1
|
Ke Y, Cheung YB, Bakitas M, Odom JN, Lum E, Tan DSW, Tan TJ, Finkelstein E, Oh HC, Zhou S, Yang GM. ENABLE-SG (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends for Singapore) as a proactive palliative care model: protocol for a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation randomized wait-list controlled trial. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:29. [PMID: 38287335 PMCID: PMC10826230 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01353-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Specialist palliative care is often provided late in the patient's disease trajectory in response to uncontrolled symptoms. Shifting from this reactionary illness-stress paradigm to a proactive health-wellness approach, the ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends) telehealth model aims to enhance the coping, stress and symptom management, self-care, and advance care planning skills of patients with advanced cancers and their caregivers. The ENABLE model has been culturally adapted to Singapore (ENABLE-SG) and pilot-tested. A hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation design will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of ENABLE-SG while collecting real-world implementation data. METHODS This single-centre, assessor-blind, wait-list (immediately vs. 6 months) randomized controlled trial will recruit 300 adult patients within 60 days of an advanced cancer diagnosis and their family caregivers from the National Cancer Centre of Singapore. ENABLE-SG comprises structured psychoeducational sessions with a telehealth coach, covering essential topics of early palliative care. Participants will be assessed at baseline and every 3 months until patient's death, 12 months (caregivers), or end of study (patients). The primary outcome is patient quality of life 6 months after baseline. Secondary patient-reported outcomes include mood, coping, palliative care concerns, and health status. Secondary caregiver-reported outcomes include caregiver quality of life, mood, coping, and care satisfaction. Mixed-effects regression modelling for repeated measurements will be used. To assess the effectiveness of ENABLE-SG versus usual care, patient and caregiver outcomes at 6 months will be compared. To compare earlier versus delayed ENABLE-SG, patient and caregiver outcomes at 12 months will be compared. Within the hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation design, implementation outcomes will be evaluated in both the early and delayed groups. Acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, and feasibility will be assessed using a feedback survey and semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers. Transcribed interviews will be analysed thematically. Other implementation outcomes of penetration, fidelity, and cost will be assessed using records of study-related processes and summarized using descriptive statistics. A cost-effectiveness analysis will also be conducted. DISCUSSION This study will assess both effectiveness and implementation of ENABLE-SG. Insights into implementation processes can facilitate model expansion and upscaling. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered prospectively on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06044441. Registered on 21/09/2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Ke
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Yin Bun Cheung
- Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Tampere Center for Child, Adolescent and Maternal Health Research, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Program in Health Services & Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Marie Bakitas
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
- Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, UAB Centre for Palliative and Supportive Care, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - J Nicholas Odom
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
- Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, UAB Centre for Palliative and Supportive Care, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Elaine Lum
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Program in Health Services & Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore
- School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Centre for Population Health Research & Implementation, SingHealth, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Daniel Shao Weng Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Cancer Therapeutics Research Laboratory, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Genome Institute of Singapore, A*Star, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tira J Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eric Finkelstein
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Program in Health Services & Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hong Choon Oh
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Program in Health Services & Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore
- Centre for Population Health Research & Implementation, SingHealth, Singapore, Singapore
- Health Services Research, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Siqin Zhou
- Division of Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Sciences, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Grace Meijuan Yang
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bandieri E, Borelli E, Gilioli F, Bigi S, Mucciarini C, Ferrari U, Eliardo S, Pinto L, Porro CA, Efficace F, Luppi M, Potenza L. Stigma of Palliative Care among Patients with Advanced Cancer and Their Caregivers on Early Palliative Care. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3656. [PMID: 37509317 PMCID: PMC10377431 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The early referral to palliative care (PC) represents a successful value-based model with proven benefits regarding the quality of life and clinical outcomes for advanced cancer patients and their caregivers. Yet, its provision remains typically confined to the last weeks of life as per the historical, late PC model. The stigma according to which PC represents end-of-life care has been identified as the root of the problem. To explore the presence and effects of the stigma in a clinical context, we surveyed 78 patients and 110 caregivers (mean age: 71.7 and 60.7, respectively) on early PC to study what their perception of PC was before their direct experience. The responses were analyzed through a qualitative descriptive approach. The participants explicitly mentioned a lack of knowledge about PC (53% of the sample), which they identified also among physicians and the population (13%); an identification of PC with the late PC model (53%); and a detrimental reaction to the proposal of an early PC referral (83%). However, the participants explicitly mentioned that a direct experience of early PC allowed for an acquired awareness of early PC meaning and benefits (52%), as well as a comprehension of its differences with late PC (34%); the regret for the delayed referral (8%); the perception of the word "palliative" as a barrier (21%); and the belief that early PC should be part of the cancer routine practice (25%). A comprehensive multi-level intervention is necessary for a widespread understanding of the essence of anticipated PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Bandieri
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, 41012 Carpi, Italy
| | - Eleonora Borelli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy
| | - Fabio Gilioli
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rehabilitation, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, 41121 Modena, Italy
| | - Sarah Bigi
- Department of Linguistic Sciences and Foreign Literatures, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 20123 Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Mucciarini
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, 41012 Carpi, Italy
| | - Umberto Ferrari
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, 41012 Carpi, Italy
| | - Sonia Eliardo
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, 41012 Carpi, Italy
| | - Lidia Pinto
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, 41012 Carpi, Italy
| | - Carlo Adolfo Porro
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy
- Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Fabio Efficace
- Health Outcomes Research Unit, Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA), 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Luppi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy
- Hematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
| | - Leonardo Potenza
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy
- Hematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liddicoat Yamarik R, Chiu LA, Flannery M, Van Allen K, Adeyemi O, Cuthel AM, Brody AA, Goldfeld KS, Schrag D, Grudzen CR. Engagement, Advance Care Planning, and Hospice Use in a Telephonic Nurse-Led Palliative Care Program for Persons Living with Advanced Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15082310. [PMID: 37190238 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Persons living with advanced cancer have intensive symptoms and psychosocial needs that often result in visits to the Emergency Department (ED). We report on program engagement, advance care planning (ACP), and hospice use for a 6-month longitudinal nurse-led, telephonic palliative care intervention for patients with advanced cancer as part of a larger randomized trial. Patients 50 years and older with metastatic solid tumors were recruited from 18 EDs and randomized to receive nursing calls focused on ACP, symptom management, and care coordination or specialty outpatient palliative care (ClinicialTrials.gov: NCT03325985). One hundred and five (50%) graduated from the 6-month program, 54 (26%) died or enrolled in hospice, 40 (19%) were lost to follow-up, and 19 (9%) withdrew prior to program completion. In a Cox proportional hazard regression, withdrawn subjects were more likely to be white and have a low symptom burden compared to those who did not withdraw. Two hundred eighteen persons living with advanced cancer were enrolled in the nursing arm, and 182 of those (83%) completed some ACP. Of the subjects who died, 43/54 (80%) enrolled in hospice. Our program demonstrated high rates of engagement, ACP, and hospice enrollment. Enrolling subjects with a high symptom burden may result in even greater program engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laraine Ann Chiu
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Mara Flannery
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Van Allen
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Oluwaseun Adeyemi
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Allison M Cuthel
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Abraham A Brody
- Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY 10010, USA
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Keith S Goldfeld
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tanzi S, Martucci G. Doing palliative care research on hematologic cancer patients: A realist synthesis of literature and experts’ opinion on what works, for whom and in what circumstances. Front Oncol 2023; 13:991791. [PMID: 37051541 PMCID: PMC10083487 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.991791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundResearch in PC (Palliative Care) is frequently challenging for patient’s frailty, study design, professional misconceptions, and so on. Little is known about specificity in PC research on Hematologic cancer patients, who have distinct characteristics that might influence the enrollment process.AimsWhat works, how and for whom, in increasing enrollment in studies in PC on patients with hematologic malignancies?MethodsRealist review: a qualitative review whose goal is to identify and explain the interaction between Contexts, Mechanisms, and Outcomes (CMOs). The theory was informed by a narrative, theory-based literature research, including an initialsystematic research, and the addition of papers suggested by experts of the field. We also used 7 interviews with experts in PC about patients with hematologic malignancies research and our own experience from a PC pilot study on patients with hematologic malignancies to refine the initial theory.ResultsIn our initial theory we hypothesize that: - Access to palliative care could be beneficial to hematologic patients, even in early stages - Hematologists tend to under-use palliative care services in general, due to unpredictable disease trajectories and cultural barriers. - These factors may negatively impact the patients’ enrollment in PC researchWe included secondary literature as narrative reviews, if they presented interesting propositions useful for our theoretical construction. 23 papers met our inclusion criteria.We also searched for relevant CMOs impacting referral in palliative care, and we selected a list of CMOs that could be relevant also in hematology. We accordingly theorized a group of interventions that could increase the enrollment in PC research and presented them using “social exchange theory” (SET) as a theoretical framework.Prominent researchers in PC in hematologic malignancies were interviewed on their opinion on our results, and additional CMOs.ConclusionsBefore conducting research in PC on patients with hematologic malignancies, it’s probably advisable to assess: - The perception of the different actors (physicians, nurses, other professionals involved), in particular the hematologists, in terms of pros and cons of referral to PC and enrollment in PC trials - The existing relationship between PC and the Hematology departmentAccordingly, it’s possible to tailor different interventions on the various actors and choose a model of trial to increase the perception of benefits from PC and, consequently, enrollment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Tanzi
- Palliative Care Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Martucci
- Palliative Care Local Program, Local Health Unit of Modena, Modena, Italy
- *Correspondence: Gianfranco Martucci,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nwolise C, Corrie P, Fitzpatrick R, Gupta A, Jenkinson C, Middleton M, Matin R. Burden of cancer trial participation: A qualitative sub-study of the INTERIM feasibility RCT. Chronic Illn 2023; 19:81-94. [PMID: 34787471 PMCID: PMC9841458 DOI: 10.1177/17423953211060253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A qualitative sub-study was carried out within a larger phase II feasibility trial, to identify and describe the burden experienced by advanced melanoma patients participating in a clinical trial and the factors affecting their capacity to cope with the burden. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with fourteen patients with advanced melanoma recruited from National Health Service hospitals in the United Kingdom. Qualitative analysis was undertaken using a framework analysis approach. Normalisation process theory was applied to the concept of research participation burden in order to interpret and categorise findings. RESULTS Burdens of participation were identified as arising from making sense of the trial and treatment; arranging transport, appointment and prescriptions; enacting management strategies and enduring side effects; reflecting on trial documents and treatment efficacy, and emotional and mental effects of randomisation and treatment side effects. Factors reported as influencing capacity include personal attributes and skills, physical and cognitive abilities and support network. DISCUSSION This is the first study to highlight the substantial burden faced by patients with advanced melanoma in a clinical trial and factors that may lessen or worsen the burden. Consideration of identified burdens during trial design and execution will reduce the burden experienced by research participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chidiebere Nwolise
- Health Services Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population
Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research
Collaboration Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Pippa Corrie
- Cambridge Cancer Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
Foundation Trust (Addenbrooke's Hospital), Cambridge, UK
| | - Ray Fitzpatrick
- Health Services Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population
Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research
Collaboration Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Crispin Jenkinson
- Health Services Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population
Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Middleton
- University of Oxford Department of
Oncology, Cancer Research UK Oxford
Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Rubeta Matin
- Dermatology Department, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ahmed S, Naqvi SF, Sinnarajah A, McGhan G, Simon J, Santana MJ. Patient & Caregiver Experiences: Qualitative Study Comparison Before and After Implementation of Early Palliative Care for Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Can J Nurs Res 2023; 55:110-125. [PMID: 35254117 PMCID: PMC9936441 DOI: 10.1177/08445621221079534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Palliative Care Early and Systematic (PaCES) program implemented an early palliative care pathway for advanced colorectal cancer patients in January 2019, to increase specialist palliative care consultation and palliative homecare referrals more than three months before death. This study aimed to understand the experience of patients with advanced colorectal cancer and family caregivers who received early palliative care supports from a specialist palliative care nurse and compared those experiences with participants who experienced standard oncology care prior to implementation of early palliative care. METHODS This was a qualitative and patient-oriented study. We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with two cohorts of patients with advanced colorectal cancer before and after implementation of an early palliative care pathway. We conducted a thematic analysis of the transcripts guided by a Person-Centred Care Framework. RESULTS Seven patients living with advanced colorectal cancer and five family caregivers who received early palliative care supports expressed that visits from their early palliative care nurse was helpful, improved their understanding of palliative care, and improved their care. Four main themes shaped their experience of early palliative care: care coordination, perception of palliative care & advance care planning, coping with advanced cancer, and patient and family engagement. These findings were compared with experiences of 15 patients and seven caregivers prior to pathway implementation. CONCLUSION An early palliative care pathway can improve advanced cancer care, and improve understanding and acceptance of early palliative care. This work was conducted in the context of colorectal cancer but may have relevance for the care of other advanced cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadia Ahmed
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,Sadia Ahmed, Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada.
