1
|
Barnett P, Steare T, Dedat Z, Pilling S, McCrone P, Knapp M, Cooke E, Lamirel D, Dawson S, Goldblatt P, Hatch S, Henderson C, Jenkins R, K T, Machin K, Simpson A, Shah P, Stevens M, Webber M, Johnson S, Lloyd-Evans B. Interventions to improve social circumstances of people with mental health conditions: a rapid evidence synthesis. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22:302. [PMID: 35484521 PMCID: PMC9047264 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-03864-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor social circumstances can induce, exacerbate and prolong symptoms of mental health conditions, while having a mental health condition can also lead to worse social outcomes. Many people with mental health conditions prioritise improvement in social and functional outcomes over reduction in clinical symptoms. Interventions that improve social circumstances in this population should thus be considered a priority for research and policy. METHODS This rapid evidence synthesis reports on randomised controlled trials of interventions to improve social circumstances across eight social domains (Housing and homelessness; money and basic needs; work and education; social isolation and connectedness; family, intimate and caring relationships; victimisation and exploitation; offending; and rights, inclusion and citizenship) in people with mental health conditions. Economic evaluations were also identified. A comprehensive, stepped search approach of the Cochrane library, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Scopus was conducted. RESULTS One systematic review and 102 randomised controlled trials were included. We did not find RCT evidence for interventions to improve family, intimate and caring relationships and only one or two trials for each of improving money and basic needs, victimisation and exploitation, and rights, inclusion and citizenship. Evidence from successful interventions in improving homelessness (Housing First) and employment (Individual Placement and Support) suggests that high-intensity interventions which focus on the desired social outcome and provide comprehensive multidisciplinary support could influence positive change in social circumstances of people with mental health conditions. Objective social isolation could be improved using a range of approaches such as supported socialisation and social skills training but interventions to reduce offending showed few benefits. Studies with cost and cost-effectiveness components were generally supportive of interventions to improve housing and vocational outcomes. More research is needed to ensure that social circumstances accompanied by high risks of further exacerbation of mental health conditions are adequately addressed. CONCLUSIONS Although there is a large body of literature examining how to support some aspects of life for people with mental health conditions, more high-quality evidence is required in other social domains. Integration into mental health services of interventions targeting social circumstances could significantly improve a number of social outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phoebe Barnett
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK. .,Department of Psychiatry, Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Thomas Steare
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Department of Psychiatry, Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Zainab Dedat
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Department of Psychiatry, Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Pilling
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB UK ,grid.452735.20000 0004 0496 9767National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK ,grid.450564.60000 0000 8609 9937Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Paul McCrone
- grid.36316.310000 0001 0806 5472Institute of Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Martin Knapp
- grid.13063.370000 0001 0789 5319Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Eleanor Cooke
- grid.450564.60000 0000 8609 9937Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust and MH Policy Research Unit, London, UK
| | - Daphne Lamirel
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Department of Psychiatry, Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Dawson
- grid.5337.20000 0004 1936 7603Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England
| | - Peter Goldblatt
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, Institute of Health Equity, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stephani Hatch
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychological Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK ,grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Claire Henderson
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Health Services and Population Research Department, Kings College London, London, UK ,grid.37640.360000 0000 9439 0839South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rachel Jenkins
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurology, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - T K
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, Department of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Karen Machin
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, Department of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alan Simpson
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Department of Psychiatry, Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK ,grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Health Services and Population Research Department, Kings College London, London, UK ,grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Kings College London, Midwifery & Palliative care, London, UK
| | - Prisha Shah
