Rebound anxiety in anxious patients after abrupt withdrawal of benzodiazepine treatment

Clinical Utility of Semistructured Interview and Scales to Assess Withdrawal Syndromes With Dose Reduction or Discontinuation of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors or Serotonin Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Withdrawal syndromes can occur after dose reduction or discontinuation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Few measurement instruments are available to assess them: Diagnostic Clinical Interview for Drug Withdrawal 1-New Symptoms of SSRI and SNRI (DID-W1) and Discontinuation Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) checklist. We assessed their interrater reliability, verified the percent agreement between the two, and tested DESS sensitivity and specificity on the basis of the diagnoses formulated via the DID-W1.

METHODS

One-hundred thirty-four subjects who referred for withdrawal at 3 outpatient facilities were enrolled and assessed via the DESS and the DID-W1. Percent agreement and Cohen κ were calculated to measure DID-W1 and DESS interrater reliability, as well as the agreement between DID-W1 and DESS items. Sensitivity and specificity of DESS were derived from the identification of true-positive, false-negative, true-negative, and false-positive on the DID-W1.

RESULTS

Both tools showed excellent interrater reliability (DID-W1 Cohen κ = 0.958; DESS Cohen κ = 0.81-1). The degree of agreement between DID-W1 and DESS items was poor or fair (Cohen κ < 0.40) for some items and moderate (Cohen κ = 0.41-0.60) for others. Sensitivity and specificity of DESS were 0.937 (true-positive = 60, false-negative = 4) and 0.285 (true-negative = 20, false-positive = 50), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

DID-W1 was a reliable method to identify and diagnose withdrawal syndromes. The DESS checklist showed to be a useful tool for detecting withdrawal SSRI/SNRI symptoms when the aim is to achieve high sensitivity to identify true positives.

Effects of medical service fee revision on reducing irrational psychotropic polypharmacy in Japan: an interrupted time-series analysis

PURPOSE

According to the revised Japanese medical service fees aimed at reducing irrational psychotropic polypharmacy, medical service fees are reduced if the number of simultaneously prescribed psychotropic drugs exceeds the standard. This study primarily aims to examine the effect of the 2018 revision.

METHODS

Using a large Japanese administrative claims database, we retrospectively identified five groups (April 2013-September 2018) prescribed at least one drug from the following drug groups: anxiolytics, hypnotics, sum of anxiolytics and hypnotics, antipsychotics, and antidepressants (study population in each group: 547,511, 406,524, 759,137, 112,929, and 201,046, respectively). We used an interrupted time-series design to evaluate changes in the proportion of patients prescribed more than the standard number of drugs.

RESULTS

After the 2018 revision, the proportion of patients prescribed more than the standard number of drugs significantly decreased only for the sum of anxiolytics and hypnotics; estimated changes in level and trend were - 0.60% [- 0.69%, - 0.52%] and - 0.04% [- 0.06%, - 0.02%] per month, respectively. The proportion of patients exhibiting a decrease in the number of prescribed drugs from more than the standard to within the standard increased when the revision was enforced (April 2018); this proportion in April 2018 was 36.3%, while all other proportions were in the range of 12.1-22.3%.

CONCLUSION

The 2018 revision promoted a reduction in the number of prescribed drugs, which served as an important factor in the decrease in the proportion of patients prescribed more than the standard number of drugs for the sum of anxiolytics and hypnotics.

Acute and Persistent Withdrawal Syndromes Following Discontinuation of Psychotropic Medications

Studies on psychotropic medications decrease, discontinuation, or switch have uncovered withdrawal syndromes. The present overview aimed at analyzing the literature to illustrate withdrawal after decrease, discontinuation, or switch of psychotropic medications based on the drug class (i.e., benzodiazepines, nonbenzodiazepine benzodiazepine receptor agonists, antidepressants, ketamine, antipsychotics, lithium, mood stabilizers) according to the diagnostic criteria of Chouinard and Chouinard [Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(2):63-71], which encompass new withdrawal symptoms, rebound symptoms, and persistent post-withdrawal disorders. All these drugs may induce withdrawal syndromes and rebound upon discontinuation, even with slow tapering. However, only selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, and antipsychotics were consistently also associated with persistent post-withdrawal disorders and potential high severity of symptoms, including alterations of clinical course, whereas the distress associated with benzodiazepines discontinuation appears to be short-lived. As a result, the common belief that benzodiazepines should be substituted by medications that cause less dependence such as antidepressants and antipsychotics runs counter the available literature. Ketamine, and probably its derivatives, may be classified as at high risk for dependence and addiction. Because of the lag phase that has taken place between the introduction of a drug into the market and the description of withdrawal symptoms, caution is needed with the use of newer antidepressants and antipsychotics. Within medication classes, alprazolam, lorazepam, triazolam, paroxetine, venlafaxine, fluphenazine, perphenazine, clozapine, and quetiapine are more likely to induce withdrawal. The likelihood of withdrawal manifestations that may be severe and persistent should thus be taken into account in clinical practice and also in children and adolescents.

Lang U. How a Depressive Medical Doctor Profited in the Long-Term from a New and Short Psychological Group-Treatment against Major Depressive Disorder

Background: Individuals suffering from major depressive disorder (MDD) often describe workplace-related stress as one of the main causes of their disorder. Here, we present the story of a 33 year old “Bob” (a pseudonym) who suffered from a moderate (Hamilton-21 = 18) major depressive episode. Workplace-related stress seemed to be the main stressor for Bob at the time. We were interested in long-lasting effects of a newly established group called “work-related interpersonal Psychotherapy, W-IPT”. W-IPT consists of eight weekly 90 min sessions. The follow-ups were 12 weeks after the group-treatment and 18 months later. Bob was chosen because he agreed in advance to participate in a follow-up. We were interested if the group-treatment of W-IPT also has a persistent positive effect. Case presentation: We present the case of a 33-year-old man “Bob”. He was included in our previous published pilot-study 2020 with diagnosed moderate MDD, and he attended the group treatment. This case report focuses on a follow-up period of 18 months. A structured clinical interview for DSM-IV was carried out in order to be included in the study, and no comorbid diagnoses were detected. Conclusions: However, the psychotherapeutic effects in this case seem enduring and prolonged. Of course, additional research to study the long-term effects of W-IPT is needed, and more patients need to be included.

