Loop Gain As a Means to Predict a Positive Airway Pressure Suppression of Cheyne-Stokes Respiration in Patients with Heart Failure

Differences in Physiologic Endotypes Between Nonpositional and Positional OSA: Results From the Shanghai Sleep Health Study Cohort

BACKGROUND

Positional OSA (POSA) is a recognized subtype of OSA that exhibits distinct endotypic characteristics when compared with nonpositional OSA (NPOSA). The basis for the disparity in endotypes between these subtypes remains poorly understood.

RESEARCH QUESTION

(1) Do individuals with NPOSA and POSA have different underlying OSA endotypes? (2) Which endotypic characteristics are critical in determining NPOSA and POSA severity?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Within the Shanghai Sleep Health Study cohort, individuals with OSA were recruited and classified as having POSA or NPOSA. Endotypes were calculated using polysomnography.

RESULTS

Endotype analysis was conducted in 1,036 individuals with OSA. Compared with individuals with NPOSA, those with POSA had lower loop gain calculated during all sleep stages and all sleep positions (0.55; interquartile range [IQR], 0.46-0.66 vs 0.68, IQR, 0.52-0.90; P < .001), lower arousal threshold calculated during all sleep stages and all sleep positions (ArTHAll) (138.67; IQR, 118.94-180.87 percentage of the eupneic ventilation [%Veupnea] vs 189.00; IQR, 129.71-257.76 %Veupnea; P < .001), lower pharyngeal collapsibility calculated during all sleep stages and all sleep positions (VpassiveAll) (91.85; IQR, 83.13-95.15 %Veupnea vs 76.38; IQR, 23.77-92.08 %Veupnea; P < .001), and higher muscle compensation calculated during all sleep stages and all sleep positions (6.50; IQR, -6.77 to 16.39 %Veupnea vs 3.65; IQR, -10.47 to 12.14 %Veupnea; P = .003). Logistic regression analyses indicated that higher VpassiveAll was associated with increased odds of POSA vs NPOSA. In NPOSA, fully adjusted linear regression analyses indicated that VpassiveAll (β = -0.55; 95% CI, -0.68 to -0.42; P < .001) and lower loop gain calculated during all sleep stages and all sleep positions (β = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.08-0.30; P < .001) were significant independent predictors of the apnea hypopnea index, with VpassiveAll being the most critical factor. In contrast, in POSA, collapsibility appeared to be less influential (β = -0.09; 95% CI, -0.21 to 0.03; P = .138). Nonanatomic endotypic characteristics (LGAll: β = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.18-0.41; P < .001; arousal threshold in all sleep stages and all sleep positions: β = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.01-0.28; P = .031; muscle compensation in all sleep stages and all sleep positions: β = -0.21; 95% CI, -0.29 to -0.12; P < .001) were significant in determining the severity of POSA, with loop gain being the most crucial factor.

INTERPRETATION

This study highlights the differences in endotypes between NPOSA and POSA. In Chinese individuals, anatomic factors were more significant in determining the severity of NPOSA, whereas nonanatomic traits were more likely to determine the severity of POSA. Future research should focus on developing personalized management strategies for individuals with NPOSA and POSA based on their endotypes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; No.: ChiCTR1900025714; URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/indexEN.html.

Continuous positive airway pressure and adherence in patients with different endotypes of obstructive sleep apnea

Determining the endotypes of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has potential implications for precision interventions. Here we assessed whether continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment outcomes differ across endotypic subgroups. We conducted a retrospective analysis of data obtained from 225 patients with moderate-to-severe OSA from a single sleep centre. Polysomnographic and CPAP titration study data were collected between May 2020 and January 2022. One-month CPAP treatment adherence was followed. Obstructive sleep apnea endotypes, namely arousal threshold, collapsibility, loop gain, and upper airway gain were estimated from polysomnography and dichotomised as high versus low. We examined associations between endotypic subgroups and (1) optimal CPAP titration pressure, (2) CPAP-related improvements in sleep architecture (proportions of slow-wave and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep), and (3) CPAP adherence. We observed that patients with high collapsibility required a higher CPAP pressure than those with low collapsibility (∆ = 0.4 cmH2 O, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.3-1.7). A larger increase in slow-wave sleep and in REM sleep proportions after CPAP treatment were observed in patients with a high arousal threshold, high collapsibility, high loop gain, or high upper airway gain than in those with low levels of endotypes. High loop gain and high collapsibility were independently associated with longer CPAP use hours per night (∆ = 0.6 h, 95% CI = 0.2-1.5 and ∆ = 0.3 h, 95% CI = 0.03-1.5, respectively). In conclusion, different endotypic subgroups of OSA exhibit a difference in outcomes of CPAP treatment. Knowledge of endotypes may help clinicians to understand which patients are expected to benefit most from CPAP therapy prior to its administration.

A review of supine position related obstructive sleep apnea: Classification, epidemiology, pathogenesis and treatment

Supine related obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most common clinical and physiological phenotype of OSA. This condition is recognizable by patients, their families and through polysomnographic recordings. Commonly used definitions distinguish the presence of supine related OSA when respiratory events occur at twice the frequency when the patient lies in the supine compared to non-supine sleeping positions. Recent physiology studies have demonstrated that airway obstruction arises more commonly in the supine position particularly at the level of the soft palate and epiglottis. Increased airway collapsibility is reliability observed supine relative to lateral position. To a lesser extent, changes in control of breathing favour less stable ventilation when the supine sleeping posture is adopted. Many treatments have been developed and trialled to help patients avoid sleeping on their back. The last 10 years has seen the emergence of vibrotactile warning devices that are worn on the patients' neck or chest. High quality randomized controlled trial data is accumulating on the efficacy and common pitfalls of the application of these treatments.

Predictors of Initial CPAP Prescription and Subsequent Course with CPAP in Patients with Central Sleep Apneas at a Single Center

PURPOSE

Guidelines recommend considering an initial trial of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to treat central sleep apnea (CSA). However, practice patterns vary widely. This study investigated predictors for an initial trial of CPAP in patients with central apneas and whether those factors predict adequate treatment response in patients receiving an initial CPAP trial.

