Effect of the endothelin-receptor antagonist bosentan on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin

Tailoring oral anticoagulant treatment in the era of multi-drug therapies for PAH and CTEPH

The use of oral anticoagulants in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) presents distinct therapeutic challenges and benefits. In PAH, the benefits of oral anticoagulation are uncertain, with studies yielding mixed results on their efficacy and safety. Conversely, oral anticoagulants are a cornerstone in the treatment of CTEPH, where their use is consistently recommended to prevent recurrent thromboembolic events. The choice between vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remains a significant clinical question, as each type presents advantages and potential drawbacks. Furthermore, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with concomitant PAH and CTEPH treatments complicate anticoagulant management, necessitating careful consideration of individual patient regimens. This review examines the current evidence on oral anticoagulant use in PAH and CTEPH and discusses the implications of DDIs within a context of multi-drug treatments, including targeted drugs in PAH.

New Therapies in Outpatient Pulmonary Medicine

Newer medications and devices, as well as greater understanding of the benefits and limitations of existing treatments, have led to expanded treatment options for patients with lung disease. Treatment advances have led to improved outcomes for patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, and cystic fibrosis. The risks and benefits of available treatments are substantially variable within these heterogeneous disease groups. Defining the role of newer therapies mandates both an understanding of these disorders and overall treatment approaches. This section will review general treatment approaches in addition to focusing on newer therapies for these conditions..

[Targeted therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients without comorbidities]

The 2022 guidelines on pulmonary hypertension from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) provide therapeutic strategies that account for the variability in the clinical presentation of newly diagnosed patients. We summarize treatment recommendations for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in patients without significant comorbidities, particularly for idiopathic, hereditary, drug/toxin-induced, or connective tissue disease-associated PAH. In this group of patients, multidimensional assessments for short-term mortality risk guide initial treatment decisions and treatment decisions during follow-up. Upfront dual combination therapy (phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor and endothelin receptor antagonist) is recommended for low- and intermediate-risk patients, and triple therapy including a parenteral prostacyclin should be considered in high- or intermediate-high-risk patients. If a low or intermediate-low-risk profile cannot be achieved during therapy, sequential add-on therapy escalation with parenteral prostacyclin or a prostacyclin receptor agonist should be considered, and switching from a phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor to a guanylate cyclase stimulator may also be considered.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive disease characterised by remodelling of the pulmonary arteries and progressive narrowing of the pulmonary vasculature. This leads to a progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary arterial pressure and, if left untreated, to right ventricular failure and death. A correct diagnosis requires a complete work-up including right heart catheterisation performed in a specialised centre. Although our knowledge of the epidemiology, pathology and pathophysiology of the disease, as well as the development of innovative therapies, has progressed in recent decades, PAH remains a serious clinical condition. Current treatments for the disease target the three specific pathways of endothelial dysfunction that characterise PAH: the endothelin, nitric oxide and prostacyclin pathways. The current treatment algorithm is based on the assessment of severity using a multiparametric risk stratification approach at the time of diagnosis (baseline) and at regular follow-up visits. It recommends the initiation of combination therapy in PAH patients without cardiopulmonary comorbidities. The choice of therapy (dual or triple) depends on the initial severity of the condition. The main treatment goal is to achieve low-risk status. Further escalation of treatment is required if low-risk status is not achieved at subsequent follow-up assessments. In the most severe patients, who are already on maximal medical therapy, lung transplantation may be indicated. Recent advances in understanding the pathophysiology of the disease have led to the development of promising emerging therapies targeting dysfunctional pathways beyond endothelial dysfunction, including the TGF-β and PDGF pathways.

Drug Interactions Associated With Therapies for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Objective: To evaluate the potential for drug interactions with therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Treatments include calcium channel blockers, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, endothelin receptor antagonists, guanylate cyclase stimulators, prostacyclin analogues, and prostacyclin receptor agonists. Data Sources: A systemic literature search (January 1980-December 2021) was performed using PubMed and EBSCO to locate relevant articles. The mesh terms used included each specific medication available as well as "drug interactions." DAILYMED was used for product-specific drug interactions. Study Selection and Data Extraction: The search was conducted to identify drug interactions with PAH treatments. The search was limited to those articles studying human applications with PAH treatments and publications using the English language. Case reports, clinical trials, review articles, treatment guidelines, and package labeling were selected for inclusion. Data Synthesis: Primary literature and package labeling indicate that PAH treatments are subject to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. The management of PAH is rapidly evolving. As more and more evidence becomes available for the use of combination therapy in PAH, the increasing use of combination therapy increases the risk of drug-drug interactions. Pulmonary arterial hypertension is also associated with other comorbidities that require concomitant pharmacotherapy. Conclusion: The available literature indicates that PAH therapies are associated with clinically significant drug interactions and the potential for subsequent adverse reactions. Clinicians in all practice settings should be mindful that increased awareness of drug interactions with PAH therapy will ensure optimal management and patient safety.

Candidate Proficiency Test Chemicals to Address Industrial Chemical Applicability Domains for in vitro Human Cytochrome P450 Enzyme Induction

