Lack of Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Anidulafungin and Tacrolimus

Invasive aspergillosis in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is increasing worldwide with underlying pathologies dominated by metabolic and alcoholic diseases in developed countries.

METHODS

We provide a narrative review of invasive aspergillosis (IA) in liver transplant (LT) recipients. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for references without language and time restrictions.

RESULTS

The incidence of IA in LT recipients is low (1.8%), while mortality is high (∼50%). It occurs mainly early (<3 months) after LT. Some risk factors have been identified before (corticosteroid, renal, and liver failure), during (massive transfusion and duration of surgical procedure), and after transplantation (intensive care unit stay, re-transplantation, re-operation). Diagnosis can be difficult and therefore requires full radiological and clinicobiological collaboration. Accurate identification of Aspergillus species is recommended due to the cryptic species, and susceptibility testing is crucial given the increasing resistance of Aspergillus fumigatus to azoles. It is recommended to reduce the dose of tacrolimus (50%) and to closely monitor the trough level when introducing voriconazole, isavuconazole, and posaconazole. Surgery should be discussed on a case-by-case basis. Antifungal prophylaxis is recommended in high-risk patients. Environmental preventative measures should be implemented to prevent outbreaks of nosocomial aspergillosis in LT recipient units.

CONCLUSION

IA remains a very serious disease in LT patients and should be promptly sought and, if possible, prevented by clinicians when risk factors are identified.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of the Echinocandin Antifungal Agents: Is There a Role in Clinical Practice? A Position Statement of the Anti-Infective Drugs Committee of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology

PURPOSE

Reduced exposure to echinocandins has been reported in specific patient populations, such as critically ill patients; however, fixed dosing strategies are still used. The present review examines the accumulated evidence supporting echinocandin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and summarizes available assays and sampling strategies.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed in December 2020, with search terms such as echinocandins, anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, or rezafungin with pharmacology, pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), drug-drug interactions, TDM, resistance, drug susceptibility testing, toxicity, adverse drug reactions, bioanalysis, chromatography, and mass spectrometry. Data on PD/PD (PK/PD) outcome markers, drug resistance, PK variability, drug-drug interactions, assays, and TDM sampling strategies were summarized.

RESULTS

Echinocandins demonstrate drug exposure-efficacy relationships, and maximum concentration/minimal inhibitory concentration ratio (Cmax/MIC) and area under the concentration-time curve/MIC ratio (AUC/MIC) are proposed PK/PD markers for clinical response. The relationship between drug exposure and toxicity remains poorly clarified. TDM could be valuable in patients at risk of low drug exposure, such as those with critical illness and/or obesity. TDM of echinocandins may also be useful in patients with moderate liver impairment, drug-drug interactions, hypoalbuminemia, and those undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, as these conditions are associated with altered exposure to caspofungin and/or micafungin. Assays are available to measure anidulafungin, micafungin, and caspofungin concentrations. A limited-sampling strategy for anidulafungin has been reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Echinocandin TDM should be considered in patients at known risk of suboptimal drug exposure. However, for implementing TDM, clinical validation of PK/PD targets is needed.

Drug Interactions between Antimicrobial and Immunosuppressive Agents in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

The number of allogeneic solid organ and bone marrow transplants is increasing all over the world. To prevent transplant rejection and treat acute rejection of transplant, immunosuppressant drugs are used. The outcomes of solid organ transplants have dramatically improved over last 30 years, due to availability of multiple immunosuppressive agents, with varied mechanisms of action. The use of intense immunosuppression makes the individual having undergone solid organ transplant at the risk of several serious infections, which may prove fatal. To prevent and treat these infections (when they occur), patients are often given antimicrobial prophylaxis and therapy. The use of antimicrobials can interfere with the metabolism of the immunosuppressants, and may put the patient at risk of developing severe adverse effects due to unwanted increase or decrease in the serum levels of immunosuppressive agents. Knowledge of these interactions is essential for successful management of solid organ transplant patients. We therefore decided to review the literature and present the interactions that commonly occur between these two life-saving groups of drugs.

How to cite this article: Bhagat V, Pandit RA, Ambapurkar S, Sengar M, Kulkarni AP. Drug Interactions between Antimicrobial and Immunosuppressive Agents in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(1):67–76.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics variability of echinocandins in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin are three widely used echinocandin drugs licensed for the treatment of invasive fungal infections, and their clinical use is widespread. To evaluate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics variability of echinocandins in critically ill patients by comparing the differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between critically ill patients and healthy volunteers or general patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and Pubmed were searched from inception until 6 September 2018. Studies investigating the pharmacokinetic parameters of echinocandins in critically ill patients, healthy volunteers or general patients were included. Our primary outcomes included AUC0-24 h , Cmax and Cmin (24 hours). Two reviewers independently reviewed all titles, abstracts and text, and extracted data. We applied R software (R 2017) to conduct meta-analysis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Of 3235 articles screened, 17 studies were included in the data synthesis. Descriptive data from single-arm studies show that critically ill patients who received caspofungin had more stable AUC0-24 h than those who received anidulafungin and micafungin. The Cmax of critically ill patients who received caspofungin and micafungin was similar to healthy volunteers. However, the Cmax in critically ill patients who received anidulafungin was lower than in healthy volunteers. The Cmin and T1/2 of critically ill patients who received caspofungin were larger than in healthy volunteers. The Vd and CL of critically ill patients receiving anidulafungin and micafungin were larger than in healthy volunteers.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

This systematic review provides an analysis of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics variability of echinocandins in critically ill patients. Based on the limited data available, caspofungin has less pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics variability than anidulafungin and micafungin.

