1
|
Caplan H, Santos J, Bershad M, Spritzer K, Liantonio J. Assessment of Feelings Towards Advanced Care Planning in the Latino Community. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2024; 41:187-192. [PMID: 37159467 DOI: 10.1177/10499091231173413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have noted that participation in advanced care planning (ACP) and end-of-life (EOL) discussions remain low among Latino communities. Various studies have found that interventions within Latino communities can positively improve engagement in ACP, however, minimal research exists regarding patient satisfaction of ACP discussions with healthcare providers outside of preorganized educational interventions. Our study aims to understand how conversations about ACP are perceived by Latino patients in a primary care setting. METHODS Subjects were identified from the institution's family medicine clinic from October 2021 to October 2022. Participants were those over the age of 50 who identified as Latino and were available at the clinic on the day of survey administration. An 8-question, 5-point, Likert scale survey assessed perceptions about ACP planning and gauged satisfaction of conversations with health care providers. The survey concluded with a multiple-choice question inquiring about individuals whom patients have spoken to regarding ACP/EOL wishes. Survey data was gathered through Qualtrics. RESULTS Of the 33 patients, the majority have at least somewhat thought about their EOL wishes (avg = 3.48/5). Most usually felt they were given enough time with their doctor (avg = 4.12/5) and comfortable speaking about ACP and EOL decisions (avg = 4.55/5). Generally, participants felt somewhat happy with how their doctor has spoken about ACP/EOL care (avg = 3.24/5). However, patients only felt a little to somewhat satisfied with the explanation of ACP/EOL from providers (avg = 2.82/5) and a little to somewhat confident in having the proper forms in place (avg = 2.76/5). Religious officials were a little to somewhat important to these conversations (avg = 2.55/5). Overall, patients have discussed ACP more frequently with family members and friends than health care providers, lawyers, or religious leaders. CONCLUSIONS The initial data demonstrates that many Latino patients are engaging in ACP conversations, both with healthcare providers and loved ones. Patients largely feel comfortable discussing EOL wishes with their doctor suggesting a trustful relationship. However, patients are only somewhat happy with these ACP conversations. Our study highlights a need for enhanced ACP education to improve satisfaction and confidence in formal documentation. Physicians should continue to engage and individualize ACP discussions to increase EOL preparedness among Latino patients.
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang T, Ho MH, Xu X, Choi HR, Lin CC. Motivational interviews to enhance advance care plans in older adults: systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023:spcare-2023-004424. [PMID: 37709366 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tongyao Wang
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Mu-Hsing Ho
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Xinyi Xu
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Hye Ri Choi
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Chia-Chin Lin
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wilson E, Caswell G, Turner N, Pollock K. Talking about death and dying: Findings from deliberative discussion groups with members of the public. MORTALITY (ABINGDON, ENGLAND) 2022; 29:176-192. [PMID: 38293271 PMCID: PMC10824017 DOI: 10.1080/13576275.2022.2136515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
Talking about death and dying is promoted in UK health policy and practice, from a perception that to do so encourages people to plan for their end of life and so increase their likelihood of experiencing a good death. This encouragement occurs alongside a belief that members of the public are reluctant to talk about death, although surveys suggest this is not the case. This paper describes findings from a research study in which people participated in deliberative discussion groups during which they talked about a range of topics related to death, including talking about death, the good death, choice and planning and compassionate communities. Here we report what they had to say in relation to talking about death and dying. We identified three themes: 1. The difference between talking about death as an abstract concept and confronting the certainty of death, 2. how death and dying presents issues for planning and responsibility, and 3. approaches to normalising death within society. For our participants, planning was considered most appropriate in relation to wills and funerals, while dying was considered too unpredictable to be easy to plan for; they had complex ideas about the value of talking about death and dying.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Wilson
- NCARE, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Glenys Caswell
- NCARE, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Nicola Turner
- NCARE, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kristian Pollock
- NCARE, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mallidou AA, Tschanz C, Antifeau E, Lee KY, Mtambo JK, Heckl H. The Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) form completion: a retrospective study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1186. [PMID: 36131303 PMCID: PMC9492459 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08542-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Advance care planning (ACP) involves discussions about patient and families’ wishes and preferences for future healthcare respecting autonomy, improving quality of care, and reducing overtreatment. The Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) form records person preferred level and types of treatment and intervention. Purpose To examine the MOST form use in inpatient units within a British Columbia (Canada) hospital, estimate and compare its completion rate, and inform health policies for continuous, quality and individualized patient care. Methods About 5,000 patients admitted to the participating tertiary acute care hospital during October 2020. Data from 780 eligible participants in medical, surgical, or psychiatry unit were analyzed with descriptive statistics, the chi-square test for group comparisons, and logistic regression to assess predictors of the MOST form completion. Results Participants’ (54% men) age ranged from 20–97 years (mean = 59.53, SD = 19.54). Mainly physicians (99.1%) completed the MOST form for about 60% of them. A statistically significant difference of MOST completion found among the units [Pearson χ2(df=2, n=780) = 79.53, p < .001, φ = .319]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that age (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.06) and unit admission (OR = .60, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.99 in psychiatry; and OR = .21, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.31 in surgery) were independently associated with the MOST form completion. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate a need for consistent and broad completion of the MOST form across all jurisdictions using, desirably, advanced electronic systems. Healthcare providers need to raise awareness of the MOST completion benefits and be prepared to discuss topics relevant to end-of-life. Further research is required on the MOST form completion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia A Mallidou
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, B236 - HSD Building, 3800 Finnerty (Ring) Road, Victoria, BC, V8P 5C2, Canada.
| | - Coby Tschanz
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, B236 - HSD Building, 3800 Finnerty (Ring) Road, Victoria, BC, V8P 5C2, Canada
| | - Elisabeth Antifeau
- Palliative Care and End of Life Services, Interior Health, Vancouver, VIC, Canada
| | | | | | - Holly Heckl
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, B236 - HSD Building, 3800 Finnerty (Ring) Road, Victoria, BC, V8P 5C2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wong SPY, Foglia MB, Cohen J, Oestreich T, O'Hare AM. The VA Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative: A qualitative analysis of veterans with advanced kidney disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70:2517-2529. [PMID: 35435246 PMCID: PMC9790645 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Documentation of patients' goals of care is integral to promoting goal-concordant care. In 2017, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) launched a system-wide initiative to standardize documentation of patients' preferences for life-sustaining treatments (LST) and related goals-of-care conversations (GoCC) that included using a note template in its national electronic medical record system. We describe implementation of the LST note based on documentation in the medical records of patients with advanced kidney disease, a group that has traditionally experienced highly intensive patterns of care. METHODS We performed a qualitative analysis of documentation in the VA electronic medical record for a national random sample of 500 adults with advanced kidney disease for whom at least one LST note was completed between July 2018 and March 2019 to identify prominent themes pertaining to the content and context of LST notes. RESULTS During the observation period, a total of 723 (mean 1.5, range 1-6) LST notes were completed for this cohort. Two themes emerged from the analysis: (1) Reactive approach: LST notes were largely completed in response to medical crises, in which they focused on short-term goals and preferences rather than patients' broader health and goals, or certain clinical encounters designated by the initiative as "triggering events" for LST note completion; (2) Practitioner-driven: Documentation suggested that practitioners would attempt to engage patients/surrogates in GoCC to lay out treatment options in order to move care forward, but patients/surrogates sometimes appeared reluctant to engage in GoCC and had difficulty communicating in ways that practitioners could understand. CONCLUSIONS Standardized documentation of patients' treatment preferences and related GoCC was used to inform in-the-moment decision-making during acute illness and certain junctures in care. There is opportunity to expand standardized documentation practices and related GoCC to address patients'/surrogates' broader health concerns and goals and to enhance their engagement in these processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan P. Y. Wong
- Division of NephrologyVA Puget Sound Health Care SystemSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Mary Beth Foglia
- VA National Center for Ethics in Health CareSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Jennifer Cohen
- VA National Center for Ethics in Health CareSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Taryn Oestreich
- Division of NephrologyVA Puget Sound Health Care SystemSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Ann M. O'Hare
- Division of NephrologyVA Puget Sound Health Care SystemSeattleWashingtonUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ludwick R, Bakerjian D, Zalon ML, Melander SD, Crist JD. Advance care planning at life milestones. Nurs Outlook 2022; 70:451-457. [PMID: 35440365 DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2022.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Much progress has been made in advance care planning (ACP), especially related to end of life and palliative care. These advances have moved thinking about ACP from a checklist approach to an upstream recognition that ACP is an iterative process that should begin early in adulthood and be revisited with each milestone or life-changing event. It is recognized that there are many stages and milestones in adult life that contribute to changing loci of responsibility and life goals. These changes impact how individuals view their lives, the complexity of health care, and the myriad of health conditions they may encounter. ACP discussions should routinely be started and reexamined at the time of key life events like starting a career or a marriage and not delayed until hospitalization, the occurrence of a serious accident, or the development of a catastrophic illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Ludwick
- Kent State University, College of Nursing, Kent, OH.
