1
|
Stenman T, Rönngren Y, Näppä U, Melin-Johansson C. "Unless someone sees and hears you, how do you know you exist?" Meanings of confidential conversations - a hermeneutic study of the experiences of patients with palliative care needs. BMC Nurs 2024; 23:336. [PMID: 38762496 PMCID: PMC11102614 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-01988-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with palliative care needs live with the reality of limited time due to illness or age, eliciting emotional and existential responses. A failure to address their existential needs can lead to significant suffering. A person-centred approach is paramount to effectively address these needs, emphasising holistic care and effective communication. Although existing communication models focus on predefined frameworks, a need exists to explore more spontaneous and confidential conversations between patients and nurses. Confidential conversations have the potential to build therapeutic relationships and provide vital emotional support, highlighting the need for further research and integration into palliative care practice. This study aims to more deeply understand the meaning of confidential conversations for patients with palliative care needs. METHODS In-depth interviews were conducted with 10 patients in the context of specialised palliative care. A hermeneutic analysis was used to gain a deeper understanding of the meanings of the conversations. RESULTS The patients had varying experiences and wishes concerning confidential conversations. They strived for self-determination in finding confidants, seeking trust and comfort in their interactions with nurses. Trust was crucial for creating a safe space where patients could express themselves authentically. In shared belonging, confidential conversations with a nurse provided validation and relief from life's challenges. Experiences of feeling unheard or rejected by a nurse could intensify loneliness, prompting individuals to withdraw and remain silent. Regardless of the motives behind their choices, it was crucial that patients felt respect and validation in their decisions. Their autonomy could thus be recognised, and they felt empowered to make decisions based on their unique preferences. CONCLUSIONS Patients value trust and understanding, particularly in confidential conversations with nurses, which offer solace, validation and empowerment. However, indifference can increase patients' suffering, fostering self-doubt and reluctance to engage further. To address this, health care can prioritise empathic communication skills, offer ongoing support to nurses, and promote continuity in care through investment in training and resources. Additionally, adopting a person-centred approach in confidential conversations is crucial, considering patients' varying preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tove Stenman
- Department of Health Sciences Nursing Science, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, S-831 25, Sweden.
| | - Ylva Rönngren
- Department of Health Sciences Nursing Science, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, S-831 25, Sweden
| | - Ulla Näppä
- Department of Health Sciences Nursing Science, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, S-831 25, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hughes NM, Noyes J, Stringer C, Pritchard T. "Before I came to the hospice, I had nobody". A qualitative exploration of what patients, family-caregivers, clinicians and volunteers valued most about home, day therapy or inpatient hospice services. Palliat Care Soc Pract 2024; 18:26323524241231820. [PMID: 38426037 PMCID: PMC10903190 DOI: 10.1177/26323524241231820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Globally, the demand for hospice care continues to grow resulting in substantial resource burden. Whilst some countries are able to rely on fixed government contributions, statutory funding for palliative care in the United Kingdom is unequally distributed. These unstable funding streams and increased demand means that hospices need to evidence their value. Objective This study explored the experiences of patients and family-caregivers to determine what they valued most from accessing hospice services in Wales. Methods In this large multi-site qualitative study, 94 semi-structured interviews and 2 focus groups were conducted with hospice patients (n = 45), family-caregivers (n = 18), hospice staff (n = 31) and volunteers (n = 10). The audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Framework analysis. Results Seven themes described patient and family-caregiver experiences and what they valued most: relationships with staff and volunteers, greater support networks which reduced social isolation and loneliness, provision of information and advice which improved patient autonomy, symptom management and subsequent reduction in psychological distress, improvements in patient functionality, mobility and overall physical health and respite relief which promoted improved relationships. Conclusion This is the largest study to explore what patients and family-caregivers value from hospice care. Findings indicate that hospice care provides a truly needs-led and strengths-based service to those who are nearing and at the end-of-life, which is highly valued by patients and family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jane Noyes
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2DG, UK
| | - Carys Stringer
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Namukwaya E, de Sousa AB, Lopes S, Touwen DP, van der Steen JT, Bélanger E, Brooks J, Yghemonos S, Sehmi K, Gomes B. EOLinPLACE: an international research project to reform the way dying places are classified and understood. Palliat Care Soc Pract 2024; 18:26323524231222498. [PMID: 38357678 PMCID: PMC10865961 DOI: 10.1177/26323524231222498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Whenever possible, a person should die where they feel it is the right place to be. There is substantial global variation in home death percentages but it is unclear whether these differences reflect preferences, and there are major limitations in how the place of death is classified and compared across countries. Objectives EOLinPLACE is an international interdisciplinary research project funded by the European Research Council aiming to create a solid base for a ground-breaking international classification tool that will enable the mapping of preferred and actual places towards death. Design Mixed-methods observational research. Methods and analysis We combine classic methods of developing health classifications with a bottom-up participatory research approach, working with international organizations representing patients and informal carers [International Alliance of Patients' Organizations (IAPO) and Eurocarers]. First, we will conduct an international comparative analysis of existing classification systems and routinely collected death certificate data on place of death. Secondly, we will conduct a mixed-methods study (ethnography followed by longitudinal quantitative study) in four countries (the Netherlands, Portugal, Uganda and the United States), to compare the preferences and experiences of patients with life-threatening conditions and their families. Thirdly, based on the generated evidence, we will build a contemporary classification of dying places; assess its content validity through focus groups with patients, carers and other stakeholders; and evaluate it in a psychometric study to examine construct validity, reliability, responsiveness, data quality and interpretability. Ethics Approved by the ethics committee of the University of Coimbra, Faculty of Medicine (CE-068-2022) and committees in each of the participating countries. Discussion The findings will provide a deeper understanding of the diversity in individual end-of-life pathways. They will enable key developments such as measurement of progress towards achievement of preferences when care can be planned. The project will open new directions in how to care for the dying. Trial registration Research Registry UIN 9213.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Namukwaya
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal Department of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Sílvia Lopes
- NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Dorothea Petra Touwen
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Law, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jenny Theodora van der Steen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Primary and Community Care and Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Emmanuelle Bélanger
- Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Joanna Brooks
- Population Health and Palliative Medicine, Master of Health Services Administration, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - Kawaldip Sehmi
- International Alliance of Patients’ Organizations, London, UK
| | - Barbara Gomes
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Pólo III, Sub-Unidade 3, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, Coimbra 3000-548, Portugal Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Hylckama Vlieg MAM, Pot IE, Visser HPJ, Jong MAC, van der Vorst MJDL, van Mastrigt BJ, Kiers JNA, van den Homberg PPPH, Thijs-Visser MF, Oomen-de Hoop E, van der Heide A, van der Kuy PHM, van der Rijt CCD, Geijteman ECT. Appropriate medication use in Dutch terminal care: study protocol of a multicentre stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial (the AMUSE study). BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:6. [PMID: 38172930 PMCID: PMC10762916 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01334-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polypharmacy is common among patients with a limited life expectancy, even shortly before death. This is partly inevitable, because these patients often have multiple symptoms which need to be alleviated. However, the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in these patients is also common. Although patients and relatives are often willing to deprescribe medication, physicians are sometimes reluctant due to the lack of evidence on appropriate medication management for patients in the last phase of life. The aim of the AMUSE study is to investigate whether the use of CDSS-OPTIMED, a software program that gives weekly personalized medication recommendations to attending physicians of patients with a limited life expectancy, improves patients' quality of life. METHODS A multicentre stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial will be conducted among patients with a life expectancy of three months or less. The stepped-wedge cluster design, where the clusters are the different study sites, involves sequential crossover of clusters from control to intervention until all clusters are exposed. In total, seven sites (4 hospitals, 2 general practices and 1 hospice from the Netherlands) will participate in this study. During the control period, patients will receive 'care as usual'. During the intervention period, CDSS-OPTIMED will be activated. CDSS-OPTIMED is a validated software program that analyses the use of medication based on a specific set of clinical rules for patients with a limited life expectancy. The software program will provide the attending physicians with weekly personalized medication recommendations. The primary outcome of this study is patients' quality of life two weeks after baseline assessment as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire, quality of life question. DISCUSSION This will be the first study investigating the effect of weekly personalized medication recommendations to attending physicians on the quality of life of patients with a limited life expectancy. We hypothesize that the CDSS-OPTIMED intervention could lead to improved quality of life in patients with a life expectancy of three months or less. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05351281, Registration Date: April 11, 2022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - I E Pot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H P J Visser
- Department of Internal Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuis, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - M A C Jong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuis, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - M J D L van der Vorst
- Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Supportive and Palliative Care, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - J N A Kiers
- Family Medicine Network, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - M F Thijs-Visser
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Oomen-de Hoop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A van der Heide
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P H M van der Kuy
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C C D van der Rijt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E C T Geijteman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dunleavy L, Preston N, Walshe C. Health care professional recruitment of patients and family carers to palliative care randomised controlled trials: A qualitative multiple case study. Palliat Med 2023; 37:1540-1553. [PMID: 37753865 PMCID: PMC10657513 DOI: 10.1177/02692163231197917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trial participant recruitment is an interactional process between health care professionals, patients and carers. Little is known about how clinicians carry out this role in palliative care trials and the reasons why they do or do not recruit participants. AIMS To explore how clinicians recruit to palliative care trials, why they choose to implement particular recruitment strategies, and the factors that influence their choices. DESIGN A qualitative multiple case study of three UK palliative care trials. Data collection included interviews and study documentation. Analysis involved developing and refining theoretical propositions, guided by the '6Ps' of the 'Social Marketing Mix Framework' as an a priori framework (identifying participants, product, price, place, promotion and working with partners). Framework Analysis guided within and then cross-case analysis. SETTINGS/PARTICIPANTS Study investigators and research staff (n = 3, 9, 7) from trial coordinating centres and recruitment sites (hospice and hospital). RESULTS Cross-case analysis suggests the 'Social Marketing Mix Framework' is useful for understanding recruitment processes but wider contextual issues need to be incorporated. These include the 'emotional labour' of diagnosing dying and communicating palliative and end-of-life care to potential participants and how the recruitment process is influenced by the power relationships and hierarchies that exist among professional groups. These factors can lead to and support paternalistic practices. CONCLUSIONS Those planning trials need to ensure that trial recruiters, depending on their experience and trial characteristics, have access to training and support to address the 'emotional labour' of recruitment. The type of training required requires further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lesley Dunleavy
