Effects of Social Determinants of Health Care on Pediatric Thyroid Cancer Outcomes in the United States

The Association of Social Determinants of Health With Short Term Pediatric Gastrostomy Tube Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Social determinants of health (SDH) have been found to be important contributors to postoperative outcomes, especially those related to procedures that require significant postoperative resources. The association between short-term gastrostomy tube (GT) outcomes and SDH in the pediatric population is unknown.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all patients less than 18 y old who received a GT between January 2018 and December 2020 at a single institution. Data including demographics, area deprivation index (ADI), and perioperative information were collected. Patient characteristics were compared in those that did and did not have an unexpected emergency department (ED) visit within 6 wk of discharge from GT placement. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon sum-rank, Chi-squared test, and Fisher's exact test where applicable, and univariable and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 541 children who underwent GT placement, 112 (20.7%) returned to the ED within 6 wk postdischarge. In univariable analysis, Black children had 1.64 the odds of an unexpected ED visit compared to White children (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-2.60, P = 0.03). When controlling for ethnicity, primary language, insurance, ADI and comorbidities, Black children had 1.80 the odds of an unexpected ED visit compared to White children (95% CI 1.10-2.97, P = 0.02). Final model fit which added a race by ADI interaction term revealed Black children had 2.52 the odds of an unexpected ED visit compared to White children in the low (1-6) ADI group (95% CI 1.41-4.60, P = 0.002). Within advantaged neighborhoods (ADI 1-6), the probability of unplanned ED visits for White children was 17.3% (95%CI 8.9% - 31.1%), which was significantly lower than that for Black children (34.6%, 95% CI 18.8% - 54.7%; P value = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Race and neighborhood disadvantage can be associated with unexpected ED visits within 6 wk of discharge from GT placement in the pediatric population. For procedures that require significant postdischarge resources it is important to study the effect of SDH on return to the healthcare system as they can be an important driver of disparities in outcomes.

Pediatric thyroid cancer: Socioeconomic disparities and their impact on access to care

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined the disparities in access to care for pediatric thyroid cancers. We sought to clarify socioeconomic and patient factors that affect access to care for pediatric differentiated thyroid cancer and aggressive variants of papillary thyroid cancer.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, we performed a retrospective study on pediatric differentiated thyroid cancer and aggressive variants of papillary thyroid cancer (2004-2019). Patients were divided into three periods (2004-2008, 2009-2013, 2014-2019) to assess for trends. The χ2 analysis and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to test for independence of groupings for each socioeconomic and disease-related factor.

RESULTS

In all, 6,275 patients with pediatric differentiated thyroid cancer and 182 with aggressive variants of papillary thyroid cancer were analyzed. Differentiated thyroid cancer patients with Medicaid (median 18.0 miles) and those from lower-income households (median 21-30 miles) had to travel greater distances for care in recent years (2014-2019). Racial/ethnic disparities were evident; Black and Hispanic patients have higher odds of waiting >30 days for surgery (odds ratio 1.39, 1.49, P < .05, respectively) than White patients. Black patients with differentiated thyroid cancer had a higher risk of mortality compared with White and Hispanic patients (hazard ratio 4.31, 95% confidence interval: 1.95-9.51, P < .05). Nodal positivity was higher in Hispanic patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (60%, P < .05, White patients 51% and Black patients 36%). Socioeconomic factors did not significantly affect survival or nodal positivity in aggressive variants of papillary thyroid cancer.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights disparities in access to care and survival outcomes in pediatric differentiated thyroid cancer and aggressive variants of papillary thyroid cancer. Race, income status, and type of insurance all play a role in these disparities. Understanding the complex etiologies and developing interventions to improve access and patient outcomes are crucial.

