Principles and requirements for stroke recovery science

Pharmacological and stem cell therapy of stroke in animal models: Do they accurately reflect the response of humans?

Cerebrovascular diseases are the second leading cause of death worldwide. Despite significant research investment, the only available therapeutic options are mechanical thrombectomy and tissue plasminogen activator thrombolysis. None of the more than a thousand drugs tested on animal models have proven successful in human clinical trials. Several factors contribute to this poor translation of data from stroke-related animal models to human stroke patients. Firstly, our understanding of the molecular and cellular processes involved in recovering from an ischemic stroke is severely limited. Secondly, although the risk of stroke is particularly high among older patients with comorbidities, most drugs are tested on young, healthy animals in controlled laboratory conditions. Furthermore, in animal models, the tracking of post-stroke recovery typically spans only 3 to 28 days, with occasional extensions to 60 days, whereas human stroke recovery is a more extended and complex process. Thirdly, young animal models often exhibit a considerably higher rate of spontaneous recovery compared to humans following a stroke. Fourth, only a very limited number of animals are utilized for each condition, including control groups. Another contributing factor to the much smaller beneficial effects in humans is that positive outcomes from numerous animal studies are more readily accepted than results reported in human trials that do not show a clear benefit to the patient. Useful recommendations for conducting experiments in animal models, with increased chances of translatability to humans, have been issued by both the STEPS investigative team and the STAIR committee. However, largely, due to economic factors, these recommendations are largely ignored. Furthermore, one might attribute the overall failures in predicting and subsequently developing effective acute stroke therapies beyond thrombolysis to potential design deficiencies in clinical trials.

Group 2 innate lymphoid cells suppress neuroinflammation and brain injury following intracerebral hemorrhage

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) mobilizes circulating leukocytes that contribute to neuroinflammation and neural injury. However, little is known about the endogenous regulatory immune mechanisms to restrict neuroinflammation following ICH. We examined the role of group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2) that are a specialized subset of innate immune modulators in a mouse model of ICH. We found accumulation of ILC2 in the brain following acute ICH and a concomitant increase of ILC2 within the peripheral lymph nodes. Depletion of ILC2 exacerbated neurodeficits and brain edema after ICH in male and female mice. This aggravated ICH injury was accompanied by augmented microglia activity and leukocyte infiltration. In contrast, expansion of ILC2 using IL-33 led to reduced ICH injury, microglia activity and leukocyte infiltration. Notably, elimination of microglia using a colony stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibitor diminished the exacerbation of ICH injury induced by depletion of ILC2. Brain-infiltrating ILC2 had upregulation of IL-13 after ICH. Results from in vitro assays revealed that ILC2 suppressed thrombin-induced inflammatory activity in microglia-like BV2 cells. Thus, our findings demonstrate that ILC2 suppress neuroinflammation and acute ICH injury.

Malignancy-associated ischemic stroke: Implications for diagnostic and therapeutic workup

BACKGROUND

Patients with malignancies have an increased risk of suffering ischemic stroke via several mechanisms such as coagulation dysfunction and other malignancy-related effects as well as iatrogenic causes. Moreover, stroke can be the first sign of an occult malignancy, termed as malignancy-associated ischemic stroke (MAS). Therefore, timely diagnostic assessment and targeted management of this complex clinical situation are critical.

FINDINGS

Patients with both stroke and malignancy have atypical ages, risk factors, and often exhibit malignancy-related symptoms and multiple lesions on neuroimaging. New biomarkers such as eicosapentaenoic acid and blood mRNA profiles may help in distinguishing MAS from other strokes. In terms of treatment, malignancy should not be considered a contraindication, given comparable rates of recanalization and complications between stroke patients with or without malignancies.

CONCLUSION

In this review, we summarize the latest developments in diagnosing and managing MAS, especially stroke with occult malignancies, and provide new recommendations from recently emerged clinical evidence for diagnostic and therapeutic workup strategies.

