Effects of oral prasterone (dehydroepiandrosterone) on single-dose pharmacokinetics of oral prednisone and cortisol suppression in normal women

Chronopharmacology of glucocorticoids

Glucocorticoids influence a wide array of metabolic, anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive, and cognitive signaling processes, playing an important role in homeostasis and preservation of normal organ function. Synthesis is regulated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis of which cortisol is the primary glucocorticoid in humans. Synthetic glucocorticoids are important pharmacological agents that augment the anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties of endogenous cortisol and are widely used for the treatment of asthma, Crohn's disease, and rheumatoid arthritis, amongst other chronic conditions. The homeostatic activity of cortisol is disrupted by the administration of synthetic glucocorticoids and so there is interest in developing treatment options that minimize HPA axis disturbance while maintaining the pharmacological effects. Studies suggest that optimizing drug administration time can achieve this goal. The present review provides an overview of endogenous glucocorticoid activity and recent advances in treatment options that have further improved patient safety and efficacy with an emphasis on chronopharmacology.

Natural Health Product Interactions with Medication

Natural health products (or dietary supplements) refer to those products found in oral dosage forms, containing 1 or more active ingredients considered to be a nutrient, an herbal product, or any other nonnutrient/nonherbal substance. Their use continues to increase in the general population and in patients seen by nutrition support clinicians. Aside from an appraisal of product safety and effectiveness, attention should be paid to the potential for these product ingredients to interact with medication. Estimates are that at least 15 million adults in the United States are at risk for supplement-drug interactions. These can occur through both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic mechanisms. This review describes the influence of dietary supplements on both the disposition and the effect of medication and provides numerous examples. Patients at greatest risk for interactions are those with chronic disease, who use multiple medications-particularly those with a narrow therapeutic range-have genetic variants in drug metabolism, impaired organ function, and are at either end of the age spectrum. Knowledge of the specific effects on drug absorption, metabolism, and effect is still incomplete. Relative to the large number of possible interactions between supplements and medication, only a small number of combinations have been examined or reported. The greatest limiting factor remains the quality or reliability of the existing evidence, as many widely accepted interactions are only theoretical based either on in vitro data or known pharmacology. A distinction needs to be clearly drawn between "documented" interactions and "potential" interactions. Although drug-drug interactions have been widely recognized, supplement-drug interactions may be as important to recognize, report, and manage.

Maintaining physiological testosterone levels by adding dehydroepiandrosterone to combined oral contraceptives: I. Endocrine effects

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether adding dehydroepiandrosterone to combined oral contraceptives (COCs) maintains physiological levels of free testosterone.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study conducted in 81 healthy women (age range: 20-35 years; Body mass index (BMI) range: 18-35 kg/m²) using oral contraceptives. Androgens, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), estradiol (E2) and estrone (E1) were measured, and free testosterone and the free testosterone index were calculated. Subjects discontinued oral contraceptive use for at least one menstrual cycle before being randomized to receive five cycles of ethinyl estradiol (EE) combined with either levonorgestrel (EE/LNG group) or drospirenone (EE/DRSP group) together with either dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) (50 mg/day orally) or placebo. Subsequently, all subjects crossed over to the other treatment arm for an additional five cycles.

RESULTS

Both COCs decreased the levels of all androgens measured. Significant decreases (p<.05) were found with EE/LNG and EE/DRSP for total testosterone (54.5% and 11.3%, respectively) and for free testosterone (66.8% and 75.6%, respectively). Adding DHEA to the COCs significantly increased all androgens compared to placebo. Moreover, including DHEA restored free testosterone levels to baseline values in both COC groups and total testosterone levels to baseline in the EE/LNG group and above baseline in the EE/DRSP group. SHBG concentrations were significantly higher with EE/DRSP compared to EE/LNG (p<.0001). The addition of DHEA did not affect the levels of SHBG.

