Efficacy of Gastric-Stimulator as an Adjunct to Pyloroplasty for Gastroparesis: Characterizing Patients Suitable for Single Procedure versus Dual Procedure Approach

BACKGROUND

Pyloroplasty is an effective surgery for gastroparesis. However, some patients fail to improve after pyloric drainage and may require subsequent gastric electric stimulation. There is a paucity of data on the efficacy of gastric stimulator as an adjunct to failed pyloroplasty. This study aimed to describe our experience with pyloroplasty, determine the efficacy of gastric-stimulator for failed pyloroplasty, and compare the final outcomes of those who required pyloroplasty with and without gastric stimulator for gastroparesis.

METHODS

Records of patients who underwent primary pyloroplasty for gastroparesis at our institution were reviewed. Patients with poor symptomatic improvement after pyloroplasty underwent subsequent gastric-stimulator. Symptoms were assessed using the gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) preoperatively and after each surgery. Severe gastroparesis was defined as GSCI total score ≥3. Outcomes were assessed after pyloroplasty in all patients and after stimulator in patients who failed pyloroplasty. Final outcomes were then compared between those who did and did not require adjunct gastric-stimulator.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 104 patients (89.4% female) with a mean (SD) age of 42.2(11) and BMI of 26.9(7). Gastroparesis etiologies were 71.2% idiopathic, 17.3% diabetic, and 11.5% postsurgical. At 18.7(12) months after pyloroplasty there was a decrease in the GCSI total score [3.5(1) to 2.7(1.2), p=0.0012] and the rate of severe gastroparesis (71.9% to 29.3%, p<0.0001). Gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) 4-hr retention decreased [36.5(24) to 15.3(18), p=0.0003]. Adjunct gastric-stimulator was required by 30 (28.8%) patients due to suboptimal outcomes with no improvement in GCSI (p=0.201) or GES (p=0.320). These patients were younger [40.5(10.6) vs 49.6(15.2), p=0.0016)], with higher baseline GSCI-Total scores [4.3(0.7)-vs-3.7(1.1), p<0.001] and more severe gastroparesis (100%-vs-55.6%, p<0.001). All other preoperative characteristics were similar. At 21.7(15) months after gastric-stimulator there was improvement in GCSI [4.1(0.7) to 2.6(1.1), p<0.0001], severe gastroparesis (100% to 33.3%, p<0.0001), and GES 4-hr retention [21.2(22) to 7.6(10), p=0.054]. Prior to gastric stimulator, those who failed pyloroplasty had significantly worse GCSI (p=0.0009) and GES (p=0.048). However, after gastric stimulator, GCSI and GES improved, and were comparable to those who only required pyloroplasty (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Pyloroplasty improved gastroparesis symptoms and gastric emptying, yet 28% failed, requiring gastric stimulator. Younger patients and those with preoperative GCSI scores ≥3 were more likely to fail. Gastric stimulator improved outcomes after failed pyloroplasty, with comparable final GCSI and GES to those who did not fail.

Pathogenesis and management of diabetic gastroparesis: An updated clinically oriented review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Diabetic gastroparesis (DGp) is a common and preventable complication of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (D.M.) and significantly affects the Quality of Life of patients. Diagnosis and management present as a clinical challenge due to the disease's complexity and limited effective therapeutic options. This review aims to comprehensively outline the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of diabetic gastroparesis, evaluating evolving approaches to guide clinicians and provide future recommendations.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted on scholarly databases of PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science encompassing published articles, gray literature and relevant clinical guidelines. Data were synthesized and analyzed to provide a comprehensive overview of diabetic gastroparesis, focusing on pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management.

RESULTS

The review intricately explores the pathogenesis contributing to diabetic gastroparesis, emphasizing autonomic neuropathy, oxidative stress, inflammation, hormonal dysregulation, microbiota alterations, and gastrointestinal neuropathy. Primary management strategies are underscored, including lifestyle modifications, symptom relief, and glycemic control. The discussion encompasses pharmacological and surgical options, highlighting the importance of a multidisciplinary approach involving various healthcare professionals for comprehensive patient care.

CONCLUSION

This review offers a thorough understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of diabetic gastroparesis, underlining evolving approaches for clinicians. A multidisciplinary approach is crucial to address both the physical and mental health aspects of diabetes and its complications.

In silico modelling of the effect of pyloric intervention procedures on gastric flow and emptying in a stomach with gastroparesis

Pyloric interventions are surgical procedures employed to increase the gastric emptying rate in gastroparesis patients. In this study, we use an in silico model to investigate the consequences of pyloric intervention on gastric flow and emptying for two phenotypes of gastroparesis: antral hypomotility and decreased gastric tone. The transpyloric pressure gradient predicted by the in silico model, based on viscous fluid flow equations, is compared against in vivo measurements. Both phenotypes exhibit a similar pre-procedural emptying rate reduction, but after pyloric surgery, antral hypomotility case with preserved gastric tone shows significant improvements in emptying rates, up to 131%, accompanied by bile reflux from the duodenum into the stomach. Conversely, severely reduced gastric tone cases exhibited a post-procedural reduction in the net emptying rate due to the relatively larger bile reflux. In cases with a combination of antral hypomotility and reduced gastric tone, post-procedural improvements were observed only when both conditions were mild. Our findings highlight the pivotal role of the relative increase in pyloric orifice diameter in determining post-operative emptying rates. The study suggests a possible explanation for the selective response of patients toward these procedures and underscores the potential of in silico modelling to generate valuable insights to inform gastric surgery.