METHODS

Charts of patients receiving a diagnostic code for CSA following a sleep study during 2016-2018 at a single center were reviewed. Patient factors, initial treatment prescriptions, and subsequent changes to therapy were extracted from electronic health records. Regression models were used to estimate factors associated with an initial CPAP prescription and the likelihood of an adequate CPAP response (no subsequent therapy change and no discontinuation of therapy) among patients prescribed CPAP.

RESULTS

429/588 (73%) patients with central apneas received an initial trial of CPAP. Younger age, diagnosis by home sleep testing, non-opiate etiology of central apneas, and a lower proportion of central apneas at diagnosis were independently associated with a higher likelihood of an initial CPAP trial. A lower proportion of central apneas was associated with a higher probability of adequate response, while current smoking and opiate-related central apneas predicted an unsuccessful CPAP trial. A new finding was that older age predicted a lower likelihood of an initial CPAP prescription but did not predict an unsatisfactory response to CPAP.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians may incorrectly weigh certain clinical and sleep study characteristics when deciding whether to trial CPAP for patients with central apneas.

Mechanisms relating to sleeping position to the endotypes of sleep disordered breathing

PURPOSE

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity varies considerably depending on the body position during sleep in certain subjects. Such variability may be underpinned by specific, body position-related changes in OSA pathophysiological determinants, or endotypes. Also head position relative to trunk may influence OSA endotypes. However, no studies to our knowledge have reviewed the endotype variations according to head or body position up to now.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several findings illustrate that supine OSA is mostly attributable to unfavorable upper airway anatomy compared to lateral position. However, a reduced lung volume, with consequent ventilatory instability (or elevated loop gain), may also play a role. Furthermore, preliminary findings suggest that prone and reclined positions may have a beneficial effect on collapsibility and loop gain.

SUMMARY

Sleeping supine induces many unfavorable pathophysiological changes, especially in certain predisposed OSA patients. Little is known on the influence of other sleep positions on key endotypic traits.

Sex-related Differences in Loop Gain during High-Altitude Sleep-disordered Breathing

Rationale: Central sleep apnea (CSA) is pervasive during sleep at high altitude, disproportionately impacting men and associated with increased peripheral chemosensitivity. Objectives: We aimed to assess whether biological sex affects loop gain (LGn) and CSA severity during sleep over 9-10 days of acclimatization to 3,800 m. We hypothesized that CSA severity would worsen with acclimatization in men but not in women because of greater increases in LGn in men. Methods: Sleep studies were collected from 20 (12 male) healthy participants at low altitude (1,130 m, baseline) and after ascent to (nights 2/3, acute) and residence at high altitude (nights 9/10, prolonged). CSA severity was quantified as the respiratory event index (REI) as a surrogate of the apnea-hypopnea index. LGn, a measure of ventilatory control instability, was quantified using a ventilatory control model fit to nasal flow. Linear mixed models evaluated effects of time at altitude and sex on respiratory event index and LGn. Data are presented as contrast means with 95% confidence intervals. Results: REI was comparable between men and women at acute altitude (4.1 [-9.3, 17.5] events/h; P = 0.54) but significantly greater in men at prolonged altitude (23.7 [10.3, 37.1] events/h; P = 0.0008). Men had greater LGn than did women for acute (0.08 [0.001, 0.15]; P = 0.047) and prolonged (0.17 [0.10, 0.25]; P < 0.0001) altitude. The change in REI per change in LGn was significantly greater in men than in women (107 ± 46 events/h/LGn; P = 0.02). Conclusions: The LGn response to high altitude differed between sexes and contributed to worsening of CSA over time in men but not in women. This sex difference in acclimatization appears to protect females from high altitude-related CSA. These data provide fundamental sex-specific physiological insight into high-altitude acclimatization in healthy individuals and may help to inform sex differences in sleep-disordered breathing pathogenesis in patients with cardiorespiratory disease.

Predictors of Initial CPAP Prescription and Subsequent Course with CPAP in Patients with Central Sleep Apneas

Purpose

Guidelines recommend considering an initial trial of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to treat central sleep apnea (CSA). However, practice patterns vary widely. This study investigated predictors for an initial trial of CPAP in patients with central apneas and whether those factors predict adequate treatment response in patients receiving an initial CPAP trial.

Methods

Charts of patients receiving a diagnostic code for CSA following a sleep study during 2016-2018 at a single center were reviewed. Patient factors, initial treatment prescriptions, and subsequent changes to therapy were extracted from electronic health records. Regression models were used to estimate factors associated with an initial CPAP prescription and the likelihood of an adequate CPAP response (no subsequent therapy change or nonadherence) among patients prescribed CPAP.

Results

429/588 (73%) patients with central apneas received an initial trial of CPAP. Younger age, diagnosis by home sleep testing, non-opiate etiology of central apneas, and a lower proportion of central apneas at diagnosis were independently associated with a higher likelihood of an initial CPAP trial. A lower proportion of central apneas was associated with a higher probability of adequate response, while current smoking and opiate-related central apneas predicted an unsuccessful CPAP trial. A new finding was that older age predicted a lower likelihood of an initial CPAP prescription but did not predict a suboptimal response to CPAP.

Conclusion

Clinicians may incorrectly weigh certain clinical and sleep study characteristics when deciding whether to trial CPAP for patients with central apneas.

Predictors and consequences of residual apnea during positive airway pressure therapy

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Determine the risk factors for, and consequences of, residual apnea during long-term positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of 195 subjects after a split-night polysomnogram. Estimation of residual respiratory events on PAP were done by both automated and manual scoring of data in EncoreAnywhere™. Clinical and polysomnographic predictors of residual apnea were estimated.