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes play a key role in the metabolism of both xenobiotics and endogenous chemicals, and the activity of some CYP isoforms are susceptible to induction and/or inhibition by certain chemicals. As CYP induction/inhibition can bring about significant alterations in the level of in vivo exposure to CYP substrates and metabolites, CYP induction/inhibition data is needed for regulatory chemical toxicity hazard assessment. On the basis of available human in vivo pharmaceutical data, a draft Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Test Guideline (TG) for an in vitro CYP HepaRG test method that is capable of detecting the induction of four human CYPs (CYP1A1/1A2, 2B6, and 3A4), has been developed and validated for a set of pharmaceutical proficiency chemicals. However to support TG adoption, further validation data was requested to demonstrate the ability of the test method to also accurately detect CYP induction mediated by industrial and pesticidal chemicals, together with an indication on regulatory uses of the test method. As part of "GOLIATH", a European Union Horizon-2020 funded research project on metabolic disrupting chemical testing approaches, work is underway to generate supplemental validated data for an additional set of chemicals with sufficient diversity to allow for the approval of the guideline. Here we report on the process of proficiency chemical selection based on a targeted literature review, the selection criteria and considerations required for acceptance of proficiency chemical selection for OECD TG development (i.e. structural diversity, range of activity, relevant chemical sectors, global restrictions etc). The following 13 proposed proficiency chemicals were reviewed and selected as a suitable set for use in the additional validation experiments: tebuconazole, benfuracarb, atrazine, cypermethrin, chlorpyrifos, perfluorooctanoic acid, bisphenol A, N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide, benzo-[a]-pyrene, fludioxonil, malathion, triclosan, and caffeine. Illustrations of applications of the test method in relation to endocrine disruption and non-genotoxic carcinogenicity are provided.

Inhibition and induction of CYP enzymes in humans: an update

The cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme family is the most important enzyme system catalyzing the phase 1 metabolism of pharmaceuticals and other xenobiotics such as herbal remedies and toxic compounds in the environment. The inhibition and induction of CYPs are major mechanisms causing pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions. This review presents a comprehensive update on the inhibitors and inducers of the specific CYP enzymes in humans. The focus is on the more recent human in vitro and in vivo findings since the publication of our previous review on this topic in 2008. In addition to the general presentation of inhibitory drugs and inducers of human CYP enzymes by drugs, herbal remedies, and toxic compounds, an in-depth view on tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and antiretroviral HIV medications as victims and perpetrators of drug–drug interactions is provided as examples of the current trends in the field. Also, a concise overview of the mechanisms of CYP induction is presented to aid the understanding of the induction phenomena.

Results from Drug-Drug Interaction Studies In Vitro and In Vivo Investigating the Effect of Finerenone on the Pharmacokinetics of Comedications

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In vivo studies were performed with the novel, selective, non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone to assess the relevance of inductive and/or inhibitory effects on cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes observed in vitro.

METHODS

CYP isoenzyme-specific substrates were incubated in vitro with finerenone or its metabolites to investigate reversible and irreversible inhibitory as well as inductive potential. Three crossover studies in healthy male volunteers investigated the effects of finerenone (20 mg orally) on the pharmacokinetics of the index substrates midazolam (CYP3A4, n = 30), repaglinide (CYP2C8, n = 28) and warfarin (CYP2C9, n = 24).

RESULTS

Finerenone caused direct inhibitory effects on CYP activities in vitro in the rank order CYP2C8, CYP1A1 > CYP3A4 > CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, but not on other major CYP isoforms. Moreover, irreversible inhibition of CYP3A4 was observed. The major metabolites of finerenone demonstrated minor reversible inhibition of CYP1A1, CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 with no hint of time-dependent inhibition of any CYP isoform. Calculations from in vitro data according to regulatory guidelines suggested likely inhibition of CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 in vivo, whereas this was not the case for CYP1A1, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. Furthermore, finerenone and three of its metabolites were inducers of CYP3A4 in vitro with predicted weak-to-moderate in vivo relevance. Studies in healthy volunteers, prompted by these results, demonstrated no effect of finerenone on CYP isoenzymes for which in vitro data had indicated potential inhibition or induction.

CONCLUSION

Administration of finerenone 20 mg once daily confers no risk of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with substrates of cytochrome P450 enzymes.

Validation of in vitro methods for human cytochrome P450 enzyme induction: Outcome of a multi-laboratory study

CYP enzyme induction is a sensitive biomarker for phenotypic metabolic competence of in vitro test systems; it is a key event associated with thyroid disruption, and a biomarker for toxicologically relevant nuclear receptor-mediated pathways. This paper summarises the results of a multi-laboratory validation study of two in vitro methods that assess the potential of chemicals to induce cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme activity, in particular CYP1A2, CYP2B6, and CYP3A4. The methods are based on the use of cryopreserved primary human hepatocytes (PHH) and human HepaRG cells. The validation study was coordinated by the European Union Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal Testing of the European Commission's Joint Research Centre and involved a ring trial among six laboratories. The reproducibility was assessed within and between laboratories using a validation set of 13 selected chemicals (known human inducers and non-inducers) tested under blind conditions. The ability of the two methods to predict human CYP induction potential was assessed. Chemical space analysis confirmed that the selected chemicals are broadly representative of a diverse range of chemicals. The two methods were found to be reliable and relevant in vitro tools for the assessment of human CYP induction, with the HepaRG method being better suited for routine testing. Recommendations for the practical application of the two methods are proposed.

Rivaroxaban and macitentan can be coadministered without dose adjustment but the combination of rivaroxaban and St John's wort should be avoided

AIMS

We assessed the potential mutual interaction of oral macitentan (cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 substrate) at steady-state with single-dose oral rivaroxaban (CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein substrate) and evaluated the effect of the CYP3A and P-glycoprotein inducer St John's wort (SJW) on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Twelve healthy volunteers completed this open-label, monocentre, two-period, one-sequence phase I clinical trial. The pharmacokinetics of macitentan (10 mg) was assessed on study days 3 (single dose), 15 (steady-state), 16 (impact of rivaroxaban) and 29 (after induction by oral SJW), and of rivaroxaban on days 2 (single dose), 16 (impact of macitentan at steady-state) and 29 (after induction by SJW). Concurrently, we quantified changes of CYP3A activity using oral microdoses of midazolam (30 μg).