Large-data contextualizations of social determinant associations in pediatric head and neck cancers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Prior investigations in social determinants of health (SDoH) and their impact on pediatric head and neck cancers are limited by the narrow scope of cancer types and SDoH being studied while lacking inquiry on the interrelational contribution of varied SDoH in real-world contexts. The purpose of this review is to discuss the current research tackling these shortcomings of SDoH-based studies in head and neck cancer and to discuss means of applying these findings in prospective initiatives and implementations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Through leveraging contemporary, large-data analyses measuring diverse social vulnerabilities, several studies have identified comprehensive delineations of which social disparities contribute the largest quantifiable impact on the care of head and neck cancer patients. Progressing from prior SDoH-based research of the decade, these studies contextualize the effect of social vulnerabilities and have laid the foundations to begin addressing these issues in the complex, modern-day environment of interrelatedsocial factors.

SUMMARY

Social determinants of health markedly affect pediatric head and neck cancer care and prognosis in complex and surprising ways. Modern-day tools and analyses derived from large-data techniques have unveiled the quantifiable underpinnings of how SDoH impact these pathologies.

Impact of social disparities on 10 year survival rates in paediatric cancers: a cohort study

Background

Studies reporting on the impact of social determinants of health on childhood cancer are limited. The current study aimed to examine the relationship between health disparities, as measured by the social deprivation index, and mortality in paediatric oncology patients using a population-based national database.

Methods

In this cohort study of children across all paediatric cancers, survival rates were determined using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1975 to 2016. The social deprivation index was used to measure and assess healthcare disparities and specifically the impact on both overall and cancer-specific survival. Hazard ratios were used to assess the association of area deprivation.

Findings

The study cohort was composed of 99,542 patients with paediatric cancer. Patients had a median age of 10 years old (IQR: 3-16) with 46,109 (46.3%) of female sex. Based on race, 79,984 (80.4%) of patients were identified as white while 10,801 (10.9%) were identified as Black. Patients from socially deprived areas had significantly higher hazard of death overall for both non-metastatic [1.27 (95% CI: 1.19-1.36)] and metastatic presentations [1.09 (95% CI: 1.05-1.15)] compared to in more socially affluent areas.

Interpretation

Patients from the most socially deprived areas had lower rates of overall and cancer-specific survival compared to patients from socially affluent areas. With an increase in childhood cancer survivors, implementation of social determinant indices, such as the social deprivation index, might aid improvement in healthcare outcomes for the most vulnerable patients.

Funding

There was no study sponsor or extramural funding.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: The Big Picture

Efforts are being made to achieve equitable health care for all, in addition to providing equal opportunity for those working within the health care system. Many challenges, however, still need to be overcome as research increasingly brings to light new areas of concern. In this commentary, we highlight recently published findings within the field of otolaryngology in the United States. These findings are then discussed within the context of global health care disparities to emphasize the importance of equitable health care on a global scale.

Evidence-Based Medicine in Otolaryngology Part 14: Falsehood and Bias

OBJECTIVE

Falsehood and bias can have tangible effects, whether related to the "hoax" of Corona virus disease/COVID-19 or the impact of personal protective equipment in city-wide news. The spread of false information requires the diversion of time and resources into rebolstering the truth. Our objective is thus to elucidate types of bias that may influence our daily work, along with ways to mitigate them.

DATA SOURCES

Publications are included which delineate specific aspects of bias or address how to preempt, mitigate, or correct bias, whether conscious or unconscious.

REVIEW METHODS

We discuss: (1) the background and rationale for proactively considering potential sources of bias, (2) relevant definitions and concepts, (3) potential means to limit effects of inaccurate data sources, and (4) evolving frontiers in the management of bias. In doing so, we review epidemiological concepts and susceptibility to bias within study designs, including database studies, observational studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. We additionally discuss concepts such as the difference between disinformation and misinformation, differential or nondifferential misclassification, bias toward a null result, and unconscious bias, among others.

CONCLUSION

We have the means to mitigate sources of potential bias in database studies, observational studies, RCTs, and systematic reviews, beginning with education and awareness.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

False information may spread faster than true information, so it is beneficial to understand potential sources of falsehood we face, in order to safeguard our daily impressions and decisions. Awareness of potential sources of falsehood and bias forms the foundation for accuracy in our everyday work.

