulmonary stretch receptor activity during inspiration. These findings show that differences in inspiratory pressure waveforms influence the spontaneous breathing effort during assist/control ventilation in cats.

International randomised controlled trial of patient triggered ventilation in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

AIM

To compare the effects of patient triggered ventilation (PTV) with conventional ventilation (IMV) in preterm infants ventilated for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

METHODS

Nine hundred and twenty four babies from 22 neonatal intensive care units were assessed. They were under 32 weeks of gestation and had been ventilated for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) for less than 6 hours within 72 hours of birth. The infants were randomly allocated to receive either PTV or IMV. Analysis was on an "intention to treat" basis. Death before discharge home or oxygen therapy at 36 weeks of gestation; pneumothorax while ventilated; cerebral ultrasound abnormality nearest to 6 weeks; and duration of ventilation in survivors were the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in outcome between the two groups. Unadjusted rates for death or oxygen dependency at 36 weeks of gestation were 47.4% and 48.7%, for PTV and IMV, respectively; for pneumothorax these were 13.4% and 10.3%; and for cerebral ultrasound abnormality nearest to 6 weeks these were 35.4% and 36.9%. Median duration of ventilation for survivors in both groups was 6 days. Overall, 79% of babies received only their assigned ventilation. PTV babies were more likely to depart from their intended ventilation (27% vs 15%). The trend towards higher pneumothorax rates with PTV occurred only in infants below 28 weeks of gestation (18.8% vs 11.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no observed benefit from the use of PTV, with a trend towards a higher rate of pneumothorax under 28 weeks of gestation. Although PTV has a similar outcome to IMV for treatment of RDS in infants of 28 weeks or more gestation, within 72 hours of birth, it was abandoned more often. It cannot be recommended for infants of less than 28 weeks' gestation with the ventilators used in this study.

Comparing the effects of nasal synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nSIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) after extubation in very low birth weight infants

In this study we hypothesized that nasal synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nSIPPV) would provide more ventilatory support than nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in the immediate post-extubation period in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the effects of these two ventilatory techniques on ventilation, gas exchange, and patient inspiratory effort in 11 preterm infants immediately after extubation. All neonates studied (BW: 1141+/-(SEM) 53 g; GA: 28.1+/-(SEM) 0.5 wks) had received mechanical ventilation because of respiratory distress at birth and were extubated by day 14 of life. Nasal SIPPV and nCPAP were applied in random order to each infant after extubation so that each was his/her own control. Both nCPAP and nSIPPV were delivered at end-expiratory pressures (PEEP) of 3 cm H2O. Inspiratory times (Ti) and peak inspiratory pressures set during nSIPPV were the same as those used at the time of extubation. Recordings lasted 45 min in each mode of ventilation. Tidal volume (Vt), minute volume (Ve), respiratory rate (RR), airway pressure (Paw), transcutaneous PO2 (TcPO2) and PCO2 (TcPCO2) as well as phasic esophageal pressure deflections (Pe), as an estimate of inspiratory effort, were measured. The measurements obtained during both modes of ventilation indicated significant differences between the two techniques. Indeed, application of nSIPPV was associated with a statistically significant increase in Vt and Ve. In addition, Pe decreased by 30% during nSIPPV (P<0.01). TcPCO2 was statistically significantly lower during nSIPPV than nCPAP, and RR as well. These data therefore suggest that nSIPPV may provide more ventilatory support than nCPAP in the post-extubation period with less patient inspiratory effort.

New ways to ventilate newborns in acute respiratory failure

Out treatment options for acute neonatal failure have expanded greatly in the last 20 to 30 years. This article reviews patient-triggered ventilation, high frequency ventilation, negative extrathoracic pressure ventilation, nitric oxide therapy, liquid ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and advances in pulmonary function monitoring. The authors present background theories, describe equipment, review clinical strategies, and the results of recent trials.

Triggering delay time and work of breathing in three paediatric patient-triggered ventilators

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness of three patient-triggered ventilators by evaluating triggering delay time and pressure-volume loops during initiation of inspiration.