RESULTS

There were 166 and 101 patients still on PAP at the 3 and 12 months, respectively. Seventy four (44.6%) and 46 (45.5%) had a residual scored respiratory event index-flow (sREI_FLOW) ≥ 15/hour of use and 46 (45.5%) at the 3rd and 12th month, respectively. Treatment phase central apnea hypopnea index (TCAHI), a surrogate of high loop gain, was the main predictor for residual sREI_FLOW (β = 0.345, p: 0.025) at the 3rd and 12th month (β = 0.147, p: 0.020). TCAHI also predicted unstable breathing (U) %. The body mass index (hazard ratio [HR] 1.034, 95% CI 1.008-1.062, p: 0.012) and effective sREI_FLOW>15/hour in the first month (HR 2.477, 95% CI 1.510-4.065, p < 0.001) were the key predictors for drop out of PAP use at the 12th month. Effective sREI_FLOW>15/hour in the first month was also a predictor for median usage duration >4 h for 70% of the night at both the 3rd month (odds ratio [OR] 0.947, 95% CI 0.909-0.986, p: 0.008) and 12th month (OR 0.973, 95% CI 0.951-0.994, p: 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment-phase CAHI predicts long-term residual apnea on PAP. High residual disease adversely impacts adherence.

Abnormal Sleep-Related Breathing Related to Heart Failure

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is highly prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF). Untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and central sleep apnea (CSA) in patients with HF are associated with worse outcomes. Detailed sleep history along with polysomnography (PSG) should be conducted if SDB is suspected in patients with HF. First line of treatment is the optimization of medical therapy for HF and if symptoms persist despite optimization of the treatment, positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy will be started to treat SDB. At present, there is limited evidence to prescribe any drugs for treating CSA in patients with HF. There is limited evidence for the efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) in improving mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). There is a need to perform well-designed studies to identify different phenotypes of CSA/OSA in patients with HF and to determine which phenotype responds to which therapy. Results of ongoing trials, ADVENT-HF, and LOFT-HF are eagerly awaited to shed more light on the management of CSA in patients with HF. Until then the management of SDB in patients with HF is limited due to the lack of evidence and guidance for treating SDB in patients with HF.

The role of acetazolamide in sleep apnea at sea level: a systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The recognition of specific endotypes as drivers of sleep apnea suggests the need of therapies targeting individual mechanisms. Acetazolamide is known to stabilize respiration at high altitude but benefits at sea level are less well understood.

METHODS

All controlled studies of acetazolamide in obstructive sleep apnea and/or central sleep apnea (CSA) were evaluated. The primary outcome was the apnea-hypopnea index.

RESULTS

Fifteen trials with a total of 256 patients were pooled in our systematic review. Acetazolamide reduced the overall apnea-hypopnea index (mean difference [MD] -15.82, 95% CI: -21.91 to -9.74, P < .00001) in central sleep apnea (MD -22.60, 95% CI: -29.11 to -16.09, P < .00001), but not in obstructive sleep apnea (MD -10.29, 95% CI: -33.34 to 12.77, P = .38). Acetazolamide reduced the respiratory related arousal index (MD -0.82, 95% CI: -1.56 to -0.08, P = .03), improved partial arterial of oxygen (MD 11.62, 95% CI: 9.13-14.11, P < .00001), mean oxygen saturation (MD 1.78, 95% CI: 0.53-3.04, P = .005), total sleep time (MD 25.74, 95% CI: 4.10-47.38, P = .02), N2 sleep (MD 3.34, 95% CI: 0.12-6.56, P = .04) and sleep efficiency (MD 4.83, 95% CI: 0.53-9.13, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Acetazolamide improves the apnea-hypopnea index and several sleep metrics in central sleep apnea. The drug may be of clinical benefit in patients with high loop gain apnea of various etiologies and patterns. The existence of high heterogeneity is an important limitation in applicability of our analysis.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Registry: PROSPERO; Name: The effect of acetazolamide in patients with sleep apnea at sea level: a systematic review and meta analysis; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020163316; Identifier: CRD42020163316.

Central apnea and periodic breathing in children with underlying conditions

Central sleep apneas and periodic breathing are poorly described in childhood. The aim of the study was to describe the prevalence and characteristics of central sleep apnea and periodic breathing in children with associated medical conditions, and the therapeutic management. We retrospectively reviewed all poly(somno)graphies with a central apnea index ≥ 5 events per hr in children aged > 1 month performed in a paediatric sleep laboratory over a 6‐year period. Clinical data and follow‐up poly(somno)graphies were gathered. Ninety‐five out of 2,981 patients (3%) presented central sleep apnea: 40% were < 1 year, 41% aged 1–6 years, and 19% aged ≥ 6 years. Chiari malformation was the most common diagnosis (13%). Mean central apnea index was 20 ± 30 events per hr (range 5–177). Fifty‐eight (61%) children had an exclusive central pattern with < 5 obstructive events per hr. Periodic breathing was present in 79 (83%) patients, with a mean percentage of time with periodic breathing of 9 ± 16%. Among periodic breathing episodes, 40% appeared after a sigh, 8% after an obstructive event, 6% after breathing instability and 2% after bradypnea. The highest clinical apnea index and percentage of time with periodic breathing were observed in children with encephalopathy and/or epilepsy (68 ± 63 events per hr and 30 ± 34%). Clinical apnea index did not differ according to age, while periodic breathing duration was longer in children > 1 year old. Watchful waiting was performed in 22 (23%) patients with spontaneous improvement in 20. Other treatments (upper airway or neurosurgery, nocturnal oxygen therapy, continuous positive airway pressure, non‐invasive ventilation) were effective in selected patients. Central sleep apnea is rare in children and comprises heterogeneous conditions. Sleep studies are essential for the diagnosis, characterization and management of central sleep apnea.