RESULTS

Rivaroxaban and macitentan did not significantly change the pharmacokinetics of each other. After induction with SJW, CYP3A activity increased by 272% and geometric mean ratios of macitentan AUC decreased by 48% and of C_max by 45%. Concurrently, also geometric mean ratios of rivaroxaban AUC and C_max decreased by 25%.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence for a relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between macitentan and rivaroxaban suggesting that these two drugs can be combined without dose adjustment. SJW strongly increased CYP3A activity and substantially reduced rivaroxaban and macitentan exposure while estimated net endothelin antagonism only decreased by 20%, which is considered clinically irrelevant. The combination of SJW with rivaroxaban should be avoided.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Bosentan Identifies the Saturable Hepatic Uptake As a Major Contributor to Its Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics

Bosentan is a substrate of hepatic uptake transporter organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs), and undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism by cytochrome P450 (P450), namely, CYP3A4 and CYP2C9. Several clinical investigations have reported a nonlinear relationship between bosentan doses and its systemic exposure, which likely involves the saturation of OATP-mediated uptake, P450-mediated metabolism, or both in the liver. Yet, the underlying causes for the nonlinear bosentan pharmacokinetics are not fully delineated. To address this, we performed physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling analyses for bosentan after its intravenous administration at different doses. As a bottom-up approach, PBPK modeling analyses were performed using in vitro kinetic parameters, other relevant parameters, and scaling factors. As top-down approaches, three different types of PBPK models that incorporate the saturation of hepatic uptake, metabolism, or both were compared. The prediction from the bottom-up approach (models 1 and 2) yielded blood bosentan concentration-time profiles and their systemic clearance values that were not in good agreement with the clinically observed data. From top-down approaches (models 3, 4, 5-1, and 5-2), the prediction accuracy was best only with the incorporation of the saturable hepatic uptake for bosentan. Taken together, the PBPK models for bosentan were successfully established, and the comparison of different PBPK models identified the saturation of the hepatic uptake process as a major contributing factor for the nonlinear pharmacokinetics of bosentan.

Metabolism and Disposition of a Novel Selective α7 Neuronal Acetylcholine Receptor Agonist ABT-126 in Humans: Characterization of the Major Roles for Flavin-Containing Monooxygenases and UDP-Glucuronosyl Transferase 1A4 and 2B10 in Catalysis

Mass balance, metabolism, and excretion of ABT-126, an α7 neuronal acetylcholine receptor agonist, were characterized in healthy male subjects (n = 4) after a single 100-mg (100 μCi) oral dose. The total recovery of the administered radioactivity was 94.0% (±2.09%), with 81.5% (±10.2%) in urine and 12.4% (±9.3%) in feces. Metabolite profiling indicated that ABT-126 had been extensively metabolized, with 6.6% of the dose remaining as unchanged parent drug in urine. Parent drug accounted for 12.2% of the administered radioactivity in feces. The primary metabolic transformations of ABT-126 involved aza-adamantane N-oxidation (M1, 50.3% in urine) and aza-adamantane N-glucuronidation (M11, 19.9% in urine). M1 and M11 were also major circulating metabolites, accounting for 32.6% and 36.6% of the drug-related material in plasma, respectively. These results demonstrated that ABT-126 is eliminated primarily by hepatic metabolism, followed by urinary excretion. Enzymatic studies suggested that M1 formation is mediated primarily by human liver flavin-containing monooxygenase (FMO)3 and, to a lesser extent, by human kidney FMO1; M11 is generated mainly by human uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A4, whereas UGT 2B10 also contributes to ABT-126 glucuronidation. Species-dependent formation of M11 was observed in hepatocytes; M11 was formed in human and monkey hepatocytes, but not in rat and dog hepatocytes, suggesting that monkeys constitute an appropriate model for predicting the fate of compounds undergoing significant N-glucuronidation. M1 and M11 are not expected to have clinically relevant on- or off-target pharmacologic activities. In summary, this study characterized ABT-126 metabolites in the circulation and excreta and the primary elimination pathways of ABT-126 in humans.

Considerations from the IQ Induction Working Group in Response to Drug-Drug Interaction Guidance from Regulatory Agencies: Focus on Downregulation, CYP2C Induction, and CYP2B6 Positive Control

The European Medicines Agency (EMA), the Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have issued guidelines for the conduct of drug-drug interaction studies. To examine the applicability of these regulatory recommendations specifically for induction, a group of scientists, under the auspices of the Drug Metabolism Leadership Group of the Innovation and Quality (IQ) Consortium, formed the Induction Working Group (IWG). A team of 19 scientists, from 16 of the 39 pharmaceutical companies that are members of the IQ Consortium and two Contract Research Organizations reviewed the recommendations, focusing initially on the current EMA guidelines. Questions were collated from IQ member companies as to which aspects of the guidelines require further evaluation. The EMA was then approached to provide insights into their recommendations on the following: 1) evaluation of downregulation, 2) in vitro assessment of CYP2C induction, 3) the use of CITCO as the positive control for CYP2B6 induction by CAR, 4) data interpretation (a 2-fold increase in mRNA as evidence of induction), and 5) the duration of incubation of hepatocytes with test article. The IWG conducted an anonymous survey among IQ member companies to query current practices, focusing specifically on the aforementioned key points. Responses were received from 19 companies. All data and information were blinded before being shared with the IWG. The results of the survey are presented, together with consensus recommendations on downregulation, CYP2C induction, and CYP2B6 positive control. Results and recommendations related to data interpretation and induction time course will be reported in subsequent articles.

Survival benefits of warfarin in Korean patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) is an incurable disease with high mortality. Although most studies recommend anticoagulation treatment for IPAH, the benefits are uncertain, particularly in Korea, where it has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate survival outcomes of Korean patients with IPAH treated with warfarin.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed previously with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at the Asan Medical Center in Korea, between January 1994 and February 2013. We excluded patients with associated PAH, patients who did not undergo right heart catheterization (RHC), and patients with a positive vasoreactivity test. Patients in the study cohort were classified into a "warfarin group" and a "non-warfarin group," according to the treatment they received during the first year after diagnosis.