Assessment of Social Vulnerability in Pediatric Head and Neck Cancer Care and Prognosis in the United States

IMPORTANCE

Prior investigations in social determinants of health (SDoH) in pediatric head and neck cancer (HNC) have only considered a narrow scope of HNCs, SDoH, and geography while lacking inquiry into the interrelational association of SDoH with disparities in clinical pediatric HNC.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association of SDoH with disparities in HNC among children and adolescents and to assess which specific aspects of SDoH are most associated with disparities in dynamic and regional sociodemographic contexts.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study included data about patients (aged ≤19 years) with pediatric HNC who were diagnosed from 1975 to 2017 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. Data were analyzed from October 2021 to October 2022.

EXPOSURES

Overall social vulnerability and its subcomponent contributions from 15 SDoH variables, grouped into socioeconomic status (SES; poverty, unemployment, income level, and high school diploma status), minority and language status (ML; minoritized racial and ethnic group and proficiency with English), household composition (HH; household members aged ≥65 and ≤17 years, disability status, single-parent status), and housing and transportation (HT; multiunit structure, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle, group quarters). These were ranked and scored across all US counties.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Regression trends were performed in continuous measures of surveillance and survival period and in discrete measures of advanced staging and surgery receipt.

RESULTS

A total of 37 043 patients (20 729 [55.9%] aged 10-19 years; 18 603 [50.2%] male patients; 22 430 [60.6%] White patients) with 30 different HNCs in SEER had significant relative decreases in the surveillance period, ranging from 23.9% for malignant melanomas (mean [SD] duration, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 170 [128] months to 129 [88] months) to 41.9% for non-Hodgkin lymphomas (mean [SD] duration, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 216 [142] months vs 127 [94] months). SES followed by ML and HT vulnerabilities were associated with these overall trends per relative-difference magnitudes (eg, SES for ependymomas and choroid plexus tumors: mean [SD] duration, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 114 [113] months vs 86 [84] months; P < .001). Differences in mean survival time were observed with increasing social vulnerability, ranging from 11.3% for ependymomas and choroid plexus tumors (mean [SD] survival, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 46 [46] months to 41 [48] months; P = .43) to 61.4% for gliomas not otherwise specified (NOS) (mean [SD] survival, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 44 [84] months to 17 [28] months; P < .001), with ML vulnerability followed by SES, HH, and HT being significantly associated with decreased survival (eg, ML for gliomas NOS: mean [SD] survival, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 42 [84] months vs 19 [35] months; P < .001). Increased odds of advanced staging with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02-1.45) and retinoblastomas (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.14-1.50) and decreased odds of surgery receipt for melanomas (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.91) and rhabdomyosarcomas (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.98) were associated with increasing overall social vulnerability.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study of patients with pediatric HNC, significant decreases in receipt of care and survival time were observed with increasing SDoH vulnerability.

Sociodemographic Disparities in the Diagnostic Management of Pediatric Thyroid Nodules

Importance

Thyroid cancer is the most common pediatric endocrine malignant neoplasm. Disparities in the workup of thyroid nodules may be significantly associated with thyroid cancer outcomes.

Objective

To determine the association of sociodemographic factors with the odds of receiving a biopsy, timeliness of the procedure, and risk of nodule malignancy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study using insurance claims data from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database. The study cohort comprised pediatric patients diagnosed with single thyroid nodules between 2003 and 2020. Data analysis was performed from January 1, 2003, to June 30, 2020.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify demographic variables associated with biopsy and nodule malignant neoplasm. A multivariable linear regression model was used to assess the time between thyroid nodule diagnosis and biopsy.

Results

Of 11 643 children (median [IQR] age at diagnosis or procedure, 15 [12-17] years; 8549 [73.2%] were female and 3126 [26.8%] were male) diagnosed with single thyroid nodules, 2117 (18.2%) received a biopsy. Among the patients who received a biopsy, 304 (14.4%) were found to have a malignant nodule. Greater parental education was associated with a shorter diagnosis-to-biopsy interval (mean difference, -7.24 days; 95% CI, -13.75 to -0.73). Older age at nodule diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.09-1.13) and female gender (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.11-1.40) were associated with increased odds of receiving a biopsy, while Black/African American (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-0.99) and Hispanic (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.99) patients had lower odds of receiving a biopsy compared with White patients. Finally, female gender (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.80-1.47) was not associated with lower odds of nodule malignant neoplasm.