| | - Deb Bakerjian
- Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing at UC Davis, Sacramento, CA
| | - Margarete L Zalon
- Health Informatics Program, Department of Nursing, University of Scranton, Scranton, PA
| | - Sheila D Melander
- MSN and DNP Faculty and Practice Affairs, University of Kentucky College of Nursing, Lexington, KY
| | - Janice D Crist
- College of Nursing, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yamarik RL, Tan A, Brody AA, Curtis J, Chiu L, Bouillon-Minois JB, Grudzen CR. Nurse-Led Telephonic Palliative Care: A Case-Based Series of a Novel Model of Palliative Care Delivery. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2022; 24:E3-E9. [PMID: 35149656 DOI: 10.1097/njh.0000000000000850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Americans near the end of life experience high rates of nonbeneficial, burdensome, and preventable hospital-based care. If patients' goals of care are unknown or unclear, they have higher rates of hospitalization at the end of life. The demand for palliative care has grown exponentially because of its impact on quality of life, symptom burden, and resource use, requiring the development of new palliative care models. Nurses' holistic outlook and patient-centered focus make them ideal to deliver telephonic palliative care. This article discusses 4 cases delivered by a nurse-led telephonic palliative care program, a part of the Emergency Medicine Palliative Care Access project, which is a randomized controlled trial comparing outpatient palliative care with nurse-led telephonic case management after an emergency department visit. Telephonic nurses discuss patients' goals, fears, hopes, and concerns regarding their illness and its trajectory that inform decisions for future interventions and treatments. In addition, they share this information with the patients' surrogate decision-makers and clinicians to facilitate care coordination and symptom management. For seriously ill patients, nurses' abilities and expertise, as well as the difficulties of providing care through in-person models of palliative care delivery, make a nurse-led telephonic model an optimal option.
Collapse
|
8
|
Gazarian P, Gupta A, Reich A, Perez S, Semco R, Prigerson H, Ashana D, Dey T, Carlston D, Cooper Z, Weissman J, Ladin K. Educational Resources and Self-Management Support to Engage Patients in Advance Care Planning: An Interpretation of Current Practice in the US. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2022; 39:934-944. [PMID: 35077259 DOI: 10.1177/10499091211064834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Educational resources and decision aids help patients, their care partners and health care providers prepare for and confidently engage in Advance Care Planning (ACP). Incorporating ACP resources as part of a self-management approach may lead to fuller engagement with ACP beyond identifying a surrogate decision-maker, towards supporting a person to identify their values and goals and to communicate them with their care partners and health care providers. OBJECTIVE To examine the use of educational resources and decision aids to support self-management of ACP in 11 health systems across the US. METHODS This study was a qualitative interview study examining barriers and facilitators to ACP. Guided by interpretative description and the chronic care model, we sought to describe how health care stakeholders (clinicians and administrators) and patients use ACP resources to support engagement with ACP. RESULTS 274 health care stakeholders were interviewed, and 7 patient focus groups were conducted across 11 health systems. The majority of participants reported using resources to support completion of preference documentation, with fewer participants using resources that promote more engagement in ACP. ACP resources were reported as valuable in preparing for and complementing a complex, interpersonal, and interprofessional process. Barriers to using resources included a lack of a defined workflow and time. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that ACP resources that promote engagement are valued but under-utilized in practice. The use of ACP resources with an inter-professional team and a self-management approach is a promising strategy to mitigate the barriers of ACP implementation while improving engagement in ACP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priscilla Gazarian
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, 1861Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Nursing, 1851University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Avni Gupta
- Department of Public Health Policy and Management, 5894New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amanda Reich
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, 1861Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen Perez
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, 1861Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert Semco
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, 1861Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Holly Prigerson
- Center for Research on the End-of-Life, 12295Joan and Sanford I Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Deepshikha Ashana
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, 12277Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Tanujit Dey
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, 1861Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Carlston
- Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab), 1810Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA
| | - Zara Cooper
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, 1861Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joel Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, 1861Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Keren Ladin
- Department of Occupational Therapy and Community Health, 1810Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Levy C, Esmaeili A, Smith D, Hogikyan R, Periyakoil V, Carpenter JG, Sales A, Ersek M. Family members' experience improves with care preference documentation in home based primary care. J Am Geriatr Soc 2021; 69:3576-3583. [PMID: 34390489 PMCID: PMC9794361 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Veterans Health Administration (VA) implemented the comprehensive life-sustaining treatment (LST) Decisions Initiative to provide training and standardize documentation of goals of care and LST preferences for seriously ill Veterans to improve end-of-life (EOL) outcomes. LST documentation is expected for all Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) Veterans because they are at high risk of hospitalization and mortality. METHODS A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis compared associations between Bereaved Family Survey (BFS) EOL care ratings and LST documentation. Participants were Veterans who died August 1, 2018 through September 30, 2019 in one of 55 VA HBPC programs. Regression modeling generated odds for key BFS outcomes. LST template completion rate was plotted by month to understand the interaction between time, LST completion rate, and EOL care family ratings. RESULTS LST preferences were documented for 39% of HBPC Veterans. Family members rated overall EOL care as excellent for 53% of Veterans but significant divergence in BFS ratings occurred during the last 7 months of the study with 60% of family members of LST completers rating care as excellent compared with 48% for Veterans lacking LST documentation (p = 0.003). The adjusted odds of rating overall care in the final month of life as excellent was higher among those with a completed LST template (1.64 95% CI 1.19, 2.26). CONCLUSIONS Higher rates of LST documentation were associated with more favorable ratings of EOL but not in initial months following implementation of the comprehensive initiative; however, LST documentation rates were lower than expected among HBPC Veterans. Following an initial period of implementation of a comprehensive national initiative to promote Veteran choice about care during serious illness, documented LST preferences were associated with better family ratings of EOL care. HBPC clinicians may improve the bereaved family experience by using LSDTI tools and training to elicit and document preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cari Levy
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA,University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Aryan Esmaeili
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Dawn Smith
- Veteran Experience Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert Hogikyan
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | | | | - Anne Sales
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Mary Ersek
- Veteran Experience Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Department of Veterans Affairs, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gloeckler S, Krones T, Biller-Andorno N. Advance care planning evaluation: a scoping review of best research practice. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2021:bmjspcare-2021-003193. [PMID: 34667065 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Various indicators have been used to evaluate advance care planning, including completion rates, type of care received, and satisfaction. Recent consensus suggests, though, that receiving care consistent with one's goals is the primary outcome of advance care planning and assessment should capture this metric. Goal concordant care is challenging to measure, and there is little clarity about how best to do so. The aim of this scoping review is to explore what methods have been used to measure goal concordant care in the evaluation of advance care planning. PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane were searched in September 2020 to identify studies that aimed to track whether advance care planning affected the likelihood of patients receiving care that matched their preferred care. 135 original studies were included for review. Studies used retrospective chart review (36%, n=49), questionnaire (36%, n=48) and interview (31%, n=42), focusing on both patients and proxies. Studies considered both actual care received (55%, n=74) and hypothetical scenarios anticipating possible future care (49%, n=66); some studies did both. While the reviewed studies demonstrate the possibility of working towards a solid methodology, there were significant weaknesses. Notably, studies often lacked enough reporting clarity to be reproducible and, relatedly, key concepts, such as end-of-life or preferred care, were left undefined. The recommendations that follow from these findings inform future research approaches, supporting the development of a strong evidence base to guide advance care planning implementation in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Gloeckler
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tanja Krones
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Clinical Ethics, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nikola Biller-Andorno
