1
|
Fucini GB, Geffers C, Schwab F, Behnke M, Moellmann J, Sunder W, Gastmeier P. [The structural and spatial design of German intensive care units from the point of view of infection control measures : Survey among ICU-KISS participants]. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2024; 119:27-38. [PMID: 37280415 PMCID: PMC10243682 DOI: 10.1007/s00063-023-01022-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intensive care unit (ICU) structural and spatial design may play a role in infection prevention and control. METHODS Between 09/2021 and 11/2021 we performed an online survey among ICUs in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. RESULTS A total of 597 (40%) of the invited ICUs answered the survey; 20% of the ICUs were built before 1990. The median number of single rooms with interquartile range is 4 (IQR 2-6). The median total room number is 8 (IQR 6-12). The median room size is 19 (IQR 16-22) m2 for single rooms and 31 (26-37.5) m2 for multiple bed rooms. Furthermore, 80% of ICUs have sinks and 86.4% have heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC) systems in patient rooms. 54.6% of ICUs must store materials outside of storage rooms due to lack of space and only 33.5% have a room dedicated to disinfection and cleaning of used medical devices. Comparing ICUs built before 1990 and after 2011 we could show a slightly increase of single rooms (3 [IQR 2-5] before 1990 vs. 5 [IQR 2-8] after 2011; p < 0.001). DISCUSSION A large proportion of German ICUs do not meet the requirements of German professional societies regarding the number of single rooms and size of the patient rooms. Many ICUs lack storage space and other functional rooms. CONCLUSION There is an urgent need to support the construction and renovation of intensive care units in Germany with adequate funding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni-Battista Fucini
- Institut für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Deutschland.
- Nationales Referenzzentrum für Krankenhausinfektionen (NRZ), Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - Christine Geffers
- Institut für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Deutschland
- Nationales Referenzzentrum für Krankenhausinfektionen (NRZ), Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Frank Schwab
- Institut für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Deutschland
- Nationales Referenzzentrum für Krankenhausinfektionen (NRZ), Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Michael Behnke
- Institut für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Deutschland
- Nationales Referenzzentrum für Krankenhausinfektionen (NRZ), Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Julia Moellmann
- IKE Institut für Konstruktives Entwerfen, Industrie- und Gesundheitsbau, Technische Universität Carolo Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig, Pockelsstr. 3, 38106, Braunschweig, Deutschland
| | - Wolfgang Sunder
- IKE Institut für Konstruktives Entwerfen, Industrie- und Gesundheitsbau, Technische Universität Carolo Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig, Pockelsstr. 3, 38106, Braunschweig, Deutschland
| | - Petra Gastmeier
- Institut für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Deutschland
- Nationales Referenzzentrum für Krankenhausinfektionen (NRZ), Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Butler MJ, Sloof D, Peters C, Conway Morris A, Gouliouris T, Thaxter R, Keevil VL, Beggs CB. Impact of supplementary air filtration on aerosols and particulate matter in a UK hospital ward: a case study. J Hosp Infect 2023; 135:81-89. [PMID: 36842537 PMCID: PMC9957342 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aerosol spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a major problem in hospitals, leading to an increase in supplementary high-efficiency particulate air filtration aimed at reducing nosocomial transmission. This article reports a natural experiment that occurred when an air cleaning unit (ACU) on a medicine for older people ward was switched off accidentally while being commissioned. AIM To assess aerosol transport within the ward and determine whether the ACU reduced airborne particulate matter (PM) levels. METHODS An ACU was placed in a ward comprising two six-bedded bays plus three single-bed isolation rooms which had previously experienced several outbreaks of coronavirus disease 2019. During commissioning, real-time measurements of key indoor air quality parameters (PM1-10, CO2, temperature and humidity) were collected from multiple sensors over 2 days. During this period, the ACU was switched off accidentally for approximately 7 h, allowing the impact of the intervention on PM to be assessed. FINDINGS The ACU reduced the PM counts considerably (e.g. PM1 65.5-78.2%) throughout the ward (P<0.001 all sizes), with positive correlation found for all PM fractions and CO2 (r=0.343-0.817; all P<0.001). PM counts rose/fell simultaneously when the ACU was off, with correlation of PM signals from multiple locations (e.g. r=0.343-0.868; all P<0.001) for particulates <1 μm). CONCLUSION Aerosols migrated rapidly between the various ward subcompartments, suggesting that social distancing alone cannot prevent nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV-2 as this fails to mitigate longer-range (>2 m) transmission. The ACU reduced PM levels considerably throughout the ward space, indicating its potential as an effective intervention to reduce the risk posed by infectious airborne particles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Butler
- Department of Medicine for the Elderly, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Sloof
- AirPurity UK, Ltd, Cambridge, UK
| | - C Peters
- Department of Microbiology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - A Conway Morris
- John V Farman Intensive Care Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK; Division of Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - T Gouliouris
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - R Thaxter
- Infection Prevention and Control, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - V L Keevil
- Department of Medicine for the Elderly, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - C B Beggs