Dépendance aux benzodiazépines et syndrome de sevrage. Revue de la littérature

Ce travail rapporte les résultats d'une revue de la littérature mondiale (247 publications), concernant les syndromes de sevrage et la dépendance aux benzodiazépines, réalisant ainsi une mise à jour de l'tude eifectuée par Marks (1986) pour la période 1961-1984. Quatre-vingts cas publiés individuellement et 269 cas publiés par séries ont été recensés pour la période 1984-1988 (janvier), soit en ajoutant ces chiffres à ceux de Marks (1986): 928 cas individuels et 969 cas publiés par séries, soit encore au total: 1 897 cas publiés. L'analyse détaillée de ces cas, leur signification en termes de risque sont rapportées et discutées.

Au plan pratique, il apparaît que toutes les benzodiazépines peuvent être à l'origine de syndrome de sevrage, y compris celles à demi-vie courte. Le risque de dépendance est d'autant plus important que la durée de la prescription et les posologies employées sont élevées. Il est donc nécessaire de préconiser un sevragesystématiquementprogressif, quelles que soient la molécule et la durée de prescription, d'éviter l'administration aux sujets ayant des antécédents d'abus de toxiques ou de médicaments, de réserver l'usage à long terme aux pathologies anxieuses chroniques, en réévaluant régulièrement l'indication, de prescrire le moins longtemps possible et à la dose la plus faible possible dans tous les autres cas, en faisant varier la posologie selon l'évolution de l'intensité des symptômes.

Dependence, withdrawal and rebound of CNS drugs: an update and regulatory considerations for new drugs development

The purpose of this article is to describe dependence and withdrawal phenomena related to CNS drugs discontinuation and to clarify issues related to the evaluation of clinical drug withdrawal and rebound as they relate to safety in new drug development. The article presents current understanding and definitions of drug dependence and withdrawal which are also relevant and important features of addiction, though not the same. Addiction, called substance use disorder in DSM-5, affects an individual’s brain and behaviour, represents uncontrollable drug abuse and inability to stop taking a drug regardless of the harm it causes. Characteristic withdrawal syndromes following abrupt discontinuation of CNS-active drugs from numerous drug classes are described. These include drugs both scheduled and non-scheduled in the Controlled Substances Act, which categorizes drugs in five schedules based on their relative abuse potentials and dependence liabilities and for regulatory purposes. Schedules 1 and 2 contain drugs identified as those with the highest abuse potential and strictest regulations. Less recognized aspects of drug withdrawal, such as rebound and protracted withdrawal syndromes for several drug classes are also addressed. Part I presents relevant definitions and describes clinical withdrawal and dependence phenomena. Part II reviews known withdrawal syndromes for the different drug classes, Part III describes rebound and Part IV describes protracted withdrawal syndromes. To our knowledge, this is the first compilation of withdrawal syndromes for CNS drugs. Part V provides details of evaluation of dependence and withdrawal in the clinical trials for CNS drugs, which includes general design recommendations, and several tools, such as withdrawal questionnaires and multiple scales that are helpful in the systematic evaluation of withdrawal. The limitations of different aspects of this method of dependence and withdrawal evaluation are also discussed.

Challenges of a mechanistic feedback model describing nicotinic acid-induced changes in non-esterified fatty acids in rats

Previously, we developed a feedback model to describe the tolerance and oscillatory rebound of non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) plasma concentrations in male Sprague Dawley rats after intravenous infusions of nicotinic acid (NiAc). This study challenges that model, using the following regimens of intravenous and oral NiAc dosing in male Sprague Dawley rats (n = 95) to create different patterns of exposure: (A) 30 min infusion at 0, 1, 5 or 20 μmol kg(-1) body weight; (B) 300 min infusion at 0, 5, 10 or 51 μmol kg(-1); (C) 30 min infusion at 5 μmol kg(-1), followed by a stepwise decrease in rate every 10 min for 180 min; (D) 30 min infusion at 5 μmol kg(-1), followed by a stepwise decrease in rate every 10 min for 180 min and another 30 min infusion at 5 μmol kg(-1) from 210 to 240 min; (E) an oral dose of 0, 24.4, 81.2 or 812 μmol kg(-1). Serial arterial blood samples were taken for measurement of plasma NiAc and NEFA concentrations. The gradual decrease in infusion rate in (C) and (D) were also designed to test the hypothesis that a gradual reduction in NiAc plasma concentration may be expected to reduce or prevent rebound. The absorption of NiAc was described by parallel linear and non-linear processes and the disposition of NiAc by a two-compartment model with endogenous turnover rate and two parallel capacity-limited elimination processes. NEFA (R) turnover, which was driven by the plasma concentration of NiAc via an inhibitory drug-mechanism function acting on NEFA formation, was described by a feedback model with a moderator distributed over a series of transit compartments, where the first compartment (M 1) inhibited the formation of R and the last compartment (M N ) stimulated the loss of R. All processes regulating the plasma NEFA concentration were assumed to be captured by the moderator function. Data were analyzed using non-linear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM). The potency IC 50 of NiAc was 68 nmol L(-1), the fractional turnover rate k out 0.27 L mmol(-1) min(-1), and the turnover rate of moderator k tol 0.023 min(-1). The lower physiological limit of NEFA, which was modeled as a NiAc-independent release (k cap ) of NEFA into plasma, was estimated to 0.023 mmol L(-1) min(-1). The parameter estimates derived in this study were consistent with our previous estimates, suggesting that the model may be used for prediction of the NEFA response time-course following different modes and routes administration of NiAc or NiAc analogues. In order to avoid NiAc-induced NEFA rebound, a slow decline in the NiAc exposure pattern is needed at or below IC (50).

Combination treatment with benzodiazepines and SSRIs for comorbid anxiety and depression: a review

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on the co-occurrence of anxiety with depressive disorders and the rationale for and use of combination treatment with benzodiazepines and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs/SNRIs) for treating comorbid anxiety and depression.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and PsycINFO were searched using terms identified as relevant based on existing practice guidelines. The primary search terms were anxiety, anxiety disorders, depression, depressive disorders, comorbidity, epidemiology, benzodiazepines, antidepressants, pharmacology, clinical trials, and pharmacotherapy. Reference lists of identified articles were also reviewed to ensure capture of relevant literature.

STUDY SELECTION

Publications were selected for inclusion in the review if they applied to adult populations and specifically addressed the comorbidity of anxiety and depression, their epidemiology, or their management. Case reports and case series were not considered for inclusion.