Chronic Opioid Use and Central Sleep Apnea, Where Are We Now and Where To Go? A State of the Art Review

Opioids are commonly used for pain management, perioperative procedures, and addiction treatment. There is a current opioid epidemic in North America that is paralleled by a marked increase in related deaths. Since 2000, chronic opioid users have been recognized to have significant central sleep apnea (CSA). After heart failure-related Cheyne-Stokes breathing (CSB), opioid-induced CSA is now the second most commonly seen CSA. It occurs in around 24% of chronic opioid users, typically after opioids have been used for more than 2 months, and usually corresponds in magnitude to opioid dose/plasma concentration. Opioid-induced CSA events often mix with episodes of ataxic breathing. The pathophysiology of opioid-induced CSA is based on dysfunction in respiratory rhythm generation and ventilatory chemoreflexes. Opioids have a paradoxical effect on different brain regions, which result in irregular respiratory rhythm. Regarding ventilatory chemoreflexes, chronic opioid use induces hypoxia that appears to stimulate an augmented hypoxic ventilatory response (high loop gain) and cause a narrow CO2 reserve, a combination that promotes respiratory instability. To date, no direct evidence has shown any major clinical consequence from CSA in chronic opioid users. A line of evidence suggested increased morbidity and mortality in overall chronic opioid users. CSA in chronic opioid users is likely to be a compensatory mechanism to avoid opioid injury and is potentially beneficial. The current treatments of CSA in chronic opioid users mainly focus on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) or adding oxygen. ASV is more effective in reducing CSA events than CPAP. However, a recent ASV trial suggested an increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality with the removal of CSA/CSB in cardiac failure patients. A major reason could be counteracting of a compensatory mechanism. No similar trial has been conducted for chronic opioid-related CSA. Future studies should focus on (1) investigating the phenotypes and genotypes of opioid-induced CSA that may have different clinical outcomes; (2) determining if CSA in chronic opioid users is beneficial or detrimental; and (3) assessing clinical consequences on different treatment options on opioid-induced CSA.

Different antimuscarinics when combined with atomoxetine have differential effects on obstructive sleep apnea severity

The combination of the noradrenergic agent atomoxetine plus the antimuscarinic oxybutynin has recently been shown to improve upper airway physiology and reduce obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity. However, the effects of different antimuscarinics when combined with atomoxetine is limited. This study aimed to determine the effects of atomoxetine combined with two different antimuscarinics with varying M-subtype receptor selectivity on OSA severity and upper airway physiology. Ten people with predominantly severe OSA completed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Participants completed three overnight in-laboratory sleep studies after either 80 mg atomoxetine + 5 mg solifenacin succinate (ato-sol) or 80 mg atomoxetine + 2 mg biperiden hydrochloride (ato-bip) or placebo. OSA severity, ventilatory stability (loop gain), respiratory-arousal threshold (via epiglottic manometry), next-day subjective sleepiness [Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)], and alertness were compared between conditions. Neither drug combination altered the apnea/hypopnea index versus placebo (P = 0.63). Ato-sol caused a shift toward milder respiratory events with reduced frequency of obstructive apneas (13 ± 14 vs. 22 ± 17 events/h; means ± SD, P = 0.04) and increased hypopneas during nonrapid eye movement (NREM) (38 ± 21 vs. 24 ± 18 events/h, P = 0.006) with improved nadir oxygenation versus placebo (83 ± 4 vs. 80 ± 8%, P = 0.03). Both combinations reduced loop gain by ∼10% versus placebo; sleep efficiency and arousal threshold were unaltered. Ato-bip reduced next-day sleepiness versus placebo (KSS = 4.3 ± 2.2 vs. 5.6 ± 1.6, P = 0.03). Atomoxetine + biperiden hydrochloride reduces perceived sleepiness, and atomoxetine + solifenacin modestly improves upper airway function in people with OSA but to a lesser extent versus recently published atomoxetine + oxybutynin (broad M-subtype receptor selectivity) findings. These results provide novel mechanistic insight into the role of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic agents on sleep and breathing and are important for pharmacotherapy development for OSA.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In contrast to recent findings of major reductions in OSA severity when atomoxetine is combined with a nonspecific antimuscarinic, oxybutynin (broad M-subtype receptor selectivity), addition of solifenacin succinate (M2 and M3 muscarinic receptor selectivity) or biperiden (M1 muscarinic receptor selectivity) with atomoxetine had modest effects on upper airway function during sleep, which provide mechanistic insight into the role of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic agents on sleep and breathing and are important for pharmacotherapy development for OSA.

Research Priorities for Patients with Heart Failure and Central Sleep Apnea. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement

Background: Central sleep apnea (CSA) is common among patients with heart failure and has been strongly linked to adverse outcomes. However, progress toward improving outcomes for such patients has been limited. The purpose of this official statement from the American Thoracic Society is to identify key areas to prioritize for future research regarding CSA in heart failure.

Methods: An international multidisciplinary group with expertise in sleep medicine, pulmonary medicine, heart failure, clinical research, and health outcomes was convened. The group met at the American Thoracic Society 2019 International Conference to determine research priority areas. A statement summarizing the findings of the group was subsequently authored using input from all members.

Results: The workgroup identified 11 specific research priorities in several key areas: 1) control of breathing and pathophysiology leading to CSA, 2) variability across individuals and over time, 3) techniques to examine CSA pathogenesis and outcomes, 4) impact of device and pharmacological treatment, and 5) implementing CSA treatment for all individuals

Conclusions: Advancing care for patients with CSA in the context of heart failure will require progress in the arenas of translational (basic through clinical), epidemiological, and patient-centered outcome research. Given the increasing prevalence of heart failure and its associated substantial burden to individuals, society, and the healthcare system, targeted research to improve knowledge of CSA pathogenesis and treatment is a priority.

Treatment-Emergent Central Apnea: Physiologic Mechanisms Informing Clinical Practice

The purpose of this review was to describe our management approach to patients with treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA). The emergence of central sleep apnea during positive airway pressure therapy occurs in approximately 8% of titration studies for OSA, and it has been associated with several demographic, clinical, and polysomnographic factors, as well as factors related to the titration study itself. TECSA shares similar pathophysiology with central sleep apnea. In fact, central and OSA pathophysiologic mechanisms are inextricably intertwined, with ventilatory instability and upper airway narrowing occurring in both entities. TECSA is a "dynamic" process, with spontaneous resolution with ongoing positive airway pressure therapy in most patients, persistence in some, or appearing de novo in a minority of patients. Management strategy for TECSA aims to eliminate abnormal respiratory events, stabilize sleep architecture, and improve the underlying contributing medical comorbidities. CPAP therapy remains a standard therapy for TECSA. Expectant management is appropriate given its transient nature in most cases, whereas select patients would benefit from an early switch to an alternative positive airway pressure modality. Other treatment options include supplemental oxygen and pharmacologic therapy.