RESULTS

We identified 31 patients with IPAH and a negative vasoreactivity test on RHC. Median patient age was 36.0 years, and 23 patients (74.2%) were female. The median time from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis was 19.0 months, and the most common presenting symptom was dyspnea. Survival rates of the patients at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 90.2%, 79.5%, 62.7%, and 34.8%, respectively. The mean survival period was 12.0 years in the warfarin group and 6.1 years in the non-warfarin group. Warfarin treatment had significant survival benefits in patients with IPAH (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Warfarin treatment substantially improved survival outcomes in Korean cases of IPAH.

Clarithromycin substantially increases steady-state bosentan exposure in healthy volunteers

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 inhibitor clarithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of bosentan. We also aimed to evaluate the impact of CYP2C9 and SLCO1B1 (encoding for OATP1B1) genotypes and their combination.

METHODS

We assessed the effect of the OATP and CYP3A inhibitor clarithromycin on bosentan pharmacokinetics at steady state and concurrently quantified changes of CYP3A activity using midazolam as a probe drug. Sixteen healthy volunteers received therapeutic doses of bosentan (125 mg twice daily) for 14 days and clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily) concomitantly for the last 4 days, and bosentan pharmacokinetics was assessed on days 1, 10 and 14.

RESULTS

Clarithromycin significantly increased bosentan area under the plasma concentration-time curve of the dosing interval 3.7-fold and peak concentration 3.8-fold in all participants irrespective of the genotype. Clarithromycin also reduced CYP3A activity (midazolam clearance) in all participants; however, these changes were not correlated to the changes of bosentan clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Clarithromycin substantially increases the exposure to bosentan, suggesting that dose reductions may be necessary.

The role of endothelin-1 in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare but debilitating disease, which if left untreated rapidly progresses to right ventricular failure and eventually death. In the quest to understand the pathogenesis of this disease differences in the profile, expression and action of vasoactive substances released by the endothelium have been identified in patients with PAH. Of these, endothelin-1 (ET-1) is of particular interest since it is known to be an extremely powerful vasoconstrictor and also involved in vascular remodelling. Identification of ET-1 as a target for pharmacological intervention has lead to the discovery of a number of compounds that can block the receptors via which ET-1 mediates its effects. This review sets out the evidence in support of a role for ET-1 in the onset and progression of the disease and reviews the data from the various clinical trials of ET-1 receptor antagonists for the treatment of PAH.

A descriptive evaluation of warfarin use in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Although warfarin is often recommended for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) management to mitigate thrombotic risk and improve survival, limited information exists to guide anticoagulation therapy. The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast warfarin therapy monitoring requirements and outcomes in patients with PAH and atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving long-term anticoagulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients initiated on warfarin for PAH between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2008 were matched by warfarin initiation date (±90 days), age (±5 years), chronic disease score (±1 points), and sex to patients initiated for AF. The primary study endpoint was frequency of INR monitoring per 30 days of observation. Secondary endpoints included indicators of INR control and warfarin-related adverse events.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

A total of 84 patients were included - 18 and 66 in the PAH and AF groups, respectively. Patients with PAH had a higher median rate of INR measurements per 30 days compared to patients with AF (median=2.0, interquartile range [IQR]=1.5 - 2.3 vs. median=1.6, IQR=1.3 - 2.0, p=0.046). There were no differences between groups with respect to percent of INR measurements in range, overall time in therapeutic range (TTR), or warfarin-related adverse events (all p>0.05). Study results suggest that patients with PAH may be more difficult to manage as seen through more frequent INR monitoring. Potential management difficulties did not translate to a lower performance on indicators of INR control or increased risk of warfarin-related adverse events.

Bosentan

Bosentan (Tracleer, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd) is an oral dual endothelin receptor antagonist approved for use in functional class III to IV pulmonary arterial hypertension. In two placebo-controlled trials, patients receiving bosentan showed improved functional class, 6-minute walk distance and hemodynamics over a 12- to 16-week period. Follow-up data over 3 years has shown few deteriorations,with the majority of patients maintaining their response to bosentan alone. Investigations exploring the use of bosentan as an add-on agent to intravenous epoprostenol (Flolan, GlaxoSmithKline Plc) in those with the most severe disease are ongoing. Bosentan may also have antifibrotic properties and its use in pulmonary fibrosis is being explored. Ease of administration of bosentan with twice-daily oral dosing will provide many patients with pulmonary hypertension an option for treatment without the risks and discomforts of continuous intravenous medication.

Efficacy, safety and clinical pharmacology of macitentan in comparison to other endothelin receptor antagonists in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Macitentan is a novel dual endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) showing sustained receptor occupancy. In vitro and in vivo animal studies have demonstrated its potency in antagonizing endothelin-induced disorders. A large morbidity/mortality study in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) taking macitentan has been completed recently.

AREAS COVERED

This drug evaluation reviews the efficacy, safety and clinical pharmacology of macitentan in the treatment of PAH.

EXPERT OPINION

The large Phase III study (SERAPHIN) tested macitentan in more than 700 PAH patients and has provided unique long-term outcome data for this ERA, not available for other members of this class. The effect on a composite clinically relevant morbidity/mortality end point was highly significant at a 10 mg/day dose. The safety profile of macitentan appears to be superior with respect to hepatic safety and edema/fluid retention than bosentan and ambrisentan, respectively, and is similar when considering decrease in hemoglobin concentration. The drug has a low propensity for drug-drug interactions and has one circulating pharmacologically active metabolite. The pharmacokinetics of macitentan in patients with renal or hepatic impairment does not require dose adjustments. Based on its characteristics, macitentan is an important addition to the therapeutic armamentarium in the long-term treatment of PAH. Its potential use in other disorders is under investigation.