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, England, UK
| | - Nancy Preston
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, England, UK
| | - Catherine Walshe
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee W, Sheehan C, Chye R, Chang S, Bayes A, Loo C, Draper B, Agar MR, Currow DC. Subcutaneous ketamine infusion in palliative patients for major depressive disorder (SKIPMDD)-Phase II single-arm open-label feasibility study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0290876. [PMID: 37963146 PMCID: PMC10645343 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ketamine at subanaesthetic dosages (≤0.5mg/kg) exhibits rapid onset (over hours to days) antidepressant effects against major depressive disorder in people who are otherwise well. However, its safety, tolerability and efficacy are not known for major depressive disorder in people with advanced life-limiting illnesses. OBJECTIVE To determine the feasibility, safety, tolerability, acceptability and any antidepressant signal/activity to justify and inform a fully powered study of subcutaneous ketamine infusions for major depressive disorder in the palliative setting. METHODS This was a single arm, open-label, phase II feasibility study (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry Number-ACTRN12618001586202). We recruited adults (≥ 18-years-old) with advanced life-limiting illnesses referred to four palliative care services in Sydney, Australia, diagnosed with major depressive disorder from any care setting. Participants received weekly subcutaneous ketamine infusion (0.1-0.4mg/kg) over two hours using individual dose-titration design. Outcomes assessed were feasibility, safety, tolerability and antidepressant activity. RESULTS Out of ninety-nine referrals, ten participants received ketamine and were analysed for responses. Accrual rate was 0.54 participants/month across sites with 50% of treated participants achieving ≥ 50% reduction in baseline Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, meeting feasibility criteria set a priori. There were no clinically relevant harms encountered. CONCLUSIONS A future definitive trial exploring the effectiveness of subcutaneous infusion of ketamine for major depressive disorder in the palliative care setting may be feasible by addressing identified study barriers. Individual dose-titration of subcutaneous ketamine infusions over two hours from 0.1mg/kg can be well-tolerated and appears to produce transient antidepressant signals over hours to days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Lee
- University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
- St. Vincent Health Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- HammondCare, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW, Australia
- University of Sydney, Northern Clinical School, St. Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Richard Chye
- University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
- St. Vincent Health Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, NSW, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Sungwon Chang
- University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Adam Bayes
- University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Blackdog Institute, Hospital Road, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Colleen Loo
- University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Blackdog Institute, Hospital Road, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Brian Draper
- University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Meera R. Agar
- University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kistemaker KRJ, de Graeff A, Crul M, de Klerk G, van de Ven PM, van der Meulen MP, van Zuylen L, Steegers MAH. Magnesium hydroxide versus macrogol/electrolytes in the prevention of opioid-induced constipation in incurable cancer patients: study protocol for an open-label, randomized controlled trial (the OMAMA study). BMC Palliat Care 2023; 22:22. [PMID: 36915062 PMCID: PMC10012532 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01143-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a common symptom in cancer patients treated with opioids with a prevalence of up to 59%. International guidelines recommend standard laxatives such as macrogol/electrolytes and magnesium hydroxide to prevent OIC, although evidence from randomized controlled trials is largely lacking. The aim of our study is to compare magnesium hydroxide with macrogol /electrolytes in the prevention of OIC in patients with incurable cancer and to compare side-effects, tolerability and cost-effectiveness. METHODS Our study is an open-label, randomized, multicenter study to examine if magnesium hydroxide is non-inferior to macrogol/electrolytes in the prevention of OIC. In total, 330 patients with incurable cancer, starting with opioids for pain management, will be randomized to treatment with either macrogol/electrolytes or magnesium hydroxide. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of patients with a score of < 30 on the Bowel Function Index (BFI), measured on day 14. The Rome IV criteria for constipation, side effects of and satisfaction with laxatives, pain scores, quality of life (using the EQ-5D-5L), daily use of laxatives and escape medication, and cost-effectiveness will also be assessed. DISCUSSION In this study we aim to examine if magnesium hydroxide is non-inferior to macrogol/electrolytes in the prevention of OIC. The outcome of our study will contribute to prevention of OIC and scientific evidence of guidelines on (opioid-induced) constipation. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05216328 and in the Dutch trial register: NTR80508. EudraCT number 2022-000408-36.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K R J Kistemaker
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anesthesiology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - A de Graeff
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Academic Hospice Demeter, De Bilt, The Netherlands
| | - M Crul
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G de Klerk
- Spaarne Gasthuis Location Hoofddorp, Medical Oncology, Spaarnepoort 1, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - P M van de Ven
- Department of Data Science and Biostatistics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M P van der Meulen
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Economics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - L van Zuylen
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M A H Steegers
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anesthesiology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Downey J, Fornasiero M, Cooper S, Bassett L, Doherty M, Dubeibe Fong A, Bradley N, Cornwall J. Combining realist evaluation and transformative evaluation to advance research in palliative care: The case of end of life companionship. Palliat Med 2023; 37:413-420. [PMID: 36732901 DOI: 10.1177/02692163231152524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative care requires innovative methods to understand what works, for whom, in what circumstances and why. Realist evaluation has become one prominent approach due to its preoccupation with building, and testing, causal theories to explain the influence of contextual factors on outcomes. Undertaking realist evaluation is not without challenges and may amplify issues of underrepresentation, disempower those working in palliative care, and produce results with poor ecological validity. Complementary approaches are needed which mitigate these challenges, whilst producing credible findings that advances knowledge. PURPOSE In this article it is outlined how realist evaluation provides a toolkit to advance research to explain, and empirically test, the complex contours of palliative care. Moreover, it is proposed that transformative evaluation can provide a catalyst to engage and empower those within palliative care, create the opportunity for care transformation, and produce more informed and authentic theories. DISCUSSION Contemporary issues in palliative care pertain to the complexity of palliative care, the insufficiency of experimental designs alone, and the challenges of achieving inclusive research participation. In this article it is argued that theory led, participatory, opportunistic and naturalistic approaches can provide an antidote to the issues in the literature. The combination also mitigates many methodological critiques of the individual approaches, by increasing the transformative potential of realist evaluation, and explanatory potential of transformative evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Downey
- Sport, Health, and Wellbeing, Plymouth Marjon University, UK
| | | | - Susan Cooper
- Institute of Education, Plymouth Marjon University, UK
| | - Lynn Bassett
- The Centre for the Art of Dying Well), St Mary's University, UK
| | | | | | - Natasha Bradley
- Centre for Health & Clinical Research, University of the West of England, UK
| | - Jon Cornwall
- Memberships Department, St Vincent De Paul, Englang and Wales
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Koffman J, Bajwah S, Davies JM, Hussain JA. Researching minoritised communities in palliative care: An agenda for change. Palliat Med 2022; 37:530-542. [PMID: 36271636 DOI: 10.1177/02692163221132091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative care access, experiences and outcomes of care disadvantage those from ethnically diverse, Indigenous, First nation and First people communities. Research into this field of inquiry raises unique theoretical, methodological, and moral issues. Without the critical reflection of methods of study and reporting of findings, researchers may inadvertently compromise their contribution to reducing injustices and perpetuating racism. AIM To examine key evidence of the place of minoritised communities in palliative care research to devise recommendations that improve the precision and rigour of research and reporting of findings. METHODS Narrative review of articles identified from PubMed, CINAHL and Google Scholar for 10 years augmented with supplementary searches. RESULTS We identified and appraised 109 relevant articles. Four main themes were identified (i) Lack of precision when working with a difference; (ii) 'black box epidemiology' and its presence in palliative care research; (iii) the inclusion of minoritised communities in palliative care research; and (iv) the potential to cause harm. All stymie opportunities to 'level up' health experiences and outcomes across the palliative care spectrum. CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings of this review palliative care research must reflect on and justify the classification of minoritised communities, explore and understand intersectionality, optimise data quality, decolonise research teams and methods, and focus on reducing inequities to level up end-of-life care experiences and outcomes. Palliative care research must be forthright in explicitly indentifying instances of structural and systemic racism in palliative care research and engaging in non-judgemental debate on changes required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Koffman
- University of Hull, Hull York Medical School, Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull, UK
| | - Sabrina Bajwah
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| | - Joanna M Davies
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| | - Jamilla Akhter Hussain
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Olsson Möller U, Beck I, Fürst CJ, H. Rasmussen B. A Reduced Deck of Conversation Cards of Wishes and Priorities of Patients in Palliative Care. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2022; 24:175-180. [PMID: 35121686 PMCID: PMC9052860 DOI: 10.1097/njh.0000000000000846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The individual wishes and priorities of patients with advanced disease are too often neglected, making a deck of cards with statements reflecting potential wishes and priorities a useful conversation tool. However, in the most ill patients, the card selection and sorting process may be too strenuous. The aims of this study were to explore the wishes and priorities of patients receiving palliative care and to reduce a deck of statement cards to be clinically useable even for the most ill patients. In interviews, participants selected their top 10 from a deck of 46 statement cards. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used. Thirty-nine patients from 5 specialized palliative care units in Sweden participated. Six participants died within 1 month of the interviews. "To be free from pain" was ranked as the highest priority by the majority, and "To have staff I feel comfortable with" was ranked highest by the 6 most ill participants. A deck of cards with the 20 statements most chosen by patients receiving palliative care was created. The cards cover physical, psychological, social, existential, and practical aspects and are helpful for formulating goals of care for patients and informing the development of a core outcome set for palliative care.
