Nutritional support team vs nonteam management of enteral nutritional support in a Veterans Administration Medical Center teaching hospital

Nutrition support teams: Institution, evolution, and innovation

The historical institution, evolution, and innovations of nutrition support teams (NSTs) over the past six decades are presented. Focused aspects of the transition to transdisciplinary and patient-centered care, NST membership, leadership, and the future of NSTs are further discussed. NSTs were instituted to address the need for the safe implementation and management of parenteral nutrition, developed in the late 1960s, which requires the expertise of individuals working collaboratively in a multidisciplinary fashion. In 1976, the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) was established using the multidisciplinary model. In 1983, the United States established the inpatient prospective payment system with associated diagnosis-related groupings, which altered the provision of nutrition support in hospitals with funded NSTs. The number of funded NSTs has waxed and waned since; yet hospitals and healthcare have adapted, as additional education and experience grew, primarily through ASPEN's efforts. Nutrition support was not administered in some instances by the "core of four" (physician, nurse, dietitian, pharmacist). The functions may be carried out by a member of the core of four not associated with the parent discipline, in accordance with licensure/privileging. This cross-functioning has evolved into the adaptation of the concept of transdisciplinarity, emphasizing function over form, supported and enhanced by "top-of-license" practice. In some institutions, nutrition support has been incorporated into other healthcare teams. Future innovations will assist NSTs in providing the right nutrition support for the right patient in the right way at the right time, recognizing that nutrition care is a human right.

Demonstrating the Value of the Nutrition Support Team to the C-Suite in a Value-Based Environment: Rise or Demise of Nutrition Support Teams?

Nutrition support teams (NSTs) in the United States have had to justify their existence since their inception in the 1970s. Concomitant with those efforts, changes in healthcare financing have challenged hospital administrators to adapt their reimbursement strategies and methods. NSTs, if they are to survive and/or thrive, must be aware of the convulsive currents of change faced by those who determine which programs move downstream and which find their demise on the banks of the stream. This review provides a historical perspective of both the US healthcare financing system and the NST experiences of nutrition clinicians over the past 4 decades. Focused discussions of 5 teams are provided from individual members of those varied NSTs. Additional recommendations from the administrative side of the equation are presented by 3 administrators. Whether NSTs will "rise or demise" depends on many factors. Understanding what those who control the purse strings are seeking in terms of salutary cost and quality outcomes in the current value-based system will facilitate the NST's communication with them. The demonstration of the NST's value is more likely to succeed when bolstered by current evidence-based data as applied to the specific institution. These efforts can be carried out by a formal NST in larger or academic institutions or a "virtual" team with a single individual coordinating the services in a transdisciplinary fashion, employing the acronym ACT (accountability, communication, [transdisciplinary] teamwork).

Factors related to home discharge in malnourished community-dwelling older adults: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study

Patients who become malnourished during hospitalization because of illness or treatment often receive intervention from a nutrition support team (NST). The NST intervention not only enhances the nutritional status but also decreases medical expenses and catheter-related complications. However, the impact of the NST intervention on the home discharge of hospitalized community-dwelling older adults remains unclear. Hence, this study aims to investigate factors related to home discharge in malnourished community-dwelling older adults.In this retrospective longitudinal cohort study, examined 191 community-dwelling older adults aged ≥65 years (108 males; mean age: 80.9 ± 7.8 years) who received the NST intervention. All participants were categorized into two groups based on whether they were home discharged or not (home discharge group and non-home discharge group). We performed intergroup comparisons using serum albumin (Alb) as an index of the nutritional status and functional independence measure (FIM: motor and cognitive items) as an index of activities of daily living (ADL). Furthermore, we constructed a prognostic model of home discharge using the logistic regression analysis.The home discharge group had 94 participants, with a home discharge rate of 50.8%. Baseline body mass index (BMI), motor-FIM score, and cognitive-FIM score were significantly higher in the home discharge group compared with the non-home discharge group (P = .002, P < .001, P < .001, respectively). In the home discharge group, BMI declined significantly, Alb elevated significantly, and both motor-FIM and cognitive-FIM score enhanced significantly by the completion of the NST intervention (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, P = .005, respectively). The adjusted logistic regression analysis extracted the baseline BMI (odds ratio [OR], 1.146; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.034-1.270), baseline motor-FIM score (OR, 1.070; 95% CI: 1.036-1.105), and extent of change in the motor-FIM score (OR, 1.061; 95% CI: 1.026-1.098) as independent factors that predict home discharge.This study highlights the significance of higher baseline BMI, higher baseline ADL level, ADL enhancements, and improvements in the nutritional status by the NST intervention in malnourished community-dwelling older adults considering home discharge.