| | - Syeda Farwa Naqvi
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Aynharan Sinnarajah
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gwen McGhan
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jessica Simon
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Maria J. Santana
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,O’Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chatland LE, Harvey C, Kelly K, Paradine S, Bhagat M, Hudson BF. Research participation in palliative medicine-benefits and barriers for patients and families: rapid review and thematic synthesis. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023; 13:35-44. [PMID: 34404745 PMCID: PMC9985719 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research is essential for gathering evidence to inform best practice and clinical decision making, for developing and testing new treatments and services in palliative and end-of-life care (PEoLC). The participation of patients, carers and family members is essential, however, personal and ethical concerns are often cited by professionals as barriers to recruitment. There is evidence that patients and family members can benefit from participation in PEoLC research. AIM To synthesise the evidence regarding patients', family members' and carers' experiences of participating in PEoLC research. To identify recommendations for enhancing the experience of participants. DESIGN A qualitative rapid review and thematic synthesis. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, PsycINFO and PubMed were searched from 2010 to 2020. Studies reporting patients', family members' or carers' experiences of participating in PEoLC research were included. RESULTS 4 studies were included and 7 themes identified relating to the benefits of, and barriers to, participation in PEoLC research. Both altruistic and personal benefits of participation were reported. Barriers (negative aspects) to participation included feeling overwhelmed, practical issues, reminders of being a patient, not seeing the research as relevant to them and unmet needs. CONCLUSIONS A number of benefits (positive aspects) surround participation in PEoLC research. However, several barriers (negative aspects) can prevent or discourage participation. This review has identified recommendations for research teams to enhance the experience, and number of people who those participating in research in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Meena Bhagat
- Research and Policy Team, Marie Curie, London, UK
| | - Briony F Hudson
- Research and Policy Team, Marie Curie, London, UK
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Patra L, Ghoshal A, Damani A, Salins N. Cancer palliative care referral: patients' and family caregivers' perspectives - a systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2022:spcare-2022-003990. [PMID: 36328397 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2022-003990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the evidence of palliative care benefits, referrals are infrequent and delayed. Patients and their caregivers are essential stakeholders in the referral process with valuable perspectives. This review systematically explored their perceived facilitators and barriers to palliative care referral. METHODS 4 subject-specific databases (PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO and EMBASE), 3 multidisciplinary databases (SCOPUS, Web of Science and Cochrane database) and 11 journals from 1 January 1990 to 31 May 2022 were searched; and scored for their methodological rigour using Hawker's tool. Findings were synthesised using Popay's Narrative Synthesis method and interpreted using decision-making theory. RESULTS 4 themes were generated from 14 studies: (1) The timing of referral should be right and communication must be comprehensive. Delays in initiating serious illness conversations, prognostication, and decision-making hindered referral. In contrast, the presence of symptoms facilitated it. (2) Referral was equated to death, and as an inferior form of treatment, a rebranding might mitigate the stigma. (3) Referral made families feel emotional and devastated; explanation and team initiatives enabled the normalisation and positive coping. (4) Long-term holistic palliative care facilitated a positive care experience and a sense of reassurance and satisfaction, enabling a smooth transition from curative to comfort care. The late referral was associated with perceived inadequate symptom management, diminished quality of life and death and complicated bereavement issues. CONCLUSION Patients' and caregivers' predisposition to palliative care engagement was influenced by timely referral, comprehensive communication, perception and stigma about palliative care. Longitudinal association with the palliative care team mitigated negative perceptions and improved satisfaction and coping. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018091481.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lipika Patra
- Bagchi-Karunashraya Palliative Care Centre, Bangalore Hospice Trust, Bhubaneswar, India
| | | | - Anuja Damani
- Department of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Naveen Salins
- Department of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bigi S, Ganfi V, Borelli E, Potenza L, Artioli F, Eliardo S, Mucciarini C, Cottafavi L, Ferrari U, Lombardo L, Cagossi K, Pietramaggiori A, Fantuzzi V, Bernardini I, Cruciani M, Cacciari C, Odejide O, Adolfo Porro C, Zimmermann C, Efficace F, Bruera E, Luppi M, Bandieri E. Perceptions of Death Among Patients with Advanced Cancer Receiving Early Palliative Care and Their Caregivers: Results from a Mixed-Method Analysis. Oncologist 2022; 28:e54-e62. [PMID: 36320128 PMCID: PMC9847550 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oncologists are often concerned that talking about death with patients may hinder their relationship. However, the views of death held by patients have not been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to describe the perception of death among patients with advanced cancer receiving early palliative care (EPC) and their caregivers. MATERIAL AND METHODS Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed on 2 databases: (a) transcripts of open-ended questionnaires administered to 130 cancer patients receiving EPC with a mean age of 68.4 years and to 115 primary caregivers of patients on EPC with a mean age of 56.8; (b) texts collected from an Italian forum, containing instances of web-mediated interactions between patients and their caregivers. RESULTS Quantitative analysis shows that: (a) patients and caregivers are not afraid of speaking about death; (b) patients and caregivers on EPC use the word "death" significantly more than patients on standard oncology care (SOC) and their caregivers (P < .0001). For both participants on EPC and SOC, the adjectives and verbs associated with the word "death" have positive connotations; however, these associations are significantly more frequent for participants on EPC (verbs, Ps < .0001; adjectives, Ps < .003). Qualitative analysis reveals that these positive connotations refer to an actual, positive experience of the end of life in the EPC group and a wish or a negated event in the SOC group. CONCLUSIONS EPC interventions, along with proper physician-patient communication, may be associated with an increased acceptance of death in patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Bigi
- Corresponding author: Sarah Bigi, PhD, Department of Linguistic Sciences and Foreign Literatures, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo Gemelli 1—20123 Milan, Italy. Tel: +39 02 7234 3042; Fax: +39 02 7234 3667; ; or, Mario Luppi, MD, PhD, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena Hematology Unit and Chair, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena, Via del Pozzo, 71—41124 Modena, Italy. Tel: +39 059 4224641 (studio)—5570 (free-set); Fax: +39 059 4224429l;
| | - Vittorio Ganfi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Leonardo Potenza
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy,Hematology Unit and Chair, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Artioli
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USL, Carpi, Italy
| | - Sonia Eliardo
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USL, Carpi, Italy
| | - Claudia Mucciarini
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USL, Carpi, Italy
| | - Luca Cottafavi
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USL, Carpi, Italy
| | - Umberto Ferrari
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USL, Carpi, Italy
| | - Laura Lombardo
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USL, Carpi, Italy
| | - Katia Cagossi
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USL, Carpi, Italy
| | | | - Valeria Fantuzzi
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USL, Carpi, Italy
| | - Ilaria Bernardini
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USL, Carpi, Italy
| | | | - Cristina Cacciari
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy,Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mario Luppi
- Corresponding author: Sarah Bigi, PhD, Department of Linguistic Sciences and Foreign Literatures, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo Gemelli 1—20123 Milan, Italy. Tel: +39 02 7234 3042; Fax: +39 02 7234 3667; ; or, Mario Luppi, MD, PhD, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena Hematology Unit and Chair, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena, Via del Pozzo, 71—41124 Modena, Italy. Tel: +39 059 4224641 (studio)—5570 (free-set); Fax: +39 059 4224429l;
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Borelli E, Bigi S, Potenza L, Gilioli F, Artioli F, Porzio G, Porro CA, Efficace F, Bruera E, Luppi M, Bandieri E. Gratitude among advanced cancer patients and their caregivers: The role of early palliative care. Front Oncol 2022; 12:991250. [PMID: 36353529 PMCID: PMC9639866 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.991250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A cancer diagnosis represents a unique trauma, given its life-threatening, multidimensional, and uncertain nature. Gratitude is a construct representing the emotional state that arises when individuals recognize that a benefit has been received as a result of someone else's action or a spiritual entity's intervention. Based on the positive psychological wellbeing, gratitude has been associated with improved health outcomes even in the disease setting. Thus, the models of care that foster gratitude should be adopted in the clinical context. This study aims to explore whether and how gratitude may originate in patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers undergoing early palliative care (EPC). METHODS We analyzed 251 reports from 133 patients and 118 caregivers describing their clinical experience in two EPC units. The sources of gratitude were identified and ranked based on their frequencies. Words expressing gratitude and words referring to communication and spirituality were collected by means of the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software and correlated. RESULTS In total, 123 (92.5%) of 133 patients' and 97 (82.2%) of 118 caregivers' reports, respectively, included explicit or implicit expressions of gratitude. Gratitude was associated specifically with successful physical symptom management, emotional support, improved attitude toward death, better information, humanity, and the familiar environment. The use of words of gratitude in patients' reports was positively correlated with the use of words referring to communication (r = .215, p = .026) and spirituality (r = .612, p <.001). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that interventions within the EPC model based on doctor-patient-caregiver communication may allow patients and caregivers to experience a feeling of gratitude, and this may represent a resource to be exploited to improve their physical and psychosocial wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Borelli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Sarah Bigi
- Department of Linguistic Sciences and Foreign Literatures, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Potenza
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
- Hematology Unit and Chair, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Fabio Gilioli
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rehabilitation, Unitá Sanitaria Locale (USL), Modena, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Artioli
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, Unitá Sanitaria Locale (USL), Carpi, Italy
| | | | - Carlo Adolfo Porro
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
- Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Fabio Efficace
- Health Outcomes Research Unit, Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA), Rome, Italy
| | - Eduardo Bruera
- Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Mario Luppi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
- Hematology Unit and Chair, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Elena Bandieri
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, Unitá Sanitaria Locale (USL), Carpi, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tong A, Scholes-Robertson N, Hawley C, Viecelli AK, Carter SA, Levin A, Hemmelgarn BR, Harris T, Craig JC. Patient-centred clinical trial design. Nat Rev Nephrol 2022; 18:514-523. [PMID: 35668231 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-022-00585-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Patient involvement in clinical trial design can facilitate the recruitment and retention of participants as well as potentially increase the uptake of the tested intervention and the impact of the findings on patient outcomes. Despite these benefits, patients still have very limited involvement in designing and conducting trials in nephrology. Many trials do not address research questions and outcomes that are important to patients, including patient-reported outcomes that reflect how patients feel and function. This limitation can undermine the relevance, reliability and value of trial-based evidence for decision-making in clinical practice and health policy. However, efforts to involve patients with kidney disease are increasing across all stages of the trial process from priority setting, to study design (including selection of outcomes and approaches to improve participant recruitment and retention) and dissemination and implementation of the findings. Harnessing the patient voice in designing trials can ensure that efforts and resources are directed towards patient-centred trials that address the needs, concerns and priorities of patients living with kidney disease with the aim of achieving transformative improvements in care and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Nicole Scholes-Robertson
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carmel Hawley
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Andrea K Viecelli
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Simon A Carter
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Adeera Levin
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Brenda R Hemmelgarn
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry at University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Jonathan C Craig
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Esch HJ, Prins SD, van de Vathorst S, van der Rijt CCD, van der Heide A, van Zuylen L. Reflections on Including Patients in a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Multicentre Trial in the Dying Phase - the SILENCE Study. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:e545-e552. [PMID: 34954069 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
A need exists for studies investigating symptom relief at the end of life. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for demonstrating efficacy of medication, but they are difficult to perform at the end of life due to barriers such as the vulnerability of patients, and gatekeeping by healthcare professionals. We analyzed and reflected on recruitment, participation, and strategies used in an RCT at the end of life. The SILENCE study, performed in six inpatient hospice facilities, was a placebo-controlled trial to study the effect of ScopolamIne butyLbromidE giveN prophylactiCally for dEath rattle in dying patients. We addressed patients' vulnerability by using an advance consent procedure, and potential gatekeeping by extensive training of health care professionals and the appointment of hospice doctors as daily responsible researchers. In almost three years, 1097 patients were admitted of whom 626 were eligible at first assessment. Of these, 119 (19%) dropped out because of physical deterioration before they could be informed about the study (44) or sign informed consent (75). Twenty-five (4%) patients were not asked to participate. In 24 cases (4%), relatives advised against the patient participating. Overall, 229 patients (37%) gave informed consent to participate. The vulnerability of patients was the most important barrier in this medication study at the end of life. Gatekeeping by HCPs and relatives occurred in a small number of patients. The robust design and applied strategies to facilitate patient recruitment in this study resulted in a successful study with sufficient participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriëtte J van Esch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Laurens Cadenza, Oosterhagen 239, 3078 CL Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sanne D Prins