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Poveda-Moral S, Falcó-Pegueroles A, Ballesteros-Silva MP, Bosch-Alcaraz A. Barriers to Advance Care Planning Implementation in Health care: An Umbrella Review with Implications for Evidence-Based Practice. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2021; 18:254-263. [PMID: 34506051 DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advance care planning (ACP) refers to a process of discussions between professionals, patients, and their families, which allows the patient to define and communicate their care and treatment preferences. Understanding the barriers to advance care planning is the first step on the way to overcoming them and to improving person-centred care and attention. AIMS To identify the barriers perceived by professionals, patients, and family members when implementing ACP in a clinical context and to analyse the methodological quality of the evidence. METHODS An umbrella review guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute and a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA 2015 were utilized. Data were obtained from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, The Joanna Briggs Institute, CINAHL, Scopus, and EMBASE in November 2018. RESULTS Fourteen systematic reviews were included. The main barriers reported by professionals were lack of knowledge and skills to carry out ACP, a certain fear of starting conversations about ACP, and a lack of time for discussions. Patients and family members considered that the main barriers were fear of discussing their relative's end of life, lack of ability to carry out ACP, and not knowing who was responsible for initiating conversations about ACP. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION This review has examined the barriers presented by health professionals, patients, and family members, so that future lines of research can develop preventive or decisive measures that encourage the implementation of ACP in health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Poveda-Moral
- Escola Universitària d'Infermeria i Teràpia Ocupacional de Terrassa, School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Falcó-Pegueroles
- Department of Fundamental Care and Medical-Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Consolidated Research Group SGR 269 Quantitative Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Alejandro Bosch-Alcaraz
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pilch M, Lunt V, May P, Mockler D, Thomas S, Doyle F. Facilitators and barriers to stakeholder engagement in advance care planning for older adults in community settings: a hybrid systematic review protocol. HRB Open Res 2021; 3:38. [PMID: 34212126 PMCID: PMC8212429 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13082.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Poor stakeholder engagement in advance care planning (ACP) poses national and international challenges, preventing maximisation of its potential benefits. Conceptualisation of advance care planning as a health behaviour highlights the need to design innovative, evidence-based strategies that will facilitate meaningful end-of-life care decision-making. Aim: To review systematically and synthesise quantitative and qualitative evidence on barriers and facilitators to stakeholders` engagement in ACP for older adults (≥ 50 years old) in a community setting. Methods: A hybrid systematic review will be conducted, identifying studies for consideration in two phases. First, databases will be searched from inception to identify relevant prior systematic reviews, and assess all studies included in those reviews against eligibility criteria (Phase 1). Second, databases will be searched systematically for individual studies falling outside the timeframe of those reviews (Phase 2). A modified SPIDER framework informed eligibility criteria. A study will be considered if it (a) included relevant adult stakeholders; (b) explored engagement in ACP among older adults (≥50 years old); (c) employed any type of design; (d) identified enablers and/or barriers to events specified in the Organising Framework of ACP Outcomes; (e) used either quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods methodology; and (f) evaluated phenomena of interest in a community setting (e.g., primary care or community healthcare centres). Screening, selection, bias assessment, and data extraction will be completed independently by two reviewers. Integrated methodologies will be employed and quantitative and qualitative data will be combined into a single mixed method synthesis. The Behaviour Change Wheel will be used as an overarching analytical framework and to facilitate interpretation of findings. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Reviewers` Manual and PRISMA-P guidelines have been used to inform this protocol development. Registration: This protocol has been submitted for registration on PROSPERO, registration number CRD42020189568 and is awaiting review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Pilch
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| | - Victoria Lunt
- Beaumont Hospital and St Luke's Radiation Oncology Centre at Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin, D9, Ireland
| | - Peter May
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
- The Irish Longitudinal study on Ageing (TILDA), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| | - David Mockler
- The Library of Trinity College Dublin, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| | - Stephen Thomas
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| | - Frank Doyle
- Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cipolletta S, Reggiani M. End-of-life care after the legal introduction of advance directives: A qualitative study involving healthcare professionals and family caregivers of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Palliat Med 2021; 35:209-218. [PMID: 33112196 DOI: 10.1177/0269216320967280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advance care planning and advance directives play a key role in the care of life-threatening illnesses such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. AIM The aim of the present study is to explore how the introduction of these features by law improves the experience of end-of-life care. DESIGN Five focus groups were conducted in Italy 1 year after the new law on advance directives was introduced. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Purposive sampling was used to recruit 24 health professionals and 23 family caregivers of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, for a total of 47 participants. RESULTS The thematic analysis, conducted through the use of ATLAS.ti software, identified four thematic areas: best practices, managing difficulties, care relationships and proposals. The results indicated a lack of organization, collaboration and continuity on the part of healthcare services and professionals, a lack of information on palliative care, advance care planning, and advance directives. End-of-life care is often left to the good will of the individual professional. Difficulties can also derive from ethical dilemmas concerning end-of-life decision-making and from a lack of communication and relationships between health professionals, patients and their families. CONCLUSION The introduction of advance directives by law has not been sufficient to improve end-of-life care. In order to make legal regulation effective, the organization of healthcare services needs to be improved and clearer procedures have to be implemented and shared with patients and families.
Collapse
|
14
|
Frechman E, Dietrich MS, Walden RL, Maxwell CA. Exploring the Uptake of Advance Care Planning in Older Adults: An Integrative Review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 60:1208-1222.e59. [PMID: 32645455 PMCID: PMC7342022 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.06.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Revised: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Advance care planning (ACP) is essential to elicit goals, values, and preferences of care in older adults with serious illness and on trajectories of frailty. An exploration of ACP uptake in older adults may identify barriers and facilitators. OBJECTIVE To conduct an integrative review of research on the uptake of ACP in older adults and create a conceptual model of the findings. METHODS Using Whittemore and Knafl's methodology, we systematically searched four electronic databases of ACP literature in older adults from 1996 through December 2019. Critical appraisal tools were used to assess study quality, and articles were categorized according to level of evidence. Statistical and thematic analysis was then undertaken. RESULTS Among 1081 studies, 78 met inclusion criteria. Statistical analysis evaluated ACP and variables within the domains of demographics, psychosocial, disability and functioning, and miscellaneous. Thematic analysis identified a central category of enhanced communication, followed by categories of 1) provider role and preparation; 2) patient/family relationship patterns; 3) standardized processes and structured approaches; 4) contextual influences; and 5) missed opportunities. A conceptual model depicted categories and relationships. CONCLUSIONS Enhanced communication and ACP facilitators improve uptake of ACP. Clinicians should be cognizant of these factors. This review provides a guide for clinicians who are considering implementation strategies to facilitate ACP in real-world settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Frechman
- Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
| | - Mary S Dietrich
- Vanderbilt University Schools of Medicine and Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Rachel Lane Walden
- Vanderbilt University Eskind Biomedical Library, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Cathy A Maxwell
- Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore family members' experiences of advance care planning in nursing homes. DESIGN Individual interviews. Thematic analysis. SETTING Four nursing homes in Sweden. SUBJECTS Eighteen family members of deceased nursing home patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Family members' experiences of advance care planning in nursing homes. RESULTS Family members' experiences of advance care planning in a nursing home context involved five themes: Elephant in the room, comprising end-of-life issues being difficult to talk about; Also silent understanding, e.g. patient's preferences explicitly communicated, but also implicitly conveyed. In some cases family members had a sense of the patient's wishes although preferences had not been communicated openly; Significance of small details, e.g. family members perceive everyday details as symbols of staff commitment; Invisible physician, supporting nurse, e.g. nurse being a gatekeeper, providing a first line assessment in the physician's absence; and Feeling of guilt, e.g. family members wish to participate in decisions regarding direction of care and treatment limits, and need guidance in the decisions. CONCLUSION Our study stresses the significance of staff involving the patient and family members in the advance care planning process in nursing homes, thereby adapting the care in line with patient's wishes, and for the patient to share these preferences with family members. Education in communication related to the subject may be important to shape advance care planning. Key points Knowledge on advance care planning (ACP) in a nursing home (NH) context from the perspective of family members is limited. Role of the nurse in ACP is seen as central, whereas physician involvement is often perceived to be lacking. Significance of small details, perceive to symbolize staff competence and respect for patient autonomy. To limit family members' feeling of guilt, communicating end-of-life issues is important in order to align ACP with patient preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Kastbom
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Primary Health Care Center in Ljungsbro, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- CONTACT Lisa Kastbom Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, pl 14, Linköping, S-581 83, Sweden
| | - Marit Karlsson
- Department of Advanced Home Care in Linköping, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Magnus Falk
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Primary Health Care Center in Kärna, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Anna Milberg