Population Analysis of Anidulafungin in Infants to Older Adults With Confirmed or Suspected Invasive Candidiasis

In a pooled population analysis, we investigated the pharmacokinetics of i.v. anidulafungin in four studies across a full range of adult and pediatric ages in patients with confirmed, suspected, or at high risk of invasive candidiasis (IC). Relationships between anidulafungin exposure and key efficacy end points (global response of success and all‐cause mortality) and safety end points (all‐cause hepatic or gastrointestinal adverse events) in all patients and separately in pediatric patients and the appropriate dosing regimen for IC treatment in pediatric patients were evaluated. Pediatric patients received a 3.0 mg/kg (maximum 200 mg) i.v. loading dose and 1.5 mg/kg (maximum 100 mg) daily thereafter. Adults received a 200 mg i.v. loading dose and 100 mg daily thereafter. Estimated systemic anidulafungin exposures were similar across age groups (neonates to adults) at the weight‐based doses studied in pediatric patients. No clear associations were identified between anidulafungin exposure and efficacy or safety end points.

Pharmacokinetic study of anidulafungin in ICU patients with intra-abdominal candidiasis

Background

Only limited pharmacokinetic data are available for anidulafungin in ICU patients, especially in patients treated for severe intra-abdominal infection (IAI).

Methods

This was a prospective multicentre observational study in ICU patients with suspected yeast IAI. All patients received an intravenous loading dose of 200 mg of anidulafungin, followed by 100 mg/day. Thirteen blood samples were drawn between day 1 and day 5 for pharmacokinetic analysis. Samples were analysed by an HPLC-tandem MS method. Demographics and SAPS2 and SOFA scores were recorded.

Results

Fourteen patients with a median age (IQR) of 62 years (48-70) and with a mean BMI of 30.5 kg/m 2 were included from three centres; 57.1% were women. Their median (IQR) SAPS2 score was 54 (45-67) and their median (IQR) SOFA score was 8 (7-12). Six patients with community-acquired IAI and eight patients with nosocomial-acquired IAI were included. Twelve yeasts were isolated: six Candida albicans , two Candida glabrata , two Candida tropicalis , one Candida parapsilosis and one Candida krusei . Pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows [mean (% coefficient of variation)]: C max (mg/L) = 6.0 (29%); T max (h) = 1.6 (25.8%); C min (mg/L) = 3.2 (36.8%); AUC 0-24 (mg·h/L) = 88.9 (38.6%); t 1/2 (h) = 42.1 (68.2%); CL (L/h) = 1.2 (42.3%); and V (L) = 72.8 (87.8%). A two-compartment model best described the anidulafungin concentrations in the population pharmacokinetic study.

Conclusions

The pharmacokinetic parameters of anidulafungin in critically ill ICU patients with complicated IAI are similar to those observed in the literature. However, an increased V and a longer t 1/2 were observed in this study. (EudraCT No. 2010-018695-25).

Does Weight Impact Anidulafungin Pharmacokinetics?

Bodyweight has been shown to influence anidulafungin exposure, but data from obese patients are lacking. We determined anidulafungin pharmacokinetics (100-mg single dose) in eight morbidly obese subjects (body mass index >40 kg/m(2)). Anidulafungin exposure was on average 32.5 % lower compared with the general patient population, suggesting dose increases may be required in this population.

Pharmacokinetics of antifungal drugs: practical implications for optimized treatment of patients

Introduction

Because of the high mortality of invasive fungal infections (IFIs), appropriate exposure to antifungals appears to be crucial for therapeutic efficacy and safety.

Materials and methods

This review summarises published pharmacokinetic data on systemically administered antifungals focusing on co-morbidities, target-site penetration, and combination antifungal therapy.

Conclusions and discussion

Amphotericin B is eliminated unchanged via urine and faeces. Flucytosine and fluconazole display low protein binding and are eliminated by the kidney. Itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole and isavuconazole are metabolised in the liver. Azoles are substrates and inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes and are therefore involved in numerous drug–drug interactions. Anidulafungin is spontaneously degraded in the plasma. Caspofungin and micafungin undergo enzymatic metabolism in the liver, which is independent of CYP. Although several drug–drug interactions occur during caspofungin and micafungin treatment, echinocandins display a lower potential for drug–drug interactions. Flucytosine and azoles penetrate into most of relevant tissues. Amphotericin B accumulates in the liver and in the spleen. Its concentrations in lung and kidney are intermediate and relatively low myocardium and brain. Tissue distribution of echinocandins is similar to that of amphotericin. Combination antifungal therapy is established for cryptococcosis but controversial in other IFIs such as invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis.