Imaging in Gastroparesis: Exploring Innovative Diagnostic Approaches, Symptoms, and Treatment

Gastroparesis (GP) is a chronic disease characterized by upper gastrointestinal symptoms, primarily nausea and vomiting, and delayed gastric emptying (GE), in the absence of mechanical GI obstruction. The underlying pathophysiology of GP remains unclear, but factors contributing to the condition include vagal nerve dysfunction, impaired gastric fundic accommodation, antral hypomotility, gastric dysrhythmias, and pyloric dysfunction. Currently, gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) is considered the gold standard for GP diagnosis. However, the overall delay in GE weakly correlates with GP symptoms and their severity. Recent research efforts have focused on developing treatments that address the presumed underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of GP, such as pyloric hypertonicity, with Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (G-POEM) one of these procedures. New promising diagnostic tools for gastroparesis include wireless motility capsule (WMC), the 13 carbon-GE breath test, high-resolution electrogastrography, and the Endoluminal Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP). Some of these tools assess alterations beyond GE, such as muscular electrical activity and pyloric tone. These modalities have the potential to characterize the pathophysiology of gastroparesis, identifying patients who may benefit from targeted therapies. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current knowledge on diagnostic pathways in GP, with a focus on the association between diagnosis, symptoms, and treatment.

Gastroparesis: An Evidence-Based Review for the Bariatric and Foregut Surgeon

Gastroparesis is a gastric motility disorder characterized by delayed gastric emptying. It is a rare disease and difficult to treat effectively; management is a dilemma for gastroenterologists and surgeons alike. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to evaluate current diagnostic tools as well as treatment options. We describe key elements in the pathophysiology of the disease, in addition to current evidence on treatment alternatives, including nutritional considerations, medical and surgical options, and related outcomes.

Gastroparesis

Gastroparesis is characterized by symptoms suggestive of, and objective evidence of, delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. This review addresses the normal emptying of solids and liquids from the stomach and details the myogenic and neuromuscular control mechanisms, including the specialized function of the pyloric sphincter, that result in normal emptying, based predominantly on animal research. A clear understanding of fundamental mechanisms is necessary to comprehend derangements leading to gastroparesis, and additional research on human gastric muscles is needed. The section on pathophysiology of gastroparesis considers neuromuscular diseases that affect nonsphincteric gastric muscle, disorders of the extrinsic neural control, and pyloric dysfunction that lead to gastroparesis. The potential cellular basis for gastroparesis is attributed to the effects of oxidative stress and inflammation, with increased pro-inflammatory and decreased resident macrophages, as observed in full-thickness biopsies from patients with gastroparesis. Predominant diagnostic tests involving measurements of gastric emptying, the use of a functional luminal imaging probe, and high-resolution antral duodenal manometry in characterizing the abnormal motor functions at the gastroduodenal junction are discussed. Management is based on supporting nutrition; dietary interventions, including the physical reduction in particle size of solid foods; pharmacological agents, including prokinetics and anti-emetics; and interventions such as gastric electrical stimulation and pyloromyotomy. These are discussed briefly, and comment is added on the potential for individualized treatments in the future, based on optimal gastric emptying measurement and objective documentation of the underlying pathophysiology causing the gastroparesis.

Pyloric dilation with the esophageal functional lumen imaging probe in gastroparesis improves gastric emptying, pyloric distensibility, and symptoms

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The role of decreased pyloric distensibility in gastroparesis as measured by the endolumenal functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP) has been receiving increasing attention. In this study, we present clinical outcomes to pyloric dilation with the esophageal FLIP (EsoFLIP) in regard to gastric emptying, symptom evolution, and FLIP metrics.

METHODS

Patients evaluated for gastroparesis (gastric emptying studies of t_1/2 ≥180 minutes during ¹³C-octanoic acid breath test and/or gastric remnants during gastroscopy after a sufficient fasting period) were scheduled for EsoFLIP controlled pyloric dilation. Pre- and postprocedural gastric emptying studies, questionnaires (Patient Assessment of Upper GI Symptoms Severity Index [PAGI-SYM; including the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index] and Patient Assessment of Quality of Life Index [PAGI-QOL]), and FLIP metrics were documented. Dilation was conducted according to a self-developed algorithm.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were analyzed (72% women; median age, 39 years [range, 18-88]). Etiologies of gastroparesis were diabetic in 10 patients (22%), idiopathic in 33 (72%), and postoperative in 3 (6%). Postprocedural gastric emptying time decreased from a median of 211 minutes to 179 minutes (P = .001). In accordance, pyloric distensibility, PAGI-SYM, PAGI-QOL, and Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index values improved significantly. After a median follow-up of 3.9 months, 57% of all treated patients with returned questionnaires reported improved symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Pyloric EsoFLIP controlled dilation shows value in the treatment of gastroparesis, both subjectively and objectively. Long-term follow-up to assess efficacy and comparative trials are warranted.