A systematic-search-and-review of registered pharmacological therapies investigated to improve neuro-recovery after a stroke

Background

Stroke burden is largely due to long-term impairments requiring prolonged care with loss of productivity. We aimed to identify and assess studies of different registered pharmacological therapies as treatments to improve post-stroke impairments and/or disabilities.

Methods

We performed a systematic-search-and-review of treatments that have been investigated as recovery-enhancing or recovery-promoting therapies in adult patients with stroke. The treatment must have received registration or market authorization in any country regardless of primary indication. Outcomes included in the review were neurological impairments and functional/disability assessments. "The best available studies" based on study design, study size, and/or date of publication were selected and graded for level of evidence (LOE) by consensus.

Results

Our systematic search yielded 7,801 citations, and we reviewed 665 full-text papers. Fifty-eight publications were selected as "the best studies" across 25 pharmacological classes: 31 on ischemic stroke, 21 on ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, 4 on intracerebral hemorrhage, and 2 on subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Twenty-six were systematic reviews/meta-analyses, 29 were randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and three were cohort studies. Only nimodipine for SAH had LOE A of benefit (systematic review and network meta-analysis). Many studies, some of which showed treatment effects, were assessed as LOE C-LD, mainly due to small sample sizes or poor quality. Seven interventions had LOE B-R (systematic review/meta-analysis or RCT) of treatment effects.

Conclusion

Only one commercially available treatment has LOE A for routine use in stroke. Further studies of putative neuroprotective drugs as adjunctive treatment to revascularization procedures and more confirmatory trials on recovery-promoting therapies will enhance the certainty of their benefit. The decision on their use must be guided by the clinical profile, neurological impairments, and target outcomes based on the available evidence.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=376973, PROSPERO, CRD42022376973.

Growth arrest specific protein 6 alleviated white matter injury after experimental ischemic stroke

Ischemic white matter injury leads to long-term neurological deficits and lacks effective medication. Growth arrest specific protein 6 (Gas6) clears myelin debris, which is hypothesized to promote white matter integrity in experimental stroke models. By the middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) stroke model, we observed that Gas6 reduced infarcted volume and behavior deficits 4 weeks after MCAO. Compared with control mice, Gas6-treatment mice represented higher FA values in the ipsilateral external capsules by MRI DTI scan. The SMI32/MBP ratio of the ipsilateral cortex and striatum was profoundly alleviated by Gas6 administration. Gas6-treatment group manifested thicker myelin sheaths than the control group by electron microscopy. We observed that Gas6 mainly promoted OPC maturation, which was closely related to microglia. Mechanically, Gas6 accelerated microglia-mediated myelin debris clearance and cholesterol transport protein expression (abca1, abcg1, apoc1, apoe) in vivo and in vitro, accordingly less myelin debris and lipid deposited in Gas6 treated stroke mice. HX531 (RXR inhibitor) administration mitigated the functions of Gas6 in speeding up debris clearance and cholesterol transport protein expression. Generally, we concluded that Gas6 cleared myelin debris and promoted cholesterol transportation protein expression through activating RXR, which could be one critical mechanism contributing to white matter repair after stroke.

Protein kinase D2 confers neuroprotection by promoting AKT and CREB activation in ischemic stroke

Ischemic stroke, constituting 80-90% of all strokes, is a leading cause of death and long-term disability in adults. There is an urgent need to discover new targets and therapies for this devastating condition. Protein kinase D (PKD), as a key target of diacylglycerol involved in ischemic responses, has not been well studied in ischemic stroke, particularly PKD2. In this study, we found that PKD2 expression and activity were significantly upregulated in the ipsilateral side of the brain after transient focal cerebral ischemia, which coincides with the upregulation of PKD2 in primary neurons in response to in vitro ischemia, implying a potential role of PKD2 in neuronal survival in ischemic stroke. Using kinase-dead PKD2 knock-in (PKD2-KI) mice, we examined whether loss of PKD2 activity affected stroke outcomes in mice subjected to 1 h of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) and 24 h of reperfusion. Our data demonstrated that PKD2-KI mice exhibited larger infarction volumes and worsened neurological scores, indicative of increased brain injury, as compared to the wild-type (WT) mice, confirming a neuroprotective role of PKD2 in ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Mouse primary neurons obtained from PKD2-KI mice also exhibited increased cell death as compared to the WT neurons when subjected to in vitro ischemia. We have further identified AKT and CREB as two main signaling nodes through which PKD2 regulates neuronal survival during I/R injury. In summary, PKD2 confers neuroprotection in ischemic stroke by promoting AKT and CREB activation and targeted activation of PKD2 may benefit neuronal survival in ischemic stroke.