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, Department of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Martin Stevens
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764NIHR Policy Research Unit On Health and Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Martin Webber
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668International Centre for Mental Health Social Research, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, York, England
| | - Sonia Johnson
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Department of Psychiatry, Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK ,grid.450564.60000 0000 8609 9937Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Department of Psychiatry, Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Suijkerbuijk YB, Schaafsma FG, van Mechelen JC, Ojajärvi A, Corbière M, Anema JR. Interventions for obtaining and maintaining employment in adults with severe mental illness, a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 9:CD011867. [PMID: 28898402 PMCID: PMC6483771 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011867.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with severe mental illness show high rates of unemployment and work disability, however, they often have a desire to participate in employment. People with severe mental illness used to be placed in sheltered employment or were enrolled in prevocational training to facilitate transition to a competitive job. Now, there are also interventions focusing on rapid search for a competitive job, with ongoing support to keep the job, known as supported employment. Recently, there has been a growing interest in combining supported employment with other prevocational or psychiatric interventions. OBJECTIVES To assess the comparative effectiveness of various types of vocational rehabilitation interventions and to rank these interventions according to their effectiveness to facilitate competitive employment in adults with severe mental illness. SEARCH METHODS In November 2016 we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, and CINAHL, and reference lists of articles for randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews. We identified systematic reviews from which to extract randomised controlled trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials and cluster-randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of interventions on obtaining competitive employment for adults with severe mental illness. We included trials with competitive employment outcomes. The main intervention groups were prevocational training programmes, transitional employment interventions, supported employment, supported employment augmented with other specific interventions, and psychiatric care only. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently identified trials, performed data extraction, including adverse events, and assessed trial quality. We performed direct meta-analyses and a network meta-analysis including measurements of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). We assessed the quality of the evidence for outcomes within the network meta-analysis according to GRADE. MAIN RESULTS We included 48 randomised controlled trials involving 8743 participants. Of these, 30 studied supported employment, 13 augmented supported employment, 17 prevocational training, and 6 transitional employment. Psychiatric care only was the control condition in 13 studies. Direct comparison meta-analysis of obtaining competitive employmentWe could include 18 trials with short-term follow-up in a direct meta-analysis (N = 2291) of the following comparisons. Supported employment was more effective than prevocational training (RR 2.52, 95% CI 1.21 to 5.24) and transitional employment (RR 3.49, 95% CI 1.77 to 6.89) and prevocational training was more effective than psychiatric care only (RR 8.96, 95% CI 1.77 to 45.51) in obtaining competitive employment.For the long-term follow-up direct meta-analysis, we could include 22 trials (N = 5233). Augmented supported employment (RR 4.32, 95% CI 1.49 to 12.48), supported employment (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.68) and prevocational training (RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.07 to 4.46) were more effective than psychiatric care only. Augmented supported employment was more effective than supported employment (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.65), transitional employment (RR 2.45, 95% CI 1.69 to 3.55) and prevocational training (RR 5.42, 95% CI 1.08 to 27.11). Supported employment was more effective than transitional employment (RR 3.28, 95% CI 2.13 to 5.04) and prevocational training (RR 2.31, 95% CI 1.85 to 2.89). Network meta-analysis of obtaining competitive employmentWe could include 22 trials with long-term follow-up in a network meta-analysis.Augmented supported employment was the most effective intervention versus psychiatric care only in obtaining competitive employment (RR 3.81, 95% CI 1.99 to 7.31, SUCRA 98.5, moderate-quality evidence), followed by supported employment (RR 2.72 95% CI 1.55 to 4.76; SUCRA 76.5, low-quality evidence).Prevocational training (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.73 to 2.19; SUCRA 40.3, very low-quality evidence) and transitional employment were not considerably different from psychiatric care only (RR 1.00,95% CI 0.51 to 1.96; SUCRA 17.2, low-quality evidence) in achieving competitive employment, but prevocational training stood out in the SUCRA value and rank.Augmented supported employment was slightly better than supported employment, but not significantly (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.14). The SUCRA value and mean rank were higher for augmented supported employment.The results of the network meta-analysis of the intervention subgroups favoured augmented supported employment interventions, but also cognitive