Mortality Among Parkinson's Disease Patients Treated With Pimavanserin or Atypical Antipsychotics: An Observational Study in Medicare Beneficiaries

Retrospective analyses evaluating the mortality risk associated with pimavanserin or other atypical antipsychotics in patients with Parkinson disease psychosis

Introduction

Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with increased mortality risk (MR), reflecting progression of motor and nonmotor symptoms. PD psychosis (PDP), a common nonmotor symptom, increases with prolonged disease and elevates the MR of PD even further. Pimavanserin is the only FDA-approved treatment for PDP. This review summarizes real-world evidence around the MR of patients with PDP treated with pimavanserin versus off-label atypical antipsychotics.

Methods

A PubMed search was conducted using the following search terms: pimavanserin AND antipsychotic AND mortality AND Parkinson's disease AND psychosis. Inclusion criteria specified the entry of retrospective, observational, and open-label studies comparing pimavanserin to atypical antipsychotics or untreated controls.

Results

A total of 10 of the 32 articles met inclusion criteria. Among five comparisons of pimavanserin with atypical antipsychotics, two were large (n = 21,719; n = 21,975), representative, Medicare-database studies, which demonstrated comparable or lower all-cause pimavanserin MR. Among three pimavanserin versus control studies, two reported lower or comparable pimavanserin MR and one, long-term care study reported higher MR for pimavanserin versus non-pimavanserin treated patients with unknown PDP status. Two open-label extensions reported pimavanserin mortality rates of 6.45 and 18.8 deaths per 100 patient-years, which are comparable to, or lower than, mortality rates for PD, PDP, and other atypical antipsychotics. Most studies (70 %; 7 of 10) demonstrated pimavanserin's MR was lower than or similar to other atypical antipsychotics or untreated controls.

Conclusions

Pimavanserin did not increase the MR in PDP. Pimavanserin's MR appears to be comparable to or lower than other atypical antipsychotics prescribed for PDP, including quetiapine.

On the Optimal Diagnosis and the Evolving Role of Pimavanserin in Parkinson's Disease Psychosis

Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with the development of psychosis (PDP), including hallucinations and delusions, in more than half of the patient population. Optimal PD management must therefore involve considerations about both motor and non-motor symptoms. Often, clinicians fail to diagnosis psychosis in patients with PD and, when it is recognized, treat it suboptimally, despite the availability of multiple interventions. In this paper, we provide a summary of the current guidelines and clinical evidence for treating PDP with antipsychotics. We also provide recommendations for diagnosis and follow-up. Finally, an updated treatment algorithm for PDP that incorporates the use of pimavanserin, the only US FDA-approved drug for the treatment of PDP, was developed by extrapolating from a limited evidence base to bridge to clinical practice using expert opinion and experience. Because pimavanserin is only approved for the treatment of PDP in the US, in other parts of the world other recommendations and algorithms must be considered.

Dementia Prevention and Treatment: A Narrative Review

Importance

Dementia affects 10% of those 65 years or older and 35% of those 90 years or older, often with profound cognitive, behavioral, and functional consequences. As the baby boomers and subsequent generations age, effective preventive and treatment strategies will assume increasing importance.

Observations

Preventive measures are aimed at modifiable risk factors, many of which have been identified. To date, no randomized clinical trial data conclusively confirm that interventions of any kind can prevent dementia. Nevertheless, addressing risk factors may have other health benefits and should be considered. Alzheimer disease can be treated with cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine, and antiamyloid immunomodulators, with the last modestly slowing cognitive and functional decline in people with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia due to Alzheimer disease. Cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine may benefit persons with other types of dementia, including dementia with Lewy bodies, Parkinson disease dementia, vascular dementia, and dementia due to traumatic brain injury. Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia are best treated with nonpharmacologic management, including identifying and mitigating the underlying causes and individually tailored behavioral approaches. Psychotropic medications have minimal evidence of efficacy for treating these symptoms and are associated with increased mortality and clinically meaningful risks of falls and cognitive decline. Several emerging prevention and treatment strategies hold promise to improve dementia care in the future.

