Innovative Approaches and Future Directions in the Management and Understanding of Varicose Veins: A Systematic Review

Varicose veins, a prevalent condition that primarily affects the lower limbs, present significant hurdles in diagnosis and treatment due to their diverse causes. This study dives into the complex hormonal, environmental, and molecular elements that influence varicose vein genesis, emphasizing the need for precise diagnostic methods and changing therapy approaches to improve patient outcomes. It investigates the epidemiology and demographic distribution of varicose veins, delves into their pathophysiology, and assesses diagnostic methods such as duplex ultrasonography and the CEAP classification system. In addition, the study discusses novel therapies such as sclerotherapy and endovenous thermal ablation, as well as the effectiveness of existing diagnostic methods in detecting chronic venous illnesses. By investigating venous wall remodeling and inflammatory pathways, it gives a thorough knowledge of varicose vein formation. The study calls for future research that focuses on patient-centered methods, bioengineering advances, digital health applications, and genetic and molecular studies to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of vascular therapy. As a result, a multidisciplinary literature analysis was done, drawing on insights from vascular medicine, epidemiology, genetics, and pharmacology, to consolidate existing knowledge and identify possibilities to enhance varicose vein diagnosis, treatment, and patient care outcomes.

A Systematic Review of Radiological Diagnosis and Management of May-Thurner Syndrome

May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) is an anatomical condition of external luminal compression of common iliac vein due to a partial obstruction of the common iliac vein between common iliac artery and lumbar vertebra causes deep-vein thrombosis, venous hypertension, and chronic venous insufficiencies. In this article, we review present evidence of the clinical diagnosis and management of MTS. Here, we conducted a literature review of studies on MTS. We also reviewed different clinical features, presentation, diagnostic methods, and therapeutic procedure for this condition. Most studies mentioned the diagnosis of this condition is performed by color Doppler, computed tomographic angiography, venography, and problem-solving cases by intravascular ultrasound technique. Nonsurgical methods of management are first line, and vascular surgery is reserved for refractory cases. Multiple modalities are required to reach the diagnosis of MTS, and noninvasive intervention radiology methods are the first line of management. This review highlights the presentations of MTS and outlines diagnostic procedure and management.

Clinical Outcomes at 3 Years After Stenting for Thrombotic and Non-thrombotic Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome Patients

Iliac vein stenting for the treatment of iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS) has been gradually developed. This article investigated the long-term patency and improvement of clinical symptoms after endovascular stenting for iliac vein obstruction patients. From 2020 to 2022, 83 patients at a single institution with IVCS underwent venous stent implantation and were divided into two groups: non-thrombotic IVCS (n = 55) and thrombotic IVCS (n = 28). The main stent-related outcomes include technical success, long-term patency, and thrombotic events. The technical success rate of all stent implantation was 100%. The mean length of hospital stay and cost were higher in the thrombotic IVCS group than in the non-thrombotic ICVS group, as well as the length of diseased vessel segment and the number of stents implanted were higher than in the control non-thrombotic group. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year patency rates were 85.4%, 80% and 66.7% in the thrombosis group, which were lower than 93.6%, 88.7%, and 87.5% in the control group (P = .0135, hazard ratio = 2.644). In addition, patients in both groups had a foreign body sensation after stent implantation, which resolved spontaneously within 1 year after surgery. Overall, there were statistically significant differences in long-term patency rate outcome between patients with thrombotic and non-thrombotic IVCS, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year patency rates in non-thrombotic IVCS patients were higher than those in thrombotic IVCS patients.

Antithrombotic management of patients with deep vein thrombosis and venous stents: an international registry

BACKGROUND

In patients with acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) treated with catheter-based thrombolysis and venous stenting, poststenting anticoagulant management is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the type and duration of antithrombotic therapy used in patients who have received venous stents for treatment of acute lower extremity DVT.

METHODS

We created an international registry of patients with leg DVT from 2005 to 2019 who received venous stents as part of their acute management. We collected data on baseline clinical characteristics and pre-venous and post-venous stent antithrombotic therapy.

RESULTS

We studied 173 patients with venous stents: 101 (58%) were aged ≤50 years, 105 (61%) were female, and 128 (74%) had risk factors for thrombotic disease. DVT was iliofemoral in 150 (87%) patients, and catheter-based treatment was given within 7 days of diagnosis in 92 (53%) patients. After venous stenting, 109 (63%) patients received anticoagulant-only therapy with a direct oral anticoagulant (29%), warfarin (22%), or low-molecular-weight heparin (10%), and 59 (34%) received anticoagulant-antiplatelet therapy. In patients taking anticoagulant-only therapy, 29% received indefinite treatment; in patients on anticoagulant-antiplatelet therapy, 19% received indefinite treatment. Factors associated with combined anticoagulant-antiplatelet therapy vs anticoagulant-only therapy were use of thrombolytic, thrombectomy, and aspiration interventions (odds ratio [OR], 5.11; 95% CI, 1.45-18.05); use of balloon angioplasty (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.20-5.76); and immediate stent restenosis (OR, 7.2; 95% CI, 1.45-5.89).

CONCLUSION

Anticoagulant therapy without concomitant antiplatelet therapy appears to be the most common antithrombotic strategy in patients with DVT and venous stenting. More research is needed to determine outcomes of venous stenting in relation to antithrombotic therapy.

Risk factors and outcomes regarding the acute kidney injury after AngioJet thrombectomy for acute lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk factors and outcomes regarding acute kidney injury (AKI) after AngioJet thrombectomy for acute lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

METHODS

Patients were divided into AKI and non-AKI groups according to whether AKI occurred postoperatively. The demographic data, pre-operative and post-operative laboratory data and surgical differences were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to identify the AKI risk factors and outcomes, respectively.

RESULTS

Among the 341 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 45 developed AKI (AKI group) and 296 had normal renal function (non-AKI group) post-surgery. There were significant differences between the two groups in the course (t = 10.885, P = 0.000); preoperative history of a major surgery within 3 months (3M-MS) (odds ratio [OR] = 5.492, P = 0.001); duration of aspiration thrombectomy (Z = -8.803, P = 0.000); volumes of aspiration (Z = -8.215, P = 0.000); contrast volume (Z = -3.204, P = 0.001) and pulmonary thrombectomy (OR = 18.200, P = 0.002); and preoperative complications of hypertension (OR = 4.637, P = 0.002), diabetes (OR = 18.088, P = 0.000), or pulmonary embolism (OR = 0.085, P = 0.011). Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed that the renal function of every patient in the AKI group returned to normal 3 months after the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The course, preoperative complications of diabetes or hypertension, 3M-MS, contrast volume, duration and volume of aspiration thrombectomy, and pulmonary thrombectomy are risk factors for post-AngioJet-thrombectomy AKI, which is temporary.

Evaluation of safety and performance of a new prototype self-expandable nitinol venous stent in an ovine model

Objective

Our study was a prospective in vivo study performed on an animal model to evaluate the safety and performance of a novel venous stent designed specifically for venous applications.

Methods

The novel stents were implanted in the inferior vena cava of nine sheep. The stents were deployed with different distances between the closed cell rings to test for if the segments might migrate after being deployed at maximal distance. Three different total lengths were 9, 11, and 13 cm. After 1, 3, and 6 months, vascular injury, thrombus, neointima coverage, and stent migration were evaluated through computed tomography venography and histopathology. Imaging, histology, and integration data were analyzed for each group.

Results

All stents were deployed successfully, and all sheep survived until the time of harvesting. In all cases, the native blood vessel sections were intact. The segmented stent parts showed a differently pronounced tissue coverage, depending on the duration of the implantation.

