Content Validity of Parental Stressor Scale: Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PSS:PICU)

Translation and Adaptation of the Japanese Version of the Revised Parental Stressor Scale: Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Introduction The physical, cognitive, and psychiatric disorders that occur in patients after leaving the intensive care unit (ICU) are collectively called post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). Moreover, PICS-family (PICS-F) refers to the long-term psychological and social disorders that occur in the family. The symptoms of PICS-F can be psychological, and stress is a known cause of these symptoms. The Parental Stressor Scale: Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PSS: PICU) was developed to assess stress levels and related factors among the families of patients admitted to the PICU. It has been translated into several languages and was revised in 2021. However, a Japanese version of the revised PSS: PICU (J-R-PSS: PICU) has not yet been developed. This study aimed to develop a J-R-PSS: PICU and to test its acceptability for clinical use. Materials and methods A back-translation method, involving initial translation, review by bilingual experts, and subsequent re-translation to ensure accuracy, was used to develop the J-R-PSS: PICU. Families with patients in the PICU for >48 hours between November and December 2021 and those who were transferred out of the ICU were recruited. Moreover, the study documents with a QR code for a web questionnaire were provided and explained to family members. Stress scores and stressors of family members were collected from web questionnaires using the PSS: PICU as the primary endpoint. Other information about the patients and their families was collected from clinical records and questionnaires. Participants and an expert panel evaluated the clarity of each item, and the expert panel evaluated the relevance of each item. Results Twenty family members who met the inclusion criteria and provided informed consent were included. The J-R-PSS: PICU was developed using a back-translation method. For clarity, all items were clarified after a single modification by an interdisciplinary team. For relevance, all the items had a content validity index at an item level of ≥0.8 and a scale level of 0.94. Alpha coefficients were 0.93 for the overall scale and 0.69-0.97 for its subscales. Conclusion We developed the J-R-PSS: PICU with high content validity and internal consistency using a back-translation method.

Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure the congenital heart disease of children's family stressor

Background

Families of children with congenital heart disease (CHD) face tremendous stressors in the process of coping with the disease, which threatens the health of families of children with CHD. Studies have shown that nursing interventions focusing on family stress management can improve parents' ability to cope with illness and promote family health. At present, there is no measuring tool for family stressors of CHD.

Methods

The items of the scale were generated through qualitative interviews and a literature review. Initial items were evaluated by seven experts to determine content validity. Factor analysis and reliability testing were conducted with a convenience sample of 670 family members. The criterion-related validity of the scale was calculated using scores on the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS).

Results

The CHD Children's Family Stressor Scale consisted of six dimensions and 41 items. In the exploratory factor analysis, the cumulative explained variance of the six factors was 61.085%. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the six factors in the EFA were well validated, indicating that the model fits well. The correlation coefficient between CHD Children's Family Stressor Scale and SAS was r = 0.504 (p < 0.001), which indicated that the criterion-related validity of the scale was good. In the reliability test, Cronbach's α coefficients of six sub-scales were 0.774-0.940, and the scale-level Cronbach's α coefficient value was 0.945.

Conclusion

The study indicates that the CHD Children's Family Stressor Scale is valid and reliable, and it is recommended for use in clinical practice to assess CHD children's family stressors.

Psychometric properties of parental stress scales used in paediatric health care settings: A systematic review1

AIM

To identify scales that assess parental stress in the paediatric clinical population and to analyse their psychometric properties.

METHODS

Four electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Scopus) and metasearch engines (Google Scholar and Open Grey) were searched with no time period limitations. Methodological quality was assessed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach modified by COSMIN. Finally, recommendations were made for the instruments with the highest quality of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 38 studies reporting on 11 different instruments for assessing parental stress in the paediatric clinical setting were included. Six instruments were 'A' rated (recommended) in the final phase in line with COSMIN guidelines. The Paediatric Inventory for Parents was the instrument that evaluated the highest number of psychometric properties and obtained the highest methodological quality, global assessment, and quality of evidence for the different psychometric properties.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review provides an overview of the measurement properties of the parental stress instruments used in the paediatric clinical setting. The Paediatric Inventory for Parents stands out as being one of the most robust instruments for measuring stress in parents with a hospitalised or sick child. Evidence needs to be generated for all the parental stress scales used in the clinical setting.

IMPACT

Given that the psychometric properties of the existing parental stress scales used in paediatric health care settings have not been systematically assessed, the present review utilised comprehensive methods according to COSMIN.

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

REPORTING METHOD: PRISMA statement and COSMIN reporting guidelines for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures.

