Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Serum Endocan Levels in Patients With COVID-19

COVID-19 and Long COVID: Disruption of the Neurovascular Unit, Blood-Brain Barrier, and Tight Junctions

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), could affect brain structure and function. SARS-CoV-2 can enter the brain through different routes, including the olfactory, trigeminal, and vagus nerves, and through blood and immunocytes. SARS-CoV-2 may also enter the brain from the peripheral blood through a disrupted blood-brain barrier (BBB). The neurovascular unit in the brain, composed of neurons, astrocytes, endothelial cells, and pericytes, protects brain parenchyma by regulating the entry of substances from the blood. The endothelial cells, pericytes, and astrocytes highly express angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), indicating that the BBB can be disturbed by SARS-CoV-2 and lead to derangements of tight junction and adherens junction proteins. This leads to increased BBB permeability, leakage of blood components, and movement of immune cells into the brain parenchyma. SARS-CoV-2 may also cross microvascular endothelial cells through an ACE2 receptor-associated pathway. The exact mechanism of BBB dysregulation in COVID-19/neuro-COVID is not clearly known, nor is the development of long COVID. Various blood biomarkers could indicate disease severity and neurologic complications in COVID-19 and help objectively diagnose those developing long COVID. This review highlights the importance of neurovascular and BBB disruption, as well as some potentially useful biomarkers in COVID-19, and long COVID/neuro-COVID.

Endothelial dysfunction and disease severity in COVID-19: Insights from circulating Tang cell counts as a potential biomarker

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endothelial dysfunction is a common risk factor of severe COVID-19. Angiogenic T cells (Tang cells) play a critical role in repairing endothelial injury; however, their changes and potential roles in COVID-19 remain unclear. We aimed to assess Tang cell counts in patients with COVID-19 and evaluate their association with disease severity and prognosis.

METHODS

Circulating Tang cell populations in patients with COVID-19 and healthy controls were quantified using flow cytometry. Demographic and routine laboratory data were recorded.

RESULTS

The Tang cell count decreased significantly with increasing disease severity and were lowest in fatal cases. Additionally, the Tang cell count was significantly decreased in patients with comorbid cardiovascular disease or hypertension. Tang cell counts were negatively correlated with inflammatory markers, kidney and myocardial injury markers, coagulation dysfunction indicators, and viral load and positively correlated with oxidative stress markers, nutritional markers, and lymphocytes. Receiver operating characteristic curves confirmed that Tang cell count could serve as a potential biomarker for predicting disease severity and patient mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating Tang cell count is significantly reduced in patients with COVID-19 and is correlated with disease severity and prognosis. The Tang cell count is an important potential biomarker for COVID-19 clinical management. Additionally, these findings provide insight into the pathological features of COVID-19 endothelial injury and provide new directions for treatment.

Investigation of Serum Endocan Levels in SARS-CoV-2 Patients

Endocan is an endothelial-cell-specific proteoglycan (ESM-1) and has emerged as an endothelial dysfunction and inflammatory marker in recent years. Endocan can be used as a marker of inflammatory endothelial dysfunction in endothelium-dependent disease: cardiovascular disease, sepsis, lung and kidney disease and malignancies. Recent data suggest that endothelial dysfunction is a key mechanism in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Endotheliitis and thrombo-inflammation are associated with severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and endocan is currently under investigation as a potential diagnostic and prognostic marker. The aim of this study was to determine serum endocan levels in patients with COVID-19 to evaluate the correlation between endocan levels and clinical disease diagnosis and prognosis. This study enrolled 56 patients, divided into three groups depending on disease severity: mild (15), moderate (25) and severe (16). The biochemical, demographic, clinical and imagistic data were collected and evaluated in correlation with the endocan levels. Serum endocan levels were significantly higher in the COVID-19 patients compared to the control group; also, endocan concentration correlated with vaccination status. The results revealed significantly elevated serum endocan levels in COVID-19 patients compared to the control group, with a correlation observed between endocan concentration and vaccination status. These findings suggest that endocan may serve as a novel biomarker for detecting inflammation and endothelial dysfunction risk in COVID-19 patients. There was no significant relationship between serum endocan levels and disease severity or the presence of cardiovascular diseases. Endocan can be considered a novel biomarker for the detection of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction risk in COVID-19 patients.

Systematic Review of Endocan as a Potential Biomarker of COVID-19

Since the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, several biomarkers have been proposed to assess the diagnosis and prognosis of this disease. The present systematic review evaluated endocan (a marker of endothelial cell damage) as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for COVID-19. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for studies comparing circulating endocan levels between COVID-19 cases and controls, and/or different severities/complications of COVID-19. Eight studies (686 individuals) were included, from which four reported significantly higher levels of endocan in COVID-19 cases compared with healthy controls. More severe disease was also associated with higher endocan levels in some of the studies. Studies reported higher endocan levels in patients who died from COVID-19, were admitted to an intensive care unit, and had COVID-19-related complications. Endocan also acted as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker with different cut-offs. In conclusion, endocan could be a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for COVID-19. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to evaluate this role of endocan.

