1
|
Contrera KJ, Mahomva CR, Sharma BK, Wei W, Burkey BB, Fritz M, Ku JA, Lamarre ED, Lorenz RR, Scharpf J, Silver N, Sindwani R, Koyfman SA, Prendes BL. Patterns of failure after salvage head and neck surgery. Oral Oncol 2024; 157:106957. [PMID: 39018695 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.106957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 07/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advancements in immunotherapy for recurrent head and neck cancer have necessitated a better understanding of salvage surgical outcomes. This study aimed to determine patterns of failure following salvage head and neck surgery. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 280 patients who underwent salvage surgery for recurrent mucosal squamous cell carcinoma from 1997 to 2018. Cumulative incidence was calculated using the nonparametric Aalen-Johansen estimator. Time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate associated factors. RESULTS The 2 and 5-year cumulative incidence rates of second recurrence were 48.3 % (95 % CI 42.4-54.3) and 54.9 % (95 % CI 48.9-60.8), respectively. At 5 years, second locoregional recurrence was twice as common as distant recurrence (41.5 % [95 % CI 35.6-47.4] vs. 21.7 % [95 % CI 16.8-26.6]). The median TTR was 21.1 months (95 % CI 4.4-34.8), which varied by site (38.2 larynx/hypopharynx, 13.9 oral cavity, 8.3 sinonasal, and 7.8 oropharynx, P=.0001). The median OS was 32.1 months (95 % CI 24.1-47.6) and was worse for patients who were Black (hazard ratio [HR] 2.15, 95 % CI 1.19-3.9), current smokers (HR 2.73, 95 % CI 1.53-4.88), former smokers (HR 2.00, 95 % CI 1.19-3.35), ≥ 60 years of age (HR 1.41, 95 % CI 1.01-1.97), or received multimodal primary therapy (HR 1.98, 95 % CI 1.26-3.13). CONCLUSION Rates of recurrence and mortality after salvage surgery were poor but worse for patients who were Black, older, smoked, had initial multimodal therapy, or had sinonasal or oropharyngeal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J Contrera
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Bhavya K Sharma
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Brian B Burkey
- Head & Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Michael Fritz
- Head & Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jamie A Ku
- Head & Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Eric D Lamarre
- Head & Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Joseph Scharpf
- Head & Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Natalie Silver
- Head & Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Raj Sindwani
- Head & Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Shlomo A Koyfman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alapati R, Wagoner SF, Lawrence A, Bon Nieves A, Desai A, Shnayder Y, Hamill C, Kakarala K, Neupane P, Gan G, Sykes KJ, Bur AM. Impact of Adjuvant Radiotherapy Setting on Quality-of-Life in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2024; 134:3645-3655. [PMID: 38436503 DOI: 10.1002/lary.31382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine differences in post-treatment QoL across treatment settings in patients receiving adjuvant radiation therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS This was a prospective observational cohort study of patients with HNSCC initially evaluated in a head and neck surgical oncologic and reconstructive clinic at an academic medical center (AMC). Participants were enrolled prior to treatment in a prospective registry collecting demographic, social, and clinical data. Physical and social-emotional QoL (phys-QoL and soc-QoL, respectively) was measured using the University of Washington-QoL questionnaire at pre-treatment and post-treatment visits. RESULTS A cohort of 177 patients, primarily male and White with an average age of 61.2 ± 11.2 years, met inclusion criteria. Most patients presented with oral cavity tumors (n = 132, 74.6%), had non-HPV-mediated disease (n = 97, 61.8%), and were classified as Stage IVa (n = 72, 42.8%). After controlling for covariates, patients treated at community medical centers (CMCs) reported a 7.15-point lower phys-QoL compared with those treated at AMCs (95% CI: -13.96 to -0.35, p = 0.040) up to 12 months post-treatment. Additionally, patients who were treated at CMCs had a 5.77-point (-11.86-0.31, p = 0.063) lower soc-QoL score compared with those treated at an AMC, which was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION This study revealed that HNSCC patients treated with radiation at AMCs reported significantly greater phys-QoL in their first-year post-treatment compared to those treated at CMCs, but soc-QoL did not differ significantly. Further observational studies are needed to explore potential factors, including treatment planning and cancer resource engagement, behind disparities between AMCs and CMCs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 134:3645-3655, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Alapati
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Sarah F Wagoner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Amelia Lawrence
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Antonio Bon Nieves
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Atharva Desai
- School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A
| | - Yelizaveta Shnayder
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Chelsea Hamill
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Kiran Kakarala
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Prakash Neupane
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Gregory Gan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Kevin J Sykes
- Baylor Scott & White, Health and Wellness Center, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Andrés M Bur