METHODS

In a two-part study, a model lung was used in part 1 and 20 children, after tracheal intubation, in part 2. Triggering delay time and work of breathing (WOB) during pressure support ventilation using three patient-triggered ventilators: Servo Ventilator 300, VIP Bird, and SLE 2000 Neonatal Ventilator. Triggering delay time was from the beginning of negative deflection in the oesophageal pressure trace, to the onset of inspiration. The WOB was estimated directly by measuring the oesophageal pressure-volume loop.

RESULTS

The Servo demonstrated superior triggering delay time and reduced WOB in the model study. The VIP Bird demonstrated shorter triggering delay and reduced WOB in the clinical component of the study. In the model lung, triggering delay time in the Servo 300 [62 +/- 6 msec (mean +/- SD)] was shorter than that in the VIP Bird (76 +/- 7 msec) (P < 0.05), and WOB with the SLE 2000 (202 +/- 37 g.cm) was greater than with other ventilators, (Servo 300, 112 +/- 32 g.cm and VIP Bird 72 +/- 41 g.cm) (P < 0.05). In the clinical study, triggering delay time in the VIP Bird (52 +/- 19 msec) was shorter than in the other ventilators, Servo 300 (66 +/- 14 msec), SLE 2000 (68 +/- 65 msec) (P < 0.05). The Servo 300 (56 +/- 34 g.cm) required higher WOB than the other ventilators: VIP Bird (22 +/- 12 g.cm), SLE 2000 (14 +/- 3 g.cm) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Comparative model lung performance of these ventilators does not correspond with their clinical performance. In our clinical evaluation, the VIP Bird ventilator demonstrated superior performance with shorter triggering delay time, low WOB needed to initiate inspiration, and little air leak.

Thoracoabdominal motion in newborns during ventilation delivered by endotracheal tube or nasal prongs

Preterm infants have asynchronous thoracoabdominal motion (TAM) secondary to a highly compliant chest wall and different lung mechanics compared to term infants. We compared TAM during continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) administered through an endotracheal tube (ETT-CPAP) or nasal prongs (nasal-CPAP), and during synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation administered by nasal prongs (nasal-SIMV) in 14 preterm newborn infants. Asynchrony of TAM was quantified by measuring relative motion of chest wall and abdomen with strain gauges and calculating phase angles (theta). Phase angles were lower during nasal-SIMV compared to nasal-CPAP or ETT-CPAP (P < 0.05), and lower during nasal-CPAP compared to ETT-CPAP (P < 0.05). The reduced TAM asynchrony during nasal-SIMV and nasal-CPAP may be due to elimination of resistance of the ETT and/or effective stabilization of the chest wall. These data suggest that nasal-SIMV may be an effective mode of respiratory support for preterm infants requiring minimal ventilatory support.

Comparison of synchronized and conventional intermittent mandatory ventilation in neonates

Between October 1993 and April 1995, a total of 77 neonates requiring mechanical ventilation were enrolled in this study and were randomly divided into two groups. Group A consisted of 31 premature infants (mean birthweight 1.36 +/- 0.29 kg) with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and seven neonates (mean birthweight 3.2 +/- 0.5 kg) with meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS). Group B consisted of 31 premature infants (mean birthweight 1.31 +/- 0.3 kg) with RDS and eight neonates (mean birthweight 3.3 +/- 0.5 kg) with MAS. Infants in group A received synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) and infants in group B received conventional intermittent mandatory ventilation (CIMV) therapy. In premature infants with RDS, our data showed: (i) the duration of ventilation was significantly shorter (P < 0.05) in the synchronized group (156 +/- 122 h) compared to the conventional group (242 +/- 175 h); (ii) significantly fewer (P < 0.05) patients required reintubation in the synchronized group than in the conventional group (three vs 11 patients); (iii) incidence of severe intraventricular hemorrhage (grades 3 and 4) was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the synchronized group compared to the conventional group (one vs seven patients); (iv) incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the synchronized group than in the control group (one vs seven patients). In neonates with MAS, our data showed no significant difference (P < 0.05) on duration of ventilation, incidence of reintubation, incidence of pneumothorax or mortality rate between synchronized and control groups.