DATA EXTRACTION

Each author assessed the publications independently for content related to the review topics. Findings considered relevant to the clinical understanding and management of comorbid anxiety and depression were incorporated into the review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Comorbidity is very common among patients with anxiety and depressive disorders, and, even when full criteria for 2 separate disorders are not met, subsyndromal symptoms are often present. Little controlled research has explored how benzodiazepines and SSRIs/SNRIs may be usefully combined, yet their combination is frequently employed in clinical practice. Patients with comorbidities are likely to have poorer treatment outcomes and have greater utilization of health care resources. Currently SSRIs/SNRIs are considered first-line therapy and are effective in both anxiety and depressive states. Nevertheless, many patients have only a partial response or have difficulty tolerating efficacious doses of antidepressant monotherapy. Benzodiazepines appear to improve treatment outcomes when an anxiety disorder co-occurs with depression or for depression characterized by anxious features. Specifically, they may provide benefits both in terms of speed of response and overall response.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term management plans for anxiety disorder with or without comorbid depression should include strategies for acute or short-term care, long-term maintenance, and episodic or breakthrough symptoms. Combination therapy with benzodiazepines and antide-pressants in appropriate clinical settings may improve outcomes over monotherapy in some patients.

Quantitative analysis of rate and extent of tolerance of biomarkers: application to nicotinic acid-induced changes in non-esterified fatty acids in rats

In this paper we quantitatively evaluate two feedback systems with a focus on rate and extent of tolerance and rebound development. In the two feedback systems, the regulation of turnover of response is governed by one or several moderators. In the basic system, one single moderator inhibits the formation of response. This system has been applied to cortisol secretion and serotonin reuptake inhibition. The basic system has been extended to adequately describe nicotinic acid (NiAc)-induced changes in non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA). In the extended system, the feedback is described by a cascade of moderators where the first inhibits formation of response and the last stimulates loss of response. The objectives of this paper were to analyze these systems from a mathematical/analytical and quantitative point of view and to present simulations with different parameter settings and dosing regimens in order to highlight the intrinsic behaviour of these systems and to present expressions and graphs that are applicable for quantification of rate and extent of tolerance and rebound. The dynamics of the moderators (k(tol)) compared to the dynamics of the response (k(out)), was shown to be important for the behaviour of both systems. For instance, slow dynamics of the moderator compared to the response (k(tol)<<k(out)), resulted in overshoot and pronounced rebound. The extent of tolerance was studied over time at a single constant drug concentration and at steady state for different drug concentrations and was found to be largest at drug concentrations close to IC(50). An upper limit for the response could be identified and included in the quantification of extent of rebound. Especially, for the extended system, the duration of exposure was an important factor affecting size of rebound. The rate of tolerance development was addressed by quantitatively estimating the time to steady state for the two systems, in which the value of k(tol) and the length of the cascade were critical.

Pregabalin versus naltrexone in alcohol dependence: a randomised, double-blind, comparison trial

Pregabalin (PRE) acts as a presynaptic inhibitor of the release of excessive levels of excitatory neurotransmitters by selectively binding to the alpha(2)-delta subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels. In this randomised, double-blind comparison trial with naltrexone (NAL), we aimed to investigate the efficacy of PRE on alcohol drinking indices. Craving reduction and improvement of psychiatric symptoms were the secondary endpoints. Seventy-one alcohol-dependent subjects were detoxified and subsequently randomised into two groups, receiving 50 mg of NAL or 150-450 mg of PRE. Craving (VAS; OCDS), withdrawal (CIWA-Ar) and psychiatric symptoms (SCL-90-R) rating scales were applied. Alcohol drinking indices and craving scores were not significantly different between groups. Compared with NAL, PRE resulted in greater improvement of specific symptoms in the areas of anxiety, hostility and psychoticism, and survival function (duration of abstinence from alcohol). PRE also resulted in better outcome in patients reporting a comorbid psychiatric disorder. Results from this study globally place PRE within the same range of efficacy as that of NAL. The mechanism involved in the efficacy of PRE in relapse prevention could be less related to alcohol craving and more associated with the treatment of the comorbid psychiatric symptomatology.

Efficacy of CBT for benzodiazepine discontinuation in patients with panic disorder: Further evaluation

Despite its acute efficacy for the treatment of panic disorder, benzodiazepines (BZs) are associated with a withdrawal syndrome that closely mimics anxiety sensations, leading to difficulty with treatment discontinuation and often disorder relapse. An exposure-based cognitive-behavioral treatment for BZ discontinuation, Panic Control Treatment for BZ Discontinuation (CBT) targets the fear of these sensations and has demonstrated efficacy in preventing disorder relapse and facilitating successful BZ discontinuation among patients with panic disorder. In this randomized controlled trial, CBT was compared to taper alone and a taper plus a relaxation condition to control for the effect of therapist contact and support among 47 patients with panic disorder seeking taper from BZs. Based on the primary outcome of successful discontinuation of BZ use, results indicate that adjunctive CBT provided additive benefits above both taper alone and taper plus relaxation, with consistently medium and large effect sizes over time that reached significance at the six month follow-up evaluation. The efficacy of CBT relative to either of the other taper conditions reflected very large and significant effect sizes at that time. These findings suggest that CBT provides specific efficacy for the successful discontinuation from BZs, even when controlling for therapist contact and relaxation training.

Pregabalin in outpatient detoxification of subjects with mild-to-moderate alcohol withdrawal syndrome

OBJECTIVE

In this open, prospective study we aimed to investigate the efficacy, medical safety and practicability of pregabalin in outpatient detoxification of alcohol-dependent patients with mild-to-moderate alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). Craving reduction, improvement of psychiatric symptoms and quality of life were the secondary endpoints.

METHODS

Forty alcohol dependent patients (DSM-IV) were detoxified receiving 200-450 mg of pregabalin. Withdrawal (Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol (CIWA-Ar)) and craving (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); Obsessive and Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS)) rating scales were applied; psychiatric symptoms and quality of life were evaluated using the Symptom Check List-90 Revised (SCL-90-R) and the QL-Index, respectively. Relapsed and abstinent patients in the post-detoxification evaluation have been compared.

RESULTS

Alcohol withdrawal symptoms and craving for alcohol resulted significantly reduced (p < 0.001) over time after pregabalin treatment. Pregabalin also resulted in a favourable improvement in psychiatric symptoms and quality of life (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first open, prospective study, about the possible use of pregabalin as an outpatient detoxification agent. These preliminary data show its efficacy and safety in the management of patients with mild-to-moderate AWS.