Conclusions and Relevance

Although current prevention and treatment approaches to dementia have been less than optimally successful, substantial investments in dementia research will undoubtedly provide new answers to reducing the burden of dementia worldwide.

Analysis of Medicare Patients Treated with Pimavanserin versus Other Atypical Antipsychotics: A Cost-Offset Model Evaluating Skilled Nursing Facility Stays and Long-Term Care Admissions in Parkinson's Disease Psychosis

Background

Patients with Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP) treated with pimavanserin (PIM) versus other atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) including quetiapine (QUE) may have health-care cost savings due to fewer skilled nursing facility-stays (SNF-stays) and long-term care admissions (LTCA).

Methods

A decision analytic model was developed using the 2019 Medicare Patient Driven Payment Model (PDPM) to estimate SNF-stays and LTCA associated per-patient- per-year (PPPY) facility and rehabilitation costs among patients that initiated PIM vs QUE or vs other-AAPs (i.e, quetiapine, risperidone, olanzapine, aripiprazole). Model inputs were derived for: (i) annual SNF-stay and LTCA rates from an analysis of Medicare beneficiaries with PDP, and (ii) annual mean rehabilitation and resident care-stay costs from PDPM case-mix adjusted value-based payment rates for 5 rehabilitation components (ie, physical-therapy, occupational-therapy, nursing, speech-language pathology, non-therapy ancillary), and an additional variable-per-diem for room/board services. PPPY costs were estimated from (i) SNF-stay and (ii) LTCA rates multiplied by annual mean costs of stay in 2022 USD. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was performed using 1000 Monte Carlo simulations.

Results

Overall SNF-stay rates of 20.2%, 31.4%, and 31.7%, and LTCA rates of 23.2%, 33.8%, 34.6% were observed for PIM, QUE, and other-AAPs, respectively. Based on annual mean costs, PPPY SNF-stay rehabilitation and resident related costs for PIM ($41,808) vs QUE ($65,172) or vs other-AAPs ($65,664), resulted in $23,364 and $23,856 PPPY cost savings, respectively. Similarly, PPPY LTCA rehabilitation and resident related costs for PIM ($47,957) vs QUE ($70,091) or vs other-AAPs ($71,566) resulted in $22,134 and $23,609 PPPY cost-savings for PIM, respectively. PSA suggested PIM would provide cost-savings vs QUE or other-AAPs in >99% of iterations.

Conclusion

In this analysis, PIM demonstrated nearly 36% and 32% lower PPPY SNF-stays and LTCA costs, respectively, vs QUE or other-AAPs. Research examining additional cost-offsets (i.e., fewer falls/fractures) associated with SNF-stay or LTCA may be needed.

Parkinson's disease psychosis management: an evidence based, experience informed, pragmatic approach

INTRODUCTION

Psychotic symptoms in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) have attracted increasing. Recommendations on treating psychosis often fail to take into account what psychotic symptoms require treatment, which has been complicated by the increasing number of reports documenting the frequency of 'minor' hallucinations.

AREAS COVERED

This article focuses both on the phenomenology of psychotic symptoms and their management.

EXPERT OPINION

Understanding the nature and implications of the types of psychotic symptoms in PD is the key to proper treatment. Evidence and experience-based data on the effect of anti-psychotic medications will be reviewed and how the various clinical settings should determine the treatment approach. The evidence base consists of all reported blinded trials recorded in PubMed and the experience-based studies are those chosen by the author from PubMed as illustrative. Specific recommendations for the treatment of psychosis will be listed for specific situations. Pimavanserin is the first-line choice for mild symptoms; quetiapine for symptoms that require improvement in a short period and clozapine for urgent problems or those which fail the other approaches.