Trigger delay in infant ventilators

In an experimental study we determined the response trigger delay time of three infant ventilators with a capacity to detect and support spontaneous breathing. We measured this in anaesthetized cats as the time between the start of phrenic nerve activity and the increase in airway pressure caused by the subsequent inflation. Two modes of ventilatory support were used, namely Assist/Control (A/C) and synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV). We found that ventilators equipped with flow sensors close to the free end of the endotracheal tube had a shorter trigger delay than a ventilator which detected breathing with an abdominal sensor. Further, the trigger delay was shorter in SIMV mode than in A/C mode of operation. A higher set sensitivity reduced the response time. We conclude that triggered ventilation may be used in infants, at least when the spontaneous breathing rate is below 60 breaths per minute. This mode of ventilation could be useful when infants are to be weaned off the ventilator.

A versatile mechanical ventilator (DIGIT) with high flow stability and a programmable inspiratory phase flow pattern

The paper describes the general characteristics of a newly developed nonconstant-flow generator for automatic ventilation of the lungs. It is known that the application of very high pressure to high internal resistance leads to a very stable flow, in that the flow itself is unaffected by external load (patient) variations. The stability of the flow means that the inspiratory process can be controlled by means of the ventilated volume, thus extending DIGIT utilization to high resistance patients. The modulation of the flow is implemented via a digital electromechanical system, which allows the ventilator functions to be accurately programmed. The desired flow waveform is obtained by means of a series of pneumatic valves, the apertures of which are digitally controlled. The design is innovative in that it allows the flow waveform in each of the ten digitalized time steps into which each inspiratory phase is divided to be both programmed and controlled. Other ventilators commercially available and currently in use do not have this functional capability, as they are all designed to model the integral flow of the inspiratory waveform without being able to modify the subunit time steps of a single inspiratory phase. The paper also discusses the results of fundamental tests concerning the performance characteristics of the ventilator.

Patient-triggered ventilation: a comparison of tidal volume and chestwall and abdominal motion as trigger signals

Patient-triggered synchronized ventilation requires reliable and early detection of the infant's inspiratory effort. Several trigger methods have been developed that frequently lack the sensitivity to detect inspiration in small preterm infants (trigger failure), or show a high rate of breaths triggered by artifacts in the respiratory signal (autotrigger). The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the following trigger signals: abdominal movement sensed by a newly developed induction technique, chestwall motion detected by changes in transthoracic impedance, and tidal volume measured by anemometry at the endotracheal tube connector. Ten preterm infants (birth weight, 580-1,424 g; median weight, 943 g; study weight, 535-1,415 g; median weight, 838 g; gestation age, 26-32 weeks, median gestational age, 28 weeks, study age, 1-50 days, median study age, 11 days) were included in the study. A Sechrist SAVI ventilator was triggered by one of three signals: chestwall or abdominal movement, or tidal volume generated by the infants. Response time between beginning of inspiratory flow, the occurrence of the trigger signal (signal delay), and the onset of the triggered breath (trigger delay) were determined for each of the three signals. The signal response time was -13.5 msec (95% CI, -33 to -2 msec) for the abdominal movement signal, indicating that it started before inspiratory flow; 0.0 msec for the volume signal; and 44.0 msec (95% CI, 29-73 msec) for the chestwall signal (P < 0.002); this long delay was secondary to chestwall distortion and a subsequent delay in outward ribcage movement in many infants. The trigger delay for the abdominal signal was 90.0 msec (95% CI, 55-104 msec), 135.5 msec (95% CI: 82-186 msec) for the volume signal, and 176.5 msec (95% CI: 165-232 msec) for the chestwall signal, indicating that there was a difference in the rise time of signal voltage between the three methods (P < 0.01). The rate of autotriggered breaths was 3.2% (95% CI, 0.3-9.3%) when using the abdominal signal, 0.55% (95% CI, 0.0-2.1%) for the tidal volume signal, and 11.25% (95% CI, 0.5-27.8%) for the chestwall signal (P < 0.05). The incidence of trigger failure was low with all three signals and was not significantly different between the techniques. In summary, the chestwall signal had a long trigger delay and was highly susceptible to false triggering. It is, therefore, not a reliable trigger signal for synchronized mechanical ventilation in preterm infants. In contrast, tidal volume and abdominal movement signals had an acceptable trigger delay and a low rate of autotriggering, making them useful clinical trigger signals.