CONCLUSIONS

Taking COCs reduces total and free testosterone levels and increases SHBG concentrations. By coadministration with DHEA, physiological levels of total and free testosterone are restored while using EE/LNG. With EE/DRSP, only the free testosterone level is normalized by DHEA coadministration.

IMPLICATIONS

A daily oral dose of 50-mg DHEA maintains physiological free and total testosterone levels in women who are using an EE/LNG-containing COC.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dehydroepiandrosterone during use of an ethinylestradiol- and drospirenone-containing oral contraceptive

BACKGROUND

Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) reduce the levels of ovarian and adrenal androgens. Co-administration of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) may normalise androgen levels during COC use.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of the addition of DHEA to a COC on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of DHEA and its sulphate (DHEA-S), and on levels of total and free testosterone (T).

METHODS

In a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study involving 21 female volunteers, the PK and PD of DHEA and DHEA-S were investigated during the use of one cycle of a COC containing 30 μg ethinylestradiol (EE) and 3 mg drospirenone (DRSP) with and without daily co-administration of 50 mg DHEA.

RESULTS

Treatment during one cycle with a COC containing EE and DRSP reduces the exposure to DHEA and DHEA-S by at least 20%. This loss of adrenal androgens can be fully compensated by daily oral co-administration of 50 mg DHEA. With DHEA co-administration total T levels rise significantly (1.44 nmol/L with DHEA vs. 0.82 nmol/L with placebo; p < 0.001). Free T levels decrease significantly with both DHEA and placebo treatment, but significantly less during co-administration of DHEA (6.34 pmol/L with DHEA vs. 3.96 pmol/L with placebo; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

By adding DHEA to a COC the loss of adrenal and ovarian androgens can be restored.

The bioequivalence of the contraceptive steroids ethinylestradiol and drospirenone is not affected by co-administration of dehydroepiandrosterone

OBJECTIVES

To study the effect of co-administration of 50 mg dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on the bioequivalence of ethinylestradiol (EE) and drospirenone (DRSP) in women who were using a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 30 μg EE and 3 mg DRSP, and to estimate whether the addition of DHEA to this COC affects the serum levels and the bioequivalence of the synthetic contraceptive steroids.

METHODS

This was a randomised, double-blind, two-period crossover study. Participants received two EE/DRSP COC treatment cycles in random order, one with and one without daily 50 mg DHEA , separated by a 28-day wash-out cycle during which the subjects used an EE/levonorgestrel (LNG) COC without DHEA. Serum levels of EE and DRSP were measured according to a sampling scheme allowing pharmacokinetic evaluations.

RESULTS

Addition of DHEA to an EE/DRSP COC had no effect on serum levels of EE and DRSP. The COC regimens with and without DHEA were bioequivalent. Oestradiol levels were equally suppressed during pill intake, whether with placebo or DHEA.

CONCLUSION

Adding DHEA to a COC containing EE and DRSP does not affect the pharmacokinetic properties of EE and DRSP. Therefore, it will most likely not affect its contraceptive efficacy.

Assessment of the impact of dosing time on the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of prednisolone

Prednisolone is widely used for the treatment of inflammation and auto-immune diseases. It exhibits nonlinear pharmacokinetics (PK); and its induced systemic effects (pharmacodynamics (PD)) are commonly evaluated with two biomarkers, cortisol and blood lymphocytes in plasma. Circadian patterns are observed in both biomarkers. Furthermore, the disease itself may show a circadian pattern. For example, in rheumatoid arthritis patients, better therapeutic outcomes have been reported when prednisolone was administered in the very early morning. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of dosing time on the PK/PD of prednisolone with a simulation approach using an interactive algorithm. A series of simulations were performed with either intravenous or oral administration of prednisolone or prednisone. The results showed that the initial or maximum concentration and trough concentration of total prednisolone were lower when the drug was administered in the early morning around 6 AM: . Oscillation patterns were observed in cumulative cortisol suppression (CCS) and alteration of total lymphocyte trafficking in blood. When the drug was given in the morning within the therapeutic dose range, or around 6 PM: for a small dose amount (<1 mg), the minimum CCS and maximum effect on lymphocytes were observed. These results indicated that the PK/PD of prednisolone are time- and dose-dependent, and suggested that it is necessary to consider the application of chronotherapy to achieve better clinical outcomes with fewer side effects of prednisolone, and a PK/PD simulation approach could provide a valuable tool to evaluate and predict time-dependency in the system.

