Apolipoprotein E phenotyping: a word of caution

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and its renal complications in relation to apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism

The apolipoprotein E (APOE) epsilon2 allele is reported to be associated with greater risk of renal impairment in type 2 diabetes. Relationships among APOE polymorphisms, renal impairment, and biochemical parameters were explored. A prospective study of 405 consenting Chinese type 2 diabetic patients [mean age +/- standard deviation (SD): 59.2 +/- 10.3 years] without advanced complications at entry was conducted. APOE genotyping and measurement of plasma biomarkers of oxidative stress and antioxidants were performed at entry. HbA1C, plasma glucose, lipids, creatinine, urine albumin/creatinine, and blood pressure were measured at entry and at up to 4 years of follow-up. APOE allelic frequencies were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Odds ratios of albuminuria at entry and/or during follow-up for different APOE groups were not significantly different. The non-epsilon2 (epsilon3/3, epsilon3/4, epsilon4/4) group had significantly greater plasma ascorbate (51.6 +/- 20.1 mumol/L) than the epsilon2 (epsilon2/2, epsilon2/3) group (44.5 +/- 16.2 mumol/L, P = 0.021), but higher plasma ascorbate levels did not seem to decrease the risk of renal impairment in the non-epsilon2 group. Baseline plasma lipid-standardized alpha-tocopherol levels were least in epsilon2 subjects with persistent albuminuria (3.6 +/- 1.1 mumol/mmol of total cholesterol plus triglycerides, P = 0.008) compared with epsilon2 subjects who had no albuminuria at entry or during follow-up (4.5 +/- 0.8 mumol/mmol of total cholesterol plus triglycerides). The APOE epsilon2 allele does not seem to be associated with increased risk of renal impairment in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients. Plasma lipid-standardized alpha-tocopherol may play a role in determining risk of renal dysfunction in type 2 diabetes.

Apolipoprotein E polymorphism in normal Han Chinese population: frequency and effect on lipid parameters

Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotypes were studied in order to determine the prevalence and effect on lipid parameters in normal Han Chinese population. Fragments of ApoE gene forth exon containing codon 112 and 158 polymorphic locus were amplified by PCR, and then digested with Cfo I endonuclease. Genotypes and alleles frequencies of 168 healthy Han Chinese were calculated. The frequency of genotypes epsilon3/3, epsilon3/4, and epsilon2/3 was found to be 75.00, 10.70, and 11.90%, respectively, and 0.60, 1.20, and 0.60% for epsilon2/2, epsilon2/4, and epsilon4/4. The effects of ApoE genotypes and alleles on lipid parameters were analyzed. The effects of ApoE alleles on TC, LDL-C, ApoB was: along a decreasing gradient epsilon4 > epsilon3 > epsilon2. The effect of epsilon4 allele was to increase serum levels of TC, LDL-C and ApoB, and epsilon2 allele had an effect opposite to that of epsilon4 allele. Results obtained in this study indicate that ApoE polymorphism is an independent genetic factor on individual serum levels of lipids and apolipoproteins.

Simple and effective determination of apolipoprotein E genotypes by positive/negative polymerase chain reaction products

Several protein and DNA-based methods have been previously described for the identification of apolipoprotein E isoforms or genotypes. However, all of them generate frequently false-positive results. The purpose of this study was to set up a new, simple, and effective method for the analysis of the apoE polymorphism. A total of 1,253 subjects previously examined for the apolipoprotein E polymorphism by restriction fragment length polymorphism were reanalyzed by our new method based on Taq DNA polymerase's inability to correctly initiate the replication in the presence of a mismatch at the 3' end of the primer. We conceived a combination of 4 specific primers in 3 different pairs sharing the same stringent polymerase chain reaction conditions to directly detect the presence/absence of polymerase chain reaction products, and thus reveal the 6 apolipoprotein E genotypes. We confirm our previous results in 1,171 subjects, whereas in 82 subjects out of 1,253 (about 6%), the results have been reinterpreted. The final analysis revealed a total of 12 homozygotic subjects for the e2 allele (1.0%), 874 homozygotes for the e3 allele (69.8 %), and 8 homozygotes for the e4 allele (0.6 %). The frequence of heterozygotes was 8.7% for the e2/e3 genotype (n=109), 1.4% for the e2/e4 genotype (n=17), and 0.6% for the e3/e4 genotype (n=8). Relative allele frequencies were e2=0.060, e3=0.834, and e4=0.106. We describe a new, simple, unequivocal, and nonexpensive method for the identification of the 6 apoE genotypes.