Inspiratory work of breathing in ventilated preterm infants

In ventilated newborns, part of the inspiratory work of breathing (WOB) may be due to the inspiratory efforts preceding inspiratory ventilator flow. This study was designed to quantify the contribution of these efforts to WOB. WOB was evaluated in six intubated preterm infants ventilated by the Dräger Babylog 8000. The ventilatory modes studied were intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and assist-control ventilation at 10 (ACV10) and 15 (ACV15) cmH2O peak pressure. Mouth flow (V) and esophageal pressure (Pe) were recorded, and WOB was estimate from the area delineated by the esophageal pressure-volume curve, where volume is the time integral of V. Calculation of WOB started either at the onset of the infant's inspiratory flow (WOBi), or at the beginning of the infant's inspiratory muscle efforts, detected on Pe and confirmed on the V tracing (WOBm). WOBm was found to be significantly higher than WOBi under all ventilatory conditions studied. The difference in work of breathing (delta W) between WOBm and WOBi did not depend on the type of ventilatory mode. When delta W was related to WOBm, it amounted to about 30% of WOBm in IMV and CPAP, and 60% in ACV (P < 0.05, ACV15 vs. IMV). These results suggest that, in preterm infants connected to a ventilator, inspiratory efforts preceding flow inspiration might account for a large fraction of the inspiratory work of breathing.

Randomized multicenter trial comparing synchronized and conventional intermittent mandatory ventilation in neonates

OBJECTIVE

To compare synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) and conventional intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) in neonates.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

Level III neonatal intensive care units at six university or children's hospitals.

PATIENTS

Three hundred twenty-seven infants receiving conventional IMV for respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, or meconium aspiration pneumonitis were randomly assigned a 7.5 +/- 6 hours of age to either continue with IMV or change to SIMV. Infants assigned to each mode of ventilation had similar birth weight (BW), gestational age, and Apgar scores at birth, and similar oxygenation indexes at randomization. They received similar surfactant therapy and had similar incidence of sepsis, seizures, secondary pneumonia, and necrotizing enterocolitis. In the infants with BW less than 1000 gm, more infants receiving IMV had surgical ligation of their patent ductus arteriosus than did those receiving SIMV (27 vs. 7 %; p = 0.02).

ANALYSIS

Data was analyzed overall for all infants and also separately within three BW groups: less than 1000 gm, 1000 to 2000 gm, and more than 2000 gm. The 1000 to 2000 gm BW group was further analyzed in subgroups weighing 1000 to 1499 gm and 1500 to 2000 gm.

RESULTS

In all infants, at 1 hour after randomization, the infants receiving SIMV had a lower mean airway pressure than those receiving IMV (8.08 +/- 2.15 vs. 8.63 +/- 2.59; p<0.05), with similar fractions of inspired oxygen and oxygenation indexes. Infants whose BW was 1000 to 2000 gm at 0.5 hour required a lower fraction of inspired oxygen with SIMV than with IMV (0.52 +/- 0.20 vs. 0.62 +/- 0.27; p<0.05) and had better oxygenation at 1 hour, as shown by lower oxygenation indexes with SIMV than with IMV (6.14 +/- 4.17 vs. 9.42 +/- 8.41; p = 0.01). Infants whose BW was 1000 to 2000 gm received a lower number of unit doses of sedative/analgesic drugs per infant during the first 4 days of SIMV than did infants receiving IMV (3.8 +/- 3.4 vs 6.3 +/- 5.5 unit doses; p = 0.02). Infants whose BW was more than 2000 gm had a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation with SIMV than with IMV (median, 72 vs 93 hours; p = 0.02). Three of the forty-six infants receiving IMV but none of the 47 infants receiving SIMV required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In the infants with BW less than 1000 gm, fewer infants treated with SIMV required supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks of postconceptional age than did those treated with IMV (47 vs 72%; p<0.05). In 83 infants whose lungs were mechanically ventilated for 14 days or longer, all with BW less than 2000 gm, those treated with SIMV regained their BW earlier than those treated with IMV (median, 21.5 vs 29 days; p<0.01). There were no differences in the rates of death, intraventricular hemorrhage (grades III and IV), air leak, need for pharmacologic paralysis, or need for supplemental oxygen at 28 days.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that SIMV was at least as efficacious as conventional IMV, and may have improved certain outcomes in BW-specific groups.