A signal demodulation-based method for the early detection of Cheyne-Stokes respiration

Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) is a sleep-disordered breathing characterized by recurrent central apneas alternating with hyperventilation exhibiting a crescendo-decrescendo pattern of tidal volume. This respiration is reported in patients with heart failure, stroke or damage in respiratory centers. It increases mortality for patients with severe heart failure as it has adverse impacts on the cardiac function. Early stage of CSR, also called periodic breathing, is often undiagnosed as it only provokes hypopneas instead of apneas, which are much more difficult to detect. This paper demonstrates the proof of concept of a new method devoted to the early detection of CSR. The proposed approach relies on a signal demodulation technique applied to ventilation signals measured on 15 patients with chronic heart failure whose respiration goes from normal to severe CSR. Based on a modulation index and its instantaneous frequency, oscillation zones are detected and classified into three categories: CSR, periodic breathing and no abnormal pattern. The modulation index is used as an efficient indicator to quantify the degree of certainty of the pathology for each patient. Results show high correlation with experts’ annotations with sensitivity and specificity values of 87.1% and 89.8% respectively. A final decision leads to a classification which is confirmed by the experts’ conclusions.

Central sleep apnoea and periodic breathing in heart failure: prognostic significance and treatment options

Central sleep apnoea (CSA) including periodic breathing is prevalent in more than one-third of patients with heart failure and is highly and independently associated with poor outcomes. Optimal treatment is still debated and well-conducted studies regarding efficacy and impact on outcomes of available treatment options are limited, particularly in cardiac failure with preserved ejection fraction. While continuous positive airway pressure and oxygen reduce breathing disturbances by 50%, adaptive servoventilation (ASV) normalises breathing disturbances by to controlling the underlying mechanism of CSA. Results are contradictory regarding impact of ASV on hard outcomes. Cohorts and registry studies show survival improvement under ASV, while secondary analyses of the large SERVE-HF randomised trial showed an excess mortality in cardiac failure with reduced ejection fraction. The current priority is to understand which phenotypes of cardiac failure patients may benefit from treatment guiding individualised and personalised management.

Assessing ventilatory instability using the response to spontaneous sighs during sleep in preterm infants

Study Objectives

Periodic breathing (PB) is common in newborns and is an obvious manifestation of ventilatory control instability. However, many infants without PB may still have important underlying ventilatory control instabilities that go unnoticed using standard clinical monitoring. Methods to detect infants with "subclinical" ventilatory control instability are therefore required. The current study aimed to assess the degree of ventilatory control instability using simple bedside recordings in preterm infants.

Methods

Respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) recordings were analyzed from ~20 minutes of quiet sleep in 20 preterm infants at 36 weeks post-menstrual age (median [range]: 36 [34-40]). The percentage time spent in PB was also calculated for each infant (%PB). Spontaneous sighs were identified and breath-by-breath measurements of (uncalibrated) ventilation were derived from RIP traces. Loop gain (LG, a measure of ventilatory control instability) was calculated by fitting a simple ventilatory control model (gain, time-constant, delay) to the post-sigh ventilatory pattern. For comparison, periodic inter-breath variability was also quantified using power spectral analysis (ventilatory oscillation magnitude index [VOMI]).

Results

%PB was strongly associated with LG (r2 = 0.77, p < 0.001) and moderately with the VOMI (r2 = 0.21, p = 0.047). LG (0.52 ± 0.05 vs. 0.30 ± 0.03; p = 0.0025) and the VOMI (-8.2 ± 1.1 dB vs. -11.8 ± 0.9 dB; p = 0.026) were both significantly higher in infants that displayed PB vs. those without.

Conclusions

LG and VOMI determined from the ventilatory responses to spontaneous sighs can provide a practical approach to assessing ventilatory control instability in preterm infants. Such simple techniques may help identify infants at particular risk for ventilatory instabilities with concomitant hypoxemia and its associated consequences.

More than Heart Failure: Central Sleep Apnea and Sleep-Related Hypoventilation

Central sleep apnea (CSA) comprises a variety of breathing patterns and clinical entities. They can be classified into 2 categories based on the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the arterial blood. Nonhypercapnic CSA is usually characterized by a periodic breathing pattern, while hypercapnic CSA is based on hypoventilation. The latter CSA form is associated with central nervous, neuromuscular, and rib cage disorders as well as obesity and certain medication or substance intake. In contrast, nonhypercapnic CSA is typically accompanied by an overshoot of the ventilation and often associated with heart failure, cerebrovascular diseases, and stay in high altitude. CSA and hypoventilation syndromes are often considered separately, but pathophysiological aspects frequently overlap. An integrative approach helps to recognize underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and to choose adequate therapeutic strategies. Research in the last decades improved our insights; nevertheless, diagnostic tools are not always appropriately chosen to perform comprehensive sleep studies. This supports misinterpretation and misclassification of sleep disordered breathing. The purpose of this article is to highlight unresolved problems, raise awareness for different pathophysiological components and to discuss the evidence for targeted therapeutic strategies.

Effects of optimized heart failure medication on central sleep apnea with Cheyne-Stokes respiration pattern in chronic heart failure with reduced left-ventricular ejection fraction

Central Sleep Apnea with Cheyne Stokes Respiration (CSA-CSR) is often diagnosed in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). CSA-CSR displays a periodic breathing pattern with a typical waxing and waning breathing with central sleep apnea phases in between. Optimization of heart failure medication with Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition (ARNi) can effect phenotypic traits of CSA-CSR indicating improvements of both, hemodynamic parameters and central chemosensitivity.

Central sleep apnea: misunderstood and mistreated!