TaqMan systems for genotyping of disease-related polymorphisms present in the gene encoding apolipoprotein E

Polymorphisms of the gene encoding apolipoprotein E have been implicated in the pathogenesis of peripheral and coronary artery disease and neurodegenerative disorders such as sporadic and late-onset familial forms of Alzheimer's disease. We have developed TaqMan assay systems for the single nucleotide polymorphisms -219G/T, located in the promoter of the apolipoprotein E gene, 113G/C, present in the transcriptional enhancer element of intron 1, 334T/C, determining Cys or Arg as amino acid residue 112 of mature apolipoprotein E, and 472C/T, determining Arg or Cys as residue 158. The accuracy of genotype determination with the TaqMan systems was demonstrated by analyses with restriction endonucleases. We determined the genotypes of the apolipoprotein E polymorphisms in 2349 study subjects. The genotypes were distributed as: -219GG = 27.3%, -219GT = 49.1%, and -219TT = 23.6% (p = 0.435); 113GG = 41.3%, 113GC = 45.2%, and 113CC = 13.5% (p = 0.343); 334TT = 73.4%, 334TC = 24.7%, and 334CC = 1.9% (p = 0.539); 472CC = 86.3%, 472CT=12.8%, and 472TT= 0.9% ( p = 0.004) (Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium estimates are given in parentheses). The allele combinations which define the three major isoforms of apolipoprotein E, namely apoE2, apoE3, and apoE4, had the following allele frequencies: 334T/472T (epsilon2; 112Cys/158Cys) = 7.3%, 334T/472C (epsilon3; 112Cys/158Arg) = 78.4%, and 334C/472C (epsilon4; 112Arg/158Arg) = 14.2%, respectively. ApoE genotypes were distributed as: epsilon2epsilon2 = 0.9%, epsilon2epsilon3 = 11.2%, epsilon2epsilon4 = 1.6%, epsilon3epsilon3 = 61.3%, epsilon3epsilon4 = 23.1%, and epsilon4epsilon4 = 1.9% (p = 0.014). The TaqMan assays allow for fast and sensitive genotyping and are especially suitable for studies including large numbers of participants.

Genotypes and Phenotypes for Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer Disease in the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study

Background: The utility of apolipoprotein E (ApoE) type as an indicator of genetic susceptibility to Alzheimer disease (AD) depends on the reliability of typing. Although ApoE protein isoform phenotyping is generally assumed equivalent to genotyping from DNA, phenotype-genotype differences have been reported.

Methods: ApoE genotype and phenotype results were examined for 3564 older (ages 71–93 years) Japanese-American male participants of the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study, an ongoing population-based study of aging and dementia.

Results: Both methods demonstrated similar associations of ApoE type with AD: a direct association with ApoE4 and a less dramatic inverse association ApoE2. Advanced age did not appear to influence the ApoE4-AD association. The association with AD among ApoE4 homozygotes [odds ratio (OR) = 14.7] was higher than expected based on an observed OR of 2.0 in heterozygotes. Phenotype-genotype nonconcordance was more frequent for ApoE2 than for ApoE4. The ApoE2 phenotype occurred at a frequency of 7.9% vs a genotype frequency of 4.9%, corresponding to a probability of 56% that an individual with ApoE2 phenotype had the same genotype.

Conclusions: Whereas E4 and E2 phenotypes and genotypes were comparably associated with AD, neither method would be expected to substantially improve the efficiency of case finding in the context of population screening beyond prediction based on age and education. Nonconcordance of phenotype and genotype was substantial for E2 and modest for E4 in this population. The ApoE4-AD association was independent of age.