Predictors of Early Readmissions in Hospitalized Patients With Gastroparesis: A Nationwide Analysis

Background/Aims

Gastroparesis is a chronic gastrointestinal disorder that frequently presents with symptoms that are difficult to manage, necessitating frequent hospitalizations. We sought to determine the predictors of early readmission due to gastroparesis based on etiology.

Methods

We identified all adults discharged with a principal diagnosis of gastroparesis after hospitalization from the 2014 Nationwide Readmission Database. We compared etiology wise (diabetes, post-surgical, and idiopathic) early readmission. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify significant predictors of 30-day readmission.

Results

A total of 12 689 patients were identified, 30.7% diabetic, 2.6% post-surgical, and 66.7% were idiopathic. Patients with diabetic gastroparesis were more likely to be readmitted within 30 days than idiopathic (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.94) and post-surgical gastroparesis (aOR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.34-0.98). Pyloroplasty was associated with less likelihood of 30-day readmission (aOR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.20-0.97). In addition, male gender (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.02-1.37), modified Elixhauser comorbidity score ≥ 3 (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.18-1.61), chronic pain syndrome (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.11-1.78), younger (18-64 years) age (aOR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.34-2.00), need for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/jejunostomy tube (aOR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.21-3.52), and need for total parenteral nutrition (aOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.24-2.35) were associated with increased risk of 30-day readmission.

Conclusions

One in 5 patients was readmitted with gastroparesis within 30 days. In the diabetic group, diabetes-related complications contributed to readmissions than gastroparesis. Pyloroplasty is associated with reduced early hospital readmission. Prospective studies are needed for validation of these results.

Gastroparesis in the Hospital Setting

Gastroparesis (GP) is commonly seen in hospitalized patients. Refractory vomiting and related dehydration, electrolyte abnormalities, and malnutrition are indications for hospital admission. In addition, tube feeding intolerance is a common sign of gastric dysmotility in critically ill patients. The diagnosis and management of GP in the hospital setting can be quite challenging. Diagnostic tests are often deferred because of patient intolerance of the oral meal for standard scintigraphy or severity of the primary disease. The diagnosis of GP is often established on the basis of clinical scenario and risk factors for gastric motor dysfunction. Medical therapy in GP is directed toward controlling nausea and vomiting by prokinetic and antinausea medications and correcting nutrition risks or treating malnutrition with nutrition therapy. Enteral nutrition is the preferred nutrition intervention for patients with GP. Delayed gastric emptying in critically ill patients has a negative impact on the timely delivery of enteral feeding and meeting the energy and protein goals. Measures to improve gastric tolerance or provide feeding beyond the stomach are often needed, since early enteral nutrition has been an important target of therapy for critically ill patients. This review will address the current understanding of the mechanisms of GP and feeding intolerance in critical illness, diagnostic workup, drug therapies, and interventions to improve the provision of enteral nutrition in hospital settings when gastric dysmotility is present or suspected.

Medical and surgical management of gastroparesis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Gastroparesis (GPS) is a rare disease with multiple etiologies that results in delayed gastric emptying. Diagnosis of GPS can be challenging due to its rather complex clinical presentation. Pharmacologic refractory cases require surgical interventions, all of which have yet to be standardized and characterized.

OBJECTIVES

We present a review of the literature and provide an update of current therapies for patients with GPS.

SETTING

Department of General Surgery, Academic Hospital, United States.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase of English-written articles published in the last 38 years, with an advance title search of "gastroparesis management." Other keywords included: "surgical management" and "refractory gastroparesis." Further references were obtained through cross-reference.

RESULTS

A total of 12,250 articles were selected after eliminating duplicates. Following thorough screening of selection criteria, 68 full-text articles were included for review.

CONCLUSION

GPS is a challenging disease to manage. Nutritional support must remain the primary approach, followed by either medical or surgical treatment modalities if necessary. In patients with refractory gastroparesis, adjunctive therapies have been proposed as promising long-term options.

Impact of gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy on static and dynamic pyloric function in gastroparesis patients

BACKGROUND

Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP) tests typically measure static pyloric parameters, but the pylorus exhibits phasic variations on manometry. Dynamic changes in pyloric function have not been quantified using EndoFLIP, and the impact of Gastric Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (G-POEM) on static and dynamic pyloric activity in gastroparesis is unknown.

METHODS

EndoFLIP balloon inflation to 30, 40, and 50 mL was performed to measure mean, maximum, and minimum values and variability in pyloric diameter and distensibility before and after G-POEM in 20 patients with refractory gastroparesis. The impact of phasic contractions on these pyloric measures was compared.