The extracellular matrix as modifier of neuroinflammation and recovery in ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage

Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide and has two major subtypes: ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke. Neuroinflammation is a pathological hallmark of ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), contributing to the extent of brain injury but also in its repair. Neuroinflammation is intricately linked to the extracellular matrix (ECM), which is profoundly altered after brain injury and in aging. In the early stages after ischemic stroke and ICH, immune cells are involved in the deposition and remodeling of the ECM thereby affecting processes such as blood-brain barrier and cellular integrity. ECM components regulate leukocyte infiltration into the central nervous system, activate a variety of immune cells, and induce the elevation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) after stroke. In turn, excessive MMPs may degrade ECM into components that are pro-inflammatory and injurious. Conversely, in the later stages after stroke, several ECM molecules may contribute to tissue recovery. For example, thrombospondin-1 and biglycan may promote activity of regulatory T cells, inhibit the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines, and aid regenerative processes. We highlight these roles of the ECM in ischemic stroke and ICH and discuss their potential cellular and molecular mechanisms. Finally, we discuss therapeutics that could be considered to normalize the ECM in stroke. Our goal is to spur research on the ECM in order to improve the prognosis of ischemic stroke and ICH.

Stroke Rehabilitation and Motor Recovery

OBJECTIVE

Up to 50% of the nearly 800,000 patients who experience a new or recurrent stroke each year in the United States fail to achieve full independence afterward. More effective approaches to enhance motor recovery following stroke are needed. This article reviews the rehabilitative principles and strategies that can be used to maximize post-stroke recovery.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Evidence dictates that mobilization should not begin prior to 24 hours following stroke, but detailed guidelines beyond this are lacking. Specific classes of potentially detrimental medications should be avoided in the early days poststroke. Patients with stroke who are unable to return home should be referred for evaluation to an inpatient rehabilitation facility. Research suggests that a substantial increase in both the dose and intensity of upper and lower extremity exercise is beneficial. A clinical trial supports vagus nerve stimulation as an adjunct to occupational therapy for motor recovery in the upper extremity. The data remain somewhat mixed as to whether robotics, transcranial magnetic stimulation, functional electrical stimulation, and transcranial direct current stimulation are better than dose-matched traditional exercise. No current drug therapy has been proven to augment exercise poststroke to enhance motor recovery.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Neurologists will collaborate with rehabilitation professionals for several months following a patient's stroke. Many questions still remain about the ideal exercise regimen to maximize motor recovery in patients poststroke. The next several years will likely bring a host of new research studies exploring the latest strategies to enhance motor recovery using poststroke exercise.

Outcomes in minor stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis

AIMS

Our study aimed to describe the short-, medium-, and long-term outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis in minor stroke, and to explore the relationship between thrombolysis and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Our study included ischemic minor stroke patients (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤ 5) within 4.5 h from symptom onset from the Third China National Stroke Registry (CNSR-III) between August 2015 and March 2018. The primary outcome was a favorable functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1 at 3 months. The secondary outcomes included mRS score of 0-1 at discharge, 6 months, and 1 year. The safety outcomes were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) at 24-36 h and all-cause mortality. The association between intravenous thrombolysis and clinical outcomes was studied using multivariable models.