Conclusions

The new nitinol stent is safe and feasible to implant in the venous system with a rapid surface coverage. Alteration of stent length did not affect the development of neointimal formation and did not cause migration.

Predictors of long-term outcomes after catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with stent implantation in acute deep vein thrombosis secondary to iliac vein compression

The purpose of this study is to analyze predictive factors for long-term clinical outcomes after catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) combined with stent implantation for acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) secondary to iliac vein compression (IVC). A retrospective analysis was performed to review clinical data and follow-up information on 52 patients who underwent CDT combined with stent implantation for acute DVT secondary to IVC from June 2015 to March 2020. Clinical outcomes including stent patency and incidence of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) were investigated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. All included patients were categorized into 2 groups according to the presence of PTS. Potential risk factors, including age, gender, degree of iliac vein stenosis, time from onset to treatment, dosage of thrombolytic agent, stent extending below the inguinal ligament, and duration of anticoagulation for PTS were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Over a median follow-up of 24 months, 4 individuals underwent reintervention due to in-stent stenosis or stent compression. Primary stent patency was 98.1% at 1 month, 94.2% at 6 months, 90.4% at 12 months, and 88.5% at 24 months. Freedom from PTS was 98.1% at 6 months, 84.6% at 12 months, and 75% at 24 months. No treatment-related mortality or morbidity was observed. Based on the development of PTS, 13 patients with PTS were classified into group A and 39 patients without PTS were regarded as group B. Upon multivariate logistic regression analysis, key prognostic factors for PTS were degree of iliac vein stenosis and time from onset to treatment. CDT combined with stent implantation is safe and effective for acute DVT secondary to IVC in the long-term perspective. Severe iliac vein stenosis and longer period from onset to treatment may be associated with a higher risk of PTS.

Seizures, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary emboli in a severe case of May–Thurner syndrome: a case report

Background

May–Thurner syndrome is a vascular disorder caused by the right common iliac artery compressing the left common iliac vein against the lumbar spine, causing distal venous stasis and potentially leading to fibrous change in the venous wall structure. Although May–Thurner syndrome is most commonly discovered in females upon investigation of new-onset deep vein thrombosis, we present the case of an otherwise healthy 29-year-old male with severe May–Thurner syndrome who presented with seizures, bilateral deep vein thrombosis, and diffuse pulmonary emboli. Seizures constituted the earliest presenting symptoms for the patient. Although it is difficult to prove that the patient’s seizures were related to the May–Thurner syndrome, this possible association renders this case extraordinary.

Case presentation

This report describes the case of a 29-year-old previously healthy white male with a severe case of left-sided May–Thurner syndrome that required extensive medical and interventional treatment. The patient experienced two seizures, one month apart, both of which occurred while residing at high altitude. The patient had no prior history of seizures, and epilepsy was ruled out. Three weeks after the second seizure, he presented to the emergency room with hemoptysis, dyspnea, and severe leg pain. Sites of thrombus were confirmed in both legs and diffusely in the lungs. Etiological work-up after treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator revealed May–Thurner syndrome. Hematology workup including genetic testing showed no evidence of coagulopathy. Bilateral common iliac venous stents were placed to attempt definitive treatment. Despite stenting, the patient had another thrombotic event with associated sequelae after discontinuation of anticoagulation. The patient has not had another seizure since the stents were placed. Despite the negative testing, the patient remains on lifelong chemoprophylaxis in the event of an undiscovered hypercoagulopathy.

Conclusions

The care team theorizes that the seizures resulted from hypoxia due to May–Thurner syndrome-induced hemostasis and associated thrombotic events, the high-altitude location of his residence at the time he experienced the seizures, and shallow breathing during sleep. For patients with lower limb venous thrombosis, May–Thurner syndrome should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Endovascular treatment followed by extended prophylactic anticoagulation therapy until the patient is determined to be no longer at risk for thrombosis is recommended. Post-venoplasty thrombosis is a common complication of endovascular treatment of May–Thurner syndrome and should be carefully monitored.

May-Thurner Syndrome and Lymphedema Reconstruction

May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) is an anatomical variant that results in compression of the left common iliac vein by the right common iliac artery. Although often asymptomatic, lower extremity swelling/edema, deep venous thrombosis, post-thrombotic syndrome, and eventual lymphedema (due to long-standing venous obstruction) can develop. The clinical management of patients presenting for lymphedema surgery with concomitant or undiagnosed MTS is not well described.

Methods

This review investigates two patients who were evaluated for unilateral lower extremity lymphedema, both of whom were subsequently diagnosed with MTS. Standard imaging (including lymphoscintigraphy, indocyanine green lymphangiography, and magnetic resonance venography) were performed to identify proximal venous obstruction. Treatment was accomplished using vascular surgical management, including stenting of the iliac vein before lymphedema reconstruction with vascularized lymph node transfer and multiple lymphovenous bypass.

Results

Both patients we examined in this review had improvement of lymphedema with vascular surgical management. Literature review reveals that MTS has an incidence as high as 20% in the population, although commonly unidentified due to lack of symptomatology.

Conclusions

There are no studies documenting the incidence of MTS in patients referred for lymphedema surgical management. Routine studies should be obtained to screen for proximal venous obstruction in patients presenting for surgical management of lower extremity lymphedema. Additional research is needed regarding the approach to managing patients with both MTS and lymphedema. Careful observational and prospective studies may elucidate the appropriate time interval between venous stenting and lymphedema microsurgical reconstruction.

Pivotal Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the Abre Venous Self-Expanding Stent System in Patients With Symptomatic Iliofemoral Venous Outflow Obstruction

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:

Iliofemoral venous obstruction is recognized with increasing frequency as the underlying cause of lower extremity symptoms including edema, pain, skin changes, and, in advanced cases, ulceration. This study sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Abre venous self-expanding stent system for the treatment of symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction.

Methods:

The ABRE Study (A Multi-Center, Non-Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Abre Venous Self-Expanding Stent System in Patients With Symptomatic Iliofemoral Venous Outflow Obstruction) is a single-arm, multicenter, prospective study that included 200 subjects from 24 global sites. The primary end points were 12-month primary patency and major adverse events within 30 days. Secondary end points included lesion and procedure success, primary-assisted and secondary patency, major adverse events, stent migration, stent fracture, and quality of life changes. End point-related adverse events and imaging studies were adjudicated by independent clinical events committee and core laboratories, respectively.

Results:

Venous obstruction cause was classified as acute deep vein thrombosis (16.5%, 33/200), post-thrombotic syndrome (47.5%, 95/200), or nonthrombotic iliac vein lesion (36.0%, 72/200). The common iliac and external iliac veins were stented in 96.0% (192/200), 80.5% (161/200) of subjects, respectively. Stent implant into the common femoral vein was required in 44.0% (88/200). Primary patency at 12 months was 88.0% (162/184). Four (2.0%) major adverse events occurred within 30 days. Twelve-month primary-assisted and secondary patency were 91.8% (169/184) and 92.9% (171/184), respectively. No stent fractures or migrations were reported. Mean target limb Villalta score decreased from 11.2±5.6 at baseline to 4.1±4.8 at 12 months, and the mean target limb revised Venous Clinical Severity Score decreased from 8.8±4.7 at baseline to 4.3±3.6 at 12 months. Clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life and venous functional assessment scores from baseline were demonstrated through 12 months in all measures.