[Echinocandins: Applied pharmacology]

The echinocandins share pharmacodynamic properties, although there are some interesting differences in their pharmacokinetic behaviour in the clinical practice. They are not absorbed by the oral route. They have a somewhat special distribution in the organism, as some of them can reach high intracellular concentrations while, with some others, the concentration is reduced. They are highly bound to plasma proteins, thus it is recommended to administer a loading dose for anidulafungin and caspofungin, although this procedure is not yet clear with micafungin. Echinocandins are excreted via a non-microsomal metabolism, so the urinary concentration is very low. Some carrier proteins that take part in the biliary clearance process are probably involved in the interactions described with caspofungin and micafungin. These two drugs must be used with caution in patients with severely impaired hepatic function, while all of them can be used without special precautions when there is renal impairment or the patient requires renal replacement therapy.

Consensus guidelines for optimising antifungal drug delivery and monitoring to avoid toxicity and improve outcomes in patients with haematological malignancy, 2014

Antifungal agents may be associated with significant toxicity or drug interactions leading to sub-therapeutic antifungal drug concentrations and poorer clinical outcomes for patients with haematological malignancy. These risks may be minimised by clinical assessment, laboratory monitoring, avoidance of particular drug combinations and dose modification. Specific measures, such as the optimal timing of oral drug administration in relation to meals, use of pre-hydration and electrolyte supplementation may also be required. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antifungal agents is warranted, especially where non-compliance, non-linear pharmacokinetics, inadequate absorption, a narrow therapeutic window, suspected drug interaction or unexpected toxicity are encountered. Recommended indications for voriconazole and posaconazole TDM in the clinical management of haematology patients are provided. With emerging knowledge regarding the impact of pharmacogenomics upon metabolism of azole agents (particularly voriconazole), potential applications of pharmacogenomic evaluation to clinical practice are proposed.

Impact of special patient populations on the pharmacokinetics of echinocandins

Echinocandins belong to the class of antifungal agents. Currently, three echinocandin drugs are licensed for intravenous treatment of invasive fungal infections: anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin. While their antifungal activity overlaps, there are substantial differences in pharmacokinetics (PK). Numerous factors may account for variability in PK of echinocandins including age (pediatrics vs adults), body surface area and body composition (normal weight vs obesity), disease status (e.g., critically ill and burn patients) and organ dysfunction (kidney and liver impairment). Subsequent effects of altered exposure might impact efficacy and safety. Knowledge of PK behavior is crucial in optimal clinical utilization of echinocandin in a specific patient or patient population. This review provides up-to-date information on PK data of anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin in special patient populations. Patient populations addressed are neonates, children and adolescents, obese patients, patients with hepatic or renal impairment, critically ill patients (including burn patients) and patients with hematological diseases.

Limited-sampling strategies for anidulafungin in critically ill patients

Efficacy of anidulafungin is driven by the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratio. Determination of the anidulafungin AUC along with MIC values can therefore be useful. Since obtaining a full concentration-time curve to determine an AUC is not always feasible or appropriate, limited-sampling strategies may be useful in adequately estimating exposure. The objective of this study was to develop a model to predict the individual anidulafungin exposure in critically ill patients using limited-sampling strategies. Pharmacokinetic data were derived from 20 critically ill patients with invasive candidiasis treated with anidulafungin. These data were used to develop a two-compartment model in MW\Pharm using an iterative 2-stage Bayesian procedure. Limited-sampling strategies were subsequently investigated using two methods, a Bayesian analysis and a linear regression analysis. The best possible strategies for these two methods were evaluated by a Bland-Altman analysis for correlation of the predicted and observed AUC from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) values. Anidulafungin exposure can be adequately estimated with the concentration from a single sample drawn 12 h after the start of the infusion either by linear regression (R2=0.99; bias, 0.05%; root mean square error [RMSE], 3%) or using a population pharmacokinetic model (R2=0.89; bias, -0.1%; RMSE, 9%) in critically ill patients and also in less severely ill patients, as reflected by healthy volunteers. Limited sampling can be advantageous for future studies evaluating the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anidulafungin and for therapeutic drug monitoring in selected patients. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01047267.).

Simultaneous quantification of anidulafungin and caspofungin in plasma by an accurate and simple liquid chromatography tandem mass-spectrometric method

INTRODUCTION

Echinocandins are a valuable addition for the treatment of invasive fungal infections, as they are efficacious, demonstrate low toxicity, and have limited drug-drug interactions. In specific clinical situations when altered pharmacokinetics can be expected or dosing guidelines are conflicting, it may be useful to measure concentrations. For this purpose, a liquid chromatography tandem mass-spectrometric method to measure anidulafungin and caspofungin in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid plasma was developed.

METHODS

The method was developed on a Thermo Fisher TSQ Quantum LC-MS/MS. For separation, a BetaBasic C4 (100 mm × 3.0 mm; 5 μm) analytical column was used. Sample preparation consisted of protein precipitation directly in the autosampler vial. The internal standard aculeacin A is structurally related, not used in humans, and commercially available. The method was validated according to the guidelines for bioanalytical method validation of the Food and Drug Administration.