Pimavanserin's Safety Profile: Insights from a Phase 3b Clinical Trial

 The recent Alva et al. Phase 3b study on pimavanserin use in older adults with neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs), specifically including Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, Parkinson's disease (with or without dementia), frontotemporal dementia, and dementia with Lewy bodies, provides important new data on its safety for managing neuropsychiatric symptoms in this population. This commentary on the study further examines the findings within the broader context of antipsychotic therapy as it has evolved from chlorpromazine to pimavanserin in a continuous search for greater safety. Comparing pimavanserin's safety and efficacy profile with historical data and regulatory milestones provides a nuanced perspective for clinicians regarding the significance of the drug's known advantages over prior antipsychotic treatments. More research is needed to determine the full potential of pimavanserin to improve neuropsychiatric symptoms in older adults with NDDs.

Risk of long-term care admissions among Medicare beneficiaries treated with pimavanserin or quetiapine for Parkinson's disease psychosis in USA: a retrospective administrative claims database analysis

Aim: Risk of long-term care (LTC) admission (LTCA) associated with atypical antipsychotic (AAP) use among patients with Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP) is a major concern. However, no comparative studies have examined the differences in risk of LTC admissions between pimavanserin (PIM), the only FDA-approved AAP for PDP, and other off-label AAPs including quetiapine (QUE). Objective: To examine all-cause LTCA rates and risk among PDP patients treated with AAPs such as QUE or PIM. Methods: Analysis of Parts A, B and D claims (100% Medicare sample; 2013-2019) of Medicare beneficiaries with PDP that initiate ≥12-month continuous PIM or QUE monotherapy from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2018 (i.e., index date) without any AAP use in the 12-month pre-index period was conducted. Outcome assessments among 1:1 propensity score-matched (31 variables - age, sex, race, region and 27 Elixhauser comorbidities) beneficiaries on PIM versus QUE included risk of all-cause skilled nursing facility stays (SNF-stays), LTC-stays, and overall LTCA (i.e., SNF-stays or LTC-stays). All-cause LTCA rates and LTCA risk were compared using logistic regression and cox proportional hazards models, respectively, controlling for demographics, comorbidities and co-existing-dementia or insomnia. Results: Of the matched sample (n = 842 for each group) from total sample (n = 9652), overall all-cause LTCA and SNF-stay rates were 23.2 and 20.2% for PIM versus 33.8 and 31.4% for QUE, respectively (p < 0.05, for each). Hazard ratio (95% CI) for risk of SNF-stay and overall LTCA was 0.78 (0.61, 0.98) and 0.80 (0.66, 0.97), respectively, for PIM versus QUE beneficiaries (p < 0.05, for each). Conclusion: The 20% lower risk of LTCA (i.e., greater delay) with PIM versus QUE in this analysis may suggest that PIM should be started early for the treatment of PDP.

Pimavanserin: A Truly Effective Treatment for Parkinson's Disease Psychosis? A Review of Interventions

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second-most common neurodegenerative disorder with a long-term 60% cumulative prevalence of PD psychosis. Medical treatment is limited to few atypical antipsychotic drugs with low affinity to dopamine D2 receptors. In 2016, pimavanserin, a selective 5-HT2A inverse agonist/antagonist, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as the only treatment for PD psychosis (PDP). This article provides an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment options for PDP and illuminates the mode of action and therapy options with pimavanserin and the current study data.

Comparison of Pimavanserin Versus Quetiapine for Hospitalization and Mortality Risk Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Parkinson's Disease Psychosis

Background

Pimavanserin is currently the only antipsychotic approved for Parkinson's disease (PD) psychosis, yet its relative safety compared with treatment alternatives has not been thoroughly assessed.

Objectives

This study aimed to compare hospitalization and mortality risk in Medicare beneficiaries with PD receiving new prescriptions of pimavanserin or quetiapine for PD psychosis.