Conclusions:

Symptomatic iliofemoral venous obstruction can be successfully treated with an Abre venous stent. Study outcomes demonstrated a high patency rate with a good safety profile. Patients demonstrated a significant reduction in clinical symptoms and improvement in quality of life that was maintained through 12-month follow-up.

Registration:

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03038438.

Current Status and Prospect of Stent Placement for May-Thurner Syndrome

Stent implantation has been proven to be safe and has become the first-line intervention for May-Thurner syndrome (MTS), with satisfactory mid-term patency rates and clinical outcomes. Recent research has demonstrated that catheter-directed thrombolysis is the preferred strategy when MTS is combined with deep vein thrombosis after self-expanding stent placement. However, the stent used for the venous system was developed based on the experience obtained in the treatment of arterial disease. Consequently, relatively common corresponding complications may come along later, which include stent displacement, deformation, and obstruction. Different measures such as adopting a stent with a larger diameter, improving stent flexibility, and increasing stent strength have been employed in order to prevent these complications. The ideal venous stent is presently being evaluated and will be introduced in detail in this review.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 12-Month Patency After Intervention for Iliofemoral Obstruction Using Dedicated or Non-Dedicated Venous Stents

BACKGROUND

Endovascular stenting of the deep venous system has been proposed as a method to treat patients with symptomatic iliofemoral outflow obstruction. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of this treatment at 1-year following the development of dedicated venous stents.

METHOD AND RESULTS

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies evaluating the effectiveness of venous stent placement. Data were extracted by disease pathogenesis: non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVL), acute thrombotic (DVT), or post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Main outcomes included technical success, stent patency at 1 year and symptom relief. A total of 49 studies reporting outcomes in 5154 patients (NIVL, 1431; DVT, 950; PTS, 2773) were included in the meta-analysis. Technical success rates were comparable among groups (97%-100%). There were no periprocedural deaths. Minor bleeding was reported in up to 5% of patients and major bleeding in 0.5% upon intervention. Transient back pain was noted in 55% of PTS patients following intervention. There was significant heterogeneity between studies reporting outcomes in PTS patients. Primary and cumulative patency at 1 year was: NIVL-96% and 100%; DVT-91% and 97%; PTS (stents above the ligament)-77% and 94%, and; PTS (stents across the ligament)-78% and 94%. There were insufficient data to compare patency outcomes of dedicated and nondedicated venous stents in patients with acute DVT. In NIVL and PTS patients, stent patency was comparable at 1 year. There was inconsistency in the use of validated tools for the measurement of symptoms before and after intervention. When reported, venous claudication, improved in 83% of PTS patients and 90% of NIVL patients, and ulcer healing occurred in 80% of PTS patients and 32% of NIVL patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The first generation of dedicated venous stents perform comparably in terms of patency and clinical outcomes to non-dedicated technologies at 1 year for the treatment of patients with NIVL and PTS. However, significant heterogeneity exists between studies and standardized criteria are urgently needed to report outcomes in patients undergoing deep venous stenting.

Impact of the Result of Continued Thrombolysis After Stenting Following Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy for Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis-A Retrospective Study

Objective

The aim of this study is to compare the procedure and treatment outcomes of using either direct stenting alone following pharmacomechanical thrombectomy or continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after stenting for treatment of acute left iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis while clot removal degree achieved grade III.

Methods

From March 2018 to May 2019, 82 patients who underwent iliac venous stenting for treatment of acute left iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis with iliac vein stenosis after pharmacomechanical thrombectomy therapy using the AngioJet system while Clot removal degree achieved grade III were divided into two groups: Direct stenting alone group (n = 39) and continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after stenting group (n = 43). Comparisons were made regarding the treatment outcomes, stent patency rate, and Villalta scale between these two groups.

Results

No serious perioperative complications occurred. The mean urokinase dose and hospitalization time in the stenting alone group and continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after the stenting group were 0.30 million U versus 1.76 ± 0.54 million U and 4.85 ± 0.93 days versus 6.33 ± 1.02 days, (P < .001). In the first 30 days after the operation, there were 3 recurrent episodes of deep vein thrombosis in the stenting alone group (P = 0.064). Each patient has completed at least one year of follow-up, the mean follow-up was 15.95 ± 3.44 months. Overall cumulative stent patency rates were 87.2% in stenting alone group and 97.7% in continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after stenting group at 12months (P = 0.037). The Villalta scores at 12 months had a significant difference between the two groups. The mean Villalta scores in the stenting alone group and continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after the stenting group were 4.44 ± 1.63 and 1.63 ± 1.29, respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

When the clot removal degree of pharmacomechanical thrombectomy thrombectomy reaches grade III, both stenting alone and continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after stenting are effective treatment modalities. For young patients with low bleeding risk, continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after stenting has a better patency rate and a lower 1-year post-thrombotic syndrome risk and does not increase major bleeding events. However, it may increase the time and costs of hospitalization accordingly.

Three-Year Results from the Venovo Venous Stent Study for the Treatment of Iliac and Femoral Vein Obstruction

Purpose

To assess safety and patency of the Venovo venous stent for the treatment of iliofemoral vein obstruction.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-two international centers enrolled 170 patients in the VERNACULAR study (93 post-thrombotic syndrome; 77 non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions). Primary outcome measures were major adverse events at 30 days and 12-month primary patency (freedom from target vessel revascularization, thrombotic occlusion, or stenosis > 50%). Secondary outcomes included the Venous Clinical Severity Score Pain Assessment and Chronic Venous Quality-of-Life Questionnaire assessments (hypothesis tested). Secondary observations included primary patency, target vessel and lesion revascularization (TVR/TLR), and assessment of stent integrity through 36 months.

Results

Freedom from major adverse events through 30 days was 93.5%, statistically higher than a pre-specified performance goal of 89% (p = 0.032) while primary patency at 12 months was 88.6%, also statistically higher than a performance goal of 74% (p < 0.0001). Mean quality-of-life measures were statistically improved compared to baseline values at 12 months (p < 0.0001). Primary patency at 36 months was 84% (Kaplan–Meier analysis) while freedom from TVR/TLR was 88.1%. There was no stent embolization/migration, and no core laboratory assessed stent fractures reported through 36 months. Six deaths were reported; none adjudicated as device or procedure related.

Conclusion

The Venovo venous stent was successfully deployed in obstructive iliofemoral vein lesions and met the pre-specified primary outcome measures through 12 months. At 3 years, primary patency was 84%, reintervention rates were low, standardized quality-of-life and pain measures improved from baseline, and there was no stent migration or fractures.

Level of Evidence

Level 2—prospective, multicenter, controlled clinical study without a concurrent control or randomization. Pre-specified endpoints were hypothesis-tested to performance goals derived from peer-reviewed clinical literature.

Registration clinicaltrials.gov

Unique Identifier NCT02655887.

May-Thurner Syndrome: An Anatomic Predisposition to Deep Vein Thrombosis

May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) is a rare clinical condition caused by extrinsic compression of the left common iliac vein by the right common iliac artery, leading to venous stasis and predisposing to thrombus formation. Here, we present the case of a 39-year-old female with no obviously known other risk factors predisposing to thrombosis who presented with severe left leg pain and swelling for a week. The international normalized ratio was elevated and the venous Doppler study showed extensive thrombosis extending from the left common iliac vein to the common femoral vein and the popliteal vein. She was diagnosed with MTS and treated with catheter-directed mechanical thrombolysis and thrombectomy, along with angioplasty of the left common iliac vein and external iliac vein, with near-complete resolution post-treatment. MTS should be suspected in patients who present with unilateral limb thrombosis regardless of the presence of predisposing factors. Timely management with endovascular procedures is necessary to help prevent other potential life-threatening complications.