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Advanced Home Care in Norrköping, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pilch M, Lunt V, May P, Mockler D, Thomas S, Doyle F. Facilitators and barriers to stakeholder engagement in advance care planning for older adults in community settings: a hybrid systematic review protocol. HRB Open Res 2020; 3:38. [PMID: 34212126 PMCID: PMC8212429 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13082.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 04/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Poor stakeholder engagement in advance care planning (ACP) poses national and international challenges, preventing maximisation of its potential benefits. Conceptualisation of advance care planning as a health behaviour highlights the need to design innovative, evidence-based strategies that will facilitate meaningful end-of-life care decision-making. Aim: To review systematically and synthesise quantitative and qualitative evidence on barriers and facilitators to stakeholders` engagement in ACP for older adults (≥ 50 years old) in a community setting. Methods: A hybrid systematic review will be conducted, identifying studies for consideration in two phases. First, databases will be searched from inception to identify relevant prior systematic reviews, and assess all studies included in those reviews against eligibility criteria (Phase 1). Second, databases will be searched systematically for individual studies falling outside the timeframe of those reviews (Phase 2). A modified SPIDER framework informed eligibility criteria. A study will be considered if it (a) included relevant adult stakeholders; (b) explored engagement in ACP among older adults (≥50 years old); (c) employed any type of design; (d) identified enablers and/or barriers to events specified in the Organising Framework of ACP Outcomes; (e) used either quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods methodology; and (f) evaluated phenomena of interest in a community setting (e.g., primary care or community healthcare centres). Screening, selection, bias assessment, and data extraction will be completed independently by two reviewers. Integrated methodologies will be employed and quantitative and qualitative data will be combined into a single mixed method synthesis. The Behaviour Change Wheel will be used as an overarching analytical framework and to facilitate interpretation of findings. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Reviewers` Manual and PRISMA-P guidelines have been used to inform this protocol development. Registration: This protocol has been submitted for registration on PROSPERO and is awaiting review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Pilch
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| | - Victoria Lunt
- Beaumont Hospital and St Luke's Radiation Oncology Centre at Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin, D9, Ireland
| | - Peter May
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
- The Irish Longitudinal study on Ageing (TILDA), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| | - David Mockler
- The Library of Trinity College Dublin, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| | - Stephen Thomas
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| | - Frank Doyle
- Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bielinska AM, Archer S, Soosaipillai G, Riley J, Darzi LA, Urch C. Views of advance care planning in caregivers of older hospitalised patients following an emergency admission: A qualitative study. J Health Psychol 2020; 27:432-444. [PMID: 32515241 PMCID: PMC8793289 DOI: 10.1177/1359105320926547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
This study explores the views of advance care planning in caregivers of older hospitalised patients following an emergency admission. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight carers, mostly with a personal relationship to the older patient. Thematic analysis generated three themes: (1) working with uncertainty – it all sounds very fine. . . what is the reality?, (2) supporting the older person – you have to look at it on an individual basis and (3) enabling the process – when you do it properly. The belief that advance care planning can support older individuals and scepticism whether advance care planning can be enabled among social and healthcare challenges are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Julia Riley
- Imperial College London, UK.,The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Lord Ara Darzi
- Imperial College London, UK.,Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
| | - Catherine Urch
- Imperial College London, UK.,Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Walshe C. Aims, actions and advance care planning by district nurses providing palliative care: an ethnographic observational study. Br J Community Nurs 2020; 25:276-286. [PMID: 32496856 DOI: 10.12968/bjcn.2020.25.6.276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
District nurses are core providers of palliative care, yet little is known about the way that they provide care to people at home. This study aimed to investigate the role and practice of the district nurse in palliative care provision. This was an ethnographic study, with non-participant observation of district nurse-palliative care patient encounters, and post-observation interviews. District nurse teams from three geographical areas in northwest England participated. Data were analysed iteratively, facilitated by the use of NVivo, using techniques of constant comparison. Some 17 encounters were observed, with 23 post-observation interviews (11 with district nurses, 12 with patients/carers). Core themes were 'planning for the future' and 'caring in the moment'. District nurses described how they provided and planned future care, but observations showed that this care focused on physical symptom management. District nurses engaged in friendly relationship building, which allows detailed management of symptomatology, but with little evidence of advance care planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Walshe
- Professor of Palliative Care, International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Levy C, Ersek M, Scott W, Carpenter JG, Kononowech J, Phibbs C, Lowry J, Cohen J, Foglia M. Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative: Early Implementation Results of a National Veterans Affairs Program to Honor Veterans' Care Preferences. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35:1803-1812. [PMID: 32096084 PMCID: PMC7280392 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05697-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND On July 1, 2018, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) National Center for Ethics in Health Care implemented the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative (LSTDI). Its goal is to identify, document, and honor LST decisions of seriously ill veterans. Providers document veterans' goals and decisions using a standardized LST template and order set. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the first 7 months of LSTDI implementation and identify predictors of LST template completion. DESIGN Retrospective observational study of clinical and administrative data. We identified all completed LST templates, defined as completion of four required template fields. Templates also include four non-required fields. Results were stratified by risk of hospitalization or death as estimated by the Care Assessment Need (CAN) score. SUBJECTS All veterans with VA utilization between July 1, 2018, and January 31, 2019. MAIN MEASURES Completed LST templates, goals and LST preferences, and predictors of documentation. RESULTS LST templates were documented for 108,145 veterans, and 85% had one or more of the non-required fields completed in addition to the required fields. Approximately half documented a preference for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Among those who documented specific goals, half wanted to improve or maintain function, independence, and quality of life while 28% had a goal of life prolongation irrespective of risk of hospitalization/death and 45% expressed a goal of comfort. Only 7% expressed a goal of being cured. Predictors of documentation included VA nursing home residence, older age, frailty, and comorbidity, while non-Caucasian race, rural residence, and receipt of care in a lower complexity medical center were predictive of no documentation. CONCLUSIONS LST decisions were documented for veterans at high risk of hospitalization or death. While few expressed a preference for cure, half desire, cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Predictors of documentation were generally consistent with existing literature. Opportunities to reduce observed disparities exist by leveraging available VA resources and programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cari Levy
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Rocky Mountain VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Mary Ersek
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Joan G Carpenter
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer Kononowech
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Jill Lowry
- Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jennifer Cohen
- Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Washington, DC, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Marybeth Foglia
- Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Washington, DC, USA
- Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Teixeira MJC, Abreu W, Costa N, Maddocks M. Understanding family caregivers' needs to support relatives with advanced progressive disease at home: an ethnographic study in rural Portugal. BMC Palliat Care 2020; 19:73. [PMID: 32450848 PMCID: PMC7249372 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-00583-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Family caregivers play an important role supporting their relatives with advanced progressive disease to live at home. There is limited research to understand family caregiver needs over time, particularly outside of high-income settings. The aim of this study was to explore family caregivers’ experiences of caring for a relative living with advanced progressive disease at home, and their perceptions of met and unmet care needs over time. Methods An ethnographic study comprising observations and interviews. A purposive sample of 10 family caregivers and 10 relatives was recruited within a rural area in the north of Portugal. Data were collected between 2014 and 16 using serial participant observations (n = 33) and in-depth interviews (n = 11). Thematic content analysis was used to analyse the data. Results Five overarching themes were yielded: (1) provision of care towards independence and prevention of complications; (2) perceived and (3) unknown caregiver needs; (4) caregivers’ physical and emotional impairments; and (5) balancing limited time. An imbalance towards any one of these aspects may lead to reduced capability and performance of the family caregiver, with increased risk of complications for their relative. However, with balance, family caregivers embraced their role over time. Conclusions These findings enhance understanding around the needs of family caregivers, which are optimally met when professionals and family caregivers work together with a collaborative approach over time. Patients and their families should be seen as equal partners. Family-focused care would enhance nursing practice in this context and this research can inform nursing training and educational programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria João Cardoso Teixeira
- Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust & National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Brockley Hill Road, Stanmore, Middlesex, HA7 4LP, UK.