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne van de Vathorst
- Department of Medical ethics,philosophy and history, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carin C D van der Rijt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Agnes van der Heide
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lia van Zuylen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Formagini T, Poague C, O'Neal A, Brooks JV. "When I Heard the Word Palliative": Obscuring and Clarifying Factors Affecting the Stigma Around Palliative Care Referral in Oncology. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e72-e79. [PMID: 34310185 PMCID: PMC8758121 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Palliative care (PC) can help patients with cancer manage symptoms and achieve a greater quality of life. However, there are many barriers to patients with cancer receiving referrals to PC, including the stigmatizing association of PC with end of life. This study explores factors that obscure or clarify the stigma around PC referrals and its associations with end of life in cancer care. METHODS A qualitative descriptive design using grounded theory components was designed to investigate barriers to PC referrals for patients receiving treatment at an outpatient cancer center. Interviews with patients, caregivers, and oncology professionals were audio-recorded, transcribed, and independently coded by three investigators to ensure rigor. Participants were asked about their perceptions of PC and PC referral experiences. RESULTS Interviews with 44 participants revealed both obscuring and clarifying factors surrounding the association of PC as end of life. Prognostic uncertainty, confusion about PC's role, and social network influence all perpetuated an inaccurate and stigmatizing association of PC with end of life. Contrarily, familiarity with PC, prognostic confidence, and clear referral communication helped delineate PC as distinct from end of life. CONCLUSION To reduce the stigmatizing association of PC with end of life, referring clinicians should clearly communicate prognosis, PC's role, and the reason for referral within the context of each patient and his or her unique cancer trajectory. The oncology team plays a vital role in framing the messaging surrounding referrals to PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taynara Formagini
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS
| | - Claire Poague
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS
| | - Alicia O'Neal
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS
| | - Joanna Veazey Brooks
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS,University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS,Joanna Veazey Brooks, MBE, PhD, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Mail Stop 3044, Kansas City, KS 66106; e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bigi S, Ganfi V, Borelli E, Potenza L, Artioli F, Eliardo S, Mucciarini C, Cottafavi L, Cruciani M, Cacciari C, Odejide O, Porro CA, Zimmermann C, Efficace F, Bruera E, Luppi M, Bandieri E. OUP accepted manuscript. Oncologist 2022; 27:e168-e175. [PMID: 35641207 PMCID: PMC8895751 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Oncologists’ fear of taking away hope from patients when proposing early palliative care (EPC) is a barrier to the implementation of this model. This study explores hope perceptions among bereaved caregivers of onco-hematologic patients who received EPC. Materials and Methods Open-ended questionnaires were administered to 36 primary caregivers of patients who received EPC (26 solid and 10 hematologic cancer patients; mean age: 51.4 years, range age: 20-74), at 2 cancer centers, 2 months to 3 years after a patient death. Definitions of hope in the caregivers’ narratives were analyzed through a directed approach to content analysis. Results were complemented with automated lexicographic analysis. Results Caregivers perceived hope mainly as resilience and as expectations based on what they were told about the patients’ clinical conditions. Their hope was bolstered by trusting relationships with the healthcare teams. EPC interventions were recalled as the major support for hope, both during the illness and after the death of the patient. The automated quantitative lexical analysis provided deeper insights into the links between hope, truth, and trust. Conclusions Our findings suggest that telling the truth about an incurable onco-hematologic disease and beginning EPC might be the combination of factors triggering hope in the setting of incurable cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Bigi
- Department of Linguistic Sciences and Foreign Literatures, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy
- Corresponding author: Sarah Bigi, PhD, Department of Linguistic Sciences and Foreign Literatures, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo Gemelli 1 – 20123 Milan, Italy. Tel.: +39-02-7234-3042;
| | - Vittorio Ganfi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Eleonora Borelli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Leonardo Potenza
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
- Hematology Unit and Chair, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Artioli
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USL, Carpi, Italy
| | - Sonia Eliardo
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USL, Carpi, Italy
| | - Claudia Mucciarini
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USL, Carpi, Italy
| | - Luca Cottafavi
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USL, Carpi, Italy
| | | | - Cristina Cacciari
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
- Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Oreofe Odejide
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carlo Adolfo Porro
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
- Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Camilla Zimmermann
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fabio Efficace
- Health Outcomes Research Unit, Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA), Rome, Italy
| | - Eduardo Bruera
- Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mario Luppi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
- Hematology Unit and Chair, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
- Mario Luppi, MD, PhD, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena; Hematology Unit and Chair, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena, Via del Pozzo, 71 – 41124 Modena, Italy. Tel: +39 059 4224641 (office) - 5570 (free-set);
| | - Elena Bandieri
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USL, Carpi, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Thiessen M, Harris D, Pinches A, Vaska M, Moules N, Raffin Bouchal S, Sinclair S. Qualitative Studies Conducted Alongside Randomized Controlled Trials in Oncology: A Scoping Review of Use and Rigour of Reporting. Int J Nurs Stud 2022; 128:104174. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
16
|
Portz JD, Graney BA, Bekelman DB. " Made Me Realize That Life Is Worth Living": A Qualitative Study of Patient Perceptions of a Primary Palliative Care Intervention. J Palliat Med 2022; 25:28-38. [PMID: 34264752 PMCID: PMC8721497 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Primary palliative care is needed to meet the complex needs of patients with serious illness and their families. However, patient perceptions of primary palliative care are not well understood and can inform subsequent primary palliative care interventions and implementation. Objective: Elicit the patient perspective on a primary palliative care intervention, Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness (CASA), from patient perspectives. Design: Qualitative study using patient interviews and two methods of triangulation. Setting/Subjects: Between July 2014 and September 2015, we interviewed 45 patients who participated in the intervention in a Veterans Affairs (VA) (primary site), academic, and urban safety-net health system in the United States. Main Measures: Participants were asked about what was most and least helpful, how the intervention affected participants' lives, and what should be changed about the intervention. Data were analyzed using a general inductive approach. To enhance validity of the results, we triangulated the findings from patient interviews, reviews of care coordinator documentation, and interprofessional palliative care providers. Results: The six themes identified that primary care intervention: (1) Cared for My Psychosocial Needs, (2) Encouraged Self-Management, (3) Medication Recommendations Worked, (4) Facilitated Goal Attainment, (5) Team was Beneficial, and (6) Good Visit Timing. Conclusions: Participants experienced benefits from the primary palliative care intervention and attributed these benefits to individualized assessment and support, facilitation of skill building and self-management, and oversight from an interprofessional care team. Future primary palliative care interventions may benefit from targeting these specific patient-valued processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Dickman Portz
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Address correspondence to: Jennifer Dickman Portz, PhD, MSW, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Mailstop B180, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Bridget A. Graney
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - David B. Bekelman
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Department of Medicine, Department of Veterans Affairs, Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Borelli E, Bigi S, Potenza L, Eliardo S, Artioli F, Mucciarini C, Cottafavi L, Cagossi K, Razzini G, Cruciani M, Pietramaggiori A, Fantuzzi V, Lombardo L, Ferrari U, Ganfi V, Lui F, Odejide O, Cacciari C, Porro CA, Zimmermann C, Efficace F, Bruera E, Luppi M, Bandieri E. Changes in Cancer Patients' and Caregivers' Disease Perceptions While Receiving Early Palliative Care: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis. Oncologist 2021; 26:e2274-e2287. [PMID: 34510624 PMCID: PMC8649024 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the underlying mechanisms through which early palliative care (EPC) improves multiple outcomes in patients with cancer and their caregivers. The aim of this study was to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze patients' and caregivers' thoughts and emotional and cognitive perceptions about the disease prior to and during the EPC intervention, and in the end of life, following the exposure to EPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seventy-seven patients with advanced cancer and 48 caregivers from two cancer centers participated in semistructured interviews. Their reports were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed by the means of the grounded theory and a text-analysis program. RESULTS Participants reported their past as overwhelmed by unmanaged symptoms, with detrimental physical and psychosocial consequences. The EPC intervention allowed a prompt resolution of symptoms and of their consequences and empowerment, an appreciation of its multidimensional approach, its focus on the person and its environment, and the need for EPC for oncologic populations. Patients reported that conversations with the EPC team increased their acceptance of end of life and their expectation of a painless future. Quantitative analysis revealed higher use of Negative Affects (p < .001) and Biological Processes words (p < .001) when discussing the past; Agency words when discussing the present (p < .001); Positive Affects (p < .001), Optimism (p = .002), and Insight Thinking words (p < .001) when discussing the present and the future; and Anxiety (p = .002) and Sadness words (p = .003) when discussing the future. CONCLUSION Overall, participants perceived EPC to be beneficial. Our findings suggest that emotional and cognitive processes centered on communication underlie the benefits experienced by participants on EPC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE By qualitative and quantitative analyses of the emotional and cognitive perceptions of cancer patients and their caregivers about their experiences before and during EPC interventions, this study may help physicians/nurses to focus on the disease perception by patients/caregivers and the benefits of EPC, as a standard practice. The analysis of words used by patients/caregivers provides a proxy for their psychological condition and support in tailoring an EPC intervention, based on individual needs. This study highlights that the relationship of the triad EPC team/patients/caregivers may rise as a therapeutic tool, allowing increasing awareness and progressive acceptance of the idea of death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Borelli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Sarah Bigi
- Department of Linguistic Sciences and Foreign Literatures, Catholic University of the Sacred HeartMilanItaly
| | - Leonardo Potenza
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
- Hematology Unit and Chair, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Sonia Eliardo
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USLCarpiItaly
| | - Fabrizio Artioli
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USLCarpiItaly
| | | | - Luca Cottafavi
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USLCarpiItaly
| | - Katia Cagossi
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USLCarpiItaly
| | - Giorgia Razzini
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USLCarpiItaly
| | | | | | - Valeria Fantuzzi
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USLCarpiItaly
| | - Laura Lombardo
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USLCarpiItaly
| | - Umberto Ferrari
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USLCarpiItaly
| | - Vittorio Ganfi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Fausta Lui
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
- Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Oreofe Odejide
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana‐Farber Cancer InstituteBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Cristina Cacciari
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
- Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Carlo Adolfo Porro
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
- Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Camilla Zimmermann
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health NetworkTorontoOntarioCanada
- University of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Fabio Efficace
- Health Outcomes Research Unit, Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA)RomeItaly
| | - Eduardo Bruera
- Palliative Care & Rehabilitation Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Mario Luppi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
- Hematology Unit and Chair, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Elena Bandieri
- Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Civil Hospital Carpi, USLCarpiItaly
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Philip J, Le B, Pasanen L, Rosens E, Wong A, Mendis R, Boughey M, Coperchini M, Moran J, Hynson J, Weil J, Rosenthal M. Palliative Care Clinical Trials: Building Capability and Capacity. J Palliat Med 2021; 25:421-427. [PMID: 34788568 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials are a key component of expanding the evidence base in palliative care. A key strategic objective of the Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre (VCCC), a multisite cancer center alliance, was to increase palliative care clinical trial expertise. The palliative care services within the VCCC alliance presented substantial trial development opportunities with large number of patients and established relationships, but few trial-active centers. Objectives: To establish a multi-site "Building Capability in Palliative Care Clinical Trials" program as a service development, and to assess the strategies, activities, and the outcomes resulting from this program. Methods: A series of strategies and activities were developed linked to the key program objectives of increasing the number of clinical sites and skilled clinicians conducting clinical trials, increasing the number of trials available and patients participating, broadening research opportunities in palliative care, and establishing the program sustainability. Results: In the two years of implementation, the program resulted in the establishment and conduct of several Phase 4 postmarketing pharmacovigilance studies, nine Phase 2 and 3 trials across five palliative care services, and a Phase 1 clinical trial. During the program, 150 patients were recruited to clinical trials, and 258 prospective pharmacovigilance monitoring cases were recorded. Five investigator-initiated trials were developed by clinical trial fellows and achieved competitive (n = 3) or commercial (n = 2) funding. Clinicians reported that undertaking clinical trials had increased attention to the evidence base of care provision, and increased service research activity more broadly. Long-term sustainability remains a challenge, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: Clinical trials in palliative care services are feasible, acceptable, and result in increased attention to the evidence base of care. The strategies detailing the framework, activities, and outcomes have been collated to facilitate implementation of clinical trials in other sites and with other trial-naive disciplinary groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Philip