RESULTS

The method was accurate (bias ranging from -3.0% to 1.9%) and precise (within-run and between-run coefficients of variation of 2.2% to 7.7% and 1.6% to 9.0%, respectively). All calibration curves were linear over a range of 0.5-10.0 mg/L for anidulafungin and 0.1-20.0 mg/L for caspofungin, and if necessary, samples can be diluted 10-fold. The samples were stable for 3 freeze-thaw cycles, with a bias ranging from 0.6% to 11%. The maximum bias from the worst storage condition, 72 hours at room temperature, was -14.7%. In patient samples, anidulafungin peak concentrations ranged from 2.8 to 8.6 mg/L (n = 20) and trough concentrations ranged from 1.0 to 4.7 mg/L (n = 79). The measured caspofungin concentrations ranged from 1.9 to 7.3 mg/L (n = 20).

CONCLUSIONS

The method developed has a straightforward sample preparation and uses a structural analog as the internal standard. This method has been applied successfully for the measurement of anidulafungin and caspofungin concentrations in patient samples, both for clinical practice and for research.

Anidulafungin: advantage for the newcomer?

Anidulafungin is the most recently approved compound of the echinocandin antifungal class. Its mode of action is the noncompetitive inhibition of β-(1,3)-D-glucan synthesis. Potent fungicidal activity has been demonstrated against many Candida spp., including non-albicansCandida spp. and fluconazole-resistant strains, as well as fungistatic activity against Aspergillus spp. Owing to low oral bioavailability, it can only be administered intravenously. Anidulafungin is not metabolized by the liver and renal clearance is negligible, thus rendering dosage adjustments in patients with impaired hepatic or renal function unnecessary. Due to lack of interference with the cytochrome P450 pathway, it displays minimal drug-drug interaction. Anidulafungin has been approved by the US FDA for the treatment of esophageal and invasive candidiasis after clinical trials demonstrated its noninferiority to fluconazole. In September 2007, anidulafungin gained EMEA approval for the treatment of invasive candidiasis in adult non-neutropenic patients. For those with invasive or noninvasive candidiasis with resistance or intolerance to fluconazole in particular, as well as those requiring antifungal medication, that anidulafungin does not interact with concomitant medication means it may be regarded as a safe and efficacious treatment option. Promising results from animal models and experience with the other echinocandins indicate several potential lines of investigation: invasive aspergillosis, prophylaxis and treatment of transplant patients, and empirical treatment in patients with febrile neutropenia. Significant differences in clinical efficacy or safety favoring anidulafungin over the other echinocandins are yet to be discovered.

[Liver dysfunctions in intensive care patients--consequences for the treatment of invasive Candida infections]

Liver dysfunction is common among patients on intensive care units (ICU) due to sepsis, chronic liver disease, ischemic hepatitis, drug toxicity and intensive care measures. Critically ill patients with invasive fungal infections should therefore be treated with antifungals that are not metabolized by the liver. This may help to avoid therapeutic complications by drug accumulation, inadequate dosages or drug-drug interactions. Echinocandins are established as the antifungal class of choice in the treatment of invasive Candida infections. Anidulafungin is not hepatically metabolized and may be used without dose adjustments in patients with severe liver dysfunction. It has no known clinically relevant drug interactions. In the primary endpoint of the randomized pivotal trial in patients with candidemia or invasive candidiasis, anidulafungin was statistically superior versus the former standard therapy (fluconazole), with a favourable overall safety profile. More recent study data particularly in ICU patients confirm the efficacy of anidulafungin for these patient groups. Therefore, anidulafungin is an important antifungal treatment option for patients with liver dysfunction.

Trends in oral drug bioavailability following bariatric surgery: examining the variable extent of impact on exposure of different drug classes

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT

Changes to oral drug bioavailability have been observed post bariatric surgery. However, the magnitude and the direction of changes have not been assessed systematically to provide insights into the parameters governing the observed trends. Understanding these can help with dose adjustments.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

Analysis of drug characteristics based on a biopharmaceutical classification system is not adequate to explain observed trends in altered oral drug bioavailability following bariatric surgery, although the findings suggest solubility to play an important role.

AIMS

To identify the most commonly prescribed drugs in a bariatric surgery population and to assess existing evidence regarding trends in oral drug bioavailability post bariatric surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective audit was undertaken to document commonly prescribed drugs amongst patients undergoing bariatric surgery in an NHS hospital in the UK and to assess practice for drug administration following bariatric surgery. The available literature was examined for trends relating to drug permeability and solubility with regards to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) and main route of elimination.

RESULTS

No significant difference in the 'post/pre surgery oral drug exposure ratio' (ppR) was apparent between BCS class I to IV drugs, with regards to dose number (Do) or main route of elimination. Drugs classified as 'solubility limited' displayed an overall reduction as compared with 'freely soluble' compounds, as well as an unaltered and increased ppR.

CONCLUSION

Clinical studies establishing guidelines for commonly prescribed drugs, and the monitoring of drugs exhibiting a narrow therapeutic window or without a readily assessed clinical endpoint, are warranted. Using mechanistically based pharmacokinetic modelling for simulating the multivariate nature of changes in drug exposure may serve as a useful tool in the further understanding of postoperative trends in oral drug exposure and in developing practical clinical guidance.