[Iatrogenic psychiatric-like symptoms recognition]

INTRODUCTION

This article proposes a review of atypical multicentre studies for drug-induced movement disorders (and related psychiatric symptoms) and supersensitivity psychosis. A well-conducted antipsychotic treatment consists of regular attempts to reduce the dose by finding the minimal therapeutic dose. To achieve optimal antipsychotic treatment, it is important to distinguish psychiatric symptoms associated with drug-induced movement disorder(s) (DIMD) or supersensitivity psychosis from true relapse.

LITERATURE FINDINGS

Persistent DIMD have been found to be a predictor of supersensitivity psychosis or tardive dyskinesia (DT). DIMD-associated psychiatric symptoms can be classified into three types: directly induced by DIMD; resulting from confounding DIMD with psychiatric symptoms; and supersensitivity symptoms associated with DIMD. Without this distinction, the beneficial effects of antipsychotics are masked by emergent DIMD psychiatric symptoms (as was confounded in the CATIE study).

DISCUSSION

A constant decline in the prevalence of TD (hyperkinetic, involuntary and purposeless movement disorder) has been observed since the introduction of atypical antipsychotics. The neurotoxic effects of classical antipsychotics are well documented and their discontinuation is required. However, the risk of TD still exits with atypical antipsychotics and continued surveillance of emerging cases is very important for clinicians. Moreover, a regular evaluation of DIMD and associated psychiatric symptoms is crucial. It is important to underline the fact that DIMD persists with antipsychotics, with significantly higher total PANSS scores than in patients without DIMD.

CONCLUSION

Supersensitivity psychosis is a drug-induced psychotic relapse (6 weeks following the decrease or withdrawal of an antipsychotic). Discontinuation syndromes can produce psychiatric symptoms (and be confounded with true relapse), but can be improved more quickly after reintroduction of treatment. Interestingly, various data suggest that lower doses of antipsychotics could prevent such symptoms. Anticonvulsants can be efficient adjuvants in the treatment of psychosis. In the United States, many patients received valproate or gabapentin treatment. These adjuvants, by antikindling effect, can facilitate minimal maintenance drug treatment and be efficient for anxiety. Resistant schizophrenia can be related to supersensitivity psychosis; gabapentin and lamotrigine are effective in this case.

Pregabalin, tiapride and lorazepam in alcohol withdrawal syndrome: a multi-centre, randomized, single-blind comparison trial

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this trial was to compare lorazepam with non-benzodiazepine medications such as pregabalin and tiapride in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). These drugs were chosen for their inhibitorial effects on the hypersecretion of neurotransmitters usually observed in AWS. Craving reduction and improvement of psychiatric symptoms were the secondary end-points.

METHODS

One hundred and ninety subjects affected by current alcohol dependence were considered consecutively: 111 were enrolled and divided into three groups of 37 subjects each. Within a treatment duration of 14 days, medication was given up to the following maximum doses (pregabalin 450 mg/day; tiapride 800 mg/day; lorazepam 10 mg/day). Withdrawal (CIWA-Ar), craving [visual analogue scale (VAS); Obsessive and Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS)], psychiatric symptoms [Symptom Check List 90 Revised (SCL-90-R)] and quality of life (QL-index) rating scales were applied.

RESULTS

On the CIWA-Ar score, all the groups showed a significant reduction between times (P < 0.001) with a higher reduction for the pregabalin group (P < 0.01) on items regarding headache and orientation. Retention in treatment was lower in the tiapride group (P < 0.05), while the number of subjects remaining alcohol free was higher in the pregabalin group (P < 0.05). Significant reduction between baseline and the end of the treatment was found in all the groups at the OCDS and the VAS for craving, at the SCL-90-R and QL-index (P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

All the medications in the trial showed evidence of safety and efficacy in the treatment of uncomplicated forms of AWS, with some particular differences. The efficacy of pregabalin was superior to that of tiapride, used largely in research trials and, for some measures, to that of the 'gold standard', lorazepam. Accordingly, pregabalin may be considered as a potentially useful new drug for treatment of AWS, deserving further investigation.

Benzodiazepine Withdrawal in Primary Care: A Comparison of Behavioural Group Training and Individual Sessions

Group training in anxiety management was compared with individual general practitioner appointments as a means of reducing dosage of benzodiazepines. Subjects were encouraged to withdraw at their own pace. Drug reduction, self-ratings of anxiety, depression and Health Locus of Control comprised the outcome measures. Process changes were recorded using visual analogue scales, and daily diary records. At the end of a six-week intervention period, the average dosage had significantly reduced in both groups. This reduction was maintined at a 15-week follow-up. There were no other differences in outcome between conditions. Although subjects reported a variety of symptoms during drug withdrawal, their occurrence was not significantly associated with the degree of dosage reduction.

Physician Withdrawal Checklist (PWC-20)

Anxiety disorders are the most common mental illnesses in the United States. Despite having a number of medication options readily available, benzodiazepines (BZs) and antidepressants have achieved remission rates of only 35% after 8 weeks of acute treatment. In the development of new anxiolytics, particularly those that affect the gamma-aminobutyric acid system, it is essential to assess the new compound's potential to cause discontinuation symptoms after stopping the medication as part of both short- and long-term treatment. This report describes the development of the 20-item Penn Physician Withdrawal Checklist (PWC), a smaller version of the original 35-item PWC, and examines its validity, internal consistency, test-retest and interrater reliability, and factor structure. The PWC scores, assessed at the peak of withdrawal severity, were selected from 143 of our patients for an orthogonal factor analysis. Our results suggest that the Penn Physician Withdrawal Checklist is a simple and accurate method to assess anxiolytic discontinuation symptoms.

A retrospective data analysis of the impact of the New York triplicate prescription program on benzodiazepine use in medicaid patients with chronic psychiatric and neurologic disorders

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepines are treatment mainstays for several disorders, but there is often concern about dependency and addiction. In January 1989, New York implemented regulations requiring physicians to order benzodiazepines using state-monitored triplicate prescription forms.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of the triplicate prescription program (TPP) on changes in use of benzodiazepines and other psychoactive drugs in clinically vulnerable Medicaid populations.

METHODS

Using an interrupted time series with comparison series design, psychoactive medication use was examined in the New York (intervention) and New Jersey (control) Medicaid programs before and after implementation of the New York benzodiazepine TPP among community-dwelling Medicaid beneficiaries aged >/=19 years continuously enrolled from January 1988 through December 1990 in New York or New Jersey with diagnoses of schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, schizoaffective disorder, schizoid personality disorder, or schizotypal personality disorder; bipolar disorder; epilepsy; and/or panic disorder, agoraphobia without history of panic disorder, social phobia, or specific phobia.