WHO Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension: current and investigative therapies

Major advances have been made in the treatment of World Health Organization Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Since the mid-1990s, nine medications have become available in the United States to target three key pathophysiologic derangements in PAH - the prostacyclin, endothelin, and nitric oxide pathways. As a group, these agents have led to improvements in functional capacity, symptoms, hemodynamics, and survival. Most patients with mild to moderate PAH are started on orally active agents such as endothelin receptor antagonists or phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Patients with more severe disease, particularly those with evidence of right heart failure, should be treated with continuous prostacyclin infusion or a combination of a prostacyclin and oral therapy. Each medication has unique properties and clinical considerations, and the selection of an appropriate therapy must be tailored to the individual patient. None of the currently available WHO Group 1 PAH therapies are curative, however, and it is the hope that new therapies in development may halt or reverse disease progression. This review will discuss the major therapeutic classes of presently available medications and their role in managing the patient with PAH. We will also review data supporting the use of combination therapy, adjuvant background therapy, and new agents currently under investigation.

Influence of CYP4F2 polymorphisms and plasma vitamin K levels on warfarin sensitivity in Japanese pediatric patients

The aim of this study was to reveal the contribution of CYP4F2, CYP2C9, and VKORC1 genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in Japanese pediatric patients. Genetic analyses of CYP4F2 (rs2108622), CYP2C9 (*2 and *3), and VKORC1 (-1639G>A) were performed, and plasma unbound warfarin, vitamin K1 (VK1), and menaquinone-4 (MK-4) concentrations were determined in 37 Japanese pediatric patients. The patients with CYP4F2 variant alleles C/T and T/T scored significantly lower values for the warfarin sensitivity index (INR/Cpss) and had significantly higher plasma concentrations of MK-4 than patients with the CYP4F2 allele C/C. Moreover, the plasma MK-4 concentration was negatively correlated with the warfarin sensitivity index. In contrast, the VKORC1 genetic polymorphism did not influence the warfarin sensitivity index. In patients with the CYP2C9 *3 allele, the unbound oral clearance values (normalized to body surface area) for S-warfarin were found to be significantly lower than in patients with the wild-type allele. In conclusion, CYP4F2 genetic polymorphism and plasma MK-4 concentration influence the pharmacodynamics of warfarin, suggesting a mechanism though which CYP4F2 genotype affects warfarin dose.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of endothelin receptor antagonists in pulmonary arterial hypertension

The authors review the basic pharmacology and potential for adverse drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of bosentan and ambrisentan, the 2 endothelin receptor antagonists currently approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treatment. Bosentan, an endothelin (ET) receptor-type ET(A) and ET(B) antagonist, is metabolized to active metabolites by and an inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP)2C9 and CYP3A. Ambrisentan, a selective ET(A) receptor antagonist, is metabolized primarily by uridine 5'diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) 1A9S, 2B7S, and 1A3S and, to a lesser extent, by CYP3A and CYP2C19. Drug interactions observed with bosentan DDI studies have demonstrated a potential for significant clinical implications during PAH management: bosentan is contraindicated with cyclosporine A and glyburide, and additional monitoring/dose adjustments are required when coadministered with hormonal contraceptives, simvastatin, lopinavir/ritonavir, and rifampicin. As bosentan carries a boxed warning regarding risks of liver injury and showed dose-dependant increases in serum aminotransferase abnormalities, drug interactions that increase bosentan exposure are of particular clinical concern. Ambrisentan DDI studies performed to date have shown only one clinically relevant DDI, an interaction with cyclosporine A that requires ambrisentan dose reduction. As the treatment of PAH moves toward multimodal combination therapy, scrutiny should be placed on ensuring that drug combinations achieve maximal clinical benefit while minimizing side effects.

Endothelin receptor antagonists -- their role in pulmonary medicine

INTRODUCTION

Understanding of the function of endothelin-1 in the pathophysiology of endothelial disease, in particular pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), has paved the way for the development of endothelin-receptor antagonists (ERAs) and explains the leading role they now play in the treatment armamentarium for this disease.

BACKGROUND

Three active ERA drugs (bosentan, sitaxentan, ambrisentan) are currently approved for the treatment of PAH in France. Several randomised clinical trials have demonstrated their efficacy and safety in PAH.

PERSPECTIVES AND CONCLUSION

Besides its vasoconstrictor effect, endothelin-1 (ET-1) plays a pivotal role in cell proliferation and apoptosis. ERAs are innovative drugs potentially useful in some pulmonary disorders such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis or systemic sclerosis, even though the preliminary results published remain insufficient or controversial.

CONCLUSION

ERAs play a major role in the management of pulmonary vascular disease. Other drugs, still under study, could prove useful in the treatment of infiltrating pneumonias.

Differential modulation of the expression of important drug metabolising enzymes and transporters by endothelin-1 receptor antagonists ambrisentan and bosentan in vitro

The safety and effectiveness of drugs used to treat chronic diseases critically depend on their propensity to interact with co-administered drugs. Induction of enzymes and drug transporters involved in the clearance and distribution of drugs may critically reduce exposure with their substrates and thus lead to nonresponse. We therefore investigated the impact of the endothelin-1 receptor antagonists bosentan and ambrisentan on the expression of relevant human efflux and uptake transporters and on phase 1 and phase 2 enzymes. LS180 adenocarcinoma cells were treated for four days with bosentan or ambrisentan (1-50 μM), the positive control rifampicin, or medium only (negative control). For evaluation of bosentan also HuH-7 human hepatoma cells were used and treated similarly. Gene expression was quantified at the mRNA level by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and for some genes also at the protein level by western blot analysis. Comparable to rifampicin, bosentan was a moderate to strong inductor for all cytochrome P450 isozymes and ATP-binding cassette transporters tested, and it also induced organic anion transporting polypeptides. 50 μM bosentan up-regulated e.g. CYP3A4 8.5-fold, ABCB1 5.1-fold, and ABCB11 1.9-fold at the mRNA level in LS180 cells. In HuH-7 cells induction was much less pronounced (e.g. CYP3A4 1.9-fold for bosentan). In contrast, ambrisentan only weakly induced some of the genes investigated in LS180 cells. These findings corroborate the in vivo finding that bosentan is much more prone to drug interactions than ambrisentan.