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia.,Departments of Palliative Care and Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Departments of Palliative Care and Medical Oncology, Melbourne Health, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Australia.,Department of Palliative Care, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia
| | - Brian Le
- Departments of Palliative Care and Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Departments of Palliative Care and Medical Oncology, Melbourne Health, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Australia
| | - Leeanne Pasanen
- Department of Palliative Care, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia
| | - Evelien Rosens
- Departments of Palliative Care and Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Australia
| | - Aaron Wong
- Departments of Palliative Care and Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Departments of Palliative Care and Medical Oncology, Melbourne Health, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Australia.,Palliative Care Service, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Ruwani Mendis
- Palliative Care Service, Western Health, Footscray, Australia
| | - Mark Boughey
- Department of Palliative Care, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia
| | | | - Juli Moran
- Palliative Care Service, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Jenny Hynson
- Palliative Care Service, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jenny Weil
- Department of Palliative Care, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia
| | - Mark Rosenthal
- Departments of Palliative Care and Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Departments of Palliative Care and Medical Oncology, Melbourne Health, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zimmermann C, Wong JL, Swami N, Pope A, Cheng Y, Mathews J, Howell D, Sullivan R, Rodin G, Hannon B, Moineddin R, Le LW. Public knowledge and attitudes concerning palliative care. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2021:bmjspcare-2021-003340. [PMID: 34620693 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE WHO recommends early integration of palliative care alongside usual care to improve quality of life, although misunderstanding of palliative care may impede this. We compared the public's perceived and actual knowledge of palliative care, and examined the relationship of this knowledge to attitudes concerning palliative care. METHODS We analysed data from a survey of a representative sample of the Canadian public, accessed through a survey panel in May-June 2019. We compared high perceived knowledge ('know what palliative care is and could explain it') with actual knowledge of the WHO definition (knew ≥5/8 components, including that palliative care can be provided early in the illness and together with life-prolonging treatments), and examined their associations with attitudes to palliative care. RESULTS Of 1518 adult participants residing in Canada, 45% had high perceived knowledge, of whom 46% had high actual knowledge. Participants with high (vs low) perceived knowledge were more likely to associate palliative care with end-of-life care (adjusted OR 2.15 (95% CI 1.66 to 2.79), p<0.0001) and less likely to believe it offered hope (0.62 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.81), p=0.0004). Conversely, participants with high (vs low) actual knowledge were less likely to find palliative care fearful (0.67 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.86), p=0.002) or depressing (0.72 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.93), p=0.01) and more likely to believe it offered hope (1.88 (95% CI 1.46 to 2.43), p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Stigma regarding palliative care may be perpetuated by those who falsely believe they understand its meaning. Public health education is needed to increase knowledge about palliative care, promote its early integration and counter false assumptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Zimmermann
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joanne L Wong
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nadia Swami
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ashley Pope
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - YiQin Cheng
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jean Mathews
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Doris Howell
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard Sullivan
- Institute of Cancer Policy, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Gary Rodin
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Breffni Hannon
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rahim Moineddin
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa W Le
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yang GM, Dionne-Odom JN, Foo YH, Chung AHM, Kamal NHA, Tan L, Yu CC, Khanh LM, Koh ARX, Teo I, Yoon S, Bakitas M. Adapting ENABLE for patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers in Singapore: a qualitative formative evaluation. BMC Palliat Care 2021; 20:86. [PMID: 34158022 PMCID: PMC8218975 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00799-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends) is a nurse coach-led, early palliative care model for patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers. Content covered includes problem-solving, advance care planning, symptom management and self-care. The aim was to evaluate the cultural acceptability of ENABLE among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers in Singapore and identify modifications for an adapted ENABLE-SG model. METHODS Qualitative formative evaluation with a thematic analysis approach in two hospitals in Singapore, involving patients (n = 10), family caregivers (n = 11) and healthcare professionals (n = 10) who care for patients with advanced cancer. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore (i) the main needs and challenges facing individuals with advanced cancer and their family caregivers; (ii) patient involvement in healthcare decision making; and (iii) content and delivery of ENABLE. RESULTS While physical needs were largely well met, participants expressed that psychosocial care was delivered too late in the illness trajectory. Healthcare decision making approaches varied from a patient-centred shared decision-making model to a family-centred model where patients may not know their cancer diagnosis and prognosis. The content was considered to be relevant, comprehensive and practical; financial assistance, adjustment to body image, and evaluation of complementary therapy were also recommended. Face-to-face rather than telephone sessions were preferred to facilitate rapport building. CONCLUSIONS ENABLE was broadly acceptable with some modifications, including adjusting the content to ensure it can be delivered even if the patient is not fully aware of cancer diagnosis and delivering the first session face-to-face with flexibility for subsequent sessions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Meijuan Yang
- National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
| | | | - Yi Han Foo
- National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | | | - Chou Chuen Yu
- Geriatric Education and Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Le Mai Khanh
- Geriatric Education and Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Audrey Rui Xuan Koh
- National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Irene Teo
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Oluyase AO, Higginson IJ, Yi D, Gao W, Evans CJ, Grande G, Todd C, Costantini M, Murtagh FEM, Bajwah S. Hospital-based specialist palliative care compared with usual care for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers: a systematic review. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr09120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Most deaths still take place in hospital; cost-effective commissioning of end-of-life resources is a priority. This review provides clarity on the effectiveness of hospital-based specialist palliative care.
Objectives
The objectives were to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hospital-based specialist palliative care.
Population
Adult patients with advanced illnesses and their unpaid caregivers.
Intervention
Hospital-based specialist palliative care.
Comparators
Inpatient or outpatient hospital care without specialist palliative care input at the point of entry to the study, or community care or hospice care provided outside the hospital setting (usual care).
Primary outcomes
Patient health-related quality of life and symptom burden.
Data sources
Six databases (The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO and CareSearch), clinical trial registers, reference lists and systematic reviews were searched to August 2019.
Review methods
Two independent reviewers screened, data extracted and assessed methodological quality. Meta-analysis was carried out using RevMan (The Cochrane Collaboration, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark), with separate synthesis of qualitative data.
Results
Forty-two randomised controlled trials involving 7779 participants (6678 patients and 1101 unpaid caregivers) were included. Diagnoses of participants were as follows: cancer, 21 studies; non-cancer, 14 studies; and mixed cancer and non-cancer, seven studies. Hospital-based specialist palliative care was offered in the following models: ward based (one study), inpatient consult (10 studies), outpatient (six studies), hospital at home or hospital outreach (five studies) and multiple settings that included hospital (20 studies). Meta-analyses demonstrated significant improvement favouring hospital-based specialist palliative care over usual care in patient health-related quality of life (10 studies, standardised mean difference 0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.37; I
2 = 3%) and patient satisfaction with care (two studies, standardised mean difference 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.14 to 0.57; I
2 = 0%), a significant reduction in patient symptom burden (six studies, standardised mean difference –0.26, 95% confidence interval –0.41 to –0.12; I
2 = 0%) and patient depression (eight studies, standardised mean difference –0.22, 95% confidence interval –0.34 to –0.10; I
2 = 0%), and a significant increase in the chances of patients dying in their preferred place (measured by number of patients with home death) (seven studies, odds ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.23 to 2.16; I
2 = 0%). There were non-significant improvements in pain (four studies, standardised mean difference –0.16, 95% confidence interval –0.33 to 0.01; I
2 = 0%) and patient anxiety (five studies, mean difference –0.63, 95% confidence interval –2.22 to 0.96; I
2 = 76%). Hospital-based specialist palliative care showed no evidence of causing serious harm. The evidence on mortality/survival and cost-effectiveness was inconclusive. Qualitative studies (10 studies, 322 participants) suggested that hospital-based specialist palliative care was beneficial as it ensured personalised and holistic care for patients and their families, while also fostering open communication, shared decision-making and respectful and compassionate care.
Limitation
In almost half of the included randomised controlled trials, there was palliative care involvement in the control group.
Conclusions
Hospital-based specialist palliative care may offer benefits for person-centred outcomes including health-related quality of life, symptom burden, patient depression and satisfaction with care, while also increasing the chances of patients dying in their preferred place (measured by home death) with little evidence of harm.
Future work
More studies are needed of populations with non-malignant diseases, different models of hospital-based specialist palliative care, and cost-effectiveness.
Study registration
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017083205.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 12. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adejoke O Oluyase
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Deokhee Yi
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Wei Gao
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Catherine J Evans
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Gunn Grande
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Chris Todd
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Massimo Costantini
- Palliative Care Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale – Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (USL-IRCCS), Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Fliss EM Murtagh
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Sabrina Bajwah
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mah K, Swami N, O'Connor B, Hannon B, Rodin G, Zimmermann C. Early palliative intervention: effects on patient care satisfaction in advanced cancer. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2021; 12:218-225. [PMID: 33419858 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In a cluster-randomised controlled trial of early palliative care (EPC) in advanced cancer, EPC was robustly associated with increased patient satisfaction with care. The present study evaluated mediational mechanisms underlying this EPC effect, including improved physical and psychological symptoms and quality of life, as well as relationships with healthcare providers and preparation for end of life. METHOD Participants with advanced cancer (n=461) completed measures at baseline and then monthly to 4 months. Mediational analyses, using a robust bootstrapping approach, focused on 3-month and 4-month follow-up data. RESULTS At 3 months, EPC decreased psychological symptoms, which resulted in greater satisfaction either directly (βindirect effect=0.05) or through greater quality of life (βindirect effect=0.02). At 4 months, EPC increased satisfaction through improved quality of life (βindirect effect=0.08). Physical symptom management showed no significant mediational effects at either time point. Better relationships with healthcare providers consistently mediated the EPC effect on patient satisfaction at 3 and 4 months, directly (βindirect effect=0.13-0.16) and through reduced psychological symptoms and/or improved quality of life (βindirect effect=0.00-0.02). At 4 months, improved preparation for end-of-life mediated EPC effects on satisfaction by enhancing quality of life (βindirect effect=0.01) or by reducing psychological symptoms and thereby increasing quality of life (βindirect effect=0.02). CONCLUSION EPC increases satisfaction with care in advanced cancer by attending effectively to patients' emotional distress and quality of life, enhancing collaborative relationships with healthcare providers, and addressing concerns about preparation for end-of-life. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01248624.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Mah
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nadia Swami
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brenda O'Connor
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Breffni Hannon
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gary Rodin
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Princess Margaret Cancer Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Camilla Zimmermann
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Princess Margaret Cancer Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cancer Patients' Long-term Experiences of Participating in a Comprehensive Lifestyle Intervention Study While Receiving Chemotherapy. Cancer Nurs 2020; 43:60-68. [PMID: 30312192 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lifestyle interventions seem promising with regard to cancer patients' potential for physical and psychological health benefits and as an empowerment tool. Nevertheless, there is a lack of knowledge concerning cancer patients' longer-term experiences of participating in comprehensive lifestyle interventions. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to explore cancer patients' long-term experiences of participating in a 12-month individualized comprehensive lifestyle intervention study focusing on physical activity, diet, smoking cessation, and stress management while receiving curative or palliative chemotherapy. METHODS A qualitative design with semistructured interviews of 7 curative and 7 palliative cancer patients was conducted 12 months after inclusion in lifestyle intervention. Data were analyzed following a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach. RESULTS Two main themes emerged: (1) awareness of the importance of a healthy lifestyle during cancer treatment and (2) individual follow-up; it's good to have someone to talk to. CONCLUSIONS Participation in a 12-month comprehensive lifestyle intervention is both feasible and desirable in curative and palliative patients. However, although the curative participants' motivation and perceived ability to adhere to lifestyle recommendations increased during the intervention period, the palliative participants' perceived ability to adhere decreased even though they were overall highly motivated. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Our findings encourage the future implementation of lifestyle interventions during cancer treatment, even in cancer patients with advanced disease. However, when implementing lifestyle interventions, healthcare professionals must keep the patients' motivation, perceived ability to adhere to lifestyle recommendations, and individual needs in mind.