Effects of different triggering systems and external PEEP on trigger capability of the ventilator

OBJECTIVE

The triggering capability of both the pressure and flow triggering systems of the Servo 300 ventilator (Siemens-Elema, Sweden) was compared at various levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), airway resistance (R(aw)), inspiratory effort and air leak, using a mechanical lung model.

DESIGN

The ventilator was connected to a two bellows-in-series-type lung model with various mechanical properties. Lung compliance and chest wall compliance were 0.03 and 0.121/cmH2O, respectively. R(aw) was 5, 20 and 50 cmH2O/l/s. Respiratory rate was 15 breaths/min. To compare the triggering capability of both systems, the sensitivity of pressure and flow triggered pressure support ventilation (PSV) was adjusted to be equal by observing the triggering time at 0 cmH2O PEEP and 16 cmH2O of pressure support (PS) with no air leak. No auto-PEEP was developed. In the measurement of trigger delay, the PS level ranged from 16 to 22 cmH2O to attain a set tidal volume (V(T)) of 470 ml at a R(aw) of 5, 20 and 50 cmH2O/l/s. The PEEP level was then changed from 0, 5 and 10 cmH2O at a PS level of 17 cmH2O and R(aw) of 5 and 20 cmH2O/l/s, and the trigger delay was determined. The effect of various levels of air leak and inspiratory effort on triggering capability was also evaluated. Inspiratory effort during triggering delay was estimated by measurements of pressure differentials of airway pressure (Paw) and driving pressure in the diaphragm bellows (Pdriv) in both systems.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

There were no significant differences in trigger delay between the two triggering systems at the various PEEP and R(aw) levels. At the matched sensitivity level, air leak decreased trigger delay in both systems, and additional PEEP caused auto-cycling. A low inspiratory drive increased trigger delay in the pressure sensing system, while trigger delay was not affected in the flow sensing system. The Paw and Pdriv differentials were lower in flow triggering than in pressure triggering.

CONCLUSIONS

With respect to triggering delay, the triggering capabilities of the pressure and flow sensing systems were comparable with and without PEEP and/or high airway resistance at the same sensitivity level, unless low inspiratory drive and air leak were present. In terms of pressure differentials, the flow triggering system may require less inspiratory effort to trigger the ventilator than that of the pressure triggering system with a comparable triggering time. However, this difference may be extremely small.

Airway leak size in neonates and autocycling of three flow-triggered ventilators

OBJECTIVES

To define the spectrum of airway leak in the neonatal population and examine the occurrence rate of autocycling of three flow-triggered ventilators within the defined spectrum of airleak.

DESIGN

Prospective study of pulmonary function tests of intubated infants and performance of ventilators on a mechanical lung model under simulated clinical conditions.

SETTING

An intensive care nursery and research laboratory at a university medical center.