Common iliac vein stenting for May-Thurner syndrome and subsequent pregnancy

BACKGROUND

For women with left common iliac vein compression (ie, May-Thurner syndrome) who undergo venous stenting and subsequently become pregnant, concerns have been raised regarding a possible compromise of stent patency due to compression from the gravid uterus and the hypercoagulability induced by pregnancy. Only a small body of literature exists on this subject, and limited management guidelines are available. The present study was designed to evaluate the safety of iliac vein stenting for May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) with subsequent pregnancy.

METHODS

Female patients who had undergone common iliac vein stenting at our center who were aged 18 to 45 years and had subsequently become pregnant were identified. A retrospective medical record review of eight eligible patients was conducted, recording the demographics, procedural characteristics, and anticoagulation strategies. The primary outcome evaluated was stent patency.

RESULTS

All eight patients had undergone left common iliac vein stenting for MTS. A total of eight stents were placed, and all demonstrated duplex ultrasound patency throughout pregnancy and postpartum. Seven patients delivered healthy pregnancies, and one experienced a stillbirth. The clinical CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic) class remained unchanged or improved from pregnancy to postpartum for all patients. The average age at stent placement was 31 ± 5 years, and the average interval from stent placement to pregnancy was 28 ± 19 months. One patient developed nonobstructive deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the left femoral vein during pregnancy and was treated with therapeutic enoxaparin. The nonobstructive DVT did not compromise the iliac vein stent. Two patients received low-dose aspirin and prophylactic doses of enoxaparin, one for a history of DVT and factor V Leiden and one for a recent history of fertility treatment. The five remaining patients received no anticoagulation, three received low-dose aspirin, and two received no antiplatelet therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Common iliac vein stent patency was not compromised by subsequent pregnancy in our eight patients with MTS. Furthermore, the stents remained patent throughout pregnancy in patients receiving a wide range of anticoagulation and antiplatelet treatments, suggesting that no uniform therapeutic threshold exists and treatment should be individualized. For most patients, low-dose aspirin alone or no treatment was adequate. This could have implications for counseling women who require intervention for MTS and are of child-bearing age.

Iliac vein stenting is safe when performed in an office based laboratory setting

BACKGROUND

Venous stenting for iliac vein outflow obstruction is associated with excellent long-term stent patency and symptom resolution. However, the safety of iliac vein stenting performed in an office-based laboratory (OBL) setting is not well-defined. The purpose of our investigation was to determine the safety profile of iliac vein stenting in an OBL setting.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected in the Center for Vascular Medicine electronic medical record system (NextGen Healthcare Information System, Irvine, Calif) and retrospectively analyzed. Standardized patient safety and sedation protocols were used in accordance with the accreditation standards of the Joint Commission for Accreditation of Hospital Organizations for office-based surgery centers. Patient consultations, interventions, and follow-up at 1 to 6 weeks were included in the present analysis. All the patients had received moderate sedation during their procedure. Complications requiring hospitalization were classified as major complications. Minor complications consisted of bleeding, hematoma, vasovagal response, in-stent thrombosis resulting in complete occlusion of the iliac vein stent, an allergic reaction, hematemesis, hypotension, pelvic discomfort, and pseudoaneurysm.

RESULTS

Between January 2015 and January 2019, 1223 iliac vein stents were placed in 1104 patients (23.7% male; 76.3% female). A total of 90 minor complications (7.36%) and 5 major complications (0.41%) were observed. The major complications included the following: one allergic reaction, one episode of atrial fibrillation, one episode of supraventricular tachycardia, one episode of chest pain, and one case of acute stent occlusion. The minor complications were primarily insertion site hematomas. No complications were related to sedation or acute renal failure. No patient died.

CONCLUSIONS

Major complications were rare after iliac vein stenting in an OBL setting. Minor complications were primarily insertion site hematomas, which did not require inpatient hospitalization. Our analysis has shown that iliac vein stenting in an OBL setting is a safe and well-tolerated procedure.

Clinical effects of pigtail catheter crushing thrombus combined with AngioJet mechanical aspiration in treatment of acute left iliofemoral vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

We investigated the efficacy of combined pigtail catheter crushing and AngioJet mechanical aspiration of thrombi in the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

METHODS

Eighty-two patients with acute iliofemoral DVT were retrospectively divided into a pigtail catheter + AngioJet group (group A, 42 cases) and an AngioJet-only group (group B, 40 cases). The difference in the circumference of the healthy limbs before and after treatment, immediate thrombus clearance rate in the lower limbs, recannalization percentage of venous lumen, and duration of postoperative hematuria were compared to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the combination method.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 100%, no serious bleeding complications occurred, lower extremity symptoms were effectively alleviated, and post-treatment recannalization percentage of venous lumen were similarly high in both groups. Group A fared significantly better than group B in immediate thrombus clearance (P < 0.05), intraoperative aspiration time (199.38 ± 68.55 vs. 295.30 ± 76.02 s), postoperative CDT urokinase dosage (2.10 ± 0.94 vs. 3.07 ± 0.94 million units), and duration of postoperative hematuria (13.23 ± 2.96 vs. 16.75 ± 3.11 h) (all P < 0.001). At 6 months, the recannalization percentage of venous lumen of group A and group B was 89.71 ± 16.02% and 88.64 ± 16.68%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combination of pigtail catheter crushing and AngioJet mechanical aspiration of thrombi for acute left iliofemoral vein thrombosis is safe, easy, and effective, with a satisfactory short-term outcome.

Nonnegligible causes of symptoms of acute lower extremities--3 cases of May-Thurner syndrome with deep vein thrombosis

Background

May-Thurner syndrome is a kind of disease caused by the compression of the left common iliac vein. It is one of the causes of incomplete venous valves and superficial varicose veins in lower limbs, and is also a potential factor of acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

Method

Here 3 cases are diagnosed as May-Thurner syndrome at different ages.

Case presentations

1. A 35-year-old female patient was hospitalized with swelling of the left lower limb for 1 week. Computed tomography (CT) showed compression of the left common iliac vein with thrombosis. May-Thurner syndrome was diagnosed and catheter-directed thrombolysis was performed. 2. A 37-year-old male patient came to our hospital due to sudden swelling of the right lower extremity and pain for 3 days. Computed tomography showed compression of the left common iliac vein and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the right iliac vein. May-Thurner syndrome was diagnosed. The patient was performed with inferior vena cava (IVC) filter implantation, catheter-directed thrombolysis and balloon angioplasty for right iliac vein. And the patient recovered well; 3. A 55-year-old female patient came to our hospital with swelling and discomfort in the left lower extremity for 3 days. Computed tomography showed stenosis of the left common iliac vein with deep vein thrombosis. May-Thurner syndrome was diagnosed, balloon dilation and stent implantation were performed. During 3 years of follow-up, there was no swelling or new thrombosis in her lower limbs.

Conclusion

When encountering unexplained deep vein thrombosis, iliac vein compression syndrome should be considered and treated in time to prevent the recurrence of thrombosis. Catheter-directed thrombolysis can relieve symptoms and stenting placement is the optimal way to relieve stenosis, supplemented by long-term anticoagulation therapy and graduated compression stockings.