Association Between Risk Factors and Intensive Nutritional Intervention Outcomes in Elderly Individuals

Background

The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for intensive nutritional intervention outcomes in elderly undernourished patients to help reduce the number of patients with prolonged hospital stay or without recuperation of previous activities of daily living and quality of life.

Methods

In total, 230 patients who received interventions from a nutrition support team (NST) between January 2016 and July 2018 were included. Patients were classified into two groups based on NST intervention outcomes: patients with improved nutritional status were included in the successful group, whereas those whose nutritional status did not improve, as defined by progressive illness or death, were classified into the non-successful group. We assessed patient characteristics, laboratory data, and nutrition support methods.

Results

Our multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that: 1) The presence of peripheral parenteral nutrition (hazard ratio (HR): 1.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13 - 2.88) was identified as an independent risk factor for NST intervention outcomes; 2) The energy fill rate to total energy expenditure was < 66.0% (HR: 1.61; 95% CI: 0.98 - 2.66); and 3) A geriatric nutritional risk index score < 70.0 (HR: 1.54; 95% CI: 0.92 - 2.56) tended to be negatively associated with NST intervention outcomes.

Conclusions

In addition to the nutrition therapy provided by a traditional NST, patients with the risk factors require nutritional intervention. Elderly individuals should also receive nutrition care because they have been recuperating at their home or in long-term care facilities, to prevent experiencing adverse conditions.

Nutrition support in hospitalised adults at nutritional risk

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of disease-related malnutrition in Western European hospitals is estimated to be about 30%. There is no consensus whether poor nutritional status causes poorer clinical outcome or if it is merely associated with it. The intention with all forms of nutrition support is to increase uptake of essential nutrients and improve clinical outcome. Previous reviews have shown conflicting results with regard to the effects of nutrition support.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of nutrition support versus no intervention, treatment as usual, or placebo in hospitalised adults at nutritional risk.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (Ovid SP), Embase (Ovid SP), LILACS (BIREME), and Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science). We also searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (www.who.int/ictrp); ClinicalTrials.gov; Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP); Google Scholar; and BIOSIS, as well as relevant bibliographies of review articles and personal files. All searches are current to February 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We include randomised clinical trials, irrespective of publication type, publication date, and language, comparing nutrition support versus control in hospitalised adults at nutritional risk. We exclude trials assessing non-standard nutrition support.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane and the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group. We used trial domains to assess the risks of systematic error (bias). We conducted Trial Sequential Analyses to control for the risks of random errors. We considered a P value of 0.025 or less as statistically significant. We used GRADE methodology. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, and health-related quality of life.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 244 randomised clinical trials with 28,619 participants that met our inclusion criteria. We considered all trials to be at high risk of bias. Two trials accounted for one-third of all included participants. The included participants were heterogenous with regard to disease (20 different medical specialties). The experimental interventions were parenteral nutrition (86 trials); enteral nutrition (tube-feeding) (80 trials); oral nutrition support (55 trials); mixed experimental intervention (12 trials); general nutrition support (9 trials); and fortified food (2 trials). The control interventions were treatment as usual (122 trials); no intervention (107 trials); and placebo (15 trials). In 204/244 trials, the intervention lasted three days or more.We found no evidence of a difference between nutrition support and control for short-term mortality (end of intervention). The absolute risk was 8.3% across the control groups compared with 7.8% (7.1% to 8.5%) in the intervention groups, based on the risk ratio (RR) of 0.94 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.03, P = 0.16, 21,758 participants, 114 trials, low quality of evidence). We found no evidence of a difference between nutrition support and control for long-term mortality (maximum follow-up). The absolute risk was 13.2% in the control group compared with 12.2% (11.6% to 13%) following nutritional interventions based on a RR of 0.93 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.99, P = 0.03, 23,170 participants, 127 trials, low quality of evidence). Trial Sequential Analysis showed we only had enough information to assess a risk ratio reduction of approximately 10% or more. A risk ratio reduction of 10% or more could be rejected.We found no evidence of a difference between nutrition support and control for short-term serious adverse events. The absolute risk was 9.9% in the control groups versus 9.2% (8.5% to 10%), with nutrition based on the RR of 0.93 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.01, P = 0.07, 22,087 participants, 123 trials, low quality of evidence). At long-term follow-up, the reduction in the risk of serious adverse events was 1.5%, from 15.2% in control groups to 13.8% (12.9% to 14.7%) following nutritional support (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.97, P = 0.004, 23,413 participants, 137 trials, low quality of evidence). However, the Trial Sequential Analysis showed we only had enough information to assess a risk ratio reduction of approximately 10% or more. A risk ratio reduction of 10% or more could be rejected.Trial Sequential Analysis of enteral nutrition alone showed that enteral nutrition might reduce serious adverse events at maximum follow-up in people with different diseases. We could find no beneficial effect of oral nutrition support or parenteral nutrition support on all-cause mortality and serious adverse events in any subgroup.Only 16 trials assessed health-related quality of life. We performed a meta-analysis of two trials reporting EuroQoL utility score at long-term follow-up and found very low quality of evidence for effects of nutritional support on quality of life (mean difference (MD) -0.01, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.01; 3961 participants, two trials). Trial Sequential Analyses showed that we did not have enough information to confirm or reject clinically relevant intervention effects on quality of life.Nutrition support may increase weight at short-term follow-up (MD 1.32 kg, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.00, 5445 participants, 68 trials, very low quality of evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is low-quality evidence for the effects of nutrition support on mortality and serious adverse events. Based on the results of our review, it does not appear to lead to a risk ratio reduction of approximately 10% or more in either all-cause mortality or serious adverse events at short-term and long-term follow-up.There is very low-quality evidence for an increase in weight with nutrition support at the end of treatment in hospitalised adults determined to be at nutritional risk. The effects of nutrition support on all remaining outcomes are unclear.Despite the clinically heterogenous population and the high risk of bias of all included trials, our analyses showed limited signs of statistical heterogeneity. Further trials may be warranted, assessing enteral nutrition (tube-feeding) for different patient groups. Future trials ought to be conducted with low risks of systematic errors and low risks of random errors, and they also ought to assess health-related quality of life.