Collapse
|
11
|
DeCamp M, Alasmar A, Fischer S, Kutner JS. Meeting ethical challenges with authenticity when engaging patients and families in end-of-life and palliative care research: a qualitative study. BMC Palliat Care 2022; 21:74. [PMID: 35578262 PMCID: PMC9108140 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-022-00964-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delivering high quality, patient- and family-centered care depends upon high quality end-of-life and palliative care (EOLPC) research. Engaging patients and families as advisors, partners, or co-investigators throughout the research lifecycle is widely regarded as critical to ensuring high quality research. Engagement is not only an ethical obligation, it also raises ethical challenges of its own. We conducted a qualitative study to understand ethical challenges and potential solutions when engaging patients and families in EOLPC research. METHODS We recruited and interviewed 20 clinical investigators and 22 patients or family caregivers through the Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group (PCRC). Interview transcripts were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory methodology. Analysis sought to identify ethical challenges and potential solutions, as well as to synthesize findings into practical recommendations tailored to engaging patients and families in EOLPC research. RESULTS Our study identified 8 ethical challenges considered unique to the EOLPC research context and 11 potential solutions to these challenges. The most frequently described ethical challenges included the need to minimize burdens of engagement for patients and caregivers, challenges of dealing with death and illness, and paternalism or "gatekeeping" (i.e., withholding the opportunity to participate from patients or caregivers). Investigators and patients or family caregivers conceptualized ethics challenges differently; several issues appeared to fall outside a traditional research ethics paradigm and more into the ethics of relationships. We synthesized these findings into 4 practical recommendations hypothesized to support authentic engagement. CONCLUSIONS Engaging patients and families in EOLPC research can raise unique ethical challenges. These challenges can be overcome to empower participation, minimize the unique burdens of EOLPC, and promote diversity. Whereas traditional research ethics tend to emphasize protecting research participants who may be vulnerable, an ethics approach based on authentic engagement that explores what it means for investigators and patients or family caregivers to be in a relationship may be needed. Future research is needed to explore this approach and test these recommendations in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew DeCamp
- Center for Bioethics and Humanities and Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 13080 E. 19th Ave, Mail Stop B137, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| | - Ahmed Alasmar
- Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA
| | - Stacy Fischer
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA
| | - Jean S Kutner
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Seipp H, Haasenritter J, Hach M, Becker D, Schütze D, Engler J, Ploeger C, Bösner S, Kuss K. Integrating patient- and caregiver-reported outcome measures into the daily care routines of specialised outpatient palliative care: a qualitative study (ELSAH) on feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness. BMC Palliat Care 2022; 21:60. [PMID: 35501844 PMCID: PMC9063228 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-022-00944-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and caregiver-reported outcome measures can raise the patient centeredness of treatment and improve the quality of palliative care. Nevertheless, the everyday implementation of self-report in patients and caregivers is complex, and should be adapted for use in specific settings. We aimed to implement a set of outcome measures that included patient and caregiver self- and proxy-reported outcome measures in specialised outpatient palliative care (SOPC). In this study, we explore how the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale (IPOS), IPOS Views on Care (IPOS VoC) and the Short-form Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview (ZBI-7) can be feasibly, acceptably and appropriately implemented in the daily care routines of SOPC. METHODS Five SOPC teams were trained, and used the outcome measures in daily practice. Team members were mainly nurses and physicians. To investigate their feedback, we used a multi-method qualitative design consisting of focus groups with SOPC-team members (n = 14), field notes of meetings and conversations with the SOPC teams. In an iterative process, we analysed the findings using qualitative content analysis and refined use of the outcome measures. RESULTS We found that integrating patient and caregiver outcome measures into daily care routines in SOPC is feasible. To improve feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness, the resulting burden on patients and relatives should be kept to a minimum, the usefulness of the measures must be understood, they should be used considerately, and administration must be manageable. We removed ZBI-7 from the set of measures as a result of feedback on its content and wording. CONCLUSIONS SOPC-team members have reservations about the implementation of PROM in SOPC, but with appropriate adjustments, its application in daily care is feasible, accepted and perceived as appropriate. Previous to use, SOPC-team members should be trained in how to apply the measures, in the design of manageable processes that include integration into electronic documentation systems, and in ongoing evaluation and support. They should also be taught how useful the measures can be. TRIAL REGISTRATION May 19th, 2017, German Clinical Trials Register DRKS-ID: DRKS00012421 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Seipp
- Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Philipps-University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 4, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
| | - Jörg Haasenritter
- Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Philipps-University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 4, 35032, Marburg, Germany
| | - Michaela Hach
- Professional Association of Specialised Palliative Homecare in Hesse, Weihergasse 15, 65203, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Dorothée Becker
- Professional Association of Specialised Palliative Homecare in Hesse, Weihergasse 15, 65203, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Dania Schütze
- Institute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jennifer Engler
- Institute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Cornelia Ploeger
- Institute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Stefan Bösner
- Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Philipps-University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 4, 35032, Marburg, Germany
| | - Katrin Kuss
- Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Philipps-University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 4, 35032, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ullrich A, Hollburg W, Schulz H, Goldbach S, Rommel A, Müller M, Kirsch D, Kopplin-Foertsch K, Messerer J, König L, Schulz-Kindermann F, Bokemeyer C, Oechsle K. What are the personal last wishes of people with a life-limiting illness? Findings from a longitudinal observational study in specialist palliative care. Palliat Care 2022; 21:38. [PMID: 35317813 PMCID: PMC8939163 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-022-00928-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Personal last wishes of people facing a life-limiting illness may change closer to death and may vary across different forms of specialist palliative care (SPC). Aims To explore the presence and common themes of last wishes over time and according to the SPC settings (inpatient vs. home-based SPC), and to identify factors associated to having a last wish. Methods Patients enrolled in a longitudinal study completed questionnaires at the onset (baseline, t0) and within the first 6 weeks (follow-up, t1) of SPC including an open-ended question on their personal last wishes. Last wishes were content analyzed, and all wishes were coded for presence or absence of each of the identified themes. Changes of last wishes (t0-t1) were analyzed by a McNemar test. The chi-square-test was used to compare the two SPC settings. Predictors for the presence of a last wish were identified by logistic regression analysis. Results Three hundred sixty-one patients (mean age, 69.5 years; 49% female) answered at t0, and 130 at t1. In cross-sectional analyses, the presence of last wishes was higher at t0 (67%) than at t1 (59%). Comparisons revealed a higher presence of last wishes among inpatients than those in home-based SPC at t0 (78% vs. 62%; p = .002), but not at t1. Inpatient SPC (OR = 1.987, p = .011) and greater physical symptom burden over the past week (OR = 1.168, p < .001) predicted presence of a last wish at t0. Common themes of last wishes were Travel, Activities, Regaining health, Quality of life, Being with family and friends, Dying comfortably, Turn back time, and Taking care of final matters. The most frequent theme was Travel, at both t0 (31%) and t1 (39%). Themes did not differ between SPC settings, neither at t0 nor at t1. Longitudinal analyses (t0-t1) showed no significant intra-personal changes in the presence or any themes of last wishes over time. Conclusions In this late phase of their illness, many patients voiced last wishes. Our study suggests working with such wishes as a framework for person-centered care. Comparisons of SPC settings indicate that individualized approaches to patients’ last wishes, rather than setting-specific approaches, may be important.
Collapse
|
14
|
van der Steen JT, Bloomer MJ, Martins Pereira S. The importance of methodology to palliative care research: A new article type for Palliative Medicine. Palliat Med 2022; 36:4-6. [PMID: 34965752 PMCID: PMC8796148 DOI: 10.1177/02692163211069566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny T van der Steen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Melissa J Bloomer
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Sandra Martins Pereira
- CEGE: Research Center in Management and Economics, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal
- Instituto de Bioética, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Matsuda Y, Yamaguchi T, Matsumoto Y, Ishiki H, Usui Y, Kako J, Suzuki K, Matsunuma R, Mori M, Watanabe H, Zenda S. Research policy in supportive care and palliative care for cancer dyspnea. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021; 52:260-265. [PMID: 34894136 PMCID: PMC8894919 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyab193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dyspnea is a common and distressing symptom in patients with cancer. To improve its management, multicenter confirmatory studies are necessary. Research policy would be useful in conducting these studies. Here, we propose a new research policy for the management of dyspnea in patients with cancer. METHODS The first draft was developed by a policy working group of 11 specialists in the field of supportive care or palliative care for dyspnea. Then, a provisional draft was developed after review by a research support group (the Japanese Supportive, Palliative and Psychosocial Care Study Group) and five Japanese scientific societies (Japanese Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, Japanese Society of Palliative Medicine, Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine and Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology), and receipt of public comments. RESULTS The policy includes the following components of research policy on dyspnea: (i) definition of dyspnea, (ii) scale for assessment of dyspnea, (iii) reason for dyspnea or factors associated with dyspnea and (iv) treatment effectiveness outcomes/adverse events. The final policy (Ver1.0) was completed on 1 March 2021. CONCLUSIONS This policy could help researchers plan and conduct studies on the management of cancer dyspnea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshinobu Matsuda
- Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai, Japan
| | - Takashi Yamaguchi
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Konan Medical Center, Kobe, Japan.,Department of Palliative Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Yoshihisa Matsumoto
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Hiroto Ishiki
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuko Usui
- Division of Palliative Therapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Kako
- College of Nursing Art and Science, University of Hyogo, Akashi, Japan
| | - Kozue Suzuki
- Department of Palliative Care, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryo Matsunuma
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Konan Medical Center, Kobe, Japan.,Department of Palliative Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Masanori Mori
- Palliative and Supportive Care Division, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | | | - Sadamoto Zenda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Musonda KC, Nyashanu M, Mutale W, Sitali D, Mweemba O. Exploring The Challenges Faced by Informal Home Based Palliative (HBP) Caregivers in Ndola District, Zambia. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK IN END-OF-LIFE & PALLIATIVE CARE 2021; 17:349-363. [PMID: 34612170 DOI: 10.1080/15524256.2021.1976351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
In order to explore informal Home-based palliative caregivers' challenging experiences, this study gives an overview of the need of Home-based palliative caregivers in communities. Dialogs using In-depth interviews (IDI's) with twenty-five (25) purposively and conveniently selected respondents aged 18 years and over were conducted. They were not professional caregivers but volunteers from within the community attached to health facilities in Ndola. Discussions on global, Africa and Zambian' situations, and Ndola in particular were included. The findings, using thematic analysis, were lack of supporting resources, inadequate coordination, lack of training, undesirable working conditions and unreliable transport network. The study will facilitate formulation of guiding principles and policies for palliative care practices through recommendations based on results from this study to improve and sustain palliative care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Wilbroad Mutale
- School of Medicine Lusaka Zambia, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Doreen Sitali
- Lecturer in Public Health - Health Promotion and Education, University of Zambia, Ridgeway Campus, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Oliver Mweemba
- Department of Public health, Ridgeway Campus, University of Zambia, Zambia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cooper M, Pollard A, Pandey A, Bremner S, Macken L, Evans CJ, Austin M, Parnell N, Steer S, Thomson S, Hashim A, Mason L, Verma S. Palliative Long-Term Abdominal Drains Versus Large Volume Paracentesis in Refractory Ascites Due to Cirrhosis (REDUCe Study): Qualitative Outcomes. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 62:312-325.e2. [PMID: 33348031 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Revised: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Palliative care remains suboptimal in end-stage liver disease (ESLD). OBJECTIVES We report qualitative outcomes from the REDUCe study. We aimed to explore and contrast experiences/perceptions/care pathways of patients with refractory ascites due to ESLD randomized to either palliative long-term abdominal drains (LTADs) (allow home drainage) vs. large volume paracentesis (LVP) (hospital drainage). METHODS Concurrent embedded qualitative study in a 12-week feasibility randomized controlled trial. Telephone interviews were conducted, data being recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using applied thematic analysis, considered in terms of a pathway approach toward accessing health care. Quantitative outcomes were collected (integrated palliative outcome scale, short-form liver disease quality of life, EQ-5D-5 L, Zarit Burden Interview-12). RESULTS Fourteen patients (six allocated LTAD and eight LVP) and eight nurses participated in the qualitative study. The patient journey in the LVP group could be hindered by challenges along the entire care pathway, from recognizing the need for drainage to a lengthy wait in hospital for drainage and/or to be discharged. These issues also impacted upon caregivers. In contrast, LTADs appeared to transform this care pathway at all levels across the patient's journey by removing the need for hospital drainage. Additional benefits included personalized care, improved symptom control of ascites, being at home, and regular support from community nurses. Nurses also viewed the LTAD favorably, though expressed the need for additional support should this become standard of care. CONCLUSION Patients and nurses expressed acceptability of palliative LTAD in ESLD and preference for this approach in enabling care at home. Proceeding to a definitive trial is feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN30697116, date assigned: 07/10/2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Cooper
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Alex Pollard
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Aparajita Pandey
- Research & Development Department, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK
| | | | - Lucia Macken
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Catherine J Evans
- Kings College, Cicely Saunders Institute, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK; Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Mark Austin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Nick Parnell
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Shani Steer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Sam Thomson
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Western Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
| | - Ahmed Hashim
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Louise Mason
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Sumita Verma
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals Trust, Brighton, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Catania G, Zanini M, Signori A, Dal Molin A, Pilastri P, Bottino M, Cervetti C, Aleo G, Sasso L, Bagnasco A. Providing a nurse-led complex nursing INtervention FOcused on quality of life assessment on advanced cancer patients: The INFO-QoL pilot trial. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2021; 52:101961. [PMID: 33984605 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Unmet needs for advanced-disease cancer patients are fatigue, pain, and emotional support. Little information is available about the feasibility of interventions focused on patient-reported outcome measurement developed according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework in advanced-disease cancer patients. We aimed to pilot a nurse-led complex intervention focused on QoL assessment in advanced-disease cancer patients. METHODS The INFO-QoL study was based on an exploratory, nonequivalent comparison group, pre-test-post-test design. Study sites received either the INFO-QoL intervention or usual care. Adult advanced-disease cancer patients admitted to hospice inpatient units that gave their informed consent were included in the study. Subjects were 187 patients and their families and 19 healthcare professionals. We evaluated feasibility, acceptability, and patients' outcomes using the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale. RESULTS Nineteen healthcare professionals were included. The mean competence score increased significantly over time (p < 0.001) and the mean usefulness score was high 8.63 (±1.36). In the post-test phase, 54 patients were allocated to the experimental unit and 36 in the comparison unit. Compared to the comparison unit, in the experimental unit anxiety (R2 = 0.07; 95% CI = -0.06; 0.19), family anxiety (R2 = 0.22; 95% CI = -0.03; 0.41), depression (R2 = 0.31; 95% CI = -0.05; 0.56) and sharing feelings (R2 = 0.09; 95% CI = -0.05; 0.23), were improved between pre-test and post-test phase. CONCLUSIONS The INFO-QoL was feasible and potentially improved psychological outcomes. Despite the high attrition rate, the INFO-QoL improved the quality and safety culture for patients in palliative care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Catania
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Via Antonio Pastore, 1, 16132, Genoa, Italy; Senior Fellow of Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, USA.