Conclusions and Relevance

Findings of this cross-sectional study highlight disparities in the diagnostic management of pediatric thyroid nodules. These results call for future work to ensure equitable access to thyroid care for all children.

Health Burdens and SES in Alabama: Using Geographic Information System to Examine Prostate Cancer Health Disparity

Simple Summary

The focus of the research was to examine the relationship between Socioeconomic status and prostate cancer in Alabama’s Black Belt region. The cancer rate in Alabama is high, and the state has one of the highest rates of prostate cancer in the USA. The research aims to identify probable reasons, raise awareness, and propose cancer prevention policies. The Geographic Information System, a robust technology, has been adopted to understand Alabama’s county-level prostate cancer incidence and mortality and its association with socioeconomic and health disparities. The analysis indicated an apparent socioeconomic disparity between the Black Belt and Non-Black Belt counties of Alabama. The poverty rate is higher in Black Belt counties. The data revealed that the preexisting condition of diabetes and obesity is closely associated with prostate cancer. Also, incidence and mortality disparities strongly relate to socioeconomic status, and the preexisting condition of obesity and diabetes adds to prostate cancer incidences. Poverty is the root course of inequalities in education, income, and healthcare facilities, particularly among African Americans, contributing to Alabama’s health burden of prostate cancer. The study proposes effective health policy intervention to prevent and reduce prostate cases and mortality among underserved communities in Alabama.

Abstract

Socioeconomic disparities influence the risk of many diseases, including cancer. The cancer rate in Alabama is high, and the state has one of the highest rates of prostate cancer in the USA. Alabama’s counties are embedded with socioeconomic disparities, politics, race, ethnicity, and oppression, among which social equity and socioeconomic status (SES) been closely associated with prostate cancer. The Geographic Information System (GIS) has become a valuable technology in understanding public health in many applications, including cancer. This study integrates Alabama’s county-level prostate cancer incidence and mortality and its association with socioeconomic and health disparities. We conducted robust data mining from several data sources such as the Alabama State Cancer Profile data, Alabama Department of Health, American Cancer Society, Center for Disease Control, and National Cancer Institute. The research method is the Geographic Information System (GIS), and we employed prostate cancer data within GIS to understand Alabama’s prostate cancer prevalence regarding SES. The GIS analysis indicated an apparent socioeconomic disparity between the Black Belt and Non-Black Belt counties of Alabama. The Black Belt counties’ poverty rate is also remarkably higher than non-Black Belt counties. In addition, we analyzed the median household income by race. Our analysis demonstrates that the Asian background population in the state earned the highest median income compared to non-Hispanic whites and the African American population. Furthermore, the data revealed that the preexisting condition of diabetes and obesity is closely associated with prostate cancer. The GIS analysis suggests that prostate cancer incidence and mortality disparities are strongly related to SES. In addition, the preexisting condition of obesity and diabetes adds to prostate cancer incidences. Poverty also reflects inequalities in education, income, and healthcare facilities, particularly among African Americans, contributing to Alabama’s health burden of prostate cancer.

Year in Thyroidology-Recent Developments and Future Challenges: Clinical Science Review

Background: The 2021 Year in Thyroidology-Recent Developments and Future Challenges: Clinical Science Review featured key clinical research within five categories: Thyroid Nodules and Cancer, Thyroid Function and Thyroid Eye Disease, Thyroid and Pregnancy, Thyroid and Pediatrics, and Disparities in Thyroid. Methods: A literature search of PubMed from November 2019 to August 2021 was performed to identify relevant peer-reviewed articles published in English and with a focus on human subjects. Results: There were three nominees for each of the five categories and one featured article per category. The featured articles had the most potential to change clinical practice, focused on a novel topic, and/or included of strong methodology. Conclusions: There were many strong publications on thyroid between November 2019 and August 2021; the 15 nominees and 5 featured articles span a breadth of topics and methodological approaches. The featured articles all have potential to change practice patterns or to stimulate further research that will ultimately change practice patterns.