Contemporary treatment of May-Thurner Syndrome

Compression of the left common iliac vein by the overlying right common iliac artery is a benign anatomic abnormality in most individuals. However, in patients with significant vein compression, outflow obstruction and chronic intraluminal venous damage may lead to May-Thurner Syndrome. This syndrome commonly manifests as unilateral left leg swelling or acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis. In addition to clinical findings, diagnosis is made with ultrasound, computed tomography venography, or magnetic resonance venography. The extent of compression of the iliac vein is best determined by venography with intravascular ultrasound. Symptoms and hemodynamic significance of the compression guides the ideal treatment approach. Iliocaval stenting has become the standard treatment for this condition and has promising patency rates and clinical outcomes. This review paper provides an overview of pathophysiology, and utility and limitations of the existing diagnostic modalities and treatment options in the management of May-Thurner Syndrome.

Postinterventional antithrombotic management after venous stenting of the iliofemoral tract in acute and chronic thrombosis: A systematic review

Venous stenting has become a common treatment option for central deep venous outflow obstructions and postthrombotic syndrome. Following successful recanalization and stenting, stent patency is endangered by in-stent thrombosis and recurrent venous thromboembolism. Antithrombotic therapy might reduce patency loss. This systematic review summarizes the literature on antithrombotic therapy following (post)thrombotic venous stenting. A systematic PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane search was performed for studies addressing antithrombotic therapy prescribed following venous stenting of the iliofemoral tract indicated by acute or chronic thrombotic pathology. A total of 277 articles was identified of which 64 (56 original studies) were selected. Overall, a mean primary patency rate of 82.3% was seen 1 year after the intervention, which decreased to 73.3% after 2 years. In the majority (43 of 56 studies, 77%), treatment was based on use of vitamin K antagonists, either with (18%) or without (59%) use of antiplatelet drugs. Only two studies (4%) directly assessed the effect of antithrombotic therapy on treatment outcomes. The impact of postinterventional antithrombotic therapy on stent patency remains unknown because of limited and insufficient data available in current literature. Further clinical research should more clearly address the role of antithrombotic therapy for preservation of long-term patency following venous stenting.

Percutaneous endovenous intervention without vena cava filter for acute proximal deep vein thrombosis secondary to iliac vein compression syndrome: preliminary outcomes

The aim is to report the preliminary outcomes of percutaneous endovenous intervention (PEVI) for acute proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) secondary to iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS) without inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) placement. Acute DVT patients who underwent PEVI without IVCF were analyzed retrospectively. PEVI consisted of catheter-directed thrombolysis, manual aspiration thrombectomy, balloon angioplasty and stenting. CT was used to evaluate the left common iliac vein (LCIV). Sixty-two consecutive patients (17 men and 45 women, mean age, 59.4 ± 15.2 years) were enrolled. The compression percentage of the LCIV ranged from 51.7% to 95.2% (median 83.2%). Iliac DVT was present in 7 patients; iliofemoral, in 30 patients; and iliofemoropopliteal, in 25 patients. Complete technical success and clinical improvement were obtained in all subjects without the occurrence of symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE). Five patients experienced recurrent thrombosis. The primary patency rates at 12 and 24 months were 93.8% and 91.4%, respectively, which remained stable at 36, 48 and 60 months. The secondary patency rates at 12 and 24 months were 95.7% and 93.3%, respectively, and there was no change at 60 months. Although limited, our preliminary results suggested that PEVI without IVCF placement seemed to be safe and effective for acute proximal DVT secondary to IVCS without inferior vena cava thrombosis or symptomatic PE.

Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Rivaroxaban with Warfarin for Patients after Successful Stent Placement for Chronic Iliofemoral Occlusion: A Retrospective Single Institution Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to compare the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban and warfarin as anticoagulants for treating patients with post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) with chronic iliofemoral venous occlusion undergoing iliofemoral venous stenting.

METHODS

This single institution retrospective study analysed patients with PTS with chronic iliofemoral venous occlusion who were prescribed rivaroxaban or warfarin for one year after successfully undergoing iliofemoral venous stenting. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were bleeding complication rate and primary patency rate at one year. Secondary outcomes included Villalta score, symptom recurrence rate, ulcer healing rate, and clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR) rate during follow up.

RESULTS

From January 2016 to December 2017, 154 legs from 154 patients were included in this study (69 in rivaroxaban group and 85 in warfarin group). The groups were well matched for patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and procedural details. There was no significant difference between the rivaroxaban group and warfarin group in bleeding complication rate (10% vs. 16%, p = .23, hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25 - 1.37) at one year, as well as major bleeding complication rate (0% vs. 2%, p = .20, HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.01 - 2.61) and minor bleeding complication rate (10% vs. 14%, p = .40, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.27 - 1.66). The primary patency rate was higher in the rivaroxaban group at one year (84% vs. 71%, p = .049, HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.26 - 0.96) and at two years (79% vs. 63%, p = .037, HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29 - 0.93). At a mean follow up of 24 months (range 1 - 42 months), the rivaroxaban group had a significantly lower post-operative Villalta score (4.87 ± 3.51 vs. 6.88 ± 5.85, p = .010, t = 2.64, 95% CI 0.50 - 3.52), lower rate of symptom recurrence (4% vs. 32%, p < .001), lower CD-TLR rates (3% vs. 13%, p = .039), and higher ulcer healing rate (90% vs. 59%, p = .004) than the warfarin group.

CONCLUSION

For PTS patients with chronic iliofemoral venous occlusion undergoing iliofemoral venous stenting, rivaroxaban probably exhibited similar safety but superior efficacy to warfarin. However, further prospective control studies with large sample size are necessary to confirm the results.

Diagnosis and treatment of iliac vein stenosis

Stenosis of the iliac veins is common in patients with chronic venous insufficiency. The article describes the methods for the diagnosis and treatment of iliac vein stenosis. The causes of iliac vein stenosis include extravasal compression or the consequences of ileofemoral thrombosis. Stenosis of the iliac veins exists in 1/4 of the entire adult population, but clinical manifestations do not occur in all patients. Stenosis of the iliac veins should be considered in case of an unknown edema, more often in the left lower extremity, since venous duplex ultrasound of lower extremities is not sensitive and specific enough when examining the veins above the inguinal ligament. The most accurate diagnostic method is intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) but the appeared computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with high-quality images have become a good replacement for IVUS. The main method of treatment of iliac vein stenosis, besides stenting, isindispensable drug therapy consisting of antithrombotic and phlebotonic drugs.

A retrospective comparison of thrombectomy followed by stenting and thrombectomy alone for the management of deep vein thrombosis with May-Thurner syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the clinical results of thrombectomy with stenting (TBS) in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) secondary to May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) compared with the outcomes in patients treated with thrombectomy alone (TB).

METHODS

A retrospective observation of patients with proximal DVT secondary to MTS was conducted in our institution. Patients accepted treatment including either catheter-directed TBS or TB. The complications and stent patency rates were recorded after treatments. The clinical results were assessed in both groups. The independent predictors for in-stent restenosis were further calculated in this study.

RESULTS

We included 372 patients with DVT secondary to MTS. Two hundred twenty-one patients received treatment with thrombectomy with TBS and 151 with TB. A longer mean procedure time (65.1 ± 13.9 minutes vs 49.5 ± 15.7 minutes; P < .001) and higher venous perforation rate (23 patients vs 5 patients; P = .011) were observed in the TBS group than in the TB group. The median follow-up time was 34 months. The patency rates in the TBS group at 36 months were as follows: primary patency rate of 74.0% and secondary patency rate of 92.1%. Independent predictors for restenosis included visible remaining collateral vessels (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12-3.29; P = .02), residual thrombus (HR, 1.40-4.38; P = .002), and tapered iliac vein (HR, 1.26-4.06; P = .006). Clinical results, including Venous Clinical Severity Scores (TBS, 8.0 ± 3.0; TB, 11.4 ± 3.2), Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire score (TBS, 76.4 ± 4.0; TB, 83.1 ± 4.6), Villalta scores (TBS, 3.8 ± 1.7; TB, 6.6 ± 3.2), and edema scores (TBS, 0.7 ± 0.7; TB, 1.6 ± 0.6), improved significantly in the TBS group.