RESULTS

A total of 125,837 New York and 139,405 New Jersey Medicaid beneficiaries were continuously enrolled and met the study inclusion criteria. Of these, there were 6054 Medicaid enrollees in New York and 6875 enrollees in New Jersey who were clinically vulnerable patients with >/=1 of the specified diagnoses. New York Medicaid patients with any of these diagnoses experienced a -48.1% relative change (95% CI, -50.0% to -46.2%) in benzodiazepine use at 6 months after TPP implementation, with no decline in use in New Jersey patients. The largest reduction in benzodiazepine use was seen among patients with seizure disorder (-59.9% at 6 months; 95% CI, -63.9% to -55.9%). Although use of substitute drugs increased slightly in New York after the TPP, it did not offset reductions in benzodiazepine use. The effects of TPP were sustained for 7 years of follow-up and had the greatest impact on nonproblematic benzodiazepine use.

CONCLUSIONS

During the time period studied in this analysis, the New York TPP reduced benzodiazepine use among chronically ill patients for whom these agents represent effective treatment. Our findings suggest that many patients previously receiving benzodiazepines did not receive any pharmacologic intervention.

Characterization of the longitudinal course of improvement in generalized anxiety disorder during long-term treatment with venlafaxine XR

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the response to the serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, venlafaxine extended release (XR), during the long-term treatment of generalized anxiety disorder.

METHODS

Data from two double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-month trials of venlafaxine XR for the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder were pooled. Criteria for response (> or = 50% improvement from baseline HAM-A score) and remission (HAM-A score < or = 7) and their temporal profile were used to characterize patient improvement over 6 months of treatment with venlafaxine XR and placebo.

RESULTS

Venlafaxine XR was associated with significantly (P<0.001) higher response and remission rates (66 and 43%, respectively) compared with placebo (39 and 19%), regardless of the level of baseline anxiety. In the venlafaxine XR group, 61% of the patients who had responded but not remitted by week 8 showed remission by the end of 6 months. In comparison, only 39% of placebo responders who did not qualify for remission at the end of the first 8 weeks of therapy remitted by the end of the 6 months (P=0.007). Relapse occurred in 6% of venlafaxine XR-treated patients and 15% of placebo-treated patients (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

This analysis provides further insight into the outcome of long-term treatment of generalised anxiety disorder with venlafaxine XR and shows for the first time that long-term treatment might be necessary to achieve and maintain remission of symptoms.

The effects of carbamazepine and lorazepam on single versus multiple previous alcohol withdrawals in an outpatient randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

Benzodiazepines are the mainstay of treatment for mild-to-moderate alcohol withdrawal in outpatient settings, but they can interact with alcohol, cause motor incoordination, or be abused. This study compared the therapeutic responses of the benzodiazepine lorazepam and the anticonvulsant carbamazepine for the outpatient treatment of acute alcohol withdrawal in terms of patients' previous detoxification histories, and compared the effects of these 2 medications on drinking behaviors in the immediate postdetoxification period.

DESIGN

This was a randomized double-blind trial comparing patient responses to carbamazepine and lorazepam across 2 levels of detoxification histories (0-1 or >or=2 previous medicated detoxifications).

SETTING

A university medical center substance abuse clinic in Charleston, SC.

PATIENTS

One hundred thirty-six patients in moderate alcohol withdrawal were randomized. Major exclusions were significant hepatic or hematologic abnormalities and use of medications that could alter withdrawal symptoms.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received 600-800 mg of carbamazepine or 6-8 mg of lorazepam in divided doses on day 1 tapering to 200 mg of carbamazepine or 2 mg of lorazepam.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol-Revised was used to assess alcohol withdrawal symptoms on days 1 through 5 and postmedication at days 7 and 12. Daily drinking was measured by patient report using a daily drinking log and a breath alcohol level with each visit. Side effects were recorded daily.

RESULTS

Carbamazepine and lorazepam were equally effective at decreasing the symptoms of alcohol withdrawal. In the post-treatment period, 89 patients drank on at least 1 day; on average, carbamazepine patients drank less than 1 drink per drinking day and lorazepam patients drank almost 3 drinks per drinking day (P =.003). Among those with multiple past detoxifications, the carbamazepine group drank less than 1 drink per day on average and the lorazepam group drank about 5 drinks per day on average (P =.033). Lorazepam-treated patients had a significant rebound of alcohol withdrawal symptoms post-treatment (P =.007) and the risk of having a first drink was 3 times greater (P =.04) than for carbamazepine-treated patients. Twenty percent of lorazepam-treated patients had dizziness, motor incoordination, or ataxia and did not recognize their impairment. Twenty percent of carbamazepine-treated patients reported pruritus but no rash.

CONCLUSIONS

Carbamazepine and lorazepam were both effective in decreasing the symptoms of alcohol withdrawal in relatively healthy, middle-aged outpatients. Carbamazepine, however, was superior to lorazepam in preventing rebound withdrawal symptoms and reducing post-treatment drinking, especially for those with a history of multiple treated withdrawals.

The Undertreatment of Anxiety: Overcoming the Confusion and Stigma

1. The patient, the nurse, and organizational variables all interact in a dynamic and complex manner, which all have an impact on decisions about intervention. 2. The numbers and variety of agents ordered as PRN indicate the responsibility for treatment placed by physicians on nurses and their reliance on appropriate and accurate nursing assessment. 3. Much of the stigma surrounding symptoms of anxiety and their treatment is based not only on the nature of the illness, but on the perceptions and beliefs concerning the use of anti-anxiety agents.

A controlled trial of dothiepin and placebo in treating benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms

BACKGROUND

The possibility that treatment with tricyclic antidepressants, in the form of dothiepin, might attenuate benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms was investigated in a double-blind trial.

METHOD

Eighty-seven non-depressed psychiatric out-patients with putative normal dose benzodiazepine dependence had their benzodiazepines reduced in stepwise amounts of 20% of the original dose for eight weeks. The patients were randomised to receive dothiepin (with dosage increasing to 150 mg/day) or placebo as an aid to withdrawal before benzodiazepine reduction and these drugs were taken for four further weeks before being stopped.