Association of apolipoprotein (Apo)E genotype with plasma apo E levels

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of apolipoprotein (apo) E genotype on plasma apo E levels as well as serum total, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglyceride, and glucose values in 734 middle-aged and elderly, female and male subjects. Apo E allele frequencies were similar to those reported in other Caucasian populations. After adjustment for medications, alcohol use, smoking, age, and body mass index, apo E genotype was noted to have significant effects on apo E, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and glucose levels in females, and on apo E, LDL cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol levels, as well as the total cholesterol (TC)/HDL cholesterol ratio in males. Female and male subjects with the apo E4 allele had significantly (P<0.05) lower plasma apo E (25 and 15%) and higher LDL cholesterol levels (5 and 2%), while those with the apo E2 allele had significantly (P<0.05) higher apo E (32 and 27%) and lower LDL cholesterol levels (10 and 10%) than the apo E3/3 group. Moreover, female apo E4 carriers had significantly (P<0.05) lower glucose values (11%) than the apo E3/3 group. These data are consistent with the concept that, in addition to the well known effects of apo E genotype on LDL-C values, this locus plays a very significant role in modulating plasma apo E levels.

The relevance of apolipoprotein E polymorphism to Alzheimer's disease

The apo E gene located on chromosome 19 in humans is polymorphic. The three apo E isoforms E2, E3, and E4 are coded by three common alleles of the gene. The amyloid plaques in brains of Alzheimer disease (AD) patients are known to contain apo E. There is an increased prevalence of E4 allele in AD patients. apo E exhibits increased binding to a peptide Aβ deriving from amylold precursor protein. apo E, the risk factor for late AD disease is unable to prevent formation of paired helical filaments which in turn destabilizes neuronal microtubules.A variety of molecular techniques are available for apo E genotyping using DNA amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The high guanine to cytosine content of apo E is problematic to the extent that the yield of PCR product and hybridization stringency can be compromised. The specificity of diagnosis of late-onset AD can be improved when results of apo E genotyping are evaluated together with clinical criteria.

Lack of influence of apolipoprotein E4 on lipoprotein levels in the island population of Sardinia

BACKGROUND

In this study, the apolipoprotein E (apoE) genotypes as well as plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels have been determined for the first time in 633 healthy and unrelated inhabitants on the island of Sardinia (291 men and 342 women, age range 6-89 years), randomly selected in the four districts of Sardinia among healthy people having parents and grandparents born in the same geographic area. This island lies in the centre of the western Mediterranean sea with a well-recognized peculiar and preserved genetic background. The epsilon 3 allele frequency (0.897) is higher than that previously reported in southern and mainland Italy and is one of the highest in Europe and among Caucasians; epsilon 2 allele frequency (0.040) is the lowest in Europe; epsilon 4 (0.063) is unusually low and, most interestingly, does not change in the different age groups, i.e. does not decrease in old subjects.

RESULTS

Lipid and lipoprotein analysis confirm that total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels are lower than those described in mainland Italy; moreover, in this large Sardinian series, accurately selected, epsilon 4 allele did not influence total cholesterol (P = 0.270), LDL-cholesterol (P = 0.667) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (P = 0.549) as in other populations. In contrast, subjects carrying the epsilon 2 allele were found to have significantly lower total cholesterol (P = 0.001) and LDL-cholesterol (P = 0.001) levels than epsilon 3 carriers.

CONCLUSION

The low epsilon 4 frequency and the lack of influence of this allele on lipid metabolism is a unique characteristic and, to date, has been described only in Sardinia among Caucasians; it might contribute to the low prevalence of coronary artery disease in this island.