When is feeding via a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy indicated?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review addresses current controversies regarding appropriate indications for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) insertion. We address specific indications, namely, dementia, stroke, aspiration, motor neurone disease/amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and head and neck cancer. We recommend practical strategies for improving patient selection.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is now a general consensus in the United States that PEG feeding does not benefit patients with advanced dementia. 'Early' PEG insertion following stroke is similarly of no benefit. It is currently unclear whether patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and head and neck tumors should have PEG or radiologically inserted gastrostomy.

SUMMARY

Decisions relating to PEG insertion remain difficult. The gastroenterologist, working as a member of a multidisciplinary nutrition team, needs to take a lead role in this regard, rather than functioning as a technician.

An American Clinical Training Program for Spanish Nutrition Support Pharmacists: A Three-Year Experience

A clinical nutrition support pharmacist training program, in collaboration with the Spanish Foundation of Hospital Pharmacy, Spanish Society of Clinical Nutrition, Abbott Nutrition International, University of Tennessee, College of Pharmacy and Regional One Health, is described. Nutrition support pharmacists from Spain were selected to participate in a one-month training program with an experienced board-certified nutrition support pharmacist faculty member within an interdisciplinary nutrition support team environment in the U.S. Participants were expected to actively engage in an advanced clinical practice role with supervision. Clinical activities included daily intensive patient monitoring, physical assessment, critical evaluation of the patient and development of an appropriate treatment plan for patients receiving either enteral or parenteral nutrition therapy. Upon successful completion of the training program, participants were anticipated to incorporate these techniques into their current practice in Spain and to train other pharmacists to function in an advanced clinical role independently or within an interdisciplinary nutrition support team environment.

Gastroenteric tube feeding: Techniques, problems and solutions

Gastroenteric tube feeding plays a major role in the management of patients with poor voluntary intake, chronic neurological or mechanical dysphagia or gut dysfunction, and patients who are critically ill. However, despite the benefits and widespread use of enteral tube feeding, some patients experience complications. This review aims to discuss and compare current knowledge regarding the clinical application of enteral tube feeding, together with associated complications and special aspects. We conducted an extensive literature search on PubMed, Embase and Medline using index terms relating to enteral access, enteral feeding/nutrition, tube feeding, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/jejunostomy, endoscopic nasoenteric tube, nasogastric tube, and refeeding syndrome. The literature showed common routes of enteral access to include nasoenteral tube, gastrostomy and jejunostomy, while complications fall into four major categories: mechanical, e.g., tube blockage or removal; gastrointestinal, e.g., diarrhea; infectious e.g., aspiration pneumonia, tube site infection; and metabolic, e.g., refeeding syndrome, hyperglycemia. Although the type and frequency of complications arising from tube feeding vary considerably according to the chosen access route, gastrointestinal complications are without doubt the most common. Complications associated with enteral tube feeding can be reduced by careful observance of guidelines, including those related to food composition, administration rate, portion size, food temperature and patient supervision.