RESULTS

Fewer patients entered and completed the study than expected and a Type II error was possible in the results. Although there was some evidence of withdrawal symptoms being less marked in those patients allocated to dothiepin this was independent of any antidepressant effect as depression scores were lower in the placebo group in the early phase of withdrawal (P < 0.01). Of those completing the study, greater satisfaction (P = 0.03) was recorded by those who had received dothiepin; no other differences reached statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Dothiepin (and by implication other tricyclic antidepressants) might have some value in reducing benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms but does not aid drug withdrawal.

The efficacy of complaints management training in facilitating benzodiazepine withdrawal

The study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of complaints management training (CMT) compared to that of anxiety management training (AMT) in patients undergoing benzodiazepine withdrawal. CMT focused on techniques to alleviate reported withdrawal symptoms. Nineteen patients were randomly allocated either to CMT or to AMT. Both groups received 9 weekly treatment sessions and were assessed every other week. Withdrawal was designed to be gradual over the first 4 weeks. CMT proved more successful than AMT in terms of abstinence rate, reported number of severe withdrawal symptoms, depression and anxiety. At follow-up after 6 months, there was no difference between groups in terms of abstinence rate.

Alprazolam withdrawal symptoms in agoraphobia with panic disorder: observations from a controlled Anglo-Canadian study

The study examines the effect of discontinuing alprazolam in panic disorder+agoraphobia patients. Fifty-seven alprazolam and 50 placebo agoraphobia+panic disorder patients, who had participated in an 8 week double- blind controlled study of alprazolam at average doses of 5 mg daily, were withdrawn gradually from their medication over the subsequent 8 weeks. The effects of discontinuation of medication on anxiety, panic, depression, phobia and withdrawal symptoms were examined during the taper phase and over the following 6 months. Alprazolam patients deteriorated on anxiety, panics, Hamilton depression and phobia. There was no difference between the two drug groups on rebound. Serious withdrawal symptoms did not arise, but weight loss, sweating and muscle twitching were more common in alprazolam patients. The deterioration in alprazolam patients persisted up to 6 months post-taper. A high dose of alprazolam at week 8 was the best predictor of subsequent deterioration. Discontinuation of alprazolam leads to recurrence of the original disorder in some patients. Rebound and severe withdrawal reactions were not found during gradual taper of alprazolam, but minor withdrawal symptoms did arise. The study shows the importance of using gradual taper to minimize withdrawal effects.

Anxiolytic drugs: dependence, addiction and abuse

The concepts of dependence, addiction and abuse comprise overlapping clinical phenomena. The earlier anxiolytic drugs, in particular the barbiturates, were prone to abuse, i.e., non-medical use, and to high-dose misuse. Their modern counterparts, the benzodiazepines, are abused in a patchy way and are sometimes taken in regularly high doses. However, the main problem is physical dependence as manifested by a withdrawal syndrome on discontinuation of the drug. The withdrawal syndrome has been carefully described and comprises physical and psychological features. In particular, perceptual symptoms such as photophobia, hyperacusis and feelings of unsteadiness may predominate. The syndrome may come on during dosage reduction but generally starts 2-10 days after cessation of the benzodiazepine, depending on its elimination half-life. About a third of long-term users suffer a recognisable syndrome even after a tapered withdrawal, its duration usually being only a few weeks. A few patients go on to a prolonged withdrawal syndrome, often characterised by muscular spasm. The treatment of the withdrawal syndrome is supportive and non-specific. A few patients started on benzodiazepine therapy escalate the dose. They tend to show the characteristic 'passive-dependent' personality features and may previously have misused other CNS depressants such as the barbiturates and alcohol. Abuse of benzodiazepines occurs in a rather varied way from country to country. Worldwide, flunitrazepam has caused concern but, in the UK, the main problem has been the intravenous use of temazepam. The molecular pharmacology of the benzodiazepine receptor has been extensively studied and is undoubtedly complex.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The dependence potential of short half-life benzodiazepines: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The dependence potential of benzodiazepine medications is now widely recognized, but uncertainty exists as to whether use of short half-life vs long half-life drugs results in greater dependence. The present study reports a meta-analysis of the extant research to evaluate the dependence potential of different types of benzodiazepines.

METHOD

Seven studies were found that specifically compared long half-life and short half-life benzodiazepines and allowed statistical comparison by their homogeneous dependent variables. Drugs in these studies were used as daytime sedatives.

RESULTS

Substantial evidence was found for differential effects of short vs long half-life drugs at withdrawal. In all studies, dropouts were higher among short half-life subjects. In the random-assignment short-term use studies, Hamilton Anxiety Scale scores showed higher incidence of rebound among subjects who used the short half-life drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis confirms clinical impressions of the greater dependence potential of short vs long half-life benzodiazepines. Doctors, patients, and policymakers need to be informed so as to avoid harm to the public health through unintended drug dependence.

Benzodiazepine dependence. Avoidance and withdrawal

Benzodiazepine dependence is a frequent complication of regular prescriptions for 4 weeks or longer, occurring in almost one-third of patients. Although it is also manifested by tolerance to drug effects and occasional drug seeking behaviour, particularly in those prone to drug abuse, most dependence is characterised by a withdrawal syndrome on stopping treatment. The withdrawal syndrome includes symptoms of anxiety and those of perceptual disturbance such as depersonalisation, hypersensitivity of all major senses, dysphoria and (rarely) epileptic seizures and psychotic episodes. Risk factors for dependence include high dosage, use of more potent and short acting benzodiazepines, long duration of therapy and dependent premorbid personality characteristics. If none of these apply, benzodiazepines can be prescribed with safety.