Clinical chemistry of common apolipoprotein E isoforms

Apolipoprotein E plays a central role in clearance of lipoprotein remnants by serving as a ligand for low-density lipoprotein and apolipoprotein E receptors. Three common alleles (apolipoprotein E(2), E(3) and E(4)) give rise to six phenotypes. Apolipoprotein E(3) is the ancestral form. Common apolipoprotein E isoforms derive from nucleotide substitutions in codons 112 and 158. Resulting cysteine-arginine substitutions cause differences in: affinities for low-density lipoprotein and apolipoprotein E receptors, low-density lipoprotein receptor activities, distribution of apolipoprotein E among lipoproteins, low-density lipoprotein formation rate, and cholesterol absorption. Accompanying changes in triglycerides, cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein may promote atherosclerosis development. Over 90% of patients with familial dysbetalipoproteinaemia have apolipoprotein E(2)/E(2). Apolipoprotein E(4) may promote atherosclerosis by its low-density lipoprotein raising effect. Establishment of apolipoprotein E isoforms may be important for patients with diabetes mellitus and several non-atherosclerotic diseases. Apolipoprotein E phenotyping exploits differences in isoelectric points. Isoelectric focusing uses gels that contain pH 4-7 ampholytes and urea. Serum is directly applied, or prepurified by delipidation, lipoprotein precipitation or dialysation. Isoelectric focusing is followed by immunofixation/protein staining. Another approach is electro- or diffusion blotting, followed by protein staining or immunological detection with anti-apolipoprotein E antibodies and an enzyme-conjugated second antibody. Apolipoprotein E genotyping demonstrates underlying point mutations. Analyses of polymerase chain reaction products are done by allele-specific oligonucleotide probes, restriction fragment length polymorphism, single-stranded conformational polymorphism, the primer-guided nucleotide incorporation assay, or denaturating gradient gel electrophoresis. Detection with primers that either or not initiate amplification is performed with the amplification refractory mutation system. Disparities between phenotyping and genotyping may derive from isoelectric focusing methods that do not adequately separate apolipoprotein E posttranslational variants, storage artifacts or faint isoelectric focusing bands.

Apolipoprotein E4 phenotype is not an important risk factor for coronary heart disease or stroke in elderly subjects

The allele e4 (apo e4) of apolipoprotein E (apo E) has been associated with an increased risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) in cross-sectional studies in middle-aged subjects. We investigated the risk of CHD and stroke with respect to the number of apo e4 alleles in a prospective study of a Finnish nondiabetic cohort including 1067 subjects 65 to 74 years old at baseline. During the 3.5-year follow-up, CHD mortality was 2.8%, total CHD incidence 6.9%, and the cumulative occurrence of CHD (prevalence at baseline and the 3.5-year incidence combined) 17.0%. The incidence of stroke was 3.4%, and the cumulative occurrence of stroke was 6.0%. The CHD mortality was 3.4% in subjects with no apo e4 allele (n = 734), 1.7% in those with one apo e4 allele (n = 296), and 0% in subjects with two apo e4 alleles (n = 37) (P = NS between the three groups). The incidence of CHD according to the number of apo e4 alleles was 6.9% (no apo e4 alleles), 7.4% (one apo e4 allele), and 2.7% (two apo e4 alleles), and the cumulative occurrence of CHD was 16.5%, 18.6%, and 13.5%, respectively (P = NS). The incidence of stroke was 3.8% in subjects with no apo e4 allele, 2.7% in those with one apo e4 allele, and 0% in those with two apo e4 alleles (P = NS). The cumulative occurrence of stroke was 6.0%, 6.4%, and 2.7%, respectively (P = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Rapid and safe determination of human apolipoprotein E genotypes by miniaturised SDS-PAGE in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus

AIMS

To present a non-isotopic procedure for the analysis of the different apolipoprotein E genotypes in normal subjects and patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

Apolipoprotein E genotypes were detected following polymerase chain reaction and miniaturised sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (PhastSystem Pharmacia).

RESULTS

The time taken from extraction of DNA from 6 microliters whole blood to the final result was eight hours. The allele frequencies in patients with diabetes mellitus in our series were similar to those found in the control subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

SDS-PAGE is rapid, reliable and safe with few drawbacks, can be used as a routine procedure and may easily replace apolipoprotein E phenotyping.