Methods

The study identified new users of pimavanserin and quetiapine from a 15% national sample of Medicare fee-for-service claims collected between May 1, 2016, and December 30, 2018. All-cause hospitalization and mortality were assessed in time-to-event regression models. Standardized mortality ratio weighting balanced pimavanserin and quetiapine users on baseline characteristics. Follow-up was censored at discontinuation, switch, disenrollment, or the end of the study period.

Results

There were 844 new pimavanserin users and 2505 new quetiapine users. The adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for hospitalization at 30, 90, 180, and 365 days for pimavanserin versus quetiapine users were 0.59 (0.43-0.81), 0.56 (0.44-0.72), 0.63 (0.52-0.77), and 0.70 (0.60-0.83). The most common reasons for hospitalization were traumatic injury and sepsis. Hospitalizations for heart-related issues were higher with pimavanserin (P < 0.05). The adjusted hazard ratios (95% CIs) for all-cause mortality at 90, 180, and 365 days for pimavanserin versus quetiapine users were 0.73 (0.48-1.13), 0.80 (0.58-1.10), and 0.94 (0.74-1.19).

Conclusions

Risk of hospitalization was lower in pimavanserin users compared with quetiapine, and no difference in mortality was observed between pimavanserin and quetiapine. An active comparator analyses with treatment alternatives provided the most clinically relevant information for patients and physicians.

Mortality in Patients with Parkinson's Disease-Related Psychosis Treated with Pimavanserin Compared with Other Atypical Antipsychotics: A Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Pimavanserin is approved in the USA to treat hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP).

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated mortality in patients with PDP after initiation of pimavanserin or comparator atypical antipsychotics, overall, over time, and across subgroups.

METHODS

A cohort of patients aged ≥65 years in the USA with PDP newly initiating pimavanserin or a comparator atypical antipsychotic (clozapine, quetiapine, risperidone, olanzapine, aripiprazole, brexpiprazole) was identified in 2016-2019 Medicare claims data. All-cause mortality in the propensity score-matched treatment groups was compared with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) estimated with Cox-proportional hazards models. Cumulative incidence curves and time period-specific models evaluated risk over time. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed, including a sub-cohort of long-term care (LTC) or skilled nursing facility (SNF) residents.

RESULTS

We identified 2892 pimavanserin initiators and 19,083 comparator initiators (overall 47% female, mean age = 80.9 years, LTC/SNF residents = 30%). Before matching, pimavanserin users had fewer severe comorbidities and more anti-Parkinson medication use than comparators. Matching resulted in 2891 patients in both groups, and all covariates were well balanced. In the matched cohort, the HR for mortality for pimavanserin versus comparator was 0.78 (95% CI 0.67-0.91), with the lowest time period-specific HRs in the first 180 days. Hazard ratios were similar across sensitivity analyses and subgroups. In LTC/SNF residents, the HR was 0.78 (95% CI 0.60-1.01).

CONCLUSION

The observed mortality rates were lower among patients treated with pimavanserin compared with those treated with other atypical antipsychotics.

STUDY REGISTRATION

European Union Post-authorization Study (EU PAS) register number 46331.

Treatment for cognitive and neuropsychiatric non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease: current evidence and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Non-motor symptoms (NMS) affect patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) from the prodromal to the advanced stages. NMS phenotypes greatly vary and have a huge impact on patients' and caregivers' quality of life (QoL). The management of cognitive and neuropsychiatric NMS remains an unmet need.

AREAS COVERED

The authors, herein, review the dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic pathogenesis, clinical features, assessment, and pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments of cognitive and neuropsychiatric NMS in PD. They discuss the current evidence and report the findings of an overview of ongoing trials on pharmacological and selected non-pharmacological strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

The treatment of cognitive and neuropsychiatric NMS in PD is poorly explored, and therapeutic options are unsatisfactory. Pharmacological treatment of cognitive NMS is based on symptomatic active principles used in Alzheimer's disease. Dopamine agonists, selective serotonin, and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors have some evidence on PD-related depression. Clozapine, quetiapine, and pimavanserin may be considered for psychosis in PD. Evidence on the treatment of other neuropsychiatric NMS is limited or lacking. Addressing pathophysiological and clinical issues, which hamper solid evidence on the treatment of cognitive and neuropsychiatric NMS, may reduce the impact on QoL for PD patients and their caregivers.