Discontinuation reactions to alprazolam in panic disorder

Panic disorder is a chronic illness with only some degree of spontaneous recovery. It is not surprising therefore that discontinuation of an effective medical treatment may be followed by relapse. Therefore the timing and methodology of discontinuing that treatment are now recognized as essential facets of optimal clinical management. In addition to relapse, rebound and the withdrawal syndrome have been reported with many psychotropic agents, particularly with the benzodiazepines. This paper discusses data from three discontinuation studies with alprazolam i.e. the Phase I Cross-National Collaborative Panic discontinuation study after short-term treatment, the Phase I discontinuation study after long-term treatment, and data from the Montreal site of the Alprazolam SR discontinuation study. Phase I of the Cross-National Collaborative Study of Panic Disorder investigated the discontinuation of alprazolam in two populations. There was an intensive, placebo-controlled, time-limited study of discontinuation after short-term treatment (8 weeks) in the first population. For the second, there was a less rigorous open follow-up of patients who had been treated for 5-12 months with alprazolam. The dose-reduction regimen of alprazolam in both studies was approximately the same--a 1 mg decrease every 3-7 days. In the short-term treatment study, 109 patients were treated for 8 weeks, tapered for 4 weeks and observed for another 2 weeks post discontinuation. Significant relapse in the alprazolam-treated group occurred during discontinuation. Rebound of panic attacks occurred in 27% of patients given alprazolam, and distinct transient withdrawal syndrome occurred in 35%. Indicative of the withdrawal syndrome were confusion, clouded sensorium, heightened sensory perception, dysosmia, paresthesias, muscle cramps, muscle twitch, blurred vision, diarrhea, decreased appetite, and weight loss. The clinical course in the alprazolam-treated patients revealed a marked exacerbation of symptoms during the end of the tapering period and the first week without medication, which was followed by improvement during the second post-taper week. In the long-term treatment study, 142 patients were treated with alprazolam for periods ranging from 5 months to 1 year (mean, 27.5 weeks). In this naturalistic study, 76% of the patients reported improvement, 6.3% reported no change, and 10.6% reported that they were worse. During discontinuation, 12.8% of the 128 patients whose dosage was tapered reported some kind of nonspecified withdrawal symptoms. Of the 142 patients, 47.2% were able to taper their medication dosage and to discontinue treatment; 19.7% tapered but restarted alprazolam shortly after discontinuation; 33.1% were unable or unwilling to taper or discontinue alprazolam.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adjunctive treatment of benzodiazepine discontinuation syndromes: a review

The variety of pharmacologic and psychotherapeutic approaches to facilitate benzodiazepine discontinuation are reviewed. Strategies to attenuate physiologic withdrawal with clonidine, propranolol and carbamazepine have been inconsistently effective. Strategies to prevent relapse by substituting medications that could later be discontinued more easily (i.e., antidepressants and azapirones) appear more useful but have been less well studied. Psychotherapeutic approaches appear to work, but specific therapeutic components are unclear and non-specific "placebo" effects may play an important role.

From the jumping Frenchmen of Maine to post-traumatic stress disorder: the startle response in neuropsychiatry

The startle response is a universal and phylogenetically ancient reflex. Pathological exaggerations and modifications of startle underlie the symptomatology of a surprisingly diverse range of neuropsychiatric disorders, a fact that seems to have gone largely unappreciated. We review the available literature on the physiology of the normal human startle response and examine the neuropsychiatric conditions characterized by pathological startle. Startle epilepsy and primary hyperekplexia are considered as neurological disorders involving abnormal startle. Patients with hyperstartle and exotic culture-bound syndromes characterized by excessive startle are considered by the authors to represent extreme variants of the normal startle response. Post-traumatic stress disorder, drug and alcohol withdrawal states and schizophrenia all have abnormal startle as a clinical feature secondary to increased arousal and presumed disturbance of central neurotransmitter systems. The neurophysiological mechanisms by which abnormalities of the startle response may occur are discussed and a system of classification of neuropsychiatric hyperstartles is suggested.

A pilot study of the effects of flumazenil on symptoms persisting after benzodiazepine withdrawal

The potential of the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil (Ro 15-1788) to lessen persisting benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms was demonstrated in 11 patients who had been drug free for between 1 month and 5 years. Doses ranging from 0.2 to 2.0 mg divided into three intravenous injections over a few hours relieved long-standing symptoms to varying extents. These included clouded thinking, tiredness, muscular symptoms such as neck tension, cramps and shaking and the characteristic perceptual symptoms of benzodiazepine withdrawal, namely, pins and needles, burning skin, pain and subjective sensations of bodily distortion. Mood disorder, when present, also improved but the reduction in anxiety and depression may have reflected relief of physical symptoms. The onset of maximum response was sometimes delayed by as much as a day but was usually prompt. Side effects were reported to be either absent or typically described as lightheadedness or dizziness, lasted only a few minutes and were usually well tolerated. The benefits last between a few hours and several days despite flumazenil's otherwise short duration of action. However, symptoms did return to varying degrees in most cases, suggesting the need for repeated doses.

Benzodiazepines: abuse and new use

Both abuse and new uses for benzodiazepines are reviewed. The pharmacology of benzodiazepines is summarized and statistics regarding their general use are given. The question of benzodiazepine abuse is reviewed in some detail and the question of rebound, recurrence of symptoms and physiological withdrawal is differentiated. Benzodiazepines are regarded as a very safe class of drugs and the abuse potential is felt to be negligible provided that they are prescribed for appropriate conditions and monitored carefully. The dangers of alternatives to benzodiazepines such as alcohol or barbiturates is emphasized. New uses for benzodiazepines are reviewed including the use of benzodiazepines in panic disorder, as well as an adjunct in the therapy of mania and some psychotic states. Rational prescribing of benzodiazepines is encouraged and the attitude that these are dangerous and addictive drugs is discouraged and put into perspective.

A guide to benzodiazepine selection. Part II: Clinical aspects

To suit the specific needs of various clinical situations, selection of an appropriate benzodiazepine derivative should be based on consideration of their different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Benzodiazepine derivatives that are rapidly eliminated produce the most pronounced rebound and withdrawal syndromes. Benzodiazepines that are slowly absorbed and slowly eliminated are most appropriate for the anxious patient, since these derivatives produce a gradual and sustained anxiolytic effect. Rapidly absorbed and slowly eliminated benzodiazepines are usually more appropriate for patients with sleep disturbances, since the rapid absorption induces sleep and the slower elimination rate may induce less tolerance to the sedative effect. Rational selection of a benzodiazepine for the elderly and for the suspected drug abuser is more problematic. The relevant pharmacokinetic and clinical considerations for these users are discussed. Certain derivatives may possess pharmacodynamic properties not shared by the entire benzodiazepine class; empirical studies have suggested the existence of anti-panic properties for alprazolam and clonazepam, antidepressant properties for alprazolam, and anti-manic properties for clonazepam and possibly lorazepam.

Pharmacologic aspects of benzodiazepine tolerance and dependence

Benzodiazepines, which are among the safest and most effective drugs, possess all the characteristic of abuseable compounds. Although there appear to be differences in potency among compounds and variations in sensitivity among individuals, benzodiazepines have clear reinforcing properties. Tolerance to the depressant effects of benzodiazepines is rapid, but tolerance to the anxiolytic effects develops slowly and to a limited extent. Although abusers use very high doses, most long-term users persist at daily doses in the low therapeutic range (10-20 mg of diazepam or its equivalent) without dose escalation. Physical dependence is a risk associated with long-term use, even at therapeutic doses. The withdrawal syndrome is mild at low doses. Continued self-administration of low therapeutic doses is maintained to alleviate withdrawal symptoms. The advances in the recent understanding of the molecular biology of the benzodiazepine receptor gives hope to the development of new anxiolytic compounds with less dependence liability than the present ones.