Changes in plasma endocan level are related to circulatory but not respiratory failure in critically ill patients with COVID-19

The aim of this prospective, observational study was to assess whether changes in the level of endocan, a marker of endothelial damage, may be an indicator of clinical deterioration and mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Endocan and clinical parameters were evaluated in 40 patients with acute respiratory failure on days 1-5 after admission to the intensive care unit. Endocan levels were not related to the degree of respiratory failure, but to the presence of cardiovascular failure. In patients with cardiovascular failure, the level of endocan increased over the first 5 days (1.63, 2.50, 2.68, 2.77, 3.31 ng/mL, p = 0.016), while in patients without failure it decreased (1.51, 1.50, 1.56, 1.42, 1.13 ng/mL, p = 0.046). In addition, mortality was more than twice as high in patients with acute cardiovascular failure compared to those without failure (68% vs. 32%, p = 0.035). Baseline endocan levels were lower in viral than in bacterial infections (1.57 ng/mL vs. 5.25 ng/mL, p < 0.001), with a good discrimination between infections of different etiologies (AUC of 0.914, p < 0.001). In conclusion, endocan levels are associated with the occurrence of cardiovascular failure in COVID-19 and depend on the etiology of the infection, with higher values for bacterial than for viral sepsis.

MR-proADM as Prognostic Factor of Outcome in COVID-19 Patients

BACKGROUND

Serum mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) has emerged as a marker of organ failure (mainly lungs and kidneys) and poor prognosis in patients admitted to intensive care (IC); some reports also suggest it and other markers, such as Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), as a prognostic biomarker of COVID-19. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance MR-proADM in hospitalized COVID-19 patients for predicting in-hospital mortality and need for non-invasive or invasive respiratory support.

METHODS

We enrolled 74 patients hospitalized in the COVID Unit of Siena Hospital from March to May 2020, for whom serum samples were available on admission for assay of MR-proADM, KL-6 and IL-6. Demographic data, comorbidities, medical history and clinical laboratory data on days 1-3 of admission and Simplified Acute Physiology Score and Simplified Organ Failure Assessment scores calculated at day 1 were collected retrospectively, as well as mortality and IC admission data.

RESULTS

12 patients died in hospital (16%) and 14 patients were admitted to IC (19%). Serum concentrations of MR-proADM on admission and on day 1 were higher among non-survivors than among survivors (p = 0.015 and p = 0.045, respectively), while those on day 3 were not significantly different. Patients needing respiratory support had higher MR-proADM concentrations on admission than the others (p = 0.046), and those requiring invasive mechanical ventilation had higher MR-proADM on day 1 (p = 0.017). Serum concentrations of KL-6 and IL-6 were significantly higher in non-survivors (p = 0.03 and p = 0.004, respectively). ROC curve analysis showed that serum MR-proADM on day 1 had the best accuracy in predicting death and/or IC admission (AUC = 0.9583, p = 0.0006); the combination of all three biomarkers further improved the accuracy of prediction of death or IC admission (AUC = 0.9793; p = 0.00004).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data sustain the potential of serum MR-proADM as a reliable prognostic biomarker of hospitalized COVID-19 patients and confirms the utility of the three markers in the management and risk stratification of hospitalized patients. The markers are collected mini-invasively and are quick to analyze and cost-effective.

Role of Serum Endocan Levels in Children with Bacterial and Viral Pneumonia: A Prospective, Case-Control Study

Introduction and Objective: Endocan has been used as a biomarker in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary diseases in adults. However, there are only a limited number of studies on its use in children. In this context, the objective of this study is to evaluate the relationship between serum endocan levels in children with bacterial and viral pneumonia. Materials and Methods: The population of this prospective case-control study consisted of hospitalized children aged 1 month to 15 years diagnosed with pneumonia between August 2020 and July 2021, whereas the control group consisted of randomly selected healthy children. The demographic and clinical characteristics of all participants were recorded. Participants' endocan levels, white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil counts, and C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) levels were measured within the scope of the laboratory tests. Results: The study sample consisted of 41 children, of whom 21 had bacterial pneumonia and 20 had viral pneumonia, whereas the control group consisted of 47 healthy children. Serum endocan levels, WBC and neutrophil counts, and PCT and CRP levels were significantly higher in children with bacterial pneumonia than in children with viral pneumonia and healthy children (P < 0.05). Additionally, serum endocan levels were significantly higher in children with viral pneumonia than in healthy children (P < 0.001). The endocan levels in children with bacterial pneumonia were significantly associated with the need for intensive care (P = 0.004) and correlated with the length of hospital stay (LoS) (r = 0.592, P = 0.005). Conclusion: The findings of this study indicated that serum endocan levels can be used in the differential diagnosis of bacterial and viral pneumonias. Additionally, it was found that the need for intensive care and LoS were significantly correlated with endocan levels in children with bacterial pneumonia.