CONCLUSIONS

TBS is effective and feasible for patients with proximal DVT secondary to MTS. Furthermore, compared with TB, additional stenting might be effective in improving the venous clinical results at follow-up observations.

PERFORMANCE TEST AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF SPECIAL STENT FOR TREATMENT OF ILIAC VEIN STENOSIS

Objective: Animal experiments and clinical trials were carried out to evaluate the efficiency of a new stent for the treatment of iliac vein stenosis. Methods: The new iliac vein stent and the control stent were implanted, respectively, into the 12 experimental pigs. Digital Subtraction Angiography was done separately at the same day, 14th, 30th, 60th and 90th day after stent implantation to observe the stent deployment. One patient was implanted with a new iliac vein stent. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was done after the operation to calculate the lumen loss value and lumen loss rate of the stent and evaluate the performance of the new iliac vein stent at 12 months of follow-up. Results: The mechanical experiment and finite element analysis of the stent proved that the radial support force of the new stent is significantly better than that of the control stent. In animal experimental verification, both groups of stent were released satisfactorily during implantation. No obvious stent displacement was found at each time point. The patency rate of stents was 100%. Except for a small amount of old thrombosis in the stent in the control group, no other stents were found in that condition. The diameter of the stent lumen was retracted in different degrees in both groups after the operation, but no significant statistical difference was found in the comparison of the stent lumen loss rate at each relative inspection day. Conclusion: The new nickel-titanium alloy iliac vein stent has excellent radial support performance, which may be an ideal iliac vein stent.

Outcomes of endovascular venous stenting in patients on direct oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet therapy at a tertiary referral center

BACKGROUND

Endovenous revascularization is the standard in the management of acute thrombotic, chronic post-thrombotic iliocaval or iliofemoral obstruction, and nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions. The purpose of this study is to describe our single-center experience of postprocedure anticoagulation and antiplatelet regimens used after endovenous revascularization for a variety of venous occlusive conditions.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive patients who underwent endovenous stenting for iliocaval or iliofemoral obstruction from January 1, 2014, to April 30, 2018. Patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants, warfarin, or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) with or without antiplatelet therapy were identified. Demographic, procedural, patency, and follow-up data were collected. Stent patency was evaluated using duplex Doppler ultrasound examination or contrast venography.

RESULTS

Seventy-one of 100 patients were treated with direct oral anticoagulant therapy (DOAC). Sixteen (23%) were lost to follow-up, leaving 55 (77%) available for analysis. The mean follow-up was 14 months (range, 1-43 months) with 32 patients (58%) followed for 12 months or longer. Primary, primary-assisted, and secondary-assisted patency rates were 87%, 97%, and 98%, respectively, at 12 months. In the non-DOAC group (patients treated with warfarin or LMWH), these rates were 87%, 93%, and 95%, respectively, at 12 months. Antiplatelet therapy, including clopidogrel, aspirin, or both, was used in 53 of 55 patients in the DOAC cohort and 18 of 19 patients in the non-DOAC group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our-single center retrospective analysis demonstrates acceptable primary patency rates when using DOAC therapy compared with those treated with warfarin or LMWH.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiologic Management of Iliofemoral Venous Thrombosis

Iliofemoral venous thrombosis carries a high risk for pulmonary embolism, recurrent deep vein thrombosis, and post-thrombotic syndrome complicating 30% to 71% of those affected. The clinical scenarios in which iliofemoral venous thrombosis is managed may be diverse, presenting a challenge to identify optimum therapy tailored to each situation. Goals for management include preventing morbidity from venous occlusive disease, and morbidity and mortality from pulmonary embolism. Anticoagulation remains the standard of care for iliofemoral venous thrombosis, although a role for more aggressive therapies with catheter-based interventions or surgery exists in select circumstances. Results from recent prospective trials have improved patient selection guidelines for more aggressive therapies, and have also demonstrated a lack of efficacy for certain conservative therapies. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

May-Thurner syndrome: History of understanding and need for defining population prevalence

Patients with May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) are at elevated risk of developing an extensive left iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT; localized blood clot) due to an anatomical variant where the right common iliac artery compresses the left common iliac vein against the lumbar spine. While MTS was initially presumed to be rare when it was first anatomically defined in 1957, case reports of this syndrome have recently become more frequent, perhaps due to improved imaging techniques allowing for enhanced visualization of the iliac veins. Still, the population burden of this condition is unknown, and there is speculation it may be higher than generally perceived. In the present review, we (a) review history of how MTS became recognized, (b) describe practical challenges of studying MTS in population-based settings due to the specialized imaging required for diagnosis, (c) discuss why the contribution of MTS to DVT may be underestimated, (d) describe uncertainty regarding the degree of venous compression which leads to DVT, and (e) outline future research needs. Our goal is to raise awareness of MTS and spark additional research into the epidemiology of this condition, which may be an underappreciated causative venous thromboembolism risk factor.

Contralateral deep vein thrombosis after stenting across the iliocaval confluence in chronic venous disease – A systematic review

Objective

Stenting of the iliac veins is increasingly considered in the presence of symptomatic obstructive chronic lesions in the iliac vein segment. However, it is often necessary to extend the stented zone into the inferior vena cava, increasing the risk of contralateral iliac vein thrombosis. This study aims to review the current literature concerning the incidence of contralateral deep vein thrombosis after stenting across the iliocaval confluence.

Methods

A systematic review from potentially relevant published articles reporting contralateral deep vein thrombosis after iliac venous stenting between January 2007 and February 2019 was performed.

Results

A total of 764 references were retrieved initially. Twelve studies reporting events of contralateral deep vein thrombosis were selected for review, with a total of 1864 patients. Contralateral deep vein thrombosis incidence varied between 0% and 15.6%. The post-interventional and follow-up anticoagulation regimens were heterogeneous between studies. The decision to maintain patients on anticoagulation and the duration of treatment was based on the presence of comorbidities, hypercoagulable states, post-thrombotic syndrome and history of recurrent deep vein thrombosis. Patients with non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions were either anticoagulated for three or six months after stenting or received no anticoagulation. Patients with post-thrombotic syndrome were anticoagulated for longer periods. Most studies (eight studies) used an oral vitamin K antagonist agent. The data on compliance with anticoagulation treatment is scarce and few references present data on whether contralateral deep vein thrombosis occurred during anticoagulation treatment. The use of antiplatelet agents in addition to the anticoagulant treatment in the follow-up period was also variable.

Conclusion

The incidence of contralateral deep vein thrombosis due to iliac vein jailing is not negligible and reported being as high as 15.6%. Large-scale studies on the ideal antithrombotic treatment and its impact are necessary. It is possible that patients with stent crossing the iliocaval confluence might benefit from long-term antithrombotic treatment.