training. However, supported employment augmented with symptom-related skills training showed the best results (RR compared to psychiatric care only 3.61 with 95% CI 1.03 to 12.63, SUCRA 80.3).We graded the quality of the evidence of the network ranking as very low because of potential risk of bias in the included studies, inconsistency and publication bias. Direct meta-analysis of maintaining competitive employment Based on the direct meta-analysis of the short-term follow-up of maintaining employment, supported employment was more effective than: psychiatric care only, transitional employment, prevocational training, and augmented supported employment.In the long-term follow-up direct meta-analysis, augmented supported employment was more effective than prevocational training (MD 22.79 weeks, 95% CI 15.96 to 29.62) and supported employment (MD 10.09, 95% CI 0.32 to 19.85) in maintaining competitive employment. Participants receiving supported employment worked more weeks than those receiving transitional employment (MD 17.36, 95% CI 11.53 to 23.18) or prevocational training (MD 11.56, 95% CI 5.99 to 17.13).We did not find differences between interventions in the risk of dropouts or hospital admissions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Supported employment and augmented supported employment were the most effective interventions for people with severe mental illness in terms of obtaining and maintaining employment, based on both the direct comparison analysis and the network meta-analysis, without increasing the risk of adverse events. These results are based on moderate- to low-quality evidence, meaning that future studies with lower risk of bias could change these results. Augmented supported employment may be slightly more effective compared to supported employment alone. However, this difference was small, based on the direct comparison analysis, and further decreased with the network meta-analysis meaning that this difference should be interpreted cautiously. More studies on maintaining competitive employment are needed to get a better understanding of whether the costs and efforts are worthwhile in the long term for both the individual and society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne B Suijkerbuijk
- VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVan der Boechorststraat 7Postbus 7057AmsterdamNetherlands1007 MB
- AMC‐UMCG‐UWV‐VUmcResearch Centre for Insurance MedicineAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Frederieke G Schaafsma
- VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVan der Boechorststraat 7Postbus 7057AmsterdamNetherlands1007 MB
- AMC‐UMCG‐UWV‐VUmcResearch Centre for Insurance MedicineAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Joost C van Mechelen
- VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVan der Boechorststraat 7Postbus 7057AmsterdamNetherlands1007 MB
| | - Anneli Ojajärvi
- Finnish Institute of Occupational HealthTopeliuksenkatu 41 a AHelsinkiFinlandFI‐00250
| | - Marc Corbière
- Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM)Department of Education and Pedagogy ‐ Career CounselingMontrealQCCanada
- Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (CR‐IUSMM)MontrealCanada
| | - Johannes R Anema
- VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVan der Boechorststraat 7Postbus 7057AmsterdamNetherlands1007 MB
- AMC‐UMCG‐UWV‐VUmcResearch Centre for Insurance MedicineAmsterdamNetherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mervis JE, Fiszdon JM, Lysaker PH, Nienow TM, Mathews L, Wardwell P, Petrik T, Thime W, Choi J. Effects of the Indianapolis Vocational Intervention Program (IVIP) on defeatist beliefs, work motivation, and work outcomes in serious mental illness. Schizophr Res 2017; 182:129-134. [PMID: 27802910 PMCID: PMC5828005 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.10.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2016] [Revised: 10/23/2016] [Accepted: 10/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Defeatist beliefs and amotivation are prominent obstacles in vocational rehabilitation for people with serious mental illnesses (SMI). The CBT-based Indianapolis Vocational Intervention Program (IVIP) was specifically designed to reduce defeatist beliefs related to work functioning. In the current study, we examined the impact of IVIP on defeatist beliefs and motivation for work, hypothesizing that IVIP would be associated with a reduction in defeatist beliefs and greater motivation for work. We also examined the effects of IVIP on these variables as well as work outcomes during a 12-month follow-up. Participants with SMI (n=64) enrolled in a four-month work therapy program were randomized to IVIP or a support therapy group (SG). Assessments were conducted at baseline, post-treatment (4months), and follow-up (1year). Compared to those in SG condition, individuals randomized to IVIP condition reported greater reductions in defeatist beliefs and greater motivation for work at follow-up, along with greater supported employment retention rates. Specifically treating and targeting negative expectations for work therapy improves outcomes, even once active supports of the IVIP program and work therapy are withdrawn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua E. Mervis
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN, USA,Corresponding author
| | - Joanna M. Fiszdon
- Psychology Service, VA Connecticut Healthcare System & Yale University School of Medicine, 950 Campbell Ave, West Haven, CT 06516 USA
| | - Paul H. Lysaker
- Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Tasha M. Nienow
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System, 1 Veterans Dr., Minneapolis, MN 55417 USA
| | - Laura Mathews
- Department of Psychiatric Vocational Services, The Institute of Living at Hartford Hospital, 200 Retreat Ave, Hartford, CT 06106, USA.