Modulation of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11betaHSD) activity biomarkers and pharmacokinetics of PF-00915275, a selective 11betaHSD1 inhibitor

CONTEXT

11beta-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11betaHSD1) is a promising target for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. 11betaHSD1 catalyzes the intracrine conversion of inactive cortisone to the active glucocorticoid cortisol.

OBJECTIVE

Demonstrating inhibition of 11betaHSD1 is challenging because there is no accessible way to directly assess the enzyme activity in vivo. Thus, it was proposed to assess the enzyme activity, in an indirect fashion, using two biomarker methods: the prednisolone generation study (conversion of oral prednisone to prednisolone in plasma) and the ratio of cortisol and cortisone metabolites in urine.

DESIGN

This was a phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multiple-dose study.

SETTING

The study was conducted in a clinical research unit.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty healthy adult volunteers participated in the study.

INTERVENTION

Oral doses of PF-00915275 (0.3-15 mg) and prednisone (10 mg) were administered during the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of PF-00915275, a selective 11betaHSD1 inhibitor, were measured.

RESULTS

Overall, multiple oral doses of PF-00915275 were safe and well tolerated. After oral administration, PF-00915275 was rapidly absorbed, slowly eliminated, and generally displayed dose-proportional increases in exposure. At the 15-mg dose, mean exposure to prednisolone was reduced by 37%, and there was a dose-dependent fall in the 5alpha-tetrahydrocortisol + 5beta-tetrahydrocortisol to tetrahydrocortisone ratio with maximum inhibition of 26% after 14 d. The urinary free cortisol to urinary free cortisone ratio, an indicator of 11betaHSD2 inhibition, did not change.

CONCLUSION

PF-00915275 was safe at all doses tested. The results of the prednisolone generation test and the urinary metabolite ratios confirm that PF-00915275 is a selective 11betaHSD1 inhibitor.

A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Approach to Predict Total Prednisolone Concentrations in Human Plasma

Prednisolone and prednisone are two widely used corticosteroids for various inflammatory and immune diseases. Prednisolone is the active form of prednisone in vivo. Total prednisolone in plasma exhibits nonlinear pharmacokinetics mainly due to its nonlinear protein binding. Other factors such as reversible metabolism (or interconversion between prednisolone and prednisone), competitive protein binding from endogenous cortisol, cortisol circadian rhythm, and prednisolone mediated cortisol suppression complicate prednisolone pharmacokinetics. This study was aimed to develop a new approach to describe the nonlinear pharmacokinetics of total prednisolone and predict total prednisolone concentrations in plasma. Based on literature datasets, a linear two-compartment pharmacokinetic model was developed to adequately describe the reversible metabolism between free prednisone and prednisolone. Cortisol and prednisolone protein binding were described via the sum of a Langmuir and linear type binding. The endogenous cortisol circadian rhythm and cortisol suppression during prednisone or prednisolone exposure were described with a previously reported linear release rate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. By combining the pharmacokinetic models for free prednisone and prednisolone, the linear release rate model for cortisol suppression, and competitive protein binding between cortisol and prednisolone, we were able to predict total prednisolone concentrations in plasma. The predicted total prednisolone concentrations in plasma were in good agreement with the literature reported data. Thus, this PK/PD approach shows that the combination of nonlinear protein binding, cortisol circadian rhythm, and cortisol suppression could account for the nonlinearity of total prednisolone. In addition, it also allows a valid prediction of total prednisolone in plasma after either prednisone or prednisolone administration.