Hypokalemia during the early phase of refeeding in patients with cancer

OBJECTIVE

Refeeding syndrome occurs in patients with severe malnutrition when refeeding begins after a long period of starvation. This syndrome increases the risk of clinical complications and mortality. Hypophosphatemia is considered the primary characteristic of the syndrome. The aim of our study was to investigate the presence of other electrolyte alterations in patients with cancer during the early stage of refeeding.

METHODS

In this observational study, we enrolled 34 patients with cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract receiving upfront radiotherapy who were also enrolled in a nutrition program. A caloric intake assessment, anthropometric measurements and biochemical laboratory tests were performed.

RESULTS

Significant weight loss (∼20%) was found in these patients. In the patients receiving artificial nutrition, we found lower levels of potassium and total protein compared with those who were fed orally (p = 0.03 for potassium and 0.02 for protein, respectively). Patients on enteral tube feeding had a higher caloric intake compared with those who were fed orally (25±5 kcal/kg/day vs. 10±2 kcal/kg/day).

CONCLUSION

Hypokalemia, like hypophosphatemia, could be a complication associated with refeeding in patients with cancer. Hypokalemia was present in the early stages of high-calorie refeeding.

Difficulties with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): a practical guide for the endoscopist

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a widely used and effective means of providing long-term nutrition in patients with inadequate oral intake. The demand for this intervention has risen steadily since the early 1990s. Endoscopists who perform PEG insertion have become increasingly concerned about inappropriate use of this intervention.

AIMS

This review addresses the particular areas of difficulty, namely, dementia, stroke, aspiration pneumonia and use of PEG to facilitate discharge from hospital.

METHODS

A Pubmed literature search and the author's personal experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Strategies for improving patient selection and a practical approach to difficult decisions are described.

Commercial enteral formulas and nutrition support teams improve the outcome of home enteral tube feeding

BACKGROUND

The benefits of home enteral tube feeding (HETF) provided by nutrition support teams (NSTs) have been questioned recently, given the growing costs to the healthcare system. This study examined the effect of a specialized home enteral nutrition program on clinical outcome variables in HETF patients.

METHODS

The observational study included 203 patients (103 women, 100 men; mean age 52.5 years) receiving HETF with homemade diets for at least 12 months before starting a specialized home nutrition program for another 12 months consisting of provision of commercial enteral formulas and the guidance of an NST. Both study periods were compared regarding the number of hospital admissions, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and costs of hospitalization.

RESULTS

A specialized HETF program significantly reduced the number of hospital admissions and the duration of hospital and ICU stays. The need for hospitalization and ICU admission was significantly reduced, with odds ratios of 0.083 (95% confidence interval, 0.051-0.133, P < .001) and 0.259 (95% confidence interval, 0.124-0.539, P < .001), respectively. Specialized HETF was associated with a significant decrease in the prevalence of pneumonia (24.1% vs 14.2%), respiratory failure (7.3% vs 1.9%), urinary tract infection (11.3% vs 4.9%), and anemia (3.9% vs 0%) requiring hospitalization. The average yearly cost of hospital treatment decreased from $764.65 per patient to $142.66 per year per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The specialized HETF care program reduces morbidity and costs related to long-term enteral feeding at home.

Refeeding syndrome: a clinical review

Refeeding syndrome can result in a wide variety of complications and may be life threatening. Although well described in hospital practice, refeeding syndrome is often under-recognized and inadequately treated.

Nutrition support teams: how they work, are set up and maintained

Safe cost effective nutritional support is provided by a multidisciplinary team whose activity is overseen by a Nutrition Steering Group that reports directly to the Hospital Trust Board. When a nutrition support team (NST) is first formed, a nutrition nurse specialist enables parenteral nutrition to be given safely. An NST needs to have a clearly agreed scope of practice and needs to be able to justify its presence in terms of quality and cost savings.

Endoscopic feeding tube placement in patients with cancer: a prospective clinical audit of 2055 procedures in 1866 patients

BACKGROUND

Feeding tube placement in patients with aero-digestive cancer is challenging because of the distortion and/or obstruction of the upper digestive passage. As a result, many patients may receive intravenous fluids and parenteral nutrition instead of enteral feeds.

AIM

To audit all the endoscopic feeding tube placements in large sample of patients to determine difficulties, success, reasons for failures and procedure-related complications.

METHODS

Audit of all consecutive feeding tube placements from January 1996 to December 2003 was conducted. Tubes were placed depending on the site of cancer and anticipated duration of feeding: naso-gastric tubes, naso-enteral tubes and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Nutrition support team evaluated these patients. Technical modifications, difficulties, success and complications encountered during the procedure were recorded.