Targeted oral therapies in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Recent advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have led to the US FDA's approval of eight drugs for its treatment. Although guidelines for the use of PAH therapies are available and regularly updated, there is a lack of information on how these agents differ and what characteristics may enable one agent to be of greater relative clinical utility than another. Oral agents may be compared across a variety of measures, including clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability, dosing and pharmacology, potential for drug interactions, treatment adherence and suitability for use in combination regimens. Although no large, prospective, head-to-head trial has been conducted with oral agents for PAH, data from placebo-controlled studies indicate that the enrolled patient populations were remarkably homogeneous with respect to demographic and disease severity parameters. In general, data suggest that these agents improve functional capacity, delay disease progression and improve haemodynamics. Additionally, long-term sustainability of response has been demonstrated. However, there was no consistently superior agent across the primary and secondary endpoints assessed in these trials, and the magnitudes of improvements were in a fairly defined range across agents. Consequently, treatment choice may shift to other aspects such as drug safety and tolerability, potential for drug interactions, dosing convenience, treatment adherence, effect on quality of life and access to medication. In this review, the four targeted oral agents approved for the treatment of PAH in the US are reviewed, and clinical results are placed into context.

Riociguat (BAY 63-2521) and warfarin: a pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction study

Riociguat (BAY 63-2521) and warfarin are likely to be used concomitantly to treat pulmonary hypertension. The aim of this double-blind, crossover, clinical pharmacological study in 30 healthy volunteers was to investigate potential pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between the 2 drugs. Healthy volunteers took 2.5 mg of oral riociguat or matching placebo 3 times daily for 10 days. A single oral dose of warfarin sodium (25 mg) was given 21 days before the study and on the seventh day of riociguat/placebo treatment. Twenty-one participants valid for safety analysis reported 89 treatment-emergent adverse events, all of mild or moderate severity. No serious adverse events occurred. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events considered to be drug-related were dyspepsia, headache, flatulence, nausea, and vomiting. Twenty-two participants were valid for pharmacodynamic/pharmaco-kinetic analysis. Riociguat (2.5 mg 3 times daily) had no pharmacodynamic interaction with warfarin. Steady-state plasma levels of riociguat did not affect prothrombin time, factor VII clotting activity, or the pharmacokinetics of warfarin. The single dose of warfarin led to a slight decrease (16%) in maximum concentration of riociguat in plasma, which is not likely to be clinically relevant. Clinical studies will confirm the finding here that combined use of riociguat with warfarin will not require dose adaptation.

Bosentan

IMPORTANCE TO THE FIELD

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a morbid condition with high mortality if left untreated. Bosentan is an effective treatment option for group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension. Bosentan improves exercise tolerance and functional class and delays the time to clinical worsening in these patients. Investigation is ongoing to determine its efficacy in other groups of pulmonary hypertension.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This review provides a background on endothelin activity in PAH, as a rationale for the use of bosentan in this disease. It also presents evidence from key clinical trials of bosentan and discusses future directions in the study of bosentan to help the clinician better understand the role of bosentan in PAH management.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

i) An understanding of the rationale for using endothelin receptor antagonists in treating PAH; ii) an understanding of the clinical evidence to support bosentan for the treatment of PAH; and iii) an understanding of how to use bosentan optimally in the treatment of PAH.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Bosentan is an effective and safe treatment for patients with PAH. Patients with suspected PAH should be evaluated carefully as the use of bosentan in non-group 1 pulmonary hypertension is still being investigated. Patients on bosentan should be monitored with monthly liver transaminase testing. Coadministration with other drugs should be reviewed carefully as drug-drug interactions may be important.

Bosentan: a review of its use in the management of mildly symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension

Bosentan (Tracleer) is an orally administered dual endothelin-1 (ET-1) receptor antagonist approved for use in patients with WHO class II (mildly symptomatic) pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Oral bosentan therapy was beneficial and generally well tolerated in patients with mildly symptomatic PAH. In a well designed, placebo-controlled trial in adolescents and adults with mildly symptomatic PAH, pulmonary vascular resistance was significantly reduced with bosentan relative to placebo, but the 6-minute walk distance did not increase significantly. Similarly, pediatric patients (most of whom had mildly symptomatic PAH) in a small uncontrolled trial experienced some improvement in hemodynamic variables with bosentan, but did not experience a significant increase in exercise capacity. Adverse events associated with bosentan were consistent with those seen in other indications, with major concerns being the potential for teratogenicity and hepatotoxicity, for which regular liver function monitoring is recommended. Overall, considering the progressive nature of PAH, bosentan extends the treatment options available to patients with mildly symptomatic PAH.

Bosentan: a review of its use in the management of digital ulcers associated with systemic sclerosis

Bosentan (Tracleer) is an orally administered dual endothelin-1 (ET-1) receptor antagonist approved in the EU for reducing the number of new digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis and ongoing digital ulcer disease. Oral bosentan therapy was beneficial and generally well tolerated in patients with digital ulcers associated with systemic sclerosis. In well designed, placebo-controlled trials, bosentan treatment significantly reduced the number of new ulcers, but had no effect on ulcer healing, in patients with digital ulcers. Adverse events associated with bosentan were consistent with those seen during treatment for other indications, with major concerns being the potential for teratogenicity and hepatotoxicity, for which regular liver function monitoring is recommended. Overall, considering the large unmet need for therapeutic options in patients with digital ulcers, bosentan extends the treatment options available to patients with systemic sclerosis-associated digital ulcers.

