Lithium prophylaxis of tricyclic-antidepressant-induced mania in bipolar patients

A systematic review of manic/hypomanic and depressive switches in patients with bipolar disorder in naturalistic settings: The role of antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs

The present systematic review was aimed at critically summarizing the evidence about treatment-emergent manic/hypomanic and depressive switches during the course of bipolar disorder (BD). A systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycInfo electronic databases was conducted until March 24th, 2021, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Observational studies clearly reporting data regarding the prevalence of treatment-emergent mood switches in patients with BD were considered for inclusion. Thirty-two original studies met the inclusion criteria. In the majority of cases, manic switches were analyzed; only 3 papers investigated depressive switches in type I BD. Treatment-emergent mania/hypomania in BD subjects ranged from 17.3% to 48.8% and was more frequent with antidepressant monotherapy compared to combination treatment with mood stabilizers, especially lithium, or second-generation antipsychotics. A higher likelihood of mood switch has been reported with tricyclics and a lower rate with bupropion. Depressive switches were detected in 5-16% of type I BD subjects and were associated with first-generation antipsychotic use, the concomitant use of first- and second-generation antipsychotics, and benzodiazepines. The included studies presented considerable methodological heterogeneity, small sample sizes and comparability flaws. In conclusion, many studies, although heterogeneous and partly discordant, have been conducted on manic/hypomanic switches, whereas depressive switches during treatment with antipsychotics are poorly investigated. In BD subjects, both antidepressant and antipsychotic medications seems to play a role in the occurrence of mood switches, although the effects of different pharmacological compounds have yet to be fully investigated.

Mania associated with antidepressant treatment: comprehensive meta-analytic review

OBJECTIVE

To review available data pertaining to risk of mania-hypomania among bipolar (BPD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) patients with vs. without exposure to antidepressant drugs (ADs) and consider effects of mood stabilizers.

METHOD

Computerized searching yielded 73 reports (109 trials, 114 521 adult patients); 35 were suitable for random effects meta-analysis, and multivariate-regression modeling included all available trials to test for effects of trial design, AD type, and mood-stabilizer use.

RESULTS

The overall risk of mania with/without ADs averaged 12.5%/7.5%. The AD-associated mania was more frequent in BPD than MDD patients, but increased more in MDD cases. Tricyclic antidepressants were riskier than serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SRIs); data for other types of ADs were inconclusive. Mood stabilizers had minor effects probably confounded by their preferential use in mania-prone patients.

CONCLUSION

Use of ADs in adults with BPD or MDD was highly prevalent and moderately increased the risk of mania overall, with little protection by mood stabilizers.

Bipolar disorder, antidepressants and induction of hypomania or mania. A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The literature cautions against the induction of (hypo)mania owing to the use of antidepressants in bipolar disorder. Objectives of this review are to examine: (1) the evidence for this assumption; (2) underlying risk factors; and (3) the extent to which a mood stabilizer may be protective.

METHOD

A systematic literature review was conducted.

RESULTS

Thirteen relevant studies were included. All of them had methodological shortcomings. Overall, there is no strong evidence that use of antidepressants in bipolar disorder increases the risk of (hypo)mania. Possible, although unreplicated, risk factors are: a short allele of the promoter region of the serotonin transporter gene SCL6A4, substance abuse or dependence, multiple antidepressant trials, lower number of previous manias, less delusions during illness, depressive polarity at illness onset, and rapid cycling that has, however, been contradicted by another study. Subtype of bipolar disorder (I or II) has been considered in four studies, with conflicting results. Mood stabilizers are possibly protective.

CONCLUSION

There is an urgent need for adequate studies of sufficient size. For the time being, treatment of bipolar depression may best be based on the results of the life chart of the individual patient keeping in mind the risk factors found until now.

Antidepressant-induced mania: an overview of current controversies

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence, characteristics, and possible risk factors associated with antidepressant-induced mania remain poorly described. The present review sought to identify published rates of antidepressant-induced mania and describe risk factors for its emergence.

METHODS

A MedLine search was conducted of journals that focused on mania or hypomania associated with recent antidepressant use. Data from published reports were augmented with relevant findings from recent clinical trials presented at scientific conferences.