RESULTS

Two thousand and fifty-five attempts were made for feeding tube placements (naso-gastric tube - 1637, naso-enteral tube - 177 and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy - 241) in 1866 patients. Technical success was achieved in 1969 (96%, 95% CI: 95-97%). Immediate complications occurred in 62 (3%, 95% CI: 2-4%), seven needed hospitalization and one patient died of tumour perforation caused by naso-gastric tube placement. The technical success and complications rates of the procedures performed by fellows in training were comparable to those performed by attending consultants.

CONCLUSIONS

Enteral feeding tubes can be placed in almost all patients with cancer using endoscopic techniques. Adequate training of the endoscopy fellows and sufficient care by nutrition support team help achieve high success with few complications.

Home parenteral and enteral nutrition

Home parenteral and enteral nutrition (HPEN) has evolved to become a very successful, lifesaving treatment in the management of patients with intestinal and oral failure, respectively. Nevertheless, the provision of HPEN remains intrusive, expensive, and continues to be associated with significant morbidity. The management of HPEN by a nutrition support team that optimally includes an experienced clinician, nurse specialist, dietitian, and pharmacist reduces HPEN-related morbidity and may reduce costs associated with its use. Because clinical expertise in the management of patients receiving HPEN is not widely available, the referral of these patients to experienced centers for periodic assessment should be encouraged.

Atuação da equipe multidisciplinar na terapia nutricional de pacientes sob cuidados intensivos

Pacientes hospitalizados podem ter necessidades nutricionais especiais em função da desnutrição e dos desequilíbrios metabólicos impostos pelas doenças. A terapia nutricional, principalmente nos estágios críticos das enfermidades, deve ser administrada de modo seguro e eficaz. Vários estudos têm avaliado o papel da equipe multidisciplinar na administração da terapia nutricional. Com o objetivo de identificar os problemas inerentes à administração da terapia nutricional em pacientes hospitalizados e verificar o impacto da atuação de uma equipe multidisciplinar na qualidade dos procedimentos, foi realizada uma revisão que analisou artigos publicados entre 1980 e 2004 sobre o papel da atuação de equipes multidisciplinares no cuidado e na evolução nutricional de pacientes hospitalizados, principalmente os que se encontravam sob cuidados intensivos. Os termos utilizados na pesquisa foram: "multidisciplinary team", "nutritional support", "parente-ral nutrition", "enteral feeding", "critically ill", "intensive care unit","critically ill child". Dos 130 estudos inicialmente identificados, foram selecionados 24, dos quais 14 compararam o padrão de terapia nutricional com e sem a presença da equipe multidisciplinar. Os principais problemas detectados na administração de terapia nutricional em pacientes hospitalizados foram a oferta inadequada de nutrientes, as complicações infecciosas e metabólicas e o uso excessivo de nutrição parenteral. Nos estudos comparativos, a presença da equipe multidisciplinar melhorou o padrão de oferta nutricional, reduziu a incidência de complicações e os custos.

Cost savings of an adult hospital nutrition support team

OBJECTIVES

A hospital-based nutrition support team (NST) may need to demonstrate cost savings and quality benefits. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether an NST could show tangible cost savings (equipment, investigations, and medication costs) from managing patients considered for parenteral nutrition (PN). Secondary aims related to the quality issues of placement of PN catheters, catheter-related sepsis (CRS), duration of parenteral nutrition, and mortality.

METHODS

An NST was formed in 1999 and worked in all adult areas of a university hospital (Leicester Royal Infirmary). Comparative data about all patients given PN were collected for 2 consecutive years (a retrospective pre-NST year and a prospective NST year).

RESULTS

In the pre-NST year there were 82 PN episodes (54 patients), 665 PN days, and a CRS rate of 71% (seven infections/100 PN days). In the NST year, there were 133 referrals for PN but only 78 PN episodes (75 patients, 59% of referrals), 752 PN days, and a decreased overall CRS rate of 29% (three infections/100 PN days, P < 0.05) but a rate of 7% (0.6 infection/100 PN days) in the final 3 mo of the NST year. Tangible cost savings for the NST year were derived from 55 avoided PN episodes (42741 pounds sterlings) and 35 avoided CRS episodes (7974 pounds sterlings). Thirty-nine percent of PN catheters were inserted by the NST with no insertion-related complications. Competency-based training of ward nursing staff decreased the CRS rate. Mean duration of PN increased from 8 to 10 d (P not significant). In-hospital mortality for patients who had PN was 23 of 54 (43%) in the pre-NST year compared with 18 of 75 (24%) in the NST year (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the number of PN days increased with an NST, tangible cost savings of 50715 pounds sterlings were demonstrated within the NST year by avoided PN episodes and a decreased incidence of CRS. These savings justify the salaries of a nutrition nurse specialist and a senior dietitian.