Prasterone

PURPOSE

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects and toxicities, drug interactions, dosage and administration, and safety issues related to the use of prasterone are discussed.

SUMMARY

Prasterone is a proprietary synthetic dehydroepiandrosterone product under investigation for use in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who are taking glucocorticoids. Initial trials investigated prasterone as a treatment to improve disease activity and symptoms in women with mild to moderate SLE. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) did not approve prasterone's labeling for these indications. Subsequent trials have focused on prasterone as a treatment to limit bone loss in women who have SLE. A study was conducted to assess bone mineral density in patients who had been taking glucocorticoids for six months or longer. The patients in the prasterone group showed an increase in bone mineral density, while the placebo group demonstrated a loss. The most common adverse effects of prasterone therapy were acne and hirsutism. Hematuria, hypertension, and serum creatinine concentration increases have also occurred. Interactions of prasterone potentially exist with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors and additive or antagonistic effects could possibly occur with androgens, estrogens, oral contraceptives, and progestins. In clinical trials, oral prasterone dosages of 100-200 mg/day were administered. These dosages have resulted in supraphysiological hormone levels.

CONCLUSION

FDA has granted orphan drug status for the prevention of loss of bone mineral density in SLE patients taking glucocorticoids. FDA is requesting additional Phase III trial data for the treatment of SLE and the prevention of loss of bone mineral density.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of systemically administered glucocorticoids

Glucocorticoids have pleiotropic effects that are used to treat diverse diseases such as asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and acute kidney transplant rejection. The most commonly used systemic glucocorticoids are hydrocortisone, prednisolone, methylprednisolone and dexamethasone. These glucocorticoids have good oral bioavailability and are eliminated mainly by hepatic metabolism and renal excretion of the metabolites. Plasma concentrations follow a biexponential pattern. Two-compartment models are used after intravenous administration, but one-compartment models are sufficient after oral administration.The effects of glucocorticoids are mediated by genomic and possibly nongenomic mechanisms. Genomic mechanisms include activation of the cytosolic glucocorticoid receptor that leads to activation or repression of protein synthesis, including cytokines, chemokines, inflammatory enzymes and adhesion molecules. Thus, inflammation and immune response mechanisms may be modified. Nongenomic mechanisms might play an additional role in glucocorticoid pulse therapy. Clinical efficacy depends on glucocorticoid pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as the elimination half-life, and pharmacodynamic parameters such as the concentration producing the half-maximal effect, determine the duration and intensity of glucocorticoid effects. The special contribution of either of these can be distinguished with pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis. We performed simulations with a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model using T helper cell counts and endogenous cortisol as biomarkers for the effects of methylprednisolone. These simulations suggest that the clinical efficacy of low-dose glucocorticoid regimens might be increased with twice-daily glucocorticoid administration.

Lupus nephritis: a review of the current pharmacological treatments

Proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis World Health Organization Class III and IV patients should benefit from an induction and maintenance therapy with a combined immunosuppressive treatment. Cyclophosphamide is the main recommended drug in induction therapy for a 3- to 6-month treatment period. Refractory lupus nephritis may be considered for immunoablative cyclophosphamide treatment with or without haematopoietic CD34(+) stem-cell transplantation or rituximab. Maintenance therapy should contain either quarterly cyclophosphamide pulses, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil for a total treatment duration of at least 2 years. Recent studies suggested a similar efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide in induction and maintenance therapy. This result has to be confirmed in long-term studies.