Central sleep apnea is prevalent in patients with heart failure, healthy individuals at high altitudes, and chronic opiate users and in the initiation of "mixed" (that is, central plus obstructive apneas). This brief review focuses on (a) the causes of repetitive, cyclical central apneas as mediated primarily through enhanced sensitivities in the respiratory control system and (b) treatment of central sleep apnea through modification of key components of neurochemical control as opposed to the current universal use of positive airway pressure.

Inherent vs. Induced Loop Gain Abnormalities in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Unstable ventilatory chemoreflex control, quantified as loop gain, is recognized as one of four key pathophysiological traits that contribute to cause obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Novel treatments aimed at reducing loop gain are being investigated, with the intention that future OSA treatment may be tailored to the individual's specific cause of apnea. However, few studies have evaluated loop gain in OSA and non-OSA controls and those that have provide little evidence to support an inherent abnormality in either overall chemical loop gain in OSA patients vs. non-OSA controls, or its components (controller and plant gain). However, intermittent hypoxia may induce high controller gain through neuroplastic changes to chemoreflex control, and may also decrease plant gain via oxidative stress induced inflammation and reduced lung function. The inherent difficulties and limitations with loop gain measurements are discussed and areas where further research are required are highlighted, as only by understanding the mechanisms underlying OSA are new therapeutic approaches likely to emerge in OSA.

Cycle length identifies obstructive sleep apnea and central sleep apnea in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

AIM

To clarify whether unmasking of central sleep apnea during continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) initiation can be identified from initial diagnostic polysomnography (PSG) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three consecutive patients with obstructive sleep apnea and central sleep apnea (OSA/CSA) in HFREF were matched with 43 HFREF patients with OSA and successful CPAP initiation. Obstructive apneas during diagnostic PSG were then analyzed for cycle length (CL), ventilation length (VL), apnea length (AL), time to peak ventilation (TTPV), and circulatory delay (CD). We calculated duty ratio (DR) as the ratio of VL/CL and mathematic loop gain (LG).

RESULTS

While AL was similar, CL, VL, TTPV, CD, and DR was significantly longer in patients with OSA/CSA compared to those with OSA, and LG was significantly higher. Receiver operator curves identified optimal cutoff values of 50.2 s for CL (area under the curve (AUC) 0.85, 29.2 s for VL (AUC 0.92), 11.5 s for TTPV (AUC 0.82), 26.4 s for CD (AUC 0.79), and 3.96 (AUC 0.78)) respectively for LG to identify OSA/CSA.

CONCLUSION

OSA/CSA in HFREF can be identified by longer CL, VL, TTPV, and CD from obstructive events in initial diagnostic PSG. The underlying mechanisms seem to be the presence of an increased LG.

Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation, a novel therapeutic approach for central sleep apnea

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is common in heart failure (HF) patients. Traditional treatment of CSA, including continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), adaptive servo ventilation (ASV), oxygen therapy, and CO₂ inhalation, has respective limitations. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS), a novel therapeutic approach for CSA, was proved to be effective and safe. The remedē^® system and related transvenous PNS methods was approved by FDA in 2017, for treating moderate to severe CSA.

Epidemiology of Sleep-Disordered Breathing and Heart Failure: What Drives What

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The bidirectional relationships that have been demonstrated between heart failure (HF) and central sleep apnea (CSA) demand further exploration with respect to the implications that each condition has for the other. This review discusses the body of literature that has accumulated on these relationships and how CSA and its potential treatment may affect outcomes in patients with CSA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) can exacerbate hypertension, type 2 diabetes, obesity, and atherosclerosis, which are known predicates of HF. Conversely, patients with HF more frequently exhibit OSA partly due to respiratory control system instability. These same mechanisms are responsible for the frequent association of HF with CSA with or without a Hunter-Cheyne-Stokes breathing (HCSB) pattern. Just as is the case with OSA, patients with HF complicated by CSA exhibit more severe cardiac dysfunction leading to increased mortality; the increase in severity of HF can in turn worsen the degree of sleep disordered breathing (SDB). Thus, a bidirectional relationship exists between HF and both phenotypes of SDB; moreover, an individual patient may exhibit a combination of these phenotypes. Both types of SDB remain significantly underdiagnosed in patients with HF and hence undertreated. Appropriate screening for, and treatment of, OSA is clearly a significant factor in the comprehensive management of HF, while the relevance of CSA remains controversial. Given the unexpected results of the Treatment of Sleep-Disordered Breathing with Predominant Central Sleep Apnea by Adaptive Servo Ventilation in Patients with Heart Failure trial, it is now of paramount importance that additional analysis of these data be expeditiously reported. It is also critical that ongoing and proposed prospective studies of this issue proceed without delay.

Phenotyping the pathophysiology of obstructive sleep apnea using polygraphy/polysomnography: a review of the literature

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first-line treatment for the majority of patients affected by obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA). However, long-term compliance with CPAP therapy may result limited and alternatives to CPAP therapy are required to address the increasing need to provide tailored therapeutic options. Understanding the pathophysiological traits (PTs) of OSA patients [upper airway (UA) anatomical collapsibility, loop gain (LG), arousal threshold (AT), and UA gain (UAG)] lies at the heart of the customized OSA treatment. However, sleep research laboratories capable to phenotype OSA patients are sparse and the diagnostic procedures time-consuming, costly, and requiring significant expertise. The question arises whether the use of routine clinical polysomnography or nocturnal portable multi-channel monitoring (PSG/PM) can provide sufficient information to characterize the above traits. The aim of the present review is to deduce if the information obtainable from the clinical PSG/PM analysis, independently of the scope and context of the original studies, is clinically useful to define qualitatively the PTs of individual OSA patients. In summary, it is possible to identify four patterns using PSG/PM that are consistent with an altered UA collapsibility, three that are consistent with altered LG, two with altered AT, and three consistent with flow limitation/UA muscle response. Furthermore, some PSG/PM indexes and patterns, useful for the suitable management of OSA patient, have been discussed. The delivery of this clinical approach to phenotype pathophysiological traits will allow patients to benefit in a wider range of sleep services by facilitating tailored therapeutic options.

Adaptive servoventilation in clinical practice: beyond SERVE-HF?