Survey on the current practice of nutritional therapy in Portugal

BACKGROUND & AIMS

This survey aimed to provide a nationwide overview about the current practice of nutrition.

METHODS

Questionnaires designed by the Portuguese Association of Parenteral Enteral Nutrition were sent, with postage-paid addressee envelopes, to all hospitals and primary-care institutions.

RESULTS

Hospitals' response rate was 44/100 (44%), reaching 274/359 (60%) in primary care, P=0.02. A Nutrition Support Team (NST) was reported in 34% hospitals, 40% of which were teaching hospitals. In 3/15 (9%) hospitals, NST nutrition prescriptions covered the whole hospital population; in 16% the NST only acted on a consultant basis; in 30% they were involved in purchasing nutrition products and in 18% the NST promoted teaching/training. Physicians alone prescribed oral, enteral and parenteral nutrition in 50%, 64% and 74% hospitals, respectively, and also monitored parenteral nutrition in 69% hospitals; monitoring oral/enteral nutrition involved dietitians in 46% and 41% hospitals, respectively; nurses were never involved in NSTs and seldom participated in nutritional management. Most primary-care institutions with hospital units (91%) provided nutrition therapy and nurses were then the most involved professionals, P=0.001, even prescribing regimens while physicians favoured monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Nutrition therapy is mostly unidisciplinary; the concept of a NST and its roles is wrongly perceived; education and training are eagerly awaited.

Organizational aspects of starting and running an effective nutritional support service

Setting up and running a Clinical Nutritional Support Team can be challenging and is time consuming. Team members have to be motivated, committed and persistent. High quality working relationships are fundamentally important within the team, between teams and with other healthcare professionals. Good communication, careful planning, sensitive implementation and robust monitoring are the cornerstones of a successful service. Looking forward as well as back will help the team to maintain and improve its position in an ever-changing environment. While nutritional support is everyone's business, an effective multiprofessional Clinical Nutritional Support Team is the best way to ensure that patients receive appropriate and timely treatment. It is also wise to remember that a successful Clinical Nutritional Support Team will be as committed to its own development as it is to the care of the patients referred to it.

Nutrition support teams: past, present, and future

Nutrition support teams have evolved rapidly and grown in numbers since the early 1970s. While not all hospitals have or need nutrition support teams, the team approach has been demonstrated to be an excellent mechanism for identifying patients in need of nutrition support, reducing the complications associated with enteral and parental nutrition, and providing cost-effective nutrition support in a variety of hospital environments. The organization of a nutrition support team is reviewed, and suggestions are outlined for team survival in this uncertain era of health care reform. New JCAHO standards are reported which require performance-based interdisciplinary delivery of nutrition support, and make it more likely that efficiently organized nutrition support teams will thrive and continue to make important contributions to safe and cost-effective health care now and in the immediate future.

Nutrition support team management of enterally fed patients in a community hospital is cost-beneficial

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether nutrition support team (NST) management of enterally fed patients is cost-beneficial and to compare primary outcomes of care between team and nonteam management.

DESIGN

A quasi-experimental study was conducted over a 7-month period.

SETTING

A 400-bed community hospital.

SUBJECTS

A convenience sample of 136 subjects who had received enteral nutrition support for at least 24 hours. Forty-two patients died; only their mortality data were used. Ninety-six patients completed the study.

INTERVENTION

Outcomes, including cost, for enterally fed patients in two treatment groups--those managed by the nutrition support team and those managed by nonteam staff--were compared.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Severity of illness level was determined for patients managed by the nutrition support team and those managed by nonteam staff. For each group, the following measures were adjusted to reflect a significant difference in average severity of illness and then compared: length of hospital stay, readmission rates, and mortality rates. Complication rates between the groups were also compared. The cost benefit was determined based on savings from the reduction in adjusted length of hospital stay.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED

Parametric and nonparametric statistics were used to evaluate outcomes between the two groups.

RESULTS

Differences were statistically significant for both severity of illness, which was at a higher level in the nutrition support team group (P < .001), and complication rate, which was greater in the nonteam group (P < .001). In the nutrition support team-managed group, there was a 23% reduction in adjusted mortality rate, an 11.6% reduction in the adjusted length of hospital stay, and a 43% reduction in adjusted readmission rate. Cost-benefit analysis revealed that for every $1 invested in nutrition support team management, a benefit of $4.20 was realized.

APPLICATIONS

Financial and humanitarian benefits are associated with nutrition support team management of enterally fed hospitalized patients.