KEY RESULTS

G-POEM increased mean (P < .0001) and maximum (P = .0002) pyloric diameters and mean (P = .02) and maximum (P = .02) pyloric distensibility on 50 mL EndoFLIP inflation but not intraballoon pressures or minimum diameters or distensibility. Temporal variability of pyloric diameter (P = .02) and distensibility (P = .02) also increased after G-POEM. Phasic coupled contractions propagating from the antrum through the pylorus were observed in 37.5% of recordings; other phasic activity including isolated pyloric contractions were seen in 23.3%. Variability of pyloric diameter and distensibility tended to be higher during recordings with phasic activity. Some pyloric responses to G-POEM were influenced by age, gastroparesis etiology, gastric emptying, and prior botulinum toxin injection.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Pyloric activity exhibits dynamic changes on EndoFLIP testing in gastroparesis. G-POEM increases maximal but not minimal diameter and distensibility with increased variations, suggesting this therapy enhances pyloric opening but may not impair pyloric closure. Phasic pyloric contractions contribute to variations in pyloric activity.

Pathophysiology, Aetiology and Treatment of Gastroparesis

Gastroparesis is characterized by delayed gastric emptying, with symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain, in the absence of mechanical obstruction. In most cases, it is idiopathic although diabetes mellitus is another leading cause. The physiology of gastric emptying is a complex process which is influenced by various inputs including the central nervous system, enteric nervous system and gut hormones. Developments in our understanding of gastroparesis have now demonstrated dysfunction in these systems, thus disrupting normal gastric emptying. Once mechanical obstruction is excluded, gastric scintigraphy remains the gold standard for diagnosis although wireless motility capsule and breath testing are alternative methods for diagnosis. Treatment for gastroparesis is challenging, and widely available therapies are often limited either by their poor evidence for efficacy or concerns over their long-term safety profile. Novel prokinetic agents have shown initial promise in clinical trials, and new endoscopic techniques such as gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy are emerging. These new treatment modalities may provide an option in refractory gastroparesis with the adage of reduced morbidity compared to surgical treatments.

Gastroparesis in the 2020s: New Treatments, New Paradigms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights recent work that will lead to near-term advances in the understanding and treatment of gastroparesis (Gp).

RECENT FINDINGS

Major current advancements in the pathophysiology of Gp, include recognition of the SIP syncytium as the pacemaking unit rather than ICC alone and that Gp may be part of a pan-enteric autoimmune and/or autonomic disorder with macrophage imbalance. The development of newer techniques to assess gastric emptying (gastric emptying breath test and wireless motility capsule) and pyloric distensibility (EndoFLIP®) are allowing clinicians better characterization of their patients. In addition to pharmaceutical compounds in the pipeline, neuromodulation and endosurgical techniques, such as G-POEM, may help address refractory Gp. We expect that the 2020 decade will witness exciting developments. Treatments targeting gastrointestinal motility, immunological dysfunction, and inflammatory mediators will be evaluated. We anticipate future studies will be guided by biomarkers correlated with patient outcomes and therapeutic efficacy to establish new paradigms in the management of Gp.

Patient factors influence surgical options in gastroparesis

BACKGROUND

Patient selection for the diverse surgical procedures for gastroparesis remains poorly defined. Our aim was to evaluate how patient factors have determined our surgical approach to gastroparesis.

METHODS

95 patients undergoing 105 surgical procedures for gastroparesis were reviewed. Patient factors were compared across six surgical procedures: gastric neurostimulator, pyloroplasty, neurostimulator plus pyloroplasty, sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass and gastrectomy. Global symptom severity was determined preoperatively and at last follow up.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in etiology, BMI and gastroesophageal reflux across the various operations. Patients undergoing pyloroplasty and gastrectomy; were more likely to have a postsurgical etiology. (p < .05) Patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass were more likely to have BMI >35. ^{(p <.05)} Those undergoing sleeve gastrectomy were less likely to have gastroesophageal reflux preoperatively. ^{(p <.05)} There was no difference in preoperative clinical stage across the procedures.

CONCLUSION

Patient factors influence choice of procedure in the surgical treatment of gastroparesis. Etiology of gastroparesis, BMI >35 and gastroesophageal reflux are important determinants.

Clinical efficacy of gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) in the treatment of refractory gastroparesis and predictors of outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis using surgical pyloroplasty as a comparator group

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) is a novel minimally invasive technique in endosurgery. Data is limited as to its efficacy, safety, and predictive factors. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical outcomes of G-POEM and used the outcomes of surgical pyloroplasty as a comparator group in the treatment of refractory gastroparesis.

METHODS

We searched multiple databases from inception through March 2019 to identify studies that reported on G-POEM and pyloroplasty in gastroparesis. Our primary outcome was to analyze and compare the pooled rates of clinical success, in terms of Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) score and 4-h gastric emptying study (GES) results, with G-POEM and pyloroplasty.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty-two and 375 patients underwent G-POEM (11 studies) and surgical pyloroplasty (seven studies), respectively. The pooled rate of clinical success, based on the GCSI score, with G-POEM was 75.8% (95% CI 68.1-82.1, I² = 50) and with surgical pyloroplasty was 77.3% (95% CI 66.4-85.4, I² = 0), with no significance, p = 0.81. The pooled rate of clinical success, based on the 4-hour GES results, with G-POEM was 85.1% (95% CI 68.9-93.7, I² = 74) and with surgical pyloroplasty was 84% (95% CI 64.4-93.8, I² = 81), with no significance, p = 0.91. The overall adverse events were comparable. Based on meta-regression analysis, idiopathic gastroparesis, prior treatment with botulinum toxin and gastric stimulator seemed to predict clinical success with G-POEM.