Pharmacokinetics of anidulafungin in critically ill patients with candidemia/invasive candidiasis

The pharmacokinetics of intravenous anidulafungin in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients were assessed in this study and compared with historical data from a general patient population and healthy subjects. Intensive plasma sampling was performed over a dosing interval at steady state from 21 ICU patients with candidemia/invasive candidiasis. All patients received the recommended dosing regimen (a 200-mg loading dose on day 1, followed by a daily 100-mg maintenance dose), except for a 54-year-old 240-kg female patient (who received a daily 150-mg maintenance dose instead). Plasma samples were assayed for anidulafungin using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Pharmacokinetic parameters in ICU patients were calculated by a noncompartmental method. With the exclusion of the 240-kg patient, the median (minimum, maximum) age, weight, and body mass index (BMI) of 20 ICU patients were 57 (39, 78) years, 65 (48, 106) kg, and 23.3 (16.2, 33.8) kg/m(2), respectively. The average anidulafungin area under the curve over the 24-hour dosing interval (AUC(0-24)), maximum concentration (C(max)), and clearance (CL) in 20 ICU patients were 92.7 mg · h/liter, 7.7 mg/liter, and 1.3 liters/h, respectively. The exposure in the 240-kg patient at a daily 150-mg dose was within the range observed in ICU patients overall. The average AUC(0-24) and Cmax in the general patient population and healthy subjects were 110.3 and 105.9 mg · h/liter and 7.2 and 7.0 mg/liter, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of anidulafungin in ICU patients appeared to be comparable to those in the general patient population and healthy subjects at the same dosing regimen.

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of anidulafungin in adult patients with fungal infections

To evaluate the exposure-response relationships for efficacy and safety of intravenous anidulafungin in adult patients with fungal infections, a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) analysis was performed with data from 262 patients in four phase 2/3 studies. The plasma concentration data were fitted with a previously developed population PK model. Anidulafungin exposures in patients with weight extremities (e.g., 40 kg and 150 kg) were simulated based on the final PK model. Since the patient population, disease status, and efficacy endpoints varied in these studies, the exposure-efficacy relationship was investigated separately for each study using logistic regression as appropriate. Safety data from three studies (n = 235) were pooled for analysis, and one study was excluded due to concomitant use of amphotericin B as a study treatment and different disease populations. The analysis showed that the same dosing regimen of anidulafungin can be administered to all patients regardless of body weight. Nonetheless, caution should be taken for patients with extremely high weight (e.g., >150 kg). There was a trend of positive association between anidulafungin exposure and efficacy in patients with esophageal candidiasis or invasive candidiasis, including candidemia (ICC); however, adequate characterization of the effect of anidulafungin exposure on response could not be established due to the relatively small sample size. No threshold value for exposure could be established, since patients with low exposure also achieved successful outcomes (e.g., area under the curve < 40 mg · h/liter in ICC patients). There was no association between anidulafungin exposure and the treatment-related adverse events or all-causality hepatic laboratory abnormalities.

Safety of anidulafungin in solid organ transplant recipients

The aim of this study was the evaluation of the safety of anidulafungin in adult solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients. During the study period (14 months), we included all consecutive SOT recipients from 14 centers who received anidulafungin for at least 48 hours for the treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) or as prophylaxis. Relevant clinical and analytical information on clinical charts was reviewed. Clinical side effects, liver function tests, and serum creatinine levels were assessed at least weekly. The need for the modification of immunosuppressive drugs was also recorded by the investigators. All patients were followed for at least 1 week after the end of treatment (EOT) or until death. Eighty-six SOT recipients were evaluated (56 transplant recipients, 20 lung transplant recipients, 8 kidney transplant recipients, and 2 heart transplant recipients). Sixty-two patients (72%) received anidulafungin for prophylaxis, and 24 (28%) received anidulafungin for the treatment of IFIs [candidemia/invasive candidiasis (16) or invasive aspergillosis (8)]. At the baseline, only 5% of the patients were neutropenic (<500 neutrophils/mL). There was no need for the modification of immunosuppressive drug doses because of anidulafungin therapy. No patient discontinued anidulafungin because of severe adverse effects. While receiving anidulafungin, 1 patient developed mild liver toxicity, but the liver function normalized without the discontinuation of anidulafungin. At EOT, the median serum creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase levels were significantly lower than the baseline levels, even in liver transplant recipients and patients who had higher baseline levels of serum creatinine. In conclusion, these results show that anidulafungin is a well-tolerated drug in SOT recipients.

Austrian clinical practice with anidulafungin in 2008: a multicenter survey

Anidulafungin had demonstrated favorable efficacy versus fluconazole in a randomized trial on invasive Candida infections. Since patient characteristics in the post-approval use of antifungals likely deviate from clinical trials, we surveyed the use of anidulafungin in clinical routine. We performed a retrospective survey of the post-approval use of anidulafungin in 9 Austrian clinical centers. Anidulafungin was used in 129 critically ill patients with severe comorbidities and multiple risk factors. Indications were suspected invasive fungal infections (IFI) (61%), proven candidemia (19%), and at risk for IFI (prophylaxis, 20%). Candida colonization in conjunction with other risk factors prompted treatment in many patients. predominant pathogens were C. albicans, C. glabrata and C. krusei. Anidulafungin was mostly used for pre-emptive (69%) and first-line treatment (17%) of invasive candidiasis. Treatment response, i.e. complete response/stabilization as determined by investigators (89% in the overall population; 87% for documented candidemia) and survival rates (81% and 75%, respectively) were similar to previous trial data. No breakthrough IFI and few adverse events were reported. Overall, favorable clinical experiences were documented with anidulafungin in the clinical routine setting.