Collapse
|
24
|
Bajwah S, Oluyase AO, Yi D, Gao W, Evans CJ, Grande G, Todd C, Costantini M, Murtagh FE, Higginson IJ. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hospital-based specialist palliative care for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 9:CD012780. [PMID: 32996586 PMCID: PMC8428758 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012780.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serious illness is often characterised by physical/psychological problems, family support needs, and high healthcare resource use. Hospital-based specialist palliative care (HSPC) has developed to assist in better meeting the needs of patients and their families and potentially reducing hospital care expenditure. There is a need for clarity on the effectiveness and optimal models of HSPC, given that most people still die in hospital and also to allocate scarce resources judiciously. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of HSPC compared to usual care for adults with advanced illness (hereafter patients) and their unpaid caregivers/families. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, CDSR, DARE and HTA database via the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE; Embase; CINAHL; PsycINFO; CareSearch; National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED) and two trial registers to August 2019, together with checking of reference lists and relevant systematic reviews, citation searching and contact with experts to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the impact of HSPC on outcomes for patients or their unpaid caregivers/families, or both. HSPC was defined as specialist palliative care delivered by a palliative care team that is based in a hospital providing holistic care, co-ordination by a multidisciplinary team, and collaboration between HSPC providers and generalists. HSPC was provided to patients while they were admitted as inpatients to acute care hospitals, outpatients or patients receiving care from hospital outreach teams at home. The comparator was usual care, defined as inpatient or outpatient hospital care without specialist palliative care input at the point of entry into the study, community care or hospice care provided outside of the hospital setting. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We assessed risk of bias and extracted data. To account for use of different scales across studies, we calculated standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous data. We used an inverse variance random-effects model. For binary data, we calculated odds ratio (ORs) with 95% CIs. We assessed the evidence using GRADE and created a 'Summary of findings' table. Our primary outcomes were patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and symptom burden (a collection of two or more symptoms). Key secondary outcomes were pain, depression, satisfaction with care, achieving preferred place of death, mortality/survival, unpaid caregiver burden, and cost-effectiveness. Qualitative data was analysed where available. MAIN RESULTS We identified 42 RCTs involving 7779 participants (6678 patients and 1101 caregivers/family members). Twenty-one studies were with cancer populations, 14 were with non-cancer populations (of which six were with heart failure patients), and seven with mixed cancer and non-cancer populations (mixed diagnoses). HSPC was offered in different ways and included the following models: ward-based, inpatient consult, outpatient, hospital-at-home or hospital outreach, and service provision across multiple settings which included hospital. For our main analyses, we pooled data from studies reporting adjusted endpoint values. Forty studies had a high risk of bias in at least one domain. Compared with usual care, HSPC improved patient HRQoL with a small effect size of 0.26 SMD over usual care (95% CI 0.15 to 0.37; I2 = 3%, 10 studies, 1344 participants, low-quality evidence, higher scores indicate better patient HRQoL). HSPC also improved other person-centred outcomes. It reduced patient symptom burden with a small effect size of -0.26 SMD over usual care (95% CI -0.41 to -0.12; I2 = 0%, 6 studies, 761 participants, very low-quality evidence, lower scores indicate lower symptom burden). HSPC improved patient satisfaction with care with a small effect size of 0.36 SMD over usual care (95% CI 0.41 to 0.57; I2 = 0%, 2 studies, 337 participants, low-quality evidence, higher scores indicate better patient satisfaction with care). Using home death as a proxy measure for achieving patient's preferred place of death, patients were more likely to die at home with HSPC compared to usual care (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.16; I2 = 0%, 7 studies, 861 participants, low-quality evidence). Data on pain (4 studies, 525 participants) showed no evidence of a difference between HSPC and usual care (SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.01; I2 = 0%, very low-quality evidence). Eight studies (N = 1252 participants) reported on adverse events and very low-quality evidence did not demonstrate an effect of HSPC on serious harms. Two studies (170 participants) presented data on caregiver burden and both found no evidence of effect of HSPC (very low-quality evidence). We included 13 economic studies (2103 participants). Overall, the evidence on cost-effectiveness of HSPC compared to usual care was inconsistent among the four full economic studies. Other studies that used only partial economic analysis and those that presented more limited resource use and cost information also had inconsistent results (very low-quality evidence). Quality of the evidence The quality of the evidence assessed using GRADE was very low to low, downgraded due to a high risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Very low- to low-quality evidence suggests that when compared to usual care, HSPC may offer small benefits for several person-centred outcomes including patient HRQoL, symptom burden and patient satisfaction with care, while also increasing the chances of patients dying in their preferred place (measured by home death). While we found no evidence that HSPC causes serious harms, the evidence was insufficient to draw strong conclusions. Although these are only small effect sizes, they may be clinically relevant at an advanced stage of disease with limited prognosis, and are person-centred outcomes important to many patients and families. More well conducted studies are needed to study populations with non-malignant diseases and mixed diagnoses, ward-based models of HSPC, 24 hours access (out-of-hours care) as part of HSPC, pain, achieving patient preferred place of care, patient satisfaction with care, caregiver outcomes (satisfaction with care, burden, depression, anxiety, grief, quality of life), and cost-effectiveness of HSPC. In addition, research is needed to provide validated person-centred outcomes to be used across studies and populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Bajwah
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Adejoke O Oluyase
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Deokhee Yi
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Wei Gao
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Catherine J Evans
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Gunn Grande
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Chris Todd
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Fliss E Murtagh
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Applebaum AJ, Marziliano A, Schofield E, Breitbart W, Rosenfeld B. Measuring positive psychosocial sequelae in patients with advanced cancer. PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA-THEORY RESEARCH PRACTICE AND POLICY 2020; 13:703-712. [PMID: 32881572 DOI: 10.1037/tra0000944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Posttraumatic growth and benefit finding describe the potential for positive changes resulting from traumatic experiences, including cancer. In oncology, these constructs are increasingly examined concurrently using the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) and the Benefit Finding Scale (BFS). However, distinctions between these constructs and their corresponding scales are not altogether clear, and the burden of administering 2 lengthy questionnaires is evident, particularly for patients at end-of-life. METHOD Baseline data from 209 participants enrolled in a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a psychosocial intervention were analyzed. We assessed the structure and covariance of all PTGI and BFS items using item response theory to determine the extent to which these measures overlap and the potential value of their concurrent administration in patients with advanced cancer. RESULTS Despite conceptual differences in posttraumatic growth and benefit finding, results indicated that these measures address the same underlying construct. We subsequently analyzed 3 abbreviated scales (7, 11, and 16 items) that combine items from both scales to identify an optimal briefer combined scale. Results supported all 3 versions, with the 7- and 16-item measures appearing to have the best balance of content and concurrent validity and the 11-item version optimizing information gained with brevity. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate that concurrent administration of the PTGI and BFS may be unnecessary given the high degree of overlap between these 2 measures and that a brief subset of items may adequately evaluate positive change among patients with advanced cancer while reducing participant burden. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
|
26
|
Bickel KE, Levy C, MacPhee ER, Brenner K, Temel JS, Arch JJ, Greer JA. An Integrative Framework of Appraisal and Adaptation in Serious Medical Illness. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 60:657-677.e6. [PMID: 32446974 PMCID: PMC7483912 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Revised: 05/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that palliative care improves the quality of life of individuals with serious medical illness. Research also suggests that in patients with advanced cancer, palliative care's focus on symptom management, coping with illness, goals of care, and treatment decisions may be associated with improved patient quality of life in part by increasing patients' use of active (vs. passive) and approach-oriented (vs. avoidant) coping strategies. However, without a framework outlining the process that individuals with serious medical illness and their loved ones undergo, it is challenging to discern exactly where, how, and why palliative care may affect the serious medical illness experience. To address this gap, we propose a clinically applicable framework, derived from existing theory and research in the social and behavioral sciences. This framework, called the Integrative Framework of Appraisal and Adaptation in Serious Medical Illness, describes how patients and their loved ones cognitively and emotionally process the various events that may occur as they navigate serious medical illness and the end of life. The framework also describes how individuals and their loved ones use that event processing to determine next steps, while considering the impact of their surrounding external environment, their individual social roles, and their connections on this decision making. The framework presented in this article is intended to improve our ability to understand and care for individuals with serious medical illness and their loved ones, while stimulating further discussion and research to test and refine these ideas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen E Bickel
- VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
| | - Cari Levy
- Palliative Medicine Section Chief, VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Research, Division of Health Care Policy and Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Edward R MacPhee
- Psychiatry Section Chief, VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Keri Brenner
- Medicine-Section of Palliative Care, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jennifer S Temel
- Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Cancer Outcomes Research & Education Program, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Thoracic Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joanna J Arch
- Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Joseph A Greer
- Psychology, Harvard Medical School, Center for Psychiatric Oncology & Behavioral Science, Cancer Outcomes Research & Education Program, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Early for Everyone: Reconceptualizing Palliative Care in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Adv Neonatal Care 2020; 20:109-117. [PMID: 31990696 DOI: 10.1097/anc.0000000000000707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative care (PC) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is often provided exclusively to infants expected to die. Standards of care support providing PC early after diagnosis with any condition likely to impact quality of life. PURPOSE To determine the state of early PC practice across populations to derive elements of early PC applicable to neonates and their families and demonstrate their application in practice. SEARCH STRATEGY Multiple literature searches were conducted from 2016 to 2019. Common keywords used were: palliative care; early PC; end of life, neonate; NICU; perinatal PC; pediatric PC; family-centered care; advanced care planning; palliative care consultant; and shared decision-making. FINDINGS Early PC is an emerging practice in adult, pediatric, and perinatal populations that has been shown to be helpful for and recommended by families. Three key elements of early PC in the NICU are shared decision-making, care planning, and coping with distress. A hypothetical case of a 24-week infant is presented to illustrate how findings may be applied. Evidence supports expansion of neonatal PC to include infants and families without terminal diagnoses and initiation earlier in care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Involving parents more fully in care planning activities and decision-making and providing structured support for them to cope with distress despite their child's prognosis are essential to early PC. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH As early PC is incorporated into practice, strategies should be evaluated for feasibility and efficacy to improve parental and neonatal outcomes. Researchers should consider engaging NICU parent stakeholders in leading early PC program development and research.