RESULTS

A total of 1905 minor ischemic stroke patients were included. Overall 527 patients (28%) received intravenous t-PA (IV t-PA) and 1378 patients (72%) in the non-IV t-PA group. Of them, 18.85% (359/1905) participants had a disabled outcome (defined as mRS score ≥ 2) at discharge, 12.8% (242/1885) at 3 months, 13.9% (262/1886) at 6 months, and 13.9% (260/1871) at 1 year. In multivariable analysis, IV t-PA was associated with favorable functional outcomes at discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.96; p = 0.004), 3 months (aOR 1.51; 95% CI 1.09-2.10; p = 0.01), 6 months (aOR 1.64; 95% CI 1.19-2.27; p = 0.003), and 1 year (aOR 1.52; 95% CI 1.10-2.10; p = 0.01). Symptomatic ICH occurred in 3 (0.6%) patients in IV t-PA versus 2 (0.1%) in the non-IV t-PA group. No significant differences were found in all-cause mortality between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous t-PA may be safe and effective in minor stroke (NIHSS ≤ 5) within a 4.5-h window and further randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Clinically Applicable Experimental Design and Considerations for Stroke Recovery Preclinical Studies

Development of stroke recovery therapies is an active field of research and represents an opportunity to reduce the global impact of stroke as the leading cause of acquired, long-term disability in adults. The negative outcomes of recent large-scale clinical trials have highlighted deficiencies in the translational process and endanger the trajectory of post-stroke recovery research. Because of this, a number of strategies have been recommended by experts to better navigate the translational pipeline. To assist the field in advancing to the next stage for successful clinical translation, the goal of this chapter is to discuss concepts relevant to the experimental design of in vivo preclinical pharmacological studies to make them clinically relevant and informative for future trials.

Guhong injection promotes post-stroke functional recovery via attenuating cortical inflammation and apoptosis in subacute stage of ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

As a leading cause of death and disability, alternative therapies for stroke are still limited by its complicated pathophysiological manifestations. Guhong injection (GHI), consisting of safflower aqueous extract and aceglutamide, has been widely applied for the clinical treatment of cerebrovascular diseases, especially ischemic stroke and post-stroke recovery, in China. Recently, a series of studies have reported the positive effect of GHI against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury via targeting various molecular mechanisms. However, questions remain on whether treatment with GHI contributes to better functional recovery after stroke and if so, the potential mechanisms and active substances.

PURPOSE

The aim of this work was to explore the potential therapeutic possibilities of GHI for the neurological and behavioral recovery after stroke and to investigate the underlying molecular mechanisms as well as active substances.

METHODS

The neural and motor deficits as well as cortical lesions after GHI treatment were investigated in a mouse model of transient ischemic stroke. Based on the substance identification of GHI, network pharmacology combined with an experimental verification method was used to systematically decipher the biological processes and signaling pathways closely related to GHI intervention in response to post-stroke functional outcomes. Subsequently, ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) analysis was performed to determine the anti-stroke active substances targeting to the hub targets involved in the significant molecular pathways regulated by GHI treatment.

RESULTS

Therapeutically, administration of GHI observably ameliorated the post-stroke recovery of neural and locomotor function as well as reduced infarct volume and histopathological damage to the cerebral cortex in subacute stroke mice. According to 26 identified or tentatively characterized substances in GHI, the compound-target-pathway network was built. Bioinformatics analysis suggested that inflammatory and apoptotic pathways were tightly associated with the anti-stroke effect of GHI. Based on protein-protein interaction network analysis, the hub targets (such as NF-κB p65, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, Bax, Bcl-2, and Caspase-3) involved in inflammation and apoptosis were selected. On the one hand, immunofluorescence and ELISA results showed that GHI (10 ml/kg) treatment obviously reduced NF-κB p65 nuclear translocation as well as decreased the abnormally elevated concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β) in damaged cortex tissues. On the other hand, GHI (10 ml/kg) treatment significantly downregulated the number of TUNEL-positive apoptotic cells in ischemic cortex and effectively restored the abnormal expression of Bax, Bcl-2, and Caspase-3. Based on the results of IPA, hydroxysafflor yellow A, baicalin, scutellarin, gallic acid, syringin, chlorogenic acid, kaempferol, kaempferol-3-O-β-rutinoside, and rutin acted synergistically on core targets, which could be considered as the active substances of GHI.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the current findings showed that the beneficial action of GHI on improving post-stroke functional recovery of subacute stroke mice partly via the modulation of cortical inflammation and apoptosis. These findings not only provide a reliable reference for the clinical application of GHI, but also shed light on a promising alternative therapeutic strategy for ischemic stroke patients.