[Antifungal therapy update: new drugs and medical uses]

Increases in the rates of fungal infections, as well as their associated morbidity and mortality has led to a need for additional antifungal agents. The most common serious fungal agents in immunosuppressed and critically ill patients are Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., although other emerging fungi must be considered. Rational, early systemic antifungal treatment should be based on diagnostic imaging techniques and conventional mycological and non-culture-based procedures. While the availability of new therapeutic options is an important advance, antifungal therapy has become increasingly complex. In addition to the available antifungal armamentarium, recent research has resulted in the introduction of three new antifungal agents: micafungin, anidulafungin, and posaconazole. This article provides an update, based on the latest scientific evidence, of the clinical efficacy, pharmacokinetics, safety and dosing of antifungal drugs administered in the management of Candida spp., Aspergillus spp., Cryptococcus spp., Zygomycetes, Scedosporium spp. and Fusarium spp.

Anidulafungin: is it a promising option in the treatment of pediatric invasive fungal infections?

Cases of invasive fungal infections are increasing globally due to an increase in the immunosuppressed population, the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and the invasive instrumentation of patients in intensive care units. Ongoing emergence of resistance and problems with toxicity have resulted in the need for the development of new antifungal agents. Anidulafungin, the most recently developed echinocandin, is approved by the US FDA for treatment of candidemia, other forms of Candida infection and esophageal candidiasis in non-neutropenic adult patients, but it is not currently licensed for pediatric usage. The drug is projected to be distinctive owing to its unique pharmacokinetics and is already listed in adult antifungal treatment guidelines. In this article, anidulafungin will be reviewed with a focus on pediatric patients.

Effect of telaprevir on the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine and tacrolimus

The hepatitis C virus protease inhibitor telaprevir is an inhibitor of the enzyme cytochrome P450 3A, responsible for the metabolism of both cyclosporine and tacrolimus. This Phase I, open-label, nonrandomized, single-sequence study assessed the effect of telaprevir coadministration on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of either cyclosporine or tacrolimus in two separate panels of 10 healthy volunteers each. In Part A, cyclosporine was administered alone as a single 100-mg oral dose, followed by a minimum 8-day washout period, and subsequent coadministration of a single 10-mg oral dose of cyclosporine with either a single dose of telaprevir (750 mg) or with steady-state telaprevir (750 mg every 8 hours [q8h]). In Part B, tacrolimus was administered alone as a single 2-mg oral dose, followed by a minimum 14-day washout period, and subsequent coadministration of a single 0.5-mg dose of tacrolimus with steady-state telaprevir (750 mg q8h). Coadministration with steady-state telaprevir increased cyclosporine dose-normalized (DN) exposure (DN_AUC(0-∞)) by approximately 4.6-fold and increased tacrolimus DN_AUC(0-∞) by approximately 70-fold. Coadministration with telaprevir increased the terminal elimination half-life (t(½)) of cyclosporine from a mean (standard deviation [SD]) of 12 (1.67) hours to 42.1 (11.3) hours and t(½) of tacrolimus from a mean (SD) of 40.7 (5.85) hours to 196 (159) hours.

CONCLUSION

In this study, telaprevir increased the blood concentrations of both cyclosporine and tacrolimus significantly, which could lead to serious or life-threatening adverse events. Telaprevir has not been studied in organ transplant patients; its use in these patients is not recommended because the required studies have not been completed to understand appropriate dose adjustments needed for safe coadministration of telaprevir with cyclosporine or tacrolimus, and regulatory approval has not been obtained.

Treatment and prophylaxis of invasive candidiasis with anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin:review of the literature

Working by a distinct cell wall-specific mechanism of action, the echinocandin class of antifungals has substantially expanded the range of available treatments for invasive Candida infections. Anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin were investigated versus drugs from earlier antifungal classes in large clinical trials that demonstrated their excellent clinical and microbiological efficacy in the primary treatment of invasive candidiasis. Therefore, and supported by a number of favourable pharmacological characteristics, the echinocandins rapidly became established in guidelines and clinical practice as primary treatment options for moderately to severely ill patients with invasive candidiasis. This article reviews the relevant clinical evidence that forms the basis for the use of echinocandins in the management of invasive candidiasis, and discusses their current role in the context of recent guideline recommendations and treatment optimization strategies.

Pharmacokinetics, antifungal activity and clinical efficacy of anidulafungin in the treatment of fungal infections

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Anidulafungin is one of three available intravenous echinocandins that plays an important role in the treatment of serious fungal infections. Currently, anidulafungin is approved for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis, candidemia and other invasive Candida infections including intra-abdominal abscesses and peritonitis.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This paper covers a comprehensive review of anidulafungin.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The reader will be provided the most recent data available regarding the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, in vitro activity and clinical utility of anidulafungin for the treatment of serious fungal infections.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Echinocandin antifungals, such as anidulafungin, are now considered first line for the treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis, particularly in critically ill patients or those who have previously received azole therapy. Anidulafungin has potent in vitro activity against Candida and Aspergillus species, predictable pharmacokinetics that does not require dosage adjustment, few drug interactions and is well tolerated. Because of these favorable characteristics, anidulafungin is an important addition to our antifungal armamentarium.