Collapse
|
28
|
Skjoedt N, Johnsen AT, Sjøgren P, Neergaard MA, Damkier A, Gluud C, Lindschou J, Fayers P, Higginson IJ, Strömgren AS, Groenvold M. Early specialised palliative care: interventions, symptoms, problems. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2020; 11:444-453. [PMID: 32220944 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have investigated the content of interventions provided in early specialised palliative care (SPC). OBJECTIVES To characterise the content of interventions delivered in early SPC in the Danish Palliative Care Trial (DanPaCT), a multicentre trial with six participating sites. METHODS A retrospective qualitative and quantitative study coding all new interventions initiated by the palliative teams and documented in the medical records during the 8-week study period of DanPaCT. Interventions were categorised according to (a) symptom/problem prompting the intervention, (b) type of intervention and (c) professional(s) providing the intervention. RESULTS In total, 145 patients were randomised to the SPC teams. According to the medical records, patients received a median of 3.5 (range 0-22) new interventions in the 8-week intervention-period from the palliative teams. For 24 (18%) of the patients there was no documented interventions in the medical records. The most frequent symptom/problems treated were pain, (100 interventions; 20% of interventions given) and impaired physical function (62; 13% of interventions given). The most frequent type of intervention was pharmacological (232; 42% of interventions given). CONCLUSIONS This is one of the first studies to meticulously investigate the content of interventions documented in the medical records for patients receiving early SPC. Diverse symptoms were treated with many different interventions. However, a relatively low number of interventions were documented. This may explain the lack of effect in DanPaCT but also questions whether all interventions were adequately documented TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01348048.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nete Skjoedt
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anna Thit Johnsen
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark .,Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Per Sjøgren
- Section of Palliative Medicine, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Anette Damkier
- Department of Psychiatry, Odense Universitetshospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Christian Gluud
- The Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jane Lindschou
- The Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Fayers
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.,Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | | | - Mogens Groenvold
- The Research Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Currow DC, Agar MR, Phillips JL. Role of Hospice Care at the End of Life for People With Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:937-943. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.02235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Patient-defined factors that are important at the end of life include being physically independent for as long as possible, good symptom control, and spending quality time with friends and family. Hospice care adds to the quality of care and these patient-centered priorities for people with cancer and their families in the last weeks and days of life. Evidence from large observational studies demonstrate that hospice care can improve outcomes directly and support better and more appropriate health care use for people in the last stages of cancer. Team-based community hospice care has measurable benefits for patients, their family caregivers, and health services. In addition to improved symptom control for patients and a greater likelihood of time spent at home, caregiver outcomes are better when hospice care is accessed: informational needs are better met, and caregivers have an improved ability to move on with life after the patient’s death compared with people who did not have access to these services. Hospice care continues to evolve as its reach expands and the needs of patients continue to broaden. This is reflected in the transition from hospice being based on excellence in nursing to teams with a broad range of health professionals to meet the complex and changing needs of patients and their families. Additional integration of cancer services with hospice care will help to provide more seamless care for patients and supporting family caregivers during their caregiving and after the death of the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C. Currow
- University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
- University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - Meera R. Agar
- University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
- Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Greer JA, Applebaum AJ, Jacobsen JC, Temel JS, Jackson VA. Understanding and Addressing the Role of Coping in Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:915-925. [PMID: 32023161 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Advanced cancer, with its considerable physical symptoms and psychosocial burdens, represents an existential threat and major stressor to patients and their caregivers. In response to such stress, patients and their caregivers use a variety of strategies to manage the disease and related symptoms, such as problem-focused, emotion-focused, meaning-focused, and spiritual/religious coping. The use of such coping strategies is associated with multiple outcomes, including quality of life, symptoms of depression and anxiety, illness understanding, and end-of-life care. Accumulating data demonstrate that early palliative care, integrated with oncology care, not only improves these key outcomes but also enhances coping in patients with advanced cancer. In addition, trials of home-based palliative care interventions have shown promise for improving the ways that patients and family caregivers cope together and manage problems as a dyad. In this article, we describe the nature and correlates of coping in this population, highlight the role of palliative care to promote effective coping strategies in patients and caregivers, and review evidence supporting the beneficial effects of palliative care on patient coping as well as the mechanisms by which improved coping is associated with better outcomes. We conclude with a discussion of the limitations of the state of science, future directions, and best practices on the basis of available evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph A Greer
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Juliet C Jacobsen
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer S Temel
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Vicki A Jackson
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
TORUN NAZAN. Hasta ailesinin palyatif bakım deneyimleri. CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL 2019. [DOI: 10.17826/cumj.559077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
32
|
Borno HT, Bakke BM, Kaplan C, Hebig-Prophet A, Chao J, Kim YJ, Yeager J, Cinar P, Small E, Boscardin C, Gonzales R. A step towards equitable clinical trial recruitment: a protocol for the development and preliminary testing of an online prostate cancer health information and clinical trial matching tool. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2019; 5:123. [PMID: 31720002 PMCID: PMC6839161 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-019-0516-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recruitment of a diverse participant pool to cancer clinical trials is an essential component of clinical research as it improves the generalizability of findings. Investigating and piloting novel recruitment strategies that take advantage of ubiquitous digital technologies has become an important component of facilitating broad recruitment and addressing inequities in clinical trial participation. Equitable and inclusive recruitment improves generalizability of clinical trial outcomes, benefiting patients, clinicians, and the research community. The increasing prevalence of online connectivity in the USA and use of the Internet as a resource for medical information provides an opportunity for digital recruitment strategies in cancer clinical trials. This study aims to measure the acceptability, preliminary estimates of efficacy, and feasibility of the Trial Library intervention, an Internet-based cancer clinical trial matching tool. This study will also examine the extent to which the Trial Library website, designed to address the linguistic and literacy needs of broader patient populations, influences patient-initiated conversations with physicians about clinical trial participation. Methods This is a study protocol for a non-randomized, single-arm pilot study. This is a mixed methods study design that utilizes the statistical analysis of quantitative survey data and the qualitative analysis of interview data to assess the participant experience with the Trial Library intervention. This study will examine (1) acceptability as a measure of participant satisfaction with this intervention, (2) preliminary measure of efficacy as a measure of proportion of participants with documented clinical trial discussion in the electronic medical record, and (3) feasibility of the intervention as a measure of duration of clinical visit. Discussion The principles that informed the design of the Trial Library intervention aim to be generalizable to clinical trials across many disease contexts. From the ground up, this intervention is built to be inclusive of the linguistic, literacy, and technological needs of underrepresented patient populations. This study will collect essential preliminary data prior to a multi-site randomized clinical trial of the Trial Library intervention. Trial registration This study has received institutional approval from the Committee of Human Subjects Research at the University of California, San Francisco.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hala T Borno
- 1Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 6th Floor, Box 3211, Office 6554, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
| | - Brian M Bakke
- 2School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Celia Kaplan
- 3Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Anke Hebig-Prophet
- 4Clinical Innovation Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Jessica Chao
- 4Clinical Innovation Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Yoon-Ji Kim
- 4Clinical Innovation Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Jan Yeager
- 4Clinical Innovation Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Pelin Cinar
- 1Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 6th Floor, Box 3211, Office 6554, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
| | - Eric Small
- 1Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 6th Floor, Box 3211, Office 6554, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA.,3Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Christy Boscardin
- 4Clinical Innovation Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Ralph Gonzales
- 4Clinical Innovation Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Fliedner M, Zambrano S, Schols JM, Bakitas M, Lohrmann C, Halfens RJ, Eychmüller S. An early palliative care intervention can be confronting but reassuring: A qualitative study on the experiences of patients with advanced cancer. Palliat Med 2019; 33:783-792. [PMID: 31068119 DOI: 10.1177/0269216319847884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intervention trials confirm that patients with advanced cancer receiving early palliative care experience a better quality of life and show improved knowledge about and use of palliative care services. To involve patients in future health-care decisions, health professionals should understand patients' perspectives. However, little is known about how patients' experience such interventions. AIM To explore advanced cancer patients' experiences with a structured early palliative care intervention, its acceptability and impact on the patients' life including influencing factors. DESIGN Qualitative content analysis of in-depth, semi-structured interviews. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Patients with various advanced cancer diagnoses were enrolled in a multicenter randomized controlled trial (NCT01983956), which investigated the impact of "Symptoms, End-of-life decisions, Network, Support," a structured early palliative care intervention, on distress. Of these, 20 patients who underwent the intervention participated in this study. RESULTS Participants received the intervention well and gained a better understanding of their personal situation. Patients reported that the intervention can feel "confronting" but with the right timing it can be confirming and facilitate family conversations. Patients' personal background and the intervention timing within their personal disease trajectory influenced their emotional and cognitive experiences; it also impacted their understanding of palliative care and triggered actions toward future care planning. CONCLUSION Early palliative care interventions like "Symptoms, End-of-life decisions, Network, Support" may provoke emotions and feel "confrontational" often because this is the first time when issues about one's end of life are openly discussed; yet, advanced cancer patients found it beneficial and felt it should be incorporated into routine care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Fliedner
- 1 DOLS, University Center for Palliative Care, University Hospital Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- 2 Department of Health Services Research, School CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sofia Zambrano
- 1 DOLS, University Center for Palliative Care, University Hospital Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jos Mga Schols
- 2 Department of Health Services Research, School CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- 3 Department of Family Medicine, School CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marie Bakitas
- 4 School of Nursing, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Christa Lohrmann
- 5 Institute of Nursing Science, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ruud Jg Halfens
- 2 Department of Health Services Research, School CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Steffen Eychmüller
- 1 DOLS, University Center for Palliative Care, University Hospital Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fulton JJ, LeBlanc TW, Cutson TM, Porter Starr KN, Kamal A, Ramos K, Freiermuth CE, McDuffie JR, Kosinski A, Adam S, Nagi A, Williams JW. Integrated outpatient palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Palliat Med 2019; 33:123-134. [PMID: 30488781 PMCID: PMC7069657 DOI: 10.1177/0269216318812633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite increasing emphasis on integration of palliative care with disease-directed care for advanced cancer, the nature of this integration and its effects on patient and caregiver outcomes are not well-understood. AIM: We evaluated the effects of integrated outpatient palliative and oncology care for advanced cancer on patient and caregiver outcomes. DESIGN: Following a standard protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42017057541), investigators independently screened reports to identify randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies that evaluated the effect of integrated outpatient palliative and oncology care interventions on quality of life, survival, and healthcare utilization among adults with advanced cancer. Data were synthesized using random-effects meta-analyses, supplemented with qualitative methods when necessary. DATA SOURCES: English-language peer-reviewed publications in PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central through November 2016. We subsequently updated our PubMed search through July 2018. RESULTS: Eight randomized-controlled and two cluster-randomized trials were included. Most patients had multiple advanced cancers, with median time from diagnosis or recurrence to enrollment ranging from 8 to 12 weeks. All interventions included a multidisciplinary team, were classified as “moderately integrated,” and addressed physical and psychological symptoms. In a meta-analysis, short-term quality of life improved, symptom burden improved, and all-cause mortality decreased. Qualitative analyses revealed no association between integration elements, palliative care intervention elements, and intervention impact. Utilization and caregiver outcomes were often not reported. CONCLUSIONS: Moderately integrated palliative and oncology outpatient interventions had positive effects on short-term quality of life, symptom burden, and survival. Evidence for effects on healthcare utilization and caregiver outcomes remains sparse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica J Fulton
- 1 Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,2 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.,3 Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Thomas W LeBlanc
- 4 Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.,5 Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Toni M Cutson
- 1 Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,6 Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kathryn N Porter Starr
- 3 Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,6 Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.,7 Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Arif Kamal
- 5 Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.,8 Duke Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Katherine Ramos
- 1 Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,3 Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,7 Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Jennifer R McDuffie
- 10 Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.,11 Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Andrzej Kosinski
- 12 Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Soheir Adam
- 13 Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Avishek Nagi
- 10 Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John W Williams