Perioperative stroke: A perspective on challenges and opportunities for experimental treatment and diagnostic strategies

Perioperative stroke is an ischemic or hemorrhagic cerebral event during or up to 30 days after surgery. It is a feared condition due to a relatively high incidence, difficulties in timely detection, and unfavorable outcome compared to spontaneously occurring stroke. Recent preclinical data suggest that specific pathophysiological mechanisms such as aggravated neuroinflammation contribute to the detrimental impact of perioperative stroke. Conventional treatment options are limited in the perioperative setting due to difficult diagnosis and medications affecting coagulation in may cases. On the contrary, the chance to anticipate cerebrovascular events at the time of surgery may pave the way for prevention strategies. This review provides an overview on perioperative stroke incidence, related problems, and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Based on this analysis, we assess experimental stroke treatments including neuroprotective approaches, cell therapies, and conditioning medicine strategies regarding their potential use in perioperative stroke. Interestingly, the specific aspects of perioperative stroke might enable a more effective application of experimental treatment strategies such as classical neuroprotection whereas others including cell therapies may be of limited use. We also discuss experimental diagnostic options for perioperative stroke augmenting classical clinical and imaging stroke diagnosis. While some experimental stroke treatments may have specific advantages in perioperative stroke, the paucity of established guidelines or multicenter clinical research initiatives currently limits their thorough investigation.

Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Signaling in Ischemic Stroke: From Bench to Bedside and Beyond

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) signaling is being increasingly recognized as a strong modulator of immune cell migration and endothelial function. Fingolimod and other S1P modulators in ischemic stroke treatment have shown promise in emerging experimental models and small-scale clinical trials. In this article, we will review the current knowledge of the role of S1P signaling in brain ischemia from the aspects of inflammation and immune interventions, sustaining endothelial functions, regulation of blood-brain barrier integrity, and functional recovery. We will then discuss the current and future therapeutic perspectives of targeting S1P for the treatment of ischemic stroke. Mechanism studies would help to bridge the gap between preclinical studies and clinical practice. Future success of bench-to-bedside translation shall be based on in depth understanding of S1P signaling during stroke and on the ability to have a fine temporal and spatial regulation of the signal pathway.

Stroke recovery enhancing therapies: lessons from recent clinical trials

Poststroke recovery processes include restoration or compensation of function, respectively functions initially lost or new functions acquired after an injury. Therapeutic interventions can enhance these processes and/or reduce processes impeding regeneration. Numerous experimental studies suggest great opportunities for such treatments, but the results from recent large clinical trials using neuromodulators such as dopamine and fluoxetine are disappointing. The reasons for this are manifold affecting forward translation of results from animals models into the human situation. This “translational road block” is defined by differences between animals and humans with regard to the genetic and epigenetic background, size and anatomy of the brain, cerebral vascular anatomy, immune system, as well as clinical function and behavior. Backward blockade includes the incompatible adaption of targets and outcomes in clinical trials with regard to prior preclinical findings. For example, the design of clinical recovery trials varies widely and was characterized by the selection of different clinical endpoints, the inclusion a broad spectrum of stroke subtypes and clinical syndromes as well as different time windows for treatment initiation after infarct onset. This review will discuss these aspects based on the results of the recent stroke recovery trials with the goal to contribute to the currently biggest unmet need in stroke research - the development of a recovery enhancing therapy that improves the functional outcome of a chronic stroke patient.