| | - Wilson Abreu
- School of Nursing & Research Centre "Centre for Health Technology and Services Research / ESEP -CINTESIS", Porto, Portugal
| | - Nilza Costa
- University of Aveiro - Research Centre "Didactic and Technology in the Education of Educators/CIDTFF", Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Matthew Maddocks
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Trankle SA, Shanmugam S, Lewis E, Nicholson M, Hillman K, Cardona M. Are We Making Progress on Communication with People Who Are Near the End of Life in the Australian Health System? A Thematic Analysis. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2020; 35:158-167. [PMID: 30475078 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1548335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Initiating end-of-life (EoL) discussions with patients is often delayed or avoided altogether by healthcare practitioners even in light of imminent death. This continues despite the availability of guidelines and conceptual frameworks on how to communicate prognoses at EoL. We surveyed healthcare practitioners to elicit their exposure to and confidence in EoL discussions and to better understand factors that enable or challenge the initiation of discussions in Australian healthcare settings. Thematic analysis identified that EoL discussions could be emotionally burdensome for healthcare practitioners but were regarded as valuable. Effective communications were challenged by conflict with families and between healthcare practitioners as to appropriate care goal transition, and by prognostic uncertainty. Communication skills appeared to be developed more from experience, and beneficial strategies such as role play and mentoring particularly for younger nurses and doctors were identified. Specific training in EoL communications should target undergraduates and new healthcare practitioners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven A Trankle
- Department of General Practice, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University
| | | | - Ebony Lewis
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The University of New South Wales
| | | | - Ken Hillman
- Intensive Care Unit, Liverpool Hospital
- The Simpson Centre for Health Services Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales
| | - Magnolia Cardona
- Centre for Research in Evidence Based Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine Bond University
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Maffoni M, Argentero P, Giorgi I, Giardini A. Healthcare professionals' perceptions about the Italian law on advance directives. Nurs Ethics 2019; 27:796-808. [PMID: 31631774 DOI: 10.1177/0969733019878831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the variegated legislative framework on advance directives, the first specific regulation in Italy on this issue came into force only in 2018. RESEARCH OBJECTIVE This qualitative study aimed to investigate the implications of the new Italian law on advance directives in clinical practice from the perspective of those who deal with this delicate ethical issue on an everyday basis, that is, Italian healthcare professionals. RESEARCH DESIGN A qualitative research design using semi-structured audio-recorded interviews was adopted. The data collection and analysis were performed according to the Grounded Theory approach. PARTICIPANTS Nineteen healthcare professionals (16 nurses, 3 physicians) working in a palliative care unit of a research and clinical institute in Italy. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS The study is part of the WeDistress HELL Project (WEllness and DISTRESS in HEalth care professionals dealing with end of Life and bioethicaL issues) approved by the Ethical Committee of ICS Maugeri - Institute of Pavia (Italy). FINDINGS The authors identified a main overall category, 'Pros and Cons of the Italian law on advance directives', composed of six constituent categories: Positive welcome, Self-determination and protection, Prompts for future betterment, Uncertainties, Lack of knowledge, and Neutrality and no suggestions. DISCUSSION The Italian law n. 219/2017 on advance directives was seen as a legal instrument possessing both strengths and weaknesses, but able to guarantee the patient's self-determination and support healthcare professionals in providing care according to patients' wishes. CONCLUSION An understanding of the healthcare providers' perspective may support the discussion on advance directives and bridge the gaps that currently persist in handling ethical issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Maffoni
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Ines Giorgi
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Psychology Unit - Institute of Pavia, Italy
| | - Anna Giardini
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Psychology Unit - Institute of Montescano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Howard M, Slaven M, Bernard C, Borhan S, Elston D, Arora N, Tan A, Heyland DK. Decision support intervention (Plan Well Guide) for patients and their substitute decision-makers to improve engagement in advance care planning: protocol for a randomised trial. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e027897. [PMID: 31542737 PMCID: PMC6756453 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this randomised trial is to evaluate the efficacy of a decision support intervention for serious illness decisions (the Plan Well Guide decision aid; www.PlanWellguide.com) in increasing the engagement of substitute decision-makers (SDMs) in the patient's advance care planning process (ie, 'ACP engagement'), specifically the SDM's confidence and readiness for the role in the future. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study is a parallel group randomised controlled trial. We aim to enrol 90 participant dyads: patients aged 65 years and older attending outpatient healthcare settings and with indicators they would be at high risk of needing future medical decisions and their SDM. The intervention is the Plan Well Guide decision aid, administered to the patient by a facilitator, with the SDM present. The primary endpoint is change after 3 months in the SDM's ACP engagement using a validated measure of behavioural change (SDM's knowledge, contemplation, self-efficacy and readiness) to enact the role. The secondary endpoints are (1) ACP engagement of the patient measured by a validated survey; (2) change in SDM decisional conflict regarding involvement in future decision-making and (3) postintervention patient decisional conflict regarding preference for life-sustaining treatments. Primary and secondary continuous outcomes will be analysed using the linear regression. The mean difference and 95% CIs will be reported. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Approval was received August 2017 (2017-3714-GRA) from the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board. We plan to disseminate trial results in peer-reviewed journals, at national and international conferences, and via our web-based knowledge translation platforms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03239639; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Howard
- Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marissa Slaven
- Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carrie Bernard
- Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sayem Borhan
- Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dawn Elston
- Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neha Arora
- Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amy Tan
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Daren K Heyland
- Critical Care, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Evaluation Research Unit, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lennard C. Best interest versus advance decisions to refuse treatment in advance care planning for neurodegenerative illness. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 27:1261-1267. [PMID: 30457382 DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2018.27.21.1261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
This article describes the role of nurses assisting people with degenerative illness in advance care planning (ACP) for a time when they may lose decision-making capacity. It looks at the concept of advance decisions to refuse treatment (ADRT), as defined in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 , exploring the legal, ethical and philosophical ramifications of carrying out, or overriding, formerly expressed wishes of someone who has subsequently lost decision-making capacity. It uses an illustrative composite case study of an individual with Huntington's disease whose prognosis includes future deterioration in swallowing, together with consideration of whether to have or refuse a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. The author, who as part of his role cares for people with neurodegenerative conditions, including Huntington's disease, discusses the difficulties and dilemmas that nurses experience with ADRTs, drawing on personal experience. He suggests that, rather than focusing on ADRTs, ACP may be most effective in preparing people and their surrogates to make real-time decisions, based on a shared understanding of the individual's values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Lennard
- Registered mental health nurse, Pirton Grange Specialist Care Centre, Pirton, Worcestershire
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hall A, Rowland C, Grande G. How Should End-of-Life Advance Care Planning Discussions Be Implemented According to Patients and Informal Carers? A Qualitative Review of Reviews. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 58:311-335. [PMID: 31004772 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Revised: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The goal of advance care planning (ACP) is to help ensure that the care people receive during periods of serious illness is consistent with their preferences and values. There is a lack of clear understanding about how patients and their informal carers feel ACP discussions should be implemented. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to synthesize literature reviews pertaining to patients' and informal carers' perspectives on ACP discussions. METHODS This is a systematic review of reviews. RESULTS We identified 55 literature reviews published between 2007 and 2018. ACP discussions were facilitated by a diverse range of formats and tools, all of which were acceptable to patients and carers. Patients and carers preferred health professionals to initiate discussions, with the relationships they had with the professionals being particularly important. There were mixed feelings about the best timing, with many people preferring to defer discussions until they perceived them to be clinically relevant. ACP was felt to bring benefits including a greater sense of peace and less worry, but it could also be disruptive and distressing. Patients and carers perceived many benefits from ACP discussions, but these may differ from the dominant narratives about ACP in health policy and may move away from the narratives of RCTs and standardization in research and practice. CONCLUSION Researchers and clinicians may need to adjust their approaches as current practices are not aligned enough with patients' and carers' preferences. Future research may need to test implementation strategies of ACP interventions to elucidate how benefits from standardization and flexibility might both be realized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Hall
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC), Greater Manchester, UK.
| | - Christine Rowland
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC), Greater Manchester, UK
| | - Gunn Grande
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC), Greater Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kastbom L, Milberg A, Karlsson M. 'We have no crystal ball' - advance care planning at nursing homes from the perspective of nurses and physicians. Scand J Prim Health Care 2019; 37:191-199. [PMID: 31122099 PMCID: PMC6567000 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1608068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To investigate clinicians' perspectives on the factors that shape the process of advance care planning in a nursing home context. Design: Interviews. Latent qualitative content analysis. Setting: Nine nursing homes in Sweden. Subjects: 14 physicians and 11 nurses working at nursing homes. Main outcome measures: Participants' views on advance care planning (ACP) at nursing homes. Results: The analysis of the interviews resulted in four manifest categories: Exploration of preferences and views, e.g. exploring patient wishes regarding end-of-life issues and restrictions in care at an early stage, and sensitivity to patient's readiness to discuss end-of-life issues; Integration of preferences and views, e.g. integration of patient's preferences and staff's and family member's views; Decision & documentation of the ACP, e.g. clear documentation in patient's medical records that are up-to-date and available for staff caring for the patient, and Implementation & re-evaluation of the ACP, e.g. nurse following up after ACP-appointment to confirm the content of the documented ACP. The latent theme, Establishing beneficence - defending oneself against tacit accusations of maleficence, emerged as a deeper meaning of all the four (manifest) parts of the ACP-process Conclusion: This study stresses the importance of involving patients, family members, and the team in the work with advance care planning in nursing homes. In addition, clear medical record documentation and proficiency in end-of-life communication related to advance care planning for physicians as well as nurses may also be factors that significantly shape advance care planning in a nursing home context. Key Points Advance care planning can help patients to receive care in line with their preferences and can positively impact quality of end-of-life care. Our results describe a process consisting of four manifest categories and one latent theme constituting the process of advance care planning, that may be considered in education in advance care planning. The significance of nurses and physicians perceiving beneficence as well as fear of accusations of maleficence are important factors to contemplate. The study has implications for healthcare staff caring for patients near the end of their lives, in particular patients in nursing homes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Kastbom
- Primary Health Center in Ljungsbro, and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Ljungsbro, Sweden;
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden;
- CONTACT Lisa Kastbom , Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, pl 14, S-581 83Linköping, Sweden
| | - Anna Milberg
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden;
- Department of Advanced Home Care, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden;
| | - Marit Karlsson
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden;