| | - Milko Zanini
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Via Antonio Pastore, 1, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Alessio Signori
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Via Antonio Pastore, 1, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
| | - A Dal Molin
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Via Solaroli, 17, 28100, Novara, Italy.
| | - Paola Pilastri
- Hospice Unit "Maria Chighine", Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Marta Bottino
- Hospice Gigi Ghirotti, Corso Europa, 50, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
| | | | - Giuseppe Aleo
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Via Antonio Pastore, 1, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Loredana Sasso
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Via Antonio Pastore, 1, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Annamaria Bagnasco
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Via Antonio Pastore, 1, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
To avoid discomfort, health care professionals may hesitate to pursue conversations about end of life with patients. Certain tools have the potential to facilitate smoother conversations in this matter. The objective was to explore the experiences of patients in palliative care in using statement cards to talk about their wishes and priorities. Forty-six cards with statements of wishes and priorities were developed and tested for feasibility with 40 participants, who chose the 10 most important cards and shared their thoughts about the statements and conversation. Data from individual interviews and field notes were analyzed using content analysis. One category describes practical aspects of using the cards including the relevance of the content and the process of sorting the cards. The second category describes the significance of using the cards including becoming aware of what is important, sharing wishes and priorities, and reflecting on whether wishes and priorities change closer to death. The cards helped raise awareness and verbalize wishes and priorities. All statements were considered relevant. The conversations focused not only on death and dying, but also on challenges in the participants' current life situation. For the most ill and frail participants, the number of cards needs to be reduced.
Collapse
|
20
|
Affiliation(s)
- Geraldine Foley
- Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Oriani A, Fusi-Schmidhauser T, Guo P. Should end-of-life patients be enrolled as participants in clinical research? A best-fit framework synthesis. J Adv Nurs 2020; 77:1656-1666. [PMID: 33615566 DOI: 10.1111/jan.14712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM To identify and appraise evidence about ethical concerns regarding conducting medical research with end-of-life patients. DESIGN A best-fit framework synthesis of the literature regarding ethical issues in research involving adult patients at the end of life was conducted. DATA SOURCES Five databases were searched (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsychINFO) between January 2000-August 2019. REVIEW METHODS Data were synthesized and categorized according to the moral positions described by Foster. RESULTS In all, 18 papers that met the inclusion criteria were included in this review. These papers provided rich knowledge not only about various ethical objections to researching the end of life but also about the social, moral, and clinical requirements to perform rigorous studies on clinical interventions in this field. CONCLUSIONS Research on people at end of life is not an unsolvable ethical dilemma between providing the best possible care and enhancing new therapies. It is important to find a balance between the moral duties of providing care and achieving research outcomes that are rigorous and meaningful for service users. IMPACT Research ethics committees can be challenged by the evaluation of human research. This review provides up-to-date evidence on key challenges and ethical considerations about researching with end-of-life patients. SUMMARY STATEMENT This study is a review of relevant evidence and key ethical challenges and issues around palliative and end-of-life research. Our findings provided important recommendations for clinicians, research, and ethics committee members when evaluating clinical research with people at their end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Oriani
- ASST Valle Olona, Palliative Care and Hospice, Regione Lombardia, Italy
| | - Tanja Fusi-Schmidhauser
- Palliative and Supportive Care Clinic, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Ping Guo
- School of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingha, Birmingham, UK.,Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Smith N, Rajabali S, Hunter KF, Chambers T, Fasinger R, Wagg A. Bladder and bowel preferences of patients at the end of life: a scoping review. Int J Palliat Nurs 2020; 26:432-442. [PMID: 33331214 DOI: 10.12968/ijpn.2020.26.8.432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Following patient preferences at the end of life should improve outcomes of care, yet patient preferences regarding bladder and bowel care are not often accommodated, as they are not well known in the literature. AIMS This scoping review sought to identify bladder and bowel care preferences of patients at the end of life in published literature. METHODS Papers published in or after 1997 (in English) that focused on adult preferences for bladder and bowel care at the end of life were included. FINDINGS Scant literature exists on preferences for bladder and bowel care for adult patients at end of life. Further investigation is warranted to arrive at a better understanding of preferences regarding bladder and bowel symptom management. CONCLUSIONS Future research should explore if prioritising the symptoms caused by incontinence, among the many symptoms experienced at the end of life, could be achieved through careful questioning and development of a standardised tool focused on improving patient care and incorporating patient preferences for care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Saima Rajabali
- Clinical Trials Project Coordinator for Division of Geriatric Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta
| | - Kathleen F Hunter
- Professor, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta
| | - Thane Chambers
- Research Impact Librarian, Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta
| | - Robin Fasinger
- Professor, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta
| | - Adrian Wagg
- Professor/Director, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Evans CJ, Yorganci E, Lewis P, Koffman J, Stone K, Tunnard I, Wee B, Bernal W, Hotopf M, Higginson IJ. Processes of consent in research for adults with impaired mental capacity nearing the end of life: systematic review and transparent expert consultation (MORECare_Capacity statement). BMC Med 2020; 18:221. [PMID: 32693800 PMCID: PMC7374835 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01654-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Involving adults lacking capacity (ALC) in research on end of life care (EoLC) or serious illness is important, but often omitted. We aimed to develop evidence-based guidance on how best to include individuals with impaired capacity nearing the end of life in research, by identifying the challenges and solutions for processes of consent across the capacity spectrum. METHODS Methods Of Researching End of Life Care_Capacity (MORECare_C) furthers the MORECare statement on research evaluating EoLC. We used simultaneous methods of systematic review and transparent expert consultation (TEC). The systematic review involved four electronic databases searches. The eligibility criteria identified studies involving adults with serious illness and impaired capacity, and methods for recruitment in research, implementing the research methods, and exploring public attitudes. The TEC involved stakeholder consultation to discuss and generate recommendations, and a Delphi survey and an expert 'think-tank' to explore consensus. We narratively synthesised the literature mapping processes of consent with recruitment outcomes, solutions, and challenges. We explored recommendation consensus using descriptive statistics. Synthesis of all the findings informed the guidance statement. RESULTS Of the 5539 articles identified, 91 met eligibility. The studies encompassed people with dementia (27%) and in palliative care (18%). Seventy-five percent used observational designs. Studies on research methods (37 studies) focused on processes of proxy decision-making, advance consent, and deferred consent. Studies implementing research methods (30 studies) demonstrated the role of family members as both proxy decision-makers and supporting decision-making for the person with impaired capacity. The TEC involved 43 participants who generated 29 recommendations, with consensus that indicated. Key areas were the timeliness of the consent process and maximising an individual's decisional capacity. The think-tank (n = 19) refined equivocal recommendations including supporting proxy decision-makers, training practitioners, and incorporating legislative frameworks. CONCLUSIONS The MORECare_C statement details 20 solutions to recruit ALC nearing the EoL in research. The statement provides much needed guidance to enrol individuals with serious illness in research. Key is involving family members early and designing study procedures to accommodate variable and changeable levels of capacity. The statement demonstrates the ethical imperative and processes of recruiting adults across the capacity spectrum in varying populations and settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C J Evans
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
- Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton General Hospital, Brighton, UK.