RESULTS

Antidepressant-induced manias have been reported with all major antidepressant classes in a subgroup of about 20-40% of bipolar patients. Lithium may confer better protection against this outcome when compared with other standard mood stabilizers, although switch rates have been reported with comparable frequencies on or off mood stabilizers. Evidence across studies most consistently supports an elevated risk in patients with (i) previous antidepressant-induced manias, (ii) a bipolar family history, and (iii) exposure to multiple antidepressant trials.

CONCLUSION

About one-quarter to one-third of bipolar patients may be inherently susceptible to antidepressant-induced manias. Bipolar patients with a strong genetic loading for bipolar illness whose initial illness begins in adolescence or young adulthood may be especially at risk. Further efforts are needed to better identify high-vulnerability subgroups and differentiate illness-specific from medication-specific factors in mood destabilization.

Avoiding drug-induced switching in patients with bipolar depression

Antidepressant-induced switching is a major risk during the treatment of bipolar depression. Despite several clinical studies, questions remain regarding both the definition of these mood switches and the most appropriate therapeutic strategy to avoid this adverse effect. This review will first briefly consider the current guidelines for the acute treatment of bipolar depression. We will then review the mechanisms of action of antidepressant and mood stabilisers, and the switches induced by various types of antidepressant treatments, or triggered by antidepressant withdrawal, as well as by atypical antipsychotics. We then will address the risk of mood switch according to the type of mood stabiliser used. The propensity to mood switches in bipolar patients is subject to individual differences. Therefore we will describe both the clinical and biological characteristics of patients prone to mood switches under antidepressant treatment. However, the clinical characteristics of the depressive syndrome may also be a key determinant for mood switches. Various data help identify the most appropriate drug management strategies for avoiding mood switches during the treatment of bipolar depression. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors appear to be the drugs of first-choice because of the low associated risk of mood switching. Antidepressants must be associated with a mood stabiliser and the most effective in the prevention of switches seems to be lithium. Whatever the mood stabiliser used, effective plasma levels must be ensured. The optimal duration of antidepressant treatment for bipolar depression is still an open issue - prolonged treatments after recovery may be unnecessary and may facilitate mood elation. Moreover, some mood episodes with mixed symptoms can be worsened by antidepressants pointing to the need for a better delineation of the categories of symptoms requiring antidepressant treatment. Finally, as a result of this review, we suggest some propositions to define drug-induced switches in bipolar patients, and to try to delineate which strategies should be recommended in clinical practice to reduce as far as possible the risk of mood switch during the treatment of bipolar depression.

Validating antidepressant-associated hypomania (bipolar III): a systematic comparison with spontaneous hypomania (bipolar II)

BACKGROUND

According to DSM-IV and ICD-10, hypomania which occurs solely during antidepressant treatment does not belong to the category of bipolar II (BP-II).

METHODS

As part of the EPIDEP National Multisite French Study of 493 consecutive DSM-IV major depressive patients evaluated in at least two semi-structured interviews 1 month apart, 144 (29.2%) fulfilled the criteria for bipolar II with spontaneous hypomania (BP-II Sp), and 52 (10.5%) had hypomania associated solely with antidepressants (BP-H AA).

RESULTS

BP-II Sp group had earlier age at onset, more hypomanic episodes, and higher ratings on cyclothymic and hyperthymic temperaments, and abused alcohol more often. The two groups were indistinguishable on the hypomania checklist score (12.2+/-4.0 vs. 11.4+/-4.4, respectively, P=0.25) and on rates of familial bipolarity (14.1% vs. 11.8%, respectively, P=0.68). But BP-H AA had significantly more family history of suicide, had higher ratings on depressive temperament, with greater chronicity of depression, were more likely to be admitted to the hospital for suicidal depressions, and were more likely to have psychotic features; finally, clinicians were more likely to treat them with ECT, lithium and mood stabilizing anticonvulsants.

LIMITATION

Naturalistic study, where treatment was uncontrolled.