CONCLUSION

G-POEM demonstrates clinical success in treating refractory gastroparesis. Idiopathic gastroparesis, prior treatment with botulinum injections and gastric stimulator appear to have positive predictive effects on the 4-h GES results after G-POEM. Outcomes seem comparable to surgical pyloroplasty.

Diabetic Gastroparesis

This review covers the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and management of diabetic gastroparesis, and more broadly diabetic gastroenteropathy, which encompasses all the gastrointestinal manifestations of diabetes mellitus. Up to 50% of patients with type 1 and type 2 DM and suboptimal glycemic control have delayed gastric emptying (GE), which can be documented with scintigraphy, 13C breath tests, or a wireless motility capsule; the remainder have normal or rapid GE. Many patients with delayed GE are asymptomatic; others have dyspepsia (i.e., mild to moderate indigestion, with or without a mild delay in GE) or gastroparesis, which is a syndrome characterized by moderate to severe upper gastrointestinal symptoms and delayed GE that suggest, but are not accompanied by, gastric outlet obstruction. Gastroparesis can markedly impair quality of life, and up to 50% of patients have significant anxiety and/or depression. Often the distinction between dyspepsia and gastroparesis is based on clinical judgement rather than established criteria. Hyperglycemia, autonomic neuropathy, and enteric neuromuscular inflammation and injury are implicated in the pathogenesis of delayed GE. Alternatively, there are limited data to suggest that delayed GE may affect glycemic control. The management of diabetic gastroparesis is guided by the severity of symptoms, the magnitude of delayed GE, and the nutritional status. Initial options include dietary modifications, supplemental oral nutrition, and antiemetic and prokinetic medications. Patients with more severe symptoms may require a venting gastrostomy or jejunostomy and/or gastric electrical stimulation. Promising newer therapeutic approaches include ghrelin receptor agonists and selective 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor agonists.

Per-oral Pyloromyotomy (POP) for Medically Refractory Gastroparesis: Short Term Results From the First 100 Patients at a High Volume Center

OBJECTIVE

For patients with gastroparesis, temporary pyloric disruption has been shown to improve symptoms and gastric emptying. Per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) is an innovative endoscopic procedure to divide the pylorus from within a submucosal tunnel, as a corollary to surgical pyloromyotomy. Here we evaluate subjective and objective outcomes 12-weeks after POP at a high volume center.

METHODS

The first 100 consecutive patients undergoing POP were included, with procedure dates between January 2016 and October 2017. Patients were evaluated using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), and 4-hour solid-phase scintigraphic gastric emptying studies (GES) prior to procedure and at 90 days post-POP RESULTS:: The study cohort was 85% female with a mean age of 45.0 ± 14.6 years. Gastroparesis etiologies were divided among idiopathic (56%), diabetic (21%), postsurgical (19%), and other in 4%. There were 67% of the patients who had previous endoscopic or surgical interventions for gastroparesis. Most POP procedures were performed in the operating room (97%) and were completed in an average of 33 minutes. Ten patients incurred complications (10%), which included 1 diagnostic laparoscopy and 2 cases of gastrointestinal bleeding. Overall GCSI improved from a preoperative mean of 3.82 ± 0.86 to 2.54 ± 1.2 (P < 0.001). The improvement in each GCSI subscore was also highly statistically significant. Among the patients with postoperative GES available, 78% had objectively better 4-hour emptying with a mean improvement in retention by 23.6% (P < 0.001). This included 57% of patients with normal gastric emptying post-POP.

CONCLUSION

For patients with medically refractory gastroparesis, POP results in both subjective and objective improvement in the majority of patients. Prior intervention does not obviate POP as a therapeutic option. POP should be included along the treatment algorithm for patients with gastroparesis as an organ-sparing procedure.

Gastrectomy versus stomach left in situ with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for the treatment of gastroparesis

BACKGROUND

Gastroparesis is a debilitating functional disorder of the stomach marked by delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Patients with severe, refractory symptoms may ultimately be managed with Roux-en-Y reconstruction; however, it is unclear whether the stomach should be left in situ, similar to a conventional gastric bypass, or resected as in gastrectomy.

METHODS

All patients undergoing Roux-en-Y for the treatment of gastroparesis (GP) at our institution from September 2010 through March 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with prior gastric resection or whose primary operative indication was not gastroparesis were excluded from analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients underwent Roux-en-Y with stomach left in situ (RY-SIS) and twenty-seven patients underwent gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction during the study period. The mean age was 49.7 years in the RY-SIS cohort and 48.5 years in the gastrectomy cohort. Etiology of GP was similar between the two cohorts. Patients undergoing gastrectomy were more likely to have previous interventions for GP (63.0% vs. 26.9%). RY-SIS was associated with a shorter operative time (155 vs. 223 min), less blood loss (24 vs. 130 mL), and shorter length of stay (4.0 vs. 7.2 days). Twelve patients (44.4%) had complications within 30 days following gastrectomy compared to two patients (7.7%) following RY-SIS (p = 0.001). Patients in the RY-SIS cohort were more likely to require further subsequent surgical intervention for GP (23.1% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.04). At last follow-up, there were no differences in reported GP symptoms or symptom scoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastrectomy was associated with greater perioperative morbidity compared to leaving the stomach in situ. Symptomatic improvement at intermediate follow-up was equivalent following either procedure. However, patients undergoing RY-SIS were more likely to require subsequent surgical intervention, suggesting that gastrectomy may be a more definitive operation for the management of medically refractory gastroparesis.

Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP) for Medically Refractory Post-Surgical Gastroparesis

BACKGROUND

Post-surgical gastroparesis (psGP) is putatively related to vagal denervation from either therapeutic transection or inadvertent injury. Here, we present a series of patients undergoing endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) as a treatment for medically refractory psGP.

METHODS

Patients identified from a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing POP procedures at our institution from January 2016 to January 2018 were included. Surgical history, symptom scores, and gastric emptying studies before and 3 months after POP were additionally recorded.

RESULTS

During the study period, 177 POP procedures were performed, of which 38 (21.5%) were for psGP. The study cohort was 84.2% female with a mean body mass index of 27.6 kg/m² and mean age of 55.2 years. Common comorbidities included hypertension (34.2%), depression (31.6%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (28.9%). Hiatal/paraesophageal hernia repair (39.5%) or fundoplication (36.8%) preceded psGP diagnosis most often. The mean operative time was 30 ± 20 min. There were no intraoperative complications. Mean postoperative length of stay was 1.2 days. There were two readmissions within 30 days, one for melena and one for dehydration. The mean improvement in total Gastroparesis Symptom Index Score was 1.29 (p = 0.0002). The mean 4-h gastric retention improved from a pre-POP mean of 46.4 to 17.9% post-POP. Normal gastric emptying was noted in 50% of subjects with available follow-up imaging.

CONCLUSION

POP is a safe and effective endoscopic therapy for patients with psGP. POP should be considered a reasonable first-line option for patients with medically refractory psGP and may allow stomach preservation.

Therapeutic effect of a temporary transpyloric stent in refractory post-surgical gastroparesis: a case report

BACKGROUND

Gastroparesis is a syndrome characterized by delayed gastric emptying with associated symptoms. It was reported that the symptoms of diabetic gastroparesis had been greatly improved by transpyloric stent placement. However, the use of stents in benign conditions is considered to be contraindicated because of the increasing risk of complications, such as stent migration, reflux, perforation, bleeding, and, most importantly, new strictures caused by stent-induced tissue hyperplasia. While temporary placement of a self-expanding metallic stent (SEMC) can drastically reduce the risk of complications, few reports are available on the treatment of refractory PSG by temporary transpyloric stent. Does it have a long-term clinical effect after the stent being retrieved?

CASE PRESENTATION

After accepting partial resection of the lesser curvature in another hospital, a patient developed refractory gastroparesis. The symptoms hadn't been improved after long-term drug therapy and balloon dilation therapy. Four months after surgery, a fully covered SEMC was placed by endoscopy in our hospital. Gastroparesis had been greatly improved. Two weeks later, the transpyloric stent was retrieved and the patient didn't show recurrent symptoms. Follow-ups were arranged at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year respectively, and there was no evidence of recurrence was found.

CONCLUSIONS

This case indicates that temporary transpyloric SEMC is a safe, effective and less invasive alternative for post-surgical gastroparesis patients.

Helping Patients with Gastroparesis

Gastroparesis is an increasing concern and options remain limited. Diagnosis hinges on recognition of delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Nontransit studies evaluating gastric motility serve a complementary role and may help guide therapy. Treatment consists of a combination of lifestyle and dietary medication, medications (antiemetics, prokinetics, neuromodulators, and accommodation-enhancers), alternative and complementary therapy, endoscopic therapy (pyloric-directed therapy, temporary stimulation, jejunostomy, or venting gastrostomy) and surgical therapy (pyloroplasty, gastric electrical stimulation, gastrectomy). Treatment can be tailored to the individual needs and symptoms of the affected patient.

Surgical Management for Gastroparesis

Gastroparesis is a debilitating chronic condition of indeterminate cause. Although conservative management is the mainstay of treatment, a significant percentage of patients will need interventions. Interventions range from supportive measures, such as feeding tubes, to more radical surgeries, including endoscopic pyloromyotomy (per oral pyloromyotomy), laparoscopic pyloroplasty, laparoscopic gastric stimulator placement, and even subtotal or total gastrectomy. The authors present some current treatment algorithms focused on the treatment side of the spectrum along with outcomes data to support the various approaches.