| | - E Yorganci
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - P Lewis
- Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, The Dickson Poon School of Law, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J Koffman
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - K Stone
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - I Tunnard
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - B Wee
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - W Bernal
- King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Hotopf
- Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - I J Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Friedel M, Brichard B, Boonen S, Tonon C, De Terwangne B, Bellis D, Mevisse M, Fonteyne C, Jaspard M, Schruse M, Harding R, Downing J, Namisango E, Degryse JM, Aujoulat I. Face and Content Validity, Acceptability, and Feasibility of the Adapted Version of the Children's Palliative Outcome Scale: A Qualitative Pilot Study. J Palliat Med 2020; 24:181-188. [PMID: 32679002 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To assess the face and content validity, acceptability and feasibility of a French version of the Children's Palliative Outcome Scale (CPOS). Background: Instruments in French used to measure outcomes in pediatric palliative care are lacking. Methods: After forward-backward translation of the 12-item English CPOS to French, we conducted a qualitative pilot study. During semi structured interviews among children and parents, we used the CPOS, the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life interview guide (SEIQoL) and the Quality of Life in Life-threatening Illness-Family Carer questionnaire (QOLLTI-F), in addition to three expert meetings with PLTs. Results: Fourteen children and adolescents (8-18 years) with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions cared for at home, in hospital or in respite care services, 19 parents, and 9 members of 4 pediatric liaison teams (PLTs) providing palliative care in a Belgian francophone region were included in the study. No families refused to participate. All children with verbal capacities chose to be interviewed in the presence of their parents and a PLT member. The children valued being given the opportunity to share their experiences. New QOL dimensions pertaining to social, emotional, and administrative health-care related issues were added to the original version of the 12-item CPOS, leading to a 22-item CPOS-2. Discussion: The CPOS-2 was perceived as relevant and easy to use by the principal stakeholders. Our study paves the way for a large-scale field study assessing its psychometric characteristics and its implementation in routine clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Friedel
- Institute of Health and Society, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.,Haute Ecole Léonard de Vinci, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Bénédicte Brichard
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Cliniques universitaires st Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sabine Boonen
- Interface pédiatrique, Cliniques universitaires st Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Corinne Tonon
- Interface pédiatrique, Cliniques universitaires st Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Dominique Bellis
- Haute Ecole Léonard de Vinci, Brussels, Belgium.,Interface pédiatrique, Cliniques universitaires st Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Murielle Mevisse
- Interface pédiatrique, Cliniques universitaires st Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christine Fonteyne
- Globul'home, Hôpital universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Maud Jaspard
- Equipe liaison pédiatrique, Centre hospitalier chrétien, Clinique de l'Espérance, Liège, Belgium
| | - Marie Schruse
- Equipe liaison pédiatrique, Centre hospitalier chrétien, Clinique de l'Espérance, Liège, Belgium
| | - Richard Harding
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Kings College London, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Downing
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Kings College London, United Kingdom.,International Children's Palliative Care Network, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Eve Namisango
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Kings College London, United Kingdom.,African Palliative Care Association, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Jean-Marie Degryse
- Institute of Health and Society, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Aujoulat
- Institute of Health and Society, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Preston N, van Delden JJM, Ingravallo F, Hughes S, Hasselaar J, van der Heide A, Van den Block L, Dunleavy L, Groot M, Csikos A, Payne S. Ethical and research governance approval across Europe: Experiences from three European palliative care studies. Palliat Med 2020; 34:817-821. [PMID: 32186242 PMCID: PMC7521003 DOI: 10.1177/0269216320908774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research requires high-quality ethical and governance scrutiny and approval. However, when research is conducted across different countries, this can cause challenges due to the differing ethico-legal framework requirements of ethical boards. There is no specific guidance for research which does not involve non-medicinal products. AIM To describe and address differences in ethical and research governance procedures applied by research ethics committees for non-pharmaceutical palliative care studies including adult participants in collaborative European studies. DESIGN An online survey analysed using descriptive statistics. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Eighteen principal investigators in 11 countries conducting one of three European-funded studies. RESULTS There was variation in practice including whether ethical approval was required. The time to gain full approvals differed with the United Kingdom having governance procedures that took the longest time. Written consent was not required in all countries nor were data safety monitoring committees for trials. There were additional differences in relation to other data management issues. CONCLUSION Researchers need to take the differences in research approval procedures into account when planning studies. Future research is needed to establish European-wide recommendations for policy and practice that dovetail ethical procedures and enhance transnational research collaborations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Preston
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | | | | | - Sean Hughes
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | | | | | - Lieve Van den Block
- VUB-UGhent End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lesley Dunleavy
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | | | - Agnes Csikos
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Sheila Payne
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pereira SM, Hernández-Marrero P. Research ethics in palliative care: A hallmark in Palliative Medicine. Palliat Med 2020; 34:NP1-NP2. [PMID: 30688153 DOI: 10.1177/0269216319827178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Martins Pereira
- Instituto de Bioética, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal
- UNESCO Chair in Bioethics, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal
- Research Centre in Management and Economics-CEGE, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal
| | - Pablo Hernández-Marrero
- Instituto de Bioética, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal
- UNESCO Chair in Bioethics, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal
- Research Centre in Management and Economics-CEGE, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Haraldsdottir E, Lloyd A, Dewing J. Relational ethics in palliative care research: including a person-centred approach. Palliat Care Soc Pract 2019; 13:2632352419885384. [PMID: 32215372 PMCID: PMC7065500 DOI: 10.1177/2632352419885384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The traditional approach to research ethics is to ensure that all ethical issues
are adhered to through the scrutiny of research proposals by research ethics
committees, themselves sitting within national research governance frameworks.
The current approach implies that all potential ethical issues can be considered
and mitigated prior to the research. This article is a perspective piece whereby
we consider how this approach, on its own, is not enough to ensure ethical
practice. We draw attention to the limitations of current ethical procedures in
the inherent detachment between the researcher and research participants. We
argue that applying a person-centred approach to research ethics allows for
contextual and situational factors and places the relationship between research
participants and researcher as central.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jan Dewing
- School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret
University, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chambers E, Gardiner C, Thompson J, Seymour J. Patient and carer involvement in palliative care research: An integrative qualitative evidence synthesis review. Palliat Med 2019; 33:969-984. [PMID: 31250702 PMCID: PMC6691598 DOI: 10.1177/0269216319858247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient/carer involvement in palliative care research has been reported as complex, difficult and less advanced compared to other areas of health and social care research. There is seemingly limited evidence on impact and effectiveness. AIM To examine the evidence regarding patient/carer involvement in palliative care research and identify the facilitators, barriers, impacts and gaps in the evidence base. DESIGN Qualitative evidence synthesis using an integrative review approach and thematic analysis. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases were searched up to March 2018. Additional methods included searching websites and ongoing/unpublished studies, author searching and contacting experts. Eligibility criteria were based on the SPICE (Setting, Perspective, Intervention, Comparison, Evaluation) framework. Two quality assessments on methodology and involvement were undertaken. RESULTS A total of 93 records were included. Eight main themes were identified, mainly concerning facilitators and barriers to effective patient and carer involvement in palliative care research: definitions/roles, values/principles, organisations/culture, training/support, networking/groups, perspectives/diversity, relationships/communication and emotions/impact. Evidence on the impact of involvement was limited, but when carried out effectively, involvement brought positive benefits for all concerned, improving the relevance and quality of research. Evidence gaps were found in non-cancer populations and collaborative/user-led involvement. CONCLUSION Evidence identified suggests that involvement in palliative care research is challenging, but not dissimilar to that elsewhere. The facilitators and barriers identified relate mainly to the conduct of researchers at an individual level; in particular, there exists a reluctance among professionals to undertake involvement, and myths still perpetuate that patients/carers do not want to be involved. A developed infrastructure, more involvement-friendly organisational cultures and a strengthening of the evidence base would also be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Chambers
- The School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Clare Gardiner
- The School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jill Thompson
- The School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jane Seymour
- The School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
de Wolf-Linder S, Dawkins M, Wicks F, Pask S, Eagar K, Evans CJ, Higginson IJ, Murtagh FEM. Which outcome domains are important in palliative care and when? An international expert consensus workshop, using the nominal group technique. Palliat Med 2019; 33:1058-1068. [PMID: 31185812 PMCID: PMC6691595 DOI: 10.1177/0269216319854154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When capturing patient-level outcomes in palliative care, it is essential to identify which outcome domains are most important and focus efforts to capture these, in order to improve quality of care and minimise collection burden. AIM To determine which domains of palliative care are most important for measurement of outcomes, and the optimal time period over which these should be measured. DESIGN An international expert consensus workshop using nominal group technique. Data were analysed descriptively, and weighted according to ranking (1-5, lowest to highest priority) of domains. Participants' rationales for their choices were analysed thematically. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS In all, 33 clinicians and researchers working globally in palliative care outcome measurement participated. Two groups (n = 16; n = 17) answered one question each (either on domains or optimal timing). This workshop was conducted at the 9th World Research Congress of the European Association for Palliative Care in 2016. RESULTS Participants' years of experience in palliative care and in outcome measurement ranged from 10.9 to 14.7 years and 5.8 to 6.4 years, respectively. The mean scores (weighted by rank) for the top-ranked domains were 'overall wellbeing/quality of life' (2.75), 'pain' (2.06), and 'information needs/preferences' (2.06), respectively. The palliative measure 'Phase of Illness' was recommended as the preferred measure of time period over which the domains were measured. CONCLUSION The domains of 'overall wellbeing/quality of life', 'pain', and 'information needs/preferences' are recommended for regular measurement, assessed using 'Phase of Illness'. International adoption of these recommendations will help standardise approaches to improving the quality of palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne de Wolf-Linder
- School of Health Professions, Institute of Nursing, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Marsha Dawkins
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Francesca Wicks
- Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sophie Pask
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Kathy Eagar
- Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Catherine J Evans
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Fliss E M Murtagh
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Payne C, Brown MJ, Guerin S, Kernohan WG. EMTReK: An Evidence-based Model for the Transfer & Exchange of Research Knowledge-Five Case Studies in Palliative Care. SAGE Open Nurs 2019; 5:2377960819861854. [PMID: 33415246 PMCID: PMC7774354 DOI: 10.1177/2377960819861854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2018] [Revised: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Knowledge transfer is recognized as a vital stage in evidence-informed nursing with several models available to guide the process. Although the main components commonly involve identification of messages, stakeholders, processes and contexts, the underpinning models remain largely unrefined and untested; and they need to be evaluated. We set out to explore the use of our “Evidence-based Model for Transfer & Exchange of Research Knowledge” (EMTReK) within palliative care research. Between January 2016 and May 2017, data were collected from five case studies which used the EMTReK model as a means to transfer knowledge relating to palliative care research, undertaken in Ireland. A qualitative approach was taken with thematic analysis of case documentation, semistructured interviews, and field notes from the case studies. Qualitative analysis supports the core components of EMTReK as a model of knowledge transfer and exchange in palliative care. Results focused upon identification of messages to be transferred to defined stakeholders through interactive processes that take account of context. Case study findings show how the model was interpreted and operationalized by participants and demonstrate its impact on knowledge transfer and exchange. Eight themes were drawn from the data: Credibility of the Model, Model Accessibility, Applicability to Palliative Care, A Matter of Timing, Positive Role of Facilitation, Required Resources, Enhancing Research Quality, Limitations or Areas for Further Consideration. Study participants found EMTReK to be a useful guide when making knowledge transfer plans. Success depended upon adequate facilitation and guidance. Further exploration of the model's utility is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy Payne
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland
| | - Mary J. Brown
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland
| | - Suzanne Guerin
- Centre for Disability Studies, School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Ireland
| | - W. George Kernohan
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland
- W. George Kernohan, Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Antrim BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Maddocks M, Brighton LJ, Farquhar M, Booth S, Miller S, Klass L, Tunnard I, Yi D, Gao W, Bajwah S, Man WDC, Higginson IJ. Holistic services for people with advanced disease and chronic or refractory breathlessness: a mixed-methods evidence synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2019. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr07220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background
Breathlessness is a common and distressing symptom of many advanced diseases, affecting around 2 million people in the UK. Breathlessness increases with disease progression and often becomes chronic or refractory. Breathlessness-triggered services that integrate holistic assessment and specialist palliative care input as part of a multiprofessional approach have been developed for this group, offering tailored interventions to support self-management and reduce distress.
Objectives
The aim was to synthesise evidence on holistic breathlessness services for people with advanced disease and chronic or refractory breathlessness. The objectives were to describe the structure, organisation and delivery of services, determine clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability, identify predictors of treatment response, and elicit stakeholders’ evidence-based priorities for clinical practice, policy and research.