- Department of Advanced Home Care, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Andreasen P, Finne-Soveri UH, Deliens L, Van den Block L, Payne S, Gambassi G, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Smets T, Lilja E, Kijowska V, Szczerbińska K. Advance directives in European long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2019; 12:bmjspcare-2018-001743. [PMID: 31113800 PMCID: PMC9380512 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Revised: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND End-of-life care practices in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are the focus of growing attention in Europe, due to rapidly increasing number of older persons living in LTCFs. The knowledge about end-of-life discussions or existence of written advance directives in the European LTCFs is scarce. This study's aim is to investigate the prevalence of written advance directives and their sociodemographic associates, among recently deceased LTCF residents, in six European countries. METHODS Data from the European Union-funded PACE database were collected from 322 LTCFs in six European countries in 2014. The assessments were performed by using two questionnaires designed for LTCF administrative staff and for staff member.LTCFs were selected within each country by using proportional stratified random sampling procedure. Facilities with certain types and sizes were included from each country.Multilevel multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate associations between written advance directives and selected predictors. RESULTS In total, 32.5 % of the 1384 deceased LTCF residents had a written advance directive with a range from 0% to 77 % between countries. The proportion of the most common advance directive, 'Do not resuscitate in case of cardiac or respiratory arrest (DNR)', varied correspondingly from 0% to 75%.LTCF type (OR 2.86 95% CI 1.59 to 5.23) and capability of expressing at the time of admission (OR 3.26 95% CI 2.26 to 4.71) were the independent predictors for advance directive. Residents living in LTCFs where physician was available were less likely to have advance directive compared with residents from LTCFs where physician was not available. CONCLUSION Extensive differences for prevalence of written advance directive exist between countries among older LTCF residents in Europe. Timely and appropriate response to LTCF resident's health needs and preferences efforts advance care planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Andreasen
- The Department of Welfare, The Ageing, Disability and Functioning Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ulla Harriet Finne-Soveri
- The Department of Welfare, The Ageing, Disability and Functioning Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Luc Deliens
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Department of Family Medicine & Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lieve Van den Block
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Department of Family Medicine & Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sheila Payne
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, Lancashire, UK
| | - Giovanni Gambassi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Istituto di Medicina Interna e Geriatria, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Expertise Center of Palliative Care, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tinne Smets
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Department of Family Medicine & Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Eero Lilja
- The Department of Welfare, The Equality and Inclusion Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Violetta Kijowska
- Department of Sociology of Medicine, Medical Faculty, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Szczerbińska
- Laboratory for Research on Aging Society, Department of Sociology of Medicine, Medical Faculty, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Levinson M, Walker KJ, Hanning J, Dunlop W, Cheong E, Mills A. Medical perspectives regarding goals-of-care consultations in Emergency Departments. PSYCHOL HEALTH MED 2019; 24:1137-1147. [PMID: 30924364 DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2019.1595683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Goals-of-care discussions aim to establish patient values for shared medical decision-making. These discussions are relevant towards end-of-life as patients may receive non-beneficial treatments if they have never discussed preferences for care. End-of-life care is provided in Emergency Departments (EDs) but little is known regarding ED-led goals-of-care discussions. We aimed to explore practitioner perspectives on goals-of-care discussions for adult ED patients nearing end-of-life. We report the qualitative component of a mixed methods study regarding a 'Goals-of-Care' form in an Australian ED. Eighteen out of 34 doctors who completed the form were interviewed. We characterised ED-led goals-of-care consultations for the first time. Emergency doctors perceive goals-of-care discussions to be relevant to their practice and occurring frequently. They aim to ensure appropriate care is provided prior to review by the admitting team, focusing on limitations of treatment and clarity in the care process. ED doctors felt they could recognise end-of-life and that ED visits often prompt consideration of end-of-life care planning. They wanted long-term practitioners to initiate discussions prior to patient deterioration. There were numerous interpretations of palliative care concepts. Standardisation of language, education, collaboration and further research is required to ensure Emergency practitioners are equipped to facilitate these challenging conversations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Levinson
- a Department of Medicine , Monash University , Melbourne , Australia
| | - Katherine J Walker
- b Emergency Department , Cabrini , Melbourne , Australia.,c Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine , Monash University , Melbourne , Australia
| | - Jennifer Hanning
- b Emergency Department , Cabrini , Melbourne , Australia.,d Melbourne Medical School , University of Melbourne , Melbourne , Australia
| | - William Dunlop
- b Emergency Department , Cabrini , Melbourne , Australia
| | - Edward Cheong
- b Emergency Department , Cabrini , Melbourne , Australia
| | - Amber Mills
- a Department of Medicine , Monash University , Melbourne , Australia.,e Bolton Clarke
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cardona M, Lewis E, Shanmugam S, Nicholson M, Williamson M, Hanly L, Hillman K. Dissonance on perceptions of end-of-life needs between health-care providers and members of the public: Quantitative cross-sectional surveys. Australas J Ageing 2019; 38:e75-e84. [PMID: 30868725 DOI: 10.1111/ajag.12630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Revised: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate views, determinants and barriers to end-of-life discussions for doctors, nurses and members of the public (MoP) and their acceptability of risk prediction tools. METHODS Concurrent surveys of 360 doctors and nurses and 497 MoP. RESULTS Sixty per cent of clinicians reported high confidence in initiating end-of-life discussions, and 55.8% regularly engaged in them. Barriers to end-of-life communication reported by clinicians were uncertainty on the likely time to death (44.7%) and family requests to withhold information from patients (44.2%). By contrast, most (92.8%) MoP wanted information about life expectancy; 89.9% wanted involvement in treatment decisions if the likelihood of death was high; and 23.8% already had an advance care directive. CONCLUSIONS A dissonance exists between doctor/nurses perception of older peoples' preference for receiving prognostic information and the public desire for involvement in decision-making at the end of life. As public attitudes change, strategies for greater involvement of patients in shared end-of-life planning are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magnolia Cardona
- Centre for Research in Evidence Based Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.,Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ebony Lewis
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Margaret Nicholson
- Intensive Care Unit, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Margaret Williamson
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Laura Hanly
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ken Hillman
- Intensive Care Unit, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gleeson A, Noble S, Mann M. Advance care planning for home health staff: a systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2019; 11:209-216. [PMID: 30808626 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Revised: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advance care planning (ACP) is a process where patients express their wishes regarding their future healthcare. Its importance has been increasingly recognised in the past decade. As increasing numbers of elderly people are living in care homes, the aim of this review was to identify the most effective ACP interventions to train/educate all levels of healthcare professionals working in care homes. DESIGN A systematic review. Two independent reviewers undertook screening, data extraction and quality assessment. DATA SOURCES Searched from inception to June 2018: Ovid Medline, Ovid Medline in process, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EBSCO Cinahl and Ovid PsycINFO. RESULTS Six studies were included: three before and after studies, one cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), one non-blinded RCT and one qualitative study. Five studies reported on ACP documentation, three on impact on ACP practice and three studies on healthcare-related outcomes. All quantitative studies reported an improvement in outcomes. In the three studies reporting on health-related outcomes, one showed significant reductions in hospitalisation rate, days and healthcare costs; one reported significant reductions in hospital deaths; and the third showed reductions in hospital days and deaths. A meta-analysis could not be performed due to the heterogeneity of the outcome measures. The included qualitative study highlighted perceived challenges to implementing an educational programme in the care home setting. CONCLUSION There is limited evidence for the effectiveness of ACP training for care home workers. More well-designed studies are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42016042385 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aoife Gleeson
- Palliative Medicine, Ysbyty Ystrad Fawr, Newport, UK
| | - Simon Noble
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Mala Mann
- University Library Service, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mauleon J, Staffileno BA. Integration of an Advance Care Planning Model in Home Health: Favorable Outcomes in End-of-Life Discussions, POLST Rates, and 60-day Hospital Readmissions. Home Healthc Now 2019; 37:337-344. [PMID: 31688468 DOI: 10.1097/nhh.0000000000000797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Only 2.3% of patients at a Midwest home healthcare (HH) agency had documented advance directives (ADs), compared with 28% nationally. Of concern, this HH agency lacked standardized procedures for advance care planning (ACP) leading to inadequate staff knowledge regarding end-of-life, avoidable hospital readmissions, and delayed transitions into hospice care. Lack of ADs is directly correlated to higher hospital readmission rates and lower hospice length of stay. The purpose of this initiative was to develop evidence-based procedures using the Respecting Choices ACP model to: 1) educate staff, 2) increase ACP conversations offered and completed among high-risk patients, 3) increase Practitioner Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) rates, 4) reduce 60-day hospital readmissions, and 5) support hospice care admissions. Staff received discipline-specific education on ACP/ADs. The Knowledge-Attitudinal-Experiential Survey on Advance Directives (KAESAD), assessed staff ACP/AD knowledge, confidence, and experiences. Standardized electronic medical record tools were created to track ACP conversations, POLST rates, 60-day hospital readmissions, and hospice admissions. Paired t-test and chi-square analyses compared changes pre- and post implementation. The KAESAD survey was analyzed for 75 staff (100%) and demonstrates improvement in knowledge, confidence, and experiences. Data also demonstrate increases in: ACP offered 6% to 80% (p < .001); ACP conversations completed 4% to 31% (p < .001); POLST rates 26% to 43.6% (p = .059); decreased 60-day hospital readmissions 40% to 20% (p = .025); whereas hospice care admissions was not impacted ranging from 10% to 5.5% (p = .381). Respecting Choices serves as an effective ACP framework to improve ACP conversations, POLST rates, and hospital readmissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Mauleon
- Jessica Mauleon, DNP, AGPCNP-C, is a Nurse Practitioner at an Internal Medicine practice in Lincolnshire, Illinois. Beth A. Staffileno, PhD, RN, FAHA, is an Associate Professor, Co-Director Center for Clinical Research and Scholarship, College of Nursing, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Since the latter part of the twentith century, international research, education and practice of advance care planning has experienced a diversity of developments and defintions. Whilst this variety may seem bewildering, a continued commitment to accurate, focussed research enables better care through better understanding and better evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Russell
- 1 Hospice UK, London, UK.,2 University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ahluwalia SC, Chen C, Raaen L, Motala A, Walling AM, Chamberlin M, O'Hanlon C, Larkin J, Lorenz K, Akinniranye O, Hempel S. A Systematic Review in Support of the National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care, Fourth Edition. J Pain Symptom Manage 2018; 56:831-870. [PMID: 30391049 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Palliative care continues to be a rapidly growing field aimed at improving quality of life for patients and their caregivers. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this review was to provide a synthesis of the evidence in palliative care to inform the fourth edition of the National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care. METHODS Ten key review questions addressing eight content domains guided a systematic review focused on palliative care interventions. We searched eight databases in February 2018 for systematic reviews published in English from 2013, after the last edition of National Consensus Project guidelines was published, to present. Experienced literature reviewers screened, abstracted, and appraised data per a detailed protocol registered in PROSPERO. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations criteria. The review was supported by a technical expert panel. RESULTS We identified 139 systematic reviews meeting inclusion criteria. Reviews addressed the structure and process of care (interdisciplinary team care, 13 reviews; care coordination, 18 reviews); physical aspects (48 reviews); psychological aspects (26 reviews); social aspects (two reviews); spiritual, religious, and existential aspects (11 reviews); cultural aspects (three reviews); care of the patient nearing the end of life (grief/bereavement programs, six reviews; final days of life, two reviews); ethical and legal aspects (36 reviews). CONCLUSION A substantial body of evidence exists to support clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care, but the quality of evidence is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangeeta C Ahluwalia
- RAND Health, Santa Monica, California, USA; UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, USA.