Gastroparesis

Gastroparesis is a disorder characterized by delayed gastric emptying of solid food in the absence of a mechanical obstruction of the stomach, resulting in the cardinal symptoms of early satiety, postprandial fullness, nausea, vomiting, belching and bloating. Gastroparesis is now recognized as part of a broader spectrum of gastric neuromuscular dysfunction that includes impaired gastric accommodation. The overlap between upper gastrointestinal symptoms makes the distinction between gastroparesis and other disorders, such as functional dyspepsia, challenging. Thus, a confirmed diagnosis of gastroparesis requires measurement of delayed gastric emptying via an appropriate test, such as gastric scintigraphy or breath testing. Gastroparesis can have idiopathic, diabetic, iatrogenic, post-surgical or post-viral aetiologies. The management of gastroparesis involves: correcting fluid, electrolyte and nutritional deficiencies; identifying and treating the cause of delayed gastric emptying (for example, diabetes mellitus); and suppressing or eliminating symptoms with pharmacological agents as first-line therapies. Several novel pharmacologic agents and interventions are currently in the pipeline and show promise to help tailor individualized therapy for patients with gastroparesis.

The Investigation and Treatment of Diabetic Gastroparesis

PURPOSE

This review provides an update on the investigations and treatment options for gastroparesis.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of Medline, PubMed, Embase and OVID was conducted which included all systematic reviews and research articles that focused on the diagnosis, investigations and management diabetic gastroparesis.

FINDINGS

Dietary modifications and pharmacologic treatment with prokinetics to increase gastric motility form the mainstay of treatment. However, the use of prokinetics is limited by adverse effects and serious adverse effects, leaving metoclopramide as the only drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of gastroparesis. Newer therapies, including motilin receptor agonists, ghrelin receptor agonists, and neurokinin receptor antagonists, are currently being investigated. Transpyloric stenting, gastric electrical stimulation, and gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy provide mechanical options for intervention, and surgical interventions in severe intractable gastroparesis include laparoscopic pyloroplasty or gastrectomy.

IMPLICATIONS

Advances to better understand the pathophysiology and management of diabetic gastroparesis have been limited, especially with discordance between symptoms and severity of delay in gastric emptying. Established treatment options are limited; however, recent pharmacologic and surgical interventions show promise.

Endoscopic Therapies for Gastroparesis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastroparesis remains a difficult-to-treat disease with limited therapeutic options. Though patients often have a common syndrome of stereotypic symptoms, the underlying pathophysiology is heterogeneous, often leading to variable treatment responses. Due to limitations in medical and surgical therapies, endoscopic options have been increasingly explored. These options can be broadly categorized into pyloric-directed therapy, non-pyloric-directed therapy, and nutritional support. In this review, we will highlight current and emerging endoscopic options, such as gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM).

RECENT FINDINGS

Early retrospective studies on G-POEM offer encouraging results up to one year out, with an acceptable safety profile. Other pyloric-directed therapies, such as pyloric dilation and stenting, have also been explored. While emerging endoscopic therapeutic options are encouraging, efficacy will likely depend on a better characterization of underlying pathophysiology and improved patient selection. Future prospective, controlled studies are needed.

Diabetes and the Stomach

OPINION STATEMENT

Longstanding diabetes mellitus (both type 1 and type 2) can impair gastric motor function and cause significant upper gastrointestinal symptoms which significantly degrade quality of life, cause nutritional deficits, and degrade healthcare resource use. The most commonly considered gut complication of diabetes, diabetic gastroparesis, is a syndrome of delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction which leads to symptoms of nausea, vomiting, postprandial fullness, early satiation, bloating, and upper abdominal pain. Gastroparesis also can lead to loss of glycemic control. A diagnosis of gastroparesis is made by documenting delayed gastric emptying and excluding mechanical obstruction. Gastric emptying scintigraphy is the most commonly utilized test for the diagnosis of gastroparesis but novel tests of gastric function have recently been introduced including the gastric emptying breath test and wireless motility capsule. Management most often is aimed at controlling symptoms, which includes dietary modification, optimization of glycemic control, and medication therapy with prokinetics, antiemetics, and neuromodulatory agents. Endoscopic and/or surgical therapies may be considered for refractory cases of gastroparesis. Recent research has provided new insights into the pathophysiology of this disease and is characterizing potential benefits of novel therapeutic agents which show promise in the treatment of this condition. This article will review the pathophysiology, new insights into disease mechanism, and treatment options for diabetic gastroparesis.

Effectiveness and feasibility of robotic gastric neurostimulator placement in patients with refractory gastroparesis

Gastric neurostimulation (GNS) with Enterra^® therapy device (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) appears as the last resort for patients with refractory gastroparesis. Currently, the device has Humanitarian Use status by Food and Drug Administration, thereby requiring further investigation. We aim to describe its feasibility and clinical outcomes using robotic technique. From June 2014 to September 2016, 15 consecutive patients underwent robotic insertion of Enterra^® device. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes including mortality, length of stay, readmission rates, reoperation and complications were retrospectively collected. Patients were also assessed based on a validated 14-point questionnaire regarding satisfaction with the operation, quality of life and symptomatic relief. Mean age was 41.6 years ± 13.8 and there were 11 females (73.3%). No mortality was reported. The annual hospital admissions were reduced after GNS (2.5 ± 4.1 vs. 3.6 ± 4.4, p = 0.004). The frequency of bloating (p = 0.029) and severity of emesis (p = 0.038), early satiety (p = 0.042) and bloating (p = 0.031) were reduced after GNS. The severity and frequency total scores were also improved after GNS (12.6 ± 1.4 vs. 18.1 ± 2.7, p = 0.008 and 12.9 ± 2.2 vs. 16.1 ± 1.1, p = 0.016, respectively). This is the first report describing the clinical experience with robotic insertion of GNS device. This approach is safe and feasible and seems to have similar long-term outcomes as laparoscopic technique. Potential advantages to robotic technique include enhanced dexterity and suturing of the device within gastric wall. Further experience with large prospective studies and randomized clinical trials may be warranted.