Design
The mixed-methods evidence synthesis comprised three components: (1) a systematic review to determine the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of holistic breathlessness services; (2) a secondary analysis of pooled individual data from three trials to determine predictors of clinical response; and (3) a transparent expert consultation (TEC), comprising a stakeholder workshop and an online consensus survey, to identify stakeholders’ priorities.
Results
Thirty-seven papers reporting on 18 holistic breathlessness services were included in the systematic review. Most studies enrolled people with thoracic cancer, were delivered over 4–6 weeks, and included breathing training, relaxation techniques and psychological support. Meta-analysis demonstrated significant reductions in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) distress due to breathlessness, significant reductions in the Hospital Anxiety and Depressions Scale (HADS) depression scores, and non-significant reductions in the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ) mastery and HADS anxiety, favouring the intervention. Recipients valued education, self-management interventions, and expertise of the staff in breathlessness and person-centred care. Evidence for cost-effectiveness was limited and inconclusive. The responder analysis (n = 259) revealed baseline CRQ mastery and NRS distress to be strong predictors of the response to breathlessness services assessed by these same measures, and no significant influence from baseline breathlessness intensity, patient diagnosis, lung function, health status, anxiety or depression. The TEC elicited 34 priorities from stakeholders. Seven priorities received high agreement and consensus, reflecting stakeholders’ (n = 74) views that services should be person-centred and multiprofessional, share their breathlessness management skills with others, and recognise the roles and support needs of informal carers.
Limitations
The evidence synthesis draws predominantly from UK services and may not be generalisable to other settings. Some meta-analyses were restricted by reporting biases and statistical heterogeneity.
Conclusions
Despite heterogeneity in composition and delivery, holistic breathlessness services are highly valued by recipients and can lead to significant improvements in the distress caused by breathlessness and depression. Outcomes of improved mastery and reduced distress caused by breathlessness are not influenced by patient diagnosis, lung function or health status. Stakeholders highlighted the need for improved access to person-centred, multiprofessional breathlessness services and support for informal carers.
Future work
Our research suggests that key therapeutic components of holistic breathlessness services be considered in clinical practice and models of delivery and educational strategies to address stakeholders’ priorities tested.
Study registration
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017057508.
Funding
The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery programme. Matthew Maddocks, Wei Gao and Irene J Higginson are supported by the NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) South London; Matthew Maddocks is supported by a NIHR Career Development Fellowship (CDF-2017-009), William D-C Man is supported by the NIHR CLAHRC Northwest London and Irene J Higginson holds a NIHR Emeritus Senior Investigator Award.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Maddocks
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Lisa Jane Brighton
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Morag Farquhar
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Sara Booth
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sophie Miller
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Lara Klass
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - India Tunnard
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Deokhee Yi
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Wei Gao
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sabrina Bajwah
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - William D-C Man
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Harefield Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Muscle Research Laboratory, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Brighton LJ, Tunnard I, Farquhar M, Booth S, Miller S, Yi D, Gao W, Bajwah S, Man WDC, Reilly CC, Ogden M, Bailey S, Ewart C, Higginson IJ, Maddocks M. Recommendations for services for people living with chronic breathlessness in advanced disease: Results of a transparent expert consultation. Chron Respir Dis 2019; 16:1479973118816448. [PMID: 30789022 PMCID: PMC6313262 DOI: 10.1177/1479973118816448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 10/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic breathlessness is highly distressing for people with advanced disease and their informal carers, yet health services for this group remain highly heterogeneous. We aimed to generate evidence-based stakeholder-endorsed recommendations for practice, policy and research concerning services for people with advanced disease and chronic breathlessness. We used transparent expert consultation, comprising modified nominal group technique during a stakeholder workshop, and an online consensus survey. Stakeholders, representing multiple specialities and professions, and patient/carers were invited to participate. Thirty-seven participants attended the stakeholder workshop and generated 34 separate recommendations, rated by 74 online survey respondents. Seven recommendations had strong agreement and high levels of consensus. Stakeholders agreed services should be person-centred and flexible, should cut across multiple disciplines and providers and should prioritize breathlessness management in its own right. They advocated for wide geographical coverage and access to expert care, supported through skills-sharing among professionals. They also recommended recognition of informal carers and their role by clinicians and policymakers. Overall, stakeholders' recommendations reflect the need for improved access to person-centred, multi-professional care and support for carers to provide or access breathlessness management interventions. Future research should test the optimal models of care and educational strategies to meet these recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Jane Brighton
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - India Tunnard
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Morag Farquhar
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich,
UK
| | - Sara Booth
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sophie Miller
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Deokhee Yi
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Wei Gao
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sabrina Bajwah
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - William DC Man
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London,
UK
- Harefield Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Muscle Research Laboratory,
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Charles C Reilly
- Department of Physiotherapy, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation
Trust, London, UK
| | - Margaret Ogden
- Cicely Saunders Institute Patient and Public Involvement Group,
King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sylvia Bailey
- Cicely Saunders Institute Patient and Public Involvement Group,
King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Colleen Ewart
- Cicely Saunders Institute Patient and Public Involvement Group,
King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Matthew Maddocks
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Diffin J, Ewing G, Harvey G, Grande G. Facilitating successful implementation of a person-centred intervention to support family carers within palliative care: a qualitative study of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) intervention. BMC Palliat Care 2018; 17:129. [PMID: 30572859 PMCID: PMC6302509 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-018-0382-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An understanding of how to implement person-centred interventions in palliative and end of life care is lacking, particularly for supporting family carers. To address this gap, we investigated components related to successful implementation of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) intervention, a person-centred process of carer assessment and support, using Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) as a theoretical framework. This study identifies how the PARIHS component of 'facilitation' and its interplay with the components of 'context' and 'evidence' affect implementation success. METHODS MRC Framework Phase IV study to evaluate implementation of the CSNAT intervention at scale, over six months, in 36 UK palliative care services. 38 practitioners acting as internal facilitators in 35/36 services were interviewed. Field notes were collected during teleconference support sessions between the external and internal facilitators. RESULTS Successful implementation was associated with internal facilitators' 'leverage' including their positioning within services, authority to change practice, and having a team of supportive co-facilitators. Effective facilitation processes included a collaborative approach, ongoing communication, and proactive problem solving to address implementation barriers. Facilitators needed to communicate the evidence and provide legitimacy for changing practice. Contextual constraints on facilitation included having to adjust recording systems to support implementation, organisational changes, a patient-focused culture and lack of managerial support. CONCLUSIONS The CSNAT intervention requires attention to both facilitation processes and conducive organisational structures for successful implementation. These findings are likely to be applicable to any person-centred process of assessment and support within palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Diffin
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Research Fellow, Queen's University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK. .,Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - G Ewing
- Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - G Harvey
- Health Management Group, Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Adelaide Nursing School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - G Grande
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
How can a measure improve assessment and management of symptoms and concerns for people with dementia in care homes? A mixed-methods feasibility and process evaluation of IPOS-Dem. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0200240. [PMID: 29995932 PMCID: PMC6040756 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2017] [Accepted: 06/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Assessment of people with dementia is challenging; with undetected and under treated symptoms and concerns resulting in avoidable distress, and few evidence-based interventions to support this. We aimed to understand the mechanisms of action of a measure to support comprehensive assessment of people with dementia in care homes; and its acceptability, feasibility, and implementation requirements. Methods A qualitative study with an embedded quantitative component in three residential care homes, underpinned by an initial theoretical model of mechanisms of action. The measure, the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale for Dementia (IPOS-Dem), was introduced into the care of residents with dementia for 12 weeks. Qualitative data comprised focus groups and semi-structured interviews with family, care home staff, general practitioners and district nurses; and non-participant observations. Quantitative data comprised IPOS-Dem data. Directed content analysis for qualitative data, and descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data. Findings Key mechanisms of action were: improved observation and awareness of residents, collaborative assessment, comprehensive ‘picture of the person’, systematic record keeping, improved review and monitoring, care planning and changes to care provision, and facilitated multi-agency communication. Potential benefit included improved symptom management, improved comprehensive care, and increased family empowerment and engagement. IPOS-Dem was found to be acceptable and feasible. It was perceived as quick and easy to use, with proportion of overall missing data decreasing from 2.1% to 1.1% from baseline to final time points. ‘Trust’ in the measure was important; and leadership essential to ensure integration into care processes. Conclusions In a population with complex care needs, with challenges to assessment and barriers to multi-agency working, a measure introduced into routine care is feasible and acceptable, and supports assessment and management of symptoms and concerns. A refined theoretical model demonstrating the likely mechanisms of action was developed. Further evaluation is required to test its effectiveness.