| | - Patricia Wardwell
- Department of Psychiatric Vocational Services, The Institute of Living at Hartford Hospital, 200 Retreat Ave, Hartford, CT 06106, USA.
| | - Tammy Petrik
- Department of Psychiatric Vocational Services, The Institute of Living at Hartford Hospital, 200 Retreat Ave, Hartford, CT 06106, USA.
| | - Warren Thime
- Schizophrenia Rehabilitation Program, The Institute of Living at Hartford Hospital, 200 Retreat Ave, Hartford, CT 06106, USA.
| | - Jimmy Choi
- Schizophrenia Rehabilitation Program, The Institute of Living at Hartford Hospital, 200 Retreat Ave, Hartford, CT 06106, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mervis JE, Lysaker PH, Fiszdon JM, Bell MD, Chue AE, Pauls C, Bisoglio J, Choi J. Addressing defeatist beliefs in work rehabilitation. J Ment Health 2016; 25:366-371. [PMID: 26828824 PMCID: PMC5842921 DOI: 10.3109/09638237.2016.1139069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adults with serious mental illness (SMI) may struggle with expectations of failure in vocational rehabilitation. These expectations can be global and trait-like or performance-specific and related to ability. AIMS To date, it has not been examined whether global or performance-specific defeatist beliefs are related to functional outcomes. METHOD The Indianapolis Vocational Intervention Program (IVIP) is a CBT intervention used to address expectations of failure and improve work performance. We examined the relationships between defeatist beliefs, self-esteem, social functioning, and work behaviors in 54 adults with SMI who completed IVIP within a work therapy program. RESULTS Baseline work-specific defeatist beliefs were related to baseline self-esteem, employment attitude, and work behaviors. Decline in work-specific defeatist beliefs was associated with better social functioning, self-esteem, and work behaviors. Decline in global defeatist beliefs was only associated with improvements in social functioning. CONCLUSIONS Performance-specific expectations about work may be an appropriate therapeutic target to enhance work outcome in SMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua E. Mervis
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Paul H. Lysaker
- Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Joanna M. Fiszdon
- Psychology Service, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT & Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Morris D. Bell
- Psychology Service, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT & Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Amanda E. Chue
- Department of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Carol Pauls
- Columbia Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Jimmy Choi
- Institute of Living/Hartford Healthcare Corporation, Hartford, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Supportive therapy is often used in everyday clinical care and in evaluative studies of other treatments. OBJECTIVES To review the effects of supportive therapy compared with standard care, or other treatments in addition to standard care for people with schizophrenia. SEARCH METHODS For this update, we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's register of trials (November 2012). SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised trials involving people with schizophrenia and comparing supportive therapy with any other treatment or standard care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We reliably selected studies, quality rated these and extracted data. For dichotomous data, we estimated the risk ratio (RR) using a fixed-effect model with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Where possible, we undertook intention-to-treat analyses. For continuous data, we estimated the mean difference (MD) fixed-effect with 95% CIs. We estimated heterogeneity (I(2) technique) and publication bias. We used GRADE to rate quality of evidence. MAIN RESULTS Four new trials were added after the 2012 search. The review now includes 24 relevant studies, with 2126 participants. Overall, the evidence was very low quality.We found no significant differences in the primary outcomes of relapse, hospitalisation and general functioning between supportive therapy and standard care.There were, however, significant differences favouring other psychological or psychosocial treatments over supportive therapy. These included hospitalisation rates (4 RCTs, n = 306, RR 1.82 CI 1.11 to 2.99, very low quality of evidence), clinical improvement in mental state (3 RCTs, n = 194, RR 1.27 CI 1.04 to 1.54, very low quality of evidence) and satisfaction of treatment for the recipient of care (1 RCT, n = 45, RR 3.19 CI 1.01 to 10.7, very low quality of evidence). For this comparison, we found no evidence of significant differences for rate of relapse, leaving the study early and quality of life.When we compared supportive therapy to cognitive behavioural therapy CBT), we again found no significant differences in primary outcomes. There were very limited data to compare supportive therapy with family therapy and psychoeducation, and no studies provided data regarding clinically important change in general functioning, one of our primary outcomes of interest. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There are insufficient data to identify a difference in outcome between supportive therapy and standard care. There are several outcomes, including hospitalisation and general mental state, indicating advantages for other psychological therapies over supportive therapy but these findings are based on a few small studies where we graded the evidence as very low quality. Future research would benefit from larger trials that use supportive therapy as the main treatment arm rather than the comparator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy A Buckley
- Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation TrustSunderland Psychotherapy ServiceCherry Knowle HospitalUpper Poplars, RyhopeSunderlandTyne and WearUKSR2 0NB
| | - Nicola Maayan
- CochraneCochrane ResponseSt Albans House57‐59 HaymarketLondonUKSW1Y 4QX
| | - Karla Soares‐Weiser
- CochraneCochrane Editorial UnitSt Albans House, 57 ‐ 59 HaymarketLondonUKSW1Y 4QX
| | - Clive E Adams
- The University of NottinghamCochrane Schizophrenia GroupInstitute of Mental HealthInnovation Park, Triumph Road,NottinghamUKNG7 2TU
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kinoshita Y, Furukawa TA, Kinoshita K, Honyashiki M, Omori IM, Marshall M, Bond GR, Huxley P, Amano N, Kingdon D. Supported employment for adults with severe mental illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013:CD008297. [PMID: 24030739 PMCID: PMC7433300 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008297.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who suffer from severe mental disorder experience high rates of unemployment. Supported employment is an approach to vocational rehabilitation that involves trying to place clients in competitive jobs without any extended preparation. The Individual placement and support (IPS) model is a carefully specified form of supported employment. OBJECTIVES 1. To review the effectiveness of supported employment compared with other approaches to vocational rehabilitation or treatment as usual.2. Secondary objectives were to establish how far:(a) fidelity to the IPS model affects the effectiveness of supported employment,(b) the effectiveness of supported employment can be augmented by the addition of other interventions. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (February 2010), which is compiled by systematic searches of major databases, handsearches and conference proceedings. SELECTION CRITERIA All relevant randomised clinical trials focusing on people with severe mental illness, of working age (normally 16 to 70 years), where supported employment was compared with other vocational approaches or treatment as usual. Outcomes such as days in employment, job stability, global state, social functioning, mental state, quality of life, satisfaction and costs were sought. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors (YK and KK) independently extracted data. For binary outcomes, we calculated risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we estimated mean difference (MD) between groups and its 95% (CI). We employed a fixed-effect model for analyses. A random-effects model was also employed where heterogeneity was present. MAIN RESULTS A total of 14 randomised controlled trials were included in this review (total 2265 people). In terms of our primary outcome (employment: days in competitive employment, over one year follow-up), supported employment seems to significantly increase levels of any employment obtained during the course of studies (7 RCTs, n = 951, RR 3.24 CI 2.17 to 4.82, very low quality of evidence). Supported employment also seems to increase length of competitive employment when compared with other vocational approaches (1 RCT, n = 204, MD 70.63 CI 43.22 to 94.04, very low quality evidence). Supported employment also showed some advantages in other secondary outcomes. It appears to increase length (in days) of any form of paid employment (2 RCTs, n = 510, MD 84.94 CI 51.99 to 117.89, very low quality evidence) and job tenure (weeks) for competitive employment (1 RCT, n = 204, MD 9.86 CI 5.36 to 14.36, very low quality evidence) and any paid employment (3 RCTs, n = 735, MD 3.86 CI -2.94 to 22.17, very low quality evidence). Furthermore, one study indicated a decreased time to first competitive employment in the long term for people in supported employment (1 RCT, n = 204, MD -161.60 CI -225.73 to -97.47, very low quality evidence). A large amount of data were considerably skewed, and therefore not included in meta-analysis, which makes any meaningful interpretation of the vast amount of data very difficult. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The limited available evidence suggests that supported employment is effective in improving a number of vocational outcomes relevant to people with severe mental illness, though there appears to exist some overall risk of bias in terms of the quality of individual studies. All studies should report a standard set of vocational and non-vocational outcomes that are relevant to the consumers and policy-makers. Studies with longer follow-up should be conducted to answer or address the critical question about durability of effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Toshi A Furukawa
- Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public HealthDepartments of Health Promotion and Behavior Change and of Clinical EpidemiologyYoshida Konoe‐cho, Sakyo‐ku,KyotoJapan601‐8501
| | | | - Mina Honyashiki
- Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public HealthDepartment of Health Promotion and Human BehaviorYoshida Konoe‐cho, Sakyo‐kuKyotoJapan601‐8501
| | - Ichiro M Omori
- Toyokawa City HospitalDepartment of PsychiatryKoumei 1‐19ToyokawaAichiJapan442‐8561
| | - Max Marshall
- The Lantern CentreUniversity of ManchesterVicarage LaneOf Watling Street Road, FulwoodPreston.LancashireUK
| | - Gary R Bond
- Dartmouth Medical SchoolDepartment of PsychiatryRivermill Commercial Centre85 Mechanic StreetLebanonNew HampshireUSA03766
| | - Peter Huxley
- University of SwanseaApplied Social StudiesVivian BuildingSingleton ParkSwanseaUKSA2 8PP
| | - Naoji Amano
- Shinshu University, School of MedicineDepartment of PsychiatryMatsumotoJapan
| | - David Kingdon
- University of SouthamptonMental Health GroupCollege Keep4‐12 Terminus TerraceSouthamptonUKSO14 3DT
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
[How can the mentally ill achieve sustained employment? Supported employment versus pre-vocational training]. DER NERVENARZT 2012; 83:840-6. [PMID: 22729512 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-011-3470-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
People with severe mental disorders are often without work, although work may have a positive effect on their health. The paper presents some results in this field from the German S3 guidelines on psychosocial therapies. In terms of evidence-based medicine supported employment (SE - first place then train) has proven to be most effective. Nevertheless, SE is still rare in Germany. Pre-vocational training, however, follows the concept first train then place and is offered in rehabilitation of the mentally ill (RPK) centres in Germany. There is some evidence that the programs are beneficial for users. The UN Convention for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities outlines an obligation for work on an equal basis with others and for vocational training. So far, the German mental health system only partly meets these requirements.
Collapse
|
8
|
Work status, daily activities and quality of life among people with severe mental illness. Qual Life Res 2009; 18:163-70. [PMID: 19125354 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-008-9431-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2008] [Accepted: 12/08/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Work is often a desired goal for people with mental illness, as expressed by both themselves and their relatives. This study investigated the importance of work status, everyday activities and objective life indices for subjective quality of life, with a special focus on quality of life domains. METHOD The sample consisted of 103 individuals with severe mental illness in Sweden, a majority of whom had schizophrenia. Interview-based questionnaires were used to assess quality of life (MANSA) and activity factors (SDO, OVal-pd). RESULTS Work status and activity in terms of actual doing were of some, but minor, importance to subjective quality of life domains, whereas satisfying and valuable activities were consistently associated with most quality of life domains. CONCLUSION Although no causal relationship could be established, the findings indicate that open-market work might not be decisive for subjective quality of life, but that satisfying and meaningful everyday activities could contribute to a better life quality for those who have a severe and lasting mental illness.