Motor- and cognition-related safety of pimavanserin in patients with Parkinson's disease psychosis

Background

Pimavanserin, a selective 5-HT_2A inverse agonist/antagonist, is the only treatment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease (PD) psychosis.

Aim

We aimed to evaluate motor- and cognition-related safety in pimavanserin-treated patients with PD psychosis.

Methods

This analysis included patients with PD psychosis treated with pimavanserin 34 mg from a pooled analysis of 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-week studies [NCT00477672 (study ACP-103-012), NCT00658567 (study ACP-103-014), and NCT01174004 (study ACP-103-020)] and a subgroup of patients with PD dementia with psychosis from HARMONY (NCT03325556), a randomized discontinuation study that included a 12-week open-label period followed by a randomized double-blind period of up to 26 weeks. Motor- and cognition-related safety were examined.

Results

The pooled analysis included 433 randomized patients (pimavanserin, 202; placebo, 231). Least squares mean (standard error [SE]) change from baseline to week 6 Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II + III score was similar for pimavanserin [−2.4 (0.69)] and placebo [−2.3 (0.60)] (95% Confidence Interval [CI]:−1.9, 1.6). The change from baseline to week 6 for UPDRS II and UPDRS III scores was similar between groups. In the HARMONY open-label period, 49 patients with PD dementia with psychosis were treated with pimavanserin 34 mg, 36 of whom were randomized in the double-blind period (pimavanserin, 16; placebo, 20). In the open-label period, the mean (SE) change from baseline to week 12 (n = 39) Extra-Pyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS-A) score was −1.7 (0.74); in the double-blind period, the results were generally comparable between the pimavanserin and placebo arms. The change from baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score was also comparable between pimavanserin- and placebo-treated patients in HARMONY [open-label (n = 37): mean (SE) change from baseline to week 12, 0.3 (0.66)]. Rates of motor- and cognition-related adverse events were similar between pimavanserin and placebo in both analyses.

Conclusions

Pimavanserin 34 mg was well tolerated and did not yield a negative impact on motor- or cognition-related function in patients with PD psychosis.

Pimavanserin and Parkinson's Disease Psychosis: A Narrative Review

Pimavanserin (PMV) is the first approved drug for treating hallucinations and delusions in Parkinson's disease (PD) psychosis. Psychosis is one of the leading causes of nursing home placement in people with PD. Furthermore, hallucinations are a more frequent cause of institutionalization than motor disability or dementia related to PD. The management of PD psychosis involves antipsychotic medications. Most of the drugs in this class directly block dopamine D2 receptors, leading to significantly worsening motor symptoms in patients with PD. The most commonly used medications for managing PD psychosis are quetiapine, clozapine, and PMV. This literature review aims to study pimavanserin's history, mechanism, clinical trials, and post-marketing experience. PMV is a potent 5-HT2A receptor antagonist/inverse agonist. Moreover, this drug can interact with 5-HT2C receptors. We calculated some physicochemical descriptors and pharmacokinetic properties of PMV. Eight clinical trials of PMV and PD psychosis are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Only four of them have complete results already published. Meta-analytic results showed that PMV efficacy is inferior to clozapine. However, PMV has a significantly lower number of side-effects for managing psychosis in PD. Medicare database assessment revealed 35% lower mortality with PMV compared to other atypical antipsychotics. Moreover, sensitive statistical analysis demonstrated that PMV is a protective factor for the risk of falls in individuals with PD.