Plasma Endocan as a Biomarker of Thrombotic Events in COVID-19 Patients

(1) Background: Endocan is a marker of endothelial dysfunction that may be associated with thrombotic events. The aim of the study was to investigate the performance of endocan as a marker of thrombotic events in COVID-19 patients. (2) Methods: We measured endocan in plasma from 79 documented COVID-19 patients classified according to disease severity (from mild to critical). Thrombotic events were recorded. (3) Results: Endocan concentrations at admission were significantly increased according to COVID-19 severity. Levels of endocan were significantly increased in patients experiencing thrombotic events in comparison with those without (16.2 (5.5−26.7) vs. 1.81 (0.71−10.5) ng/mL, p < 0.001). However, endocan concentrations were not different between pulmonary embolism and other thrombotic events. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis for the identification of thrombotic events showed an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.776 with an optimal threshold at 2.83 ng/mL (93.8% sensitivity and 54.7% specificity). When combining an endocan measurement with D-dimers, the AUC increased to 0.853. When considering both biomarkers, the Kaplan−Meier survival curves showed that the combination of endocan and D-dimers better discriminated patients with thrombotic events than those without. The combination of D-dimers and endocan was independently associated with thrombotic events. (4) Conclusions: Endocan might be a useful and informative biomarker to better identify thrombotic events in COVID-19 patients.

COVID-19 and Inflammatory Markers

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) causes mild illness to serious infection with lung involvement, thrombosis, and other complications potentially resulting in fatal outcomes. Recognised inflammatory biomarkers play important roles in managing patients with COVID-19; for example, diagnosis, follow-up, assessment of treatment response, and risk stratification. Inflammatory markers in COVID-19 disease were analysed in two categories. Well-known inflammatory markers include complete blood count, C-reactive protein, albumin, cytokines, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Asymmetric dimethylarginine, endocan, pentraxin 3, serum amyloid A, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, total oxidant status and total antioxidant status, and galectin-3 are considered among the emerging inflammatory markers. This brief narrative review assesses the relationship between these inflammatory markers and COVID-19 infection.

Can Serum Endocan Levels be Used as an Early Prognostic Marker for Endothelial Dysfunction in COVID-19?

In this study, we aimed to investigate whether degree of pneumonia and COVID-19 prognosis are associated with serum endocan levels at the early stage, when vascular damage has started. Patients between the ages of 18-85 years who were hospitalized and followed up with a diagnosis of COVID-19 were included in the study. A total of 80 patients were divided into 2 groups as mild/moderate pneumonia and severe pneumonia. Serum endocan levels were measured on the 8th day from the onset of symptoms in all patients. Of the 80 patients included in the study, 56.3% were female and 43.8% were male. There was no significant relationship between serum endocan levels and degree of pneumonia (P = .220) and prognosis of the disease (P = .761). The correlation analysis indicated a weak positive correlation between serum endocan levels and lactate level in venous blood gas (r = .270; P = .037). During the 28-day follow-up, the mortality rate was 3.75%. It was determined that the serum endocan levels was not associated with the degree of pneumonia and was not an early prognostic marker for COVID-19.

Derivation and Validation of a Predictive Score for Respiratory Failure Worsening Leading to Secondary Intubation in COVID-19: The CERES Score

Predictive scores assessing the risk of respiratory failure in COVID-19 mostly focused on the prediction of early intubation. A combined assessment of clinical parameters and biomarkers of endotheliopathy could allow to predict late worsening of acute respiratory failure (ARF), subsequently warranting intubation in COVID-19. Retrospective single-center derivation (n = 92 subjects) and validation cohorts (n = 59 subjects), including severe COVID-19 patients with non-invasive respiratory support, were assessed for at least 48 h following intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We used stepwise regression to construct the COVID endothelial and respiratory failure (CERES) score in a derivation cohort, and secondly assessed its accuracy for the prediction of late ARF worsening, requiring intubation within 15 days following ICU admission in an independent validation cohort. Platelet count, fraction of inspired oxygen, and endocan measured on ICU admission were identified as the top three predictive variables for late ARF worsening and subsequently included in the CERES score. The area under the ROC curve of the CERES score to predict late ARF worsening was calculated in the derivation and validation cohorts at 0.834 and 0.780, respectively. The CERES score is a simple tool with good performances to predict respiratory failure worsening, leading to secondary intubation, in COVID-19 patients.