Iliac vein compression: epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment

Iliac vein compression (LIVC) is a prevalent finding in the general population, but a smaller number of patients are symptomatic. ILVC should be considered in symptomatic patients with unexplained unilateral lower leg swelling. Patients typically complain of one or more of the following symptoms: lower leg pain, heaviness, venous claudication, swelling, hyperpigmentation and ulceration. ILVC can be thrombotic, combined with acute or chronic DVT, or non-thrombotic. ILVC is best diagnosed with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), but computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) have emerged as valid screening tests. Venography underestimates the severity of ILVC but may provide insights into the anatomy and the presence of collaterals. Based on current available evidence, endovascular therapy with stenting remains the main treatment strategy for ILVC. Dedicated nitinol venous stents are currently under review by the Food and Drug Administration for potential approval in the United States. These stents have been released outside the US. There is no consensus to the optimal anticoagulation regimen post-ILVC stenting. Oral anticoagulants, however, remain a preferred therapy in patients with history of thrombotic ILVC.

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

https://youtu.be/InSwn2AebNY

Endovascular treatment of post-thrombotic and non-thrombotic iliofemoral venous outflow obstructions with self-expanding nitinol stents

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to investigate venous patency and clinical outcomes for endovascular treatment of iliofemoral venous obstruction in patients with post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and non-thrombotic iliac vein lesion (NIVL) with dedicated self-expanding nitinol stents.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were collected from the prospective Swiss Venous Stent Registry, enrolling consecutive patients with a standardized follow-up procedure since January 2008. Patency was evaluated by duplex sonography and clinical outcome by various scores including the Villalta score at baseline, three, six, and 12 months, and then annually after endovascular therapy.

RESULTS

Overall, 93 patients (64 PTS, 29 NIVL) were analysed. Mean follow-up time was 20 ± 16 (range 3-70) months. A total of 11 (12 %) patients had a stent occlusion, all of which occurred in the PTS group, and 13 (14 %) patients had a symptomatic stent stenosis. Primary patency was 79 % (95 % CI 68-87 %) at 12 months and 72 % (95 % CI 59-82 %) at 24 months. In PTS patients, primary patency at 12 months was 75 % (95 % CI 61-84 %) vs. 89 % (95 % CI 63-97 %) in NIVL patients (p = 0.10). Secondary patency at 24 months was 94 % (95 % CI 84-98 %) in PTS and 100 % in NIVL, p = 0.19). Overall, 62 (67 %) patients were free from PTS at the latest follow-up with a Villalta score < 5 points. Predictive factors for the loss of primary patency were stents placed below the inguinal ligament (OR 2.59, 95 % CI, 0.99-6.84, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In symptomatic patients with chronic iliofemoral vein obstruction, endovascular therapy with self-expanding nitinol stents was associated with favourable patency rates and clinical improvement in the majority of patients.

Percutaneous Endovenous Intervention Plus Anticoagulation versus Anticoagulation Alone for Treating Patients with Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Combination treatment with percutaneous endovenous intervention (PEVI) and anticoagulation has been proposed for treating lower-extremity proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effect of PEVI plus anticoagulation versus anticoagulation alone in patients with lower-extremity proximal DVT.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to May 2016. All RCTs comparing clinical outcomes between additional PEVI and anticoagulation alone were included. The main end points were postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) and major bleeding complications. Secondary outcomes included the iliofemoral patency rate, venous obstruction, and recurrent DVT. We assessed pooled data using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Four RCTs were included. PEVI plus standard anticoagulation compared with anticoagulation alone was associated with a lower rate of PTS (odds ratio [OR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.63), significantly higher iliofemoral patency rate at 6 months and 12 months (OR 8.49, 95% CI 1.32-54.60), a lower rate of venous obstruction (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.924), and a lower rate of recurrent DVT (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.92). However, more major bleeding episodes occurred in the group with catheter-directed thrombolysis (Peto OR 5.86, 95% CI 1.76-19.48).

CONCLUSIONS

PEVI plus anticoagulation reduced the occurrence of PTS, recurrent DVT, and venous obstruction. Another advantage is an increased patency rate at 6 and 12 months. The disadvantage is an increased occurrence of major bleeding events.

May-Thurner: diagnosis and endovascular management

Common left iliac vein compression, otherwise known as May-Thurner (MT), is an anatomical risk factor for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). MT refers to chronic compression of the left iliac vein against the lumbar spine by the overlying right common iliac artery. The compression may be asymptomatic. The syndrome is a clinical spectrum of physical findings and history plus the lesion. It is characterized by the varying degrees of venous hypertension. This can be non-thrombotic, combined with acute DVT or post-thrombotic. Traditionally, acute DVT was treated with standard anticoagulation and sometimes, thrombectomy. However these measures do not address the underlying culprit lesion of mechanical compression. Furthermore, if managed only with anticoagulation, patients with residual thrombus are at risk for developing recurrent DVT or post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Both retrospective and prospective studies have shown that endovascular management should be the preferred approach to dissolve proximal thrombus and to also treat the underlying compression with endovascular stent placement.

May-Thurner syndrome: old acquaintance, new perspective : Case report

May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) results from a frequent anatomic variant in which compression of the left common iliac vein between the body of the fifth lumbar vertebra and the pulsating right common iliac artery can cause deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the left lower limb. While anticoagulation remains the mainstay treatment of acute DVT, catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with stenting provides a safe and effective method for relieving acute symptoms and preventing postthrombotic syndrome in patients with MTS. In this article the diagnostic and treatment methods are presented in the case report of a 65-year-old woman with MTS who suffered iliofemoral DVT. Knowledge of anatomy is crucial for understanding and recognizing MTS as well as for treating MTS with endovascular procedures.

Patency and Clinical Outcomes of a Dedicated, Self-Expanding, Hybrid Oblique Stent Used in the Treatment of Common Iliac Vein Compression

Purpose: To investigate the clinical outcomes of a dedicated hybrid oblique nitinol stent that has been specifically designed to treat common iliac vein compression. Methods: The Bern Venous Stent Registry database was interrogated to identify all patients who had at least 6-month follow-up after treatment with the sinus-Obliquus hybrid stent for common iliac vein compression. The search identified 24 patients (mean age 39±18 years; 20 women) who matched the search criteria. Ten patients had postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), another 10 patients had acute iliofemoral thrombosis after catheter-directed therapy, and 4 patients had nonthrombotic iliac vein compression. Primary treatment success was defined as antegrade flow and stenosis <30% on venography and evidence of a spontaneous Doppler signal in the treated segment. Stent patency was assessed using duplex ultrasound. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using a clinical symptom score (Villalta) and the revised venous clinical severity score (rVCSS) at 3, 6, and 12 months in follow-up. Results: Primary treatment success was achieved in all patients. Mean follow-up was 10±3 months. Primary patency estimates by Kaplan-Meier analysis were 92% at 6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 71% to 98%] and 83% (95% CI 54% to 95%) at 10 months. Three symptomatic patients underwent reintervention for early and late stent thromboses and the third for in-stent restenosis, resulting in secondary patency of 100%. Overall, all patients had clinical improvement at the latest follow-up; 50% reported complete resolution of symptoms. In patients with PTS, the Villalta score decreased by 6±6 points (p=0.02) and the rVCSS score by 3±1 points (p=0.05). Among deep vein thrombosis patients, none developed PTS. Conclusion: In patients with common iliac vein compression, the oblique hybrid nitinol stent appears to provide excellent early patency and clinical outcomes.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: Korean Practice Guidelines

Lower extremity deep vein thrombosis is a serious medical condition that can result in death or major disability due to pulmonary embolism or post-thrombotic syndrome. Appropriate diagnosis and treatment are required to improve symptoms and salvage the affected limb. Early thrombus clearance rapidly resolves symptoms related to venous obstruction, restores valve function and reduces the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome. Recently, endovascular treatment has been established as a standard method for early thrombus removal. However, there are a variety of views regarding the indications and procedures among medical institutions and operators. Therefore, we intend to provide evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis by multidisciplinary consensus. These guidelines are the result of a close collaboration between interventional radiologists and vascular surgeons. The goals of these guidelines are to improve treatment, to serve as a guide to the clinician, and consequently to contribute to public health care.