INTERVENTIONS

Analysis of pulmonary function tests of 50 infants from our intensive care nursery, selected at random, to determine size of airleak around the endotracheal tube. The rate of autocycling of ventilators due to airleak of variable size, while connected to a test lung was subsequently studied. Ventilators were set on the assist-control mode with the control rate set at 0 breath/min. Each ventilator was studied at the maximum sensitivity setting, which was 1, 2.5, and 3.3 mL/sec for each ventilator, respectively, and also at decreased sensitivity settings to 10 mL/sec. Airleak size was varied (10% to 45%) by increasing the orifice size within the endotracheal tube adapter/connector sideport and/or the positive end-expiratory pressure level (2 to 8 cm H2O).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In the infants, airleak size was calculated during synchronous ventilator breaths as (inspiratory minus expiratory) tidal volume/expiratory tidal volume x 100% (n = 25 +/- 11 breaths/patient). Mean +/- SD leak size in the infants was 15.6 +/- 11%. A minimal leak size of 0 to 10% was present in 15 (30%) infants, leak size of 10% to 20% in 24 (48%), leak size of 20% to 30% in seven (14%), and leak size > 30% in four (8%) infants. The relative tendency of the three ventilators to autocycle is a function of the maximum sensitivity setting, which varies with each ventilator. The ventilator with the maximum sensitivity set at 1 mL/sec autocycled rapidly (> or = 40 breaths/min) at leak size of > 10%; the ventilator set at 2.5 mL/sec autocycled rapidly at leak size of > or = 20%; and the ventilator set at 3.3 mL/sec autocycled rapidly at leak size of > or = 30%. In all ventilators, the rate of autocycling increased with increased leak size, and decreased with decreased sensitivity setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Flow-triggered ventilators are susceptible to autocycling due to flow compensation to maintain positive end-expiratory pressure levels in the presence of an airway leak. The difference in autocycling is due to the maximum sensitivity setting of each ventilator, and not to intrinsic ventilator flowsensing or other software mechanisms. The 3.3-mL/sec setting was the least prone to autocycling and seems appropriate. The ventilator set at 2.5 mL/sec at the time of this study has been released instead at 4 mL/sec, due to these findings. The ventilator with the maximum setting at 1 mL/sec autocycled readily at leak size of > or = 10%. Since such a leak size was present in 70% of infants, this setting should be used with caution. Using these guidelines, autocycling of all three ventilators is likely to occur mainly in 8% of infants with leak size of > 30%. In these cases, lowering the sensitivity setting and/or positive end-expiratory pressure level may decrease autocycling, or may necessitate reintubation with a larger endotracheal tube.

Improved oxygenation during synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, crossover study

In a randomized, crossover study, we compared arterial partial pressure of oxygen and of carbon dioxide between consecutive periods of conventional and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV). We studied spontaneously breathing infants with an endotracheal tube in place. The infants were < 12 hours of age, had a diagnosis of respiratory distress syndrome, and had an arterial/alveolar oxygen ratio of < 0.25. The infants had a mean birth weight of 1077 gm and gestational age of 28 weeks. The mean rate of asynchrony on intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) was 52% (range, 36% to 76%), and on SIMV was < 1%. Infants were randomly assigned to IMV or SIMV as their initial ventilator mode and underwent ventilation for four 15-minute periods, and crossed over to the alternate mode after each period. Ventilator settings and the fraction of inspired oxygen were not changed between modes. At the end of each period, arterial blood gas measurements were obtained; 26 paired comparisons were made between modes. The mean arterial partial pressure of oxygen was significantly higher during SIMV than during IMV (mean, 61.5 vs 53.3 mmHg; p < 0.01). The mean arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide was slightly lower during SIMV than during IMV (mean, 42.7 vs 41.3 mm Hg; p < 0.05). The improvement in oxygenation demonstrated with SIMV may allow a reduction in ventilator pressure or oxygen exposure in this group of infants, who are at risk of having complications of ventilation.

Airway and body surface sensors for triggering in neonatal ventilation

Failure of neonatal patient triggered ventilation may reflect a delay in delivery of flow relative to the inspiratory effort of the infant. Transmission of diaphragmatic contraction to the sensor site (patient delay) and further transmission to and within the sensing device (device delay) both contribute to the delay in triggering. Patient and device delays were studied for different sensing systems in 36 infants, 24 of whom were intubated. Device delay was long (> 40 ms) with a conventional apnoea monitor compared with sensors placed at the airway opening (2 ms), the inspiratory (12 ms) and expiratory (3 ms) pressure transducers of the ventilator, the Graseby capsule (8 ms), strain gauges (3 ms) and oesophageal pressure (6 ms). In near normal infants, the sum of patient and device delays for the latter sensors was less than 20 ms and a minor component of the total delay. However, in severe lung disease the total delay may be more than 100 ms even for airway sensors.