- 10 Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.,11 Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Tay LH, Ong AKW, Lang DSP. Experiences of adult cancer patients receiving counseling from nurses: a qualitative systematic review. JBI DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND IMPLEMENTATION REPORTS 2018; 16:1965-2012. [PMID: 30335040 DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-2017-003606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Counseling is a brief psycho-educational intervention that is useful in facilitating personal growth and adaptive resolution of life stresses. With increased recognition on the psycho-emotional needs of patients with cancer, it is prudent to consider the possibility of expanding the role of nurses in the provision of counseling. OBJECTIVE This qualitative systematic review aimed to establish the best available evidence on the experiences of adult cancer patients receiving counseling provided by nurses. INCLUSION CRITERIA This review included studies on adult cancer patients of at least 18 years of age who were diagnosed with oncological malignancies of any type and staging. The phenomena of interest were the experiences of adult cancer patients who received nurse counseling (patient education, psycho-education and/or supportive counseling) that was conducted face-to-face or via other communication modes. The review included studies done in institutional and community settings. Qualitative data including, but not limited to, designs of phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research, feminist research and mixed methods research were considered. SEARCH STRATEGY A three-step search strategy was utilized to find both published and unpublished studies in the English language. Databases searched included CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, JSTOR, PsycINFO, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Wiley Online Library and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. Two reviewers independently appraised the 14 included studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. The studies were of moderate to high quality, mostly, falling short in quality due to lack of statements locating the researchers and their influence on the research. Data were extracted from included papers using the standardized JBI data extraction tool. DATA SYNTHESIS Two reviewers independently reviewed and pooled similar findings into categories. All three reviewers then collaborated in finalizing these derived categories to generate a meta-synthesis. RESULTS Five synthesized findings were generated during the meta-synthesis: (1) Nurses provide tailored information and teaching to enhance patients' coping; (2) Nurses attend to patients' emotional needs; (3) Nurses assume the role of a significant person in the patients' journey; (4) Patients feel valued as a whole person and the ready availability of nursing interactions; and (5) Nursing role ambiguity and time constraints limit nurse counseling. CONCLUSION Overall, cancer patients' experiences with nurse counseling are positive and beneficial to them. Despite some nursing role ambiguity and time constraints impeding nurse counseling, this review has established the diverse instrumental roles nurses have played in enhancing adaptive coping in patients across their illness trajectory. In particular, the nurses' presence and availability, a trusting nurse-patient relationship, use of psychotherapy techniques, a holistic approach, human touch and continuity of care were highlighted as key factors in enhancing healing. The role of the nurse navigator and the use of expressive writing warrant more attention when tending to patients' psycho-emotional distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Hui Tay
- Singapore National University Hospital (NUH) Centre for Evidence-Based Nursing
- National University Healthcare System (NUHS), Singapore
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (NCIS), Singapore
| | - Andrew Kok Wah Ong
- Singapore National University Hospital (NUH) Centre for Evidence-Based Nursing
- National University Healthcare System (NUHS), Singapore
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (NCIS), Singapore
| | - Dora Siew Ping Lang
- Singapore National University Hospital (NUH) Centre for Evidence-Based Nursing
- National University Healthcare System (NUHS), Singapore
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (NCIS), Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wakefield D, Bayly J, Selman LE, Firth AM, Higginson IJ, Murtagh FE. Patient empowerment, what does it mean for adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness: A systematic review using critical interpretive synthesis. Palliat Med 2018; 32:1288-1304. [PMID: 29956568 PMCID: PMC6088522 DOI: 10.1177/0269216318783919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient empowerment, defined as 'a process through which people gain greater control over decisions and actions affecting their health' (World Health Organization) is a key theme within global health and social care strategies. The benefits of incorporating empowerment strategies in care are well documented, but little is known about their application or impact for patients with advanced, life-limiting illness(s). AIM To identify and synthesise the international evidence on patient empowerment for adults with advanced, life-limiting illness(s). DESIGN Systematic review (PROSPERO no. 46113) with critical interpretive synthesis methodology. DATA SOURCES Five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINHAL, PsycINFO and Cochrane) were searched from inception to March 2018. Grey literature and reference list/citation searches of included papers were undertaken. INCLUSION CRITERIA empirical research involving patients with advanced life-limiting illness including descriptions of, or references to, patient empowerment within the study results. RESULTS In all, 13 papers met inclusion criteria. Two qualitative studies explored patient empowerment as a study objective. Six papers evaluated interventions, referencing patient empowerment as an incidental outcome. The following themes were identified from the interpretive synthesis: self-identity, personalised knowledge in theory and practice, negotiating personal and healthcare relationships, acknowledgement of terminal illness, and navigating continued losses. CONCLUSION There are features of empowerment, for patients with advanced life-limiting illness distinct to those of other patient groups. Greater efforts should be made to progress the empowerment of patients nearing the end of their lives. We propose that the identified themes may provide a useful starting point to guide the assessment of existing or planned services and inform future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique Wakefield
- 1 Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jo Bayly
- 1 Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Lucy Ellen Selman
- 2 Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration (BRTC), School of Social and Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Alice M Firth
- 1 Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- 1 Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Fliss Em Murtagh
- 3 Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Budhwani S, Wodchis WP, Zimmermann C, Moineddin R, Howell D. Self-management, self-management support needs and interventions in advanced cancer: a scoping review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2018; 9:12-25. [PMID: 30121581 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Revised: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Patients with advanced cancer can experience illness trajectories similar to other progressive chronic disease conditions where undertaking self-management (SM) and provision of self-management support (SMS) becomes important. The main objectives of this study were to map the literature of SM strategies and SMS needs of patients with advanced cancer and to describe SMS interventions tested in this patient population. A scoping review of all literature published between 2002 and 2016 was conducted. A total of 11 094 articles were generated for screening from MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Library databases. A final 55 articles were extracted for inclusion in the review. Included studies identified a wide variety of SM behaviours used by patients with advanced cancer including controlling and coping with the physical components of the disease and facilitating emotional and psychosocial adjustments to a life-limiting illness. Studies also described a wide range of SMS needs, SMS interventions and their effectiveness in this patient population. Findings suggest that SMS interventions addressing SMS needs should be based on a sound understanding of the core skills required for effective SM and theoretical and conceptual frameworks. Future research should examine how a patient-oriented SMS approach can be incorporated into existing models of care delivery and the effects of SMS on quality of life and health system utilisation in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suman Budhwani
- Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Health System Performance Research Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Walter P Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Health System Performance Research Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Camilla Zimmermann
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rahim Moineddin
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Doris Howell
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Akyar I, Dionne-Odom JN, Bakitas MA. Using Patients and Their Caregivers Feedback to Develop ENABLE CHF-PC: An Early Palliative Care Intervention for Advanced Heart Failure. J Palliat Care 2018; 34:103-110. [PMID: 29952216 DOI: 10.1177/0825859718785231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Models of early, community-based palliative care for individuals with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV heart failure and their families are lacking. We used the Medical Research Council process of developing complex interventions to conduct a formative evaluation study to translate an early palliative care intervention from cancer to heart failure. METHOD: One component of the parent formative evaluation pilot study was qualitative satisfaction interviews with 8 patient-caregiver dyad participants who completed Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends Comprehensive Heartcare For Patient and Caregivers (ENABLE CHF-PC) intervention. The ENABLE CHF-PC consists of an in-person palliative care assessment, weekly telehealth coaching sessions, and monthly follow-up. Subsequent to completing the coaching sessions, patient and caregiver participants were interviewed to elicit their experiences with ENABLE CHF-PC. Digitally recorded interviews were transcribed and analyzed using a thematic approach. RESULTS: Patients (n = 8) mean age was 67.3, 62.5% were female, 75% were married/living with a partner; caregivers (n = 8) mean age was 56.8, and 87.5% were female. Four themes related to experiences with ENABLE CHF-PC included "allowed me to vent," "gained perspective," "helped me plan," and "gained illness management and decision-making skills." Recommendations for intervention modification included (1) start program at diagnosis, (2) maintain phone-based approach, and (3) expand topics and modify format. CONCLUSION: Patients and caregivers unanimously found the intervention to be helpful and acceptable. After incorporating modifications, ENABLE CHF-PC is currently undergoing efficacy testing in a large randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imatullah Akyar
- 1 Faculty of Nursing, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.,2 School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - J Nicholas Dionne-Odom
- 2 School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.,3 Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Marie A Bakitas
- 2 School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.,3 Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lehto RH, Miller SEL, Flanigan M, Wyatt G. Mental health in patients with advanced cancer at the end of life: evaluation of evidence and future directions. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/23809000.2018.1483192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca H Lehto
- Michigan State University College of Nursing, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Sara EL Miller
- University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Megan Flanigan
- Michigan State University College of Nursing, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Gwen Wyatt
- Michigan State University College of Nursing, East Lansing, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Schulman-Green D, Lin JJ, Smith CB, Feder S, Bickell NA. Facilitators and Barriers to Oncologists’ Conduct of Goals of Care Conversations. J Palliat Care 2018; 33:143-148. [DOI: 10.1177/0825859718777361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Goals of care (GoC) conversations optimally begin early in the course of cancer care, yet most happen near the end of life. We sought to describe oncologist-reported facilitators of and barriers to GoC conversations with patients who have advanced cancer. Methods and Materials: We conducted individual, semistructured qualitative interviews with oncologists from 4 academic, community, municipal, and rural hospitals in New York and Connecticut. Interview topics included approach to GoC conversations, facilitators, barriers, and organizational influences. We analyzed data using interpretive description. We collected demographic and practice information and surveyed oncologists on their communication skills training. We calculated descriptive statistics for quantitative data. Results: Oncologists (n = 21) had a mean age of 46 years (range: 34-68), 67% were male, 71% were White, 24% were Asian, 10% were Hispanic, and 5% were Black. They reported an average of 20 years in practice (range: 8-42), and 62% had received training on having GoC conversations. Facilitators included patient’s poor functional status, patient’s high health literacy, family understanding and acceptance, oncologist’s practice experience, and a supportive practice environment. Barriers included certain patient demographic and clinical characteristics, patient religion and culture, patient’s denial, and lack of time. Conclusion: GoC conversations may be facilitated by enabling oncologists to conduct these conversations despite difficult circumstances and emotional reactions by activating patients and family via increased health literacy and by advancing palliative-informed practice environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jenny J. Lin
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cardinale B. Smith
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ang K, Hepgul N, Gao W, Higginson IJ. Strategies used in improving and assessing the level of reporting of implementation fidelity in randomised controlled trials of palliative care complex interventions: A systematic review. Palliat Med 2018; 32:500-516. [PMID: 28691583 DOI: 10.1177/0269216317717369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation fidelity is critical in evaluating effectiveness of interventions. AIM Identifying and summarising strategies to improve and assess the level of reporting of implementation fidelity in randomised controlled trials of palliative care complex interventions. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES Published and completed randomised controlled trials from 2000 to current evaluating effectiveness of specialised palliative care services on patient-centred outcomes in adult patients were examined. MEDLINE was searched from 2008 to 29 September 2015 and supplemented by randomised controlled trials identified in a 2008 systematic review. RESULTS Altogether, 20 randomised controlled trials involving 8426 patients were reviewed using 40 subcomponents of five elements of implementation fidelity (resulting in 20 × 40 = 800 items). Over 88 strategies were identified, classified under the following elements: 'treatment design', 'training providers', 'delivery of treatment', 'receipt of treatment' and 'enactment of treatment skills'. No single overarching strategy was discovered. Strategies under 'treatment design' aimed to ensure equivalent treatment dose between and within intervention and control groups, and delivery of necessary ingredients. Ongoing 'training (of) providers' included supervision and ensuring skill acquisition. Use of treatment manuals and implementation checklists aimed to aid 'delivery of treatment'. Research teams aimed to improve 'receipt of treatment' by transmitting clear information and verifying understanding, while improving 'enactment of treatment skills' by reviewing and reinforcing prior content. Only 26% of the items received sufficient reporting; 34% were either not used or reported on. CONCLUSION Implementation fidelity in palliative care is under-recognised. A table to collate these strategies to improve implementation fidelity in palliative care research and clinical practice is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kexin Ang
- 1 Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore.,2 Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Nilay Hepgul
- 2 Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Wei Gao
- 2 Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- 2 Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Costantini M, Apolone G, Tanzi S, Falco F, Rondini E, Guberti M, Fanello S, Cavuto S, Savoldi L, Piro R, Mecugni D, Di Leo S. Is early integration of palliative care feasible and acceptable for advanced respiratory and gastrointestinal cancer patients? A phase 2 mixed-methods study. Palliat Med 2018; 32:46-58. [PMID: 28952881 DOI: 10.1177/0269216317731571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is evidence that early integration of palliative care improves quality of life, lowers spending and helps clarify preferences and goals for advanced cancer patients. Little is known about the feasibility and acceptability of early integration. AIM Assessing feasibility of early integration of palliative care, and exploring concerns perceived and problems encountered by patients, relatives and oncologists. DESIGN A phase 2 mixed-methods study ( ClinicalTrials.Gov :NCT02078700). METHODS Oncologists of two outpatient clinics offered a specialised palliative care intervention integrated with standard oncological care to all consecutive newly diagnosed metastatic respiratory/gastrointestinal cancer patients. We interviewed samples of patients, relatives and oncologists to explore strengths and weaknesses of the intervention. RESULTS The intervention was proposed to 44/54 eligible patients (81.5%), 40 (90.1%) accepted, 38 (95.0%) attended the first palliative care visit. The intervention was completed for 32 patients (80.0%). It did not start for three (7.5%) and was interrupted for three patients who refused (7.5%). The Palliative Care Unit performed 274 visits in 38 patients (median per patient 4.5), and 24 family meetings with relatives of 16 patients. All patients and most relatives referred to the usefulness of the intervention, specifically for symptoms management, information and support to strategies for coping. Oncologists highlighted their difficulties in informing patients on palliative intervention, sharing information and coordinating patient's care with the palliative care team. CONCLUSION Early integration of palliative care in oncological setting seems feasible and well accepted by patients, relatives and, to a lesser extent, oncologists. Some difficulties emerged concerning patient information and inter-professional communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Silvia Tanzi
- 3 Palliative Care Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Francesco Falco
- 4 Pulmonology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Ermanno Rondini
- 5 Oncology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Monica Guberti
- 6 Department of Health Professions, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Silvia Fanello
- 5 Oncology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Silvio Cavuto
- 7 Department Infrastructure Research and Statistics, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Luisa Savoldi
- 7 Department Infrastructure Research and Statistics, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Roberto Piro
- 4 Pulmonology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Daniela Mecugni
- 8 Surgical, Medical and Dental Department of Morphological Sciences related to Transplant, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Silvia Di Leo