Safety and tolerability of bosentan in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Endothelin receptor antagonism has emerged as an important therapeutic approach in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Bench to bedside scientific research has clearly shown that endothelin-1 (ET-1) is over-expressed in several forms of pulmonary vascular disease and plays an important pathogenetic role in the development and progression of PAH. Oral endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) have been shown to improve exercise capacity, functional status, pulmonary hemodynamics, and delay the time to clinical worsening in several randomized placebo-controlled trials. Bosentan, the first oral ERA, was approved in 2001 and since that time it has established a strong record of safety and efficacy in PAH. More recently, two additional ERAs, ambrisentan and sitaxsentan, have been approved for use. The objective of this review is to evaluate the available evidence supporting the efficacy, pharmacology, safety and tolerability, and patient-focused perspectives for bosentan, the first approved ERA for PAH. Ongoing and forthcoming randomized trials are also highlighted including the application of bosentan in combination with other PAH therapies.

Interaction of acenocoumarol and sitaxentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND

Sitaxentan inhibits the metabolism of warfarin, resulting in a need for adjustment of warfarin dose when both drugs are coadministered. We report the long-term effects on bleeding of acenocoumarol co-administered as part of conventional therapy for pulmonary hypertension with sitaxentan in a subset of patients enrolled in the Sitaxentan To Relieve ImpaireD Exercise-3 (STRIDE-3) study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

STRIDE-3 is an ongoing, long-term, open-label trial, evaluating the safety and efficacy of sitaxentan, 100 mg once daily, in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Information on bleeding events was collected prospectively, including the type of event, severity, anticoagulant use and investigator attribution of causality. Coagulation tests were performed on a monthly basis. A clinically significant interaction was defined as an international normalized ratio (INR) >/= 5.0, or any minor bleeding event plus an INR > 2.0 and < 5.0.

RESULTS

Of 55 patients enrolled in STRIDE-3, 50 received acenocoumarol. Average follow-up was 158.6 +/- 57.6 weeks. The average dose of anticoagulant therapy was 3.9 +/- 1.3 mg week(-1) (range, 1.5-7.0 mg week(-1)). Following treatment, an INR >/= 5 in at least one INR determination was observed in 13 patients, although none of these patients had a clinically significant bleeding event. Dose reductions in acenocoumarol were performed to adjust target INR to 1.5-2.0. Two patients died of massive haemoptysis, but these episodes were not attributed to a drug interaction. Four patients with an INR > 2.0 and < 5.0 experienced a minor bleeding event (nosebleeds/gingivitis).

CONCLUSIONS

No clinically significant bleeding events were recorded with coadministration of sitaxentan and acenocoumarol in this patient subgroup. These results suggest that coadministration of sitaxentan and acenocoumarol is clinically manageable and well tolerated.

The science of endothelin-1 and endothelin receptor antagonists in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension: current understanding and future studies

Pathological vascular remodelling is a key contributor to the symptomatology of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and reversing this process may offer the best hope for improving this debilitating condition. The vascular remodelling process is believed to be due to endothelial cell dysfunction and to involve altered production of endothelial cell-derived vasoactive mediators. The observation that circulating plasma levels of the vasoactive peptide endothelin (ET)-1 are raised in patients with PAH, and that ET-1 production is increased in the pulmonary tissue of affected individuals, makes it a particularly interesting target for a therapeutic intervention in PAH. Clinical trials with ET receptor antagonists (ETRAs) show that they provide symptomatic benefit in patients with PAH, thereby proving the clinical relevance of the ET system as a therapeutic target. In this paper, we review the role of ET-1 together with the available data on the roles of the specific ET receptors and ETRAs in PAH. In particular, we discuss the possible role of ET receptor selectivity in the vascular remodelling process in PAH and whether selective ET(A) or nonselective ET(A)/ET(B) blockade offers the greatest potential to improve symptoms and alter the clinical course of the disease.

Bleeding events in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Despite limited evidence from clinical studies, anticoagulant drugs such as vitamin K antagonists (VKA) (e.g., warfarin or phenprocoumon) are widely used in the background treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). According to current guidelines, they are generally accepted as efficacious drugs, although their efficacy is neither supported by randomised controlled trials, nor formally approved by regulatory agencies for use in the specific PAH indication. The use of these drugs is not without problems, as a paradoxical situation has to be managed in the treatment of this condition. On one hand, thrombosis is one of the key pathophysiologic features of PAH (besides vasoconstriction, proliferation and inflammation). On the other hand, the incidence of bleeding events is increased in PAH patients. This applies particularly to PAH that is related to connective tissue diseases, congenital heart disease and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. In patients receiving VKA, caution must be observed in particular when concomitantly using prostanoids or sildenafil. Similarly, VKA doses have to be adjusted according to the labelling when using sitaxentan concomitantly. Regular International Normalized Ratio monitoring contributes to the safety of PAH patients on VKA.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in combination with ambrisentan in healthy volunteers

AIMS

Ambrisentan is an oral, propanoic acid-based endothelin receptor antagonist often co-administered with warfarin to patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential for ambrisentan to affect warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

METHODS

In this open-label cross-over study, 22 healthy subjects received a single dose of racemic warfarin 25 mg alone and after 8 days of ambrisentan 10 mg once daily. Assessments included exposure (AUC(0-last)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) for R- and S-warfarin, and International Normalized Ratio maximum observed value (INR(max)) and area under the curve (INR(AUC(0-last))). The effects of warfarin on ambrisentan steady-state pharmacokinetics and the safety of ambrisentan/warfarin co-administration were assessed. Data are presented as geometric mean ratios.