Interactions of prednisolone and other immunosuppressants used in dual treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus in lymphocyte proliferation assays

Systemic lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune disease primarily affecting women. Currently, systemic lupus erythematosus therapy is suboptimal due to adverse effects of immunosuppressants, particularly corticosteroids. This study determines the single effects of prednisolone, dehydroepiandrosterone, bromocriptine, tamoxifen, mycophenolic acid, 2-chloro-2'-deoxyadenosine, azathioprine, and chloroquine on lectin-stimulated proliferation of human T lymphocytes, as well as determining whether there are interactions in the joint effects of prednisolone and these agents. The T lymphocytes from the whole blood of 10 middle-aged women were stimulated by phytohemagglutinin and cultured with varying drug concentrations. The Hill function was used to evaluate single-drug response data. Isobolograms were constructed to qualitatively analyze interactions. Parametric analysis based on competitive and noncompetitive interaction models was further applied to quantify the joint interactions and predict steroid-sparing potential. The surface interaction parameter (psi) estimated from parametric analysis was in concordance with isobolographic inspection for all interactions studied. All interactions favored the noncompetitive model. Results suggest that dehydroepiandrosterone is additive in its effect with prednisolone, whereas tamoxifen interacts synergistically, both providing steroid-sparing effects. Novel immuno-suppressants such as mycophenolic acid may still provide added pharmacologic benefit during therapy despite a slight antagonistic interaction with prednisolone. These studies help rationalize actual or potential use of other drugs with prednisolone in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus.

The effects of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate on counterregulatory responses during repeated hypoglycemia in conscious normal rats

We previously determined that both antecedent hypoglycemia and elevated cortisol levels blunt neuroendocrine and metabolic responses to subsequent hypoglycemia in conscious, unrestrained rats. The adrenal steroid dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) has been shown in several studies to oppose corticosteroid action. The purpose of this study was to determine if DHEA-S could preserve counterregulatory responses during repeated hypoglycemia. We studied 40 male Sprague-Dawley rats during a series of 2-day protocols. Day 1 consisted of two 2-h episodes of 1) hyperinsulinemic (30 pmol. kg(-1). min(-1)) euglycemia (6.2 +/- 0.2 mmol/l; n = 12; ANTE EUG), 2) hyperinsulinemic euglycemia (6.0 +/- 0.1 mmol/l; n = 8) plus simultaneous intravenous infusion of DHEA-S (30 mg/kg; ANTE EUG + DHEA-S), 3) hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (2.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/l; n = 12; ANTE HYPO), or 4) hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (2.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/l; n = 8) with simultaneous intravenous infusion of DHEA-S (30 mg/kg; ANTE HYPO + DHEA-S). Day 2 consisted of a single 2-h hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemic (2.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/l) clamp. During the final 30 min of day 2, hypoglycemia norepinephrine levels were significantly lower in the ANTE HYPO group versus the ANTE HYPO + DHEA-S group (2.0 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.3 +/- 0.6 nmol/l; P < 0.05). In addition, epinephrine (8 +/- 1 vs. 17 +/- 2, 14 +/- 3, and 15 +/- 3 nmol/l), glucagon (91 +/- 8 vs. 273 +/- 36, 231 +/- 42, and 297 +/- 48 ng/l), and corticosterone (1,255 +/- 193 vs. 1,915 +/- 212, 1,557 +/- 112, and 1,668 +/- 119 pmol/l) were significantly lower in the ANTE HYPO group versus the ANTE EUG, ANTE EUG + DHEA-S, and ANTE HYPO + DHEA-S groups (P < 0.05). Endogenous glucose production was also significantly less in the ANTE HYPO group versus the ANTE EUG, ANTE EUG + DHEA-S, and ANTE HYPO + DHEA-S groups (13 +/- 5 vs. 32 +/- 3, 38 +/- 7, and 29 +/- 8 micro mol/l. kg(-1). min(-1); P < 0.05). Consequently, the amount of exogenous glucose needed to maintain the glycemic level during the clamp studies was significantly higher in the ANTE HYPO versus the ANTE EUG, ANTE EUG + DHEA-S, and ANTE HYPO + DHEA-S groups (57 +/- 8 vs. 22 +/- 5, 18 +/- 6, and 18 +/- 3 micro mol/l. kg(-1). min(-1); P < 0.05). In summary, day-1 antecedent hypoglycemia blunted neuroendocrine and metabolic responses to next-day hypoglycemia. However, simultaneous DHEA-S infusion during antecedent hypoglycemia preserved neuroendocrine and metabolic counterregulatory responses during subsequent hypoglycemia in conscious rats.