| | - Christine Chen
- Pardee RAND Graduate School, Santa Monica, California, USA
| | | | - Aneesa Motala
- Evidence based Practice Center, RAND Corp., Santa Monica, California, USA
| | - Anne M Walling
- RAND Health, Santa Monica, California, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA; Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | | - Jody Larkin
- Evidence based Practice Center, RAND Corp., Santa Monica, California, USA
| | - Karl Lorenz
- RAND Health, Santa Monica, California, USA; VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Center for Innovation to Implementation, Menlo Park, California, USA; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | - Susanne Hempel
- Evidence based Practice Center, RAND Corp., Santa Monica, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Jimenez G, Tan WS, Virk AK, Low CK, Car J, Ho AHY. Overview of Systematic Reviews of Advance Care Planning: Summary of Evidence and Global Lessons. J Pain Symptom Manage 2018; 56:436-459.e25. [PMID: 29807158 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 295] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Revised: 05/16/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advance care planning (ACP) involves important decision making about future medical needs. The high-volume and disparate nature of ACP research makes it difficult to grasp the evidence and derive clear policy lessons for policymakers and clinicians. AIM The aim of this study was to synthesize ACP research evidence and identify relevant contextual elements, program features, implementation principles, and impacted outcomes to inform policy and practice. DESIGN An overview of systematic reviews using the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions was performed. Study quality was assessed using a modified version of the AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Reviews) tool. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EBM Reviews, Cochrane Reviews, CINAHL, Global Health, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were searched for ACP-related research from inception of each database to April 2017. Searches were supplemented with gray literature and manual searches. Eighty systematic reviews, covering over 1660 original articles, were included in the analysis. RESULTS Legislations, institutional policies, and cultural factors influence ACP development. Positive perceptions toward ACP do not necessarily translate into more end-of-life conversations. Many factors related to patients' and providers' attitudes, and perceptions toward life and mortality influence ACP implementation, decision making, and completion. Limited, low-quality evidence points to several ACP benefits, such as improved end-of-life communication, documentation of care preferences, dying in preferred place, and health care savings. Recurring features that make ACP programs effective include repeated and interactive discussion sessions, decision aids, and interventions targeting multiple stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS Preliminary evidence highlights several elements that influence the ACP process and provides a variety of features that could support successful, effective, and sustainable ACP implementation. However, this evidence is compartmentalized and limited. Further studies evaluating ACP as a unified program and assessing the impact of ACP for different populations, settings, and contexts are needed to develop programs that are able to unleash ACP's full potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geronimo Jimenez
- Centre for Population Health Sciences (CePHaS), Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Woan Shin Tan
- Centre for Population Health Sciences (CePHaS), Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore; NTU Institute of Health Technologies (HealthTech), Interdisciplinary Graduate School, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore; Health Services and Outcomes Research Department, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Amrit K Virk
- Centre for Population Health Sciences (CePHaS), Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chan Kee Low
- Economics Programme, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Josip Car
- Centre for Population Health Sciences (CePHaS), Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore; Global eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Andy Hau Yan Ho
- Centre for Population Health Sciences (CePHaS), Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore; Psychology Programme, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore; Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
State of advance care planning research: A descriptive overview of systematic reviews. Palliat Support Care 2018; 17:234-244. [PMID: 30058506 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951518000500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of the current state of research of advance care planning (ACP), highlighting most studied topics, publication time, quality of studies and reported outcomes, and to identify gaps to improve ACP receptivity, utilization, implementation, and outcomes. METHOD Cochrane methodology for conducting overviews of systematic reviews. Study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews tool. The following databases were searched from inception to April 2017: MEDLINE, EBM Reviews, Cochrane Reviews, CINAHL, Global Health, PsycINFO, and EMBASE. Searches were supplemented with gray literature and manual searches. RESULT Eighty systematic reviews, covering 1,662 single articles, show that ACP-related research focuses on nine main topics: (1) ACP as part of end-of-life or palliative care interventions, (2) care decision-making; (3) communication strategies; (4) factors influencing ACP implementation; (5) ACP for specific patient groups, (6) ACP effectiveness; (7) ACP experiences; (8) ACP cost; and (9) ACP outcome measures. The majority of this research was published since 2014, its quality ranges from moderate to low, and reports on documentation, concordance, preferences, and resource utilization outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS Despite the surge of ACP research, there are major knowledge gaps about ACP initiation, timeliness, optimal content, and impact because of the low quality and fragmentation of the available evidence. Research has mostly focused on discrete aspects within ACP instead of using a holistic evaluative approach that takes into account its intricate working mechanisms, the effects of systems and contexts, and the impacts on multilevel stakeholders. Higher quality studies and innovative interventions are needed to develop effective ACP programs and address research gaps.