Nutritional support teams: a review of comparative trials

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the literature describing the influence of nutritional support teams (NSTs) on the provision of nutritional therapy.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts search (key terms: nutritional support, nutritional support service/team, hyperalimentation service/team, metabolic support service/team, service/team) covering 1970-1993 were used to identify pertinent literature.

STUDY SELECTION

The results of comparative trials involving NSTs are presented.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data from comparative trials examining the influence of NSTs on the provision of enteral nutrition (EN) and total parenteral nutrition are discussed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

NSTs dramatically reduced the incidence of catheter-related complications, especially sepsis, by developing central venous catheter insertion and care guidelines. Early studies found that NSTs reduced the incidence of electrolyte and metabolic abnormalities by more stringent laboratory and clinical monitoring, but this was not found consistently in later studies. The ability of consultative NSTs to reduce the incidence of metabolic and electrolyte abnormalities is less clear. NSTs also were more likely to evaluate, document, and subsequently meet a patient's nutritional requirements. Studies examining the financial impact of NSTs frequently reported cost savings, but often failed to include personnel costs in their analysis. The provision of EN by an NST reduced the frequency of complications and increased the adequacy of nutritional supplementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Early nutritional support teams produced significant benefits largely through the development of protocols and standardization. Current NSTs should increase the dissemination of information supporting their continued benefits. To remain viable, NSTs need to expand their roles, document improved patient outcomes, and show cost-effectiveness.

Audit of nutritional support provided to surgical patients by a nutrition team

An audit was carried out over a 24 month period to assess the practice, safety and efficacy of nutritional support provided to surgical patients by a designated team. 135 patients received nutritional support: 51% were fed parenterally, 32% enterally and 17% via combined nutritional support. The duration of feeding ranged from 1-177 days with 23% being supported for < 7 days. The line infection rate for patients receiving intravenous nutrition was 6.5%. Nutritional outcome was assessed using weight, anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis. Pre-and post-feeding results were available for 67% of patients. These patients were classified as either oedematous (n = 21), normally nourished (n = 23) or nutritionally depleted (n = 46). Overall, the oedematous patients lost water, the protein status of the normally nourished group deteriorated slightly and the nutritional status of the nutritionally depleted patients was maintained. Audit is a valuable means of defining the efficacy of a nutrition support service and has identified areas which require review.

Standardized enteral orders attain caloric goals sooner: a prospective study

Standardized enteral nutrition order forms were introduced listing the enteral formulary, the advancement schedule of formulae, and whether feedings should be given continuously or intermittently. The efficiency of these forms was evaluated prospectively by counting the number of days needed to reach the patient's estimated caloric needs in a total of 113 patients studied 3 months before (pre-group) and 3 months after (post-group) the introduction of the form. When the standardized enteral order forms were used, patients in the post-group reached their caloric goals 3.1 days sooner than did those in the pre-group. Use of standardized enteral nutrition order forms decreases the time needed to reach a patient's estimated caloric needs, thereby achieving effective nutritional therapy sooner.

Comparison of tolerance and nutritional outcome between a peptide and a standard enteral formula in critically ill, hypoalbuminemic patients

Dipeptides have been reported to be more efficiently absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract than free amino acids. The objective of this study was to compare prospectively a peptide enteral formula (PEF) with a standard enteral formula (SEF) for tolerance and nutritional outcome in acutely injured, hypoalbuminemic (less than 3.0 g/dL) patients who require enteral nutrition support. The prevalence of diarrhea and elevated gastric residuals was assessed daily. Prealbumin, transferrin, colloid oncotic pressure, Prognostic Nutritional Index, and nitrogen balance were measured on days 0, 5, and 10 of enteral nutrition support. Forty-one patients received 345 days of enteral nutrition support. Prevalences of diarrhea and elevated gastric residuals were similar between groups. Prealbumin increased and the Prognostic Nutritional Index decreased significantly from baseline at day 10 in both groups. Transferrin increased in both groups, but not significantly. Colloid oncotic pressure increased significantly from baseline at days 5 and 10 in the SEF group and day 10 in the PEF group. Nitrogen balance increased significantly from baseline at days 5 and 10 in each group. The only significant difference between groups was for nitrogen balance at day 10, which was higher in the SEF group. We conclude based upon our selected measurements of tolerance and nutritional outcome PEF seems to offer no advantage over SEF in acutely injured, hypoalbuminemic patients.

A nutrition support team quality assurance plan

The Nutrition Support Team at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center is responsible for the development of guidelines related to the provision of both total parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition support. A Quality Assurance plan which was approved by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of HealthCare Organizations was implemented by the Nutrition Support Team. This plan addresses: nutritional assessment and consultation, indications for enteral and parenteral nutrition support, provision of optimal nutrition support including attainment of nutritional goals, and the prevention, detection, and management of complications. The indicators and criteria for each aspect of care are described. This program has provided documentation of the activities of the Nutrition Support Team as well as data defining the patient population requiring specialized nutrition support, and has helped identify areas where improvement is required.