Collapse
|
9
|
Honey A. Benefits and drawbacks of employment: perspectives of people with mental illness. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2004; 14:381-395. [PMID: 15011905 DOI: 10.1177/1049732303261867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
In this article, the author presents the perspectives of people with mental illness about the benefits and drawbacks of employment, what factors influence these, and how they affect consumers' decisions and actions. Forty-one consumers of mental health services participated in 76 in-depth interviews and two focus groups. The author coded data inductively and analyzed them using grounded theory method. The results demonstrate that the benefits and drawbacks of employment are experienced in six domains. Individuals' perceptions of benefits and drawbacks are influenced by individual and contextual factors, are dynamic over time, and are instrumental in determining their employment-related actions. The findings suggest several areas for future exploration with a view to improving policy and practice in employment for people with mental illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Honey
- School of Education, University of Western Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bybee D, Mowbray CT, Oyserman D, Lewandowski L. Variability in community functioning of mothers with serious mental illness. J Behav Health Serv Res 2003; 30:269-89. [PMID: 12875096 DOI: 10.1007/bf02287317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
In the post-deinstitutionalization era, everyday community functioning is an important aspect of assessment and treatment of individuals with serious mental illness. The current study focuses on correlates of community functioning among 332 low-income mothers with serious mental illness. Results revealed significant relationships between everyday functioning and a number of demographic, psychiatric, contextual, and mental health treatment variables. Current psychiatric symptoms accounted for the greatest amount of variance and completely mediated the effects of diagnosis and substance abuse history on community functioning; yet contextual variables such as financial worries and social support were also significant predictors, even after controlling for symptoms and other clinical characteristics. Additionally, use of mental health services was a significant moderator of the effect of social stress on community functioning. Implications of results for future research and practice are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Bybee
- Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Crowther R, Marshall M, Bond G, Huxley P. Vocational rehabilitation for people with severe mental illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; 2001:CD003080. [PMID: 11406069 PMCID: PMC4170889 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unemployment rates are high amongst people with severe mental illness, yet surveys show that most want to work. Vocational rehabilitation services exist to help mentally ill people find work. Traditionally, these services have offered a period of preparation (Pre-vocational Training), before trying to place clients in competitive (i.e. open) employment. More recently, some services have begun placing clients in competitive employment immediately whilst providing on-the-job support (Supported Employment). It is unclear which approach is most effective. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of Pre-vocational Training and Supported Employment (for people with severe mental illness) against each other and against standard care (in hospital or community). In addition, to assess the effects of: (a) special varieties of Pre-vocational Training (Clubhouse model) and Supported Employment (Individual Placement and Support model); and (b) techniques for enhancing either approach, for example payment or psychological intervention. SEARCH STRATEGY Searches were undertaken of CINAHL (1982-1998), The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1999), EMBASE (1980-1998), MEDLINE (1966-1998) and PsycLIT (1887-1998). Reference lists of eligible studies and reviews were inspected and researchers in the field were approached to identify unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials of approaches to vocational rehabilitation for people with severe mental illness. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Included trials were reliably selected by a team of two raters. Data were extracted separately by two reviewers and cross-checked. Authors of trials were contacted for additional information. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of homogeneous dichotomous data were calculated. A random effects model was used for heterogeneous dichotomous data. Continuous data were presented in tables (there were insufficient continuous data for formal meta-analysis). A sensitivity analysis was performed, excluding poorer quality trials. MAIN RESULTS Eighteen randomised controlled trials of reasonable quality were identified. The main finding was that on the primary outcome (number in competitive employment) Supported Employment was significantly more effective than Pre-vocational Training; for example, at 18 months 34% of people in Supported Employment were employed versus 12% in Pre-vocational Training (RR random effects (unemployment) 0.76 95% CI 0.64 to 0.89, NNT 4.5). Clients in Supported Employment also earned more and worked more hours per month than those in Pre-vocational Training. There was no evidence that Pre-vocational Training was more effective in helping clients to obtain competitive employment than standard community care. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS Supported employment is more effective than Pre-vocational Training in helping severely mentally ill people to obtain competitive employment. There is no clear evidence that Pre-vocational Training is effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Crowther
- Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Manchester, Academic Unit, Royal Preston Hospital, Sharoe Green Lane, Fulwood, Preston, Lancashire, UK, PR2 9HT.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Drake RE, Becker DR, Clark RE, Mueser KT. Research on the individual placement and support model of supported employment. Psychiatr Q 1999; 70:289-301. [PMID: 10587985 DOI: 10.1023/a:1022086131916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
This paper reviews research on the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model of supported employment for people with severe mental illness. Current evidence indicates that IPS supported employment is a more effective approach for helping people with psychiatric disabilities to find and maintain competitive employment than rehabilitative day programs or than traditional, stepwise approaches to vocational rehabilitation. There is no evidence that the rapid-job-search, high-expectations approach of IPS produces untoward side effects. IPS positively affects satisfaction with finances and vocational services, but probably has minimal impact on clinical adjustment. The cost of IPS is similar to the costs of other vocational services, and cost reductions may occur when IPS displaces traditional day treatment programs. Future research should be directed at efforts to enhance job tenure and long-term vocational careers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R E Drake
- Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|