Safety and Effectiveness of Stent Placement for Iliofemoral Venous Outflow Obstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Endovenous recanalization of iliofemoral stenosis or occlusion with angioplasty and stent placement has been increasingly used to maintain long-term venous patency in patients with iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine safety and effectiveness of venous stent placement in patients with iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies evaluating safety or effectiveness of stent placement in patients with iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction. Data were extracted by disease pathogenesis: nonthrombotic, acute thrombotic, or chronic post-thrombotic. Main outcomes included technical success, periprocedural complications, symptom relief at final follow-up, and primary/secondary patency through 5 years. A total of 37 studies reporting 45 treatment effects (nonthrombotic, 8; acute thrombotic, 19; and chronic post-thrombotic, 18) from 2869 patients (nonthrombotic, 1122; acute thrombotic, 629; and chronic post-thrombotic, 1118) were included. Technical success rates were comparable among groups, ranging from 94% to 96%. Complication rates ranged from 0.3% to 1.1% among groups for major bleeding, from 0.2% to 0.9% for pulmonary embolism, from 0.1% to 0.7% for periprocedural mortality, and from 1.0% to 6.8% for early thrombosis. Patient symptom relief data were reported inconsistently. At 1 year, primary and secondary patency were 96% and 99% for nonthrombotic, 87% and 89% for acute thrombotic, and 79% and 94% for chronic post-thrombotic.

CONCLUSIONS

Stent placement for iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction results in high technical success and acceptable complication rates regardless of cause of obstruction.

Catheter-directed thrombolysis for extensive iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: review of literature and ongoing trials

In patients with extensive lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) that, typically, extends into the iliofemoral veins, catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) can achieve faster and more complete thrombus lysis as compared with systemic thrombolysis, while providing an acceptable safety profile through administration of lower doses of thrombolytic agents. Through a reduction in thrombus burden, CDT has the potential to mitigate the risk for post-thrombotic syndrome by restoring venous patency and preserving venous valve function. The efficacy of CDT may be improved by adjunctive approaches that include percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, angioplasty with or without stenting, and ultrasound-assisted CDT. CDT may also have a specific therapeutic role in the management of iliofemoral DVT involving patients who are pregnant or with May-Thurner syndrome. This article summarizes the literature in this area and discusses recently completed and ongoing randomized trials on the use of CDT in patients with extensive lower limb DVT.

Excellent long-term results with iliac stenting in local anesthesia for post-thrombotic syndrome

Background

Only 20% of iliac veins will recanalize on anticoagulation (AC) treatment alone and may, therefore, develop venous obstruction after iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT). A considerable number of these patients will suffer from post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) leading to impaired quality of life in more than 50%. Endovascular treatment for iliac vein obstruction using stents is known to alleviate PTS symptoms in selected patients.

Purpose

To report the Danish long-term results of endovascular treatment with iliac stenting.

Material and Methods

From 2000 to 2013 consecutive patients were evaluated and 19 patients with severe venous claudication were identified and subsequently underwent angioplasty and stenting. AC treatment was prescribed for 6 months, and knee-high class II compression stocking recommended for 1 year. Scheduled follow-up was done in the outpatient clinic at 6 weeks, 3 months, and annually thereafter.

Results

Nineteen patients, all women, all with left-sided iliac vein obstruction, and all with severe PTS symptoms were included. The median follow-up time was 81 months (range, 1–146 months; mean, 69 months). Primary patency rate of the inserted iliac stent was 89% (17/19) and 16 patients (84 %) had almost or total symptom relief at follow-up.

Conclusion

Endovascular stenting of iliac obstruction in local anesthesia is minimally invasive and shows excellent long-term outcomes for patients suffering from PTS.

Influence of Iliac Vein Stent Implantation on the Contralateral Iliac Vein

OBJECTIVES

Stent implantation is frequently used to treat iliac vein occlusion. However, the recommended extension of the stent mesh into the inferior vena cava (IVC) may affect blood flow through the contralateral iliac vein. We analyzed the influence of iliac vein stent extension on contralateral iliac vein patency and neointima formation in a dog surgery model.

METHODS

Bare stents were implanted into the left iliac veins of 12 beagles with the proximal end covering the opening of the contralateral iliac vein. Blood flow was measured by color Doppler 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperation. At each measurement point, a subgroup was killed, and the stents and veins were removed for pathological examination.

RESULTS

Stents were successfully implanted, and there was no immediate stent occlusion or iliac vein thrombus by color Doppler examinations. Contralateral blood flow was maintained with no obvious abnormalities for 12 weeks. Neointima formed and advanced toward the center of the stent, but small coverage of the contralateral iliac vein opening did not change significantly with time postoperation (9.33% ± 1.54% at 4 weeks, 10.65% ± 1.01% at 8 weeks, and 10.92% ± 1.30% at 12 weeks; P > .05). Scanning electron microscopy showed neointima covering the surface of stent wires at the opening of the contralateral iliac vein, which did increase with time: 63.58% ± 12.39% at 4 weeks, 97.13% ± 2.71% at 8 weeks (P < .001 vs 4 weeks), and 99.63% ± 0.60% after 12 weeks (P > .05 vs 8 weeks; P < .001 vs 4 weeks). The neointimal coverage rate of the meshes increased obviously with time. However, no neointima was found forming a mesh between stent wires.

CONCLUSION

Although there was intimal hyperplasia on the rim of the bare stent in the IVC, expansion was limited and did not block the opening of the contralateral iliac vein. The stent had no obvious influence on blood backflow in the contralateral iliac vein.

Combination of factor Xa inhibition and antiplatelet therapy after stenting in patients with iliofemoral post-thrombotic venous obstruction

OBJECTIVES

Studies addressing optimal postprocedural pharmacological management after endovascular stenting of iliofemoral post-thrombotic venous obstruction are lacking. We report our early clinical experience with a combination of rivaroxaban and clopidogrel in patients after iliofemoral post-thrombotic venous obstruction stenting.

METHODS

Demographic, procedural, and follow-up data of nine patients (seven women; mean age of 32 ± 11 years) undergoing 10 procedures for iliofemoral post-thrombotic venous obstruction performed between August 2012 and January 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. After endovascular intervention, all patients were administered 20 mg rivaroxaban once daily (s.i.d.) and 75 mg clopidogrel s.i.d. or every second day depending on the individual drug responsiveness for at least six months. The adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation (platelet aggregation, in aggregation units × min) was assessed on a Multiplate analyzer. Patency was verified venographically at procedure end and was evaluated with duplex ultrasound in regular follow-ups.

RESULTS

Iliofemoral venous flow was successfully re-established by percutaneous endovascular angioplasty and stent implantation in nine left-sided and one bilateral iliofemoral post-thrombotic venous obstruction. Under dual treatment strategy of rivaroxaban and clopidogrel with platelet aggregation control (median (range): 285 aggregation units × min (192; 402)), none of the patients experienced restenosis or stent thrombosis, respectively. After a median follow-up of 14 months (range: 6-26 months), the primary patency rate was 100% and no in-stent restenosis, stent occlusion or relevant minor or major bleeding occurred.

CONCLUSION

Combined factor Xa inhibition and tailored antiplatelet therapy after stenting of iliofemoral post-thrombotic venous obstruction were safe and performed favorably in terms of vessel patency.