Evidence that the APOE locus influences rate of disease progression in late onset familial Alzheimer's Disease but is not causative

An association has been observed in several independent data sets between late onset Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and the APOE locus on chromosome 19. We have examined the genotype in family history positive (FHP) and family history negative (FHN) cases and find a distortion of the APOE allele frequencies in accord with previous studies. However, when we examined the allele distribution of the at-risk siblings of the FHP group we found an excess of the epsilon 4 allele which also differs significantly from historic controls but not from the affected siblings. The age distribution of the affected and unaffected siblings was similar, suggesting that the allelic frequency distortion in the unaffected siblings was not due to their being below the mean age of onset. Lod score linkage analysis, with age dependent onset and non-stringent specification of the genetic parameters, did not suggest linkage to the APOE locus. Furthermore, an analysis of variance of the age of disease free survival suggested that APOE genotype contributes a small fraction of the total variance indicating that the APOE locus is a poor predictor of disease free survival age within late onset families. One explanation for the age dependent association reported by other groups, and our results, is that the APOE locus enhances the rate of progression of the disease process in otherwise predisposed individuals and that variation at this locus is not able in and of itself to cause the disease. We suggest this hypothesis is compatible with the current literature regarding APOE and AD.

Apolipoprotein E genotyping methods for the clinical laboratory

To select the best method for detecting apolipoprotein E (apo E) genotypes determined by the three common alleles epsilon 2, epsilon 3 and epsilon 4, we compared the radiolabeled allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO) probe assay and the nonisotopic restriction isotyping assay. Leukocytic DNA was extracted from the blood of 93 patients after which the region containing two mutation points coding amino acid residues 112 and 158 was amplified by using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Amplified DNA fragments were spotted on nylon membranes, then hybridized for the ASO probe assay. The amplified DNA fragments were also digested with restriction endonuclease Hhal, followed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the restriction isotyping assay. The apo E genotypes determined by both methods for every specimen studied were in complete agreement. Although the radiolabeled ASO probe method was 10 times more sensitive than restriction isotyping on polyacrylamide gel, the two were comparable in accuracy. Additionally, because it is simpler to perform, is less time consuming, and is less expensive, we conclude that the restriction isotyping assay is the more suitable of these two methods for use in a clinical laboratory.

Genotyping compared with protein phenotyping of the common apolipoprotein E polymorphism

Apolipoprotein E (apo E) genotypes have been determined in 460 Danish men, with the use of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify a 244 base pair fragment spanning the first-base polymorphic sites in the codons of amino acids 112 and 158 followed by restriction endonuclease cleavage. The results were compared with the apo E phenotypes previously determined by isoelectric focusing (IEF) of delipidated plasma, not pretreated with neuraminidase, followed by apo E specific immunoblotting. Conflicting results were found in only 9 cases (2.0%) and in each case only with respect to one allele. Five of the discrepancies can be explained, post hoc, by technical difficulties with the IEF method ('faint bands'). A possible cause of the other 4 discrepancies is the presence of rare mutations. Our findings in this large study are reassuring, since, if appreciable and systematic misclassification of genotypes do occur by using IEF, as has been reported from some laboratories, it may influence the validity of genetic epidemiological studies.

Apolipoprotein E phenotypes and genotypes as determined by polymerase chain reaction using allele-specific oligonucleotide probes and the amplification refractory mutation system in children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

The frequency of apolipoprotein E (apo E) phenotypes and genotypes due to allelic variation at amino acids 112 and 158 was analysed in 50 children with type I diabetes. Phenotypes were determined by isoelectric focusing and genotypes by the technique of polymerase chain reaction using allele-specific oligonucleotide probes (PCR/ASO) and the amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS). Discrepancies between phenotypes and genotypes as assigned by PCR/ASO were observed in 12 (24%) cases and by ARMS in eight (16%) cases. Results revealed the apo E3/3 genotype, as assigned by ARMS, to be the most frequent one (70%), followed by apo E3/4 in 16%, apo E2/2 in 2%, apo E2/3 in 8%, apo E2/4 in 2% and apo E4/4 in 2% of the cases. Apo E3/4 genotype and phenotype were more frequently present in the children with type I diabetes as compared with the diabetic adults previously reported on.