Collapse
|
35
|
Bloomer MJ, Hutchinson AM, Brooks L, Botti M. Dying persons' perspectives on, or experiences of, participating in research: An integrative review. Palliat Med 2018; 32:851-860. [PMID: 29235418 PMCID: PMC6144348 DOI: 10.1177/0269216317744503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conducting research with dying persons can be controversial and challenging due to concerns for the vulnerability of the dying and the potential burden on those who participate with the possibility of little benefit. AIM To conduct an integrative review to answer the question 'What are dying persons' perspectives or experiences of participating in research? DESIGN A structured integrative review of the empirical literature was undertaken. DATA SOURCES Cumulative Index Nursing and Allied Health Complete, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Informit and Embase databases were searched for the empirical literature published since inception of the databases until February 2017. RESULTS From 2369 references, 10 papers were included in the review. Six were qualitative studies, and the remaining four were quantitative. Analysis revealed four themes: value of research, desire to help, expression of self and participation preferences. Dying persons value research participation, regarding their contribution as important, particularly if it provides an opportunity to help others. Participants perceived that the potential benefits of research can and should be measured in ways other than life prolongation or cure. Willingness to participate is influenced by study type or feature and degree of inconvenience. CONCLUSION Understanding dying persons' perspectives of research participation will enhance future care of dying persons. It is essential that researchers do not exclude dying persons from clinically relevant research due to their prognosis, fear or burden or perceived vulnerability. The dying should be afforded the opportunity to participate in research with the knowledge it may contribute to science and understanding and improve the care and treatment of others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa J Bloomer
- School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Deakin University, Geelong Waterfront Campus, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Alison M Hutchinson
- School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Deakin University, Geelong Waterfront Campus, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Laura Brooks
- School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Deakin University, Geelong Waterfront Campus, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Mari Botti
- School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Deakin University, Geelong Waterfront Campus, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
|
37
|
Higginson IJ, Daveson BA, Morrison RS, Yi D, Meier D, Smith M, Ryan K, McQuillan R, Johnston BM, Normand C. Social and clinical determinants of preferences and their achievement at the end of life: prospective cohort study of older adults receiving palliative care in three countries. BMC Geriatr 2017; 17:271. [PMID: 29169346 PMCID: PMC5701500 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-017-0648-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Achieving choice is proposed as a quality marker. But little is known about what influences preferences especially among older adults. We aimed to determine and compare, across three countries, factors associated with preferences for place of death and treatment, and actual site of death. Methods We recruited adults aged ≥65-years from hospital-based multiprofessional palliative care services in London, Dublin, New York, and followed them for >17 months. All services offered consultation on hospital wards, support for existing clinical teams, outpatient services and received funding from their National Health Service and/or relevant Insurance reimbursements. The New York service additionally had 10 inpatient beds. All worked with and referred patients to local hospices. Face-to-face interviews recorded most and least preferred place of death, treatment goal priorities, demographic and clinical information using validated questionnaires. Multivariable and multilevel analyses assessed associated factors. Results One hundred and thirty eight older adults (64 London, 59 Dublin, 15 New York) were recruited, 110 died during follow-up. Home was the most preferred place of death (77/138, 56%) followed by inpatient palliative care/hospice units (22%). Hospital was least preferred (35/138, 25%), followed by nursing home (20%) and home (16%); hospice/palliative care unit was rarely least preferred (4%). Most respondents prioritised improving quality of life, either alone (54%), or equal with life extension (39%); few (3%) chose only life extension. There were no significant differences between countries. Main associates with home preference were: cancer diagnosis (OR 3.72, 95% CI 1.40–9.90) and living with someone (OR 2.19, 1.33–3.62). Adults with non-cancer diagnoses were more likely to prefer palliative care units (OR 2.39, 1.14–5.03). Conversely, functional independence (OR 1.05, 1.04–1.06) and valuing quality of life (OR 3.11, 2.89–3.36) were associated with dying at home. There was a mismatch between preferences and achievements – of 85 people who preferred home or a palliative care unit, 19 (25%) achieved their first preference. Conclusion Although home is the most common first preference, it is polarising and for 16% it is the least preferred. Inpatient palliative care unit emerges as the second most preferred place, is rarely least preferred, and yet was often not achieved for those who wanted to die there. Factors affecting stated preferences and met preferences differ. Available services, notably community support and palliative care units, require expansion. Contrasting actual place of death with capacity for meeting patient and family needs may be a better quality indicator than simply ‘achieved preferences’. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-017-0648-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene J Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute Of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, and King's College Hospital, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
| | - Barbara A Daveson
- Cicely Saunders Institute Of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, and King's College Hospital, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - R Sean Morrison
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029-6574, USA
| | - Deokhee Yi
- Cicely Saunders Institute Of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, and King's College Hospital, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
| | - Diane Meier
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029-6574, USA
| | - Melinda Smith
- Cicely Saunders Institute Of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, and King's College Hospital, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - Karen Ryan
- Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland
| | | | - Bridget M Johnston
- The Centre of Health Policy and Management, Trinity College Dublin, Room 0.21, 3-4 Foster Place, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Charles Normand
- The Centre of Health Policy and Management, Trinity College Dublin, Room 0.21, 3-4 Foster Place, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Swarbrick CM, Sampson E, Keady J. Notes from the hospital bedside: reflections on researcher roles and responsibilities at the end of life in dementia. QUALITY IN AGEING AND OLDER ADULTS 2017. [DOI: 10.1108/qaoa-09-2016-0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to explore some of the ethical and practical dilemmas faced by an experienced researcher in undertaking research with a person with dementia (whom we have called Amy). Amy died shortly after a period of observation had ended and the family subsequently consented to the data being shared.
Design/methodology/approach
This individual case study presentation was nested within a larger study conducted in England and Scotland between 2013 and 2014. The overall aim of the main study was to investigate how healthcare professionals and informal carers recognised, assessed and managed pain in patients living with dementia in a range of acute settings.
Findings
The presented case study of Amy raises three critical reflection points: (i) Researcher providing care, i.e. the place and positioning of compassion in research observation; (ii) What do the stories mean? i.e. the reframing of Amy's words, gestures and behaviours as (end of) life review, potentially highlights unresolved personal conflicts and reflections on loss; and (iii) Communication is embodied, i.e. the need to move beyond the recording of words to represent lived experience and into more multi-sensory methods of data capture.
Originality/value
Researcher guidance and training about end of life observations in dementia is presently absent in the literature and this case study stimulates debate in a much overlooked area, including the role of ethics committees.
Collapse
|
39
|
Steinhauser KE, Fitchett G, Handzo GF, Johnson KS, Koenig HG, Pargament KI, Puchalski CM, Sinclair S, Taylor EJ, Balboni TA. State of the Science of Spirituality and Palliative Care Research Part I: Definitions, Measurement, and Outcomes. J Pain Symptom Manage 2017; 54:428-440. [PMID: 28733252 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/20/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The State of the Science in Spirituality and Palliative Care was convened to address the current landscape of research at the intersection of spirituality and palliative care and to identify critical next steps to advance this field of inquiry. Part I of the SOS-SPC two-part series focuses on questions of 1) What is spirituality? 2) What methodological and measurement issues are most salient for research in palliative care? And 3) What is the evidence relating spirituality and health outcomes? After describing current evidence we make recommendations for future research in each of the three areas of focus. Results show wide variance in the ways spirituality is operationalized and the need for definition and conceptual clarity in research in spirituality. Furthermore, the field would benefit from hypothesis-driven outcomes research based on a priori specification of the spiritual dimensions under investigation and their longitudinal relationship with key palliative outcomes, the use of validated measures of predictors and outcomes, and rigorous assessment of potential confounding variables. Finally, results highlight the need for research in more diverse populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen E Steinhauser
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Center of Innovation in Health Services Research, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - George Fitchett
- Department of Religion, Health and Human Values, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Kimberly S Johnson
- Division of Geriatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Harold G Koenig
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Psychiatry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Center for Spirituality, Theology and Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Kenneth I Pargament
- Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio
| | - Christina M Puchalski
- George Washington Institute for Spirituality and Health, George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, D.C
| | | | | | - Tracy A Balboni
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hudson BF, Oostendorp LJM, Candy B, Vickerstaff V, Jones L, Lakhanpaul M, Bluebond-Langner M, Stone P. The under reporting of recruitment strategies in research with children with life-threatening illnesses: A systematic review. Palliat Med 2017; 31:419-436. [PMID: 27609607 PMCID: PMC5405809 DOI: 10.1177/0269216316663856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Researchers report difficulties in conducting research with children and young people with life-limiting conditions or life-threatening illnesses and their families. Recruitment is challenged by barriers including ethical, logistical and clinical considerations. AIM To explore how children and young people (aged 0-25 years) with life-limiting conditions or life-threatening illnesses and their families were identified, invited and consented to research published in the last 5 years. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Sciences Citation Index and SCOPUS were searched for original English language research published between 2009 and 2014, recruiting children and young people with life-limiting conditions or life-threatening illness and their families. RESULTS A total of 215 studies - 152 qualitative, 54 quantitative and 9 mixed methods - were included. Limited recruitment information but a range of strategies and difficulties were provided. The proportion of eligible participants from those screened could not be calculated in 80% of studies. Recruitment rates could not be calculated in 77%. A total of 31% of studies recruited less than 50% of eligible participants. Reasons given for non-invitation included missing clinical or contact data, or clinician judgements of participant unsuitability. Reasons for non-participation included lack of interest and participants' perceptions of potential burdens. CONCLUSION All stages of recruitment were under reported. Transparency in reporting of participant identification, invitation and consent is needed to enable researchers to understand research implications, bias risk and to whom results apply. Research is needed to explore why consenting participants decide to take part or not and their experiences of research recruitment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Briony F Hudson
- Louis Dundas Centre for Children’s Palliative Care, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, UCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK
| | - Linda JM Oostendorp
- Louis Dundas Centre for Children’s Palliative Care, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Bridget Candy
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, UCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK
| | - Victoria Vickerstaff
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, UCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK
| | - Louise Jones
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, UCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK
| | - Monica Lakhanpaul
- Population, Policy and Practice Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Myra Bluebond-Langner
- Louis Dundas Centre for Children’s Palliative Care, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Paddy Stone
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, UCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Aoun S, Slatyer S, Deas K, Nekolaichuk C. Family Caregiver Participation in Palliative Care Research: Challenging the Myth. J Pain Symptom Manage 2017; 53:851-861. [PMID: 28062338 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2016] [Revised: 11/10/2016] [Accepted: 12/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Despite international guidelines emphasizing consumer-directed care and autonomous decisions in research participation, there is a common myth that research can be an additional and unwanted burden on patients and their family members. OBJECTIVES To examine the experiences and impact of research involvement on family caregivers (FCs) of terminally ill people, focusing within home-based palliative care. METHODS Three hundred sixteen of 322 participants (98.1%), who completed an FC support intervention through a stepped-wedge cluster trial (Australia, 2012-2015), participated in a postintervention telephone interview on their study experiences, which included quantitative and qualitative questions. RESULTS Ninety-seven percent of both the control (n = 89) and intervention (n = 227) groups perceived positive aspects, whereas almost all did not report any negative aspects of being involved in this research; the majority rated their involvement as very/extremely beneficial (control 77%; intervention 83%). The qualitative analysis generated three major themes: "intrapersonal-inward directed"; "connection with others-outward directed"; and "interpersonal-participant-researcher relationship." CONCLUSIONS This study provided quantitative and qualitative evidence challenging the myth. In contrast to health professional concerns, FCs appreciated the opportunity to participate and benefited from their involvement in research. Research protocols need to be specifically tailored to the needs of family caregivers and include debriefing opportunities for all participants at the end of intervention studies, regardless of which group they have been assigned. Strategies that facilitate health professionals' understanding of the research and risk benefits may help reduce gatekeeping and improve the validity of research findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samar Aoun
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - Susan Slatyer
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Centre for Nursing Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kathleen Deas
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Cheryl Nekolaichuk
- Division of Palliative Care Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Borgstrom
- School of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
| | - Julie Ellis
- Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Zhang X, Wu Z, Zhao H, Li C, Wu J, Dai G. Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Palliative and Supportive Care for Cancer. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2016; 34:53-56. [PMID: 26353985 DOI: 10.1177/1049909115605058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