Quantitation of azoles and echinocandins in compartments of peripheral blood by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

A rapid turnaround is a prerequisite of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). For antifungals, this need is still unmet, since hardly any method has been established to simultaneously quantitate concentrations of different antifungal classes. A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed allowing quantitation of anidulafungin (ANF), caspofungin (CSF), isavuconazole (ISC), micafungin (MCF), posaconazole (PSC), and voriconazole (VRC). Quantitation was successful with diluted plasma samples, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN), and erythrocytes (RBC). A triple quadrupole mass spectrometer in selected reaction monitoring mode was used with positive electrospray ionization. Cells and calibration standards were extracted with acetonitrile containing internal standard. Internal standards were a CSF derivate for echinocandins and itraconazole for triazoles. Chromatographic separation of the supernatant was achieved by a gradient method facilitating a BetaBasic C4 column. Analytes were quantified in a single 8-min run. Calibration curves were linear and fitted using least squares with a weighting factor of the reciprocal concentration. Limits of detection (ng/ml) were ANF, 8.3; CSF, 31.5; ISC, 1.5; MCF, 97.7; PSC, 3.3; and VRC, 1.4. The lower limits of quantitation (ng/ml) were ANF, 64; CSF, 108; ISC, 4.5; MCF, 160; PSC, 10; and VRC, 4.2. Intraday precisions ranged from 6.3% to 8.8% for azoles and 8.8% to 15.4% for echinocandins. Intraday and interday accuracies (percent bias) of all analytes were within 13.8%. The method was established as standard practice for the quantitation of intracellular antifungal concentrations and optimizes TDM by applying a rapid single method for 6 antifungals.

Drug interactions in transplant patients: what everyone should know

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adverse events due to drug-drug interactions remain a challenge in the postsurgical care of transplant recipients. A combination of potent and selective immunosuppressive drugs, which have a narrow therapeutic index, with medications for the treatment of comorbidities such as dyslipidemia, infection, psychiatric conditions, and hypertension, can lead to life-threatening drug-drug interactions.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are a number of important drug-drug interactions which are important for physicians to consider. It is critical to understand the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of drug-drug interactions, their potential impact on patient care, and the management strategies.

SUMMARY

Close therapeutic drug monitoring and evaluation of drug-specific side effects continue to be an important key to minimize adverse events due to drug-drug interactions.

Anidulafungin and its role in candida infections

Candida infections continue to play a significant role not only in critically ill and immunocompromised patients but also in non-compromised patients. The incidence of systemic fungal infections in the United States has been on the rise for the past 30 years. Anidulafungin and all echinocandins inhibit glucan synthase thus inhibiting the formation of 1,3-β-D-glucan which is an essential component of the fungal cell wall. The decrease in 1,3-β-D-glucan results in the osmotic lysis of the cell, resulting in fungicidal activity against candida. Anidulafungin is active against most species of candida and resistance to it is very rare. Two potential mechanisms conferring reduced susceptibility to the echinocandins are efflux and target alteration. The efflux pump associated with fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans can confer higher minimum inhibitory concentrations to caspofungin. The second mechanism of resistance is via mutations in the genes which code for 1,3 β-D-glucan synthase, specifically FKS1. Because of its spectrum of activity, fungicidal nature, and tolerability it is an attractive first-line therapeutic choice for treating candidemia in both non-neutropenic and neutropenic patients. Because it is available only parenterally its role in treating mucocutaneous candidiasis is primarily in patients unable to take oral therapy.

Anidulafungin in the treatment of patients with invasive candidiasis

Echinocandins have emerged as important agents for the treatment of invasive candidiasis. Forthcoming guidelines are expected to recommend an echinocandin agent as initial primary therapy in patients who are severely ill and/or have risk factors for azole resistance. Amphotericin B deoxycholate and fluconazole should be considered for initial therapy in specific populations. The echinocandin, anidulafungin, has been shown to have higher response rates compared with fluconazole in patients with invasive candidiasis. Additionally, patients treated with anidulafungin compared with patients receiving fluconazole have exhibited a trend toward improved survival. The three echinocandins (anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin) offer proven efficacy along with excellent side-effect profiles. While these three drugs have important differences, the empirical selection of an echinocandin should be based on the specific patient population, including clinical status, the suspected pathogen, and the susceptibility pattern at the institution. Once the Candida species is identified and its susceptibility is determined, clinicians should consider step-down therapy to either fluconazole or voriconazole, with possible conversion from intravenous to oral therapy.