- 9 Psycho-Oncology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Phongtankuel V, Meador L, Adelman RD, Roberts J, Henderson CR, Mehta SS, del Carmen T, Reid M. Multicomponent Palliative Care Interventions in Advanced Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2018; 35:173-183. [PMID: 28273750 PMCID: PMC5879777 DOI: 10.1177/1049909116674669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patients live with serious chronic or terminal illnesses. Multicomponent palliative care interventions have been increasingly utilized in patient care; however, it is unclear what is being implemented and who is delivering these interventions. OBJECTIVES To (1) describe the delivery of multicomponent palliative care interventions, (2) characterize the disciplines delivering care, (3) identify the components being implemented, and (4) analyze whether the number of disciplines or components being implemented are associated with positive outcomes. DESIGN Systematic review. STUDY SELECTION English-language articles analyzing multicomponent palliative care interventions. OUTCOMES MEASURED Delivery of palliative interventions by discipline, components of palliative care implemented, and number of positive outcomes (eg, pain, quality of life). RESULTS Our search strategy yielded 71 articles, which detailed 64 unique multicomponent palliative care interventions. Nurses (n = 64, 88%) were most often involved in delivering care, followed by physicians (n = 43, 67%), social workers (n = 33, 52%), and chaplains (n = 19, 30%). The most common palliative care components patients received were symptom management (n = 56, 88%), psychological support/counseling (n = 52, 81%), and disease education (n = 48, 75%). Statistical analysis did not uncover an association between number of disciplines or components and positive outcomes. CONCLUSIONS While there has been growth in multicomponent palliative care interventions over the past 3 decades, important aspects require additional study such as better inclusion of key groups (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end-stage renal disease, minorities, older adults); incorporating core components of palliative care (eg, interdisciplinary team, integrating caregivers, providing spiritual support); and developing ways to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions that can be readily replicated and disseminated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerawat Phongtankuel
- Department of Medicine, Joan and Sanford I Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lauren Meador
- Department of Medicine, Joan and Sanford I Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ronald D. Adelman
- Department of Medicine, Joan and Sanford I Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Sonal S. Mehta
- Department of Medicine, Joan and Sanford I Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tessa del Carmen
- Department of Medicine, Joan and Sanford I Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - M.C. Reid
- Department of Medicine, Joan and Sanford I Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tartaglione EV, Vig EK, Reinke LF. Bridging the Cultural Divide Between Oncology and Palliative Care Subspecialties: Clinicians' Perceptions on Team Integration. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2017; 35:978-984. [PMID: 29258319 DOI: 10.1177/1049909117747288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Palliative care improves symptom burden, distress, patient and family satisfaction, and survival for patients with cancer. Oncology professional societies endorse the integration of palliative care into routine care for patients with advanced cancers. Despite this, cultural differences between medical subspecialties and the limited number of clinicians trained in palliative care lower the adoption of integrated care models. We assessed oncologists' and palliative care clinicians' perceptions about integrating oncology and palliative care using a nurse delivering palliative care to patients newly diagnosed with lung cancer. METHODS We conducted semistructured telephone interviews with 7 oncology clinicians and 12 palliative care clinicians purposively sampled across 6 geographically diverse Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers (VAs). Oncologists were asked about their perspectives and experiences with consulting palliative care services. Palliative care clinicians were asked about their experiences with receiving consultations from subspecialties. Both were asked about utilizing a registered nurse to deliver telephone-based palliative care to patients newly diagnosed with lung cancer. Interviews were analyzed using traditional content analysis approaches. RESULTS We identified 2 main themes: (1) tensions, differences, and mistrust between services occur in the least integrated teams and (2) open communication, sharing common goals, and promoting oncology "buy in" build trust and foster collaboration between teams. Clinicians described qualities important to possess to promote successful adoption of a nurse-led model of palliative care. CONCLUSIONS Integration between oncology and palliative care among the 6 VA medical centers varies considerably. Nurses delivering palliative care embedded in oncology teams may facilitate the integration of these subspecialties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica V Tartaglione
- 1 Department of Veterans Affairs, Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Services R&D, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Elizabeth K Vig
- 2 Department of Veterans Affairs, Puget Sound Health Care System, Geriatrics and Extended Care, Seattle, WA, USA.,3 Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lynn F Reinke
- 1 Department of Veterans Affairs, Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Services R&D, Seattle, WA, USA.,4 Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Specialized palliative care in advanced cancer: What is the efficacy? A systematic review. Palliat Support Care 2017; 15:724-740. [DOI: 10.1017/s1478951517000402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACTObjective:Due to the multiple physical, psychological, existential, and social symptoms involved, patients with advanced cancer often have a reduced quality of life (QoL), which requires specialized palliative care (SPC) interventions. The primary objective of the present systematic review was to review the existing literature about SPC and its effect on QoL, on physical and psychological symptoms, and on survival in adult patients with advanced cancer.Method:We utilized a search strategy based on the PICO (problem/population, intervention, comparison, and outcome) framework and employed terminology related to cancer, QoL, symptoms, mood, and palliative care. The search was performed in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Selected studies were analyzed and categorized according to methods, results, quality of evidence, and strength of recommendation.Results:Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected for analysis (out of a total of 1,115 studies). Two other studies were found by hand search, one of which was only published in conference abstract form. The RCTs differed in terms of aims, interventions, control groups, and outcomes; however, the primary aim of all of them was to investigate the effect of SPC on patient QoL. Five studies found improved QoL in the intervention group. Physical symptom intensity decreased in two studies, and three studies found improved mood in the intervention group. However, physical and psychological symptoms were secondary outcomes in these studies. Survival was improved in two studies. All the studies offered generalizability, but the level of evidence validity varied among them.Significance of results:Due to several methodological limitations, the evidence offered in these studies ranged from low to high. The evidence in this field of study in general is still nascent, but there is growing support for the utilization of SPC to improve the quality of life of adult patients with advanced cancer. The evidence that SPC reduces physical and psychological symptoms is moderate, while the evidence that it prolongs survival is low.
Collapse
|
46
|
Haun MW, Estel S, Rücker G, Friederich H, Villalobos M, Thomas M, Hartmann M. Early palliative care for adults with advanced cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 6:CD011129. [PMID: 28603881 PMCID: PMC6481832 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011129.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 258] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incurable cancer, which often constitutes an enormous challenge for patients, their families, and medical professionals, profoundly affects the patient's physical and psychosocial well-being. In standard cancer care, palliative measures generally are initiated when it is evident that disease-modifying treatments have been unsuccessful, no treatments can be offered, or death is anticipated. In contrast, early palliative care is initiated much earlier in the disease trajectory and closer to the diagnosis of incurable cancer. OBJECTIVES To compare effects of early palliative care interventions versus treatment as usual/standard cancer care on health-related quality of life, depression, symptom intensity, and survival among adults with a diagnosis of advanced cancer. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, OpenGrey (a database for grey literature), and three clinical trial registers to October 2016. We checked reference lists, searched citations, and contacted study authors to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-randomised controlled trials (cRCTs) on professional palliative care services that provided or co-ordinated comprehensive care for adults at early advanced stages of cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures as expected by Cochrane. We assessed risk of bias, extracted data, and collected information on adverse events. For quantitative synthesis, we combined respective results on our primary outcomes of health-related quality of life, survival (death hazard ratio), depression, and symptom intensity across studies in meta-analyses using an inverse variance random-effects model. We expressed pooled effects as standardised mean differences (SMDs, or Hedges' adjusted g). We assessed certainty of evidence at the outcome level using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) and created a 'Summary of findings' table. MAIN RESULTS We included seven randomised and cluster-randomised controlled trials that together recruited 1614 participants. Four studies evaluated interventions delivered by specialised palliative care teams, and the remaining studies assessed models of co-ordinated care. Overall, risk of bias at the study level was mostly low, apart from possible selection bias in three studies and attrition bias in one study, along with insufficient information on blinding of participants and outcome assessment in six studies.Compared with usual/standard cancer care alone, early palliative care significantly improved health-related quality of life at a small effect size (SMD 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 0.38; participants analysed at post treatment = 1028; evidence of low certainty). As re-expressed in natural units (absolute change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) score), health-related quality of life scores increased on average by 4.59 (95% CI 2.55 to 6.46) points more among participants given early palliative care than among control participants. Data on survival, available from four studies enrolling a total of 800 participants, did not indicate differences in efficacy (death hazard ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.28; evidence of very low certainty). Levels of depressive symptoms among those receiving early palliative care did not differ significantly from levels among those receiving usual/standard cancer care (five studies; SMD -0.11, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.03; participants analysed at post treatment = 762; evidence of very low certainty). Results from seven studies that analysed 1054 participants post treatment suggest a small effect for significantly lower symptom intensity in early palliative care compared with the control condition (SMD -0.23, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.10; evidence of low certainty). The type of model used to provide early palliative care did not affect study results. One RCT reported potential adverse events of early palliative care, such as a higher percentage of participants with severe scores for pain and poor appetite; the remaining six studies did not report adverse events in study publications. For these six studies, principal investigators stated upon request that they had not observed any adverse events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This systematic review of a small number of trials indicates that early palliative care interventions may have more beneficial effects on quality of life and symptom intensity among patients with advanced cancer than among those given usual/standard cancer care alone. Although we found only small effect sizes, these may be clinically relevant at an advanced disease stage with limited prognosis, at which time further decline in quality of life is very common. At this point, effects on mortality and depression are uncertain. We have to interpret current results with caution owing to very low to low certainty of current evidence and between-study differences regarding participant populations, interventions, and methods. Additional research now under way will present a clearer picture of the effect and specific indication of early palliative care. Upcoming results from several ongoing studies (N = 20) and studies awaiting assessment (N = 10) may increase the certainty of study results and may lead to improved decision making. In perspective, early palliative care is a newly emerging field, and well-conducted studies are needed to explicitly describe the components of early palliative care and control treatments, after blinding of participants and outcome assessors, and to report on possible adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus W Haun
- Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, Heidelberg University HospitalDepartment of General Internal Medicine and PsychosomaticsHeidelbergGermanyD‐69120
| | - Stephanie Estel
- Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, Heidelberg University HospitalDepartment of General Internal Medicine and PsychosomaticsHeidelbergGermanyD‐69120
| | - Gerta Rücker
- Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center – University of FreiburgInstitute for Medical Biometry and StatisticsStefan‐Meier‐Str. 26FreiburgGermany79104
| | - Hans‐Christoph Friederich
- University Hospital DüsseldorfPsychosomatic Medicine and PsychotherapyMoorenstrasse 5DüsseldorfGermany40225
| | - Matthias Villalobos
- Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University HospitalDepartment of Thoracic OncologyHeidelbergGermanyD‐69120
| | - Michael Thomas
- Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University HospitalDepartment of Thoracic OncologyHeidelbergGermanyD‐69120
| | - Mechthild Hartmann
- Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, Heidelberg University HospitalDepartment of General Internal Medicine and PsychosomaticsHeidelbergGermanyD‐69120
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
|
48
|
Palliative Cancer Patients' Experiences of Participating in a Lifestyle Intervention Study While Receiving Chemotherapy. Cancer Nurs 2017; 38:E52-8. [PMID: 25730593 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lifestyle interventions have promise in terms of their potential health benefits and as an empowerment tool for cancer patients. Nevertheless, documentation of palliative cancer patients experiences of participating in lifestyle interventions remains poor. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to explore how palliative cancer patients experience participation in a feasibility study focusing on multiple lifestyle interventions (physical, nutritional, smoking cessation, and stress management) while receiving chemotherapy. METHODS This was a qualitative design with semistructured interviews of 9 palliative cancer patients 3 to 4 months after inclusion to the lifestyle intervention. Data were analyzed according to a qualitative content analysis within a hermeneutic approach. RESULTS Three main themes emerged: (1) adopting a healthier lifestyle, (2) taking on a more active role, and (3) boosting confidence. Participation made some participants feel guilty when they were not able to reach their own lifestyle goals. CONCLUSIONS Participation in lifestyle interventions is valued by palliative cancer patients and may strengthen their coping abilities. However, some of the participants also expressed feelings of guilt and inadequacy. Thus, the organizational aspects of interventions need to be considered carefully to minimize the possibility of causing increased strain on the participants, who already experience the burden of coping with their disease. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This study provides a unique insight into the palliative cancer patients experiences of participating in a trial focusing on multiple lifestyle interventions while receiving chemotherapy. The results may provide guidance for healthcare professionals in their efforts to help palliative cancer patients adopt a healthier lifestyle and to help patients increase their coping abilities.
Collapse
|
49
|
Hannon B, Swami N, Rodin G, Pope A, Zimmermann C. Experiences of patients and caregivers with early palliative care: A qualitative study. Palliat Med 2017; 31:72-81. [PMID: 27495814 DOI: 10.1177/0269216316649126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early palliative care improves quality of life and satisfaction with care and is increasingly endorsed for patients with advanced cancer. However, little is known about the experience of receiving early palliative care from a patient and caregiver perspective. AIM The aim of this qualitative study was to determine, from a participant perspective, the experience of receiving early palliative care and elements of that care. DESIGN Qualitative grounded theory study using individual interviews. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS The study took place at a comprehensive cancer centre. Patients ( n = 26) and caregivers ( n = 14) from the intervention arm of a cluster-randomised controlled trial of early palliative care versus standard oncology care participated in qualitative interviews. Participants were asked to comment on their quality of life, the quality of care provided over the intervention period and their experiences with the palliative care team. RESULTS Participants described feeling supported and guided in their illness experience and in their navigation of the healthcare system. Specific elements of early palliative care included prompt, personalised symptom management; holistic support for patients and caregivers; guidance in decision-making; and preparation for the future. Patients with symptoms particularly valued prompt attention to their physical concerns, while those without symptoms valued other elements of care. Although three patients were ambivalent about their current need for palliative care, no distress was reported as a consequence of the intervention. CONCLUSION The elements of care described by participants may be used to develop, support and refine models of early palliative care for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Breffni Hannon
- 1 Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,2 Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nadia Swami
- 2 Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gary Rodin
- 2 Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,3 Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,4 Campbell Family Cancer Research Institute, Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ashley Pope
- 2 Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Camilla Zimmermann
- 1 Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,2 Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,3 Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,4 Campbell Family Cancer Research Institute, Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Pérez-García E. Experiencias de pacientes con cáncer en estado paliativo respecto a su participación en un estudio de intervención sobre el estilo de vida mientras reciben quimioterapia. ENFERMERIA CLINICA 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2015.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|