Pyloric Therapies for Gastroparesis

OPINION STATEMENT

Gastroparesis is a syndrome that can be difficult to treat effectively and likely represents the common clinical presentation of multiple underlying mechanisms. One of these presumed mechanisms involves pyloric dysfunction, tied perhaps to spasm or fibrosis, manifesting as functional gastric outlet obstruction. Various diagnostic modalities have been used to better characterize this hypothesized abnormality, including most recently antroduodenal manometry and impedance planimetry. A variety of therapeutic interventions specific to the pylorus have also been proposed in the last several years, including intrapyloric injections of botulinum toxin, transpyloric stenting, surgical pyloroplasty, and endoscopic pyloromyotomy. The clinical application of these maneuvers has been mostly empiric thus far, but efforts are ongoing to identify the subset of patients whose physiology best positions them to benefit from such therapy. Early results for many of these interventions have been promising and will serve as the basis for larger and more systematic research frameworks moving forward.

Novel Diet, Drugs, and Gastric Interventions for Gastroparesis

This review of the pathophysiologic basis for gastroparesis and recent advances in the treatment of patients with gastroparesis shows that there are several novel approaches to advance treatment of gastroparesis including diet, novel prokinetics, interventions on the pylorus, and novel forms of gastric electrical stimulation. The field of gastroparesis is likely to advance with further studies, with help from a guidance document from the Food and Drug Administration on gastroparesis, and with recent approval of the stable isotope gastric emptying test to ensure eligibility of participants in multicenter trials. Clinical experience and a formal, randomized, controlled trial provide insights on optimizing dietary interventions in patients with gastroparesis. This review addresses the biologic rationale of these different treatments, based on known physiology and pathophysiology of gastric emptying. The novel medications include the motilin agonist, camicinal; 5-HT4 receptor agonists, such as velusetrag; and the ghrelin agonist, relamorelin. New approaches target pylorospasm by stent placement, endoscopic pyloric myotomy, or laparoscopic pyloroplasty. These approaches offer the opportunity to achieve more permanent reduction of resistance to flow at the pylorus over the intrapyloric injection of botulinum toxin, which typically has to be repeated every few months if it is efficacious. A novel device, deployed in porcine stomach, involved per-endoscopic electrical stimulation. These promising approaches require formal, randomized, controlled trials and deployment in patients. The presence of concomitant antral hypomotility may be a significant factor in the responsiveness to interventions at the pylorus.

Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP): An Emerging Application of Submucosal Tunneling for the Treatment of Refractory Gastroparesis

A growing body of literature supports the use of laparoscopic pyloroplasty as a minimally invasive treatment of refractory gastroparesis that has failed conservative measures and for benign gastric outlet obstruction. Endoscopic pyloric dilation, stent placement, and Botox have been described for similar indications, but often with transient or mixed results. Per-oral pyloromyotomy has recently been proposed as an endoscopic alternative to surgical pyloroplasty or pylormyotomy because it is less invasive by its nature and potentially more durable than current endoscopic treatments.

Gastroparesis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes recent progress in the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of gastroparesis.

RECENT FINDINGS

The relationship between delayed gastric emptying and symptom pattern in gastroparesis and, related to it, its separation from functional dyspepsia remains an area of controversy and uncertainty. Pathophysiological studies have focused on the role of pyloric resistance and duodenal motility in generation of symptoms. In diabetic patients, glycemic control did not determine short-term changes in gastric emptying rate in type 2 diabetes, but poor glycemic control was a major risk factor for long-term development of gastroparesis in type 1 diabetes. At the cellular level, diabetic gastroparesis is characterized by loss of interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs), and this is inversely correlated to the number of CD206+ macrophages, which are thought to have a protective effect on ICCs. Treatment trials have focused on dietary factors and a nasal spray formulation of metoclopramide. A meta-analysis of prokinetic studies found no association between symptom improvement and enhancement of gastric emptying in gastroparesis. Two controlled studies showed no benefit of tricyclic antidepressants (nortriptyline, amitriptyline) in idiopathic gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia with delayed emptying.

SUMMARY

The relationship between delay in gastric emptying, symptom pattern, and response to prokinetic therapy in gastroparesis is poor. In diabetes, gastroparesis is characterized by loss of ICCs, and this is inversely correlated to the number of CD206+ macrophages. Dietary interventions may help to alleviate symptoms. Tricyclic antidepressants do not provide symptomatic benefit to patients with idiopathic gastroparesis.