The Safety of Body Wraps on Skin-to-Skin Care in the Neonatal Population: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Despite well-established benefits of skin-to-skin care (SSC) for preterm infants and parents, standardized guidelines for implementation do not exist. Furthermore, the literature offers little evidence-based information to guide best practice.

PURPOSE

To discover whether SSC using a body wrap to hold preterm infants would increase the duration of SSC, decrease parental stress during SSC, and minimize adverse events to ensure that body wraps are safe and feasible.

METHODS

Twenty-nine dyads of parents and preterm infants younger than 34 weeks postmenstrual age were enrolled. The first 15 dyads to meet inclusion criteria were assigned to a standard of care group for SSC with no body wrap. The remaining 14 dyads were assigned to an experimental group for SSC with a body wrap. Each dyad performed 2 SSC holds. Parents completed the Parental Stressor Scale and Parent Feedback Form. Adverse events were also documented.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups in total SSC time ( P = .33), the number of adverse events ( P = .31 for major events; P = .38 for minor events), average parental stress ( P = .22), and parental confidence performing SSC ( P = .18).

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH

This study found that SSC with a body wrap is safe for preterm infants in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). This is the first study to explore the use, safety, and effectiveness of body wraps during SSC with preterm infants in an NICU. Future research should be conducted with larger sample sizes to further evaluate the safety and efficacy.

Is Pediatric Intensive Care Trauma-Informed? A Review of Principles and Evidence

Pediatric critical illness and injury, along with the experience of recovering from critical illness are among the most potentially traumatic experiences for children and their families. Additionally, children often come to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) with pre-existing trauma that may sensitize them to PICU-related distress. Trauma-informed care (TIC) in the PICU, while under-examined, has the potential to enhance quality of care, mitigate trauma-related symptoms, encourage positive coping, and provide anticipatory guidance for the recovery process. This narrative review paper first describes the need for TIC in the PICU and then introduces the principles of TIC as outlined by the American Academy of Pediatrics: awareness, readiness, detection and assessment, management, and integration. Current clinical practices within PICU settings are reviewed according to each TIC principle. Discussion about opportunities for further development of TIC programs to improve patient care and advance knowledge is also included.

Stressful Experiences of Parents in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit: Searching for the Most Intensive PICU Stressors

Hospitalization of a child in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is extremely stressful, both for the child and for his or her family. The purpose of this study was to gain deeper insight into the stressful experiences of parents of children hospitalized in the PICU. This study included 96 parents. The data were collected using a translated and standardized scale "The Parental Stressor Scale: Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PSS: PICU)". This study confirms high exposure of parents to numerous PICU stressors. The most intense PICU stressor for parents was child's breathing depending on the ventilator (4.22 ± 1.17), and the least intense was child's demanding behaviour (1.17 ± 0.33). A significant positive correlation between the level of parents' perceived stress and the number of their children was recorded (r = 0.240, p = 0.02), while there was no significant correlation between the level of stress and other sociodemographic variables. A significantly higher level of stress was experienced by parents with primary school education (p = 0.032) and parents who are not healthcare professionals (p < 0.01). It is necessary to establish a system that will enable continuous assessment of parents' stress levels and timely prevention of stressful experiences for parents in the PICU.

Exploratory model of parental stress during children's hospitalisation in a paediatric intensive care unit

OBJECTIVES

This exploratory study (a) examined pre-existing and peri-trauma risk factors of parental stress during a child's PICU hospitalisation using the Integrative Trajectory Model of Paediatric Medical Traumatic Stress and (b) identified the type of PICU-related stressors that predicted parental stress during the child's PICU hospitalisation.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, descriptive correlational design with 81 parents of children admitted 48 or more hours to a Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). Questionnaires measured parent's and child's demographic and clinical characteristics and parent-reported stressors using the Parental Stressors Scale (PSS:PICU). Analysis included descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression analyses with simultaneous predictor entry.

RESULTS

Male parents tended to be significantly more stressed than female parents. Parental stress was significantly increased when parents had one or more stressful life events one-month prior to PICU admission, when the child required ventilatory support, or the child had a cardiovascular diagnosis. Parental stress was also predicted by the child's appearance, procedures, child's behaviour, behaviour of staff, and parental role.

CONCLUSION

Nurses are in a prime position to identify parents at potentially high risk for psychological morbidity when they know a parent has had a stressful life event prior to admission, has a child with a cardiovascular diagnosis or requires ventilatory assistance. Nurses can diminish parental stress by interpreting the child's appearance for parents, helping parents understand the procedures being done for the child, interpreting the child's behaviour, explaining the staff's behaviour, and assisting parents to define their parental role during the child's hospitalisation.