Prednisolone

To develop limited-sampling strategy (LSS) models for estimating prednisolone's area under plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC(0-infinity)), its maximum concentration in plasma (C(max)), and total clearance (CL/F). Healthy subjects (n = 24), enrolled in a bioequivalence study, received 20 mg PO of the prodrug prednisone as reference and test tablets, and plasma prednisolone concentrations (n = 576) were measured by a validated HPLC assay. A linear regression analysis of AUC(0-infinity), C(max), CL/F, and log(CL/F) against the plasma prednisolone concentrations for the reference formulation was carried out to develop LSS models to estimate these parameters. The LSS models were validated on the test formulation data sets and on simulated sets generated by the software ADAPT II. LSS models based on a single [1.5 hours for C(max) and 7 hours for AUC(0-infinity), CL/F, and log(CL/F)] plasma sample, accurately estimated (R2 = 0.84-0.97, mean bias < 1%; mean precision < 10%) these pharmacokinetic parameters. Validation tests indicated that the most informative single-point LSS models developed for the reference formulation provide precise estimates (R(2) > 0.83; mean bias < 3%; mean precision < 10%) of the corresponding pharmacokinetic parameters for the test formulation. LSS models based on the two most informative sampling points (1.5 and 7 hours) were required for accurate estimates (R(2) > 0.87; mean bias < 6%; mean precision < 8%) of prednisolone's C(max), AUC(0-infinity), CL/F, and log(CL/F) for the simulated data sets. Finally, bioequivalence assessment of the prednisone formulations, based on LSS-derived AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) values provided results identical to those obtained using the original values for these parameters. One- and 2-point LSS models provided accurate estimates of prednisolone's C(max), AUC(0-infinity), and CL/F, following single oral doses of prednisone, and allowed correct assessment of bioequivalence between two prednisone formulations.

Effects of prasterone on corticosteroid requirements of women with systemic lupus erythematosus: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether treatment with prasterone (dehydroepiandrosterone [DHEA]) would allow the dosage of prednisone (or an equivalent corticosteroid) to be reduced to < or = 7.5 mg/day for 2 months or longer while maintaining stable or reduced disease activity in steroid-dependent women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

In a double-blind, randomized trial, 191 female SLE patients receiving prednisone (10-30 mg/day) were treated daily with either placebo, 100 mg of oral prasterone (an adrenal androgen), or 200 mg of oral prasterone for 7-9-months. At monthly intervals, corticosteroid dosages were reduced by algorithm in patients whose SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score was stable or improved. Patients for whom a sustained reduction in the dosage of prednisone (< or = 7.5 mg/day) was achieved for at least the last 2 months of the 7-9-month treatment period were classified as responders.

RESULTS

Response rates were 41% in the placebo group, 44% in the 100-mg prasterone group, and 55% in the 200-mg group (P = 0.110, 200 mg versus placebo). Among the 137 subjects (45 in the placebo group, 47 in the 100-mg group, and 45 in the 200-mg group) who had active disease at baseline (defined as SLEDAI score >2), 29%, 38%, and 51%, respectively, were responders (P = 0.031 for 200 mg prasterone versus placebo). Acne was the most common adverse event but was generally mild. Clinical and laboratory changes primarily reflected androgenic effects of prasterone.

CONCLUSION

Among women with lupus disease activity, reducing the dosage of prednisone to < or = 7.5 mg/day for a sustained period of time while maintaining stabilization or a reduction of disease activity was possible in a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with oral prasterone, 200 mg once daily, compared with patients treated with placebo.