RESULTS

Ambrisentan had no significant effects on the AUC(0-last) of R-warfarin [104.7; 90% confidence interval (CI) 101.7, 107.7) or S-warfarin (101.6; 90% CI 98.4, 105.0). Similarly, ambrisentan had no significant effects on the C(max) of R-warfarin (91.6; 90% CI 86.2, 97.4) or S-warfarin (89.9; 90% CI 84.8, 95.3). Consistent with these observations, little pharmacodynamic change was observed for INR(max) (85.3; 90% CI 82.4, 88.2) or INR(AUC(0-last)) (93.0; 90% CI 90.8, 95.3). In addition, co-administration of warfarin did not alter ambrisentan steady-state pharmacokinetics. Adverse events were infrequent, and there were no bleeding adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple doses of ambrisentan had no clinically relevant effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of warfarin. Therefore, significant dose adjustments of either drug are unlikely to be required with co-administration.

Inhibition and induction of human cytochrome P450 enzymes: current status

Variability of drug metabolism, especially that of the most important phase I enzymes or cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, is an important complicating factor in many areas of pharmacology and toxicology, in drug development, preclinical toxicity studies, clinical trials, drug therapy, environmental exposures and risk assessment. These frequently enormous consequences in mind, predictive and pre-emptying measures have been a top priority in both pharmacology and toxicology. This means the development of predictive in vitro approaches. The sound prediction is always based on the firm background of basic research on the phenomena of inhibition and induction and their underlying mechanisms; consequently the description of these aspects is the purpose of this review. We cover both inhibition and induction of CYP enzymes, always keeping in mind the basic mechanisms on which to build predictive and preventive in vitro approaches. Just because validation is an essential part of any in vitro-in vivo extrapolation scenario, we cover also necessary in vivo research and findings in order to provide a proper view to justify in vitro approaches and observations.

Inhibition of endothelin receptors in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: does selectivity matter?

Treatment options for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have considerably improved in the past few years. Endothelin (ET)-receptor antagonism has been established as a first-line option for the majority of PAH patients. Endothelin-receptor antagonists (ETRAs) comprise sulfonamide and non-sulfonamide agents with different affinities for ET-receptor subtypes (ET_A and ET_B), and the focus of development has shifted from drugs with less selectivity to those with high selectivity. There is ongoing debate as to whether selective or non-selective ET-receptor antagonism is more beneficial in the treatment of PAH. This paper reviews the current evidence from experimental and clinical studies obtained from a thorough literature search focusing on the three marketed drugs bosentan, sitaxentan, and ambrisentan. A clinically meaningful difference among the three approved ETRAs with respect to their ET-receptor selectivity could not be demonstrated to date. Therefore, in clinical practice, other features are likely to be of greater relevance when considering treatment, such as the potential for serious drug–drug interactions, convenience of dosing schedule, or rates of limiting side effects. These characteristics bear more relation to the chemical or pharmacological properties of the drugs than to receptor selectivity itself.

Bosentan for the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension, pulmonary fibrosis and digital ulcers

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a devastating multisytemic autoimmune disease associated with widespread vascular damage. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) occurs in a significant proportion of patients and contributes to the morbidity and mortality that occurs in this disease. The recent development of specific therapies for the treatment of PAH mandates the early recognition, appropriate evaluation and judicious management of PAH in patients with SSc. Because endothelin (ET)-1 plays an important role in the development of PAH in SSc, and may also contribute to the vascular damage and fibrosis that occur in multiple organs in patients with the disease, inhibiting the production and activity of ET-1 is an appealing strategy for the treatment of SSc. This article reviews the pathophysiology of SSc and its vascular complications, and critically evaluates the current knowledge regarding the potential role of the ET-1 receptor blocker bosentan in the management of patients with SSc.

Endothelin receptor antagonists

Endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) have been developed to block the effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1) in a variety of cardiovascular conditions. ET-1 is a powerful vasoconstrictor with mitogenic or co-mitogenic properties, which acts through the stimulation of 2 subtypes of receptors [endothelin receptor subtype A (ETA) and endothelin receptor subtype B (ETB) receptors]. Endogenous ET-1 is involved in a variety of conditions including systemic and pulmonary hypertension (PH), congestive heart failure (CHF), vascular remodeling (restenosis, atherosclerosis), renal failure, cancer, and cerebrovascular disease. The first dual ETA/ETB receptor blocker, bosentan, has already been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Trials of endothelin receptor antagonists in heart failure have been completed with mixed results so far. Studies are ongoing on the effects of selective ETA antagonists or dual ETA/ETB antagonists in lung fibrosis, cancer, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. While non-peptidic ET-1 receptor antagonists suitable for oral intake with excellent bioavailability have become available, proven efficacy is limited to pulmonary hypertension, but it is possible that these agents might find a place in the treatment of several cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular diseases in the coming future.

Bosentan Therapy for Inoperable Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

STUDY OBJECTIVES

We performed an open-label multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan in patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).

PATIENTS

Nineteen patients with inoperable CTEPH were enrolled.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary end point was a change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Secondary end points included 6-min walk test, peak oxygen uptake (V(O2)), New York Heart Association functional class, serum levels of N-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP), and various other hemodynamic parameters.

RESULTS

After 3 months of treatment with bosentan, PVR decreased from 914 +/- 329 to 611 +/- 220 dyne.s.cm(-5) (p < 0.001). Functional class and peak V(O2) remained unchanged, but 6-min walk distance increased from 340 +/- 102 to 413 +/- 130 m (p = 0.009), and serum NT-pro BNP levels improved from 2,895 +/- 2,620 to 2,179 +/- 2,301 (p = 0.027). One patient died, presumably from influenza A infection, and another patient experienced progressive fluid retention despite reduction of PVR. Other than that, treatment was well tolerated by all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This open-label pilot trial suggests that bosentan may offer a therapeutic option for patients with inoperable CTEPH. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.