CONCLUSION

BP-H AA emerges as a disorder with depressive temperamental instability, manifesting hypomania later in life (and, by definition, during pharmacotherapy only). By the standards of clinicians who have taken care of these patients for long periods of time, BP-H AA appears as no less bipolar than those with prototypical BP-II. We submit that familial bipolarity ('genotypic' bipolarity) strongly favors their inclusion within the realm of bipolar II spectrum, as a prognostically less favorable depression-prone phenotype of this disorder, and which is susceptible to destabilization under antidepressant treatment. These considerations argue for revisions of DSM-IV and ICD-10 conventions. BP-HAA may represent a genetically less penetrant expression of BP-II; phenotypically; it might provisionally be categorized as bipolar III.

The comorbidity of bipolar and anxiety disorders: prevalence, psychobiology, and treatment issues

BACKGROUND

Although symptoms of anxiety as well as anxiety disorders commonly occur in patients with bipolar disorder, the pathophysiologic, theoretical, and clinical significance of their co-occurrence has not been well studied.

METHODS

The epidemiological and clinical studies that have assessed the overlap of bipolar and anxiety disorders are reviewed, with focus on panic disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and to a lesser extent, social phobia and post-traumatic stress disorder. Potential neural mechanism and treatment response data are also reviewed.

RESULTS

A growing number of epidemiological studies have found that bipolar disorder significantly co-occurs with anxiety disorders at rates that are higher than those in the general population. Clinical studies have also demonstrated high comorbidity between bipolar disorder and panic disorder, OCD, social phobia, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychobiological mechanisms that may account for these high comorbidity rates likely involve a complicated interplay among various neurotransmitter systems, particularly norepinephrine, dopamine, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and serotonin. The second-messenger system constituent, inositol, may also be involved. Little controlled data are available regarding the treatment of bipolar disorder complicated by an anxiety disorder. However, adequate mood stabilization should be achieved before antidepressants are used to treat residual anxiety symptoms so as to minimize antidepressant-induced mania or cycling. Moreover, preliminary data suggesting that certain antimanic agents may have anxiolytic properties (e.g. valproate and possibly antipsychotics), and that some anxiolytics may not induce mania (e.g. gabapentin and benzodiazepines other than alprazolam) indicate that these agents may be particularly useful for anxious bipolar patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbid anxiety symptoms and disorders must be considered when diagnosing and treating patients with bipolar disorder. Conversely, patients presenting with anxiety disorders must be assessed for comorbid mood disorders, including bipolar disorder. Pathophysiological, theoretical, and clinical implications of the overlap of bipolar and anxiety disorders are discussed.

Mood-stabilisers reduce the risk of developing antidepressant-induced maniform states in acute treatment of bipolar I depressed patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to give further support to the available evidence that mood stabilizers can reduce the risk of antidepressant-induced maniform switch phenomena in bipolar I depressed patients.

METHODS

Medical records of 158 patients with bipolar I depression were analysed for the incidence of switch phenomena from depression to maniform states (mania and hypomania). The impact of mood stabilizers on reducing the risk of switching was analyzed using logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Maniform switches during inpatient treatment were observed in 39 (25%) patients out of the total of 158 patients. Results indicate that especially patients receiving tricyclic antidepressants are at risk of switching to maniform states. This risk was shown to be significantly less when patients also received a mood stabilising medication (lithium, carbamazepine or valproic acid).

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective study with patients receiving naturalistic treatment. A prospective, double-blind design would probably lead to more conclusive findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with mood stabilizers may be a potent strategy to reduce the risk of antidepressant-induced maniform switches in bipolar I depressed patients.

Re-evaluating the prevalence of and diagnostic composition within the broad clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders

Until recently it was believed that no more than 1% of the general population has bipolar disorder. Emerging transatlantic data are beginning to provide converging evidence for a higher prevalence of up to at least 5%. Manic states, even those with mood-incongruent features, as well as mixed (dysphoric) mania, are now formally included in both ICD-10 and DSM-IV. Mixed states occur in an average of 40% of bipolar patients over a lifetime; current evidence supports a broader definition of mixed states consisting of full-blown mania with two or more concomitant depressive symptoms. The largest increase in prevalence rates, however, is accounted for by 'softer' clinical expressions of bipolarity situated between the extremes of full-blown bipolar disorder where the person has at least one manic episode (bipolar I) and strictly defined unipolar major depressive disorder without personal or family history for excited periods. Bipolar II is the prototype for these intermediary conditions with major depressions and history of spontaneous hypomanic episodes; current evidence indicates that most hypomanias pursue a recurrent course and that their usual duration is 1-3 days, falling below the arbitrary 4-day cutoff required in DSM-IV. Depressions with antidepressant-associated hypomania (sometimes referred to as bipolar III) also appear, on the basis of extensive international research neglected by both ICD-10 and DSM-IV, to belong to the clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders. Broadly defined, the bipolar spectrum in studies conducted during the last decade accounts for 30-55% of all major depressions. Rapid-cycling, defined as alternation of depressive and excited (at least four per year), more often arise from a bipolar II than a bipolar I baseline; such cycling does not in the main appear to be a distinct clinical subtype - but rather a transient complication in 20% in the long-term course of bipolar disorder. Major depressions superimposed on cyclothymic oscillations represent a more severe variant of bipolar II, often mistaken for borderline or other personality disorders in the dramatic cluster. Moreover, atypical depressive features with reversed vegetative signs, anxiety states, as well as alcohol and substance abuse comorbidity, is common in these and other bipolar patients. The proper recognition of the entire clinical spectrum of bipolarity behind such 'masks' has important implications for psychiatric research and practice. Conditions which require further investigation include: (1) major depressive episodes where hyperthymic traits - lifelong hypomanic features without discrete hypomanic episodes - dominate the intermorbid or premorbid phases; and (2) depressive mixed states consisting of few hypomanic symptoms (i.e., racing thoughts, sexual arousal) during full-blown major depressive episodes - included in Kraepelin's schema of mixed states, but excluded by DSM-IV. These do not exhaust all potential diagnostic entities for possible inclusion in the clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders: the present review did not consider cyclic, seasonal, irritable-dysphoric or otherwise impulse-ridden, intermittently explosive or agitated psychiatric conditions for which the bipolar connection is less established. The concept of bipolar spectrum as used herein denotes overlapping clinical expressions, without necessarily implying underlying genetic homogeneity. In the course of the illness of the same patient, one often observes the varied manifestations described above - whether they be formal diagnostic categories or those which have remained outside the official nosology. Some form of life charting of illness with colored graphic representation of episodes, stressors, and treatments received can be used to document the uniquely varied course characteristic of each patient, thereby greatly enhancing clinical evaluation.

Is it time to have another look at lithium maintenance therapy in bipolar disorder?

1. Bipolar disorder is typically a chronic disease entailing an episodes course, whereby psychiatric status alternates between periods of normal functioning and periods of illness. Lithium is well established and approved for the treatment of bipolar disorder. However, its efficacy in practice is not as great as expected. This retrospective record study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of lithium in bipolar disorders. 2. 48 patients who met DSM-III-R diagnostic criteria for bipolar I disorder and had been admitted once before lithium therapy and twice or more after that, were included in this study. 3. No significant difference in length between episode (frequency) was observed before and after lithium maintenance therapy. In addition, the percentages of manic episode after lithium therapy were much greater than before that. 4. The results indicate that it is worth re-examining the efficacy of lithium in bipolar disorders.

Ongoing lithium treatment prevents relapse after total sleep deprivation

Forty bipolar depressed inpatients underwent three consecutive cycles of total sleep deprivation (TSD). At the beginning of the study, 20 patients were free of psychotropic drugs and 20 had been receiving lithium medication for at least 6 months. Mood was rated on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression before and after TSD; perceived mood changes during treatment were evaluated with self-administered visual analog scales. Patients undergoing long-term lithium treatment showed a significantly better response to TSD as rated on both scales: 13 of 20 patients (vs. 2 of 20 patients without lithium) showed a sustained response during a follow-up period of 3 months. This preliminary evidence of a positive interaction of TSD and long-term lithium treatment could be explained by a synergistic effect of both treatments on brain serotonergic function, possibly via a desensitization of 5-hydroxytryptamine-1A inhibitory autoreceptors.