Alprazolam and diazepam: addiction potential

Alprazolam and diazepam, the two most prescribed benzodiazepine anxiolytics in the United States, have potential for addictive use. The Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) indicates they are the most mentioned benzodiazepines, and the National Household Survey indicates significant abuse of tranquilizers. Both drugs are rapidly absorbed and enter the brain tissue rapidly, leading to reinforcement. Alprazolam has a shorter half-life, which may lead to more withdrawal symptoms than diazepam. In experimental conditions, they are among the most reinforcing benzodiazepines. Each causes a withdrawal syndrome, but alprazolam withdrawal may be more severe and may occur after a shorter period of use. Adverse effects from their use are said to be rare, yet subtle negative consequences may be seen with some regularity. Alprazolam deserves special caution because of its relative newness, great popularity, reinforcing capabilities, relatively severe withdrawal syndrome, and reports of addiction and negative consequences of use.

Clinical and humoral effects of beta-blockade with ICI 118,551 in the general neurotic syndrome

Fifty-six patients satisfying the diagnostic criteria for the general neurotic syndrome, a mixed anxiety-depressive disorder, were randomly allocated to treatment with a selective β( 2)-blocking drug, ICI 118,551, in a dose of 50 mg tds, or placebo for 4 weeks after a 2-week placebo run-in period. Ratings of anxiety using the Hamilton anxiety rating scale and patient self-assessments in 46 evaluable patients showed no significant difference in the outcome of active drug and placebo groups, and also no significant improvement over time during the study. This unusual finding supports the impression of the general neurotic syndrome as a severe form of neurotic disorder which shows little evidence of placebo response. Diastolic blood pressure was increased and heart rate reduced after 2 weeks on ICI 118,551, and plasma levels of noradrenaline and adrenaline showed no evidence of an expected decrease with active drug; on the contrary the data showed some evidence of increased catecholamine levels. The results suggest that selective β-blockade has little part to play in the treatment of anxiety and that on repeated dosage the effects of selective blockade are attenuated or reversed.

Adverse effects of benzodiazepines

The growing realisation that the benzodiazepines have potential for causing serious harm has caused concern due to their wide and common use. This paper is a review of the adverse effects of benzodiazepines, and concentrates on four areas of particular concern: drug dependence with the consequent withdrawal symptoms; psychological effects while on the drugs; use by the elderly; and tolerance to the drug effects. Although the phenomenon of a benzodiazepine withdrawal syndrome is generally accepted, there is still controversy over the frequency amongst users. A number of major studies are reviewed here, and the main methodological issues are discussed. These include definition of the withdrawal symptoms, selection of subjects, and use of double-blind, placebo-controlled conditions. The studies investigating psychological impairment with benzodiazepine use deal mainly with motor performance and co-ordination, although there is a large group of studies looking at the effect of the drugs on memory. Although the studies reviewed make a considerable contribution to the understanding of the effects of benzodiazepines, they focus on physiological and specific psychological variables, rather than more global measures of functioning and behaviour. It is suggested here that this emphasis needs to change in order to obtain a clearer picture of how benzodiazepines affect quality of life. Future studies should also be prospective in design, and include clear criteria for the selection of subjects and for the definition of withdrawal symptoms.

Detoxification from benzodiazepines: schedules and strategies

Management of benzodiazepine (BZD) tolerance is divided into low- and high-dose withdrawal. Low-dose withdrawal includes patients who have received manufacturer-recommended doses of BZD on a daily basis for longer than 1 month. Gradual tapering of the BZD over 4 weeks on an outpatient basis is suggested. High-dose withdrawal includes patients who have been ingesting doses of BZD greater than the equivalent of diazepam 40 mg/d for longer than 8 months. It is recommended that the patients be tolerance tested with diazepam and, if tolerant, tapered off medication as inpatients at a rate of 10% per day. Triazolobenzodiazepines may be exceptions to these recommendations. Alprazolam should be titrated at a rate of 0.5 mg three times a day regardless of whether the patient is being tapered for low- or high-dose withdrawal.

Chronic benzodiazepine dependence. A comparative study of abrupt withdrawal under propranolol cover versus gradual withdrawal

Thirty-one patients dependent on benzodiazepines were randomly assigned to either slow withdrawal (SW) or abrupt withdrawal under propranolol cover (PW). Of 16 patients in the SW group, 11 successfully withdrew from their drugs, while only 4 out of 15 in the PW group did so. Patients in the SW group had only mild withdrawal symptoms, while those in the PW group suffered more severe symptoms, which lasted around four weeks. In all, 81% of the whole group suffered withdrawal symptoms of some kind. Patients in both groups were significantly less anxious at the end of the study than at baseline. Younger subjects and those who were more severely anxious at the start of the trial had more difficulty in withdrawing than older and less anxious patients.

Drug development optimization--benzodiazepines

The benzodiazepines are among the most widely-used of drugs. Sedative effects are common but tend to lessen after a few days, although cognitive effects may persist. Car accidents and falls in the elderly are the most serious practical consequences. On discontinuation, a variety of syndromes are encountered, including relapse, rebound, and withdrawal. Anxiety disorders tend to be remitting and relapsing rather than chronic. Withdrawal follows a characteristic course and symptom pattern, perceptual hypersensitivity being common and distressing. The syndrome is worse after stopping shorter-acting than longer-acting benzodiazepines. Benzodiazepines are prescribed for many different mental and physical conditions, sometimes inappropriately. Chronic use for twelve months or more ranges from 0.5% of the adult population in Sweden through 1.8% in the U.S.A., 3.1% in the U.K., and 6.8% in Belgium. Benzodiazepines differ with respect to elimination half-life and potency. High-potency compounds may be particularly likely to induce sedation, memory disturbance and perhaps dependence. Partial agonists may be less of a problem in these respects. Newer compounds include benzodiazepines with selectivity on one or other of the putative subclasses of receptor, partial inverse agonists and antagonists, compounds acting near the benzodiazepine complex, and new drugs, such as buspirone, believed to act primarily on 5-HT pathways.