Collapse
|
36
|
Does implementation matter if comprehension is lacking? A qualitative investigation into perceptions of advance care planning in people with cancer. Support Care Cancer 2018; 26:3765-3771. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4241-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2018] [Accepted: 04/26/2018] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
|
37
|
Yasui H, Iwase S, Ariyoshi K, Nojima M, Yoshiuchi K. Decline of Physical Activity in Terminally Ill Patients Could Be Useful for Predicting Short-Term Survival. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2017; 35:749-753. [PMID: 29145731 DOI: 10.1177/1049909117741472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although it is recommended that all terminally ill patients receive advance care planning (ACP), this is occasionally challenging because of the difficulty in predicting survival. There are some indexes for predicting survival, but few are accurate, especially at the terminal stages of illness. METHODS Twenty-two patients at the terminal stages of cancer were retrospectively analyzed. We assessed their physical activity and condition using activities of daily living (ADL) scores for 1 month before the death. The ADL scores included 7 items: walking, bathing, grooming, dressing, eating, transferring, and toileting. RESULTS Survival time after the first decline of physical activity was calculated (median: 13 days, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 5.6-20.4 days). Survival time after the second (median: 5 days, 95% CI: 0-10.9 days), third (median: 5 days, 95% CI: 0-13.4 days), and fourth (median time: 1 day, 95% CI: not applicable due to small size) decline of physical activity was also calculated. CONCLUSION Change in physical activity seems helpful for estimating survival time, especially at the end of life, and this index could be useful for coordinating final ACP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Yasui
- 1 Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoru Iwase
- 2 Department of General Internal Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ariyoshi
- 3 NPO JORTC (Japanese Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masanori Nojima
- 4 Center for Translational Research, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Yoshiuchi
- 5 Department of Stress Sciences and Psychosomatic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bereavement support for family caregivers: The gap between guidelines and practice in palliative care. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0184750. [PMID: 28977013 PMCID: PMC5627900 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Accepted: 08/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Standards for bereavement care propose that support should be matched to risk and need. However, studies in many countries demonstrate that palliative care services continue to adopt a generic approach in offering support to bereaved families. Objective To identify patterns of bereavement support in palliative care services based upon the experience of bereaved people from a population based survey and in relation to clinical practice guidelines. Design An anonymous postal survey collected information from clients of six funeral providers in four Australian states (2014–15), 6 to 24 months after the death of their family member or friend, with 1,139 responding. Responses from 506 bereaved relatives of people who had terminal illnesses were analysed. Of these, 298 had used palliative care services and 208 had not. Results More people with cancer (64%) had received palliative care in comparison to other illnesses such as heart disease, dementia and organ failure (4–10%). The support for family caregivers before and after their relative’s death was not considered optimal. Only 39.4% of the bereaved reported being specifically asked about their emotional/ psychological distress pre-bereavement, and just half of the bereaved perceived they had enough support from palliative care services. Half of the bereaved had a follow up contact from the service at 3–6 weeks, and a quarter had a follow-up at 6 months. Their qualitative feedback underlined the limited helpfulness of the blanket approach to bereavement support, which was often described as “not personal” or “generic”, or “just standard practice”. Conclusions Timeliness and consistency of relationship is crucial to building rapport and trust in the service’s ability to help at post-bereavement as well as a focus on the specific rather than the generic needs of the bereaved. In light of these limitations, palliative care services might do better investing their efforts principally in assessing and supporting family caregivers during the pre-bereavement period and developing community capacity and referral pathways for bereavement care. Our findings suggest that bereavement support in Australian palliative care services has only a tenuous relationship with guidelines and assessment tools, a conclusion also drawn in studies from other countries, emphasizing the international implications of our study.
Collapse
|
39
|
Bradley SL, Tieman JJ, Woodman RJ, Phillips PA. Which online format is most effective for assisting Baby Boomers to complete advance directives? A randomised controlled trial of email prompting versus online education module. BMC Palliat Care 2017; 16:43. [PMID: 28851337 PMCID: PMC5576351 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-017-0225-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2016] [Accepted: 07/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Completion of Advance Directives (ADs), being financial and healthcare proxy or instructional documents, is relatively uncommon in Australia. Efforts to increase completion rates include online education and prompting which past literature suggests may be effective. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to assess computer-based online AD information and email prompting for facilitating completion of ADs by Australian Baby Boomers (b.1946–1965) as well as factors which may impede or assist completion of these documents by this generation when using the online environment. Methods Two hundred eighty-two men and women aged 49–68 years at the time of the trial were randomly assigned to one of 3 intervention groups: education module only; email prompt only; email prompt and education module; and a control group with no education module and no email prompt. The randomized controlled trial was undertaken in participants’ location of choice. Randomization and allocation to trial group were carried out by a central computer system. The primary analysis was based on a final total of 189 participants who completed the trial (n = 52 education module only; n = 44 email prompt only; n = 46 email prompt and education module; and n = 47 control). The primary outcome was the number of individuals in any group completing any of the 4 legal ADs in South Australia within 12 months or less from entry into the trial. Frequency analysis was conducted on secondary outcomes such as reasons for non-completion. Results Mean follow-up post-intervention at 12 months showed that 7% of overall participants completed one or more of the 4 legal ADs but without significant difference between groups (delta = 1%, p = .48 Prompt/Non-Prompt groups, delta = 5%, p = .44 education/non-education groups). Reasons offered for non-completion were too busy (26%) and/or it wasn’t the right time (21%). Conclusion Our results suggest that neither email prompting nor provision of additional educational material online were sufficient to significantly impact AD completion rates for this generational cohort. Research with this cohort over longer periods of time exploring online preferences for engagement with ADs as they age may provide better insight into using this environment for ADs with this group. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616000425493. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12904-017-0225-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra L Bradley
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University South Australia, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
| | - Jennifer J Tieman
- School of Health Sciences, Flinders University, South Australia, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Richard J Woodman
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Flinders University South Australia, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Paddy A Phillips
- School of Medicine, Flinders University South Australia, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Prince-Paul M, DiFranco E. Upstreaming and Normalizing Advance Care Planning Conversations-A Public Health Approach. Behav Sci (Basel) 2017; 7:bs7020018. [PMID: 28417931 PMCID: PMC5485448 DOI: 10.3390/bs7020018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2017] [Revised: 04/05/2017] [Accepted: 04/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
As a society, we simply don’t talk about this universal experience called dying and death; in fact, we ignore it until we have to face it. Thus, it is often in a crisis experience when we have to make decisions while we are laden with uncertainty and intense emotions. Sixty percent of people say making sure their family is not burdened by tough decisions is extremely important, yet 56% of them have not held a conversation about its context. Instead of waiting to make end-of-life decisions, let us begin to think about what matters most while we are living, what we value most, and how we translate these values into conversations about what is important. As a public health concern, if we can upstream the advance care planning discussion into usual health promotion activities, perhaps, as a society, we can begin to normalize and reshape how we make decisions about the last chapters of our lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryjo Prince-Paul
- School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, 2120 Cornell Road, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
| | - Evelina DiFranco
- School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, 2120 Cornell Road, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Recent Literature Feature Editor: Paul C. Rousseau. J Palliat Med 2017. [DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
42
|
Rahman AN, Bressette M, Enguidanos S. Quality of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Forms Completed in Nursing Homes. J Palliat Med 2016; 20:538-541. [PMID: 27841953 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST) form allows seriously ill individuals to express their preferences for end-of-life treatments. Despite increased POLST use, little is known about the quality of completed forms. OBJECTIVE We examined the quality of POLST forms prepared for nursing home residents, including whether they had required signatures and clinically consistent care preferences. DESIGN We conducted a chart review of POLST forms for a sample of nursing home residents in California. SETTING/SAMPLE We completed POLST audits for 938 residents in 13 nursing homes in Los Angeles. MEASURES We recorded whether POLST forms were signed by both the patient (or proxy) and the physician, and whether the patient's treatment choices regarding resuscitation and medical intervention were consistent, as required by the California form. RESULTS Overall, 69.6% of audited POLST forms had at least one indicator of poor quality. Most lacked a required signature (15.8% lacked a physician signature and 17.4% lacked a patient/proxy signature) and 5.6% had conflicting treatment preferences. CONCLUSION We found 30.4% of POLST forms for nursing home residents were not complete or documented clinically contradictory treatment preferences. Improvement in the quality of POLST forms is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna N Rahman
- 1 Gerontology Research Consultant, Los Angeles, California.,2 Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, California
| | - Matthew Bressette
- 2 Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, California
| | - Susan Enguidanos
- 2 Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Howard M, Bonham AJ, Heyland DK, Sudore R, Fassbender K, Robinson CA, McKenzie M, Elston D, You JJ. Measuring engagement in advance care planning: a cross-sectional multicentre feasibility study. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e010375. [PMID: 27338877 PMCID: PMC4932285 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the feasibility, acceptability and clinical sensibility of a novel survey, the advance care planning (ACP) Engagement Survey, in various healthcare settings. SETTING A target sample of 50 patients from each of primary care, hospital, cancer care and dialysis care settings. PARTICIPANTS A convenience sample of patients without cognitive impairment who could speak and read English was recruited. Patients 50 and older were eligible in primary care; patients 80 and older or 55 and older with clinical markers of advanced chronic disease were recruited in hospital; patients aged 19 and older were recruited in cancer and renal dialysis centres. OUTCOMES We assessed feasibility, acceptability and clinical sensibility of the ACP Engagement Survey using a 6-point scale. The ACP Engagement Survey measures ACP processes (knowledge, contemplation, self-efficacy and readiness) on 5-point Likert scales and actions (yes/no). RESULTS 196 patients (38-96 years old, 50.5% women) participated. Mean (±SD) time to administer was 48.8±19.6 min. Mean acceptability scores ranged from 3.2±1.3 in hospital to 4.7±0.9 in primary care, and mean relevance ranged from 3.5±1.0 in hospital to 4.9±0.9 in dialysis centres (p<0.001 for both). The mean process score was 3.1±0.6 and the mean action score was 11.2±5.6 (of a possible 25). CONCLUSIONS The ACP Engagement Survey demonstrated feasibility and acceptability in outpatient settings but was less feasible and acceptable among hospitalised patients due to length. A shorter version may improve feasibility. Engagement in ACP was low to moderate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Howard
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron J Bonham
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daren K Heyland
- Clinical Evaluation Research Unit, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Public Health, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rebecca Sudore
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Carole A Robinson
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael McKenzie
- Radiation Therapy Program, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver Cancer Centre, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Dawn Elston
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - John J You
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|