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fang Q, Yuan J, Zhang X, Dai L, Luo R, Xu C. Neck management in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with parotid metastasis. Head Neck 2024; 46:1938-1945. [PMID: 38334480 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Revised: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our objective is to assess the oncologic outcomes of observation, elective neck dissection (END), and elective neck irradiation (ENI) in the neck management of head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNcSCC) with parotid metastasis (P+) and to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) of patients who received END or ENI. METHODS Patients with P+ HNcSCC were retrospectively enrolled. The impact of observation, END, and ENI on regional control (RC) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards model with presentation via hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). QoL was evaluated using the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 134 patients were included in our analysis. In the Cox model for RC, both END and ENI had decreased HRs of 0.27 (95% CI: 0.15-0.69) and 0.34 (95% CI: 0.18-0.86), respectively, in comparison with observation. In the Cox model for OS, both END (p = 0.001, HR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.10-0.72) and ENI (p = 0.006, HR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.17-0.83) were superior to observation. In patients with three or more positive parotid lymph nodes, END resulted in significantly better RC (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.001) compared with ENI. The two groups were found to be comparable in all 12 domains of the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire. CONCLUSION In the neck management of P+ HNcSCC, observation is not recommended. END is the preferred option, but ENI is an alternative method without compromise to survival or QoL, except in cases with three or more metastatic parotid lymph nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qigen Fang
- Department of Head Neck and Thyroid, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Junhui Yuan
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xu Zhang
- Department of Head Neck and Thyroid, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Liyuan Dai
- Department of Head Neck and Thyroid, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ruihua Luo
- Department of Head Neck and Thyroid, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Chunmiao Xu
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aljawadi MH, Alkhudair N, Alrasheed M, Alsuhaibani AS, Alotaibi BJ, Almuqbil M, Alhammad AM, Arafah A, AlGahtani FH, Rehman MU. Understanding the Quality of Life Among Patients With Cancer in Saudi Arabia: Insights From a Cross-Sectional Study. Cancer Control 2024; 31:10732748241263013. [PMID: 38870396 PMCID: PMC11179550 DOI: 10.1177/10732748241263013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer patients' quality of life (QoL) significantly influences treatment response and mortality rates. Understanding QoL domains among patients with cancer and what affects it can help create interventions that improve QoL and ease patients' experience. This study measures the OoL among patients with cancer and influencing factors. METHODS A prospective cross-sectional questionnaire-based study included cancer patients aged >18 currently receiving treatment. The questionnaire collected social and economic data, followed by the validated Arabic version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30). Means and standard deviations for described numeric variables and frequencies and percentages described categorical variables. Analysis of variance, F-tests, and P-values were reported. RESULTS Among 182 cancer patients, 60% were female. Younger patients exhibited higher QoL in physical and role functioning (P = .016 and .03) and experienced more significant financial impact (P = .0144). Females reported more adverse effects from cancer symptoms, including fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and pain (36.7% vs 25.5%, P = .005; 20.6% vs 11.5%, P = .0186; 34.7% vs 25.1%, P = .0281). Single patients had superior QoL in physical functioning compared to others (P = .0127). Patients traveling long distances were more likely to face adverse financial consequences (P = .007). Asthmatic patients exhibited lower QoL in physical, role, and cognitive functioning (72.3 vs 37.8, P = .0147; 76.4 vs 22.2, P = .0024; 84.7 vs 44.4, P = .0038) and reported increased dyspnea and appetite loss (16 vs 55.6 and 26.1 vs 66.7, both P < .05). CONCLUSION Factors influencing QoL in Saudi cancer patients include age, marital status, gender, hospital distance, and chronic conditions. Thus emphasizing the necessity for personalized care strategies to enhance outcomes and alleviate the overall burden of cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad H Aljawadi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nora Alkhudair
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Marwan Alrasheed
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulaziz S Alsuhaibani
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Basil J Alotaibi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mansour Almuqbil
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah M Alhammad
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Azhar Arafah
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Farjah H AlGahtani
- Department of internal Medicine, King Saud University College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Muneeb U Rehman
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|