Adaptive servoventilation (ASV) has proven effective at suppressing breathing disturbances during sleep, improving quality of life and cardiac surrogate parameters. Since the publication of the SERVE-HF-trial, ASV became restricted. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of the SERVE-HF inclusion criteria in real life and estimate the portion of patients with these criteria with or without risk factors who are undergoing ASV treatment.

We performed a retrospective study of all patients who were treated with ASV in a university-affiliated sleep laboratory. We reviewed the history of cardiovascular diseases, echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and polysomnography.

From 1998 to 2015, 293 patients received ASV, of which 255 (87.0%) had cardiovascular diseases and 118 (40.3%) had HF. Among those with HF, the LVEF was ≤45% in 47 patients (16.0%). Only 12 patients (4.1%) had LVEF <30%. The SERVE-HF inclusion criteria were present in 28 (9.6%) ASV recipients. Of these patients, 3 died within 30–58 months of therapy, all with systolic HF and a LVEF <30%.

In this study, only a small minority of ASV patients fell in the risk group. The number of fatalities did not exceed the expected mortality in optimally treated systolic HF patients.

The majority of ASV patients do not fulfil the risk criteria. Fatalities under ASV did not exceed expected figures.http://ow.ly/V2HI30fBURh

Dynamic loop gain increases upon adopting the supine body position during sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is typically worse in the supine versus lateral sleeping position. One potential factor driving this observation is a decrease in lung volume in the supine position which is expected by theory to increase a key OSA pathogenic factor: dynamic ventilatory control instability (i.e. loop gain). We aimed to quantify dynamic loop gain in OSA patients in the lateral and supine positions, and to explore the relationship between change in dynamic loop gain and change in lung volume with position.

METHODS

Data from 20 patients enrolled in previous studies on the effect of body position on OSA pathogenesis were retrospectively analysed. Dynamic loop gain was calculated from routinely collected polysomnographic signals using a previously validated mathematical model. Lung volumes were measured in the awake state with a nitrogen washout technique.

RESULTS

Dynamic loop gain was significantly higher in the supine than in the lateral position (0.77 ± 0.15 vs 0.68 ± 0.14, P = 0.012). Supine functional residual capacity (FRC) was significantly lower than lateral FRC (81.0 ± 15.4% vs 87.3 ± 18.4% of the seated FRC, P = 0.021). The reduced FRC we observed on moving to the supine position was predicted by theory to increase loop gain by 10.2 (0.6, 17.1)%, a value similar to the observed increase of 8.4 (-1.5, 31.0)%.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic loop gain increased by a small but statistically significant amount when moving from the lateral to supine position and this may, in part, contribute to the worsening of OSA in the supine sleeping position.

Resonance as the Mechanism of Daytime Periodic Breathing in Patients with Heart Failure

RATIONALE

In patients with chronic heart failure, daytime oscillatory breathing at rest is associated with a high risk of mortality. Experimental evidence, including exaggerated ventilatory responses to CO₂ and prolonged circulation time, implicates the ventilatory control system and suggests feedback instability (loop gain > 1) is responsible. However, daytime oscillatory patterns often appear remarkably irregular versus classic instability (Cheyne-Stokes respiration), suggesting our mechanistic understanding is limited.

OBJECTIVES

We propose that daytime ventilatory oscillations generally result from a chemoreflex resonance, in which spontaneous biological variations in ventilatory drive repeatedly induce temporary and irregular ringing effects. Importantly, the ease with which spontaneous biological variations induce irregular oscillations (resonance "strength") rises profoundly as loop gain rises toward 1. We tested this hypothesis through a comparison of mathematical predictions against actual measurements in patients with heart failure and healthy control subjects.

METHODS

In 25 patients with chronic heart failure and 25 control subjects, we examined spontaneous oscillations in ventilation and separately quantified loop gain using dynamic inspired CO₂ stimulation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Resonance was detected in 24 of 25 patients with heart failure and 18 of 25 control subjects. With increased loop gain-consequent to increased chemosensitivity and delay-the strength of spontaneous oscillations increased precipitously as predicted (r = 0.88), yielding larger (r = 0.78) and more regular (interpeak interval SD, r = -0.68) oscillations (P < 0.001 for all, both groups combined).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study elucidates the mechanism underlying daytime ventilatory oscillations in heart failure and provides a means to measure and interpret these oscillations to reveal the underlying chemoreflex hypersensitivity and reduced stability that foretells mortality in this population.

Bed Rest and Hypoxic Exposure Affect Sleep Architecture and Breathing Stability

Objective: Despite over 50 years of research on the physiological effects of sustained bed rest, data characterizing its effects on sleep macrostructure and breathing stability in humans are scarce. This study was conducted to determine the effects of continuous exposure to hypoxia and sustained best rest, both individually and combined, on nocturnal sleep and breathing stability.

Methods: Eleven participants completed three randomized, counter-balanced, 21-days trials of: (1) normoxic bed rest (NBR, P_IO₂ = 133.1 ± 0.3), (2) hypoxic ambulatory confinement (HAMB, P_IO₂ = 90.0 ± 0.4) and (3) hypoxic bed rest (HBR, P_IO₂ = 90.0 ± 0.4; ~4,000 m equivalent altitude). Full objective polysomnography was performed at baseline, on Night 1 and Night 21 in each condition.

Results: In NBR Night 1, more time was spent in light sleep (10 ± 2%) compared to baseline (8 ± 2%; p = 0.028); Slow-wave sleep (SWS) was reduced from baseline in the hypoxic-only trial by 18% (HAMB Night 21, p = 0.028) and further reduced by 33% (HBR Night 1, p = 0.010), and 36% (HBR Night 21, p = 0.008) when combined with bed rest. The apnea-hypopnea index doubled from Night 1 to Night 21 in HBR (32–62 events·h⁻¹) and HAMB (31–59 events·h⁻¹; p = 0.002). Those who experienced greatest breathing instability from Night 1 to Night 21 (NBR) were correlated to unchanged or higher (+1%) night SpO₂ concentrations (R² = 0.471, p = 0.020).