- Department of Medicine for the Elderly, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK; Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Izadyar N, Miller W. Ventilation strategies and design impacts on indoor airborne transmission: A review. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT 2022; 218:109158. [PMID: 35573806 PMCID: PMC9075988 DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 outbreak has brought the indoor airborne transmission issue to the forefront. Although ventilation systems provide clean air and dilute indoor contaminated air, there is strong evidence that airborne transmission is the main route for contamination spread. This review paper aims to critically investigate ventilation impacts on particle spread and identify efficient ventilation strategies in controlling aerosol distribution in clinical and non-clinical environments. This article also examines influential ventilation design features (i.e., exhaust location) affecting ventilation performance in preventing aerosols spread. This paper shortlisted published documents for a review based on identification (keywords), pre-processing, screening, and eligibility of these articles. The literature review emphasizes the importance of ventilation systems' design and demonstrates all strategies (i.e., mechanical ventilation) could efficiently remove particles if appropriately designed. The study highlights the need for occupant-based ventilation systems, such as personalized ventilation instead of central systems, to reduce cross-infections. The literature underlines critical impacts of design features like ventilation rates and the number and location of exhausts and suggests designing systems considering airborne transmission. This review underpins that a higher ventilation rate should not be regarded as a sole indicator for designing ventilation systems because it cannot guarantee reducing risks. Using filtration and decontamination devices based on building functionalities and particle sizes can also increase ventilation performance. This paper suggests future research on optimizing ventilation systems, particularly in high infection risk spaces such as multi-storey hotel quarantine facilities. This review contributes to adjusting ventilation facilities to control indoor aerosol transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nima Izadyar
- School of Built Environment, College of Engineering and Science, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Wendy Miller
- School of Architecture & Built Environment, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dancer SJ, Cormack K, Loh M, Coulombe C, Thomas L, Pravinkumar SJ, Kasengele K, King MF, Keaney J. Healthcare-acquired clusters of COVID-19 across multiple wards in a Scottish health board. J Hosp Infect 2021; 120:23-30. [PMID: 34863874 PMCID: PMC8634690 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Background Healthcare-acquired COVID-19 has been an additional burden on hospitals managing increasing numbers of patients with SARS-CoV-2. One acute hospital (W) among three in a Scottish healthboard experienced an unexpected surge of COVID-19 clusters. Aim To investigate possible causes of COVID-19 clusters at Hospital W. Methods Daily surveillance provided total numbers of patients and staff involved in clusters in three acute hospitals (H, M and W) and care homes across the healthboard. All clusters were investigated and documented, along with patient boarding, community infection rates and outdoor temperatures from October 2020 to March 2021. Selected SARS-CoV-2 strains were genotyped. Findings There were 19 COVID-19 clusters on 14 wards at Hospital W during the six-month study period, lasting from two to 42 days (average, five days; median, 14 days) and involving an average of nine patients (range 1–24) and seven staff (range 0–17). COVID-19 clusters in Hospitals H and M reflected community infection rates. An outbreak management team implemented a control package including daily surveillance; ward closures; universal masking; screening; restricting staff and patient movement; enhanced cleaning; and improved ventilation. Forty clusters occurred across all three hospitals before a January window-opening policy, after which there were three during the remainder of the study. Conclusion The winter surge of COVID-19 clusters was multi-factorial, but clearly exacerbated by moving trauma patients around the hospital. An extended infection prevention and control package including enhanced natural ventilation helped reduce COVID-19 clusters in acute hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J Dancer
- Department of Microbiology, NHS Lanarkshire & Edinburgh Napier University, UK.
| | - K Cormack
- Quality Directorate, NHS Lanarkshire, UK
| | - M Loh
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK
| | - C Coulombe
- Infection Prevention & Control, NHS Lanarkshire, UK
| | - L Thomas
- Infection Prevention & Control, NHS Lanarkshire, UK
| | | | - K Kasengele
- Department of Public Health, NHS Lanarkshire, UK
| | - M-F King
- School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Büchner F, Hoffman M, Dobermann UH, Edel B, Lehmann T, Kipp F. Do closed waste containers lead to less air contamination than opened? A clinical case study at Jena University Hospital, Germany. WASTE MANAGEMENT (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2021; 136:11-17. [PMID: 34634566 DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.09.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Nosocomial infections are a growing challenge at hospitals. This clinical study aimed to investigate the influence of waste container construction ((open (O), closed (C), and hands-free opening (HF)) on microbial air contamination in a hospital setting. The results are intended to help develop guidelines for waste containers for the collection of non-infectious waste at hospitals and medical facilities. The clinical experiment was conducted at the University Hospital Jena, Germany. Air Impactor samples were performed and microbiologically evaluated for bacteria and fungi both quantitatively and qualitatively. The results were statistically determined using generalized estimating equations. Quantitatively, the lowest bacterial counts in ambient air were found around closed waste containers (114.74 CFU/m3) in comparison to HF (129.28 CFU/m3) and O (126.28 CFU/m3). For fungi, the surrounding air of C (2.08 CFU/m3) and HF (1.97 CFU/m3) waste containers showed a lower impact of fungal air contamination than for O (2.32 CFU/m3). Overall, it was shown that C are more preferable to HF and O waste containers from the point of view of microbial air contamination at hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziskus Büchner
- Institute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, D-07747 Jena, Germany.
| | - Marc Hoffman
- Integrative Health and Security Management Center, Staff Section Environmental Protection, Jena University Hospital, Bachstraße 18, D-07743 Jena, Germany
| | - Ute-Helke Dobermann
- Institute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, D-07747 Jena, Germany
| | - Birgit Edel
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, D-07747 Jena, Germany
| | - Thomas Lehmann
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Computer and Data Sciences, Jena University Hospital, Bachstraße 18, D-07743 Jena, Germany
| | - Frank Kipp
- Institute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, D-07747 Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|