In vitro and in vivo studies to characterize the clearance mechanism and potential cytochrome P450 interactions of anidulafungin

Anidulafungin is a novel semisynthetic echinocandin with potent activity against Candida (including azole-resistant isolates) and Aspergillus spp. and is used for serious systemic fungal infections. The purpose of these studies was to characterize the clearance mechanism and potential for drug interactions of anidulafungin. Experiments included in vitro degradation of anidulafungin in buffer and human plasma, a bioassay for antifungal activity, in vitro human cytochrome P450 inhibition studies, in vitro incubation with rat and human hepatocytes, and mass balance studies in rats and humans. Clearance of anidulafungin appeared to be primarily due to slow chemical degradation, with no evidence of hepatic-mediated metabolism (phase 1 or 2). Under physiological conditions, further degradation of the primary degradant appears to take place. The primary degradation product does not retain antifungal activity. Anidulafungin was not an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 enzymes commonly involved in drug metabolism. Mass balance studies showed that anidulafungin was eliminated in the feces predominantly as degradation products, with only a small fraction (10%) eliminated as unchanged drug; fecal elimination likely occurred via biliary excretion. Only negligible renal involvement in the drug's elimination was observed. In conclusion, the primary biotransformation of anidulafungin is mediated by slow chemical degradation, with no evidence for hepatic enzymatic metabolism or renal elimination.

Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid, tacrolimus and sirolimus after gastric bypass surgery in end-stage renal disease and transplant patients: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Promising data regarding the safety and efficacy of gastric bypass surgery (GBS) as an option to address obesity in the transplant population are emerging. The data lack on how GBS may alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of modern immunosuppression. The objective of this study was to describe the alterations in the PK of modern immunosuppressants and the GBS population.

METHODS

Data are presented on six subjects who participated in this trial--four were on dialysis and two were renal transplant recipients. Dialysis-dependent bypass subjects received a single dose of 6 mg of sirolimus, two 4-mg doses of tacrolimus and two 1000-mg doses of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) over the 24-h study period. Transplant recipients continued their current regimen. Maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (T(max)) and the area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve (AUC(0-12) and AUC(0-infinity) where appropriate) were calculated for tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolic acid (MPA) and mycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPAG).

RESULTS

Significant inter-patient variability in the C(max), T(max) and AUC of tacrolimus, sirolimus MPA and MPAG was observed. A notable difference in the AUC:dose ratio for tacrolimus was seen when comparing data with published data in the non-bypass population. Similar differences in PK were seen with sirolimus, MPA and MPAG.

CONCLUSIONS

When comparing the PK of sirolimus, tacrolimus, MPA and MPAG to published PK data in the non-bypass population, significant differences are observed. It is likely that transplant recipients with GBS would need higher doses of tacrolimus, sirolimus and MMF to provide similar exposure to a non-bypass patient.

[The role of anidulafungin therapy in solid organ transplant recipients]

Anidulafungin is a new echinocandin recently approved for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis, candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis, such as peritonitis and intra-abdominal abscesses in non-neutropenic patients. It is fungicidal against Candida spp. and fungistatic against Aspergillus spp. It is active against Pneumocystis jirovecii. In contrast, anidulafungin does not have activity against Cryptococcus neoformans, Zygomycetes or molds, other than Aspergillus spp. The drug is well tolerated, even in patients with renal or hepatic impairment. In contrast to other echinocandins, it does not significantly interfere with the cytochrome P450 pathway and has a low drug-drug interaction profile, including calcineurinic agents and other drugs used in transplant recipients. So far, anidulafungin appears to have an excellent safety profile with few adverse events and it promises a special consideration in the management of fungal infections happening in transplant recipients.

[Anidulafungin: a new therapeutic approach in antifungal therapy. Pharmacology of anidulafungin]

Anidulafungin is a new echinocandin antifungal agent which inhibits beta-1,3-D-glucan synthase and disrupts fungal cell-wall synthesis. It has marked antifungal activity against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., including amphotericin B and triazole resistant strains. Due to the limited oral availability, anidulafungin in clinical use is available for parenteral administration only. Elimination of anidulafungin takes place via slow non-enzymatic degradation to inactive metabolites. Less than 10% and 1% of the initially administered drug is excreted unchanged into feces and urine, respectively. It does not require dosage adjustment in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment established. Anidulafungin is generally well tolerated. Adverse events appear not to be dose or infusion related. The most common treatment related adverse events are phlebitis, headache, nausea, vomiting and pyrexia. The lack of interactions with tacrolimus, cyclosporine and corticosteroids and its limited toxicity profile places anidulafungin as an attractive new option for the treatment of invasive fungal infections especially in transplant patients.

Antifungal management practices in liver transplant recipients

We sought to determine the approach to antifungal prophylaxis, and diagnostic and therapeutic practices for the management of invasive aspergillosis in liver transplant recipients. Data were collected by an electronic survey questionnaire sent to all active liver transplant programs in North America; 63% (67/106) of the sites completed the survey. Overall, 91% of the sites employed antifungal prophylaxis; 28% used universal prophylaxis and 72% targeted it toward high-risk patients. Fluconazole was the most commonly used agent for universal and targeted prophylaxis. The leading choice for mold-active agents for antifungal prophylaxis was the echinocandins. Combination therapy was used as primary therapy for invasive aspergillosis in 47%, and as salvage in 80%. Thus, a vast majority of the surveyed programs employ antifungal prophylaxis and most use targeted prophylaxis. Consideration of these practices could guide clinical trial design to optimize antifungal prophylaxis in these patients. Our findings also merit investigations to better define the role of diagnostic assays and combination therapeutic strategies for invasive aspergillosis in liver transplant recipients.