Treatment-resistant bipolar depression

Patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression require careful management, which takes into account the life-threatening potential of their depression and the risk of iatrogenic mania. Because there are few data specific to treatment of bipolar depression, much of the approach to bipolar depression is derived from experience with unipolar depression. There are, however, important differences between these two illnesses. Compared with patients with unipolar illness, patients with bipolar depression more likely experience antidepressant benefit from mood-stabilizing medication and, therefore, avoid the risks of antidepressant medication. Treatment of comorbid anxiety and substance abuse improves response. The risk of treating bipolar patients can be reduced but not avoided. Improved outcome may be achieved by careful assessment, prospective mood charting, and attempts to taper antidepressant medications after an appropriate continuation phase.

Bipolar mood disorder: practical strategies for acute and maintenance phase treatment

The chronic, complex, and episodic course of bipolar mood disorder presents a formidable challenge to the clinician making a treatment plan. Although numerous therapeutic agents are reported to be efficacious for one or more aspects of bipolar illness, treatment is seldom completely effective and is never curative. The goal of treatment is to modify the symptomatic expression of the illness with the result that fewer, briefer, and milder episodes occur. In pursuit of this goal, the use of multiple medications, polypharmacy, is the rule rather than the exception. This article offers recommendations for treatment strategies based on the phase and stage of the illness. The strategies are organized into algorithms that emphasize the use of mood-stabilizing medications as initial steps in a systematic, iterative approach to treatment. Practical issues related to the use of mood-stabilizing therapies are discussed.

Antidepressant treatment and the occurrence of mania in bipolar patients admitted for depression

We examined the records of 33 patients who had 70 inpatient admissions with a diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder, depressed. During 14 of these admissions, a switch occurred from depression into mania. We compared the treatment patients were on at the time of their switch to treatment during the 56 admissions where there was no switch. We conclude that clinicians must be prepared for depressed bipolar patients to switch to mania regardless of treatment status.

Drug-induced mania--causative agents, clinical characteristics and management. A retrospective analysis of the literature

128 case reports of drug-induced mania were reviewed. Steroids, levodopa and other dopaminergic agents, iproniazid, sympathomimetic amines, triazolobenzodiazepines and hallucinogens were the agents that most commonly induced manic syndromes. The most common characteristics of drug-induced manic episodes were increased activity, rapid speech, elevated mood, and insomnia. Patients who developed mania often had a prior history, family history, or current symptoms of mood disturbance. The episodes were most commonly treated by discontinuing or reducing the dose of causative agent. Discontinuation of the inciting drug and treatment with neuroleptic agents were equally efficacious: lithium treatment was less effective. The majority of agents that induce mania have an effect on monoaminergic systems.

Lithium therapy for mania and depression

The literature on lithium carbonate was reviewed for clues to the processes involved in mania. Lithium has proved effective therapeutically and prophylactically for mania and depressive disorders. Children and adolescents as well as adults tolerate lithium well. Side effects rarely are serious enough to necessitate having lithium therapy. Some success with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders has broadened the scope of lithium's therapeutic efficacy but also blunted the expectation for a direct relationship between lithium and the processes involved in mania. Research points to neurotransmitters as contributing to the etiology and symptom pattern of mania.

Clinical uses of lithium salts

A comprehensive overview of the clinical aspects of lithium therapy is presented. Emphasis is placed on recent developments regarding the clinical uses of Li2CO3 in non-psychiatric conditions. The established efficacy of the drug in the treatment and prophylaxis of mania and bipolar affective disorders is noted, and the evidence supporting the use of lithium salts as a prophylactic agent in unipolar depression, aggressive behavior, schizophrenic disorders and organic brain dysfunction is discussed. The use of lithium carbonate in various disorders of movement and in certain extrapyramidal diseases is summarized, as are the results of its trials in alcoholism and drug abuse. In addition, uses of Li2CO3 in asthma, thyroid diseases, granulocytopenia, headache, bowel disease, anesthesiology, cardiology, and sleep disorders are summarized. The data suggests the potential effectiveness of Li2CO3 in a variety of clinical conditions other than those for which it is classically indicated, provided more detailed double-blind studies are performed.