To assess the conclusiveness of the Cochrane reviews (CRs) in the field of palliative and supportive care for cancer. We searched the CRs on Pain, Palliative, and Supportive Care Group available in the Cochrane library on February 01, 2015, to analyze whether a CR could reach a clinical decision. Each CR was analyzed for conclusiveness, number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolled, number of participants enrolled, the need for further studies, and the reasons. Only 45% (30 of 66) of the CRs reached definitive clinical recommendations. The number of RCTs and participants enrolled in conclusive CRs were significantly higher than those in inconclusive CRs. Nearly all CRs recognized the need for further studies. The conclusiveness was not affected by the year of publication. We concluded that a large number of clinical trials were not carried out well in the palliative and supportive oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xia Zhang
- 1 Department of Oncology II, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiyong Wu
- 1 Department of Oncology II, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Haiqing Zhao
- 1 Department of Oncology II, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chenxi Li
- 1 Department of Oncology II, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jianyu Wu
- 1 Department of Oncology II, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Guanghai Dai
- 1 Department of Oncology II, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
L Campbell C, Bailey C, Armour K, Perry R, Orlando R, Kinghorn P, Jones L, Coast J. A team approach to recruitment in hospice research: engaging patients, close people and health professionals. Int J Palliat Nurs 2016; 22:324-32. [DOI: 10.12968/ijpn.2016.22.7.324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy L Campbell
- Associate Professor, University of Virginia, School of Nursing Charlottesville, VA, US
| | - Cara Bailey
- Senior Lecturer in Nursing, School of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, West Midlands, UK
| | | | - Rachel Perry
- Research Nurse, Marie Curie Hospice, Solihull, West Midlands, UK
| | - Rosanna Orlando
- Health Economist Research Fellow, CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, UK
| | - Philip Kinghorn
- Research Fellow, Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Louise Jones
- Clinical Senior Lecturer, University College London, UK
| | - Joanna Coast
- Professor, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Higginson IJ, Rumble C, Shipman C, Koffman J, Sleeman KE, Morgan M, Hopkins P, Noble J, Bernal W, Leonard S, Dampier O, Prentice W, Burman R, Costantini M. The value of uncertainty in critical illness? An ethnographic study of patterns and conflicts in care and decision-making trajectories. BMC Anesthesiol 2016; 16:11. [PMID: 26860461 PMCID: PMC4746769 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-016-0177-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2015] [Accepted: 02/01/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With increasingly intensive treatments and population ageing, more people face complex treatment and care decisions. We explored patterns of the decision-making processes during critical care, and sources of conflict and resolution. METHODS Ethnographic study in two Intensive Care Units (ICUs) in an inner city hospital comprising: non-participant observation of general care and decisions, followed by case studies where treatment limitation decisions, comfort care and/or end of life discussions were occurring. These involved: semi-structured interviews with consenting families, where possible, patients; direct observations of care; and review of medical records. RESULTS Initial non-participant observation included daytime, evenings, nights and weekends. The cases were 16 patients with varied diagnoses, aged 19-87 years; 19 family members were interviewed, aged 30-73 years. Cases were observed for <1 to 156 days (median 22), depending on length of ICU admission. Decisions were made serially over the whole trajectory, usually several days or weeks. We identified four trajectories with distinct patterns: curative care from admission; oscillating curative and comfort care; shift to comfort care; comfort care from admission. Some families considered decision-making a negative concept and preferred uncertainty. Conflict occurred most commonly in the trajectories with oscillating curative and comfort care. Conflict also occurred inside clinical teams. Families were most often involved in decision-making regarding care outcomes and seemed to find it easier when patients switched definitively from curative to comfort care. We found eight categories of decision-making; three related to the care outcomes (aim, place, response to needs) and five to the care processes (resuscitation, decision support, medications/fluids, monitoring/interventions, other specialty involvement). CONCLUSIONS Decision-making in critical illness involves a web of discussions regarding the potential outcomes and processes of care, across the whole disease trajectory. When measures oscillate between curative and comfort there is greatest conflict. This suggests a need to support early communication, especially around values and preferred care outcomes, from which other decisions follow, including DNAR. Offering further support, possibly with expert palliative care, communication, and discussion of 'trial of treatment' may be beneficial at this time, rather than waiting until the 'end of life'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I J Higginson
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
| | - C Rumble
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - C Shipman
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - J Koffman
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - K E Sleeman
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - M Morgan
- King's College London, Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, Capital House, London Bridge, London, UK
| | - P Hopkins
- King's College Hospital, King's Critical Care, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - J Noble
- King's College Hospital, King's Critical Care, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - W Bernal
- King's College Hospital, King's Critical Care, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - S Leonard
- King's College Hospital, King's Critical Care, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - O Dampier
- King's College Hospital, King's Critical Care, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - W Prentice
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - R Burman
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - M Costantini
- Palliative Care Unit, IRCCS Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Johnston B, Pringle J, Buchanan D. Operationalizing reflexivity to improve the rigor of palliative care research. Appl Nurs Res 2015; 31:e1-5. [PMID: 26620579 DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2015.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2015] [Accepted: 10/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Reflective practice involves deliberate consideration of actions, attitudes and behaviors. Reflexivity in research is considered important for ensuring that research is ethically and rigorously conducted. This paper details the challenges of conducting research involving patients with palliative care needs within the acute hospital environment. It discusses the contribution of reflexivity to a pilot study using the Patient Dignity Question (PDQ) "What do I need to know about you as a person to take the best care of you that I can?" as a brief intervention to foster a more person-centered climate. Challenges that emerged are discussed from the perspectives of the researchers, the participants, and the setting; they relate to: timing and recruitment, the nature of palliative care illness, attitudes to research, and the research environment. Awareness of such issues can prompt researchers to devise appropriate strategies and approaches that may inform and assist the rigor and conduct of future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget Johnston
- Sue Ryder Care Centre for the Study of Supportive, Palliative and End of Life Care, The University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2HA.
| | - Jan Pringle
- University of Dundee and University of Nottingham, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Airlie Place, Dundee
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Daveson BA, de Wolf-Linder S, Witt J, Newson K, Morris C, Higginson IJ, Evans CJ. Results of a transparent expert consultation on patient and public involvement in palliative care research. Palliat Med 2015; 29:939-49. [PMID: 25931336 PMCID: PMC4668913 DOI: 10.1177/0269216315584875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Support and evidence for patient, unpaid caregiver and public involvement in research (user involvement) are growing. Consensus on how best to involve users in palliative care research is lacking. AIM To determine an optimal user-involvement model for palliative care research. DESIGN We hosted a consultation workshop using expert presentations, discussion and nominal group technique to generate recommendations and consensus on agreement of importance. A total of 35 users and 32 researchers were approached to attend the workshop, which included break-out groups and a ranking exercise. Descriptive statistical analysis to establish consensus and highlight divergence was applied. Qualitative analysis of discussions was completed to aid interpretation of findings. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Participants involved in palliative care research were invited to a global research institute, UK. RESULTS A total of 12 users and 5 researchers participated. Users wanted their involvement to be more visible, including during dissemination, with a greater emphasis on the difference their involvement makes. Researchers wanted to improve productivity, relevance and quality through involvement. Users and researchers agreed that an optimal model should consist of (a) early involvement to ensure meaningful involvement and impact and (b) diverse virtual and face-to-face involvement methods to ensure flexibility. CONCLUSION For involvement in palliative care research to succeed, early and flexible involvement is required. Researchers should advertise opportunities for involvement and promote impact of involvement via dissemination plans. Users should prioritise adding value to research through enhancing productivity, quality and relevance. More research is needed not only to inform implementation and ensure effectiveness but also to investigate the cost-effectiveness of involvement in palliative care research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara A Daveson
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation; Cicely Saunders Institute; King's College London, London, UK
| | - Susanne de Wolf-Linder
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation; Cicely Saunders Institute; King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jana Witt
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation; Cicely Saunders Institute; King's College London, London, UK
| | - Kirstie Newson
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation; Cicely Saunders Institute; King's College London, London, UK Psychosocial Oncology and Consumer Liaison Groups, UK
| | - Carolyn Morris
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation; Cicely Saunders Institute; King's College London, London, UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation; Cicely Saunders Institute; King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Stiel S, Heckel M, Bussmann S, Weber M, Ostgathe C. End-of-life care research with bereaved informal caregivers--analysis of recruitment strategy and participation rate from a multi-centre validation study. BMC Palliat Care 2015; 14:21. [PMID: 25934560 PMCID: PMC4422133 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-015-0020-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2014] [Accepted: 04/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background One essential element of research is the successful recruitment of participants. However, concerns are obvious regarding the ethical implications of involving terminally ill and even dying patients and their informal caregivers as research participants. This study aims to illustrate central issues encountered when recruiting bereaved informal caregivers for a questionnaire validation study on the quality of dying and death. Methods Between July 2012 and November 2013, informal caregivers of deceased inpatients who were treated at two palliative care units in Germany were invited to participate in a questionnaire validation study. Informal caregivers were called by a trained researcher at the end of the fourth week after death at the earliest and by the sixteenth week after death at the latest and asked to participate in a face-to-face interview in their private home. Results The overall participation rate of all eligible informal caregivers was 76.1% (226/297). The mean burden score was 2.5 (NRS from 0 = no burden to 10 = maximum burden; n = 221). Higher burden scores (≥4) were associated with emotional and burdensome memories (n = 34) being invoked throughout the interview. Severe or maximum burden scores (≥7) were stated by 13.2% of participants. The average time between the associated patient’s death and the informal caregiver’s interview was 57.3 days (range 26–176 days, median 49.5 days). 5.3% of all 226 interviews were not completed due to different reasons. Participants’ comments on the way in which the study was conducted gave insight into their motivation to take part in the study and their evaluation of the interview situation. Conclusions The recruitment strategy can be recommended to other researchers developing research with bereaved carers. The burden caused by study participation was acceptable to the researchers carrying out this research, although a small group of participants experienced high levels of burden which should be anticipated and appropriate support services offered. Family caregivers are willing to support end-of-life care research, have different motivations for participation and even reported benefits from participation. Nevertheless, study designs have to take into account and ease the potential burden of interviews for caregivers experiencing grief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Stiel
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. .,Comprehensive Cancer Centre, CCC Erlangen - EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Maria Heckel
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. .,Comprehensive Cancer Centre, CCC Erlangen - EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Sonja Bussmann
- Interdisciplinary Palliative Care Unit, III. Department of Medicine, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Martin Weber
- Interdisciplinary Palliative Care Unit, III. Department of Medicine, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Christoph Ostgathe
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. .,Comprehensive Cancer Centre, CCC Erlangen - EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Byrne A, Upton L, Townsend S. Mind the gap: a step forward in supporting hospice-based research. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2015; 5:4-6. [PMID: 25713220 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Byrne
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Laura Upton
- R&D Department, Velindre NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abernethy AP, Capell WH, Aziz NM, Ritchie C, Prince-Paul M, Bennett RE, Kutner JS. Ethical conduct of palliative care research: enhancing communication between investigators and institutional review boards. J Pain Symptom Manage 2014; 48:1211-21. [PMID: 24879998 PMCID: PMC4247357 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2014] [Revised: 04/21/2014] [Accepted: 05/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Palliative care has faced moral and ethical challenges when conducting research involving human subjects. There are currently no resources to guide institutional review boards (IRBs) in applying standard ethical principles and terms-in a specific way-to palliative care research. Using as a case study a recently completed multisite palliative care clinical trial, this article provides guidance and recommendations for both IRBs and palliative care investigators to facilitate communication and attain the goal of conducting ethical palliative care research and protecting study participants while advancing the science. Beyond identifying current challenges faced by palliative care researchers and IRBs reviewing palliative care research, this article suggests steps that the palliative care research community can take to establish a scientifically sound, stable, productive, and well-functioning relationship between palliative care investigators and the ethical bodies that oversee their work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy P Abernethy
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Warren H Capell
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Noreen M Aziz
- Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Christine Ritchie
- University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Maryjo Prince-Paul
- Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Jean S Kutner
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
| |
Collapse
|