Prospective randomized evaluation of two regimens for converting from continuous to intermittent feedings in patients with feeding gastrostomies

Forty enterally fed male patients were randomized to one of two regimens designed to determine the better means of converting them from continuous to intermittent enteral feedings. All patients received a nutritionally complete iso-osmolal 1 kcal/cc formula containing 6 g of nitrogen/L beginning on the second postgastrostomy day. Half of the patients (20) were randomized to a discontinuous regimen abruptly changing from continuous to gradually increasing intermittent feedings until reaching their nutritional goals. Intravenous fluids were given to maintain normal fluid balance. The other 20 patients were randomized to an overlapping regimen, receiving continuous feedings at a decreasing rate while intermittent feedings were progressively increased. Intravenous fluids were used during the first three stages only. There were no significant differences (p less than 0.05) in major diagnosis, type of gastrostomy, age, weight, height, admission or discharge serum albumin concentration, calculated basal energy expenditure (BEE), or nutrient goals (1.5 X BEE, 1.5 g of protein/kg per day).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Nutritional support in the critical care setting (Part 1)

Over the past two decades nutritional support has rapidly become an integral part of the medical care of critically ill patients. As scientific evidence accumulates supporting the important role of underlying nutritional status in determining the eventual outcome of many illnesses, aggressive nutritional intervention has become commonplace in our medical and surgical ICUs. However, nutritional support, particularly parenteral alimentation, is expensive and associated with important morbidity and even mortality. Furthermore, definite evidence of its clinical efficacy under certain specific conditions is often lacking and in need of properly done prospective studies. This review summarizes the basic principles of nutrition as applied to the critically ill patient in the clinical setting. Special emphasis is on practical considerations regarding cost, efficacy (or lack thereof), and potential advantages, disadvantages, and risk of complications of each proposed approach.

Efficacy of tube feeding in supplying energy requirements of hospitalized patients

During a 6-week period, all adult patients in a university hospital receiving ready-to-feed nasoenteric tube feeding formula were prospectively studied. The study objective was to determine each patient's caloric intake from tube feeding relative to their energy needs and to identify factors causing decreased feeding intake. Each of 35 patients was visited at least once daily to determine their volumetric intake of tube feeding formula. Daily review of patient care records and nursing interviews were used to identify interruptions in therapy. Patient's basal energy expenditures (BEE) were calculated using the Harris-Benedict equation. Calorie goals were set by members of the Nutrition Support Service or clinical dietitians. Intakes averaged 1095 +/- 41 Kcal (SEM) per day or 61% of their mean calorie goal of 1791 +/- 41 Kcal. Mean daily calorie intake was statistically different (p less than 0.05) from mean energy goal on patient study days 1 through 5, 7, and 8. Only 16 of the 35 patients achieved an intake of 100% of their energy goal on any day of therapy. Calorie goals averaged 1.4 times BEE. Mean daily calorie intake did not exceed BEE until study day 10. Eighteen % of potential feeding time was lost due to temporary feeding interruptions; primarily inadvertent extubation (4.6%), gastrointestinal intolerance (4.7%), medical procedures requiring discontinuation of feeding (2.8%), and feeding tube positioning difficulties (1.5%). In addition, physicians ordered only 75% of calculated energy goals. These data indicate that tube feeding therapy, when provided under usual hospital conditions, does not meet patient's energy requirements.

Subjective distress during continuous enteral alimentation: superiority of silicone rubber to polyurethane

A small-bore feeding tube of silicone rubber was developed in order to improve the acceptance of enteral feeding. The insertion procedure was facilitated by providing a double guidewire which allows continuous adjustment of tip rigidity. The usefulness of this tube was tested in a short-term and a long-term volunteer study as well as in a prospective follow-up of patients receiving enteral nutrition. The volunteer study showed that the newly developed tube significantly reduced subjective distress (rank value 14) when compared to a conventional tube made of polyurethane (rank value 20). In the patient study, 131 silicone rubber tubes were used in 85 patients who received enteral nutrition for a total period of 2080 days and complained about foreign-body feeling and rhinorrhea in only 3.7% and 0.5% of the days, respectively. The rate of inadvertent removals was relatively low (32%), mainly due to restricted mental status of the patients.

The nutrition team in a children's hospital

This paper discusses the reasons for a paediatric nutritional care team, the members involved, and their role within the team. The methods used for nutritional assessment are described and the cost effectiveness of the nutrition team's involvement is discussed.