Conclusion: Bed rest negatively affects sleep macrostructure, increases the apnea-hypopnea index, and worsens breathing stability, each independently exacerbated by continuous exposure to hypoxia.

Ventilatory Cycle Measurements and Loop Gain in Central Apnea in Mining Drivers Exposed to Intermittent Altitude

STUDY OBJECTIVES

By measuring the apnea length, ventilatory phase, respiratory cycle length, and loop gain, we can further characterize the central apneas of high altitude (CAHA).

METHODS

Sixty-three drivers of all-terrain vehicles, working in a Peruvian mine located at 2,020 meters above sea level (MASL), were evaluated. A respiratory polygraph was performed in the first night they slept at high altitude. None of the subjects were exposed to oxygen during the test or acetazolamide in the preceding days of the test.

RESULTS

Sixty-three respiratory polygraphs were performed, and 59 were considered for analysis. Forty-six (78%) were normal, 6 (10%) had OSA, and 7 (12%) had CAHA. Key data from subjects include: residing altitude: 341 ± 828 MASL, Lake Louise scoring: 0.4 ± 0.8, Epworth score: 3.4 ± 2.7, apneahypopnea index: 35.7 ± 19.3, CA index: 13.4 ± 14.2, CA length: 14.4 ± 3.6 sec, ventilatory length: 13.5 ± 2.9 sec, cycle length: 26.5 ± 4.0 sec, ventilatory length/CA length ratio 0.9 ± 0.3 and circulatory delay 13.3 ± 2.9 sec. Duty ratio media [ventilatory duration/cycle duration] was 0.522 ± 0 0.128 [0.308-0.700] and loop gain was calculated from the duty ratio utilizing this formula: LG = 2π / [(2πDR-sin(2πDR)]. All subjects have a high loop gain media 2.415 ± 1.761 [1.175-6.260]. Multiple correlations were established with loop gain values, but the only significant correlation detected was between central apnea index and loop gain.

CONCLUSIONS

Twelve percent of the studied population had CAHA. Measurements of respiratory cycle in workers with CAHA are more similar to idiopathic central apneas rather than Hunter-Cheyne-Stokes respiration. Also, there was a high degree of correlation between severity of central apnea and the degree of loop gain. The abnormal breathing patterns in those subjects could affect the sleep quality and potentially increase the risk for work accidents.

Sleep apnoea in heart failure: To treat or not to treat?

Heart failure (HF) and sleep apnoea are common disorders which frequently coexist. Two main types of apnoea occur: one is obstructive which, through recurring episodes of snoring, hypoxaemia, large negative intra-thoracic pressures and arousals from sleep leading to downstream inflammatory and autonomic nervous system changes, is thought to be a causative factor to the development of systemic hypertension and HF. The other type of apnoea, Cheyne-Stokes respiration with central sleep apnoea (CSR-CSA), is characterized by an oscillatory pattern of ventilation with a prevailing hyperventilation-induced hypocapnia, often in the absence of significant hypoxaemia and snoring, and is thought to be a consequence of advanced HF-related low cardiac output, high sympathetic nervous system activation and pulmonary congestion. CSR-CSA may be a compensatory response to advanced HF. Rostral fluid shift during sleep may play an important role in the pathogenesis of both obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and CSA. Studies of positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment of OSA and CSA in HF have shown short-term improvements in cardiac and autonomic function; however, there is no evidence of improved survival. Loop gain may provide useful marker of continuous PAP (CPAP) responsiveness in patients with central apnoea. A greater understanding of the pathophysiology of the interaction between obstructive and central apnoea and the various types of HF, and the mechanisms of therapies, such as PAP, is required to develop new strategies to overcome the disabling symptoms, and perhaps improve the mortality, that accompany HF with sleep apnoea.

Pathogenesis of central and complex sleep apnoea

Central sleep apnoea (CSA) - the temporary absence or diminution of ventilatory effort during sleep - is seen in a variety of forms including periodic breathing in infancy and healthy adults at altitude and Cheyne-Stokes respiration in heart failure. In most circumstances, the cyclic absence of effort is paradoxically a consequence of hypersensitive ventilatory chemoreflex responses to oppose changes in airflow, that is elevated loop gain, leading to overshoot/undershoot ventilatory oscillations. Considerable evidence illustrates overlap between CSA and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), including elevated loop gain in patients with OSA and the presence of pharyngeal narrowing during central apnoeas. Indeed, treatment of OSA, whether via continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), tracheostomy or oral appliances, can reveal CSA, an occurrence referred to as complex sleep apnoea. Factors influencing loop gain include increased chemosensitivity (increased controller gain), reduced damping of blood gas levels (increased plant gain) and increased lung to chemoreceptor circulatory delay. Sleep-wake transitions and pharyngeal dilator muscle responses effectively raise the controller gain and therefore also contribute to total loop gain and overall instability. In some circumstances, for example apnoea of infancy and central congenital hypoventilation syndrome, central apnoeas are the consequence of ventilatory depression and defective ventilatory responses, that is low loop gain. The efficacy of available treatments for CSA can be explained in terms of their effects on loop gain, for example CPAP improves lung volume (plant gain), stimulants reduce the alveolar-inspired PCO₂ difference and supplemental oxygen lowers chemosensitivity. Understanding the magnitude of loop gain and the mechanisms contributing to instability may facilitate personalized interventions for CSA.

Obstructive sleep apnoea pathogenesis from mild to severe: Is it all the same?

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common disorder caused by not only an impaired upper airway anatomy (i.e. anatomically narrow/collapsible airway), but also by several non-anatomical factors. In this review, we summarise what is known about how each of the pathological factors that cause OSA vary according to disease severity as measured by the apnoea-hypopnoea index. Our synthesis of the available literature indicates that most of the key factors that cause OSA vary with disease severity. However, there is substantial heterogeneity such that the relative contribution of each of these traits varies both between patients and within different severities of disease. These differences likely contribute to variable efficacy of many non-continuous positive airway pressure treatments and inconsistencies in responses with regard to different OSA severities at baseline.